Dokumendiregister | Siseministeerium |
Viit | 5-4/114-1 |
Registreeritud | 22.10.2024 |
Sünkroonitud | 23.10.2024 |
Liik | Sissetulev kiri |
Funktsioon | 5 EL otsustusprotsess ja rahvusvaheline koostöö |
Sari | 5-4 Rahvusvaheliste suhete ja välislepingute alane kirjavahetus (AV) |
Toimik | 5-4/2024 |
Juurdepääsupiirang | Avalik |
Juurdepääsupiirang | |
Adressaat | European Fisheries Control Agency - EFCA |
Saabumis/saatmisviis | European Fisheries Control Agency - EFCA |
Vastutaja | Jaana Napa (kantsleri juhtimisala, Euroopa Liidu ja välissuhete osakond) |
Originaal | Ava uues aknas |
Saatja: Tiiu Noobel <[email protected]>
Saadetud: 22.10.2024 10:34
Adressaat: SiM info <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; info <[email protected]>; Kaitseministeerium
Koopia: <[email protected]>; Reet Ulm <[email protected]>; Hiie Marie
Loovere <[email protected]>; Esindus EL juures
(Põllumajandustalitus) <[email protected]>; eko AGRI <[email protected]>; Rene
Hartõkainen <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; Raili Lillemets <[email protected]>
Teema: FW: Estonia - Letter (2024) to Permanent Representatives to the EU
: European cooperation on coast guard functions - Ares(2024)7463464
Manused: Estonia_EFCA-ED Letter_Per_Rep_.pdf; Annex 1_Estonia.xlsx; Annex
1_Estonia.pdf; Annex 2_Estonia_Organisational Chart.docx; Annex
2_Estonia_Organisational Chart.pdf
TÄHELEPANU! Tegemist on väljastpoolt asutust saabunud kirjaga. Tundmatu
saatja korral palume linke ja faile mitte avada!
Tere!
Edastan Euroopa Kalanduskontrolli Ameti kirja, registreeritud EV AEEL
juures
21.10.2024, nr 10.2-12.K/1117. Palun vaadake, kes on siin peavastutaja,
kes
koondab info kokku ja vastab. Võib ka otse EFCAle vastata lisades
esinduse
[email protected] koopiasse.
Heade soovidega
Tiiu Noobel
Sekretär
Eesti Vabariigi alaline esindus EL juures
Rue Guimard 11/13, 1040 Brüssel
Tel: + 32 2227 4337, [email protected]
https://eu.mfa.ee/et/
-----Original Message-----
From: ARES NOREPLY <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2024 12:06 PM
To: Esindus EL juures üldaadress <[email protected]>
Cc: HARTÕKAINEN Rene (Estonian Police and Border Guard Board (Politsei-
ja
Piirivalveamet)) <[email protected]>; LUKS Vaido
<[email protected]>; OKAS Reemet (Keskkonnaministeerium = Ministry of the
Environment) <[email protected]>
Subject: Estonia - Letter (2024) to Permanent Representatives to the EU :
European cooperation on coast guard functions - Ares(2024)7463464
“Your Excellency,
Within the framework of the European Cooperation on Coast Guard
Functions,
please, find attached a letter with two Annexes from the EFCA Executive
Director, Dr. Susan Steele (document Ares(2024)7463464.
We invite you to confirm the information included in the Annexes (Excel
file
and Word document) to the email address [email protected]
within
the next 30 calendar days.
Thank you very much in advance for your cooperation.
Yours sincerely,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
Note: This e-mail was automatically generated by European Commission's
central mail registration system.
Replies by e-mail must be addressed to the original sender mailto:
Remarque: Cet e-mail a été généré automatiquement par le système
d'enregistrement central du corrier de la Comission européenne..
Toute réponse éventuelle par e-mail doit être adressée à l'expéditeur en
personne, mailto: [email protected].
Appendix 5:
Regional/International/Bilateral/Multilateral
Cooperation and Coordination Mechanisms Please check information in column S and correct if
necessary
No REGIONAL/INTERNATIONAL/BILATERAL/MULTILATERA
L COOPERATION & COORDINATION MECHANISM Link
1 Arctic and North Atlantic Security and Emergency
Preparedness Network (ARCSAR) https://arcsar.eu/
2 Arctic Coast Guard Forum (ACGF) https://www.arcticcoastguardf
orum.com/
3 Arctic Council https://arctic-
council.org/index.php/en/
4 Arctic Regional Hydrographic Commission (ARHC) https://uia.org/s/or/en/112227
4975
5 Agreement on the International Dolphin Conservation
Programme (AIDCP) (sister organisation to IATTC)
https://www.iattc.org/DolphinS
afeENG.htm
6 AQUAPOL - International Police Cooperation on the Water https://www.aquapol-
police.com/
7 Balkans and Black Sea Cooperation Forum (BBSCF) http://www.balkansblackseafor
um.org/bbsf2018/
8 Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission (Helcom) http://www.helcom.fi/
9 Baltic Sea Region Border Control Cooperation (BSRBCC) http://www.bsrbcc.org/about/
strategic-partners/
10 Baltic Sea Fisheries Forum (BALTFISH)
https://www.balticsea-region-
strategy.eu/attachments/articl
e/590800/2017%2002%2003%20B
ALTFISH%20final%20report.pdf
11 Baltic Sea Task Force on Organised Crime (BSTF-OC)
https://www.cbss.org/safe-
secure-region/baltic-sea-task-
force-organized-crime/
12 Barcelona Convention - Protection of the Marine Environment
and Coastal Regions of the Mediterranean
http://web.unep.org/unepmap
/
13 Black Sea Cooperation Forum (BSCF) http://www.bscforum.org/
14 Bonn Agreement - Cooperation in Dealing with Pollution in
the North Sea
https://www.bonnagreement.o
rg/
15 Bucharest Convention - Protection of the Black Sea against
Pollution
http://www.blacksea-
commission.org/_convention.as
p
16 Coordination Centre for Anti-Drug Enforcement in the
Mediterranean (CeCLAD-M)
https://www.drogues.gouv.fr/l
a-mildeca/l-action-publique/l-
action-
internationnale/cooperation-
operationnelle
17 Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna
(CCSBT) http://www.ccsbt.org/
18 Convention on Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living
Resources (CCAMLR) http://www.ccamlr.org/
19 Convention on the Conservation and Management of Pollock
Resources - Central Bering Sea (CCBSP)
http://www.fao.org/fishery/rfb
/ccbsp/en
20 Copenhagen Agreement on the Cooperation in Combating
against Pollution Incidents at Sea
https://www.kystverket.no/en/
EN_Preparedness-against-acute-
pollution/Protection-against-
acute-pollution/International-
cooperation/
21 Council of the Baltic Sea States (CBSS) https://www.cbss.org/
22 Denmark-Germany DENGER Agreement 1993
23 Denmark-Germany-Netherlands DENGERNETH Agreement
24 European Association of Airport and Seaport Police (EAASP) https://eaasp.org/
25 European Coast Guard Functions Forum (ECGFF)
https://ec.europa.eu/maritime
affairs/press/european-coast-
guard-functions-forum-ecgff-ten-
years-fruitful-co-operation-
address-security_en
26 European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) Joint Deployment
Plans
https://www.efca.europa.eu/e
n/content/joint-deployment-
plans-eu-waters
27 European Search and Rescue Plan (EUR Doc 039)-
International Civil Aviation Organisation
https://www.icao.int/EURNAT/
EUR%20and%20NAT%20Documen
ts/EUR%20Documents/EUR%20D
ocuments/039%20-
%20EUR%20Search%20and%20Res
cue%20Plan.pdf
28 European Union Civil Protection Mechanism (EUCPM)
https://ec.europa.eu/echo/wh
at/civil-
protection/mechanism_en
29 Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations
(FAO)
http://www.fao.org/fishery-
aquaculture/en/
30 France (New-Caledonia)-Australia: Bilateral Arrangement for
Cooperation between SAR Services (1999)
31 France (La Réunion)-Australia: Bilateral Arrangement for
Cooperation between SAR Services (2000)
32 France (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)-Canada: Bilateral
Arrangement for Cooperation between SAR Services (2002)
33 France-China: Bilateral Arrangement for Cooperation in the
maritime search and rescue area (2005)
34 France-Cyprus: Agreement on Maritime and Port Security
35 France-Italy-Monaco RAMOGE Agreement http://www.ramoge.org/fr/def
ault.aspx
36 France-Italy-Monaco RAMOGEPOL Plan http://www.ramoge.org/docum
ents/ramogepol.pdf
37 France-Italy-Spain SAR MEDOCC
38 France-Mauritius Island : Bilateral Arrangement for
Cooperation between SAR Services (2011)
39 France-Monaco: Bilateral Arrangement for Cooperation
between SAR Services (1999)
40 France (New-Caledonia)-New Zealand: Bilateral Arrangement
for Cooperation between SAR Services (2002)
41 France-Portugal: Bilateral Arrangement for Cooperation
between SAR Services (2008)
42 France-Portugal Cooperation Plan: On Request for Assistance
in Case of Large-scale Spill Response
43 France (Martinique)-Saint Lucia: Bilateral Arrangement for
Cooperation between SAR Services (2001)
44 France (La Réunion)-South Africa: Bilateral Arrangement for
Cooperation between SAR Services (2001)
45 France-Spain BISCAYE Plan
46 France-Spain LION Plan
47 France-Spain: Technical Arrangement for Joint Maritime
Border Surveillance
48 France-United Kingdom MANCHE Plan
49 France (New-Caledonia)-Vanuatu: Bilateral Arrangement for
Cooperation between SAR Services (2004)
50 Fisheries Committee for the Eastern Central Atlantic (CECAF) http://www.fao.org/fi/body/rf
b/cecaf/cecaf_home.htm
51 General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM) http://www.fao.org/gfcm/en/
52 Germany-Denmark – Agreement on Safety of Navigation in
the KADETRENDEN
53 Germany-Netherlands - River ‘EMS’ VTS Working Group
54 German Maritime Search and Rescue Joint Mutual Support
(Germany,Denmark,Netherlands,Sweden,UK)
55 German Maritime Search and Rescue Operational Agreements
(Germany, Denmark, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, UK)
56 German Police and Customs Cooperation Centre (PCCC) for
DENMARK (Padborg), POLAND (Swiecko)
https://www.bmi.bund.de/EN/
topics/security/international-
cooperation/police-
cooperation/police-cooperation-
node.html
57 Greece-Albania Protocol on Cooperation for Supervision of
Sea Areas
58 Greece-Cyprus Agreement Cooperation in the Field of Search
and Rescue
59 Greece-Italian MOU on Cooperation in Search and Rescue
60 Greece-Malta Agreement on Cooperation in the Field of
Search and Rescue
61 Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) https://iotc.org/
62 Information Fusion Centre – Indian Ocean Region (IFC-IOR) https://www.indiannavy.nic.in/
ifc-ior/index.html
63 Information Fusion Centre – Singapore (IFC)
https://www.ifc.org.sg/ifc2web
/app_pages/User/common/abo
utus.cshtml
64 Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) http://www.iattc.org/
65 International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and
Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) https://www.iala-aism.org/
66 International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) https://www.icao.int/about-
icao/Pages/default.aspx
67 International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic
Tunas (ICCAT) http://www.iccat.int/
68 International Maritime Rescue Federation (IMRF) https://www.international-
maritime-rescue.org/
69 Ireland-France SAR Technical Agreement
70 Ireland-UK MOU on SAR
71 Joint Inter-Agency Task Force-South (JIATF-S) https://www.jiatfs.southcom.m
il/
72 Lisbon Agreement: Cooperation Agreement for the Protection
of the Coasts and Waters of the North-east Atlantic against
Pollution
https://www.dgpm.mm.gov.pt/
lisbon-agreement
73 Marine Accident Investigators International Forum (MAIIF) https://maiif.org/
74 Maritime Analysis and Operations Centre - Narcotics (MAOC-
N) https://maoc.eu/
75 Mediterranean Coast Guard Functions Forum (MCGFF)
76 Mediterranean AIS Regional Exchange System - MareΣ
http://www.guardiacostiera.go
v.it/mezzi-e-
tecnologie/Pages/rete-ais-
nazionale.aspx
77 Netherlands-Germany NETHGER Agreement 1991
78 North Atlantic Coast Guard Forum (NACGF) https://www.kustwacht.nl/en/
NACGF-general.html
79 North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organisation (NASCO) http://www.nasco.int/
80 North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC) http://www.neafc.org/
81 Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) http://www.nafo.int/
82 North Sea and Channel Maritime Information Group (NSCMIG)
83 OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the Marine
Environment of the North -East Atlantic
https://www.ospar.org/conven
tion
84 Paris Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on Port State
Control
https://www.parismou.org/abo
ut-us/organisation
85 Poland-Denmark Operational Agreement on Maritime SAR Co-
operation (1994)
86 Poland-Germany Operational Agreement on SAR Co-operation
(1993) https://www.sar.gov.pl/pl/
87 Poland-Germany POLGER Agreement https://www.gov.pl/web/gospo
darkamorska
88 Poland-Germany Operational Agreement on Marine Accidents
and Combating Marine Pollution on Pomeranian Bay (2001)
89 Poland-Lithuania Governmental Agreement on Maritime and
Aeronautical SAR Co-operation (2009)
90 Poland-Norway Fisheries Control Agreement (2003)
91 Poland-Russia Governmental Agreement on Maritime and
Aeronautical SAR Co-operation (1996)
https://www.gov.pl/web/gospo
darkamorska
92 Poland-Russia Mixed Commission for Fisheries Management
93 Poland-Russia Working Agreement on Co-operation in
combating Marine Pollution of the Baltic Sea and the Vistula
Lagoon (2010)
94 Poland-Sweden Governmental Agreement on Aeronautical
and Maritime SAR Co-operation (1998)
95 Regional Maritime Information Centre – Madagascar (RMIFC) http://crfimmadagascar.org/
