Kiri

Saatja: VPS EUCPN <[email protected]>

Saadetud: 10.12.2024 14:19

Adressaat: <"Anu Leps">; Barbara HAAGE

<[email protected]>; <"Stanislav Solodov">;

<"Justiitsministeerium">

Koopia: VPS EUCPN <[email protected]>

Teema: ECPA 2024 – feedback letter

Tähelepanu! Tegemist on välisvõrgust saabunud kirjaga.Tundmatu saatja

korral palume linke ja faile mitte avada.

Dear Estonian National Representatives and ECPA contestants,

Thank you for participating in the 2024 BPC-ECPA in Budapest. Please find

the feedback letter for Estonia attached containing the arguments from

the Jury for your project and the top 3.

Sincerely,Sarah

Sarah Bosman

EUCPN / ENAA Secretariat Research officer

General phone: &#43;32 2 488 33 30

Personal phone: &#43;32 2 488 33 85

-

Handelsstraat / Rue Du Commerce 96

1040 Brussels Belgium

The personal data exchanged by e-mail may be retained in order to provide

the reaction that is considered to be necessary by the services of the

FPS Home Affairs. They are registered and, where appropriate, transmitted

to the authorities involved that are in charge of handling your e-mail.

You have the right to access, modify, and oppose the data concerning

yourself and you can exercise this right at our DPO by sending a request

through the forms available on our website: . There you can also consult

the details regarding our privacy declaration

Dear ECPA participant,

The main objective of organising the Best Practice Conference – European Crime Prevention Award is

to exchange information and good practices about crime prevention. Therefore, the Hungarian

Presidency and the EUCPN Secretariat would like to thank you for entering into the competition, for

taking the time to fill in the application form and presenting your project during the online Best

Practice Conference.

Supporting crime prevention initiatives all over Europe is one of the main tasks of the European Crime

Prevention Network. Therefore, we kindly offer you this feedback letter on your project. It reflects

what has been said during the Jury meeting. It contains the strengths and weaknesses of your project

and suggestions for improvements.

The Estonian project ‘re-entry services for ex-offenders’ was applauded by the Jury for its

comprehensive views on the causes of recidivism. They stated that the attitude shaping as well as the

competence building are strong pillars of the project. Additionally, a good cooperation is described

between all stakeholders, yet the Jury would have liked to gain better insights in how this cooperation

was practically implemented. Finally, questions were raised on the contextual factors required for

other member states to replicate this initiative, seeing it is tailored to the Estonian context.

Best regards,

The EUCPN Secretariat

European Crime Prevention

Award – 2024 Feedback Letter

3-4 December – Budapest

Estonia

The EUCPN also wants to explain the reasons for awarding the European Crime Prevention Award:

First place

The Jury awards the Czech project ‘Non-Profit Employment Agency

RUBIKON’, first place. They deemed the focus of the project

comprehensive as well as an important aspect of reintegration. Also the fact

that a non-profit is taking the lead, creates a different type of cooperation

that still involves a variety of partners. The Jury, however, stated that the

project could become even more holistic by incorporating additional focus

areas, such as the provision of housing.

Second place

The Jury awards the Finish project ‘Revion Rehabilitation Programme’

second place. They specifically praised the important focus on the target

group that is over-represented in prison facilities, yet often overlooked.

Additionally, the scientific base of the project as well as the work to

improve professionals’ knowledge was deemed relevant for all European

member states. The Jury did debate whether replication will be as feasible in

countries lacking similar foundations.

Third place

The Jury awards the Danish project ‘Primus Motor’ (‘Driving Force’) third

place. They commended the provision of peer support through the use of

volunteers, particularly in combination with the target group. Especially,

since the volunteering culture is not yet a common practice throughout

Europe. Additionally, the Jury applauded the involvement of various

partners to ensure good assistance as well as obtain relevant outcomes.

Comments and notes