Laste seksuaalse väärkohtlemisega võitlemise direktiiv

EN EN

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Strasbourg, 6.2.2024

COM(2024) 60 final

ANNEXES 1 to 3

ANNEXES

to the

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council

on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual

abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)

{SEC(2024) 57 final} - {SWD(2024) 32 final} - {SWD(2024) 33 final} -

{SWD(2024) 34 final}

EN 1 EN

ANNEX I

TIME-LIMIT FOR TRANSPOSITION INTO NATIONAL LAW

(REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 35)

Directive Time-limit for transposition

2011/93/EU 18 December 2013

_____________

EN 2 EN

ANNEX II

CORRELATION TABLE BETWEEN ARTICLES IN DIRECTIVE 2011/93 AND THIS DIRECTIVE

Directive 2011/93/EU This Directive

Article 1 Article 1

Article 2, introductory wording Article 2, introductory wording

Article 2, point (a) Article 2, point (1)

Article 2, point (b) Article 2, point (2)

Article 2, point (c), introductory wording Article 2, point (3), introductory wording

Article 2, point (c)(i) Article 2, point (3)(a)

Article 2, point (c)(ii) Article 2, point (3)(b)

Article 2, point (c)(iii) Article 2, point (3)(c)

Article 2, point (c)(iv) Article 2, point (3)(d)

- Article 2, point (4)

Article 2, point (d) Article 2, point (5)

Article 2, point (e)(i) Article 2, point (6)(a)

Article 2, point (e)(ii) Article 2, point (6)(b)

Article 2, point (f) Article 2, point (7)

- Article 2, point (8)

- Article 2, point (9)

Article 3(1) Article 3(1)

Article 3(2) Article 3(2)

Article 3(3) Article 3(3)

Article 3(4) Article 3(4)

Article 3(5)(i) Article 3(5)(a)

Article 3(5)(ii) Article 3(5)(b)

Article 3(5)(iii) Article 3(5)(c)

EN 3 EN

Article 3(6) Article 3(6)

- Article 3(7)

- Article 3(8)

- Article 3(9)(a)

- Article 3(9)(b)

- Article 3(9)(c)

Article 4(1) Article 4(1)

Article 4(2) Article 4(2)

Article 4(3) Article 4(3)

Article 4(4) Article 4(4)

Article 4(5) Article 4(5)

Article 4(6) Article 4(6)

Article 4(7) Article 4(7)

Article 5(1) Article 5(1)

Article 5(2) Article 5(2)

Article 5(3) Article 5(3)

Article 5(4) Article 5(4)

Article 5(5) Article 5(5)

Article 5(6) Article 5(6)

- Article 5(7)

- Article 5(8)(a)

- Article 5(8)(b)

- Article 5(8)(c)

- Article 5(8)(d)

Article 5(7) Article 5(9)

Article 5(8) Article 5(10)

EN 4 EN

Article 6(1) Article 6(1)

Article 6(2) Article 6(2)

- Article 6(3)

- Article 7

- Article 8

Article 7(1) Article 9(1)

Article 7(2) Article 9(2)

Article 8(1) Article 10(1)

Article 8(2) Article 10(2)

Article 8(3) Article 10(3)

- Article 10(4)

- Article 10(5)

- Article 10(6)

Article 9, introductory wording Article 11, introductory wording

Article 9, point (a) Article 11, point (a)

Article 9, point (b) Article 11, point (b)

Article 9, point (c) Article 11, point (c)

Article 9, point (d) Article 11, point (d)

Article 9, point (e) Article 11, point (e)

Article 9, point (f) Article 11, point (f)

Article 9, point (g) Article 11, point (g)

- Article 11, point (h)

- Article 11, point (i)

- Article 11, point (j)

Article 10(1) Article 12(1)

Article 10(2) Article 12(2)

EN 5 EN

Article 10(3) Article 12(3)

Article 11 -

Article 12(1)(a) Article 13(1), point (a)

Article 12(1)(b) Article 13(1), point (b)

Article 12(1)(c) Article 13(1), point (c)

Article 12(2) Article 13(2)

Article 12(3) Article 13(3)

Article 13(1), introductory wording Article 14(1), introductory wording

Article 13(1), point (a) Article 14(1), point (a)

- Article 14(1), point (b)

Article 13(1), point (b) Article 14(1), point (c)

Article 13(1), point (c) Article 14(1), point (d)

Article 13(1), point (d) Article 14(1), point (e)

Article 13(1), point (e) Article 14(1), point (f)

Article 13(2) -

- Article 14(2)

- Article 14(3)

Article 14 Article 15

Article 15(1) Article 16(1)

Article 15(2) Article 16(2)

- Article 16(2), point (a)

- Article 16(2), point (b)

- Article 16(2), point (c)

Article 15(3) Article 16(3)

- Article 16(4)

Article 15(4) Article 16(5)

EN 6 EN

Article 16(1) Article 17(1)

Article 16(2) Article 17(2)

- Article 17(3)

- Article 17(4)

- Article 18(1)

- Article 18(2)

- Article 18(3)

Article 17(1), introductory wording Article 19(1), introductory wording

Article 17(1), point (a) Article 19(1), point (a)

Article 17(1), point (b) Article 19(1), point (b)

Article 17(2), introductory wording Article 19(2), introductory wording

Article 17(2), point (a) Article 19(2), point (a)

Article 17(2), point (b) Article 19(2), point (b)

Article 17(2), point (c) Article 19(2), point (c)

Article 17(3) Article 19(3)

Article 17(4) Article 19(4)

Article 17(5) Article 19(5)

- Article 19(6)

Article 18(1) Article 20(1)

Article 18(2) Article 20(2)

Article 18(3) Article 20(3)

Article 19(1) Article 21(1)

- Article 21(2)

- Article 21(3)

- Article 21(4)

Article 19(2) Article 21(5)

EN 7 EN

Article 19(3) Article 21(6)

Article 19(4) Article 21(7)

Article 19(5) Article 21(8)

- Article 21(9), point (a)

- Article 21(9), point (b)

- Article 21(9), point (c)

- Article 21(9), point (d)

- Article 21(10)

Article 20(1) Article 22(1)

Article 20(2) Article 22(2)

Article 20(3), introductory wording Article 22(3), introductory wording

Article 20(3), point (a) Article 22(3), point (a)

Article 20(3), point (b) Article 22(3), point (b)

Article 20(3), point (c) Article 22(3), point (c)

Article 20(3), point (d) Article 22(3), point (d)

Article 20(3), point (e) Article 22(3), point (e)

Article 20(3), point (f) Article 22(3), point (f)

- Article 22(3), point (g)

Article 20(4) Article 22(4)

Article 20(5), introductory wording Article 22(5), introductory wording

Article 20(5), point (a) Article 22(5), point (a)

Article 20(5), point (b) Article 22(5), point (b)

Article 20(6) Article 22(6)

- Article 22(7)

- Article 23(1)

- Article 23(2)

EN 8 EN

- Article 23(3), introductory wording

- Article 23(3), point (a)

- Article 23(3), point (b)

- Article 23(3), point (c)

- Article 23(4), introductory wording

- Article 23(4), point (a)

- Article 23(4), point (b)

- Article 23(4), point (c)

- Article 24

- Article 25

Article 21, introductory wording Article 26, introductory wording

Article 21, point (a) Article 26, point (a)

Article 21, point (b) Article 26, point (b)

Article 22 Article 27

- Article 27(2)

Article 23(1) Article 28(1)

Article 23(2) Article 28(2)

Article 23(3) Article 28(3)

- Article 28(4), introductory wording

- Article 28(4), point (a)

- Article 28(4), point (b)

- Article 28(4), point (c)

- Article 28(5), introductory wording

- Article 28(5), point (a)

- Article 28(5), point (b)

- Article 28(5), point (c)

EN 9 EN

Article 24(1) Article 29(1)

Article 24(2) Article 29(2)

Article 24(3), introductory wording Article 29(3), introductory wording

Article 24(3), point (a) Article 29(3), point (a)

Article 24(3), point (b) Article 29(3), point (b)

Article 24(4) Article 29(4)

Article 24(5), introductory wording Article 29(5), introductory wording

Article 24(5), point (a) Article 29(5), point (a)

Article 24(5), point (b) Article 29(5), point (b)

Article 24(4) Article 29(4)

Article 24(5), introductory wording Article 29(5), introductory wording

Article 24(5), point (a) Article 29(5), point (a)

Article 24(5), point (b) Article 29(5), point (b)

Article 24(5), point (c) Article 29(5), point (c)

Article 25(1) Article 30(1)

Article 25(2) Article 30(2)

- Article 31(1)

- Article 31(2), introductory wording

- Article 31(2), point (a)

- Article 31(2), point (b)

- Article 31(2), point (c)

- Article 31(3)

- Article 31(4)

- Article 31(5)

- Article 31(6)

- Article 31(7)

EN 10 EN

Article 26 -

Article 27(1) Article 33(1)

Article 27(2) -

Article 27(3) Article 33(2)

- Article 33(3)

Article 28 Article 32

- Article 34

Article 29 Article 35

Article 30 Article 36

_____________

EN 11 EN

ANNEX III

Correlation Table between recitals and articles in this Directive

Recitals Articles

(1), (7) General (need for the recast)

(2), (3), (4) Article 1

(5), (6), (8) General (other legal instruments)

(9) Article 4, 10

(10), (11), (12) Article 2, letter (c)

(13) Article 3(5), letter (b); Article 11, letter (a)

(14), (16), (17), (18), (19), (29) Articles 3 to 9

(15) Article 2, point (c), Articles 3 to 9

(20) Article 5(1) and (7)

(21) Article 5(3)

(22), (23) Article 6

(24) Article 10

(25), (26) Article 11

(27) Articles 21, 23

(28) Article 15

(30), (31), (32), (33) Article 16

(34) Articles 17, 18

(35) Article 19

(36), (37), (38) Articles 20, 21, 22

(39) Article 23

(40) Articles 21, 24, 25, 28

(41) Article 24

(42) Article 26

EN 12 EN

(43) Articles 27, 28, 29

(44) Articles 17, 18

(45) Article 5(1), (7) and (8)

(46) Article 28(3) and (4)

(47), (48) Articles 27, 28, 29

(49) Article 29

(50), (51), (52), (53) Article 12

(54) Article 31

(55) Article 17

(56), (57), (58) Article 30

(59), (60), (61), (62) General (legal basis, respect of the Charter,

participating Member States)

(63), (64) Article 33

_____________

EN EN

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Strasbourg, 6.2.2024

COM(2024) 60 final

2024/0035 (COD)

Proposal for a

DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual

abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)

{SEC(2024) 57} - {SWD(2024) 32} - {SWD(2024) 33} - {SWD(2024) 34}

EN 1 EN

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

• Reasons for and objectives of the proposal

In July 2020, the Commission presented an EU Strategy for a more effective fight against

child sexual abuse (hereinafter ‘the Strategy’). This Strategy set out eight initiatives aiming to

ensure full implementation and, where needed, further development of the legal framework to

combat child sexual abuse and exploitation. At the same time, it sought to strengthen the law

enforcement response and to catalyse multistakeholder efforts in relation to prevention and

investigation, and for assistance to victims and survivors.

In particular, the Strategy recognised the need to assess whether the current EU criminal law

framework, namely Directive 2011/93/EU on combating the sexual abuse and sexual

exploitation of children and child pornography (hereinafter ‘the Directive’), is fit for purpose

considering the societal and technological changes over the past decade. The Directive was

adopted to establish minimum standards to prevent and fight these particularly serious forms

of crime, which are directed against children, namely victims that have a right to special

protection and care. It established minimum rules on the definition of criminal offences and

sanctions in the area of sexual exploitation of children, as well as minimum standards on

effective investigation and prosecution, assistance and support to victims, and prevention of

child sexual abuse and exploitation.

In 2022, the Commission conducted an evaluation to assess the implementation of the

Directive, assessing possible legislative gaps, best practices and priority actions at EU level.

The study showed that the text presents opportunities for improvement: it highlighted the

ambiguity of certain definitions set out in the Directive, and challenges concerning

investigations and prosecution of offenders. The study raised concerns related to the

exponential growth of online sharing of child sexual abuse material and to the increased

possibilities for perpetrators to hide their identity (and conceal their illegal activities), most

notably online, thereby escaping investigation and prosecution. In conclusion, the study found

that both the increased online presence of children and the latest technological developments

raise challenges for law enforcement while creating new possibilities for abuse that are not

entirely covered by the current Directive.

The study also concluded that the various legal frameworks in place in Member States

concerning investigation and prosecution do not provide for an effective fight against child

sexual abuse and exploitation throughout the EU, notably due to insufficient criminalisation

of child sexual abuse and exploitation offences committed through the use of new and

emerging technologies. Finally, it highlighted that Member State efforts to prevent child

sexual abuse and to assist victims are still limited, lack coordination and are of unclear

effectiveness. To address shortcomings in implementation, the Commission followed up

through enforcement measures, launching infringement procedures as necessary. At the same

time, the evaluation showed clearly that a renewed legislative framework is needed at EU

level.

Against this background, a targeted revision of the Directive is necessary:

• to ensure that all forms of child sexual abuse and exploitation, including those

enabled or facilitated by technological developments, are criminalised;

EN 2 EN

• to ensure that national rules on investigation and prosecution provide for an

effective fight against child sexual abuse and exploitation by taking into

account recent technological developments;

• to improve both prevention and assistance to victims; and

• to promote better coordination in preventing and combatting child sexual abuse

across Member States and, at national level, among all parties involved.

• Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area

This proposal further develops the existing provisions of the Directive and is presented in the

framework of the 2020 EU Strategy for a more effective fight against child sexual abuse.

The proposal complements other EU initiatives that, directly or indirectly, address aspects of

the challenges linked to child sexual abuse and exploitation offences. These initiatives

include:

– Directive 2012/29/EU on establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and

protection of victims of crime;

– Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and

protecting its victims;

– Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 on a temporary derogation from certain provisions of

Directive 2002/58/EC as regards the use of technologies by providers of number-

independent interpersonal communications services for the processing of personal

and other data for the purpose of combating online child sexual abuse, and the

recently adopted proposal for a limited extension in time of the temporary

derogation1; and

– the Proposal for a Regulation laying down rules to prevent and combat child sexual

abuse.

The latter would put in place obligations on online service providers to take responsibility for

protecting children who use their services from online child sexual abuse. The proposed

Regulation relies on the Directive for the definition of what is a criminal offence because it

constitutes child sexual abuse material and solicitation. The Directive constitutes the criminal

law pillar upon which the proposed Regulation stands.

The two instruments would reinforce each other to jointly provide a more comprehensive

response to the crime of child sexual abuse and exploitation, both offline and online. In

particular, the EU Centre to prevent and combat child sexual abuse, envisaged in the proposed

Regulation, would also play an important role in supporting Member State actions on both

prevention and assistance to victims under this proposal. While the EU Centre would support

law enforcement and the judiciary in providing reports of higher quality, it leaves unaffected

the current distribution of responsibilities among Europol, Eurojust, and national law

enforcement and judiciary authorities.

1 Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council amending Regulation (EU)

2021/1232 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a temporary derogation from certain

provisions of Directive 2002/58/EC for the purpose of combating online child sexual abuse,

COM(2023) 777 final of 30.11.2023.

EN 3 EN

• Consistency with other Union policies

This proposal is consistent with related Union policy, in particular the following:

– It complements the EU legal framework regulating digital services, most notably the

recently adopted Digital Services Act2. The latter addresses the responsibility of

online service providers in relation to illegal content circulating on their services.

This proposal ensures that the definition of a specific type of illegal content, namely

online child sexual abuse, is updated and suitable to ensure effective action in

today’s and tomorrow’s digital world, while also insisting on awareness raising and

education. By doing so, the proposal is also fully complementary with the EU

strategy for a Better Internet for Kids (BIK+).

– It is consistent with, and complementary to, the proposal for a Directive on

combating violence against women and domestic violence. That proposal aims at

establishing minimum standards in relation to: the definition of offences and

sanctions for violence against women and domestic violence throughout the EU; the

protection of victims of these crimes and access to justice; victim support and

prevention; and coordination and cooperation between all relevant stakeholders.

– It is consistent with the proposal for the revision of the Victims’ Rights Directive

which provides for targeted amendments aiming to ensure that victims can fully rely

on their rights in the EU.

– It is consistent, especially in its awareness-raising and education components, with

the 2019-2027 EU Youth Strategy, which recognises that young people in the EU

face specific challenges and that their empowerment, including through education, is

crucial in helping them to face such challenges successfully.

– It is consistent also with the comprehensive EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child,

the adoption of which in 2021 created an overarching EU policy framework for

children’s rights and child protection. The Commission plans to complement this by

a Commission recommendation on integrated child protection systems.

– It is also consistent with the European Child Guarantee, which aims at preventing

and combatting social exclusion by guaranteeing effective access of children in need

(including those hailing from precarious, violent and abusive family backgrounds) to

a set of key services, such as education, healthcare and housing.

– It is consistent with the “do no significant harm” principle on not supporting or

carrying out economic activities that do significant harm to any environmental

objective, where relevant, within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU)

2020/8523, as the Directive has no negative impact on these objectives. It is also

consistent with the climate-neutrality objective set out in the European Climate

Law4.

2 Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 on a single market for digital services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC

(Digital Services Act), OJ L 277, 27.10.2022, pp. 1–102. 3 Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the

establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU)

2019/2088, OJ L 198, 22.6.2020, p. 13. 4 Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing

the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU)

2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’), OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1–17.

EN 4 EN

2. LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY

• Legal basis

This proposal recasts Directive 2011/93/EU. It is therefore based on Articles 82(2) and 83(1)

of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which are the legal bases of

Directive 2011/93/EU. The two legal bases allow the European Parliament and the Council to

establish, by means of directives, minimum rules necessary to facilitate mutual recognition of

judgments and judicial decisions and police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters

having a cross-border dimension, and minimum rules on the definition of criminal offences

and sanctions in the area of sexual exploitation of children, respectively.