96 Portugal-Spain Memorandum of Cooperation between GNR
and Guardia Civil
https://www.gnr.pt/copInterna
cional.aspx
97 Portugal-Spain ESPPS Exchange of Situational Picture of
Neighbouring External Border Sections between the National
Coordination Centres
https://www.gnr.pt/copInterna
cional.aspx
98 Regional Marine Pollution Emergency Response Centre for the
Mediterranean Sea (REMPEC) http://www.rempec.org/
99 Sea Surveillance Cooperation Baltic Sea (SUCBAS) http://sucbas.org/
100 Slovenia-Italy MOU on SAR in Northern Adriatic
https://www.uradni-
list.si/glasilo-uradni-list-
rs/vsebina/2000-02-
0129?sop=2000-02-0129
101 Slovenia-Croatia-Italy MOU on Mandatory Ship Reporting
System in Adriatic Sea (Adriatic Traffic)
https://www.uradni-
list.si/glasilo-uradni-list-
rs/vsebina/2000-02-
0127?sop=2000-02-0127
102 Slovenia-Croatia Contingency Plan for Prevention of
Preparedness for and Response to Major Marine Pollution
Incidents in the Adriatic Sea
https://www.uradni-
list.si/glasilo-uradni-list-
rs/vsebina/2008-02-
0073?sop=2008-02-0073
103 Slovenia-Croatia-Italy MOU on the Establishment of a
Common Routing System and Traffic Separation Scheme in
Northern Part of the North Adriatic
https://www.uradni-
list.si/glasilo-uradni-list-
rs/vsebina/2000-02-
0128?sop=2000-02-0128
104 Slovenia-Croatia Agreement on Cooperation in Protection
against Natural and Man-Made Disasters
105 Slovenia-Italy MOU on Cooperation in the area of Disaster
Management
http://www.sos112.si/slo/tdocs
/mednarodno_italija.pdf
106 Slovenia- Italy Protocol on Cross-border Cooperation in
Forecasting, Prevention and Mutual Assistance in case of
Natural and other Disasters
http://www.sos112.si/slo/tdocs
/mednarodno_italija_furlanija.p
df
107 South-East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO) http://www.seafo.org/
108 South Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA) https://www.apsoi.org/
109 South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation
(SPRFMO) https://www.sprfmo.int/
110 South West Indian Ocean Fisheries Commission (SWIOFC)
http://www.fao.org/policy-
support/mechanisms/mechanis
ms-details/en/c/423143/
111 Sweden-Denmark-Germany SWEDENGER Agreement 2002
112 Virtual-Regional Maritime Traffic Centre (V-RMTC)/Trans-
Regional Maritime Network (T-RMN)
http://www.marina.difesa.it/E
N/facts/Pagine/vrmtc_trmn.asp
x
113 Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) http://www.wcpfc.int/
114 Western Central Atlantic Fisheries Commission (WECAFC) http://www.fao.org/fishery/rfb
/wecafc/en
Bilateral, Regional,
Multilateral Classification Legal nature/basis
Regional Other
Network. Project Consortium
that has received funding
from the European Union’s
Horizon 2020 research and
innovation programme under
grant agreement No 786571.
Regional Forum
It is an independent,
informal, operationally-driven
organization, not bound by
treaty. Chairmanship duties of
the ACGF rotate every two
years in concert with the
Chairmanship of the Arctic
Council.
Regional Forum
High-level intergovernmental
forum with a permanent
secretariat in Tromsø,
Norway. It was established by
the Ottawa Declaration on 19
September 1996.
Regional Other
Regional hydrographic
commission of the B-XB2115 -
International Hydrographic
Organization (IHO), which is
an intergovernmental
organisation grounded by an
intergovernmental convention
whose official custodian is the
Government of the
Principality of Monaco. Its
Statutes are registered
in 'UNTS 1/10764.
Multilateral Legally binding
Legally binding, multilateral
agreement that entered into
force in February 1999. The
IATTC provides the
Secretariat for the program.
The IATTC is an Inter-
governmental organization
created by the Convention for
the Establishment of an Inter-
American Tropical Tuna
Commission, signed on 31 May
1949.
Multilateral Other
Network established in 2002
composed of 18 States with 27
organisations through
Europworking by régional
HUBS. It is receiving EU Funds
from DG HOME.
Regional Forum
It is an independent,
nongovernmental, nonpartisan
economic platform powered
by private & public
institutions and supported by
a number of international and
regional organizations.
Regional Intergovernmental
organisation
It is an intergovernmental
organisation and a regional
sea convention in the Baltic
Sea area established in 1974.
It was founded by the
Convention on the Protection
of the Marine Environment of
the Baltic Sea Area.
Regional Other
Cooperation of law
enforcement agencies working
at the borders in the Baltic
Sea Region. Its establishment
was decided in Turku/Finland
in the context of the first
meeting of the heads of the
Border Guard Services of the -
10- Baltic Sea States in 1997.
Regional Forum
Regional body providing a
platform for discussion on
important fisheries issues in
the Baltic Sea. It was initiated
in 2009 as a flagship project
under the BSRS PA 9.
Regional Other
Task force created on 4 May
1996 due to the decision
taken by the Heads of
Governments of the Baltic Sea
States. It comprises 11
personal representatives of
the Heads of Governments of
the Baltic Sea States.
Regional Legally binding
Legally binding instrument. It
was adopted on 16 February
1976 in Barcelona and entered
into force in 1978.
Regional Forum
It was established with the
agreement signed within the
framework of the decision
taken at the 7th Black Sea
Littoral States Border / Coast
Guard Leaders Meeting held in
Istanbul between 07 - 09
November 2006.
Regional Legally binding Legally binding Agreement. It
was originally signed in 1969.
Regional Legally binding
Legally binding instrument. It
was signed in Bucharest in
April 1992 and ratified by all
six legislative assemblies of
the Black Sea countries in the
beginning of 1994; it is the
basic legal framework for
regional cooperation to
protect the coastal and
marine environment.
Regional Other
It is an international anti drug
trafficking agency based in
Toulon (France), set up in
2008 to coordinate anti-drug
trafficking operations and
intelligence in the
Mediterranean.
Regional Intergovernmental
organisation
Regional fisheries
management organisation
(intergovernmental
organisation). The Convention
for the Conservation of
Southern Bluefin Tuna (legally
binding) entered into force on
20 May 1994.
Regional Legally binding
Legally binding instrument. It
entered into force on 7 April
1982 by the Commission for
the Conservation of Antarctic
Marine Living Resources,
headquartered in Tasmania,
Australia.
Regional Legally binding
Legally binding instrument. It
went into effect in December
1995.
Regional Legally binding Legally binding instrument
signed in 1971.
Regional Forum
It is an inter-governmental
political forum for
cooperation in the Baltic Sea
Region.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Regional Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Regional Association
Association (Private Law
entity constituted through
statutes).
Regional Forum
It is a self-governing, non-
binding, voluntary,
independent, and non-
political forum.
Regional Legally binding
Art. 5.2 of the Regulation
(EU) 2019/473 on the
European Fisheries Control
Agency, which is in force
since 14 April 2019 (hard
law).
Regional Other
European Search and Rescue
Plan (EUR SAR Plan). A EUR
Document constitutes
supplementary reference and
guidance material (soft law).
Regional Other
Initiative of the European
Commission to constitute a
framework for cooperation in
disaster preparedness,
prevention and response.
Multilateral Intergovernmental
organisation
Specialized agency of the
United Nations (independent
international organization)
created on 16 October 1945
by a Constitution.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding arrangement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Regional Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Regional Other
Sub-regional contingency plan
that details response
arrangements between
France, Monaco and Italy.
Regional Legally binding
Tripartite Agreement signed
in 1972 by France, Italy and
Spain for air rescue
operations in the western
Mediterranean region.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Other Cooperation plan.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding
Bilateral maritime rescue plan
in the Bay of Biscay, the first
version of which dates back to
1999. The plan incorporates
the European Directives on
places of refuge and the
distribution of responsibilities
on both sides of the border.
Bilateral Legally binding
Sub-regional contingency plan
that covers the Western
Mediterranean parts of France
and Spain.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding
Franco-British agreement
whose purpose is to organize
cooperation between the
French and British authorities
in the event of a maritime
disaster in the Channel. It
deals with cooperation
procedures in maritime search
and rescue operations and the
fight against pollution of all
kinds.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Regional Other
It was established in 1967 by
Resolution 1/48 adopted by
the FAO Council at its Forty-
eighth Session held in Rome
under Article VI (2) of the
FAO Constitution.
Regional Intergovernmental
organisation
Regional fisheries
management organization
(RFMO) established in 1949
under the provisions of Article
XIV of the Constitution of the
FAO.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Other Working group.
Bilateral Non legally binding
agreement Bilateral MOUs
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding bilateral
agreements.
Bilateral Legally binding
Legally binding bilateral
agreements on cross-border
police cooperation.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Non legally binding
agreement
As a MOU, it is a non legally
binding agreement that
signals the willingness of the
parties to move forward with
a contract.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Regional Intergovernmental
organisation
Intergovernmental
organisation responsible for
the management of tuna and
tuna-like species in the Indian
Ocean. It was established in
1993 at the 105th Session of
the Council of the FAO under
Article XIV of the FAO
constitution.
Regional Other
Centre hosted by the Indian
Navy that was established by
the Government of India at
Gurugram on 22 December
2018 to further Maritime
Safety and Security in the
Indian Ocean Region.
Regional Other
Regional Maritime Security
(MARSEC) centre hosted by
the Republic of Singapore
Navy (RSN).
Regional Intergovernmental
organisation
Regional fisheries
management organization.
The Antigua Convention,
which was negotiated to
strengthen and replace the
1949 Convention establishing
the IATTC, entered into force
on 27 August 2010.
Multilateral Association
It is a non-profit,
international technical
association established in
1957. It provides for
recommendations (soft law).
Multilateral Intergovernmental
organisation
Specialized agency of the
United Nations founded by
the Chicago Convention in
1944.
Regional Intergovernmental
organisation
Intergovernmental regional
fisheries organization founded
by the International
Convention for the
Conservation of Atlantic
Tunas in 1966.
Multilateral
International non-
governmental
organisation
International non-
governmental organisation
(NGO) funded in 1924.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Non legally binding
agreement
MOU concerning the Common
Travel Area and associated
rights and privileges signed on
8 May 2019. As a MOU, it is a
non legally binding agreement
that signals the willingness of
the parties to move forward
with a contract.
Regional Other
Centre of excellence for all-
resource fusion and
employment of joint,
interagency, and international
capabilities to interdict illicit
trafficking posing a threat to
national security and regional
stability.
Regional Legally binding
Legally binding agreement
that entered into force on 1
February 2014.
Multilateral Forum
International non-profit
organisation dedicated to the
advancement of maritime
safety and the prevention of
marine pollution.
Regional Other
Initiative by 6 EU Member
Countries and the UK co-
funded by the Internal
Security Fund of the European
Union. The Centre was
created in 2007 and provides
a forum for multi-lateral
cooperation to suppress illicit
drug trafficking by sea and
air.
Regional Forum
It is a non-binding, non-
political and independent
platform composed of 24
Mediterranean countries.
Regional Other
Platform for the exchange of
AIS information between the
countries of the southern
shore of the Mediterranean,
beneficiaries of the
Community program called
SAFEMED.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Regional Forum
It is a non-binding, voluntary,
neither policy nor regulatory-
oriented Forum created in
2007 that operates within
existing legal frameworks.
Regional Intergovernmental
organisation
International organisation
established under the
Convention for the
Conservation of Salmon in the
North Atlantic Ocean from 1
October 1983.
