Leping

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport

MOVE.B – Investment, Innovative & Sustainable Transport B.4 – Sustainable & Intelligent Transport

GRANT AGREEMENT

Project 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X

PREAMBLE

This Agreement (‘the Agreement’) is between the following parties:

on the one part,

the European Union (‘EU’), represented by the European Commission (‘European Commission’ or ‘granting authority’),

and

on the other part,

1. ‘the coordinator’:

BUNDESANSTALT FUER STRASSEN-UND VERKEHRSWESEN (DE-BAST), PIC 999606729, established in BRUEDERSTRASSE 53, BERGISCH GLADBACH 51427, Germany,

and the following other beneficiaries, if they sign their ‘accession form’ (see Annex 3 and Article 40):

2. FREIE UND HANSESTADT HAMBURG (DE-HH), PIC 998928602, established in RATHAUSMARKT 1, HAMBURG 20095, Germany,

3. MINISTERIUM FUR UMWELT, NATURSCHUTZ UND VERKEHR DES LANDES NORDRHEIN-WESTFALEN (DE-NRW-MIN), PIC 888355392, established in Emilie-Preyer- Platz 1, DUSSELDORF 40479, Germany,

4. NVBW - NAHVERKEHRSGESELLSCHAFT BADEN-WURTTEMBERG MBH (DE- NVBW), PIC 889834254, established in Wilhelmsplatz 11, Stuttgart 70182, Germany,

5. RHEIN-MAIN-VERKEHRSVERBUND SERVICEGELLSCHAFT MBH (DE-RMS), PIC 908140579, established in AM HAUPTBAHNHOF 6, FRANKFURT AM MAIN 60329, Germany,

6. Mobilitatsverbunde Osterreich OG (AT-MVO), PIC 893590676, established in Europaplatz 3/3, VIENNA 1150, Austria,

7. AUTOBAHNEN- UND SCHNELLSTRASSEN-FINANZIERUNGS- AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (AT-ASFINAG), PIC 950547427, established in SCHNIRCHGASSE 17, WIEN 1030, Austria,

1

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

8. AUSTRIATECH - GESELLSCHAFT DES BUNDES FUR TECHNOLOGIEPOLITISCHE MASSNAHMEN GMBH (AT-ATE), PIC 999642425, established in RAIMUNDGASSE 1/6, WIEN 1020, Austria,

9. SERVICE PUBLIC FEDERAL MOBILITE ET TRANSPORTS (BE-FED), PIC 885645212, established in Rue du progrès 56, Brussels 1210, Belgium,

10. VLAAMSE GEWEST (BE-FL), PIC 999575107, established in AVENUE DU PORT 88, BRUSSEL 1000, Belgium,

11. INSTITUT GEOGRAPHIQUE NATIONAL (BE-NGI), PIC 953503696, established in AVENUE DE CORTENBERGH 115, BRUXELLES 1000, Belgium,

12. HRVATSKE CESTE DRUSTVO S OGRANICENOM ODGOVORNOSCU ZA UPRAVLJANJE GRADENJE I ODRZAVANJE DRZAVNIH CESTA (HR-CESTE), PIC 905115828, established in VONCININA 3, ZAGREB GRAD ZAGREB 10000, Croatia,

13. MINISTARSTVO MORA, PROMETA I INFRASTRUKTURE (HR-MMPI), PIC 895631750, established in Prisavlje 14, Zagreb 10000, Croatia,

14. YPOURGEIO METAFORON, EPIKOINONION KAI ERGON (CY-PWD), PIC 958850433, established in Acheon 28, NICOSIA 1424, Cyprus,

15. CENTRUM DOPRAVNIHO VYZKUMU v.v.i. (CZ-CDV), PIC 999450171, established in Lisenska 33a, BRNO 636 00, Czechia,

16. MINISTERSTVO DOPRAVY (CZ-MDCR), PIC 985636401, established in Nábřeží Ludvíka Svobody 12, Praha 1 11015, Czechia,

17. CESKE VYSOKE UCENI TECHNICKE V PRAZE (CZ-CVUT), PIC 999848744, established in JUGOSLAVSKYCH PARTYZANU 1580/3, PRAHA 160 00, Czechia,

18. TAMTAM RESEARCH SRO (CZ-TTR), PIC 892455000, established in SLUNECNICOVA 338/3, KARVINA - RAJ 734 01, Czechia,

19. VEJDIREKTORATET (DK-DRD), PIC 998722768, established in CARSTEN NIEBUHRS 43-5, KOBENHAVN K 1577, Denmark,

20. TRAFIKSTYRELSEN (DK-TS), PIC 887835860, established in Carsten Niebuhrs Gade 43, Copenhagen V 1577, Denmark,

21. TRANSPORDIAMET (EE-ETA), PIC 888420576, established in VALGE 4, TALLINN 11413, Estonia,

22. LIIKENTEENOHJAUSYHTIO FINTRAFFIC OY (FI-FINTRA), PIC 885860746, established in PL 71, HELSINKI 00241, Finland,

23. LIIKENNE- JA VIESTINTAVIRASTO (FI-TRAFICOM), PIC 900306956, established in OPASTINSILTA 12 A, HELSINKI 00520, Finland,

24. MINISTERE DE LA TRANSITION ECOLOGIQUE, DE L'ENERGIE, DU CLIMAT ET DE LA PREVENTION DES RISQUES (FR-MIN), PIC 996384874, established in Grande Arche - Tour Sequoia, Paris - La Défense 92055, France,

2

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

25. CENTRE D ETUDES ET D EXPERTISE SUR LES RISQUES L ENVIRONNEMENT LA MOBILITE ET L AMENAGEMENT (FR-CEREMA), PIC 948933735, established in 25 AV FRANCOIS MITTERRAND, BRON 69500, France,

26. AUTORITE DE REGULATION DES TRANSPORTS (FR-ART), PIC 875225569, established in 11, place des 5 martyrs du Lycée Buffon, PARIS 75675, France,

27. YPOURGEIO YPODOMON KAI METAFORON (GR-MIN), PIC 939019850, established in 2, Anastaseos Str and Tsigante, HOLARGOS 101 91, Greece,

28. EPITESI ES KOZLEKEDESI MINISZTERIUM (HU-EKM), PIC 884022208, established in ALKOTMANY UTCA 5, BUDAPEST 1054, Hungary,

29. MAGYAR KOZUT NONPROFIT ZARTKORUEN MUKODO RESZVENYTARSASAG (HU-KOZUT), PIC 905297121, established in FENYES ELEK UTCA 7-13, BUDAPEST 1024, Hungary,

30. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT (IE-DFT), PIC 975472159, established in Leeson Lane, DUBLIN 2 D02 TR60, Ireland,

31. MINISTERO DELLE INFRASTRUTTURE E DEI TRASPORTI (IT-MIN), PIC 996445790, established in Via Nomentana, 2, Roma 00161, Italy,

32. SOCIETA INIZIATIVE NAZIONALI AUTOSTRADALI - S.I.N.A. SPA (IT-SINA), PIC 971458396, established in VIALE ISONZO 14/1, MILANO 20135, Italy,

33. AUTOSTRADE PER L'ITALIA SPA (IT-ASPI), PIC 995995904, established in VIA ALBERTO BERGAMINI 50, ROMA 00159, Italy,

34. MOVYON S.P.A. (IT-MOVYON), PIC 873673375, established in VIA ALBERTO BERGAMINI 50, ROMA 00159, Italy,

35. 5T SRL (IT-5T), PIC 996356065, established in CORSO NOVARA 96, TORINO 10122, Italy,

36. CEFRIEL SOCIETA CONSORTILE A RESPONSABILITA LIMITATA SOCIETA BENEFIT (IT-CEF), PIC 999647178, established in VIALE SARCA 226, MILANO 20126, Italy,

37. QMAP SRL (IT-QM), PIC 895821579, established in Via Panaro 25, Roma 00199, Italy,

38. Sinelec SPA (IT-SINELEC), PIC 872279000, established in S.P. 211 della Lomellina, 3/13, Tortona 15057, Italy,

39. LATVIJAS VALSTS CELI (LV-CELI), PIC 952381212, established in EMILIJAS BENJAMINAS IELA 3, RIGA 1050, Latvia,

40. AKCINE BENDROVE VIA LIETUVA (LT-VIA), PIC 995630020, established in KAUNO STR. 22-202, VILNIUS LT-03212, Lithuania,

41. AUTHORITY FOR TRANSPORT IN MALTA (MT-TRANSP), PIC 965978478, established in XATT L-GHASSARA TA' L - GHENEB, MARSA MRS 1917, Malta,

42. MINISTERIE VAN INFRASTRUCTUUR EN WATERSTAAT (NL-MIN), PIC 967944377, established in RIJNSTRAAT 8, DEN HAAG 2500 EX, Netherlands,

3

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

43. GENERALNA DYREKCJA DROG KRAJOWYCH I AUTOSTRAD (PL-GDNRM), PIC 894744006, established in UL WRONIA 53, WARSZAWA 00 874, Poland,

44. INSTITUTO DA MOBILIDADE E DOS TRANSPORTES, I P (PT-IMT), PIC 966290430, established in AVENIDA DAS FORCAS ARMADAS 40, LISBOA 1649 022, Portugal,

45. ARMIS - SISTEMAS DE INFORMACAO LDA (PT-ARMIS), PIC 876922487, established in RUA DO FREIXO, 725B, PORTO 4300-217, Portugal,

46. MINISTERUL TRANSPORTURILOR SI INFRASTRUCTURII (RO-MIN), PIC 888053916, established in BLD. DINICU GOLESCU 38, BUCURESTI SECTOR 1 010873, Romania,

47. COMPANIA NATIONALA DE ADMINISTRARE A INFRASTRUCTURII RUTIERE SA (RO-NCRIA), PIC 984896485, established in BDUL DINICU GOLESCU 38 SECTOR 1, BUCURESTI 010873, Romania,

48. ORGANIZATIA ROMANA PENTRU IMPLEMENTAREA SISTEMELOR INTELIGENTE DE TRANSPORT (RO-ITS), PIC 985882393, established in B-DUL DINICU GOLESCU 38 GATE A 6TH FLOOR ROOM 48 SECTOR 1 SECTOR 1, BUCURESTI 010873, Romania,

49. ELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS SRL (RO-ELSOL), PIC 984592487, established in ION MIHALACHE 113 BL 11 SC A ET 7 AP 33, BUCURESTI 011177, Romania,

50. MINISTERSTVO DOPRAVY SR (SK-MIN), PIC 992649986, established in Namestie Slobody P.O.Box 100 c. 6, Bratislava 15 810 05, Slovakia,

51. MINISTRSTVO ZA INFRASTRUKTURO (SI-MZI), PIC 952242696, established in TRZASKA CESTA 19, LJUBLJANA 1000, Slovenia,

52. UNIVERZA V MARIBORU (SI-UM), PIC 999903646, established in SLOMSKOV TRG 15, MARIBOR 2000, Slovenia,

53. JEFATURA CENTRAL DE TRAFICO (ES-DGT), PIC 962730433, established in CALLE JOSEFA VALCARCEL 28, MADRID 28027, Spain,

54. TRAFIKVERKET - TRV (SE-TV), PIC 984295764, established in RODA VAGEN 1, BORLANGE 781 89, Sweden,

55. Samtrafiken i Sverige Aktiebolag*Interconnection in Sweden Limited Liability Company (SE-ST), PIC 872315084, established in Centralplan 3, Stockholm 111 20, Sweden,

56. MINISTERUL INFRASTRUCTURII SI DEZVOLTARII REGIONALE (XMD-MIN), PIC 884219700, established in PIATA MARII ADUNARI NATIONALE 1, CHISINAU 2033, Moldova,

57. UNION INTERNATIONALE DES TRANSPORTS PUBLICS (Y-UITP), PIC 999945647, established in RUE SAINTE MARIE 6, BRUXELLES 1080, Belgium,

58. Information Technology for Public Transport (Y-ITxPT), PIC 908239810, established in Rue Sainte-Marie 6, BRUSSELS 1080, Belgium,

4

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

59. EUROPEAN ROAD TRANSPORT TELEMATICS IMPLEMENTATION COORDINATION ORGANISATION - INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS & SERVICES EUROPE (Y-ERTICO), PIC 999785112, established in AVENUE LOUISE 523, BRUXELLES 1050, Belgium,

Unless otherwise specified, references to ‘beneficiary’ or ‘beneficiaries’ include the coordinator and affiliated entities (if any).

If only one beneficiary signs the grant agreement (‘mono-beneficiary grant’), all provisions referring to the ‘coordinator’ or the ‘beneficiaries’ will be considered — mutatis mutandis — as referring to the beneficiary.

The parties referred to above have agreed to enter into the Agreement.

By signing the Agreement and the accession forms, the beneficiaries accept the grant and agree to implement the action under their own responsibility and in accordance with the Agreement, with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out.

The Agreement is composed of:

Preamble

Terms and Conditions (including Data Sheet)

Annex 1 Description of the action1

Annex 2 Estimated budget for the action

Annex 2a Additional information on unit costs and contributions (if applicable)

Annex 3 Accession forms (if applicable)2

Annex 3a Declaration on joint and several liability of affiliated entities (if applicable)3

Annex 4 Model for the financial statements

Annex 5 Specific rules (if applicable)

1 Template published on Portal Reference Documents. 2 Template published on Portal Reference Documents. 3 Template published on Portal Reference Documents.

5

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GRANT AGREEMENT.................................................................................................................................................... 1

PREAMBLE........................................................................................................................................................................1

TERMS AND CONDITIONS...........................................................................................................................................6

DATASHEET.................................................................................................................................................................... 11

CHAPTER 1 GENERAL..............................................................................................................................................19

ARTICLE 1 — SUBJECT OF THE AGREEMENT ..................................................................................... 19

ARTICLE 2 — DEFINITIONS........................................................................................................................19

CHAPTER 2 ACTION................................................................................................................................................. 20

ARTICLE 3 — ACTION................................................................................................................................. 20

ARTICLE 4 — DURATION AND STARTING DATE...................................................................................20

CHAPTER 3 GRANT...................................................................................................................................................20

ARTICLE 5 — GRANT...................................................................................................................................20

5.1 Form of grant......................................................................................................................................21

5.2 Maximum grant amount..................................................................................................................... 21

5.3 Funding rate........................................................................................................................................21

5.4 Estimated budget, budget categories and forms of funding.............................................................. 21

5.5 Budget flexibility................................................................................................................................21

ARTICLE 6 — ELIGIBLE AND INELIGIBLE COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS......................................22

6.1 General eligibility conditions............................................................................................................. 22

6.2 Specific eligibility conditions for each budget category................................................................... 23

6.3 Ineligible costs and contributions...................................................................................................... 27

6.4 Consequences of non-compliance...................................................................................................... 28

CHAPTER 4 GRANT IMPLEMENTATION............................................................................................................ 28

SECTION 1 CONSORTIUM: BENEFICIARIES, AFFILIATED ENTITIES AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS........................................................................................................................................ 28

ARTICLE 7 — BENEFICIARIES................................................................................................................... 28

ARTICLE 8 — AFFILIATED ENTITIES....................................................................................................... 30

ARTICLE 9 — OTHER PARTICIPANTS INVOLVED IN THE ACTION................................................... 30

9.1 Associated partners.............................................................................................................................31

9.2 Third parties giving in-kind contributions to the action.................................................................... 32

9.3 Subcontractors.....................................................................................................................................32

6

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

9.4 Recipients of financial support to third parties..................................................................................32

ARTICLE 10 — PARTICIPANTS WITH SPECIAL STATUS....................................................................... 32

10.1 Non-EU participants......................................................................................................................... 32

10.2 Participants which are international organisations...........................................................................33

10.3 Pillar-assessed participants............................................................................................................... 33

SECTION 2 RULES FOR CARRYING OUT THE ACTION...........................................................................35

ARTICLE 11 — PROPER IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACTION............................................................ 35

11.1 Obligation to properly implement the action................................................................................... 35

11.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 35

ARTICLE 12 — CONFLICT OF INTERESTS.............................................................................................. 35

12.1 Conflict of interests.......................................................................................................................... 35

12.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 36

ARTICLE 13 — CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY............................................................................ 36

13.1 Sensitive information........................................................................................................................36

13.2 Classified information...................................................................................................................... 37

13.3 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 37

ARTICLE 14 — ETHICS AND VALUES...................................................................................................... 37

14.1 Ethics.................................................................................................................................................37

14.2 Values................................................................................................................................................37

14.3 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 37

ARTICLE 15 — DATA PROTECTION.......................................................................................................... 38

15.1 Data processing by the granting authority....................................................................................... 38

15.2 Data processing by the beneficiaries............................................................................................... 38

15.3 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 38

ARTICLE 16 — INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) — BACKGROUND AND RESULTS — ACCESS RIGHTS AND RIGHTS OF USE................................................................................ 39

16.1 Background and access rights to background..................................................................................39

16.2 Ownership of results.........................................................................................................................39

16.3 Rights of use of the granting authority on materials, documents and information received for policy, information, communication, dissemination and publicity purposes...................................39

16.4 Specific rules on IPR, results and background................................................................................40

16.5 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 40

ARTICLE 17 — COMMUNICATION, DISSEMINATION AND VISIBILITY............................................ 40

17.1 Communication — Dissemination — Promoting the action........................................................... 40

17.2 Visibility — European flag and funding statement......................................................................... 41

17.3 Quality of information — Disclaimer..............................................................................................41

7

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

17.4 Specific communication, dissemination and visibility rules............................................................42

17.5 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 42

ARTICLE 18 — SPECIFIC RULES FOR CARRYING OUT THE ACTION............................................... 42

18.1 Specific rules for carrying out the action........................................................................................ 42

18.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 42

SECTION 3 GRANT ADMINISTRATION......................................................................................................... 42

ARTICLE 19 — GENERAL INFORMATION OBLIGATIONS....................................................................42

19.1 Information requests......................................................................................................................... 42

19.2 Participant Register data updates..................................................................................................... 42

19.3 Information about events and circumstances which impact the action............................................42

19.4 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 43

ARTICLE 20 — RECORD-KEEPING............................................................................................................ 43

20.1 Keeping records and supporting documents.................................................................................... 43

20.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 44

ARTICLE 21 — REPORTING........................................................................................................................ 44

21.1 Continuous reporting........................................................................................................................ 44

21.2 Periodic reporting: Technical reports and financial statements....................................................... 44

21.3 Currency for financial statements and conversion into euros..........................................................45

21.4 Reporting language...........................................................................................................................46

21.5 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 46

ARTICLE 22 — PAYMENTS AND RECOVERIES — CALCULATION OF AMOUNTS DUE................. 46

22.1 Payments and payment arrangements.............................................................................................. 46

