| Dokumendiregister | Riigikogu |
| Viit | 1-2/26-589/1 |
| Registreeritud | 11.09.2026 |
| Sünkroonitud | 11.10.2026 |
| Liik | EL dokument |
| Funktsioon | |
| Sari | |
| Toimik | KOMISJONI TEATIS EUROOPA PARLAMENDILE, NÕUKOGULE, EUROOPA MAJANDUS- JA SOTSIAALKOMITEELE NING REGIOONIDE KOMITEELE Teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni uus strateegiline lähenemisviis, et tagada põllumajanduse, metsanduse, maapiirkondade ja toidusüsteemide konkurentsivõimelisus, vastupidavus ja kestlikkus ELi põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse tulevikukindlaks muutmine raamistike „AgRI 2040“ ja „Food 2040“ kaudu - SWD(2026) 271, COM(2026) 453 |
| Juurdepääsupiirang | Avalik |
| Adressaat | |
| Saabumis/saatmisviis | |
| Vastutaja | |
| Originaal | Ava uues aknas |
| Taotle dokumendi eemaldamist või parandamist |
EN EN
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Brussels, 8.9.2026 COM(2026) 453 final
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN
PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL
COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
New Strategic Approach to Research and Innovation for competitive, resilient and
sustainable agriculture, forestry, rural areas and food systems
Future-proofing EU agri-food through AgRI 2040 and Food 2040
{SWD(2026) 271 final}
1
1. THE NEW CONTEXT FOR THE EU RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, RURAL AREAS AND FOOD SYSTEMS
The agri-food sector1, comprising agriculture, forestry, activities in rural areas and the broader
food systems,is a strategic asset for the European Union (EU) and its food security,
sustainability and competitiveness. It ensures a continuous supply of sufficient, affordable, safe,
healthy and high-quality food for 450 million Europeans. In addition, it plays a key role in
mitigating and adapting to climate change threats, while supporting the sustainable management
of natural resources, a circular and sustainable bioeconomy and global food security.
In 2023, EU agriculture and food systemsgenerated more than EUR 1 trillion in added value and
employed around 30 million people (15% of all jobs in the EU2). This includes 4.8 million people
employed in 309 000 businesses in the food and drink industry, the EU’s largest manufacturing
sector3 that delivered EUR 1.5 trillion in turnover and EUR 296 billion in value added. As the
world’s largest agri-food exporter, the EU recorded a EUR 50 billion agri-food trade surplus in
20254.
Rural areas, home to 25% of the EU population and covering more than 75% of its territory, are
key drivers of sustainable growth and innovation5. Forests and other wooded land cover nearly
44% of the EU’s territory and are essential for Europeans’ health, biodiversity, rural livelihoods,
cultural heritage, economic prosperity, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and the
prevention of future environmental and health crises.
To maintain its global leadership, the sector must innovate and modernise more quickly. Despite
higher spending on research and development (R&D) over time6, Europe’s scientific excellence in
the agri-food sector, for instance on digital and artificial intelligence (AI) applications, is facing
challenges. If the status quo is maintained and the current innovation and deployment gap
persist, future agricultural total factor productivity growth is expected to remain modest.
This suggests that research and innovation (R&I) outputs are not sufficiently translated into
proportionate productivity gains7, sustainability and resource efficiency. In addition, despite
remaining relatively competitive in selected agri-food tech segments, Europe's investment gap is
1 For the purpose of this Communication, the agri-food sector is understood in a broad sense, encompassing
agriculture, forestry, food systems and rural areas. 2 Eurostat, Key figures on the European food chain – 2025 edition, 12 December 2025,
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-key-figures/w/ks-01-25-049. 3 FoodDrinkEurope, Data & Trends: EU Food and Drink Industry – 2026 Edition, 2026,
https://www.fooddrinkeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/FoodDrinkEurope-Data-Trends-2026-report-
digital.pdf. 4 Monitoring EU agri-food trade: Developments in 2025, European Commission, 2026. The agri-food trade data only
cover goods, and exclude fisheries, aquaculture and forestry. 5 COM/2025/75 final. 6 OECD, Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2024, 2024, Paris,
https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/agricultural-policy-monitoring-and-evaluation-2024_74da57ed-en.html. 7 European Commission: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, EU Agricultural Outlook 2025–
2035, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2762/4491268.
2
becoming increasingly pronounced. Agri-food tech investment in Europe fell by 67% from 2020
to 2024, compared with levels 50–70% that were higher in the United States and Canada8. To
reduce its dependences on other major global powers, in particular when it comes to technologies
used in food production, the EU must further strengthen its strategic autonomy by developing AI
capabilities for agriculture and food systems.
The EU agri-food sector operates in an increasingly complex and rapidly changing
environment. The geopolitical context is marked by volatile input and commodity prices, and
significant dependencies on third countries not only for technologies but also for farming inputs,
in particular fertilisers, energy and protein feed. These challenges are compounded by
an ageing and shrinking workforce with gender imbalances, and pressures on land use and natural
resources, and are aggravated by the effects of climate change, pollution and biodiversity losses.
Structural transformations are underway, from new technology driven farming and food
production methods to the emergence of innovative value chains and new circular business models
in the bioeconomy sector and use of AI and biotechnology.
Sustainable competitiveness driven by R&I is at the core of both the Vision for agriculture and
food and the strategy for European life sciences. The vision calls for an update of the 2016
strategic approach to R&I in agriculture, forestry and rural areas to better target investments,
align future priorities with scientific developments and seize new opportunities. The life sciences
strategy seeks to position the EU as a global hub for innovation across health, biotech, food and
biomanufacturing by 2030, including attracting talents through the Choose Europe Initiative. The
strategy also announced the development of a complementary new strategic R&I agenda on
food systems, building on the current Food 2030 framework. This agenda will support the
development of competitive, sustainable and resilient food systems. Letta and Draghi reports
highlighted the need to strengthen the EU’s single market and enhance its competitiveness, being
also relevant for the agri-food sector.
Boosting competitiveness requires the adoption of a full value chain perspective that strengthens
the innovation journey of EU startups and scaleups from research to market. The strategic approach
will be structured around two closely interlinked frameworks set out in this Communication,
aiming to address the EU agri-food R&I ecosystem in a systemic and cross-cutting manner. These
frameworks are AgRI 2040, focusing on agriculture, forestry and rural areas, and Food 2040,
focusing on food systems, including fisheries and aquaculture. This Communication draws on
insights from the public consultations supporting AgRI 2040 and Food 2040 as summarized in the
Staff Working Document9. Common thematic issues across both frameworks will be addressed
jointly. More specific areas of actions will be identified under AgRI 2040 and Food 2040 focusing
8 AgFunder, Global Agrifoodtech Investment Report 2025, AgFunder, San Francisco, CA, 2025,
https://agfunder.com/research/agfunder-global-agrifoodtech-investment-report-2025/. 9 Commission Staff Working Document: Analytical overview of the achievements of the 2016 strategic approach to
agricultural R&I and Food 2030 R&I framework and insights from stakeholder consultation activities,
accompanying this strategic approach.
3
on high-level policy orientations without prejudging the implementation of the next multiannual
financial frameworks (MFF).
2. SHAPING A THRIVING AND INTERCONNECTED EU RESEARCH AND
INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM
2.1. Closing the gap ‘from lab to fab’
A strong innovation-based ecosystem is essential to the competitiveness, resilience and
sustainability of the agri-food sector. It relies on open, fair, and collaborative interconnectedness
across the different segments of the value chain, and from farmers to consumers.
Europe generates high-quality scientific knowledge in agriculture and food systems. However, its
competitiveness is hindered by insufficient private investment in R&I10 and the slow development
of early-stage research results into commercial opportunities. The predominance of SMEs,
limited investment capacity, and a high labour intensity are additional constraints on
commercialisation specific to agriculture, forestry and food systems11.
Innovative SMEs and startups12 in the agri-food sector are well placed to develop, adapt and
scale up solutions across different contexts. At the same time, their participation in Horizon
Europe projects and the valorisation of project results remain limited13. Fragmented funding10,
regulatory complexity and insufficient support at higher technology readiness levels (TRLs)
remain key barriers to turning research results into market-ready products and services also
in the agri-food sector.
This section proposes actions to strengthen the R&I ecosystem, from early-stage innovation to
market deployment, by leveraging research results and supporting market uptake and the growth
of startups in the EU agri-food sector, in line with the EU startup and scaleup strategy. It draws on
insights from the public consultation supporting AgRI 2040 and Food 2040, as well as feedback
from stakeholders and Member States, including contributions from the Task Force on Startup and
Scaleup of the Standing Committee for Agriculture and Research (SCAR).
10 European Commission, & Heitor, M. (Ed.), Align, act, accelerate: Research, technology and innovation to boost
European competitiveness, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2024,
https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/9106236. 11 European Commission: European Innovation Council and SMEs Executive Agency, Technopolis Group, IDEA
Consult, Monitoring industrial ecosystems – Agri-food – Analytical report – 2024 edition, Publications Office of
the European Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2826/4766674. 12 Although start-ups and scale-ups often qualify as SMEs within the meaning of the EU SME definition, they are
treated as distinct categories in this Communication for analytical and policy purposes. 13 Commission Staff Working Document: Analytical overview of the achievements of the 2016 strategic approach to
agricultural R&I and Food 2030 R&I framework and insights from stakeholder consultation activities,
accompanying this strategic approach.
4
Fostering investments and valorisation of R&I results in the agri-food sector
The Commission seeks to make EU-funded R&I projects more business-oriented by
introducing appropriate elements into calls for proposals, increasing the involvement of private
sector and market experts in the evaluation of proposals, and incentivising the valorisation and
exploitation of R&I results. Without prejudging the ongoing MFF negotiations and the
implementation of future EU funding programmes, the Commission will explore ways to lower
entry barriers and increase SME and startup participation in Horizon Europe projects.
These mechanisms could include the greater use, visibility and accessibility of cascade funding14
and other simplified administrative procedures, and stronger support to build consortia.
The Commission will manage the portfolio of R&I funded projects in the agri-food sector so
that it takes into account more explicitly a higher level of technological development15, combining
assessments of innovation maturity with targeted support tailored to each stage of development.
It will explore the development of scale-up pathways16 that link different sources of funding
to support seamless investment journeys in the agri-food sector. These endeavours will strengthen
the proposed close links between Horizon Europe and the future European Competitiveness Fund
(ECF), while ensuring the possibility to use ECF InvestEU Instrument as a delivery tool. The
objective is to accelerate commercialisation and strengthen agri-food innovation across the EU.
The Commission will also seek stronger synergies with organisations and platforms that can
support deployment, including EIT (the European Institute of Innovation and Technology) Food,
the European Innovation Council (EIC), the Enterprise European Network and its successor, the
EU4Business Network, under the ECF, or European Technology Platforms (e.g. ETP Food for
Life) to name a few.
The EIC plays a central role in supporting breakthrough innovation. Additional ways to strengthen
links between collaborative research projects and EIC instruments will be promoted. The
Commission will also explore a renewed fast-track-to-innovation scheme, featuring smaller
consortia, shorter time-to-grant periods, higher TRLs and stronger participation of startups and
other SMEs, farmers, foresters and industry.
A mechanism will also be created for the early identification of promising R&I results with
commercial potential. The selected results could receive light-touch, rapid and flexible top up
funding to bridge the gap between research and early-stage market validation.
14 EU Funding and Tenders Portal, Financial Support for Third Parties (FSTP). 15 Technology maturity is usually assessed using the Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) scale, which indicates how
far a technology has progressed from early research to deployment. TRLs are defined in accordance with the
Horizon Europe Programme Guide (European Commission, 2025). 16 A structured, document-based framework mapping and linking available funding instruments and support measures
across stages (TRLs), guiding innovations from research to market deployment and scale-up, and helping SMEs
and startups identify and access relevant financing opportunities.
5
In order to support innovation actors such as researchers, innovators, entrepreneurs, start-ups and
other SMEs, the Commission will explore complementary actions, such as innovation vouchers17,
to strengthen their collaboration with European, national and regional incubators, accelerators,
Living Labs18, and pilot plants. These actions would provide tailored, demand-driven support
for training, business model development, customer research, intellectual property, targeted
funding opportunities, and access to testers and corporate partners.
For intellectual property (IP), the Commission will explore more tailored support for projects
with significant market potential at critical stages, building on existing resources such as the
European IP Helpdesk, Horizon IP Scan, and the Horizon Results Booster.
Supporting experimentation, regulatory learning and innovation deployment in the agri-food
sector
Rapid experimentation cycles can significantly accelerate the transition from ideas to deployable
and commercially viable solutions. The Commission will further explore funding opportunities to
facilitate access to testing and experimentation infrastructures such as Living Labs and
innovation hubs, as well as public procurement schemes in support of innovation. This would
enablestartups and other SMEs to quickly validate prototypes under real-world conditions.
Additional R&I investments are needed to underpin methodologies for risk assessment, in
addition to a greater use of experimentation tools such as regulatory sandboxes19 and closer
collaboration with EU risk assessment bodies (e.g.theEuropean Food Safety Authority). The
aim hereof is to harvest regulatory learnings to support any necessary adjustments (including data
requirements and/or alternative regulatory requirements, among others) to support pre-market
approvals and authorisations for agri-food innovations including plant protection products, feed
and food (including those derived from genetically modified organisms). The Commission will
seek regular input from relevant EU risk assessment bodiesand, where relevant, their national
counterparts, on R&I needs related to the risk assessment of agri-food innovations.
Long term collaborative and interconnected R&I ecosystems have demonstrated their added value
including through EU Missions such as the Mission ‘A Soil Deal for Europe’, institutionalised
partnerships as Joint Undertakings, and co-funded partnerships. In line with the ongoing
assessment20, the Commission will explore how partnerships can be further leveraged to
17 Innovation vouchers are small, flexible grants for innovation actors to access external business creation and
acceleration support services, helping transform promising ideas into viable, market-ready businesses. 18 Living Labs are user-centered place-based and transdisciplinary research and innovation ecosystems, involving
relevant partners in systemic research and codesign, testing, monitoring and evaluation of solutions in real life
settings. LLs have been established under initiatives like the Mission Soil, the Partnership on Agroecology, and
other Horizon Europe-funded actions. 19 In COM/2025/1022 final the Commission has put forward in the context of its proposal for European Biotech Act
a set of targeted amendments to the General Food Law Regulation setting out the conditions under which regulatory
sandboxes can be set up in the context of the food chain. 20 European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, “Public consultation on Joint
Undertakings, Art. 185 initiatives, and thematic priorities for European Partnerships under Horizon Europe 28-34”,
6
attract additional private and public investment in priority areas. The SCAR could play a
stronger role as a knowledge broker for assessing EU R&I capacities (strengths and weaknesses)
in different agri-food sectors.
By launching a ‘Science for Policy Centre on Agriculture, Forestry, Rural Development and
Food System Innovation and Transformation’, managed by the Joint Research Centre (JRC),
the Commission will support EU and Member States agri-food innovation policies and the sector’s
stakeholders (from producers to entrepreneurs) by identifying key innovation opportunities in the
agri-food sector; analysing economic impacts and market and deployment gaps; and providing
stakeholders with evidence based and actionable knowledge to support strategic decision-making,
with the goal to strengthen EU innovation capacities.
Member States are encouraged to consider how they can use their future national and regional
partnership plans to further reinforce and enhance a supportive innovation ecosystem in the agri-
food sector, for example by investing in capacity-building, human resources and innovation-
enabling infrastructures such as testing facilities.
2.2 Accelerating knowledge and innovation uptake by farmers, foresters and rural actors
The uptake of innovation is essential for EU food security and for the competitiveness,
sustainability and resilience of agriculture, forestry and rural areas.
To deliver on the vision for agriculture and food’s objectives, innovation must move beyond
individual projects, spread across regions and become embedded in everyday practices. This
requires progress across three dimensions: (i) scaling out, by expanding proven solutions to more
users and locations, (ii) scaling up, by shaping policies and regulations to support innovation
uptake, and (iii) scaling deep, by channelling new practices, values and beliefs in society.
Instruments under the common agricultural policy (CAP) can stimulate demand for innovative
solutions by supporting farmers in adopting new technologies, sustainable practices and digital
tools, and in deploying innovation thanks to investment support. EU agricultural R&I policy,
working in close complementarity with the current CAP, has established strong foundations for
the co-creation and dissemination of knowledge and innovation. However, stakeholders
continue to highlight the need for targeted improvements to accelerate uptake of the R&I results21.
10 July 2026, https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/news/all-research-and-innovation-news/public-
consultation-joint-undertakings-art-185-initiatives-and-thematic-priorities-european-2026-07-10_en. 21 European Commission: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Future-proofing EU agri-food
through research and innovation – Summary of results of the open consultation, Publications Office of the European
Union, Luxembourg, 2026, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2762/2404939.
7
Supporting farmer-led innovation through the multi-actor approach and Living Labs
Farmers are more likely to adopt innovations that have been co-created with them, tested under
real-life conditions and supported by advisory services and peer-to-peer exchanges22. Over the last
decade, the multi-actor approach23has become a core feature of agricultural, forestry and rural
R&I projects funded under Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe becoming mandatory in more
than 70% of relevant calls for proposals24. Living Labs have similarly fostered long-term,
transdisciplinary collaboration through place-based experimentation that integrates technical,
social and behavioural dimensions.
However, challenges remain, including inconsistent implementation across projects, barriers to
the early and meaningful involvement of relevant actors, and uneven adoption of results.
The Commission is conducting a study to assess the impact of existing instruments on the
dissemination and uptake of innovation. Drawing on its results, the Commission will seek to
harmonise the terminology and methodologies for the multi-actor approach and Living Labs
and strengthen evaluation and monitoring mechanisms at project level.The Commission
envisages to explore, under the Horizon Europe (2028-2034) and the future ECF,ways to support
theearly and meaningfulinvolvement of relevant actors through pre-proposal support measures
that facilitate consortium-building, as well as through simplified financial support to ensure fair
recognition and remuneration for farmers’ and other stakeholders’ participation in projects. The
link with social sciences and humanities should be strengthened to support inclusive co-creation
processes. The participation of farmers’ organisations, cooperatives, advisory and extension
services, and agricultural chambers in R&I projects will continue being encouraged. The
Commission will also explore collaborative platforms, to better connect farmers and other
practitioners to projects taking a multi-actor approach.
To support bottom-up innovation, the Commission will promote initiatives that validate
traditional knowledge and practitioner-led solutions, whileengaging farmers in testing
innovations across different regions. These efforts should generate practical guidance to support
wider adoption of innovations. Projects should also systematically assess the economic,
environmental and social costs and benefits of adopting proposed innovations, while identifying
viable business opportunities to better meet users’ or market needs. Finally, the Commission will
map existing infrastructures for testing and demonstration including EU and national Living
Labs, demonstration farms and Lighthouses. By helping farmers and practitioners identify relevant
22 European Commission: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development – Unit A.3, Study on outcomes
achieved by EIP-AGRI Operational Group projects under the CAP, EU CAP Network, 2024, https://eu-cap-
network.ec.europa.eu/publications/study-outcomes-achieved-eip-agri-operational-group-projects-under-cap_en. 23 The multi-actor approach is a form of interactive, transdisciplinary and responsible R&I that aims to make the R&I
process more co-creative and inclusive by actively involving relevant actors throughout the research project to make
outcomes more co-owned, reliable, demand-driven and relevant to society. 24 Commission Staff Working Document: Analytical overview of the achievements of the 2016 strategic approach to
agricultural R&I and Food 2030 R&I framework and insights from stakeholder consultation activities,
accompanying this strategic approach.
8
locations and resources, this approach will improve their accessibility to relevant infrastructures
and strengthen peer-to-peer learning.
Strengthening synergies: building a sustainable and interconnected innovation ecosystem
The Commission will further strengthen the links between present and future Horizon Europe
and CAP, by promoting systematic interactions between national contact points (NCP) and CAP
networks,notably through agreater use of events organised by the European Innovation
Partnership for Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability (EIP-AGRI). Continued support will
be provided to encourage the participation of EIP AGRI Operational Groups in R&I projects
and to facilitate the dissemination of their results through the EU Thematic Knowledge Hubs as
reference points for users and reduce the burden on agricultural advisors25.
Synergies between Living Labs and Operational Groups will be strengthened to support the
local adaptation of innovative solutions. This will include encouraging Living Labs to involve
Operational Group partners and, in cooperation with Member States, promoting the uptake and
adaptation by Operational Groups of results developed in Living Labs26. Connections between
Living Labs and the upcoming EU Thematic Knowledge Hubs should also be strengthened to help
scale locally tested innovations across the EU.Collaboration with testing and experimentation
facilities27 should be encouraged to accelerate the uptake of digital innovations in agriculture,
forestry and rural areas.
Maximising the impact and reach of practical knowledge
The Commission will continue to strengthen knowledge repositories andinteroperable, user-
centred infrastructuresto ensure the long-term accessibility and usability of moregranular,
context specific and practically explained R&I results.
The EIP-AGRI practice abstracts28 format will be revised for greater accessibility, clarity and
relevance. Projects will be encouraged to allocate resources to turn R&I outcomes into
practitioner-oriented handbooks, which should be peer-reviewed to ensure quality and user
relevance. They will also be encouraged to make greater use of digital tools and AI to support a
broader and smarter dissemination of practical findings.
25 EU Thematic Knowledge Hubs, as promoted and defined in Horizon Europe Cluster 6 – Work Programme 2026-
2027 (C/2025/8493 final), will be projects designed to act as central sources of thematic knowledge. They should
facilitate access to thematic research findings, innovative solutions, and best practices, empowering advisors with
cutting-edge knowledge and providing ample opportunities of collaboration and cross-fertilization amongst the
different AKIS actors. 26European Commission: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Non-paper ‘Exploring
potential synergies between Horizon Europe projects using Living Labs and Lighthouses applied to agriculture, the
Common Agricultural Policy EIP-AGRI Operational Group projects and other similar initiatives: the Mission Soil
example’, 2026, https://mission-soil-platform.ec.europa.eu/resource-library/non-paper-lls-and-ogs-synergies. 27 Sectorial AI Testing and Experimentation Facilities under the Digital Europe Programme such as the agrifoodTEF. 28 Practice abstracts are short, practitioner-oriented summaries designed to pass on practical knowledge from Multi-
Actor Approach projects and EIP AGRI Operational Groups to users.
9
Training materials developed through Horizon Europe thematic and advisory networks should
be integrated into training programmesbynational Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation
Systems (AKIS) to support high-quality farm advisory services. Strongerlinks between advisors
and universities will also be essential to ensure that field-level advice reflects the latest research
and innovation.
Embedding research outcomes in vocational education and training and higher education will
be critical for mainstreaming sustainable practices29 and equipping the future workforce with the
skills needed to drive innovation, particularly in the context of challenges posed by generational
renewal. Building on the activities of the European Skills Intelligence Observatory, the Large-
Scale Partnership for the agri-food ecosystem, Centres of Vocational Excellence funded by
Erasmus+ and EIT KICs will help identify and address emerging skills gaps.
Finally, achieving widespread innovation uptake will require R&I to engage beyond the
traditional actors (farmers, advisors and other rural actors), by involving entrepreneurs, regional
authorities, educators, civil society and industry more systemically, while strengthening support
for citizen science.
2.3 Boosting food technology for food-chain resilience and food security
The food industry’s diverse ecosystem, which spans innovative startups and other SMEs, and
multinationals, requires significant lab-to-market collaboration to accelerate impactful solutions
for new products and services.
While the EU is strong in financing early-stage innovation, upscaling new, sustainable food
ingredients requires more financial support to help innovative startups and other SMEs overcome
the second valley of death30. This is particularly true for the food industry, which has significant
capital expenditure requirements and where private investors are often hesitant to support
infrastructure financing31. Financial support notably implies addressing the continent-wide
shortage of industrial-scale contract manufacturing capacity at TRL 8-9 for fermentation-based
technologies32 for food and feed ingredients while fully respecting the EU risk assessment and
authorisation framework. Quantum computing, with its significant computational power,
combined with digital and AI tools can contribute to improved downstream processing, the
development of new food ingredients and the more efficient development of personalised nutrition.
The Commission will explore how to increase investment including through the ECF InvestEU
Instrument, to accelerate commercialisation and strengthen food innovation in the EU.
Moreover, the EU needs to speed up the adoption of advanced food technologies from early-stage
research, scaling up activities to the commercialisation through industrial deployment, while
29 OECD, Policies for the Future of Farming and Food in the European Union, OECD Agriculture and Food Policy
Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2023 https://doi.org/10.1787/32810cf6-en. 30 The second valley of death occurs from pilot/demo to market scale. 31 European Investment Bank, Feeding future generations – How finance can boost innovation in agri-food,
Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2019, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2867/008109. 32 These technologies include biorefineries and advanced fermentation using yeasts, algae, bacteria and other
microorganisms.
10
continuing to ensure food safety. Achieving this will require committed engagement from key
infrastructures and research organisations, including the Industrial Biotechnology Innovation
and Synthetic Biology Accelerator (IBISBA), universities, research institutes, biomanufacturing
facilities, technology transfer offices and innovation hubs, supported by tools such as the EU
biotech and biomanufacturing hub.
Strengthening food supply and security will increase the EU’s independence by supporting
domestic supply chains for essential food ingredients such as vitamins, amino acids and enzymes,
thereby reducing external dependencies. The Commission, together with Member States, could
also improve this resilience through digital and AI tools and solutions. The Important Projects of
Common European Interest (IPCEI) is another example for pooling Member State investments in
strategic food and bio-based value chains.
These can contribute to the transformation of food systems, with applications to reduce food loss
and waste, improve the EU’s surveillance of food safety and traceability including fighting food
fraud, reduce production costs, predict and manage climate-induced risks and human disease risk
factors, and boost consumer confidence in the integrity of the EU’s food systems.
The Commission has identified advanced fermentation as a lead technology in the EU bioeconomy
strategy and will explore how to encourage private investment in the building and upgrading of
open-access pilot and demo-scale bioprocessing infrastructure for advanced fermentation to
support the food industry, including SMEs, to test and de-risk their processes without the need
for prohibitive up-front capital expenditure. Member States will be encouraged to do the same.
Health and food are closely interconnected, with nutrition, in line with national dietary
recommendations, playing a fundamental role in maintaining good health and health promotion33.
This area has attracted both emerging and advanced technologies with products contributing
positively to consumers health by, for example, addressing the inadequate consumption of some
vitamins and minerals in line with national nutrition policies. The Commission will consider how
to reinforce R&I on the link between health and food to address the increasing number of
diseases linked to cardiometabolic and neurological systems, and to include, among others,
personalised nutrition.
3. R&I NEEDS FOR A COMPETITIVE, SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT EU AGRI-
FOOD SECTOR
3.1. Cross-cutting priorities
The complex and interconnected nature of the agri-food sector call for broad R&I
interventions that can deliver impact.
33 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social
Committee and the Committee of the Regions on an EU cardiovascular health plan: the Safe Hearts Plan,
COM/2025/1024 final.
11
While specific thematic R&I areas of action are defined in sections 3.3 and 3.4 as regards the agri-
food sector, a systemic approach should be applied across all R&I policy areas and informed by a
set of cross-cutting priorities.
Six initial priorities, presented below,will guide the implementation of AgRI 2040 and Food 2040
and the deployment of R&I actions that can be supported by, among others, the future Horizon
Europe and the ECF, without prejudging the methods of implementing future funding programmes,
nor the preparation of work programmes for the period of the next MFF 2028-2034.
• Competitiveness, startups and scaleups
The Commission will aim to strengthen long-term competitiveness by fostering an R&I
ecosystem that enables researchers, innovators and entrepreneurs, together with farmers, foresters,
rural actors and industries, startups, scaleups, other SMEs and other businesses to develop new
approaches, products and technologies and address the challenges facing their sectors.
• Food security, resilience and preparedness
Increasing resilience and preparedness will be a central objective of future actions under this
strategic approach, in line with the European preparedness union strategy and its emphasis on early
warning and an integrated all-hazards approach. This priority seeks to increase anticipation and
preparedness by recognising how climate impacts, supply-chain disruptions, structural lock-ins
and other risks can interact and reinforce one another, and by developing solutions to improve
access to raw materials for agriculture, food production and supply, and the bioeconomy.
Resilience requires a holistic approach encompassing food security and sovereignty, open
strategic autonomy, ensuring the sustainable management of natural resources, mitigating risks,
reducing dependencies, diversification and supply chain continuity, with preparedness capacities
strengthened at local, regional and national levels. This includes fostering EU production and
supply of proteins, vitamins and other essential nutrients, as well as considering relevant aspects
of the recently adopted Action Plan for resilience, strategic autonomy and sustainability of the EU
protein system. R&I plays a key role in supporting this transition through the development of tools
and capabilities for monitoring, early warning, stress-testing and foresight.
• Natural resources and circularity
R&I will support the sustainable management of natural resources. It will contribute to strengthen
climate change mitigation and adaptation, including through the development and large-scale
deployment of climate-smart solutions for the agri-food sector that also preserve or
restore biodiversity and ecosystem functions, while reducing environmental degradation and
pollution.
A central element of this priority is to continue supporting the transition towards a sustainable,
circular and resource-efficient (including regarding renewable energy) agri-food sector. This
involves moving away from linear production and consumption models towards circular systems
in which biological resources are used sustainably, more efficiently and waste streams are
12
minimised and valorised. It also includes efforts to prevent food loss and waste across all stages
of the value chain, from production and processing to distribution and consumption.
This priority is aligned with the objectives of the EU bioeconomy strategy, the Nature Restoration
Regulation and the upcoming Circular Economy Act, promoting the circular, regenerative and
sustainable use of biological resources to support green growth, and reduce dependence on fossil-
based resources, through the sustainable sourcing and use of biomass.
• Food and feed safety, nutrition and health
The Commission will contribute to ensuring that food and feed safety, food chain integrity34 and
nutritional quality are addressed in an integrated manner. By deploying R&I across different areas
including agriculture, food, nutrition and health, new knowledge and innovations, such as those
that are microbiome-based, can help improve safety, nutrition and health.
It will support a level playing field for compliant operators while addressing critical
challenges such as food fraud, human malnutrition, biodiversity loss and resource depletion.
Where relevant, actions under this priority will be guided by the One Health approach and the
objectives of the life sciences strategy.
• Fairness
The Commission will promote R&I that contributes to fair, resilient and inclusive agri-food value
chains by ensuring that innovation creates opportunities and benefits for farmers, foresters, rural
communities, businesses and consumers. R&I should support fair value creation, distribution of
risks, costs and benefits, improve the attractiveness of careers in the agri-food sector for
newcomers, and contribute to quality jobs and good working and living conditions, ensuring that
the benefits of the transition are shared across regions, generations and all actors in thevalue
chains.
• Global cooperation for sustainable agriculture, forestry, rural areas and food systems
This priority addresses the international dimension of R&I in the agri-food sector, in line with EU
policy priorities including the EU global gateway strategy and the EU bioeconomy strategy, and
seeks to promote shared interests and strengthen collaboration with international partners on
common R&I priorities.
The new roadmap agreed between the African Union and the EU on ‘Food and Nutrition Security
and Sustainable Agriculture’ (FNSSA), together with the related International Research
Consortium should provide a framework for identifying, with the African Union and related
partners, common areas on which to focus. Cooperation with other partners to address similar
challenges in agriculture, forestry and rural areas, such as India or the Community of Latin
American and Caribbean States, could be further explored.
34 Food chain integrity refers to: authenticity, traceability, transparency and the prevention and detection of food fraud.
It supports a level playing field for compliant operators while enhancing consumer trust and resilient food supply
chain.
13
Cooperation with Eastern Neighbourhood countries can play an important role in developing a
shared R&I agenda with the EU and addressing common challenges, such as the BIOEAST
initiative along with Ukraine, Moldova and the Western Balkans. Further collaboration should also
be pursued with the Mediterranean Neighbourhood countries to support and complement the
PRIMA initiative. Collaboration should also be strengthened with international organisations such
as the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the World Health Organisation, the World
Organisation for Animal Health, the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research
(CGIAR) and the OECD to enhance the importance and global impact of research and innovation
in the agri-food sector.
3.2 Common enablers
Governance, technologies and communities are key enablers for the implementation of this
strategic approach to maximise the impact of R&I activities, strengthen the EU innovation
ecosystem and accelerate the deployment of research results.
• Governance
Governance is a critical precondition for coherent and effective policy making. It enables
coordination across different sectors, disciplines, stakeholder groups and levels of decision-
making.
The effective governance of R&I in the agri-food sector helps ensure that the EU invests in
impactful research, technology and innovation. It also supports the integration of diverse forms of
knowledge and different perspectives and business models, encourages inclusive stakeholder
engagement, promotes youth participation and gender equality, and strengthens skills development
and training.
Strong governance also supports transdisciplinary research, greater integration of natural sciences
and the social sciences and humanities, and stronger links between R&I and policymaking,
including in relation to the blue economy35. Some examples are the EU Mission ‘A Soil Deal for
Europe’ and the Bioeconomy Mutual Learning Exercise. The One Health approach can contribute
to the development of competitive, sustainable and resilient agriculture and food systems. For
example, the One Health approach can address the challenge of antimicrobial resistance36 by
considering interlinkages between humans, animals and the environment. Furthermore, One
Health microbiome-based solutions can create opportunities for new products for health, food,
sustainable agriculture and forestry or aquaculture.
R&I can further support governance by generating evidence, testing and comparing approaches,
strengthening monitoring capacities, and helping public authorities and stakeholders understand
what works in different territorial and sectoral contexts. One way of achieving this is through
foresight exercises, developed with Member States and stakeholders, that explore credible future
35 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social
Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a new approach for a sustainable blue economy in the EU
Transforming the EU's Blue Economy for a Sustainable Future, COM/2021/240 final. 36 Council Recommendation on stepping up EU actions to combat antimicrobial resistance in a One Health approach
2023/C 220/01, ST/9581/2023/INIT.
14
scenarios and identify where R&I can provide timely new knowledge and innovation to address
emerging challenges.
• Technologies
Technologies are a cross-cutting driver of innovation, and a key enabler of this strategic approach.
R&I plays a central role in developing emerging technologies, supporting the uptake of existing
solutions and addressing related social and ethical considerations.
Technologies, including digital ones such as AI, are important tools to transform agriculture,
forestry, rural areas, the food industry and food environments, and to enable sustainable
patterns of food consumption. They are also rapidly reshaping the way research is carried out.
At the same time, data has become a strategic asset that drives digital transformation, creates
competitive advantages and enables innovative solutions.
Biotechnologies are another important cross-sectoral enabler for the agri-food sector that can help
it realise its full potential37, as reflected in the recently proposed first European Biotech Act, which
is to be followed by a second Biotech Act.
The Commission will identify emerging trends and the digital, data-driven and biotechnological
innovations that are available. These efforts will strengthen connections across the agri-food
ecosystem and be developed in full complementarity with current and upcoming initiatives,
including the proposed Observatory on Emerging Technologies38, existing European
partnerships39, Common European Data Spaces, European Digital Infrastructure Consortia
(EDICs) and European Digital Innovation Hubs (EDIHs), as well as actions under the EU
bioeconomy strategy and under the life sciences strategy.
• Territories and communities
The uptake of innovation in agricultural and food systems depends on the involvement of farmers,
actors in the food chain, consumers and local communities, and on solutions that are adapted to
local and regional realities. Territories, including regions, act as living innovation environments
where technological and social innovations and new methods of governance can be tested, adapted
and embedded.
Place-based approaches are a powerful tool for delivering local responses to global challenges.
They can strengthen urban-rural links and contribute to both sustainability and resilience40,
37 European Commission: Joint Research Centre, Emerging biotechnologies in Europe – Foresight for policy,
Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2024, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/4814109. 38 The proposed Regulation for the European Competitiveness Fund (COM/2025/555 final, Art. 14) states that the
Observatory should “inform the ECF Strategic Stakeholder Board”, by identifying investment opportunities across
different technology areas. 39 Notably, the Horizon Europe Partnership of Agriculture of Data. 40 European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Urban food system transformation in the
context of Food 2030 – Current practice & outlook towards 2030, Publications Office of the European Union, 2023,
https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/507125.
15
enabling agrifood transformation by connecting local resources, knowledge, people and
innovation.
Resilience can be strengthened by balancing long and short supply chains, increasing
diversity, and developing robust and sustainable local and regional food systems.This can
contribute to strategic autonomy while reducing local food insecurity.
The involvement of local actors in innovation processes is crucial for the acceptance, uptake
and long-term integration of innovations in local ecosystems (for example through Living Labs,
the LEADER programme, smart villages, the I3 Instrument and the startup villages initiative).
Territorially grounded and community-driven innovation will be pursued through this common
enabler. It will support solutions that build on local assets and opportunities, including for agri-
food industries and where the multi-actor approach can play a role in the empowerment of
communities.
Considering the role of territories and communities in R&I will help strengthen regional
competitiveness and improve the EU’s diverse innovation ecosystems. In parallel, the science-
policy-society interface for the agri-food sector will be reinforced, with stronger linkages between
projects and decision-makers to maximise the impact of innovative solutions at local level.
Cooperation between territories, communities and municipalities with shared R&I priorities and
complementary capabilities is also a powerful catalyst for innovation, as demonstrated by
partnerships of the Thematic Smart Specialisation Platform on Agri-Food within the
framework of Smart Specialisation Strategies (S3) under cohesion policy, including the European
Regional Development Fund and Interregional Innovation Investment instrument.
3.3. AgRI 2040
AgRI 2040 will be an overarching framework for agricultural, forestry and rural research and
innovation. It will help identify thematic and cross-cutting R&I needs through evidence-based
analysis and stakeholder co-creation, and will be regularly updated to reflect the evolving global
context.
Without prejudice to the next MFF, AgRI 2040 will provide a strategic direction under which these
needs could be addressed through actions funded by relevant work programmes of future funding
programmes. Particular attention will be paid to the valorisation of research and innovation results
into startups, scaleups and industrial deployment, as well as to their dissemination, uptake and
adoption by farmers, foresters and rural communities.
Furthermore, AgRI 2040 will serve as an organising framework to mobilise funding and
implementation partners around well-defined segments of the agri-food value chain, while
providing a coherent governance structure. Particular attention will be paid to strengthening AKIS
through R&I, improving knowledge flows, advisory services, skills development and innovation
uptake, while promoting agroecological approaches, including organic farming.
16
AgRI 2040 will propose areas of action to implement the priorities of this strategic approach.
The following eight preliminary areas of action reflect the needs already identified through
the vision for agriculture and food, the public consultation, SCAR inputs and the staff working
document accompanying this Communication. The Commission will organise the EU AgRI
2040 conference on 24-25 September 2026 and follow-up activities to further co-create and refine
these areas of action with stakeholders.
• Soil, agri-ecosystems, water and nutrient capital
This area of action focuses on R&I that contributes to restoring and maintaining healthy soils
and resilient water systems as the foundation for climate change mitigation and resilience, food
security, biodiversity protection and restoration, and sustainable agricultural production.
Priority actions include generating knowledge, technologies and tools to improve soil health, water
quality and water availability, while addressing pollution, erosion, water scarcity, desertification,
nutrient losses and biodiversity decline. It also includes R&I that develops sustainable land and
water management approaches and practices, such as agroecology and organic farming, carbon
farming, agroforestry and nature-based solutions.
A further priority should include R&I to reduce the use of resources and improve use efficiency,
particularly for nutrients and water, while helping to scale-up the circular recovery and
management of nutrients, including bio-based fertilisers and soil improvers, and the valorisation
of agricultural and food-processing waste streams.
R&I can accelerate the deployment of practical solutions through Living Labs, including digital
technologies and integrated systems to monitor soil, water and nutrients. Innovations at the
interface between agriculture and aquaculture should be explored. Particular attention should be
paid to the soil-water-energy nexus, including R&I on controlled-environment agriculture, as
well as on multilevel governance, innovative business models, and soil literacy to support long-
term change across the value chain.
• Cropping systems
This area aims to foster R&I that supports climate-smart, sustainable, resilient and competitive
cropping systems. It focuses on strengthening adaptation to environmental stresses such as
drought, salinity and extreme temperatures, including through agroecological approaches.
It also seeks to improve preparedness for and responsiveness to emerging and future threats
to plant health. This includes developing and deploying rapid and effective tools for prevention,
early detection, treatment and biological control of plant pests.
R&I actions should promote sustainable and low-risk crop protection through integrated
approaches that combine agroecological and agronomic practices with biological solutions, low-
risk alternatives, breeding, biotechnology, precision technologies, and digital tools.
The potential of plant breeding, knowledge of seeds and plant varieties, biotechnology and
genetic resources should be further leveraged. This includes supporting breeding activities, as
17
well as the development or reintroduction of climate-smart, resource-efficient, resilient, resistant
and diverse varieties, including neglected and underutilised species, suited to a wide range of
conditions, with due consideration of the legal41 and policy context.
R&I actions should also strengthen protein crops as a strategic component of a more resilient and
sustainable EU protein system, addressing agronomic performance, processing and nutritional
value, and the development of food, feed, and circular value-chains.
• Livestock systems
This area aims to foster R&I that supports the sustainability, competitiveness, excellence,
territoriality and resilience of livestock systems to safeguard animal health and welfare, reduce
the environmental impact of the livestock sector, and promote precision farming. It will
contribute to the objectives of the livestock strategy.
It should support impact-driven animal breeding for multiple purposes with due consideration of
the legal and policy context, and foster the development of sustainable feed and nutrients,
including vitamins and amino acids.
R&I can reinforce biosecurity measures by taking a multidisciplinary approach. R&I should
support the development of new interventions, treatments and vaccines, as well as improvements
to existing solutions that target priority animal diseases, including zoonoses, while safeguarding
animal welfare and encouraging the prudent use of antimicrobials.
Integrated approaches to animal health and welfare, including the socio-economic dimension,
should be further developed through R&I and measures that combine disease prevention, disease
control and emergency preparedness while improving animal welfare outcomes.
Resource efficiency should be improved through innovative feed measures, such as optimising
grass-based and pasture systems, improving feed conversion, and safeguarding biodiversity while
reducing land pressure through approaches such as agropastoralism. Resource efficiency should
also contribute to mitigate emissions and minimising waste across the value chain by promoting
the principles of the circular economy. Structural changes that impact the livestock sector, such as
the use of new alternative proteins, climate change or changes in the geopolitical context should
be duly considered and comprehensively addressed as part of a systemic approach.
• Bioeconomy in agriculture, forestry and rural areas
This area focuses on R&I for the efficient and sustainable use of agricultural and forestry land
and biomass, and to boost biomanufacturing while generating evidence to support sustainable
business models and governance tools that create additional income for primary producers and
rural communities. Through R&I, the European production of bio-based alternatives to synthetic
inputs should be improved, including bio-based (organic) fertilisers and low-carbon
41 Regulation (EU) 2026/1388 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2026 on plants obtained by
certain new genomic techniques and their products, and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/625, OJ L 1388,
30.6.2026.
18
fertilisers42. In line with the cascading principle for the use of biomass, R&I should also enhance
the co-production of renewable energy. Furthermore, this area should provide opportunities for
innovation in wood-based products and materials.
This area should also include the development of new business models to reduce production costs
and increase the resilience of biomass producers. R&I should also support technologies and
processes for the local valorisation of sustainable biomass, by-products and residues, circular
processes, recycling and reuse of bio-based products.
• Multi-functional forests
This area aims to strengthen the sustainable management of forests for multiple benefits,
according to the principles of active sustainable forest management as defined by Forest Europe43,
increase the resilience of forest ecosystems and forest-based sectors, and reward foresters for the
ecosystem services they provide in both rural and urban contexts.
Priority actions should include supporting the restoration and protection of forest habitats,
contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation, capitalising on the potential of
agroforestry and boosting the forest-based bioeconomy.
This area should include R&I to generate scientific evidence for the identification of adaptive
and resilient forest management practices, analysing the impact of different forest management
practices on the sustainability of forest ecosystems, and improving knowledge on forest carbon
sinks, including the role of forest soil.
It should also promote the sustainability and resilience of European forests in the face of new
and emerging pests and diseases, R&I on how to restore damaged forests, and help to reduce
wildfire risks. It should explore the use of currently underutilised tree species through adapting
processing technologies, technical and digital innovation and new business models. R&I should
assess tree species diversity, develop and test methods for the conservation of forest genetic
resources and tree propagation.
To strengthen the forest-based bioeconomy, a better understanding of the benefits of wood-based
products is needed, including the capacity to ensure long-term carbon storage and delivering
greater value including from by-products.
This area should strengthen the role of foresters in the value chain, develop new business models
for foresters, enhance financial incentives for non-provisioning services, and meet societal
expectations for forests, including on the well-being of different actors.
42 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social
Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Fertiliser Action Plan: Partnership for ensuring the availability,
affordability and strategic autonomy in home-grown EU fertilisers, COM/2026/310 final. 43 Forest Europe, Sustainable Forest Management, SFM.
19
• Rural areas
This area focuses on R&I to strengthen the competitiveness and attractiveness of rural areas,
thereby supporting generational renewal and improving services and infrastructure to enhance
living and working conditions and strengthening the links between farms, forests, territories, and
food systems.
Particular attention should be paid to innovation and entrepreneurship by women and young
people in rural areas, and place-based approaches to innovation at local scale, including through
regulatory sandboxes.
R&I should also support innovation to delivering public services (including education,
healthcare, transport and mobility and digital connectivity), market access and green businesses.
It should open up new job opportunities in diverse economic sectors to improve people’s quality
of life, retain people and talents working in rural communities, and attract new actors.
Further support is needed for education, vocational training and lifelong learning, and to improve
people’s skills. In addition, robust digital infrastructures should be further supported and improved.
• Stronger agri-food value chain
As part of the shared AgRI 2040 and Food 2040 cross cutting priority of fairness, this area aims to
address aspects such as the development of new knowledge and tools to strengthen farmers’
position in the agri-food value chain and address cost pressures and sustainable transitions by
collaborating across the agri-food value chain. It should also promote on-farm and local food
processing and commercialisation and improve the governance of rural food systems while
reinforcing urban-rural linkages. Furthermore, it should support innovations that strengthen
opportunities for farmers in short, local and regional supply chains, encourage new and
sustainable business models and increase digitalisation and decarbonisation.
