| Dokumendiregister | Riigikogu |
| Viit | 1-2/26-473/1 |
| Registreeritud | 03.07.2026 |
| Sünkroonitud | 04.07.2026 |
| Liik | EL dokument |
| Funktsioon | |
| Sari | |
| Toimik | Aruanne - COM(2026) 337 |
| Juurdepääsupiirang | Avalik |
| Adressaat | |
| Saabumis/saatmisviis | |
| Vastutaja | |
| Originaal | Ava uues aknas |
| Taotle dokumendi eemaldamist või parandamist |
EN EN
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Brussels, 2.7.2026 COM(2026) 337 final
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE
COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE
COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
on the EU Work Plan for Culture 2023-2026
1
Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 2
2. CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................................... 2
3. WORK PLAN – MAIN SURVEY RESULTS ............................................................................... 3
3.1. General feedback on the work plan ....................................................................................... 4
3.2. Observations on working methods ........................................................................................ 4
4. OVERVIEW OF THE WORK CONDUCTED .............................................................................. 5
4.1. Priority a) Artists and cultural professionals: empowering the cultural and creative sectors 5
4.2. Priority b) Culture for the people: enhancing cultural participation and the role of culture in
society ................................................................................................................................. 10
4.3. Priority c) Culture for the planet: unleashing the power of culture ..................................... 13
4.4. Priority d) Culture for co-creative partnerships: strengthening the cultural dimension of EU
external relations ................................................................................................................. 16
5. LOOKING AHEAD: THE NEXT WORK PLAN FOR CULTURE ........................................... 18
ANNEX ................................................................................................................................................ 21
2
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION
ON THE EU WORK PLAN FOR CULTURE 2023-2026
1. INTRODUCTION
The Council Resolution on the EU Work Plan for Culture 2023-20261 outlines priorities for policy
cooperation, implemented through collaboration between the Member States, the Commission and the
Presidencies of the Council. The Resolution invites the Commission to adopt a final implementation
report, based on voluntary written contributions from Member States, by June 2026.
This report assesses the progress made since January 2023, highlights key achievements and identifies
future priorities beyond 2026 to inform discussions in the Council on the next work plan. While
comprehensive, it does not cover EU cultural policy initiatives unrelated to the themes of the work
plan.
To prepare the report, the Commission conducted a targeted survey among Member States (3
February to 19 March 2026). This involved gathering data on the work plan’s implementation and
contribution to national policymaking, the suitability of its working methods and priorities for the next
cycle2. The findings of the survey are shown in Annex 1. The assessment also draws on the
Commission’s work, exchanges with other EU institutions, and dialogue with the cultural and creative
sectors.
2. CONTEXT
Over the past decade, EU policy action in the field of culture has been guided by the Commission’s
European Agendas for Culture3, the European Framework for Action on Cultural Heritage4, the Joint
Communication ‘Towards an EU strategy for international cultural relations’5, and, since 2002, the
Council’s multiannual work plans for culture.
The 2023-2026 EU Work Plan for Culture was formulated in response to four major developments
that have had a significant impact on Europe’s cultural landscape.
• The COVID-19 pandemic. This has exposed structural vulnerabilities in the cultural and
creative sectors, including, in particular, the precarious employment conditions of artists,
inadequate social protection, and the digital divide in cultural participation.
• Russia’s illegal full-scale invasion of Ukraine. This has directly threatened Ukrainian
heritage, artists and cultural professionals. It has also weaponised culture, thereby
undermining fundamental values of the EU. Furthermore, it has highlighted the critical role
played by culture in societal resilience and post-conflict reconstruction. It has also underlined
the importance of not only the fight against illicit trafficking of cultural goods, but also, more
generally, cultural cooperation as a key dimension of EU solidarity.
• The rapid digital transformation, accelerated by generative AI. Thishas created both
opportunities for the cultural and creative sectors and also challenges for creators’
remuneration and intellectual property protection. It also has implications for cultural
diversity and for the discoverability of European content online.
• The escalating climate emergency and energy crisis. These have highlighted the cultural and
creative sectors’ vulnerability to environmental threats while also positioning them as key
strategic actors in advancing towards sustainability objectives. Simultaneously, the energy
1 Council Resolution on the EU Work Plan for Culture 2023-2026 2 Preliminary findings from the survey analysis were presented to the Cultural Affairs Committee in Brussels
on 27 March 2026. 3 Communications from the Commission on a European agenda for culture in a globalising world and on a
New European Agenda for Culture 4 European framework for action on cultural heritage 5 Joint communication towards an EU strategy for international cultural relations
3
crisis has underscored the urgency of transitioning to sustainable practices across all areas,
including culture.
Amidst these challenges, the cultural and creative sectors have been grappling with significant
financial strains. These multifaceted issues have placed unprecedented demands on resources, forcing
the sectors to adjust operational models and find innovative solutions to build resilience.
The Creative Europe programme has been mobilised to respond to the EU Work Plan for Culture with
its annual work programmes supporting key initiatives since 2024. Work plan priorities have been
embedded in the main calls for proposals: annual cultural cooperation call; calls for European
networks of cultural and creative organisations and European platforms for emerging artists – these
have led to the selection of 39 networks and 19 platforms implementing work packages and activities
contributing directly to the priorities of the work plan.
At the EU institutional level, the period since 2024 has been marked by the start of new mandates for
the European Parliament and the European Commission. The Commission’s Political Guidelines6 and
the European Council’s new strategic agenda7 set the overarching direction for EU action. This is
against a backdrop of heightened global geopolitical tensions, growing threats to democratic values,
increasingly volatile markets – with repercussions for Europe’s economy – and the rapid rise of
artificial intelligence. These strategic frameworks place a strong emphasis on democracy, resilience,
prosperity, competitiveness, security and the EU’s global role.
In response to the Council’s invitation and calls from the European Parliament and stakeholders, in
the first year of its new mandate, the Commission presented a new EU strategic framework for culture
– the Culture Compass for Europe8 (November 2025). It articulates a vision that places culture in
the centre of EU policymaking and aligns cultural policy with the EU’s broader political priorities.
The Compass helps Europe’s cultural and creative sectors to thrive, both within Europe and globally.
It does so by focusing on key areas, including artistic freedom, access to culture, working conditions
in the cultural and creative sectors, resilience, competitiveness, adaptation to AI and international
cultural relations.
The Culture Compass aligns with and is further reinforced by the Commission’s proposal for a new
Multiannual Financial Framework, particularly the proposed AgoraEU programme, alongside other
instruments, such as the European Competitiveness Fund, signalling the intention to increase EU
investment in culture.
On the regulatory side, landmark digital legislation adopted since 2022 has had broad implications
across sectors, including culture, notably the Digital Services Act (DSA), the Digital Markets Act
(DMA) and the AI Act. At different levels and within their scope of application, these contribute to
shaping a safer, more transparent and fairer digital environment. They also benefit the cultural and
creative industries and creators’ rights.
At the multilateral level, culture has gained prominence in forums such as the G79, the G2010, and
UNESCO11, where it is not only recognised as an important priority in its own right but also as a
cross-cutting enabler of democracy, cohesion, competitiveness and Europe’s global standing.
3. WORK PLAN – MAIN SURVEY RESULTS
The EU Work Plan for Culture 2023-2026 has continued to be a key instrument guiding policy
cooperation between the Member States at EU level. It sets out guiding principles, 4 overarching
priorities12 and 21 thematic actions. Several actions had been designed to ensure policy coherence and
6 Political Guidelines 2024-2029 | European Commission 7 Strategic Agenda 2024-2029 8 Culture Compass for Europe - Culture and Creativity
9 2024 Italy 10 2023 India, 2024 Brazil, 2025 South Africa 11 MONDIACULT Declaration 2022 and MONDIACULT 2025 Outcome Document
12 a) Artists and cultural professionals: empowering the cultural and creative sectors, b) Culture for the people:
enhancing cultural participation and the role of culture in society, c) Culture for the planet: unleashing the
4
continuity with the preceding work plan (2019-2022). The following assessment draws from Member
States’ responses to the survey, including to both ranked and open text questions.
3.1. General feedback on the work plan
Member States13 positively assessed the work plan as a relevant and strategic framework for guiding
European cultural cooperation. The strongest agreement concerned the work plan’s overarching
priorities12, with a clear majority fully agreeing that they were appropriate. Regarding the 21 themes,
while respondents largely agreed that these were relevant, many indicated that they could have been
further refined.
Implementation of the work plan largely met the expectations of Member States. In terms of policy
impact, survey respondents agreed that the work plan informed existing areas of national cultural
policymaking and expanded policy agendas to include new topics. Qualitative responses confirmed
that outputs, such as Open Method of Cooperation (OMC) reports and peer-learning activities,
supported evidence-based policymaking, strengthened inter-ministerial cooperation, and informed
national strategies – for example, in areas such as culture and health, sustainability and artists’
working conditions.