22.2 Recoveries.........................................................................................................................................46

22.3 Amounts due.....................................................................................................................................47

22.4 Enforced recovery.............................................................................................................................52

22.5 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 52

ARTICLE 23 — GUARANTEES....................................................................................................................53

23.1 Prefinancing guarantee..................................................................................................................... 53

23.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 53

ARTICLE 24 — CERTIFICATES................................................................................................................... 53

24.1 Operational verification report (OVR).............................................................................................54

24.2 Certificate on the financial statements (CFS).................................................................................. 54

24.3 Certificate on the compliance of usual cost accounting practices (CoMUC).................................. 54

24.4 Systems and process audit (SPA).....................................................................................................55

24.5 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 55

8

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

ARTICLE 25 — CHECKS, REVIEWS, AUDITS AND INVESTIGATIONS — EXTENSION OF FINDINGS..................................................................................................................................... 55

25.1 Granting authority checks, reviews and audits................................................................................ 55

25.2 European Commission checks, reviews and audits in grants of other granting authorities..............56

25.3 Access to records for assessing simplified forms of funding.......................................................... 57

25.4 OLAF, EPPO and ECA audits and investigations........................................................................... 57

25.5 Consequences of checks, reviews, audits and investigations — Extension of results of reviews, audits or investigations.................................................................................................................... 57

25.6 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 58

ARTICLE 26 — IMPACT EVALUATIONS................................................................................................... 59

26.1 Impact evaluation............................................................................................................................. 59

26.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 59

CHAPTER 5 CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE.................................................................................. 59

SECTION 1 REJECTIONS AND GRANT REDUCTION.................................................................................59

ARTICLE 27 — REJECTION OF COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS...........................................................59

27.1 Conditions......................................................................................................................................... 59

27.2 Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 59

27.3 Effects............................................................................................................................................... 59

ARTICLE 28 — GRANT REDUCTION........................................................................................................ 60

28.1 Conditions......................................................................................................................................... 60

28.2 Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 60

28.3 Effects............................................................................................................................................... 60

SECTION 2 SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION............................................................................................60

ARTICLE 29 — PAYMENT DEADLINE SUSPENSION............................................................................. 60

29.1 Conditions......................................................................................................................................... 61

29.2 Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 61

ARTICLE 30 — PAYMENT SUSPENSION...................................................................................................61

30.1 Conditions......................................................................................................................................... 61

30.2 Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 62

ARTICLE 31 — GRANT AGREEMENT SUSPENSION..............................................................................62

31.1 Consortium-requested GA suspension............................................................................................. 62

31.2 EU-initiated GA suspension.............................................................................................................63

ARTICLE 32 — GRANT AGREEMENT OR BENEFICIARY TERMINATION......................................... 64

32.1 Consortium-requested GA termination............................................................................................ 64

32.2 Consortium-requested beneficiary termination................................................................................ 65

32.3 EU-initiated GA or beneficiary termination.................................................................................... 66

9

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

SECTION 3 OTHER CONSEQUENCES: DAMAGES AND ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS............... 69

ARTICLE 33 — DAMAGES...........................................................................................................................69

33.1 Liability of the granting authority....................................................................................................69

33.2 Liability of the beneficiaries............................................................................................................ 70

ARTICLE 34 — ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS AND OTHER MEASURES....................................... 70

SECTION 4 FORCE MAJEURE.......................................................................................................................... 70

ARTICLE 35 — FORCE MAJEURE..............................................................................................................70

CHAPTER 6 FINAL PROVISIONS...........................................................................................................................71

ARTICLE 36 — COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES...............................................................71

36.1 Forms and means of communication — Electronic management................................................... 71

36.2 Date of communication.................................................................................................................... 71

36.3 Addresses for communication.......................................................................................................... 71

ARTICLE 37 — INTERPRETATION OF THE AGREEMENT.....................................................................71

ARTICLE 38 — CALCULATION OF PERIODS AND DEADLINES..........................................................72

ARTICLE 39 — AMENDMENTS.................................................................................................................. 72

39.1 Conditions......................................................................................................................................... 72

39.2 Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 72

ARTICLE 40 — ACCESSION AND ADDITION OF NEW BENEFICIARIES........................................... 73

40.1 Accession of the beneficiaries mentioned in the Preamble............................................................. 73

40.2 Addition of new beneficiaries.......................................................................................................... 73

ARTICLE 41 — TRANSFER OF THE AGREEMENT................................................................................. 73

ARTICLE 42 — ASSIGNMENTS OF CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT AGAINST THE GRANTING AUTHORITY.................................................................................................................................74

ARTICLE 43 — APPLICABLE LAW AND SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES.............................................. 74

43.1 Applicable law..................................................................................................................................74

43.2 Dispute settlement............................................................................................................................ 74

ARTICLE 44 — ENTRY INTO FORCE.........................................................................................................74

10

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

DATA SHEET

1.  General data

Project summary:

Project summary

NAPCORE-X is the project to continue the operation and management of the National Access Point Coordination Organisation for Europe (“NAPCORE”). This includes the work previously managed by the EC-funded projects DATEX II, TN-ITS and DATA4PT. NAPCORE has the following objectives: - To coordinate the alignment of operational aspects of the implementation of the Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) Directive as mentioned in Article 5.3 amongst the Member States; - To advise the European Commission and the Member States on the effects of other (besides the ITS Directive) and future legislation in relation to the mobility data domain; - To monitor, evaluate, assess and possibly propose action dealing with relevant European technological and societal developments relevant for the mobility data domain as well as to track relevant global developments; - To establish coordination and facilitate cooperation between relevant stakeholders; - To develop and offer tools and processes as well as to share best practices supporting National Access Points and National Bodies on a European level; - To share findings and results within and beyond the NAPCORE community to ensure broader awareness and harmonization among stakeholders. The need and justification for NAPCORE-X is given by the revised Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the framework for the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in the field of road transport and for interfaces with other modes of transport (the ITS Directive), Article 5 (3), in which a cooperation and coordination of Member States on matters related to mobility data exchange via the National Access Points is mandated. NAPCORE, enabled through this NAPCORE-X project, is the organisational structure in which this coordination takes place.

Keywords:

– mobility data, National Access Points, ITS

Project number: 101234721

Project name: Continuation of NAPCORE - the National Access Point Coordination Organisation for Europe

Project acronym: 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X

Call: CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Topic: CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG-NAPCORE

Type of action: CEF Project Grants

Granting authority: European Commission-EU

Grant managed through EU Funding & Tenders Portal: Yes (eGrants)

Project starting date: fixed date: 1 July 2025

Project end date: 31 December 2027

Project duration: 30 months

Consortium agreement: Yes

2. Participants

List of participants:

N° Role Short name Legal name Ctry PIC Total

eligible costs (BEN and AE)

Max grant amount

1 COO DE-BAST BUNDESANSTALT FUER STRASSEN-UND VERKEHRSWESEN

DE 999606729 1 203 697.00 1 023 142.45

2 BEN DE-HH FREIE UND HANSESTADT HAMBURG DE 998928602 65 909.00 56 022.65

3 BEN DE-NRW-MIN MINISTERIUM FUR UMWELT, NATURSCHUTZ UND VERKEHR DES LANDES NORDRHEIN-WESTFALEN

DE 888355392 88 688.00 75 384.80

11

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

N° Role Short name Legal name Ctry PIC Total

eligible costs (BEN and AE)

Max grant amount

4 BEN DE-NVBW NVBW - NAHVERKEHRSGESELLSCHAFT BADEN- WURTTEMBERG MBH

DE 889834254 95 835.00 81 459.75

5 BEN DE-RMS RHEIN-MAIN-VERKEHRSVERBUND SERVICEGELLSCHAFT MBH

DE 908140579 172 479.00 146 607.15

6 BEN AT-MVO Mobilitatsverbunde Osterreich OG AT 893590676 54 079.00 45 967.15

7 BEN AT-ASFINAG AUTOBAHNEN- UND SCHNELLSTRASSEN- FINANZIERUNGS- AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

AT 950547427 195 105.00 165 839.25

8 BEN AT-ATE AUSTRIATECH - GESELLSCHAFT DES BUNDES FUR TECHNOLOGIEPOLITISCHE MASSNAHMEN GMBH

AT 999642425 769 582.00 654 144.70

9 BEN BE-FED SERVICE PUBLIC FEDERAL MOBILITE ET TRANSPORTS

BE 885645212 243 292.00 206 798.20

10 BEN BE-FL VLAAMSE GEWEST BE 999575107 38 369.00 32 613.65

11 BEN BE-NGI INSTITUT GEOGRAPHIQUE NATIONAL BE 953503696 183 487.00 155 963.95

12 BEN HR-CESTE HRVATSKE CESTE DRUSTVO S OGRANICENOM ODGOVORNOSCU ZA UPRAVLJANJE GRADENJE I ODRZAVANJE DRZAVNIH CESTA

HR 905115828 389 785.00 331 317.25

13 BEN HR-MMPI MINISTARSTVO MORA, PROMETA I INFRASTRUKTURE

HR 895631750 126 251.00 107 313.35

14 BEN CY-PWD YPOURGEIO METAFORON, EPIKOINONION KAI ERGON

CY 958850433 300 667.00 255 566.95

15 BEN CZ-CDV CENTRUM DOPRAVNIHO VYZKUMU v.v.i. CZ 999450171 134 803.00 114 582.55

16 BEN CZ-MDCR MINISTERSTVO DOPRAVY CZ 985636401 47 030.00 39 975.50

17 BEN CZ-CVUT CESKE VYSOKE UCENI TECHNICKE V PRAZE CZ 999848744 123 053.00 104 595.05

18 BEN CZ-TTR TAMTAM RESEARCH SRO CZ 892455000 232 060.00 197 251.00

19 BEN DK-DRD VEJDIREKTORATET DK 998722768 56 624.00 48 130.40

20 BEN DK-TS TRAFIKSTYRELSEN DK 887835860 43 168.00 36 692.80

21 BEN EE-ETA TRANSPORDIAMET EE 888420576 43 674.00 37 122.90

22 BEN FI-FINTRA LIIKENTEENOHJAUSYHTIO FINTRAFFIC OY FI 885860746 190 535.00 161 954.75

23 BEN FI-TRAFICOM LIIKENNE- JA VIESTINTAVIRASTO FI 900306956 89 157.00 75 783.45

24 BEN FR-MIN MINISTERE DE LA TRANSITION ECOLOGIQUE, DE L'ENERGIE, DU CLIMAT ET DE LA PREVENTION DES RISQUES

FR 996384874 523 270.00 444 779.50

25 BEN FR-CEREMA CENTRE D ETUDES ET D EXPERTISE SUR LES RISQUES L ENVIRONNEMENT LA MOBILITE ET L AMENAGEMENT

FR 948933735 256 934.00 218 393.90

26 BEN FR-ART AUTORITE DE REGULATION DES TRANSPORTS FR 875225569 43 785.00 37 217.25

27 BEN GR-MIN YPOURGEIO YPODOMON KAI METAFORON EL 939019850 319 021.00 271 167.85

28 BEN HU-EKM EPITESI ES KOZLEKEDESI MINISZTERIUM HU 884022208 0.00 0.00

29 BEN HU-KOZUT MAGYAR KOZUT NONPROFIT ZARTKORUEN MUKODO RESZVENYTARSASAG

HU 905297121 95 498.00 81 173.30

30 BEN IE-DFT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT IE 975472159 0.00 0.00

31 BEN IT-MIN MINISTERO DELLE INFRASTRUTTURE E DEI TRASPORTI

IT 996445790 35 453.00 30 135.05

32 BEN IT-SINA SOCIETA INIZIATIVE NAZIONALI AUTOSTRADALI - S.I.N.A. SPA

IT 971458396 186 501.00 158 525.85

33 BEN IT-ASPI AUTOSTRADE PER L'ITALIA SPA IT 995995904 169 163.00 143 788.55

34 BEN IT-MOVYON MOVYON S.P.A. IT 873673375 79 355.00 67 451.75

35 BEN IT-5T 5T SRL IT 996356065 97 234.00 82 648.90

36 BEN IT-CEF CEFRIEL SOCIETA CONSORTILE A RESPONSABILITA LIMITATA SOCIETA BENEFIT

IT 999647178 191 932.00 163 142.20

37 BEN IT-QM QMAP SRL IT 895821579 18 120.00 15 402.00

12

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

N° Role Short name Legal name Ctry PIC Total

eligible costs (BEN and AE)

Max grant amount

38 BEN IT-SINELEC Sinelec SPA IT 872279000 78 892.00 67 058.20

39 BEN LV-CELI LATVIJAS VALSTS CELI LV 952381212 84 458.00 71 789.30

40 BEN LT-VIA AKCINE BENDROVE VIA LIETUVA LT 995630020 107 175.00 91 098.75

41 BEN MT-TRANSP AUTHORITY FOR TRANSPORT IN MALTA MT 965978478 319 803.00 271 832.55

42 BEN NL-MIN MINISTERIE VAN INFRASTRUCTUUR EN WATERSTAAT

NL 967944377 1 136 533.00 966 053.05

43 BEN PL-GDNRM GENERALNA DYREKCJA DROG KRAJOWYCH I AUTOSTRAD

PL 894744006 82 938.00 70 497.30

44 BEN PT-IMT INSTITUTO DA MOBILIDADE E DOS TRANSPORTES, I P

PT 966290430 77 963.00 66 268.55

45 BEN PT-ARMIS ARMIS - SISTEMAS DE INFORMACAO LDA PT 876922487 322 688.00 274 284.80

46 BEN RO-MIN MINISTERUL TRANSPORTURILOR SI INFRASTRUCTURII

RO 888053916 53 938.00 45 847.30

47 BEN RO-NCRIA COMPANIA NATIONALA DE ADMINISTRARE A INFRASTRUCTURII RUTIERE SA

RO 984896485 77 791.00 66 122.35

48 BEN RO-ITS ORGANIZATIA ROMANA PENTRU IMPLEMENTAREA SISTEMELOR INTELIGENTE DE TRANSPORT

RO 985882393 99 080.00 84 218.00

49 BEN RO-ELSOL ELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS SRL RO 984592487 84 596.00 71 906.60

50 BEN SK-MIN MINISTERSTVO DOPRAVY SR SK 992649986 56 893.00 48 359.05

51 BEN SI-MZI MINISTRSTVO ZA INFRASTRUKTURO SI 952242696 221 906.00 188 620.10

52 BEN SI-UM UNIVERZA V MARIBORU SI 999903646 238 060.00 202 351.00

53 BEN ES-DGT JEFATURA CENTRAL DE TRAFICO ES 962730433 102 550.00 87 167.50

54 BEN SE-TV TRAFIKVERKET - TRV SE 984295764 158 836.00 135 010.60

55 BEN SE-ST Samtrafiken i Sverige Aktiebolag*Interconnection in Sweden Limited Liability Company

SE 872315084 129 901.00 110 415.85

56 BEN XMD-MIN MINISTERUL INFRASTRUCTURII SI DEZVOLTARII REGIONALE

MD 884219700 0.00 0.00

57 BEN Y-UITP UNION INTERNATIONALE DES TRANSPORTS PUBLICS

BE 999945647 297 206.00 252 625.10

58 BEN Y-ITxPT Information Technology for Public Transport BE 908239810 224 440.00 190 774.00

59 BEN Y-ERTICO EUROPEAN ROAD TRANSPORT TELEMATICS IMPLEMENTATION COORDINATION ORGANISATION - INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS & SERVICES EUROPE

BE 999785112 304 095.00 258 480.75

60 AP DE-AB DIE AUTOBAHN GMBH DES BUNDES DE 888874051 0.00 0.00

61 AP AT-BMIMI BUNDESMINISTERIUM FUER INNOVATION, MOBILITAET UND INFRASTRUKTUR

AT 999633695 0.00 0.00

62 AP BE-WAL SERVICE PUBLIC DE WALLONIE BE 999811884 0.00 0.00

63 AP BG-MIN MINISTERSTVO NA TRANSPORTA I SAOBSHTENIYATA

BG 954100440 0.00 0.00

64 AP BG-API Agentsia Patna Infrastruktura BG 881408640 0.00 0.00

65 AP EE-MIN-KLI KLIIMAMINISTEERIUM EE 941609750 0.00 0.00

66 AP FR-ASFA ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONNELLE DES SOCIETES FRANCAISES CONCESSIONNAIRES OU EXPLOITANTES D AUTOROUTES OU D OUVRAGES ROUTIERS

FR 999810817 0.00 0.00

67 AP IE-TII NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY IE 996493611 0.00 0.00

68 AP IE-NTA National Transport Authority IE 939093182 0.00 0.00

69 AP LU-MIN MINISTERE DE LA MOBILITE ET DES TRAVAUX PUBLICS

LU 879222648 0.00 0.00

70 AP PL-MIN MINISTERSTWO INFRASTRUKTURY PL 986541120 0.00 0.00

71 AP XIS-VEG VEGAGERDIN IS 951549340 0.00 0.00

13

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

N° Role Short name Legal name Ctry PIC Total

eligible costs (BEN and AE)

Max grant amount

72 AP XME-MIN MINISTARSTVO SAOBRACAJA I POMORSTVA ME 911469716 0.00 0.00

73 AP XNO-NPRA STATENS VEGVESEN NO 999661340 0.00 0.00

74 AP XCH-FEDRO Bundesamt für Strassen CH 896055252 0.00 0.00

75 AP XUK-DFT DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT UK 999476264 0.00 0.00

76 AP XUK-NH NATIONAL HIGHWAYS LIMITED UK 924758619 0.00 0.00

77 AP SE-STA TRANSPORTSTYRELSEN SE 917179039 0.00 0.00

Total 11 163 337.00 9 488 836.45

Coordinator:

– BUNDESANSTALT FUER STRASSEN-UND VERKEHRSWESEN (DE-BAST)

3. Grant

Maximum grant amount, total estimated eligible costs and contributions and funding rate:

Total eligible costs (BEN and AE)

Funding rate (%)

Maximum grant amount (Annex 2)

Maximum grant amount (award decision)

11 163 337.00 85 9 488 836.45 9 488 836.45

Grant form: Budget-based

Grant mode: Action grant

Budget categories/activity types:

- A. Personnel costs - A.1 Employees, A.2 Natural persons under direct contract, A.3 Seconded persons - A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries

- B. Subcontracting costs

- C. Purchase costs - C.1 Travel and subsistence - C.2 Equipment - C.3 Other goods, works and services

- D. Other cost categories - D.1 Financial support to third parties

- E. Indirect costs

Cost eligibility options:

- Standard supplementary payments

- Average personnel costs (unit cost according to usual cost accounting practices)

- Limitation for subcontracting

- Travel and subsistence: - Travel: Actual costs - Accommodation: Actual costs - Subsistence: Actual costs

14

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

- Equipment: full costs only

- Costs for providing financial support to third parties (actual cost; max amount for each recipient: EUR 0.00)

- Indirect cost flat-rate: 0% of the eligible direct costs (categories A-D, except volunteers costs and exempted specific cost categories, if any)

- VAT: No

- Other ineligible costs

Budget flexibility: Yes (no flexibility cap)

4. Reporting, payments and recoveries

4.1 Continuous reporting (art 21)

Deliverables: see Funding & Tenders Portal Continuous Reporting tool

4.2 Periodic reporting and payments

Reporting and payment schedule (art 21, 22):

Reporting Payments

Reporting periods Type Deadline Type Deadline (time to pay)

RP No Month from Month to

Initial prefinancing

30 days from entry into force/

financial guarantee (if required) – whichever is the latest

1 1 30 Periodic report 60 days after end of reporting period

Final payment 90 days from receiving

periodic report

Prefinancing payments and guarantees:

Prefinancing payment Prefinancing guarantee

Type Amount Guarantee amount Division per participant

Prefinancing 1 (initial) 3 795 534.58 n/a 1 - DE-BAST n/a

2 - DE-HH n/a

3 - DE-NRW-MIN n/a

4 - DE-NVBW n/a

5 - DE-RMS n/a

6 - AT-MVO n/a

7 - AT-ASFINAG n/a

8 - AT-ATE n/a

9 - BE-FED n/a

10 - BE-FL n/a

11 - BE-NGI n/a

12 - HR-CESTE n/a

15

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

Prefinancing payment Prefinancing guarantee

Type Amount Guarantee amount Division per participant

13 - HR-MMPI n/a

14 - CY-PWD n/a

15 - CZ-CDV n/a

16 - CZ-MDCR n/a

17 - CZ-CVUT n/a

18 - CZ-TTR n/a

19 - DK-DRD n/a

20 - DK-TS n/a

21 - EE-ETA n/a

22 - FI-FINTRA n/a

23 - FI-TRAFICOM n/a

24 - FR-MIN n/a

25 - FR-CEREMA n/a

26 - FR-ART n/a

27 - GR-MIN n/a

28 - HU-EKM n/a

29 - HU-KOZUT n/a

30 - IE-DFT n/a

31 - IT-MIN n/a

32 - IT-SINA n/a

33 - IT-ASPI n/a

34 - IT-MOVYON n/a

35 - IT-5T n/a

36 - IT-CEF n/a

37 - IT-QM n/a

38 - IT-SINELEC n/a

39 - LV-CELI n/a

40 - LT-VIA n/a

41 - MT-TRANSP n/a

42 - NL-MIN n/a

43 - PL-GDNRM n/a

44 - PT-IMT n/a

45 - PT-ARMIS n/a

46 - RO-MIN n/a

47 - RO-NCRIA n/a

48 - RO-ITS n/a

49 - RO-ELSOL n/a

50 - SK-MIN n/a

51 - SI-MZI n/a

52 - SI-UM n/a

53 - ES-DGT n/a

54 - SE-TV n/a

55 - SE-ST n/a

16

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

Prefinancing payment Prefinancing guarantee

Type Amount Guarantee amount Division per participant

56 - XMD-MIN n/a

57 - Y-UITP n/a

58 - Y-ITxPT n/a

59 - Y-ERTICO n/a

Reporting and payment modalities (art 21, 22):

Mutual Insurance Mechanism (MIM): No

Restrictions on distribution of initial prefinancing: The prefinancing may be distributed only if the minimum number of beneficiaries set out in the call condititions (if any) have acceded to the Agreement and only to beneficiaries that have acceded.

Interim payment ceiling (if any): 90% of the maximum grant amount

No-profit rule: Yes

Late payment interest: ECB + 3.5%

Bank account for payments:

DE81590000000059001020 MARKDEF1590

Conversion into euros: Double conversion

Reporting language: Language of the Agreement

4.3 Certificates (art 24):

Certificates on the financial statements (CFS):

Conditions:

Schedule: interim/final payment, if threshold is reached

Standard threshold (beneficiary-level):

- financial statement: requested EU contribution to costs ≥ EUR 325 000.00

4.4 Recoveries (art 22)

First-line liability for recoveries:

Beneficiary termination: Beneficiary concerned

Final payment: Coordinator

After final payment: Beneficiary concerned

Joint and several liability for enforced recoveries (in case of non-payment):

Limited joint and several liability of other beneficiaries — up to the maximum grant amount of the beneficiary

Joint and several liability of affiliated entities — n/a

17

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

5. Consequences of non-compliance, applicable law & dispute settlement forum

Suspension and termination:

Additional suspension grounds (art 31)

Additional termination grounds (art 32)

Applicable law (art 43):

Standard applicable law regime: EU law + law of Belgium

Dispute settlement forum (art 43):

Standard dispute settlement forum:

EU beneficiaries: EU General Court + EU Court of Justice (on appeal)

Non-EU beneficiaries: Courts of Brussels, Belgium (unless an international agreement provides for the enforceability of EU court judgements)

6. Other

Specific rules (Annex 5): Yes

Standard time-limits after project end:

Confidentiality (for X years after final payment): 5

Record-keeping (for X years after final payment): 5 (or 3 for grants of not more than EUR 60 000)

Reviews (up to X years after final payment): 5 (or 3 for grants of not more than EUR 60 000)

Audits (up to X years after final payment): 5 (or 3 for grants of not more than EUR 60 000)

Extension of findings from other grants to this grant (no later than X years after final payment): 5 (or 3 for grants of not more than EUR 60 000)

Impact evaluation (up to X years after final payment): 5 (or 3 for grants of not more than EUR 60 000)

18

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

CHAPTER 1 GENERAL

ARTICLE 1 — SUBJECT OF THE AGREEMENT

This Agreement sets out the rights and obligations and terms and conditions applicable to the grant awarded for the implementation of the action set out in Chapter 2.

ARTICLE 2 — DEFINITIONS

For the purpose of this Agreement, the following definitions apply:

Actions — The project which is being funded in the context of this Agreement.

Grant — The grant awarded in the context of this Agreement.

EU grants — Grants awarded by EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies (including EU executive agencies, EU regulatory agencies, EDA, joint undertakings, etc.).

Participants — Entities participating in the action as beneficiaries, affiliated entities, associated partners, third parties giving in-kind contributions, subcontractors or recipients of financial support to third parties.

Beneficiaries (BEN) — The signatories of this Agreement (either directly or through an accession form).

Affiliated entities (AE) — Entities affiliated to a beneficiary within the meaning of Article 190 of EU Financial Regulation 2024/25094 which participate in the action with similar rights and obligations as the beneficiaries (obligation to implement action tasks and right to charge costs and claim contributions).

Associated partners (AP) — Entities which participate in the action, but without the right to charge costs or claim contributions.

Purchases — Contracts for goods, works or services needed to carry out the action (e.g. equipment, consumables and supplies) but which are not part of the action tasks (see Annex 1).

Subcontracting — Contracts for goods, works or services that are part of the action tasks (see Annex 1).

In-kind contributions — In-kind contributions within the meaning of Article 2(38) of EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509, i.e. non-financial resources made available free of charge by third parties.

4 For the definition, see Article 190 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2024 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (recast) (‘EU Financial Regulation’) (OJ L, 2024/2509, 26.9.2024): “affiliated entities [are]: (a) entities that form a sole beneficiary [(i.e. where an entity is formed of several entities that satisfy the criteria for

being awarded a grant, including where the entity is specifically established for the purpose of implementing an action to be financed by a grant)];

(b) entities that satisfy the eligibility criteria and that do not fall within one of the situations referred to in Article 138(1) and 143(1) and that have a link with the beneficiary, in particular a legal or capital link, which is neither limited to the action nor established for the sole purpose of its implementation”.

19

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

Fraud — Fraud within the meaning of Article 3 of EU Directive 2017/13715 and Article 1 of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests, drawn up by the Council Act of 26 July 19956, as well as any other wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain.

Irregularities — Any type of breach (regulatory or contractual) which could impact the EU financial interests, including irregularities within the meaning of Article 1(2) of EU Regulation 2988/957.

Grave professional misconduct — Any type of unacceptable or improper behaviour in exercising one’s profession, especially by employees, including grave professional misconduct within the meaning of Article 138(1)(c) of EU Financial Regulation 2024/25098.

Applicable EU, international and national law — Any legal acts or other (binding or non-binding) rules and guidance in the area concerned.

Portal — EU Funding & Tenders Portal; electronic portal and exchange system managed by the European Commission and used by itself and other EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies for the management of their funding programmes (grants, procurements, prizes, etc.).

CHAPTER 2 ACTION

ARTICLE 3 — ACTION

The grant is awarded for the action 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X (‘action’), as described in Annex 1.

ARTICLE 4 — DURATION AND STARTING DATE

The duration and the starting date of the action are set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 1).

CHAPTER 3 GRANT

ARTICLE 5 — GRANT

5 Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law (OJ L 198, 28.7.2017, p. 29).

6 OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48. 7 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities

financial interests (OJ L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 1). 8 ‘Professional misconduct’ includes, in particular, the following: violation of ethical standards of the profession;

wrongful conduct with impact on professional credibility; breach of generally accepted professional ethical standards; false declarations/misrepresentation of information; participation in a cartel or other agreement distorting competition; violation of IPR; attempting to influence decision-making processes by taking advantage, through misrepresentation, of a conflict of interests, or to obtain confidential information from public authorities to gain an advantage; incitement to discrimination, hatred or violence or similar activities contrary to the EU values where negatively affecting or risking to affect the performance of a legal commitment.

20

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

5.1 Form of grant

The grant is an action grant9 which takes the form of a budget-based mixed actual cost grant (i.e. a grant based on actual costs incurred, but which may also include other forms of funding, such as unit costs or contributions, flat-rate costs or contributions, lump sum costs or contributions or financing not linked to costs).

5.2 Maximum grant amount

The maximum grant amount is set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 3) and in the estimated budget (Annex 2).

5.3 Funding rate

The funding rate for costs is 85% of the action’s eligible costs.

Contributions are not subject to any funding rate.

5.4 Estimated budget, budget categories and forms of funding

The estimated budget for the action is set out in Annex 2.

It contains the estimated eligible costs and contributions for the action, broken down by participant and budget category.

Annex 2 also shows the types of costs and contributions (forms of funding)10 to be used for each budget category.

If unit costs or contributions are used, the details on the calculation will be explained in Annex 2a.

5.5 Budget flexibility

The budget breakdown may be adjusted — without an amendment (see Article 39) — by transfers (between participants and budget categories), as long as this does not imply any substantive or important change to the description of the action in Annex 1.

However:

- changes to the budget category for volunteers (if used) always require an amendment

- changes to budget categories with lump sums costs or contributions (if used; including financing not linked to costs) always require an amendment

- changes to budget categories with higher funding rates or budget ceilings (if used) always require an amendment

- addition of amounts for subcontracts not provided for in Annex 1 either require an amendment or simplified approval in accordance with Article 6.2

9 For the definition, see Article 183(2)(a) EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509: ‘action grant’ means an EU grant to finance “an action intended to help achieve a Union policy objective”.

10 See Article 125 EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509.

21

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

- other changes require an amendment or simplified approval, if specifically provided for in Article 6.2

- flexibility caps: not applicable.

ARTICLE 6 — ELIGIBLE AND INELIGIBLE COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

In order to be eligible, costs and contributions must meet the eligibility conditions set out in this Article.

6.1 General eligibility conditions

The general eligibility conditions are the following:

(a) for actual costs:

(i) they must be actually incurred by the beneficiary

(ii) they must be incurred in the period set out in Article 4 (with the exception of costs relating to the submission of the final periodic report, which may be incurred afterwards; see Article 21)

(iii) they must be declared under one of the budget categories set out in Article 6.2 and Annex 2

(iv) they must be incurred in connection with the action as described in Annex 1 and necessary for its implementation

(v) they must be identifiable and verifiable, in particular recorded in the beneficiary’s accounts in accordance with the accounting standards applicable in the country where the beneficiary is established and with the beneficiary’s usual cost accounting practices

(vi) they must comply with the applicable national law on taxes, labour and social security and

(vii) they must be reasonable, justified and must comply with the principle of sound financial management, in particular regarding economy and efficiency

(b) for unit costs or contributions (if any):

(i) they must be declared under one of the budget categories set out in Article 6.2 and Annex 2

(ii) the units must:

- be actually used or produced by the beneficiary in the period set out in Article 4 (with the exception of units relating to the submission of the final periodic report, which may be used or produced afterwards; see Article 21)

- be necessary for the implementation of the action and

(iii) the number of units must be identifiable and verifiable, in particular supported by records and documentation (see Article 20)

22

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

(c) for flat-rate costs or contributions (if any):

(i) they must be declared under one of the budget categories set out in Article 6.2 and Annex 2

(ii) the costs or contributions to which the flat-rate is applied must:

- be eligible

- relate to the period set out in Article 4 (with the exception of costs or contributions relating to the submission of the final periodic report, which may be incurred afterwards; see Article 21)

(d) for lump sum costs or contributions (if any):

(i) they must be declared under one of the budget categories set out in Article 6.2 and Annex 2

(ii) the work must be properly implemented by the beneficiary in accordance with Annex 1

(iii) the deliverables/outputs must be achieved in the period set out in Article 4 (with the exception of deliverables/outputs relating to the submission of the final periodic report, which may be achieved afterwards; see Article 21)

(e) for unit, flat-rate or lump sum costs or contributions according to usual cost accounting practices (if any):

(i) they must fulfil the general eligibility conditions for the type of cost concerned

(ii) the cost accounting practices must be applied in a consistent manner, based on objective criteria, regardless of the source of funding

(f) for financing not linked to costs (if any): the results must be achieved or the conditions must be fulfilled as described in Annex 1.

In addition, for direct cost categories (e.g. personnel, travel & subsistence, subcontracting and other direct costs) only costs that are directly linked to the action implementation and can therefore be attributed to it directly are eligible. They must not include any indirect costs (i.e. costs that are only indirectly linked to the action, e.g. via cost drivers).

6.2 Specific eligibility conditions for each budget category

For each budget category, the specific eligibility conditions are as follows:

Direct costs

A. Personnel costs

A.1 Costs for employees (or equivalent) are eligible as personnel costs, if they fulfil the general eligibility conditions and are related to personnel working for the beneficiary under an employment contract (or equivalent appointing act) and assigned to the action.

They must be limited to salaries, social security contributions, taxes and other costs linked to the

23

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

remuneration, if they arise from national law or the employment contract (or equivalent appointing act) and be calculated on the basis of the costs actually incurred, in accordance with the following method:

{daily rate for the person

multiplied by

number of day-equivalents worked on the action (rounded up or down to the nearest half-day)}.

The daily rate must be calculated as:

{annual personnel costs for the person

divided by

215}.

The number of day-equivalents declared for a person must be identifiable and verifiable (see Article 20).

The total number of day-equivalents declared in EU grants, for a person for a year, cannot be higher than 215.

The personnel costs may also include supplementary payments for personnel assigned to the action (including payments on the basis of supplementary contracts regardless of their nature), if:

- it is part of the beneficiary’s usual remuneration practices and is paid in a consistent manner whenever the same kind of work or expertise is required

- the criteria used to calculate the supplementary payments are objective and generally applied by the beneficiary, regardless of the source of funding used.

If the beneficiary uses average personnel costs (unit cost according to usual cost accounting practices), the personnel costs must fulfil the general eligibility conditions for such unit costs and the daily rate must be calculated:

- using the actual personnel costs recorded in the beneficiary’s accounts and excluding any costs which are ineligible or already included in other budget categories; the actual personnel costs may be adjusted on the basis of budgeted or estimated elements, if they are relevant for calculating the personnel costs, reasonable and correspond to objective and verifiable information

and

- according to usual cost accounting practices which are applied in a consistent manner, based on objective criteria, regardless of the source of funding.

A.2 and A.3 Costs for natural persons working under a direct contract other than an employment contract and costs for seconded persons by a third party against payment are also eligible as personnel costs, if they are assigned to the action, fulfil the general eligibility conditions and:

(a) work under conditions similar to those of an employee (in particular regarding the way the work is organised, the tasks that are performed and the premises where they are performed) and

24

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

(b) the result of the work belongs to the beneficiary (unless agreed otherwise).

They must be calculated on the basis of a rate which corresponds to the costs actually incurred for the direct contract or secondment and must not be significantly different from those for personnel performing similar tasks under an employment contract with the beneficiary.

A.4 The work of SME owners for the action (i.e. owners of beneficiaries that are small and medium- sized enterprises11 not receiving a salary) or natural person beneficiaries (i.e. beneficiaries that are natural persons not receiving a salary) may be declared as personnel costs, if they fulfil the general eligibility conditions and are calculated as unit costs in accordance with the method set out in Annex 2a.

B. Subcontracting costs

Subcontracting costs for the action (including related duties, taxes and charges) are eligible, if they are calculated on the basis of the costs actually incurred, fulfil the general eligibility conditions and are awarded using the beneficiary’s usual purchasing practices — provided these ensure subcontracts with best value for money (or if appropriate the lowest price) and that there is no conflict of interests (see Article 12).

Beneficiaries that are ‘contracting authorities/entities’ within the meaning of the EU Directives on public procurement must also comply with the applicable national law on public procurement.

Subcontracting may cover only a limited part of the action.

The tasks to be subcontracted and the estimated cost for each subcontract must be set out in Annex 1 and the total estimated costs of subcontracting per beneficiary must be set out in Annex 2 (or may be approved ex post in the periodic report, if the use of subcontracting does not entail changes to the Agreement which would call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants; ‘simplified approval procedure’).

C. Purchase costs

Purchase costs for the action (including related duties, taxes and charges) are eligible if they fulfil the general eligibility conditions and are bought using the beneficiary’s usual purchasing practices — provided these ensure purchases with best value for money (or if appropriate the lowest price) and that there is no conflict of interests (see Article 12).

Beneficiaries that are ‘contracting authorities/entities’ within the meaning of the EU Directives on public procurement must also comply with the applicable national law on public procurement.

C.1 Travel and subsistence

11 For the definition, see Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC: micro, small or medium-sized enterprise (SME) are enterprises

- engaged in an economic activity, irrespective of their legal form (including, in particular, self- employed persons and family businesses engaged in craft or other activities, and partnerships or associations regularly engaged in an economic activity) and

- employing fewer than 250 persons (expressed in ‘annual working units’ as defined in Article 5 of the Recommendation) and which have an annual turnover not exceeding EUR 50 million, and/or an annual balance sheet total not exceeding EUR 43 million.