To strengthen farmers’ position in the agri-food value chains, R&I should support EU quality
schemes, including organic production and geographical indications, as well as the processing and
marketing of organic products and other value-chain innovations that improve farmers' economic
position.
• Digitalisation, AI and robotics
This area of action aims to foster data valorisation across agri-food supply chains, forestry,
and rural services to enable actors to make effective and efficient use of data, AI and digital
solutions. Better access to, and use of, high-quality data can support informed decision making
and evidence-based policies and pave the way for digital solutions and advanced AI applications,
including generative AI.
Priority should be given to increasing the development, accessibility and uptake of digital solutions
for a broad range of users, including small and medium-sized farms and rural businesses. R&I
20
should support the deployment and use of key technologies such as software and IT tools,
robotics, drones, augmented and virtual reality, and remote and proximal sensing, ensuring they
meet operational needs and suit users of all skill levels. The accelerated adoption of AI should be
fostered to help reduce administrative burdens, increase performance, improve access to
knowledge and support faster and better-informed decisions-making through predictive insights.
R&I should also enable new AI-powered robotic applications and more efficient, data-driven
operations across farming, forestry and rural services.
The benefits and costs of digital-based and data-based R&I solutions should be demonstrated in a
feasible, strengthening trust in their use and the skills, know-how and advisory capacity needed
for their effective integration into daily practices should be deployed.
3.4. Food 2040
Under Food 2040, the Commission will develop six areas of action to implement the priorities of
this strategic approach, to enable the co-creation of R&I activities that meet identified needs, and
to facilitate the identification, dissemination and uptake of R&I results in EU food systems,
without prejudging the next MFF.
• Place-based food systems
This area of action connects with the enabler ‘Territories and Communities’ to deploy future R&I
projects in this field. Place-based food systems reflect the diversity and richness of Europe’s food
cultures and territories, and can serve as incubators for innovations and for social cohesion.
This area of action will foster resilient and inclusive local (including urban) and regional food
economies and the cross-border interactions that address local challenges (including
environmental challenges). It combines technological and social innovation with community
engagement to encourage food system innovations and develop education and skills.
Place-based food systems include ‘rural-urban’ and ‘city-region’ interfaces as areas where
interlinkages can help with the co-creation of innovations in local food systems through, among
other activities, entrepreneurship initiatives, co-creation spaces, networks of cities and Living
Labs. These are powerful initiatives that can enrich territories. Regional Innovation Valleys for
Bioeconomy and Food Systems, which can support the implementation of other place-based
initiatives, are examples of interregional collaboration in Europe.
• Healthy and sustainable diets
Over half of the world’s population struggles to access healthy diets44, leading to negative
consequences for public health, social equity, and the environment.
This area of action will advance R&I for healthy, more sustainable and nutritious foods (in
accordance with the cross-cutting priority ‘food and feed safety, nutrition and health’). In addition,
it will support the diversification of protein sources, while addressing citizens awareness of
44 Independent Expert Group (IEG), 2021 Global Nutrition Report: The state of global nutrition, Development
Initiatives, Bristol, UK, 2021, https://globalnutritionreport.org/reports/2021-global-nutrition-report/.
21
biotech-based ingredients, and using AI to enable the safety of food to be predicted. The R&I
activities will also consider food safety, food contaminants, macro- and micronutrients, enzymes,
reformulation and food-health interactions, which all play a prominent role in supporting healthy
and sustainable diets.
This area of action will explore microbiome science, the interaction of food and gut microbiome
functionality, the microbiome’s link to specific human disorders, the identification of specific
microbial biomarkers for risk-related diseases and enabling the microbiome to promote health
benefits at different stages of the food value chain.
Cultural, behavioural and social drivers of diets will be considered to promote equitable and
sustainable dietary transitions through education and inclusion, accounting for demographic shifts
and the nutritional needs of an ageing population. R&I activities will also address concerns about
food accessibility and affordability by promoting healthier diets and dietary diversification
within planetary boundaries.
• Resource efficiency and zero-pollution in food systems
This area of action will foster new knowledge and innovative solutions to increase resource
efficiency, reduce food waste from processing to consumption, and decouple food systems
(including food processing and distribution) from fossil fuels (including petrochemical products
for packaging and transport). It will cover activities to help the food and drink manufacturers,
transport companies, and other operators across the food value chain, in their efforts to reduce
pollution, while preserving biodiversity. It will support the energy transition of food systems
as a critical lever for achieving climate and energy goals and ensuring the competitiveness and
resilience of the food industry. It will also cover food packaging solutions that aim to boost
sustainability, such as reducing material use, increasing bio-based packaging, and improving
recyclability and the shelf life of products.
The area of action will also support research on microbiome-based solutions, including the study
of their behaviour and functionality in post-harvest environments (e.g. storage, processing and
packaging), with the aim of unlocking their potential to reduce pollution, improve food
preservation, and enhance overall resource efficiency.
• Food environments and consumer empowerment
This area of action will advance understanding of the environments that shape what people
eat, including the availability, affordability, accessibility, labelling, packaging, transport,
distribution, and marketing of food, as well as the role of social media. It will support the
development of solutions that improve the availability, affordability and transparency of healthy
and sustainable choices. This area of action will be closely linked, therefore, to the ‘Healthy and
sustainable diets’ area of action. It will draw on behavioural, social, and cultural sciences to better
understand consumer behaviour and perceptions of food, support demand-side transformation, and
strengthen consumer trust and education.
22
• Scaling innovations, business models and fair food systems solutions
This area of action will support a food systems transition that is innovative, competitive and
closer to market, as well as socially fair and respectful of ecosystems and planetary boundaries.
R&I activities should lead more often to commercial applications such as innovative products, new
ventures and technologies which require: (i) collaboration between academia, industry and
different institutions or infrastructures; (ii) investment; and (iii) the promotion of the right
partnerships to succeed. This area of action is defined in cross reference to sections 2.1 and 2.3.
In addition, structural barriers, inequities and vulnerabilities, and environmental degradation from
food systems will be addressed in order to scale promising solutions and to create new business
models from pilot stage to market by providing technical and financial support. Technologies,
including AI solutions, digital platforms and the development of biotechnologies for scaling up
R&I activities on food systems will be a priority area of intervention in cross reference to the
technologies enabler.
• Aquatic food
In line with the forthcoming EU ocean and water research and innovation strategy, this area of
action will aim to foster new knowledge and solutions in support of sustainable fisheries and
aquaculture in marine and inland waters, while supporting sustainable food systems and food
security, and the transition towards a thriving and regenerative blue bioeconomy.
It will address, among other elements, climate-related and other natural risks that affect aquatic
food value chains. It will include the development of models to understand and predict the
interaction between fisheries and aquaculture and aquatic ecosystems and will support the
integration of food production in the most circular and sustainable way.
Innovation in selective and low-impact fishing gear will reduce by-catch and habitat disturbance.
Animal welfare and health issues will continue to be a priority, with a focus on the full range of
farmed and fished aquatic biota, addressing breeding and, where applicable, feeding and the
reduction of EU reliance on feed imports. It will empower fishers and aquaculture farmers to
co-design the management of aquatic living resources in the most societally acceptable way,
balancing biological, ecological, economic and social considerations. R&I will support sustainable
aquaculture (including organic, offshore and integrated multi-trophic aquaculture), technologies
such as advanced fermentation, market uptake of underutilised aquatic biomass (such as
byproducts from fisheries and aquaculture, algae, and invasive species) and sustainable and short
aquatic food value chains.
4. CONCLUSIONS
Research and innovation related to the EU’s agri-food sector is crucial for Europe’s food security
and strategic autonomy, and to safeguard and boost the overall EU’s competitiveness. Building on
the 2016 strategic approach to EU agricultural R&I and the Food 2030 R&I framework on food
systems, this new EU strategic approachpresents R&I as an opportunity to improve the
23
competitiveness, sustainability and resilience of the EU agri-food sector, and to secure a good
quality of life for people in Europe within planetary boundaries.
This new strategic approach will serve to strengthen the innovation to investment journey, and
boost the uptake of new knowledge, innovation and solutions across the agri-food sector. It will
also help to ensure that investments are efficiently and effectively targeted, align future priorities
with scientific developments, and enable the EU to seize new opportunities through the closely
interlinked frameworks of AgRI 2040 and Food 2040.
24
Annex 1: Key actions and timeline
Closing the gap from lab to fab
Actions Starting
from
1 Support, through a targeted call for proposals and other actions in the current
Horizon Europe, the better valorisation and exploitation of results from
collaborative projects and the greater use of AI in agriculture and food systems
2027
2 Increase the involvement of private sector and market experts in the evaluation
of collaborative research proposals submitted to Horizon Europe agri-food
sector calls
2027
3 Strengthen support for risk assessment methodologies by harvesting more
systematically R&I needs from EU bodies responsible for the pre-market
assessment of agri-food innovations
Q4 2027
4 Promote closer collaboration between Horizon Europe’s agri-food sector
collaborative research and the EIT Food and the European Innovation Council
(EIC)
Q4 2026
5 Launch a ‘Science for Policy Centre on Agriculture, Forestry, Rural
Development and Food System Innovation and Transformation’, managed by
the JRC, to support EU and Member States policymaking and stakeholders’
innovation capacities
Q4 2027
6 Prepare a toolbox for EU and national actions to help startups and scale ups in
the agri-food sector with the active involvement of the Standing Committee for
Agricultural Research.
Q4 2027
7 Encourage Member States to use the future national and regional partnership
plans to further enhance a supportive innovation ecosystem in the agri-food
sector
Q4 2026
Accelerating the uptake of knowledge and innovation by farmers, foresters and rural actors
Actions Starting
from
8 Enhance the efficient implementation of the multi-actor approach by
harmonising terminologies and strengthening its evaluation and monitoring
frameworks
Q1 2028
9 Establish and manage the use of collaborative platforms to facilitate
matchmaking between farmers, practitioners and multi-actor approach
projects, boosting the engagement of users in R&I
Q1 2028
10 Foster stronger links between Horizon Europe national contact points and
national CAP networks through targeted EIP-AGRI events 2027
11 Revise the common format of the practice abstracts, that are used to
disseminate the practical results of operational groups and Horizon Europe
projects, to enhance their clarity, user accessibility and practical orientation
Q4 2027
12 Map and promote EU and national testing and demonstration sites to boost
farmers’ access and the uptake of peer-to-peer innovations.
Q4 2027
25
Actions Starting
from
13 Valorise the results of the EU study on the impact of specific Horizon Europe
tools that support sustainable innovation in agriculture, forestry and rural
areas
Q4 2026
Boosting food technology for food chain resilience and food security
Actions Starting
from
14 Encourage private investment to support the building and upgrading of open-
access pilot and demo-scale bioprocessing infrastructure to support SMEs to
test and de-risk their processes without the need for prohibitive up-front
capital expenditure
Q1 2028
15 Reinforce the link between health and food to address the increasing number
of diseases linked to cardiometabolic and neurological systems, and to
include among others personalised nutrition
Q1 2027
AgRI 2040: Identifying potential R&I needs for competitive, sustainable and resilient EU
agriculture, forestry and rural areas
Actions Starting
from
16 Host the first AgRI 2040 conference to identify R&I needs and co-create the
preliminaryareas of action with stakeholders
Q3 2026
17 Develop areas of action under AgRI 2040 with R&I needs identified with
stakeholders
Q4 2027
Food 2040: Identifying potential R&I needs for competitive, sustainable and resilient food
systems
Actions Starting
from
18 Develop R&I activities on the six Food 2040 areas for action to achieve the
priorities identified
Q3 2028
19 Host the first Food 2040 high-level conference to bring the R&I food
systems community together
Q4 2028
EN EN
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Brussels, 8.9.2026 SWD(2026) 271 final
COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT
Analytical overview of the achievements of the 2016 strategic approach to agricultural
research and innovation and Food 2030 research and innovation framework and
insights from stakeholder consultation activities
Accompanying the document
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN
PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL
COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
New Strategic Approach to Research and Innovation for competitive, resilient and
sustainable agriculture, forestry, rural areas and food systems
Future-proofing EU agri-food through AgRI 2040 and Food 2040
{COM(2026) 453 final}
1
Glossary .................................................................................................................................................. 2
1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 4
2. THE ROLE OF COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN THE CURRENT EU
INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM FOR AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, RURAL AREAS AND FOOD
SYSTEMS .............................................................................................................................................. 4
2.1. Support for the innovation journey under Horizon Europe 2021-2027 ....................................... 5
2.2. Scaling impact through the current Horizon Europe Pillar II collaborative instruments ............. 7
2.3. Tools to boost and facilitate impact of collaborative R&I ......................................................... 10
3. DELIVERING ON THE 2016 STRATEGIC APPROACH TO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
AND INNOVATION ............................................................................................................................ 14
3.1. Boosting demand-driven and interactive innovation, and the uptake of R&I results through
synergies with the common agricultural policy. ............................................................................... 16
3.2. Analysis and key achievements on priority thematic areas ....................................................... 18
3.3. Analysis and key achievements on the innovation journey ....................................................... 46
4. DELIVERING ON THE FOOD 2030 RESEARCH AND INNOVATION FRAMEWORK ......... 56
4.1. Relevance of food systems and Food 2030 legacy .................................................................... 56
4.2. Analysis and key achievements ................................................................................................. 64
5. STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH ....................................................................................................... 81
5.1. Updating the 2016 strategic approach to agricultural R&I: stakeholder outreach ..................... 81
5.2. Food 2030 stakeholder outreach ................................................................................................ 82
5.3. Consultation of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Research .......................................... 85
6. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 86
7. ANNEXES ........................................................................................................................................ 89
2
Glossary
Abbreviation
or acronym
Meaning or definition
AKIS Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems
BIC Bio-based Industries Consortium
BBI-JU Bio-Based Industries – Joint Undertaking
CBE-JU Circular Bio-based Europe – Joint Undertaking
COFUND A co-funding instrument under Horizon Europe to support partnerships
CSA Coordination and support actions
EFSA European Food Safety Authority
EIC European Innovation Council
EIP-AGRI European Innovation Partnership for Agricultural Productivity and
Sustainability
EIT European Institute of Innovation and Technology
EJP European joint programmes
ERA-NET A co-funding instrument under Horizon 2020 to support partnerships
FNSSA EU-AU Research and Innovation Partnership on Food and Nutrition
Security and Sustainable Agriculture
H2020 Horizon 2020
HE Horizon Europe
IA Innovation actions
IPR Intellectual property rights
JRC Joint Research Centre
JU Joint undertaking
KIC Knowledge and information communities
PCP Pre-commercial procurement
3
PPI Public procurement of innovative solutions
PRIMA Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean area
R&I Research and Innovation
RIA Research and innovation actions
SCAR Standing Committee on Agricultural Research
SMEs Small and medium-sized enterprises
TRL Technology readiness level
4
1. INTRODUCTION
Research and innovation (R&I) are essential to support a competitive, resilient, sustainable,
fair and attractive agri-food sector1 in the European Union. In a context marked by climate
change, biodiversity loss, pressure on natural resources, including soil health, geopolitical
instability, changing consumer expectations, and the need to strengthen Europe’s
competitiveness and strategic autonomy, EU-funded R&I has a central role to play in
generating knowledge, developing solutions, supporting uptake, and informing policy.
This Staff Working Document (SWD) reviews the implementation and achievements of two
complementary EU R&I strategic approaches launched in 2016: the strategic approach to EU
agricultural R&I2, and Food 20303, the EU R&I framework for food systems transformation.
Together, these approaches have helped guide investments under Horizon 2020 and
Horizon Europe 2021-2027 in closely connected areas: agriculture, forestry and rural areas on
the one hand, and wider, post-primary production food systems on the other hand, including
food processing, consumption, nutrition, and health-related aspects.
The analysis presented in this SWD brings together evidence on implementation, achievements
and emerging lessons from both strategic approaches. It aims to take stock of past investments
and provide an evidence base for the preparation ofthe new EU strategic approach to R&I
for competitive, resilient and sustainable agriculture, forestry, rural areas, and food
systems.
The SWD is based on the analysis of Horizon Dashboard4 data, project-level information,
stakeholder consultations, workshops, surveys and contributions from Member States and
associated countries, across the agri-food R&I sectors. It also covers information from the
implementation of Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe projects up to the most recent final data
available; as Horizon Europe 2021-2027 is still ongoing at the time of publication of this SWD,
further results will emerge over time.
2. THE ROLE OF COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN THE
CURRENT EU INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM FOR AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY,
RURAL AREAS AND FOOD SYSTEMS
The 2016 strategic approach to EU agricultural R&I and Food 2030 are distinct but
complementary R&I frameworks. Both have been implemented mainly through
collaborative R&I activities under the previous Horizon 2020 and current Horizon Europe
programme, and have relied on common R&I instruments, programming tools, stakeholder
communities and cooperation platforms.
This section presents an overview of the Horizon Europe 2021-2027 instruments, and in
particular collaborative R&I instruments and their programming tools that have been used to
fund R&I activities related to the agri-food sector. These activities are connected to the
priorities identified in the 2016 strategic approach to EU agricultural R&I and Food 2030.
1 For the purpose of this Staff Working Document, the agri-food sector covers agriculture, forestry, rural areas
and food systems. 2 https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/horizon2020/items/33294/en. 3 Food 2030 - Research and innovation - European Commission. 4 https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunities/horizon-dashboard.
5
Sector-specific statistics on collaborative R&I programming over the 2014 - 2024 period
(covering Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe) show trends in investments supporting the R&I
journey towards a sustainable, competitive and resilient agri-food sector.
The final three years of the Horizon Europe 2021-2027 Framework Programme (2025-2027)
are not considered in this analysis, so the data presented below is likely to change by the end
of the programme. The data underpinning this analysis is publicly available as it was entirely
sourced from the Horizon Dashboard.
Annex I describes the methodology in detail. The list of projects included for the analysis is
accessible online as supplementary material to this staff working document.
2.1. Support for the innovation journey under Horizon Europe 2021-2027
The innovation journey starts with fundamental and frontier research or the identification of
shared challenges and the generation of knowledge, often where risks are highest and market
incentives are weakest. In the EU, this stage is primarily supported under the Horizon Europe
2021-2027 Pillar I (Figure 1).
Figure 1. The ‘innovation journey’ and the different EU-funded instruments available to support the
transformation of scientific knowledge into market-ready solutions
As innovation progresses, the focus shifts to applied research, development, testing, and
demonstration under real conditions advancing on the technology readiness level scale5,
characterised by high financial and operational risks, particularly for small and medium-sized
actors. Targeted public support helps bridge this gap by improving readiness for further
investment. The current Horizon Europe Pillar II, organised into six thematic clusters, plays a
substantial role in this phase. It supports applied and collaborative research, skills development,
and scientific excellence, and prioritises demand-driven approaches to ensure practical impacts
that align with end-user needs. Farmers, foresters, rural communities and wider food systems
5 European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Trucco, P., van Lopik, J. and
Zanobetti, L., Scaling up ideas – Using Technology Readiness Levels to analyse technology progression in
Horizon Europe, Publications Office of the European Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/1580173.
6
actors are placed in a central position, in particular in the R&I activities funded under Cluster
6 ‘Food, Bioeconomy, Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment’, facilitating co-
creation, adoption, and accelerated uptake of innovations.
At a more advanced stage, innovation requires deployment and effective market uptake. This
requires capacity to mobilise investment, skills development and trust among value chain
actors. At EU level, the current Horizon Europe Pillar III, in particular the European Innovation
Council (EIC) and the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), offer dedicated
support tools.
The EIC supports startups and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) working on
agriculture- and food-related innovation, including through its Agriculture & Food portfolio
and relevant EIC Accelerator Challenges calls6, helping to advance scaling, manufacturing
capacity and market uptake7.
The EIT funds knowledge and innovation communities (KIC), such as EIT Food8. EIT Food
supports startups, scaleups, education activities and innovation programmes across the
agricultural and food systems, including regenerative agriculture, food waste reduction,
protein diversification, food biotechnology, circularity and healthier diets9. Directly
complementing the current Horizon Europe Pillar II, EIT Food is a key innovation ecosystem
support tool that facilitates turning innovations into market-ready commercial solutions,
creating an impactful change in agricultural and food systems and improving industrial
competitiveness.
The innovation journey is also supported through the building of synergies between
Horizon Europe 2021-2027 and other EU programmes, for example with the EU’s environment
and climate programme LIFE10. Horizon Europe 2021-2027-funded projects typically generate
results that subsequently can be further demonstrated and tested through LIFE projects,
ensuring continuity and tangible impact, particularly for a sustainable agri-food sector, on
dietary patterns and environmental outcomes.
Building on the Horizon 2020 programme ‘Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation’
(WIDESPREAD), widening actions to strengthen R&I capacity in countries and regions with
lower participation in the Framework Programme continued under Horizon Europe 2021-2027
with the ‘Widening Participation and Strengthening the European Research Area’ (WIDERA)
programme. As cross-cutting Horizon instruments, widening actions complement thematic
R&I investments by supporting excellence, networking, research management capacity
6 Examples of agri-food sector relevant EIC calls include HORIZON-EIC-2023-
ACCELERATORCHALLENGES-06: Novel technologies for resilient agriculture; HORIZON-EIC-2024-
ACCELERATORCHALLENGES-04: Food from precision fermentation and algae; HORIZON-EIC-2025-
ACCELERATOR-02-CHALLENGES-02: Biotechnology driven low emission food and feed production systems,
HORIZON-EIC-2026-ACCELERATOR-02-CHALLENGES-03: Biotech for regenerating agricultural soils. 7 Examples of startups and scaleups supported by EU funding: Melt&Marble is a good example of a company
which received an EU grant and through precision fermentation placed into the EU market a functional bio-active
lipid for skincare and hair-care cosmetics products. The company’s focus is, however, alternative proteins/meats
which mimic meat and dairy fat functionality and they are pursuing this through the GRAS route for a ‘generally
recognised as safe’ designation in the US. Another EU company following the GRAS route is Onego Bio that
uses precision fermentation to produce Bioalbumen®, a fermentation-derived ovalbumin identical to the main
protein in egg whites and designed as a functional ingredient for food manufacturers. Solmeyea7 is another
example of a biotech company thatproduced high-protein powder through biomass fermentation of microalgae. 8 EIT Food. 9 Test Farms - EIT Food. 10 Programme for the Environment and Climate Action (LIFE).
7
and innovation ecosystems. Several projects have contributed to areas relevant to the agri--
food sector. These areas include sustainable agriculture, food security, plant sciences,
agrobiodiversity, digital biology, circular bioeconomy, climate-resilient agriculture and food
value chains. In doing so, those projects have broadened the capacity base for a competitive,
resilient and sustainable agri-food sector11.
2.2. Scaling impact through the current Horizon Europe Pillar II collaborative
instruments
To deliver on the 2016 strategic approach to EU agricultural R&I and Food 2030, the
Commission has been strongly investing in collaborative R&I under the current Horizon
Europe Pillar II, fostering the generation of knowledge and solutions to support the agri-food
sector with transnational consortia involving public and/or private bodies from EU Member
States, associated countries or third countries.
Building on stakeholder input from AgriResearch Conferences and Food 2030 workshops and
conferences, the programming of collaborative R&I projects on the agri-food sector supporting
the objectives set in the 2016 strategic approach to EU agricultural R&I and Food 2030 has
been structured around evolving R&I thematic and enabling “roadmaps/pathways for action”
reflecting R&I priorities.
To deliver on the priorities, the Commission invested in a wide set of complementary
collaborative R&I projects, including:
• research and innovation actions (RIA) of high scientific excellence that establish new
knowledge and/or explore a new or improved technology, practice, product, process,
service or solution;
• innovation actions (IA) that produce impactful plans or designs for new or improved
products, processes or services including prototyping, testing, demonstrating, piloting,
large-scale product validation and market replication;
• coordination and support actions (CSA) that improve cooperation between legal entities
from the EU and associated countries to strengthen the European Research Area
including, for example, standardisation, dissemination, awareness-raising,
communication and networking activities, policy dialogues, mutual learning or studies;
• Co-funded partnerships (COFUND) are R&I initiatives that align European and
national or regional priorities and funding and enable long-term collaboration between
the EU's various partners.
This broad spectrum of activities contributes to developing and deploying innovative tools,
practices, technologies, products, and governance and business models to support the
agricultural sector and food systems.
11 Under Horizon 2020, WIDESPREAD calls supported the establishment or upgrading of centres of excellence
with relevance to agriculture, forestry, rural and food-related R&I, including ANTARES in Serbia for advanced
technologies in sustainable agriculture and food security, PlantaSYST in Bulgaria for the translation of
fundamental plant research into sustainable bio-based technologies and BIOPOLIS in Portugal for environmental
biology, ecosystem research and agrobiodiversity. Under Horizon Europe, WIDERA calls continued to fund
capacity-building and innovation ecosystems in agri-food sector-relevant areas, including the Centre for
Digitalisation of biology DIGIBIO to strengthen capacities in digital biology and bio sustainability in Estonia, the
European Excellence initiative TALLHEDA supporting higher education alliances in digital agriculture in
widening countries, and the Excellence Hubs EXCEL4MED, AGRI-BIOCIRCULAR-HUB and CARBONICA,
respectively focused on Mediterranean food value chains, smart agriculture and circular bioeconomy in Poland,
Latvia and Ukraine, and carbon farming for climate-resilient agriculture in Cyprus, Greece and North Macedonia.
8
In addition to transnational collaborative research projects, the current Horizon Europe Pillar
II offers other key instruments, in particular co-funded partnerships, institutionalised
partnerships (including Joint Undertakings) and five ‘EU Missions’ (large-scale, time-bound
initiatives designed to deliver concrete solutions to society’s greatest challenges by 2030,
combining research with citizen engagement and policy action). These instruments are
contributing to reinforcing synergies and aligning R&I agendas between the EU, Member
States and associated countries and the private sector.
‘European Partnerships’ are strategic instruments that pool resources and strengthen
collaboration and knowledge exchange across Europe and beyond. They help reinforce the
global position for European R&I and enhance industrial investment by sharing risks and
ensuring investment predictability12.
By fostering and implementing co-funded partnerships on Agroecology13, Animal Health
and Welfare14, Agriculture of Data15, Forest16 and FutureFoodS17, the EU has been
catalysing strategic investments and collective actions around common objectives and
priorities for agricultural, forestry and rural R&I, as well as on food systems. Guided by
strategic research and innovation agendas co-created in most cases with the
Standing Committee on Agricultural Research (SCAR), which aim to ensure impactful results,
their focus is on the practical challenges faced by the sectors. These strategic partnerships have
so far been able to bring together 421 participants (242 unique participants) from 25 EU
Member States and 11 countries associated to Horizon Europe 2021-2027 and catalyse a
total budget of almost EUR 700 million, with an EU contribution of almost EUR 250 million.
The partnerships on Agroecology, Animal Health and Welfare, and FutureFoodS are in the
process of receiving top‑ups to their grant agreements. Once these amendments are finalised,
the total budget allocated to all co-funded partnerships will increase to over EUR 1 300
million, with an overall EU contribution of more than EUR 500 million.
There are two types of institutionalised R&I partnerships contributing to long-term
collaborations between the EU and private and public partners: joint undertakings (JUs), and
joint programmes between the EU and partner countries. JUs are partnerships between the
European Union and industry and/or Member States that fast-track next-generation
technologies, keeping Europe ahead in global markets. By co-funding large EU-wide projects
that no single country or sector could fund alone, and by connecting industry, SMEs, startups,
academia, and public bodies, these public–private partnerships enhance EU competitiveness,
resilience and sustainability.
Joint undertakings are set up for impact at scale: with a shared public-private investment and
risk, they build a full innovation chain from lab to market. They speed up
commercialisation, bringing innovations to Europeans faster, strengthening Europe’s industrial
edge, opening global market opportunities, while creating jobs and new income sources locally.
Building on the public-private partnership Bio-Based Industries Joint Undertaking (BBI JU)
(2014-2020) and running from 2021 to 2031, the Circular Bio-based Europe
Joint Undertaking18 (CBE-JU) is a EUR 2 billion partnership between the EU and the Bio-
12 Performance of European partnerships - Publications Office of the EU. 13 https://www.agroecologypartnership.eu/en/ - https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101132349. 14 https://www.eupahw.eu/ - https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101136346. 15 https://agricultureofdata.eu/ - https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101197332. 16 https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101272463. 17 https://www.futurefoodspartnership.eu - https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101136361. 18 CBE-JU: Circular Bio-based Europe Joint-Undertaking.
9
based Industries Consortium (BIC), funding R&I projects delivering sustainable bio-based
solutions to address the challenges faced by bioeconomy actors. The main goals of the CBE JU
are to: (i) accelerate the innovation process and development of bio-based innovative solutions;
(ii) accelerate market deployment of the existing mature and innovative bio-based solutions;
(iii) ensure a high level of environmental performance of bio-based industrial systems. The
CBE-JU helps support sustainable biomass use, circularity, and the development of new
value chains for primary producers and innovative bio-based or food and feed
ingredients. Concretely, as many as 17 of its 26 ‘flagship’ projects (projects with high
technology readiness levels) support innovation and deployment in the area of food and feed
ingredients, with a significant amount of EU funding involved19.
The Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean area (PRIMA)20 is an
example of a joint programme between the EU and partner countries from the Mediterranean
area focused on water availability, sustainable agriculture and food production.
The EU launched five ‘EU Missions’ as new large-scale initiatives under Horizon Europe
2021-2027 21. They address pressing societal challenges – climate change, soil and water
health, and cancer – by going beyond traditional instruments and placing R&I in a new role.
EU missions set clear, ambitious and time-bound objectives and mobilise coordinated action
around them, engaging researchers, citizens, policymakers and stakeholders to deliver concrete
solutions. Individual R&I projects remain at the core but are integrated into a systemic
approach to achieve each mission’s goals. Citizen engagement is a key element for the EU
missions. This allows the missions to produce societal impact and long-term transformation in
line with their objectives.
One of those five EU missions is ‘A Soil Deal for Europe’ (‘Mission Soil’)22. It contributes
directly to addressing food security and the competitiveness, sustainability and resilience of
the agri-food sector by striving to achieve healthy soils by 2050. It is a large-scale initiative
focused on protecting and restoring soils and promoting sustainable management practices in
urban and rural areas. ‘Mission Soil’ pioneers, showcases, and accelerates the transition to
healthy soils through ambitious R&I actions and its goal of establishing 100 ‘living labs and
lighthouses’ by 2030. Other EU missions, such as ‘Adaptation to climate change’ and ’Oceans
& Water’, also contribute to the Commission’s strategic R&I objectives to support the agri-
food sector.
Figure 2 focuses on the type of actions programmed for agriculture, forestry and rural areas on
the one hand, and for food systems on the other hand during the period 2014-2024: RIAs, IAs
and CSAs under Horizon 2020 Societal Challenge 2, Horizon Europe 2021-2027 Cluster 6 and
Mission Soil23, co-funded European partnerships (COFUND)24, European Joint Programmes
(EJP)25 and ERA-NET26 (a co-funding instrument under Horizon 2020 to support public-public
partnerships). R&I for agriculture, forestry and rural areas under Horizon 2020 and
Horizon Europe 2021-2027 dedicated the largest share of funds to RIAs, with a small decrease
19 Projects | Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking (CBE JU). 20 PRIMA. 21 EU Missions in Horizon Europe - Research and innovation: Adaptation to climate change, Cancer, Climate-
neutral and smart cities, A Soil Deal for Europe, and Restore our Ocean and Waters. 22 Mission Soil platform. 23 Notwithstanding that other EU-funded projects outside the scope of this analysis contribute directly or indirectly
to R&I in agriculture, forestry and rural areas. 24 Horizon Europe COFUND includes AGROECOLOGY, EUPAHW, FutureFoodS and AgData. 25 Horizon 2020 European Joint Programme Cofund (EJP Cofund) including One Health EJP and EJP Soil. 26 Horizon 2020 ERA-net cofund, including ICRAD and ICT-AGRI-FOOD.
10
between programmes (from 65 to 61%). These shares represent 158 projects and EUR 969.8
million in H2020, and 174 projects and EUR 1 118.5 million in Horizon Europe. The share of
IAs remained similar in Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe (11%) and translated into 37
projects and EUR 258.6 million and 55 projects and EUR 318.6 million, respectively. There
was a slight increase in the share of CSAs (from 11% to 14%), which totalised 69 projects and
EUR 167.7 million in Horizon 2020 and 65 projects and EUR 254.9 million in Horizon Europe.
The share of funding granted through co-funded instruments27 also slightly increased (from 7%
to 8%), from 4 projects and EUR 98 million to 3 projects and EUR 147.2 million.
Figure 2. Share of EU funding per type of action in H2020 (2014-2020) (left) and Horizon Europe (2021-
2024) (right) related to collaborative research in agriculture, forestry and rural areas (AGRI) and food
systems (Food 2030). Note that EJP and ERA-NET actions were implemented during H2020 and
COFUND during Horizon Europe 2021-2027.
The figure illustrates a shift in the type of actions funded by Food 2030- related projects. In
Horizon 2020, the emphasis was mainly on IAs (36 projects, EUR 274.7 million) compared to
RIAs (20 projects, EUR 150.5 million). Under Horizon Europe, the focus was more on RIAs
(53 projects, EUR 336.7 million) compared to IAs (16 projects, EUR 86 million). The number
of CSAs increased from 3 projects in Horizon 2020 (EUR 7 million) to 10 projects in the
current Horizon Europe (EUR 35.2 million). The number of partnerships (ERA-NETs under
Horizon 2020, COFUND under Horizon Europe 2021-2027) decreased from 8 in Horizon 2020
to 1 in Horizon Europe 2021-2027. However, the average funding per partnership increased
from EUR 5.3 million under Horizon 2020 to EUR 32 million (until 2025) under the current
Horizon Europe.
2.3. Tools to boost and facilitate impact of collaborative R&I
The EU Framework Programmes for Research and Innovation provide a set of programming
tools implemented in collaborative R&I projects that contribute to knowledge sharing and the
27 EJP and ERA-NET under Horizon 2020 and co-funded partnerships under Horizon Europe 2021-2027.
11
uptake of innovation in the agri-food sector. The 2016 strategic approach to agricultural R&I
and Food 2030 have been instrumental in fostering the impact of such tools.
Introduced in the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme and reinforced under Horizon Europe
2021-2027, the multi-actor approach is a programming tool for interactive and
transdisciplinary R&I that makes the R&I process co-creative and inclusive with relevant
stakeholders including potential users of results, and thus its outcomes are more co-owned,
reliable, demand driven and relevant to society28. When included as an eligibility condition in
relevant topics, the multi-actor approach ensures the genuine involvement of farmers, foresters,
rural and other food system actors in the R&I process, making them both recipients of the new
solutions, and active contributors to the development of new knowledge, tools, and services.
The development and implementation of the multi-actor approach benefited from the
experience gained through European Innovation Partnership for Agricultural Productivity
and Sustainability (EIP-AGRI) Operational Groups, which pioneered interactive
innovation and co-creation approaches in agriculture and rural areas. This approach in Horizon
Europe 2021-2027 implies meeting seven mandatory requirements, ensuring the quality of the
co-creation process in R&I activities. It is implemented under the current Horizon Europe
Cluster 6, Mission Soil, and the CBE-JU, including under all ‘flagship’ projects with high
technology readiness levels. From 2014 to 2024, the Horizon portfolio implementing tools
related to the multi-actor approach have been used for 3 681 unique organisations,
including over 1 000 SMEs (28%)29.
The 2016 strategic approach to agricultural R&I has been instrumental in further
mainstreaming the multi-actor approach. Most projects in agriculture, forestry and rural
areas apply this approach, accounting for 195 projects in Horizon 2020 and 219 in the current
Horizon Europe to date (Figure 3 and 4). In terms of investment, it amounts to EUR 1 040.7
million in Horizon 2020 and 1 241.8 million in Horizon Europe. These projects are also the
main contributors for the shares in Societal Challenge 2 (195/213) and Pillar III (195/229) of
Horizon 2020, as well as Cluster 6 (219/322) and Pillar II (219/391) under the current Horizon
Europe.
Figure 3. The share of projects applying the multi-actor approach for agriculture, forestry and rural
areas (AGRI), Food 2030, Societal Challenges 2 and Pillar III in Horizon 2020 (left) and for AGRI,
Cluster 6 and Pillar II in the current Horizon Europe (right), considering RIAs, IAs, CSAs, EJP, ERA-
NET and COFUND
28 Multi-actor approach - Agriculture and rural development. 29 European Commission. Data from CORDIS — EU Research Results. Available at: https://cordis.europa.eu.
12
Figure 4. The total number of projects applying the multi-actor approach for agriculture, forestry and
rural areas (AGRI), Food 2030, Societal Challenges 2 and Pillar III in Horizon 2020 (left) and for AGRI,
Cluster 6 and Pillar II in the current Horizon Europe (right), considering RIAs, IAs, CSAs, EJP, ERA-
NET and COFUND.
Figure 4 highlights a marked increase in the adoption of the multi-actor approach within the
Food 2030 related projects, rising from 19 projects in Horizon 2020 to 69 projects in the current
Horizon Europe. Overall (across both programmes), 60% of the Food 2030 projects have
reported applying the multi-actor approach. This can be explained by the efforts developed
under Horizon Europe 2021-2027 to include multi-actor approach as part of the eligibility
conditions.
Building on the success of the multi-actor approach, the Commission has been strongly
promoting the establishment of other specific instruments that are user-centred, directly engage
farmers, foresters, rural communities and other food system actors in collaborative R&I, and
enable place-based innovation: the Living Labs and lighthouses.
Living Labs are dynamic, open innovation ecosystems where R&I and experimentation unfold
in real-life, placing end-users at the centre of the innovation process, thus ensuring that new
solutions are demand driven. Living Labs are the key instruments used under Mission Soil and
the agroecology partnership.
Lighthouses are places to demonstrate exemplary innovative solutions, such as technologies,
practices, trainings and peer-to-peer learning, allowing testing under real-life conditions to
stimulate uptake of innovation.
Horizon tools such as cascade funding (also known as ‘financial support for third parties’ -
FSTP) under Article 207 of the Financial Regulation30 have been used to stimulate the inclusion
of small actors, such as SMEs (including farmers and foresters) in the implementation of the
projects. This kind of support rewards small actors for carrying out concrete R&I activities, in
particular those related to the testing and validation of results brought about by researchers and
innovators.
The mainstreaming of social sciences and humanities such as economics, sociology,
anthropology, management, arts, and psychology, including by promoting interdisciplinary
approaches integrating science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and
social sciences and humanities disciplines, reinforced the scope of R&I activities supporting
the agri-food sector. An important added value of the collaboration between researchers and
experts from STEM and social sciences and humanities disciplines is to take a human-centric
30 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union.
13
approach to addressing technical and societal challenges, ensuring that scientific advancements
deliver benefits to society. The meaningful and effective integration of research activities
involving social sciences and humanities disciplines is important to ensure the alignment of the
R&I activities with the needs and expectations of the end users, and therefore to facilitate the
adoption of the solutions proposed and increase the societal and economic impact.
Between 2014 and 2020, 52.6% of projects related to collaborative R&I in agriculture, forestry
and rural areas integrated social sciences and humanities, whereas between 2021 and 2024,
29.3%31. In this regard, projects on agriculture, forestry and rural areas under Horizon 2020
were within the average of Societal Challenge 2 and Pillar III, while for the current Horizon
Europe, the data shows a lower average, although the data is still incomplete for the whole
Horizon Europe 2021-2027 period (Figure 5). In Food 2030 projects, there has been a notable
rise in projects integrating social sciences and humanities activities and expertise, increasing
from 43 in Horizon 2020 to 62 in the current Horizon Europe.
Figure 5. Share of projects flagged with social sciences and humanities for agriculture, forestry and rural
areas (AGRI), Food 2030, Societal Challenges 2 and Pillar III in Horizon 2020 (left) and for AGRI,
Cluster 6 and Pillar II in the current Horizon Europe (right), considering RIAs, IAs, CSAs, EJP, ERA-
NET and COFUND
The effective contribution of social sciences and humanities disciplines enables the
development of more adequate solutions to the challenges and opportunities faced by
agricultural, forestry and rural communities. SSH are crucial to better understand and navigate
practitioners’ needs and conditions, and to identify barriers and enabling conditions for the
successful uptake and deployment of innovation. Behavioural analyses and agri-food sector
modelling activities help inform decision-making processes, as well as the design and impact
assessment of policies.
Monitoring and knowledge-management capacities help translate R&I outputs into policy-
relevant evidence for the agri-food sector. For example, the European Food Safety Authority
(EFSA) has a research platform that provides information on EU-funded research projects and
on external research projects involving EFSA, supporting access to evidence that could be
relevant to food safety and risk assessment32. Furthermore, the Joint Research Centre (JRC) is
an active partner in R&I projects on the agri-food sector, to facilitate the science to policy
interface.
31 Horizon Dashboard. 32 Research Platform | EFSA.
14
The EU’s cooperation with third countries and actors and with international organisations
in R&I on the agri-food sector has received increased focus in the programming of Horizon
2020 and Horizon Europe 2021-2027 due to its strategic potential.
Bilateral R&I cooperation opportunities have been pursued with the African Union (AU) and
China, through the EU-AU Food and Nutrition Security and Sustainable Agriculture
Partnership (FNSSA)33, part of the AU-EU High-Level Policy Dialogue on Science,
Technology and Innovation, embedded in the Joint Africa-EU Strategy, and the EU-China
Flagship on Food, Agriculture and Biosolutions34.
Cooperation with African partners has supported the 2016 strategic approach on agricultural
R&I objectives on sustainable primary production, resilience, agricultural innovation,
knowledge exchange and food security. This cooperation has also contributed to the Food 2030
agenda, which includes nutrition, urban and territorial food systems, value chains, governance
and systemic approaches to resilience.
The experience under the FNSSA is a good example of how R&I cooperation connects primary
production, food security, nutrition, sustainability and innovation uptake across regions inside
and outside the EU. It also helps align EU internal and external action, including with wider
cooperation frameworks such as Global Gateway, while ensuring that international R&I
partnerships remain mutually beneficial and responsive to regional needs. For example, the
FNSSA benefited from reinforced synergies between Horizon Europe 2021-2027 and key
initiatives such as the AU Research Grant programme35 and DeSIRA (Development Smart
Innovation through Research in Agriculture)36, thereby supporting climate-relevant, productive
and sustainable food-system transformation in low- and middle-income countries.
3. DELIVERING ON THE 2016 STRATEGIC APPROACH TO AGRICULTURAL
RESEARCH AND INNOVATION
Farming, forestry and rural areas are core to the European way of life, competitiveness and
food security and constitute strategic sectors for the Union, supported by a common agricultural
policy (CAP)37 since 1962.
R&I play a key role in making the agricultural and forestry sectors and rural areas more
competitive, resilient, sustainable, fair and attractive and inform the design and implementation
of public policies by providing the necessary knowledge and evidence base. Investments under
Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe 2021-2027 have been aligned with successive policy
developments. R&I activities contributed to addressing R&I needs to support the successive
reforms of the common agricultural policy, the Sustainable Development Goals38, the
initiatives under the European Green Deal (including the European Climate Law39, the Nature
Restoration Law40, the farm to fork strategy41, the forest strategy for 203042, the EU
33 Partnership on Food and Nutrition Security and Sustainable Agriculture (FNSSA) - Research and innovation. 34 International cooperation with China in research and innovation. 35 Funding and support - Research and innovation - European Commission. 36 DeSIRA | Capacity4dev. 37 CAP at a glance - Agriculture and rural development - European Commission. 38 Sustainable Development Goals - European Commission. 39 Regulation - 2021/1119 - EN - EUR-Lex. 40 Regulation - EU - 2024/1991 - EN - EUR-Lex. 41 EUR-Lex - 52020DC0381 - EN - EUR-Lex. 42 EUR-Lex - 52021DC0572 - EN - EUR-Lex.
15
biodiversity strategy for 203043 and the EU soil strategy for 203044), the EU action plan on the
development of organic production45, and the long-term vision for the EU’s rural areas. More
recently, R&I contributed to the vision for agriculture and food, to the strategy for generational
renewal in agriculture46, to the strategy for a competitive and sustainable EU bioeconomy47,
and to the life sciences strategy48. Policy initiatives have also been continuously fed by
evidence from R&I, for example the Soil Monitoring Law49 or the fertiliser action plan50.
Sustained investment in R&I is essential, ensuring that solutions are scalable, accessible and
adapted to the diversity of practitioners and territories, so that no community or sector is left
behind. The vision for agriculture and food51 published in February 2025 reiterated the enabling
role of knowledge, skills, research and innovation for the transformation of the agri-food sector.
In 2016, the European Commission published a strategic approach to EU agricultural R&I
(‘the 2016 strategic approach’). The 2016 strategic approach aimed to harness EU
investments in the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation with a view to
ensuring food security in the long term; addressing the environmental sustainability and
resilience of competitive land-based primary production; boosting the sustainable growth of
rural territories; and improving the delivery of research results for policy impact.
The 2016 strategic approach built on five priority areas for agricultural R&I:
Three of these priority areas concerned creating value from land - sustainable primary
production:
• resource management, in particular soil, water and biodiversity
• healthier plants and animals
• integrated ecological approaches from farm to landscape level
Two concerned enhancing rural innovation - modernising rural territories and policies:
• new openings for rural growth
• enhancing human and social capital in rural areas
The 2016 strategic approach, which guided the Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe 2021-2027
strategic planning52, has been instrumental in introducing the new Horizon way of
programming and implementing R&I for agriculture, forestry and rural areas. It has
promoted co-creation with all relevant stakeholders as the basis for identifying and designing
key R&I priorities and long-term impacts at various levels. This was achieved by working
closely with the Member States and associated countries, through the Horizon 2020 Societal
Challenge 2 ‘Food security, sustainable agriculture and forestry, marine, maritime and inland
water research, and the bioeconomy’ and the current Horizon Europe Cluster 6 Programme
43 EUR-Lex - 52020DC0380 - EN - EUR-Lex. 44 EUR-Lex - 52021DC0699 - EN - EUR-Lex. 45 EUR-Lex - 52021DC0141R(01) - EN - EUR-Lex. 46 EUR-Lex - 52025DC0872 - EN - EUR-Lex. 47 EUR-Lex - 52025DC0960 - EN - EUR-Lex. 48 EUR-Lex - 52025DC0525 - EN - EUR-Lex. 49 Directive - EU - 2025/2360 - EN - EUR-Lex. 50 EUR-Lex - 52026DC0310 - EN - EUR-Lex. 51 EUR-Lex - 52025DC0075 - EN - EUR-Lex. 52 European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Horizon Europe strategic plan 2021-
2024, Publications Office of the European Union, 2021, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/083753.