Regional Intergovernmental
organisation
Regional Fisheries
Management Organisation
(RFMO) for the North East
Atlantic founded by the
Convention on Multilateral
Cooperation in North East
Atlantic Fisheries, which
entered into force in
November 1982.
Regional Intergovernmental
organisation
Intergovernmental fisheries
science and management
body that was founded in
1979 by the NAFO Convention.
Regional Other
Group whose Members are
France, the Netherlands,
Belgium and Germany.
Regional Legally binding
Legally binding Convention
that entered into force on 25
March 1998.
Multilateral Non legally binding
agreement
Administrative non-binding
agreement between the 27
participating Maritime
Authorities implementing a
harmonized system of Port
State Control. It entered into
operation on 1 July 1982.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding
As a working agreement, they
are guidelines that define
how the parties want to work
together.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Regional Other
The centre was opened in
2016 and was one of the
outcomes of the MASE
Programme to Promote
Maritime Security funded by
the European Union, which
ran from 2012 to 2018.
Bilateral Non legally binding
agreement
As a MoC it aims to provide
for a framework of
cooperation and determine
specific working arrangements
between the Parties.
Bilateral Other
Art.9.9 of the Regulation (EU)
No 1052/2013 of the European
Parliament and of the Council
of 22 October 2013
establishing the European
Border Surveillance System
(Eurosur)
Regional Other
The legal framework is set out
in the Protocol concerning Co-
operation in Preventing
Pollution from Ships and, in
Cases of Emergency,
Combating Pollution of the
Mediterranean Sea (2002
Prevention and Emergency
Protocol) to the Convention
for the Protection of the
Marine Environment and the
Coastal Region of the
Mediterranean (Barcelona
Convention).
Regional Other
Operational cornerstone for
sea surveillance information
exchange and co-operation
within the Baltic Sea area and
its approaches.
Bilateral Non legally binding
agreement.
Non legally binding
agreement.
Regional Non legally binding
agreement.
Non legally binding
agreement.
Bilateral Other
Contingency plan developed
by virtue of Art. 17 of the
Prevention and Emergency
Protocol to the Barcelona
Convention.
Regional Non legally binding
agreement.
Non legally binding
agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Bilateral Non legally binding
agreement.
Non legally binding
agreement.
Bilateral Legally binding Legally binding agreement.
Regional Intergovernmental
organisation
Regional fisheries
management organisation in
South East Atlantic Ocean
established in line with the
provisions of the United
Nations Law of the Sea
(Article 118) and United
Nations Fish Stocks Agreement
(UNFSA).
Regional Legally binding
Legally binding agreement
signed in Rome the 7th July
2006 and that entered into
force in June 2012.
Regional Intergovernmental
organisation
Intergovernmental
organization created by
international treaty, the
Convention on the
Conservation and Management
of High Seas Fishery Resources
in the South Pacific Ocean
signed in Auckland on 14
November 2009.
Regional Other
FAO mechanism to promote
the sustainable utilization of
the living marine resources of
the Southwest Indian Ocean
region.
Regional Legally binding Legally binding agreeement.
Regional Other
Network connecting Maritime
Operation Centres of member
Navies. It based on an Italian
Navy homemade software
called “Service-oriented
infrastructure for MARitime
Traffic tracking (SMART)”,
currently evolving to the
SMART FENIX release (as of
2018), with more tools and an
advanced user interface.
Regional Intergovernmental
organisation
It was established by the
Convention for the
Conservation and Management
of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks
in the Western and Central
Pacific Ocean (WCPF
Convention) which entered
into force on 19 June 2004.
Regional Intergovernmental
organisation
Regional Fishery Body
established in 1973 by
Resolution 4/61 of the FAO
Council under Article VI of the
FAO Constitution. Its statutes
were amended by the FAO
Council at its Seventy-fourth
Session in December 1978 and
by the Hundred and Thirty-
first Session of the FAO
Council in November 2006.
Description Maritime
Safety
Ship
Casualty
Fishery
Inspection/C
ontrol
The ARCSAR network addresses the Arctic and North-Atlantic
(ANA) region, preparing to cope with the Security and safety
threats that will result from increased commercial activity in the
region including traffic through the Northern passages, cruise
traffic, and offshore oil and gas activity. It aims to establish and
support a new Arctic and North Atlantic Security and Emergency
Preparedness Network for those involved in front-line security
and emergency response, directly involving practitioners, existing
networks, university stakeholders, research centres, industry,
and those involved in governance, and policy-making.
X X
The Arctic Coast Guard Forum (ACGF) is an independent,
informal, operationally driven organization, not bound by treaty,
to foster safe, secure, and environmentally responsible maritime
activity in the Arctic. All Arctic countries, Canada, Denmark,
Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden and the United States
are members of the forum. The ‘Chair’ duties of the ACGF rotate
every two years in concert with the Chairmanship of the Arctic
Council. Iceland is the chair for the Forum in 2019 - 2021. The
work of the ACGF is headed by the ACGF Chair and supported by
the Secretariat and Working Groups. The Secretariat is
responsible for implementing strategic direction and the
operation of the ACGF and its Working Groups.
x x x
COAST GUARD FUNCTION (CGF)
The Arctic Council is the leading intergovernmental forum
promoting cooperation, coordination and interaction among the
Arctic States, Arctic indigenous communities and other Arctic
inhabitants on common Arctic issues, in particular issues of
sustainable development and environmental protection in the
Arctic. The Council Member States are Canada, Denmark,
Finland, Iceland, Norway, the Russian Federation, Sweden and
the US. In addition, six organisations representing Arctic
indigenous peoples have status as Permanent Participants. The
Council operates a number of different Task Forces on issues such
as Marine Cooperation, Search and Rescue, Oil Pollution
Prevention, Oil Pollution Preparedness and Response etc.
X X
The ARHC aims to promote technical cooperation in the domain
of hydrographic surveying, marine cartography and nautical
information as well as examining the implications in the Arctic
Ocean Region of matters of general interest. It also aims to
stimulate the widening of hydrographic activity in the Arctic
Ocean Region and encourage seeking technical advice and
assistance in establishing and strengthening hydrographic
capabilities, It helps to define the needs for new hydrographic
products and services; facilitate information exchange and aid in
the planning and organization of hydrographic activities. The
following are member countries of the ARHC: Canada, Denmark,
Norway, Russia, United States of America and Iceland.
X X
The objective of the agreement is to implement a multilateral
programme for the protection of dolphins; to progressively
reduce incidental dolphin mortalities in tuna fishery and, to this
end, seek ecologically sound means of catching tuna while
sparing dolphins; to ensure the long-term sustainability of tuna
stocks and marine resources in the relevant areas. These
objectives are pursued through the IATTC, which has the
coordinating role under the Agreement. The contracting parties
are Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, the European Union,
Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru, the US,
Vanuatu, and Venezuela.
X
AQUAPOL’s vision is for a more safe, secure and environmental-
friendly waterborne transport in Europe by enhancement of law-
enforcement through cross-border cooperation. The AQUAPOL
organisation acts as a platform for learning and for a permanent
exchange of good practice for law-enforcement in the domain of
waterborne transport in Europe. Its main activities are focussed
on exchange of intelligence, exchange of operational information
and experience, and cross border cooperation in day-to-day law-
enforcement work. AQUAPOL works closely together with a
number of external stakeholders at operational, policy, and
legislative level.
The Balkans and the Black Sea region is a strategic, although
sensitive area, which requires a multilevel approach to enhancing
mutual understanding aimed at deepening economic relations and
cross-border cooperation. At the crossroads of Europe, Middle
East and Central Asia, the region is in the centre of gravity for
investments and geopolitical influence of world’s superpowers
during a time of larger region-wide and global change. At the
cross section of public and business sectors, Balkans & Black Sea
Cooperation Forum aiming at identifying, strengthening &
promoting economic relations, business opportunities,
cross-border cooperation and sustainable growth & development
across the Balkans, the Black Sea region and beyond.
HELCOM (Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission –
Helsinki Commission) is the governing body of the Convention on
the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area,
known as the Helsinki Convention. The Contracting Parties are
Denmark, Estonia, the European Union, Finland, Germany,
Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Russia and Sweden. HELCOM was
established about four decades ago to protect the marine
environment of the Baltic Sea from all sources of pollution
through intergovernmental cooperation. Its vision for the future
is a healthy Baltic Sea environment with diverse biological
components functioning in balance, resulting in a good ecological
status and supporting a wide range of sustainable economic and
social activities. It also includes cooperation mechanisms for
fisheries and navigation safety.
X X
The Baltic Sea Region Border Control Cooperation (BSRBCC) is a
flexible regional tool for daily inter-agency interaction in the
field of environmental protection. It also aims to combat cross-
border crime in the Baltic Sea region, with a particular focus on
the maritime environment. Cooperation Partners are Police,
Border Guards, Coast Guards and Customs Authorities. The
BSRBCC Border Guard Chiefs meet annually and is responsible for
the cooperation initiative, and approving the operational
strategy. It also has an operational and economic mandate for
cooperation. The BSRBCC presidency, which is for one year, is
supported by a secretariat, which includes representatives from
the last, current and next Presidency, thereby ensuring
continuity. The Baltic Border Committee (BBC) prepares and
implements the cooperation strategy through joint operations,
where national representatives integrate national action and
local cooperation into wider cooperation as necessary. Each MS
operates a 24/7 National Coordination Centre (NCC), whilst the
Presidency maintains an International Coordination Centre (ICC).
BALTFISH was initiated 2009 as a flagship project within the EU
Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region, EUSBSR. A Memorandum of
Understanding was signed in December 2013 by the ministers in
the eight member states in the Baltic Sea Region, and thus
changing the status of BALTFISH from a flagship project to a
permanent fisheries forum. BALTFISH works on two levels. There
is a high-level group (HLG) composed of the Member States
fisheries directors and invited officials from the European
Commission. There is also the BALTFISH Forum Seminar composed
of representatives from Member States, the European Commission
and the Baltic Sea Advisory Council as well as representatives
from other relevant stakeholders in the Baltic Sea fisheries.
X
The Baltic Sea Task Force on Organised Crime (BSTF-OC) was
created in 1996 in Visby (Sweden) through a decision of the
Heads of Governments of the Baltic Sea States. It comprises 11
personal representatives of the Heads of Governments of the
Baltic Sea States (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Iceland,
Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Russia and Sweden). Officials
from Interpol, Europol, the EU Council and the Secretariat of the
Council of the Baltic Sea States have the status of observers at
the BSTF meetings.
The Barcelona Convention aims to address in a holistic manner all
sources of pollution, which may threaten the marine environment
of the Mediterranean and its coastal areas. In particular, the
Protocol Concerning Cooperation in Preventing Pollution from
Ships and, in Cases of Emergency, Combating Pollution of the
Mediterranean Sea is the legal framework within which regional
cooperation in the fields of prevention of and response to marine
pollution from ships is developing. A regional strategy aims to
improve the follow-up of pollution events and
monitoring/surveillance of illicit discharges. The 22 Contracting
Parties are Albania, Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia,
Cyprus, Egypt, France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Lebanon, Libya,
Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, Morocco, Slovenia, Spain, Syria,
Tunisia, Turkey, and the EU.
The Black Sea Cooperation Forum was established in 2000,
between the Coast Guard / Border Authorities of the Black Sea
states, namely Turkey, Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine, Russian
Federation and Georgia. The main purpose is to enhance peace,
stability and maritime security in the Black Sea area, by
increasing regional co-operation, and improving good
relationship. Its tasks include enhancing existing interaction
among border/coast guard agencies to prevent illegal activities,
as well as strengthening the safety and security of navigation in
the Black Sea. It conducts counterterrorism and weapon of mass
destruction non-proliferation activities. It aims to help improve
cooperation in the areas of fishery protection, search and rescue,
marine pollution, marine environmental protection, information
exchange, personnel exchange programs, joint/shared training.
X X X
The Bonn Agreement is the mechanism by which ten
Governments, together with the European Union, cooperate in
dealing with pollution of the North Sea by oil and other harmful
substances. The signatories to the Agreement are the
Governments Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland,
Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, the UK and the European Union.
Spain joined as a Contracting Party in 2019.
The Bucharest Convention was signed in Bucharest in April 1992,
and was ratified by all six legislative assemblies of the Black Sea
countries (i.e. Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, Russian Federation,
Turkey and Ukraine) in 1994. It is the basic framework of
agreement and has three specific Protocols, dealing with the
control of land-based sources of pollution, the dumping of waste,
and joint action in the case of accidents (such as oil spills). The
implementation of the Convention is managed by the Commission
for the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution (also
sometimes referred to as the Istanbul Commission), and its
Permanent Secretariat is in Istanbul, Turkey.