The work plan also contributed to strengthening the recognition of culture across policy areas, with a
vast majority of respondents agreeing that it enhanced the role of culture in other sectors. However,
this contribution was more often assessed as partial rather than full agreement, reflecting ongoing
challenges in achieving deeper cross-sectoral integration.
Despite these positive findings, some limitations were noted. Member States highlighted uneven
translation of EU priorities into concrete national outcomes. They cited recurring issues, such as
limited visibility and follow-up of actions, insufficient focus on implementation, and the need for
greater consistency across instruments. Several responses also emphasised the importance of
maintaining a focused work plan with clear priorities and tangible added value.
3.2. Observations on working methods
The work plan’s instruments were widely regarded as suitable for contributing to policymaking, with
the OMC groups receiving particularly high ratings and standing out as the most effective cooperation
tool. Qualitative feedback highlighted the strong added value of the OMC groups in enabling peer
learning, the exchange of knowledge, and developing policy-relevant outputs, while also building
lasting expert networks across Member States. OMC groups were considered most effective when
they had clear mandates, sufficiently focused topics, and outputs directly linked to implementation
and policy and funding instruments. However, challenges identified by respondents included overly
broad mandates, heavy workload (including administrative burden), and difficulties in ensuring cross-
sectoral participation. Some respondents also noted inconsistencies in organisation, including uneven
number of meetings and delays in delivering outputs.
Peer-learning activities14 were highly valued for providing practical, transferable approaches and
supporting implementation at national level. Workshops were similarly well regarded, though slightly
less highly, with their effectiveness depending on their focus and follow-up.
Other instruments received more mixed assessments. Think-tank meetings and stocktaking exercises
garnered less support, with the latter frequently described as disproportionately burdensome relative
to their added value. Commission-led expert groups were viewed positively overall.
Across working methods, Member States consistently called for improvements in follow-up and
implementation. These included clearer links between discussions and concrete outcomes, better
dissemination of results, and more concise and accessible outputs. There was also strong support for
power of culture, d) Culture for co-creative partnerships: strengthening the cultural dimension of EU
external relations. 13 26 EU Member States replied to the survey. 14 Relating to the following work-plan actions: ‘Culture and promoting democracy: towards a cultural
citizenship in Europe’; ‘Safeguarding heritage against natural and human-made disasters’; ‘Preserving
cultural heritage and empowering local cultural and creative sectors in Ukraine’.
5
expanding hybrid participation formats and ensuring adequate resources for engagement. Peer-
learning activities were specifically highlighted as a format that could be used more extensively.
Overall, while the working methods are widely regarded as relevant and useful, their effectiveness
could be further strengthened through more targeted focus, improved coordination, and a greater
emphasis on translating outputs into tangible policy results.
4. OVERVIEW OF THE WORK CONDUCTED
This chapter outlines the implementation of the work plan under each priority and across its 21
thematic actions, assessing progress and key outputs. It also gives examples of related actions taken at
Member State level. Overall, actions have been implemented as planned, while some adjustments
became necessary due to the high number of planned outputs and in view of the challenging
geopolitical and political context.
4.1. Priority a) Artists and cultural professionals: empowering the cultural and
creative sectors
1) Status and working conditions of artists and cultural and creative professionals
Artists’ working conditions have remained a firm priority on the EU agenda, addressed through the
EU Work Plan for Culture, ministerial debates, the European Parliament’s own-initiative report15 and
collaborative work between the Commission and the Member States. Since the end of 2025, this has
been further reinforced by the Culture Compass for Europe.
The Commission facilitated an Open Method of Coordination (OMC) group, comprising experts from
all 27 EU Member States’ ministries of culture and employment/social affairs. The group examined a
range of pertinent subjects – including artist status and social security, fair practice, skills and life-
long learning and artistic freedom – and issued its report and recommendations in July 202316. Based
on its findings, the ‘This is How We Work’ section was launched on the CreativesUnite platform17,
offering factual information and comparative data on Member States’ legal frameworks, including on
social security and labour relations.
A key recommendation of the OMC group was to ‘set up an EU framework for artists’ and creative
professionals’ working conditions’. In November 2023, the European Parliament adopted an own-
initiative legislative resolution calling for a framework of this kind.
In May 2024, the Belgian Presidency hosted a seminar on artists’ working conditions, while the
Commission organised a technical workshop with the OMC group. Meanwhile, the European Labour
Authority (ELA) held a seminar on undeclared work in the cultural sector and published a report18.
The Senior Labour Inspectors Committee (SLIC) launched an investigation into potential issues
related to the enforcement of the EU occupational health and safety legislation (report adopted in
November 2025). In June 2024, the EU-funded ‘MoveS’ network (focused on free movement and
social security coordination) held a webinar on ‘Labour mobility and social security challenges for
artists’. In October 2024, the Commission convened a joint meeting of social partners in the
audiovisual and live performance sectors to identify gaps in the application of EU rules in relation to
the employment situation of artists and cultural professionals. In November 2024, the Directors-
General for Industrial Relations (Member States’ labour law officials) discussed labour law
implementation challenges, focusing on the status of the artist and exchanging national practices.
15 2022/2047(INI) 16 The status and working conditions of artists and cultural and creative professionals – Publications Office of
the EU 17 https://creativesunite.eu/work-condition/ 18 Creative sectors: ELA study reveals precarious working conditions and undeclared labour | European Labour
Authority
6
In May 2025, the Commission organised a mutual learning seminar on social protection for artists and
cultural professionals, bringing together Member States’ social security services and ministries of
culture, and subsequently issued a report19. The same month, the Council adopted conclusions on
supporting young artists and cultural and creative professionals in starting their careers20, focusing on
precarious working conditions, limited business skills and fair pay. The conclusions call for
‘promoting appropriate conditions for the social and professional situation of young artists and
cultural and creative professionals’.
In December 2025, responding to the European Parliament’s resolution, the Commission hosted a
high-level round table with stakeholders on artists’ working conditions. This was followed, in
Brussels in June 2026, by a conference which also featured artists’ working conditions and was
organised through the Creative FLIP21 project in cooperation with the Commission.
The Culture Compass maintains momentum on this priority, proposing the development of an EU
Artists’ Charter, in collaboration with social partners and the cultural and creative sectors, in 2027.
The Charter should ‘outline fundamental principles, guidance, and commitments for fair working
conditions in the sectors, and increase compliance and accountability, particularly by recipients of EU
funding for culture’. The Commission started preparations in 2026.
According to the survey among Member States, national measures implemented to improve artists’
working conditions include legal reforms (e.g. draft legislation, amendments to legal acts and new
social protection or economic support schemes) and administrative tools (e.g. an artist registry or
creative persons status for self-employed artists and freelance professionals). One standout example is
Ireland’s ‘basic income for the arts’ scheme, which has now been made permanent.
2) Artistic freedom
The work plan acknowledges artistic freedom as a fundamental part of cultural work and a critical
link between culture and democracy. Artistic freedom now faces new and increasingly difficult
challenges. The Council recognised that joint efforts throughout the EU are needed.
Under the Swedish Presidency (first half of 2023), these priorities were advanced through a high-level
conference ‘Free to Create – European Union Conference on Artistic Freedom and Cultural and
Creative Industries’ (16-17 February, Umeå, Sweden) and Council conclusions on at-risk and
displaced artists (adopted on 16 May). The Presidency conference brought together EU institutions,
civil society and artistic sector representatives to discuss freedom of creation. Key themes included
free expression, exclusion from the arts, displaced artists and artists at risk, and the conditions needed
for the cultural and creative sectors to thrive. The Council conclusions affirmed the crucial role that
artists play in the life, development and resilience of societies and individuals, and stressed the need
to protect creativity from threats or violations that put artists in danger as a result of their artistic
work. Moreover, the Council conclusions proposed practical measures, including ‘cities of refuge’,
emergency residencies and integration into local communities.
Artistic freedom has remained at the top of the Council’s work on culture in the years since:
• Under the Spanish Presidency (2/2023), EU Culture Ministers, meeting informally, adopted
the Cáceres Declaration22;
• Under the Belgian Presidency (1/2024), the completion of the European Media Freedom
Act23, while not falling within the remit of the Education, Youth, Culture and Sport (EYCS)
Council, was a significant achievement with implications for freedom of expression;
• Under the Hungarian Presidency (2/2024), the Council adopted conclusions on improving and
fostering access to culture24, including provisions that contribute to the protection and
promotion of artistic freedom;
19 Mutual learning on inclusive social protection for artists and creative workers – European Commission 20 Council conclusions on supporting young artists and cultural and creative professionals in starting their
careers 21 Finance, Learning, Innovation & Intellectual Property Rights for the CCSI 22 Cáceres Declaration 23 Regulation (EU) 2024/1083
7
• Under the Polish Presidency (1/2025), the Council adopted conclusions on supporting young
artists and cultural and creative professionals in starting their careers20;
• Under the Danish Presidency (2/2025), the Council adopted conclusions on the strategic role
of culture, cultural heritage and audiovisual works in upholding European values and
democratic resilience25.
