Iceland L?I1 Liechtenstein Norway grants

Fl ALPROGRA MEREPOT F 14-21

Estonia

Norway grants

Corn petitiveness

Iceland Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra ts grants

Programme short name EE-INNOVATION Programme Operator Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (EE) Host Programme Area PAUl Business Development, Innovation and SMEs Financial Mechanisms Norway Grants Programme grant in EUR ¬ 19,360,660.00 Programme co-financing in EUR ¬3,416,587.06 Final incurred amount in EUR ¬21,596,000.81 Final incurred rate % 94.81 %

PROGRAMME RESULTS

Programme Objective: Increased value creation and sustainable growth

Eligible expenditure: ¬ 22,777,247.06 Amount incurred: ¬ 21,596,000.81

Issues the programme aimed to address

Green ICT is a business development programme with the objective of increased value creation and sustainable growth in Estonia's private sector. The programme aimed to stimulate and develop innovation-led long-term business cooperation between Estonia and Norway. The programme was operated by the Estonian Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications and implemented by the Estonian Business and Innovation Agency with Innovation Norway as donor programme partner. The programme had three focus areas: Green Industry Innovation, ICT, and Welfare Technologies with ICT as a horizontal cross-cutting component.

The programme mainly targeted small and medium sized enterprises and was implemented through five public calls and two pre-defined projects. The grant aimed to increase annual turnover and operating profit of Estonian companies and to create new jobs, thereby contributing to the achievement of the socio-economic results set within the framework of the programme. Projects in the Green Industry Innovation focus area also contributed to reducing carbon dioxide emissions and energy consumption.

The programme aligned with national priorities - sustainable economic growth, social cohesion, and technological advancement. The programme contributed to the general objective of the Estonian Research and Development, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Strategy 202 1-2035: Estonian research, development, innovation, and entrepreneurship work together to increase the well-being of society and the productivity of the Estonian economy. A specific focus on business environment that encourages entrepreneurship and the growth of knowledge-intensive enterprises was addressed. Priority was given to the creation and export of higher value-added sustainable, and innovative products and services.

Estonia, as a small and open economy, has long sought to balance economic growth with sustainable practices, making programme selected focus areas critically important. These challenges were particularly pertinent given Estonia's reliance on energy-intensive industries, the pressing need to diversify its economy, and the demand for digital transformation. By addressing these challenges, the Green ICT programme played a pivotal role in fostering innovation and sustainability in Estonia.

Programme contribution to overall objectives

Reducinci Social and Economic Disparities

The programme has increased the growth of innovation capacity and productivity, also contributed to the promotion of research and development as well as resource efficiency in Estonia. According to Statistics Estonia, the share of private sector research and development expenditure in GDP has increased from 0.64% in 2014 to 1.01% by 2022, mainly in the manufacturing and information and

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra ts grants

communication sectors. Although this shows a positive trend, Estonia still lags behind the EU average in terms of the volume of private sector expenditure (Estonia 1.01% in 2022, EU average 1.48%, Eurostat). Nevertheless, these figures reflect the trend of increase in investments in innovation in 2020- 2023. Also, based on European Innovation Scoreboard, Estonia has moved from a moderate innovator to a strong innovator. Estonia's innovation performance increased from 98.6% in 2023 to 104.8% of the EU average in 2024, making Estonia an innovation leader, especially in promoting cooperation between SMEs. Thus, Estonia has managed to strengthen its innovation system and improve cooperation between businesses and the public sector and the role of the Green CT programme in this cannot be underestimated.

The programme outputs not only contributed to the achievement of the programme objectives, but also supported the wider goals of Estonia's long-term strategy "Estonia 2035", aiming for a strong, innovative and responsible economy. Programme outputs are wider than the individual results of the supported projects, having a positive impact on Estonia's social, economic and sustainable development. The strategic impact of the programme included the integration of innovative solutions across sectors, strengthening the competitiveness of Estonian companies in all focus areas. In addition, the programme has raised awareness of the use of climate neutral technologies and promoted cooperation between partner organizations. Support under the Green lOT programme has enabled Estonian companies to apply and develop new products, services and processes, and to strengthen the companies' market position and therefore create prerequisites for sustainable business models and long-term strategic developments.

Strencitheninci Bilateral Cooperation

The bilateral dimension of the programme was definitely one of its key strengths. Collaboration between Estonian and Norwegian partners was instrumental in fostering knowledge transfer and building enduring relationships. With 19 donor partnership projects, the programme contributed to strengthening of bilateral cooperation through new and continuous partnerships. Collaboration projects created new knowledge and the conditions for ongoing cooperations through knowledge sharing, which is expected to form into strong long-term business partnerships and open new opportunities in the future. Projects that included Estonian and Norwegian research institutions and universities set a solid foundation for a scientific base development, which includes high-level publications and data validation activities, especially in the Welfare Technology focus area. Norwegian partners provided critical insights, enriching Estonian capabilities, fostering an exchange of best practices, and building long-term cooperation.

The bilateral cooperation had a broader social and cultural impact between Estonia and Norway. This aspect of the programme laid a foundation for continued collaboration, underscoring the long-term value of such international partnerships.

Sustainability

The sustainability of the "Green lOT" programme's outcomes is a critical consideration. Supported projects demonstrated strong potential for enduring impact, particularly in areas such as resource efficiency, energy savings, and the adoption of innovative technologies. For instance, reductions in C02 emissions and the implementation of resource-efficient processes created resource-saving opportunities for enterprises while aligning with broader market trends. The awareness of such new solutions has increased, as shown by the growing interest towards new developments, such as consumption and 002 footprint monitoring functions.

However, ensuring long-term sustainability requires addressing challenges such as the financial capacity of SMEs to scale their projects and external disruptions, including supply chain issues exacerbated by the COVlD-19 pandemic. A continued focus on strategic support, capacity-building, and fostering market readiness will be essential to maintaining the programme's positive impacts. One of its key factors is continuation of established partnerships and joint developments, that has had a good impact on overall results as well as potential for the future. Many cooperations initiated within the

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra ts grants

framework of the Green ICT programme will continue, and the next steps are planned for further developments.

Given the global trends, development of green technologies is inevitable in future economic environment. In Estonia, it is important to continue with greening the industry by developing new, less environmentally burdensome sectors, while maintaining the focus on sustainable development and resource-efficient innovation in conjunction with the digitalization of the private sector. Positive impact can be further fostered with support for innovation and green solutions, involving more regions and developing innovative procurement and local cooperation processes.

Outcome 1: Increased competitiveness of Estonian companies within focus areas Green Industry Innovation, ICT and Welfare Technology

Amount incurred: ¬ 20,261,466.14

Results

The grant support was targeted to Estonian SMEs through five public calls for proposals. The programme achieved significant results, contributing to sustainable growth in Estonia's private sector. A total of 56 new products, services or processes were developed, exceeding the target (25) by more than twice. Projects under the Green Industry Innovation focus area distinguished in achieving this goal, contributing with 24 new solutions. These developments included solutions to improve the efficiency of the industrial production software (EE-INNOVATION-0053), but also smart transportation or logistics optimization solutions (EE-INNOVATION-0056, EE-INNOVATION-0057, EE-INNOVATION-0058), and platforms enabling energy efficiency (EE- lNN0VATl0N-0082, EE-INNOVATION-0084, EE- INN0VATl0N-0085).

The best examples arise from projects where the grant has fostered modernization of companies' internal processes that further enabled the production of new, innovative products. For example, Roofit Solar Energy 00 (projects EE-INNOVATION-0059, EE-lNNOVATlON-0062, EE-lNNOVATlON-0096), which has developed a unique integrated metal roofing material with monocrystalline silicon elements. The innovative solar roof looks like a traditional steel roof and is as electrically powerful as conventional solar panels. The company implemented two parallel main call projects, followed by an additional activity with the development of software for planning electricity-generating roofs, fully automating the production line and the Roofit.App developments. New products allowed the company to offer both a modular steel roof that generates electricity, as well as click-fastened roof panels that would fit perfectly with the so-called Classic profiles. In addition to increased turnover and reduced C02 emissions, these projects contributed to the modern architecture in cities and villages with modern, but also sustainable roofing materials.

Eight out of 56 new products were developed in welfare technology projects. Good examples include the implementation of polygenic risk score guided breast cancer precision prevention developed by Antegenes 00 in consortium with Estonian and donor partners (EE- INNOVATION-0074). The company has launched the AnteBC test for assessing the genetic risk of breast cancer, which is based on polygenic risk score technology. AnteBC allows women to distinguish their genetic predisposition to breast cancer and, based on this, provide more precise recommendations for breast cancer prevention and early detection. The project comprised of various activities from analyzing the performance of the AnteBC test on genetic data in Norwegian population to a successfully completed clinical trial in Norwegian healthcare institutions and the preparation of scientific and regulatory documentation for the implementation of precision breast cancer prevention.

Among the product developments, the programme also enabled Estonian companies to undertake investments that facilitated the adoption of new sustainable technologies. Altogether, eleven new green technologies were applied in Estonian companies. For instance, the wood industry sector companies

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland L141' Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra ts grants

Thermory (EE- INNOVATION-0051) and Standwood (EE-INNOVATION-0083) applied thermo-treatment technologies to create solutions that allow the companies to offer their customers more durable products with a longer life cycle, such as finger-jointed sauna materials, thermally modified façade cladding and terrace flooring made of coniferous wood. These technologies allow the production of thermo-treated wood, which is processed durable and weatherproof with a special technology using only heat and water. In terms of properties, thermo-wood is sustainable and chemical-free and therefore a good alternative to, for example, tropical wood, the use of which creates a significant negative footprint on rainforests, as well as to cheap wood material impregnated with chemicals or composite materials made of plastic and wood fibers.

New green technologies were also applied to fully automate production processes, for example by Chemi-Pharm AS (EE-INNOVATION-0063), Estover Dairy Products 00 (EE-INNOVATION-0052), Exmet Services 00 (EE-INNOVATION-0079), and Estiko Packaging Solutions (EE- INNOVATION- 0077). The latter project had an important environmental impact. It modernized the company's production process so that it could offer sustainable vacuum bag products. The investments ensured a lower ecological footprint and higher resource savings across the entire production activities and automated several manual activities in the production planning software, thereby ensuring both better digitalization of the company. Also, Project Promoter Estiko was awarded the Sustainability Promoter of the Year award in the national entrepreneurship competition in 2024 for its outstanding sustainability efforts.

