Küsimustik
| Dokumendiregister | Justiitsministeerium |
| Viit | 7-2/4823 |
| Registreeritud | 04.06.2025 |
| Sünkroonitud | 05.06.2025 |
| Liik | Sissetulev kiri |
| Funktsioon | 7 EL otsustusprotsessis osalemine ja rahvusvaheline koostöö |
| Sari | 7-2 Rahvusvahelise koostöö korraldamisega seotud kirjavahetus (Arhiiviväärtuslik) |
| Toimik | 7-2/2025 |
| Juurdepääsupiirang | Avalik |
| Juurdepääsupiirang | |
| Adressaat | Secretariat | CEP Probation |
| Saabumis/saatmisviis | Secretariat | CEP Probation |
| Vastutaja | Mariel Männiste (Justiits- ja Digiministeerium, Kantsleri vastutusvaldkond, Vanglate valdkond, Vanglate osakond, Taasühiskonnastamise talitus) |
| Originaal | Ava uues aknas |
Failid
CEP ANNUAL dATA COLLECTION ON
FRAMEWORK DECISIONS 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA
Country/Jurisdiction
Is there a single point of contact in your country? If yes, fill in Legal Authority below
Legal Authority
organisation
address
postal code
city
email
phone (international)
If there is more than 1 single point of contact, is there a body or department that records national data?
If so, please write the details here.
Contact Person for further communications (single contact points for Probation Services)
name
organisation
email
phone (international)
Explanatory note
Since the adoption of Framework Decisions 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA by the European Union, the Confederation of European Probation (CEP) has undertaken a variety of initiatives to support and promote their implementation.
To get a yearly update on each country’s implementation and further process with the Framework Decisions 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA, CEP kindly ask you to answer this questionnaire. We like you to add the numbers of incoming cases (“caseload”) and actual transfers in 2023 and 2024. If you do not have access to which countries transfers have been made to/from but you do have the numbers, please use the category “unknown”. An incoming case that becomes an actual transfer should be marked in that column.
The results of the answer will be summarized, used to further develop the work of the network and presented on the CEP website to provide an overview of the cases and transfers. CEP hopes that the overview can serve as a sole base for each member country in prioritizing resources for cooperation and in other decisions related to the Framework Decisions.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
Your responses will be most helpful in developing and strengthening the CEP network working for the implementation of FD 829 and FD 947, developing appropriate information materials and their dissemination and completing preparations for the next Framework Decisions expert meeting.
I agree to have my name and details included in the participant´s list for the events related to the Framework Decisions 829 and 947. Personal information will only be used for the meeting’s purposes and for the creation of a professional network and will not be shared with third parties.
Yes / No
1 a) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2008/947/JHA – 2024
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
1 a) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2008/947/JHA – 2023
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
1b) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2009/829/JHA – 2024
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
1b) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2009/829/JHA – 2023
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
2. Is there specific training provided in your jurisdiction to probation staff:
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
If yes, please provide as much detail as possible on the training programme and content, timeframe (initial training or later on), training providers, personnel trained, training materials and any related publication or supporting documentation/links.
3. Is there specific information and/or publications distributed and made available to Courts, legal professions and probation staff in your jurisdiction regarding:
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
If yes, please describe each of them briefly including details of content, distribution, available languages, access points, website links, social media etc.
4. Please describe your experience, to this date, in the implementation of
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
Please include both the positive (“good practices”) as the negative (“obstacles”). Are there particular issues or processes you would suggest adding, changing or deleting? Please provide as much information as possible.
5. Have there been any significant Court decisions or judgments in your jurisdiction (which determine practice or decisions in other cases and/or Courts) on any aspect of
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
If yes, please provide a brief outline of the case(s) and decision(s) with title, reference numbers, web address and any other tracking details in respect of each case and the Framework Decision.
6. Is there particular information, guidance or support you believe that CEP or other bodies, could or should provide in promoting and enabling the best implementation of
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions)
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order)?
7. Regarding transfer on FD 947 which alternative sanction is used (transferred) more:
a. Community Measure or
b. Supervision Order?
If possible, please add an explanation.
8. Please outline topics, themes or issues you believe should be included in the agenda of the expert meeting.
9. Any other comments or suggestions you wish to make?
FRAMEWORK DECISIONS 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA
Country/Jurisdiction
Is there a single point of contact in your country? If yes, fill in Legal Authority below
Legal Authority
organisation
address
postal code
city
phone (international)
If there is more than 1 single point of contact, is there a body or department that records national data?
If so, please write the details here.
Contact Person for further communications (single contact points for Probation Services)
name
organisation
phone (international)
Explanatory note
Since the adoption of Framework Decisions 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA by the European Union, the Confederation of European Probation (CEP) has undertaken a variety of initiatives to support and promote their implementation.
To get a yearly update on each country’s implementation and further process with the Framework Decisions 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA, CEP kindly ask you to answer this questionnaire. We like you to add the numbers of incoming cases (“caseload”) and actual transfers in 2023 and 2024. If you do not have access to which countries transfers have been made to/from but you do have the numbers, please use the category “unknown”. An incoming case that becomes an actual transfer should be marked in that column.