The Culture Compass for Europe takes a rights-based approach and recognises that artistic freedom is
fundamental to healthy democratic societies and a resilient Europe that protects its values. A key
flagship action under the Compass is the announcement of a new periodic Report on the State of
Culture in the EU, with a dedicated focus on artists’ experiences in relation to artistic freedom. The
Compass also calls for safeguarding artistic freedom through current and future EU policies and
programmes, including the future AgoraEU under the next EU long-term budget. Member States and
EU institutions are encouraged to ensure that their policies, legal frameworks and administrative
practices support free artistic creation, expression and circulation. The European Democracy Shield26,
adopted on the same day as the Culture Compass, aims to protect and promote democracy and societal
resilience in the long run.
At national level, according to the survey, Member States reported non-legislative initiatives as the
primary response, including conferences, strategies and safeguards for freedom of creation in public
programming or culture funding, as well as targeted programmes, such as ‘Safe to Create’ and support
for at-risk and displaced artists in cities.
3) Stimulate the digital transformation of the cultural and creative sectors
The digital transition continued to be another central theme in EU cultural policy cooperation. Under
the Belgian Presidency, a two-day conference on the Digital Transformation of the Cultural and
Creative Sectors placed special emphasis on data-driven audience engagement. A key outcome was
the Ghent Manifesto27, which led to the establishment of the European Policy Forum on Data-Driven
Audience Development in the Cultural and Creative Sectors.
In May 2025, the Council adopted conclusions28 calling on empowering the cultural and creative
sectors through data-driven audience development, skills enhancement, information exchange and a
supportive policy framework.
As a follow-up, the Forum released a policy document in March 202629 addressing the Commission
and the Member States with recommendations to strengthen data literacy across the cultural and
creative sectors, develop and implement standardised audience metrics and put in place tools to
facilitate data-driven audience engagement.
The Culture Compass reinforces this priority by proposing actions to improve data collection and
analysis (cultural data hub, state of culture report), harness digital tech and AI in the cultural and
creative sectors and industries, and further develop the Common European Data Space for Cultural
Heritage. Several discussions among EU culture ministers, both at formal meetings and during
informal gatherings organised by the rotating Presidencies, have focused on digital transformation, in
particularly AI. This includes the informal meeting of culture ministers in Nicosia on 1-2 June, which
focused on subjects including cultural rights, creativity and AI.
In the survey, Member States primarily listed funding initiatives as examples of national-level
measures implemented during the work plan period, with several mentions of the National Recovery
24 Council conclusions on improving and fostering access to culture 25 Council conclusions on the strategic role of culture, cultural heritage and audiovisual works in upholding
European values and democratic resilience 26 JOIN(2025) 791 final 27 The Ghent Manifesto 28 Council conclusions on empowering the cultural and creative sectors through data-driven audience
development 29 Naar datagedreven publieksontwikkeling in Europa | Departement Cultuur, Jeugd & Media
8
and Resilience Plan funds, which supported the digital and green transition of the cultural and creative
sectors. A prominent area was the digitalisation of cultural heritage30.
4) Stimulate the green transition of the cultural and creative sectors, with a specific focus on
the energy crisis
In the first six months of 2023, the Swedish Presidency carried out a stocktaking exercise within the
Cultural Affairs Committee (CAC) to assess the energy crisis’ impact on the cultural and creative
sectors. The findings were summarised in a Presidency note31. This followed the abrupt rise in energy
prices, which had, and continues to have, significant financial implications for the cultural and
creative sectors, altering the cost structure of their activities. The note examined cultural heritage and
energy performance, discussed the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD)32, and
compiled examples of EU and Member States’ support measures in the spirit of sharing knowledge
and good practice. In September 2023, the ‘Voices of Culture’ structured dialogue between the
Commission and the cultural sectors gathered to discuss how these sectors drive the green transition,
while navigating the energy crisis33.
The OMC group ‘Stimulate the green transition of the cultural and creative sectors, with specific
focus on the energy crisis’ started its work in April 2024, co-chaired by Ireland (Environment) and
Italy (Culture). The group brought together 42 experts from 22 Member States, from both culture and
climate-environmental Ministries. It pursued a dual objective: scaling up proven good practices and
tools to support greening efforts of the cultural and creative sectors, while highlighting culture’s
under-recognised role in enabling the mindset shifts required for a just, inclusive and equitable green
transition. The experts’ work built on previous OMC reports and EU studies, on external expertise and
on two dedicated surveys. It culminated in the report ‘Creative shifts: Empowering culture for
sustainable living’, announced at Mondiacult Barcelona (September 2025) and published in December
202534.
The report shows how the cultural and creative sectors are already making an impact through energy-
saving, climate adaptation, circular practices and sustainable mobility. It includes recommendations
for improving the use of existing tools and data for informed decision-making, scaling up proven
good practices, stimulating action through targeted policies and institutional support, enhancing
knowledge-sharing across Europe and better integrating culture into national and EU climate
strategies. OMC experts are continuing dissemination efforts at national level to help ensure that the
report’s recommendations inform policy action. The Culture Compass for Europe highlights the need
to address climate change and environmental sustainability through creative pathways as a key area
for action.
According to Member States, this OMC has influenced policy and funding priorities by inspiring
national funding schemes for sustainable cultural and creative sectors’ practices and contributing to
the development of climate strategies for cultural institutions and heritage, thereby reinforcing the role
of culture in achieving environmental objectives.
5) Enhancing the cultural and creative dimension in the European video games sector
The European video games sector has gained increasing recognition for its cultural and economic
potential, prompting targeted EU-level efforts. In 2024, the Commission organised four round tables
to explore (i) the economic and cultural relevance of gaming, within and beyond the gaming industry;
(ii) skills and innovation gaps in the sector; (iii) investment needs and available financing; and (iv)
national and regional policies/practices and peer learning. With over 50 participants from Member
State administrations, academia and business, the discussions highlighted the need to further
acknowledge the cultural and economic value of video games, to improve skills development, to
increase opportunities for technological innovation, and to strengthen public-private collaborations.
30 Recovery and Resilience Scoreboard – Thematic Analysis – Culture and Creative Industries.pdf 31 Stocktaking on the energy crisis – Final Presidency note 8649/23 32 EU/2024/1275 33 Voices of culture brainstorming report: Culture and creative sectors and industries driving green transition
and facing the energy crisis 34 Creative shifts – Publications Office of the EU
9
This process helped the Commission to identify key stakeholders in Member States, leading to
subsequent consultations relevant to the sector. It also informed the Commission’s main market study
on video games35 and gave useful insights into the policy needs of the industry.
In November 2023, the culture ministers adopted the Council’s conclusions36, agreeing to enhance the
video games sector’s cultural and creative dimension in Europe and acknowledging its potential to
transmit cultural content and the richness of European creation, heritage and history.
Examples of measures taken by Member States to boost the video games sector include tax credits for
video games projects and funding schemes. Some examples of these measures relate to projects
promoting cultural heritage (museums, sites) and cross-sector collaboration between developers,
designers and traditional artists. Non-funding examples include parliamentary reporting on video
games policy and dialogue with industry representatives.
6) Stocktaking on the implementation of the Council conclusions on the recovery, resilience
and sustainability of the cultural and creative sectors
In May 2021, a year after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, under the Portuguese presidency,
the Council approved conclusions on the recovery, resilience and sustainability of the cultural and
creative sectors, underlining the need to take action to support them in times of crisis and beyond. The
subsequent stocktaking on the implementation of these conclusions was carried out by the Swedish
and Spanish Presidencies, with an exchange between Member States and the Commission at the
Council’s Cultural Affairs Committee meeting in March 2023 and written input in response to queries
by the Presidency.
During the crisis, tailored grants supported live events, digital projects and freelancers across Europe.
Meanwhile, streamlined processes, such as non-repayable aid, digital application portals and reduced
documentation requirements, made funding more accessible. Creative Europe, for instance, received a
67% funding increase, going from EUR 1.46 billion for the 2014-2020 period to EUR 2.44 billion for
2021-2027, to bolster recovery efforts. National initiatives further strengthened resilience through
artist statutes aiming at improved freelance protections, unemployment compensation, tax exemptions
and social security moratoriums. Mobility was also facilitated through simplified cross-border travel
procedures and tax guidance. Digital event streaming was also supported or incentivised.