All these examples present excellent migration of business and innovation that laid the foundations for more sustainable business operations and solutions, and also long-term partnerships.

The Green ICT programme also proved significant social and environmental impact. During the implementation of the funded projects 470 new jobs were created, exceeding the set target (100). On the environmental scale, the aim was to reduce C02 emissions by 25,000 tons. As a result, C02 emissions were reduced by an estimated 140,981 tons (564% of the target). The reduction was achieved using a variety of methods and accounting approaches, including reducing energy consumption in production processes, implementing innovative solutions in the transport and logistics sector, and using renewable energy. Although several projects are still in the development stage and some objectives have not been fully achieved, the results achieved in reducing the climate impact can be considered significant. However, energy consumption reductions varied across projects, but an overall reduction of 8% was achieved, exceeding the set target (5%).

Challenges and Lessons Learned

Although most of the projects were implemented as planned, there were still difficulties arising from external factors. The disruption of supply chains due to COVID-19 and the war in Ukraine, as well as the sharp increase in raw material prices, caused problems and created the need for bigger flexibility during project implementation. The situation was worsened by the gradual economic recession, which can be considered one of the biggest factors inhibiting business activity and scaling project results. The combined effect of these factors resulted in lower use of funds with allocations to other programmes in Estonia. Aiming for lower risks generated financial barriers in some projects, because companies were more focused on survival rather than investing in high-risk innovation or did it in a smaller scale than initially planned. Therefore, in conjunction with the above, not all projects were successful although the overall target was achieved across the programme.

Also, despite the positive impact of the grants on employment, it did not yet reflect a direct impact on companies' productivity. Since too little time has passed since the completion of projects, it can be stated that higher productivity is likely to reveal over a longer period in upcoming years.

In some projects, irregularities emerged as the Audit Authority identified inconsistencies in procurement practices of the Project Promoters necessitating better oversight when purchasing goods and services. The Audit Authority identified problems, where Project Promoters failed to specify evaluation criteria or

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra ts grants

deadlines for submission of tenders, and different deadlines were applied to tenderers, which resulted in ineligible costs. This led to non-compliance with the requirements of the "Regulation on the implementation of the Norway Grants 2014-2021", as the rules set out in the regulation were not fully applied to ensure the full and fair competition and price comparison in non-public procurement. In addition, there were no clear and unambiguous grounds for making financial corrections as the control practices became stricter during the implementation of the programme. For example, while at the beginning of the project implementation, the procurement procedure rules for non-procurement parties were based on more lenient rules, the practice had become stricter by the time of the audit.

As a lesson, it is important to improve existing guidelines and measures to improve the prevention of procurement problems and ensure smoother project implementation. The task includes training, but also communication to help project parties better understand the requirements of procurement procedures and avoid common errors. In addition to the above, equally important is that control mechanisms remain clear and stable during the implementation.

Timing of calls for proposals was of crucial importance in terms of successful implementation and achieving results. An independent evaluator has suggested in the evaluation report that rolling calls for proposals without certain application deadline might be more convenient for the applicants.

Calls for proposals to initiate additional activities worked well and was highlighted by applicants as a good practice to be used also in the future.

Bilateral Outcome: Enhanced collaboration between beneficiary and donor state entities involved in the programme

Results

Bilateral partnerships were a cornerstone of the Green lCT programme, yielding with joint innovations, knowledge transfer that improved Estonian enterprises' competitiveness and strengthened networks fostering long-term cooperation and market integration.

Altogether, 19 projects involved a Norwegian partner, which constituted 42% of the program's goal (target level 45). Although the number of partnership projects was lower than initially expected, the overall result can be considered good as the established partnerships represent the best practices in this period. This is reflected in the overall satisfaction with partnerships in Estonia, that was rated for 5.22 on a seven-point scale, which exceeded the target value of 4.5 set by the program by 0.72 points.

All partners in the Green lCT program contributed with not only to the implementation of specific activities, but also by sharing costs, having their own budget and clear areas of responsibility. Thus, all parties played an important role and responsibility in achieving and sharing the project results.

It is noteworthy that some partnerships date back to the previous programming period and were continued in Green ICT program. For instance, in project EE-INNOVATION-0049 Estonian company Skeleton AS cooperated with Norwegian company NXTech AS. The companies started their cooperation with the development of ultracapacitors during the Norway Grants period 2009-2014 and formed into further developments of marine-certified ultracapacitor modules in the current period. Such long-term partnerships were highly encouraged in the program, as it opens new business opportunities for both companies in the field of onboard energy storage systems for ship builders and integrators to achieve significant emission reductions.

Donor partnership projects also included high-level scientific capacity, for example, the Estonian company Antegenes OU (EE- lNNOVATlON-0074) collaborated with Oslo Cancer Cluster SA, Oslo University Hospital, Cancer Registry of Norway, University of Oslo and Vestre Viken HF. Such a high- level research consortium ensured the inclusion of the best scientific expertise in Norway to assess the

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland L?IP1 Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra ts grants

performance and utility of Antegenes tests. This means that one of the largest hospitals applied tests in a clinical practice and a well-connected cancer knowledge cluster communicated the project outputs to drive further engagement in the local stakeholder community. Abovementioned collaboration has a transnational impact in fostering innovation, enhancing various market access, and establishing a robust network for ongoing cooperation. Several partnership-based cooperations are planned to be continued in future projects, including the abovementioned examples.

Partners search and bilateral activities were actively fostered by the donor programme partner, who organized various umbrella events for all beneficiary countries. These activities included B2B Match and networking, that proved to be a success in introducing both business opportunities as well as promoting international partnerships. During the implementation period, more than ten events aimed at developing bilateral relations were organized, which were attended by about a hundred representatives from the Estonian companies and public institutions. This indicates to the continuous interest towards such initiatives, but also the future potential for cooperation, which will lead to new projects and long-term collaborations.

Challenges and Lessons Learned

The number of donor partnerships in the Green ICT programme remained somewhat modest than initially expected and therefore the bilateral effect did not reach fully desired potential. Project Promoters have cited difficulties in engaging partners, including lack of partner interest in some fields, but also simultaneous start of programmes in several beneficiary countries and therefore increased competition for attracting Norwegian partners. The collaboration was undoubtedly affected by the COVlD-19 pandemic, which inevitably resulted in limited communication and travel. This in turn led to a smaller number of bilateral partnerships without reaching its full potential and is therefore considered as the main challenge in the programme.

A prerequisite for successful cooperation is also a common understanding of both the Estonian and Norwegian business environment, regulations, local opportunities and challenges. The lack of knowledge of such background sometimes caused misunderstandings or delays in project implementation, as partners often needed time and resources to adapt to the specific conditions in some areas. In some cases, the interest of Norwegian partners remained low or even disappeared during the implementation of the project, which in some projects led to determination of projects in early stage.

However, one of the major concerns for Norwegian partners appeared to be a low grant rate and regulatory requirements in the reporting and cost verification process. Although a simplified procedure allowed submission of reports by an independent auditor or an internal public officer for public organisations, the requirements were unclear and complicated. Also, involving an external auditor required financial resources from the partners, as well as time and commitment, which might be one of the reasons of the collaborations may not always go as smoothly as planned. The lesson for the new programming period is that reporting requirements must be clear and understandable to all counterparts. They should also be simple and flexible for instance, regarding state aid rules.

As also pointed out by the independent programme evaluator, for the successful implementation of such complex and intricate projects, it is important to ensure a flexible framework in the rules and conditions, which allows grant recipients to adjust project objectives and budgets according to the needs of partners and changing conditions, while complying with the programme's funding conditions and other related EU and national regulations. Reducing administrative burdens for partners by establishing clearer frameworks for bilateral collaboration could enhance efficiency and outcomes, but also encourage more Norwegian partners to be involved in the programme. One possibility to mitigate this risk occurring in the upcoming period is strengthening collaboration between implementing agency and donor programme partner by providing even more practical tools and platforms to facilitate partnerships and better understanding the regulatory framework. Also, more attention should be paid to promoting strategic and long-term cooperation with Norwegian companies and focus on areas where cooperation allows for the highest innovation and market potential.

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

III. U,, Iceland . " I Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra s grants

IRREGULARITIES

Case Id Reporting

Nature of irregularity Case

Status Estimated final input to the

Decision Amount of financial level opened FMO for cases not closed

____________ ______________ ____________________________ __________ ________ _____________________________ correction

IR54 EE-

Error in financial report 26/04/202

Closed -

Amount linked to irregularity paid ¬ 144.30

___________ INNOVATION __________________________ 1 ________ back/deducted from payment.

IR70 EE-

Error in financial report 17/08/202 Closed

___________________________

-

Amount linked to irregularity paid ________________

¬ 3,186.00 ___________ INNOVATION 1 ________ ___________________________ back/deducted from payment.

EE- 30/05/202

________________

jftj INNOVATION- Deviation from project contract 2 Closed 02.2025 Project grant amount reduced. ¬ 22,403.12

____________ 0050 EE-

31/05/202 IR136 INNOVATION- Conflict of interest 2 Closed 02.2024 No action needed. -

____________

0067 ____________________________

EE- Deviation from programme

__________

01/07/202

________ _____________________________

Project grant amount reduced. 1111.41 INNOVATION-

agreement 2 Closed - Amount linked to irregularity paid ¬ 802.80 0085 ____________________________ back/deducted from payment. EE-

30/08/202

________________

iEi INNOVATION- Deviation from project contract Closed - Wrongly reported. -

____________ 0081 ____________________________

2

EE- Deviation from public 21/10/202 Project grant amount reduced.