The results of the answer will be summarized, used to further develop the work of the network and presented on the CEP website to provide an overview of the cases and transfers. CEP hopes that the overview can serve as a sole base for each member country in prioritizing resources for cooperation and in other decisions related to the Framework Decisions.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
Your responses will be most helpful in developing and strengthening the CEP network working for the implementation of FD 829 and FD 947, developing appropriate information materials and their dissemination and completing preparations for the next Framework Decisions expert meeting.
I agree to have my name and details included in the participant´s list for the events related to the Framework Decisions 829 and 947. Personal information will only be used for the meeting’s purposes and for the creation of a professional network and will not be shared with third parties.
Yes / No
1 a) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2008/947/JHA – 2024
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
1 a) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2008/947/JHA – 2023
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
1b) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2009/829/JHA – 2024
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
1b) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2009/829/JHA – 2023
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
2. Is there specific training provided in your jurisdiction to probation staff:
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
If yes, please provide as much detail as possible on the training programme and content, timeframe (initial training or later on), training providers, personnel trained, training materials and any related publication or supporting documentation/links.
3. Is there specific information and/or publications distributed and made available to Courts, legal professions and probation staff in your jurisdiction regarding:
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
If yes, please describe each of them briefly including details of content, distribution, available languages, access points, website links, social media etc.
4. Please describe your experience, to this date, in the implementation of
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
Please include both the positive (“good practices”) as the negative (“obstacles”). Are there particular issues or processes you would suggest adding, changing or deleting? Please provide as much information as possible.
5. Have there been any significant Court decisions or judgments in your jurisdiction (which determine practice or decisions in other cases and/or Courts) on any aspect of
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
If yes, please provide a brief outline of the case(s) and decision(s) with title, reference numbers, web address and any other tracking details in respect of each case and the Framework Decision.
6. Is there particular information, guidance or support you believe that CEP or other bodies, could or should provide in promoting and enabling the best implementation of
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions)
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order)?
7. Regarding transfer on FD 947 which alternative sanction is used (transferred) more:
a. Community Measure or
b. Supervision Order?
If possible, please add an explanation.
8. Please outline topics, themes or issues you believe should be included in the agenda of the expert meeting.
9. Any other comments or suggestions you wish to make?
Tähelepanu! Tegemist on välisvõrgust saabunud kirjaga. |
Dear CEP member.
Since the adoption of Framework Decisions 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA by the European Union, CEP has undertaken a variety of initiatives to support and promote their implementation. To get a yearly update on each country’s implementation and further process with the Framework Decisions 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA, CEP kindly ask you to answer the questionnaire attached.
Please be informed that CEP aims to reinstate this annual data collection and compile a comprehensive contact list of practitioners involved with the Framework Decisions within Probation Services. These efforts are intended to enhance communication, promote knowledge sharing, and provide support in applying the Framework Decisions in daily practice.
Please come back to Mirka ([email protected]) by 31 July 2025.
Thank you for you help and support.
With kind regards,
Mirka
Ms Mirka Jakesova
CEP Policy Officer
Upcoming events
More events? >>>View the 2025 Calendar!
www.cep-probation.org | Subscribe to our newsletter
Find us on social media: X | Linkedin |Facebook | YouTube | Instagram
CEP ANNUAL dATA COLLECTION ON
FRAMEWORK DECISIONS 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA
Country/Jurisdiction
Is there a single point of contact in your country? If yes, fill in Legal Authority below
Legal Authority
organisation
address
postal code
city
email
phone (international)
If there is more than 1 single point of contact, is there a body or department that records national data?
If so, please write the details here.
Contact Person for further communications (single contact points for Probation Services)
name
organisation
email
phone (international)
Explanatory note
Since the adoption of Framework Decisions 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA by the European Union, the Confederation of European Probation (CEP) has undertaken a variety of initiatives to support and promote their implementation.
To get a yearly update on each country’s implementation and further process with the Framework Decisions 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA, CEP kindly ask you to answer this questionnaire. We like you to add the numbers of incoming cases (“caseload”) and actual transfers in 2023 and 2024. If you do not have access to which countries transfers have been made to/from but you do have the numbers, please use the category “unknown”. An incoming case that becomes an actual transfer should be marked in that column.
The results of the answer will be summarized, used to further develop the work of the network and presented on the CEP website to provide an overview of the cases and transfers. CEP hopes that the overview can serve as a sole base for each member country in prioritizing resources for cooperation and in other decisions related to the Framework Decisions.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
Your responses will be most helpful in developing and strengthening the CEP network working for the implementation of FD 829 and FD 947, developing appropriate information materials and their dissemination and completing preparations for the next Framework Decisions expert meeting.
I agree to have my name and details included in the participant´s list for the events related to the Framework Decisions 829 and 947. Personal information will only be used for the meeting’s purposes and for the creation of a professional network and will not be shared with third parties.