16
Committee. The prioritisation and programming of R&I under the 2016 strategic approach also
benefited from the advice of expert groups, such as SCAR53, and the engagement of important
stakeholders through public and stakeholder consultations, AgriResearch Conferences54,
workshops, and project clustering events.
Three editions of the EU AgriResearch Conference took place in 2016, 2018 and 2023.
They have been instrumental for the co-creation and implementation of the long-term strategic
approach to EU agricultural R&I, in particular for the identification of R&I needs. The input
gathered during those conferences has guided R&I programmes in agriculture, forestry, and
rural areas during the second half of Horizon 2020 and under Horizon Europe 2021-2027.
Programming has thus been driven and structured to deliver solutions to the sectors’ challenges
with a coherent and complementary approach, jointly addressing:
• What are the R&I needs to address the challenges and/or seize the opportunities for
agriculture, forestry and rural areas?
• How should those needs be delivered through R&I?
The EU has invested more than EUR 3 billion in 565 R&I projects in the period 2014-
2024, led by the 2016 strategic approach, addressing key challenges for the EU’s farming and
forestry sectors and for rural areas. This investment through Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe
2021-2027 collaborative R&I delivered an array of opportunities for generating new
knowledge and innovations, such as practices and technologies, to support the competitiveness,
sustainability and resilience of the EU agriculture, forestry and rural sectors.
This section presents an overview of the EU-funded R&I activities in the area of agriculture,
forestry and rural areas implemented through collaborative R&I in Horizon 2020 (2014-2020)
and Horizon Europe (period 2021-2024), connected to the priorities identified in the
2016 strategic approach to EU agricultural R&I.
This overview is complemented by a sector-specific analysis of key collaborative R&I
implementation and statistics over the 2014-2024 period, covering Horizon 2020 Societal
Challenge 2, the current Horizon Europe Cluster 6 and Mission Soil55, as well as Horizon 2020
Pillar III and the current Horizon Europe Pillar II. This makes it possible to reflect on trends
and the impacts of the investments made to support the R&I journey towards sustainable,
competitive and resilient agriculture, forestry and rural areas.
3.1. Boosting demand-driven and interactive innovation, and the uptake of R&I results
through synergies with the common agricultural policy
Strengthening the links between science and policymaking has been at the core of the
2016 strategic approach. R&I efforts under the EU Framework Programmes for R&I help
deliver on the cross-cutting objective of the CAP to address the needs of agriculture, forestry
and rural areas, helping them become more competitive, sustainable and resilient. In this
regard, R&I actions have built on and further strengthened synergies between two main EU
policies: the EU Research and Innovation Framework Programme Horizon Europe 2021-
2027, and the CAP. Working in synergy through the European Innovation Partnership for
53 https://scar-europe.org/. 54 European Commission: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, 2023 AgriResearch
Conference – Knowledge, innovation and skills for sustainable horizons – 31 May-1 June 2023, Brussels –
Conference report, Publications Office of the European Union, 2024, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2762/614982. 55 Notwithstanding that other EU funded projects outside the scope of this analysis contribute directly or indirectly
to R&I in agriculture, forestry and rural areas.
17
Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability (EIP-AGRI)56, both policies have stimulated co-
creation, exchange of knowledge and innovation, ensuring demand-driven research and
impactful results facilitating uptake by practitioners.
Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems (AKIS)57 emerged as a key framework to
enable agricultural innovation both in Europe and internationally. AKIS refer to ‘the combined
organisation and knowledge flows between individuals, organisations, and institutions who use
and produce knowledge for agriculture and interrelated fields’58, including public decision-
makers alongside farmers, foresters, rural actors, researchers, educators, advisory and
extension services, the private sector, and other stakeholders. Farmers are at the centre of these
systems, within the ‘knowledge triangle’ – comprising research, education, and extension
services – empowering them to co-develop and adopt innovative, sustainable agricultural
practices.
AKIS aim at enhancing and organising knowledge flows among actors involved in agriculture
and related sectors. Within AKIS, the EIP-AGRI promotes an innovation model based on the
co-creation, knowledge sharing and multi-actor collaboration. It makes it possible to capitalise
on complementary knowledge and expertise of different actors, including farmers, foresters
and rural actors, which supports the transition from research to the deployment of the solutions
developed, thus reinforcing the innovation ecosystem.
Importantly, both Horizon Europe 2021-2027 and the CAP support the effective functioning of
AKIS, through initiatives aimed at accelerating innovation and the adoption of R&I outcomes.
Setting up and reinforcing an integrated AKIS became a mandatory element in the CAP 2023-
2027, requiring Member States to develop their national strategies for AKIS.
Under Horizon, the EU has funded a number of projects specifically to support the
implementation of AKIS across the different Member States. It has also funded thematic
networks and advisory networks to support knowledge sharing and innovation uptake.
Thematic networks collect and disseminate existing knowledge across regions and sectors,
facilitating the scaling out of proven solutions. Advisory networks connect advisors across
Member States, associated countries, and support them in sharing their knowledge and
expertise, staying up to date with cutting-edge knowledge and innovation, and contribute to
translating science into practice by making advisors better equipped to accompany farmers,
foresters and rural actors.
Building on the experience with thematic and advisory networks, EU Thematic Knowledge
Hubs are being funded under the Horizon Europe Work Programme 2026-2027. They will
encourage gathering of knowledge and advice under a cohesive thematic umbrella. This will
help users identify go-to sources for valuable thematic content and mitigate fatigue among
advisors, whose presence is often requested in multiple initiatives.
EIP-AGRI is bringing together AKIS actors with complementary knowledge - farmers,
foresters, researchers, advisors, businesses, environmental groups, consumer interest groups or
other NGOs - to co-create practical solutions for agriculture, forestry and rural communities in
innovation projects.
Under the CAP, over 5 200 EIP operational groups have been established since 201459.
Operational groups are spaces where ideas are tested, adjusted and made to work in real
56 About EIP-AGRI projects | EU CAP Network. 57 AKIS | EU CAP Network. 58 Regulation - 2021/2115 - EN - EUR-Lex. 59 https://eu-cap-network.ec.europa.eu/operational-groups-eu-member-states_en.
18
farming conditions, following the ‘interactive innovation model’60. Starting from farmers’
concrete needs, these bottom-up projects draw on existing knowledge and innovations from
EU, national or regional programmes and adapt them to local realities. More than 6 600 projects
are planned for the period 2023-2027.
In synergy, the Horizon Europe 2021-2027 Cluster 6 Work Programmes have (i) promoted the
involvement of operational groups in R&I projects through the multi-actor approach, (ii)
supported the dissemination of knowledge generated by operational groups in several
countries, and (iii) promoted links between operational groups and Living Labs. The reverse
integration - testing solutions from Horizon projects in operational groups to translate them
into practical, locally tailored solutions - appears to need more work61. Furthermore, the EU
CAP network supports the implementation of the CAP by connecting actors across Member
States, facilitating peer learning, thematic exchanges, and dissemination of best practices and
project results from Horizon projects and operational groups.
To guarantee the release of actionable outcomes from multi-actor projects, practice abstracts
have been implemented across Horizon multi-actor approach projects and operational groups
and collected in the EIP-AGRI project database, resulting in the development of over 14 000
practice abstracts. These practice abstracts - following a common EIP-AGRI format - are meant
to offer valuable practical information for projects to pass on to users for application in real-
world settings.
The establishment of place-based innovation such as living labs and lighthouses was strongly
promoted under the 2016 strategic approach, valorising their potential to reduce technical,
economic, and social risks associated with the adoption of innovative practices. Living Labs
and lighthouses are central tools in the co-funded partnerships on agroecology, agriculture
of data, and forest, and in the EU mission ‘A Soil Deal for Europe’. EIP-AGRI operational
groups provide a complementary mechanism for testing, adapting and implementing
innovations in real farming and forestry conditions, often serving as entry points for scaling
innovations developed in research projects and Living Labs.
Demonstration farms – set up both under Horizon and CAP, in certain Member States – also
deserve mention in this respect, as effective tools in providing farmers with opportunities to
exchange knowledge with their peers and with experts, jointly solving problems through hands-
on activities32, strongly influencing farmers’ decision to innovate.
Farmer involvement in R&I has also been stepped up through other means, such as through
relevant governance structures. For instance, the CBE-JU established a working group
dedicated to enhancing the role of primary producers along the bio-based value chains62.
3.2. Analysis and key achievements on priority thematic areas
In this section, key achievements of the implementation of the 2016 strategic approach in
priority thematic areas are presented, with an overview of the projects funded and selected
success stories and flagship examples of R&I activities.
To deliver on the four objectives of the 2016 strategic approach, R&I activities have been
programmed in a landscape of thematic areas, regularly reviewed based on the input of
stakeholders during the AgriResearch Conferences. Together, these thematic areas
60 Article 127 of the Regulation - 2021/2115 - EN - EUR-Lex. 61 European Court of Auditors, special report 09/2026 “European innovation partnership in the common
agricultural policy – A key tool for innovation in EU agriculture falling short of its full potential”, Publications
Office of the European Union, 2026. 62 Working group on primary producers | Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking (CBE JU).
19
comprehensively address R&I needs on specific sector or thematic, and on cross-cutting
challenges. In this section, we provide an overview of the R&I activities funded under
Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe 2021-2027, under the 13 thematic areas defined following
the 2023 AgriResearch Conference:
1. Climate smart agriculture
2. Biodiversity friendly agriculture
3. Sustainable management of land, soil, water and nutrients
4. Sustainable management of forests
5. Healthy, sustainable and resilient cropping systems
6. Healthy, sustainable and resilient livestock systems
7. New farming, food and bio-based systems
8. Rural opportunities
9. Fostering agroecology and organic farming at the farm and landscape levels
10. Strengthening socio-economic performance and modernising policies
11. Unlocking the potential of digital and data technologies
12. Enhancing knowledge flows and skills
13. Strengthening international cooperation
3.2.1. Climate-smart agriculture
Impacts of climate change are becoming increasingly evident. People working with and on the
land are most directly affected. To limit further concentration of greenhouse gases in the
atmosphere, emissions must be cut through mitigation measures and carbon sequestration must
be strengthened, while resilience against unavoidable impacts must be built through adaptation
measures and climate smart solutions. Climate-smart solutions are innovative strategies
designed to address climate change and foster sustainable development.
EU-funded R&I is driving advances in climate-smart agriculture through projects such as
ClieNFarms, ClimateSmartAdvisors, Climate Farm Demo, ClimateSmartResearch. Projects
such as CREDIBLE, MARVIC, MRV4SOC help farmers, foresters and rural communities
adapt to changing climate conditions, reduce GHG emissions, and improve carbon removals.
Peatlands are crucial carbon sinks and natural water regulators, but decades of drainage-based
agriculture have led to CO₂ emissions, soil degradation, and water problems. Paludiculture,
sustainable cultivation on wet and rewetted peatlands, offers a nature-based solution that
restores water retention, reduces nutrient runoff, and supports biodiversity. Paludi4All, PALUS
DEMOS, and PaluWise are driving this transition by assessing socio-economic and
environmental impacts, establishing large-scale demo sites, and scaling multi-actor strategies
across Europe. Together, they aim to reduce emissions, protect water resources, and promote
resilient, low-impact farming systems.
Flagship stories
ClieNFarms (Climate Neutral Farms, 2022-2025, IA) responded to the dual challenge
facing European agriculture: reducing its contribution to climate change while building its
resilience to the droughts, heatwaves and floods that increasingly threaten agricultural
productivity. Working directly with farmers and a broad range of stakeholders including
20
advisors, banks, agri-food actors and investors, the project developed, tested and validated a
portfolio of systemic farm-level climate solutions covering both livestock and crop farming.
Solutions to these challenges range from feeding animals with specific herbs or plant extracts
to reduce methane emissions, to establishing permanent vegetation cover under olive trees
to reduce soil erosion, and approaches to better manage soil, reduce fertiliser use and
improve animal nutrition and rearing. All solutions were tested and validated in real-world
scenarios and compiled into a publicly accessible Catalogue of Climate Solutions, with
locations and production systems explorable via an interactive map.
Beyond individual farm practices, the project developed transition roadmaps to help agri-
food actors adapt climate-neutral practices, a scaling toolbox providing step-by-step
guidance for doing so, microlearning content to support adoption, and policy briefs
identifying potential barriers to achieving climate-neutral production.
The project’s results continue to have impact through the EU-funded ClimateSmartAdvisors
and Climate Farm Demo projects, as well as the Farming for Climate platform. More about
the project results can be found here.
Climate Farm Demo (A European-wide network of pilot farmers implementing and
demonstrating climate smart solutions for a carbon-neutral Europe, 2022-2029, CSA)
is an ongoing pan-European initiative building the largest network of its kind to accelerate
the transition to climate-smart farming,with 1 460 pilot demo farms across 28 countries and
all major pedoclimatic zones.
The project connects farmers with more than 230 dedicated climate farm advisors who
support them in developing individual adaptation and mitigation plans, grounded in carbon
audits and tailored to each farm’s conditions. Technical and social innovations are
demonstrated to the wider farming community through six annual demo campaigns, with a
target of 4 500 demonstration events over the project’s lifetime, and new climate-smart
solutions are co-created in 10 living labs operating across Europe.
To underpin the transition with robust evidence, the project benchmarks carbon and climate
assessment tools used across the EU and is developing a monitoring, reporting and
verification process to quantify greenhouse gas reductions at farm level, with consolidated
data from 1 460 farms set to constitute a unique pan-European dataset. A framework for
rewarding mechanisms has been initiated to help equip farmers and advisors to engage with
emerging incentive systems, feeding into EU policy recommendations grounded in real field
experience.
An online knowledge repository gathers project activities, registered farms, demonstration
events and results, supporting knowledge exchange both within the network and with the
broader agricultural community. The project aims to reach 250 000 stakeholders, including
150 000 farmers,becoming a real-world laboratory for testing climate-smart practice transfer
at scale.
ClimateSmartAdvisors (Connecting and mobilising the EU agricultural advisory
community to support the transition to Climate Smart Farming, 2023-2030, CSA) is a
pan-European multi-actor network covering 27 countries. Its aim is to boost the EU
agricultural advisory community, leading to an acceleration of the adoption of climate smart
(CS) farming practices by the wider farming community within and across EU AKIS.
The project unites 1 500 advisors, 27 national coordinators, and 12 thematic leaders in a
shared effort to advance climate-smart agriculture in Europe. Its core mechanism is the
creation of 260 advisory ‘communities of practice’, peer-to-peer knowledge exchange
21
groups organised around 12 thematic areas covering climate change mitigation and
adaptation.
A Farming for Climate knowledge repository, bringing together climate-smart advisory
tools, carbon assessment tools and mitigation and adaptation practices, is under development
as a lasting open resource for the advisory community.
CLIMED-FRUIT (Adaptation to climate change and mitigation for perennial crops in
Mediterranean Area, 2022-2025, CSA) had built on the results of nine EIP-AGRI
operational groups to compile and share field-tested knowledge on climate adaptation and
mitigation covering several Mediterranean perennial crops in 7 different countries (France,
Spain, Portugal, Greece, Italy, Croatia, Serbia).
This thematic network structured its work around five thematic areas: soil conservation and
carbon storage; improving crop resilience to climatic hazards; innovative practices for water
stress management and dry farming; adaptation of food chain processes to climate change;
and diversification and biodiversity preservation in Mediterranean crops.
It published a comprehensive technical review that brought together innovative strategies
and real-world results from operational groups and EU projects, covering practices ranging
from cover crops and composting techniques to smart irrigation systems and post-harvest
innovations. By translating research and on-farm experience into practical, accessible
guidance, the project aimed to equip Mediterranean farmers with concrete tools to sustain
productivity while protecting the region’s ecosystems under increasing climate pressure.
3.2.2. Biodiversity-friendly agriculture
Agrobiodiversity is a vital foundation for resilient farming systems, yet its practical uptake can
be constrained by economic, technical, knowledge-related and implementation barriers. As
farms face growing pressures from climate change, soil degradation, biodiversity loss and
market uncertainty, the challenge is to better understand how diverse crops, species, varieties,
habitats and management practices can be effectively integrated and scaled into productive,
viable and sustainable farming systems.
Wild pollinators are declining across Europe and beyond, with alarming consequences for
functioning ecosystems and agricultural production. EU-funded projects such as RestPoll,
Safeguard, ProPollSoil, and AGRI4POL address this challenge by restoring habitats,
identifying emerging threats, assessing the role of soil management and land use, and exploring
how crop varieties, agricultural practices and landscape features can better support pollinators.
To assess the impact of practices, monitoring agrobiodiversity is vital to advance sustainable
agriculture. EU-funded projects such as BioMonitor4CAP, SOB4ES, BIOservicES,
SHOWCASE and FRAMEwork address this challenge through complementary approaches:
developing advanced monitoring systems, integrating soil biodiversity indicators into land
management, assessing the role of soil organisms, testing incentives for biodiversity-enhancing
practices, and supporting farmer-led collaboration and knowledge exchange.
Soil degradation and climate change increasingly threaten biodiversity, ecosystem services and
agricultural resilience, highlighting the need for more sustainable soil management. EU-funded
projects (including those under Mission Soil) address this challenge through complementary
approaches: MultiSoil co-creates farmer-led guidelines for soil health and functional
biodiversity; SOILRES implements agroecological strategies to strengthen soil health, crop
resilience and biodiversity; SOILGUARD developed predictive tools to support policy and
management decisions.
22
SoildiverAgro and EXCALIBUR advanced innovative soil management practices by
developing guidance for farmers and policymakers, testing practical solutions, and harnessing
soil biodiversity through microbial bioproducts and soil-improving approaches.
A dedicated CORDIS results pack Enabling nature-based solutions in sustainable agriculture
brings together these examples and more, highlighting how EU-funded R&I projects, alongside
key European initiatives such as the agroecology partnership and Biodiversa-plus, are
supporting the uptake of sustainable farming approaches, including agroecological and nature-
based solutions that strengthen agrobiodiversity, resilience and long-term sustainability.
Flagship stories
SHOWCASE (SHOWCASing synergies between agriculture, biodiversity and
Ecosystem services to help farmers capitalising on native biodiversity, 2020-2025, RIA)
addressed the persistent gap between scientific evidence on farmland biodiversity and its
actual adoption by the farming sector. The project established a multi-actor network of
experimental biodiversity areas across 11 sites in 10 European countries, bringing together
farmers, researchers, advisors and local communities to test and demonstrate biodiversity
management strategies under real-world conditions.
Field studies produced concrete evidence of biodiversity gains. The project developed
biodiversity indicators and key performance indicators based on easily quantifiable land-use
characteristics to support large-scale monitoring. Farmers demonstrated high willingness to
accept the indicators most strongly linked to biodiversity outcomes. A practical handbook
entitled Farming with Biodiversity was produced as an evidence-based guide for farmers,
advisors and policymakers, alongside awareness-raising materials linking biodiversity to
food security and pest control. More about the project results can be found here.
SoildiverAgro (Soil biodiversity enhancement in European agroecosystems to promote
their stability and resilience by external inputs reduction and crop performance
increase, 2019-2025, RIA) set out to demonstrate that enhancing soil biodiversity is a
practical pathway to more sustainable and resilient European agriculture, reducing
dependence on external inputs while maintaining or improving crop yields and farm
profitability.
Through 15 case studies across six European pedoclimatic zones, the project tested a wide
range of crop management practices adapted to local conditions, focusing on potato and
wheat in both monoculture and diversified cropping systems.
The project developed a predictive tool using infrared spectroscopy and basic climatic and
soil parameters to estimate soil biodiversity variables. It also developed a complementary
decision support tool integrating machine learning models in order to estimate wheat
production and soil biodiversity indices from readily accessible field data. Network analysis
of over 10 000 taxonomic units identified key relationships between specific soil organism
groups and ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling, water retention
and erosion control across different European regions. These results were translated into Best
Practice Guidelines for wheat, potato and vegetable crops, alongside policy
recommendations to accelerate adoption of biodiversity-positive practices at local and
European levels. More about the project results can be found here.
3.2.3. Sustainable management of land, soil, water and nutrients
European agriculture depends on healthy soils, reliable water availability and efficient nutrient
cycling. However, soil degradation, water scarcity, pollution and dependence on external
23
fertiliser inputs are putting farm productivity, ecosystem services and food security under
pressure. EU R&I support integrated approaches that improve soil health, water resilience and
nutrient efficiency while helping farmers adapt solutions to local agro-ecological conditions.
Mission Soil: ‘A Soil Deal for Europe’
The Mission Soil ‘A Soil Deal for Europe’ aims to accelerate the transition towards healthy
soils through research, innovation, engagement and living labs and lighthouses. The mission is
proving an essential tool for generating and facilitating access to knowledge, data, and
innovative practices on soil health to farmers, foresters and other land managers and
landowners, helping them to increase their productivity, resilience and competitiveness
sustainably. Since its launch in 2021, 45 living labs have been established, contributing to the
objective of setting up 100 living labs by 2030. With 63 research and innovation projects
funded in 2021-2024 under Mission Soil, the current investment amounts to EUR 469 million,
with nearly 1 400 organisations involved.
Living labs: Mission Soil living labs are user-centred, place-based and transdisciplinary
research and innovation ecosystems that bring together land managers, scientists, citizens,
businesses and local authorities to co-design, test, monitor and evaluate solutions to improve
soil health in real-life settings. Collaboration across sites enables partners to replicate actions,
compare results, exchange good practices, validate methodologies and promote cross-
fertilisation at local and regional level.
The funded network of living labs focuses on different land uses, soil challenges and pedo-
climatic conditions. The projects in this network include LivingSoiLL, GOV4LL,
iCOSHELLs, SOILCRATES, LILAS4SOILS, Nemesis, GroundWork, TRAILS4SOIL, and
URSOILL. The projects PREPSOIL, NATI00NS, SOILL-Startup, and SOILL-Stepup support
the preparation, deployment and operationalisation of the network of living labs.
For example, the LILAS4SOILS project established five living labs in real-life settings across
six different countries to co-create and co-implement carbon farming practices based on
regional agricultural contexts. Farmers are an active part of the research process by co-creating,
testing and validating practices such as manure incorporation, reduced tillage, grassland
maintenance, cover cropping, among others. Their involvement in the R&I is partly bottom-up
implemented through an open call and cascade funding mechanism. The cross-fertilisation of
knowledge between living labs is also promoted to enhance the transfer and uptake of
innovation.
Mission Soil is also fostering a growing innovation ecosystem of stakeholders around soil
health, strengthening its ties with the private sector, including finance and funding providers,
and international organisations, such as UNESCO. The Mission Soil Manifesto, a voluntary,
non-binding commitment has gathered so far over 3 500 signatures, including nearly 700 legal
entities.
Mission Soil’s citizen engagement initiatives are also supported by a range of projects,
communication activities and information materials. Since its first edition in 2023, the
European Mission Soil Week has been a flagship event for the European soil community,
bringing together around 300–350 participants in person each year. The network of 37 Mission
Soil Ambassadors, who operate primarily at local and regional level, supports efforts to raise
public awareness of the importance of soil health and to promote the mission’s activities on a
large scale. Complementing this, the Mission Soil Investment Forum is an annual event
dedicated to improving soil health through innovative business models and strategic
investments.
24
Mission Soil is also enhancing awareness of the societal role of soils, to ensure access to soil
health education and training, to strengthen citizen participation in soil and land-oriented
activities, and to reward best practices. Soil literacy is fundamental to the success of this
initiative. Through targeted communication, peer-to-peer knowledge exchange, practitioner-
led research, and digital learning opportunities, the aim is to embed soil awareness across
society, with schools, training institutions, and universities playing a central role in driving the
green transition.
Soil health is an important component of the CAP’s environmental and climate objectives.
Through conditionality requirements, eco-schemes, and rural development measures, the CAP
supports practices that protect soil, enhance soil fertility, increase organic carbon, and reduce
erosion and degradation. Mission Soil complements the CAP by developing, testing, and
demonstrating innovative solutions for soil health through research and living labs,
generating knowledge and evidence that can be scaled up and implemented through CAP
instruments across the EU.
Mission Soil also plays a central role in the implementation of the Soil Monitoring Law,
as it supports the development of soil monitoring systems, indicators, data and practical
approaches needed to safeguard and assess soil health across Europe.
As outlined in the Mission Soil Implementation Plan, the mission’s project portfolio is
organised around several complementary thematic clusters, each contributing to the mission’s
objectives.
A harmonised EU soil health monitoring framework is being developed through
BENCHMARKS, AI4SoilHealth, and WHEATWATCHER, with dedicated projects addressing
specific threats: erosion (EUROSION), desertification (TERRASAFE, MONALISA), and
nitrogen fluxes (NitroScope). Cross-cutting objectives are supported by SoilWise (which
curates an open-access knowledge and data catalogue) and SOLO (which identifies R&I
priorities for the soil health agenda).
Knowledge generation to improve soil literacy and broaden stakeholder engagement is driven
by NBSOIL, LOESS, CURIOSOIL, ECHO, SOILSCAPE, and SoilTribes.
Mission Soil has established innovation hotspots across four thematic areas:
- biodiversity: SOIL O-LIVE, SOB4ES, BIOservisES, MultiSoil, ProPollSoil, SOILRES;
- carbon farming: MaRViC, MRV4SOC, CREDIBLE, DeepHorizon, SUS-SOIL, OGCR,
CAFAMORE, ForPeat;
- soil pollution and remediation: ARAGORN, ISLANDR, EDAPHOS, SOILPROM;
- circular solutions for soil health: DeliSoil, Waste4Soil, BIN2BEAN, FENIX,
bioSOILUTIONS.
Mission Soil also addresses cross-cutting dimensions spanning new business models for soil
health (NOVASOIL, SoilValues, InBestSoil), international cooperation (AUSO), digital
innovation (PHISHES, E-SPFdigit), and territorial approaches (HuMUS, SPADES).
Mission Soil supports dedicated research into the soil–water nexus through SpongeWorks,
Path4Med, and SEACURE. Hort2thefuture and SPIN-FERT are developing sustainable,
circular alternatives to peat for horticultural production, reducing pressure on vulnerable
peatland ecosystems while supporting the EU's commitment to peatland restoration and climate
neutrality.
25
Water resilience and efficient water management are becoming critical for European
agriculture as climate change increases droughts, water scarcity and variability in water
availability. Improving water-use efficiency, retention and reuse is essential to strengthen agro-
ecosystem resilience, maintain productivity and reduce pressure on natural resources.
Research in this area spans several complementary themes. Drought resilience and climate
adaptation are addressed through projects focused on improving crop resilience to water stress
via breeding, root system optimisation, and resilient farming systems (Root2Res, TOMRES,
SolACE, BRESOV). Complementing this, efficient irrigation and water-use optimisation
are pursued through the development of precision irrigation technologies, digital monitoring,
and decision-support tools to improve water efficiency at farm level (RAINS, FATIMA,
FERTINNOWA, FARMWISE, SHui, MOSES).
At landscape scale, water retention and nature-based solutions are enhanced through
projects that improve soil water retention and biodiversity, and ecosystem-based approaches to
build resilience against both droughts and floods (BOOSTER, STRATUS, SpongeWorks).
Water reuse, circularity, and integrated management are promoted across agricultural
systems and value chains through circular approaches and integrated water governance
(WATERAGRI, OPTAIN, MASLOWATEN, SuWaNu Europe, Circular4Farm, GEORGIA,
WATERPROTECT, AYUMI).
Nutrients and fertilisers are essential to sustain agricultural productivity and food security, but
their inefficient use contributes to soil degradation, water pollution, eutrophication, and
greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time, the EU remains highly dependent on imported
fertilisers and raw materials, highlighting the need for more circular, resource-efficient and
resilient nutrient management systems.
This challenge is addressed across four interconnected areas. Nutrient-use efficiency and the
reduction of environmental losses are tackled through improved fertiliser application practices
and nutrient budgeting (NutriBudget, ECONUTRI). Nutrient recovery and circular
bioeconomy initiatives recover nutrients from agricultural, urban, and industrial waste streams
to produce recycled fertiliser products (Nutri2Cycle, CIRCULAR AGRONOMICS, WalNUT).
The development of bio-based and alternative fertilisers further reduces dependency on
imported mineral inputs by bringing sustainable fertiliser products to market (RUSTICA,
SEA2LAND, FERTIMANURE, LEX4BIO). Dedicated knowledge transfer and advisory
support activities provide farmers, advisors, and value-chain actors with practical tools,
guidance, and business models to accelerate uptake (NUTRIMAN, Trans4Num).
Flagship stories
EJP SOIL (Towards climate-smart and sustainable soil management, 2020-2025,
COFUND) brought together a group of 26 leading European research institutes and
universities in 24 countries. The project has mobilised over EUR 40 million, in addition to
the EU contribution of EUR 40 million. The project addressed key societal challenges
including food and water security, climate change adaptation and mitigation, biodiversity
preservation and ecosystem services, recognising agricultural soils as a critical resource.
Through three internal and two external calls for research proposals, 26 internal and 19
external projects were selected for funding, generating a substantial body of new knowledge
on soil carbon sequestration, soil health indicators, fertilisation guidelines and the impact of
sustainable management practices across European conditions.
A roadmap for soil research in Europe was developed, consulted with national stakeholders
and updated based on a synthesis of existing research, research needs and gaps to serve as
26
an agenda and implementation plan for the programme and beyond, in close collaboration
with SOLO, PREPSOIL, ORCASA and FACCE-JPI initiatives.
To support long-term monitoring and data sharing, a software framework for a harmonised
agricultural soil information system was developed alongside guidelines for mapping and
accounting soil carbon, fertility and degradation at different scales, and a network of long-
term experimental sites and soil laboratories was established.
Education and training activities included a joint PhD curriculum, topic-specific doctoral
courses and seven rounds of a visiting scientists programme, strengthening the next
generation of European soil researchers.
Policy dialogue was advanced through EU policy forums and national workshops, translating
research findings into evidence-based recommendations for practitioners and decision-
makers.
More about the project results can be found here.
SEA2LAND (Producing advanced bio-based fertilizers from fisheries wastes, 2021-
2025, IA) demonstrated the large-scale recovery and reuse of nutrients from fish processing
waste and other bio-based streams to produce safe and marketable fertilisers across several
European regions.
The project developed and validated nine bio-based fertiliser technologies adapted to
different crops and soil conditions, while involving farmers, fertiliser companies and public
authorities throughout the value chain. By combining technological innovation, field
demonstrations and regulatory support, the project showed how nutrient recycling can reduce
dependence on imported mineral fertilisers, lower environmental impacts and create new
business opportunities within a circular bioeconomy while improving soil health. More about
the project results can be found here.
More in-depth examples of Horizon R&I results in this area can be found in the 2026 Cordis
results pack on Nutrient-rich fertilisers from organic waste and renewable biomass. A
dedicated CORDIS results pack - Soil health: Reaping the benefits of healthy soils, for food,
people, nature and the climate showcases how EU-funded research and innovation projects are
advancing sustainable soil management, carbon sequestration, biodiversity and resilience of
agro-ecosystems. Complementing this, the results pack on Innovative research for sustainable
fertiliser production and nutrient management highlights solutions supporting circular nutrient
use, fertiliser efficiency and reduced dependency on imported inputs, contributing to more
sustainable and resilient farming systems.
3.2.4. Sustainable management of forests
Europe’s forests are facing growing pressure from climate change and increasing natural
disturbances such as wildfires, storms, pests, and diseases, threatening their biodiversity,
resilience, and ability to provide essential ecosystem services. At the same time, forests are
critical for climate change mitigation, carbon storage, human wellbeing, and the transition to a
circular and sustainable bioeconomy. Addressing these interconnected challenges requires
targeted research and innovation investments to protect and restore healthy, resilient, and
multifunctional forest ecosystems across Europe.
EU-funded projects are addressing these challenges. SMURF and Small4Good projects
contribute to sustainable forest management to secure resources, support biodiversity, and help
small landowners transition to new business models, while HOMED and FORSAID foster
innovation in forest health through holistic management approaches and digital technologies.
27
Enhancing scientific knowledge and adaptive management on forest ecosystem services and
resilience has been key focus. INFORMA, CLIMB-FOREST, and OptFor-EU enhance science-
based knowledge on EU forests, including old-growth forests and capacities to mitigate climate
change. FORWARDS prototypes the ForestWard Observatory to demonstrate the impact of
climate change on forests, guiding decision-making for practical forest management.
OptFORESTS supports the protection and sustainable management of forest genetic resources.
Innovative technologies and new value chains are developed to unlock the economic and
environmental potential of forests through digitalization and precision tools. The core objective
of SINTETIC is to set up and demonstrate a traceability system for trees, logs and boards based
on information and communications technology innovations. Projects TIMBERHAUS and
WoodStock explore the role of timber-based construction in reducing carbon emissions and
promoting sustainable architectural practices.
Collaboration and innovation in forest governance drive the exchange of expertise and the
creation of robust research agendas across Europe. One of the main outputs of the EUFORE
project is a strategic R&I agenda (SRIA) for forestry and the forest-based sector. The SRIA
served as the basis for the European co-funded partnership on ‘FOrests, forestry, and the forest-
based sector: Research and innovation for a Sustainable Transition (FOREST)’.
To promote the sustainability and resilience of European forests, the EU CAP network focus
group on ‘Forestry and forest health’ brought together experts, practitioners, researchers,
foresters, advisors, and policymakers to exchange knowledge and identify practical solutions
and future research needs for improving forest health and resilience.
Flagship stories
European Partnership for FOrests, forestry, and the forest-based sector: Research and
innovation for a Sustainable Transition (‘FOREST Partnership’)
The FOREST partnership aims to advance research and innovation that support the transition
towards a sustainable and circular bioeconomy rooted in forest ecosystems. The partnership
aims to address fragmentation within the sector, strengthen collaboration and knowledge
exchange, and enhance the resilience of ecosystems, biodiversity, and soil health, while
improving adaptation to climate change impacts.
As a key platform for cooperation among stakeholders from Member States and Associated
Countries, the partnership will promote transnationally-coordinated R&I activities, reduce
duplication of efforts, and stimulate innovation across the sector. It is designed to support
the transition towards a more innovative, knowledge-driven, resource-efficient, productive,
and resilient forest-based economy.
The FOREST partnership represents a large-scale ten-year research programme involving
100 organisations from 28 countries during its initial phase. From 2026 to 2036, the
partnership plans to launch seven co-funded joint calls, supporting an estimated 200-250
transnational research and innovation projects involving around 400 stakeholders. In
parallel, it will establish living labs to enable real-world experimentation and innovation.
3.2.5. Healthy, sustainable and resilient cropping systems
Crops and cropping systems are facing growing pressure from climate change, biodiversity
loss, soil and water degradation, and the spread of new and re-emerging pests and diseases,
among many other challenges. These pressures rarely occur in isolation; rather, crops are
increasingly exposed to multifactorial stress, with several biotic and abiotic factors interacting
28
at the same time and often reinforcing one another. Together, these challenges increase risks to
food security, farm viability and strategic autonomy. Strengthening plant health and enhancing
the sustainability and resilience of European agriculture are therefore essential.
EU-funded projects are helping address these challenges and support the transition towards
healthy, sustainable and resilient crops and cropping systems. In particular:
• projects like IPMWorks, IPM Decisions, AdoptIPM IWMPraise, Conserwa, Agrosus,
GOOD have advanced integrated pest and weed management;
• projects like SuperPests, Novaterra, WeLaser, novIGRain, and PestNu have supported
innovative approaches to control plant pests;
• projects like Viroplant, nEUROSTRESSPEP, Sagropia, NextGenBioPest, MultiSoil and
SOILRES have helped develop safer and more sustainable crop protection solutions.
Together, these projects have been delivering results including improved and innovative
management strategies, tools to support decision-making alternative control methods,
and field-tested solutions that broaden the range of crop protection options available to
farmers.
In parallel, networks and thematic actions like AdvisoryNetPest, Oper8, RENOVATE,
INNOSETA, SMARTPROTECT, and WINETWORK are bringing practical solutions and
training closer to farmers, advisors and other end users.
Various projects supporting EU Plant Health efforts, including XF-ACTORS, PRE-HLB, FF-
IPM, IPM-Popillia, MUSA, VIRTIGATION, TROPICSAFE, HOMED, REACT, Patafest,
Nem-Emerge, POMATO, CITRUSBUSTERS, EUFAWReady and BeXyl have targeted
emerging threats to plant health, including Xylella fastidiosa, Popillia japonica, Spodoptera
frugiperda, as well as other priority pests in the EU. These projects have contributed to
improved surveillance, monitoring, preparedness, risk assessment and integrated
management approaches.
In addition, projects like PurPest, FORSAID, STELLA, CERBERUS, VALITEST,
SenseApest, EmergeNOW that support the development of diagnostic tools, monitoring
methods and rapid detection capacities have improved the early detection and diagnostics of
plant pests.
Breeding plays a central role in enhancing the sustainability, adaptability and resilience of
crops and cropping systems. In this context, targeted efforts have focused on broadening the
genetic base of crops and developing varieties that better meet multiple demands, including
quality, resilience and sustainability.
• Projects like Neurice, SolACE, UNTWIST and ADAPT have supported the development
of crops better adapted to abiotic and biotic stresses and to low-input conditions.
• Root2Res, BarleyMicroBreed and BOLERO have advanced breeding strategies for
climate-resilient crops through improved root-microbiome interactions.
• IPMorama, SHIELD4Grape and GrapeBreed4IPM have supported breeding pest-
resistant and disease-resistant varieties.
• Liveseed, Ecobreed, and Bresov have increased the availability and quality of organic
seeds and developed resilient new cultivars.
• InnObreed, OrganicYieldsUp and Liveseeding aim to foster and upscale organic crop
breeding.
29
Together, these projects have generated results including new breeding approaches, improved
use of genetic resources, and crop materials with enhanced tolerance, resistance and resource-
use efficiency.
The conservation, characterisation and use of plant genetic resources have been supported
through projects focusing on:
• crop wild relatives, including PRO-WILD, FRUITDIV, COUSIN;
• pre-breeding activities (BreedingValue, GEN4OLIVE, Harnesstom, and INCREASE);
• stakeholder coordination and strategic action to safeguard genetic resources, including
FarmersPride, DYNAVERSITY and GenResBridge;
• modernisation and use of gene banks and genetic collections, including AGENT and
IMAGE;
• innovation in plant variety testing, including InnoVar and INVITE.
Other projects funded focused on:
• crop diversification and new openings for regional, high-quality products and
economic development (Biovalue, Radiant, CropDiva,Divinfood);
• minor root and tuber crops (ROTATES) and orphan legumes (Prosper).
A dedicated set of projects have also been addressing protein crops to boost production and
resilience in the EU protein system, particularly through:
• value-chain development (VALPRO Path);
• ecosystem services valorisation (LEGENDARY, LegumES, VALERECO);
• intercropping (LEGUMINOSE, IntercropValuES);
• legume breeding (EUCLEG, BELIS and Legume Generation).
Forthcoming projects will focus on protein crops for feed use and the sector’s competitiveness.
More examples of results in this area can be found in the 2021 Cordis results pack on Plant
health: Keeping plants healthy while protecting the environment and the 2026 Cordis results
pack on Advanced technologies for growing resilient, sustainable crops.
Flagship stories
XF-ACTORS (Xylella Fastidiosa Active Containment Through a multidisciplinary-
Oriented Research Strategy, 2016-2021, RIA) was the first European research project
entirely devoted to fighting Xylella fastidiosa (Xf), mobilising 29 partners from 14 countries,
including 4 non-European research centres (from the United States, Brazil, Costa Rica and
Taiwan).
Large-scale genomic sequencing revealed the true origins of Xf in Europe and showed that
strains differ in aggressiveness, enabling outbreak-specific management. New insights into
host defence mechanisms opened pathways for future resistant-variety breeding. Meanwhile
microbiome analysis demonstrated that Xf actively suppresses competing microbes to
dominate the plant, a key finding for future biocontrol research. Field and laboratory studies
decoded insect vector life cycles, feeding behaviour and transmission dynamics, supporting
more targeted and environmentally sound control measures. Finally, epidemiological models
and risk maps were developed to prioritise surveillance sites, alongside improved early-
detection tools for the bacterium in the field.
XF-ACTORS is a landmark example of how European research funding can mobilise
international scientific expertise to confront a cross-border agricultural threat, generating the
30
foundational knowledge needed for sustainable, long-term solutions. More about the project
results can be found here.
ADAPT (Accelerated Development of multiple-stress tolerAnt PoTato, 2020-2024, RIA)
addressed one of the most pressing challenges facing European potato production: the
increasing frequency of heat and drought events that depress yields and tuber quality even
under good agronomic practice. The project mobilised partners across Europe to combine field
trials, controlled glasshouse experiments and large-scale data analysis, always keeping
commercially grown varieties and marketable yield at the centre of evaluation.
Field trials with up to 54 potato varieties were conducted at sites in Spain, the Netherlands,
Serbia and Austria, and a survey of more than 550 growers confirmed that heat and drought are
already the dominant pressures in many production regions. Glasshouse studies using high-
throughput phenotyping and live-imaging sensor plants tracked stress signalling in real time.
Integrated data pipelines combining drone imagery, environmental sensors and molecular
readouts enabled patterns to be compared across sites, seasons and varieties, and identified
early growth traits as strong predictors of yield under stress.
These results were made openly accessible through the StressKnowledgeMap app, an online
tool organising stress-response evidence into connected maps for researchers and breeders.
More about the project results can be found here.
GEN4OLIVE (Mobilisation of Olive GenRes through pre-breeding activities to face the
future challenges and development of an intelligent interface to ensure a friendly
information availability for end users, 2020-2025, IA) addressed the growing threat of
genetic erosion in the olive sector, where the rise of high-density monocultures, emerging
diseases and climate change increasingly jeopardise long-term productivity in one of Europe’s
most culturally and economically significant crops. The project brought together 16 partners
from seven countries, supported by the International Olive Council and with FAO on its
Advisory Board, to mobilise and valorise the untapped diversity held in olive genetic resources.
More than 500 cultivars and wild or ancient genotypes were phenotypically evaluated across
five germplasm banks over four seasons, assessing productivity, stress tolerance, phenology
and oil quality, revealing previously undocumented variation in oleic acid content and phenolic
compounds with direct relevance for breeding and health claims. Genomic and transcriptomic
analyses identified molecular markers linked to resistance to Verticillium dahliae, Xylella
fastidiosa, drought and cold. Early selection markers for juvenility were validated to accelerate
breeding timelines.
Machine-learning tools were developed for cultivar and disease identification, accessible via
mobile devices, and all data were made publicly available through an open online platform
hosting a catalogue of over 500 cultivars. Two cascade funding calls engaged 25 SMEs,
fostering new public-private collaborations and innovation pathways.
A landmark outcome was the formal inclusion of the Córdoba World Olive Germplasm Bank
under the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources, ensuring long-term preservation
and equitable access to olive genetic material, with selected accessions also prepared for
deposit in the Svalbard Global Seed Vault. More about the project results can be found here.
3.2.6. Healthy, sustainable and resilient livestock systems
The livestock sector plays a vital economic and social role in the EU, representing millions of
farms. At the same time, it is confronted with many challenges stemming from climate change,
increased pressure on natural resources, spread of animal infectious diseases and zoonoses,
31
misuse of antimicrobials and increased societal demand for better animal welfare and more
animal-based products.
EU-funded projects are addressing these challenges in support of healthy and resilient animals.
Progress has been made in understanding animal diseases (DELTA-FLU, PALE-Blu, PIGSs,
DEFEND, Kappa-Flu, WiLiMan-ID, COMBAT, and PREPARE4VBD), the animal immune
systems (HoloRuminant and 3D-omics), biosecurity in farms (HE-FARM and BioSecure),
early detection and diagnostics of diseases (SWINOSTICS, VIVALDI, DECIDE),
developing vaccines (SAPHIR, PIGSs, Paragone, DEFEND, VACDIVA, REPRODIVAC,
SPIDVAC).
Progress has also been made in addressing practices to implement the objectives of One
Health via EU-funded projects aiming to reduce the use of antimicrobials and antimicrobial
resistance (DISARM, ROADMAP, HealthyLivestock, AVANT, NeoGiANT).
Several EU-funded projects (Inno4Grass, EuroSheep, EuroDairy, SheepNet, BovINE and
Grazing4AgroEcology) delivered practice-driven innovations in grass-based and pasture
systems, whereas the CoCo project is addressing the integration of pastoralism and wildlife
management. Other projects (iSAGE, SmaRT, 4D4F, R4D, Eu PiG and Digi4Live) developed
sustainable practices using advanced tools (e.g. precision livestock farming, decision support
systems, digital technologies) to respond to challenges like climate change, resource use
efficiency and food security.
Several EU-funded projects are also dedicated to animal welfare practices and welfare
assessment tools to respond to the increased societal demand on animal well-being
(Hennovation, PPILOW, ClearFarm, TechCare and aWISH). Other EU-funded projects aimed
to optimise feed formulations in different breeds and management conditions, improve the feed
efficiency and explore novel feed sources (Feed-a-Gene, OK-Net EcoFeed, ProFuture,
SUSINCHAIN, and NUTRIFEEDS).
The assessment of genotype-environment interactions was the objectives of some EU-funded
projects (GENRES, GENE-SWitCH, Re-Livestock) that helped in developing innovative
breeding strategies that utilise resilience and efficiency related traits and, at the same time,
balance economic, social and environmental challenges. The SheepHeatIT and RUMINATE
projects also address how to advance animal breeding and genetics, aiming to tackle challenges
posed by climate and environmental changes (e.g., greenhouse gas emissions, heat stress).
Some EU funded projects developed apps to help livestock farmers adopt more sustainable
farming practices (mEATquality), enhance transparency in the value chain and build a feedback
loop between consumers and farmers (Code Re-farm), and enable consumers to visualise the
nutritional and environmental impact of their diets (PATHWAYS).