R162 INNOVATION- procurement rules/principles 2 Closed - Amount linked to irregularity paid ¬52,180.00

0073 back/deducted from payment. EE-

Deviation from public 27/10/202 Project grant amount reduced. ________________

iBJ INNOVATION- procurement rules/principles 2 Closed - Amount linked to irregularity paid ¬36,621.60

0001 back/deducted from payment. EE-

09/01/202 Ongoin

_________________

IR208 INNOVATION- Deviation from project contract 3

02.2025 - ¬214,013.85

____________ 0060 ____________________________ __________

g ________

EE- Deviation from public 22/02/202

_____________________________ __________________________________ Project grant amount reduced.

210 INNOVATION- procurement rules/principles 3

Closed - Amount linked to irregularity paid ¬8,514.80 0048 back/deducted from payment. EE-

Deviation from public 27/02/202 Project grant amount reduced. _________________

IR211 INNOVATION- procurement rules/principles 3 Closed - Amount linked to irregularity paid ¬31,100.00

0051 ____________________________ __________ ________ _____________________________ back/deducted from payment. EE-

Deviation from public 26/05/202

_________________

IR240 INNOVATION- procurement rules/principles 3 Closed - Wrongly reported. -

0001

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

liii. Iceland Liechtenstein Norway Norway grants grants

EE- 15/06/202 Ongoin

ii4i INNOVATION- Deviation from project contract 3

02.2025 - ¬45,025.78 0067 __________

g ________ _____________________________

____________

EE- ____________________________

16/06/202

__________________________________ Project grant amount reduced.

_________________

1R269 INNOVATION- Deviation from project contract 3 Closed - Amount linked to irregularity paid ¬ 29,072.98

0091 __________ ________ _____________________________ back/deducted from payment. EE- INNOVATION-

____________________________

Deviation from public 13/07/202 Ongoin 05.2024 -

_________________

¬21,707.91 0082

procurement rules/principles 3 __________

g ________ _____________________________ ____________

EE- ____________________________

26/03/202

__________________________________ Project grant amount reduced.

_________________

IR328 INNOVATION- Error in financial report Closed - Amount linked to irregularity paid ¬8,417.80 0089

4 back/deducted from payment.

U361 EE- INNOVATION-

____________________________

Deviation from programme

__________

23/04/202

________

Ongoin

_____________________________

08.2024 -

_________________

¬ 8,446.26 0095

agreement 4 __________

g ________ ______________________________ ____________________________________ __________________ _____________

EE- INNOVATION-

_____________________________

Deviation from public 10/02/202 Ongoin 10.2026 - ¬1,657.40

procurement rules/principles 5 g 0090 ____________

EE- ____________________________ __________

02/06/202

________

Ongoin

_____________________________ __________________________________ _________________

INNOVATION- Error in financial report 5

10.2026 - ¬6,902.42 0087 __________

g ________ ______________________________ ____________________________________ __________________

EE- INNOVATION-

_____________________________

Deviation from public 03/07/202 Ongoin 10.2026 - ¬ 18,748.80 procurement rules/principles 5 g

0001 ________ ___________________________ ________________________________ ________________

U533 EE- INNOVATION-

__________________________

Deviation from public

_________

03/07/202 Ongoin 10.2026 - ¬ 50,664.00

0001 procurement rules/principles 5 g

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

.1. Iceland . Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra s grants

SUMMARY OF PROJECTS Number of

Number of Project grant Project grant Project Eligible Project Eligible

projects projects contracted incurred Expenditure contracted

Expenditure incurred

contracte complete (Norway Grant +

national co-financing) (Norway Grant +

national co-financing) (Includes project co- (Includes project co- d d financing) financing)

Pre- defined

2 2 ¬5,295,143.40 ¬4,143,562.26 ¬4,212,975.06 ¬4,143,562.26

Contracte dthrough 38 31 ¬18,113,110.17 ¬13,106,377.80 ¬30,665,175.53 ¬32,333,708.64 open calls

Outcome 1: Increased competitiveness of Contracte Estonian companies within focus areas Green d through Industry Innovation, ICT and Welfare Technology small 64 61 ¬3,585,550.29 ¬3,011,526.08 ¬6,398,983.71 ¬6,388,185.75

grants scheme

Total Outcome 104 94 ¬26,993,803.86 ¬20,261,466.14 ¬41,277,134.30 ¬42,865,456.65 I

Total programme costs 104 94 ¬26,993,803.86 ¬20,261,466.14 ¬41,277,134.30 ¬42,865,456.65 (Excluding_programme_management_costs) _____________ _____________

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland " ii Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra s grants

FINAL BALANCE

Overview of programme expenditure

Programme Norway Total grant Programm Total

Programm Budget Heading Norway Total grant eligible Grants

contribution e co- eligible e area (PA) Grants

expenditure contribution incurred financing expenditure

incurred incurred incurred

PA01 Programme management ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬

1,229634.00 1,229,634.00 1,446,628.24 1 134,354.47 1,134,354.47 200,180.20 1,334,534.67 Outcome 1: Increased competitiveness of Estonian companies ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬

PAO1 within focus areas Green Industry Innovation, ICT and Welfare 18,131,026.0 18,131,026.0 21,330,618.8 17,222,246.2 17,222,246.2 3,039,219.9 20,261,466.1 Technology (Norway Grants) 0 0 2 2 2 2 4 ___________

¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ Total 19,360,660.0 19,360,660.0 22,777,247.0 18,356,600.6 18,356,600.6 3,239,400.1 21,596,000.8

0 0 6 9 9 2 1

Description of budget spending

Programme management

There was an underspending of programme management cost due to covid crises, which limited the possibilities to travel. Initially planned IT development works of project management environment of the Implementing Agency was cancelled as it started using the central project management system administered by the National Focal Point. It resulted with remarkable savings in the programme management budget.

Outcome 1: Increased competitiveness of Estonian companies within focus areas Green Industry Innovation, ICT and Welfare Technology (Norway Grants)

Budget was spent on payments to project promoters. Some amounts were not reimbursed to project promoters due to errors in calculations or due to minor irregularities. Some project promoters used their financial resources more effectively than initially planned. Most of the project promoters achieved the project results in full scale and all the project related costs were reimbursed accordingly. Some project promoters decided to terminate the project even before the start of the project activities and therefore, they did not make any project related expenses. Some project promoters decided to implement a project in a smaller scale, mainly due to uncertainty caused by the globally worsened security and economic situation. One project achieved the project results only partly, because the initially planned business model turned out to be less competitive due to increased prices of components of the designed product. Project promoter realised the changed circumstances and responsibly decided not to implement the project in full scale.

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

.1 Iceland . Liechtenstein Norway grants

Calculation of the final balance

I. Norway grants

I Norway Grants Total_reported_eligible_expenditure_of the_programme Total eligible expenditure incurred

________________________

¬ 21,596,000.81 (-) Total (national) programme co-financing incurred (15.00 % rate) ¬3,239,400.12

(=) Total grant contribution incurred (85.00 % grant rate) ¬ 18,356,600.69 Amounts to be deducted from the total grant contribution1

(-) Total advance and interim payments to the programme from the Donors ¬ 21,289,202.03 (-) Any co-financing from sources other than the Donors/national2 ¬ 0.00 (-) Total interest earned reported ¬ 250,814.19 Final balance

(=) Final balance payable to the Programme Operator ¬ 0.00

(=) Final balance payable to the Donors ¬3,183,415.53

1 Any funds reimbursed from Project Promoters to the Programme Operator, not paid to other projects or reimbursed to the FMO (ref. Article 9.4.1(b)(iv) of the Regulation should be reported as negative adjustments in the Financial report for the last reporting period (Annex 1). In this case, such funds will be subtracted from the "Total eligible expenditure incurred" of the programme. 2 For example, financing from EU structural funds or other EU sources, from the Swiss contribution, etc. This row includes only the financing incurred during the programme eligibility period.

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland Liechtenstein Norway grants

The Annexes are intended for internal use only and will not be published.

Norway grants

13 Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland 4h

Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra ts grants

Annex 1: Financial report for the last reporting period Part A - Statement of actual expenditure incurred and interest earned

Incurred expenditure - summary

Start date of incurred expenditure period 01/07/2024 End date of incurred expenditure period 30/04/2025

Previously Incurred this Available incurred

period Total to date Total Budget balance

_____________ expenditure _____________

Eligible ¬ ¬ ______________

¬ ______________

¬ _____________

¬ expenditure 19,258,535.37 2,337,465.44 21,596,000.81 22,777,247.06 1,181,246.25 Norway ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ Grants 16,369,755.06 1,986,845.63 18,356,600.69 19,360,660.00 1,004,059.31 Co-financing ¬2,888,780.31 ¬350,619.81 ¬3,239,400.12 ¬3,416,587.06 ¬ 177,186.94

Incurred expenditure - details

Title: Programme management Previously I

Incurred this I I Available incurred

i period Total to date Budget I balance

____________

expenditure I Eligible expenditure

¬1,170,189.27 ________________________________

¬164,345.40

______________

¬1,334,534.67 ________________

____________________________

¬ 1,446,628.24 ________________________________ ¬112,093.57

Brief description of actual expenditure incurred

Main cost categories: - Salaries for a staff in the Implementing Agency. - Cost of expertise for evaluation of environmental impact achieved by projects. - Cost of participation in Oslo Innovation Week and Norway Grants' bilateral events. - Cost of promotional video clips. - Cost of the programme's impact evaluation. - Cost of the cooperation committee meeting.

Eligible expenditures Eligible expenditure - EUR

¬ 145,226.19

Adjustments

MMIYYYY I Eligible I I

adjusted expenditure - I Adjustment Type I Description I EUR I I

06.2024 ¬19,119.21 I Previously non-reported I Amount was not fully paid by the eligible expenditure reporting deadline of previous IFR.

Total ¬ 164,345.40

Title: Outcome 1: Increased competitiveness of Estonian companies within focus areas Green Industry Innovation, ICT and Welfare Technology (Norway Grants)

I Previously I I Incurred this I I I I Available I incurred I

I period I Total to date I I

Budget I balance I expenditure I I I Eligible I ¬ I ¬ I ¬ I ¬ I ¬ expenditure 18,088,346.10 2,173,120.04 20,261,466.14 21,330,618.82 1,069,152.68

3rief description of actual expenditure incurred for the outcome

Final payments to project promoters supported from open calls and also to project promoters of predefined projects.