Member States have supported the digital and green transitions, as well as the cultural and creative
sectors’ resilience by making use of the Recovery and Resilience Facility. Key measures adopted
include reforms, for example of the status of artists; investments in technological upgrades for
theatres, museum archives and other cultural operators; support for the digitisation of cultural
heritage, for renovations to improve energy efficiency in cultural buildings, for ecological practices
and for capacity building. Additionally, some Member States have planned innovative actions to
harness the power of culture for social cohesion and well-being37. Tools such as the Commission’s
CultureEU funding guide38 have improved transparency and accessibility to EU funding. The
Commission has enhanced mobility via Culture Moves Europe39 and shared opportunities through
platforms like CreativesUnite.
7) Stocktaking on the implementation of the Council conclusions on reinforcing intercultural
exchanges through the mobility of artists and cultural and creative professionals, and
through multilingualism in the digital era
To take stock of the implementation of these Council conclusions in the Member States and at EU
level, the Polish Presidency launched online surveys to collect information on relevant measures since
2022.
Nearly all Member States stated that they have in place national schemes, such as residencies, travel
grants and scholarships, with the goal of fostering global collaborations in arts, music and literature.
35 The European media industry outlook – Publications Office of the EU 36 Council conclusions on enhancing the cultural and creative dimension of the European video games sector 37 Recovery and Resilience Facility Thematic analysis: Culture and Creative Industries 38 Discover funding opportunities for the Cultural and Creative Sectors – Culture and Creativity 39 Culture Moves Europe – Culture and Creativity
10
At the EU level, the Culture Moves Europe scheme (funded under Creative Europe) has become a
leading mobility option for artists, thanks to its accessible rolling calls and focus on emerging talent.
Member States and the Commission further promote mobility through peer events and Creative
Europe desks. However, challenges remain, including low awareness, fragmented information,
economic barriers, visa complexities, administrative hurdles and language gaps, all of which demand
tailored solutions. The stocktaking document urges deeper synergies between Erasmus+ and Creative
Europe, alongside efforts to bolster multilingualism through education, AI-driven tools like
eTranslation, and protections for minority languages to counter digital divides.
4.2. Priority b) Culture for the people: enhancing cultural participation and the role
of culture in society
8) Culture and promoting democracy: towards cultural citizenship in Europe
To deliver on this action, the Commission has launched the ‘Culture and Democracy Study and Peer-
Learning Project’. This explores how schools, artists and cultural organisations can collaborate
through participatory arts and cultural activities to enhance young peoples’ democratic and civic
engagement.
Implemented by a consortium of contractors since June 2025, the 27-month project pursues two main
aims: first, to collect existing knowledge on effective school/culture collaborations at national,
regional and local levels, identifying practical ways to support them as strategic tools; second, to share
this knowledge and examples of good practice with policy makers, educators, creative professionals
and other key stakeholders, informing policy and practice across the EU. Deliverables will include a
study distilling key lessons for policy and practice and a compendium of good practices, expected in
mid-2026, followed by four peer-learning workshops (until 2027) for culture and education
policymakers. A handbook for practitioners, with concrete guidance on how to establish and run such
collaborations, along with a final conference, will conclude the work.
Under the Danish Presidency, the Council adopted the aforementioned conclusions40 setting out a
comprehensive framework for protecting and promoting European values and democratic resilience
through culture and cultural heritage, particularly in the context of geopolitical challenges.
Across the EU, culture and democracy have remained an overarching priority, with Member States
implementing diverse measures, such as cross-ministerial collaboration establishing structural
synergies between schools and cultural institutions. National culture strategies now increasingly
incorporate the topic, while flagship institutions are repositioning their missions to foster democratic
discourse. Awareness-raising initiatives further complement these efforts
9) Culture and health
The growing evidence and recognition of culture’s role in enhancing health and well-being has led to
increased attention being paid at EU level to this vital cross-sectoral collaboration.
In February 2024, the Open Method of Coordination Group on Culture and Health began its work. It
included representatives from ministries of culture, ministries of health and NGOs across nearly all
EU Member States, as well as external experts, including the WHO. Tasked with addressing
compelling international evidence, the group examined how participation in cultural and creative
activities supports better health outcomes and improved well-being at individual, community and
societal level, in particular in terms of health promotion, disease prevention, management and
treatment of health conditions (including physical and mental health), and social inclusion and
cohesion.
This work gained further endorsement at the end of 2024, when the Council, under the Hungarian
Presidency, adopted conclusions on access to culture41, while recognising the importance of cultural
participation for personal health and well-being. Moreover, the Council conclusions from June 2025
40 Council conclusions on the strategic role of culture, cultural heritage and audiovisual works in upholding
European values and democratic resilience 41 Council conclusions on improving and fostering access to culture
11
on promoting and protecting the mental health of children and adolescents in the digital era42
underlined the importance of cultural participation, libraries and cultural hubs in promoting a healthy
lifestyle and providing alternatives to screen time.
The OMC group’s report ‘Culture and Health: Time to Act’43, was launched by Commissioner Glenn
Micallef and Ernest Urtasun, Spanish Minister of Culture, at Mondiacult in Barcelona on
29 September 2025. It provides policy recommendations for decision makers at European, national,
regional and local levels, as well as for cultural organisations. It envisions a future where everyone in
Europe has access to cultural and creative participation as an intrinsic part of their health journey,
leading to better health and well-being outcomes and better quality of life for all.
The report’s findings highlight global and sectoral challenges – spanning health, culture and their
intersection – while identifying 21 opportunities for cross-sector collaboration. The findings are
illustrated by numerous good practices from all Member States as well as by cross-border European
cooperation. The OMC results have been widely used and have served as an evidence base for
integrating culture into health policies, helping to legitimise culture’s role in well-being and
prevention. This has led to concrete outcomes, such as the development of arts-in-health programmes
(including cultural prescription and hospital-based initiatives), strengthened cooperation between
ministries of culture and health, and has prompted the inclusion of culture in national mental health
strategies. The topic received further political support from ministers of culture, health, and state
secretaries attending OMC meetings and the launch of the OMC report in several countries.
Culture for health and well-being remains a priority in the Culture Compass. The Commission, with
the support of experts and national contact points, will develop EU guidelines on culture, health and
well-being by 2028.
10) Building bridges: strengthening the multiple roles of libraries as gateways to and
transmitters of cultural works, skills and European values
In 2023, an OMC group was mandated to examine how to strengthen and promote the multiple roles
of public libraries and to better understand and document the cultural, societal and democratic roles
that libraries play in society. The work started in February 2024, bringing together 36 experts from 25
EU Member States, with input from non-EU countries including Norway, Türkiye, Iceland, Georgia,
Moldova, Switzerland, Ukraine and the UK. A final Presidency conference is planned in late October
2026, hosted by Ireland.
The resulting report (planned for publication by mid-2026) aims to stimulate a Europe-wide debate on
better leveraging libraries’ potential in tackling societal challenges. It builds bridges between
policymakers and library professionals and offers guidance on fostering innovation, expanding
services and strengthening the contribution of libraries to European values and societal goals. It
showcases best practice examples of libraries providing local solutions to 10 societal challenges,
using an integrated approach aligned with European, national and regional strategies. Among its
recommendations, the report identifies six high-level enablers to future-proof public libraries and
amplify their impact. This OMC group has contributed to strengthening the recognition of libraries as
key social and democratic infrastructure.
On 14-15 October 2024, Hungary hosted a Presidency conference titled ‘ReAImagining public
collections in the 21st century in light of technological developments’, which explored key topics,
including the digitalisation and technological innovations transforming public collections. At national
level, according to the survey conducted to pave the way for this report, Member States have worked
on national library laws or amendments expanding library functions. Targeted funding measures –
including support under the Recovery and Resilience Plans and Cohesion Policy funds (in particular
under the European Regional Development Fund) – focused on investments covering modernisation
of public library networks as cultural hubs, inclusive public spaces and programmes aimed at young
audiences and heritage discovery.
42 Council conclusions from June 2025 on promoting and protecting the mental health of children and
adolescents in the digital era 43 Culture and health – Publications Office of the EU
12
Several EU programmes supported relevant projects, as highlighted in the report ‘The multifaceted
role of public libraries’44.