25

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

Purchases for travel, accommodation and subsistence must be calculated as follows:

- travel: on the basis of the costs actually incurred and in line with the beneficiary’s usual practices on travel

- accommodation: on the basis of the costs actually incurred and in line with the beneficiary’s usual practices on travel

- subsistence: on the basis of the costs actually incurred and in line with the beneficiary’s usual practices on travel .

C.2 Equipment

Purchases of equipment, infrastructure or other assets specifically for the action (or developed as part of the action tasks) may be declared as full capitalised costs if they fulfil the cost eligibility conditions applicable to their respective cost categories.

‘Capitalised costs’ means:

- costs incurred in the purchase or for the development of the equipment, infrastructure or other assets and

- which are recorded under a fixed asset account of the beneficiary in compliance with international accounting standards and the beneficiary’s usual cost accounting practices.

If such equipment, infrastructure or other assets are rented or leased, full costs for renting or leasing are eligible, if they do not exceed the depreciation costs of similar equipment, infrastructure or assets and do not include any financing fees.

C.3 Other goods, works and services

Purchases of other goods, works and services must be calculated on the basis of the costs actually incurred.

Such goods, works and services include, for instance, consumables and supplies, promotion, dissemination, protection of results, translations, publications, certificates and financial guarantees, if required under the Agreement.

D. Other cost categories

D.1 Financial support to third parties

Costs for providing financial support to third parties (in the form of grants, prizes or similar forms of support; if any) are eligible, if and as declared eligible in the call conditions, if they fulfil the general eligibility conditions, are calculated on the basis of the costs actually incurred and the support is implemented in accordance with the conditions set out in Annex 1.

These conditions must ensure objective and transparent selection procedures and include at least the following:

(a) for grants (or similar):

(i) the maximum amount of financial support for each third party (‘recipient’); this amount

26

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

may not exceed the amount set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 3) or otherwise agreed with the granting authority

(ii) the criteria for calculating the exact amount of the financial support

(iii) the different types of activity that qualify for financial support, on the basis of a closed list

(iv) the persons or categories of persons that will be supported and

(v) the criteria and procedures for giving financial support

(b) for prizes (or similar):

(i) the eligibility and award criteria

(ii) the amount of the prize and

(iii) the payment arrangements.

Indirect costs

E. Indirect costs

Indirect costs will be reimbursed at the flat-rate of 0% of the eligible direct costs (categories A-D, except volunteers costs and exempted specific cost categories, if any).

Contributions

Not applicable

6.3 Ineligible costs and contributions

The following costs or contributions are ineligible:

(a) costs or contributions that do not comply with the conditions set out above (Article 6.1 and 6.2), in particular:

(i) costs related to return on capital and dividends paid by a beneficiary

(ii) debt and debt service charges

(iii) provisions for future losses or debts

(iv) interest owed

(v) currency exchange losses

(vi) bank costs charged by the beneficiary’s bank for transfers from the granting authority

(vii) excessive or reckless expenditure

(viii) VAT (always ineligible)

27

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

(ix) costs incurred or contributions for activities implemented during grant agreement suspension (see Article 31)

(x) in-kind contributions by third parties

(b) costs or contributions declared under other EU grants (or grants awarded by an EU Member State, non-EU country or other body implementing the EU budget), except for the following cases:

(i) Synergy actions: not applicable

(ii) if the action grant is combined with an operating grant12 running during the same period and the beneficiary can demonstrate that the operating grant does not cover any (direct or indirect) costs of the action grant

(c) costs or contributions for staff of a national (or regional/local) administration, for activities that are part of the administration’s normal activities (i.e. not undertaken only because of the grant)

(d) costs or contributions (especially travel and subsistence) for staff or representatives of EU institutions, bodies or agencies

(e) other :

(i) country restrictions for eligible costs: not applicable

(ii) costs or contributions declared specifically ineligible in the call conditions.

6.4 Consequences of non-compliance

If a beneficiary declares costs or contributions that are ineligible, they will be rejected (see Article 27).

This may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5.

CHAPTER 4 GRANT IMPLEMENTATION

SECTION 1 CONSORTIUM: BENEFICIARIES, AFFILIATED ENTITIES AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS

ARTICLE 7 — BENEFICIARIES

The beneficiaries, as signatories of the Agreement, are fully responsible towards the granting authority for implementing it and for complying with all its obligations.

They must implement the Agreement to their best abilities, in good faith and in accordance with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out.

12 For the definition, see Article 183(2)(b) EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509: ‘operating grant’ means an EU grant to finance “the functioning of a body which has an objective forming part of and supporting an EU policy”.

28

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

They must have the appropriate resources to implement the action and implement the action under their own responsibility and in accordance with Article 11. If they rely on affiliated entities or other participants (see Articles 8 and 9), they retain sole responsibility towards the granting authority and the other beneficiaries.

They are jointly responsible for the technical implementation of the action. If one of the beneficiaries fails to implement their part of the action, the other beneficiaries must ensure that this part is implemented by someone else (without being entitled to an increase of the maximum grant amount and subject to an amendment; see Article 39). The financial responsibility of each beneficiary in case of recoveries is governed by Article 22.

The beneficiaries (and their action) must remain eligible under the EU programme funding the grant for the entire duration of the action. Costs and contributions will be eligible only as long as the beneficiary and the action are eligible.

The internal roles and responsibilities of the beneficiaries are divided as follows:

(a) Each beneficiary must:

(i) keep information stored in the Portal Participant Register up to date (see Article 19)

(ii) inform the granting authority (and the other beneficiaries) immediately of any events or circumstances likely to affect significantly or delay the implementation of the action (see Article 19)

(iii) submit to the coordinator in good time:

- the prefinancing guarantees (if required; see Article 23)

- the financial statements and certificates on the financial statements (CFS) (if required; see Articles 21 and 24.2 and Data Sheet, Point 4.3)

- the contribution to the deliverables and technical reports (see Article 21)

- any other documents or information required by the granting authority under the Agreement

(iv) submit via the Portal data and information related to the participation of their affiliated entities.

(b) The coordinator must:

(i) monitor that the action is implemented properly (see Article 11)

(ii) act as the intermediary for all communications between the consortium and the granting authority, unless the Agreement or granting authority specifies otherwise, and in particular:

- submit the prefinancing guarantees to the granting authority (if any)

- request and review any documents or information required and verify their quality and completeness before passing them on to the granting authority

29

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

- submit the deliverables and reports to the granting authority

- inform the granting authority about the payments made to the other beneficiaries (report on the distribution of payments; if required, see Articles 22 and 32)

(iii) distribute the payments received from the granting authority to the other beneficiaries without unjustified delay (see Article 22).

The coordinator may not delegate or subcontract the above-mentioned tasks to any other beneficiary or third party (including affiliated entities).

However, coordinators which are public bodies may delegate the tasks set out in Point (b)(ii) last indent and (iii) above to entities with ‘authorisation to administer’ which they have created or which are controlled by or affiliated to them. In this case, the coordinator retains sole responsibility for the payments and for compliance with the obligations under the Agreement.

Moreover, coordinators which are ‘sole beneficiaries’13 (or similar, such as European research infrastructure consortia (ERICs)) may delegate the tasks set out in Point (b)(i) to (iii) above to one of their members. The coordinator retains sole responsibility for compliance with the obligations under the Agreement.

The beneficiaries must have internal arrangements regarding their operation and co-ordination, to ensure that the action is implemented properly.

If required by the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 1), these arrangements must be set out in a written consortium agreement between the beneficiaries, covering for instance:

- the internal organisation of the consortium

- the management of access to the Portal

- different distribution keys for the payments and financial responsibilities in case of recoveries (if any)

- additional rules on rights and obligations related to background and results (see Article 16)

- settlement of internal disputes

- liability, indemnification and confidentiality arrangements between the beneficiaries.

The internal arrangements must not contain any provision contrary to this Agreement.

ARTICLE 8 — AFFILIATED ENTITIES

Not applicable

ARTICLE 9 — OTHER PARTICIPANTS INVOLVED IN THE ACTION

13 For the definition, see Article 190(2) EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509: “Where several entities satisfy the criteria for being awarded a grant and together form one entity, that entity may be treated as the sole beneficiary, including where it is specifically established for the purpose of implementing the action financed by the grant.”

30

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

9.1 Associated partners

The following entities which cooperate with a beneficiary will participate in the action as ‘associated partners’:

- DIE AUTOBAHN GMBH DES BUNDES (DE-AB), PIC 888874051

- BUNDESMINISTERIUM FUER INNOVATION, MOBILITAET UND INFRASTRUKTUR (AT-BMIMI), PIC 999633695

- SERVICE PUBLIC DE WALLONIE (BE-WAL), PIC 999811884

- MINISTERSTVO NA TRANSPORTA I SAOBSHTENIYATA (BG-MIN), PIC 954100440

- Agentsia Patna Infrastruktura (BG-API), PIC 881408640

- KLIIMAMINISTEERIUM (EE-MIN-KLI), PIC 941609750

- ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONNELLE DES SOCIETES FRANCAISES CONCESSIONNAIRES OU EXPLOITANTES D AUTOROUTES OU D OUVRAGES ROUTIERS (FR-ASFA), PIC 999810817

- NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY (IE-TII), PIC 996493611

- National Transport Authority (IE-NTA), PIC 939093182

- MINISTERE DE LA MOBILITE ET DES TRAVAUX PUBLICS (LU-MIN), PIC 879222648

- MINISTERSTWO INFRASTRUKTURY (PL-MIN), PIC 986541120

- VEGAGERDIN (XIS-VEG), PIC 951549340

- MINISTARSTVO SAOBRACAJA I POMORSTVA (XME-MIN), PIC 911469716

- STATENS VEGVESEN (XNO-NPRA), PIC 999661340

- Bundesamt für Strassen (XCH-FEDRO), PIC 896055252

- DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT (XUK-DFT), PIC 999476264

- NATIONAL HIGHWAYS LIMITED (XUK-NH), PIC 924758619

- TRANSPORTSTYRELSEN (SE-STA), PIC 917179039

Associated partners must implement the action tasks attributed to them in Annex 1 in accordance with Article 11. They may not charge costs or contributions to the action and the costs for their tasks are not eligible.

The tasks must be set out in Annex 1.

The beneficiaries must ensure that their contractual obligations under Articles 11 (proper implementation), 12 (conflict of interests), 13 (confidentiality and security), 14 (ethics), 17.2

31

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

(visibility), 18 (specific rules for carrying out action), 19 (information) and 20 (record-keeping) also apply to the associated partners.

The beneficiaries must ensure that the bodies mentioned in Article 25 (e.g. granting authority, OLAF, Court of Auditors (ECA), etc.) can exercise their rights also towards the associated partners.

9.2 Third parties giving in-kind contributions to the action

Other third parties may give in-kind contributions to the action (i.e. personnel, equipment, other goods, works and services, etc. which are free-of-charge), if necessary for the implementation.

Third parties giving in-kind contributions do not implement any action tasks. They may not charge costs or contributions to the action and the costs for the in-kind contributions are not eligible.

The third parties and their in-kind contributions should be set out in Annex 1.

9.3 Subcontractors

Subcontractors may participate in the action, if necessary for the implementation.

Subcontractors must implement their action tasks in accordance with Article 11. The costs for the subcontracted tasks (invoiced price from the subcontractor) are eligible and may be charged by the beneficiaries, under the conditions set out in Article 6. The costs will be included in Annex 2 as part of the beneficiaries’ costs.

The beneficiaries must ensure that their contractual obligations under Articles 11 (proper implementation), 12 (conflict of interest), 13 (confidentiality and security), 14 (ethics), 17.2 (visibility), 18 (specific rules for carrying out action), 19 (information) and 20 (record-keeping) also apply to the subcontractors.

The beneficiaries must ensure that the bodies mentioned in Article 25 (e.g. granting authority, OLAF, Court of Auditors (ECA), etc.) can exercise their rights also towards the subcontractors.

9.4 Recipients of financial support to third parties

If the action includes providing financial support to third parties (e.g. grants, prizes or similar forms of support), the beneficiaries must ensure that their contractual obligations under Articles 12 (conflict of interest), 13 (confidentiality and security), 14 (ethics), 17.2 (visibility), 18 (specific rules for carrying out action), 19 (information) and 20 (record-keeping)also apply to the third parties receiving the support (recipients).

The beneficiaries must also ensure that the bodies mentioned in Article 25 (e.g. granting authority, OLAF, Court of Auditors (ECA), etc.) can exercise their rights also towards the recipients.

ARTICLE 10 — PARTICIPANTS WITH SPECIAL STATUS

10.1 Non-EU participants

Participants which are established in a non-EU country (if any) undertake to comply with their obligations under the Agreement and:

- to respect general principles (including fundamental rights, values and ethical principles,

32

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

environmental and labour standards, rules on classified information, intellectual property rights, visibility of funding and protection of personal data)

- for the submission of certificates under Article 24: to use qualified external auditors which are independent and comply with comparable standards as those set out in EU Directive 2006/43/EC14

- for the controls under Article 25: to allow for checks, reviews, audits and investigations (including on-the-spot checks, visits and inspections) by the bodies mentioned in that Article (e.g. granting authority, OLAF, Court of Auditors (ECA), etc.).

Special rules on dispute settlement apply (see Data Sheet, Point 5).

10.2 Participants which are international organisations

Participants which are international organisations (IOs; if any) undertake to comply with their obligations under the Agreement and:

- to respect general principles (including fundamental rights, values and ethical principles, environmental and labour standards, rules on classified information, intellectual property rights, visibility of funding and protection of personal data)

- for the submission of certificates under Article 24: to use either independent public officers or external auditors which comply with comparable standards as those set out in EU Directive 2006/43/EC15

- for the controls under Article 25: to allow for the checks, reviews, audits and investigations by the bodies mentioned in that Article, taking into account the specific agreements concluded by them and the EU (if any).

For such participants, nothing in the Agreement will be interpreted as a waiver of their privileges or immunities, as accorded by their constituent documents or international law.

Special rules on applicable law and dispute settlement apply (see Article 43 and Data Sheet, Point 5).

10.3 Pillar-assessed participants

Pillar-assessed participants (if any) may rely on their own systems, rules and procedures, in so far as they have been positively assessed and do not call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants or beneficiaries.

‘Pillar-assessment’ means a review by the European Commission on the systems, rules and procedures which participants use for managing EU grants (in particular internal control system, accounting system, external audits, financing of third parties, rules on recovery and exclusion, information on recipients and protection of personal data; see Article 157 EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509).

14 Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts (OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 87).

15 Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts (OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 87).

33

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

Participants with a positive pillar assessment may rely on their own systems, rules and procedures, in particular for:

- record-keeping (Article 20): may be done in accordance with internal standards, rules and procedures

- currency conversion for financial statements (Article 21): may be done in accordance with usual accounting practices

- guarantees (Article 23): for public law bodies, prefinancing guarantees are not needed

- certificates (Article 24):

- certificates on the financial statements (CFS): may be provided by their regular internal or external auditors and in accordance with their internal financial regulations and procedures

- certificates on usual accounting practices (CoMUC): are not needed if those practices are covered by an ex-ante assessment

and use the following specific rules, for:

- recoveries (Article 22): in case of financial support to third parties, there will be no recovery if the participant has done everything possible to retrieve the undue amounts from the third party receiving the support (including legal proceedings) and non-recovery is not due to an error or negligence on its part

- checks, reviews, audits and investigations by the EU (Article 25): will be conducted taking into account the rules and procedures specifically agreed between them and the framework agreement (if any)

- impact evaluation (Article 26): will be conducted in accordance with the participant’s internal rules and procedures and the framework agreement (if any)

- grant agreement termination (Article 32): the final grant amount and final payment will be calculated taking into account also costs relating to contracts due for execution only after termination takes effect, if the contract was entered into before the pre-information letter was received and could not reasonably be terminated on legal grounds

- liability for damages (Article 33.2): the granting authority must be compensated for damage it sustains as a result of the implementation of the action or because the action was not implemented in full compliance with the Agreement only if the damage is due to an infringement of the participant’s internal rules and procedures or due to a violation of third parties’ rights by the participant or one of its employees or individual for whom the employees are responsible.

Participants whose pillar assessment covers procurement and granting procedures may also do purchases, subcontracting and financial support to third parties (Article 6.2) in accordance with their internal rules and procedures for purchases, subcontracting and financial support.

Participants whose pillar assessment covers data protection rules may rely on their internal standards, rules and procedures for data protection (Article 15).

34

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

The participants may however not rely on provisions which would breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants or beneficiaries or call into question the decision awarding the grant, such as in particular:

- eligibility (Article 6)

- consortium roles and set-up (Articles 7-9)

- security and ethics (Articles 13, 14)

- IPR (including background and results, access rights and rights of use), communication, dissemination and visibility (Articles 16 and 17)

- information obligation (Article 19)

- payment, reporting and amendments (Articles 21, 22 and 39)

- rejections, reductions, suspensions and terminations (Articles 27, 28, 29-32)

If the pillar assessment was subject to remedial measures, reliance on the internal systems, rules and procedures is subject to compliance with those remedial measures.

Participants must inform the coordinator without delay of any changes to the systems, rules and procedures that were part of the pillar assessment. The coordinator must immediately inform the granting authority.

Pillar-assessed participants that have also concluded a framework agreement with the EU, may moreover — under the same conditions as those above (i.e. not call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants or beneficiaries) — rely on the provisions set out in that framework agreement.

SECTION 2 RULES FOR CARRYING OUT THE ACTION

ARTICLE 11 — PROPER IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACTION

11.1 Obligation to properly implement the action

The beneficiaries must implement the action as described in Annex 1 and in compliance with the provisions of the Agreement, the call conditions and all legal obligations under applicable EU, international and national law.

11.2 Consequences of non-compliance

If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28).

Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5.

ARTICLE 12 — CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

12.1 Conflict of interests

35

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

The beneficiaries must take all measures to prevent any situation where the impartial and objective implementation of the Agreement could be compromised for reasons involving family, emotional life, political or national affinity, economic interest or any other direct or indirect interest (‘conflict of interests’).

They must formally notify the granting authority without delay of any situation constituting or likely to lead to a conflict of interests and immediately take all the necessary steps to rectify this situation.

The granting authority may verify that the measures taken are appropriate and may require additional measures to be taken by a specified deadline.

12.2 Consequences of non-compliance

If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28) and the grant or the beneficiary may be terminated (see Article 32).

Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5.