Eligible expenditures

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra ts grants

Project Eligible

expenditure -

EUR EE-INNOVATION-0104 ¬63,720.30

EE- INNOVATlON-0099 ¬ 92,384.25 EE- lNNOVATl0N-0077 ¬25,374.97 EE- INNOVATION-0095 ¬ 16,432.14 EE-INNOVATlON-0079 ¬462,500.00

EE-INNOVATlON-0102 ¬27,065.96 EE- INNOVATlON-0087 ¬ 109,008.46 EE- INNOVATlON-0097 ¬ 140,180.06 EE- INNOVATION-0001 ¬ 652,961.52 EE- INNOVATION-0103 ¬5,509.90 EE-INNOVATION-0074 ¬ 170,469.19 EE-INNOVATION-0085 ¬46,483.73 EE-INNOVATION-0089 ¬ 15,983.06 EE- INNOVATION-0092 ¬79,071.23 EE-INNOVATION-0002 ¬338,889.18

Adjustments

Project MM1m'\'

Eligible expenditure -

Adjustment Description

adjusted EUR

Type ____________

EE- INNOVATION-

_________

03.2025 ¬ -414.35 Irregularity not Recovery due to violation of public

0090 reported yet procurement rules.

Violations in salary payments, in the calculation of vacation pay and

EE- Recovery due ineligible voluntary pension fund

INNOVATION- 06.2025 ¬ -3,086.76 to irregularity contributions. Deficiencies in the

0087 IR 528 procurement procedures - mandatory principles were not followed, the general principles of equal treatment and transparency were violated. Audit Authority has come to

EE- Recovery due conclusion that project promoter has

INNOVATION- 10.2026 ¬ -18,748.80 to irregularity violated the public procurement rules

0001 IR 532 and suggested Programme Operator to apply a 10% financial correction rate to the procurement contract. Audit Authority has come to

EE- Recovery due conclusion that project promoter has

INNOVATION- 10.2026 ¬ -50,664.00 to irregularity violated the public procurement rules

0001 IR 533 and suggested Programme Operator to apply a 100% financial correction rate to the procurement contract.

Total ¬2,173,120.04

Interest Earned Interest generated on accounts established by the Programme Operator for funds intended for regranting for 2024

Norway Grants Total ¬ 157,341.45 ¬157,341.45

Interest generated on accounts established by the Programme Operator for funds intended for regranting for 2025 (from 1 January until the submission of the Final Programme Report or until

15 Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra ts grants

an earlier date if reporting until the Final Programme Report date is not possible)3

The date until which the interest is reported for 2025: 30/04/2025 Norway Grants Total

¬26,470.14 ¬26,470.14

Cumulative Interest generated on accounts established by the Programme Operator for funds intended for regranting

Norway Grants Total ¬250,814.19 ¬250,814.19

Comments Interests earned is filled by CA

In line with Article 9.4.5 of the Regulations, any interest earned on the bank account of the Programme Operator between the date of the Final Programme Report and the reimbursement date (i.e. final balance payment either to the Donors or to the Beneficiary State) will also be included in the reimbursement. The FMO will contact the Certifying Authority before making the payment or issuing a debit note to request information on the remaining amount of the accumulated interest.

16 Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra ts grants

Programme Operator

Full legal name: Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (EE)

Programme Operator signature

I certify that I am duly authorised to sign this financial report for the last reporting period and the final balance of the programme. I have thoroughly reviewed the actual expenditure incurred declared in Part A and the calculation of the final balance of the programme, and confirm that the information provided is accurate. I confirm that this programme is carried out as described in the Programme Agreement and that the incurred expenditure is correctly represented.

Overall implementation status (including milestones):

All the financed projects have finalised their activities and most of them achieved their goals. All the project promoters have submitted a final report and requested a final payment, which have been reimbursed.

Question Answer Comment

Management and control systems of the Management and control systems of the Programme Operator set up fulfilling the Programme Operator set up fulfilling the general principles set out in the Regulation Yes general principles set out in the Regulation and approved by the National Focal Point have been approved by the National Focal (Art 5.7) Point.

Separate interest-bearing bank accounts Interest-bearing bank account for the dedicated to the funds intended for Yes programme has been established by regranting established and maintained (Art Certifying Authority. 5.6.1 (m)) _________________________

Information and publicity obligations fulfilled

_____

We follow all the relevant rules established

(Art 3.3) Yes in article 3.3 during the implementation of

the programme.

Monitoring and verifications conducted to Monitoring and verification activities are ensure quality and/or regularity of Yes

essential part of everyday operations. implementation (Art 5.6.1 (g) and Art 5.6.2)

Annual monitoring of a sample of projects Yes

Monitoring and evaluation is based on a conducted (Art 5.6.1 (i)) risk assessment of projects.

Project-specific statistical data is entered and up to date in the reporting database Yes PLl is updated regularly. (Art 5.6.1 (s))

Special conditions and Programme-specific Special conditions and Programme-specific rules set out in the programme agreement Yes rules set out in the programme agreement fulfilled (Art 5.6.1 (x)) are fulfilled.

All irregularities, their investigation and any Yes

All irregularities, their investigation and any remedies taken reported (Art 5.6.1 (v)) remedies taken are reported.

For the Programme Operator

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland LP4 Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra ts grants

Signed in 171LL Von .9 Oc&

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland LF4 Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra ts grants

Certification of actual expenditure incurred and co-financing

Start date of incurred expenditure period 01/07/2024 End date of incurred expenditure period 30/04/2025 Actual expenditure incurred this period ¬ 2,337,465.44 Co-financing committed to date ¬ 3,239,400.12 Co-financing for incurred expenditure paid ¬ 3,239,400.12 Interest earned 2024 ¬ 157,341.45 Interest earned 2025 ¬26,470.14

In relation to the Financial report for the last reporting period and the calculation of the final balance of the programme, the Certifying Authority hereby certifies that:

(i) the summary of eligible expenditure submitted by the Programme Operator is in full conformity with the supporting documents; (ii) the supporting documents have been examined and found to be authentic, correct and accurate; (iii) the summary of eligible expenditure is based on verifiable accounting which complies with generally accepted accounting principles and methods; (iv) the summary of eligible expenditure falls within eligible expenditure under the Regulation for the implementation of the EEA/Norwegian Financial Mechanisms 2014-2021; (v) the summary of expenditure is incurred as part of the implementation of the Programme in accordance with the Programme Agreement; (vi) sufficient audit trail exists; (vii) co-financing committed to date has been made available; (viii) co-financing in relation to incurred expenditure has been paid; (ix) when relevant, that the interest earned at Programme Operator account is correct.

For the Certifying Authority

Signed in .................................on ................

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland EI4 Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra ts grants

Annex 2 Communications

Best projects

Project title Project code Project promoter Confirm the PLI is updated in GrACE

Roofit.solar process innovation for developing INNOVATION- Roofit Solar Energy

Yes software and automated production line OU (EE) __________

0059 ___________

Development of autonomous power line inspection INNOVATION- Hepta Group

_____

Yes technology uBird ___________

Airborne OU (EE) __________

0068

Implementation of polygenic risk score guided breast INNOVATION- OU Antegenes

_____

Yes cancer precision prevention (EE)

CO2-negative concrete as a sustainable and scalable INNOVATION-

UP Catalyst OU Yes building material (EE)

Further development of CO2-negative concrete for INNOVATION- UP Catalyst 00 Yes market growth (EE)

Communication activities

To raise public awareness, several communication activities were carried out, including media articles, press-releases, content marketing, and social media announcements. Video footage of the best projects has also been produced and published in EEA media library, implementing agency and Project Promoters' media channels. Green lCT program's website ensured the accessibility of all necessary information about the program and supported projects.

The public opinion survey conducted annually showed that in 2023, 15% of residents had heard of the EEA and Norway Grants, but only 5% has had direct contact with the grants. In comparison, 96% of the population is aware of grants provided by European Union. However, 46% of residents would like to receive more information about the EEA and Norway Grants (48% in 2022; 40-57% in previous surveys). The most preferred information channels about these grants are equally social media (40%) and television (38%), followed by national newspapers (31%). An increase in the preference for social media has raised.

Those aware of EEA and Norway Grants mentioned education and research (22%) and social field/employment (17%) as the fields that receive funding from that source. The survey did not include a separate question on the visibility of the Green ICT program, but the low visibility partly indicates to the low impact of the implementing agency and Project Promoters' communication activities on public awareness. Thus, people cannot draw a direct connection with the new innovative solutions in the market that were made available by the financial support of the Norway Grants.

At the same time, it must be acknowledged that comparing the visibility of smaller programs with larger EU investments is difficult and even unrealistic. Smaller programs cannot be expected to achieve the same visibility as larger funded support programs, which have much more visibility and communication resources at their disposal. Nevertheless, the results of the public opinion survey indicate to the need to further enhance communication activities and increase the visibility of EEA and Norway Grants funded projects in the future.