The Centre de Coordination de la Lutte Anti-drogue en
Méditerranée, or Coordination Centre for Anti-Drug Enforcement
in the Mediterranean area was established in 2008 during the
French Presidency of the EU. It is based near Paris, France, and is
closely modelled on MAOC-N in Lisbon. The centre aims to
intercept drug trafficking from Northern and Western Africa in
the Mediterranean.
The Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna
(CCSBT) is an intergovernmental organisation responsible for the
management of southern bluefin tuna throughout its distribution.
The CCSBT's main objective is to ensure, through appropriate
management, the conservation and optimum utilisation of the
global Southern Bluefin Tuna fishery. The Commission also
provides an internationally recognised forum in which other
countries and entities can actively participate in Southern Bluefin
Tuna issues. Members of the Extended Commission comprise of
Australia, the European Union, the Fishing Entity of Taiwan,
Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, New Zealand and South
Africa.
X
The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living
Resources (CCAMLR) was established by international convention
in 1982 with the objective of conserving Antarctic marine life.
This was in response to increasing commercial interest in
Antarctic krill resources, a keystone component of the Antarctic
ecosystem and a history of over-exploitation of several other
marine resources in the Southern Ocean. CCAMLR is an
international commission with 26 Members, and a further 10
countries have acceded to the Convention. Based on the best
available scientific information, the Commission agrees a set of
conservation measures that determine the use of marine living
resources in the Antarctic.
X
The Convention on the Conservation and Management of Pollock
Resources in the Central Bering Sea (CCBSP) establishes an
international regime for conservation, management, and an
optimum utilization of pollock resources in the Convention Area.
It aims to restore and maintain the pollock resources in the
Bering Sea at levels, which will permit their maximum sustainable
yield. It facilitates cooperation in the gathering and examining of
information concerning pollock and other living marine resources
in the Bering Sea. The CCBSP has 6 members i.e. Japan, Peoples
Republic of China, Republic of Korea, Poland, the Russian
Federation and the United States.
X
Denmark including Greenland and the Faroe island, Iceland,
Finland including Åland island, Sweden and Norway are parties to
this agreement, which covers mutual notification, assistance and
aerial surveillance of oil and other chemicals at sea. Very few
countries have sufficient resources for combating oil spills and
other pollution incidents on their own, and for that reason, it is
important that nations cooperate closely with other nations on
mutual assistance.
The Council of the Baltic Sea States is an overall political forum
for regional cooperation. Consisting of 11 Member States
(Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania,
Norway, Poland, Russia & Sweden), as well as a representative of
the European Union, it supports a global perspective on regional
problems. The Council of the Baltic Sea States functions as a
coordinator of a multitude of regional actors in the areas of its
three long-term priorities: Regional Identity, Sustainable &
Prosperous Region, and Safe & Secure Region. Set up in 1992 to
ease the transition to a new international landscape, the
organisation today focuses on themes such as societal security,
sustainability, research & innovation, as well as countering
human trafficking.
DENGER is a bilateral agreement between Denmark and Germany,
which provides a Joint Maritime Contingency plan on combating
pollution from oil and other harmful substances in the North Sea.
The DENGERNETH Plan is a trilateral agreement between
Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands, which establishes a
joint response plan to maritime incidents involving oil and other
harmful substances, including marine pollution or threat of
marine pollution. The plan is an operational agreement, which
describes in detail the cooperation in aerial surveillance and oil
spill response, and the 3 Member States conduct annual
exercises.
The EAASP aims to work in partnership through the mutual
exchange of knowledge and practices to make the ports of
Europe a safe environment for the communities they serve. The
responsibility for the control of seaports within EAASP member
countries lies, as it does with aviation, with national
organisations. However, the EAASP Maritime Group (EMG) can,
and does, play an important role in the coordination and
implementation of joint security operations carried out by those
organisations, as well as legislative changes relating to the
management and security of seaports. The EMG promotes
common standards and inter-operability, and aims to develop the
exchange of information and intelligence.
The European Coast Guard Functions Forum (ECGFF) is a self-
governing, non-binding, voluntary, independent and non-political
forum bringing together the Coast Guard authorities from 25 EU
Member States and Schengen associated countries, as well as
representatives of the EU institutions and bodies with
competencies related to EU CG Functions. Since its establishment
in 2009 the European Commission and EU Agencies, have
supported the ECGFF. The rotating chair, supported by a
secretariat, governs the Forum with responsibility to implement
the annual programme. Bringing together over 30 national
coastguard authorities from EU countries and associated
Schengen countries, it works on collaborative issues i.e. multi-
agency, multinational operations and capacity building among CG
academies.
X X X
The EFCA coordinates the implementation of Specific Control and
Inspection Programmes (SCIP) for the Baltic Sea, the Black Sea,
the Mediterranean Sea, the North Sea and the Western Waters.
EFCA, with the MS’s, provides a specific organisational framework
for operational coordination of control activities in the different
areas, known as Joint Deployment Plan (JDP’s). The JDPs are for
fisheries/areas prioritised by the European Commission and the
MS’s concerned. They can be for European Union waters for
which the SCIP has been adopted by the Commission with the
Member States, or for International waters under the competence
of an RFMO, such as NAFO or NEAFC, where EFCA is requested to
coordinate the implementation of the EU obligations under an
International Control and Inspection Scheme.
X
The Plan aims to identify the status of SAR preparedness of EUR
Region States and State SAR arrangements. It also makes
recommendations for SAR planning and preparedness
enhancements, in terms of compliance with the Convention on
International Civil Aviation, Annex 12, the International
Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue (IAMSAR) Manual
guidance, and accepted best international practice. It provides
recommendations to IMO for harmonised and interoperable
delivery of both aeronautical and maritime SAR services. It requires regular updating to keep current with changes in ICAO
Annexes and guidance material, the IAMSAR Manual, regional
aviation activity, developments in ATM system, new technology,
political considerations, as well as human performance lessons
learned from actual SAR responses.
The overall objective of the EU Civil Protection Mechanism is to
strengthen cooperation between the EU Member States and 6
Participating States in the field of civil protection, with a view to
improve prevention, preparedness and response to disasters.
When the scale of an emergency overwhelms the response
capabilities of a country, it can request assistance via the
Mechanism. The European Commission plays a key role in
coordinating the response to disasters in Europe and beyond and
contributes to at least 75% of the transport and/or operational
costs of deployments. In addition to the EU Member States, the
six participating states are Iceland, Norway, Serbia, North
Macedonia, Montenegro, and Turkey.
The Fisheries and Aquaculture Department of the FAO supports
all efforts to promote Blue Growth - with its emphasis on
reconciling social and economic development with environmental
performance - to all fisheries and aquaculture policies. It
promotes and supports the implementation of the Code of
Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, in addition to providing
scientific advice, strategic planning, and training materials. It
serves as a neutral forum to discuss issues related to
international cooperation and multistakeholder approaches. The
Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries (EAF) used by the FAO is the
appropriate and practical way to implement the Code of Conduct
for Responsible Fisheries.
X
The Chief Executive, Australian Maritime Safety Authority, and
the Haut Commissaire de la République française en Nouvelle-
Calédonie, Délégué du Gouvernement , recognising the
importance of cooperation in maritime SAR and the need to
ensure expeditious and effective search and rescue services,
passed and Arrangement on maritime search and rescue. The
Rescue Coordination Centres of both parties will especially assist
each other, to the extent possible, in the conduct of SAR missions
in their respective Search and Rescue Regions (SRRs) and across
their common SRRs boundaries and will regularly exchange SAR
information concerning an actual distress or a potential distress
situation.
The Chief Executive, Australian Maritime Safety Authority, and
Le Préfet de La Reunion, Délégué du Gouvernement pour
l’action de l’Etat en mer , recognising the importance of
cooperation in maritime SAR and the need to ensure expeditious
and effective search and rescue services, passed and
Arrangement on maritime search and rescue. The Rescue
Coordination Centres of both parties will especially assist each
other, to the extent possible, in the conduct of SAR missions in
their respective Search and Rescue Regions (SRRs) and across
their common SRRs boundaries and will regularly exchange SAR
information concerning an actual distress or a potential distress
situation. This Arrangement was amended in 2011.
Following the report of the International Maritime Organization
Conference on Maritime Search and Rescue in the Atlantic Ocean,
which was held in Lisbon, Portugal in 1994, Canada and Saint-
Pierre-et-Miquelon agreed an Arrangement on maritime SAR. The
Parties confirmed that the French territorial sea of Saint-Pierre-
et-Miquelon is included in the Canadian Search and Rescue Region
of Halifax (SRR Halifax), for which the Maritime Rescue
Coordination Centre is JRCC Halifax.
The French Ministry of Transport and the Ministry of Transport of
the People’s Republic of China passed an Arrangement on
maritime search and rescue and maritime assistance, aimed to
improve skills, techniques and technology in life saving at sea.
This agreement also enables the Parties to exchange information
about ways, approaches and the regime to organize and
coordinate both government and non-government rescue forces
and resources.
An agreement between French maritime Gendarmerie and Cyprus
Maritime Police where both parties cooperate on exchange of
crewmembers, education on maritime security (given by the
French Maritime Gendarmerie), support to the re-organisation of
Cyprus CROPMar, etc. Planned to exchange information.
In force since 1976, the RAMOGE Agreement is a scientific,
technical, legal and administrative cooperation instrument by
which the governments of France, Monaco and Italy implement
actions for an integrated management of the coastline. The main
objective is to coordinate the actions of the three parties to
protect Mediterranean littoral waters. It is part of Barcelona
Convention, and has an executive secretariat in Monaco. The
area of the RAMOGE Agreement encompasses the maritime
waters of South-East France (Region Sud-Provence Alpes Côte
d’Azur), Monaco, and North-West of Italy (Region of Liguria),
forming a pilot zone for prevention of and response to maritime
pollution.
X
The RAMOGE Agreement between France, Italy and Monaco
establishes a joint intervention plan for spill response in the
Mediterranean Sea (from the mouth of Rhône river on the West,
to the lighthouse of Capo d’Anzio in the East, including Corsica
and Sardinia islands). The area is divided into 2 sub-areas, one
where each party shall provide assets in an automatic way, and
the other where joint intervention is scheduled only after request
to national authority concerned by the pollution. The plan
describes all the operational procedures, assets available, time to
mobilize, expertise, national doctrines for use of dispersants etc.
X X
SAR MEDOCC is a technical agreement between France, Spain and
Italy on SAR organization in Western Mediterranean Sea and
adjacent areas, in force since 1972. It aims at coordinating the
SAR organizations of the three contracting parties regarding
aircrafts in distress, according to Chicago convention on
International Civil Aviation, and, as far as possible, safety of life
at sea or ashore. Morocco takes part as an observer. The MRCC
Malta participates within means at its disposal.
The Government of the French Republic and the Government of
the Mauritius Republic passed an agreement on maritime search
and rescue, establishing cooperation between the different
authorities. This arrangement especially defines the standard
operating procedures for the Rescue Coordination Centres
(RCCs), particularly the determination of the responsible RCCs,
the communication about the search areas, the transferring of
SAR coordination responsibility or the liaison during a SAR
operation. This agreement also deals with the use of the
different SAR assets belonging to the two Parties and the SAR
operational expenses.
The Government of the French Republic and the Government of
His Serene Highness the Prince of Monaco passed an agreement
on maritime search and rescue, recalling that the SAR conference
held in Valencia (Spain) in 1997 on the initiative of the
International Maritime Organization assigned France a maritime
Search and Rescue Region (SRR) in the Mediterranean Sea.
Monegasque territorial waters shall be included in the SRR
assigned to France in the Mediterranean Sea. In this SRR, the
Maritime Rescue Co-ordination Centre shall be CROSS La Garde ,
under the authority of the Préfet maritime de la Méditerranée .
In the context of Global Maritime Distress and Safety System
(GMDSS), this centre shall receive alerts coming from Monegasque
territorial waters.
The Director of Civil Aviation, New Zealand, and the Haut
Commissaire de la République française en Nouvelle-Calédonie,
Délégué du Gouvernement , passed an arrangement for
cooperation between New Zealand Search and Rescue Services
and French Maritime Search and Rescue Services in New
Caledonia. This arrangement especially defines the standard
operating procedures for the Rescue Coordination Centres
(RCCs), particularly the determination of the Responsible RCCs,
the transferring of SAR Coordination Responsibility or the liaison
during a SAR operation.
The Government of the French Republic and the Government of
the Portuguese Republic passed an agreement for the exchange
of information between the French Antilles and the Portuguese
maritime search and rescue services. The maritime rescue
coordination centres (MRCCs) of the two Parties shall regularly
exchange the information, especially when a SAR operation is
launched on the high seas in their search and rescue area. They
shall exchange information on the available units in proximity to
the location of the alert and carry out combined liaison tests at
least to ensure their capacity to communicate.