Emission reduction and climate adaptation drive projects like Re-Livestock and NUTRITIVE,
which test feed additives, manure management, and precision farming to cut greenhouse gases
and pollution while strengthening resilience to climate change.
Projects such as PATHWAYS and STEP UP, apply systemic approaches and provide policy
guidance through interactive platforms, scenario modelling and transition roadmaps. These
tools help stakeholders assess impacts, develop strategies, and align livestock systems with
sustainability goals. LCA, PLF and decision-support systems help measure impacts, improve
farming practices, and bridge research to practical implementation for farmers and policy
makers.
32
More examples of results in this area can be found in the 2022 Cordis results pack on healthy
animals for healthy people, in the 2024 R&I report on livestock system sustainability63, and in
the 2025 report on R&I on AMR in livestock64.
Flagship stories
European Partnership for Animal Health and Welfare - EUPAHW
The EU Partnership on Animal Health and Welfare aims to provide the R&I needed by
society to support the development of sustainable livestock, poultry and aquaculture
production. Infectious animal diseases are optimally prevented and controlled with
appropriate means, antimicrobials are used prudently, and animal welfare is respected in
every phase of the production cycle.
Launched in 2024, the EU partnership on Animal Health and Welfare is anticipated to
invest (EU co-funded) EUR 360 million over ten years to boost research and facilitate
cooperation between all actors.
The scope goes beyond the animal health and welfare actors to enhance cross sector
collaboration and, through a ‘one health and one welfare’ approach, to provide societal
impact. It also contributes to EU risk assessment activities by involving the European Food
Safety Authority and of the European Medicines Agency.
The objectives of the EU Partnership on Animal Health and Welfare align with the European
Green Deal and the vision for agriculture and food for a fair, healthy, and environmentally
friendly food system. In 2026, 55 R&I projects are already on-going under the five priority
areas defined by the partnership:
- surveillance/monitoring systems and risk assessment for animal health and welfare;
- procedures, methodologies and tools to analyse animal health and welfare;
- management and husbandry guidelines on farm including aquaculture, during
transport and at slaughter;
- vaccines and treatments;
- integrated approach, including socio-economic aspects of animal health and welfare.
3.2.7. New farming, food and bio-based systems
The bioeconomy and new farming approaches offer major opportunities to make agriculture
more sustainable, resilient, and competitive, and to ensure food security. By developing bio-
based value chains, farmers can diversify their income, valorise agricultural residues, and
create new rural jobs, while innovative business models and technologies help attract
newcomers in agriculture, meet changing consumer demands and improve environmental and
social outcomes. Since 2021, 25 bioeconomy-related projects have been funded under the
current Horizon Europe Cluster 6 with a total budget of EUR 122 million. 71 projects were
funded under Horizon 2020 with a total budget of EUR 395 million.
63 European Commission: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Iadecola, F., Feo, E.,
Santoni, E., Dimitrova, N. et al., Research and innovation solutions to improve livestock system sustainability
(environmental, social, economic) – Report on R&I Project Cluster Analysis, Publications Office of the European
Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2762/1063453. 64 European Commission: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development and Kazlauskaite, D., EU
funded research and innovation on veterinary aspects of the fight against antimicrobial resistance – Portfolio
analysis, Publications Office of the European Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2762/1663813.
33
New farming approaches offer a promising way to increase farmers’ competitiveness and
address growing global demand for food, with precision agriculture, agroecological practices,
controlled environment agriculture and digital tools enhancing productivity while reducing
resource use and environmental impact.
Understanding the complex interplay within food systems is key to driving progress across
both bio-based initiatives and new farming methodologies. Investigating food chain dynamics
and their interaction with non-food sectors can unlock synergies between the agri-food sector
and the bioeconomy.
The projects BioRural, BioRural toolkit, MainstreamBIO, RuralBioUp and SCALE-UP are
integrating small-scale bio-based solutions into mainstream practice. The PRIMARY,
HARWASTING and EMBEDED projects are revalorising biomass and waste from agrifood,
feed, and forestry industries into useful products such as fertiliser, bioenergy, and biomaterial
packaging.
The Horizon 2020 public-private partnership Bio-Based Industries (BBI) invested from 2014
to 2020 in R&I activities supporting new economic opportunities for farming and forestry from
the bioeconomy. Projects such as BeonNAT focused on innovative value chains valorising
agricultural and forest biomass for bio-based industry use, while others contributed to the
scaling of key bioeconomy infrastructures such as biorefineries in FIRST2RUN or the
development of bio-based products such as bio-fertilisers in B-FERST.
The EU has also invested, through Mission Soil, more than EUR 30 million in the circular
economy to improve agricultural and food systems’ sustainability and soil health with soil
improvers from bio-waste.
Flagship stories
Circular bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking
The vision for agriculture and food underscores the importance of the bioeconomy in
strengthening Europe’s food and agriculture sectors. Through targeted funding and strategic
initiatives, the Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking (CBE JU) is supporting the
decarbonisation of the sector, increasing resilience, and creating new opportunities for future
generations.
Between 2022 and 2025, CBE-JU dedicated around EUR 185 million to funding projects
addressing key challenges faced by primary producers in rolling out circular bio-based
solutions and innovations while ensuring that they benefit from the opportunities of being
part of new and innovative circular and bio-based value chains.
Those projects focus on areas such as:
• valorising agricultural and forest residues and underused crops (V-FOREST,
MANUREFINERY);
• unlocking new business opportunities (SUSTAINEXT);
• generating new income sources from unused or underutilised resources (PACE,
RUBBIO);
• developing bio-based fertilisers and crop protection alternatives to fossil-based inputs
(ReLeaf, BioCordelia, LANDFEED, ZELDA, CROPSAFE, INSOIL);
• encouraging sustainable land use (pHYBi);
34
• creating local circular business models that offer new income streams and
environmental benefits for rural communities (Rural BioReFarmeries, ROBOCOOP-
EU).
The funded projects involve 76 entities from the primary sector, in which farmers represent
around 73%. More information on how bio-based innovations are strengthening EU’s food
production is available here.
CBE-JU working group on primary producers (WGPP)
In 2025, CBE-JU established a working group on primary producers to further address the
needs of the primary sector. The objectives of this initiative are to empower primary
producers in playing an active and rewarding role in circular bio-based value chains, and to
ensure they benefit from the socio-economic and environmental opportunities of the bio-
based economy.
The working group bring together around 79 representatives from across Europe, including
farmers, foresters, fishers, aquaculture producers, cooperatives of primary producers and
other entities working closely with them. It is developing an action plan, which will propose
actionable and practical solutions to address key challenges faced by primary producers to
engage in bio-based economy, such as a lack of awareness and access to infrastructure,
financial barriers, and a limited integration in value chains.
The project RootLinks (Primary Sector Working Group Support Project) supports and
facilitates the efforts of the WGPP.
Projects like C4B, PRIMED, CARINA, MAGIC and PANACEA are securing diversification,
competitiveness, resilience and sustainability of farming systems for instance through
innovative business models.
Projects such as GI SMART, THEROS, ALLIANCE, and Strength2Food help deliver evidence
and recommendations to strengthen the implementation, and improve the traceability and
impact of quality schemes (geographical indications, organic etc.) and public procurement on
the competitiveness, sustainability and resilience of EU farming systems and rural areas.
Organic food innovation labs like InnOFoodLabs and WINN-ORGANIC are reinforcing the
entire organic value chain.
The COACH, FOODRUS, FAIRCHAIN, SMARTCHAIN, CO-FRESH, agroBRIDGES, and
COCOREADO projects help create short, smart, fair and sustainable food supply chains, while
others such as FOX and SHEALTHY develop innovative on or near-farm processing solutions.
Innovative food pricing approaches to support the transition towards sustainable and healthy
food systems, for example true cost accounting, are explored in projects such as FOODCoST.
Thematic and advisory networks are helping deploy and scale innovative farm-to-food
solutions (EU4Advice, AUTHENT-NET, COREnet).
Innovative farming systems established through the urban agriculture projects EFUA and
FOODCITYBOOST and innovative farming technologies (including controlled environment
agriculture (FIT4CEA) and robotics) improve efficiency, increase farm profitability, create
jobs, and drive economic growth.
35
Flagship stories
ALLIANCE (A hoListic framework in the quality Labelled food supply chain systems’
management towards enhanced data Integrity and verAcity, interoperability,
traNsparenCy, and tracEability, 2022-2025, IA) was a Horizon Europe-funded project
that developed an integrated digital framework to strengthen the integrity, transparency and
traceability of quality-labelled food supply chains, helping to combat food fraud while
supporting more sustainable and resilient agri-food systems. The project focused on organic
products and foods protected by PDO, PGI and GI labels, which are increasingly vulnerable
to fraud due to complex supply chains and growing market demand. To address these
challenges, ALLIANCE combined distributed ledger technologies, internet-of-things
sensing devices, portable authenticity testing tools, and AI-driven decision support to
improve data integrity, interoperability and evidence-based supply chain management. By
validating these technologies in real-world food supply chains, the project aimed to increase
consumer trust, enhance food safety and authenticity, and facilitate the adoption of
innovative digital solutions across the European agri-food sector.
FOODCoST (FOOD Costing and Internalisation of Externalities for System
Transition, 2022-2026, RIA) was a Horizon Europe-funded project working to develop
harmonised methods for measuring and internalising the environmental, social and health
externalities of food systems, enabling food prices to better reflect their true societal costs
and benefits. Current food prices often fail to account for impacts such as greenhouse gas
emissions, biodiversity loss, public health outcomes and social inequalities, limiting the
effectiveness of policies and market incentives for sustainable food production and
consumption.
To address this challenge, FOODCoST developed common valuation approaches, databases
and analytical tools to quantify food externalities and assess the impacts of true pricing
policies and business strategies. These methods were co-created and validated through
eleven case studies across diverse food value chains and regions, providing evidence and
guidance to support policymakers, businesses and other stakeholders in the transition
towards healthier, more sustainable and equitable food systems.
UNLOCK (Unlocking a feather bioeconomy for keratin-based agricultural products,
2021-2025, IA) was a BBI-funded project working on theconversion of poultry feather
waste into keratin-based biodegradable materials for agriculture, showing how bio-based
innovation can improve farm resilience, reduce environmental impacts and support circular
value chains.
Feathers are a largely underused waste stream: around 15 million tonnes are produced
annually, of which 75% remain uncollected, despite containing 90% keratin, a high-value
protein suitable for bioplastics and other sustainable materials. To harness this potential,
UNLOCK is optimising collection logistics and biorefinery processes to produce keratin-
based products such as seed trays, geotextiles and mulch films, which biodegrade in line
with crop cycles, enrich soils with nitrogen and reduce waste.
3.2.8. Rural opportunities
Home to 25% of the EU population and covering 75% of its territory65, rural areas face many
challenges (demographic change, service provision, digital gap, lower education and economic
opportunities). However, they can also build on many opportunities if the right enabling
conditions are in place and tapping into their potential for innovation, within and beyond the
36
agri-food sector, is necessary to contribute to Europe’s competitiveness, sustainability and
resilience. Rural areas are diverse; they need tailor-made and place-based innovation
approaches.
Since the 2016 strategic approach, the Commission dedicated a total of EUR 183 million (33
projects) to supporting rural areas under Horizon 2020 Societal Challenges 2 and the current
Horizon Europe Cluster 6. Moreover, it also provided funding of a total of EUR 250 million to
over 60 Horizon Europe 2021-2027 projects that specifically support rural communities under
the flagship action ‘Research and innovation for rural communities’, which is part of the EU
rural action plan adopted with the Commission communication on the long-term vision for the
EU’s rural areas66.
Examples of those projects include projects working on:
• solutions for better governance by improving indicators for tailored rural policies
(GRANULAR, RUSTIK);
• territorial governance and rural-urban synergies (PoliRuralPlus, RURBANIVE);
• necessary infrastructures and services: training centre on rural innovation (RURALITIES);
• smart XG, last-mile and edge solutions for remote farming, forestry and rural areas (XGain,
COMMECT);
• smart solutions for smart rural communities (FUTURAL, RURACTIVE, SMART ERA);
• innovations for climate-neutrality (ICONIC, STORCITO);
• emerging trends by investigating societal perceptions and benefits of rural life and jobs
(RURALITIC).
Projects have also advanced socio-economic issues related to the working conditions
contributing to the competitiveness and attractiveness of the jobs and the generational renewal
in rural areas:
• fostering generation renewal (RURALIZATION, PoliRural);
• boosting women-led innovation in farming and rural areas (SWIFT, GRASS ceiling,
FLIARA);
• assessing and improving labour conditions and health and safety at work in farming
(SafeHabitus);
• developing new business and production models for farmers and rural communities
(Greencoop, Nexrur);
• taking into account the wider rural community and the social inclusion in rural areas
through the social economy (SIMRA, ESIRA, SERIGO, INSPIRE).
Almost all of those projects have used the multi-actor approach, enabling rural organisations
to participate and benefit directly from R&I activities. Several led to the creation of Rural Pact
community groups lasting beyond the end of the project.
More examples of Horizon R&I results in this area can be found in the 2021 Cordis results
pack on Developing real solutions for smart and resilient rural areas in Europe.
65 Territorial typologies manual - degree of urbanisation - Statistics Explained - Eurostat. 66 EUR-Lex - 52024DC0450 - EN - EUR-Lex.
37
Flagship stories
SafeHabitus (Strengthening farm health and safety knowledge and innovation systems,
2023-2026, RIA) offers a systemic approach to Farm Health and Safety, covering physical and
mental health, extending to working conditions in general and all factors that contribute to the
attractiveness of farming and food security, aiming to identify all the needs to achieve effective
generational renewal in the agricultural sector and beyond to contribute to vibrant rural
communities.
SERIGO (Social Economy for Resilience, Inclusion and Good life in Rural areas, 2024-
2027, RIA) investigates the framework conditions leading to social exclusion (different
vulnerable groups identified and intersectional perspective) and focuses on how social
innovation approaches (in particular from the social and solidarity economy sector/actors) can
help enhance resilience, foster social inclusion, and overall improve the quality of life in rural
Europe.
FLIARA (Female-Led Innovation in Agriculture and Rural Areas, 2023-2025, RIA)
identified 200 innovations and many different barriers to women-led innovation. It published
several policy briefs addressing all the sectorial policies that can support women in their
innovation journey (education, digital access and knowledge, advisory services and networks,
financial support, political participation, work-life balance, care, social services, culture and
sports) and developed a guide to support the improved participation of women in rural and farm
innovation.
3.2.9. Fostering agroecology and organic farming at the farm and landscape levels
Agroecology and organic farming are approaches with proofed and recognised potential to
accelerate the transition to sustainable, resilient, competitive and fair farming and food systems.
These approaches have the potential to simultaneously address the social, environmental,
climate, and economic challenges of the agricultural sector, and increase its resilience, by
seeking cooperation with other parts of the food and non-food supply chains.
Compared to more conventional approaches, agroecology and organic farming place more
emphasis on the potential of farming practices, on innovation and on cooperation with other
parts of the food and non-food supply chains to address farming challenges, such as the need
to reduce the use and safety related risks of plant protection products and fertilisers.
Both agroecology and organic farming are approaches that deliver a range of valuable
ecosystem services. At the same time, they make farming an attractive activity with potential
to ensure generational renewal in the agricultural sector, by developing solutions and business
models adapted to context-specific challenges. This makes them knowledge-intensive
approaches compared to other more conventional ways of farming.
In diversified farming, projects have shown that crop diversification can help maintain or
increase productivity while reducing the need for chemical inputs.
Practical knowledge on crop combinations, crop management and alternatives for pest and
weed control has been developed through Diversify, Diverfarming, DiverIMPACTS, ReMIX,
IWMPraise, GOOD, AGROSUS, CONSERWA and Oper8.
Complementary work on agroecological approaches such as agroforestry and mixed farming
has improved understanding of how land use can contribute to climate action, address land
degradation and deliver ecosystem services including soil health, through STARGATE,
AFINET, MIXED, AGROMIX, REFOREST, DigitAF and AF4EU.
38
R&I have supported the development of organic farming in line with the EU action plan on
the development of organic production67. As part of the plan, the Commission intends to
dedicate at least 30% of the budget for research and innovation actions in the field of
agriculture, forestry and rural areas to topics that specific to or relevant for the organic sector.
In the period 2021-2024, the EU invested EUR 490 million in 59 topics relevant for the organic
sector.
Projects such as LIVESEED, ECOBREED, BRESOV, LIVESEEDING and InnObreed
addressed breeding and seed-related challenges in organic systems. Scale-it, BIO-2, Organic-
Plus and RELACS have explored phase-out pathways for contentious inputs and supported
knowledge exchange among farmers, advisers and researchers. The specific needs of livestock
production under organic conditions have also been addressed, including through PPILOW,
which developed solutions to improve animal welfare.
Knowledge sharing and advisory support have also been strengthened through OK-Net Arable,
which established the OrganicFarmKnowledge platform, OK-Net EcoFeed, OH-FINE and
OrganicAdviceNet, which is establishing a network of approximately 1 000 organic advisers
across Europe.
More broadly, the role of ecosystem services, biodiversity and incentive schemes in
supporting agroecological transition has been addressed through EcoStack, SHOWCASE,
FRAMEwork, Biovalue, Super-G, CONSOLE, EFFECT and Contracts2.0.
LIFT and UNISECO have examined the drivers, benefits and challenges associated with
ecological farming systems.
More examples of Horizon R&I results in this area can be found in the 2025 Cordis results
packs: Enabling nature-based solutions in sustainable agriculture, and Accelerating
agroecology and organic farming for a more sustainable agri-food system.
European Partnership accelerating farming systems transition: agroecology living labs
and research infrastructure
This partnership is one of the key actions of the farm to fork strategy, which called for the
promotion of agroecology as one of the farming approaches with capacity to help meet the
European Green Deal objectives in relation to the agri-food sector.
The partnership’s overall objective is to unlock the potential of agroecology to achieve the
environmental, economic, climate and social challenges of EU’s farming sector. It was
kicked off on 1 January 2024 and will last until 31 December 2033. It is coordinated by
Germany (Forschungszentrum Jülich). The total tentative budget is EUR 300 million, half
of which the EU is providing).
It is a Europe-wide initiative, involving 111 partners from 31 countries. Consortium
members are national and regional authorities, ministries, funding agencies, research
performing organisations, and research infrastructures, and it constitutes a key tool to align
EU and national R&I agendas on agroecology. As part of its activities, it is funding research
and innovation projects through co-funded calls. Three calls have already been published,
covering several aspects of the agroecology transition. 38 R&I projects are currently running.
67 Communication Action plan for organic production in the EU https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-
content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0141R(01).
39
The partnership is also building a Europe-wide network of agroecology living labs and
research infrastructures for knowledge sharing and co-creation of agroecological
innovations. The network currently involves 55 members.
One of the partnership’s key ambitions is to build a monitoring and data framework with
indicators and tools to monitor and measure the progress of agroecology transition, its social,
economic, environmental and climate performances and impacts.
The partnership is also improving the sharing and access to knowledge and innovation on
agroecology and helping to reinforce the agricultural knowledge and innovation systems for
agroecology across Europe. It is putting in place mechanisms for science-policy dialogue to
support the development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of policies supporting
agroecology.
3.2.10. Strengthening socio-economic performance and modernising policies
Agricultural policies aim to address a growing number of societal challenges, including food
security, farming economic sustainability, resilience to shocks, climate and biodiversity-
friendly agriculture and vibrant rural areas. R&I, in particular involving social sciences and
humanities inform decision-making processes and policymaking on achieving these
objectives. Social sciences and humanities R&I help create an enabling environment and
conditions that support farmers, foresters and rural communities in reinforcing the
competitiveness, resilience, and sustainability of their sector.
Through behavioural and experimental research, projects explore the drivers that hinder or
foster change towards sustainable, climate-neutral and biodiversity-friendly farming systems
(BEATLES, ENFASYS, VISIONARY), and provide a set of social innovations, business
models, and recommendations and tools to foster behaviourally-informed policies (PRUDENT,
ForestAgriGreenNudge).
EU projects integrating socioeconomics explore and develop innovative markets and policy
schemes (PEGASUS, PROVIDE, CONSOLE, Strength2Food, REWARD, ECOPESIA)
offering new business models and economic opportunities for farmers who adopt more
sustainable farming practices.
Projects integrating economic modelling activities help continuously improve data, models and
policy impact assessment tools, informing the design, implementation and evaluation of
agricultural policies. Economic modelling R&I support evidence-based policies towards more
sustainable food systems (VALUMICS, ACT4CAP27, FOODCoST, SUSFANS, SUFISA) and
sustainable trade (BATModel, TRADE4SD, MATS).
Other projects explore effective policy options for achieving environmental sustainability
objectives (LANDSUPPORT, BrightSpace, LAMASUS) and reduce critical input
dependencies of the agricultural sector (AgEnRes).
Coordination and support projects (SUPREMA, Tools4CAP, MEF4CAP) help decision-makers
use data, models and other analytical tools.
Social sciences and humanities R&I also improve knowledge and understanding of the
socioeconomic context and challenges of the agricultural sector. Projects help raise awareness
and deliver solutions on important issues such as strengthening farmers’ bargaining power
(Strength2Farm), risk management (SURE-Farm) working conditions, health and safety on the
farm (FARMWELL, SafeHabitus), or generational renewal (NEWBIE, RURALIZATION,
HARVEST).
40
Mission Soil-funded projects like BIOservicES, SOB4ES, InBestSoil, SoilValues and
NOVASOIL are carrying out research on economic valuation of soil ecosystem services. Other
projects like SOILSCAPE and SoilTribes are increasing societal awareness on the importance
of soil, by involving cultural and creative industries, and by increasing capacity of public and
private institutions from national to regional and local level to engage with the wide public to
promote sustainable soil management. LOESS and CURIOSOIL projects are fostering soil
education across society, supporting behavioural change and the adoption of sustainable
practices both individually and collectively. More broadly, the Mission Soil promotes social
sciences and humanities R&I to better understand and engage the societal, cultural, and
economic mechanisms and deep societal change at a range of scales through which soil health
outcomes can be achieved68.
More in-depth examples of Horizon R&I results in this area can be found in the 2025 Cordis
results pack on socioeconomics: Supporting EU farming through behavioural and economic
analyses. Cluster events bringing together Horizon projects developing economic models in
support to evidence-based agricultural policies were also organised in 2023, 2024 and 2025.
Flagship stories
LAMASUS (LAnd use and MAnagement modelling for SUStainable governance, 2022-
2026, RIA) delivers new data and evidence on land use and management practices in the EU,
as well as on the role of policies on changes in land use and management dynamics, and their
economic and environmental impacts.
The project developed an innovative modelling toolbox with full sectorial coverage from
agriculture and forestry to the whole economy, accounting for carbon, biodiversity and other
relevant sustainability dimensions, at multiple scales. The toolbox builds on the
complementarity between economic and biophysical models and integrates novel approaches
mobilising machine learning and citizen science. The toolbox is applied to test policy scenarios
and inform decisionmakers from local to EU level, for developing, assessing, and monitoring
land-related policies across various geographical scales.
VISIONARY (Food provision through sustainable farming systems and value chains,
2022-2026, RIA) is uncovering the lock-ins holding Europe back from transitioning towards
more sustainable food systems, by considering the whole agri-food chain from farmer to
consumer. The project’s innovative approach combines experimental and behavioural
economics, system thinking and policy science, to identify barriers and appropriate behavioural
interventions.
VISIONARY translates research into innovation mainly through its science-policy interfaces,
experimental case studies and targeted capacity-building, which act as living labs where
policymakers, administrators and stakeholders co-create and test policy mechanisms. e.g. for
organic public procurement, carbon markets, biodiversity labelling and water governance. The
project helps develop new business models and institutional arrangements to support the value
chain to accelerate the transition towards sustainable food systems, more effective sustainable
food marketing initiatives, better design of advisory services, and the alignment between
agricultural and environmental organisations.
VISIONARY has already led to concrete innovations: preliminary results made it possible to
identify how aligning food policy procurement would be a key policy lever that has the
potential to facilitate system-wide change.
68 Social sciences, humanities, and the arts in the EU Mission “A Soil Deal for Europe” | Mission Soil Platform.
41
3.2.11. Unlocking the potential of digital and data technologies
Digital technologies can significantly enhance agriculture, forestry and rural areas by enabling
precision management, real-time monitoring and data-driven decision-making, improving
productivity, resource efficiency and environmental performance. They can strengthen
resilience to climate and market risks through better forecasting, traceability and early-warning
systems, while supporting sustainable land and forest management. Digital connectivity and
services can also boost rural innovation and inclusion by creating new business models,
improving access to knowledge and public services, and supporting employment and quality
of life in rural communities.
Through the current Horizon Europe the EU supports the development of innovative digital
solutions in agriculture, forestry and rural areas focussing on different technologies (e.g. AI,
robotics, internet of things, etc.) and applications (e.g. pruning, spraying, irrigation, decision
making support, pest detection). For instance:
• AGRO-WELL, AGROBOOST, AgRimate, and AgRibot leverage robotics and augmented
reality to enhance working conditions and strengthen the work force in agriculture;
• projects such as CODECS and Quantifarm assess the impact of digital technologies in
agriculture;
• projects like Farmtopia, Guardians, and Phito, have been given specific support to develop
digital solutions for small and medium farms, thus helping reduce the digital divide among
farmers;
• ICAERUS, SPADE, and CHAMELEON explore the potential of drones as multi-purpose
vehicles, including for agriculture, forestry, and rural applications;
• ScaleAgData, CrackSense, and AgriDataValue capitalise on data from different sources
(e.g. sensor data) to improve competitiveness and sustainability of the EU agricultural
sector;
• CERBERUS, STELLA and FORSAID are developing and testing digital technologies for
plant and forest health monitoring and pest detection.
European Partnership of Agriculture of Data
The EU Partnership Agriculture of Data (AgData) aims to enhance agricultural practices
through innovative data-driven solutions. By leveraging advanced data analytics and digital
technologies, the partnership seeks to develop and support the uptake of digital and data
solutions, and improve competitiveness, sustainability and environmental impact in the
agricultural sector.
The initiative fosters collaboration among scientists, stakeholders and policymakers across
Member States and associated countries to develop strategies that optimise resource use and
boost the resiliency of the sector. Through research and innovation, AgData is committed to
shaping the future of agriculture in alignment with initiatives such as the European Green
Deal.
The partnership started its activities on 1 October 2025 and it is expected to run for at least
7 years. The total tentative budget is EUR 300 million, with a 30% co-funding rate from the
EU. By bringing together National Funded Use Cases and Transnational projects funded
through Open Calls, AgData is expected to contribute to several objectives outlined in its
Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda (SRIA).
42
3.2.12. Enhancing knowledge flows and skills
Farmers, foresters and rural communities need faster access to knowledge, innovation and
skills to address challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, digitalisation and
generational renewal, while supporting the transition towards more sustainable and resilient
farming systems. Working in synergy with the agricultural knowledge and innovation systems
(AKIS) implemented under the CAP, EU-funded projects help bridge the gap between research
and practice, accelerating the uptake of innovative solutions by farmers, advisors and rural
communities.
EU-funded projects are strengthening AKIS by improving knowledge flows and fostering
collaboration between farmers, advisors, researchers and educators through a strong multi-
actor approach. Projects such as LIAISON and PREMIERE have guided the implementation
of this collaborative approach to research, by supporting co-creation processes, interactive
innovation and methodologies to improve collaboration and uptake of results by end-users.
More than 60 EU-funded thematic networks have played a key role in collecting and
disseminating practical knowledge in user-friendly formats across areas such as animal health
(BROILERNET, B-THENET, EUNetHorse), organic farming (OH-FINE), crop adaptation
(CLIMED-FRUIT), forestry (FORADVISE), nutrient management (NUTRI-KNOW) and
many more. These projects have fostered peer-to-peer learning and helped scale up solutions
developed at national level through CAP-funded EIP-AGRI Operational Groups across Europe
(Oper8, Soil-X-Change, AQUAGRI-KNOW).
Advisory services and skills development have also been reinforced through advisory
networks supporting advisor cross-border cooperation and access to the latest innovation
(AdvisoryNetPEST, OrganicAdviceNetwork, STRATUS, FAIRshare, COREnet). In parallel,
MODERNAKIS and ATTRACTISS are helping Member States improve governance and
innovation support services for AKIS.
Efforts have also focused on facilitating access to practice-oriented knowledge and innovation
outputs by developing a common EU-wide knowledge reservoir for agriculture and forestry,
bringing together materials from Horizon projects, EIP-AGRI Operational Groups and national
initiatives into a single platform for farmers, advisors and educators (EU-FarmBook).
A cluster event bringing together thematic networks, advisory networks, and projects was also
organised in 2025.
43
Flagship stories
modernAKIS (Modernisation of Agriculture through more efficient and effective
Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems, 2022-2029, CSA) aims at improving
AKIS actors’ capacities to leverage individual, organisational and systemic resources needed
for the transformation towards more coherent, effective and efficient AKIS.
To this end, the project is building a European network of actors in AKIS from all EU
Member States as well as communities of practice in each Member State. modernAKIS
delivers comprehensive resources, tools and methods supporting key AKIS actors to improve
the knowledge flows and develop a well-functioning AKIS in line with relevant policy
objectives. One aspect of how to use a coherent, effective and context-aware approach the
project addresses is capacity building.
The project is also about releasing a co-designed benchmarking tool enabling Member States
to (i) assess and monitor their AKIS at national and regional level and (ii) benchmark them
against different scenarios, identifying innovative solutions and suitable interventions for
their individual situations.
EU-FarmBook (supporting knowledge exchange between all AKIS actors in the
European Union, 2022-2029, RIA) is developing an online, multilingual platform (EU-
FarmBook) able to bridge EU-funded research and innovation with practitioners across
agriculture, forestry and rural development.
This platform should serve as a centralised hub for practical, science-based solutions,
consolidating practice abstracts from Horizon multi-actor projects and national EIP-AGRI
operational groups, while allowing for links with national platforms to integrate locally
generated knowledge. It will serve a broad user community, including farmers, advisors,
educators, researchers and policymakers.
Availability in all 24 official EU languages, combined with real-time translation of uploaded
material, will ensure easy access across Member States and users. AI will support both search
and content upload, ensuring intuitive and efficient use of the platform for users and
contributors. The platform will also accommodate diverse knowledge formats – such as
videos, podcasts and presentations – complementing written materials and broadening
accessibility.
PREMIERE (Preparing multi-actor projects in a co-creative way, 2023-2027, CSA)
supports effective implementation of multi-actor approach in Horizon Europe, particularly
under Cluster 6. To do so, the project supports project consortia and coordinators, national
contact points, external evaluators and other innovation support services in the development
of more relevant, coherent and well-prepared project proposal. A particular focus is placed
on fostering bottom-up co-creation and ensuring active participation and effective
contribution of all relevant actors.
The project also prioritises widening participation by involving organisations with no
previous experience in multi-actor projects, including those previously involved in
unsuccessful proposals. To this end, PREMIERE provides a range of support services and
easy-to-use tools and materials, including training and capacity-building resources, serious
games, networking and brokerage events. The project has also piloted a seed-funding scheme
for proposal development, including specific measures to engage EIP-AGRI operational
groups.
44
3.2.13. Strengthening international cooperation
The European Commission is strengthening international cooperation in agricultural research
and innovation to support the transition to sustainable, resilient and competitive agri-food
sector. As climate change, biodiversity loss, soil degradation, water scarcity and food insecurity
increasingly affect regions worldwide, such cooperation is essential to speed up innovation
uptake, enhance knowledge exchange and develop solutions tailored to local needs with partner
countries.
International cooperations, which resulted in 34% of Horizon 2020 and 19% of the current
Horizon Europe projects in agriculture, forestry, rural areas having partners from third
countries during the 2014-2025 period, have delivered results and opportunities to jointly
address shared sustainability and resilience challenges in the sectors. Increasingly they have
achieved this by fostering place-based innovation and frameworks for AKIS through shared
experiences and lessons learned.
The Commission funds international projects of global relevance like the projects on African
swine fever (ASF):
• ASFaVIP, aiming to understand performance characteristics of live attenuated vaccines
for the prevention and control of African swine fever in wild boar and domestic pigs,
exploring administration routes, immune responses, and risk-benefit profiles or;
• VAX4ASF, developing a next-generation vaccine platform designed to protect against
diverse ASF virus variants while ensuring high safety and the ability to differentiate
infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA strategy). The project seeks to innovate based
on previous vaccination approaches and strategies with potential for success.
Through Horizon Europe 2021-2027 and long-standing initiatives such as the FNSSA
partnership, the EU supports collaboration in areas including sustainable agriculture,
agroecology, climate resilience, soil health, agroforestry and AKIS, while promoting multi-
actor approaches and capacity building.
Flagship stories
EU-AU Food and Nutrition Security and Sustainable Agriculture (FNSSA) partnership
The EU-AU Food and Nutrition Security and Sustainable Agriculture (FNSSA) partnership
is a long-term research and innovation partnership between the African Union (AU) and the
European Union (EU) to support the achievement of sustainable food systems, improved
nutrition, and resilient agriculture. The partnership promotes joint research, innovation,
capacity building, and knowledge exchange between Africa and Europe. Its activities focus
on sustainable agricultural intensification, nutrition-sensitive food systems, agricultural
markets and trade, and cross-cutting issues such as climate resilience and innovation uptake.
Since its launch, the Commission has mobilised over EUR 125.5 million to support 20
collaborative projects addressing shared challenges in agriculture, food security, and rural
development.
CEA-FIRST (Consortium Europe-Africa for Research and Innovation on Food
Systems Transformation, 2023-2027, CSA) aims to bring together 21 partners from Africa
and Europe in an alliance. It supports operationalisation of the International Research
Consortium (IRC) that works towards implementation of the FNSSA roadmap.
The project focuses on reducing research fragmentation and provides public access to a large
knowledge platform, and analyse R&I activities. It establishes thematic working groups in
45
line with the long-term IRC strategy aiming to provide inputs to high-level policy dialog. It
also contributes towards the update of FNSSA roadmap (2027-2036).
CANALLS (Driving agroecological transitions in the humid tropics of Central and
Eastern Africa through traNsdisciplinary Agroecology Living LabS, 2023-2026, RIA)
is promoting agroecological transitions in Central and Eastern Africa through eight multi-
actor agroecology living labs. It brings together researchers, farmers, advisory services, local
communities and policymakers, and supports more than 20 000 farmers and value-chain
actors in co-developing sustainable practices for key crops such as cocoa, coffee, cassava,
rice and maize.
The project has already contributed to strengthening local innovation ecosystems, improving
knowledge exchange and developing practical tools for assessing the environmental and
socio-economic impacts of agroecological practices. It also supports inclusive business
models and market access for agroecological products, demonstrating how EU-supported
R&I cooperation can connect science, policy and practice to deliver tangible benefits for
sustainable agriculture and rural communities.
PrAEctiCe (Potentials of Agroecological practices in east Africa with a focus on
Circular water-energy-nutrient systems, 2022-2026, RIA) focuses on accelerating
agroecological transitions by strengthening knowledge, practices and governance
arrangements that support more sustainable and resilient farming systems. It promotes co-
creation of solutions through multi-actor collaboration, involving researchers, farmers,
advisory services and policymakers, and builds on participatory approaches such as living
labs and on-farm experimentation. PrAEctiCe places particular emphasis on context-specific
agroecological practices, capacity building and knowledge exchange between European and
African partners, with the aim of improving the uptake of sustainable farming methods and
supporting long-term transformation of the agri-food sector. Through these activities, the
project contributes to bridging science, policy and practice and to reinforcing international
cooperation on agroecology and sustainable agriculture
Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA)
The PRIMA partnership is a ten-year initiative (2018-2028) partly funded by Horizon 2020
(EUR 220 million), Horizon Europe 2021-2027 (EUR 105 million) and the 20 participating
countries (which include countries from the EU, Horizon Europe 2021-2027 associated
countries and other Mediterranean partner countries, with combined funding of currently
EUR 274 million).
The ambition of this public-public partnership, mainly implemented through competitive
calls for proposals, is to mobilise the Euro-Mediterranean scientific communities,
stakeholders and public and private entities on a common R&I strategy to identify solutions
to improve water availability, sustainable agriculture and food production in a region heavily
affected by climate change.
PRIMA forms a unique platform for strengthening cooperation between the EU and third
countries on addressing common challenges to the Mediterranean region and beyond. It is
exemplary in the implementation of the water, energy, food and ecosystems (WEFE) nexus
approach. Between 2018 and 2025, PRIMA funded 2 900 beneficiaries in a total of 305
projects, including 69 on water, 129 on farming systems, 95 on agri-food value chains and
12 on the WEFE nexus. To date, PRIMA is the most ambitious joint programme to be
undertaken in the framework of Euro-Mediterranean cooperation.
46
The 2016 strategic approach helped to fund the generation of new knowledge and innovation
in key priority areas, and to support the innovation journey, from lab to fab. The achievements
of the 2016 strategic approach in this regard have been observed through the analysis of key
statistics on the investments made, and on the exploitation of the R&I results produced by the
funded projects.
3.3. Analysis and key achievements on the innovation journey
The data supporting this quantitative analysis focus on the type of actions programmed for
agriculture, forestry and rural areas during the period 2014-2024:
• Research and Innovation Actions (RIA),
• Innovation Actions (IA),
• Coordination and Support Actions (CSA),
• Actions funded with the COFUND instrument (COFUND)69,
• European Joint Programmes (EJP)70,
• ERA-NET71.
General observations are drawn based on the distribution of the funding actions over time and
within programmes, as well as on the oversubscription rate, proposals’ average score and links
with political priorities. Lastly, the analysis also focuses on data linked to the R&I journey from
‘lab to fab’ including SME engagement, results valorisation and co-investment rates.
While the 2016 strategic approach only applies after 2016, covering 2014 and 2015 in the
analysis made it possible to capture more elements as regards R&I policy, implementation and
development aspects through Horizon 2020 and the current Horizon Europe.
The final three years of Horizon Europe Framework Programme (2025-2027) are not
considered in this analysis, so the data presented below is likely to change by the end of the
Framework Programme. The data underpinning this analysis is publicly available as it was
entirely sourced from the Horizon Dashboard.
Annex I describes the methodology in detail. The lists of projects considered for the purpose
of the analysis in the scope of agriculture, forestry and rural areas on the one hand, and food
systems on the other hand, can be accessed online as supplementary material to this staff
working document.
3.3.1. Excellence of R&I project proposals: an analysis of oversubscription rates
The different types of actions programmed and funded during the period 2014-2024, attracted
significant interest from applicants, as indicated by the ratio excellent/funded, which provides
insights into the number of excellent proposals72 evaluated per funded proposal.
To add value to this analysis, the average score per proposal was also assessed. This analysis
focused on RIAs, IAs and CSAs. For coherence it considered single-stage and two-stage
separately. The data related to two-stage topics refers exclusively to the second and final stage
69 Horizon Europe COFUND includes AGROECOLOGY, EUPAHW and AgData. 70 Horizon 2020 European Joint Programme Cofund (EJP Cofund) including One Health EJP and EJP Soil. 71 Horizon 2020 ERA-net cofund, including ICRAD and ICT-AGRI-FOOD. 72 Excellent proposals: proposals that in the last evaluation of the proposal status are classified as Main = selected
to be funded; Reserve = selected to be funded, in case one of the ‘main’ does not succeed to sign the grant
agreement; No Money = accepted as attain all the thresholds and scores in terms of excellence, impact and
implementation, but cannot be funded due to lack of budget.
47
of evaluation, as it is only at that stage that proposals are complete and considered fully
evaluated73.
The data offers an overview of the number and quality of proposals received. The ratio of
excellent to funded proposals was greater than one to one for all categories except CSA in
Horizon 2020 (Figure 6). In other words, for each proposal that was funded, there was at least
one excellent proposal that was not funded.
The average ratio, for RIAs, IAs and CSAs across programmes, types of action and stages,
was 1:2. This means that, for each proposal funded, two excellent proposals did not get
funded.
When considered separately across programmes and stages, RIAs had a ratio of 1:2, IAs 1:3
and CSAs 1:1. The ratio and the average score were both highest for IAs. Detailed data are
available in Figure 6.
Figure 6. Ratio of excellent versus funded proposals and average score per programme, type of action and
number of evaluation stages of topics in agriculture, forestry and rural areas74.
In addition, an in-depth analysis focused on the top 20% RIAs and IAs topics with the highest
ratio in four groups: H2020 single-stage, H2020 two-stage, Horizon Europe single-stage and
Horizon Europe two-stage. The top 20% corresponded to 52 topics, which were categorised
and grouped as regards the focus of the research themes they covered (Figure 7). A ratio greater
than one was observed across all research themes and in particular for livestock, soil and plant
protection.
73 Horizon Dashboard. R&I Proposals: Scope and limitations. 74 Note that for the two-stage calls, the data refers exclusively to the second stage which evaluates the proposals
on their three dimensions: excellence, impact and implementation.
48
Figure 7. The distribution of the top 20% topics with highest ratio of excellent proposals versus funded
proposals clustered per thematic area.
3.3.2. Type of actions: Research and Innovation Actions, Innovation Actions, Coordination
and Support Actions, and investments in EU policy priorities
In four years, the current Horizon Europe has already funded Horizon 2020 for RIAs, IAs and
CSAs projects (table 1). The number of projects also registered an increase for RIAs and IAs
and a slight decrease for CSAs, although the Horizon Europe Work Programmes 2025 - 2027
will contribute further to these figures.
Table 1. The distribution of projects and EU funding for RIAs, IAs and CSAs in agriculture, forestry and
rural areas per framework programme.
Type of
Action
Number of
projects
H2020
Number of
projects
HE
EU funding
H2020
EU funding
HE
RIA 158 174 EUR 969 873 151.45 EUR 1 118 507 581.71
IA 37 55 EUR 258 692 593.22 EUR 318 610 182.81
CSA 69 65 EUR 167 748 586.52 EUR 254 944 676.64
Figure 8 shows the distribution of types of action over time by call deadline year, with a focus
on RIAs, IAs and CSAs.
49
Figure 8. The distribution of collaborative projects in agriculture, forestry and rural areas and EU funding
of RIAs, IAs and CSAs, per call deadline year, in the period 2014-2024. The dashed line separates H2020
and the current Horizon Europe years.
Table 2 offers a closer look at the data on the average growth rate of number of projects and
EU funding based on a year-on-year analysis with more information on the evolution of these
elements over time. The number of projects and EU funding for agriculture, forestry and rural
areas under Horizon 2020 and the first phase of the current Horizon Europe increased on
average 15% and 20% a year, respectively. IAs increased more than the other types of actions.
The number of IAs increased mainly between 2016 and 2020, from one project funded in 2016
to 17 projects in 2020.
Table 2. The average annual growth of number of projects in agriculture, forestry and rural areas, and
EU funding for type of action, based on a year-on-year analysis in the period 2014-2024. *Note that
during the first two years (2014, 2015) there were no IAs programmed and therefore, the figures below
for IAs address the period 2016-2024.
Type of action Projects EU funding
RIA 13% 15%
IA* 90% 56%
CSA 14% 26%
Total programme 15% 20%
In addition, the funding dedicated to these types of actions contributes to the different trackers
monitored within Horizon Europe 2021-2027 to ensure investments in fields linked to legal
commitments and strategic priorities. The R&I funding for agriculture, forestry and rural areas
had essential contributions for the climate and biodiversity trackers, while also integrating
digital and AI, as showcased in Figure 9.
50
Figure 9. The share of total funding dedicated to the climate, biodiversity, digital and AI trackers during
Horizon Europe (2021-2024), considering RIAs, IAs, CSAs, and COFUND
3.3.3. From lab to fab: co-investment, SME engagement and valorisation of results
This section explores Horizon data that provides information on the projects’ innovation
journey. The analysis explores co-investment rates and the ability of projects to attract
additional funding sources at proposal stage, the projects’ results and their exploitation
into scientific and commercial outputs.
Horizon programmes’ ability to mobilise additional sources of funding can be measured
through the co-funding by participants in R&I projects, referred to as the ‘leverage factor’. This
indicator is the ratio between the total costs borne by partners with their own funding (other
than the EU budget) and the EU budget contribution (i.e. the ratio of other funding to EU
funding).
This analysis includes a comparison between Horizon 2020 Societal Challenge 2 and the
current Horizon Europe Cluster 6 and between Horizon 2020 Pillar III and the current Horizon
Europe Pillar II. It focuses exclusively on projects under the types of action: RIA, IA, CSA,
EJP, ERA-NET and co-funded partnerships. It therefore excludes any actions linked to Pre-
Commercial Procurement (PCP), Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions (PPI), SME
instrument and Joint Undertakings (JU).
The capacity to leverage additional funding is closely linked to the types of actions
programmed, as funding actions like COFUND actions or IAs require by default funding
resources external to the EU budget funding. For example, IAs require a co-investment of 30%
from organisations that are not non-profit legal entities. The same does not apply, for example,
to RIAs which can have an EU funding rate of 100% and, therefore, the leverage factor equals
zero. On this basis, a comparison of shares of types of actions across agriculture, forestry and
rural areas, Cluster 6 and Pillar II programmed in the period 2014-2024 can provide valuable
input.
The data shows that the leverage factor for agriculture, forestry and rural areas is lower than
the average for Societal Challenge 2 of H2020 and Cluster 6 of the current Horizon Europe,
and lower than it is overall for Horizon 2020 Pillar III and the current Horizon Europe Pillar II
(Figure 10).
51
Figure 10. The leverage factor for the agriculture, forestry and rural projects (AGRI) of this analysis,
overall for Societal Challenges 2 and Pillar III in Horizon 2020 (left) and overall for AGRI, Cluster 6 and
Pillar II in the current Horizon Europe (right), considering RIAs, IAs, CSAs, EJP, ERA-NET and
COFUND.
EU funding per type of actions shows that a higher share of planned R&I projects in agriculture,
forestry and rural areas is dedicated to RIAs and CSAs than the average shares under Horizon
2020 and the current Horizon Europe (Figure 11). Conversely, the share of EU funding
dedicated to IAs is much lower, 17% compared to 29% under Horizon 2020 Societal Challenge
2 and the current Horizon Europe Cluster 6 and 33% under the current Horizon Europe Pillar
III and Pillar II. For EJP combined with ERA-NET in agriculture, forestry and rural areas, the
share represents 7% compared to 6% and 3%, and COFUND of 8% compared to 9% and 6%,
in Societal Challenge 2 / Cluster 6 and Pillar III / Pillar II, respectively.