• Variable geometry

As regards variable geometry, this proposal follows a similar approach as the current

Directive.

In accordance with Article 3 of Protocol (No 21) on the position of the United Kingdom and

Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the Treaty on

European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Ireland may

notify its wish to take part in the adoption and application of the Directive.

In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark annexed

to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this proposal and is not bound by it or subject to

its application.

• Subsidiarity (for non-exclusive competence)

The cross-border nature of child sexual abuse and exploitation offences, which justified the

adoption of the Directive, has become even more prominent in the last decade, with increased

prevalence in the use of online technologies that enable, facilitate and amplify the impact of

such offences. To provide for both effective prosecution of offenders and victim protection

everywhere in the EU, this proposal sets out to establish common minimum standards on the

definition of offences and levels of sanctions, an objective that Member States would not be

able to reach individually and that can only be achieved by action at EU level. Moreover,

given the online dimension of these crimes, which has become increasingly prominent,

Member States would not, in the absence of common rules, be able effectively to: (i) prevent

the commission of child sexual abuse offences in their territory; (ii) investigate and prosecute

child sexual abuse crimes with a cross-border dimension; and (iii) identify victims and

provide appropriate assistance to them. Hence, the proposal fully respects the principle of

subsidiarity as set out in Article 5(3) of the Treaty on European Union.

• Proportionality

The changes to the Directive under this proposal are limited and targeted, aimed at effectively

addressing the key shortcomings identified in the implementation and evaluation of that

Directive. According to the impact assessment, the proposed changes are limited to those

aspects that Member States cannot achieve satisfactorily on their own. In particular, the

definitions of offences need to be adapted at EU level to achieve the objective of tackling

cross-border child sexual abuse and exploitation. As to the amendments in relation to

prevention, assistance to victims, investigations and prosecutions, those respond to specific

gaps and challenges that have emerged during the monitoring of the implementation of

Directive 2011/93 over the past decade. Any further administrative burden that might arise

EN 5 EN

from this update is considered proportionate in view of the long-term benefits, including cost

benefits, that are linked to prevention and early detection of these types of offences for

victims and society at large. In addition, the supportive role of the EU Centre in the fields of

prevention and assistance to victims would keep any such administrative burden to a

minimum. In light of the above, the proposal does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve

the stated objectives.

• Choice of the instrument

This proposal is intended to provide for targeted changes to the Child Sexual Abuse Directive,

which are intended to address the gaps, inconsistencies and shortcomings identified from the

implementation and evaluation of the Directive. Since this proposal is to recast the Child

Sexual Abuse Directive, the same legal instrument is the most appropriate.

3. RESULTS OF EX POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER

CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

• Ex post evaluations/fitness checks of existing legislation

In the course of 2022, in line with what had been announced in the 2020 Strategy, the

Commission conducted an evaluation study to assess implementation of the Child Sexual

Abuse Directive, identifying legislative gaps, best practices and priority actions at EU level.

The evaluation study5 concluded that the Directive was not entirely capable of tackling the

challenges arising from the significant societal and technological changes that have occurred

in the past decades. It notably raised concerns in relation to the exponential growth of online

sharing, increased possibilities for perpetrators to hide their identity (and conceal their illegal

activities), and facilitation in conspiring between perpetrators to avoid accountability and to

commit further crimes. The evaluation study also highlighted ambiguities in certain of the

Directive’s provisions and pointed to persistent challenges concerning investigations and

prosecution of offenders. Moreover, it noticed that the very broad leeway left for national

differentiation in the area of prevention and assistance to victims had led to implementation

difficulties and unsatisfactory results in many Member States. It concluded that even full and

conforming transposition of the Directive in its current form would neither serve to

sufficiently address the challenges linked to the reporting, investigation and prosecution of

child sexual abuse and exploitation offences nor lead to the adoption throughout the EU of

sufficiently sound measures in relation to prevention and assistance to victims.

• Stakeholder consultations

A wide consultation was conducted in the context of the back-to-back evaluation of the Child

Sexual Abuse Directive and impact assessment of potential initiatives to fill the gaps

identified in such an evaluation. This included publication of the combined evaluation

roadmap/inception impact assessment on the Commission’s ‘Have your say’ portal from

28 September to 26 October 2021, which saw reactions from 17 stakeholders. Targeted

consultations, asking more technical questions on the revision of the Directive, took place in

the first half of 2022 and were carried out both by the Commission independently and in the

context of a study commissioned to an external contractor. Key stakeholders consulted

included:

5 Study supporting the evaluation and impact assessment of the EU Directive 2011/93 of 13th December

2011 on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography and the

impact assessment of the possible options for its amendment (finalised on 30 November 2022).

EN 6 EN

– Member State national authorities involved in the implementation of the Directive

and in its transposition (e.g. law enforcement agencies; prison, detention and parole

services; administrative, child protection and judicial authorities), and regional and

local authorities;

– relevant EU agencies (including Europol, Eurojust and the Fundamental Rights

Agency (FRA));

– relevant organisations in non-EU countries, including the US National Centre for

Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), and the Canadian Centre for Child

Protection (C3P);

– relevant international organisations, including the Council of Europe;

– relevant industry stakeholders;

– hotlines, including the EU-funded INHOPE network, and other civil society

organisations focused on child protection, child rights, prevention, and privacy; and

– researchers and academics that work on child sexual abuse and exploitation.

The Commission also carried out an open public consultation targeting the general public

with the aim of collecting information, evidence, and views on the issues at stake and to feed

into the evaluation and impact assessment process. In the context of the study, a questionnaire

in all EU official languages on the evaluation of the Child Sexual Abuse Directive was made

available, and a preliminary discussion on the objectives of a policy initiative to review it was

carried out via the Commission’s EU Survey tool between 20 April 2022 and 13 July 2022.

Overall, 49 responses were received from stakeholders in 23 countries, including 18 Member

States (AT, BE, CZ, DE, DK, EE, EL, ES, FI, FR, HR, HU, IT, MT, NL, PT, SE and SI). In

this context, the Commission also received, in addition to the replies, 21 written contributions,

including 11 contributions from civil society organisations, three from representatives of

business organisations, four from ICT companies, one from a representative of a national

ministry of justice, one from a legal expert and one from an EU citizen.

The consultation process showed, in general, that children are affected by the shortcomings of

the current Directive in relation to emerging trends enabled or facilitated by technological

development and the increased online presence of children and predators. It confirmed that

these new trends come with new investigative challenges that need addressing. It also pointed

to the need to better account for the specificities of child sexual abuse and exploitation

offences, including the challenges encountered by victims in reporting, the need for targeted

prevention and victim assistance, and to address the difficulties caused by phenomena such as

that of travelling sex offenders.

All the main problems identified in the consultations have been taken into account and

addressed in the proposal.

• Collection and use of expertise

The evaluation and impact assessment were supported by a study carried out by an external

contractor. Furthermore, the Commission organised six expert workshops, from 17 January

2018 to 6 September 2019, to gather information on challenges and emerging issues in the

field of child sexual abuse and exploitation, and to discuss the main difficulties encountered

in the Directive’s implementation, as well as its relevance in light of new and expected trends

and developments. As explained in detail in Annex 2 to the impact assessment accompanying

the proposal for a Directive (Recast), additional external expertise was gathered through the

EN 7 EN

following stakeholder consultation methods: scoping interviews, desk research, online survey,

public consultation, targeted interviews, case study interviews, and workshops.

• Impact assessment

The impact assessment carried out for the preparation of the proposal evaluated three policy

options, presenting a range of increasingly ambitious policy measures intended to respond to

three problem drivers:

– both the increased online presence of children and the latest technological

developments raise challenges for law enforcement while creating new opportunities

for abuse;

– the different legal frameworks in place in Member States concerning investigation

and prosecution, which do not provide for an effective fight against child sexual

abuse and exploitation; and

– the shortcomings of Member State efforts to prevent child sexual abuse and to assist

victims, namely their limited nature, their unclear effectiveness, and the lack of

coordination among relevant stakeholders.

The three policy options examined were as follows:

– Option A: Targeted legislative adjustments to clarify ambiguities of the current

framework, ensure coherence with new instruments, and improve the quantity and

quality of available information.

– Option B: Option A plus legislative amendments modifying definitions of crimes to

take into account current and expected technological developments.

– Option C: Option B plus legislative amendments to ensure more effective prevention,

assistance to victims, and investigation and prosecution, taking into account the

cross-border dimension of the phenomenon.

Based on the assessment of the social and economic impacts, as well as effectiveness and

efficiency, the preferred policy option is option C. The preferred option contains a larger set

of policy measures from prevention to prosecution and assistance to victims, which would

address both the original ambiguities and shortcomings identified in the Directive and the

need to update it to keep up with new and emerging trends while ensuring more efficient

cross-border cooperation. Option C further streamlines national rules on investigation and

prosecution to ensure, among other things, the full mobilisation of existing tools to prevent

sex offenders from committing crimes abroad and the availability of effective investigative

methods in all Member States. Finally, it better specifies prevention and obligations for

assistance to victims, and improves coordination among Member States, including through

the work of a network of national authorities and reliance on the EU Centre to prevent and

combat child sexual abuse.

The possible increase in the number of prosecutions and investigations concerning child

sexual abuse that might derive from more effective investigative tools and better coordination

within and among Member States might entail administrative costs for Member States.

However, it should also bring significant benefits in terms of limiting the costs to society of

child sexual abuse. In particular, the initiative is expected to significantly reduce costs

associated with child sexual abuse, producing savings relating to: (i) offenders and victims

(e.g. by preventing the offence from being committed and saving the costs linked to criminal

EN 8 EN

proceedings, as well as short and long-term assistance to victims); and (ii) society at large

(e.g. by avoiding the productivity losses linked to child sexual abuse and the related trauma).

The initiative will have a positive impact on the fundamental rights of children, including

their right to physical and mental health and their right to protection and care as is necessary

for their well-being. The initiative will also have a positive impact on the rights of adult

survivors of child sexual abuse, by improving compensation, assistance and support to

victims.

On 13 December 2022, the impact assessment was submitted to the Regulatory Scrutiny

Board, which held a meeting on 18 January 2023. The Board issued a positive opinion with

reservations on 20 January 2023. The Board pointed to a number of aspects of the impact

assessment that should be addressed. Specifically, the Board requested further clarification on

the dynamic baseline described as a starting point to assess the various options and, in

particular, on the role played in this baseline by the proposed Regulation laying down rules to

prevent and combat child sexual abuse. It requested that more details be provided on the

analytical method and assumptions underpinning the cost-benefit analysis, and on the role of

national authorities for child sexual abuse under the proposal. Finally, it asked the

Commission to include in the final version a more detailed explanation of the underlying

trade-offs that frame the context for the policy options and a more systematic account of the

views of the various categories of stakeholders.

These and other more detailed comments provided by the Board have been addressed in the

final version of the impact assessment. In particular, it describes in a clearer manner the

interplay with the proposed Regulation laying down rules to prevent and combat child sexual

abuse, gives a better account of the methodology used to assess cost and benefits, and

expands on the policy options and stakeholder views. The Board’s comments have also been

taken into account in the proposed recast Directive.

• Regulatory fitness and simplification

In compliance with the Commission’s Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme

(REFIT), all initiatives aimed at revising existing EU legislation should seek to simplify and

reduce administrative burden on Member States. The impact assessment concludes that the

preferred option would indeed have an administrative burden but that this would be offset by

the positive impact of the measures on the prevention of and fight against child abuse, and

protection of the victims of this crime.

The targeted amendments to the Directive are aimed at improving Member State capacity to

fight the crime efficiently, in relation to threats and trends that have emerged and evolved in

recent years and with new technological developments. New rules applicable to Member

States are expected to improve cross-border cooperation, both in terms of investigations and

prosecutions, and for victim assistance and support.

The initiative improves the clarity of the legal landscape for fighting child sexual abuse across

Member States. The regulatory burden related to the proposal is of limited scope, as it mostly

consists in improvements to existing norms rather than in entirely new obligations. Member

States already investigate, prosecute and punish offences related to child sexual abuse as they

stand. The proposal merely introduces a limited number of definitions and stand-alone

offences related to child sexual abuse, which will have a very significant impact on

countering the crime; indeed some, but not all, Member States have already adopted them.

Most of the regulatory and administrative burden on Member States would stem from

EN 9 EN

coordination obligations, the identification of clear benchmarks, and data collection

modifications. However, even in this respect, Member States already collect data on child

abuse, and the proposal is intended to ensure more consistency and transparency in existing

processes, and better reporting.

No impact is expected on SMEs and competitiveness. All the policy options under

consideration would result in costs for public authorities in Member States, rather than costs

for EU citizens and business.

• Fundamental rights

This initiative is consistent with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European

Union. It contributes also to strengthening specific fundamental rights, in particular: the right

to human dignity (Article 1); the right to the integrity of the person (Article 3); the prohibition

of inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (Article 4); and the rights of the child

(Article 24).

4. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS

There is no implication for the European Union budget.

5. OTHER ELEMENTS

• Implementation plans and monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements

The Commission will check the correct and effective transposition of the recast Directive into

the national laws of all participating Member States. Throughout the implementation phase,

the Commission will organise regular contact committee meetings with all Member States.

Periodically, the Commission will present to the European Parliament and the Council a

report evaluating the implementation, functioning and impact of the recast Directive.

In order to monitor and evaluate the phenomenon of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of

children, it is necessary for Member States to have mechanisms for data collection or focal

points in place. For these reasons, Article 31 is included, which obliges Member States to

have a system in place for the collection, development, production and dissemination of

statistics on offences referred to in Articles 3 to 9. Every 3 years, Member States are required

to conduct a population-based survey using the harmonised methodology of the Commission

(Eurostat) to gather data on the number of victims of offences under the Directive. On this

basis, they must assess the prevalence of and trends for all offences covered by this Directive.

Member States are to transmit the data to the Commission (Eurostat). In order to ensure

administrative data comparability across the EU, Member States are required to collect

administrative data on the basis of common disaggregations developed in cooperation with

the EU Centre and are to transmit these data to the EU Centre on a yearly basis. The EU

Centre would support Member States in the data gathering for offences under Articles 3 to 9,

including by establishing common standards on counting units, counting rules, common

disaggregations, reporting formats, and on the classification of criminal offences. The

statistics gathered by Member States are to be transmitted to the EU Centre and the

Commission, and the collected statistics are to be made available to the public on an annual

basis. Lastly, Member States are required to support research on root causes, effects,

incidences, effective prevention measures, effective victim assistance measures, and

conviction rates for the forms of offences covered by the proposal.

EN 10 EN

• Explanatory documents (for directives)

Given that the proposal contains a larger number of legal obligations compared with the

existing Directive, it will be necessary that explanatory documents, including a correlation

table between national provisions and the Directive, accompany the notification of

transposition measures. This is to ensure that the transposition measures that Member States

have added to existing legislation are clearly identifiable.

The measures adopted to transpose this proposal are unlikely to be limited to one single legal

text. For this reason, it is necessary that Member States provide an explanatory document

communicating to the Commission the text of the provisions adopted in transposing this

Directive. It should also show how such provisions interact with the provisions that had

already been adopted to transpose Directive 2011/93/EU and with provisions covered by other

relevant EU policies.

The Commission is preparing guidelines for implementing the prevention and victim

assistance obligations and these will be made available to Member States in due time. To

support EU Member States and other countries more broadly to put in place effective

prevention initiatives for persons who fear that they might offend against children, the

European Commission’s Joint Research Centre has recently published the report ‘Help Seeker

and Perpetrator Prevention Initiatives – Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation’6. This work

provides the basis for steps towards developing an EU IT platform compiling child sexual

abuse prevention initiatives, which will support EU Member States and other stakeholders in

designing and in implementing tailor-made prevention policies according to their respective

cultural and societal environments and needs.

• Detailed explanation of the specific provisions of the proposal

Throughout the Directive, the terminology used has been brought into line with recognised

international standards such as the Terminology Guidelines for the Protection of Children

from Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse adopted by the Interagency Working Group in

Luxembourg on 28 January 20167.

The following changes are being proposed:

Article 2: Accessing child sexual abuse material is often the first step towards hands-on

abuse, regardless of whether it depicts real or realistic abuse and exploitation8. The

development of augmented, extended and virtual reality settings and the possibility of

misusing artificial intelligence to create “deepfakes”, i.e. synthetically created lifelike child

sexual abuse material, has already stretched the definition of “image”, as such materials may

make use of avatars including sensory feedback, e.g. through devices providing a perception

of touch. The amendments to Article 2(3)(d) are meant to ensure that the definition of child

sexual abuse material covers these technological developments in a sufficiently technology-

neutral and hence future-proof way. In addition, there are manuals in circulation that provide

advice on how to find, groom and abuse children; on how to avoid being identified,

investigated and prosecuted; and on how best to hide materials. By lowering barriers and

6 Help seeker and Perpetrator Prevention Initiatives - Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation, ISBN 978-

92-76-60601-7, doi:10.2760/600662, JRC131323, 2023 7 Terminology Guidelines for the Protection of Children from Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse,

2016 8 Protect Children, CSAM Users in the Dark Web: Protecting Children Through Prevention, 2021.

EN 11 EN

providing the necessary know-how, these manuals, known as “paedophile handbooks”,

contribute to inciting offenders and support the commission of sexual abuse, and should

therefore also be criminalised. Article 2 also includes a definition of peers, as persons,

including both children and adults, who are close in age and degree of psychological and

physical development or maturity.

Article 3: the amendments to Article 3 are intended to ensure consistency between the level of

penalties provided for by the proposal and that provided for in relation to analogous offences,

in the Directive (EU) …/… [proposed Directive on combating violence against women and

domestic violence]. This includes an amendment to cover also the act of causing a child who

has not reached the age of sexual consent to engage in sexual activities with another person in

situations outside the context of coercing, forcing or threatening.