Project stories

Media coverage

20 Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland Liechtenstein Norway Norway gra ts grants

Marius Dirdal: Estonia-Norway cooperation contributing to European security httDs://news.err ee/1609545889/marius-dirdal-estonia-norway-cooperation-contributinq-to-european- securi

Eesti iduettevãte toob turule vôimsa kütuseelemendi ja Iiitiumioonakude hübriidlahenduse

ja-liitiumioonakude-hubriidlahenduse/

Eesti iduettevOte muudab ehitussektorit jätkusuutlikumaks https://www.ehitusuudised .ee/sisuturundus/2024/04/23/eesti-iduettevote-muudab-ehitussektorit- atkusuutlkumaks

Waybiller kohandus Norra turule toetuse abiga https//www.foundme.io/uudised/2024/02/O 1/waybiller- kohandus-norra-turule-toetuse-abipa

Website and social media

I Total number of page views in the reporting Link to programme website I year2024 htt1s:IIei? ee/en/qrants/norwaygrants/ 1

Platform Specific link or handle for the account I Number of posts published in the I

I Number of reporting year 2024 I followers _________

Facebook facebook.com/EnterpriseEstonia 1 I 7500 Linkedin iinkedin.com/company/enterprise-estonia/ I 5 I 17000 Other httrs www.facebook.com/EEANorwayGrantsEstonia 80 773

Visuals

Hepta Group Airborne OU: EE-INNOVATION-0068 httDs://www.eealibrarv.ora/a55e1153688/%22Green%201CT%22%2ODroiects%20%22Preliminarv%20S tudies%20for%2OHeDta%2OAirborne%2OAutonomous%2OPower%2OGrid%201nspecti0n%2OSystem %22%20and%20%22DeveloDment%200f%2OAutonomous%2OPower%2OLine%201ns0ecti0n%2OTec hnolo %2OuBird%22

Roofit Solar Energy OU: EE-INNOVATION-0096, EE- INNOVATION-0062, EE-INNOVATION-0059 httos://www.eealibrarv.ora/asset153537/%22Green%2OlCT%22%20or0iects%20%221nnovat1ve%2OSu stainable%2OMetal%2OSolar%2ORoofs%22,%20%22Roofit.solar%2OProcess%201nnovation%20for% 2ODeveloping%2OSoftware%20and%2OAutomated%2OProduction%2OLine%22,%20%22Roofit.solar %2OProduct%2ODevelopment%22,%2O%22Further%2ODeveloments%2Oof%2ORoofit.ap%22

lPDx Diagnostics httDs://www.eealibrary.orcj/assetI53536/%22Green%2OlCT%22%2Oproiects%2O%22Preliminarv%2OS tudies%20f0r%2OImmunoHealth%2ODiaqnostics°/ 2OService%2OPlatform%22, %20%22AutoMVA%22

UP Catalyst OU: EE-INNOVATION-0086, EE-INNOVATION-0092 https:IIwww.eealibrary.orcilasset/535351%22Green%201C1%22%20pro1ects%20%22C02- negative%2OConcrete%20as%20a%2OSustainable%20and%2OScalable%2OBuildinq%2OMaterial%22 %20and%20%22Further%2ODeveloDment%200f%20C02- nepative%2OConcrete%20for%2OMarket%2OGrowth%22

Antegenes OU: EE-INNOVATION-0074 https://www.eealibrary.orq/asset153 141/%22Green%201CT%22%2ODroject%20%22AnteNOR%22

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland LI:1- Liechtenstein Norway grants

Annex 3: Evaluation report

Norway grants

Title Date of report

Webs ite link to the evaluation Upload a copy of the report ____________________

Norway Grants 2014- __________________________________ _____________________________

2021 Innovation programme impact

17/12/2024 https://pilv.rtk.ee/s/CBNg98GQm2dXRtQ... Green ICT oneDager-EN.pdf, M6iuhindamise I6paruanne fin.odf

assessment

22 Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

III " Iceland Liechtenstein Norwaygrants

Annex 4: Final results

l I Norway grants

Objective: Increased value creation and sustainable growth ¬ 22,777,247.06 ¬ 21,596,000.81

Outcome 1: Increased competitiveness of Estonian companies within focus areas GreenIndustry Innovation, ICT and Welfare Technology

Unit of Previous Achievements until end of the

____________________________

Briefly comment on

Indicator measureme Baseline

achievement programme Target significant differences

Numerato Denominato ___________

Achieveme nt value

value value between achievement values r r nt value and target values

Estimated annual C02 emissions reductions Annual 0 00

12,023.52 -

156,711 25,000.00 Initially Set target value was under- (tons of CO2 equivalent per year) number _________ (APR 2023) estimated.

Estimated annual growth in turnover of Percentage N/A

25.00 % (APR 37 51 72.55 % 5.00 %

Initially set target value was under- supported enterprises ____________ _________ 2023) __________ ____________ -

estimated.

Estimated annual growth in net operational Percentage N/A 9.62 % (APR

17 51 33.33 % 5.00 % Initially set target value was under-

profit of supported enterprises ____________ __________ 2023) estimated.

Estimated annual decrease of energy 11.54 % (APR Effect of taken measures was consumption of supported enterprises (in Percentage

- 2023) 18 42 42.86 % 5.00 %

immediate. MWh) _________ _______ __________ _______ _________ ________

Number of products/serviceslprocesses Cumulative

_______ ____________________

Project promoter was very active to tested in the Open Cyber Range security number

0 8 (APR 2023) - - 20 10 attract more users.

platform _________ ______________ __________ ____________ ___________

Number of new

____________

Cumulative

_________ ___________________________

Estonian entrepreneurs are more products/services/processes applied (new- number

0 3 (APR 2023) - - 11 20 eager to invent instead applying the to-the-enterprise) (disaggregated by sector) already existing solutions.

Number of registered applications for Cumulative Project promoters have not applied

Intellectual Property Protection number 0 0 (APR 2023) - - 0 5 for Intellectual Property Protection so

far.

Number of jobs created Cumulative

0 280 (IFR 2024) - - 470 100 Happy to have a lot more work

number places created than expected.

Gender Female - - 48 - - 113 - I -

Male - - 95 - - 291 - -

Not specified - - 137 - - 66 - -

Age ____________ _________ __________ __________ ________ ________________________

Children and youth (0-17) __________

-

________

- 0 - - 0 - -

Young adults (18-29) - - 63 - - 145 - -

Adults (30-64) - - 80 - - 259 - -

Elderly (65+) - - 0 - - 0 - -

Not specified - - 137 - - 66 - -

23 Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

.11. Iceland . '

Liechtenstein Norway Norway grants grants

Number of new Cumulative Vast of project promoters preferred

products/services/processes developed number

0 16 (APR 2023) - - 56 25 development something new instead

J (disaggregated by sector) using the already existing solutions.

Output 1.1: Enterprises supported to develop or apply innovative green products, services and processes

Unit of Previous Achievements until end of the

_________ ___________________________

Briefly comment on

Indicator measureme Baseline

achievement programme Target significant differences __________

Numerato Denominato ____________

Achieveme nt value

value value between achievement values r r nt value and target values

Number of large enterprises supported in Cumulative 0 0(1FR2024) - - 0 15

Over estimated the interest of large SGS to prepare projects for main call number enterprises.

Number of large enterprises supported to Cumulative Over estimated the interest of large apply new green number

0 2 (IFR 2024) - - 3 5 enterprises. products/services/processes ____________ __________ _______________ __________ ____________ ____________

Number of SMEs supported in SGS to Cumulative 0 13(lFR2024) - - 13 30 Many entrepreneurs decided not to

prepare projects for main call number use the preparatory fund.

Number of SMEs supported to apply new Cumulative SMEs were not that interested in green products/services/processes (new-to- number

0 4 (lFR 2024) - - 8 15 applying trhe existing solutions. the-enterprise) ____________ __________ _______________ __________ ____________

Number of SMEs supported to develop new Cumulative 0 32 (IFR 2024) - -

____________

53

_________

5

____________________________

Vast of project promoters preferred green products/services/processes number development.

Number of large enterprises supported to Cumulative SMEs were more eager to apply for develop new green number

0 0 (IFR 2024) - - 3 2 a grant. products/services/processes ____________ __________ _______________ __________ ____________ ____________ _________

Output 1.2: Enterprises supported to develop nnovative ICTproducts, services and_processes

Unit of Previous

__________

Achievements until end of the ________ _________________________

Briefly comment on

Indicator measureme Baseline

achievement programme Target significant differences __________

Numerato Denominato ____________

Achieveme nt value value value between achievement values r r nt value and target values

Number of SMEs supported in SGS to Cumulative 0 20(lFR2024) - - 20 25 Not all the entrepreneurs decided to

prepare projects for main call number use the preparatory fund.

Number of SMEs supported to develop ICT Cumulative 0 4 (IFR 2024) - - 4 Quality of some project applications

products, services and processes number was not sufficient to be financed.

Number of large enterprises supported in Cumulative 0 0(1FR2024) - - 0 6 ICT call did not attract large ICT

SGS to prepare projects for main call number companies.

Number of large enterprises supported to Cumulative ICT call did not attract large ICT

develop ICT products, services and 0 0 (IFR 2024) - - 0 5 number companies. processes _____________ __________ _______________ ___________ _____________ ____________ __________ ______________________________

Output 1.3: Enterprises supported to develop innovative welfare products, services and processes

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

.I . Iceland . Liechtenstein Norway Norway grants grants

Achievements until end of the Briefly comment on Unit of

Baseline Previous programme Target significant differences

Indicator measureme value

achievement value between achievement values

__________

Numerato Denominato

____________

Achieveme nt value

r r nt value and target values

Number of large enterprises supported in Cumulative o o (IFR 2024) - - 0 2 Large entreprises were not

SGS to prepare projects for main call number interested.

Number of enterprises supported in SGS to Cumulative Smaller project budgets allowed us

prepare projects for main call number 0 11 (IFR 2024) - - 11 8 to support more projects than initially

planned.

Number of SMEs supported to develop new Cumulative

Smaller project budgets allowed us welfare technology

number 0 7 (IFR 2024) - - 8 5 to support more projects than initially

products/services/processes planned.

Output 1.4: Open Cyber Range (OCR) is operational ________ _____________ __________________________________ _________ _________________________

Achievements until end of the Briefly comment on Unit of

Baseline Previous

programme Target significant differences Indicator measureme

value achievement

value between achievement values __________

Numerato Denominato

____________

Achieveme nt value

r r nt value and target values

Number of SMEs supported to test new Cumulative Number of interested testers was

products/services/processes in the Open number

0 20 (IFR 2024) - - 20 15 larger than expected. Cyber Range __________ ____________ ____________ _________ ___________________________ ____________

Cumulative

_________ _____________

Regardless the different obstacles Number of professional staff trained 0 162 (IFR 2024) - - 162 100 occurred the number of trained staff

number was higher than initially planned.

Gender Female - - 28 -

- 1 28 - 1 -

Male - - 134 - - 1 134 - I -

Not specified - - 0 -

- ] 0 - -

Roma ________________________________________ __________ ______________________________

Roma -

__________

-

_______________

0 _______ ____________________

Not specified - - 162

___________________________ [ 162

Output 1.5: Health Sense data management platform developed and_operating ____________________________________ _________ __________________________

Achievements until end of the Briefly comment on Unit of

Baseline Previous programme Target significant differences

Indicator measureme value

achievement value between achievement values Numerato I Denominato I Achieveme

nt value r

I I r nt value and target values

Data collection, and publishing environment I architecture and data analysis environment Binary No Yes (IFR 2024)

- I - I Yes Yes -

architecture developed and published ____________ _________ ______________ I _________ ___________________________

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland Liechtenstein Norway grants

Norway grants

Data collection and publishing Binary No Yes (IFR 2024) - Yes Yes - procedures/tools in place and documented

Data analysis procedures/tools in place and Binary No Yes (IFR 2024) - - Yes Yes - documented

Number of data mining/Artificial Intelligence Cumulative 0 2(1FR2024) - - 3 3 - pilot projects successfully finished number

Number of professional staff trained Cumulative number 0 26 (IFR 2024) - - 26 10 The set target was too modest.