Considering this information, the lower leverage factor and therefore, co-investment within
projects on agriculture, forestry and rural areas seems to result from the lower use of IAs,
which require a co-investment of 30% from organisations that are not ‘non-profit legal
entities’.
Figure 11. The share of EU funding per type of action and programme, for agriculture, forestry and rural
projects (AGRI), Societal Challenge 2, Cluster 6, Pillar III of H2020 and Pillar II of Horizon Europe in the
period 2014-2024.
The analysis examines in particular the involvement of SMEs within the R&I-funded projects,
and the share of EU funding directed to SMEs. An observed trend is the lower share of funding
52
to SMEs in comparison to the share of SMEs’ participation, which indicates that SMEs are
funded below the average beneficiary. This trend is noted in all programmes
(Figures 12 and 13).
Figure 12. The share of SME participation for agriculture, forestry and rural areas (AGRI),
Societal Challenge 2 and Pillar III in Horizon 2020 (left) and for AGRI, Cluster 6 and Pillar II in the
current Horizon Europe (right), considering RIAs, IAs, CSAs, EJP, ERA-NET and COFUND
Figure 13. The share of EU funding provided to SMEs for agriculture, forestry and rural areas (AGRI),
Societal Challenge 2 and Pillar III in Horizon 2020 (left) and for AGRI, Cluster 6 and Pillar II in the
current Horizon Europe (right), considering RIAs, IAs, CSAs, EJP, ERA-NET and COFUND.
Nonetheless, the data provides a limited overview of SMEs. It overlooks the participation and
funding of SMEs through tools like sub-contracting or financial support to third parties which
is used to engage and involve small actors (like farmers and landowners) in R&I projects.
Furthermore, the SME definition does not consider the SME activity, which may differ
significantly within R&I projects, from a farm or technology-oriented startup to a
communication service provider, which limits the interpretation of the results. Additionally,
this analysis does not include types of actions which are designed to involve the private sector
such as joint undertakings.
The exploitation and valorisation of R&I results of Horizon projects can be assessed through
the analysis of indicators such as the number of projects that published peer-reviewed scientific
articles and registered intellectual property rights (IPR) applications.
53
A data analysis across programmes shows limitations considering the different stage of both
programmes, as not all H2020 projects are already concluded, and the current Horizon Europe
calls are still ongoing. Furthermore, peer-reviewed publications and IPR applications are
typically produced towards the end of the projects and thus require time to be reviewed and
reported.
Nonetheless, within programmes, and in comparison, with Societal Challenge 2/Cluster 6 and
Pillar III of Horizon 2020/Pillar II of the current Horizon Europe, agriculture, forestry and rural
areas related R&I activities presented a higher share of projects reporting peer-reviewed
publications in H2020 compared to overall Horizon 2020 Societal Challenge 2 and Pillar III
(Figure 14). That trend is reversed in the current Horizon Europe context, which is still
ongoing: for this reason, final conclusions cannot be drawn.
Figure 14. The share of projects that reported peer-reviewed publications for agriculture, forestry and
rural areas (AGRI), Societal Challenges 2 and Pillar III in Horizon 2020 (left) and for AGRI, Cluster 6 and
Pillar II in the current Horizon Europe (right), considering RIAs, IAs, CSAs, EJP, ERA-NET and
COFUND.
The data for IPR applications is very limited, because how advanced both programmes were.
In H2020, 4.5% of R&I projects on agriculture, forestry and rural areas led to an IPR
application, while R&I projects under Societal Challenge 2 performed better than H2020 Pillar
III overall, with 7.3% of funded projects reporting IPR applications (Figure 15).
54
Figure 15. The share of projects that reported IPR applications for agriculture, forestry and rural areas
(AGRI), Societal Challenges 2 and Pillar III in Horizon 2020 (left) and for AGRI, Cluster 6 and Pillar II in
the current Horizon Europe (right), considering RIAs, IAs, CSAs, EJP, ERA-NET and COFUND.
Between 2014 and 2024, a total of 32 intellectual property rights applications valorising
innovations from R&I projects in agriculture, forestry and rural areas were registered, including
13 trademarks and 10 patents. The research areas with the highest number of intellectual
property rights applications are agricultural waste, co-products and by-products, plant
protection and genetic resources, with five in each of those areas (Table 3).
55
Table 3. The distribution of the IPR applications resulting from R&I projects for agriculture, forestry
and rural areas. N = Number.
IPR Type Research Topic N Programme
PatentEnsuring sustainable use of agricultural waste, co-
products and by-products 5 H2020
TrademarkInnovations in plant protection 5 H2020
OtherGenetic resources and pre-breeding communities 5 H2020
PatentIncrease overall transparency of processed agri-food
products 3 H2020
TrademarkEU-China cooperation on IPM in agriculture 3 H2020
TrademarkTraditional resources for agricultural diversity and the
food chain 2 H2020
OtherCitizen science for soil health 2
Horizon
Europe
2021-2027
OtherNew and emerging risks to plant health 1 H2020
PatentGenetics and nutrition and alternative feed sources for
terrestrial livestock production 1 H2020
PatentValidation of diagnostic tools for animal and plant
health 1 H2020
TrademarkLegumes - transition paths to sustainable legume-based
farming systems and agri-feed and food chains 1 H2020
TrademarkNew and emerging risks to plant health 1 H2020
TrademarkOrganic breeding – Increasing the competitiveness of
the organic breeding and farming sectors 1 H2020
Registered
Design
EU-China international cooperation on nature-based
solutions for nutrient management in agriculture 1
Horizon
Europe
2021-2027
An indicator that can provide further insights into the R&I projects’ results exploitation
potential, and more particularly on the development maturity of the solutions, tools or
technology developed is the technology readiness level achieved by the end of a project. Data
on projects’ technological readiness levels is only available for the current Horizon Europe,
and partially, as reporting this information is not a mandatory requirement.
Fewer projects related to agriculture, forestry and rural areas report their technology
readiness levels than projects under the current Horizon Europe Cluster 6 and Horizon Europe
Pillar II (Figure 16). The low level of reporting technological readiness levels hampers a robust
analysis of how EU-funded R&I in those sectors has been facilitating the innovation journey.
Nonetheless, the reporting took place mostly in projects from 2023 and 2024, 31 out of 42
projects in agriculture, forestry and rural, which shows a positive trend. Furthermore, the share
of projects reporting technology readiness levels may significantly vary and increase as the
programme progresses, and several projects reach their final reporting period.
56
Figure 16. The share of projects reporting technology readiness levels for agriculture, forestry and rural
areas (AGRI), Cluster 6 and Pillar II in the current Horizon Europe. No data available for H2020.
4. DELIVERING ON THE FOOD 2030 RESEARCH AND INNOVATION
FRAMEWORK
4.1. Relevance of food systems and Food 2030 legacy
4.1.1. Relevance of Food systems
The European Union has a world-leading food system driven by advances in life sciences and
supported through all European framework programmes for research and innovation including
Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe 2021-2027 , private sector-led research and innovation and
excellence in entrepreneurship. It provides safe, nutritious and sustainable food to its citizens.
However, in the context of intensifying global competition, climate pressures and geopolitical
uncertainty, Europe’s ability to deliver safe, healthy, nutritious and sustainable food is no
longer just a policy objective, it is a matter of strategic autonomy and economic security.
Safe, healthy, nutritious and sustainable food systems are essential for the EU and its policy
priorities, in particular for ‘sustainable competitiveness and prosperity’ and ‘sustaining our
quality of life’.
The food and drink industry is the largest manufacturing industry in the EU in terms of
turnover, value added and employment. It is also a critical source of innovation, prosperity
and territorial cohesion. In 2023, it had a turnover of EUR 1 523 billion and generated EUR
296 billion of added value, nearly 10% higher than that of the agriculture sector. It
employed 4.8 million people, making it a leading employer in the EU, in 309 000 enterprises,
accounting for 14% of all manufacturing enterprises.
An important characteristic of the food and drink industry is the large share of small and
medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). In 2023, 80% of the EU’s food and drink manufacturers
alone were micro-enterprises, with fewer than 10 employees. SMEs make up 99% of food and
drink industries, contribute 39% of the industry turnover and provide 57% of its employment75.
In 2023, there were 2.7 million enterprises wholesaling, retailing and serving food and
beverages in the EU; they employed 17.1 million people and added EUR 549 billion of value.
75 FoodDrinkEurope-Data-Trends-2026-report-digital.pdf.
57
On average, people in the EU each spent EUR 4 290 on food, beverages and services serving
food and beverages in 2023; this was 8.8% more than in 202276.
A competitive and future-proof food system depends on research and innovation and
especially cutting- edge technologies: from biotechnology (including plants, microorganisms,
fungi etc.) to AI and digitalisation (e.g. smarter data collection and digital solutions), and from
sustainable processing and packaging to promotion of circularity and the development of new
business models. By closing the ‘innovation gap’, Europe can take a leading role, not just keep
pace, in the global transformation of food systems. At the same time, these innovations will
strengthen Europe’s resilience and preparedness, ensuring food systems are better equipped to
handle future challenges.
Food systems shape livelihoods, drive economic development, affect public health, and
determine how communities experience and adapt to climate change. At the same time, the
global food systemaccounts for almost 30% of total global greenhouse gas emissions77, the
largest contribution coming from agriculture and the land use/land-use change sector (71%),
with distribution, processing, consumption and end-of-life disposal accounting for the
remaining 29%. Food systems alone are responsible for the transgression of 5 of the 9 planetary
boundaries, the Earth's limits beyond which human activity threatens the planet's stability and
survival, and are a major contributor to the pressure on the others78. For these reasons, it is
imperative that food systems become more sustainable in all three dimensions of sustainability.
To act on climate and biodiversity in a meaningful and lasting way, we must address food
systems transformation with the same urgency, visibility, and political momentum as energy
transitions and nature protection, in ways that strengthen food security and nutrition, climate
resilience, and equitable development. This has been outlined in the thematic assessment report
on the interlinkages among biodiversity, water, food and health of the Intergovernmental
Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)79.
Food 2030 is the Research and Innovation (R&I) framework of Horizon 2020 and Horizon
Europe 2021-2027 for food systems transformation, dating back to 2016. It was designed to
tackle complex challenges that cannot be solved by any Member State alone or are
complementary to Member States initiatives and that require overcoming disciplinary, sectoral,
institutional and regulatory silos, as well as to exploit potential.
Food 2030 is part of a wider and evolving EU and global policy agenda, in which public
research and innovation underpin the transition to competitive, sustainable and resilient food
systems and a stronger bioeconomy. This aligns with the Draghi and Letta reports80’ focus on
competitiveness, innovation, decarbonisation, security, a stronger Single Market (including the
‘fifth freedom’ for research, innovation and education), and is complemented by the EU
startup and scaleup strategy81. Recent initiatives further support food-systems
transformation, notably the life sciences strategy82, the vision for agriculture and food83, the
76 Key figures on the European food chain – 2025 edition - Key figures - Eurostat. 77 Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D. et al. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic
emissions. Nat Food 2, 198–209 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9. 78 Rockström J, Thilsted S, Willett W et al. The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy, sustainable, and just food
systems.The Lancet, 2025; 406, 1625-1700, the 5 boundaries transgressed are: land, biodiversity, climate, blue
water flows, and biogeochemical flows. 79 Thematic Assessment Report on the Interlinkages among Biodiversity, Water, Food and Health | IPBES secretariat. 80 The Draghi report on EU competitiveness and Enrico Letta - Much more than a market (April 2024). 81 EU Startup and Scaleup Strategy. 82 Life Sciences Strategy. 83 Vision for Agriculture and Food.
58
strategy for a competitive and sustainable EU bioeconomy84, the Biotech Act I85 and the
2025 Food and Feed Safety Simplification Omnibus86, as well as the safe hearts plan87
promoting healthier diets.
Through a systemic, cross-sectoral R&I approach, Food 2030 operates through 11 thematic
pathways for action, while delivering co-benefits across four cross-cutting priorities: 1)
Nutrition and health; 2) Climate and sustainability; 3) Circularity and resource efficiency; 4)
Innovation and communities.
Food 2030 priorities
Nutrition and health
• Promoting healthier and more sustainable diets that prevent diet-related non-communicable diseases.
• Diversifying the offer of proteins sourced from existing and new ingredients.
• Meeting diverse, cultural and specific needs through a place-based dietary shift.
Climate and sustainability
• Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and biodiversity loss.
• Improving air and water quality.
• Reducing dependence on imports (leading to less deforestation) and external inputs (e.g. less use of
chemical fertilisers), for positive impacts on the climate.
Circularity and resource efficiency
• Decreasing the resource footprint across all sectors.
• Reducing food waste through the potential reintroduction of by-products into the food chain as
alternative protein sources (e.g. use of microorganisms or fungi on food waste).
Innovation and communities
• Triggering innovation, new jobs, business models, value-added products and services.
• Meeting the needs, values and expectations of society, especially vulnerable groups, in a responsible
and ethical way.
• Improving the resilience and performance of food systems.
Food 2030 11 Pathways for Action
1. Governance for food systems change
2. Urban food systems transformations
3. Food from the ocean and freshwater resources
4. Alternative proteins for dietary shifts
5. Food waste and resource-efficient food systems
6. The microbiome world
7. Nutrition and sustainable healthy diets
84 Strategy for a Competitive and Resilient EU Bioeconomy. 85 EU Biotech Act 1. 86 Simplification of legislation - Food Safety - European Commission. 87https://health.ec.europa.eu/non-communicable-diseases/cardiovascular-health_en#eu-cardiovascular-health-
plan-the-safe-hearts-plan.
59
8. Food safety systems of the future
9. Food systems Africa
10. Data and digital transformation
11. Zero-pollution food systems
4.1.2. Legacy of Food 2030 and synergies with other Union programmes and activities
According to the independent experts’ evaluation of Food 203088, carried out in 2025 and
further confirmed by an EU Survey conducted in 2026 targeting food systems stakeholders (see
Stakeholders’ outreach chapter), the intervention logic of Food 2030 has been pioneering,
aligning with EU strategic priorities and working across multiple topics, including urban food
policy, food safety, alternative proteins for diversified diets or the microbiome world.
Food 2030 has achieved significant milestones by adopting a holistic approach to food
systems, addressing intricate interactions between ecological, economic, and social objectives.
It has allocated approximately EUR 770 million in funding89 under Horizon 2020 and Horizon
Europe for research and innovation projects, resulting in valuable scientific contributions and
bringing new scientific knowledge in the form of publications, living labs90, robust policy
support91, innovative business models92, ICT tools93, and innovative foods94.
Additionally, Food 2030 has excelled in stakeholder engagement and community building
by employing the multi-actor approach, participatory methods and place-based solutions,
enabling support from local stakeholders and enhancing behavioural change. Social sciences
and humanities, Living Labs95 and the multi-actor approach ensured a broad engagement
of diverse stakeholders. This approach has also extended to the creation of a vibrant
community, bolstering food systems science and education. One example is the Food 2030
stakeholders mailing list, with nearly 2 000 subscriptions. It has also facilitated cross-European
cooperation through the Horizon Europe 2021-2027 FutureFoodS96 co-funded partnership,
uniting 83 partners across 29 countries and a 30% EU contribution of around EUR 95 million
mobilising another EUR 200 million in Member States’ funding. Launched in June 2024, it
88 European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Shaping the future of food research
and innovation – Insights and recommendations from Food 2030 experts, Publications Office of the European
Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/8711448. 89 Until Horizon Europe Work Programme 2023/2024, excluding the funding allocated to the co-funded
FutureFoodS partnership. 90The project HealthyFoodAfrica improved the sustainability and resilience of food systems and innovated
practices and governance arrangements in ten localized, context-specific Food System Labs across ten African
cities. The LIKE-A-PRO project has established Living Labs in 11 European countries to engage with consumers
and explore barriers and opportunities related to the uptake of alternative proteins. 91The REFRESH project contributed to policymaking by integrating its group of experts into the EU Platform on
Food Losses and Food Waste, which informed the process of updating the Waste Framework Directive to include
food waste reduction targets. 92The project IFISHIENCI produced business models showcasing the potential of valorisation of waste from
Recirculating Aquaculture Systems in bio-based industries. 93The project FUSILLI produced an ICT tool for behavioural change in the form of a social game, developed
through a mobile app, to encourage citizens to adopt a healthy diet. 94The project REALM produced novel sensors to monitor the growth and physiological state of microalgae in
real-time. 95 Search the TRANSIT resource hub - Transformative Social Innovation Theory. 96 FutureFoodS.
60
resulted from the preparatory work carried out under the CSA FoodPathS97 (funded under
Horizon Europe) with the support of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Research
(SCAR).
Most Food 2030 projects were supported through thematic Societal Challenge (H2020) and
through Cluster 6 (Horizon Europe 2021- 2027), but it has also benefited from synergies with
the broader EU R&I and innovation ecosystem, particularly in relation to market uptake,
evidence generation, monitoring and science-for-policy support. This includes the support from
the European Innovation Council and the European Food Safety Authority described in Section
2.1.
In addition, the JRC’s EU Food System Monitoring Dashboard98 monitors the sustainability
of the EU food system from an environmental, economic and social perspective, based on a set
of indicators and operates in close connection with FutureFoodS’ Food systems Observatory
for forward-looking analysis and KPI development aligned with Food 2030’s objectives. To
complement this monitoring for advancing competitive sustainable food systems, Food 2030
has also been working with the well-established EC Knowledge Centre for Global Food and
Nutrition Security99 and the Knowledge Centre for Bioeconomy100.
EIT Food101 (the knowledge and innovation community mentioned in Section 2.1) accelerates
market uptake by supporting startups and innovation programmes aligned with Food 2030 (e.g.
food waste reduction, protein diversification, circularity) developing activities on educational
aspects e.g. related to healthy diets which were linked to the Food 2030 priorities. Food 2030
also contributed to the New European Innovation Agenda (which the European Commission
adopted in 2022) through the development of the ‘Regional Innovation Valleys for
Bioeconomy and Food Systems’ concept note102.
Food 2030 also aligns thematically with the Smart Specialisation Strategy (S3) thematic
platform on agri-food103. The thematic platform and its partnerships bring together regions
sharing R&I priorities, all within the framework of the Smart Specialisation Strategy under
cohesion policy. In those regions, the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) plays a
key role in supporting R&I capacities and strengthening their R&I ecosystems Also, the
Interregional Innovation Investment (I3) instrument104 is supporting innovation across the
agriculture and food sector, helping regions turn Smart Specialisation priorities into concrete
market solutions. Among more than 70 projects, the I3 Instrument already supports a growing
portfolio that contributes to Europe's bioeconomy and agri-food transition; this includes the
AquaLoops4Med, Biotech4Food, and VALUE4PACK projects.
97 Co-creating the prototype 'Sustainable FOOD Systems PArTnersHip' | FOODPathS | Project | Fact Sheet | HORIZON |
CORDIS | European Commission. 98 EU Food System Monitoring Dashboard. 99 Global Food and Nutrition Security. 100 Bioeconomy Knowledge Centre. 101 EIT Food | Accelerating Food Innovation for a Future-Fit Food System - EIT Food. 102 European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Regional innovation valleys for
bioeconomy and food systems, Publications Office of the European Union, 2023,
https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/93434. 103 Inforegio - S3 Smart Specialisation: Agri-food. 104 Interregional Innovation Investments (I3) Instrument.
61
4.1.3. Analytical evidence on Food 2030 delivery and impact proxies
Assessing the long-term systemic impact of Food 2030 requires structured time-series data,
which are not yet fully available. In their absence, this analysis uses a set of proxy indicators
based on observable project outputs that can reasonably be linked to delivery, uptake and
potential impact. These include the number of projects with living labs, coordination and
support actions (CSAs, such as networks and alliances), and innovation actions (IAs), based
on Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe 2021-2027 projects under Food 2030 until Work
Programme 2023-2024.
Another source of information is a survey conducted in collaboration with the European
Research Executive Agency (REA) in 2024-2025. Over 100 coordinators of projects (most of
which resulted directly from Food 2030 programming) funded under the societal challenges
part of Horizon 2020 and Pillar II of Horizon Europe 2021 – 2027 responded to a questionnaire
on market uptake and social innovation emerging from the projects.
Food 2030 focused on post-farmgate food system actors post farm gate. As explained above,
the food and drink industry includes a large share of small and medium-sized enterprises
(SMEs). As such, Food 2030 sought to engage SMEs in its funded projects.
62
Figure 17: SMEs participation and funding among the Food 2030 projects
Figure 18: Shares of SMEs participation and funding among the Food 2030 projects
Figures 17 and 18 show a growing involvement of SMEs in Food 2030 projects, alongside a
corresponding increase in funding allocated to them. Under Horizon 2020, SMEs accounted
for 21.5% of participants (372 SMEs), compared with 22.6% in Horizon Europe 2021-2027
(362 SMEs). Financially, this represents a rise from EUR 84.2 million (17.8% of the total net
EU contribution) to EUR 100.6 million (20.5%).
No Food 2030 related projects under Horizon 2020 reported their technology readiness levels,
but 24 Food 2030 projects under Horizon Europe 2021-2027 did (14 RIAs and 10 IAs).
Impacts of Food 2030 can also be observed through the number of projects that have produced
peer-reviewed scientific articles and registered intellectual property rights (IPR) applications
at the end of the projects.
63
Figure 19: Share of Food 2030 projects that produced peer-reviewed publications and registered IPR
Figure 20: Number of IPR and peer-reviewed publications coming from Food 2030
Figures 19 and 20 show the number of peer-reviewed publications and IPR reported by Food
2030 projects, as well as the share of Food 2030 projects that produced peer-reviewed
publications and registered IPR. While Horizon Europe 2021-2027 related projects appear to
have significantly fewer IPR applications and peer-reviews exist outputs, this can be attributed
to the fact that these deliverables usually come towards the end of a project, and many Horizon
Europe projects are still ongoing. As such, a meaningful comparison between Horizon 2020
and Horizon Europe on this indicator is not yet possible.
That said, Food 2030 related projects have generated 18 IPR applications and 1 160 peer-
reviewed publications under Horizon 2020, and 2 IPR applications and 134 peer-reviewed
publications under Horizon Europe 2021- 2027. About 82% of the Food 2030 projects under
Horizon 2020 produced peer-reviewed publications and about 13% of them registered IPR.
Under Horizon Europe 2021-2027 so far, about 39% produced peer-reviewed publications and
2.5% registered IPR. By 2024, there were about 8.8 peer-reviewed publications per Food 2030
project.
64
Figure 21: The share of total funding dedicated to the climate, biodiversity, digital and AI trackers during
Horizon Europe (2021-2024), considering RIAs, IAs, CSAs, and COFUND
Figure 21 shows that about 66.9%, 20.7%, 21.9% and 12.3% of the Food 2030 funding in
Horizon Europe (2021-2024) was at least indirectly dedicated to climate, biodiversity, digital
and AI issues respectively.
4.2. Analysis and key achievements
The impact of Food 2030 will be showcased along the four Food 2030 priorities and
exemplified by successful EU-funded projects and their concrete outcomes.
Figure 22 shows to which degree each pathway addressed its own ambitions for the four
Food 2030 priorities105. Communities and nutrition are covered most by different pathways,
while the pathway on food systems in Africa appears to be the most cross-cutting.
105 European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Shaping the future of food research
and innovation – Insights and recommendations from Food 2030 experts, Publications Office of the European
Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/8711448, overview page 20. The assessment considers the degree to
which each pathway addressed its own ambitions with regards to the four priorities covering Horizon 2020 and
Horizon Europe. The dots represent the presumed level of attention with smaller dots representing lower attention,
and larger ones representing higher attention. The figure is informed by an analysis of gaps and contributions as
identified by the independent pathway experts.
65
Figure 22 Degree to which each pathway addressed Food 2030’s four priorities
The 2023 innovation investment gap study106 reports that, under FP7 and Horizon 2020,
around 36% of EU funding in food systems R&I activities aligned with the Food 2030
priority on climate/environmental sustainability, while 27% of the EU funding in food systems
R&I activities aligned with the Food 2030 priority on circularity/resource efficiency. By
contrast, Figure 22 suggests that Horizon Europe gives relatively greater weight to nutrition
and communities, indicating a shift in emphasis between the two EU funding programmes,
while maintaining the systemic logic of Food 2030.
106 European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, SPI and IPSOS, Food systems –
Research and innovation investment gap study – Policy report, Publications Office of the European Union,
2023, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/888905.
66
Figure 23 EU-public food-systems R&I funding per Food 2030 priority under Horizon 2020
4.2.1. Nutrition and sustainable healthy diets
Introduction
The target under this priority is to drive a dietary shift that ensures healthy diets and more
optimal nutrition, while acknowledging that health and sustainability are intrinsically linked.
Key issues under this priority include tackling all forms of malnutrition, from undernutrition
to obesity, and improving diets for the general population and specific population groups
(including children, older people, and people placed in vulnerable situations). Food
affordability is key, given that in the EU over 42 million people cannot afford a quality meal
every second day107. Access to adequate, safe, sustainable and nutritious food is fundamental
for the whole population and particular attention must be given to groups at higher risk of food
insecurity or exclusion. This is essential to support health promotion and disease prevention.
What Food 2030 enabled108
EU-funded projects supported healthy diets by advancing the state of the art in personalised
nutrition and diet-related disease prevention and health promotion.
Several projects developed personalised nutrition interventions and associated products and
technologies (NUTRISHIELD, STANCE4HEALTH, PREVENTOMICS, PROTEIN),
including innovations linking diet to individual health profiles using omics
(dataNUTRISHIELD, STANCE4HEALTH) and digital delivery such as AI-enabled apps and
wearables and communication technologies (CoDiet, PROTEIN). The microbiome pathway
was integrated by investigating how plant-based and fermented-derived food can modulate gut
microbiome to prevent metabolic diseases (DOMINO) and by assessing the nutritional impact
of microbial fermentation on pulse-based diets (HealthFerm).
Projects also targeted urgent public health challenges, such as obesity (STOP, SWEET) and
tackling malnutrition in older people (PROMISS), while promoting sustainable dietary
107 Eurostat, 2023. 108 Based on assessment of external expert report: European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and
Innovation, Shaping the future of food research and innovation – Insights and recommendations from Food 2030
experts, Publications Office of the European Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/8711448.
67
patterns through different approaches including diet’s true cost (FEAST, PLAN’EAT,
SWITCH).
Food 2030 supported food safety by advancing the state of the art and final applications to
benefit the EU food sector, consumers, industry, and to provide policy recommendations. In
the field of food safety, knowledge consortia worked closely both with the EFSA on the
development of risk assessment platforms (FoodSafety4EU) and with the industry and even
filed patents, e.g. for new kitchen tools and appliances (SafeConsumE).
Projects under the Alternative Proteins pathway aimed to diversify our dietary habits with
alternative protein sources109 (plant-based, fungi, microbes, meat from cell cultures, insects,
macroalgae and microalgae, etc.). These projects help tackle global challenges such as climate
change, natural resource scarcity, food security and sustainability, and malnutrition110.
Diversifying our protein sources can also help build food system resilience and can also reduce
reliance on imported proteins. Lastly, as alternative protein products could also reduce the risk
of zoonotic diseases and antimicrobial resistance, the R&I investment in this area, also helps
boost the ‘One Health’ approach.
Relevant projects fostered healthy diets beyond Europe, by analysing the food needs and
choices of 10 000 urban and rural consumers to support more plant-based diets, developing 26
ingredients/products with improved authenticity and safety solutions (e.g. smart storage and
bio-based packaging), and delivering tailored nutritional recommendations and consumer
nutrition-awareness campaigns (FOODLAND).
In addition, the projects funded under Cluster 6 of Horizon Europe 2021- 2027, are also in
complementarity with other projects under Cluster 1 ‘Health’, the ERA4Health111
partnership, as a proof of synergies to reinforce the link between healthy diets, nutrition and
prevention of certain diseases such as obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular and mental health
diseases and disorders.
Flagship stories
Pathway: Alternative proteins for dietary shifts
Giant Leaps (2022-2026, RIA) is a project with 30 partners that seeks to accelerate the
dietary shift from animal-based proteins to alternative dietary proteins and to improve
people’s well-being and health, by providing strategic innovations, methodologies, and
open-access datasets.
The project advances multidisciplinary work on alternative proteins, spanning food
processing, sustainability assessment, consumer research, data infrastructure, and
health-related studies. It analysed current food consumption in 28 European countries to
evaluate nutritional adequacy and quality, and environmental sustainability. Several
scientific articles published include Which are the most promising protein sources for meat
alternatives? and A review of the toxicological effects and allergenic potential of emerging
alternative protein sources. The work carried out so far covers a broad range of approaches,
110 Bending the curve of land degradation to achieve global environmental goals | Nature. 111 ERA4Health Partnership.
68
including microbial fermentation, enzymatic processing, solid-state fermentation,
extrusion, and high-pressure technologies.
Six categories of food prototypes have been developed, supporting the dietary transition
towards alternative protein sources. Prototypes of vegan burgers, meatball analogues, a
cheese spread analogue, egg replacers for bakery products, and milk and yogurt alternatives
have been developed. While the prototypes offer promising opportunities for food
innovation, optimizing taste and texture remains a key area for further development to ensure
consumer acceptance and satisfaction.
LIKE-A-PRO (2022-2026, IA) explores the production of new food products from
alternative protein sources such as rapeseed, mealworms, krill, microbes, mushrooms,
fermented fungi and peas. It also investigates the consumers’ needs and ways to meet
them with new products (Food system maps for 13 countries). The project involves 45
project partners. Notable achievements have been reached so far including the upscaling
and characterisation of several alternative protein ingredients, the development of an
extensive portfolio of pilot-scale food products, and the large-scale implementation of Food
Environment Living Labs across 11 countries. These activities produced robust evidence
on consumer behaviour, food environments, nutritional quality, safety, regulatory
feasibility, and socio-environmental impacts, thereby strengthening both the scientific and
policy relevance of the project. In several cases, results went beyond the originally planned
scale, such as the number of food prototypes developed and the breadth of outreach and
engagement activities. A total of 63 pilot-scale food prototypes were developed across 22
product types, exceeding initial targets.
Both of these projects, and others, are also part of the Horizon4Proteins collaboration, and
Horizon Magazine dedicated an article promoting the key findings in this area.
Pathway: Nutrition and sustainable healthy diets
CoDiet (2023-2026, RIA) created the largest collection of biomedical data, verified by
both AI and human experts, including unique categories of information. This data has been
used to train specialized AI models for reviewing medical literature, helping us understand
the connections between diet, disease risk factors, and biological mechanisms,
particularly metabolic syndrome.
A pilot study running in the UK, Greece, Ireland, and Spain has been conducted to test new
technologies to monitor diet and non-communicable diseases (NCD) risk using (i)
passive cameras and biomarkers from blood and urine for dietary assessment, and (ii)
integrated genetic, metabolomics, and metagenomics data with non-invasive sensors for
NCD risk monitoring.
This project is also part of the research multidisciplinary network, the European Cluster of
Obesity Research Projects (OBEClust) aiming to increase the impact of obesity research in
Europe, with a focus on prevention.
FEAST consortium (2022-2027, RIA) involves 15 countries, 35 partners and 13 living labs.
It supports the EU's just transition to healthy diets produced by sustainable food systems. It
seeks to make it easy for everyone in Europe to eat delicious, healthier and more sustainable
food along the entire chain from the production systems to the final consumers.
69
It maps and monitors dietary patterns for the general population as well as for vulnerable
groups and it identifies the micro-level factors influencing individual food choices and
behaviours. It also analyses in detail the geographical, socio-economic, behavioural, and
cultural drivers that shape dietary habits at both the individual and group levels.
It provides a toolkit with examples of strategies and interventions that can be used to address
drivers and barriers to healthier and more sustainable eating habits. Key
recommendations for food companies, governments and communities use the Healthy Food
Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI). it also provides a practical handbook containing
the experiences gained from the living labs for the co-developed interventions focussing on
food, health and sustainability.
4.2.2. Circularity and resource efficiency of food systems
Introduction
This priority focuses on achieving circularity and resource efficiency within food systems,
emphasising the need for sustainable practices to reduce and valorise the staggering 58 million
tonnes of food waste generated annually in the EU112, with an associated market value
estimated at EUR 132 billion113. This involves a commitment to minimising food loss and
waste, enhancing recycling processes, and rethinking food packaging to adopt biodegradable
options. It also responds to rising consumer demand for more transparent, sustainable and
locally relevant food choices, while supporting shorter and more resource-efficient supply
chains. An integral aspect of this priority is reducing water and energy consumption to boost
resource efficiency across all sectors of the food systems. Climate change may aggravate food
systems problems in countries with delicate food security balances and relatively high levels
of vulnerability to climate change due to the large-scale use of scarce resources (water, land,
etc.)114.
What Food 2030 enabled115
Food 2030 projects supported circular and resource-efficient food systems and healthier food
choice while reducing pollution and waste. They:
• promoted change to cut spoilage and encourage healthier consumption habits
(SISTERS, CHORIZO);
• enabled practical solutions such as diet planning and food-bank optimisation to
improve access (ZeroW);
• strengthened food security by increasing redistribution of edible food and reforming
standards, combined with behaviour-driven interventions to reduce avoidable losses
(REFRESH, ZeroW);
112 Eurostat, 2025. 113 SWD (2023)421. 114 Ensuring Access to Safe and Nutritious Food for All Through the Transformation of Food Systems - Science and
Innovations for Food Systems Transformation - NCBI Bookshelf. 115 Based on assessment of external expert report: European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and
Innovation, Shaping the future of food research and innovation – Insights and recommendations from Food 2030
experts, Publications Office of the European Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/8711448.
70
• quantified greenhouse-gas reductions enabled by waste valorisation and reuse
pathways (SCALIBUR, FOLOU).
Under this priority, the microbiome plays a specific role in tackling food waste, as the
microbiome influences the rate of food breakdown, and contributes to the decomposition of
organic matter. Projects like CIRCLES and SIMBA harness microbial ‘circular actions’ to
optimise food production cycles, using beneficial microbes to break down organic side-streams
and convert them into high-value nutrients, thereby reducing the environmental footprint of the
food system. Microbes also have the potential to break down plastic waste and convert it into
useful by-products such as biofuels or biodegradable materials. This approach has the potential
to not only reduce plastic and chemical pollution but also create new sources of sustainable
materials and energy.
Food 2030 also supported the development of sustainable fisheries and aquaculture in the
ocean and freshwater ecosystems. This included advancing predictive capacity supporting
ecosystem-based fisheries (EcoScope) following the maximum sustainable yield principle
(SEAwise). Science-based feeding and breeding in aquaculture was also advanced
(NewTechAqua, FutureEUAqua).
Flagship stories
Pathway: The microbiome world
DOMINO (2023-2028, RIA) is designed to scale high-potential microbial innovations into
commercial applications. While earlier research focused on mapping microbial ecosystems,
DOMINO applies those findings to build a climate-neutral food chain.
The project uses established tools such as the CuratedFoodMetagenomic database to harness
beneficial bacteria as natural preservatives for fermented foods. One core aim is to develop
optimised, health-promoting products that improve digestion and safety while offering
chemical-free alternatives in line with the EU vision for agriculture and food. DOMINO also
prioritises waste valorisation, using advanced technology to convert food side-streams and
waste into high-value ingredients. By turning knowledge into scalable solutions, the project
helps bring a decade of scientific breakthroughs closer to the consumer market and builds
strategically on the results of MASTER.
Pathway: Food safety systems of the future
WATSON (2023-2026, RIA) takes a full-chain systems-based approach, from producer to
consumer. Its main aim is to deliver a transformative traceability framework that integrates
data-driven services, intelligence-based toolsets and risk-estimation approaches, enabling food
safety authorities to identify and prevent fraudulent activities. The pilot demonstration and
validation campaigns enabled the deployment of the Watson solutions in real operational
environments across six important value chains (wine, honey, olive oil, meat, dairy, and fish).
Supporting policy with scientific evidence: in support of the Watson project, the JRC has
consolidated 2 445 food fraud incidents reported since 2016 (as of January 2026) into a
single, harmonised dataset and developed an interactive application to facilitate exploration
and analysis. The platform enhances pattern detection and supports early identification of
71
emerging risks.The policy briefs have mapped critical fraud vulnerabilities across supply
chains (including other value chains at high fraud risk (i.e. mushrooms, coffee, cocoa and
spices) beyond the Watson framework). The project launched a communication campaign in
Euronews series under the name of Food Detectives116.
FoodSafety4EU (2021-2023, CSA) aimed to build a permanent, collaborative EU Research &
Innovation platform connecting food safety stakeholders across Europe. The platform has 42
formal members, over 80 collaborating institutions and more than 10 EU projects, expanding
its impact across nearly all Member States and associated countries. Through a dynamic,
participatory approach, FS4EU succeeded in structuring, mobilizing, and engaging a wide
network of actors spanning authorities, scientists, industry, and civil society.
A key achievement of the project is the development of a dynamic Strategic Research and
Innovation Agenda (SRIA), updated annually through the EU Food Safety Forum, which has
become a central science–policy–society interface. Importantly, the SRIA evolved consistently
with the European Commission’s policy framework and its latest update specifically focuses
on bridging the gap between research and innovation to strengthen EU competitiveness.
To ensure long‑term sustainability, FoodSafety4EU established a non‑profit legal entity
(PIC 872618306) powered by the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche in Italy to support a
permanent structure. It continues to engage and proactively stimulate the participation of the
EU Food Safety community through the organization of the annual EU Food Safety Forum.
Pathway: Food from the ocean and freshwater resources
Pathway: Food waste and resource-efficient food systems
116 https://www.euronews.com/the-food-detectives.
AWARE (2022-2026, RIA), is developing fish farming in recycled water and is showing
that producing fish for human consumption is feasible in any city, with no impact on natural
habitats and no dependence on natural freshwater availability. Specifically, AWARE created
the first European case study for reclaimed water aquaponics in the town of Castellana Grotte
(Puglia, Italy) within a wastewater treatment plan using a multitrophic aquaponics
recirculation system. To promote the public awareness that fishes and plants grown with
properly treated wastewater can be safely consumed, good for the environment and for human
health. It will publish a study on health safety of fishes and vegetables consumption. It will
eventually add a new value chain for the farm-to-fork production of fish and vegetables to the
local economy, providing new jobs and a cheaper food production pipeline.
IMPRESS (2023-2027, IA) focuses on zero-waste, sustainable aquatic food value chains
using low trophic species and innovative circular solutions. To date it has conducted a pan-
European survey to analyse consumer preferences, habits, barriers, and attitudes toward
seafood, plant-based, and aquatic plant-based products across six countries. It also optimised
extraction of chitin and chitosan from shrimp shell waste and fish protein isolates,
hydrolysates, and lipids from haddock waste using eco-friendly technologies. High value
polysaccharides and proteins were recovered from macroalgae via biorefinery approach. A
combination of microalgal extract and microalgae-derived oil demonstrated liver-protective
properties. Collagen was extracted from lumpfish. Mussel cooking and fish processing
wastewater were valorised to extract proteins.
72
ZeroW (2022-2025, IA) provided significant contributions to preventing and reducing food
waste and enhancing the sustainability of food supply chains.
Specifically, it demonstrated innovative food loss and waste reduction solutions in nine living
labs along real-life food chains to effectively address the multidimensional issue of food
waste. These real-life Living Labs embedded systemic innovations with the potential to lead
to fundamental changes in both social dimensions (values, regulations, attitudes) and technical
dimensions (infrastructure, technology, tools, processes) and in the relations between them.
At the end of the project, seven of the nine living labs have chosen commercialisation routes,
and five are anticipating revenue growth for the partners involved.
4.2.3. Climate-smart and environmentally sustainable food systems
Introduction
This priority emphasises the responsible use and management of natural resources - water, soil,
land, and sea - in our entire food system while staying within the planetary boundaries, ensuring
their availability for future generations. This priority aims to enhance research and innovation
to support climate-smart food systems that adapt to climate change, conserve and restore
natural resources and ecosystem functions, and reduce environmental degradation while
contributing to climate change mitigation. By encouraging and developing sustainable and
innovative practices, this priority helped to develop food systems that are resilient,
environmentally sustainable and capable of contributing to climate mitigation and adaptation.
What Food 2030 enabled117
Projects supported climate-smart and environmentally sustainable food systems by supporting
greenhouse gas emission mitigation, reducing ecosystem pressure, including greenhouse gas
reduction quantifications from waste valorisation and reuse (SCALIBUR, FOLOU, ZeroW,
CIRCLES). Improved resource use (ToNoWaste, SIMBA) fostered climate adaptation and
mitigation. The environmental impact of specific alternative proteins was also addressed
(GIANT LEAPS).
Beyond Europe, projects supported biodiversity goals by valorising local varieties and species,
as well as contributing to the implementation of agro-ecological practices, precision irrigation
and protection systems, biodegradable mulching, food safety and integrated aquaculture
(FOODLAND, HealthyFoodAfrica, HealthyDiets4Africa, InnoFoodAfrica, UPRISE,
FS4AFRICA).
Flagship stories
Pathway: The microbiome world
MASTER (2019-2023, IA) pioneered the use of microbiome-based DNA sequencing to map
microbial relationships across marine, plant, soil, rumen, and food systems. This Horizon 2020
117 Based on assessment of external expert report: European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and
Innovation, Shaping the future of food research and innovation – Insights and recommendations from Food 2030
experts, Publications Office of the European Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/8711448
73
initiative bridged the gap between frontier science and commercial use, yielding over twenty
innovations to improve the quality and sustainability of agri-food chains.
Key outputs included a high-efficiency DNA extraction kit and the
CuratedFoodMetagenomic database, a vital tool for detecting microorganisms in food
processing environments. In the agricultural sector, researchers developed microbial strains to
fight crop pathogens and biofertilisers to boost grass quality. The impact extended to
aquaculture, where probiotic strains improved fish growth and animal husbandry, where
microbiome modulation enhanced nutrient extraction while cutting methane emissions.
By exploring fermentation as a natural preservative, MASTER also laid the groundwork for
safer, health-promoting food products. These achievements provided the blueprints now being
scaled by successor projects like DOMINO or HoloRuminant.
Pathway: Zero-pollution food systems
MAGNO (2024-2027, RIA) is supporting decision-making around food packaging,
contributing to the European Green Deal and EU 2030 Climate Target Plan objectives. It aims
to improve the sustainability and efficiency of food packaging, promote directions for new
policies and increase social innovation.
The project will examine plastic packaging value chains and create an ecosystem digital twin
to provide innovative and circular business strategies drawing a map of different scenarios
ahead. It will use a multi-actor approach by involving researchers, food business operators,
packaging producers, developers, converters, recyclers, consumers and local authorities to
prevent and reduce plastic packaging pollution in Europe and the Mediterranean Sea.
Pathway: Food waste and resource-efficient food systems
PRECIOUS (2024-2028, RIA) and WASTEWISE (2024-2028, RIA) are expected to deliver
robust, harmonised data on the environmental footprint of food waste across the food supply
chain, with a particular focus on greenhouse gas emissions.
They will apply the life cycle assessment methodologies to identify and assess effective
prevention and reduction pathways, contributing to climate mitigation, biodiversity protection
and resource efficiency. Their work will also support the integration of food waste reduction
measures into key EU policy instruments, including national energy and climate plans, thereby
advancing the Food 2030 priority on environment and helping to achieve the EU’s 2030 climate
targets.
4.2.4. Innovation and empowerment of communities
Introduction
Transforming food systems requires systemic change involving actors across the entire food
system, including innovators, industry, researchers, public authorities, civil society, local and
regional authorities, and citizens.
The food sector is moderately innovative overall, with strong pockets of innovation (alternative
proteins, functional foods, fermentation, digital traceability, and sustainable packaging) but
74
slower diffusion than sectors like technologies or pharma. R&I intensity is generally low,
especially among SMEs, because margins are tight, the sector is risk-averse and failure is
costly. Large multinationals typically invest more in R&I than smaller firms, while SMEs and
startups tend to be the carriers of niche or disruptive innovation. Nevertheless, uptake of
innovations can be quick when innovations reduce cost, risk, waste, or labour.
Food retail and distribution, another part of the food system, shows faster change in customer-
facing and digital areas (loyalty schemes, personalisation), than core logistics. E-commerce has
driven significant experimentation. Automation is growing (self-checkouts, micro-fulfilment,
warehouse robotics, vertical farming, etc.), but rollout is capital-intensive. Supply-chain
visibility and traceability technology is expanding, yet hindered by interoperability and
supplier readiness. Overall, uptake of innovation is shaped by legislations and compliance
(food safety, labelling, etc.) and consumer trust.
This priority focuses on promoting a healthy, place-based innovation ecosystem that supports
the creation of innovative and digital technologies, new business models and solutions with
societal benefits and market potential. This approach aims to foster resilient and empowered
local and regional communities, generate employment across the EU, and support vibrant
urban, rural, and coastal economies. Research and innovation challenges under this priority
include fostering food governance innovation at all levels, empowering local authorities,
facilitating social innovation, combating food poverty, and ensuring sustainable, accessible
food in marginalised communities. It also emphasises citizen science, education, skills and
capacity development, including data-driven solutions.
What Food 2030 enabled118
EU Food 2030 projects helped translate R&I investments into direct policy change. EU
funding enabled cities to make formal political commitments to food, adopt food policies and
dedicated budgets, and set-up of food policy councils charters and municipal food commissions
(CLEVERFOOD, FUSILLI).
Job creation was fostered by local activities; for example, FoodSHIFT2030 led to the creation
of jobs based on continued Living Lab activities. There are examples of effective industry
involvement, with several patents filed e.g. for new kitchen tools and appliances as a direct
result of the project (SafeConsumE). SMEs and business development were supported by
connecting food companies with technology and the IT community (S3FOOD,
Data4Food2030).