This operational cooperation plan applies to large-scale spill
response (oil, HNS). It establishes the technical conditions and
procedures for requests for assistance between the General
Direction of the Maritime Authority (Portugal) and the Maritime
Prefecture of the Atlantic (France) regarding the deployment and
activation of assets. The applicable area is between the parallels
40°N and 46°N, and from the meridian 14°W, to the Portuguese,
Spanish and French coasts. The parties may agree to extend it
beyond this area in case of exceptional situation.
X X
The Government of Saint Lucia and the Government of the
French Republic passed an agreement on maritime search and
rescue. Based on the SAR conferences held in Caracas
(Venezuela) in 1984 and in Lisbon (Portugal) in 1994, which made
France responsible for a maritime Search and Rescue Region
(SRR), in the Western Atlantic Ocean and the Eastern Caribbean
Sea, in which Saint Lucia is geographically located. In this SRR,
the Maritime Rescue Co-ordination Centre is MRCC Fort-de-
France.
The Government of the Republic of South Africa and the
Government of the French Republic, recognising the importance
of cooperation in maritime Search and Rescue, and the need to
ensure expeditious and effective search and rescue services,
passed and Arrangement on maritime search and rescue. The
Rescue Coordination Centres of both parties will especially assist
each other, to the extent possible, in the conduct of SAR missions
in their respective Search and Rescue Regions (SRRs) and across
their common SRRs boundaries and will regularly exchange SAR
information concerning an actual distress or a potential distress
situation.
Through this bilateral plan, the French and the Spanish
authorities agree for joint action in the case of maritime rescue,
assistance to ship in distress, and marine pollution in the Bay of
Biscay. The area is delimited by parallels 42°30’N and 46°00’N,
meridian 10°25’W, and French and Spanish coasts. A separation
line marks the limits of the areas of initial responsibility.
X X
This bilateral operational cooperation plan signed in 1972 and
updated in 2016 schedules terms of collaboration between French
and Spanish authorities in the field of maritime rescue, marine
pollution and assistance to ships in distress in the Mediterranean
Sea. It gives details on the availability of air and naval assets in
an area delimited by French and Spanish SRR as well as in the
specific area of the LION Plan.
X X
Since 2008, this technical agreement between the French
Maritime Gendarmerie and Spanish Guardia Civil comes down to
meetings, joint patrols on Atlantic and Mediterranean border
sections, personnel exchange during illegal immigration and
fishery control operations. In 2020, operations for securing
Spanish leisure areas (for instance in the Baleares islands) will be
added.
This bilateral agreement signed in 1978 and regularly updated
aims at coordinating French and UK capabilities in case of
maritime disaster in their adjacent waters. Its guideline is the
designation of a single authority for the coordination of the
response involving the two parties. An Anglo French accident
technical group (AFATG) meets twice a year.
X X
The Government of the French Republic and the Government of
the Republic of Vanuatu passed an agreement on maritime search
and rescue, recalling that the SAR conference held in Seoul
(Korea) in 1997 made France responsible for a maritime Search
and Rescue Region (SRR), in which Vanuatu is geographically
located. In this SRR, the Maritime Rescue Co-ordination Centre is
MRCC Nouméa, under the authority of the Haut-Commissaire de
la République en Nouvelle-Calédonie délégué du Gouvernement.
The purpose of the Committee is to promote the sustainable
utilization of the living marine resources within its area of
competence by the proper management and development of the
fisheries and fishing operations. Established in 1967, its members
are Angola, Benin, Cameroon, Cabo Verde, the Democratic Rep.
of the Congo, Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Cuba, Equatorial Guinea,
European Union, France, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Greece,
Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Liberia,
Mauritania, Morocco, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland,
Romania, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Spain,
Togo, and the United States of America.
X
The General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM)
is a regional fisheries management organization (RFMO)
established under the provisions of Article XIV of the FAO
Constitution. The main objective of the GFCM is to ensure the
conservation and the sustainable use, at the biological, social,
economic and environmental level, of living marine resources as
well as the sustainable development of aquaculture in the
Mediterranean and in the Black Sea (GFCM area of application).
The GFCM is currently composed of 24 members (23 member
countries and the European Union) who contribute to its
autonomous budget to finance its functioning and 5 Cooperating
non-Contracting Parties (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia,
Jordan, Moldova and Ukraine).
X
This Danish-German Arrangement on measures aimed at
increasing the safety of navigation in the Kadetrenden was signed
in 2001.
X
This Working Group involving Germany and the Netherlands was
established within the framework of Ems-Dollart Treaty of 8 April
1960, (D/NL)
X
German authorities have established Memorandums of
Understanding (MoU’s) on Joint Mutual Support for Maritime
Search and Rescue with Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden and
the United Kingdom.
The German Maritime Search and Rescue Organisation (DGzRS),
has put in place Operational Agreements with their respective
counterparts in Denmark (Admiral Danish Fleet) the Netherlands
(the Netherlands Coast Guard), Poland (Polish Ship Salvage),
Sweden (Swedish Maritime Administration) and the UK (Her
Majesty’s Coast Guard).
German Police have signed bilateral agreements with all its
neighbours on cross-border police cooperation. These agreements
govern cross-border police measures such as surveillance,
controlled deliveries and hot pursuit, joint police operations (in
particular joint patrols, information sharing, cross-border
personnel support, and work at the joint centres for police and
customs cooperation. At these joint centres, the police and
customs authorities of the partner countries work together in
mixed international teams under one roof based on mutual trust.
Information and experience are shared on all matters related to
the border area. This makes it easier to coordinate cross-border
operations, e.g. identifying additional contact persons in the
neighbouring country. Officers working at the joint centres are
required to be able to speak the language of both countries.
Protocol between the Ministry of mercantile marine of the
Hellenic Republic and the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of
Albania for the cooperation between the Hellenic Coast Guard
and the Albanian Border Police for the for the effective
supervision of the sea areas between both countries.
Agreement between the government of the Hellenic Republic and
the government of Cyprus on Co-operation in the Field of Search
and Rescue (2014).
Memorandum of Understanding between the government of the
Hellenic Republic and the government of the Italian Republic on
Cooperation in Search and Rescue Operations in the Ionian Sea
(2000).
Agreement between the government of the Hellenic Republic and
the government of Malta on Co-operation in the Field of Search
and Rescue (2008).
The IOTC is an intergovernmental organisation responsible for the
management of tuna and tuna-like species in the Indian Ocean. It
works to achieve this by promoting cooperation among its
Contracting Parties (Members) and Cooperating Non-Contracting
Parties in order to ensure the conservation and appropriate
utilisation of fish stocks and encouraging the sustainable
development of fisheries. At each Session of the Commission,
Members may adopt Conservation and Management Measures
concerning the management of tuna and tuna-like species under
the IOTC mandate as well as the fisheries, which target them.
These decisions are passed in the form of either Resolutions or
Recommendations. There are currently 31 Members, including
the EU, and two cooperating Non-Contracting Parties (CNCP) i.e.
Senegal and Liberia.
X
The IFC-IOR stems from the importance of the Indian Ocean to
world trade and security, and the need for the various maritime
nations and organisations to collaborate towards enhancing
maritime safety and security on the seas of this region. In
addition to utilising the collective wisdom and resources towards
addressing myriad challenges in the region, IFC-IOR will help
interface and integrate, wherein, all partners and stakeholders
would benefit from each other’s best practices and expertise.
The Indian Navy and Indian Coast Guard jointly administer the
IFC. IFC-IOR was established with the vision of strengthening
maritime security in the region and beyond, by building a
common coherent maritime situation picture and acting as a
maritime information hub for the region.
X
The Information Fusion Centre (IFC) is a regional Maritime
Security (MARSEC) centre hosted by the Republic of Singapore
Navy (RSN). The IFC aims to facilitate information sharing and
collaboration between its partners to enhance MARSEC. Since its
inception, the IFC has been at the forefront of providing
actionable information to cue responses by regional and
international navies, coast guards and other maritime agencies to
deal with the full range of MARSEC threats and incidents. This
includes piracy, sea robbery, weapons proliferation, maritime
terrorism, as well as contraband and drug smuggling. In addition
to RSN personnel the centre hosts liaison officers from 24
countries i.e. Australia, Brunei, Cambodia, Canada, China, Chile,
France, Greece, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Malaysia,
Myanmar, New Zealand, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, South Africa,
Republic of Korea, Thailand, United Kingdom, United States, and
Vietnam.
X
The objective of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission
(IATTC) is to ensure the long-term conservation and sustainable
use of tuna and tuna-like species and other species of fish taken
by vessels fishing for tunas and tuna like species in the Eastern
Pacific Ocean. Members are Belize, Canada, China, Columbia,
Costa Rica, Ecuador El Salvador, the European Union, France,
Guatemala, Japan, Kiribati, Korea, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama,
Peru, Chinese Taipei, US, Vanuatu and Venezuela. Bolivia,
Honduras, Indonesia, Liberia are Cooperating Non-Members.
X
IALA is a non-profit, international technical association.
Established in 1957, it gathers marine aids to navigation
authorities, manufacturers, consultants, and, scientific and
training institutes from all parts of the world to exchange and
compare their experiences and achievements. IALA members
work together to harmonise aids to navigation worldwide and to
ensure that the movements of vessels are safe, expeditious and
cost effective. A number of technical committees were
established to bring together experts from around the world to
work in specific areas e.g. needs of mariners, developments in
technology, etc.
X
The International Civil Aviation Organization is a UN specialized
agency, established in 1944 to manage the administration and
governance of the Convention on International Civil Aviation
(Chicago Convention). ICAO works with the Convention’s 193
Member States and industry groups to reach consensus on
international civil aviation Standards and Recommended Practices
(SARPs) and policies in support of a safe, efficient, secure,
economically sustainable and environmentally responsible civil
aviation sector. These ensure local civil aviation operations and
regulations conform to global norms, allowing more than 100,000
daily flights in aviation’s global network to operate safely and
reliably, many over the world’s oceans and seas.
ICCAT is an intergovernmental organization for the management
and conservation of tuna and tuna-like species in the Atlantic
Ocean and adjacent seas. The organisation was established in
1966, at a conference in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and operates in
English, French and Spanish. ICCAT has 53 members and 5
‘Cooperators’. ICCAT carries out studies on biometry, fisheries
ecology and oceanography, focusing on the effects of fishing on
tuna stock abundance. They collect and analyse fisheries
statistics required for the management of resources. Based on
scientific and other information, such as fishery statistics and
stock assessments provided by members, each year the
Commission decides on conservation and management measures
aimed at maintaining target stocks at levels that permit the
maximum sustainable catch for food.
X
The International Maritime Rescue Federation (IMRF) is
the international non-governmental organisation (NGO)
working to develop and improve maritime search and rescue
(SAR) capacity around the world, improving maritime SAR
capability worldwide. The IMRF brings together the world's
maritime SAR organisations involving both voluntary and
governmental organisations. As well as capacity building, the
IMRF also has an advocacy role, providing an international voice
for its members. It is the only maritime SAR NGO with
consultative status at the United Nations’ International Maritime
Organization (IMO).
The Irish Coast Guard, Department of Transport, Tourism and
Sport and the Maritime Prefect for the Atlantic Region signed a
Technical Agreement under the IMO International Convention for
Maritime Search and Rescue to cooperate in the case of major
disaster or events of exceptional seriousness, assist one another
through their search and rescue services. The memorandum aims
at defining the formal procedures and technical aspects of the
request of assistance between the Irish Coast Guard coordination
centres and the French Maritime Prefecture for the Atlantic, for
the employment of their respective air assets. Both parties
further recognise that similar support may be possible in the
event of maritime casualties within their respective EEZs.
X
The Irish Coast Guard (ICG), Dept. of Transport, Tourism and
Sport and the UK Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) signed
an MOU under the IMO International Convention for Maritime
Search and Rescue to cooperate in the case of major disaster or
events of exceptional seriousness, assist one another through
their search and rescue services. The MOU defines the formal
procedures and technical aspects of the request of assistance
between the ICG coordination centres and the UK MCA and both
parties further recognise that similar support may be possible in
the event of maritime casualties within their EEZs.
X
Located at Naval Air Station in Key West, Florida, Joint
Interagency Task Force South (JIATF South) conducts detection
and monitoring operations throughout the Caribbean to facilitate
the interdiction of illicit trafficking in support of the US (Coast
Guard and Navy) and partner nations security, among them
France and Netherlands who have national territories in this
area. Coordinated operations aim at denying transnational
criminal organizations the ability to exploit shipment routes for
the movement of narcotics, precursor chemicals, bulk cash,
human trafficking and weapons.
On 17 October 1990, Portugal, France, Morocco, Spain and the
European Community signed the Lisbon Agreement, which is
essentially a mechanism to ensure cooperation between the
Contracting Parties in the event of a pollution incident. Such a
pollution incident is a discharge or danger of a discharge of
hydrocarbons or other harmful substances, which has occasioned
or may occasion damage to the marine environment, the coast or
the related interests of one or more of the Parties, and requiring
emergency action or an immediate reaction. The Agreement
establish the obligation on the Contracting Parties to create their
own intervention agencies and to set their own national plans of
action. An International Centre, located in Portugal, is assisting
the Parties to react swiftly and effectively to pollution incidents.