11) Protection of children and young people from harmful content on digital platforms
The Digital Services Act (DSA)45 aims to create a safer digital space for all users and places the
protection of minors online at its core, requiring platforms to ensure a high level of privacy, safety,
and security for minors on their services. Between 2023 and 2026, the Commission supported the
implementation of the DSA through several workshops and round tables, including (i) an all-day DSA
stakeholder event (June 2023), with several workshops covering the protection of minors, to discuss
implementation priorities ahead of the full application of the DSA (as from February 2024); (ii) a
thematic stakeholder workshop on risk assessments for very large online platforms (April 2025); (iii)
two consultation workshops on the preparation of the guidelines on the protection of minors under
Article 28 of the DSA (October 2024 and June 2025), and on feedback from focus groups involving
children in seven Member States with the support of the Safer Internet Centres; (iv) regular online
round tables with civil society organisations (2024-2026) to raise awareness about the DSA, and
exchanges of views on developments in research and risk analysis at national and grassroots level; (v)
several annual activities under the better internet for kids (BIK+) strategy46, with a focus on the DSA.
The Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD)47 sets out sector-specific obligations for video-
sharing platforms to protect minors from harmful audiovisual content. The ongoing AVMSD
evaluation and upcoming review by Q3 2026 will assess whether the current rules for the protection
of minors are fit for purpose, in particular in the online environment, and address potential
shortcomings. As part of this process, a call for evidence and a public consultation, as well as
stakeholder meetings were organised also covering such protection of minors rules under the
Directive.
The BIK+ strategy and the Safer Internet Centres network in Member States continue to play a key
role in advising on child safety, education and youth participation. In 2025, the Commission’s annual
youth-led Safer Internet Forum focused on ‘Protecting and empowering youth in the digital age’
gathering more than 800 people from over 65 countries. Each February marks ‘Safer Internet Day’
with activities taking place worldwide under the slogan ‘Together for a better internet’. The 2026 EU
action plan against cyberbullying48 was shaped by consultations with over 400 stakeholders and views
collected from 6 300 children. To coordinate efforts at EU level, regular sharing of good practice has
been organised by the network of Safer Internet Centres which, together with the BIK platform,
reaches more than 46 million people in Europe and beyond in 2025. Several Member States have
funded projects on safe internet and media literacy.
12) Discoverability of diverse European cultural content in the digital environment
The work plan underscored the need to strengthen the discoverability of diverse European cultural
content online, which led the Commission to commission a study to better understand this complex
and increasingly relevant subject.
The study, published on 8 April 202649 and focusing primarily on music and books, identifies
opportunities arising from digitisation, such as increasing democratisation of, and access to, culture. It
also highlights overarching challenges for European works in reaching audiences beyond borders,
including language silos and translation gaps, algorithmic opacity and platform dominance. Other
factors influencing diversity include algorithmic biases, data limitations, promotion and curation
inequalities, capacity gaps and digital literacy – compounded by the rise of AI-generated content. The
study concludes that concerted efforts are required to fully tap into the opportunities presented by
44 Programmes, such as Creative Europe, Horizon Europe, ERASMUS+ or the Asylum, Migration and
Integration Fund (AMIF); The multifaceted role of public libraries – Publications Office of the EU 45 EU/2022/2065 46 Better Internet for Kids strategy (BIK+) 47 EU/2018/1808 48 COM(2026) 71 final 49 Study on the discoverability of diverse European cultural content in the digital environment – Publications
Office of the EU
13
digitisation, address the structural imbalances identified and harness technology to enhance the
discoverability of European works.
The recommendations, targeting cultural sectors, digital platforms and policymakers at EU and
national levels, address six strategic action areas: (i) fostering collaboration and governance for fair
discoverability; (ii) enhancing data collaboration and knowledge; (iii) building digital capacity and
tools for creators and cultural organisations; (iv) audience-focused measures; (v) accelerating research
and innovation for discoverability; and (vi) bolstering European content supply: funding, curation,
prominence and transparency. The study was presented at a dedicated conference with stakeholders
and Member States’ representatives in Brussels on 20 April 2026.
Following the publication of the study, the Commission committed to continuing to support
investments on discoverability of diverse cultural content created in Europe to foster its consumption
within and outside the EU, as provided by the Culture Compass.
4.3. Priority c) Culture for the planet: unleashing the power of culture
13) Cultural statistics – to build resilience in and through culture
In 2023, Eurostat set up a task force with representatives from the statistical institutes of the EU
Member States and observer members from selected key organisations to update the EU statistical
framework for culture statistics. Member States adopted the revised framework in spring 2026. In
agreement with the Member States, Eurostat prepared an updated guide for cultural statistics,
reflecting the revised framework. Following its implementation, first results are expected in 2026,
depending on the timing and scope of data collections.
This new EU framework on cultural statistics together with the revision of relevant official
classifications such as NACE Rev. 2.1, will enable Eurostat to disseminate more accurate data,
including on employment in the cultural and creative sectors, to provide a clearer picture of the field
and its different sub-sectors. Building on previous work, as outlined in the Culture Compass, the
Commission will develop an EU cultural data hub50 to collect and analyse cultural data, monitor
trends, and pool best practices.
For the period of the work plan, many Member States reported progress in developing cultural
indicators and data systems.
14) Cultural governance
In early 2026, the Cypriot Presidency organised several ‘online workshops’ with experts as part of a
think-tank process where knowledge from practice, research and policymaking could intersect in a
structured yet informal way. These sessions started exploring how cultural governance might address
emerging societal and political realities marked by digital transformation, geopolitical uncertainty,
environmental transition and rising demands for democratic participation. The final conference,
originally scheduled for early March 2026 in Nicosia, was regrettably cancelled at short notice due to
the escalating crisis in Iran.
15) Climate action through culture, including the arts and cultural heritage
An informal meeting with former members of the OMC group on ‘Strengthening cultural heritage
resilience for climate change’ was held on 17 September 2024. Its aims were to (i) take stock of
policy developments at national level resulting from the report’s recommendations; (ii) present
additional best practice examples from members; and (iii) discuss further action to support the
report’s dissemination and amplify its impact.
At EU level, a very tangible result of the report is the launch of a European Partnership for Resilient
Cultural Heritage (2026) funded by Horizon Europe, one of the 20 flagship actions in the Culture
Compass. Internationally, the EU engages on culture-based climate action as a knowledge partner in
the Group of Friends of Culture-Based Climate Action. This is a coalition of UN Member States,
50 Data on the audiovisual sector will continue to be provided by the European Audiovisual Observatory and
the Commission’s European Media Outlook Report.
14
intergovernmental agencies and organisations within the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change framework that aims to build political momentum for recognising the critical role of
culture in addressing climate change.
The Creative Europe programme has supported the production of tools such as the Greening the
Creative Europe Programme report51 and related Guidelines on quality assessment of green aspects in
Creative Europe projects (Culture strand)52.
Member States’ survey responses point to different measures being implemented on this topic. These
include (i) embedding cultural heritage within climate strategies; (ii) assessing cultural heritage
climate vulnerability; (iii) incorporating sustainability criteria into public cultural grants and (iv)
funding to prevent climate damage to cultural monuments. Other examples of funding involve (i) New
European Bauhaus (NEB) initiatives linking citizen engagement with sustainable local development;
(ii) the incorporation of cultural heritage into climate resilience strategies; (iii) a CO₂ calculator for
museums; as well as (iv) involvement in international training, workshops and conferences on climate
change and culture.
16) High-quality living environment for everyone
In line with the recommendations of the OMC group on investing in a high-quality architecture and
living environment for everyone (2021)53 and with the Council conclusions on culture, high-quality
architecture and built environment as key aspects of the NEB initiative (2021)54, the European
Directors of Architecture Policies (EDAP) gathered under each Council presidency. Their discussions
focused on initiatives to achieve a high-quality living environment for everyone (including those
living in rural and remote areas, such as the outermost regions), while exploring synergies with the
NEB network.
EDAP meetings and related European conferences on architectural policies addressed topics such as
(i) policy implementation (from policy to practice); (ii) the quality of tomorrow’s housing (quality
living in the continuity of architecture); (iii) restoration, renovation and adapted re-use of cultural
heritage; and (iv) improvements of architecture competitions and public procurement (spatial quality
through public procurement). At the EDAP meeting on 6 May 2026, there was broad support for
continuing exchange, peer learning, and policy dialogue among Member States, EU institutions, and
relevant stakeholders under the next work plan.
Between July 2023 and November 2024, a Creative Europe-funded peer-learning initiative supported
local and regional authorities in planning and delivering high-quality architectural policies and
projects. This facilitated peer exchanges across EU cities, regions, EU countries and key stakeholders,
focusing on effective processes and good practice. This was outlined in the Commission’s NEB
Communication and followed up to the Council’s invitation to provide opportunities for research,
capacity building and peer learning55. Announced as one of the flagship actions in the Culture
Compass, the Commission adopted a new Communication on the future of the NEB56 and a related
proposal for a Council Recommendation in December 202557. The Council adopted the
Recommendation on 11 May 202658.