Gender

Female - - 19 - 1 - 19 - -

Male - - 7 - I - 7 - -

Not specified - - 0 - J - 0 - -

Roma

Roma

-

- 0 - I - I 0 - Not specified J - - 26

- - 26 } ____________________________

Bilateral Outcome: Enhanced collaboration between beneficiary and donor state entities involved in the programme

Unit of Previous Achievements until end of the

__________ ____________________________

Briefly comment on

Indicator measureme Baseline

achievement programme Target significant differences __________

Numerato Denominato ____________

Achieveme nt value

value value between achievement values r r nt value and target values

6.51, 4.50, Based on Target is

the ý4.5, and

Level of satisfaction with the partnership Scale 1-7 survey 5.48 (APR

-

-

5.65 an . - carried 2023) increase

out on on the behalf of baseline the FMO value

6.57, 4.50, Based on Target is

the ý4.5, and Level of trust between cooperating entities

Scale 1-7 survey 5.57 (APR - - 5.54 an

- in Beneficiary States and Donor States carried 2023) .

increase out on on the

behalf of baseline the FMO value

Share of donor business partnerships which Percentage N/A

100.00 % (APR 11 22 50.00 %

50.00 %, - continue after project implementation period _________________________________________ ____________ ______ _________ __ 2023) ______________ _____ __________ ___ ____________ _____ ____________ ______ Target is _________ ___________________________

26 Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

N... Iceland ' " I,

Liechtenstein Norway Norway grants grants

minimum ____________________________________________ _____________ __________ _______________ 50% Number of jointly registered applications for Cumulative

0 0(APR2023)

___________

-

_____________

-

_____________

0 3 - Intellectual Property Protection number Donor State

Norway - - 0 - - 0 - -

Iceland - - 0 - - 0 - -

Liechtenstein - - 0 - - 0 - -

Not specified - - 0 - - 0 - -

Share of cooperating organisations that 100.00 % (APR

50, Target is

That is the Only way it should be, apply the knowledge acquired from bilateral Percentage N/A

2023) 38 38 100.00 % .

minimum once the project is successfully

partnership completed. 50 %

Bilateral Output 1: Bilateral partnerships supported _________ _____________ ____________________________________

Unit of Previous Achievements until end of the

_________ ___________________________

Briefly comment on

Indicator measureme Baseline

achievement programme Target significant differences __________

Numerato Denominato ____________

Achieveme nt value

value value between achievement values r r nt value and target values

Number of projects involving cooperation Cumulative N/A, 0 23 (IFR 2024) - - 22 45

It is a satisfactory result that almost half of the projects involved a donor

with a donor project partner number partner(s).

Number of staff from donor states in Cumulative 0 0(IFR 2024) - - 0 5 - exchanges number

Donor State Norway - - 0 - - 0 - -

Iceland - - 0 - - 0 -

Liechtenstein - - 0 - - 0 -

Not specified - - 0 - - 0 - -

Gender Female - - 0 - - 0 - -

Male - - 0 - - 0 - -

Not specified - - 0 - - 0 - -

Type_of exchange _________ _____________ __________ ____________

Online ____________

- - 0 - -

____________

0 _________

-

___________________________

-

Physical - - 0 - - 0 - -

Not specified - - 0 - - 0 - -

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

.1 Iceland Liechtenstein Norwaygrants

Annex 5: Contracted projects

, I Norway grants

Number Project grant Project grant Project Project code Project title Project Promoter

implementatio Outcom of donor contracted incurred contract n modality e project (Norway Grant + (Norway Grant + status ______________________ __________________ ___________ partners national co-financing) national co-financing)

_________________

INNOVATION

__________________________________________________

Open Cyber Range (OCR) Estonian Ministry of Defence (EE)

Pre-defined project

Outcome 1

1 ¬ 3,295,143.40 ¬ 2,460,950.27 Complete d

EE- Ministry of Social Pre-defined Outcome Complete

INNOVATION Health Sense Affairs - Estonia project I

2 ¬ 2,000,000.00 ¬ 1,682611.99 d

-0002 (EE) ____________ ________ _________ ______________

INNOVATION

___________________________________

Implementation of polygenic risk score guided breast cancer precision prevention

OU Antegenes (EE) Call / Small Grants Scheme

Outcome 1

4 ¬ 761,360.20

______________

¬ 634,853.72

________

Complete d

2Q14 ________________

INNOVATION ___________

________

Development of autonomous power line inspection technology uBird

Hepta Group Airborne OU (EE)

Call / Small Grants Scheme

Outcome 1 _____________

1 ¬699,999.70 ¬617,824.64 Complete d

QQ

INNOVATION

____________

Developing UpSteam P2P business model for car washing

UpSteam Eesti OU (EE)

Call I Small Grants Scheme

Outcome I

1 ¬699,998.00 ¬693,107.72 Complete d

EE- Modernization of Estiko Plastar's production AS Estiko-Plastar Call / Small Outcome Complete

INNOVATION and development of a resource-efficient (EE) Grants Scheme 1

0 ¬ 699,977.00 ¬ 699,977.00 d

QQZZ vacuum bag __________________ _______________ _________ __________ _________________ ________________

INNOVATION Roofit.solar process innovation for developing Roofit Solar Energy Call / Small Outcome

1 ¬699,913.49 ¬641,893.47

__________

Complete software and automated production line OU (EE) Grants Scheme 1 d

2Q ________________

EE- ________

Development of Eziil production software for Eziil Production

Call / Small Outcome Complete INNOVATION

product-based production companies Intelligence OU

Grants Scheme 1 1 ¬699,901.15 ¬698,820.51

d 0053 (EE) _______________ _________ __________ _________________ ________________

INNOVATION Development of resource-efficient painted

Thermory AS (EE) Call / Small Outcome

0 ¬ 694,020.88 ¬ 694,020.88

__________

Complete heat-treated wood Grants Scheme 1 d

Olsson Green 00 Call / Small Outcome Partially INNOVATION Development of inverter battery banks

(EE) Grants Scheme I 0 ¬ 691,502.58 ¬ 241,031.01

completed

INNOVATION Developing Advanced Intelligent Building Control System for Office Buildings

Bisly 00 (EE) Call / Small Grants Scheme

Outcome I

0 ¬687,960.00 ¬678,910.50 Complete d

28 Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

I. Iceland I Liechtenstein Norwaygrants

INNOVATION Demand response combination with energy

FuseBox OU (EE) Call I Small __________

-0082 storage system Grants Scheme

Development of autonomous street cleaning Autonoomne robot Call / Small INNOVATION robots 00 (EE) Grants Scheme

RooSt Solar Energy Call / Small INNOVATION Roofit.solar product development

00 (EE) Grants Scheme

EE Development of advanced Non-Invasive Tervisetehnoloogiat

Call / Small INNOVATION ____________

Prenatal Testing NIPTIFY+ e Arenduskeskus Grants Scheme

-0071 AS (EE) EE- Futugrid

Call / Small INNOVATION Futugrid Technologies 00 Grants Scheme -0084 (EE)

Fuel cell and Li- ion capacitor power system for PowerUp Fuel Cells Call / Small INNOVATION construction industry 00 (EE) Grants Scheme

Development of a marine-certified 00 Skeleton Call I Small INNOVATION

ultracapacitor modules Technologies (EE) Grants Scheme

Development of My Health Study for data Call / Small INNOVATION collection and feedback of personalized health Quretec 00 (EE)

Grants Scheme -0070 information

Modernization of pipe and profile metal Exmet Services 00 Call I Small INNOVATION processing processes of Exmet Services (EE) Grants Scheme &QZ EE- Development of the full-scale logistics Call I Small INNOVATION management tool Intepia.com to improve the Intepia 00 (EE)

Grants Scheme efficiency of logistics companies

IPDx Diagnostics Call / Small INNOVATION AutoMVA 00 (EE) Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Development of digital waybill software Waybiller 00 (EE) Call I Small

___________

Waybiller.com Grants Scheme 2Q

EE- Center of Food and Call I Small

INNOVATION Microbiome Fermentation Grants Scheme -0072 Technologies (EE)

I. I Norway grants

¬669,892.76 ¬651,526.79

erii nate ¬627,082.53 ¬ 0.00

¬601,146.45 ¬385,486.88

¬596,275.65 ¬85,310.13

¬558,638.25 ¬551,614.32

¬ 547,914.88 ¬425,380.69 Complete d

¬ 539,767.80 ¬476,328.96 Complete d

¬ 529,449.20 ¬ 362,337.92

¬516,175.00 ¬462,500.00 Complete d

¬476,221.50 ¬0.00 Terminate d

¬449,028.95 ¬242,121.76

¬432,031.50 ¬237,196.70

Terminate ¬392,000.00 ¬0.00 d

29 Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

I" Iceland I Liechtenstein Norwaygrants

Call I Small INNOVATION "ReFinder' - renewable energy map application Sunly 00 (EE)

Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Development of next generation electric

Comodule 00 (EE) Call I Small

___________ scooter with integrated loT Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Environmentally friendly smart transport Modern Mobility 00 Call / Small solution (EE) Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Mobility platform enabling "green' and purely Modera Software Call I Small digital customer journey AS (EE) Grants Scheme

INNOVATION 3D Hospital Wayfinder and Management 3D Technologies Call I Small System R& D AS (EE) Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Development of a fully-automated edible insect

. BugBox 00 (EE) Call I Small

mass rearing and production technology Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Expansion and automation of production of Standwood 00 Call / Small Standwood 00 (EE) Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Development of a climate panel for R8tech R8 Technologies Call / Small

QQ digital operator 00 (EE) Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Development of Migrevention Digital Headache Migrevention 00 Call I Small