The Marine Accident Investigators’ International Forum (MAIIF) is
an international non-profit organisation dedicated to the
advancement of maritime safety and the prevention of marine
pollution through the exchange of ideas, experiences and
information acquired in marine accident investigation. It aims to
promote and improve marine accident investigation, and to
foster cooperation and communication between marine accident
investigators. It aims to develop and sustain a co-operative
relationship among national marine investigators in order to share
knowledge in an international forum, and to improve maritime
safety and the prevention of pollution via the dissemination of
information from the investigative process.
The Maritime Analysis and Operations Centre – Narcotics (MAOC
(N)), based in Lisbon, has 7 EU Member Countries: France,
Ireland, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Portugal and the UK. It is co-
funded by the Internal Security Fund of the EU and is a forum for
multi-lateral cooperation to suppress illicit drug trafficking by sea
and air. It is a European Law Enforcement unit with military
support that coordinates maritime and aviation intelligence,
resources and trained personnel to respond to the threat of illicit
drug trafficking.
The Mediterranean Coast Guard Functions Forum (MCGFF) is a
non-binding, voluntary, independent and non-political forum
bringing together representatives from institutions and agencies
with related competencies in coast guard functions in the
Mediterranean. The aim is to facilitate multilateral cooperation
on a wide range of issues such as maritime safety, security and
environmental protection activities as well as creating
partnerships to share experience and best practices on common
problems.
X X X
The Directive 2002/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 27 June 2002 requires the Member States (MSs) to
provide themselves with appropriate equipment and shore-based
installations for receiving and utilizing the AIS information
transmitted by the vessels. The Member States agreed to
implement common regional systems hosted and developed by
one of them. EMSA and the Italian Coast Guard subscribed, since
2009, a Service Level Agreement (SLA) by which Italy is
responsible for the hosting, maintenance, operation and
monitoring of the Mediterranean AIS Regional Server (MAREΣ) and
its connection with SafeSeaNet. Part of SafeSeaNet, MAREΣ
(Mediterranean AIS Regional Exchange System) officially started
to run on 1st January 2008; currently it allows the AIS
information sharing among Mediterranean EU countries (Portugal,
Spain, France, Italy, Malta, Slovenia, Greece, Cyprus, Romania,
Bulgaria, Croatia, Gibraltar) e non-EU which agreed to share AIS
data between themselves (e.g. Jordan, Morocco and
Montenegro).
X
NETHGER is a bilateral agreement between the Netherlands and
Germany, which provides a Joint Maritime Contingency plan on
combating pollution from oil and other harmful substances in the
North Sea.
The North Atlantic Coast Guard Forum (NACGF), formed in 2007,
aims to increase cooperation amongst member countries on
maritime safety and security in the region. The NACGF is not
policy or regulatory- oriented, is non-binding, voluntary, and
operates within existing legal frameworks. Its members are
Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland,
Ireland, Latvia, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Russia, Spain,
Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States of America.
Estonia Lithuania and Poland have observer status.
X X X
The Convention for the Conservation of Salmon in the North
Atlantic Ocean (1983) created the inter-governmental
organization NASCO (North Atlantic Salmon Conservation
Organization) with the objective to conserve, restore, enhance
and rationally manage wild Atlantic salmon. It created a large
protected zone, free of fisheries targeting Atlantic salmon in
most areas beyond 12 nm from the coast. NASCO has six Parties:
Canada, Denmark (in respect of the Faroe Islands & Greenland),
the European Union, Norway, the Russian Federation and the
United States of America. France (in respect of St.Pierre &
Miquelon) attends as an observer. Iceland withdrew in 2009.
X
The North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC) is the
RFMO for the North East Atlantic. The area stretches from the
southern tip of Greenland, east to the Barents Sea, and south to
Portugal. Its objective is the long-term conservation and
optimum utilisation of the fishery resources in the Convention
Area. There are 5 contracting partners, Denmark (for Faroe
Islands and Greenland), the European Union, Iceland, Norway and
the Russian Federation, with 6 cooperating Non-Contracting
parties, Bahamas, Canada, Curacao, Liberia, New Zealand and
Panama.
X
NAFO is an intergovernmental fisheries science and management
body, which was founded in 1979 as a successor to the
International Commission of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries
(1949-1978). The NAFO Convention on Cooperation in the
Northwest Atlantic Fisheries applies to most fishery resources of
the Northwest Atlantic except salmon, tunas/marlins, whales,
and sedentary species (e.g. shellfish). NAFO has 12 Contracting
Parties i.e. Canada, Cuba, Denmark (in respect of the Faroe
Islands and Greenland), the European Union, France (in respect
of St. Pierre and Miquelon), Iceland, Japan, Norway, Republic of
Korea, the Russian Federation, Ukraine and the United States of
America.
The group, consisting of Belgium, France, Germany the
Netherlands and the UK, aims to develop processes to share
maritime information in support of national maritime safety and
security objectives, and to improve maritime situational
awareness in the multi-agency maritime environment. With a
focus on the North Sea and the Channel, they also aim to work on
the integration of existing systems/channels as well as ongoing
projects to provide real-time data exchange, while also
developing procedures to mutually support common objectives in
areas of common maritime interest.
OSPAR is the mechanism by which 15 Governments & the EU
cooperate to protect the marine environment of the North-East
Atlantic. OSPAR was started in 1972 with the Oslo Convention
against dumping and was broadened to cover land-based sources
of marine pollution and the offshore industry by the Paris
Convention of 1974. These two conventions were unified, up-
dated and extended in 1992 with a new annex on biodiversity and
ecosystems was adopted in 1998 to cover non-polluting human
activities that can adversely affect the sea. The fifteen
Governments are Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany,
Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Norway,
Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and UK.
The Paris MOU is based on the principle that the prime
responsibility for compliance with the requirements laid down in
the international maritime conventions lies with the ship-
owner/operator. Responsibility for ensuring compliance remains
with the flag State. It aims to eliminate the operation of sub-
standard ships through a harmonized system of port State
control. The members are Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia,
Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece,
Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands,
Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovenia, Spain,
Sweden and the UK.
X
An agreement Maritime SAR Co-operation between Polish Ship
Salvage Company and Admiral Danish Fleet.
The operational agreement on Maritime SAR Co-operation was
signed in Bremen on 26.04.1993 between Polish Ship Salvage
Company and German Lifeboat Institution.
The POLGER Agreement is a bilateral operational agreement
between Poland and Germany on cooperation and response
activities in dealing with maritime incidents of pollution or the
threat of pollution in the Baltic Sea Area involving oil and other
harmful substances. Not yet in force.
X
This operational agreement covers the Pomeranian Bay and deals
with co-operation and response activities concerning marine
accidents and combating marine pollution by oil and other
harmful substances. It will be replaced by the POLGER Agreement
(please see above).
X
This agreement on Maritime and Aeronautical SAR Co-operation
was signed in Vilnius 19.10.2009 between Ministry of
Infrastructure in Poland and Ministry of Transport in Lithuania.
This agreement was signed on 1.02.2003 by the former Polish
Regional Sea Fisheries Inspectorates in Gdynia, Słupsk and
Szczecin and the Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries. It covers the
cooperation in the fields of monitoring, control and surveillance
of fisheries, especially the exchange of information on landings
and inspections, exchange of personnel between the relevant
control authorities.
X
This agreement on Maritime and Aeronautical SAR Co-operation
was signed in Moscow on 13.11.1996 between Ministry of
Transport and Maritime Economy and Russian Federation Aviation
and Maritime Services.
Signed on 05.07.1995 between Poland and Russia, the agreement
on a mutual relationship and cooperation on the fishery economy,
and used by the Ministry of Maritime Economy and Inland
Navigation, Fisheries Department.
X
Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Poland
and the Government of Russian federation on cooperation in
combating marine pollution of the Baltic sea and the Vistula
Lagoon by oil or other harmful substances. Sea area covered
includes Baltic Sea (territorial waters and economic Zones
between Poland and Kaliningrad Region) and Vistula lagoon.
Signed on 6.12.2010.
The Ministry of Transport and Maritime Economy in Poland and
the Maritime Administration in Sweden signed this agreement on
Aeronautical and Maritime SAR Co-operation in Stockholm on
10.06.1998.
Based on information from Parties and Partners, the RMIFC
receives, processes, fuses, stores, shares and exchanges
information with the objective of issuing an alert in the event of
imminent or proven danger to maritime security and safety in its
general area of interest considered to be the regional maritime
space laying between latitudes 26 ° North and 37 ° South and
longitudes 20 ° East and 76 ° East. The general area of interest
of the RMIFC is complementary to that of the IFC Singapore in the
east and the Gulf of Guinea maritime safety and security
architecture in the west.
X
Establishes effective coordination pillars, especially for the
exchange of information, supported in the case of police
operations, reinforcement of training programs and management
of services and staff.
According to the EUROSUR regulation, the national coordination
centres of neighbouring Member States shall share with each
other, directly and in near real time, the situational picture of
neighbouring external border sections. In this regard the
information collected from the national surveillance systems in
the neighbouring border sections of Portugal and Spain is shared
directly and in near real time among them, contributing to
improve the situational awareness and to increase reaction
capability.
In 1976, a Conference of Plenipotentiaries representing sixteen
Mediterranean coastal States and the European Communities
adopted the Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean
Sea Against Pollution (Barcelona Convention). This included the
“Regional Oil Combating Centre” (ROCC) with the mandate to
strengthen the capacities of coastal States in the Mediterranean
region. It also facilitates co-operation among those States to
combat massive marine pollution by oil, particularly by
developing national capacities to combat oil pollution and by
establishing a regional information system with a view to dealing
with marine pollution emergencies. In 1989, the name of the
Centre was changed to the Regional Marine Pollution Emergency
Response Centre for the Mediterranean Sea (REMPEC). The
International Maritime Organization (IMO), in cooperation with
UNEP/MAP, administers REMPEC.
SUCBAS is a cornerstone for sea surveillance, information
exchange and co-operation within the Baltic Sea area and its
approaches. The aim of the co-operation is to enhance Maritime
Situational Awareness benefiting maritime safety, security,
environmental and law enforcement activities in the region by
sharing relevant maritime data, information and knowledge
between the participants. The SUCBAS cooperation
comprises Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Germany,
Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and United Kingdom. The
initiative is led by the navies of these countries. In recognition of
the fact that responsibility for of maritime surveillance, maritime
safety, maritime security, the maritime environment and
maritime law enforcement are implemented differently in each
country, SUCBAS information is shared among national
governmental institutions with a maritime responsibility
regardless if civil or military, at their discretion.
X X X
Slovenia and Italy signed the 2000 Memorandum of Understanding
in order to improve both safety of navigation in the North
Adriatic Sea and response activities to any emergency situation at
sea in accordance with the provisions of the International
Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue, 1979.
Slovenia, Croatia and Italy signed the 2000 Memorandum of
Understanding on the Mandatory Ship Reporting System in the
Adriatic Sea with the purpose of improving safety at sea.
X X
This Sub-regional Contingency Plan for the prevention of,
preparedness for and response to major marine pollution
incidents in the Adriatic has been developed in accordance with
Article 17 of the Protocol concerning Cooperation in Preventing
Pollution from Ships and, in Cases of Emergency, Combating
Pollution of the Mediterranean Sea (Prevention and Emergency
Protocol) to the Convention for the Protection of the
Mediterranean Sea against Pollution (Barcelona Convention). Italy
has not yet ratified this agreement.
Slovenia, Croatia, and Italy agreed on a routing system and a
traffic separation scheme in the Northern Part of the North
Adriatic, with the purpose to improve safety at sea.
X
Bilateral agreement between Slovenia and Croatia on cooperation
in protection against natural and manmade disasters including
planning and implementation of measures for protection against
floods, earthquakes, fires, sudden pollution, accidents at sea,
radiological hazards and industrial and other civil disasters that
can have transboundary impact. Also includes mutual assistance
in the protection, rescue and elimination of the consequences of
accidents, cooperation on training and mobilisation members of
the Civil Protection, firefighters in other members of rescue
teams in cooperation for rescue protection, exchange of
scientific and technical information before disasters,
participation in development in the production of rescue
equipment.
Memorandum of Understanding between the Administration of
the Republic of Slovenia for Civil Protection and Disaster Relief
and Italian Department of Civil Protection which is based on
recognizing that cooperation in the field of disaster management
contribute to people safety and the importance of providing
effective disaster response.