Member States’ measures in this area – as reported in the work plan survey – span legal measures
(such as laws establishing quality criteria for architecture), funding actions (such as urban heritage
regeneration initiatives, support for architecture and design development projects) and educational
and expert activities.
51 Greening the Creative Europe Programme – Publications Office of the EU 52 Quality assessment of green aspects in Creative Europe projects (Culture strand) – Culture and Creativity 53 Towards a shared culture of architecture – Report 54 New European Bauhaus: beautiful, sustainable, together 55 Council conclusions on culture, high-quality architecture and built environment as key elements of the New
European Bauhaus initiative 56 Communication on the New European Bauhaus – New European Bauhaus 57 Proposal for a Council Recommendation on the New European Bauhaus 58 Council Recommendation on the New European Bauhaus
15
17) Safeguarding heritage against natural and human-made disasters
Recurrent crises, from armed conflicts to natural disasters, have underscored the need for strengthened
international efforts to safeguard, restore and preserve countries’ cultural heritage.
Since 2019, the Commission has funded the PROCULTHER (‘Protecting Cultural Heritage from the
Consequences of Disasters’) projects to support the development of pan-European doctrines
especially under the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM)59. The initiative spearheaded the
creation of a Cultural Heritage Protection module in the European Civil Protection Pool60, integrated
cultural heritage protection into EU exercises, and developed a methodology on combining disaster
risk management with cultural heritage protection, including through a whole-of-society approach.61
Complementarily, the EU-funded project ‘Enhancing capacities in Ukraine for cultural heritage first
aid and recovery planning’ (completed in September 2024 and implemented by ICCROM)62 trained
23 heritage professionals from 11 oblasts (including five frontline regions) to establish Ukraine’s first
national team of cultural first aiders. It is now equipped to assess, mitigate and reduce disaster and
conflict risks to all types of heritage, and ready to recover and safeguard the nation’s invaluable
heritage amid Russia’s ongoing war of aggression against Ukraine.
Another project, ‘Safeguarding Cultural Heritage from Disasters, Extreme Weather Events, and
Complex Emergencies’ (2024-2027)63, is a cascading capacity development initiative aimed at
enhancing disaster risk mitigation and emergency preparedness at heritage sites and institutions. A
first successful round of training sessions was completed in 2025, combining online and on-site
sessions, followed by field projects in participants’ home countries in early 2026.
The conference ‘Safe cultural heritage – European challenges in times of war and crisis’, organised
under the Polish Presidency in Krakow on 3-4 April 2025, also emphasised the importance of
safeguarding heritage both physically and digitally in light of mounting risks.
At national level, Member States have developed national disaster risk prevention strategies and
plans, damage assessment methodologies, and applications for recording and assessing damage to
cultural heritage. Funding has been directed at interventions, guideline development and monitoring
on climate vulnerabilities affecting cultural heritage. Proposals include a pan-European solution for
long-term digital cultural heritage preservation, with a working group mapping heritage datasets and
cross-border requirements.
18) Exchanging information between cultural heritage professionals and competent authorities
for cultural goods on the fight against trafficking in cultural goods
Following up on the ‘EU action plan against trafficking in cultural goods’ of December 202264, the
Commission set up an Expert Subgroup on the Art Market in December 202365 to facilitate
information exchange and discussions on legislation, programmes and policies related to the
protection and trade of cultural goods in the single market, and to foster the sharing of good practice.
The subgroup held its fourth meeting in Brussels on 29 January 2026.
Moreover, through the Horizon Europe programme, the Commission funded many different projects
fighting illicit trafficking of cultural goods, including RITHMS66, a research and innovation project
aimed at enhancing the operational capacity of police, customs and border authorities to combat the
organised and poly-criminal nature of cultural goods trafficking. It was presented at an event on future
59 Through the UCPM, the Commission can deploy advisory missions that provide recommendations on
safeguarding cultural heritage in times of crisis. Upon request, it can also support the evacuation of movable
cultural heritage at risk. In addition, the UCPM is establishing a pool of experts with specialised expertise in
cultural heritage protection. 60 European Civil Protection Pool - European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations 61 PROCULTHER-4ALL | UCP Knowledge Network 62 Enhancing capacities in Ukraine for cultural heritage first aid and recovery planning – ICCROM 63 READY track 1: Safeguarding Heritage Collections, Living Traditions and Practices in the face of Disasters,
Extreme Weather Events and Complex Emergencies – ICCROM 64 COM/2022/800 final 65 Subgroup on the Art Market - Register of Commission expert groups and other similar entities 66 RITHMS Project
16
policies and best practices ‘Beyond restoration – the role of restorers and conservators in supporting
law enforcement in combating the illicit trafficking of cultural goods’67, held in Brussels on
4 December 2024. The event explored how restorers can actively contribute to combating such
crimes. It featured expert panel discussions, a hands-on workshop and discussions to address the
complex challenges restorers and conservators face in their work.
At their informal meeting in Nicosia, Cyprus on 1-2 June 2026, EU culture ministers acknowledged
the potential of new technologies, particularly AI, in strengthening efforts against the trafficking in
cultural goods, particularly with regards to traceability and due diligence, and confirmed the
importance of continued engagement and cooperation among Member States, including within the
framework of EU and international standards and regulatory frameworks.
The responses of Member States to the survey conducted in preparation for this report emphasised
networking, awareness-raising and cooperation between police, customs and ministries. They
confirmed the full implementation of the EU Regulations on the introduction and the import of
cultural goods (Regulation (EU) 2019/880 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU)
2021/1079). They also cited specific cases of cross-institutional collaboration that resulted in the
return of stolen goods. Some Member States reported that they had signed bilateral agreements on
information exchange, joint training for police units, and the use of digital tools to improve
traceability and intra-EU notifications. Training activities in this period included training provided by
the OSCE Heritage Crime Task Force, national workshops for police and customs officials, and a
UNESCO capacity-building workshop in Warsaw and Chișinău focused on combating the illicit
trafficking of Ukrainian cultural property.
4.4. Priority d) Culture for co-creative partnerships: strengthening the cultural
dimension of EU external relations
19) Governance of the EU strategic approach to international cultural relations and framework
The role of culture and international cultural relations (ICR) as a strategic asset for Europe’s global
influence has gained increased recognition. The Commission and the Member States have
implemented a series of activities as part of the work plan. Experts from ministries of culture and
ministries responsible for external relations have collaborated closely under the OMC. The work
started in May 2023 and brought together around 33 experts from 23 EU Member States, with input
from internal and external guest speakers. The OMC group met nine times and, with Slovenia and
Luxembourg co-chairing the group, produced a comprehensive report with recommendations to
improve the governance of the EU’s ICR.
This report provides an overview of the current state of EU international cultural relations, covers key
discussions and contributions and makes 65 recommendations. Several of these focus on
strengthening the Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) on International Cultural Relations – the sole EU-
level forum where high-level officials from ministries of culture and those responsible for external
relations can convene. In particular, the recommendations aim to improve the SOM’s continuity and
alignment with broader strategic priorities. These recommendations are expected to inform the
revision of the EU strategy on ICR, scheduled for Q4 2027 under the Culture Compass. Beyond this,
they offer practical guidance to strengthen the EU’s cultural diplomacy and enhance its international
impact, particularly in today’s volatile, fast-changing and tense geopolitical environment.
20) Preserving cultural heritage and empowering local CCS in Ukraine
In light of Russia’s ongoing war of aggression against Ukraine, the Commission set up an expert
subgroup on ‘Safeguarding cultural heritage in Ukraine’. The subgroup reported to the Expert Group
on Cultural Heritage (created in 2019 following the 2018 European Year of Cultural Heritage), and
consisted of 26 international experts, including 6 from Ukraine. Between June 2023 and December
2024, the group met five times. The recommendations published in November 2024 in English and
67 Beyond Restoration: RITHMS policies and best practices
17
Ukrainian68 address four priority areas: (i) recognition of cultural heritage; (ii) risk management; (iii)
documentation, monitoring and data collection; and (iv) recovery of cultural heritage. High-level
participation by Ukrainian authorities, with deputy ministerial representatives engaging in the fourth
and fifth meetings, ensured national ownership.
Building on a 2022 mapping of cultural actors and their needs – conducted after the full-scale
invasion of Ukraine and Ukraine’s designation as an official EU candidate country – the Cultural
Relations Platform organised activities in 2024 (at the Commission’s request). Aligned with the EU
Work Plan for Culture, the Commission launched a dedicated project activity in January 2024 to
evaluate the state of the cultural and creative sectors in Ukraine, with a particular focus on EU
integration and its potential contribution to Ukraine’s recovery amid Russia’s ongoing war of
aggression against Ukraine.