ARTICLE 13 — CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY

13.1 Sensitive information

The parties must keep confidential any data, documents or other material (in any form) that is identified as sensitive in writing (‘sensitive information’) — during the implementation of the action and for at least until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6).

If a beneficiary requests, the granting authority may agree to keep such information confidential for a longer period.

Unless otherwise agreed between the parties, they may use sensitive information only to implement the Agreement.

The beneficiaries may disclose sensitive information to their personnel or other participants involved in the action only if they:

(a) need to know it in order to implement the Agreement and

(b) are bound by an obligation of confidentiality.

The granting authority may disclose sensitive information to its staff and to other EU institutions and bodies.

It may moreover disclose sensitive information to third parties, if:

(a) this is necessary to implement the Agreement or safeguard the EU financial interests and

(b) the recipients of the information are bound by an obligation of confidentiality.

The confidentiality obligations no longer apply if:

(a) the disclosing party agrees to release the other party

(b) the information becomes publicly available, without breaching any confidentiality obligation

36

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

(c) the disclosure of the sensitive information is required by EU, international or national law.

Specific confidentiality rules (if any) are set out in Annex 5.

13.2 Classified information

The parties must handle classified information in accordance with the applicable EU, international or national law on classified information (in particular, Decision 2015/44416 and its implementing rules).

Deliverables which contain classified information must be submitted according to special procedures agreed with the granting authority.

Action tasks involving classified information may be subcontracted only after explicit approval (in writing) from the granting authority.

Classified information may not be disclosed to any third party (including participants involved in the action implementation) without prior explicit written approval from the granting authority.

Specific security rules (if any) are set out in Annex 5.

13.3 Consequences of non-compliance

If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28).

Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5.

ARTICLE 14 — ETHICS AND VALUES

14.1 Ethics

The action must be carried out in line with the highest ethical standards and the applicable EU, international and national law on ethical principles.

Specific ethics rules (if any) are set out in Annex 5.

14.2 Values

The beneficiaries must commit to and ensure the respect of basic EU values (such as respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and human rights, including the rights of minorities).

Specific rules on values (if any) are set out in Annex 5.

14.3 Consequences of non-compliance

If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28).

16 Commission Decision 2015/444/EC, Euratom of 13 March 2015 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information (OJ L 72, 17.3.2015, p. 53).

37

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5.

ARTICLE 15 — DATA PROTECTION

15.1 Data processing by the granting authority

Any personal data under the Agreement will be processed under the responsibility of the data controller of the granting authority in accordance with and for the purposes set out in the Portal Privacy Statement.

For grants where the granting authority is the European Commission, an EU regulatory or executive agency, joint undertaking or other EU body, the processing will be subject to Regulation 2018/172517.

15.2 Data processing by the beneficiaries

The beneficiaries must process personal data under the Agreement in compliance with the applicable EU, international and national law on data protection (in particular, Regulation 2016/67918).

They must ensure that personal data is:

- processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner in relation to the data subjects

- collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes and not further processed in a manner that is incompatible with those purposes

- adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary in relation to the purposes for which they are processed

- accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date

- kept in a form which permits identification of data subjects for no longer than is necessary for the purposes for which the data is processed and

- processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security of the data.

The beneficiaries may grant their personnel access to personal data only if it is strictly necessary for implementing, managing and monitoring the Agreement. The beneficiaries must ensure that the personnel is under a confidentiality obligation.

The beneficiaries must inform the persons whose data are transferred to the granting authority and provide them with the Portal Privacy Statement.

15.3 Consequences of non-compliance

17 Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39).

18 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (‘GDPR’) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).

38

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28).

Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5.

ARTICLE 16 — INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) — BACKGROUND AND RESULTS —ACCESS RIGHTS AND RIGHTS OF USE

16.1 Background and access rights to background

The beneficiaries must give each other and the other participants access to the background identified as needed for implementing the action, subject to any specific rules in Annex 5.

‘Background’ means any data, know-how or information — whatever its form or nature (tangible or intangible), including any rights such as intellectual property rights — that is:

(a) held by the beneficiaries before they acceded to the Agreement and

(b) needed to implement the action or exploit the results.

If background is subject to rights of a third party, the beneficiary concerned must ensure that it is able to comply with its obligations under the Agreement.

16.2 Ownership of results

The granting authority does not obtain ownership of the results produced under the action.

‘Results’ means any tangible or intangible effect of the action, such as data, know-how or information, whatever its form or nature, whether or not it can be protected, as well as any rights attached to it, including intellectual property rights.

16.3 Rights of use of the granting authority on materials, documents and information received for policy, information, communication, dissemination and publicity purposes

The granting authority has the right to use non-sensitive information relating to the action and materials and documents received from the beneficiaries (notably summaries for publication, deliverables, as well as any other material, such as pictures or audio-visual material, in paper or electronic form) for policy, information, communication, dissemination and publicity purposes — during the action or afterwards.

The right to use the beneficiaries’ materials, documents and information is granted in the form of a royalty-free, non-exclusive and irrevocable licence, which includes the following rights:

(a) use for its own purposes (in particular, making them available to persons working for the granting authority or any other EU service (including institutions, bodies, offices, agencies, etc.) or EU Member State institution or body; copying or reproducing them in whole or in part, in unlimited numbers; and communication through press information services)

(b) distribution to the public (in particular, publication as hard copies and in electronic or digital format, publication on the internet, as a downloadable or non-downloadable file, broadcasting by any channel, public display or presentation, communicating through press information services, or inclusion in widely accessible databases or indexes)

39

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

(c) editing or redrafting (including shortening, summarising, inserting other elements (e.g. meta-data, legends, other graphic, visual, audio or text elements), extracting parts (e.g. audio or video files), dividing into parts, use in a compilation)

(d) translation

(e) storage in paper, electronic or other form

(f) archiving, in line with applicable document-management rules

(g) the right to authorise third parties to act on its behalf or sub-license to third parties the modes of use set out in Points (b), (c), (d) and (f), if needed for the information, communication and publicity activity of the granting authority

(h) processing, analysing, aggregating the materials, documents and information received and producing derivative works.

The rights of use are granted for the whole duration of the industrial or intellectual property rights concerned.

If materials or documents are subject to moral rights or third party rights (including intellectual property rights or rights of natural persons on their image and voice), the beneficiaries must ensure that they comply with their obligations under this Agreement (in particular, by obtaining the necessary licences and authorisations from the rights holders concerned).

Where applicable, the granting authority will insert the following information:

“© – [year] – [name of the copyright owner]. All rights reserved. Licensed to the [name of granting authority] under conditions.”

16.4 Specific rules on IPR, results and background

Specific rules regarding intellectual property rights, results and background (if any) are set out in Annex 5.

16.5 Consequences of non-compliance

If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28).

Such a breach may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5.

ARTICLE 17 — COMMUNICATION, DISSEMINATION AND VISIBILITY

17.1 Communication — Dissemination — Promoting the action

Unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority, the beneficiaries must promote the action and its results by providing targeted information to multiple audiences (including the media and the public), in accordance with Annex 1 and in a strategic, coherent and effective manner.

Before engaging in a communication or dissemination activity expected to have a major media impact, the beneficiaries must inform the granting authority.

40

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

17.2 Visibility — European flag and funding statement

Unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority, communication activities of the beneficiaries related to the action (including media relations, conferences, seminars, information material, such as brochures, leaflets, posters, presentations, etc., in electronic form, via traditional or social media, etc.), dissemination activities and any infrastructure, equipment, vehicles, supplies or major result funded by the grant must acknowledge EU support and display the European flag (emblem) and funding statement (translated into local languages, where appropriate):

The emblem must remain distinct and separate and cannot be modified by adding other visual marks, brands or text.

Apart from the emblem, no other visual identity or logo may be used to highlight the EU support.

When displayed in association with other logos (e.g. of beneficiaries or sponsors), the emblem must be displayed at least as prominently and visibly as the other logos.

For the purposes of their obligations under this Article, the beneficiaries may use the emblem without first obtaining approval from the granting authority. This does not, however, give them the right to exclusive use. Moreover, they may not appropriate the emblem or any similar trademark or logo, either by registration or by any other means.

17.3 Quality of information — Disclaimer

Any communication or dissemination activity related to the action must use factually accurate information.

Moreover, it must indicate the following disclaimer (translated into local languages where appropriate):

41

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

“Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or [name of the granting authority]. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.”

17.4 Specific communication, dissemination and visibility rules

Specific communication, dissemination and visibility rules (if any) are set out in Annex 5.

17.5 Consequences of non-compliance

If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28).

Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5.

ARTICLE 18 — SPECIFIC RULES FOR CARRYING OUT THE ACTION

18.1 Specific rules for carrying out the action

Specific rules for implementing the action (if any) are set out in Annex 5.

18.2 Consequences of non-compliance

If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28).

Such a breach may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5.

SECTION 3 GRANT ADMINISTRATION

ARTICLE 19 — GENERAL INFORMATION OBLIGATIONS

19.1 Information requests

The beneficiaries must provide — during the action or afterwards and in accordance with Article 7 — any information requested in order to verify eligibility of the costs or contributions declared, proper implementation of the action and compliance with the other obligations under the Agreement.

The information provided must be accurate, precise and complete and in the format requested, including electronic format.

19.2 Participant Register data updates

The beneficiaries must keep — at all times, during the action or afterwards — their information stored in the Portal Participant Register up to date, in particular, their name, address, legal representatives, legal form and organisation type.

19.3 Information about events and circumstances which impact the action

The beneficiaries must immediately inform the granting authority (and the other beneficiaries) of any of the following:

42

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

(a) events which are likely to affect or delay the implementation of the action or affect the EU’s financial interests, in particular:

(i) changes in their legal, financial, technical, organisational or ownership situation (including changes linked to one of the exclusion grounds listed in the declaration of honour signed before grant signature)

(ii) linked action information: not applicable

(b) circumstances affecting:

(i) the decision to award the grant or

(ii) compliance with requirements under the Agreement.

19.4 Consequences of non-compliance

If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28).

Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5.

ARTICLE 20 — RECORD-KEEPING

20.1 Keeping records and supporting documents

The beneficiaries must — at least until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6) — keep records and other supporting documents to prove the proper implementation of the action in line with the accepted standards in the respective field (if any).

In addition, the beneficiaries must — for the same period — keep the following to justify the amounts declared:

(a) for actual costs: adequate records and supporting documents to prove the costs declared (such as contracts, subcontracts, invoices and accounting records); in addition, the beneficiaries’ usual accounting and internal control procedures must enable direct reconciliation between the amounts declared, the amounts recorded in their accounts and the amounts stated in the supporting documents

(b) for flat-rate costs and contributions (if any): adequate records and supporting documents to prove the eligibility of the costs or contributions to which the flat-rate is applied

(c) for the following simplified costs and contributions: the beneficiaries do not need to keep specific records on the actual costs incurred, but must keep:

(i) for unit costs and contributions (if any): adequate records and supporting documents to prove the number of units declared

(ii) for lump sum costs and contributions (if any): adequate records and supporting documents to prove proper implementation of the work as described in Annex 1

(iii) for financing not linked to costs (if any): adequate records and supporting documents

43

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

to prove the achievement of the results or the fulfilment of the conditions as described in Annex 1

(d) for unit, flat-rate and lump sum costs and contributions according to usual cost accounting practices (if any): the beneficiaries must keep any adequate records and supporting documents to prove that their cost accounting practices have been applied in a consistent manner, based on objective criteria, regardless of the source of funding, and that they comply with the eligibility conditions set out in Articles 6.1 and 6.2.

Moreover, the following is needed for specific budget categories:

(e) for personnel costs: time worked for the beneficiary under the action must be supported by declarations signed monthly by the person and their supervisor, unless another reliable time-record system is in place; the granting authority may accept alternative evidence supporting the time worked for the action declared, if it considers that it offers an adequate level of assurance

(f) additional record-keeping rules: not applicable

The records and supporting documents must be made available upon request (see Article 19) or in the context of checks, reviews, audits or investigations (see Article 25).

If there are on-going checks, reviews, audits, investigations, litigation or other pursuits of claims under the Agreement (including the extension of findings; see Article 25), the beneficiaries must keep these records and other supporting documentation until the end of these procedures.

The beneficiaries must keep the original documents. Digital and digitalised documents are considered originals if they are authorised by the applicable national law. The granting authority may accept non-original documents if they offer a comparable level of assurance.

20.2 Consequences of non-compliance

If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, costs or contributions insufficiently substantiated will be ineligible (see Article 6) and will be rejected (see Article 27), and the grant may be reduced (see Article 28).

Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5.

ARTICLE 21 — REPORTING

21.1 Continuous reporting

The beneficiaries must report on the progress of the action (e.g. deliverables, milestones, outputs/ outcomes, critical risks, indicators, etc; if any), in the Portal Continuous Reporting tool and in accordance with the timing and conditions it sets out (as agreed with the granting authority).

Standardised deliverables (e.g. progress reports not linked to payments, reports on cumulative expenditure, special reports, etc; if any) must be submitted using the templates published on the Portal.

21.2 Periodic reporting: Technical reports and financial statements

44

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

In addition, the beneficiaries must provide reports to request payments, in accordance with the schedule and modalities set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2):

- for additional prefinancings (if any): an additional prefinancing report

- for interim payments (if any) and the final payment: a periodic report.

The prefinancing and periodic reports include a technical and financial part.

The technical part includes an overview of the action implementation. It must be prepared using the template available in the Portal Periodic Reporting tool.

The financial part of the additional prefinancing report includes a statement on the use of the previous prefinancing payment.

The financial part of the periodic report includes:

- the financial statements (individual and consolidated; for all beneficiaries/affiliated entities)

- the explanation on the use of resources (or detailed cost reporting table, if required)

- the certificates on the financial statements (CFS) (if required; see Article 24.2 and Data Sheet, Point 4.3).

The financial statements must detail the eligible costs and contributions for each budget category and, for the final payment, also the revenues for the action (see Articles 6 and 22).

All eligible costs and contributions incurred should be declared, even if they exceed the amounts indicated in the estimated budget (see Annex 2). Amounts that are not declared in the individual financial statements will not be taken into account by the granting authority.

By signing the financial statements (directly in the Portal Periodic Reporting tool), the beneficiaries confirm that:

- the information provided is complete, reliable and true

- the costs and contributions declared are eligible (see Article 6)

- the costs and contributions can be substantiated by adequate records and supporting documents (see Article 20) that will be produced upon request (see Article 19) or in the context of checks, reviews, audits and investigations (see Article 25)

- for the final periodic report: all the revenues have been declared (if required; see Article 22).

Beneficiaries will have to submit also the financial statements of their affiliated entities (if any). In case of recoveries (see Article 22), beneficiaries will be held responsible also for the financial statements of their affiliated entities.

21.3 Currency for financial statements and conversion into euros

The financial statements must be drafted in euro.

Beneficiaries with general accounts established in a currency other than the euro must convert the

45

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

costs recorded in their accounts into euro, at the average of the daily exchange rates published in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union (ECB website), calculated over the corresponding reporting period.

If no daily euro exchange rate is published in the Official Journal for the currency in question, they must be converted at the average of the monthly accounting exchange rates published on the European Commission website (InforEuro), calculated over the corresponding reporting period.

Beneficiaries with general accounts in euro must convert costs incurred in another currency into euro according to their usual accounting practices.

21.4 Reporting language

The reporting must be in the language of the Agreement, unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2).

21.5 Consequences of non-compliance

If a report submitted does not comply with this Article, the granting authority may suspend the payment deadline (see Article 29) and apply other measures described in Chapter 5.

If the coordinator breaches its reporting obligations, the granting authority may terminate the grant or the coordinator’s participation (see Article 32) or apply other measures described in Chapter 5.

ARTICLE 22 — PAYMENTS AND RECOVERIES — CALCULATION OF AMOUNTS DUE

22.1 Payments and payment arrangements

Payments will be made in accordance with the schedule and modalities set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2).

They will be made in euro to the bank account indicated by the coordinator (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2) and must be distributed without unjustified delay (restrictions may apply to distribution of the initial prefinancing payment; see Data Sheet, Point 4.2).

Payments to this bank account will discharge the granting authority from its payment obligation.

The cost of payment transfers will be borne as follows:

- the granting authority bears the cost of transfers charged by its bank

- the beneficiary bears the cost of transfers charged by its bank

- the party causing a repetition of a transfer bears all costs of the repeated transfer.

Payments by the granting authority will be considered to have been carried out on the date when they are debited to its account.

22.2 Recoveries

46

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

Recoveries will be made, if — at beneficiary termination, final payment or afterwards — it turns out that the granting authority has paid too much and needs to recover the amounts undue.

The general liability regime for recoveries (first-line liability) is as follows: At final payment, the coordinator will be fully liable for recoveries, even if it has not been the final recipient of the undue amounts. At beneficiary termination or after final payment, recoveries will be made directly against the beneficiaries concerned.

Beneficiaries will be fully liable for repaying the debts of their affiliated entities.

In case of enforced recoveries (see Article 22.4):

- the beneficiaries will be jointly and severally liable for repaying debts of another beneficiary under the Agreement (including late-payment interest), if required by the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.4)

- affiliated entities will be held liable for repaying debts of their beneficiaries under the Agreement (including late-payment interest), if required by the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.4).

22.3 Amounts due

22.3.1 Prefinancing payments

The aim of the prefinancing is to provide the beneficiaries with a float.

It remains the property of the EU until the final payment.

For initial prefinancings (if any), the amount due, schedule and modalities are set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2).

For additional prefinancings (if any), the amount due, schedule and modalities are also set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2). However, if the statement on the use of the previous prefinancing payment shows that less than 70% was used, the amount set out in the Data Sheet will be reduced by the difference between the 70% threshold and the amount used.

Prefinancing payments (or parts of them) may be offset (without the beneficiaries’ consent) against amounts owed by a beneficiary to the granting authority — up to the amount due to that beneficiary.

For grants where the granting authority is the European Commission or an EU executive agency, offsetting may also be done against amounts owed to other Commission services or executive agencies.

Payments will not be made if the payment deadline or payments are suspended (see Articles 29 and 30).

22.3.2 Amount due at beneficiary termination — Recovery

In case of beneficiary termination, the granting authority will determine the provisional amount due for the beneficiary concerned. Payments (if any) will be made with the next interim or final payment.

The amount due will be calculated in the following step:

47

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution

Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution

The granting authority will first calculate the ‘accepted EU contribution’ for the beneficiary for all reporting periods, by calculating the ‘maximum EU contribution to costs’ (applying the funding rate to the accepted costs of the beneficiary), taking into account requests for a lower contribution to costs and CFS threshold cappings (if any; see Article 24.5) and adding the contributions (accepted unit, flat-rate or lump sum contributions and financing not linked to costs, if any).