Article 4: The level of penalties for engaging in sexual activities with a child where recourse

is made to child prostitution (Article 4(7)) is increased to 8 years when relating to a child

below the age of sexual consent, and 4 years where the child is above the age of sexual

consent. This increase is necessary to ensure consistency with recent acquis, including the

Directive (EU) …/… [proposed Directive on combating violence against women and

domestic violence].

Article 5: There is a public interest in supporting the work of organisations acting in the

public interest against child sexual abuse, such as the INHOPE hotlines, that receive reports

from the public on child sexual abuse materials and facilitate removal of such materials and

the investigation of the offence. Where these organisations, acting in the public interest,

review and analyse or otherwise process material constituting child sexual abuse images or

videos for the purposes of removal or investigation, such processing should not be

criminalised. Therefore, it is necessary to limit the definition of the corresponding offences

accordingly, by clarifying that such processing is not considered to be “without right” when

these organisations have been authorised by competent authorities of the Member State in

which they are established.

Article 6: the changes to Article 6 ensure that all forms of online solicitation, including

solicitation aimed at committing child sexual abuse and exploitation offences in an online

context, are criminalised in all Member States.

Article 7: the new Article 7 is intended to ensure that all Member States criminalise, and

provide for an effective investigation and prosecution of the offence of live-streaming child

sexual abuse. This has seen a considerable increase in recent years and has raised specific

investigative challenges, linked to the impermanence of the streamed abuse and the

consequent lack of evidence available to investigative bodies.

Article 8: the new Article 8, by criminalising the conduct of running an online infrastructure

for the purpose of enabling or encouraging child sexual abuse or exploitation, is intended to

tackle the role played by the dark web in the creation of communities of offenders or potential

offenders and in the dissemination of child sexual abuse material.

Article 10: the amendments to Article 10 are intended to clarify current ambiguities in the

Directive’s text, including by ensuring that the exemption from criminalisation for consensual

sexual activities is correctly understood as applying only to material produced and possessed

between children or between peers, rather than between a child over the age of sexual consent

and an adult of any age.

EN 12 EN

Article 12: the amendments to Article 12 are intended to tackle the risks that offenders might

regain access to children through employment or voluntary activities. They put in place a

requirement for employers recruiting for professional and voluntary activities involving close

contact with children and recruiting for organisations acting in the public interest against child

sexual abuse, to request the criminal records of persons to be recruited. It also obliges

Member States to provide criminal records as complete as possible in response to such

requests, using the European Criminal Record Information System whenever relevant and any

other appropriate source of information.

Article 14: this article governing sanctions that can be imposed on legal persons was modified

to align it with recent acquis, by expanding the list of examples of possible sanctions to

include an explicit reference to exclusion from access to public funding and by including a

harmonised methodology for the calculation of minimum fines. Specifically, Member States

should take the necessary measures to ensure that legal persons that benefit from the

commission by others of offences in violation of Union restrictive measures are punishable by

fines, the maximum limit of which should be set in correlation with the severity of the offence

as defined by its minimum level of maximum penalty, to be no less than 1, respectively 5, per

cent of the total worldwide turnover of the legal person in the business year preceding the

fining decision. The liability of legal persons does not exclude the possibility of criminal

proceedings against natural persons who are the perpetrators of criminal offences specified in

this Directive.

Article 15: the amendments introduced complete and clarify the situations in which Member

States are entitled not to prosecute or impose penalties on child victims of sexual abuse and

sexual exploitation for their involvement in criminal activities, which they have been

compelled to commit, covering also the distribution, offering, supplying or making available

child sexual abuse material. The corresponding recital has been amended to clarify that the

term “compelled” should also be understood as also covering luring, without force or

coercion.

Article 16: the amendments to Article 16(2) are meant to ensure that statutes of limitations

cannot start running before the victim has reached the age of majority and to set minimum

statutes of limitations to effectively allow the victim to seek justice. The amendments impose

the following minimum standards in relation to the length of statutes of limitations:

– For offences punishable under this Directive with a maximum penalty of at least

3 years, the limitation period is to be of at least 20 years. Starting from the age of

majority, this means that the statute of limitations does not expire until the victim is

at least 38 years old.

– For offences punishable under this Directive with a maximum penalty of at least

5 years, the limitation period is to be of at least 25 years. Starting from the age of

majority, this means that the statute of limitations does not expire until the victim is

at least 43 years old.

– For offences punishable under this Directive with a maximum penalty of at least

8 years the limitation period is to be of at least 30 years. Starting from the age of

majority, this means that the statute of limitations does not expire until the victim is

at least 48 years old.

The rationale behind the proposed approach to statutes of limitations is as follows:

EN 13 EN

– Research has shown that victims of child sexual abuse and exploitation are often

unable to report the crime for several decades after the abuse took place. The need to

overcome the shame, guilt and self-blame, which can be related, among others, to the

social and cultural stigma that still surround sexual abuse, the secrecy in which the

abuse takes place, threatening or blaming conduct by the perpetrator, and/or trauma,

results in most victims being unable to speak about, let alone report, the crime to an

authority for decades9.

– A current study shows that, on average, it takes between 17.2 and 21.4 years before

survivors of child sexual abuse tell someone about their experiences. Around 60-70%

of survivors do not disclose anything until they are adults, and 27.8% of survivors do

not tell anyone10. Age and gender are strong predictors for delaying disclosure or

withholding disclosure, with trends showing fewer disclosures by younger children

and boys11.

– Currently, the statutes of limitations differ widely among Member States. Some of

them have abolished criminal statutes of limitations entirely for all or most of the

offences covered by the Directive. Some others have very short statutes of

limitations, which expire before the victim reaches the age of 40 for all or most of the

offences covered by the Directive. Yet another group of Member States maintains

statutes of limitations that expire after the victim has reached the age of 40 for all or

most of the offences covered by the Directive.

– These differences among Member States lead to unequal access to justice for victims

throughout the EU, in relation to the possibility of seeing the relevant offences

prosecuted, and of obtaining compensation. In addition, perpetrators might take

advantage of the system and escape prosecution by relocating to somewhere where

statutes of limitations are shorter and have, therefore, expired. This situation creates

the risk that potential offenders are able to escape prosecution and continue posing a

danger to children for several decades.

– In light of the above, it seems clear that effective investigation and prosecution of

child sexual abuse and exploitation crimes, and appropriate victim assistance and

support, can only be provided if statutes of limitations allow victims to report the

crime, without being barred from seeing an investigation launched, until sufficiently

late in life.

The amendments to Articles 16(3) to (5) are intended to address investigative challenges, in

particular, linked to the use of online technologies, that have emerged in the context of the

Directive’s evaluation and related stakeholder consultations. They require Member States to

ensure that persons, units or services investigating and prosecuting the offences referred to in

Articles 3 to 9 have sufficient staff, expertise and effective investigative tools, including the

possibility to conduct undercover investigations on the dark web.

9 See for example: McElvaney et al., Child sexual abuse disclosures: Does age make a difference?, Child

Abuse & Neglect, 2020, Vol. 99 (2020), p. 6; Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses

to Child Sexual Abuse, Final Report Volume 4 - Identifying and disclosing child sexual abuse, 2017,

p. 77. 10 J.E. Halvorsen, E. Tvedt Solberg & S. Hjelen Stige, ‘‘To say it out loud is to kill your own childhood.’

– An exploration of the first person perspective of barriers to disclosing child sexual abuse, Children

and Youth Services Review Vol. 113 (2020), p. 2. 11 R. Alaggia, D. Collin-Vézin & R. Lateef, Facilitators and Barriers to Child Sexual Abuse (CSA)

Disclosures: A Research Update (2000--2016), Trauma, Violence & Abuse 2019, Vol. 2 (2020), p 276.

EN 14 EN

Article 17: underreporting of child sexual abuse still constitutes a major challenge in the

efforts to stop child sexual abuse and prevent further sexual abuse from taking place, inter alia

because educators and health care providers, as well as other professionals working in close

contact with children, may hesitate to allege that anyone – potentially a colleague or a peer –

has committed child sexual abuse. Article 17(3) was amended to institute a reporting

obligation, in order to provide legal certainty to such professionals, while Article 17(4)

ensures that professionals in the health care sector working with offenders or people who fear

that they might offend are excluded from such reporting obligation.

Article 18: this article builds on the rights of victims under Articles 5 and 5a of Directive

(EU) 2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of

victims (Victims Rights Directive) [as amended by the proposed Directive amending

Directive 2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection

of victims] when it comes to reporting of offences, to ensure that easily accessible and child-

friendly reporting channels are available.

Article 21: this article expands the availability of assistance and support to victims in line

with the Victims Rights Directive [as amended by the proposed Directive amending Directive

2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims]

to ensure that children receive the necessary and age-appropriate care. In order to support the

development and expansion of best practices across Member States, the EU Centre, once

established, would support Member States’ efforts by gathering information on available

measures and programmes and making such information widely available.

Article 22: this article is amended to ensure that medical examinations of a child victim for

the purposes of the criminal proceeding, which can retraumatise a child, are limited to the

strictly necessary and performed by appropriately trained professionals.

Article 23: this new article strengthens the position of victims and survivors of child sexual

abuse by reinforcing their right to claim compensation for any damage suffered in connection

with child sexual abuse and exploitation offences, including damages caused by the online

dissemination of material concerning the abuse. It strengthens the EU minimum standards in

relation to both the timeframe to request compensation and the elements to be taken into

account when determining the compensation amount. It also broadens, in relation to the EU

minimum standards under the Victims’ Rights Directive, the number of people and entities

that must be considered responsible for granting such compensation, including legal persons

and, where appropriate, from national compensation schemes established for the benefits of

victims of crime.

Article 24: this new article addresses the challenges linked to the lack of coordination of

national efforts to prevent and fight child sexual abuse and exploitation, by requiring Member

States to establish national authorities in charge of such coordination, and of data collection in

each Member State.

Article 25: this new article obliges Member States to put in place the necessary mechanisms

to ensure a multi-agency and multistakeholder cooperation and coordination at national level

mong all the relevant parties involved in the development and implementation of measures to

prevent and combat child sexual abuse, both online and offline.

Article 26: the title of this article and the recitals accompanying this article have been updated

to use the terminology recommended in the Terminology Guidelines for the Protection of

EN 15 EN

Children from Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse12 in relation to the previously used term

“child sex tourism”.

Article 27: the amendments made in the first paragraph clarify that the prevention

programmes for persons who fear that they might offend should be dedicated to that group of

persons and that Member States should provide access to them. A new paragraph 2 aims to

ensure the accessibility of these programmes and in particular that is in line with national

standards concerning healthcare.

Article 28: the amendments made aim to further clarify the types of prevention programmes

that could be considered to reduce the likelihood that a child becomes a victim (paragraph 1)

and that a person offends (paragraph 2). Additional examples have been added to the

corresponding recitals. The article requires Member States to promote regular training not

only for front-line police officers likely to come into contact with child victims of sexual

abuse or exploitation, but also for judges and other relevant professionals, to ensure child-

friendly justice. It obliges Member States to work on prevention of both online and offline

child sexual abuse and requires them to adopt specific prevention programmes dedicated to

children in community settings, given their particular vulnerability. Finally, the amendments

attribute a crucial coordination and knowledge hub role in this respect to the future EU

Centre.

Article 31: this new article obliges Member States to collect periodically statistics on the

offences included in the Directive following a common methodology developed in

cooperation with the EU Centre, share those statistics with the EU Centre and the

Commission and make them publicly available. The EU Centre in turn should compile all

statistics received and make the compilation publicly available.

Article 32: this new article on reporting replaces the previous one and sets out reporting

requirements for the Commission every 5 years to the European Parliament and to the Council

of the EU on the application of the Directive.

Article 33: the amendments in this article clarify the provisions that need to be transposed by

Member States, i.e. those that have been amended by comparison with Directive 2011/93.

Article 34: this new article repeals Directive 2011/93/EU and clarifies the transposition

obligations of the proposed Directive versus Directive 2011/93/EU.

Article 35: this new article sets out the dates of entry into force of the Directive. It also sets

out the date of entry into application for the majority of the Directive, and the date of entry

into application of the provisions that refer to the EU Centre, which depend on the date of

establishment of the EU Centre currently being discussed in the inter-institutional

negotiations of the proposal for a Regulation laying down rules to prevent and combat child

sexual abuse.

Article 36: the amendment in this article is limited to leave open the place and date of

adoption, to be specified at a later stage.

12 Terminology Guidelines for the Protection of Children from Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse,

adopted by the Interagency Working Group in Luxembourg, 28 January 2016.

EN 16 EN

 new

2024/0035 (COD)

 2011/93/EU

Proposal for a

DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual

abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular

Article 82(2) and Article 83(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee,

Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions,

Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure,

Whereas:

 new

(1) A number of amendments are to be made to Directive 2011/93/EU of the European

Parliament and of the Council13. In the interests of clarity, that Directive should be

recast.

 2011/93/EU recital 1 (adapted)

(2) Sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children, including child

pornography  sexual abuse material , constitute serious violations of

fundamental rights, in particular of the rights of children to the protection and care

necessary for their well-being, as provided for by the 1989 United Nations Convention

13 Directive 2011/93/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on

combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, and replacing

Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (OJ L 335, 17.12.2011, p. 1,

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/93/oj1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/93/oj).

EN 17 EN

on the Rights of the Child and by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European

Union14.

 2011/93/EU recital 2 (adapted)

 new

(3) In accordance with Article 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the Union

recognises the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental

Rights of the European Union, in which Article 24(2) provides that in all actions

relating to children, whether taken by public authorities or private institutions, the

child’s best interests must be a primary consideration. Moreover, the Stockholm

Programme — An Open and Secure Europe Serving and Protecting Citizens (4)  EU

Strategy for a more effective fight against child sexual abuse15  gives a clear

priority to  stepping up the fight against  combating the sexual abuse and sexual

exploitation of children and child pornography  sexual abuse material, including

through actions aimed at ensuring the continued effectiveness of existing Union

legislation, if needed through its updating. This is also supported by the EU Strategy

on the rights of the child in its objective to fight violence against children and ensure

child-friendly justice  .

 2011/93/EU recital 3 (adapted)

(4) Child pornography  sexual abuse material  and other particularly serious forms

of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children are increasing and spreading

through the use of new technologies and the Internet.

 2011/93/EU recital 4 (adapted)

 new

(5) Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA of 22 December 2003 on combating the

sexual exploitation of children and child pornography (5) approximates Member

States’ legislation to criminalise the most serious forms of child sexual abuse and

sexual exploitation, to extend domestic jurisdiction, and to provide for a minimum

level of assistance for victims. Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA of 15

March 2001 on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings establishes a set of

victims’ rights in criminal proceedings, including the right to protection and

compensation.  Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the

Council16 establishes a set of victims’ rights for all victims of all crime, including for

child victims of sexual abuse. These rights include the right to information, the rights

to support and protection in accordance with victims’ individual needs, a set of

14 OJ C 364, 18.12.2000, p. 1. 15 COM (2020) 607 of 24 July 2020. 16 Directive 2012/29 EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012, establishing

minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime (OJ L 315, 14.11.2012, p.

57).

EN 18 EN

procedural rights and a right to a decision on compensation from the offender. The

proposal for the revision of the Victims’ Rights Directive further strengthens the rights

of victims of crime in the EU, including strengthening of the right to support and

protection for child victims of crime17. This Directive builds on and is applicable in

addition to the Victims’ Rights Directive. Moreover, the coordination of prosecution

of cases of sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of children and child

pornography  sexual abuse material  will be  is  facilitated by the

implementation of Council Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA of 30 November 2009

on prevention and settlement of conflicts of exercise of jurisdiction in criminal

proceedings18.  Where prosecution of such cases falls within jurisdiction of more

than one Member State, the Member States concerned should cooperate to determine

which Member State is best placed to prosecute. Where the competent authorities of

the Member States concerned decide, following cooperation or direct consultations

under Council Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA19, to centralise criminal

proceedings in a single Member State through the transfer of criminal proceedings, the

Regulation (EU) …/… [proposed Regulation on the transfer of proceedings in

criminal matters]20 should be used for such a transfer. 

 2011/93/EU recital 5

(6) In accordance with Article 34 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the

Child, States Parties undertake to protect the child from all forms of sexual

exploitation and sexual abuse. The 2000 United Nations Optional Protocol to the

Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and

child pornography and, in particular, the 2007 Council of Europe Convention on the

Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse are crucial steps

in the process of enhancing international cooperation in this field.

 2011/93/EU recital 6 (adapted)

 new

(7) Serious criminal offences such as the sexual exploitation of children and

pornography  sexual abuse material  require a comprehensive approach covering

the prosecution of offenders, the protection of child victims, and prevention of the

phenomenon  , including its recent and foreseeable evolutions and trends,

increasingly involving the use of online technologies. For that purpose, the current

legal framework needs to be updated, in order to ensure it remains effective . The

child’s best interests must be a primary consideration when carrying out any measures

to combat these offences in accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the

17 COM(2023) 424 final of 12 July 2023. 18 Council Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA of 30 November 2009 on prevention and settlement of

conflicts of exercise of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings (OJ L 328, 15.12.2009, p. 42,

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_framw/2009/948/oj. 19 Council Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA of 30 November 2009 on prevention and settlement of conflicts

of exercise of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings (OJ L 328, 15.12.2009, p.

42, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_framw/2009/948/oj. 20 COM(2023) 185 final.

EN 19 EN

European Union and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA should be replaced by a new instrument providing

such comprehensive legal framework to achieve that purpose.

 2011/93/EU recital 7 (adapted)

(8) This Directive should be fully complementary with Directive 2011/36/EU of the

European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating

trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council

Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA21, as some victims of human trafficking have also

been child victims of sexual abuse or sexual exploitation.

 2011/93/EU recital 8 (adapted)

(9) In the context of criminalising acts related to pornographic  child sexual abuse 

performance, this Directive refers to such acts which consist of an organised live

exhibition, aimed at an audience, thereby excluding personal face-to-face

communication between consenting peers, as well as children over the age of sexual

consent and their partners from the definition.

