Dokumendiregister | Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium |
Viit | 10-1/2556-3 |
Registreeritud | 15.10.2024 |
Sünkroonitud | 16.10.2024 |
Liik | Sissetulev kiri |
Funktsioon | 10 Ettevõtlus ja innovatsioon |
Sari | 10-1 Ettevõtluskeskkonna poliitika kavandamise ning korraldamise kirjavahetus |
Toimik | 10-1/2024 |
Juurdepääsupiirang | Avalik |
Juurdepääsupiirang | |
Adressaat | Investment and Development Agency of Latvia (LIAA) |
Saabumis/saatmisviis | Investment and Development Agency of Latvia (LIAA) |
Vastutaja | Sandra Särav (Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium, Kantsleri valdkond, Majanduse ja innovatsiooni valdkond) |
Originaal | Ava uues aknas |
Eva Kalniņa
Projektu attīstības nodaļa
Investīciju projektu departaments
Pērses iela 2, Rīga, LV-1442
Mob. Tālr.: +371 26414932
latvia.eu
Dear Colleagues
Thank You for Your questions, what a great initiative to standardize practices between member states!
I think we can have an open discussion here.
Our answers from Estonian Business and Innovation Agency (Enterprise Estonia):
However – if the company is in difficuties based on annual report, we ask them to provide a more recent report which would show that they are not in difficulties any more.
If there are foreign companies in the group, we ask applicant to provide their last approved annual reports.
– can be done both ways. At first we evaluate on the applicant level and then on the group level. If we have consolidated data, then group level will be evaluated on the basis of consolidated data. If the applicant does not provide us consolidated data, then we take annual reports from Business register or ask from applicant all the group members annual reports and evaluate them separately.
We also assess all companies owned through natural person who has majority stake in other companies (over 50% shares).
We do not consider partner companies (25-50% shares) to be part of the group when determing undertakings in difficulties.
European Comission has explained:
As already set out in replies to earlier questions, the other criteria of Article 2(18) for determining whether an undertaking is in difficulty need to be assessed at both, the level of the legal entity applying for aid and the level of the group to which such entity belongs. The assessment at the level of the group should be carried out on the basis of consolidated financial statements. If such consolidated financial statements are not available it is possible to carry out a plausibility check of the financial situation of the group on the basis of stand-alone financial statements of the individual entities forming the group, by adding up these stand alone financial statements. It is not necessary to assess separately individual entities forming a group.
We don`t have regulation or rules written down in one document at the moment unfortunately regarding UID. But we do use EC User guide to the SME Definition.
I hope this is information is useful.
We have some questions about your practises regarding the size of the company:
Hope all of you find time to answer!
PS! Can we save your contacts in case we have further questions regarding similar questions about UID and defining the size of the company?
Best regards
Kersti Kunder
Senior Consultant
Reporting and Information
Grant Centre
Estonian Business and Innovation Agency (Enterprise Estonia)
+372 5615 6549
+372 627 9748
Sepise 7, 11415 Tallinn
From: LIAA Invest <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2024 3:08 PM
To: Klienditeenindus <[email protected]>;
[email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; Andris Blumbahs <[email protected]>; Eva Kalniņa <[email protected]>
Subject: Inquiry Regarding the Application of EU Regulation 651/2014 and Harmonization of Requirements in the Baltic Region
Dear Colleagues,
I hope this message finds you well.
On behalf of the Investment and Development Agency of Latvia (LIAA), I would like to inquire about the current practices regarding the financial evaluation of company groups and partner enterprises in your country, particularly concerning the application of EU Regulation 651/2014 on the status of undertakings in difficulty.
We have identified that EU Member States interpret Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 , which declares certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in accordance with Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty, in different ways. The document relates to Article 18(2) of the EEA Agreement. In particular, we are interested in understanding how your country applies this regulation when evaluating large international company groups whose subsidiaries apply for support. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014R0651
To ensure a harmonized application of the regulation, we kindly request clarification on the following:
Additionally, we would appreciate if you could share any relevant materials or guidelines outlining the evaluation principles used in your country. Please feel free to send them in your local language if necessary, as we can arrange for translation.
We look forward to receiving your response and learning more about the approaches taken by your institutions in this area.
Eva Kalniņa
Projektu attīstības nodaļa
Investīciju projektu departaments
Pērses iela 2, Rīga, LV-1442
Mob. Tālr.: +371 26414932
latvia.eu
Nimi | K.p. | Δ | Viit | Tüüp | Org | Osapooled |
---|