TRANSPORDIAMETI JUHTIMISSÜSTEEM OT_264_K1_V3_r1
OPERATIONAL AUTHORISATION FOR THE `SPECIFIC`CATEGORY
Kinnitamine: 27.02.2023 nr 1.1-7/23/27 4/5
3.4 If the risk methodology used is the SORA, indicate the final SAIL of the operation, otherwise the equivalent
information provided by the risk assessment methodology used.
3.5 Select one of the two options.
3.6 Select one of the two options.
3.7 Characterise the ground risk (i.e. density of overflown population density, expressed in persons per km2, if
available, or ‘controlled ground area’, ‘sparsely populated area’, ‘populated area’, ‘gatherings of people’) for both
the operational and the adjacent area.
3.8.1 Select one of the four options. In case the risk assessment is based on the SORA, this consists in
M1 mitigation.
3.8.2 Select one of the four options. In case the risk assessment is based on the SORA, this consists in
M3 mitigation.
3.9 Insert the maximum flight altitude, expressed in metres and feet in parentheses, of the approved operational volume
(adding the air risk buffer, if applicable) using the AGL reference when the upper limit is below 150 m (492 ft),
or use the MSL reference when the upper limit is above 150 m (492 ft).
3.10 Select one of the four options.
3.11.1 Select one of the two options.
3.11.2 Describe the tactical mitigation methods to be applied by the UAS operator.
3.12 Select one of the two options.
3.13 Specify the type of the remote pilot certificate, if required; otherwise, indicate ‘Declared’.
3.14 Specify the type of the certificate for the staff, other than the remote pilot, essential for the safety of the operation,
if required; otherwise, indicate ‘Declared’.
3.15 List the type of events that the UAS operator should report to the competent authority, in addition to those required
by Regulation (EU) No 376/2014, if applicable.
3.16 Select one of the two options.
3.17 Indicate the OM’s identification and revision number.
3.18 Indicate the compliance evidence file identification and revision number.
3.19 Additional limitations defined by the competent authority.
4 Only the UAS features/characteristics required to be used for the operation should be identified in the form (e.g.
in case the UAS qualifies for enhanced containment but the operation requires a basic containment, and the
operator developed consistent procedures, then the basic containment should be ticked).
4.1 Name of the manufacturer of the UAS.
4.2 Model of the UAS as defined by the manufacturer.
4.3 Select one of the five options.
4.4 Indicate the maximum dimensions of the UA in metres (e.g. for aeroplanes: the length of the wingspan; for
helicopters: the diameter of the propellers; for multirotors: the maximum distance between the tips of two opposite
propellers) as used in the risk assessment to identify the ground risk.
4.5 Indicate the maximum value, expressed in kg, of the UA take-off mass (TOM), at which the UAS operation may
be operated. All flights should then be operated not exceeding that TOM. The TOM maybe be different from
(however, not higher than) the MTOM defined by the UAS manufacturer.