After that, the granting authority will take into account grant reductions (if any). The resulting amount is the ‘total accepted EU contribution’ for the beneficiary.

The balance is then calculated by deducting the payments received (if any; see report on the distribution of payments in Article 32), from the total accepted EU contribution:

{total accepted EU contribution for the beneficiary

minus

{prefinancing and interim payments received (if any)}}.

If the balance is positive, the amount will be included in the next interim or final payment to the consortium.

If the balance is negative, it will be recovered in accordance with the following procedure:

The granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the beneficiary concerned:

- formally notifying the intention to recover, the amount due, the amount to be recovered and the reasons why and

- requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification.

If no observations are submitted (or the granting authority decides to pursue recovery despite the observations it has received), it will confirm the amount to be recovered and ask this amount to be paid to the coordinator (confirmation letter).

The amounts will later on also be taken into account for the next interim or final payment.

22.3.3 Interim payments

Interim payments reimburse the eligible costs and contributions claimed for the implementation of the action during the reporting periods (if any).

Interim payments (if any) will be made in accordance with the schedule and modalities set out the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2).

Payment is subject to the approval of the periodic report. Its approval does not imply recognition of compliance, authenticity, completeness or correctness of its content.

The interim payment will be calculated by the granting authority in the following steps:

Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution

48

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

Step 2 — Limit to the interim payment ceiling

Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution

The granting authority will calculate the ‘accepted EU contribution’ for the action for the reporting period, by first calculating the ‘maximum EU contribution to costs’ (applying the funding rate to the accepted costs of each beneficiary), taking into account requests for a lower contribution to costs and CFS threshold cappings (if any; see Article 24.5) and adding the contributions (accepted unit, flat-rate or lump sum contributions and financing not linked to costs, if any).

After that, the granting authority will take into account grant reductions from beneficiary termination (if any). The resulting amount is the ‘total accepted EU contribution’.

Step 2 — Limit to the interim payment ceiling

The resulting amount is then capped to ensure that the total amount of prefinancing and interim payments (if any) does not exceed the interim payment ceiling set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2).

Interim payments (or parts of them) may be offset (without the beneficiaries’ consent) against amounts owed by a beneficiary to the granting authority — up to the amount due to that beneficiary.

For grants where the granting authority is the European Commission or an EU executive agency, offsetting may also be done against amounts owed to other Commission services or executive agencies.

Payments will not be made if the payment deadline or payments are suspended (see Articles 29 and 30).

22.3.4 Final payment — Final grant amount — Revenues and Profit — Recovery

The final payment (payment of the balance) reimburses the remaining part of the eligible costs and contributions claimed for the implementation of the action (if any).

The final payment will be made in accordance with the schedule and modalities set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2).

Payment is subject to the approval of the final periodic report. Its approval does not imply recognition of compliance, authenticity, completeness or correctness of its content.

The final grant amount for the action will be calculated in the following steps:

Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution

Step 2 — Limit to the maximum grant amount

Step 3 — Reduction due to the no-profit rule

Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution

The granting authority will first calculate the ‘accepted EU contribution’ for the action for all reporting periods, by calculating the ‘maximum EU contribution to costs’ (applying the funding rate to the total accepted costs of each beneficiary), taking into account requests for a lower contribution to costs, CFS

49

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

threshold cappings (if any; see Article 24.5) and adding the contributions (accepted unit, flat-rate or lump sum contributions and financing not linked to costs, if any).

After that, the granting authority will take into account grant reductions (if any). The resulting amount is the ‘total accepted EU contribution’.

Step 2 — Limit to the maximum grant amount

If the resulting amount is higher than the maximum grant amount set out in Article 5.2, it will be limited to the latter.

Step 3 — Reduction due to the no-profit rule

If the no-profit rule is provided for in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2), the grant must not produce a profit (i.e. surplus of the amount obtained following Step 2 plus the action’s revenues, over the eligible costs and contributions approved by the granting authority).

‘Revenue’ is all income generated by the action, during its duration (see Article 4), for beneficiaries that are profit legal entities.

If there is a profit, it will be deducted in proportion to the final rate of reimbursement of the eligible costs approved by the granting authority (as compared to the amount calculated following Steps 1 and 2 minus the contributions).

The balance (final payment) is then calculated by deducting the total amount of prefinancing and interim payments already made (if any), from the final grant amount:

{final grant amount

minus

{prefinancing and interim payments made (if any)}}.

If the balance is positive, it will be paid to the coordinator.

The final payment (or part of it) may be offset (without the beneficiaries’ consent) against amounts owed by a beneficiary to the granting authority — up to the amount due to that beneficiary.

For grants where the granting authority is the European Commission or an EU executive agency, offsetting may also be done against amounts owed to other Commission services or executive agencies.

Payments will not be made if the payment deadline or payments are suspended (see Articles 29 and 30).

If the balance is negative, it will be recovered in accordance with the following procedure:

The granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the coordinator:

- formally notifying the intention to recover, the final grant amount, the amount to be recovered and the reasons why

- requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification.

50

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

If no observations are submitted (or the granting authority decides to pursue recovery despite the observations it has received), it will confirm the amount to be recovered (confirmation letter), together with a debit note with the terms and date for payment.

If payment is not made by the date specified in the debit note, the granting authority will enforce recovery in accordance with Article 22.4.

22.3.5 Audit implementation after final payment — Revised final grant amount — Recovery

If — after the final payment (in particular, after checks, reviews, audits or investigations; see Article 25) — the granting authority rejects costs or contributions (see Article 27) or reduces the grant (see Article 28), it will calculate the revised final grant amount for the beneficiary concerned.

The beneficiary revised final grant amount will be calculated in the following step:

Step 1 — Calculation of the revised total accepted EU contribution

Step 1 — Calculation of the revised total accepted EU contribution

The granting authority will first calculate the ‘revised accepted EU contribution’ for the beneficiary, by calculating the ‘revised accepted costs’ and ‘revised accepted contributions’.

After that, it will take into account grant reductions (if any). The resulting ‘revised total accepted EU contribution’ is the beneficiary revised final grant amount.

If the revised final grant amount is lower than the beneficiary’s final grant amount (i.e. its share in the final grant amount for the action), it will be recovered in accordance with the following procedure:

The beneficiary final grant amount (i.e. share in the final grant amount for the action) is calculated as follows:

{{total accepted EU contribution for the beneficiary

divided by

total accepted EU contribution for the action}

multiplied by

final grant amount for the action}.

The granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the beneficiary concerned:

- formally notifying the intention to recover, the amount to be recovered and the reasons why and

- requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification.

If no observations are submitted (or the granting authority decides to pursue recovery despite the observations it has received), it will confirm the amount to be recovered (confirmation letter), together with a debit note with the terms and the date for payment.

Recoveries against affiliated entities (if any) will be handled through their beneficiaries.

If payment is not made by the date specified in the debit note, the granting authority will enforce recovery in accordance with Article 22.4.

51

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

22.4 Enforced recovery

If payment is not made by the date specified in the debit note, the amount due will be recovered:

(a) by offsetting the amount — without the coordinator or beneficiary’s consent — against any amounts owed to the coordinator or beneficiary by the granting authority.

In exceptional circumstances, to safeguard the EU financial interests, the amount may be offset before the payment date specified in the debit note.

For grants where the granting authority is the European Commission or an EU executive agency, debts may also be offset against amounts owed by other Commission services or executive agencies.

(b) by drawing on the financial guarantee(s) (if any)

(c) by holding other beneficiaries jointly and severally liable (if any; see Data Sheet, Point 4.4)

(d) by holding affiliated entities jointly and severally liable (if any, see Data Sheet, Point 4.4)

(e) by taking legal action (see Article 43) or, provided that the granting authority is the European Commission or an EU executive agency, by adopting an enforceable decision under Article 299 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU) and Article 100(2) of EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509.

The amount to be recovered will be increased by late-payment interest at the rate set out in Article 22.5, from the day following the payment date in the debit note, up to and including the date the full payment is received.

Partial payments will be first credited against expenses, charges and late-payment interest and then against the principal.

Bank charges incurred in the recovery process will be borne by the beneficiary, unless Directive 2015/236619 applies.

For grants where the granting authority is an EU executive agency, enforced recovery by offsetting or enforceable decision will be done by the services of the European Commission (see also Article 43).

22.5 Consequences of non-compliance

22.5.1 If the granting authority does not pay within the payment deadlines (see above), the beneficiaries are entitled to late-payment interest at the rate applied by the European Central Bank (ECB) for its main refinancing operations in euros (‘reference rate’), plus the rate specified in the Data Sheet (Point 4.2). The reference rate is the rate in force on the first day of the month in which the payment deadline expires, as published in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union.

If the late-payment interest is lower than or equal to EUR 200, it will be paid to the coordinator only on request submitted within two months of receiving the late payment.

19 Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC (OJ L 337, 23.12.2015, p. 35).

52

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

Late-payment interest is not due if all beneficiaries are EU Member States (including regional and local government authorities or other public bodies acting on behalf of a Member State for the purpose of this Agreement).

If payments or the payment deadline are suspended (see Articles 29 and 30), payment will not be considered as late.

Late-payment interest covers the period running from the day following the due date for payment (see above), up to and including the date of payment.

Late-payment interest is not considered for the purposes of calculating the final grant amount.

22.5.2 If the coordinator breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28) and the grant or the coordinator may be terminated (see Article 32).

Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5.

ARTICLE 23 — GUARANTEES

23.1 Prefinancing guarantee

If required by the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2), the beneficiaries must provide (one or more) prefinancing guarantee(s) in accordance with the timing and the amounts set out in the Data Sheet.

The coordinator must submit them to the granting authority in due time before the prefinancing they are linked to.

The guarantees must be drawn up using the template published on the Portal and fulfil the following conditions:

(a) be provided by a bank or approved financial institution established in the EU or — if requested by the coordinator and accepted by the granting authority — by a third party or a bank or financial institution established outside the EU offering equivalent security

(b) the guarantor stands as first-call guarantor and does not require the granting authority to first have recourse against the principal debtor (i.e. the beneficiary concerned) and

(c) remain explicitly in force until the final payment and, if the final payment takes the form of a recovery, until five months after the debit note is notified to a beneficiary.

They will be released within the following month.

23.2 Consequences of non-compliance

If the beneficiaries breach their obligation to provide the prefinancing guarantee, the prefinancing will not be paid.

Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5.

ARTICLE 24 — CERTIFICATES

53

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

24.1 Operational verification report (OVR)

Not applicable

24.2 Certificate on the financial statements (CFS)

If required by the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.3), the beneficiaries must provide certificates on their financial statements (CFS), in accordance with the schedule, threshold and conditions set out in the Data Sheet.

The coordinator must submit them as part of the periodic report (see Article 21).

The certificates must be drawn up using the template published on the Portal, cover the costs declared on the basis of actual costs and costs according to usual cost accounting practices (if any), and fulfil the following conditions:

(a) be provided by a qualified approved external auditor which is independent and complies with Directive 2006/43/EC20 (or for public bodies: by a competent independent public officer)

(b) the verification must be carried out according to the highest professional standards to ensure that the financial statements comply with the provisions under the Agreement and that the costs declared are eligible.

The certificates will not affect the granting authority's right to carry out its own checks, reviews or audits, nor preclude the European Court of Auditors (ECA), the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) or the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) from using their prerogatives for audits and investigations under the Agreement (see Article 25).

If the costs (or a part of them) were already audited by the granting authority, these costs do not need to be covered by the certificate and will not be counted for calculating the threshold (if any).

24.3 Certificate on the compliance of usual cost accounting practices (CoMUC)

Beneficiaries which use unit, flat rate or lump sum costs or contributions according to usual costs accounting practices (if any) may submit to the granting authority, for approval, a certificate on the methodology stating that their usual cost accounting practices comply with the eligibility conditions under the Agreement.

The certificate must be drawn up using the template published on the Portal and fulfil the following conditions:

(a) be provided by a qualified approved external auditor which is independent and complies with Directive 2006/43/EC21 (or for public bodies: by a competent independent public officer)

(b) the verification must be carried out according to the highest professional standards to ensure that the methodology for declaring costs according to usual accounting practices complies with the provisions under the Agreement.

20 Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts (OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 87).

21 Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts (OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 87).

54

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

If the certificate is approved, amounts declared in line with this methodology will not be challenged subsequently, unless the beneficiary concealed information for the purpose of the approval.

24.4 Systems and process audit (SPA)

Not applicable

24.5 Consequences of non-compliance

If a beneficiary does not submit a certificate on the financial statements (CFS) or the certificate is rejected, the accepted EU contribution to costs will be capped to reflect the CFS threshold.

If a beneficiary breaches any of its other obligations under this Article, the granting authority may apply the measures described in Chapter 5.

ARTICLE 25 — CHECKS, REVIEWS, AUDITS AND INVESTIGATIONS — EXTENSION OF FINDINGS

25.1 Granting authority checks, reviews and audits

25.1.1 Internal checks

The granting authority may — during the action or afterwards — check the proper implementation of the action and compliance with the obligations under the Agreement, including assessing costs and contributions, deliverables and reports.

25.1.2 Project reviews

The granting authority may carry out reviews on the proper implementation of the action and compliance with the obligations under the Agreement (general project reviews or specific issues reviews).

Such project reviews may be started during the implementation of the action and until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6). They will be formally notified to the coordinator or beneficiary concerned and will be considered to start on the date of the notification.

If needed, the granting authority may be assisted by independent, outside experts. If it uses outside experts, the coordinator or beneficiary concerned will be informed and have the right to object on grounds of commercial confidentiality or conflict of interest.

The coordinator or beneficiary concerned must cooperate diligently and provide — within the deadline requested — any information and data in addition to deliverables and reports already submitted (including information on the use of resources). The granting authority may request beneficiaries to provide such information to it directly. Sensitive information and documents will be treated in accordance with Article 13.

The coordinator or beneficiary concerned may be requested to participate in meetings, including with the outside experts.

For on-the-spot visits, the beneficiary concerned must allow access to sites and premises (including to the outside experts) and must ensure that information requested is readily available.

55

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

Information provided must be accurate, precise and complete and in the format requested, including electronic format.

On the basis of the review findings, a project review report will be drawn up.

The granting authority will formally notify the project review report to the coordinator or beneficiary concerned, which has 30 days from receiving notification to make observations.

Project reviews (including project review reports) will be in the language of the Agreement, unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2).

25.1.3 Audits

The granting authority may carry out audits on the proper implementation of the action and compliance with the obligations under the Agreement.

Such audits may be started during the implementation of the action and until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6). They will be formally notified to the beneficiary concerned and will be considered to start on the date of the notification.

The granting authority may use its own audit service, delegate audits to a centralised service or use external audit firms. If it uses an external firm, the beneficiary concerned will be informed and have the right to object on grounds of commercial confidentiality or conflict of interest.

The beneficiary concerned must cooperate diligently and provide — within the deadline requested — any information (including complete accounts, individual salary statements or other personal data) to verify compliance with the Agreement. Sensitive information and documents will be treated in accordance with Article 13.

For on-the-spot visits, the beneficiary concerned must allow access to sites and premises (including for the external audit firm) and must ensure that information requested is readily available.

Information provided must be accurate, precise and complete and in the format requested, including electronic format.

On the basis of the audit findings, a draft audit report will be drawn up.

The auditors will formally notify the draft audit report to the beneficiary concerned, which has 30 days from receiving notification to make observations (contradictory audit procedure).

The final audit report will take into account observations by the beneficiary concerned and will be formally notified to them.

Audits (including audit reports) will be in the language of the Agreement, unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2).

25.2 European Commission checks, reviews and audits in grants of other granting authorities

Where the granting authority is not the European Commission, the latter has the same rights of checks, reviews and audits as the granting authority.

56

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

25.3 Access to records for assessing simplified forms of funding

The beneficiaries must give the European Commission access to their statutory records for the periodic assessment of simplified forms of funding which are used in EU programmes.

25.4 OLAF, EPPO and ECA audits and investigations

The following bodies may also carry out checks, reviews, audits and investigations — during the action or afterwards:

- the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) under Regulations No 883/201322 and No 2185/9623

- the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) under Regulation 2017/1939

- the European Court of Auditors (ECA) under Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU) and Article 263 of EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509.

If requested by these bodies, the beneficiary concerned must provide full, accurate and complete information in the format requested (including complete accounts, individual salary statements or other personal data, including in electronic format) and allow access to sites and premises for on-the-spot visits or inspections — as provided for under these Regulations.

To this end, the beneficiary concerned must keep all relevant information relating to the action, at least until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (Point 6) and, in any case, until any ongoing checks, reviews, audits, investigations, litigation or other pursuits of claims have been concluded.

25.5 Consequences of checks, reviews, audits and investigations — Extension of results of reviews, audits or investigations

25.5.1 Consequences of checks, reviews, audits and investigations in this grant

Findings in checks, reviews, audits or investigations carried out in the context of this grant may lead to rejections (see Article 27), grant reduction (see Article 28) or other measures described in Chapter 5.

Rejections or grant reductions after the final payment will lead to a revised final grant amount (see Article 22).

Findings in checks, reviews, audits or investigations during the action implementation may lead to a request for amendment (see Article 39), to change the description of the action set out in Annex 1.

Checks, reviews, audits or investigations that find systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or breach of obligations in any EU grant may also lead to consequences in other EU grants awarded under similar conditions (‘extension to other grants’).

22 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 September 2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999 (OJ L 248, 18/09/2013, p. 1).

23 Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities' financial interests against fraud and other irregularities (OJ L 292, 15/11/1996, p. 2).

57

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

Moreover, findings arising from an OLAF or EPPO investigation may lead to criminal prosecution under national law.

25.5.2 Extension from other grants

Results of checks, reviews, audits or investigations in other grants may be extended to this grant, if:

(a) the beneficiary concerned is found, in other EU grants awarded under similar conditions, to have committed systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or breach of obligations that have a material impact on this grant and

(b) those findings are formally notified to the beneficiary concerned — together with the list of grants affected by the findings — within the time-limit for audits set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6).

The granting authority will formally notify the beneficiary concerned of the intention to extend the findings and the list of grants affected.

If the extension concerns rejections of costs or contributions: the notification will include:

(a) an invitation to submit observations on the list of grants affected by the findings

(b) the request to submit revised financial statements for all grants affected

(c) the correction rate for extrapolation, established on the basis of the systemic or recurrent errors, to calculate the amounts to be rejected, if the beneficiary concerned:

(i) considers that the submission of revised financial statements is not possible or practicable or

(ii) does not submit revised financial statements.