 2011/93/EU recital 9 (adapted)

 new

(10) Child pornography  sexual abuse material  frequently includes images recording

the sexual abuse of children by adults. It may also include images of children involved

in sexually explicit conduct, or of their sexual organs, where such images are produced

or used for primarily sexual purposes and exploited with or without the child’s

knowledge. Furthermore, the concept of child pornography  sexual abuse

material  also covers realistic images of a child, where a child is engaged or

depicted as being engaged in sexually explicit conduct for primarily sexual purposes

 , as well as so-called ‘paedophile manuals’  .

 new

(11) Research has shown that limiting the dissemination of child sexual abuse material is

not only crucial to avoid the re-victimisation linked to the circulation of images and

videos of the abuse but is also essential as a form of offender-side prevention, as

accessing child sexual abuse material is often the first step towards hands-on abuse,

regardless of whether it depicts real or simply realistic abuse and exploitation. The

ongoing development of artificial intelligence applications capable of creating realistic

images that are indistinguishable from real images, the number of so-called ‘deep-

21 Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and

combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework

Decision 2002/629/JHA ( OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/36/oj ))

EN 20 EN

fake’ images and videos depicting child sexual abuse is expected to grow

exponentially in the coming years. In addition, the development of augmented,

extended and virtual reality settings making use of avatars including sensory feedback,

e.g. through devices providing a perception of touch are not fully covered by the

existing definition. The inclusion of an explicit reference to ‘reproductions and

representations’ should ensure that the definition of child sexual abuse material covers

these and future technological developments in a sufficiently technology-neutral and

hence future-proof way.

(12) To prevent offences involving the sexual abuse of children, the definition of child

sexual abuse material should include so-called ‘paedophile manuals’. Paedophile

manuals provide advice on how to find, groom and abuse children and avoid being

identified and prosecuted. By lowering barriers and providing the necessary know-

how, they contribute to inciting offenders and support the commission of sexual abuse.

Their online dissemination has already led certain Member States to amend their

criminal law and explicitly criminalise possession and distribution of such manuals.

The lack of harmonisation creates an uneven level of protection across the EU.

 2011/93/EU recital 10

(13) Disability, by itself, does not automatically constitute an impossibility to consent to

sexual relations. However, the abuse of the existence of such a disability in order to

engage in sexual activities with a child should be criminalised.

 2011/93/EU recital 11

(adapted)

(14) In adopting legislation on substantive criminal law, the Union should ensure

consistency of such legislation in particular with regard to the level of penalties. The

Council conclusions of 24 and 25 April 2002 on the approach to apply regarding

approximation of penalties, which indicate four levels of penalties, should be kept in

mind in the light of the Lisbon Treaty. This Directive, because it contains an

exceptionally high number of different offences, requires, in order to reflect the

various degrees of seriousness, a differentiation in the level of penalties which goes

further than what should usually be provided in Union legal instruments.

 2011/93/EU recital 12

(adapted)

 new

(15) Serious forms of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children should be subject to

effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties. This includes, in particular, various

forms of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children which are facilitated by the

use of information and communication technology, such as the online solicitation of

children for sexual purposes via social networking websites and chat rooms. The

definition of child pornography  sexual abuse material  should also be clarified

and brought closer to that contained in international instruments.  More broadly, the

EN 21 EN

terminology used in this Directive should be brought into line with recognised

international standards such as the Terminology Guidelines for the Protection of

Children from Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse adopted by the Interagency

Working Group in Luxembourg on 28 January 2016. 

 2011/93/EU recital 13

(16) The maximum term of imprisonment provided for in this Directive for the offences

referred to therein should apply at least to the most serious forms of such offences.

 2011/93/EU recital 14

(adapted)

(17) In order to reach the maximum term of imprisonment provided for in this Directive for

offences concerning sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child

pornography  sexual abuse material , Member States may combine, taking into

account their national law, the imprisonment terms provided for in national legislation

in respect of those offences.

 2011/93/EU recital 15

(adapted)

 new

(18) This Directive  should  obliges Member States to provide for criminal penalties in

their national legislation in respect of the provisions of Union law on combating

sexual abuse  and , sexual exploitation of children and child

pornography  sexual abuse material . This Directive  should not  creates

no  any  obligations regarding the application of such penalties, or any other

available system of law enforcement, in individual cases.

 2011/93/EU recital 16

(19) Especially for those cases where the offences referred to in this Directive are

committed with the purpose of financial gain, Member States are invited to consider

providing for the possibility to impose financial penalties in addition to imprisonment.

 2011/93/EU recital 17

(adapted)

 new

(20) In the context of child pornography  sexual abuse material , the term  not be

considered to be committed ‘without right’ allows Member States to provide a

defence in respect of conduct relating to pornographic material  that could constitute

child sexual abuse material  having, for example, a medical, scientific or similar

EN 22 EN

purpose. It also allows activities carried out under domestic legal powers, such as the

legitimate possession of child pornography  sexual abuse material  by the

authorities in order to conduct criminal proceedings or to prevent, detect or investigate

crime  , or activities carried out by organisations acting in the public interest against

child sexual abuse, when these organisations have been authorised by the competent

authorities of the Member State in which they are established. These activities include,

in particular, the reception, analysis and creation of reports of suspected child sexual

abuse material, including the determination of the location where the material referred

to in the reports is hosted, submitted to them by online users or other organisations

acting in the public interest against child sexual abuse, as well as carrying out searches

to detect the dissemination of child sexual abuse material  . Furthermore, it  the

term ‘without right’ does not exclude legal defences or similar relevant principles

that relieve a person of responsibility under specific circumstances, for example where

telephone or Internet hotlines carry out activities to report those cases. .

 2011/93/EU recital 18

(adapted)

(21) Knowingly obtaining access, by means of information and communication technology,

to child pornography  sexual abuse material  should be criminalised. To be

liable, the person should both intend to enter  an online location  a site where

child pornography  sexual abuse material  is available and know that

such  material  images can be found there. Penalties should not be applied to

persons inadvertently accessing sites  online locations  containing child

pornography  sexual abuse material . The intentional nature of the offence may

notably be deduced from the fact that it is recurrent or that the offence was committed

via a service in return for payment.

 2011/93/EU recital 19

 new

(22) Solicitation of children for sexual purposes is a threat with specific characteristics in

the context of the Internet, as the latter provides unprecedented anonymity to users

because they are able to conceal their real identity and personal characteristics, such as

their age.  In the last decade, the use of information and communication

technologies has provided offenders with increasingly easy access to children, where

the contact often starts with the offender luring the child, for example by pretending to

be a peer or with other deceitful or flattering conduct, into compromising situations.

This increased access to children has led to the rapid growth of phenomena such as

‘sextortion’ (i.e. the conduct of threatening to share intimate material depicting the

victim to obtain money, child sexual abuse material or any other benefit), affecting

children both below and above the age of sexual consent. There has been a surge in

recent years of financially motivated sextortion by organised crime groups that target

in particular teenage boys, which have led to multiple cases of those children taking

their lives. It is therefore essential that all these phenomena are appropriately covered

in Member States’s law.  At the same time, Member States acknowledge the

importance of also combating the solicitation of a child outside the context of the

Internet, in particular where such solicitation is not carried out by using information

EN 23 EN

and communication technology. Member States are encouraged to criminalise the

conduct where the solicitation of a child to meet the offender for sexual purposes takes

place in the presence or proximity of the child, for instance in the form of a particular

preparatory offence, attempt to commit the offences referred to in this Directive or as a

particular form of sexual abuse. Whichever legal solution is chosen to criminalise ‘off-

line grooming’, Member States should ensure that they prosecute the perpetrators of

such offences.

 new

(23) In light of recent technological developments and, in particular, of the development of

augmented, extended and virtual reality settings, the criminalisation of the solicitation

of children should not be limited to voice, text or mail conversations, but also include

contacts or exchanges in augmented, extended or virtual reality settings, as well as

large-scale solicitation of children through the use of chat-bots trained for that

purpose, as this phenomenon is itself expected to increase in light of the foreseeable

evolution of artificial intelligence applications. Therefore “by means of information

and communication technology” should be understood in a sufficiently broad way to

cover all those technological developments.

 2011/93/EU recital 20

(adapted)

 new

(24) This Directive does not govern Member States’ policies with regard to consensual

sexual activities in which children may be involved and which can be regarded as the

normal discovery of sexuality in the course of human development, taking account of

the different cultural and legal traditions and of new forms of establishing and

maintaining relations among children and adolescents, including through information

and communication technologies. These issues fall outside of the scope of this

Directive. Member States which avail themselves of the possibilities referred to in this

Directive do so in the exercise of their competences.  More particularly, Member

States should be able to exempt from criminalisation consensual sexual activities

involving exclusively children above the age of sexual consent, as well as consensual

sexual activities involving peers. The amendments to that Article are intended to

clarify the scope of the derogation, in light of the fact that some Member States appear

to have interpreted its original wording too broadly (e.g. by exempting from

criminalisation consensual activities between minors above the age of consent and

adults of any age, considered to be ‘peers’ despite a significant age difference). 

 2011/93/EU recital 21

(25) Member States should provide for aggravating circumstances in their national law in

accordance with the applicable rules established by their legal systems on aggravating

circumstances. They should ensure that those aggravating circumstances are available

for judges to consider when sentencing offenders, although there is no obligation on

judges to apply those aggravating circumstances. The aggravating circumstances

EN 24 EN

should not be provided for in Member States’ law when irrelevant taking into account

the nature of the specific offence. The relevance of the various aggravating

circumstances provided for in this Directive should be evaluated at national level for

each of the offences referred to in this Directive.

 2011/93/EU recital 22

(26) Physical or mental incapacity under this Directive should be understood as also

including the state of physical or mental incapacity caused by the influence of drugs

and alcohol.

 2011/93/EU recital 23

(adapted)

 new

(27) In combating sexual exploitation of children, full use should be made of existing

instruments on the seizure and confiscation of the proceeds of crime, such as the

United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime22 and the

Protocols thereto, the 1990 Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search,

Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime, Council Framework Decision

2001/500/JHA of 26 June 2001 on money laundering, the identification, tracing,

freezing, seizing and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds of crime23, and

Council Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 2005 on Confiscation of

Crime Related Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property24  , and Directive […/…/…]

of the European Parliament and of the Council25 . The use of seized and confiscated

instrumentalities and the proceeds from the offences referred to in this Directive to

support victims’ assistance and protection should be encouraged.

 2011/93/EU recital 24

(adapted)

 new

(28) Secondary victimisation should be avoided for victims of offences referred to in this

Directive.  For example, and without affecting the safeguards provided for in

Directive (EU) 2016/800 of the European Parliament and of the Council26, in  . In

22 OJ L 261, 6.8.2004, p. 70 23 Council Framework Decision 2001/500/JHA of 26 June 2001 on money laundering, the identification,

tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds of crime (OJ L 182,

5.7.2001, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_framw/2001/500/oj 24 Council Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 2005 on Confiscation of Crime Related

Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property (OJ L 68, 15.3.2005, p. 49,

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_framw/2005/212/oj). 25 COM(2022) 245 of 25.5.2022. 26 Directive (EU) 2016/800 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on procedural

safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings (OJ L 132,

21.5.2016, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/800/oj.

EN 25 EN

Member States where prostitution or the appearance in pornography is punishable

under national criminal law, it should be possible not to prosecute or impose penalties

under those laws where the child concerned has committed those acts as a result of

being victim of sexual exploitation or where the child was compelled to participate in

child pornography  sexual abuse material. The term “compelled” should be

understood in this case as covering also situations where the child has been lured to

act, without having been forced or coerced, in addition to situations where the child

was forced or coerced to act. 

 2011/93/EU recital 25

(29) As an instrument of approximation of criminal law, this Directive provides for levels

of penalties which should apply without prejudice to the specific criminal policies of

the Member States concerning child offenders.

 2011/93/EU recital 26

(30) Investigating offences and bringing charges in criminal proceedings should be

facilitated, to take into account the difficulty for child victims of denouncing sexual

abuse and the anonymity of offenders in cyberspace. To ensure successful

investigations and prosecutions of the offences referred to in this Directive, their

initiation should not depend, in principle, on a report or accusation made by the victim

or by his or her representative. The length of the sufficient period of time for

prosecution should be determined in accordance with national law.

 new

(31) Victims of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children are often unable to report

the crime for several decades after its commission due to the shame, guilt and self-

blame, which can be related, among others, to the social and cultural stigma that still

surround sexual abuse, the secrecy in which the abuse takes place, threatening or

blaming conduct by the perpetrator, and/or trauma. Perpetrators of sexual abuse and

sexual exploitation of children, unlike perpetrators of other violent crimes, tend to

remain active until old age, continuing to pose a threat to children. In light of this,

effective investigation and prosecution of offences involving sexual abuse and sexual

exploitation of children, as well as appropriate victims’ assistance and support, can

only be provided if statutes of limitations allow victims to report the crime for a

significantly extended period of time.

 2011/93/EU recital 27

(adapted)

 new

(32) Effective investigatory tools should be made available to those responsible for the

investigation and prosecutions of the offences referred to in this Directive. Those tools

could include interception of communications, covert surveillance including electronic

EN 26 EN

surveillance, monitoring of bank accounts or other financial investigations, taking into

account, inter alia, the principle of proportionality and the nature and seriousness of

the offences under investigation. Where appropriate, and in  In  accordance with

national law, such tools should also include the possibility for law enforcement

authorities to use a concealed identity on the Internet  and to distribute, under

judicial supervision, child sexual abuse material. Requiring Member States to enable

the use of these investigative techniques is essential to ensure the effective

investigation and prosecution of offences involving sexual abuse and sexual

exploitation of children. As those are, in most cases, facilitated or enabled by online

tools and are therefore intrinsically cross-border, undercover operations and the use of

so-called ‘honeypots’ have proven to be particularly effective investigative tools in

relation to child sexual abuse and child sexual exploitation offences. To ensure

effective investigation and prosecution, Member States’ competent authorities should

also cooperate through and with Europol and Eurojust, within their respective

competences and in accordance with the applicable legal framework. These competent

authorities should also share information among each other and with the Commission

on issues encountered in investigations and prosecutions. 

 new

(33) Some forms of online child sexual abuse, such as the live streaming of abuse of

children, often committed physically by persons present in third countries at the

request of paying perpetrators in the EU, create particular investigative challenges, as

the streamed abuse does not usually leave images or recorded traces behind.

Cooperation with financial services defined in Article 2, point (b), of Directive

2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council27 and other relevant

service providers can be crucial to overcome challenges in investigating and

prosecuting such offences. Hence, to ensure effective investigation and prosecution,

Member States should consider providing frameworks for close cooperation between

financial services and other relevant service providers such as providers of live

streaming services. This would reduce impunity and ensure that all of the offences

covered by this Directive can be investigated effectively, using targeted and

appropriate tools and resources.

 2011/93/EU recital 28

 new

(34) Member States should encourage any person who has knowledge or suspicion of the

sexual abuse or sexual exploitation of a child to report to the competent services.  In

particular, Member States should make available information to children about the

possibility to report the abuse, including to helplines.  It is the responsibility of each

Member State to determine the competent authorities to which such suspicions may be

27 Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning

the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive 90/619/EEC and

Directives 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC (OJ L 271, 9.10.2002, p. 16,

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2002/65/oj).

EN 27 EN

reported. Those competent authorities should not be limited to child protection

services or relevant social services. The requirement of suspicion ‘in good faith’

should be aimed at preventing the provision being invoked to authorise the

denunciation of purely imaginary or untrue facts carried out with malicious intent.

 2011/93/EU recital 29

(adapted)

(35) Rules on jurisdiction should be amended to ensure that sexual abusers or sexual

exploiters of children from the Union face prosecution even if they commit their

crimes outside the Union, in particular via so-called sex tourism.  The sexual

exploitation of children in travel and tourism Child sex tourism should be

understood as the sexual exploitation of children by a person or persons who travel

from their usual environment to a destination abroad where they have sexual contact

with children. Where child sex tourism the sexual exploitation of children in travel

and tourism takes place outside the Union, Member States are encouraged to seek

to increase, through the available national and international instruments including

bilateral or multilateral treaties on extradition, mutual assistance or a transfer of the

proceedings, cooperation with third countries and international organisations with a

view to combating sex tourism. Member States should foster open dialogue and

communication with countries outside the Union in order to be able to prosecute

perpetrators, under the relevant national legislation, who travel outside the Union

borders for the purposes of  the sexual exploitation of children in travel and

tourism child sex tourism.

 2011/93/EU recital 30

 new

(36) Measures to protect child victims in a comprehensive manner should be adopted in

their best interest, taking into account an assessment of their needs. Effective child

protection requires a whole of society approach. With the child at the centre, all

relevant authorities and services should work together to protect and support the child,

in their best interests.  The “Barnahus” model of providing a child-friendly

environment staffed with specialists from all relevant disciplines is currently the most

advanced example of a child-friendly approach to justice and to avoiding

revictimisation. The relevant provisions of this Directive are built on the principles of

that model. That model aims to ensure that all children involved in child abuse or child

sexual exploitation investigations benefit from a high-quality assessment in child-

friendly settings, appropriate psychosocial support and child protective services. This

Directive attempts to ensure that all Member States uphold these principles, although

it does not require the Member States to follow the Barnahus model as such. Where

medical examinations of the child are necessary for the purposes of the criminal

investigations, for example to gather evidence of abuse, these should be limited to the

strictly necessary in order to limit retraumatisation. This obligation should not prevent

other medical examinations necessary for the well-being of the child.  Child victims

should have easy access to  child friendly justice, legal remedies and measures to

address conflicts of interest where sexual abuse or sexual exploitation of a child occurs

within the family. When a special representative should be appointed for a child

EN 28 EN

during a criminal investigation or proceeding, this role may be also carried out by a

legal person, an institution or an authority. Moreover, child victims should be

protected from penalties, for example under national legislation on prostitution, if they

bring their case to the attention of competent authorities. Furthermore, participation in

criminal proceedings by child victims should not cause additional trauma to the extent

possible, as a result of interviews or visual contact with offenders.  All authorities

involved in the proceedings should be trained in child friendly justice. A good

understanding of children and how they behave when faced with traumatic

experiences will help to ensure a high quality of evidence-taking and also reduce the

stress placed on children when carrying out the necessary measures.  Where child

victims participate in criminal proceedings, the court should take full account of their

age and maturity in conducting the proceedings and should ensure that the proceedings

are accessible and understandable to the child. 