Yes / No
1 a) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2008/947/JHA – 2024
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
1 a) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2008/947/JHA – 2023
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
1b) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2009/829/JHA – 2024
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
1b) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2009/829/JHA – 2023
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
2. Is there specific training provided in your jurisdiction to probation staff:
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
If yes, please provide as much detail as possible on the training programme and content, timeframe (initial training or later on), training providers, personnel trained, training materials and any related publication or supporting documentation/links.
3. Is there specific information and/or publications distributed and made available to Courts, legal professions and probation staff in your jurisdiction regarding:
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
If yes, please describe each of them briefly including details of content, distribution, available languages, access points, website links, social media etc.
4. Please describe your experience, to this date, in the implementation of
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
Please include both the positive (“good practices”) as the negative (“obstacles”). Are there particular issues or processes you would suggest adding, changing or deleting? Please provide as much information as possible.
5. Have there been any significant Court decisions or judgments in your jurisdiction (which determine practice or decisions in other cases and/or Courts) on any aspect of
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
If yes, please provide a brief outline of the case(s) and decision(s) with title, reference numbers, web address and any other tracking details in respect of each case and the Framework Decision.
6. Is there particular information, guidance or support you believe that CEP or other bodies, could or should provide in promoting and enabling the best implementation of
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions)
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order)?
7. Regarding transfer on FD 947 which alternative sanction is used (transferred) more:
a. Community Measure or
b. Supervision Order?
If possible, please add an explanation.
8. Please outline topics, themes or issues you believe should be included in the agenda of the expert meeting.
9. Any other comments or suggestions you wish to make?
FRAMEWORK DECISIONS 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA
Country/Jurisdiction
Is there a single point of contact in your country? If yes, fill in Legal Authority below
Legal Authority
organisation
address
postal code
city
phone (international)
If there is more than 1 single point of contact, is there a body or department that records national data?
If so, please write the details here.
Contact Person for further communications (single contact points for Probation Services)
name
organisation
phone (international)
Explanatory note
Since the adoption of Framework Decisions 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA by the European Union, the Confederation of European Probation (CEP) has undertaken a variety of initiatives to support and promote their implementation.
To get a yearly update on each country’s implementation and further process with the Framework Decisions 2008/947/JHA and 2009/829/JHA, CEP kindly ask you to answer this questionnaire. We like you to add the numbers of incoming cases (“caseload”) and actual transfers in 2023 and 2024. If you do not have access to which countries transfers have been made to/from but you do have the numbers, please use the category “unknown”. An incoming case that becomes an actual transfer should be marked in that column.
The results of the answer will be summarized, used to further develop the work of the network and presented on the CEP website to provide an overview of the cases and transfers. CEP hopes that the overview can serve as a sole base for each member country in prioritizing resources for cooperation and in other decisions related to the Framework Decisions.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
Your responses will be most helpful in developing and strengthening the CEP network working for the implementation of FD 829 and FD 947, developing appropriate information materials and their dissemination and completing preparations for the next Framework Decisions expert meeting.
I agree to have my name and details included in the participant´s list for the events related to the Framework Decisions 829 and 947. Personal information will only be used for the meeting’s purposes and for the creation of a professional network and will not be shared with third parties.
Yes / No
1 a) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2008/947/JHA – 2024
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
1 a) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2008/947/JHA – 2023
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
1b) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2009/829/JHA – 2024
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
1b) FRAMEWORK DECISION 2009/829/JHA – 2023
Caseload
Actual transfers
Countries
incoming
outgoing
incoming
outgoing
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Unknown
Total
2. Is there specific training provided in your jurisdiction to probation staff:
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
If yes, please provide as much detail as possible on the training programme and content, timeframe (initial training or later on), training providers, personnel trained, training materials and any related publication or supporting documentation/links.
3. Is there specific information and/or publications distributed and made available to Courts, legal professions and probation staff in your jurisdiction regarding:
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
If yes, please describe each of them briefly including details of content, distribution, available languages, access points, website links, social media etc.
4. Please describe your experience, to this date, in the implementation of
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
Please include both the positive (“good practices”) as the negative (“obstacles”). Are there particular issues or processes you would suggest adding, changing or deleting? Please provide as much information as possible.
5. Have there been any significant Court decisions or judgments in your jurisdiction (which determine practice or decisions in other cases and/or Courts) on any aspect of
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions) or
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order).
If yes, please provide a brief outline of the case(s) and decision(s) with title, reference numbers, web address and any other tracking details in respect of each case and the Framework Decision.
6. Is there particular information, guidance or support you believe that CEP or other bodies, could or should provide in promoting and enabling the best implementation of
a. Framework Decision 947 (on the transfer of Probation and Alternative Sanctions)
b. Framework Decision 829 (on the transfer of the European Supervision Order)?
7. Regarding transfer on FD 947 which alternative sanction is used (transferred) more:
a. Community Measure or
b. Supervision Order?
If possible, please add an explanation.
8. Please outline topics, themes or issues you believe should be included in the agenda of the expert meeting.
9. Any other comments or suggestions you wish to make?