If the extension concerns grant reductions: the notification will include:

(a) an invitation to submit observations on the list of grants affected by the findings and

(b) the correction rate for extrapolation, established on the basis of the systemic or recurrent errors and the principle of proportionality.

The beneficiary concerned has 60 days from receiving notification to submit observations, revised financial statements or to propose a duly substantiated alternative correction method/rate.

On the basis of this, the granting authority will analyse the impact and decide on the implementation (i.e. start rejection or grant reduction procedures, either on the basis of the revised financial statements or the announced/alternative method/rate or a mix of those; see Articles 27 and 28).

25.6 Consequences of non-compliance

If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, costs or contributions insufficiently substantiated will be ineligible (see Article 6) and will be rejected (see Article 27), and the grant may be reduced (see Article 28).

Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5.

58

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

ARTICLE 26 — IMPACT EVALUATIONS

26.1 Impact evaluation

The granting authority may carry out impact evaluations of the action, measured against the objectives and indicators of the EU programme funding the grant.

Such evaluations may be started during implementation of the action and until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6). They will be formally notified to the coordinator or beneficiaries and will be considered to start on the date of the notification.

If needed, the granting authority may be assisted by independent outside experts.

The coordinator or beneficiaries must provide any information relevant to evaluate the impact of the action, including information in electronic format.

26.2 Consequences of non-compliance

If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the granting authority may apply the measures described in Chapter 5.

CHAPTER 5 CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE

SECTION 1 REJECTIONS AND GRANT REDUCTION

ARTICLE 27 — REJECTION OF COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

27.1 Conditions

The granting authority will — at beneficiary termination, interim payment, final payment or afterwards — reject any costs or contributions which are ineligible (see Article 6), in particular following checks, reviews, audits or investigations (see Article 25).

The rejection may also be based on the extension of findings from other grants to this grant (see Article 25).

Ineligible costs or contributions will be rejected.

27.2 Procedure

If the rejection does not lead to a recovery, the granting authority will formally notify the coordinator or beneficiary concerned of the rejection, the amounts and the reasons why. The coordinator or beneficiary concerned may — within 30 days of receiving notification — submit observations if it disagrees with the rejection (payment review procedure).

If the rejection leads to a recovery, the granting authority will follow the contradictory procedure with pre-information letter set out in Article 22.

27.3 Effects

59

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

If the granting authority rejects costs or contributions, it will deduct them from the costs or contributions declared and then calculate the amount due (and, if needed, make a recovery; see Article 22).

ARTICLE 28 — GRANT REDUCTION

28.1 Conditions

The granting authority may — at beneficiary termination, final payment or afterwards — reduce the grant for a beneficiary, if:

(a) the beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed:

(i) substantial errors, irregularities or fraud or

(ii) serious breach of obligations under this Agreement or during its award (including improper implementation of the action, non-compliance with the call conditions, submission of false information, failure to provide required information, breach of ethics or security rules (if applicable), failure to cooperate with checks, reviews, audits and investigations, etc.), or

(b) the beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed — in other EU grants awarded to it under similar conditions — systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or serious breach of obligations that have a material impact on this grant (see Article 25).

The amount of the reduction will be calculated for each beneficiary concerned and proportionate to the seriousness and the duration of the errors, irregularities or fraud or breach of obligations, by applying an individual reduction rate to their accepted EU contribution.

28.2 Procedure

If the grant reduction does not lead to a recovery, the granting authority will formally notify the coordinator or beneficiary concerned of the reduction, the amount to be reduced and the reasons why. The coordinator or beneficiary concerned may — within 30 days of receiving notification — submit observations if it disagrees with the reduction (payment review procedure).

If the grant reduction leads to a recovery, the granting authority will follow the contradictory procedure with pre-information letter set out in Article 22.

28.3 Effects

If the granting authority reduces the grant, it will deduct the reduction and then calculate the amount due (and, if needed, make a recovery; see Article 22).

SECTION 2 SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION

ARTICLE 29 — PAYMENT DEADLINE SUSPENSION

60

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

29.1 Conditions

The granting authority may — at any moment — suspend the payment deadline if a payment cannot be processed because:

(a) the required report (see Article 21) has not been submitted or is not complete or additional information is needed

(b) there are doubts about the amount to be paid (e.g. ongoing audit extension procedure, queries about eligibility, need for a grant reduction, etc.) and additional checks, reviews, audits or investigations are necessary, or

(c) there are other issues affecting the EU financial interests.

29.2 Procedure

The granting authority will formally notify the coordinator of the suspension and the reasons why.

The suspension will take effect the day the notification is sent.

If the conditions for suspending the payment deadline are no longer met, the suspension will be lifted — and the remaining time to pay (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2) will resume.

If the suspension exceeds two months, the coordinator may request the granting authority to confirm if the suspension will continue.

If the payment deadline has been suspended due to the non-compliance of the report and the revised report is not submitted (or was submitted but is also rejected), the granting authority may also terminate the grant or the participation of the coordinator (see Article 32).

ARTICLE 30 — PAYMENT SUSPENSION

30.1 Conditions

The granting authority may — at any moment — suspend payments, in whole or in part for one or more beneficiaries, if:

(a) a beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed or is suspected of having committed:

(i) substantial errors, irregularities or fraud or

(ii) serious breach of obligations under this Agreement or during its award (including improper implementation of the action, non-compliance with the call conditions, submission of false information, failure to provide required information, breach of ethics or security rules (if applicable), failure to cooperate with checks, reviews, audits and investigations, etc.), or

(b) a beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed — in other EU grants

61

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

awarded to it under similar conditions — systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or serious breach of obligations that have a material impact on this grant.

If payments are suspended for one or more beneficiaries, the granting authority will make partial payment(s) for the part(s) not suspended. If suspension concerns the final payment, the payment (or recovery) of the remaining amount after suspension is lifted will be considered to be the payment that closes the action.

30.2 Procedure

Before suspending payments, the granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the beneficiary concerned:

- formally notifying the intention to suspend payments and the reasons why and

- requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification.

If the granting authority does not receive observations or decides to pursue the procedure despite the observations it has received, it will confirm the suspension (confirmation letter). Otherwise, it will formally notify that the procedure is discontinued.

At the end of the suspension procedure, the granting authority will also inform the coordinator.

The suspension will take effect the day after the confirmation notification is sent.

If the conditions for resuming payments are met, the suspension will be lifted. The granting authority will formally notify the beneficiary concerned (and the coordinator) and set the suspension end date.

During the suspension, no prefinancing will be paid to the beneficiaries concerned. For interim payments, the periodic reports for all reporting periods except the last one (see Article 21) must not contain any financial statements from the beneficiary concerned (or its affiliated entities). The coordinator must include them in the next periodic report after the suspension is lifted or — if suspension is not lifted before the end of the action — in the last periodic report.

ARTICLE 31 — GRANT AGREEMENT SUSPENSION

31.1 Consortium-requested GA suspension

31.1.1 Conditions and procedure

The beneficiaries may request the suspension of the grant or any part of it, if exceptional circumstances — in particular force majeure (see Article 35) — make implementation impossible or excessively difficult.

The coordinator must submit a request for amendment (see Article 39), with:

- the reasons why

- the date the suspension takes effect; this date may be before the date of the submission of the amendment request and

- the expected date of resumption.

62

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

The suspension will take effect on the day specified in the amendment.

Once circumstances allow for implementation to resume, the coordinator must immediately request another amendment of the Agreement to set the suspension end date, the resumption date (one day after suspension end date), extend the duration and make other changes necessary to adapt the action to the new situation (see Article 39) — unless the grant has been terminated (see Article 32). The suspension will be lifted with effect from the suspension end date set out in the amendment. This date may be before the date of the submission of the amendment request.

During the suspension, no prefinancing will be paid. Costs incurred or contributions for activities implemented during grant suspension are not eligible (see Article 6.3).

31.2 EU-initiated GA suspension

31.2.1 Conditions

The granting authority may suspend the grant or any part of it, if:

(a) a beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed or is suspected of having committed:

(i) substantial errors, irregularities or fraud or

(ii) serious breach of obligations under this Agreement or during its award (including improper implementation of the action, non-compliance with the call conditions, submission of false information, failure to provide required information, breach of ethics or security rules (if applicable), failure to cooperate with checks, reviews, audits and investigations, etc.), or

(b) a beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed — in other EU grants awarded to it under similar conditions — systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or serious breach of obligations that have a material impact on this grant

(c) other:

(i) linked action issues: not applicable

(ii) due to major delays, the objectives of the action risk to no longer be achieved

31.2.2 Procedure

Before suspending the grant, the granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the coordinator:

- formally notifying the intention to suspend the grant and the reasons why and

- requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification.

If the granting authority does not receive observations or decides to pursue the procedure despite the observations it has received, it will confirm the suspension (confirmation letter). Otherwise, it will formally notify that the procedure is discontinued.

63

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

The suspension will take effect the day after the confirmation notification is sent (or on a later date specified in the notification).

Once the conditions for resuming implementation of the action are met, the granting authority will formally notify the coordinator a lifting of suspension letter, in which it will set the suspension end date and invite the coordinator to request an amendment of the Agreement to set the resumption date (one day after suspension end date), extend the duration and make other changes necessary to adapt the action to the new situation (see Article 39) — unless the grant has been terminated (see Article 32). The suspension will be lifted with effect from the suspension end date set out in the lifting of suspension letter. This date may be before the date on which the letter is sent.

During the suspension, no prefinancing will be paid. Costs incurred or contributions for activities implemented during suspension are not eligible (see Article 6.3).

The beneficiaries may not claim damages due to suspension by the granting authority (see Article 33).

Grant suspension does not affect the granting authority’s right to terminate the grant or a beneficiary (see Article 32) or reduce the grant (see Article 28).

ARTICLE 32 — GRANT AGREEMENT OR BENEFICIARY TERMINATION

32.1 Consortium-requested GA termination

32.1.1 Conditions and procedure

The beneficiaries may request the termination of the grant.

The coordinator must submit a request for amendment (see Article 39), with:

- the reasons why

- the date the consortium ends work on the action (‘end of work date’) and

- the date the termination takes effect (‘termination date’); this date must be after the date of the submission of the amendment request.

The termination will take effect on the termination date specified in the amendment.

If no reasons are given or if the granting authority considers the reasons do not justify termination, it may consider the grant terminated improperly.

32.1.2 Effects

The coordinator must — within 60 days from when termination takes effect — submit a periodic report (for the open reporting period until termination).

The granting authority will calculate the final grant amount and final payment on the basis of the report submitted and taking into account the costs incurred and contributions for activities implemented before the end of work date (see Article 22). Costs relating to contracts due for execution only after the end of work are not eligible.

If the granting authority does not receive the report within the deadline, only costs and contributions

64

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

which are included in an approved periodic report will be taken into account (no costs/contributions if no periodic report was ever approved).

Improper termination may lead to a grant reduction (see Article 28).

After termination, the beneficiaries’ obligations (in particular Articles 13 (confidentiality and security), 16 (IPR), 17 (communication, dissemination and visibility), 21 (reporting), 25 (checks, reviews, audits and investigations), 26 (impact evaluation), 27 (rejections), 28 (grant reduction) and 42 (assignment of claims)) continue to apply.

32.2 Consortium-requested beneficiary termination

32.2.1 Conditions and procedure

The coordinator may request the termination of the participation of one or more beneficiaries, on request of the beneficiary concerned or on behalf of the other beneficiaries.

The coordinator must submit a request for amendment (see Article 39), with:

- the reasons why

- the opinion of the beneficiary concerned (or proof that this opinion has been requested in writing)

- the date the beneficiary ends work on the action (‘end of work date’)

- the date the termination takes effect (‘termination date’); this date must be after the date of the submission of the amendment request.

If the termination concerns the coordinator and is done without its agreement, the amendment request must be submitted by another beneficiary (acting on behalf of the consortium).

The termination will take effect on the termination date specified in the amendment.

If no information is given or if the granting authority considers that the reasons do not justify termination, it may consider the beneficiary to have been terminated improperly.

32.2.2 Effects

The coordinator must — within 60 days from when termination takes effect — submit:

(i) a report on the distribution of payments to the beneficiary concerned

(ii) a termination report from the beneficiary concerned, for the open reporting period until termination, containing an overview of the progress of the work, the financial statement, the explanation on the use of resources, and, if applicable, the certificate on the financial statement (CFS; see Articles 21 and 24.2 and Data Sheet, Point 4.3)

(iii) a second request for amendment (see Article 39) with other amendments needed (e.g. reallocation of the tasks and the estimated budget of the terminated beneficiary; addition of a new beneficiary to replace the terminated beneficiary; change of coordinator, etc.).

The granting authority will calculate the amount due to the beneficiary on the basis of the report

65

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

submitted and taking into account the costs incurred and contributions for activities implemented before the end of work date (see Article 22). Costs relating to contracts due for execution only after the end of work are not eligible.

The information in the termination report must also be included in the periodic report for the next reporting period (see Article 21).

If the granting authority does not receive the termination report within the deadline, only costs and contributions which are included in an approved periodic report will be taken into account (no costs/ contributions if no periodic report was ever approved).

If the granting authority does not receive the report on the distribution of payments within the deadline, it will consider that:

- the coordinator did not distribute any payment to the beneficiary concerned and that

- the beneficiary concerned must not repay any amount to the coordinator.

If the second request for amendment is accepted by the granting authority, the Agreement is amended to introduce the necessary changes (see Article 39).

If the second request for amendment is rejected by the granting authority (because it calls into question the decision awarding the grant or breaches the principle of equal treatment of applicants), the grant may be terminated (see Article 32).

Improper termination may lead to a reduction of the grant (see Article 31) or grant termination (see Article 32).

After termination, the concerned beneficiary’s obligations (in particular Articles 13 (confidentiality and security), 16 (IPR), 17 (communication, dissemination and visibility), 21 (reporting), 25 (checks, reviews, audits and investigations), 26 (impact evaluation), 27 (rejections), 28 (grant reduction) and 42 (assignment of claims)) continue to apply.

32.3 EU-initiated GA or beneficiary termination

32.3.1 Conditions

The granting authority may terminate the grant or the participation of one or more beneficiaries, if:

(a) one or more beneficiaries do not accede to the Agreement (see Article 40)

(b) a change to the action or the legal, financial, technical, organisational or ownership situation of a beneficiary is likely to substantially affect the implementation of the action or calls into question the decision to award the grant (including changes linked to one of the exclusion grounds listed in the declaration of honour)

(c) following termination of one or more beneficiaries, the necessary changes to the Agreement (and their impact on the action) would call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants

(d) implementation of the action has become impossible or the changes necessary for its

66

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

continuation would call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants

(e) a beneficiary (or person with unlimited liability for its debts) is subject to bankruptcy proceedings or similar (including insolvency, winding-up, administration by a liquidator or court, arrangement with creditors, suspension of business activities, etc.)

(f) a beneficiary (or person with unlimited liability for its debts) is in breach of social security or tax obligations

(g) a beneficiary (or person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has been found guilty of grave professional misconduct

(h) a beneficiary (or person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed fraud, corruption, or is involved in a criminal organisation, money laundering, terrorism-related crimes (including terrorism financing), child labour or human trafficking

(i) a beneficiary (or person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) was created under a different jurisdiction with the intent to circumvent fiscal, social or other legal obligations in the country of origin (or created another entity with this purpose)

(j) a beneficiary (or person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed:

(i) substantial errors, irregularities or fraud or

(ii) serious breach of obligations under this Agreement or during its award (including improper implementation of the action, non-compliance with the call conditions, submission of false information, failure to provide required information, breach of ethics or security rules (if applicable), failure to cooperate with checks, reviews, audits and investigations, etc.)

(k) a beneficiary (or person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed — in other EU grants awarded to it under similar conditions — systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or serious breach of obligations that have a material impact on this grant (extension of findings from other grants to this grant; see Article 25)

(l) despite a specific request by the granting authority, a beneficiary does not request — through the coordinator — an amendment to the Agreement to end the participation of one of its affiliated entities or associated partners that is in one of the situations under points (d), (f), (e), (g), (h), (i) or (j) and to reallocate its tasks, or

(m) other:

(i) linked action issues: not applicable

(ii) due to major delays, the objectives of the action can no longer be achieved

67

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

32.3.2 Procedure

Before terminating the grant or participation of one or more beneficiaries, the granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the coordinator or beneficiary concerned:

- formally notifying the intention to terminate and the reasons why and

- requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification.

If the granting authority does not receive observations or decides to pursue the procedure despite the observations it has received, it will confirm the termination and the date it will take effect (confirmation letter). Otherwise, it will formally notify that the procedure is discontinued.

For beneficiary terminations, the granting authority will — at the end of the procedure — also inform the coordinator.

The termination will take effect the day after the confirmation notification is sent (or on a later date specified in the notification; ‘termination date’).

32.3.3 Effects

(a) for GA termination:

The coordinator must — within 60 days from when termination takes effect — submit a periodic report (for the last open reporting period until termination).

The granting authority will calculate the final grant amount and final payment on the basis of the report submitted and taking into account the costs incurred and contributions for activities implemented before termination takes effect (see Article 22). Costs relating to contracts due for execution only after termination are not eligible.

If the grant is terminated for breach of the obligation to submit reports, the coordinator may not submit any report after termination.

If the granting authority does not receive the report within the deadline, only costs and contributions which are included in an approved periodic report will be taken into account (no costs/contributions if no periodic report was ever approved).

Termination does not affect the granting authority’s right to reduce the grant (see Article 28) or to impose administrative sanctions (see Article 34).

The beneficiaries may not claim damages due to termination by the granting authority (see Article 33).

After termination, the beneficiaries’ obligations (in particular Articles 13 (confidentiality and security), 16 (IPR), 17 (communication, dissemination and visibility), 21 (reporting), 25 (checks, reviews, audits and investigations), 26 (impact evaluation), 27 (rejections), 28 (grant reduction) and 42 (assignment of claims)) continue to apply.

(b) for beneficiary termination:

The coordinator must — within 60 days from when termination takes effect — submit:

68

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

(i) a report on the distribution of payments to the beneficiary concerned

(ii) a termination report from the beneficiary concerned, for the open reporting period until termination, containing an overview of the progress of the work, the financial statement, the explanation on the use of resources, and, if applicable, the certificate on the financial statement (CFS; see Articles 21 and 24.2 and Data Sheet, Point 4.3)

(iii) a request for amendment (see Article 39) with any amendments needed (e.g. reallocation of the tasks and the estimated budget of the terminated beneficiary; addition of a new beneficiary to replace the terminated beneficiary; change of coordinator, etc.).