Since the start of this war, the Creative Europe Programme has provided substantial support to
Ukraine. Under the Culture strand, two special calls were launched – EUR 5 million in 2022 and
EUR 7 million in 2025 – to support Ukrainian cultural and creative organisations, professionals and
artists in tackling the ongoing and future consequences of Russia’s war of aggression, as well as
heritage preservation and artistic performance both inside and outside Ukraine, in cooperation with
organisations from other Creative Europe countries. Beyond these calls, Ukrainian organisations have
secured EUR 7.64 million through other Creative Europe actions since 2022, including European
Cooperation Projects and the ‘Circulation of European Literary Works’ scheme. Additionally, Culture
Moves Europe (2022-2025) has awarded over EUR 700 000 in mobility grants to 360+ Ukrainian
artists and cultural professionals.
Various support initiatives to preserve Ukraine’s cultural heritage have been provided by all Member
States, primarily through funding but also via technical cooperation. Building on these efforts, at the
Ukraine Recovery Conference in July 2025, the Commission launched the Team Europe Approach
(TEA) for Cultural Heritage in Ukraine. The TEA now comprises 76 actions by 24 Member States69
and the Commission, as well as pledges by Member States to the Ukrainian Cultural Heritage Fund.
Developed by Aliph in 2025 at Ukraine’s request, the process received technical support from the
Commission, including via the ‘Case Studies on Cultural Heritage Funds in Europe’, published in
May 202570.
21) The role of culture and cultural professionals in the promotion and defence of democracy
and human rights in fragile contexts
The Council conclusions on an EU strategic approach to international cultural relations and a
framework for action (adopted by the Foreign Affairs Council on 8 April 2019)71 recognise the need
for a cross-cutting approach to culture, while aiming to strengthen the effectiveness and impact of EU
foreign policy by integrating international cultural relations into its instruments. They call for better
policy coordination among Commission Directorates-General, Member States and cultural
organisations, including joint development of local strategies by EU delegations, EU Member States
and the Commission. Cultural cooperation has continued to promote common values and Europe’s
unique cultural diversity as a cornerstone of the EU’s global influence in the world in terms of fair,
equal and long-term partnerships.
‘Unity in Cultural Diversity: a workshop on artistic freedom, human rights and the role of
international cultural relations in Europe and beyond’ was organised in June 2024 in Brussels by the
Cultural Relations Platform at the request of the European External Action Service. Fifteen speakers
from the EU institutions and representatives from Member States and civil society discussed the
importance of supporting artistic freedom in shrinking spaces, how to harness cultural diversity for
68 Recommendations from the European Commission-led expert group on the safeguarding of cultural heritage
in Ukraine - Publications Office of the EU 69 AT, BE, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, EL, ES, FI, FR, HR, IE, IT, LT, LV, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SI, SK, SE 70 European Commission: Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture and European Expert
Network on Culture, Case studies on cultural heritage funds in Europe, Publications Office of the European
Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/1231060 71 Council conclusions on an EU strategic approach to international cultural relations and a framework for
action
18
dialogue and resilience, the impact of political dynamics on international cultural relations, and fragile
contexts and project implementation.
The Slovenian Presidency’s event ‘Future Unlocked!’ (12-15 September 2021) involved the
discussion of cultural and creative sectors as agents of change. Organised by the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, the event combined the High-Level Conference on Culture in Foreign Relations, Creative
Forum Ljubljana, the European Creative Industries Summit and a senior officials’ meeting on
international cultural relations. The geographic scope also included the Western Balkans, the South
Mediterranean and Africa.
Member States addressed this issue mostly through funded initiatives. These include funding for
cultural NGO projects involving artists in exile from Russia and Belarus, grants for Ukrainian artists,
and arts council programmes promoting artistic freedom, cultural entrepreneurship and social
inclusion in fragile contexts, among others.
5. LOOKING AHEAD: THE NEXT WORK PLAN FOR CULTURE
In this rapidly shifting (geo)political and global landscape, culture has emerged as a strategic force for
a democratic, resilient and competitive Europe, rooted in our shared values, artistic freedom and
fundamental rights. Yet the cultural and creative sectors face pressing challenges from AI and digital
disruption to economic instability and social dynamics. Europe must empower them to adapt,
innovate, and thrive, thereby ensuring that they are future-ready.
This vision is embedded in the 2025 Culture Compass for Europe, through which the Commission
established an ambitious EU strategic framework for policymaking. The Compass sets out key
directions to support and strengthen the cultural and creative sectors and to mainstream culture across
policies. Backed by concrete flagship actions – many of which are already underway – the Compass
provides a foundation for long-term policy ambition.
Building on this and also on the achievements of the work plans for culture,the 2026 Joint
Declaration ‘Europe for Culture – Culture for Europe’72 is a tripartite political agreement between
the European Parliament, the Council of the EU and the Commission. It enshrines shared
commitments and guiding principles for priority areas of EU level cooperation on culture, while fully
respecting Member States’ competences. Endorsed by all three institutions, this Declaration reinforces
the strategic direction set by the Compass and offers a common point of reference for the future.
The next multiannual work plan for culture post-2026 now offers a key opportunity to translate this
collective vision and political consensus into targeted, impactful and time-bound actions. By aligning
closely with the new strategic foundation provided by the Compass and the Joint Declaration, the
work plan can further enhance policy coherence and foster complementarity with existing or planned
initiatives. By focusing on the most pressing themes and concrete deliverable actions, the work
plan can drive effective collaboration on culture between the Member States at EU level.
This view is supported by the survey findings. Several Member States emphasised the need for a
coherent, complementary and efficiently structured work plan that builds on past achievements. The
Commission therefore recommends a more focused and action-oriented approach for the next
cycle, avoiding an excessive number of topics to prevent overloading the agenda and ensure feasible
implementation by the Member States and the Commission. Working methods should be carefully
calibrated to the topic and objective at hand, with administrative burden kept to a minimum. Member
States expressed similar concern and emphasised the need for focus and efficiency.
The themes that Member States consider the most relevant for the future work plan largely align
with the priorities of the Culture Compass and the Joint Declaration. Responses also highlighted a
preference for continuity, while adapting the focus to reflect contemporary challenges. The key
priorities for the next work plan, which were also articulated by culture ministers in their policy
debate during the EYCS Council on 12 May 2026, can be summarised as follows:
• AI and the cultural and creative sectors, given AI’s role in enhancing European
72 Signed on 18 June 2026. OJ C/2026/3440, 25.6. 2026, EUR-Lex - C_202603440 - EN - EUR-Lex.
19
competitiveness, the need to balance technological adoption with the preservation of cultural
and linguistic diversity and creators’ rights, as well as AI’s ethical, legal and transparency
implications for culture. In light of this, the Commission is preparing a dedicated AI strategy,
planned for adoption in 2027. The next work plan provides an opportunity to include
complementary action to facilitate exchanges on national initiatives as well as dedicated
activities to follow up on the recommendations from the study on the discoverability of
diverse European cultural content in the digital environment, targeted at Member States.
• Crisis preparedness, security, resilience in and through culture, including peace-building
and the protection and safeguarding of cultural heritage, are increasingly vital. The urgency of
this topic is heightened by geopolitical instability and emerging conflicts, climate change and
extreme weather events. As further confirmed by ongoing policy work under the EU
preparedness Union strategy73, which identifies cultural heritage as one of the 19 core vital
societal functions, there is a need to develop and strengthen ad hoc coordination mechanisms
at local, regional and EU levels, alongside broad civil society education and awareness. To
advance these goals, the Commission considers there to be significant added value for the
next work plan in including a focus on cultural heritage risk preparedness, supplementing
Member States’ efforts through increased coordination and expertise-sharing, including by
capitalising on lessons learned from conflict and crisis contexts, particularly in Ukraine.
Meanwhile, culture remains essential for fostering social cohesion and resilience, particularly
in addressing global challenges. Digital means, such as digital preservation and 3D
digitisation, can play an important role, while intergenerational exchange can contribute to
safeguarding intangible heritage and traditional crafts.
• Access to culture and cultural heritage remains crucial, particularly in underserved
territories, for persons with disabilities, and for disadvantaged or marginalised communities.
This involves strengthening cultural participation and leveraging cultural infrastructure, such
as libraries, museums and cultural centres, as proximity spaces for engagement and engines of
local, regional and territorial development. The well-documented importance of cultural
access for democratic participation, as well as individual and societal well-being, ensures that
the topic stays high on the agenda. In this context, the Commission will propose EU
guidelines on culture for health and well-being by 2028. This process will require strong
engagement and collaboration among Member States. The next work plan could make a
meaningful contribution to this. Additionally, to enhance young people’s access to culture and
heritage, there is scope for sharing best practices and addressing challenges between Member
States related to cultural pass schemes implemented at national, regional, local, or cross-
border levels.