 2011/93/EU recital 31

 new

(37) Member States should consider giving  provide tailored and comprehensive 

short- and long-term assistance to child victims. Any harm caused by the sexual abuse

and sexual exploitation of a child is significant and should be addressed  as soon as

possible after the first contact of the victim with the authorities. Immediate assistance

to victims before and during criminal investigations and proceedings is essential to

limit the long-term trauma linked to the abuse suffered. To facilitate the swift

provision of assistance, including the identification of the relevant support services,

Member States should issue guidelines and protocols for healthcare, education and

social service professionals, including the staff at helplines . Because of the nature

of the harm caused by sexual abuse and sexual exploitation, such assistance should

continue for as long as necessary for the child’s physical and psychological recovery

and may last into adulthood if necessary. Assistance and advice should be considered

to be extended to parents  , carers  or guardians of the child victims where they

are not involved as suspects in relation to the offence concerned, in order to help them

to assist child victims throughout the proceedings.

 new

(38) The trauma arising from sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children often lasts

well into adulthood, entailing long-term effects which often prevent victims from

reporting the offence and from seeking assistance and support for years or even

decades. Therefore, Member States should provide tailored and comprehensive short-

and long-term assistance not only to child victims, but also to adult survivors of child

sexual abuse and sexual exploitation.

EN 29 EN

 2011/93/EU recital 32

(adapted)

 new

(39) Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA  Directive 2012/29/EU  establishes a set of

victims’ rights in criminal proceedings, including the right to protection and  the

right to receive a decision on  compensation  from the offender .  The

proposal for the revision of the Victims’ Rights Directive provides for targeted

amendments to all victims’ rights.  In addition  to the rights established under

that Directive,  child victims of sexual abuse, sexual exploitation and child

pornography sexual abuse material  should be given access to legal counselling

and, in accordance with the role of victims in the relevant justice systems, to legal

representation, including for the purpose of claiming compensation. Such legal

counselling and legal representation could also be provided by the competent

authorities for the purpose of claiming compensation from the State. The purpose of

legal counselling is to enable victims to be informed and receive advice about the

various possibilities open to them. Legal counselling should be provided by a person

having received appropriate legal training without necessarily being a lawyer. Legal

counselling and, in accordance with the role of victims in the relevant justice systems,

legal representation should be provided free of charge, at least when the victim does

not have sufficient financial resources, in a manner consistent with the internal

procedures of Member States.

 new

(40) The EU Centre to prevent and combat child sexual abuse (‘EU Centre’), established by

Regulation […/…/EU laying down rules to prevent and combat child sexual abuse]28,

should support Member States’ prevention and assistance to victims’ efforts and

obligations under this Directive. It should facilitate the exchange of best practices in

the Union and beyond. The EU Centre should encourage dialogue between all relevant

stakeholders to help the development of state-of-the-art prevention programmes.

Moreover, by cooperating with Member States and contributing to the standardisation

of data collection concerning child sexual abuse and sexual exploitation throughout

the Union, the EU Centre should be an asset in supporting evidence-based policy on

both prevention and assistance to victims. Member States should establish national

authorities or equivalent entities as they consider most appropriate according to their

internal organisation, taking into account the need for a minimal structure with

identified tasks, capable of carrying out assessments of trends in child sexual abuse, of

gathering statistics, of measuring the results of actions to prevent and combat child

sexual abuse, and of regularly reporting on such trends, statistics and results. Such

national authorities should serve as a national contact point and should take an

integrative multistakeholder approach in their work. In addition, Member States

should establish the necessary mechanisms at national level to ensure effective

coordination and cooperation in the development and implementation of measures to

prevent and combat child sexual abuse and child sexual exploitation, both online and

28 COM (2022) 209 of 11.5.2022.

EN 30 EN

offline, among all relevant public and private actors, as well as facilitate cooperation

with the EU Centre and the Commission.

 new

(41) Member States may choose to appoint existing bodies or entities, such as national

Coordinating Authorities already designated in accordance with Regulation […/…/EU

Proposed CSA regulation], as national authorities or equivalent mechanisms under this

Directive, to the extent that this is compatible with the need to ensure that the tasks

attributed to them under this Directive are performed effectively and in full.

 2011/93/EU recital 33

(adapted)

 new

(42) Member States should undertake action to prevent or prohibit acts related to the

promotion of child sexual abuse and  the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of

children in travel and tourism  child sex tourism. Different preventative measures

could be considered, such as the drawing up and reinforcement of a code of conduct

and self-regulatory mechanisms in the tourism industry, the setting-up of a code of

ethics or ‘quality labels’  or establishing an explicit policy for tourist organisations

combating  the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children in travel and

tourism  child sex tourism.  Member States should leverage the tools at their

disposal under EU law, national law, and international agreements, for the purpose of

preventing the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children in travel and tourism

through or towards their territory, most notably by taking appropriate action upon

reception of relevant information from third countries, including conducting further

checks or issuing a refusal of entry in the context of the Regulation (EU) 2018/1861

on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in

the field of border checks29. 

 2011/93/EU recital 34

(adapted)

 new

(43) Member States should establish and/or strengthen policies to prevent sexual abuse and

sexual exploitation of children, including measures to discourage and reduce the

demand that fosters all forms of sexual exploitation of children, and measures to

reduce the risk of children becoming victims, by means of, information and

awareness-raising campaigns,  including for parents and carers and society at large,

29 Regulation (EU) 2018/1861 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 November 2018 on

the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of border

checks, and amending the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, and amending and

repealing Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006, OJ L 312, 7.12.2018, p. 14–55, ELI:

http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/1861/oj.

EN 31 EN

 and research and education programmes. In such initiatives, Member States should

adopt a child-rights based approach. Care should be taken to ensure that awareness-

raising campaigns aimed at children are appropriate and sufficiently easy to

understand  , and tailored to the specific needs of children of different age groups,

including pre-school children. Prevention measures should take a holistic approach to

the phenomenon of child sexual abuse and sexual exploitation, by addressing its online

and offline dimensions and mobilizing all relevant stakeholders. In particular for the

online dimension, measures should include the development of digital literacy skills,

including critical engagement with the digital world, to help users identify and address

attempts of online child sexual abuse, seek support and prevent its perpetration.

Particular attention should be paid to prevention of child sexual abuse and sexual

exploitation of children that are cared for in a group facility rather than in the context

of family-based care . Where not already in place, the  The establishment

of  dedicated  help-lines or hotlines should be considered.

 2011/93/EU recital 35

(adapted)

(44) Regarding the system of reporting sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and

helping children in need, hotlines under the number 116 000 for missing children,

116 006 for victims of crime and 116 111 for helplines for children, as introduced by

Commission Decision 2007/116/EC of 15 February 2007 on reserving the national

numbering beginning with 116 for harmonised numbers for harmonised services of

social value30, should be promoted and experience regarding their functioning should

be taken into account.

 new

(45) Organisations acting in the public interest on the fight against child sexual abuse, such

as the members of the INHOPE network of hotlines, have been active for years in

several Member States, cooperating with law enforcement and providers to facilitate

the process of removal and reporting of online child sexual abuse material. This work

combats re-victimisation by limiting the spread of illegal material online, and can

provide evidence to law enforcement of crimes committed. However, the legal

framework in which they operate differs considerably from one Member State to

another and is, in many cases, lacking in terms of the identification of the tasks that

these organisations can lawfully undertake, as well as of the relevant conditions.

Member States should be able to provide an authorisation for these organisations to

carry out relevant tasks, and in particular the processing of child sexual abuse material,

in which case the processing should not be considered to be “without right”. Such

authorisations are encouraged as they increase legal certainty, maximise synergies

between national authorities and other actors involved in the fight against child sexual

30 Commission Decision 2007/116/EC of 15 February 2007 on reserving the national numbering

beginning with 116 for harmonised numbers for harmonised services of social value (OJ L 49,

17.2.2007, p. 30, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2007/116(1)/oj ).

EN 32 EN

abuse, and support victims’ rights by removing child sexual abuse material from the

public digital sphere.

 2011/93/EU recital 36

(adapted)

 new

(46) Professionals likely to come into contact with child victims of sexual abuse and sexual

exploitation should be adequately trained to identify and deal with such victims.  To

ensure child-friendly justice throughout the investigation and prosecution of child

sexual abuse and sexual exploitation cases, that That training should be promoted

for members of the following categories when they are likely to come into contact

with child victims: police officers, public prosecutors, lawyers, members of the

judiciary and court officials, child and health care personnel,  professionals in the

education sector, including in early childhood education and care, social services,

providers of victim support and restorative justice services, but could also involve

other groups of persons who are likely to encounter child victims of sexual abuse and

sexual exploitation in their work.

 2011/93/EU recital 37

(47) In order to prevent the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children, intervention

programmes or measures targeting sex offenders should be proposed to them. Those

intervention programmes or measures should meet a broad, flexible approach focusing

on the medical and psycho-social aspects and have a non-obligatory character. Those

intervention programmes or measures are without prejudice to intervention

programmes or measures imposed by the competent judicial authorities.

 2011/93/EU recital 38

 new

(48) Intervention programmes or measures are not provided as an automatic right. It is for

the Member State to decide which intervention programmes or measures are

appropriate.  In the case of persons who fear that they might offend, these

programmes or measures should be accessible in line with national standards

concerning healthcare. 

 2011/93/EU recital 39

(adapted)

 new

(49) To prevent and minimise recidivism, offenders should be subject to an assessment of

the danger posed by the offenders and the possible risks of repetition of sexual

offences against children. Arrangements for such assessment, such as the type of

authority competent to order and carry out the assessment or the moment in or after

EN 33 EN

the criminal proceedings when that assessment should take place as well as

arrangements for effective intervention programmes or measures offered following

that assessment should be consistent with the internal procedures of Member States.

For the same objective of preventing and minimising recidivism, offenders should also

have access to effective intervention programmes or measures on a voluntary basis.

Those intervention programmes or measures should not interfere with national

schemes set up to deal with the treatment of persons suffering from mental

disorders  health issues and should be accessible and affordable in line with

national standards concerning healthcare, for example with regard to their eligibility

for reimbursement under the health schemes of the Member States .

 2011/93/EU recital 40

(adapted)

 new

(50) Where the danger posed by the offenders and the possible risks of repetition of the

offences make it appropriate, convicted offenders should be temporarily or

permanently prevented from exercising at least professional activities involving direct

and regular contacts with children  or within organisations that work for children or

organisations acting in the public interest on the fight against child sexual abuse  .

Employers when recruiting for a post involving direct and regular contact with

children are entitled to be informed of  should request information on  existing

convictions for sexual offences against children entered in the criminal record, or of

existing disqualifications. For the purposes of this Directive, the term ‘employers’

should also cover persons running an organisation that is active in volunteer work

related to the supervision and/or care of children involving direct and regular contact

with children  , including community settings such as schools, hospitals, social care

services, sports clubs or religious communities . The way such information is

delivered, such as for example access via the person concerned, and the precise

content of the information, the meaning of organised voluntary activities and direct

and regular contact with children should be laid down in accordance with national

law.  However, the information transmitted from one competent authority to another

should at least contain all relevant records stored by any Member State in their

national criminal records registers, and all relevant records that can be easily obtained

from third countries, such as information that can be obtained from the United

Kingdom through the channel established in accordance with Title IX of Part Three of

the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European

Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain

and Northern Ireland, of the other part31. 

31 OJ L 149, 30.4.2021, p. 10,

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2021/689(1)/ojhttp://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internatio

n/2021/689(1)/oj.

EN 34 EN

 2011/93/EU recital 41

 new

(51)  In the area of child sexual abuse, the phenomenon of offenders that regain access

to children after a conviction or disqualification by moving to another jurisdiction is

particularly widespread and worrisome. It is therefore crucial to take all necessary

measures to prevent it.  With due regard to the different legal traditions of the

Member States, this Directive takes into account the fact that access to criminal

records is allowed only either by the competent authorities or by the person concerned.

This Directive does not establish an obligation to modify the national systems

governing criminal records or the means of access to those records.

 2011/93/EU recital 42

 new

(52)  For information not or not yet available in ECRIS, for example information

concerning offending third country nationals until the time Regulation 2019/816 of the

European Parliament and of the Council32 is fully implemented, Member States should

make use of other channels to provide all relevant information to employers that

recruit for a post involving direct and regular contact with children. The aim of this

Directive is not to harmonise rules concerning consent of the person concerned when

exchanging information from the criminal registers, i.e. whether or not to require such

consent. Whether the consent is required or not under national law, this Directive does

not establish any new obligation to change the national law and national procedures in

this respect.

 2011/93/EU recital 43

(adapted)

(53) Member States may consider adopting additional administrative measures in relation

to perpetrators, such as the registration in sex offender registers of persons convicted

of offences referred to in this Directive. Access to those registers should be subject to

limitation in accordance with national constitutional principles and applicable data

protection standards, for instance by limiting access to the judiciary and/or law

enforcement authorities.

32 Regulation (EU) 2019/816 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 establishing

a centralised system for the identification of Member States holding conviction information on third-

country nationals and stateless persons (ECRIS-TCN) to supplement the European Criminal Records

Information System amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1726 (OJ L 135, 22.5.2019, p. 1, ELI:

http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/816/oj.

EN 35 EN

 2011/93/EU recital 44

(adapted)

 new

(54) Member States are encouraged  should take the necessary measures  to create

mechanisms for data collection or focal points, at the national, local or regional levels

and in collaboration with civil society, for the purpose of observing and evaluating the

phenomenon of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children  , building also on

the broader data collection obligations set in the Directive […/…] [Victims rights

Directive, Recast], and Regulation (EU) [Regulation to prevent and combat child

sexual abuse] . In order to be able to properly evaluate the results of actions to

combat sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child

pornography  sexual abuse material , the Union should continue to develop its

work on methodologies and data collection methods to produce comparable

statistics.  The EU Centre, as a central knowledge hub on child sexual abuse in the

Union, should play a key role in this respect. 

 2011/93/EU recital 45

(55) Member States should take appropriate action for setting up information services to

provide information on how to recognise the signs of sexual abuse and sexual

exploitation.

 2011/93/EU recital 46

(adapted)

(56) Child pornography, which constitutes child sexual abuse images,  sexual abuse

material  is a specific type of content which cannot be construed as the expression

of an opinion. To combat it, it is necessary to reduce the circulation of child sexual

abuse material by making it more difficult for offenders to upload such content onto

the publicly accessible web. Action is therefore necessary to remove the content and

apprehend those guilty of making, distributing or downloading child sexual abuse

images  material  . With a view to supporting the Union’s efforts to combat child

pornography  sexual abuse material , Member States should use their best

endeavours to cooperate with third countries in seeking to secure the removal of such

content from servers within their territory.

 new

(57) Member States’ efforts to reduce the circulation of child sexual abuse material,

including by cooperating with third countries under this Directive, should not affect

Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 and […/…/ Regulation

laying down rules to prevent and combat child sexual abuse]. Online content

EN 36 EN

constituting or facilitating criminal offences referred to in this Directive will be subject

to measures pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and

of the Council33 as regards illegal content.

 2011/93/EU recital 47

(adapted)

 new

(58) However, despite Despite  such efforts  by Member States , the removal

of child pornography  sexual abuse material  at its source is often not possible

when the original materials are not located within the Union, either because the State

where the servers are hosted is not willing to cooperate or because obtaining removal

of the material from the State concerned proves to be particularly long. Mechanisms

may also be put in place to block access from the Union’s territory to Internet pages

identified as containing or disseminating child pornography  sexual abuse

material . The measures undertaken by Member States in accordance with this

Directive in order to remove or, where appropriate, block websites containing child

pornography  sexual abuse material  could be based on various types of public

action, such as legislative, non-legislative, judicial or other. In that context, this

Directive is without prejudice to voluntary action taken by the Internet industry to

prevent the misuse of its services or to any support for such action by Member States.

Whichever basis for action or method is chosen, Member States should ensure that it

provides an adequate level of legal certainty and predictability to users and service

providers. Both with a view to the removal and the blocking of child abuse content,

cooperation between public authorities should be established and strengthened,

particularly in the interests of ensuring that national lists of websites containing child

pornography  sexual abuse material  are as complete as possible and of avoiding

duplication of work. Any such developments must take account of the rights of the end

users and comply with existing legal and judicial procedures and the European

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The Safer Internet Programme

has set up a network of hotlines the goal of which is to collect information and to

ensure coverage and exchange of reports on the major types of illegal content online.

 The EU co-funded network of hotlines34 handles reports of alleged child sexual

abuse material reported anonymously by the public and cooperates with law

enforcement and industry at national, European and global level to ensure swift

removal of this type of content. 

 2011/93/EU recital 48

48. This Directive aims to amend and expand the provisions of Framework Decision

2004/68/JHA. Since the amendments to be made are of substantial number and nature, the

33 Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022

on a Single Market for Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (OJ

L 277, 27.10.2022, p. 1 34 Currently under the Digital Europe Programme.

EN 37 EN

Framework Decision should, in the interests of clarity, be replaced in its entirety in relation to

Member States participating in the adoption of this Directive.

 2011/93/EU recital 49

(adapted)

(59) Since the objective of this Directive, namely to combat child sexual abuse, sexual

exploitation of children and child pornography  sexual abuse material , cannot

be sufficiently achieved by the Member States alone and  but  can  rather 

therefore, by reasons of the scale and effects  of the action , be better achieved at

Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of

subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance

with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not

go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective.