-0076 Clinic (EE) Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Green 44 ALFA Yacht Call I Small Production 00 (EE) Grants Scheme

INNOVATION WeIl4Seis Ragnarock GEO Call / Small

-0066 00 (EE) Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Digitization of Estover Dairy Industry 00 OU Estover Call / Small

-0052 Piimatäästus (EE) Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Precision forestry platform for logistics

Timbeter 00 (EE) Call I Small ___________ optimization Grants Scheme

F' I Norway grants

¬ 386,000.00 ¬ 254906.78 Complete d

¬ 382,379.85 ¬ 382,379.85 Complete d

¬377,172.72 ¬204,811.92 Complete d

¬370,114.08 ¬233,333.20 Comptele d

¬ 366,969.60 ¬ 336,906.60 Complete d

¬ 354,340.72 ¬ 342,705.03 Complete d

¬348,916.51 ¬321,516.01 Complete d

¬ 335,720.25 ¬ 335,720.25

¬332,943.40 ¬330,365.19 Complete d

¬ 291,605.02 ¬ 288,918.70 Complete d

Term note ¬270,000.00 ¬0.00

¬227,244.15 ¬227,244.15 Complete d

¬224,820.90 ¬ 164,263.46 Complete d

30 Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

"I. Iceland I Liechtenstein Norway grants

INNOVATION Improving the production of disinfectants by full AS Chemi-Pharm Call / Small automating (EE) Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Development of VIMAC: a virtual maternity Call I Small

___________ 1ndu5try62 OU (EE) clinic Grants Scheme

INNOVATION C02-negative concrete as a sustainable and UP Catalyst 00

-0086 scalable building material (EE)

INNOVATION Development of HUUM 00 environmental

HUUM OU (EE) _________ friendly products

INNOVATION Development of an intelligent monitoring and

Bidrent 00 (EE) -0088

management system for rental houses

INNOVATION Development of lOLines drawing robot lOLines 00 (EE) Q1

Opus Online OU INNOVATION Development and launching Offur

(EE) QZ

INNOVATION Huum 00 Electric Heaters Integration with HUUM OU (EE) Consumption Management Markets

INNOVATION Further development of CO2-negative concrete UP Catalyst 00

-0092 for market growth (EE)

EE- Creating a solution for the project manufacturer Eziil Production INNOVATION to systematize data, purchase material and Intelligence 00 -0093 easily deploy the solution (EE)

INNOVATION Development of mass production series of

lOLines 00 (EE) ___________

lOlines autonomous drawing robot

INNOVATION Bidrento Green ICT additional call project Bidrent OU (EE) jQ

EE- Futugrid INNOVATION Futugrid 2022 Technologies 00 -0098 (EE)

Call / Small Grants Scheme

Call / Small Grants Scheme

Call / Small Grants Scheme

Call / Small Grants Scheme

Call I Small Grants Scheme

Call / Small Grants Scheme

Call I Small Grants Scheme

Call / Small Grants Scheme

Call / Small Grants Scheme

Call I Small Grants Scheme

Call I Small Grants Scheme

I. I Norway grants

¬ 207,886.50 ¬ 203,063.06 Complete d

Terminate ¬202,455.65 ¬ 0.00 ci

¬200,000.00 ¬ 173,777.34 Complete d

¬ 199,973.97 ¬ 128,697.40

¬ 199,737.26 ¬ 164,590.72

¬ 170,927.02 ¬ 87,218.92 Complete d

¬ 164,283.35 ¬0.00 rm n

¬150,000.00 ¬140,180.06 Complete d

¬ 149,999.99 ¬ 125,942.29

¬ 149,999.85 ¬ 149,990.23 Complete d

¬ 149,985.00 ¬ 148,303.35 Complete d

¬ 149,978.51 ¬ 149,197.54 Complete d

¬149,970.00 ¬141,384.15 Complete d

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland Liechtenstein Norway grants

INNOVATION Development of a flexible energy management R8 Technologies Call I Small service for the climate panel 00 (EE) Grants Scheme

Roofit Solar Energy Call / Small INNOVATION Further developments of Roofit.app

00 (EE) Grants Scheme -0096

3D Technologies Call / Small INNOVATION Hospital Wayfinder 2.0 R& D AS (EE) Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Demand response combination with energy

FuseBox 00 (EE) Call / Small

__________ storage systems for Denmark Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Development of Migrevention Digital Headache Migrevention 00 Call / Small Clinic - additional activities (EE) Grants Scheme

Additional activities of the Bars Elekter Green Bars Elekter 00 Call / Small INNOVATION ICT green technology project (EE) Grants Scheme

Call / Small INNOVATION Development of Calidity EMS TarkVent OU (EE)

Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Bars Electricity Green Technology project Bars Elekter 00 Call / Small

QQ (EE) Grants Scheme

Call / Small INNOVATION Calidity EMS heating control upgrade TarkVent OU (EE) Grants Scheme ii

Opus Online OU preparations for the main Opus Online 00 Call / Small INNOVATION

project (EE) Grants Scheme QQ

Call I Small INNOVATION RIFSA Rocksoft 00 (EE) Grants Scheme

INNOVATION Preliminary studies for an integrated value Nordic Houses KT Call I Small

005 chain management platform 00 (EE) Grants Scheme

EE- Preparation for the development of a Ground Call I Small

INNOVATION Monitoring Service based on the needs of AS Datel (EE) Grants Scheme

QQQ Norwegian energy sector

I I Norway grants

¬ 149,949.20 ¬ 149,949.20 Complete d

¬149,931.01 ¬74,172.50 Complete ci

¬ 149,450.50 ¬ 137,322.70 Complete d

¬ 148,167.72 ¬ 130,953.90

¬148,024.39 ¬ 118,786.68 Complete d

¬ 145,226.93 ¬ 145,226.93 Complete d

¬ 94,284.02 ¬ 65,884.60 Complete d

¬71,434.25 ¬69,592.41

¬30,060.05 ¬ 19,614.30 Complete d

¬20,000.00 ¬ 19,487.51 Complete d

¬20,000.00 ¬ 13,582.87 Complete d

¬ 20,000.00 ¬ 20,000.00 Complete d

¬20,000.00 ¬ 14,110.99 Complete d

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

.1. Iceland . Liechtenstein Norway Norway grants grants

INNOVATION Preliminary studies for Next Generation Industry62 OU (EE) Call I Small Outcome 1 ¬20,000.00 ¬ 17,932.51 Complete ___________

QQZ Organizational Engagement System NGOES _____________________________

Grants Scheme 1 d

INNOVATION Innovative sustainable metal solar roofs _____________________________

Roofit Solar Energy OU (EE)

Call I Small Grants Scheme

Outcome 1 0 ¬20,000.00 ¬ 19,999.42

Complete d

QQ

INNOVATION ___________

e-Health platform for condition management for chronic patients

Helmes AS (EE) Call / Small Grants Scheme

Outcome 1 0 ¬20,000.00 ¬9,999.25 Complete

d

INNOVATION Preliminary studies for developing automatized

BugBox OU (EE) Call / Small Outcome

0 ¬20,000.00 ¬ 19,925.00 Complete __________

insect powder rearing system Grants Scheme 1 d

EE Preliminary studies on the development of a Call I Small Outcome Complete INNOVATION health and lifestyle data collection and Quretec OU (EE)

Grants Scheme 1 0 ¬20,000.00 ¬ 19,351.39 d

-0014 management system _________________ ______________ ________ __________

INNOVATION Thinnect OU Green ICT small grant scheme

Thinnect 00 (EE) Call I Small Outcome

0

________________

¬20,000.00

________________

¬ 17,704.83

__________

Complete project Grants Scheme 1 d

INNOVATION Intepia preliminary studies Intepia OU (EE) Call I Small Outcome

0 ¬20,000.00 ¬ 18,440.54 Complete

Grants Scheme 1 d

Aggregation of smart thermostats in the Smart Load Call I Small Outcome Complete

INNOVATION Norwegian and Estonian electricity grids for Solutions 00 (EE) Grants Scheme 1

0 ¬20,000.00 ¬ 19,016.34 d

-0024 demand response purposes

INNOVATION Preliminary studies for ImmunoHealth

_________________

lPDx Diagnostics

______________

Call / Small

________

Outcome

__________

0

________________

¬20,000.00

________________

¬ 19,509.16

__________

Complete __________

diagnostics service platform 00 (EE) Grants Scheme 1 d

INNOVATION Preparation for Comodule Light Electric Vehicle Comodule 00 (EE) Call / Small Outcome

0 ¬20,000.00 ¬ 16,014.18 Complete __________

Product Development Grants Scheme 1 d

INNOVATION Small grant project for conducting studies and Digital Sputnik Call / Small Outcome

0 ¬20,000.00 ¬ 13,410.20 Complete analyzes of the main project Lighting 00 (EE) Grants Scheme 1 d

INNOVATION Modera Software preparations of the Main Call Modera Software CaII/ Small Outcome 0 ¬20,000.00 ¬ 19,316.88 Complete project AS (EE) Grants Scheme 1 d

Personalized health analysis and management Tervise Teejuht OU Call / Small Outcome Complete INNOVATION __________ platform for the working population for the

(EE) Grants Scheme 1 0 ¬20,000.00 ¬19,615.20

d -0036 doctor, employer, people _________________ ______________ ________ __________ ________________ ________________ __________

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

.1. Iceland N

Liechtenstein Norway Norway grants grants

INNOVATION Billity Arego Estonia OU Call / Small Outcome

0 ¬20,000.00 ¬ 17,997.08 Complete

__________

(EE) Grants Scheme 1 d

INNOVATION __________

Preliminary study for the development of the electronic waybill infosystem Waybiller.com

Waybiller 00 (EE) Call I Small Grants Scheme

Outcome 1

0 ¬ 19,998.75 ¬ 17,022.97 Complete d

NIPTIFY preliminary studies for the preparation Tervisetehnoloogiat

Call I Small Outcome Complete INNOVATION ____________

of entry into Norway's market e Arenduskeskus

Grants Scheme 1 0 ¬ 19,965.00 ¬ 18,303.00

d -0017 AS(EE)

INNOVATION

___________________________

Trading platform for flexible energy FuseBox OU (EE)