Protocol on cross-border cooperation between Slovenia and the
Autonomous Region of Friuli-Venezia Giulia, based on protection
and rescue in case of natural and man-made disasters. In the
event of natural or man-made disaster the countries will provide
immediate cross-border assistance, coordinate the necessary
protection and rescue measures, ensure the timely
communication of natural or man-made disasters, as well as
liaison between operational centres. Both parties are committed
to further develop international cooperation.
The South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO) is an
intergovernmental fisheries science and management body. Its
primary purpose is to ensure the long-term conservation and
sustainable use of all living marine resources in the South East
Atlantic Ocean, and to safeguard the environment and marine
ecosystems in which the resources occur. The Convention
excludes the EEZ’s of the coastal states. The contracting parties
are Angola, the EU, Japan, Republic of Korea, Namibia, Norway
and South Africa.
X
The objectives of this Agreement are to ensure the long-term
conservation and sustainable use of the fishery resources in the
Area through cooperation among the Contracting Parties, and to
promote the sustainable development of fisheries in the Area. It
covers fishery resources including fish, molluscs, crustaceans and
other sedentary species within the area, but excluding highly
migratory species and sedentary species subject to the fishery
jurisdiction of coastal states. SIOFA has nine Contracting Parties:
Australia, the Cook Islands, the European Union, France (on
behalf of its Indian Ocean Territories), Japan, the Republic of
Korea, Mauritius, the Seychelles and Thailand. In addition,
Chinese Taipei is deemed a fishing entity and Comoros is a
cooperating non-Contracting Party. Kenya, Madagascar,
Mozambique and New Zealand are also signatories, but they have
not yet ratified the agreement.
X
The South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation is
an inter-governmental organisation that is committed to the long-
term conservation and sustainable use of the fishery resources of
the South Pacific Ocean and in so doing safeguarding the marine
ecosystems in which the resources occur. The SPRFMO Convention
applies to the high seas of the South Pacific, covering about a
fourth of the Earth's high seas areas. There are 15 members:
Australia, Peoples Republic of China, Cuba, the European Union,
Republic of Korea, Peru, Chinese Taipei, Vanuatu, Chile, Cook
Islands, Ecuador, Denmark (in respect of Faroe Islands), New
Zealand, the Russian Federation and the United States.
Cooperating non-contracting parties are Columbia, Curacao,
Liberia and Panama.
X
The main objective of the Southwest Indian Ocean Fisheries
Commission (SWIOFC) is to promote the sustainable utilization of
the living marine resources of the Southwest Indian Ocean region,
by the proper management and development of the living marine
resources, and to address common problems of fisheries
management and development faced by the Members of SWIOFC.
Members are Comoros, France, Kenya, Madagascar, Maldives,
Mauritius, Mozambique, Seychelles, Somalia, South Africa, United
Rep. of Tanzania and Yemen.
X
The SWEDENGER Agreement is a joint response plan between
Sweden, Denmark and Germany for dealing with maritime
incidents involving Oil and other Harmful Substances and Co-
operation in Aerial Surveillance in the Western Baltic Sea Area.
The V-RMTC is a virtual network connecting Maritime Operation
Centres of member Navies. Through the system, based on
commercial hardware and a software developed within the Italian
Navy, it is possible to share among participants selected
unclassified information related to merchant shipping (bigger
than 300 tons). The hub of the V-RMTC is located in Rome, at the
Italian Maritime Operation Centre (MOC) of the Fleet Command
Headquarter (CINCNAV). The MOC gathers and merges the
information received, broadcasts a single near-real time
recognised picture to all V-RMTC participating Navies. The
community has 33 member Navies. V-RMTC: Albania, Belgium,
Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece,
Israel, Italy, Jordan, Malta, Montenegro, Netherlands, Portugal,
Romania, Senegal, Slovenia, Spain, Turkey, Ukraine, UK, US. T-
RMN: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, India, Nigeria, Pakistan, Singapore,
South Africa, Perù. Following Navies may also join - Ghana,
Qatar, Australia, Japan, Cameroon and Ecuador.
X
The Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission,
established in 2004 by the Convention for the Conservation and
Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and
Central Pacific Ocean. Members: Australia, China, Canada, Cook
Is, EU, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, France, Indonesia,
Japan, Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Republic of Marshall Islands,
Nauru, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea,
Philippines, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Chinese Taipei, Tonga,
Tuvalu, US, and Vanuatu.
X
The objective of the Commission is to promote the effective
conservation, management and development of the living marine
resources of the area, iaw the FAO Code of Conduct for
Responsible Fisheries, and address common problems of fisheries
management and development faced by its members. The
members are Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize,
Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic,
European Union, France, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana,
Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands,
Nicaragua, Panama, Republic of Korea, Saint Kitts and Nevis,
Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent/Grenadines, Spain, Suriname, Trinidad
and Tobago, UK, US, and Venezuela.
Maritime
Border
Control
Maritime
Environmental
Protection
Prevention & Suppression of
Trafficking and Smuggling - Law
Enforcement
Maritime Search &
Rescue
X
x x x x
COAST GUARD FUNCTION (CGF)
X X
X
X
X
X X X X
X X
X
X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X
X X
X
X
x
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X X
X
X
X X X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
EE
Maritime Monitoring &
Surveillance
Maritime
Customes
Activities
Maritime
Accident/Disaster
Response
Ship/Port
Security Estonia
X X X
x x x x
COAST GUARD FUNCTION (CGF)
X X X
X x
x
X X X x
x
X x
X
X X X X
X
X
X
X
x
X
X X
X x
X X X X x
x
x
X x
x
X
X X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X X X
X X X
x
X x
x
X
X
X
X x
X
X X X X
X X
X X
X X X X X
X
X
x
X
X
X
X X X
X
X
X
X X x
X
X
X
X X
Appendix 6: Country Factsheets
Please, correct if necessary and/or fill in blank/incomplete cells
No MEMBER STATE EMSA COD code
(Organisation ID) AUTHORITY NAME IN ENGLISH
1 Estonia Ministry of Interior
2 Estonia Ministry of Economic Affairs and
Communications
3 Estonia Ministry of Defence
4 Estonia ORG_EE98215 Ministry of Climate
5 Estonia Ministry of Finance
6 Estonia ORG_EE98213 Estonian Police and Border Guard
Board
7 Estonia ORG_EE01566 JRCC Tallinn
8 Estonia ORG_EE46155 Estonian Transport Administration
9 Estonia Water Traffic Management Unit
10 Estonia Estonian Navy
11 Estonia Environmental Board
12 Estonia Estonian Tax and Customs Board
13 Estonia Estonian Rescue Board
14 Estonia Heritage Conservation
15 Estonia Aviation Safety and Supervision
Department
16 Estonia Estonian Air Navigation Services
(EANS)
17 Estonia The North Estonia Medical Centre
18 Estonia Volunteer maritime rescuers
19 Estonia Estonian Safety Investigation Bureau
20 Estonia Estonian Internal Security Service
21 Estonia Estonian Police and Border Guard
Board - Maritime Bureau, Tallinn
22 Estonia Estonian Police and Border Guard
Board - Eastern Prefecture, Jõhvi
23 Estonia Estonian Police and Border Guard
Board - Western Prefecture, Pärnu
24 Estonia Estonian Police and Border Guard
Board - Southern Prefecture, Tartu
25 Estonia Environmental Board - Tallinn office
26 Estonia Environmental Board - Kärdla office
27 Estonia Environmental Board - Jõhvi office
28 Estonia Environmental Board - Haapsalu
office
29 Estonia Environmental Board - Rakvere
office
30 Estonia Environmental Board - Palmse office
31 Estonia Environmental Board - Põlvamaa
supervisory office
32 Estonia Environmental Board - Kuressaare
office
33 Estonia Environmental Board - Tartu office
34 Estonia Environmental Board - Valga office
35 Estonia Environmental Board - Otepää office
36 Estonia Environmental Board - Jõgeva office
37 Estonia Environmental Board - Paide office /
Järvamaa supervisory office
38 Estonia Environmental Board - Türi office
39 Estonia Environmental Board - Pärnu office
40 Estonia Environmental Board - Penijõe
office
41 Estonia Environmental Board - Viljandi
office
42 Estonia Environmental Board - Võru office
43 Estonia Environmental Board - Võrumaa
supervisory office
44 Estonia Environmental Board - Rapla office
45 Estonia Estonian Tax and Customs Board -
Airport Customs Office
46 Estonia Estonian Tax and Customs Board -
Luhamaa Customs Office
47 Estonia Estonian Tax and Customs Board -
Narva-2 Customs Office
48 Estonia Estonian Tax and Customs Board -
Koldula Road Customs Office
49 Estonia Estonian Tax and Customs Board -
Airport Terminal Customs Office
50 Estonia Estonian Tax and Customs Board -
Muuga Customs Office
51 Estonia Estonian Tax and Customs Board -
Paldiski Customs Office
52 Estonia Estonian Tax and Customs Board -
Narva Road Customs Office
53 Estonia Estonian Tax and Customs Board -
Koidula Railway Customs Office
54 Estonia Estonian Tax and Customs Board -
Narva Railway Customs Office
55 Estonia Estonian Tax and Customs Board -
Passenger Port Customs Office
56 Estonia Estonian Tax and Customs Board -
Sillamäe Customs Office
57 Estonia
Estonian Rescue Board - Northern
Rescue Centre
(Tallinn)
58 Estonia
Estonian Rescue Board - Southern
Rescue Centre
(Tartu)
59 Estonia
Estonian Rescue Board - Eastern
Rescue Centre
(Jõhvi)
60 Estonia Estonian Rescue Board - Western
Rescue Centre (Pärnu)
AUTHORITY NAME IN ORIGINAL LANGUAGE
LEVEL
(NATIONAL/
DEPARTMENT/
REGIONAL/
LOCAL)
ADDRESS (L)
Siseministeerium National Pikk 61, 15065 Tallinn
Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium National Suur-Ameerika 1, 10122
Tallinn
Kaitseministeerium National Sakala 1, 15094 Tallinn
Kliimaministeerium National Suur-Ameerika 1
10122 Tallinn
Rahandusministeerium National Suur-Ameerika 1, 10122
Tallinn
Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet National Pärnu mnt 139, 15060
Tallinn
Lennu- ja merepääste koordinatsioonikeskus (JRCC
Tallinn) National
Osmussaare 2, 13811
Tallinn
Transpordiamet National Valge 4, 11413 Tallinn
Veeliikluse juhtimise üksus National Valge 3, 11413 Tallinn
Eesti Merevägi National Juhkentali 58, 15007
Tallinn
Keskkonnaamet National Roheline 64, 80010 Pärnu
Maksu- ja Tolliamet National Lõõtsa 8a, 15176 Tallinn
Päästeamet National Raua 2, 10124 Tallinn
Muinsuskaitseamet National Pikk 2, 10123 Tallinn
Lennuamet National Lõõtsa 5, Ülemiste City,
11415 Tallinn
Lennuliiklusteeninduse AS National Kanali põik 3, Rae küla,
Rae vald Harjumaa 75310
Põhja-Eesti Regionaalhaigla erakorralise meditsiini
osakond Regional
19 J. Sütiste Str, 13419
Tallinn
Vabatahtlikud merepäästjad National Estonia
Ohutusjuurdluse Keskus National Suur-Ameerika 1, 10122
Tallinn
Kaitsepolitseiamet National
Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet: Merebüroo, Tallinn Regional
Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet: Ida Prefektuur, Jõhvi Regional
Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet: Lääne Prefektuur, Pärnu Regional
Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet: Lõuna Prefektuur, Tartu Regional
Keskkonnaameti Tallinna kontor Regional Kopli 76, 10416 Tallinn
Keskkonnaameti Kärdla kontor Regional Kõrgessaare mnt 18,
92412 Kärdla
Keskkonnaameti Jõhvi kontor Regional Pargi 15, 41537 Jõhvi
Keskkonnaameti Haapsalu kontor Regional Lahe 8, 90503 Haapsalu
Keskkonnaameti Rakvere kontor Regional Kunderi 18, 44307
Rakvere
Keskkonnaameti Palmse kontor Regional Palmse, 45435
Keskkonnaameti Põlvamaa järelevalve büroo Regional Puuri tee 1, 63308 Põlva
Keskkonnaameti Kuressaare kontor Regional Tallinna 22, 93819
Kuressaare
Keskkonnaameti Tartu kontor Regional Aleksandri 14, 51004
Tartu
Keskkonnaameti Valga kontor Regional Kesk 12, 68205 Valga
Keskkonnaameti Otepää kontor Regional Kolga tee 28, 67305
Otepää
Keskkonnaameti Jõgeva kontor Regional Suur tn 3, 48303 Jõgeva
Keskkonnaameti Paide kontor / Järvamaa
järelevalve büroo Regional Rüütli 25, 72713 Paide
Keskkonnaameti Türi kontor Regional F.J. Wiedemanni 13,
72213 Türi
Keskkonnaameti Pärnu kontor Regional Roheline 64, 80010 Pärnu
Keskkonnaameti Penijõe kontor Regional Penijõe mõis, 90305
Lääneranna vald
Keskkonnaameti Viljandi kontor Regional Paala tee 4, 71014,
Viljandi
Keskkonnaameti Võru kontor Regional Karja 17a, 65608 Võru
Keskkonnaameti Võrumaa järelevalve büroo Regional Jüri 12, 65620 Võru
Keskkonnaameti Rapla kontor Regional Tallinna mnt 14, 79513
Rapla
Maksu- ja Tolliamet - Lennujaama tollipunk Regional Valukoja 32/3, 11415
Tallinn
Maksu- ja Tolliamet - Luhamaa maantee piiripunkt Regional
Luhamaa, Lütä küla,
65018 Setomaa vald, Võru
maakond
Maksu- ja Tolliamet - Narva-2 piiripunkt (jalakäijad) Regional Kose 6, 20103 Narva
Maksu- ja Tolliamet - Koidula maantee piiripunkt Regional
Koidula küla, 64004
Setomaa vald, Võru
maakond
Maksu- ja Tolliamet - Lennujaama tollikontorolli
üksus Regional
Tartu mnt 101, 10112
Tallinn
Maksu- ja Tolliamet - Muuga tollipunkt Regional Veose 4, 74115 Maardu
Maksu- ja Tolliamet - Paldiski piiripunkt Regional
Lõunasadama tee 11,
76806 Paldiski
(Lõunasadam)
Maksu- ja Tolliamet - Narva maantee piiripunkt Regional Peterburi mnt 1, 20308
Narva
Maksu- ja Tolliamet - Koidula raudtee piiripunkt Regional
Koidula küla, 64004
Setomaa vald, Võru
maakond
Maksu- ja Tolliamet - Narva raudtee piiripunkt Regional Vaksali 14, 20308 Narva
Maksu- ja Tolliamet - Sadamate tollikontrolli üksus Regional Uus-Sadama 24, 10111
Tallinn
Maksu- ja Tolliamet - Sillamäe tollipunkt Regional Tööstuse 14, 40231
Sillamäe
Päästeamet - Põhja Päästekeskus (Tallinn) Regional Erika 3, 10416 Tallinn
Päästeamet - Lõuna Päästekeskus (Tartu) Regional Jaama 207, 50705 Tartu
Päästeamet - Ida Päästekeskus (Jõhvi) Regional Rahu 38, 41532 Jõhvi
Päästeamet - Lääne Päästekeskus (Pärnu) Regional A. H. Tammsaare pst 61,
80042 Pärnu
Email(s) Phone number(s) 24/7 - Emergency
phone number(s) RCC phone number(s)
info@siseministeeriu
m.ee +372 612 5008
[email protected] +372 625 6342
info@kaitseministeeri
um.ee +372 717 0022
info@kliimaministeeri
um.ee +372 626 2802
[email protected] +372 611 3558
[email protected] +372 612 3000
[email protected] +372 6191224 +372 6 191 224
info@transpordiamet.