 2011/93/EU recital 50

(60) This Directive respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in

particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in

particular the right to the protection of human dignity, the prohibition of torture and

inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, the rights of the child, the right to

liberty and security, the right to freedom of expression and information, the right to the

protection of personal data, the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial and the

principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties. This

Directive seeks to ensure full respect for those rights and principles and must be

implemented accordingly.

 2011/93/EU recital 51

51. In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol (No 21) on the position of United Kingdom

and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the Treaty on

European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the United

Kingdom and Ireland have notified their wish to take part in the adoption and application of

this Directive.

 new

(61) [In accordance with Article 3 and Article 4a(1) of Protocol No 21 on the position of

United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice,

annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the

European Union, Ireland has notified [, by letter of …,] its wish to take part in the

adoption and application of this Directive.]

OR

[In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 and Article 4a(1) of Protocol No 21 on the

position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security

EN 38 EN

and justice, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the

Functioning of the European Union, and without prejudice to Article 4 of that

Protocol, Ireland is not taking part in the adoption of this Directive and is not bound

by it or subject to its application.]

 2011/93/EU recital 52

(adapted)

(62) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol (No 22) on the position of

Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the

Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this

Directive and is not bound by it or subject to its application.

 new

(63) The obligation to transpose this Directive into national law should be confined to those

provisions which represent a substantive amendment as compared to the earlier

Directive. The obligation to transpose the provisions which are unchanged arises under

the earlier Directive.

 new

(64) This Directive should be without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States

relating to the time-limit for the transposition into national law of the Directive set out

in Annex I.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

Subject matter

This Directive establishes minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and

sanctions in the area of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children, child

pornography  sexual abuse material  and solicitation of children for sexual purposes. It

also introduces provisions to strengthen the prevention of those crimes  criminal

offences and the protection of the victims thereof.

EN 39 EN

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

Article 2

Definitions

For the purposes of this Directive, the following definitions apply:

(1) ‘child’ means any person below the age of 18 years;

(2) ‘age of sexual consent’ means the age below which, in accordance with national law,

it is prohibited to engage in sexual activities with a child;

(3) ‘child pornography  sexual abuse material ’ means:

(a) any material that visually depicts a child engaged in real or simulated sexually

explicit conduct;

(b) depiction of the sexual organs of a child for primarily sexual purposes;

(c) any material that visually depicts any person appearing to be a child engaged

in real or simulated sexually explicit conduct or any depiction of the sexual

organs of any person appearing to be a child, for primarily sexual purposes; or

(d) realistic images  , reproductions or representations  of a child engaged in

sexually explicit conduct or realistic images of the sexual organs of a child, for

primarily sexual purposes;

 new

(e) any material, regardless of its form, intended to provide advice, guidance or

instructions on how to commit child sexual abuse or sexual exploitation or

child solicitation;

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

(4) ‘child  exploitation in  prostitution’ means the use of a child for sexual

activities where money or any other form of remuneration or consideration is given

or promised as payment in exchange for the child engaging in sexual activities,

regardless of whether that payment, promise or consideration is made to the child or

to a third party;

(5) ‘pornographic  child sexual abuse  performance’ means a live exhibition aimed

at an audience, including by means of information and communication technology,

of:

(a) a child engaged in real or simulated sexually explicit conduct; or

(b) the sexual organs of a child for primarily sexual purposes;

EN 40 EN

(6) ‘legal person’ means an entity having legal personality under the applicable law,

except for States or public bodies in the exercise of State authority and for public

international organisations;.

 new

(7) ‘information society service’ means a service as defined in Article 1, point (b), of

Directive (EU) 2015/153535.

(8) ‘peers’ means persons who are close in age and degree of psychological and physical

development or maturity.

 2011/93/EU

 new

Article 3

Offences concerning sexual abuse

1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the conduct referred

to in paragraphs 2 to 6  8  is punishable.

2. Causing, for sexual purposes, a child who has not reached the age of sexual consent

to witness sexual activities, even without having to participate, shall be punishable

by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 1 year.

3. Causing, for sexual purposes, a child who has not reached the age of sexual consent

to witness sexual abuse, even without having to participate, shall be punishable by a

maximum term of imprisonment of at least 2 years.

4. Engaging in sexual activities with a child who has not reached the age of sexual

consent  or causing the child to engage in sexual activities with another

person shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at

least 5  8  years.

5. Engaging in sexual activities with a child, where:

(a) abuse is made of a recognised position of trust, authority or influence over the

child, shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 8

 10  years if the child has not reached the age of sexual consent, and of at

least 3  6  years of imprisonment, if the child is over that age; or

35 Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying

down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on

Information Society services (codification), OJ L 241, 17.9.2015, p. 1–15.

EN 41 EN

(b) abuse is made of a particularly vulnerable situation of the child, in particular

because of a mental or physical disability or a situation of dependence, shall be

punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 8  10  years if

the child has not reached the age of sexual consent, and of at least 3

 6  years of imprisonment if the child is over that age; or

(c) use is made of coercion, force or threats shall be punishable by a maximum

term of imprisonment of at least 10  12  years if the child has not reached

the age of sexual consent, and of at least 5  7  years of imprisonment if the

child is over that age.

6. Coercing, forcing or threatening a child into sexual activities with a third party shall

be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 10  12  years if

the child has not reached the age of sexual consent, and of at least 5  7  years of

imprisonment if the child is over that age.

 new

7. The following intentional conduct shall be punishable by a maximum term of

imprisonment of at least 12 years:

(a) engaging with a child below the age of sexual consent in any act of vaginal,

anal or oral penetration of a sexual nature, with any bodily part or object;

(b) causing a child below the age of sexual consent to engage with another person

in any act of vaginal, anal or oral penetration of a sexual nature, with any

bodily part or object.

8. Where the child is above the age of sexual consent and does not consent to the act,

the conduct referred to in paragraph 7 shall be punishable by a maximum term of

imprisonment of at least 10 years.

9. For the purpose of paragraph 8, Member States shall ensure that:

(a) a non-consensual act is understood as an act which is performed without the

child’s consent given voluntarily, as a result of the child’s free will assessed in

the context of the surrounding circumstances, or where the child is unable to

form a free will due to the presence of circumstances referred to in paragraph

5, or due to other circumstances, including the child’s physical or mental

condition such as a state of unconsciousness, intoxication, freezing, illness or

bodily injury;

(b) the consent can be withdrawn at any moment before and during the act;

(c) the absence of consent cannot be refuted exclusively by the child’s silence,

verbal or physical non-resistance or past sexual conduct.

EN 42 EN

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

Article 4

Offences concerning sexual exploitation

1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the intentional

conduct referred to in paragraphs 2 to 7 is punishable.

2. Causing or recruiting a child to participate in pornographic  child sexual

abuse  performances, or profiting from or otherwise exploiting a child for such

purposes shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 5 years

if the child has not reached the age of sexual consent and of at least 2 years of

imprisonment if the child is over that age.

3. Coercing or forcing a child to participate in pornographic  child sexual abuse 

performances, or threatening a child for such purposes shall be punishable by a

maximum term of imprisonment of at least 8 years if the child has not reached the

age of sexual consent, and of at least 5 years of imprisonment if the child is over that

age.

4. Knowingly attending pornographic  child sexual abuse  performances

involving the participation of a child shall be punishable by a maximum term of

imprisonment of at least 2 years if the child has not reached the age of sexual

consent, and of at least 1 year of imprisonment if the child is over that age.

5. Causing or recruiting a child to participate in  exploitation in  child

prostitution, or profiting from or otherwise exploiting a child for such purposes shall

be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 8 years if the child has

not reached the age of sexual consent, and of at least 5 years of imprisonment if the

child is over that age.

6. Coercing or forcing a child into  exploitation in  child prostitution, or

threatening a child for such purposes shall be punishable by a maximum term of

imprisonment of at least 10 years if the child has not reached the age of sexual

consent, and of at least 5 years of imprisonment if the child is over that age.

7. Engaging in sexual activities with a child, where recourse is made to  exploitation

in child prostitution shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of

at least 5  8  years if the child has not reached the age of sexual consent, and of

at least 2  4  years of imprisonment if the child is over that age.

EN 43 EN

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

Article 5

Offences concerning child pornography  sexual abuse material 

1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the intentional

conduct, when committed without right, referred to in paragraphs 2 to 6 is

punishable.

2. Acquisition or possession of child pornography  sexual abuse material  shall be

punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 1 year.

3. Knowingly obtaining access, by means of information and communication

technology, to child pornography  sexual abuse material  shall be punishable

by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 1 year.

4. Distribution, dissemination or transmission of child pornography  sexual abuse

material  shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 2

years.

5. Offering, supplying or making available child pornography  sexual abuse

material  shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 2

years.

6. Production of child pornography  sexual abuse material  shall be punishable by

a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 3 years.

 new

7. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the conducts referred to in paragraph 2, 3 and 4

shall not be considered to be committed without right in particular where carried out

by, or on behalf and under the responsibility of, an organisation established in a

Member State acting in the public interest against child sexual abuse that has been

authorised by competent authorities of that Member State when such actions were

carried out in accordance with the conditions set out in such authorisation.

These conditions may include the requirement that the organisations that receive

such authorisations have the necessary expertise and independence, that there are

appropriate reporting and oversight mechanisms to ensure that the organisations act

expeditiously, diligently, and in the public interest, and that the organisations make

use of secure channels of communication to carry out the actions covered by the

authorisation.

8. Member States shall ensure that authorisations for an organisation acting in the

public interest against child sexual abuse referred to in paragraph 7 allow some or all

of the following activities to:

EN 44 EN

a. receive and analyse reports of suspected child sexual abuse material,

submitted to them by victims, online users or other organisations acting

in the public interest against child sexual abuse;

b. promptly notify the relevant law enforcement authority of the Member

State where the material is hosted of reported illegal content;

c. collaborate with organisations acting in the public interest against child

sexual abuse and authorized to receive reports of suspected child sexual

abuse material in accordance with point (a) in the Member State or third

country where the material is hosted

d. carry out searches on publicly accessible material on hosting services to

detect the dissemination of child sexual abuse material, using the reports

of suspected child sexual abuse material referred to in letter (a) or on a

request of a victim.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

9. It shall be within the discretion of Member States to decide whether this Article

applies to cases involving child pornography  sexual abuse material  as

referred to in Article 2 , point (3)(c) (c)(iii), where the person appearing to be a

child was in fact 18 years of age or older at the time of depiction.

10. It shall be within the discretion of Member States to decide whether paragraphs 2 and

6 of this Article apply to cases where it is established that pornographic material as

referred to in Article 2 (c)(iv), is produced and possessed by the producer solely for

his or her private use in so far as no pornographic material as referred to in Article 2

(c)(i), (ii) or (iii) has been used for the purpose of its production and provided that

the act involves no risk of dissemination of the material.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

Article 6

Solicitation of children for sexual purposes

1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the following

intentional conduct  committed by an adult  is punishable  as follows :

(a) the proposal  proposing , by means of information and

communication technology, by an adult to meet a child who has not

reached the age of sexual consent  either online or in person , for the

purpose of committing any of the offences referred to in Article 3(4) ,

(5), (6) and (7)  and Article 5(6), where that proposal was followed by

EN 45 EN

material acts leading to such a meeting, shall be punishable by a

maximum term of imprisonment of at least 1 year;

 new

(b) The conduct referred to in the first subparagraph shall be punishable by a

maximum term of imprisonment of at least 2 years where use is made of

coercion, force or threats.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that an attempt, by means

of information and communication technology, to commit the offences provided for

in Article 5(2) and (3) by an adult soliciting a child who has not reached the age of

sexual consent to provide child pornography  sexual abuse material  depicting

that child is punishable  by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 6

months .

 new

The conduct referred to in the first subparagraph shall be punishable by a maximum

term of imprisonment of at least 1 year where use is made of coercion, force or

threats.

3. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that an attempt, by means

of information and communication technology, to commit the offences provided for

in Article 4(2) and (5) by an adult causing a child to participate in child sexual abuse

performances and exploitation in prostitution is punishable by a maximum term of

imprisonment of at least 6 months.

The conduct referred to in the first subparagraph shall be punishable by a maximum

term of imprisonment of at least 1 year where use is made of coercion, force or

threats.

EN 46 EN

 new

Article 7

Solicitation of sexual abuse

Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that intentionally promising or

giving any person money, or other form of remuneration or consideration, to cause them to

commit any of the offences listed in Article 3(4), (5),(6), (7), and (8), Article 4(2) and (3) and

Article 5(6) is punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 3 years.

 new

Article 8

Operation of an online service for the purpose of child sexual abuse or sexual exploitation

Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that intentionally operating or

administering an information society service which is conceived to facilitate or encourage the

commission of any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 7 is punishable by a maximum

term of imprisonment of at least 1 year.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

Article 9

Incitement, aiding and abetting, and attempt

1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that inciting or aiding and

abetting to commit any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 6  8 is

punishable.

2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that an attempt to commit

any of the offences referred to in Article 3(4), (5) and  ,  (6),  (7) and

(8), Article 4(2), (3), (5), (6) and (7), and Article 5(4), (5) and (6)  , Article 7 and

Article 8 is punishable.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

EN 47 EN

Article 10

Consensual sexual activities

1. It shall be within the discretion of Member States to decide whether Article 3(2) and

(4) apply to consensual sexual activities between peers, who are close in age and

degree of psychological and physical development or maturity, in so far as the acts

did not involve any abuse.

2. It shall be within the discretion of Member States to decide whether Article 4(4)

applies to a pornographic performance that takes place in the context of a consensual

relationship where the child has reached the age of sexual consent or between peers

who are close in age and degree of psychological and physical development or

maturity, in so far as the acts did not involve any abuse or exploitation and no money

or other form of remuneration or consideration is given as payment in exchange for

the pornographic performance.

3. It shall be within the discretion of Member States to decide whether Article 5(2),

 (3), (4) and (6) apply to the production, acquisition or possession of , or

access to,  material involving  which exclusively involves: 

 (a)  children who have reached the age of sexual consent , or 

 (b) children above the age of sexual consent and their peers, 

where that material is produced and possessed with the consent of those  the 

children  involved  and only for the private use of the persons involved, in so

far as the acts did not involve any abuse.

 new

4. It shall be within the discretion of Member States to decide whether Article 6 applies

to proposals, conversations, contacts or exchanges between peers.

5. For the purpose of paragraphs 1 to 4, a child above the age of sexual consent can be

considered as having consented to an activity only where the consent was given

voluntarily, as result of the child’s free will assessed in the context of the

surrounding circumstances.

Consent can be withdrawn at any moment.

The absence of consent cannot be refuted exclusively by the child’s silence, verbal or

physical non-resistance or past conduct.

6. Consensual sharing of one’s intimate images or videos cannot be interpreted as

consent to any further sharing or dissemination of that same image or video.

EN 48 EN

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

Article 11

Aggravating circumstances

In so far as the following circumstances do not already form part of the constituent elements

of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to  9  7, Member States shall take the necessary

measures to ensure that the following circumstances may, in accordance with the relevant

provisions of national law, be regarded as aggravating circumstances, in relation to the

relevant offences referred to in Articles 3 to  9  7:

(a) the offence was committed against a child in a particularly vulnerable

situation, such as a child with a mental or physical disability, in a situation of

dependence or in a state of physical or mental incapacity;

(b) the offence was committed by a member of the child’s family, a person

cohabiting with the child or a person who has abused a recognised position of

trust  ,  or authority  or influence  on the child;

(c) the offence was committed by several persons acting together;

(d) the offence was committed within the framework of a criminal organisation

within the meaning of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24

October 2008 on the fight against organised crime36;

(e) the offender has previously been convicted of offences of the same nature;

(f) the offender has deliberately or recklessly endangered the life of the child; or

(g) the offence involved serious violence or caused serious harm to the child

 ;  .

 new

(h) the offence was committed repeatedly;

(i) the offence was committed with the use or threat of using a weapon; or

(j) the offence was committed by causing the victim to take, use or be affected by

drugs, alcohol or other intoxicating substances.

36 Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime,

OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p. 42.

EN 49 EN

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

Article 12

Disqualification arising from convictions

1. In order to avoid the risk of repetition of offences, Member States shall take the

necessary measures to ensure that a natural person who has been convicted of any of

the offences referred to in Articles 3 to  9  7 may be temporarily or permanently

prevented from exercising at least professional activities involving direct and regular

contacts with children.

2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that employers, when

recruiting a person for professional or organised voluntary activities involving direct

and regular contacts with children,  and organisations acting in the public interest

against child sexual abuse, when recruiting staff,  are entitled  required  to

request information in accordance with national law by way of any appropriate

means, such as access upon request or via the person concerned, of the existence of

criminal convictions for any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to  9  7,

entered in the criminal record or of the existence of any disqualification from

exercising activities involving direct and regular contacts with children arising from

those criminal convictions.

3. For the application of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article,  when requested by

competent authorities,  Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure,

that, for the application of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article transmission of

information concerning the existence of criminal convictions for any of the offences

referred to in Articles 3 to 7  9 , or of any disqualification from exercising

activities involving direct and regular contacts with children arising from those

criminal convictions, is transmitted in accordance with the procedures set out in

Council Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA of 26 February 2009 on the

organisation and content of the exchange of information extracted from the criminal

record between Member States (13) when requested under Article 6 of that

Framework Decision with the consent of the person concerned.  , and that the

transmitted information is as complete as possible, comprising at least information

on criminal convictions or disqualifications arising from criminal convictions kept by

any Member State. For that purpose, such information shall be transmitted through

ECRIS or the mechanism for the exchange of criminal record information established

with third countries. 

EN 50 EN

 2011/93/EU

Article 11

Seizure and confiscation

Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that their competent authorities are

entitled to seize and confiscate instrumentalities and proceeds from the offences referred to in

Articles 3, 4 and 5.

 2011/93/EU

 new

Article 13

Liability of legal persons

1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that legal persons may be

held liable for any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to  9  7 committed for

their benefit by any person, acting either individually or as part of an organ of the

legal person, and having a leading position within the legal person, based on:

(a) a power of representation of the legal person;

(b) an authority to take decisions on behalf of the legal person; or

(c) an authority to exercise control within the legal person.