__________

Call / Small

______

Outcome

_______

0

___________

¬ 19,957.50

___________

¬ 19,641.78

_______

Complete

-0038 ____

Grants Scheme I d

INNOVATION Industrial Competitiveness Atlas Policy Lab 00 (EE) Call / Small

__

Outcome 0

____

¬ 19,957.50 ¬ 18,987.93

__

Coalpiete Grants Scheme 1 d

EE- Preliminary research into the development of Call I Small Outcome Complete

INNOVATION the SmartEST Health Data Management Medisoft AS (EE) Grants Scheme 1

0 ¬ 19,947.00 ¬ 19,493.25 d -0020 Platform

INNOVATION ___________

Preliminary studies for Hepta Airborne autonomous power grid inspection system

Hepta Group Airborne 00 (EE)

Call I Small Grants Scheme

Outcome 1

0 ¬ 19,923.00 ¬ 19,923.00 Complete d

EE- Preliminary studies for EZIIL production

Eziil Production Call / Small Outcome Complete

INNOVATION software

Intelligence 00 Grants Scheme 1

0 ¬ 19,916.25 ¬ 19,916.25 d -0027 (EE)

INNOVATION

___________________________________

Cityntel OU preparations for the main call Cityntel 00 (EE)

____________

Call / Small

________

Outcome

_________

0

_______________

¬ 19,910.25

______________

¬ 17,277.00

_________

Complete __________

project Grants Scheme 1 d

INNOVATION Preliminary study for the development of the

Planlogi 00 (EE) Call / Small Outcome

0 ¬ 19,878.00 ¬ 19,097.67 Complete

__________

z2Q logistics management software Planlogi Grants Scheme 1 d

INNOVATION

_____________________________

Norwegian Debut Small Project Domotics OU (EE) Call / Small Outcome

0 ¬19,830.15 ¬19,801.42 Complete

-0032 Grants Scheme 1 d

INNOVATION ___________

________

Preliminary studies for Livesoft cross-border customs module development

Live Technologies 00 (EE)

Call I Small Grants Scheme

__

Outcome 1

0

____

¬ 19,810.50 ¬ 19,749.79

__

Complete d

Call I Small Outcome Complete INNOVATION Green ICT peat production concept Milrem AS (EE)

Grants Scheme 1 0 ¬ 19,650.00 ¬ 17,882.98

d

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Iceland I' ii. Liechtenstein Norway grants

Process analysis and digital concept design for New Digital OU Call I Small INNOVATION carehomes (EE) Grants Scheme

Call / Small INNOVATION Personalized prevention of melanoma Dermtest OU (EE) Grants Scheme QQi

EE- Preparations for the development of mobile Call / Small

INNOVATION timber measurement and data management Timbeter 00 (EE) Grants Scheme

-0030 solution Timbeter

PowerUp Fuel Cells Call / Small INNOVATION Fuel cell based smart grid solution 00 (EE) Grants Scheme QQ

UpSteam Eesti 00 Call / Small INNOVATION Preliminary Studies for UpSteam Development

(EE) Grants Scheme

Mayeri Industries Call / Small INNOVATION Green ICT Mayer small grant scheme project

AS (EE) Grants Scheme Qi

Biometric Digital Guide Platform - collecting Call I Small

INNOVATION biomedical data for analysis and machine Biometric OU (EE) Grants Scheme

learning technologies in dental care EE- Feasability study for patient engaging, artificial

HealthCode Al 00 Call / Small INNOVATION intelligence health data collection, analysis and

(EE) Grants Scheme -0043 decision support "LEIA"

INNOVATION Feasibility study: Development of and SaaS Andmevara AS (EE) Call I Small portal for municipalities services Grants Scheme

Call I Small INNOVATION Nordic TradeHub (NTH) Zwoot 00 (EE)

Grants Scheme -0042

Call / Small INNOVATION Big Data collection in manufacturing industry Evocon 00 (EE) Grants Scheme

Q12 Call / Small

INNOVATION Health card Fortement 00 (EE) Grants Scheme

Call I Small INNOVATION Renewable Energy Map Application ReFinder Sunly OU (EE)

Grants Scheme

F I Norway grants

Terminate ¬ 19,632.47 ¬0.00

d

¬ 19,395.00 ¬ 18,223.93

¬ 18,008.25 ¬5,301.73

¬ 16,507.50 ¬ 12,775.08 Complete d

¬ 16,381.50 ¬ 14,740.32 Complete d

¬ 15,975.00 ¬ 15,757.93 Complete d

Term n ¬ 15,000.00 ¬ 0.00

d

¬ 14,981.25 ¬ 14,978.55

Term nate ¬ 14,925.00 ¬ 0.00

d

¬ 14,814.00 ¬9,600.90

¬ 14,760.00 ¬ 14,760.00

¬ 14,586.75 ¬ 14,314.38 Complete d

Complete ¬ 14,190.00 ¬ 14,145.76

d

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

.1. Iceland ' Liechtenstein Norway Norway grants grants

INNOVATION Smart Energy Saaremaa Soletek OU (EE) Call I Small Grants Scheme

Outcome 1 0 ¬ 10,500.00 ¬ 10,500.00 Complete

d

INNOVATION Infrared Fourier spectroscopy of gases Interspectrum OU (EE)

Call I Small Grants Scheme

Outcome 1 0 ¬ 10,050.00 ¬3,131.89 Complete

d ___________

36 Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

lh,I " Iceland . Liechtenstein Norwaygrants

Annex 6: Partially completed projects

I,' I Norway grants

For partially completed pre-defined projects or other projects receiving a grant equal to or greater than EUR 2,000,000 (including national co-financing but excluding project co-financing)

No entries found.

For partially completed non-predefined projects receiving a grant of less than EUR 2,000,000 (including national co-financing but excluding project co- financing)

Upload the form and

Project Project

supporting

Project code Project title grant contracte

grant Reason for partial completion files on viable and

d incurred identifiable

componen ts

The Project Promoter submitted an appiication to terminate the project on August 17th, 2022 due to the recent economic and security crises in the worid, which has caused unforeseen obstacles in the impiementation of the project. Suppiy chains of the materiais needed for the project have become uncertain and unavailabie, the components have become twice as expensive, and it is difficult to obtain some of the components needed for the product deveiopment due to the ongoing war in Ukraine. Therefore, Project Promoter has indicated in its application to impiementing Agency that it is not possible to implement the project in the planned scope and time frame. The

Developme ¬ ¬ National Focal Point has stated: "Based on the expianations and expertise provided to us, we cannot say that the FPR EE-

INNOVATiON nt of inverter battery

483 028 0 ' .7

241 031 0 ' "

costs of the project should be considered ineligible due to the termination of the project. in other words, we have no reason to doubt the explanations, justifications and confirmations provided by the independent experts and the

ANNEX 6 df 0081

banks implementing Agency. According to FMO's letter of 28.10.2022, in exceptional cases itis possible to leave uncompleted projects in the final report of the program by identifying their viable and identifiable components in advance, Implementing Agency and experts have confirmed that the project has fulfilled the requirement of "counted as completed, viable and identifiable" regarding the activities carried out until the decision to discontinue it." Therefore, the irregularity shall be closed, Implementing Agency has adopted a decision to complete the project on 30.01.23. The total grant initially allocated to the project is 691,502.58 euros. The total eligible expenditure is

______________ ____________ __________ __________ 483,028.07 euros, grant paid to Project Promoter is 241,031.01 euros. ___________

Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Ni N Iceland . Liechtenstein Norway grants

Annex 7: Conditions and special concerns

I I Norway

ants

Marked

Description Tracking as fulfilled Date of

fulfilment Briefly describe the measures taken in

_______________________________________________________________ _______ GrACE 1) No costs shall be eligible under pre-defined project no. 1 "Open Cyber Range (OCR)" and no. 2

One-time

_______

30/09/202 P0 submitted a detailed description and budget "Health Sense" before the detailed descriptions and budgets for these pre-defined projects have been

fulfilment Yes 0

of the pre-defined projects to the FMO and submitted to and approved by the NMFA. received approval by NMFA.

PA Annex II set the operational rules for the

1) The Programme Operator shall submit the summary description of the procedure for the selection of programme. Programme agreement was

projects to the NMFA for approval, prior to the publication of the small grant scheme and call for complemented with the procedure for the

proposals foreseen under this programme. The programme agreement shall be amended accordingly. One-time 09/01/202 selection of projects in small grant scheme and

Yes main call. The programme agreement was 2) The Programme Operator shall submit a communication plan for the programme to the NMFA for fulfilment 0 amended accordingly. approval, prior to the publication of the small grant scheme and call for proposals foreseen under this programme. Communication plan was submitted to the FMO

prior to the publication of the first small grant ________________________________________________________________________________________ scheme.

Both pre-defined projects ("Health Sense" and 1) The National Focal Point shall ensure that the Programme Operator, prior to signing a project contract "Open Cyber Range") went through the

for pre-defined project no. 1 "Open Cyber Range (OCR)" and no.2 "Health Sense", carries out an One-time 01/03/202 appraisal process performed by independent

external and independent appraisal of the project, in order to verify its quality and contribution to the fulfilment Yes assessor with positive result.

objectives of the Programme as well as compliance with EU and national legislation. Cooperation Committee approved both ______________________________________________________________________________________________ __________ ________ ___________ applications.

38 Version 5.0 as of 06/10/2026 14:36:01 CEST

Suur-Ameerika 1 / 10122 Tallinn / 625 6342 / [email protected] / www.mkm.ee

Registrikood 70003158

Liina Thalfeldt

Riigi Tugiteenuste Keskus

[email protected]

Meie 08.10.2026 nr 8-4/1737-2

Programmi "Green ICT" lõpparuande

esitamine

Lugupeetud Liina Thalfeldt

Edastame vastavalt Finantsmehhanismide Kantselei ettepanekule täiendatud Eesti-Norra

koostööprogrammi „Green ICT“ lõpparuande.

Lugupidamisega

(allkirjastatud digitaalselt)

Rando Härginen

välisvahendite valdkonnajuht

Lisa: FPR EE-INNOVATION.pdf

Tanel Tomson +372 639 7642

[email protected]

Lisaadressaat: Ettevõtluse ja Innovatsiooni Sihtasutus