• Strategic investment in culture and innovative financing tools are essential to expand the
resource base of the cultural and creative sectors and unlock the potential of culture in
addressing the challenges of today and tomorrow. Instruments such as blended finance,
public-private partnerships, philanthropy and tax incentives could be further explored and
developed. Future EU-level cooperation under the next work plan could play a key role in
providing guidance, sharing knowledge and exchanging good practices, particularly given the
diverse national funding models and experiences. This exchange could also cover lessons
learned from the use of the Recovery and Resilience Facility and Cohesion Policy support
(including the European Regional Development Fund) for culture, particularly with a view to
inspiring possible future cultural investments in the proposed National and Regional
Partnership Plans.
• Safeguarding artistic freedom has gained prominence in EU-level discussion, with a
growing consensus on its critical role in democratic and open societies. This is reflected in the
Council’s work on culture’s role in democratic resilience under the current work plan. In the
EU, protecting the freedom of artists and cultural workers to create without censorship or
intimidation and to express their views on public issues is a collective responsibility. The next
work plan offers an opportunity to build on this progress, advancing artistic freedom both as a
73 JOIN(2025) 130 final
20
cornerstone of our democracies as well as a foundational working condition that enables a
thriving and diverse cultural landscape.
• Improving working conditions for artists and cultural professionals, alongside freedom of
artistic expression, remains a key priority that should be carried over and further developed in
the next work plan. This would allow for building on the results already achieved and
integrating insights from the ongoing work under the Culture Compass, notably the upcoming
State of Culture Report and the EU Artists’ Charter.
• The EU’s international cultural relations continue to represent a key area for EU-level
work, with scope to foster coherence, strategic alignment and effective implementation of
cultural cooperation with partner countries. As highlighted by the recent Open Method of
Coordination on the topic, clearer geographical and thematic priorities are needed to avoid
fragmented approaches across instruments and projects. For the next work plan, one first step
could be a comprehensive study or mapping of existing association and partnership
agreements, with a focus on their cultural clauses, alongside improved information-sharing
mechanisms with Member States. This would enable more strategic alignment in future
negotiations, ensuring that cultural provisions reflect both EU objectives and the realities of
Member States’ engagement in partner countries, while strengthening the impact of these
provisions in full respect of subsidiarity. Moreover, the Commission supports the Open
Method of Coordination group’s recommendation seeking to improve the continuity of Senior
Official Meetings and their alignment with broader strategic priorities.
In light of the above, the next work plan could consolidate progress and reinforce ongoing
workstreams, while addressing emerging priorities in a flexible manner and avoiding dispersion
or duplication of efforts. By collaborating closely, Member States and the Commission can turn
shared priorities into tangible, durable policy outcomes at both EU and national levels.
______
ANNEX: Survey on the implementation of the Work Plan for Culture 2023-2026 – Analysis of replies
from EU Member States
21
ANNEX
Survey on the implementation of the EU Work Plan for Culture 2023-2026
Methodology
A targeted survey of EU Member States on the implementation of the EU Work Plan for Culture
2023-2026 was conducted between 3 February 2026 and 19 March 2026. The survey was distributed
to all 27 EU Member States, and 26 replies were received. The questionnaire was designed to gather
both quantitative and qualitative evidence on Member States’ assessment of the current work plan, its
implementation, its contribution to national policymaking, the suitability of its working methods, and
priorities for a possible next work plan in light of the Culture Compass for Europe and the draft Joint
Declaration ‘Europe for Culture – Culture for Europe’.
The questionnaire combined closed and open-ended questions. It included rating questions using four-
point scales, yes/no questions, multiple-selection questions and open text fields allowing Member
States to explain ratings, provide examples, and set out priorities in more detail. The survey covered
five broad areas: (i) overall assessment of the relevance and implementation of the work plan; (ii) its
contribution to policy development in Member States across the 21 themes and actions; (iii)
assessment of the working methods, including the Open Method of Coordination (OMC),
dissemination and working arrangements; (iv) reflections on priorities for the next work plan,
including thematic and possible sectoral priorities; and (v) final comments.
The analysis combined a descriptive review of the quantitative responses with a thematic assessment
of the qualitative material. Closed-question responses were aggregated to identify overall patterns in
Member States’ assessments and preferences. Open responses were reviewed to identify recurring
themes, illustrative examples and explanations of ratings or priorities. The figures produced on the
basis of the survey data are presented in this annex.
Preliminary findings from the survey analysis were presented to the Council’s Cultural Affairs
Committee in Brussels on 27 March 2026, where Member States had an opportunity to provide
feedback on the initial results. This feedback informed the further refinement of the analysis presented
in this report.
22
Analysis of replies from EU Member States
Chart 1: Overall assessment of the EU Work Plan for Culture 2023-2026 and its implementation (MS
ranking of the following statements) (%)
Source: Survey for MS on the EU Work Plan for Culture 2023-2026, data compiled by Panteia, 2026
Chart 2: How suitable do you rate the following working methods to achieving the ambitions of the work
plan? (%)
Source: Survey for MS on the EU Work Plan for Culture 2023-2026, data compiled by Panteia, 2026
20
28
28
36
44
44
44
44
48
76
60
64
68
52
44
48
56
56
48
24
16
8
4
12
8
8
4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
the Work Plan improved cooperation with cultural
organisations at EU level
the Work Plan improved cooperation on international
cultural policy matters
the Work Plan informed existing areas of cultural
policymaking at Member State level
the Work Plan contributed to increased recognition of
the role of culture within other policy areas
the Work Plan improved the EU level cooperation
between Member States on cultural policy matters
the Work Plan improved the cooperation between
Member States and the Commission on cultural policy
matters
the 21 Work Plan themes have remained relevant for
the period 2023-2026
the implementation of the Work Plan generally met the
expectations of my Member State
the Work Plan inspired the expansion of the cultural
policy agenda to new topics
the Work Plan established appropriate overarching
priorities
Fully agree Partly agree Mostly disagree Disagree
33
33
43
50
58
92
25
25
52
33
25
4
33
38
4
17
13
4
8
4
4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Stock-taking exercises
Think-tank meetings
Peer-learning activities
Workshops
Commission-led expert groups and roundtables
OMC groups
Very suitable Suitable Somewhat suitable Not suitable
23
Chart 3: How do you rate the following statements on work arrangements and performance aspects
regarding the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) groups? (%)
Source: Survey for MS on the EU Work Plan for Culture 2023-2026, data compiled by Panteia, 2026
Chart 4: Do you think that the next EU work plan should introduce discussions on specific cultural and
creative sectors? (%)
Source: Survey for MS on the EU Work Plan for Culture 2023-2026, data compiled by Panteia, 2026
46
54
58
57
63
67
68
71
86
46
42
42
43
38
25
27
25
14
8
4
8
5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
The OMC groups had sufficient time to work
The deliverables of the OMC groups met the
expectations of my Member State
The OMC groups were given a mandate that was
sufficiently clear, precise and realistic
The communication channels between experts and the
competent national authority worked well
Oral and written reporting arrangements to the
Council structures have worked effectively
The Commission has provided relevant expertise and
the necessary logistical and secretarial support to the
work of the OMC groups
Experts nominated had the necessary expertise and
represented the views of their countries well
The OMC groups enabled the pursuit of objectives
efficiently, while maintaining a manageable level of
effort for administrations
Elected chairpersons/co-chairs have facilitated
constructive debates and helped achieving desired
outcomes
Fully agree Partly agree Mostly disagree Disagree
58
42
Yes No
24
Chart 5: What themes would you prioritise in the next work plan?* (% selected)
(*) Note: Member States could select up to five themes to prioritise
Source: Survey for MS on the EU Work Plan for Culture 2023-2026, data compiled by Panteia, 2026
13
13
17
17
17
21
25
29
29
38
38
50
50
67
79
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
International cultural relations
Culture, arts, and education
Culture and heritage in the shift towards
environmental sustainability
Young people and culture: e.g. voluntary cooperation
on the mutual recognition of culture and cultural
heritage passes
Safeguarding cultural heritage and intergenerational
transmission, incl. through digital means
Cultural and linguistic diversity
Regional and territorial development, social cohesion
and convergence through culture and cultural heritage
Culture for health and well-being: e.g. EU guidelines
Societal resilience through culture
Fair, just, healthy and safe working conditions for
artists and cultural professionals
Freedom of artistic expression
Access to culture (in general or for some segments of
the population, e.g. people with disabilities)
Strategic investment in culture and innovative
financing tools (private capital, public-private
partnerships, philanthropy, etc.): e.g. EU guidelines
Crisis preparedness, security and peace-building in
relation to culture and/or cultural heritage
Artificial intelligence and culture / cultural and
creative sectors