2. Member States shall also take the necessary measures to ensure that legal persons

may be held liable where the lack of supervision or control by a person referred to in

paragraph 1 has made possible the commission, by a person under its authority, of

any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to  9  7 for the benefit of that legal

person.

3. Liability of legal persons under paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be without prejudice to

criminal proceedings against natural persons who are perpetrators, inciters or

accessories to the offences referred to in Articles 3 to  9  7.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

Article 14

Sanctions on legal persons

1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a legal person held

liable pursuant to Article  13  12(1) is punishable by effective, proportionate

and dissuasive sanctions, which shall include criminal or non-criminal fines and may

include other sanctions, such as:

(a) exclusion from entitlement to public benefits or aid;

EN 51 EN

(b)  exclusion from access to public funding, including tender procedures, grants

and concessions; 

(c) temporary or permanent disqualification from the practice of commercial

activities;

(d) placing under judicial supervision;

(e) judicial winding-up; or

(f) temporary or permanent closure of establishments which have been used for

committing the offence.

2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a legal person held

liable pursuant to Article 12(2) is punishable by sanctions or measures which are

effective, proportionate and dissuasive.

 new

2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that, for legal persons

held liable pursuant to Article 13, offences punishable by a maximum term of

imprisonment of at least 2 years for natural persons are punishable by fines whose

maximum level should be not less than 1 percent of the total worldwide turnover of

the legal person in the business year preceding the fining decision.

3. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that, for legal persons

held liable pursuant to Article 13, offences punishable by a maximum term of

imprisonment of at least 3 years for natural persons are punishable by fines, whose

maximum level should be not less than 5 percent of the total worldwide turnover of

the legal person in the business year preceding the fining decision.

 2011/93/EU

 new

Article 15

Non-prosecution or non-application of penalties to the victim

Member States shall, in accordance with the basic principles of their legal systems take the

necessary measures to ensure that competent national authorities are entitled not to prosecute

or impose penalties on child victims of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation for their

involvement in criminal activities, which they have been compelled to commit as a direct

consequence of being subjected to any of the acts referred to in Article 4(2), (3), (5) and (6),

and in Article 5  (4), (5) and  (6).

EN 52 EN

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

Article 16

Investigation and prosecution  and limitation periods 

1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that investigations into or

the prosecution of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 7  9  are not dependent

on a report or accusation being made by the victim or by his or her representative,

and that criminal proceedings may continue even if that person has withdrawn his or

her statements.

2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the prosecution of any of

the offences referred to in Article 3, Article 4(2), (3), (5), (6) and (7) and , of

any serious offences referred to in Article 5(6) when child pornography  sexual

abuse material  as referred to in Article 2  , points (3)(a) and (b)  (c)(i) and

(ii) has been used,  and of any of the offences referred to in Articles 7 and 8 , for

a sufficient period of time after the victim has reached the age of majority and which

is commensurate with the gravity of the offence concerned.

 new

This period of time referred to in the first subparagraph shall be:

(a) at least 20 years from the date the victim has reached the age of majority for

the offences punishable under this Directive by a maximum penalty of at least

3 years of imprisonment;

(b) at least 25 years from the date the victim has reached the age of majority for

the offences punishable under this Directive by a maximum penalty of at least

5 years of imprisonment;

(c) at least 30 years from the date the victim has reached the age of majority for

the offences punishable under this Directive by a maximum penalty of at least

8 years of imprisonment.

 2011/93/EU

 new

3. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that effective

investigative tools, such as those which are used in organised crime or other serious

crime cases are available to persons, units or services responsible for investigating or

prosecuting offences referred to in Articles 3 to 7  9 .

EN 53 EN

 new

4. Member States shall ensure that persons, units or services investigating and

prosecuting the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 9have sufficient staff, expertise

and effective investigative tools to effectively investigate and prosecute such crimes,

including those committed through the use of information and communication

technology, in accordance with the applicable rules of Union and national law.

Where appropriate, these tools shall include special investigative tools, such as those

which are used in countering organised crime or other serious crime cases, like the

possibility to conduct undercover investigations.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

5. Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable investigative units or

services to attempt to identify the victims of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to

7  9 , in particular by analysing child pornography  sexual abuse material 

, such as photographs and audiovisual recordings transmitted or made available by

means of information and communication technology.

 2011/93/EU

 new

Article 17

Reporting suspicion of child sexual abuse or sexual exploitation

1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the confidentiality

rules imposed by national law on certain professionals whose main duty is to work

with children do not constitute an obstacle to the possibility, for those professionals,

of their reporting to the services responsible for child protection any situation where

they have reasonable grounds for believing that a child is the victim of offences

referred to in Articles 3 to 7  9 .

2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to encourage any person who

knows about or suspects, in good faith, that any of the offences referred to in Articles

3 to 7  9  have been committed, to report this to the competent services  ,

without affecting Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European

Parliament and of the Council37 and Article 12 of Regulation (EU) …/…38 [laying

down rules to prevent and combat child sexual abuse].

37 Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a

Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (OJ L

277, 27.10.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj).

EN 54 EN

 new

3. Member States shall ensure that at least professionals working in close contact with

children in the child protection, education, childcare and health care sectors are

obliged to report to the competent authorities if they have reasonable grounds for

believing that an offence punishable under this Directive has been committed or is

likely to be committed.

4. Member States shall exempt professionals working in the health care sectors in the

context of programmes dedicated to persons who have been convicted of a criminal

offence punishable under this Directive or persons who fear that they might commit

any of the offences punishable under this Directive from the reporting obligation

provided for in paragraph 3.

5. Member States, supported by the EU Centre once established, shall issue guidelines

for the persons referred to in paragraph 3 on identifying whether an offence

punishable under this Directive has been committed or is likely to be committed and

on reporting to competent authorities. Such guidelines shall also indicate how to

address the specific needs of victims.

 new

Article 18

Reporting of child sexual abuse or sexual exploitation

1. In addition to the rights of victims when making a complaint under Article 5 of

Directive 2012/29/EU, and Article 5a under Directive (EU) …/… [proposed

Directive amending Directive 2012/29 establishing minimum standards on the rights,

support and protection of victims of crimes], Member States shall ensure that victims

can report the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 9 of this Directive to the competent

authorities in an easy and accessible manner. This shall include the possibility of

reporting those criminal offences, and submitting evidence where feasible, by means

of easily accessible and user-friendly information and communication technologies.

2. Member States shall ensure that the reporting procedures referred to in paragraph 1

are safe, confidential and designed in a child-friendly manner and language, in

accordance with their age and maturity. Member States shall ensure reporting is not

conditional upon parental consent.

3. Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities coming in contact with

victims reporting child sexual abuse offences or sexual exploitation offences are

prohibited from transferring personal data pertaining to the residence status of the

victim to competent migration authorities, at least until completion of the first

38 Regulation (EU)

EN 55 EN

individual assessment of the victims’ protection needs conducted in accordance with

Article 22 of Directive 2012/29/EU.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

Article 19

Jurisdiction and coordination of prosecution

1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to establish their jurisdiction over

the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 7  9  where:

(a) the offence is committed in whole or in part within their territory; or

(b) the offender is one of their nationals.

2. A Member State shall inform the Commission where it decides to establish further

jurisdiction over an offence referred to in Articles 3 to 7  9  committed outside

its territory, inter alia, where:

(a) the offence is committed against one of its nationals or a person who is

an habitual resident in its territory;

(b) the offence is committed for the benefit of a legal person established in

its territory; or

(c) the offender is an habitual resident in its territory.

3. Member States shall ensure that their jurisdiction includes situations where an

offence referred to in Articles 5 and  ,  6  and 8 , and in so far as is

relevant, in Articles 3 and , 4,  7  and 9  , is committed by means of

information and communication technology accessed from their territory, whether or

not it is based on their territory.

4. For the prosecution of any of the offences referred to in Article 3(4), (5)  ,  (6),

 (7), and (8),  Article 4(2), (3), (5), (6) and (7) and  ,  Article 5(6) ,

Article 7 and Article 8  committed outside the territory of the Member State

concerned, as regards paragraph 1  , point  (b) of this Article, each Member

State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that its jurisdiction is not

subordinated to the condition that the acts are a criminal offence at the place where

they were performed.

5. For the prosecution of any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to

7  9  committed outside the territory of the Member State concerned, as regards

paragraph 1  , point  (b) of this Article, each Member State shall take the

necessary measures to ensure that its jurisdiction is not subordinated to the condition

that the prosecution can only be initiated following a report made by the victim in the

place where the offence was committed, or a denunciation from the State of the place

where the offence was committed.

EN 56 EN

 new

6. Where a criminal offence referred to in Articles 3 to 9 falls within the jurisdiction of

more than one Member State, these Member States shall cooperate to determine

which Member State is to conduct criminal proceedings. The matter shall, where

appropriate and in accordance with Article 12 of Framework Decision

2009/948/JHA, be referred to Eurojust.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

Article 20

General provisions on assistance, support and protection measures for child victims

1. Child victims of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 7  9  shall be provided

assistance, support and protection in accordance with Articles 19 and 20  21 and

22  , taking into account the best interests of the child.

2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a child is provided

with assistance and support as soon as the competent authorities have a reasonable-

grounds indication for believing that a child might have been subject to any of the

offences referred to in Articles 3 to  9  7.

3. Member States shall ensure that, where the age of a person subject to any of the

offences referred to in Articles 3 to 7  9  is uncertain and there are reasons to

believe that the person is a child, that person is presumed to be a child in order to

receive immediate access to assistance, support and protection in accordance with

Articles 19 and 20  21 and 22 ..

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

Article 21

Assistance and support to victims

1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that assistance

and  specialised and appropriate  support are provided to victims before, during

and for an appropriate period of time after the conclusion of criminal proceedings in

order to enable them to exercise the rights set out in Framework Decision

2001/220/JHA  Directive 2012/29/EU  ,  Directive (EU) …/… [proposed

Directive amending Directive 2012/29 establishing minimum standards on the rights,

support and protection of victims of crimes]  and in this Directive.  Member

States shall notably ensure that victims of offences referred to in Articles 3 to 9 have

access to targeted and integrated support services for children in accordance with

Article 9a of Directive (EU) …/… [proposed Directive amending Directive 2012/29

EN 57 EN

establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of

crimes]. Member States shall, in particular, take the necessary steps to ensure

protection for children who report cases of abuse within their family.

 new

2. Victims shall be provided with coordinated, age-appropriate medical care, emotional,

psychosocial, psychological and educational support, as well as any other appropriate

support tailored in particular to situations of sexual abuse.

3. Where it is necessary to provide for interim accommodation, children shall, as a

priority, be placed with other family members, where necessary in temporary or

permanent housing, equipped with support services.

4. Victims of offences punishable under this Directive shall have access to the referral

centres established under Article 28 of Directive […/…/EU Proposed violence

against women Directive]39.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

5. 2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that assistance and

support for a child victim are not made conditional on the child victim’s willingness

to cooperate in the criminal investigation, prosecution or trial.

6. 3. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the specific actions

to assist and support child victims in enjoying their rights under this Directive, are

undertaken following an individual assessment of the special circumstances of each

particular child victim,  conducted in accordance with Article 22 of Directive (EU)

…/… [proposed Directive amending Directive 2012/29/EU establishing minimum

standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crimes] and  taking

due account of the child’s views, needs and concerns.

7. 4. Child victims of any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 7  9  shall be

considered as particularly vulnerable victims pursuant to Article 2(2), Article 8(4)

and Article 14(1) of Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA  Article 22(2) of

Directive 2012/29/EU and Directive (EU) …/… [proposed Directive amending

Directive 2012/29 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and

protection of victims of crimes] .

8. 5. Member States shall take measures, where appropriate and possible, to provide

assistance and support to the family of the child victim in enjoying the rights under

this Directive when the family is in the territory of the Member States. In particular,

Member States shall, where appropriate and possible, apply Article 4 of Framework

Decision 2001/220/JHA  Directive 2012/29/EU   and Directive (EU) …/…

[proposed Directive amending Directive 2012/29 establishing minimum standards on

the rights, support and protection of victims of crimes]  to the family of the child

victim.

39 COM(2022) 105 of 08.03.2022.

EN 58 EN

 new

9. The EU Centre, once established, shall proactively support Member States’ efforts on

assistance to victims by:

(a) inviting other Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, as well as

relevant authorities, bodies or agencies of the Member States, to share with the

EU Centre information about assistance to victims of child sexual abuse and

sexual exploitation whenever appropriate and at least once a year;

(b) collecting on its own initiative information on measures and programmes in the

field of assistance to victims of child sexual abuse and sexual exploitation,

including measures and programmes implemented in third countries;

(c) facilitating the exchange of best practices among Member States and between

Member States and third countries, by keeping a public database of assistance

to victims measures and programmes implemented in each Member States as

well as in third countries; the database shall not contain any personal data.

(d) facilitating the preparation of the guidelines and protocols referred to in

paragraph 10.

10. Member States, supported by the EU Centre once established, shall issue guidelines

for healthcare, education and social service professionals on providing appropriate

support to victims of child sexual abuse or exploitation, including on referring

victims to the relevant support services and clarifying roles and responsibilities. Such

guidelines shall also indicate how to address the specific needs of victims.

 2011/93/EU

 new

Article 22

Protection of child victims in criminal investigations and proceedings

1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that in criminal

investigations and proceedings, in accordance with the role of victims in the relevant

justice system, competent authorities appoint a special representative for the child

victim where, under national law, the holders of parental responsibility are precluded

from representing the child as a result of a conflict of interest between them and the

child victim, or where the child is unaccompanied or separated from the family.

2. Member States shall ensure that child victims have, without delay, access to legal

counselling and, in accordance with the role of victims in the relevant justice system,

to legal representation, including for the purpose of claiming compensation. Legal

counselling and legal representation shall be free of charge where the victim does not

have sufficient financial resources.

3. Without prejudice to the rights of the defence, Member States shall take the

necessary measures to ensure that in criminal investigations relating to any of the

offences referred to in Articles 3 to 7  9 :

EN 59 EN

(a) interviews with the child victim take place without unjustified delay after

the facts have been reported to the competent authorities;

(b) interviews with the child victim take place in premises designed or

adapted for this purpose;

(c) interviews with the child victim are carried out by or through

professionals trained for this purpose;

(d) the same persons, if possible and where appropriate, conduct all

interviews with the child victim;

(e) the number of interviews is as limited as possible and interviews are

carried out only where strictly necessary for the purpose of criminal

investigations and proceedings;

(f) the child victim may be accompanied by his or her legal representative

or, where appropriate, by an adult of his or her choice, unless a reasoned

decision has been made to the contrary in respect of that person.

 (g) medical examinations of the child victim for the purposes of the criminal

proceedings are as limited as possible and are carried out by

professionals trained for this purpose. 

4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that in criminal

investigations of any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 7  9  all

interviews with the child victim or, where appropriate, with a child witness, may be

audio-visually recorded and that such audio-visually recorded interviews may be

used as evidence in criminal court proceedings, in accordance with the rules under

their national law.

5. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that in criminal court

proceedings relating to any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 7  9 , that

it may be ordered that:

(a) the hearing take place without the presence of the public;

(b) the child victim be heard in the courtroom without being present, in

particular through the use of appropriate communication technologies.

6. Member States shall take the necessary measures, where in the interest of child

victims and taking into account other overriding interests, to protect the privacy,

identity and image of child victims, and to prevent the public dissemination of any

information that could lead to their identification.

 new

7. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that, where the

participation of a child is necessary in criminal court proceedings relating to any of

the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 9, the court takes into account the child’s age

and maturity in the relevant court proceedings.

EN 60 EN

 new

Article 23

Victim’s right to compensation

1. Member States shall ensure that victims of offences referred to in Articles 3 to 9 of

this Directive have a right to compensation for any damage suffered. Member States

shall ensure that compensation can be requested from perpetrators of any of the

offences referred to in Articles 3 to 9 from legal persons liable for such offences

under Articles 13 and 14 and, where appropriate, from national compensation

schemes established for the benefits of victims of crime.

2. In addition to their rights under Article 16a of Directive (EU) …/… [proposed

Directive amending Directive 2012/29 establishing minimum standards on the rights,

support and protection of victims of crimes], victims shall be allowed to request

compensation in the context of criminal and civil proceedings for any damage caused

to them by any of the offences punishable under this Directive, for a sufficient period

of time, commensurate with the gravity of the offence, after reaching the age of

majority.

3. The period referred to in the first subparagraph shall be:

(a) at least 20 years from the date the victim has reached the age of majority

for the offences punishable under this Directive by a maximum penalty

of at least 3 years;

(b) at least 25 years from the date the victim has reached the age of majority

for the offences punishable under this Directive by a maximum penalty

of at least 5 years;

(c) at least 30 years from the date the victim has reached the age of majority

for the offences punishable under this Directive by a maximum penalty

of at least 8 years.

4. Member States shall ensure that, in order to ensure sufficient compensation to

victims of offences punishable under this Directive, all relevant elements are taken

into account, including:

(a) any physical or mental pain and suffering caused by the offence,

including the pain and suffering linked to the online circulation of child

sexual abuse material concerning the victim in question;

(b) any cost of care in relation to the recovery from such pain and suffering,

including expenses related to mental and physical health and treatment

and travelling costs that might have been incurred to access such care;

and

(c) any loss of income caused by the offence.

EN 61 EN

 new

Article 24

National authorities or equivalent entities

Member States shall establish national authorities or equivalent entities to carry out the

following activities:

(1) facilitate and, where needed, coordinate efforts at national level on prevention

and assistance to victims;

(2) carry out assessments of trends in child sexual abuse, online and offline;

(3) evaluate the results of preventive programmes and measures, as well as of

programmes and measures intended to assist and support victims, including the

gathering of statistics in close cooperation with relevant civil society

organisations active in this field;

(4) report on such trends, results and statistics.