A range of projects contributed with digital and technology innovations. ALLIANCE, and
HOLIFOOD were early examples of blockchain and AI technologies within the food safety
and quality domain. Other projects on microbiomes advanced pan-European interoperability
in data, standards and tools for scalable solutions in food safety, sustainability and
microbiome applications (e.g. SymbNET, Holofood, 3D-omics, HealthFerm). Digital
innovations use metadata from in-situ and/or remote sensors and omics technologies to
develop and demonstrate next-generation food safety and traceability systems
(FoodSafety4EU, FoodSafeR SAFFI, DiTECT).
118 Based on assessment in external expert report: European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and
Innovation, Shaping the future of food research and innovation – Insights and recommendations from Food 2030
experts, Publications Office of the European Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/8711448.
75
Community-driven innovations feature prominently under the pathway on urban food
systems, deployed through living labs (e.g. Cities2030, FUSILLI, FOODCLIC), but also
through governmental and social innovations such as installing food policy councils or
drafting advisory plans for food systems governance (FOODSHIFT2030).
Community empowerment was enhanced through networks for knowledge sharing and
enhanced collaboration(e.g.SWEET, CO-CREATE, FOSSnet) and innovative citizen
education by bringing science and food choices into public spaces with accessible learning
formats, combining experiential outreach, digital learning platforms and training for citizen
science (e.g.SUMMER; AquaVitae, FOSTER).
Food 2030 created policy impact beyond the project level, it inspired local and regional food
policies, such as the Flemish Food Strategy, which based their four strategic pillars on the Food
2030 priorities.
In addition, on 20 March 2024, the Commission adopted the Communication Building the
future with nature: Boosting Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing in the EU’119. Under
Horizon Europe 2021-2027, the Commission introduced a biotechnology and
biomanufacturing monitoring flag to monitor how Horizon Europe impacted the
implementation of the Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Communication. Under Pillar II,
Pillar III (EIC) and CBE JU, the HE Work Programme 2025 provided funding of around EUR
100 million in the food area.
Flagship stories
Pathway: The microbiome world
MicrobiomeSupport (2018–2022, CSA) created a harmonised framework for microbiome
research across 33 countries; today, it continues to operate as an autonomous association.
The project acted as the ‘architect’ of the field, mapping global research to eliminate redundant
funding and effort. A major milestone was the Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda
(SRIA) publication, which aligns microbiome R&I efforts at the global level.
The project's scientific leadership is highlighted by high-impact publications, including a
‘manifesto’ for microbiome innovations in Nature Microbiology and a standardized
‘microbiome definition’ in the journal Microbiome. These contributions provided a unified
language and vision for the bioeconomy. The project also laid the groundwork for an
International Microbiome Consortium to serve as a permanent resource for policymakers.
Pathway: Urban food systems transformations
Cities2030 (2020-2024, IA) succeeded in empowering cities, regions, stakeholders and citizens
to take ownership of their food systems and create a more equitable, sustainable, and food-
secure future by creating local ecosystems. It established ‘city-region food systems’ across 42
policy and living labs in 18 countries forging 296 partnerships with very local-specific
interactions, engaging 12 000 citizens while drawing in 115 additional ‘follower-cities’.
The project generated 29 technological innovations to assist policy makers and citizens. These
included blockchain technology for improved food traceability, IT devices for urban agriculture
monitoring and digital tools for optimized food supply chain management. A capacity-building
programme supported broad uptake. Key was a S2CP technological platform, organised
119 COM/2024/137 final.
76
around 13 adaptable components that can be tailored to local needs. The platform supports
decision-making processes and communities’ engagement, as well as economic actors (SMEs,
producers) at local level. The S2CP platform submitted its product to the JRC’s ‘Innovation
Radar (IR)’, which identified two tools of the platform as having ‘Business Ready’ market
maturity and ‘Exploring’ value creation opportunities.
FoodE (2020-2024, IA) created citizen-led city region food systems (CRFS) and has created
new job opportunities in EU cities through the implementation of pilot projects (e.g. urban
agriculture parks, vertical farms, aquaponic farms, small scale fishery in school canteen,
circular economy restaurants, urban bee keeping), also involving fragile and disadvantaged
social groups. It developed an app to facilitate citizens’ active engagement in identifying,
monitoring and assessing CRFS initiatives, to achieve involvement and an effective shift to
local food consumption. A citizen-science approach raised citizens awareness on CRFS
sustainability and on the environmental impact of dietary habits and enable them to become
key actors in this respect.
An interesting example in community building across projects was the creation of a ‘Family’
of five projects funded under the urban pathway (i.e. CITIES2030, FOODTRAILS,
FUSILLI, FoodSHIFT2030 and FoodE), which led to the development of joint products (such
as a video and a policy brief), with support by the Horizon Booster.
CULTIVATE (2023-2026, IA) supports food security and resilience by deploying an online
social innovation platform, the Food Sharing Compass. Designed with and for food sharing
initiatives (from seed sharing and social dining to surplus food redistribution and community
composting), policymakers, food supply actors, researchers and citizens, the Food Sharing
Compass will identify costs, benefits and impacts of FSIs; help actors navigate governance
architectures and ensure appropriate policies and regulations of food sharing.
Pathway: Governance for food systems change
CLEVERFOOD (2023-2026) is driving a transformative shift towards a fairer, healthier, and
more sustainable European food system by mobilising citizens, farmers, entrepreneurs,
policymakers, and researchers across nine countries (Belgium, Denmark, Greece, Hungary,
Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, and Spain). The project is fostering regenerative,
resilient, and plant-based food systems through an interlinked multi-level structure of policy
labs and living labs, ensuring systemic change from production to consumption.
By co-creating governance models, advancing food policies, and accelerating social and
technological innovations, CLEVERFOOD is breaking down barriers to sustainability. Its
policy labs facilitate peer-learning programmes, multi-stakeholder dialogues, and cross-
governance collaboration, while its living labs drive sustainable value chains, impact
investment, and technology adoption, all measured through robust transition progress
frameworks.
A key achievement is the CLEVERFOOD online platform, which has already united over
70 EU-funded initiatives with a combined investment exceeding EUR 450 million, fostering
synergies for large-scale impact. CLEVERFOOD also builds long-term capacity through
education and public engagement activities. Wider mobilisation includes citizen science,
influencer campaigns and an interactive exhibition, alongside competence centres.
FoodPathS (2022-2025)was the preparatory action for the Horizon Europe partnership on
food systems transformation, FutureFoodS. Ithas developed a virtual Knowledge Hub of
77
food system labs and an interactive funders map to connect diverse funders including
regional actors and foundations. It has produced guidance on how to implement a systems
approach in transnational calls and align funding strategies on food systems. These insights
were transferred to the FutureFoodS Partnership, which launched its first call for proposals in
2024.
The project has also delivered a strategic research and innovation agenda for FutureFoodS
providing guidelines for science to policy interfaces, food system observatories and R&I,
policy and education collaboration (RIPE concept). It has delivered a handbook on guidelines
and lessons learned for building a partnership in the food domain.
Pathway: Data and digital transformation
FOODITY (2023-2025) supported 12 projects that participated in their funding
programme in demonstrating alternative paths to overcoming existing tools and platform’s
limitations to citizens’ rights to personal data sovereignty:
For example, MyNutri empowers healthier, sustainable food choices through personalised
AI-driven insights. The android application uses Open Food Facts for product data and
includes a carbon foodprint scoring. The app solution was co-developed and tested with 150
consumers to ensure matching user needs and expectations.
Another example is SEBP, a digital platform that connects sustainable producers with
socially responsible companies through employee benefit programs. It has a producer portal
for managing product listings, a company portal with basic impact reporting, and an employee
portal with an online shop offering sustainable products. The platform integrates real-time
ecological, economic and social ethics, empowering informed choices and enhancing
corporate sustainability reporting.
DRG4Food (2022-2025, RIA), empowers a fair and responsible European Food Register,
fostering citizen sovereignty and creating a data-driven food system. For the consortium
technology acts as an empowering enabler, providing the means to achieve a wide variety of
innovative and valuable use cases. These use cases range from customised food provision,
food waste reduction, and improved transparency.
For example, the SAfeNutriKids use case has developed a responsible, AI-powered nutrition
education platform for children aged 6-12 years. The solution integrates a gamified-based
frontend and an AI-based personalisation chat function to deliver age-appropriate, culturally
adaptive content.
A second use case is NutriSight, an open model to extract nutrition information from images
by automating the process using a machine learning model. The application ‘Open Food
Facts’ is available in the app store.
Pathway: Food systems Africa
HealthyFoodAfrica (2020-2025, RIA) aimed at building more sustainable, equitable and
resilient food systems in 10 African cities. This project was part of the African Union –
European Union High-Level Policy Dialogue on Science Technology and Innovation under the
Partnership on Food and Nutrition Security and Sustainable Agriculture.
78
It developed food system labs in Benin, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Uganda and Zambia on:
nutrition and consumption, sustainable production, postharvest, food safety, value chain
governance, novel products and processes. It worked with smallholders, aquafarmers, SMEs,
women, youth, street vendors, consumers, NGOs, scientists and policymakers to enhance the
capacity of producers and food chain actors to deliver diverse, nutritious, high quality,
affordable foodstuffs.
4.2.5. Cross-cutting achievements
Beyond the four priorities, Food 2030 has made significant contributions to horizontal
objectives of Horizon Europe 2021- 2027, in particular Cluster 6: ‘Food, Bioeconomy,
Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment’, by shaping not only what food-systems
R&I addresses, but also how it is performed.
Social sciences and humanities are vital for understanding societal needs and delivering
public benefit are widely integrated across Horizon Europe 2021-2027 Cluster 6. In the
European Commission’s monitoring report on the integration of social sciences and humanities
for 2021-2023 Horizon Europe 2021-2027 projects120, Cluster 6 was one of the two clusters
with the highest number of social sciences and humanities participants (21%). In the Horizon
Europe Work Programme 2026/2027, 38% of topics are expected to include a social sciences
and humanities dimension, with topics under Food 2030 in line with this average. As consumers
shape demand and trends, they are central to food systems transformation. Accordingly, social
sciences and humanities have been integrated into topics engaging citizens and consumers,
including those on dietary shifts, local and regional food systems transformation and the
deployment of enabling technologies.
The multi-actor approach is inherent to the application of a systemic approach, and ensures
all stakeholders are included. The concept refers to a transdisciplinary R&I approach that
actively involves a wide diversity of sectors (from primary production to food waste
management) and stakeholders (including researchers, policymakers, representatives from the
public and private sectors, NGOs and civil society)121. Nearly all Food 2030 projects under
Horizon Europe demanded the multi-actor approach and encouraged applicants to apply it. An
external expert evaluation concluded that multi-actor collaborations are critical to the ongoing
success and impact of the Food 2030 research and innovation framework. However, more
structural support and guidance is required to fully exploit its impact122. This is also consistent
with the broader strategic approach to R&I in agriculture, forestry and rural areas, where the
multi-actor approach is recognised as an important mode of knowledge creation, uptake and
implementation.
One application of the multi-actor approach is Living Labs123, defined as practice-driven,
place-based organisations that facilitate and foster open, collaborative research and innovation
and real-life environments where both open innovation and user innovation processes can occur
121 European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Shaping the future of food research
and innovation – Insights and recommendations from Food 2030 experts, Publications Office of the European
Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/8711448. 122 European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Shaping the future of food research
and innovation – Insights and recommendations from Food 2030 experts, Publications Office of the European
Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/8711448. 123 Search the TRANSIT resource hub - Transformative Social Innovation Theory.
79
and where bottom-up driven R&I can be designed and implemented. The external expert
evaluation32 highlights that Living Labs have played an important role in facilitating
meaningful, and, at times, sustained multi-actor activities. However, it also notes concerns
regarding the proliferation and fragmentation of networks and the related risk of stakeholder
fatigue.
The EU-funded project CLEVERFOOD has established a Food 2030 Connected Lab
Network for living labs, communities of practice and other co-creation initiatives working on
transforming the food system at the local, regional and national level. The Horizon Europe co-
funded Partnership on food systems FutureFoodS establishes a Knowledge Hub of Living
Labs, incorporating the CLEVERFOOD network and ensuring consistency. Living labs are
inherent to several projects under different pathways such as Africa (HealthyFoodAfrica),
healthy diet and nutrition (PLAN’EAT).
International cooperation is a fundamental aspect of Food 2030. An analysis of urban food
system projects124 in 2023 showed that 25 Member States were represented by city initiatives
involved in food transformation with partnering cities in Africa, South America and China.
Still, initiatives lacked Eastern European participation that should be further focussed on in the
future.
The dedicated pathway on Africa reflects the long-standing AU–EU cooperation on food and
nutrition security and sustainable agriculture and recognises that food systems transformation
requires joint work on shared challenges such as nutrition, sustainable production, resilience,
trade and innovation uptake. This pathway enhanced international cooperation between the
European Union (EU) and the African Union (AU) through the partnership on Food and
Nutrition Security and Sustainable Agriculture (FNSSA) as part of the AU-EU High-Level
Policy Dialogue on Science, Technology and Innovation.
Since its launch in 2017, the FNSSA partnership has channelled investments in areas such as:
sustainable intensification of agriculture; agriculture and food systems for nutrition; expansion
and improvement of agricultural trade and markets. The establishment of the International
Research Consortium (IRC-FNSSA) -a hosted, networked institution governed by the IRC
Statutes (2025)- has transformed the FNSSA from a coordination platform into a long-term,
inclusive mechanism for joint AU-EU research governance. Together with the forthcoming
FNSSA Roadmap for 2027-2036, the FNSSA partnership serves as a cornerstone of the AU-
EU STI cooperation, driving innovation, policy alignment, and sustainable development across
both continents. On the urban side, AfriFOODlinks and INCiTiS Food exemplify how AU-EU
cooperation advances locally-driven approaches to food system transformation anchoring
global ambitions in concrete, city-level change.
Under the Food 2030 framework, the governance pathway aimed to strengthen the coherence,
coordination and effectiveness of actions across policy domains, governance levels and
stakeholder groups, recognising that food systems are shaped by a complex interplay of
regulatory frameworks, market incentives and societal behaviours. Through support to multi-
level governance structures, participatory approaches and policy innovation, this pathway
facilitates collaboration between public authorities, research actors, private sector stakeholders
and civil society (e.g. RefreSCAR, FOSTER, CLEVERFOOD). It also promotes the alignment
of research and innovation outcomes with policy development and implementation, thereby
addressing the persistent gap between knowledge generation and systemic uptake. This
124 European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Urban food system transformation
in the context of Food 2030 – Current practice & outlook towards 2030, Fabbri, K.(editor) and Vandrich,
J.(editor), Publications Office of the European Union, 2023, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/507125.
80
contributed to food systems transformation across local, regional and other territorial
contexts, including through place-based approaches, city and regional initiatives, and
governance models adapted to different institutional and socio-economic settings.
Innovative governance mechanisms at various levels have been deployed in different projects
beyond the dedicated pathway for action. Often, these projects are linked to Living Labs which
serve as a collaborative place for co-creation, for encouraging regional innovation governance
and for helping stakeholders to align their education and R&I agendas to better address the
barriers and opportunities of food systems transformation. This suggests that governance
innovation should be treated as a transversal enabler across Food 2030 and future Food 2040
activities, supporting thematic objectives wherever coordination, uptake, scaling or policy
alignment are required. The main R&I needs identified under nearly 20 EU-funded projects
working on urban food systems transformation was innovation on governance125.
A range of technologies support Food 2030 objectives, including the application of data, AI,
digital and other instrumental technologies. The 2024 Communication ‘Boosting
Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing in the EU’126 aimed to unlock the full benefits of
biotechnologies and biomanufacturing for industrial competitiveness.
Food 2030 has anticipated some of those challenges through specific topics under the Horizon
Europe Work Programme 2025 - one dedicated on consumer education on food biotech127 and
another on the application of precision fermentation through microorganisms128. In addition, in
2025 the EIC Accelerator challenge launched a topic on food from precision fermentation and
algae129 with a budget of EUR 50 million. The public and private partnership CBE JU invested
in biotechnologies projects such as the PLENITUDE flagship project130 which aimed to
produce affordable plant-based proteins for human consumption by integrating an aerobic
fermentation plant with a conventional first-generation biorefinery.
However, despite growing interest, commercial development and market uptake of
fermentation-based proteins remain limited, and only a few microbial protein products have
been authorised in the EU. The results hint towards an untapped market opportunity and
potential for more R&I investment and valorisation support.
CBE JU has also contributed to the broader innovation landscape relevant to Food 2030 by
supporting bio-based solutions for food and feed ingredients, including alternative proteins and
ingredients derived from low-cost sustainable feedstocks, microalgae and macroalgae. While
CBE JU does not cover direct food production, its portfolio includes projects that support
biotechnology, circularity, industrial scale-up and the development of new food and feed
ingredient value chains. Based on the CBE JU portfolio, food and feed ingredients represent
21% of both EU contributions and projects funded, covering 48 projects and EUR 291.4
million in EU contributions. These activities complement Food 2030 objectives by supporting
125 EU funded projects un urban food systems under Food 2030 - cluster workshop, 10 March 2026. 126European Commission, Building the future with nature: Boosting Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing in the
EU, COM(2024) 137 final, Brussels, 20 March 2024. 127 HORIZON-CL6-2025-02-FARM2FORK-13 “Raising citizen awareness on alternative proteins derived from
biotechnology”.
128 HORIZON-CL6-2025-02-FARM2FORK-14: Nutrients produced by microorganisms utilising primarily CO2
from the air, with the support of biotechnology.
129 Food from precision fermentation and algae | Programme | HORIZON | CORDIS | European Commission. 130 PLENITUDE | Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking (CBE JU).
81
resource efficiency, protein diversification, circularity, industrial deployment and the
valorisation of R&I results131.
The following table provides detailed information on the number of projects funded in this area
as well as the EU contribution.
Table 4. CBE JU projects on food and feed ingredients by action type and technology readiness level (TRL).
CBE JU projects in
food and feed
ingredients
FLAG
TRL 8
flagship
biorefineries
IA-DEMO
TRL 6-7
Demonstration
pilots
RIA
TRL 5
In lab testing
Total
EU contribution EUR 74 473 166 EUR 144 304 635 EUR 72 657 484 EUR 291 435 285
Number of projects 5 24 19 48
5. STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH
Stakeholder engagement has been a core feature of both the 2016 strategic approach to
agricultural R&I and Food 2030. Across both processes, engagement with Member States,
associated countries, researchers, farmers, foresters, rural actors, food-system stakeholders,
industry, SMEs, civil society, public authorities and citizens has helped identify priorities,
strengthen ownership, support co-creation and improve the relevance of EU-funded research
and innovation.
Stakeholder engagement and feedback played an important role for the preparation of the
new EU strategic approach to R&I for competitive, resilient and sustainable agriculture,
forestry, rural areas, and food systems. This section summarises the main stakeholder
engagement activities conducted to support the new R&I strategic approach.
5.1. Updating the 2016 strategic approach to agricultural R&I: stakeholder outreach
5.1.1. Open consultation
On 15 December 2025, during the session on the ‘future of EU agri-food: data & innovation
for food security’ of the EU Agri-Food Days 2025, the Commission launched an
open consultation through an online survey to support the preparation of a new
strategic approach to agricultural R&I. Stakeholders were invited to share their perspectives on
five main areas by 25 January 2026:
1. R&I as an enabler of the vision for agriculture and food
2. Strengthening the EU R&I ecosystem
3. Accelerating the uptake of new knowledge and innovation
4. Stronger cooperation in Europe and beyond
5. Future thematic priorities and approaches for R&I
701 contributions from farmers, foresters, rural organisations and actors, researchers,
businesses, non-governmental organisations, citizens and public authorities were
collected. A report presenting an analysis of the results was prepared and published in April
131 Note that CBE JU does not support R&I on direct food production, as per its Strategic Research and Innovation
Agenda (SRIA).
82
2026132. The results show strong support for a broader and more forward-looking agenda,
with up to 94% of respondents backing this approach. There is also clear support for better
assistance to startups, scaleups, and SMEs, with up to 82% in favour, as well as strong demand
for faster and more practical uptake of innovation by farmers on the ground, reaching up to
88%.
At the same time, the findings send a clear signal that research results need to be translated
more effectively into market-ready innovations. The feedback received helped inform the new
R&I strategic approach on key challenges, opportunities and priority areas for future R&I to
support competitive, resilient and sustainable agriculture, forestry and rural areas.
5.1.2. EU AgRI 2040 Conference
Building on the previous editions of the AgriResearch conference in 2016, 2018 and 2023, the
European Commission is preparing the fourth edition, EU AgRI 2040: Future-proofing EU
Agri-Food through research and innovation, to be held on 24 and 25 September 2026 in
Brussels, Belgium.
On this occasion, the new strategic approach to R&I in agriculture, forestry, rural areas, and
food systems will be presented. The conference will kick-off a process of working with
stakeholders to identify priorities for future R&I on agriculture, forestry and rural areas to be
addressed under the next EU Research and Innovation Programme Horizon Europe 2028-2033
and the new European Competitiveness Fund, in support of the ambition of the
vision for agriculture and food.
5.2. Food 2030 stakeholder outreach
Stakeholder outreach has been an important building block and a key success factor of
Food 2030, combining targeted dialogue with EU-funded project communities, Member State
expert bodies, and broad multi-stakeholder consultations. Additionally, stakeholder outreach
has been intensified in view of preparing the next-generation R&I strategic approach for food
systems, ‘Food 2040’.
Cluster workshops
A range of cluster workshops of EU-funded Food 2030 projects served to obtain a state-of-
play of activities under dedicated action pathways, and an overview to further define R&I
needs.
A Food 2030 clustering workshop (on 10 September 2025) on food safety and food fraud
projects aimed to exchange knowledge about project achievements and possible new research
and innovation needs. The cluster event also helped to increase the collaboration and synergies
among the project coordinators and scientific community in areas such as food safety, food
fraud, food safety in Africa, regulatory aspects on food safety and novel technologies
applied to specific food sectors.
A Food 2030 cluster workshop (24 October 2025) gathered Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe
projects to exchange results and strengthen synergies on food waste and resource-efficient
food systems. Projects showcased innovations across the supply chain, including digital
tools, smart packaging, behavioural approaches and microbiome solutions. New projects are
linking food waste reduction with environmental footprint analysis and climate impacts. Key
challenges include industry engagement, consumer involvement and fragmented policy
132 Strategic approach - Agriculture and rural development.
83
frameworks. The discussions highlighted the importance of collaborative, multi-actor research
and innovation to accelerate systemic change, improve resource efficiency and support
evidence-based policymaking towards sustainable, circular and climate-resilient food systems.
A Food 2030 cluster workshop on urban food systems (10 March 2026) representing nearly
20 projects under Food 2030 showcased a range of impacts on community empowerment,
relevant local and regional food policies, development of innovative tools to support citizens
in their positive decision-making, better and more impactful communication and positive food
environments. Key R&I needs identified include strengthened multi-level and cross-
sectoral food system governance with clear political commitment, stronger links between
local innovation and national/EU policy, improved monitoring, and trustworthy citizen-
centred digitalisation, including reliable and transparent AI tools that support public
engagement and better decision-making in food systems.
The cluster workshop on food from the ocean and freshwater resources (16 March 2026)
represented 17 projects and showcased impacts like reduced pressure on aquatic ecosystems,
more realistic fish stock assessments, new algae-based food products, consumer awareness
and connection of all actors along the aquatic food value chain. Involving companies and all
relevant stakeholders from the very beginning of projects was highlighted as crucial for the
successful uptake and valorisation of the project’s outputs. Key R&I needs identified include
traceability systems and fully digitalised catch documentation that will enhance
transparency and consumers’ trust. More research is needed, among other things, on
climate-related and other natural risks affecting aquatic food value chains.
Cluster workshops were also organised on healthy diet and nutrition, on alternative proteins
and on microbiome. Their discussions focused on the R&I gaps and challenges, as well as the
potential impact of the recommendations on legislative revisions and next steps. Some project
coordinators highlighted the development of new technologies for producing innovative
products based on alternative proteins. When developing such products tough, several aspects
need to be taken into account (e.g. safety aspects, consumers perception and acceptance).
5.2.1. EU survey
Further stakeholders’ input was collected through an EU-wide survey to complement evidence
from the workshops and to help validate emerging priorities and action pathways. A report
presenting an analysis of the results was published in July 2026133. The consultation gathered
more than 600 responses, alongside 63 detailed written contributions from across the agri-
food landscape, including research institutes and academia, food manufacturing and
processing, NGOs, government and policy actors, farming organisations, consumer and
advocacy groups, and civil society.
The respondent profile showed very high participation from research and academia (52%), with
more limited responses from SMEs and startups. Awareness of Food 2030 was also uneven
across respondent groups. Overall, 57.6% of respondents reported being unaware of Food
2030, while lack of awareness remained substantial among individual citizens (44.1%).
Taken together, the survey and written contributions suggest continued support for the food-
systems approach introduced by Food 2030, while pointing to the need for a more focused
and operational update. Across sectors, stakeholders called for better alignment with real-
133 European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Gallina, A. and Pelissier, P.-M.
(eds), Building FOOD 2040 stakeholder input for the new EU R&I strategic agenda for food systems – Analysis
and synthesis of the results from the open consultation survey, Publications Office of the European Union, 2026,
https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/2306913.
84
world food systems, clearer objectives and impacts, stronger links to scale-up, deployment and
competitiveness, and improved monitoring of progress. There was also broad support for
simplifying and streamlining the current pathway architecture.
The feedback indicates that future priorities should focus more on post-farmgate
environmental impacts, healthier diets, resilience and preparedness, circularity, protein
diversification, and the uptake of innovation, including digital solutions. Open responses
and written submissions also highlighted issues seen as insufficiently covered in the current
framework, notably governance, territorial approaches, fairness, strategic autonomy, and the
conditions needed for deployment. Notably, 59 of the 63 written submissions identified new or
insufficiently covered areas beyond the existing Food 2030 pathways.
Overall, the feedback suggests that Food 2040 should retain the systemic logic of Food 2030
while providing a clearer, more implementation-oriented framework with stronger attention
to competitiveness, health, resilience and public value.
5.2.2. Food 2040 workshop
A Food 2040 stakeholder workshop took place on 25 March 2026 in Brussels and brought
together 80 representatives from academia and RTOs, public institutions, interest groups
(European Technology Platforms, agri-food associations, etc.) and the private sector
(particularly SMEs and startups). Two dedicated panels on policy and innovation and new
technologies set the scene ahead of two consecutive breakout sessions to provide input for
shaping the Food 2040 priorities and its related action pathways.
In the first breakout session participants agreed that while the Food 2030 approach remains
essential, it is no longer sufficient alone. The systems-based perspective was praised as a
key achievement, but concerns were raised about lagging implementation, with calls for
future work to be more operational, measurable, and aligned with current risks. Moderators
noted broad support for retaining the systemic logic in Food 2040 priorities, while
strengthening the framework - particularly around competitiveness, resilience, risk
management, justice, and governance. Governance emerged as a dominant theme, with some
advocating it as a standalone priority and others as a foundational layer shaping the entire
framework. Debates also arose over digitalisation and AI: while many viewed them as critical
cross-cutting enablers, others warned against treating them as vague solutions without clear
mechanisms to ensure trustworthy, impactful outcomes.
The second breakout session focused on updating the pathways for action while maintaining
a food systems approach. Participants agreed on retaining the strongest Food 2030 building
blocks but suggested merging, broadening, or reframing certain pathways to better address
current challenges and opportunities. Governance, technology, and digitalisation were widely
seen as cross-cutting enablers that should be integrated across all pathways rather than treated
as standalone themes. There was also strong support for reinforcing the territorial
perspective, ensuring greater emphasis on rural, regional, and local food systems alongside
urban priorities.
Participants also called for a stronger focus on implementation, scale-up and
competitiveness. The workshop highlighted the need to go from generating research to
accelerating uptake through demonstration infrastructures, public-private cooperation,
innovation-friendly regulation, investment conditions and skills development. In that context,
stakeholders emphasised that Food 2040 should better address food manufacturing and
processing, market uptake, and the conditions needed to translate innovation into broader
societal and economic value.
85
A third major conclusion concerned the scope of future priorities. Many participants called for
stronger integration of health, sustainable diets, food environments and protein
diversification, as well as greater attention to circularity, zero pollution, strategic autonomy,
resilience and Europe’s role in global food systems. At the same time, several discussions
underlined the need to address social innovation, behavioural change, fairness and
governance capacity more explicitly.
Overall, the breakout sessions suggest that Food 2040 should have a more operational and
future-oriented architecture: fewer silos, stronger cross-cutting enablers, and clearer
pathways for delivery, competitiveness and public impact.
5.3. Consultation of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Research
The Standing Committee on Agricultural Research (SCAR) is an important source of strategic
R&I policy advice from the Member States and associated countries to the European
Commission on European agriculture, fisheries, food, forestry and wider bioeconomy. It is a
catalyst for the coordination of national R&I programmes and contributes to strengthening
the integrated European Research Area. The committee played an important role in
implementing the 2016 strategic approach to agricultural R&I and Food 2030.
The SCAR plenary, organised twice a year, brings together delegates from more than
35 countries represented in the SCAR to discuss R&I policy development and SCAR working
groups activities, and take strategic decisions. The working groups are the backbone of the
SCAR. Focusing on specific priority areas134, they bring together nominated national experts
from across Europe. Together, they co-create R&I agendas, develop inspiring studies, provide
recommendations on R&I policy, highlight priority R&I needs and gaps and exchange on
experiences and best practices.
For example, the SCAR Sustainable Animal Production working group developed the ERA-
NET on Sustainable Animal Production Systems (SusAn)135, with an EU contribution of EUR
5 million and an overall budget of around EUR 16 million. The SCAR Agroecology, SCAR
Animal Health and Welfare, SCAR Food Systems and SCAR Forest working groups have been
key platforms for co-creating the strategic R&I agendas of four Horizon Europe 2021-
2027 partnerships: agroecology living labs and research infrastructures; animal health
and welfare; FutureFoodS; and FOREST. Since its creation in 2010, SCAR AKIS has been
a key working group for the Commission, Member States and associated countries to discuss
and exchange best practices on the functioning of EU AKIS, the integration of the multi-
actor approach, and synergies between Horizon programmes and the CAP136.
The SCAR foresight reports are important sources of advice to the Commission in designing
its R&I actions under the different R&I framework programmes. The latest report, the
5th SCAR Foresight Report focused on ‘Resilience and Transformation’137.
134 During the 2016-2026 period, the working groups of SCAR were the following: SCAR Agroecology,
SCAR AKIS, SCAR Agricultural Research towards greater impact on global challenges (ARCH), SCAR
Bioeconomy, SCAR FISH, SCAR Food Systems, SCAR Forest, SCAR Sustainable Animal Production, SCAR
Animal Health and Welfare, SCAR Task Force on Proteins, SCAR Task Force on Foresight, SCAR Task Force
on Startup and Scaleup. 135 European Research Area on Sustainable Animal Production Systems | SusAn | Project | Fact Sheet | H2020 |
CORDIS | European Commission. 136 Strengthening EU AKISs: 5th mandate report of the SWG- AKIS (2019-2022) Documents. 137 Report of the 5th SCAR Foresight Exercise Expert Group.
86
Another achievement was the SCAR Protein Task Force’s report on protein diversification,
which provided actionable recommendations and strategic directions to guide future R&I
agendas toward a more autonomous, sustainable and resilient European protein system.
5.3.1. 2026 SCAR consultation workshop to support the preparation of the new R&I strategic
approach
A SCAR consultation workshop on 27 February 2026 focused on supporting the development
of the EU’s new R&I strategic approach on agriculture, forestry, rural areas, and food systems.
The workshop included four breakout sessions on future thematic priorities for
agriculture, forestry and rural R&I, on boosting the uptake of R&I results by farmers,
foresters and rural actors, Food 2040 priorities and pathways, and the valorisation of
agricultural and food-systems R&I results into business creation, startups and scaleups.
Detailed outcomes and recommendations are available in the dedicated workshop
report138.
5.3.2. Establishment of a new SCAR task force on startup and scaleup
In January 2026, SCAR established a dedicated task force on startup and scaleup, representing
15 Member States and associated countries, in support of the development of the new R&I
strategic approach. The focus was on providing advice on improving the valorisation of R&I
results into business creation, startups and scaleups in the agri-food sector. The task force
collected case studies from relevant startups and scaleups across Europe and identified sector-
specific challenges and opportunities and delivered targeted R&I recommendations139.
6. CONCLUSION
The evidence presented in this Staff Working Document shows that the 2016 strategic approach
to EU agricultural R&I and Food 2030 have both played important roles in shaping EU-funded
research and innovation under Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe 2021-2027 in support of
agriculture, food systems, forestry, and rural areas. In line with the strategic planning of
Horizon programmes and ensuring transparent prioritisation with Member States through
Programme Committees, the 2016 strategic approach to EU agricultural R&I and Food 2030
have helped structure investments, mobilise research communities, support co-creation
with stakeholders, and valorise the knowledge, tools, methods and innovations emerging
from Horizon-funded activities.
The 2016 strategic approach to agricultural R&I has contributed to strengthening the
knowledge and innovation base for competitive, resilient and sustainable agriculture,
forestry and rural areas. More than EUR 3 billion were invested in 565 R&I projects in the
period 2014-2024 to support these strategic sectors. By mobilising and reinforcing tools
supporting inclusive and impactful research and innovation activities and strengthening
synergies between Horizon Europe 2021-2027 and the common agricultural policy, it helped
place farmers, foresters and rural actors more centrally in the R&I process and supported
the uptake of knowledge, practices, technologies and services in real-life settings.
European farmers, foresters, and rural actors are inherently innovative and continually adapting
to the changing context. However, the adoption of innovation remains a challenge140 for
138 Summary of the SCAR consultation workshop on European Commission’s R&I strategic approaches related
to the agri-food system. 139 Startup & Scaleup Task force. 140 OECD (2023), Policies for the Future of Farming and Food in the European Union.
87
these sectors. Barriers to uptake of innovation at farm level include economic risks, uncertainty,
compatibility with existing practices, trust in knowledge sources and reluctance to change, all
of which are and largely influenced by the region’s diverse agricultural structure141. Socio-
economic factors - such as the diversity of farming systems, the prevalence of small actors,
ageing and gender imbalance, limited investment capacities and weaker broadband
connectivity in rural areas as compared to urban ones further hinder effective uptake of
knowledge and innovations142. This calls for more support for the uptake of R&I results.
Food 2030 has provided a pioneering food-systems R&I framework, helping to connect
nutrition and health, climate and sustainability, circularity and resource efficiency, and
innovation and communities. It has supported systemic, cross-sectoral approaches,
stakeholder engagement, living labs, coordination and support actions, innovation actions, and
synergies with other EU initiatives. It has also created a strong basis for the development of
Food 2040, supporting a more integrated approach to food-systems R&I, including processing,
distribution, retail, consumption, food waste, healthy and sustainable diets, circularity and
innovation uptake.
This analytical work supports the preparation of the new Communication on the strategic
approach to R&I in agriculture, forestry, rural areas and food systems. It takes stock of
achievements, implementation experience and stakeholder input from both R&I strands. It
highlights opportunities to strengthen the innovation ecosystem, improve the uptake and
valorisation of R&I results, and better connect agricultural, forestry, rural and food-systems
R&I along the innovation and investment journey, from knowledge generation to deployment
and scale-up.
The 2016 strategic approach to agricultural R&I and Food 2030 address different parts of the
agri-food sector. However, recent stakeholder consultation activities point to several
common needs for the future: more operational frameworks, stronger links between research
and deployment, better alignment with users, stronger monitoring, stronger governance
capacity, and greater attention to competitiveness, resilience and territorial realities.
Across both areas, several shared lessons emerge. The EU R&I strategic approach supported
by this SWD should maintain a systemic and multi-actor perspective while strengthening
implementation, uptake, scale-up and valorisation. It should better connect research with
deployment, market and policy uptake, and support the enabling conditions needed for
innovation to generate public value. This includes stronger attention to skills, investment,
demonstration, regulatory interfaces, monitoring, digital tools, governance capacity and
territorial innovation ecosystems.
Stakeholder engagement also shows that future frameworks need to respond to a changed
strategic context. In the areas of the agri-food sector, competitiveness, resilience,
sustainability, strategic autonomy, health, circularity, fairness and public trust are
increasingly interconnected. Addressing the challenges faced by those areas requires
continued cooperation and close engagement with Member States and associated countries,
and sustained dialogue with all actors, including the private sector.
Building on the achievements and implementation experience of the 2016 strategic approach
to EU agricultural research and innovation and Food 2030, the new strategic approach to EU
research and innovation for competitive, resilient and sustainable agriculture, food systems,
forestry and rural areas should provide an updated and more integrated framework for
141 WIPO (2026) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-023-00440-7https://doi.org/10.1787/32810cf6-en. 142 OECD (2023), Policies for the Future of Farming and Food in the European Union.
88
future R&I investments. It should help strengthen Europe’s innovation and investment
journey, boost the uptake of new knowledge and solutions, and support competitive, resilient,
sustainable and inclusive agriculture and food systems in Europe and beyond.
89
7. ANNEXES
Annex I-Data Analysis Methodology
2016 strategic approach to agricultural research and innovation
The data used to conduct this analysis was sourced from the Horizon Dashboard, a publicly
available data platform managed by the European Commission. The period covered is 2014–
2024. The chosen timeframe allows the analysis to fully include the Horizon 2020 programme
(2014-2020), and a period with robust data on Horizon Europe (2021-2024). The year 2025
was excluded as several administrative procedures and two-stage calls are still ongoing, and
the information is constantly being updated.
The dataset ‘AGRI’ was obtained by applying the filters described below.
• Call deadline year: 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024.
• Programme: Horizon 2020 or Horizon Europe 2021-2027.
• Thematic priority description: Food security, sustainable agriculture and forestry,
marine and maritime and inland water research and the bioeconomy; or Food,
Bioeconomy, Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment.
• Simplified types of action: RIA, IA, CSA, COFUND-EJP, ERA-NET-Cofund; or
HORIZON - COFUND, HORIZON-CSA, HORIZON-IA, HORIZON-RIA.
The output was then filtered by the projects that relate to the context of the 2016
strategic approach to EU agricultural R&I. For transparency and replicability reasons,
a full list can be accessed online as supplementary material to this staff working
document.
To enable a coherent comparison between programming and funding with Societal Challenge
2, Pillar III, Cluster 6 and Pillar II, the filter ‘type of actions’ was used and only the following
types of action were used: RIAs, IAs, CSAs, EJP, ERA-NET and COFUND.
The dataset ‘Societal Challenge 2’ was obtained by applying the filters described below.
• Call deadline year: 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021.
• Programme: Horizon 2020.
• Thematic priority description: Food security, sustainable agriculture and forestry,
marine and maritime and inland water research and the bioeconomy
• Simplified types of action: RIA, IA, CSA, COFUND-EJP, ERA-NET-Cofund.
The dataset ‘Cluster 6’ was obtained by applying the filters described below.
• Call deadline Year: 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024.
• Programme: Horizon Europe 2021-2027.
• Thematic priority description: Food, Bioeconomy, Natural Resources, Agriculture and
Environment.
• Simplified types of action: HORIZON-COFUND, HORIZON-CSA, HORIZON-IA,
HORIZON - RIA.
The dataset ‘Pillar III’ was obtained by applying the filters described below.
• Call deadline year: 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021.
• Programme: Horizon 2020.
• Pillar description: Societal Challenges.
• Simplified types of action: RIA, IA, CSA, COFUND-EJP, ERA-NET-Cofund.
90
The dataset ‘Pillar II’ was obtained by applying the filters described below.
• Call deadline year: 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024.
• Programme: Horizon Europe 2021-2027.
• Pillar description: Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness.
• Simplified types of action: HORIZON-COFUND, HORIZON-CSA, HORIZON-IA,
HORIZON-RIA.
Food 2030
The data used to conduct this analysis was sourced from the same Horizon Dashboard, a
publicly available data platform managed by the European Commission. The period covered is
2014-2024; the chosen timeframe allows the analysis to fully include Horizon 2020 programme
(2014-2020), as well as a period with robust data on Horizon Europe (2021-2024).
It should be noted that Food 2030 was created in 2016, with the first calls launched in 2017.
Yet, food systems related projects existed and were launched with the same objectives as those
laid down in Food 2030 prior to the creation of Food 2030 (2014-2016). It is important to also
capture the outcomes and data of these projects to get a complete analysis.
The dataset used for the analysis was obtained by filtering, in the dashboard, the projects that
relate to the context of the Food 2030 framework since 2014.
ET ET
EUROOPA KOMISJON
Brüssel, 8.9.2026 COM(2026) 453 final
KOMISJONI TEATIS EUROOPA PARLAMENDILE, NÕUKOGULE, EUROOPA
MAJANDUS- JA SOTSIAALKOMITEELE NING REGIOONIDE KOMITEELE
Teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni uus strateegiline lähenemisviis, et tagada
põllumajanduse, metsanduse, maapiirkondade ja toidusüsteemide
konkurentsivõimelisus, vastupidavus ja kestlikkus
ELi põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse tulevikukindlaks muutmine raamistike „AgRI
2040“ ja „Food 2040“ kaudu
{SWD(2026) 271 final}
1
1. ELi PÕLLUMAJANDUSE, METSANDUSE, MAAPIIRKONDADE JA
TOIDUSÜSTEEMIDE ALASTE TEADUSUURINGUTE JA INNOVATSIOONI UUS
KONTEKST
Põllumajanduslik toidutööstus,1 mis hõlmab põllumajandust, metsandust, maapiirkondades
teostatavaid tegevusi ja laiemaid toidusüsteeme, on Euroopa Liidu (EL) ning selle toiduga
kindlustatuse, kestlikkuse ja konkurentsivõime jaoks strateegiline vara. Sellega tagatakse
450 miljoni Euroopa elaniku pidev varustamine piisava, taskukohase, ohutu, tervisliku ja
kvaliteetse toiduga. Lisaks on sellel oluline roll kliimamuutustega seotud ohtude leevendamisel ja
nendega kohanemisel, toetades samal ajal loodusvarade kestlikku majandamist, ringsuspõhist ja
kestlikku biomajandust ning ülemaailmset toiduga kindlustatust.
2023. aastal lõid ELi põllumajandus- ja toidusüsteemid rohkem kui 1 triljon eurot lisaväärtust ning
andsid tööd ligikaudu 30 miljonile inimesele (15 % kõigist töökohtadest ELis2). See hõlmab
4,8 miljonit inimest 309 000 toiduaine- ja joogitööstuse ettevõttes, mis on ELi suurim
tootmissektor3 ning mille käive oli 1,5 triljonit eurot ja mis andis 296 miljardit eurot lisaväärtust.
Maailma suurima põllumajanduslike toiduainete eksportijana oli ELi põllumajanduslike
toiduainete kaubandusbilansi ülejääk 2025. aastal 50 miljardit eurot4.
Maapiirkonnad, kus elab 25 % ELi elanikkonnast ja mis hõlmavad üle 75 % ELi territooriumist,
on kestliku majanduskasvu ja innovatsiooni peamine tõukejõud5. Metsad ja muu metsamaa
katavad peaaegu 44 % ELi territooriumist ning on Euroopa elanike tervise, elurikkuse,
maapiirkondade elatusvahendite, kultuuripärandi, majandusliku jõukuse, kliimamuutuste
leevendamise ja nendega kohanemise ning tulevaste keskkonna- ja tervisekriiside ennetamise
jaoks esmatähtsad.
Ülemaailmse juhtpositsiooni säilitamiseks peab sektor kiiremini uuendusi tegema ja
moderniseerima. Hoolimata aja jooksul suurenenud kulutustest teadus- ja arendustegevusele6
seisab Euroopa teaduse tipptase põllumajanduslikus toidutööstuses, näiteks digi- ja tehisintellekti
rakenduste valdkonnas, silmitsi probleemidega. Kui praegune olukord jätkub ning lõhe
1 Käesolevas teatises kasutatakse põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse terminit laias tähenduses, mis tähendab, et see
hõlmab põllumajandust, metsandust, toidusüsteeme ja maapiirkondi. 2 Eurostat, „Key figures on the European food chain – 2025 edition“, 12. detsember 2025,
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-key-figures/w/ks-01-25-049. 3 FoodDrinkEurope, „Data & Trends:EU Food and Drink Industry – 2026 Edition“, 2026,
https://www.fooddrinkeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/FoodDrinkEurope-Data-Trends-2026-report-
digital.pdf. 4 ELi põllumajanduslike toiduainete kaubanduse seire: areng 2025. aastal, Euroopa Komisjon, 2026.
Põllumajanduslike toiduainetega kauplemise andmed hõlmavad ainult kaupu, ent ei hõlma kalandust, vesiviljelust
ega metsandust. 5 COM(2025) 75 final. 6 OECD, „Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2024“, 2024, Pariis,
https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/agricultural-policy-monitoring-and-evaluation-2024_74da57ed-en.html.
2
innovatsiooni ja kasutuselevõtu vahel püsib, jääb põllumajanduse kogutootlikkuse kasv tulevikus
eeldatavasti tagasihoidlikuks.
See osutab sellele, et teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni väljundid ei kajastu piisavalt
proportsionaalses tootlikkuse kasvus,7 kestlikkuses ega ressursitõhususes. Lisaks on
investeeringute puudujääk Euroopas üha suurem, ehkki Euroopa on teatavates põllumajandusliku
toidutööstuse tehnoloogiasegmentides jätkuvalt suhteliselt konkurentsivõimeline. Investeeringud
põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse tehnoloogiasse vähenesid Euroopas 2020.–2024. aastal 67 %
võrreldes Ameerika Ühendriikide ja Kanada kõrgema tasemega (50–70 %)8. Selleks et vähendada
oma sõltuvust teistest suurriikidest, eelkõige toidutootmises kasutatava tehnoloogia puhul, peab
EL veelgi suurendama oma strateegilist autonoomiat, arendades tehisintellektisuutlikkust
põllumajandus- ja toidusüsteemide jaoks.