ee +372 620 1200
tln.vts@transpordiam
et.ee +372 6205 770
Naval Headquarters:
[email protected]; Naval
Base: [email protected];
Naval Headquarters:
+372 717 7000;
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
[email protected] +372 880 0812
[email protected] +372 660 1524
info@muinsuskaitsea
met.ee +372 640 3050
info@transpordiamet.
ee +372 6201200
[email protected] +372 625 8230
info@regionaalhaigla.
ee +372 617 1995
[email protected] +372 625 6314
[email protected] +372 612 3000
[email protected] +372 337 2200
[email protected] +372 444 6400
[email protected] +372 730 8800
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
- +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
- +372 662 5999
info@keskkonnaamet.
ee +372 662 5999
[email protected] +372 676 1809
louna.vahetusevanem
@emta.ee +372 676 4462
[email protected] +372 463 1390
louna.vahetusevanem
@emta.ee +372 676 4481
[email protected] +372 676 1801
+372 676 4811
+372 676 4816
+372 676 4853
+372 676 4858
+372 676 3850
+372 676 3800
louna.vahetusevanem
@emta.ee +372 676 4486
+372 676 3693
+372 676 3691
sadamate.kontroll@e
mta.ee
+372 676 4765
+372 5347 8643
+372 676 2561
+372 676 2562
+372 5692 3403
+372 5692 3574
[email protected] +372 628 2000
[email protected] +372 628 2000
[email protected] +372 628 2000
[email protected] +372 628 2000
Website
Parent
organization
number
Role (SL=Strategic
Lead,
OL=Operational
Lead, SB=
Supporting body)
National
legal basis
Role (SL=Strategic
Lead,
OL=Operational
Lead, SB=
Supporting body)
National
legal basis
http://www.siseminist
eerium.ee/en SL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/msos;
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/128012
014003?le
iaKehtiv
http://www.mkm.ee/
en
https://www.kaitsemi
nisteerium.ee/en
http://www.envir.ee/
en
http://www.rahandus
ministeerium.ee/en
Maritime Safety Ship Casualty
http://www.politsei.e
e/en 1 SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/msos
SL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/msos
www.politsei.ee 6 SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/msos
OL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/msos
https://www.transpor
diamet.ee/en 2 SL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/msos
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/msos
https://www.transpor
diamet.ee/en 8 OL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/msos
OL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/msos
http://www.mil.ee/en
/navy 3 SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/msos
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en 4 SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/msos
http://www.emta.ee/
eng 2
http://www.rescue.ee
/en 1
https://www.kul.ee/k
ultuurivaartused-ja-
digitaalne-
kultuuriparand/muins
uskaitse
https://transpordiame
t.ee/en/ 8
https://www.eans.ee
https://www.regionaa
lhaigla.ee/en
https://www.ojk.ee/e
n SL
https://www.politsei.e
e/en/services/depart
ments
6 SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/msos
https://www.politsei.e
e/en/services/depart
ments
6 SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/msos
https://www.politsei.e
e/en/services/depart
ments
6 SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/msos
https://www.politsei.e
e/en/services/depart
ments
6 SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/msos
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://keskkonnaame
t.ee/en/our-offices 11
https://www.emta.ee
/ariklient/amet-
uudised-ja-
kontakt/kontaktid/tee
12
https://www.emta.ee
/ariklient/amet-
uudised-ja-
kontakt/kontaktid/tee
ninduskohad
12
https://www.emta.ee
/ariklient/amet-
uudised-ja-
12
https://www.emta.ee
/ariklient/amet-
uudised-ja-
kontakt/kontaktid/tee
ninduskohad
12
https://www.emta.ee
/ariklient/amet-
uudised-ja-
kontakt/kontaktid/tee
ninduskohad
12
https://www.emta.ee
/ariklient/amet-
uudised-ja-
kontakt/kontaktid/tee
ninduskohad
12
https://www.emta.ee
/ariklient/amet-
uudised-ja-
kontakt/kontaktid/tee
ninduskohad
12
https://www.emta.ee
/ariklient/amet-
uudised-ja-
kontakt/kontaktid/tee
ninduskohad
12
https://www.emta.ee
/ariklient/amet-
uudised-ja-
kontakt/kontaktid/tee
ninduskohad
12
https://www.emta.ee
/ariklient/amet-
uudised-ja-
kontakt/kontaktid/tee
ninduskohad
12
https://www.emta.ee
/ariklient/amet-
uudised-ja-
kontakt/kontaktid/tee
ninduskohad
12
https://www.emta.ee
/ariklient/amet-
uudised-ja-
kontakt/kontaktid/tee
ninduskohad
12
https://www.rescue.e
e/en/places/rescue-
centers/northern-
rescue-centre
13
https://www.rescue.e
e/en/places/rescue-
centers/southern-
rescue-centre
13
https://www.rescue.e
e/en/places/rescue-
centers/eastern-
rescue-centre
13
https://www.rescue.e
e/en/places/rescue-
centers/western-
rescue-centre
13
Role (SL=Strategic
Lead,
OL=Operational
Lead, SB=
Supporting body)
National
legal basis
Role (SL=Strategic
Lead, OL=Operational
Lead, SB= Supporting
body)
National
legal basis
Role (SL=Strategic
Lead,
OL=Operational
Lead, SB=
Supporting body)
National
legal basis
SL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/127082
022003
SL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/127082
022003
SL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105122
023007?le
iaKehtiv
COAST GUARD FUNCTIONS (CGF)
Fishery Inspection/Control Maritime Border Control Maritime Environmental Protection
SB SL (transboundary
water bodies)
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/ppvs
OL (transboundary
water bodies)
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/ppvs
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
OL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/120062
022044
OL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
OL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/111112
022002
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
Role (SL=Strategic
Lead,
OL=Operational
Lead, SB=
Supporting body)
National
legal basis
Role (SL=Strategic
Lead,
OL=Operational
Lead, SB=
Supporting body)
National
legal basis
Role (SL=Strategic
Lead,
OL=Operational
Lead, SB=
Supporting body)
National
legal basis
SL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/128012
014003?le
iaKehtiv
SL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/128012
014003?le
iaKehtiv
SL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/127082
022003
COAST GUARD FUNCTIONS (CGF)
Prevention & Suppression of Trafficking and Smuggling - Law EnforcementMaritime Search & Rescue Maritime Monitoring & Surveillance
OL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/ppvs
SL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005;
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/ppvs
SB OL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
SB
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
OL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/120062
022044
SB SB
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
SB
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/ppvs
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/ppvs
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/ppvs
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/ppvs
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/105072
022005
Role (SL=Strategic
Lead,
OL=Operational
Lead, SB=
Supporting body)
National
legal basis
Role (SL=Strategic
Lead,
OL=Operational
Lead, SB=
Supporting body)
National
legal basis
Role (SL=Strategic
Lead,
OL=Operational
Lead, SB= Supporting
body)
National
legal basis
SL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/128012
014003?le
iaKehtiv
Maritime Customes Activities Maritime Accident/Disaster ResponseShip/Port Security
COAST GUARD FUNCTIONS (CGF)
SB SL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/121072
022007
OL
OL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/121072
022007
SB
SB OL
OL
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/121072
022007
SB
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/121072
022007
SL SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/121072
022007
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/121072
022007
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/121072
022007
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/121072
022007
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/121072
022007
SL
S
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/121072
022007
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/121072
022007
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/121072
022007
SB
https://w
ww.riigite
ataja.ee/a
kt/121072
022007
Country RCC Address Email(s)
Estonia JRCC Tallinn Osmussaare 2, 13811 Tallinn [email protected]
Phone
number(s) Website
+372 6 191 224 www.politsei.ee
Coast Guard Authorities
ESTONIA
Es to
n ia
: C G
A u
th o
ri ti
es
Ministry of Interior Estonian Police and Border Guard
Board
Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications
Estonian Transport Administration
Estonian Tax and Customs Board
Estonian Safety Investigation Bureau
Ministry of Defence Estonian Navy
Ministry of Climate Environmental Board
Mr. Kyllike Sillaste-Elling
Permanent Representative of Estonia to the EU Email: [email protected]
Subject: European cooperation on coast guard functions (https://coastguard.europa.eu/) Your Excellency, In the frame of the European Cooperation on Coast Guard Functions involving the European Union Agencies EMSA, EFCA and Frontex, EFCA is updating the practical information publicly available at the EU coast guard online platform https://coastguard.europa.eu/, which contains information from your Member State. You can find in the enclosed documents (Annex 1 – Excel file - and Annex 2) the information from the relevant national authorities in Estonia implementing coast guard functions1 available currently in the EU coast guard online platform. Hence, we invite you to revise, update and/or complete the information provided in the Annexes with information of national coast guard authorities not included in the files or to notify to us any comment or change you might propose to that information through the following email address: [email protected] no later than 30 calendar days after the reception of this letter. For any questions or remarks, please do not hesitate to contact EFCA Project Officer Ms. Beatriz Huarte Melgar by email ([email protected]) or by phone (+34 654 506 804). Thank you in advance for your kind support and cooperation that will further enhance the European cooperation on coast guard functions.
Yours sincerely, [e-Signed] Dr. Susan Steele Executive Director
1 Coast guard functions: https://coastguard.europa.eu/about/coast-guard-functions
2
Annexes: Annex 1: Cooperation and Coordination Mechanisms; Country Factsheet; JRCC.
Annex 2: Classification of the coast guard authorities.
Copy: EMSA: Mr Andrea Tassoni.
Frontex: Mr Brice Caldairou.
DG Mare: Ms Iglika Yakova and Mr Dario Vaschetto.
Estonia - Points of Contact: Mr. Rene Hartõkainen, Mr. Vaido Luks and Mr. Reemet
Okas.
Electronically signed on 21/10/2024 11:17 (UTC+02) in accordance with Article 11 of Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2121