In particular, national authorities shall be responsible for the data collection, research and

reporting obligations referred to in Article 31.

 new

Article 25

Multi-agency and multi-stakeholder coordination and cooperation

Member States shall put in place appropriate mechanisms to ensure effective coordination and

cooperation to develop and implement measures to tackle child sexual abuse and exploitation,

both online and offline, at the national level, of relevant authorities, agencies and bodies,

including local and regional authorities, law enforcement agencies, the judiciary, public

prosecutors, support service providers as well as providers of information society services,

non-governmental organisations, social services, including child protection or welfare

authorities, education and healthcare providers, social partners, without prejudice to their

autonomy, and other relevant organisations and entities. These mechanisms shall also ensure

effective coordination and cooperation with the EU Centre and the Commission.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

Article 26

Measures against advertising abuse opportunities and  the sexual abuse and sexual

exploitation of children in travel and tourism  child sex tourism

Member States shall take appropriate measures to prevent or prohibit:

(a) the dissemination of material advertising the opportunity to commit any of the

offences referred to in Articles 3 to  8  6; and

EN 62 EN

(b) the organisation for others, whether or not for commercial purposes, of travel

arrangements with the purpose of committing any of the offences referred to in

Articles 3 to  , 4 and  5.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

Article 27

Preventive intervention programmes or measures

 1.  Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that persons who fear

that they might commit any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 7  9  have access,

where appropriate, to  dedicated and  effective intervention programmes or measures

designed to evaluate and prevent the risk of such offences being committed.

 new

2. Member States shall ensure that the programmes or measures referred to in paragraph 1 are

accessible without undue restrictions in line with national standards concerning healthcare.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

Article 28

Prevention

1.  To discourage and reduce the demand that fosters all forms of sexual exploitation

of children,  Member States shall take appropriate measures, such as education and

training,  information and awareness raising campaigns on the lifelong

consequences of child sexual abuse and exploitation, its illegal nature, and the

possibility for persons who fear that they might commit related offences to have

access to dedicated and effective intervention programmes or measures  to

discourage and reduce the demand that fosters all forms of sexual exploitation of

children.

2. Member States shall take appropriate action, including through the Internet, such as

information and awareness-raising campaigns, research, and education  and

training  programmes  or material , where appropriate in cooperation with

relevant civil society organisations and other stakeholders, aimed at raising

awareness and reducing the risk of children, becoming victims of sexual abuse or

 sexual  exploitation.

3. Member States shall promote regular training , including in child friendly justice

for professionals, judges and  for officials likely to come into contact with child

EN 63 EN

victims of sexual abuse or sexual exploitation, including , but not limited to, child

protection professionals, legal professionals, teachers and educators, family court

judges and  front-line police officers, aimed at enabling them to identify and deal

with child victims and potential child victims of sexual abuse or sexual exploitation.

 new

4. Member States shall take appropriate measures to enhance the prevention of child

sexual abuse in community settings, including schools, hospitals, social care

services, sports clubs or religious communities.

Those measures shall include:

(a) dedicated training and awareness raising activities for staff working in such

settings;

(b) dedicated guidelines, internal protocols and standards identifying good

practices, such as the establishment of mechanisms of supervision and

accountability for staff working in close contact with children in such

settings;

(c) the creation of safe spaces, run by dedicated and appropriately trained

personnel, where children, parents, carers and members of the community

can report inappropriate behaviour.

Prevention measures shall devote particular attention to the need to protect children

who are particularly vulnerable, including children with mental or physical

disabilities.

5. The EU Centre, once established, shall proactively support Member States’

prevention efforts by:

(a) inviting other Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, as well as

relevant authorities, bodies or agencies of the Member States, to share

information about prevention measures and programmes in the field of child

sexual abuse and sexual exploitation whenever appropriate and at least once

a year;

(b) collecting information on prevention measures and programmes in the field

of child sexual abuse and exploitation, including measures and programmes

implemented in third countries;

(c) facilitating the exchange of best practices among Member States and third

countries by keeping a public database of prevention measures and

programmes implemented in each Member State as well as in third

countries.

EN 64 EN

 2011/93/EU

 new

Article 29

Intervention programmes or measures on a voluntary basis in the course of or after criminal

proceedings

1. Without prejudice to intervention programmes or measures imposed by the

competent judicial authorities under national law, Member States shall take the

necessary measures to ensure that  dedicated and  effective intervention

programmes or measures are made available to prevent and minimise the risks of

repeated offences of a sexual nature against children. Such programmes or measures

shall be accessible at any time during the criminal proceedings,  and shall be

available both  inside and outside prison, in accordance with national law.

2. The intervention programmes or measures, referred to in paragraph 1 shall meet the

specific developmental needs of children who sexually offend.

3. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the following persons

may have access to the intervention programmes or measures referred to in

paragraph 1:

(a) persons subject to criminal proceedings for any of the offences referred

to in Articles 3 to  9  7, under conditions which are neither

detrimental nor contrary to the rights of the defence or to the

requirements of a fair and impartial trial, and, in particular, in compliance

with the principle of the presumption of innocence; and

(b) persons convicted of any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to

 9  7.

4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the persons referred

to in paragraph 3 are subject to an assessment of the danger that they present and the

possible risks of repetition of any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to  9  7,

with the aim of identifying appropriate intervention programmes or measures.

5. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the persons referred

to in paragraph 3 to whom intervention programmes or measures in accordance with

paragraph 4 have been proposed:

(a) are fully informed of the reasons for the proposal;

(b) consent to their participation in the programmes or measures with full

knowledge of the facts;

(c) may refuse and, in the case of convicted persons, are made aware of the

possible consequences of such a refusal.

EN 65 EN

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

Article 30

Measures against websites containing or disseminating child pornography  sexual abuse

material 

1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure the prompt removal of

web pages containing or disseminating child pornography  sexual abuse

material  hosted in their territory and to endeavour to obtain the removal of such

pages hosted outside of their territory.

2. Member States may take measures to block access to web pages containing or

disseminating child pornography  sexual abuse material  towards the Internet

users within their territory. These measures must be set by transparent procedures

and provide adequate safeguards, in particular to ensure that the restriction is limited

to what is necessary and proportionate, and that users are informed of the reason for

the restriction. Those safeguards shall also include the possibility of judicial redress.

 new

Article 31

Data collection

1. Member States shall have a system in place for the collection, development,

production and dissemination of public statistics on offences referred to in Articles 3

to 9.

2. The statistics shall include the following data disaggregated by sex, age of the victim

and of the offender, relationship between the victim and the offender and type of

offence:

(a) the number of victims who experienced one of the offences referred to in

Articles 3 to 9 during the last 12 months, last five years and lifetime;

(b) the annual number of persons prosecuted for and convicted of the

offences referred to in Articles 3 to 9, obtained from national

administrative sources;

(c) the results of their prevention initiatives under Articles 27, 28 and 29 in

terms of the number of offenders and potential offenders having accessed

prevention programmes and the percentage of these offenders and

potential offenders who has been convicted for one of the offences in

Articles 3 to 9 after having participated in such programmes.

3. Member States shall conduct a population-based survey every 3 years using the

harmonised methodology of the Commission (Eurostat) to contribute to gather the

data referred to in paragraph 2, point (a), and on that basis assess the prevalence of

and trends for all offences referred to in Articles 3 to 9 of this Directive. For the first

time, Member States shall transmit those data to the Commission (Eurostat) by [3

years after the entry into force of the directive] at the latest.

EN 66 EN

4. Member States shall collect administrative data pursuant to paragraph 2 on the basis

of common disaggregations developed in cooperation with the EU Centre. They shall

transmit that data to the EU Centre on a yearly basis. The transmitted data shall not

contain personal data.

5. The EU Centre shall support Member States in the data gathering referred to in

paragraph 2, including by promoting the development of common voluntary

standards on counting units, counting rules, common disaggregations, reporting

formats, and on the classification of criminal offences.

6. Member States shall transmit the statistics to the EU Centre and the Commission and

make the collected statistics available to the public on an annual basis. The EU

Centre shall compile the statistics and make them publicly available. The statistics

shall not contain personal data.

7. Member States shall support research on root causes, effects, incidences, effective

prevention measures, effective assistance to victims measures and conviction rates of

the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 9 of this Directive.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

Article 32

Reporting

1. The Commission shall, by 18 December 2015, submit a report to the European

Parliament and the Council assessing the extent to which the Member States have

taken the necessary measures in order to comply with this Directive, accompanied, if

necessary, by a legislative proposal.

2. The Commission shall, by 18 December 2015, submit a report to the European

Parliament and the Council assessing the implementation of the measures referred to

in Article 25.

 new

The Commission shall, by [5 years after date of entry into application] and then every 5 years

thereafter, submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of

this Directive [in the Member States] and, if appropriate, propose amendments.

 2011/93/EU

Article 26

Replacement of Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA

Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA is hereby replaced in relation to Member States

participating in the adoption of this Directive without prejudice to the obligations of those

Member States relating to the time limits for transposition of the Framework Decision into

national law.

EN 67 EN

In relation to Member States participating in the adoption of this Directive, references to

Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA shall be construed as references to this Directive.

 2011/93/EU (adapted)

 new

Article 33

Transposition

1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative

provisions necessary to comply with this Directive  Article 2, paragraphs (3)(d),

(4), (5), (6), (8), (9); Article 3 paragraphs (1), (4), to (9); Article 4 paragraphs (4) to

(7); Article 5 paragraphs (2) to (10); Articles 6 to 10; Article 11, introductory

wording and letters (b), (h), (i), (j); Article 12; Article 13; Article 14 paragraph (1),

introductory wording and letter (b), and paragraphs (2) and (3); Article 15 to 20;

Article 21 paragraphs (1) to (4), and (6) to (10); Article 22 paragraph (3),

introductory wording and letter (g), and paragraphs (4), (5) and (7); Articles 23 to 28;

Article 29 paragraphs (1), (3) and (4); Articles 30 to 32 of this Directive  by

 [two years after entry into force]  18 December 2013.  They shall immediately

communicate the text of those measures to the Commission. 

2. Member States shall transmit to the Commission the text of the provisions

transposing into their national law the obligations imposed on them under this

Directive.

2. 3. When Member States adopt those measures, they shall contain a reference to this

Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official

publication.  They shall also include a statement that references in existing laws,

regulations and administrative provisions to the Directive repealed by this Directive

shall be construed as references to this Directive. Member States shall determine how

such reference is to be made and how that statement is to be formulated.  The

methods of making such reference shall be laid down by the Member States.

 new

3. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main measures

of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive, including a

correlation table between such national measures and the corresponding obligations

in this Directive.

 new

Article 34

Repeal

Directive 2011/93/EU is repealed with effect from [the day after the second date referred to in

Article 32, first subparagraph], without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States

EN 68 EN

relating to the time limit for the transposition into national law of the Directive set out in

Annex I.

References to the repealed Directive shall be construed as references to this Directive and

shall be read in accordance with the correlation table in Annex II.

 2011/93/EU

 new

Article 35

Entry into force  and application 

This Directive shall enter into force on the  twentieth  day  following that  of its

publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

 new

The obligations referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 33 shall apply from [… day after

transposition deadline referred to in Article 33(1)], except Article 21 paragraph (9), Article

28 paragraph (5); Article 31 paragraphs (4), (5) and (6) which shall apply from [ date to be

aligned with the CSA Regulation].

 2011/93/EU

Article 36

Addressees

This Directive is addressed to the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.

Done at Strasbourg,

For the European Parliament For the Council

The President The President

05.03.2024

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on combating the sexual abuse and

sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision

2004/68/JHA (recast), COM(2024) 60

Otsuse ettepanek koordinatsioonikogule

Kujundada seisukoht

Kaasvastutaja sisendi tähtpäev 01.04.2024

KOKi esitamise tähtpäev 08.05.2024

VV esitamise tähtpäev 16.05.2024

Ettepaneku selgitus: Peavastutaja Justiitsministeerium

Kaasvastutajad Sotsiaalministeerium ja Siseministeerium

Seisukoha valitsusse toomise alus ja põhjendus

Algatuse reguleerimisala nõuab vastavalt Eesti Vabariigi põhiseadusele seaduse või Riigikogu otsuse vastuvõtmist, muutmist või kehtetuks tunnistamist (RKKTS § 152¹ lg 1 p 1);

Algatuse vastuvõtmisega kaasneks oluline majanduslik või sotsiaalne mõju (RKKTS § 152¹ lg 1 p 2);

Sisukokkuvõte

Ettepanekuga soovitakse ajakohastada laste seksuaalset väärkohtlemist ja ärakasutamist käsitlevaid kriminaalõigusnorme (kehtivad normid 2011. aastast). Uute normidega laiendatakse kuritegude määratlusi ning kehtestatakse rangemad karistused ja spetsiiflisemad ennetustegevuse ja ohvriabi nõuded.

Ettepaneku põhiaspektid on järgmised:

• Laste seksuaalse väärkohtlemisega seotud kuritegude määratluse laiendamine kõigis liikmesriikides: uued kuriteod hõlmavad laste seksuaalse väärkohtlemise ülekandmist reaalajas ning pedofilidele mõeldud juhendite omamist ja vahetamist. Ajakohastatakse kuriteo määratlust, et see hõlmaks

ka laste seksuaalset väärkohtlemist kujutavat materjali süvavõltsingutes ja tehisintellekti loodud sisus.

• Vastutusele võtmise, ennetustegevuse ja toetuse tõhustamine: ettepanekuga pikendatakse ajavahemikku, mille jooksul ohvrid saavad teatada kogetud seksuaalsest väärkohtlemisest ja kuriteo toimepanija vastu kaebuse esitada. Aegumistähtaegade arvestus algab alles ohvri täisealiseks (18-aastaseks) saamisel. Sõltuvalt kuriteo raskusastmest on aegumistähtaeg 20, 25 või 30 aastat (st kuriteost saab teatada ja seda uurida kuni ohvri 38, 43 või 48-aastaseks saamiseni). Uute normidega antakse ohvritele ka õigus rahalisele hüvitisele. Liikmesriigid peavad looma koordineerimismehhanismi, et olemasolevaid ohvriabi- ja ennetusprogramme parimal viisil ära kasutada.

• Ennetustegevuse tõhustamine: liikmesriigid peavad suurendama investeeringuid teadlikkuse parandamisse, eelkõige veebis esinevate riskide osas, et tagada laste ja noorte jaoks turvalisem ja parem internet. Samuti tagatakse uute nõuetega, et värbajad, kes otsivad töötajaid, kes asuvad tööle tihedas kontaktis lastega, peavad küsima kandidaatidelt karistusregistri andmeid.

• Lisaks peavad vähemalt lastega tihedalt kokku puutuvad spetsialistid kuriteost kohustuslikus korras teatama. Sellega püütakse lahendada üht suurimat probleemi laste seksuaalse väärkohtlemise peatamise teel.

Kas EL algatus reguleerib karistusi või haldustrahve? Jah

Kas nähakse ette uue asutuse loomine (järelevalvelised või muud asutused)? Ei

Kas lahenduse rakendamine vajab IT-arendusi? Ei

Mõju ja sihtrühm

Inimeste heaolu ja sotsiaalne kaitse: Algatus mõjutab ohvriabisüsteemi toimimist, sh ohvrite õigusi rahalisele hüvitisele.

Inimeste õigused: Algatus on tervikuna suunatud laste õiguste kaitsele. Lastevastase vägivalla vastu võitlemine ja lastekaitse tagamine on üks ELi 2021. aasta lapse õiguste strateegia eesmärke. Direktiivi 2011/93/EL uuesti sõnastamisega püütakse tagada, et kõik liikmesriigid järgivad lapsesõbraliku õigusemõistmise põhimõtteid, mis on ette nähtud lastemaja mudeliga.

Siseturvalisus: Laste väärkasutamise oht on reaalne ja see on kogu ELis kasvanud. Ainuüksi 2022. aastal teatati esitati ELis poolteist miljonit teadet laste seksuaalse väärkohtlemise kohta. Iga viies laps kannatab mingis vormis seksuaalse vägivalla all, kas siis internetis või päriselus. Internet on laste

2

seksuaalse väärkohtlemise levikut suuresti tagant tõuganud. Kuriteo toimepanijad saavad kohtuda ohvritega veebis ning jagada videoid ja pilte laste – sageli väga väikeste laste – vastu suunatud raske seksuaalvägivalla kohta.

3

    Resolutsiooni liik: Riigikantselei resolutsioon Viide: Justiitsministeerium /  / ; Riigikantselei /  / 2-5/24-00413

Resolutsiooni teema: Laste seksuaalse väärkohtlemisega võitlemise direktiiv

Adressaat: Justiitsministeerium Ülesanne: Tulenevalt Riigikogu kodu- ja töökorra seaduse § 152` lg 1 p 2 ning Vabariigi Valitsuse reglemendi § 3 lg 4 palun valmistada ette Vabariigi Valitsuse seisukoha ja otsuse eelnõu järgneva algatuse kohta, kaasates seejuures olulisi huvigruppe ja osapooli: - Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast), COM(2024) 60.

EISi toimiku nr: 24-0070

Tähtaeg: 06.05.2024

Adressaat: Siseministeerium, Sotsiaalministeerium Ülesanne: Palun esitada oma sisend Justiitsministeeriumile seisukohtade kujundamiseks antud eelnõu kohta (eelnõude infosüsteemi (EIS) kaudu).

Tähtaeg: 01.04.2024

Lisainfo: Eelnõu on kavas arutada valitsuse 16.05.2024 istungil ja Vabariigi Valitsuse reglemendi § 6 lg 6 kohaselt sellele eelneval nädalal (08.05.2024) EL koordinatsioonikogus. Esialgsed materjalid EL koordinatsioonikoguks palume esitada hiljemalt 06.05.2024.

Kinnitaja: Katrin Juhandi, Euroopa Liidu asjade direktor Kinnitamise kuupäev: 07.03.2024 Resolutsiooni koostaja: Elen Nurme [email protected], 693 5201