ELi põllumajanduslik toidutööstus tegutseb üha keerukamas ja kiiresti muutuvas
keskkonnas. Geopoliitilist olukorda iseloomustavad kõikuvad sisendi- ja toormehinnad ning
märkimisväärne sõltuvus kolmandatest riikidest mitte ainult tehnoloogia, vaid ka
põllumajanduslike sisendite, eelkõige väetiste, energia ja valgusööda osas. Nendele probleemidele
lisanduvad tööjõu vananemine ja vähenemine, millega kaasneb sooline tasakaalustamatus, ning
surve maakasutusele ja loodusvaradele, ning neid süvendavad kliimamuutused, saaste ja
elurikkuse vähenemine. Käimas on struktuurimuutused alates uutest tehnoloogiapõhistest
põllumajandus- ja toidutootmismeetoditest kuni uuenduslike väärtusahelate ja uute ringmajanduse
ärimudelite tekkeni biomajanduse sektoris ning tehisintellekti ja biotehnoloogia kasutamiseni.
Teadusuuringutel ja innovatsioonil põhinev kestlik konkurentsivõime on kesksel kohal nii
põllumajandus- ja toidualases visioonis kui ka Euroopa bioteaduste strateegias. Visioonis
kutsutakse üles ajakohastama teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni 2016. aasta strateegilist
lähenemisviisi põllumajanduse ja metsanduse valdkonnas ning maapiirkondades, et paremini
suunata investeeringuid, viia tulevased prioriteedid kooskõlla teaduse arenguga ja kasutada ära
uusi võimalusi. Bioteaduste strateegia eesmärk on muuta EL 2030. aastaks ülemaailmseks
innovatsioonikeskuseks tervishoiu, biotehnoloogia, toidu ja biotootmise valdkonnas, sealhulgas
meelitades algatuse „Vali Euroopa“ kaudu ligi talente. Strateegias anti ka teada, et praegusele
raamistikule „Food 2030“ tuginedes töötatakse välja toidusüsteeme käsitlev uus täiendav
teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni strateegiline tegevuskava. See tegevuskava toetab
konkurentsivõimeliste, kestlike ja vastupidavate toidusüsteemide arendamist. Letta aruandes ja
Draghi aruandes rõhutati vajadust tugevdada ELi ühtset turgu ja suurendada selle
konkurentsivõimet, mis on oluline ka põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse jaoks.
Konkurentsivõime suurendamiseks tuleb kasutusele võtta tervikliku väärtusahela
lähenemisviis, mis toetab ELi idu- ja kasvufirmade innovatsiooniteekonda alates
7 Euroopa Komisjon, põllumajanduse ja maaelu arengu peadirektoraat, „EU Agricultural Outlook 2025–2035“,
Euroopa Liidu Väljaannete Talitus, Luxembourg, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2762/4491268. 8 AgFunder, „Global Agrifoodtech Investment Report 2025“, AgFunder, San Francisco, CA, 2025,
https://agfunder.com/research/agfunder-global-agrifoodtech-investment-report-2025/.
3
teadusuuringutest kuni turuni. Strateegiline lähenemisviis on üles ehitatud kahele tihedalt seotud
raamistikule, mis on esitatud käesolevas teatises ning mille eesmärk on käsitleda ELi
põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni ökosüsteemi süsteemsel ja
valdkonnaülesel viisil.Need raamistikud on „AgRI 2040“, milles keskendutakse
põllumajandusele, metsandusele ja maapiirkondadele, ning „Food 2040“, milles keskendutakse
toidusüsteemidele, sealhulgas kalandusele ja vesiviljelusele. Käesolevas teatises tuginetakse
raamistikke „AgRI 2040“ ja „Food 2040“ toetavate avalike konsultatsioonide tulemustele, mis on
kokkuvõtlikult esitatud komisjoni talituste töödokumendis9. Mõlema raamistiku ühiseid
temaatilisi küsimusi käsitletakse koos. Raamistike „AgRI 2040“ ja „Food 2040“ raames
määratakse kindlaks konkreetsemad tegevusvaldkonnad, keskendudes kõrgetasemelistele
poliitikasuunistele, ilma et see piiraks järgmiste mitmeaastaste finantsraamistike rakendamist.
2. EDUKA JA OMAVAHEL ÜHENDATUD ELI TEADUSUURINGUTE JA
INNOVATSIOONI ÖKOSÜSTEEMI KUJUNDAMINE
2.1. „Laborist tootmisse“ lõhe ületamine
Põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse konkurentsivõime, vastupidavuse ja kestlikkuse
tagamiseks on hädavajalik tugev innovatsioonipõhine ökosüsteem. See tugineb avatud,
õiglasele ja koostööl põhinevale omavahelisele seotusele väärtusahela eri segmentides alates
põllumajandustootjatest kuni tarbijateni.
Euroopa loob kvaliteetseid teaduslikke teadmisi põllumajandus- ja toidusüsteemide kohta. Tema
konkurentsivõimet pärsivad aga ebapiisavad erainvesteeringud teadusuuringutesse ja
innovatsiooni10 ning varajase etapi teadusuuringute tulemuste aeglane kasutamine
ärivõimalusteks. VKEde ülekaal, piiratud investeerimissuutlikkus ja suur tööjõumahukus on
täiendavad turustamise takistused, mis on iseloomulikud just põllumajandus-, metsandus- ja
toidusüsteemidele11.
Põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse innovaatilistel VKEdel ja idufirmadel12 on head võimalused
töötada välja, kohandada ja laiendada lahendusi eri olukordades. Samal ajal on nende osalemine
programmi „Euroopa horisont“ projektides ja projektitulemuste väärindamine endiselt
9 Komisjoni talituste töödokument „Analytical overview of the achievements of the 2016 strategic approach to
agricultural R&I and Food 2030 R&I framework and insights from stakeholder consultation activities,
accompanying this strategic approach“. 10 Euroopa Komisjon ja Heitor, M. (toim), „Align, act, accelerate:Research, technology and innovation to boost
European competitiveness“ (Kooskõlla viimine, tegutsemine, kiirendamine: teadusuuringud, tehnoloogia ja
innovatsioon Euroopa konkurentsivõime suurendamiseks), Euroopa Liidu Väljaannete Talitus, Luxembourg, 2024,
https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/9106236. 11 Euroopa Komisjon: Euroopa Innovatsiooninõukogu ja VKEde Rakendusamet, Technopolis Group, IDEA Consult,
„Monitoring industrial ecosystems – Agri-food – Analytical report – 2024 edition“ (Tööstusökosüsteemide seire –
põllumajanduslik toidutööstus – analüütiline aruanne – 2024. aasta väljaanne), Euroopa Liidu Väljaannete Talitus,
2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2826/4766674. 12 Kuigi idu- ja kasvufirmad kvalifitseeruvad sageli VKEdeks ELi VKEde määratluse tähenduses, käsitletakse neid
käesolevas teatises analüütilistel ja poliitilistel eesmärkidel eraldi kategooriatena.
4
piiratud13. Killustatud rahastamine,10 regulatiivne keerukus ja ebapiisav toetus kõrgemal
tehnoloogilise valmiduse tasemel on endiselt peamised tõkked, mis takistavad teadusuuringute
tulemuste muutmist turuvalmis toodeteks ja teenusteks ka põllumajanduslikus
toidutööstuses.
Selles jaos pakutakse välja meetmed, mis tugevdavad teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni
ökosüsteemi alates varajase etapi innovatsioonist kuni turuleviimiseni, võimendades
teadusuuringute tulemusi ning toetades turuleviimist ja idufirmade kasvu ELi põllumajanduslikus
toidutööstuses kooskõlas ELi idu- ja kasvufirmade strateegiaga. Selles tuginetakse raamistikke
„AgRI 2040 ja „Food 2040“ toetava avaliku konsultatsiooni tulemustele ning sidusrühmadelt ja
liikmesriikidelt saadud tagasisidele, sealhulgas alalise põllumajandusuuringute komitee idu- ja
kasvufirmade rakkerühmalt saadud teabele.
Investeeringute edendamine ning teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni tulemuste väärindamine
põllumajanduslikus toidutööstuses
Komisjon püüab muuta ELi rahastatavad teadus- ja innovatsiooniprojektid rohkem
ettevõtlusele suunatuks, lisades projektikonkurssidesse asjakohaseid elemente, suurendades
erasektori ja turuekspertide osalemist taotluste hindamisel ning stimuleerides teadusuuringute ja
innovatsiooni tulemuste väärindamist ja kasutamist. Ilma et see piiraks käimasolevaid
läbirääkimisi mitmeaastase finantsraamistiku üle ja tulevaste ELi rahastamisprogrammide
rakendamist, uurib komisjon võimalusi, kuidas vähendada turule sisenemise tõkkeid ning
suurendada VKEde ja idufirmade osalemist programmi „Euroopa horisont“ projektides. Need mehhanismid võiksid hõlmata astmelise rahastamise14 ja muude lihtsustatud
haldusmenetluste suuremat kasutamist, nähtavust ja kättesaadavust ning tugevamat toetust
konsortsiumide loomiseks.
Komisjon haldab põllumajanduslikus toidutööstuses teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni raames
rahastatavate projektide portfelli nii, et selles võetakse selgemalt arvesse tehnoloogia arengu
kõrgemat taset,15 ühendades innovatsiooni valmidusastme hindamise igale arenguetapile
kohandatud sihipärase toetusega.
13 Komisjoni talituste töödokument „Analytical overview of the achievements of the 2016 strategic approach to
agricultural R&I and Food 2030 R&I framework and insights from stakeholder consultation activities,
accompanying this strategic approach“. 14 ELi rahastamis- ja hankeportaal, „Financial Support for Third Parties (FSTP)“ (Rahaline toetus kolmandatele
isikutele). 15 Tehnoloogia kasutusküpsust hinnatakse tavaliselt tehnoloogilise valmiduse tasemete skaala abil, mis näitab, kui
kaugele on tehnoloogia alates varastest teadusuuringutest kuni kasutuselevõtuni jõudnud. Tehnoloogilise valmiduse
tasemed määratakse kindlaks vastavalt programmi „Euroopa horisont“ juhendile (Euroopa Komisjon, 2025).
5
Komisjon uurib selliste kasvuvõimaluste väljatöötamist,16 mis seovad omavahel eri
rahastamisallikad, et toetada sujuvat investeerimisteekonda põllumajanduslikus toidutööstuses.
Need püüdlused tugevdavad kavandatavaid tihedaid seoseid programmi „Euroopa horisont“ ja
tulevase Euroopa Konkurentsivõime Fondi vahel, tagades samal ajal võimaluse kasutada
rakendusvahendina ECFi InvestEU instrumenti. Eesmärk on kiirendada turustamist ja tugevdada
põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse innovatsiooni kogu ELis.
Komisjon püüab saavutada ka suuremat koostoimet organisatsioonide ja platvormidega, mis
võivad kasutuselevõttu toetada, sealhulgas näiteks toiduvaldkonna teadmus- ja
innovatsioonikogukonnaga, Euroopa Innovatsiooninõukoguga (EIC), Euroopa
ettevõtlusvõrgustikuga ja selle õigusjärglasega, st võrgustikuga EU4Business Euroopa
Konkurentsivõime Fondi raames või Euroopa tehnoloogiaplatvormidega (nt ETP Food for Life).
Euroopa Innovatsiooninõukogul on keskne roll murrangulise innovatsiooni toetamisel.
Edendatakse täiendavaid viise, et tugevdada sidemeid teadusalaste koostööprojektide ja
Euroopa Innovatsiooninõukogu vahendite vahel. Komisjon uurib ka innovatsiooni kiirtee
uuendatud kava, mis hõlmab väiksemaid konsortsiume, lühemat toetuse määramiseni kuluvat
aega, kõrgemaid tehnoloogilise valmiduse tasemeid ning idufirmade ja muude VKEde,
põllumajandustootjate, metsandusettevõtjate ja tööstuse suuremat osalemist.
Samuti luuakse mehhanism, mille abil teha varakult kindlaks teadusuuringute ja
innovatsiooni sellised paljutõotavad tulemused, millel on kaubanduslik potentsiaal.
Väljavalitud tulemused võivad saada lihtsalt, kiirelt ja paindlikult lisarahastust, et ületada lõhe
teadusuuringute ja varases etapis turusobivuse hindamise vahel.
Selleks et toetada selliseid innovatsioonis osalejaid nagu teadlased, novaatorid, ettevõtjad,
idufirmad ja muud VKEd, uurib komisjon täiendavaid meetmeid, näiteks innovatsiooniosakuid,17
et tugevdada nende koostööd Euroopa, riiklike ja piirkondlike ettevõtlusinkubaatorite,
kiirendite, eluslaborite18 ja katsetehastega. Nende meetmetega pakutaks kohandatud,
nõudlusest lähtuvat toetust koolitusele, ärimudeli arendamisele, kliendiuuringutele,
intellektuaalomandile ja sihipärastele rahastamisvõimalustele ning juurdepääsu testijatele ja
äripartneritele.
16 Struktureeritud ja dokumendipõhine raamistik, millega kaardistatakse ja seotakse olemasolevad rahastamisvahendid
ja toetusmeetmed eri etappides (tehnoloogilise valmiduse tasemetel), suunates innovatsiooni alates
teadusuuringutest kuni turuleviimise ja laiendamiseni ning aidates VKEdel ja idufirmadel teha kindlaks asjakohased
rahastamisvõimalused ja neile juurde pääseda. 17 Innovatsiooniosakud on väikesed paindlikud toetused innovatsioonis osalejatele, et nad saaksid juurdepääsu
välistele ettevõtte loomise ja kiirendamise tugiteenustele, ning need aitavad muuta paljutõotavad ideed elujõulisteks
ja turuvalmis ettevõteteks. 18 Eluslaborid on kasutajakesksed kohapõhised ja valdkonnaülesed teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni ökosüsteemid,
mis kaasavad asjaomaseid partnereid süsteemsetesse teadusuuringutesse ning lahenduste ühisesse kavandamisse,
katsetamisse, seiresse ja hindamisse tegelikes tingimustes. Eluslaborid on loodud selliste algatuste raames nagu
mullakokkuleppe missioon, agroökoloogia partnerlus ja muud programmist „Euroopa horisont“ rahastatavad
meetmed.
6
Intellektuaalomandi puhul uurib komisjon sihipärasemat toetust märkimisväärse
turupotentsiaaliga projektidele, mis on kriitilistes etappides, tuginedes sellistele olemasolevatele
ressurssidele nagu Euroopa intellektuaalomandi kasutajatugi, programmi „Horisont“
intellektuaalomandi eeldiagnostikateenus ja programmi „Horisont“ tulemuste kiirendi.
Eksperimenteerimise, regulatiivse õppimise ja innovatsiooni toetamine põllumajanduslikus
toidutööstuses
Kiired eksperimenteerimistsüklid võivad märkimisväärselt kiirendada üleminekut ideedelt
kasutuselevõetavatele ja majanduslikult elujõulistele lahendustele. Komisjon uurib täiendavalt
rahastamisvõimalusi, et hõlbustada juurdepääsu katse- ja eksperimenteerimistaristutele,
näiteks eluslaboritele ja innovatsioonikeskustele, ning innovatsiooni toetavatele
riigihankekavadele.See võimaldaks idufirmadel ja muudel VKEdel prototüüpe kiiresti tegelikes
tingimustes valideerida.
Lisaks eksperimenteerimisvahendite, näiteks regulatiivsete katsekeskkondade19
laialdasemale kasutamisele ja tihedamale koostööle ELi riskihindamisasutustega (nt Euroopa
Toiduohutusamet) on vaja täiendavaid investeeringuid teadusuuringutesse ja innovatsiooni, et
toetada riskihindamise meetodeid. Selle eesmärk on rakendada regulatiivseid teadmisi vajalike
kohanduste tegemiseks (sh andmenõuded ja/või alternatiivsed regulatiivsed nõuded), et toetada
turustamiseelset heakskiitmist ja lubade andmist põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse uuendustele,
sealhulgas taimekaitsevahenditele, söödale ja toidule (sh geneetiliselt muundatud organismidest
saadud toodetele). Komisjon küsib asjaomastelt ELi riskihindamisasutustelt ja vajaduse korral
nende riiklikelt partneritelt korrapäraselt teavet põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse uuenduste
riskihindamisega seotud teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni vajaduste kohta.
Pikaajalised koostööpõhised ja omavahel seotud teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni ökosüsteemid
on tõendanud oma lisaväärtust, sealhulgas selliste ELi missioonide kaudu nagu Euroopa
mullakokkuleppe missioon, institutsionaliseeritud partnerlused ühisettevõtetena ja kaasrahastatud
partnerlused. Kooskõlas käimasoleva hindamisega20 uurib komisjon, kuidas saaks partnerlusi
veelgi võimendada, et kaasata prioriteetsetesse valdkondadesse täiendavaid era- ja avaliku
sektori investeeringuid. Alalisel põllumajandusuuringute komiteel võiks olla suurem roll
teadmiste vahendajana, et hinnata ELi teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni suutlikkust (tugevusi ja
nõrkusi) põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse eri sektorites.
Teadusuuringute Ühiskeskuse hallatava põllumajanduse, metsanduse, maaelu arengu ja
toidusüsteemide innovatsiooni ja ümberkujundamise teaduskeskuse loomisega toetab
19 Komisjon on dokumendis COM(2025) 1022 final esitanud Euroopa biotehnoloogiamääruse ettepaneku raames
üldiste toidualaste õigusnormide määruse sihipärased muudatused, nähes ette tingimused, mille alusel võib
toiduahela kontekstis luua regulatiivseid katsekeskkondi. 20 Euroopa Komisjon, teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni peadirektoraat, „Public consultation on Joint Undertakings,
Art. 185 initiatives, and thematic priorities for European Partnerships under Horizon Europe 28-34“, 10. juuli 2026,
https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/news/all-research-and-innovation-news/public-consultation-joint-
undertakings-art-185-initiatives-and-thematic-priorities-european-2026-07-10_en.
7
komisjon ELi ja liikmesriikide põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse innovatsioonipoliitikat ja sektori
sidusrühmi (alates tootjatest kuni ettevõtjateni), tehes kindlaks peamised innovatsioonivõimalused
põllumajanduslikus toidutööstuses, analüüsides majanduslikku mõju ning turu ja kasutuselevõtu
lünki ning andes sidusrühmadele tõenditel põhinevaid ja rakendatavaid teadmisi, et toetada
strateegiliste otsuste tegemist eesmärgiga tugevdada ELi innovatsioonisuutlikkust.
Liikmesriike innustatakse kaaluma, kuidas nad saaksid kasutada oma tulevasi riiklikke ja
piirkondlikke partnerluskavasid, et veelgi tugevdada ja tõhustada toetavat innovatsiooni
ökosüsteemi põllumajanduslikus toidutööstuses, näiteks investeerides suutlikkuse suurendamisse,
inimressurssidesse ja sellistesse innovatsiooni võimaldavatesse taristutesse nagu katserajatised.
2.2. Teadmiste ja innovatsiooni omaksvõtu kiirendamine põllumajandustootjate,
metsandusettevõtjate ja maapiirkondade osalejate seas
ELi toiduga kindlustatuse ning põllumajanduse, metsanduse ja maapiirkondade
konkurentsivõime, kestlikkuse ja vastupidavuse tagamiseks on oluline innovatsiooni
omaksvõtt.
Põllumajandus- ja toidualase visiooni eesmärkide saavutamiseks peab innovatsioon minema
üksikutest projektidest kaugemale, levima piirkondade vahel ja lõimuma igapäevastesse tavadesse. See nõuab edenemist kolmes mõõtmes: i) laiendamine, levitades end tõestanud lahendusi
rohkematele kasutajatele ja asukohtadele, ii) suurendamine, kujundades poliitikat ja õigusnorme,
et toetada innovatsiooni omaksvõttu, ning iii) süvendamine, suunates uued tavad, väärtused ja
veendumused ühiskonda.
Ühise põllumajanduspoliitika (ÜPP) vahendite abil on võimalik stimuleerida nõudlust
uuenduslike lahenduste järele, toetades põllumajandustootjaid uue tehnoloogia, kestlike tavade ja
digivahendite kasutuselevõtul ning innovatsiooni rakendamisel tänu investeerimistoetusele. ELi
põllumajanduse teadus- ja innovatsioonipoliitika, mis toimib tihedas vastastikuses täiendavuses
praeguse ÜPPga, on loonud tugeva aluse teadmiste ja innovatsiooni koosloomisele ja
levitamisele. Sidusrühmad rõhutavad siiski jätkuvalt vajadust sihipäraste täiustuste järele, et
kiirendada teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni tulemuste kasutuselevõttu21.
21 Euroopa Komisjon, põllumajanduse ja maaelu arengu peadirektoraat, „Future-proofing EU agri-food through
research and innovation – Summary of the results of the open consultation“, Euroopa Liidu Väljaannete Talitus,
Luxembourg, 2026, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2762/2404939.
8
Põllumajandustootjate juhitud innovatsiooni toetamine mitme osalejaga lähenemisviisi ja
eluslaborite kaudu
Põllumajandustootjad võtavad suurema tõenäosusega kasutusele uuendusi, mis on loodud
nendega ühiselt, mida on katsetatud tegelikes tingimustes ning mida toetavad nõustamisteenused
ja vastastikune teabevahetus22. Viimase kümne aasta jooksul on mitme osalejaga
lähenemisviisist23 saanud programmide „Horisont 2020“ ja „Euroopa horisont“ raames
rahastatavate põllumajanduse, metsanduse ja maapiirkondade teadus- ja innovatsiooniprojektide
põhielement, mis on muutunud kohustuslikuks rohkem kui 70 % asjakohaste
projektikonkursside puhul24. Eluslaborid on samuti edendanud pikaajalist valdkondadevahelist
koostööd kohapõhise eksperimenteerimise kaudu, mis hõlmab tehnilist, sotsiaalset ja
käitumuslikku mõõdet.
Endiselt on siiski probleeme, sealhulgas projektide ebajärjekindel rakendamine, takistused
asjaomaste osalejate varajasel ja sisulisel kaasamisel ning tulemuste ebaühtlane
kasutuselevõtmine.
Komisjon viib läbi uuringu, et hinnata olemasolevate vahendite mõju innovatsiooni levitamisele
ja omaksvõtule. Tulemuste põhjal püüab komisjon ühtlustada mitme osalejaga lähenemisviisi ja
eluslaborite termineid ja meetodeid ning tugevdada hindamis- ja järelevalvemehhanisme
projekti tasandil.Komisjon kavatseb uurida programmi „Euroopa horisont“ (2028–2034) ja
tulevase Euroopa Konkurentsivõime Fondi raames viise, kuidas toetada asjaomaste osalejate
varajast ja sisulist kaasamist taotluste esitamisele eelnevate toetusmeetmete kaudu, mis
hõlbustavad konsortsiumide loomist, ning lihtsustatud rahalise toetuse kaudu, et tagada
põllumajandustootjate ja muude sidusrühmade projektides osalemise õiglane tunnustamine ja
tasustamine. Tugevdada tuleks seost sotsiaal- ja humanitaarteadustega, et toetada kaasavaid
koosloomeprotsesse. Jätkuvalt soodustatakse põllumajandustootjate organisatsioonide, ühistute,
nõustamis- ja teabeleviteenistuste ning põllumajanduskodade osalemist teadus- ja
innovatsiooniprojektides. Komisjon uurib ka koostööplatvorme, et viia põllumajandustootjad ja
teised praktikud paremini kokku projektidega, milles kasutatakse mitme osalejaga lähenemisviisi.
Alt-üles-innovatsiooni toetamiseks edendab komisjon algatusi, millega valideeritakse
traditsioonilisi teadmisi ja praktikute juhitud lahendusi, kaasates samal ajal
põllumajandustootjaid uuenduste katsetamisse eri piirkondades. Nende jõupingutuste tulemuseks
22 Euroopa Komisjon, põllumajanduse ja maaelu arengu peadirektoraat – üksus A.3, „Study on outcomes achieved by
EIP-AGRI Operational Group projects under the CAP“, ELi ÜPP võrgustik, 2024, https://eu-cap-
network.ec.europa.eu/publications/study-outcomes-achieved-eip-agri-operational-group-projects-under-cap_en. 23 Mitme osalejaga lähenemisviis on interaktiivsete, valdkondadevaheliste ja vastutustundlike teadusuuringute ja
innovatsiooni vorm, mille eesmärk on muuta teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni protsess koosloovamaks ja
kaasavamaks, kaasates aktiivselt asjaomaseid osalejaid kogu teadusprojekti vältel, et muuta tulemused ühisemaks,
usaldusväärsemaks, nõudluspõhisemaks ja ühiskonna jaoks asjakohasemaks. 24 Komisjoni talituste töödokument „Analytical overview of the achievements of the 2016 strategic approach to
agricultural R&I and Food 2030 R&I framework and insights from stakeholder consultation activities,
accompanying this strategic approach“.
9
peaksid olema praktilised suunised, et toetada uuenduste laiemat kasutuselevõttu. Projektides
tuleks süstemaatiliselt hinnata ka kavandatud uuenduste kasutuselevõtu majanduslikke,
keskkonnaalaseid ja ühiskondlikke kulusid ja tulusid, tehes samal ajal kindlaks elujõulised
ärivõimalused, et vastata paremini kasutajate või turu vajadustele. Lisaks kaardistab komisjon
olemasolevad katse- ja näidistaristud, sealhulgas ELi ja riiklikud eluslaborid, näidisfarmid ja
juhtalgatused. Aidates põllumajandustootjatel ja praktikutel teha kindlaks asjakohased asukohad
ja ressursid, parandab see lähenemisviis nende juurdepääsu asjakohastele taristutele ja edendab
vastastikust õppimist.
Koostoime tugevdamine: kestliku ja omavahel ühendatud innovatsiooni ökosüsteemi loomine
Komisjon tugevdab veelgi seoseid praeguse ja tulevase programmi „Euroopa horisont“ ja
ÜPP vahel, edendades riiklike kontaktpunktide ja ÜPP võrgustike vahelist süstemaatilist suhtlust,
eelkõige kasutades rohkem põllumajanduse tootlikkust ja kestlikkust käsitleva Euroopa
innovatsioonipartnerluse (EIP-AGRI) korraldatud üritusi. Jätkuvalt antakse toetust, et innustada
Euroopa innovatsioonipartnerluse töörühmade osalemist teadus- ja
innovatsiooniprojektides ning hõlbustada projektide tulemuste levitamist ELi temaatiliste
teadmuskeskuste kaudu, et need tulemused oleksid kasutajatele võrdlusaluseks ja vähendaksid
põllumajandusnõustajate koormust25.
Tugevdatakse eluslaborite ja töörühmade vahelist sünergiat, et toetada uuenduslike lahenduste
kohandamist kohalikul tasandil. See hõlmab eluslaborite innustamist kaasama töörühmade
partnereid ning koostöös liikmesriikidega edendama eluslaborites saadud tulemuste
kasutuselevõttu ja kohandamist töörühmades26. Samuti tuleks tugevdada sidemeid eluslaborite ja
tulevaste ELi temaatiliste teadmuskeskuste vahel, et aidata laiendada kohalikul tasandil katsetatud
uuendusi üle kogu ELi.Tuleks soodustada koostööd katse- ja eksperimenteerimisrajatistega,27
et kiirendada digitaalsete uuenduste kasutuselevõttu põllumajanduses, metsanduses ja
maapiirkondades.
Praktiliste teadmiste mõju ja ulatuse maksimeerimine
25 ELi temaatilised teadmuskeskused, mida edendatakse ja mis on määratletud programmi „Euroopa horisont“
6. teemavaldkonna „Tööprogramm aastateks 2026–2027“ (C(2025) 8493 final) all, on projektid, mis on kavandatud
toimima temaatiliste teadmiste kesksete allikatena. Need peaksid hõlbustama juurdepääsu temaatiliste
teadusuuringute tulemustele, uuenduslikele lahendustele ja parimatele tavadele, võimestades nõustajaid tipptasemel
teadmistega ning pakkudes rohkelt võimalusi koostööks ja vastastikuseks täiendavuseks põllumajanduse
teadmussiirde- ja innovatsioonisüsteemis osalejate vahel. 26Euroopa Komisjon, põllumajanduse ja maaelu arengu peadirektoraat, mitteametlik dokument „Exploring potential
synergies between Horizon Europe projects using Living Labs and Lighthouses applied to agriculture, the Common
Agricultural Policy EIP-AGRI Working Group projects and other similar initiatives:Mission Soil example“, 2026,
https://mission-soil-platform.ec.europa.eu/resource-library/non-paper-lls-and-ogs-synergies. 27 Valdkondlikud tehisintellekti katsetamise ja sellega eksperimenteerimise rajatised programmi „Digitaalne Euroopa“
raames, näiteks agrifoodTEF.
10
Komisjon jätkab teadmushoidlate ning koostalitlusvõimeliste ja kasutajakesksete taristute
tugevdamist, et tagada üksikasjalikumate, kontekstipõhiste ja praktikas selgitatud teadusuuringute
ja innovatsiooni tulemuste pikaajaline kättesaadavus ja kasutatavus.
EIP-AGRI praktiliste kokkuvõtete28 vorming vaadatakse läbi, et suurendada
juurdepääsetavust, selgust ja asjakohasust.Projekte julgustatakse eraldama vahendeid, et
muuta teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni tulemused praktikutele suunatud käsiraamatuteks, mida
tuleks vastastikku hinnata, et tagada kvaliteet ja asjakohasus kasutajate jaoks. Samuti julgustatakse
neid kasutama rohkem digivahendeid ja tehisintellekti, et toetada praktiliste järelduste laiemat ja
arukamat levitamist.
Programmi „Euroopa horisont“ temaatiliste ja nõustamisvõrgustike kaudu välja töötatud
koolitusmaterjalid tuleks integreerida riiklike põllumajanduse teadmussiirde- ja
innovatsioonisüsteemide (AKIS) koolitusprogrammidesse, et toetada kvaliteetseid
põllumajandusettevõtjate nõustamisteenuseid. Samuti on oluline tugevdada sidemeid
nõustajate ja ülikoolide vahel, et kohapealne nõustamine kajastaks uusimaid teadusuuringuid ja
innovatsiooni.
Teadusuuringute tulemuste integreerimine kutseharidusse ja -õppesse ning kõrgharidusse on
väga oluline kestlike tavade süvalaiendamiseks29 ja tulevasele tööjõule innovatsiooni
edendamiseks vajalike oskuste andmiseks, eelkõige võttes arvesse põlvkondade vahetumisest
tulenevaid probleeme. Tuginedes Euroopa oskuste vaatluskeskuse tegevusele, aitavad
põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse ökosüsteemi ulatuslik partnerlus, programmist „Erasmus+“
rahastatavad kutsehariduse tipptaseme keskused ning EIT teadmis- ja innovaatikakogukonnad
kindlaks teha tekkivaid oskuste puudujääke ja need kõrvaldada.
Innovatsiooni laialdase omaksvõtu saavutamiseks on vaja, et teadusuuringutes ja innovatsioonis
osaleksid lisaks traditsioonilistele osalejatele (põllumajandustootjad, nõustajad ja muud
maapiirkondade osalejad) ka muud osalejad, kaasates ettevõtjad, piirkondlikud omavalitsused,
haridustöötajad, kodanikuühiskond ja tööstus ning tugevdades samal ajal toetust
kodanikuteadusele.
2.3 Toidutehnoloogia edendamine toiduahela vastupidavuse ja toiduga kindlustatuse
tagamiseks
Toidutööstuse mitmekesine ökosüsteem, mis hõlmab uuenduslikke idufirmasid ja muid VKEsid
ning hargmaiseid ettevõtjaid, nõuab märkimisväärset laborite ja turu koostööd, et kiirendada
mõjusate lahenduste leidmist uute toodete ja teenuste jaoks.
28 Praktilised kokkuvõtted on lühikesed praktilise suunitlusega kokkuvõtted, mille eesmärk on anda kasutajatele edasi
mitme osalejaga lähenemisviisiga projektidest ja Euroopa innovatsioonipartnerluse töörühmadest saadud praktilisi
teadmisi. 29 OECD, „Policy for the Future of Farming and Food in the European Union“, OECD Agriculture and Food Policy
Reviews, OECD Publishing, Pariis, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1787/32810cf6-en.
11
Kuigi EL rahastab jõudsalt innovatsiooni varajases etapis, on uute kestlike toidu koostisosade
tootmise laiendamiseks vaja suuremat rahalist toetust, et aidata uuenduslikel idufirmadel ja muudel
VKEdel teisest surmaorust30 üle saada. See kehtib eelkõige toidutööstuse kohta, millel on
märkimisväärsed kapitalikulude vajadused ja kus erainvestorid on taristu rahastamise toetamisel
sageli kõhkleval seisukohal31. Rahaline toetus tähendab eelkõige seda, et tegeletakse tööstusliku
lepingulise tootmisvõimsuse kogu kontinenti hõlmava nappusega tehnoloogilise valmiduse
tasemel 8–9 toidu ja sööda koostisosade kääritamisel põhineva tehnoloogia32 puhul, järgides samal
ajal täielikult ELi riskihindamise ja lubade andmise raamistikku. Kvantarvutamine, millel on
märkimisväärne andmetöötlusvõimsus, võib koos digi- ja tehisintellektivahenditega aidata
parandada täiendavat töötlemist ning edendada uute toidu koostisosade väljatöötamist ja
personaalse toitumise tõhusamat arendamist. Komisjon uurib, kuidas saaks suurendada
investeeringuid, sealhulgas Euroopa Konkurentsivõime Fondi InvestEU instrumendi kaudu, et
kiirendada turustamist ja tugevdada toidualast innovatsiooni ELis.
Lisaks peab EL alates varajase etapi teadusuuringutest kiirendama täiustatud toidutehnoloogia
kasutuselevõttu, laiendades tegevust kuni turustamiseni tööstusliku kasutuselevõtu kaudu, tagades
samal ajal jätkuvalt toiduohutuse. Selle saavutamiseks on vaja peamiste taristute ja teadusasutuste,
sealhulgas tööstusliku biotehnoloogia innovatsiooni ja sünteetilise bioloogia kiirendi
(IBISBA), ülikoolide, uurimisinstituutide, biotootmisrajatiste, tehnosiirdekeskuste ja
innovatsioonikeskuste pühendunud kaasamist, mida toetavad sellised vahendid nagu ELi
biotehnoloogia ja biotootmise keskus.
Toiduga varustatuse ja toiduga kindlustatuse edendamine suurendab ELi sõltumatust, toetades
selliste oluliste toidu koostisosade nagu vitamiinide, aminohapete ja ensüümide ELi-siseseid
tarneahelaid ning vähendades seeläbi välissõltuvust. Komisjon võib koos liikmesriikidega seda
vastupidavust parandada ka digi- ja tehisintellektivahendite ja -lahenduste abil. Üleeuroopalist
huvi pakkuvad tähtsad projektid on veel üks näide liikmesriikide investeeringute koondamisest
strateegilistesse toidu- ja bioressursipõhistesse väärtusahelatesse.
Need võivad aidata kaasa toidusüsteemide ümberkujundamisele, kasutades rakendusi toidukao ja
-jäätmete vähendamiseks, parandada ELi järelevalvet toiduohutuse ja jälgitavuse üle, sealhulgas
võidelda toidupettuse vastu, vähendada tootmiskulusid, prognoosida ja juhtida kliimast tingitud
riske ja inimeste haiguste riskitegureid ning suurendada tarbijate usaldust ELi toidusüsteemide
terviklikkuse vastu.
Komisjon on ELi biomajanduse strateegias nimetanud kõrgtehnoloogilist kääritamist juhtivaks
tehnoloogiaks ning uurib, kuidas soodustada erainvesteeringuid kõrgtehnoloogilise kääritamise
jaoks mõeldud avatud juurdepääsuga katse- ja näidistasandi biotöötlemistaristu ehitamisse
ja ajakohastamisse, et toetada toidutööstust, sealhulgas VKEsid, oma protsesside katsetamisel
30 Teine surmaorg ulatub katse-/näidistasandist turutasandini. 31 Euroopa Investeerimispank, „Feeding future generations – How finance can boost innovation in agri-food“, Euroopa
Liidu Väljaannete Talitus, Luxembourg, 2019, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2867/008109. 32 See tehnoloogia hõlmab biokütuste rafineerimistehaseid ja täiustatud kääritamist pärmseente, vetikate, bakterite ja
muude mikroorganismide abil.
12
ja riskide vähendamisel, ilma et selleks oleks vaja teha eelnevaid algkapitali kulutusi. Liikmesriike
julgustatakse sama tegema.
Tervis ja toit on omavahel tihedalt seotud ning toitumisel on kooskõlas riiklike
toitumissoovitustega oluline roll hea tervise säilitamisel ja edendamisel33. See valdkond on
meelitanud ligi nii kujunemisjärgus kui ka tipptehnoloogia tooteid, mis aitavad positiivselt kaasa
tarbijate tervisele, näiteks tegeledes kooskõlas riikliku toitumispoliitikaga teatavate vitamiinide ja
mineraalainete ebapiisava tarbimisega. Komisjon kaalub, kuidas tugevdada tervise ja toidu
vahelist seost käsitlevaid teadusuuringuid ja innovatsiooni, et tegeleda kardiometaboolsete ja
neuroloogiliste süsteemidega seotud haiguste üha suureneva arvuga ning hõlmata muu hulgas
personaalset toitumist.
3. TEADUSUURINGUTE JA INNOVATSIOONI VAJADUSED ELI
PÕLLUMAJANDUSLIKU TOIDUTÖÖSTUSE KONKURENTSIVÕIME,
KESTLIKKUSE JA VASTUPIDAVUSE TAGAMISEKS
3.1. Valdkondadevahelised prioriteedid
Põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse keerukas ja omavahel seotud olemus nõuab ulatuslikke
teadusuuringuid ja innovatsiooni, mis saavad seda valdkonda mõjutada.
Kuigi jagudes 3.3 ja 3.4 on seoses põllumajandusliku toidutööstusega määratud kindlaks
konkreetsed teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni temaatilised valdkonnad, tuleks kõigis teadus- ja
innovatsioonipoliitika valdkondades kohaldada süsteemset lähenemisviisi ning lähtuda
valdkonnaülestest prioriteetidest.
Raamistike „AgRI 2040“ ja „Food 2040“ rakendamisel ning samuti teadus- ja
innovatsioonimeetmete rakendamisel, mida saab toetada muu hulgas tulevasest programmist
„Euroopa horisont“ ja Euroopa Konkurentsivõime Fondist, juhindutakse allpool esitatud kuuest
esialgsest prioriteedist, ilma et see piiraks tulevaste rahastamisprogrammide rakendamise
meetodeid või tööprogrammide ettevalmistamist järgmise mitmeaastase finantsraamistiku 2028–
2034 perioodiks.
• Konkurentsivõime ning idu- ja kasvufirmad
Komisjoni eesmärk on tugevdada pikaajalist konkurentsivõimet, edendades teadusuuringute ja
innovatsiooni ökosüsteemi, mis võimaldab teadlastel, novaatoritel ja ettevõtjatel koos
põllumajandustootjate, metsandusettevõtjate, maapiirkondade osalejate ja tööstusharude,
idufirmade, kasvufirmade, muude VKEde ja muude ettevõtjatega töötada välja uusi
lähenemisviise, tooteid ja tehnoloogialahendusi ning tegeleda nende sektorite ees seisvate
probleemidega.
• Toiduga kindlustatus, vastupidavus ja valmisolek
33 Komisjoni teatis Euroopa Parlamendile, nõukogule, Euroopa Majandus- ja Sotsiaalkomiteele ning Regioonide
Komiteele „ELi südame-veresoonkonna tervise kava: kava „Kaitstud südamed“, COM(2025) 1024 final.
13
Kooskõlas ELi kriisivalmiduse strateegiaga ning selle rõhuasetusega varajasele hoiatamisele ja
kõiki ohte hõlmavale integreeritud lähenemisviisile on käesoleva strateegilise lähenemisviisi
kohaste tulevaste meetmete keskne eesmärk suurendada vastupidavust ja valmisolekut. Selle
prioriteedi eesmärk on edendada prognoosimist ja valmisolekut, tunnistades seda, kuidas
kliimamõjud, tarneahela häired, struktuurne kinnistumine ja muud riskid võivad üksteist
vastastikku mõjutada ja tugevdada, ning töötades välja lahendusi, et parandada juurdepääsu
põllumajanduse, toiduainete tootmise ja tarnimise ning biomajanduse toorainetele.
Vastupidavuse tagamiseks on vaja terviklikku lähenemisviisi, mis hõlmab toiduga kindlustatust ja
toidualast sõltumatust, avatud strateegilist autonoomiat, loodusvarade kestliku majandamise
tagamist, riskide maandamist, sõltuvuse vähendamist, mitmekesistamist ja tarneahela
järjepidevust, ning valmisolekusuutlikkuse tugevdamist kohalikul, piirkondlikul ja riiklikul
tasandil. See hõlmab valkude, vitamiinide ja muude oluliste toitainete tootmise ja tarnimise
edendamist ELis ning hiljuti vastu võetud ELi valgusüsteemi vastupidavuse, strateegilise
autonoomsuse ja kestlikkuse suurendamise tegevuskava asjakohaste aspektide arvessevõtmist.
Teadusuuringutel ja innovatsioonil on seire, varajase hoiatamise, stressitestimise ja prognoosimise
vahendite ja suutlikkuse arendamise kaudu oluline roll selle ülemineku toetamisel.
• Loodusvarad ja ringsus
Teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon toetavad loodusvarade kestlikku majandamist. Teadusuuringud ja
innovatsioon aitavad edendada kliimamuutuste leevendamist ja nendega kohanemist, sealhulgas
põllumajanduslikus toidutööstuses selliste kliimateadlike lahenduste väljatöötamise ja ulatusliku
kasutuselevõtu kaudu, millega säilitatakse või taastatakse ka elurikkus ja ökosüsteemi
funktsioonid, vähendades samal ajal keskkonnaseisundi halvenemist ja saastet.
Selle prioriteedi keskne element on kestlikule, ringsuspõhisele ja ressursitõhusale (sh
taastuvenergiaga seotud) põllumajanduslikule toidutööstusele ülemineku toetamise jätkamine. See
hõlmab üleminekut lineaarsetelt tootmis- ja tarbimismudelitelt ringsuspõhistele süsteemidele, kus
bioloogilisi ressursse kasutatakse kestlikult ja tõhusamalt ning jäätmevooge minimeeritakse ja
taaskasutatakse. Samuti hõlmab see jõupingutusi toidukao ja toidujäätmete vältimiseks
väärtusahela kõigis etappides alates tootmisest ja töötlemisest kuni turustamise ja tarbimiseni.
See prioriteet on kooskõlas ELi biomajanduse strateegia, looduse taastamise määruse ja tulevase
ringmajanduse õigusakti eesmärkidega, edendades bioloogiliste ressursside ringsuspõhist,
taastavat ja kestlikku kasutamist, et toetada rohemajanduskasvu ning vähendada biomassi kestliku
hankimise ja kasutamise kaudu sõltuvust fossiilsetest ressurssidest.
• Toidu- ja söödaohutus, toitumine ja tervis
Komisjon aitab tagada, et toidu- ja söödaohutust, toiduahela terviklikkust34 ja toiteväärtust
käsitletakse integreeritult. Rakendades eri valdkondades, sealhulgas põllumajanduses ning toidu,
34 Toiduahela terviklikkus tähendab järgmist: ehtsus, jälgitavus, läbipaistvus ning toidupettuse ennetamine ja
avastamine. Sellega toetatakse nõudeid täitvate ettevõtjate võrdseid võimalusi, suurendades samal ajal tarbijate
usaldust ja edendades vastupidavat toiduainete tarneahelat.
14
toitumise ja tervise valdkonnas teadusuuringuid ja innovatsiooni, võivad uued teadmised ja (nt
mikrobioomipõhised) uuendused aidata parandada ohutust, toitumist ja tervist.
Sellega toetatakse nõudeid järgivate ettevõtjate võrdseid võimalusi, tegeledes samal ajal selliste
kriitiliste probleemidega nagu toidupettus, inimeste alatoitlus, elurikkuse vähenemine ja
ressursside ammendumine. Vajaduse korral juhindutakse selle prioriteedi raames võetavates
meetmetes terviseühtsuse põhimõttest ja bioteaduste strateegia eesmärkidest.
• Õiglus
Komisjon edendab teadusuuringuid ja innovatsiooni, mis soodustavad õiglasi, vastupidavaid ja
kaasavaid põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse väärtusahelaid, tagades, et innovatsioon loob
võimalusi ja toob kasu põllumajandustootjatele, metsandusettevõtjatele, maakogukondadele,
ettevõtjatele ja tarbijatele. Teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon peaksid toetama õiglase väärtuse
loomist ning riskide, kulude ja tulude jaotamist, suurendama põllumajanduslikus toidutööstuses
karjäärivõimaluste atraktiivsust uute tulijate jaoks ning aitama luua kvaliteetseid töökohti ning
häid töö- ja elutingimusi, tagades üleminekust saadava kasu jagamise piirkondade, põlvkondade
ja kõigi väärtusahelates osalejate vahel.
• Ülemaailmne koostöö kestliku põllumajanduse, metsanduse, maapiirkondade ja
toidusüsteemide valdkonnas
Selle prioriteedi raames käsitletakse põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse teadusuuringute ja
innovatsiooni rahvusvahelist mõõdet kooskõlas ELi poliitiliste prioriteetidega, sealhulgas ELi
strateegiaga „Global Gateway“ ja ELi biomajanduse strateegiaga, ning püütakse edendada ühiseid
huve ja tugevdada koostööd rahvusvaheliste partneritega teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni ühiste
prioriteetide osas.
Aafrika Liidu ja ELi vahel kokku lepitud uus tegevuskava „Toiduga ja toitumisalane kindlustatus
ning kestlik põllumajandus“ (FNSSA) koos sellega seotud rahvusvahelise teadusuuringute
konsortsiumiga peaks looma raamistiku, et määrata koos Aafrika Liidu ja seotud partneritega
kindlaks ühised valdkonnad, millele keskenduda. Täiendavalt võiks uurida koostöövõimalusi teiste
partneritega, näiteks Indiaga või Ladina-Ameerika ja Kariibi Riikide Ühendusega, et tegeleda
sarnaste probleemidega põllumajanduses, metsanduses ja maapiirkondades.
Koostööl idanaabruse riikidega (nt algatus BIOEAST ning Ukraina, Moldova ja Lääne-Balkani
riigid) võib olla oluline roll ELiga ühise teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni tegevuskava
väljatöötamisel ning ühiste probleemidega tegelemisel. Samuti tuleks jätkata koostööd Vahemere
piirkonna naaberriikidega, et toetada ja täiendada algatust PRIMA. Tuleks ka tugevdada koostööd
selliste rahvusvaheliste organisatsioonidega nagu ÜRO Toidu- ja Põllumajandusorganisatsioon
(FAO), Maailma Terviseorganisatsioon, Maailma Loomatervise Organisatsioon, rahvusvaheliste
põllumajandusuuringute nõuanderühm (CGIAR) ja OECD, et suurendada teadusuuringute ja
innovatsiooni tähtsust ja ülemaailmset mõju põllumajanduslikus toidutööstuses.
15
3.2. Ühised võimaldid
Juhtimine, tehnoloogia ja kogukonnad on peamised tegurid, mis võimaldavad rakendada
käesolevat strateegilist lähenemisviisi, et maksimeerida teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni mõju,
tugevdada ELi innovatsiooni ökosüsteemi ja kiirendada teadusuuringute tulemuste
kasutuselevõttu.
• Juhtimine
Juhtimine on sidusa ja tulemusliku poliitikakujundamise oluline eeltingimus. See võimaldab
koordineerida eri sektorite, teadusharude, sidusrühmade ja otsustustasandite vahel.
Teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni tõhus juhtimine põllumajanduslikus toidutööstuses aitab tagada,
et EL investeerib mõjusatesse teadusuuringutesse, tehnoloogiasse ja innovatsiooni. Samuti
toetatakse sellega eri liiki teadmiste ning eri vaatenurkade ja ärimudelite lõimimist, soodustatakse
sidusrühmade kaasamist, edendatakse noorte osalemist ja soolist võrdõiguslikkust ning
tugevdatakse oskuste arendamist ja koolitust.
Tugev juhtimine toetab ka valdkondadevahelisi teadusuuringuid, loodusteaduste ning sotsiaal- ja
humanitaarteaduste suuremat lõimimist ning tugevamaid seoseid teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni
ning poliitikakujundamise vahel, sealhulgas seoses sinimajandusega35. Mõned näited on ELi
missioon „Euroopa mullakokkulepe“ ja biomajandusega seotud vastastikune õpe.
Konkurentsivõimeliste, kestlike ja vastupidavate põllumajandus- ja toidusüsteemide arendamist
võib toetada terviseühtsuse põhimõte. Näiteks saab terviseühtsuse põhimõtte abil lahendada
antimikroobikumiresistentsuse probleemi,36 võttes arvesse inimeste, loomade ja keskkonna
vahelisi seoseid. Peale selle võivad terviseühtsuse põhimõttest lähtuvad mikrobioomipõhised
lahendused luua võimalusi uuteks toodeteks tervishoiu, toidu, kestliku põllumajanduse ja
metsanduse või vesiviljeluse valdkonnas.
Teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon võivad juhtimist veelgi toetada, luues tõendeid, katsetades ja
võrreldes lähenemisviise, suurendades seiresuutlikkust ning aidates avaliku sektori asutustel ja
sidusrühmadel mõista, mis erinevates territoriaalsetes ja valdkondlikes kontekstides toimib. Üks
viis selle saavutamiseks on kasutada koos liikmesriikide ja sidusrühmadega välja töötatud
tulevikusuundade analüüsi, mille raames uuritakse usaldusväärseid tulevikustsenaariume ning
tehakse kindlaks kohad, kus teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon võivad pakkuda õigeaegseid uusi
teadmisi ja innovatsiooni esilekerkivate probleemide lahendamiseks.
• Tehnoloogia
Tehnoloogia on innovatsiooni valdkonnaülene liikumapanev jõud ja peamine käesolevat
strateegilist lähenemisviisi võimaldav tegur. Teadusuuringutel ja innovatsioonil on keskne roll
35 Komisjoni teatis Euroopa Parlamendile, nõukogule, Euroopa Majandus- ja Sotsiaalkomiteele ning Regioonide
Komiteele uue lähenemisviisi kohta säästva sinise majanduse arendamiseks Euroopa Liidus ELi meremajanduse
ümberkujundamine kestliku tuleviku nimel, COM(2021) 240 final. 36 Nõukogu soovitus terviseühtsuse põhimõtte raames antimikroobikumiresistentsuse vastu võitlemiseks võetavate
ELi meetmete tõhustamise kohta, 2023/C 220/01, ST/9581/2023/INIT.
16
kujunemisjärgus tehnoloogia arendamisel, olemasolevate lahenduste kasutuselevõtu toetamisel
ning seonduvate sotsiaalsete ja eetiliste kaalutluste käsitlemisel.
Tehnoloogia, sealhulgas selline digitehnoloogia nagu tehisintellekt, on oluline vahend
põllumajanduse, metsanduse, maapiirkondade, toidutööstuse ja toidukeskkonna
ümberkujundamiseks ning kestlike toidutarbimise mudelite võimaldamiseks. Samuti
kujundab see kiiresti ümber teadusuuringute tegemise viisi. Samal ajal on andmetest saanud
strateegiline vara, mis edendab digipööret, loob konkurentsieeliseid ja võimaldab uuenduslikke
lahendusi.
Biotehnoloogia on veel üks oluline sektoriülene vahend põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse jaoks,
mis võib aidata sektoril oma potentsiaali täielikult ära kasutada,37 nagu on kajastatud hiljuti
esildatud esimeses Euroopa biotehnoloogiamääruses, millele järgneb teine biotehnoloogiamäärus.
Komisjon teeb kindlaks uued suundumused ning kättesaadavad digitaalsed, andmepõhised ja
biotehnoloogilised uuendused. Need jõupingutused tugevdavad sidemeid kogu põllumajandusliku
toidutööstuse ökosüsteemis ning neid arendatakse täielikus vastastikuses täiendavuses praeguste
ja tulevaste algatustega, sealhulgas kavandatava kujunemisjärgus tehnoloogiate vaatluskeskuse,38
olemasolevate Euroopa partnerluste,39 ühtsete Euroopa andmeruumide, Euroopa digitaristu
konsortsiumide (EDICd) ja Euroopa digitaalse innovatsiooni keskustega, samuti ELi
biomajanduse strateegia ja bioteaduste strateegia raames võetavate meetmetega.
• Territooriumid ja kogukonnad
Innovatsiooni omaksvõtt põllumajandus- ja toidusüsteemides sõltub põllumajandustootjate,
toiduahelas osalejate, tarbijate ja kohalike kogukondade kaasamisest ning kohalikele ja
piirkondlikele oludele kohandatud lahendustest. Territooriumid, sealhulgas piirkonnad, toimivad
elava innovatsioonikeskkonnana, kus saab katsetada, kohandada ja integreerida tehnoloogilisi ja
sotsiaalseid uuendusi ning uusi juhtimismeetodeid.
Kohapõhised lähenemisviisid on võimas vahend üleilmsetele probleemidele kohalikul tasandil
reageerimiseks. Need võivad tugevdada linna- ja maapiirkondade sidemeid ning edendada nii
kestlikkust kui ka vastupidavust,40 võimaldades kohalikke ressursse, teadmisi, inimesi ja
innovatsiooni, ühendades põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse ümberkujundamist.
Vastupidavust saab suurendada, tasakaalustades pikki ja lühikesi tarneahelaid, suurendades
mitmekesisust ning arendades tugevaid ja kestlikke kohalikke ja piirkondlikke toidusüsteeme.See
37 Euroopa Komisjon, Teadusuuringute Ühiskeskus, „Emerging biotechnologies in Europe – Foresight for policy“,
Euroopa Liidu Väljaannete Talitus, Luxembourg, 2024, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/4814109. 38 Kavandatud määruses Euroopa Konkurentsivõime Fondi kohta (COM(2025) 555 final, artikkel 14) on sätestatud,
et vaatluskeskus peaks abistama Euroopa Konkurentsivõime Fondi strateegiliste sidusrühmade nõukogu, tehes
kindlaks investeerimisvõimalused eri tehnoloogiavaldkondades. 39 Eelkõige programmi „Euroopa horisont“ põllumajanduse andmete partnerlus. 40 Euroopa Komisjon, teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni peadirektoraat, „Urban food system transformation in the
context of Food 2030 – Current practice & outlook towards 2030“, Euroopa Liidu Väljaannete Talitus, 2023,
https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/507125.
17
võib soodustada strateegilist autonoomiat, vähendades samal ajal kohalikul tasandil toiduga
kindlustamatust.
Kohalike osalejate kaasamine innovatsiooniprotsessidesse on väga oluline uuenduste
aktsepteerimiseks, kasutuselevõtuks ja pikaajaliseks integreerimiseks kohalikesse
ökosüsteemidesse (nt eluslaborite, LEADERi programmi, arukate külade,
piirkondadevaheliste innovatsiooniinvesteeringute instrumendi ja idufirmade külade
algatuse kaudu).
Selle ühise võimaldiga püütakse saavutada territoriaalselt põhjendatud ja kogukonnapõhist
innovatsiooni. Sellega toetatakse kohalikele varadele ja võimalustele tuginevaid lahendusi,
sealhulgas põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse jaoks, mille puhul mitme osalejaga lähenemisviisil
võib olla roll kogukondade mõjuvõimu suurendamisel.
Piirkondade ja kogukondade rolli arvessevõtmine teadusuuringutes ja innovatsioonis aitab
suurendada piirkondlikku konkurentsivõimet ja parandada ELi mitmekesiseid innovatsiooni
ökosüsteeme. Samal ajal tugevdatakse põllumajanduslikus toidutööstuses teaduse, poliitika ja
ühiskonna vahelist seost, luues tugevamad seosed projektide ja otsustajate vahel, et maksimeerida
uuenduslike lahenduste mõju kohalikul tasandil.
Innovatsiooni võimas katalüsaator on ka territooriumide, kogukondade ja kohalike omavalitsuste
vaheline koostöö, mida iseloomustavad teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni ühised prioriteedid ning
üksteist täiendavad võimekused, nagu on näidanud põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse
temaatilise aruka spetsialiseerumise platvormi partnerlused ühtekuuluvuspoliitika nutika
spetsialiseerumise strateegiate (S3) raames, sealhulgas Euroopa Regionaalarengu Fond ja
piirkondadevaheliste innovatsiooniinvesteeringute instrument.
3.3. AgRI 2040
„AgRI 2040“ on põllumajanduse, metsanduse ja maapiirkondadega seotud teadusuuringute ja
innovatsiooni üldine raamistik. See aitab tõenditel põhineva analüüsi ja sidusrühmade
koosloomise kaudu kindlaks teha temaatilisi ja valdkondadevahelisi teadusuuringute ja
innovatsiooni vajadusi ning seda ajakohastatakse korrapäraselt, et kajastada muutuvat
ülemaailmset konteksti.
Ilma et see piiraks järgmise mitmeaastase finantsraamistiku kohaldamist, antakse raamistikuga
„AgRI 2040“ strateegiline suund, mille alusel saaks neid vajadusi käsitleda tulevaste
rahastamisprogrammide asjakohastest tööprogrammidest rahastatavate meetmete kaudu. Erilist
tähelepanu pööratakse teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni tulemuste väärindamisele idu- ja
kasvufirmades ning nende tööstuslikule kasutuselevõtule, samuti nende levitamisele, omaks- ja
kasutuselevõtule põllumajandustootjate, metsandusettevõtjate ja maakogukondade poolt.
Lisaks toimib „AgRI 2040“ korraldusraamistikuna, et kaasata rahastamis- ja rakenduspartnereid
põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse väärtusahela täpselt kindlaks määratud segmentidesse, pakkudes
samal ajal sidusat juhtimisstruktuuri. Erilist tähelepanu pööratakse põllumajanduse teadmussiirde-
ja innovatsioonisüsteemi tugevdamisele teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni kaudu, parandades
18
teadmusvooge, nõustamisteenuseid, oskuste arendamist ja innovatsiooni omaksvõttu, edendades
samal ajal agroökoloogilisi lähenemisviise, sealhulgas mahepõllumajandust.
Raamistikus „AgRI 2040“ pakutakse välja tegevusvaldkonnad käesoleva strateegilise
lähenemisviisi prioriteetide elluviimiseks. Järgmised kaheksa esialgset tegevusvaldkonda
kajastavad vajadusi, mis on juba kindlaks tehtud põllumajandus- ja toidualase visiooni, avaliku
konsultatsiooni, alalise põllumajandusuuringute komitee sisendite ja käesolevale teatisele lisatud
komisjoni talituste töödokumendi kaudu. Komisjon korraldab 24.–25. septembril 2026 ELi
„AgRI 2040“ konverentsi ning võtab järelmeetmeid, et selliseid tegevusvaldkondi koos
sidusrühmadega täiendavalt luua ja täpsustada.
• Muld, põllumajanduslikud ökosüsteemid, vesi ja toitained
See tegevusvaldkond keskendub teadusuuringutele ja innovatsioonile, mis aitavad taastada ja
säilitada muldade head seisundit ja vastupidavaid veesüsteeme kui kliimamuutuste
leevendamise ja neile vastupanuvõime, toiduga kindlustatuse, elurikkuse kaitse ja taastamise ning
kestliku põllumajandustootmise alustalasid.
Prioriteetsed meetmed hõlmavad teadmiste, tehnoloogia ja vahendite loomist, et parandada mulla
seisundit, vee kvaliteeti ja vee kättesaadavust, tegeledes samal ajal reostuse, erosiooni,
veenappuse, kõrbestumise, toitainete kao ja elurikkuse vähenemisega. See hõlmab ka
teadusuuringuid ja innovatsiooni, millega arendatakse kestlikke maa- ja veemajanduse
lähenemisviise ja tavasid, nagu agroökoloogia ja mahepõllumajandus, süsinikupõllundus,
agrometsandus ja looduspõhised lahendused.
Veel üks prioriteet peaks hõlmama teadusuuringuid ja innovatsiooni, et vähendada ressursside
kasutamist ja parandada nende kasutamise tõhusust, eelkõige toitainete ja vee puhul, aidates
samal ajal suurendada toitainete, sealhulgas bioressursipõhiste väetiste ja mullaparandusainete
ringsuspõhist taaskasutamist ja käitlemist ning põllumajanduslike ja toidutööstuse jäätmevoogude
taaskasutamist.
Teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon võivad kiirendada praktiliste lahenduste kasutuselevõttu
eluslaborite, sealhulgas digitehnoloogia ning mulla, vee ja toitainete seire integreeritud süsteemide
abil. Uurida tuleks innovatsiooni põllumajanduse ja vesiviljeluse kokkupuutepunktis. Erilist
tähelepanu tuleks pöörata mulla, vee ja energia vahelisele seosele, sealhulgas kontrollitud
keskkonnaga põllumajandusega seotud teadusuuringutele ja innovatsioonile, samuti
mitmetasandilisele valitsemisele, uuenduslikele ärimudelitele ja mullaalastele teadmistele, et
toetada pikaajalisi muutusi kogu väärtusahelas.
• Viljelussüsteemid
Selle valdkonna eesmärk on edendada teadusuuringuid ja innovatsiooni, mis toetavad
kliimateadlikke, kestlikke, vastupidavaid ja konkurentsivõimelisi viljelussüsteeme. See keskendub
suuremale kohanemisele selliste keskkonnastressidega nagu põud, soolsus ja äärmuslikud
temperatuurid, sealhulgas agroökoloogiliste lähenemisviiside kaudu.
19
Samuti püütakse parandada valmisolekut uuteks ja tulevasteks taimetervist ähvardavateks
ohtudeks ning neile reageerimist. See hõlmab kiirete ja tulemuslike vahendite väljatöötamist ja
kasutuselevõttu taimekahjustajate ärahoidmiseks ja nende varajaseks avastamiseks, taimede
töötlemiseks ja bioloogiliseks tõrjeks.
Teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooniga tuleks edendada kestlikku ja madala riskiastmega
taimekaitset integreeritud lähenemisviiside kaudu, milles on agroökoloogilised ja agronoomilised
tavad ühendatud bioloogiliste lahenduste, madala riskiastmega alternatiivide, aretamise,
biotehnoloogia, täppistehnoloogia ja digivahenditega.
Rohkem tuleks ära kasutada sordiaretuse potentsiaali, teadmisi seemnetest ja taimesortidest,
biotehnoloogiat ja geneetilisi ressursse. See hõlmab aretustegevuse toetamist ning samuti
kliimateadlike, ressursitõhusate, vastupanuvõimeliste, vastupidavate ja mitmekesiste sortide,
sealhulgas mitmesugustesse tingimustesse sobivate kõrvalejäetud ja alakasutatud liikide
arendamist või uuesti kasutusele võtmist, võttes nõuetekohaselt arvesse õiguslikku41 ja poliitilist
konteksti.
Teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon peaksid käsitlema agronoomilist tulemuslikkust, töötlemist ja
toiteväärtust ning toidu, sööda ja ringsuspõhiste väärtusahelate arendamist, et tugevdada ka
valgukultuure kui strateegilist komponenti vastupidavamas ja kestlikumas ELi valgusüsteemis, .
• Loomakasvatussüsteemid
Selle valdkonna eesmärk on edendada teadusuuringuid ja innovatsiooni, mis toetavad
loomakasvatussüsteemide kestlikkust, konkurentsivõimet, tipptaset, territoriaalsust ja
vastupidavust, et kaitsta loomade tervist ja heaolu, vähendada loomakasvatussektori
keskkonnamõju ning edendada täppispõllumajandust. See aitab saavutada
loomakasvatusstrateegia eesmärke.
See peaks toetama mõjupõhist tõuaretust mitmel eesmärgil, võttes nõuetekohaselt arvesse
õiguslikku ja poliitilist konteksti, ning soodustama kestliku sööda ja toitainete, sealhulgas
vitamiinide ja aminohapete väljatöötamist.
Teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon võivad tugevdada bioturvalisuse meetmeid, kasutades
valdkondadevahelist lähenemisviisi. Teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon peaksid toetama uute
sekkumiste, ravimeetodite ja vaktsiinide väljatöötamist ning prioriteetsetele loomataudidele,
sealhulgas zoonoosidele suunatud olemasolevate lahenduste täiustamist, kaitstes samal ajal
loomade heaolu ja soodustades antimikroobikumide mõistlikku kasutamist.
Integreeritud lähenemisviise loomade tervisele ja heaolule, sealhulgas sotsiaal-majanduslikule
mõõtmele, tuleks edasi arendada teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni ning meetmete kaudu, mis
41 Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 17. juuni 2026. aasta määrus (EL) 2026/1388, milles käsitletakse teatavate uute
genoomikameetodite abil saadud taimi ja nendest saadud tooteid ning millega muudetakse määrust (EL) 2017/625,
OJ L 1388, 30.6.2026.
20
ühendavad haiguste ennetamise, haiguste tõrje ja hädaolukorraks valmisoleku, parandades samal
ajal loomade heaolu.
Ressursitõhusust tuleks parandada uuenduslike söödameetmete abil, nagu rohu- ja
karjamaasüsteemide optimeerimine, söödaväärinduse parandamine ja elurikkuse kaitsmine,
vähendades samal ajal survet maale selliste lähenemisviiside abil nagu põllumajanduslik
karjatamine. Ressursitõhusus peaks aitama ka vähendada süsinikuheidet ja jäätmeid kogu
väärtusahelas, edendades ringmajanduse põhimõtteid. Loomakasvatussektorit mõjutavaid
struktuurimuutusi, nagu uute alternatiivsete valkude kasutamist, kliimamuutusi või muutusi
geopoliitilises olukorras, tuleks nõuetekohaselt arvesse võtta ja terviklikult käsitleda süsteemse
lähenemisviisi osana.
• Biomajandus põllumajanduses, metsanduses ja maapiirkondades
Selles valdkonnas keskendutakse teadusuuringutele ja innovatsioonile põllumajandus- ja
metsamaa ning biomassi tõhusaks ja kestlikuks kasutamiseks ning biotootmise edendamiseks,
kogudes samal ajal tõendeid, et toetada kestlikke ärimudeleid ja juhtimisvahendeid, mis loovad
esmatootjatele ja maakogukondadele lisasissetulekut. Teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni kaudu
tuleks parandada sünteetiliste sisendite bioressursipõhiste alternatiivide, sealhulgas
bioressursipõhiste (orgaaniliste) väetiste ja vähese süsinikuheitega väetiste tootmist
Euroopas42. Kooskõlas biomassi astmelise kasutamise põhimõttega peaksid teadusuuringud ja
innovatsioon edendama ka taastuvenergia koostootmist. Lisaks peaks see valdkond pakkuma
võimalusi innovatsiooniks puidupõhiste toodete ja materjalide valdkonnas.
See valdkond peaks hõlmama ka uute ärimudelite väljatöötamist, et vähendada biomassitootjate
tootmiskulusid ja suurendada nende vastupidavust. Teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon peaksid
toetama ka tehnoloogiat ja protsesse kestliku biomassi, kõrvalsaaduste ja jääkide kohalikuks
väärindamiseks, ringsuspõhiseid protsesse, bioressursipõhiste toodete ringlussevõttu ja
korduskasutamist.
• Multifunktsionaalsed metsad
Selle valdkonna eesmärk on tugevdada metsade kestlikku majandamist mitmesuguse kasu
saamiseks vastavalt metsastrateegias „Euroopa metsad“43 määratletud aktiivse kestliku
metsamajandamise põhimõtetele, suurendada metsaökosüsteemide ja metsapõhiste sektorite
vastupidavust ning premeerida metsandusettevõtjaid ökosüsteemiteenuste eest, mida nad pakuvad
nii maa- kui ka linnakeskkonnas.
42 Komisjoni teatis Euroopa Parlamendile, nõukogule, Euroopa Majandus- ja Sotsiaalkomiteele ning Regioonide
Komiteele „Väetise tegevuskava:partnerlus ELis toodetud väetiste kättesaadavuse ja taskukohasuse ning nendega
seotud strateegilise autonoomia tagamiseks“, COM(2026) 310 final. 43 Forest Europe, „Sustainable Forest Management, SFM“.
21
Prioriteetsed meetmed peaksid hõlmama metsaelupaikade taastamise ja kaitse toetamist,
kliimamuutuste leevendamisele ja nendega kohanemisele kaasaaitamist, agrometsanduse
potentsiaali ärakasutamist ja metsapõhise biomajanduse edendamist.
See valdkond peaks hõlmama teadusuuringuid ja innovatsiooni, et luua teaduslikke tõendeid
kohanemisvõimeliste ja vastupidavate metsamajandamistavade kindlakstegemiseks,
analüüsida erinevate metsamajandamistavade mõju metsa ökosüsteemide kestlikkusele ning
parandada teadmisi metsade kui süsiniku sidujate kohta, sealhulgas metsamulla rolli kohta.
Samuti peaks see edendama Euroopa metsade kestlikkust ja vastupidavust uute ja
esilekerkivate kahjurite ja haiguste suhtes, teadusuuringuid ja innovatsiooni kahjustatud metsade
taastamise kohta ning aitama vähendada metsa- ja maastikupõlengute ohtu. Tuleks uurida praegu
alakasutatud puuliikide kasutamist töötlemistehnoloogia kohandamise, tehnilise ja digitaalse
innovatsiooni ning uute ärimudelite abil. Teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni raames tuleks hinnata
puuliikide mitmekesisust ning töötada välja ja katsetada meetodeid metsade geneetilise ressursi
säilitamiseks ja puude paljundamiseks.
Metsapõhise biomajanduse tugevdamiseks on vaja paremini mõista puidupõhiste toodete
eeliseid, sealhulgas suutlikkust tagada pikaajaline süsiniku säilitamine ja suurema väärtuse
loomine, sealhulgas kõrvalsaadustest.
See valdkond peaks tugevdama metsandusettevõtjate rolli väärtusahelas, töötama
metsandusettevõtjate jaoks välja uued ärimudelid, suurendama rahalisi stiimuleid teenuste jaoks,
mida ei pakuta, ja vastama ühiskonna ootustele metsade, sealhulgas eri osalejate heaolu suhtes.
• Maapiirkonnad
Selles valdkonnas keskendutakse teadusuuringutele ja innovatsioonile, et tugevdada
maapiirkondade konkurentsivõimet ja atraktiivsust, toetades seeläbi põlvkondade vahetumist,
täiustades teenuseid ja taristut, et parandada elu- ja töötingimusi, ning tugevdades sidemeid
põllumajandusettevõtete, metsade, territooriumide ja toidusüsteemide vahel.
Erilist tähelepanu tuleks pöörata maapiirkondade naiste ja noorte innovatsioonile ja
ettevõtlusele ning innovatsiooni kohapõhistele lähenemisviisidele kohalikul tasandil, sealhulgas
regulatiivsete katsekeskkondade kaudu.
Teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon peaksid toetama ka innovatsiooni avalike teenuste (sh haridus,
tervishoid, transport ja liikuvus ning digitaalne ühendatus) pakkumisel, turulepääsu võimaldamisel
ja keskkonnahoidlike ettevõtete loomisel. Need peaksid looma uusi töövõimalusi eri
majandussektorites, et parandada inimeste elukvaliteeti, hoida maakogukondades töötavaid
inimesi ja talente ning meelitada ligi uusi osalejaid.
22
Täiendavalt on vaja toetada haridust, kutseõpet ja elukestvat õpet ning inimeste oskuste
parandamist. Lisaks tuleks veelgi toetada tugevaid digitaristuid ja neid täiustada.
• Tugevam põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse väärtusahel
Raamistike „AgRI 2040“ ja „Food 2040“ ühise valdkondadevahelise prioriteedi (s.o õiglus)
raames on selle valdkonna eesmärk käsitleda selliseid aspekte nagu uute teadmiste ja vahendite
väljatöötamine, et tugevdada põllumajandustootjate seisundit põllumajandusliku
toidutööstuse väärtusahelas ning tegeleda kulusurve ja kestliku üleminekuga, tehes koostööd
kogu põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse väärtusahelas. Samuti peaks see edendama toidu
töötlemist ja turustamist põllumajandusettevõttes ja kohalikul tasandil ning parandama
maapiirkondade toidusüsteemide juhtimist, tugevdades samal ajal linna- ja maapiirkondade
vahelisi sidemeid. Lisaks peaks see toetama innovatsiooni, mis tugevdab
põllumajandustootjate võimalusi lühikestes, kohalikes ja piirkondlikes tarneahelates,
soodustab uusi ja kestlikke ärimudeleid ning edendab digiteerimist ja süsinikuheite vähendamist.
Selleks et tugevdada põllumajandustootjate seisundit põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse
väärtusahelates, peaksid teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon toetama ELi kvaliteedikavasid,
sealhulgas mahepõllumajanduslikku tootmist ja geograafilisi tähiseid, samuti
mahepõllumajanduslike toodete töötlemist ja turustamist ning muid väärtusahela uuendusi, mis
parandavad põllumajandustootjate majanduslikku seisundit.
• Digiteerimine, tehisintellekt ja robootika
Selle tegevusvaldkonna eesmärk on edendada andmete väärindamist põllumajandusliku
toidutööstuse tarneahelates, metsanduses ja maapiirkondade teenustes, et võimaldada
osalejatel andmeid, tehisintellekti ja digilahendusi tulemuslikult ja tõhusalt kasutada. Parem
juurdepääs kvaliteetsetele andmetele ja nende parem kasutamine võib toetada teadlike otsuste
tegemist ja tõenduspõhist poliitikat ning sillutada teed digilahendustele ja täiustatud
tehisintellektirakendustele, sealhulgas generatiivsele tehisintellektile.
Esmatähtsaks tuleks pidada digilahenduste arendamise edendamist ning nende kättesaadavuse ja
kasutuselevõtu suurendamist paljude kasutajate, sealhulgas väikeste ja keskmise suurusega
põllumajandusettevõtete ja maapiirkondade ettevõtjate jaoks. Teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon
peaksid toetama sellise olulise tehnoloogia kasutuselevõttu ja kasutamist nagu tarkvara ja IT-
vahendid, robotid, droonid, liit- ja virtuaalreaalsus ning kaug- ja lähedussensorid, tagades, et need
vastavad tegevusvajadustele ja sobivad kõigi oskuste tasemete kasutajatele. Edendada tuleks
tehisintellekti kiiremat kasutuselevõttu, et aidata vähendada halduskoormust, suurendada
tulemuslikkust, parandada juurdepääsu teadmistele ning toetada prognoositava teabe kaudu
kiiremat ja teadlikumat otsuste tegemist. Teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon peaksid võimaldama ka
uusi tehisintellektil põhinevaid robotrakendusi ning tõhusamaid andmepõhiseid toiminguid
põllumajanduses, metsanduses ja maapiirkondade teenustes.
23
Teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni digi- ja andmepõhiste lahenduste eeliseid ja kulusid tuleks
näidata teostataval viisil, suurendades usaldust nende kasutamise vastu ning kasutades oskusi,
oskusteavet ja nõustamissuutlikkust, mida on vaja nende tõhusaks lõimimiseks igapäevatöösse.
3.4. Food 2040
Raamistiku „Food 2040“ raames töötab komisjon välja kuus tegevusvaldkonda, et viia ellu
käesoleva strateegilise lähenemisviisi prioriteete, võimaldada kindlakstehtud vajadustele vastavate
teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni ühist loomist ning hõlbustada teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni
tulemuste kindlakstegemist, levitamist ja kasutuselevõttu ELi toidusüsteemides, ilma et see piiraks
järgmise mitmeaastase finantsraamistiku kohaldamist.
• Kohapõhised toidusüsteemid
See tegevusvaldkond on seotud võimaldiga „Territooriumid ja kogukonnad“, et rakendada selles
valdkonnas tulevasi teadus- ja innovatsiooniprojekte. Kohapõhised toidusüsteemid kajastavad
Euroopa toidukultuuride ja territooriumide mitmekesisust ja rikkust ning võivad toimida
innovatsiooni ja sotsiaalse ühtekuuluvuse inkubaatoritena.
See tegevusvaldkond edendab vastupidavat ja kaasavat kohalikku (sh linna) ja piirkondlikku
toidumajandust ning piiriülest suhtlust, mille eesmärk on tegeleda kohalike probleemidega (sh
keskkonnaprobleemidega). See ühendab tehnoloogilise ja sotsiaalse innovatsiooni kogukonna
kaasamisega, et soodustada toidusüsteemi innovatsiooni ning arendada haridust ja oskusi.
Kohapõhised toidusüsteemid hõlmavad maa- ja linnapiirkondade ning linnade ja regioonide
kokkupuutealasid kui valdkondi, kus seosed võivad aidata kaasa uuenduste koosloomisele
kohalikes toidusüsteemides muu hulgas ettevõtlusalgatuste, koosloomeruumide, linnade
võrgustike ja eluslaborite kaudu. Need on võimsad algatused, mis võivad territooriume rikastada.
Üks piirkondadevahelise koostöö näiteid Euroopas on biomajanduse ja toidusüsteemide
piirkondlikud innovatsiooniorud, mis võivad toetada muude kohapõhiste algatuste rakendamist.
• Tervislik ja kestlik toitumine
Üle poolel maailma elanikkonnast on raskusi ligipääsuga tervislikule toidule,44 mis toob kaasa
negatiivsed tagajärjed rahvatervisele, sotsiaalsele võrdsusele ja keskkonnale.
Selle tegevusvaldkonnaga edendatakse tervislike, kestlikumate ja täisväärtuslikumate
toiduainete alaseid teadusuuringuid ja innovatsiooni (kooskõlas valdkondadevahelise
prioriteediga „Toidu- ja söödaohutus, toitumine ja tervis“). Lisaks toetab see valguallikate
mitmekesistamist, suurendades samal ajal kodanike teadlikkust biotehnoloogial põhinevatest
koostisainetest ja kasutades tehisintellekti, et võimaldada prognoosida toidu ohutust.
Teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon käsitlevad ka toiduohutust, toidu saasteaineid, makro- ja
mikrotoitaineid, ensüüme, koostise muutmist ning toidu ja tervise koostoimet, millel kõigil on
oluline roll tervisliku ja kestliku toitumise toetamisel.
44 Sõltumatu eksperdirühm, „2021 Global Nutrition Report:The state of global nutrition“, Development Initiatives,
Bristol, Ühendkuningriik, 2021, https://globalnutritionreport.org/reports/2021-global-nutrition-report/.
24
Selles tegevusvaldkonnas uuritakse mikrobioomiteadust, toidu ja soolestiku mikrobioomi
funktsionaalsuse koostoimet, mikrobioomi seost konkreetsete inimestel esinevate haigustega,
konkreetsete mikroobsete biomarkerite kindlakstegemist riskiga seotud haiguste puhul ning
mikrobioomi võimaldamist tervisekasu edendamiseks toidu väärtusahela eri etappides.
Kaalutakse toitumise kultuurilisi, käitumuslikke ja sotsiaalseid mõjureid, et edendada hariduse
ja kaasamise kaudu õiglast ja kestlikku toitumisalast üleminekut, võttes arvesse demograafilisi
muutusi ja vananeva elanikkonna toitumisvajadusi. Teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon käsitlevad ka
toidu kättesaadavuse ja taskukohasusega seotud probleeme, edendades tervislikumat toitumist
ja toitumise mitmekesistamist Maa taluvuspiirides.
• Toidusüsteemide ressursitõhusus ja nullsaaste
Selle tegevusvaldkonnaga edendatakse uusi teadmisi ja uuenduslikke lahendusi, et suurendada
ressursitõhusust, vähendada toidu raiskamist kõigil etappidel töötlemisest tarbimiseni ning
lahutada toidusüsteemid (sh toiduainete töötlemine ja turustamine) fossiilkütustest (sh
pakendamiseks ja transpordiks mõeldud naftakeemiatoodetest). See hõlmab meetmeid, millega
aidatakse toidu- ja joogitootjatel, transpordiettevõtjatel ja muudel ettevõtjatel kogu toidu
väärtusahelas vähendada saastet, säilitades samal ajal elurikkuse. Sellega toetatakse
toidusüsteemide energiapööret, mis on oluline hoob kliima- ja energiaeesmärkide saavutamiseks
ning toidutööstuse konkurentsivõime ja vastupidavuse tagamiseks. See hõlmab ka toidupakendite
lahendusi, mille eesmärk on suurendada kestlikkust, näiteks materjalikasutuse vähendamine,
bioressursipõhiste pakendite suurendamine ning toodete ringlussevõetavuse parandamine ja
kõlblikkusaja pikendamine.
Tegevusvaldkonna raames toetatakse ka mikrobioomipõhiste lahenduste uurimist, sealhulgas
nende käitumise ja funktsionaalsuse uurimist saagikoristusjärgses keskkonnas (nt ladustamine,
töötlemine ja pakendamine), et kasutada ära nende potentsiaal vähendada saastet, parandada toidu
säilitamist ja suurendada üldist ressursitõhusust.
• Toidukeskkonnad ja tarbijate mõjuvõimu suurendamine
See tegevusvaldkond aitab paremini mõista keskkonda, mis kujundab seda, mida inimesed
söövad, sealhulgas toidu kättesaadavust, taskukohasust, juurdepääsetavust, märgistamist,
pakendamist, transporti, jaotamist ja turustamist ning sotsiaalmeedia rolli. Toetatakse selliste
lahenduste väljatöötamist, mis parandavad tervislike ja kestlike valikute kättesaadavust,
taskukohasust ja läbipaistvust. See tegevusvaldkond on seega tihedalt seotud tegevusvaldkonnaga
„Tervislik ja kestlik toitumine“. See tugineb käitumis-, sotsiaal- ja kultuuriteadustele, et paremini
mõista tarbijate käitumist ja arusaamu toidust, toetada nõudluse ümberkujundamist ning
suurendada tarbijate usaldust ja edendada nende haridust.
• Innovatsiooni, ärimudelite ja õiglaste toidusüsteemide lahenduste laiendamine
See tegevusvaldkond toetab üleminekut toidusüsteemidele, mis on uuenduslikud,
konkurentsivõimelised ja turule lähemal, samuti sotsiaalselt õiglased ning austavad
25
ökosüsteeme ja Maa taluvuspiire. Teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon peaksid sagedamini viima
selliste kaubanduslike rakendusteni nagu uuenduslikud tooted, uued ettevõtted ja
tehnoloogialahendused, mis nõuavad i) koostööd akadeemiliste ringkondade, tööstuse ja eri
institutsioonide või taristute vahel; ii) investeeringuid ning iii) edu saavutamiseks sobivate
partnerluste edendamist. See tegevusvaldkond on määratletud ristviitega jagudele 2.1 ja 2.3.
Lisaks käsitletakse toidusüsteemide struktuurseid tõkkeid, ebavõrdsust ja haavatavust ning
keskkonnaseisundi halvenemist, et laiendada paljutõotavaid lahendusi ja luua uusi
ärimudeleid alates katseetapist kuni turustamiseni, pakkudes tehnilist ja rahalist toetust.
Tehnoloogia, sealhulgas tehisintellektilahenduste, digiplatvormide ja biotehnoloogia arendamine
toidusüsteemidega seotud teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni laiendamiseks on prioriteetne
sekkumisvaldkond ristviitamisel tehnoloogia võimaldile.
• Veeannid
Kooskõlas tulevase ELi ookeani- ja veealaste teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni strateegiaga on
selle tegevusvaldkonna eesmärk edendada uusi teadmisi ja lahendusi, et toetada kestlikku
kalandust ja vesiviljelust mere- ja sisevetes, toetades samal ajal kestlikke toidusüsteeme ja
toiduga kindlustatust ning üleminekut edukale ja taastavale sinisele biomajandusele.
Selle raames käsitletakse muu hulgas kliimaga seotud ja muid looduslikke riske, mis mõjutavad
veeandide väärtusahelaid. See hõlmab mudelite väljatöötamist, et mõista ja prognoosida kalanduse
ja vesiviljeluse ning veeökosüsteemide koostoimet, ning toetab toidutootmise lõimimist kõige
ringsuspõhisemal ja kestlikumal viisil.
Selektiivsete ja vähese mõjuga püügivahendite alane innovatsioon vähendab kaaspüüki ja
elupaikade häirimist. Jätkuvalt on esmatähtsad loomade heaolu ja tervise küsimused, milles
keskendutakse kõigile kasvatatavatele ja püütavatele vee-elustiku liikidele, käsitledes aretamist ja
vajaduse korral söötmist ning vähendades ELi sõltuvust söödaimpordist. See annab kaluritele ja
vesiviljelusettevõtjatele võimaluse kavandada ühiselt vee-elusressursside majandamist
ühiskonna jaoks kõige vastuvõetavamal viisil, tasakaalustades bioloogilisi, ökoloogilisi,
majanduslikke ja sotsiaalseid kaalutlusi. Teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooniga toetatakse kestlikku
vesiviljelust (sh orgaanilist, avamere- ja integreeritud multitroofset vesiviljelust), sellist
tehnoloogiat nagu kõrgtehnoloogiline kääritamine, alakasutatud veeorganismide biomassi (nt
kalanduse ja vesiviljeluse kõrvalsaadused, vetikad ja invasiivsed võõrliigid) turuleviimist ning
kestlikke ja lühikesi veeandide väärtusahelaid.
4. JÄRELDUSED
ELi põllumajandusliku toidutööstusega seotud teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon on Euroopa toiduga
kindlustatuse ja strateegilise autonoomia tagamiseks ning ELi üldise konkurentsivõime
kaitsmiseks ja suurendamiseks äärmiselt olulised. Tuginedes ELi teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni
2016. aasta strateegilisele lähenemisviisile põllumajanduse valdkonnas ning toidusüsteemidega
seotud teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni raamistikule „Food 2030“, käsitatakse käesolevas uues
ELi strateegilises lähenemisviisis teadusuuringuid ja innovatsiooni võimalusena parandada ELi
26
põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse konkurentsivõimet, kestlikkust ja vastupidavust ning tagada
Euroopa inimestele hea elukvaliteet Maa taluvuspiirides.
Uus strateegiline lähenemisviis aitab tugevdada innovatsiooni investeerimisteekonnal ning
hoogustada uute teadmiste, innovatsiooni ja lahenduste omaksvõttu kogu põllumajanduslikus
toidutööstuses. Samuti aitab see tagada investeeringute tõhusa ja tulemusliku suunamise, viia
tulevased prioriteedid kooskõlla teaduse arenguga ning võimaldab ELil kasutada uusi võimalusi
tihedalt seotud raamistike „AgRI 2040“ ja „Food 2040“ kaudu.
27
1. lisa. Põhimeetmed ja ajakava
„Laborist tootmisse“ lõhe ületamine
Meetmed Alates
1 Toetada sihipärase projektikonkursi ja muude praeguse programmi „Euroopa
horisont“ meetmete kaudu koostööprojektide tulemuste paremat väärindamist
ja kasutamist ning tehisintellekti laialdasemat kasutamist põllumajandus- ja
toidusüsteemides
2027
2 Suurendada erasektori ja turuekspertide kaasamist programmi „Euroopa
horisont“ põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse projektikonkurssidel esitatud
teaduskoostöö ettepanekute hindamisse
2027
3 Suurendada toetust riskihindamismeetoditele, kogudes süstemaatilisemalt
andmeid teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni vajaduste kohta ELi asutustelt, kes
vastutavad põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse uuenduste turustamiseelse
hindamise eest
2027. aasta
IV kvartal
4 Edendada tihedamat koostööd programmi „Euroopa horisont“
põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse teaduskoostöö ning EIT Foodi ja Euroopa
Innovatsiooninõukogu vahel
2026. aasta
IV kvartal
5 Käivitada Teadusuuringute Ühiskeskuse hallatav põllumajanduse,
metsanduse, maaelu arengu ja toidusüsteemide innovatsiooni ja
ümberkujundamise teaduskeskus, et toetada ELi ja liikmesriikide
poliitikakujundamist ning sidusrühmade innovatsioonisuutlikkust
2027. aasta
IV kvartal
6 Valmistada alalise põllumajandusuuringute komitee aktiivsel osalusel ette ELi
ja liikmesriikide meetmete kogum, et aidata põllumajandusliku toidutööstuse
idu- ja kasvufirmasid
2027. aasta
IV kvartal
7 Julgustada liikmesriike kasutama tulevasi riiklikke ja piirkondlikke
partnerluskavasid, et veelgi tõhustada toetavat innovatsiooni ökosüsteemi
põllumajanduslikus toidutööstuses
2026. aasta
IV kvartal
Teadmiste ja innovatsiooni omaksvõtu kiirendamine põllumajandustootjate,
metsandusettevõtjate ja maapiirkondade osalejate seas
Meetmed Alates
8 Tõhustada mitme osalejaga lähenemisviisi rakendamist, ühtlustades
termineid ning tugevdades selle hindamis- ja seireraamistikke
2028. aasta
I kvartal
9 Luua koostööplatvormid ja hallata nende kasutamist, et hõlbustada
kontaktide loomist põllumajandustootjate, praktikute ja mitme osalejaga
lähenemisviisi järgivate projektide vahel, suurendades kasutajate kaasamist
teadusuuringutesse ja innovatsiooni
2028. aasta
I kvartal
10 Tugevdada sidemeid programmi „Euroopa horisont“ riiklike
kontaktpunktide ja riiklike ÜPP võrgustike vahel põllumajanduse
tootlikkust ja kestlikkust käsitleva Euroopa innovatsioonipartnerluse
sihtotstarbeliste ürituste kaudu
2027
28
Meetmed Alates
11 Vaadata läbi praktiliste kokkuvõtete ühtne vorming, mida kasutatakse
töörühmade ja programmi „Euroopa horisont“ projektide praktiliste
tulemuste levitamiseks, et muuta need selgemaks, parandada kasutajate
juurdepääsu ja edendada praktilist suunitlust
2027. aasta
IV kvartal
12 Kaardistada ja edendada ELi ja liikmesriikide katse- ja näidisrajatisi, et
suurendada põllumajandustootjate juurdepääsu ja vastastikuse innovatsiooni
omaksvõttu
2027. aasta
IV kvartal
13 Väärindada ELi uuringu tulemusi programmi „Euroopa horisont“ selliste
konkreetsete vahendite mõju kohta, millega toetatakse kestlikku
innovatsiooni põllumajanduses, metsanduses ja maapiirkondades
2026. aasta
IV kvartal
Toidutehnoloogia edendamine toiduahela vastupidavuse ja toiduga kindlustatuse tagamiseks
Meetmed Alates
14 Soodustada erainvesteeringuid, et toetada sellise avatud juurdepääsuga
katse- ja näidistaseme biotöötlemistaristu ehitamist ja ajakohastamist, mis
toetab VKEsid oma protsesside katsetamisel ja riskide vähendamisel, ilma
et neil oleks vaja teha takistavaid algkapitali kulutusi
2028. aasta
I kvartal
15 Tugevdada tervise ja toidu vahelist seost, et tegeleda kardiometaboolse
süsteemiga ja närvisüsteemiga seotud haiguste kasvava arvuga ning
hõlmata muu hulgas personaalne toitumine
2027. aasta
I kvartal
AgRI 2040: võimalike teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni vajaduste kindlakstegemine ELi
põllumajanduse, metsanduse ja maapiirkondade konkurentsivõime, kestlikkuse ja
vastupidavuse tagamiseks
Meetmed Alates
16 Korraldada esimene raamistiku „AgRI 2040“ konverents, et teha koos
sidusrühmadega kindlaks teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni vajadused ning
luua esialgsed tegevusvaldkonnad
2026. aasta
III kvartal
17 Töötada „AgRI 2040“ raames välja tegevusvaldkonnad vastavalt
sidusrühmadega koostöös kindlaks tehtud teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni
vajadustele
2027. aasta
IV kvartal
Food 2040: konkurentsivõimeliste, kestlike ja vastupidavate toidusüsteemidega seotud
võimalike teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni vajaduste kindlakstegemine
Meetmed Alates
18 Töötada välja teadusuuringud ja innovatsioon raamistiku „Food 2040“
kuues tegevusvaldkonnas, et saavutada kindlaksmääratud prioriteedid
2028. aasta
III kvartal
19 Korraldada esimene kõrgetasemeline raamistiku „Food 2040“ konverents,
et tuua kokku toidusüsteemide teadusuuringute ja innovatsiooni kogukond
2028. aasta
IV kvartal