The granting authority will calculate the amount due to the beneficiary on the basis of the report submitted and taking into account the costs incurred and contributions for activities implemented before termination takes effect (see Article 22). Costs relating to contracts due for execution only after termination are not eligible.

The information in the termination report must also be included in the periodic report for the next reporting period (see Article 21).

If the granting authority does not receive the termination report within the deadline, only costs and contributions included in an approved periodic report will be taken into account (no costs/ contributions if no periodic report was ever approved).

If the granting authority does not receive the report on the distribution of payments within the deadline, it will consider that:

- the coordinator did not distribute any payment to the beneficiary concerned and that

- the beneficiary concerned must not repay any amount to the coordinator.

If the request for amendment is accepted by the granting authority, the Agreement is amended to introduce the necessary changes (see Article 39).

If the request for amendment is rejected by the granting authority (because it calls into question the decision awarding the grant or breaches the principle of equal treatment of applicants), the grant may be terminated (see Article 32).

After termination, the concerned beneficiary’s obligations (in particular Articles 13 (confidentiality and security), 16 (IPR), 17 (communication, dissemination and visibility), 21 (reporting), 25 (checks, reviews, audits and investigations), 26 (impact evaluation), 27 (rejections), 28 (grant reduction) and 42 (assignment of claims)) continue to apply.

SECTION 3 OTHER CONSEQUENCES: DAMAGES AND ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS

ARTICLE 33 — DAMAGES

33.1 Liability of the granting authority

69

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

The granting authority cannot be held liable for any damage caused to the beneficiaries or to third parties as a consequence of the implementation of the Agreement, including for gross negligence.

The granting authority cannot be held liable for any damage caused by any of the beneficiaries or other participants involved in the action, as a consequence of the implementation of the Agreement.

33.2 Liability of the beneficiaries

The beneficiaries must compensate the granting authority for any damage it sustains as a result of the implementation of the action or because the action was not implemented in full compliance with the Agreement, provided that it was caused by gross negligence or wilful act.

The liability does not extend to indirect or consequential losses or similar damage (such as loss of profit, loss of revenue or loss of contracts), provided such damage was not caused by wilful act or by a breach of confidentiality.

ARTICLE 34 — ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS AND OTHER MEASURES

Nothing in this Agreement may be construed as preventing the adoption of administrative sanctions (i.e. exclusion from EU award procedures and/or financial penalties) or other public law measures, in addition or as an alternative to the contractual measures provided under this Agreement (see, for instance, Articles 137 to 148 EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509 and Articles 4 and 7 of Regulation 2988/9524).

SECTION 4 FORCE MAJEURE

ARTICLE 35 — FORCE MAJEURE

A party prevented by force majeure from fulfilling its obligations under the Agreement cannot be considered in breach of them.

‘Force majeure’ means any situation or event that:

- prevents either party from fulfilling their obligations under the Agreement

- was unforeseeable, exceptional situation and beyond the parties’ control

- was not due to error or negligence on their part (or on the part of other participants involved in the action) and

- proves to be inevitable in spite of exercising all due diligence.

Any situation constituting force majeure must be formally notified to the other party without delay, stating the nature, likely duration and foreseeable effects.

The parties must immediately take all the necessary steps to limit any damage due to force majeure and do their best to resume implementation of the action as soon as possible.

24 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 1).

70

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

CHAPTER 6 FINAL PROVISIONS

ARTICLE 36 — COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES

36.1 Forms and means of communication — Electronic management

EU grants are managed fully electronically through the EU Funding & Tenders Portal (‘Portal’).

All communications must be made electronically through the Portal, in accordance with the Portal Terms and Conditions and using the forms and templates provided there (except if explicitly instructed otherwise by the granting authority).

Communications must be made in writing and clearly identify the grant agreement (project number and acronym).

Communications must be made by persons authorised according to the Portal Terms and Conditions. For naming the authorised persons, each beneficiary must have designated — before the signature of this Agreement — a ‘legal entity appointed representative (LEAR)’. The role and tasks of the LEAR are stipulated in their appointment letter (see Portal Terms and Conditions).

If the electronic exchange system is temporarily unavailable, instructions will be given on the Portal.

36.2 Date of communication

The sending date for communications made through the Portal will be the date and time of sending, as indicated by the time logs.

The receiving date for communications made through the Portal will be the date and time the communication is accessed, as indicated by the time logs. Formal notifications that have not been accessed within 10 days after sending, will be considered to have been accessed (see Portal Terms and Conditions).

If a communication is exceptionally made on paper (by e-mail or postal service), general principles apply (i.e. date of sending/receipt). Formal notifications by registered post with proof of delivery will be considered to have been received either on the delivery date registered by the postal service or the deadline for collection at the post office.

If the electronic exchange system is temporarily unavailable, the sending party cannot be considered in breach of its obligation to send a communication within a specified deadline.

36.3 Addresses for communication

The Portal can be accessed via the Europa website.

The address for paper communications to the granting authority (if exceptionally allowed) is the official mailing address indicated on its website.

For beneficiaries, it is the legal address specified in the Portal Participant Register.

ARTICLE 37 — INTERPRETATION OF THE AGREEMENT

71

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

The provisions in the Data Sheet take precedence over the rest of the Terms and Conditions of the Agreement.

Annex 5 takes precedence over the Terms and Conditions; the Terms and Conditions take precedence over the Annexes other than Annex 5.

Annex 2 takes precedence over Annex 1.

ARTICLE 38 — CALCULATION OF PERIODS AND DEADLINES

In accordance with Regulation No 1182/7125, periods expressed in days, months or years are calculated from the moment the triggering event occurs.

The day during which that event occurs is not considered as falling within the period.

‘Days’ means calendar days, not working days.

ARTICLE 39 — AMENDMENTS

39.1 Conditions

The Agreement may be amended, unless the amendment entails changes to the Agreement which would call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants.

Amendments may be requested by any of the parties.

39.2 Procedure

The party requesting an amendment must submit a request for amendment signed directly in the Portal Amendment tool.

The coordinator submits and receives requests for amendment on behalf of the beneficiaries (see Annex 3). If a change of coordinator is requested without its agreement, the submission must be done by another beneficiary (acting on behalf of the other beneficiaries).

The request for amendment must include:

- the reasons why

- the appropriate supporting documents and

- for a change of coordinator without its agreement: the opinion of the coordinator (or proof that this opinion has been requested in writing).

The granting authority may request additional information.

If the party receiving the request agrees, it must sign the amendment in the tool within 45 days of receiving notification (or any additional information the granting authority has requested). If it does

25 Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of the Council of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time-limits (OJ L 124, 8/6/1971, p. 1).

72

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

not agree, it must formally notify its disagreement within the same deadline. The deadline may be extended, if necessary for the assessment of the request. If no notification is received within the deadline, the request is considered to have been rejected.

An amendment enters into force on the day of the signature of the receiving party.

An amendment takes effect on the date of entry into force or other date specified in the amendment.

ARTICLE 40 — ACCESSION AND ADDITION OF NEW BENEFICIARIES

40.1 Accession of the beneficiaries mentioned in the Preamble

The beneficiaries which are not coordinator must accede to the grant by signing the accession form (see Annex 3) directly in the Portal Grant Preparation tool, within 30 days after the entry into force of the Agreement (see Article 44).

They will assume the rights and obligations under the Agreement with effect from the date of its entry into force (see Article 44).

If a beneficiary does not accede to the grant within the above deadline, the coordinator must — within 30 days — request an amendment (see Article 39) to terminate the beneficiary and make any changes necessary to ensure proper implementation of the action. This does not affect the granting authority’s right to terminate the grant (see Article 32).

40.2 Addition of new beneficiaries

In justified cases, the beneficiaries may request the addition of a new beneficiary.

For this purpose, the coordinator must submit a request for amendment in accordance with Article 39. It must include an accession form (see Annex 3) signed by the new beneficiary directly in the Portal Amendment tool.

New beneficiaries will assume the rights and obligations under the Agreement with effect from the date of their accession specified in the accession form (see Annex 3).

Additions are also possible in mono-beneficiary grants.

ARTICLE 41 — TRANSFER OF THE AGREEMENT

In justified cases, the beneficiary of a mono-beneficiary grant may request the transfer of the grant to a new beneficiary, provided that this would not call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants.

The beneficiary must submit a request for amendment (see Article 39), with

- the reasons why

- the accession form (see Annex 3) signed by the new beneficiary directly in the Portal Amendment tool and

- additional supporting documents (if required by the granting authority).

73

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

The new beneficiary will assume the rights and obligations under the Agreement with effect from the date of accession specified in the accession form (see Annex 3).

ARTICLE 42 — ASSIGNMENTS OF CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT AGAINST THE GRANTING AUTHORITY

The beneficiaries may not assign any of their claims for payment against the granting authority to any third party, except if expressly approved in writing by the granting authority on the basis of a reasoned, written request by the coordinator (on behalf of the beneficiary concerned).

If the granting authority has not accepted the assignment or if the terms of it are not observed, the assignment will have no effect on it.

In no circumstances will an assignment release the beneficiaries from their obligations towards the granting authority.

ARTICLE 43 — APPLICABLE LAW AND SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES

43.1 Applicable law

The Agreement is governed by the applicable EU law, supplemented if necessary by the law of Belgium.

Special rules may apply for beneficiaries which are international organisations (if any; see Data Sheet, Point 5).

43.2 Dispute settlement

If a dispute concerns the interpretation, application or validity of the Agreement, the parties must bring action before the EU General Court — or, on appeal, the EU Court of Justice — under Article 272 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU).

For non-EU beneficiaries (if any), such disputes must be brought before the courts of Brussels, Belgium — unless an international agreement provides for the enforceability of EU court judgements.

For beneficiaries with arbitration as special dispute settlement forum (if any; see Data Sheet, Point 5), the dispute will — in the absence of an amicable settlement — be settled in accordance with the Rules for Arbitration published on the Portal.

If a dispute concerns administrative sanctions, offsetting or an enforceable decision under Article 299 TFEU (see Articles 22 and 34), the beneficiaries must bring action before the General Court — or, on appeal, the Court of Justice — under Article 263 TFEU.

For grants where the granting authority is an EU executive agency (see Preamble), actions against offsetting and enforceable decisions must be brought against the European Commission (not against the granting authority; see also Article 22).

ARTICLE 44 — ENTRY INTO FORCE

The Agreement will enter into force on the day of signature by the granting authority or the coordinator, depending on which is later.

74

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

SIGNATURES

For the coordinator For the granting authority

[-- TGSMark#signature-999606729_75_210--]

[-- TGSMark#signature- service_75_210--]

75

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

ANNEX 1

Connecting Europe Facility (CEF)

Description of the action (DoA)

Part A

Part B

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION (PART A)

COVER PAGE

Part A of the Description of the Action (DoA) must be completed directly on the Portal Grant Preparation screens.

PROJECT

Grant Preparation (General Information screen) — Enter the info.

Project number: 101234721

Project name: Continuation of NAPCORE - the National Access Point Coordination Organisation for Europe

Project acronym: 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X

Call: CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Topic: CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG-NAPCORE

Type of action: CEF-PJG

Service: MOVE/B/04

Project starting date: fixed date: 1 July 2025

Project duration: 30 months

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Project summary ......................................................................................................................................................3

List of participants .................................................................................................................................................. 3

List of work packages .............................................................................................................................................7

Staff effort ............................................................................................................................................................. 31

List of deliverables ................................................................................................................................................35

List of milestones (outputs/outcomes) .................................................................................................................. 57

List of critical risks ............................................................................................................................................... 57

2

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

PROJECT SUMMARY

Project summary

Grant Preparation (General Information screen) — Provide an overall description of your project (including context and overall objectives, planned activities and main achievements, and expected results and impacts (on target groups, change procedures, capacities, innovation etc)). This summary should give readers a clear idea of what your project is about.

Use the project summary from your proposal.

NAPCORE-X is the project to continue the operation and management of the National Access Point Coordination Organisation for Europe (“NAPCORE”). This includes the work previously managed by the EC-funded projects DATEX II, TN-ITS and DATA4PT. NAPCORE has the following objectives: - To coordinate the alignment of operational aspects of the implementation of the Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) Directive as mentioned in Article 5.3 amongst the Member States; - To advise the European Commission and the Member States on the effects of other (besides the ITS Directive) and future legislation in relation to the mobility data domain; - To monitor, evaluate, assess and possibly propose action dealing with relevant European technological and societal developments relevant for the mobility data domain as well as to track relevant global developments; - To establish coordination and facilitate cooperation between relevant stakeholders; - To develop and offer tools and processes as well as to share best practices supporting National Access Points and National Bodies on a European level; - To share findings and results within and beyond the NAPCORE community to ensure broader awareness and harmonization among stakeholders. The need and justification for NAPCORE-X is given by the revised Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the framework for the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in the field of road transport and for interfaces with other modes of transport (the ITS Directive), Article 5 (3), in which a cooperation and coordination of Member States on matters related to mobility data exchange via the National Access Points is mandated. NAPCORE, enabled through this NAPCORE-X project, is the organisational structure in which this coordination takes place.

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

PARTICIPANTS

Grant Preparation (Beneficiaries screen) — Enter the info.

Number Role Short name Legal name Country PIC

1 COO DE-BAST BUNDESANSTALT FUER STRASSEN-UND VERKEHRSWESEN

DE 999606729

2 BEN DE-HH FREIE UND HANSESTADT HAMBURG DE 998928602

3 BEN DE-NRW-MIN MINISTERIUM FUR UMWELT, NATURSCHUTZ UND VERKEHR DES LANDES NORDRHEIN- WESTFALEN

DE 888355392

4 BEN DE-NVBW NVBW - NAHVERKEHRSGESELLSCHAFT BADEN-WURTTEMBERG MBH

DE 889834254

5 BEN DE-RMS RHEIN-MAIN-VERKEHRSVERBUND SERVICEGELLSCHAFT MBH

DE 908140579

6 BEN AT-MVO Mobilitatsverbunde Osterreich OG AT 893590676

7 BEN AT-ASFINAG AUTOBAHNEN- UND SCHNELLSTRASSEN- FINANZIERUNGS- AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

AT 950547427

3

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

PARTICIPANTS

Grant Preparation (Beneficiaries screen) — Enter the info.

Number Role Short name Legal name Country PIC

8 BEN AT-ATE AUSTRIATECH - GESELLSCHAFT DES BUNDES FUR TECHNOLOGIEPOLITISCHE MASSNAHMEN GMBH

AT 999642425

9 BEN BE-FED SERVICE PUBLIC FEDERAL MOBILITE ET TRANSPORTS

BE 885645212

10 BEN BE-FL VLAAMSE GEWEST BE 999575107

11 BEN BE-NGI INSTITUT GEOGRAPHIQUE NATIONAL BE 953503696

12 BEN HR-CESTE HRVATSKE CESTE DRUSTVO S OGRANICENOM ODGOVORNOSCU ZA UPRAVLJANJE GRADENJE I ODRZAVANJE DRZAVNIH CESTA

HR 905115828

13 BEN HR-MMPI MINISTARSTVO MORA, PROMETA I INFRASTRUKTURE

HR 895631750

14 BEN CY-PWD YPOURGEIO METAFORON, EPIKOINONION KAI ERGON

CY 958850433

15 BEN CZ-CDV CENTRUM DOPRAVNIHO VYZKUMU v.v.i. CZ 999450171

16 BEN CZ-MDCR MINISTERSTVO DOPRAVY CZ 985636401

17 BEN CZ-CVUT CESKE VYSOKE UCENI TECHNICKE V PRAZE CZ 999848744

18 BEN CZ-TTR TAMTAM RESEARCH SRO CZ 892455000

19 BEN DK-DRD VEJDIREKTORATET DK 998722768

20 BEN DK-TS TRAFIKSTYRELSEN DK 887835860

21 BEN EE-ETA TRANSPORDIAMET EE 888420576

22 BEN FI-FINTRA LIIKENTEENOHJAUSYHTIO FINTRAFFIC OY FI 885860746

23 BEN FI-TRAFICOM LIIKENNE- JA VIESTINTAVIRASTO FI 900306956

24 BEN FR-MIN MINISTERE DE LA TRANSITION ECOLOGIQUE, DE L'ENERGIE, DU CLIMAT ET DE LA PREVENTION DES RISQUES

FR 996384874

25 BEN FR-CEREMA CENTRE D ETUDES ET D EXPERTISE SUR LES RISQUES L ENVIRONNEMENT LA MOBILITE ET L AMENAGEMENT

FR 948933735

26 BEN FR-ART AUTORITE DE REGULATION DES TRANSPORTS

FR 875225569

27 BEN GR-MIN YPOURGEIO YPODOMON KAI METAFORON EL 939019850

28 BEN HU-EKM EPITESI ES KOZLEKEDESI MINISZTERIUM HU 884022208

29 BEN HU-KOZUT MAGYAR KOZUT NONPROFIT ZARTKORUEN MUKODO RESZVENYTARSASAG

HU 905297121

30 BEN IE-DFT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT IE 975472159

31 BEN IT-MIN MINISTERO DELLE INFRASTRUTTURE E DEI TRASPORTI

IT 996445790

4

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

PARTICIPANTS

Grant Preparation (Beneficiaries screen) — Enter the info.

Number Role Short name Legal name Country PIC

32 BEN IT-SINA SOCIETA INIZIATIVE NAZIONALI AUTOSTRADALI - S.I.N.A. SPA

IT 971458396

33 BEN IT-ASPI AUTOSTRADE PER L'ITALIA SPA IT 995995904

34 BEN IT-MOVYON MOVYON S.P.A. IT 873673375

35 BEN IT-5T 5T SRL IT 996356065

36 BEN IT-CEF CEFRIEL SOCIETA CONSORTILE A RESPONSABILITA LIMITATA SOCIETA BENEFIT

IT 999647178

37 BEN IT-QM QMAP SRL IT 895821579

38 BEN IT-SINELEC Sinelec SPA IT 872279000

39 BEN LV-CELI LATVIJAS VALSTS CELI LV 952381212

40 BEN LT-VIA AKCINE BENDROVE VIA LIETUVA LT 995630020

41 BEN MT-TRANSP AUTHORITY FOR TRANSPORT IN MALTA MT 965978478

42 BEN NL-MIN MINISTERIE VAN INFRASTRUCTUUR EN WATERSTAAT

NL 967944377

43 BEN PL-GDNRM GENERALNA DYREKCJA DROG KRAJOWYCH I AUTOSTRAD

PL 894744006

44 BEN PT-IMT INSTITUTO DA MOBILIDADE E DOS TRANSPORTES, I P

PT 966290430

45 BEN PT-ARMIS ARMIS - SISTEMAS DE INFORMACAO LDA PT 876922487

46 BEN RO-MIN MINISTERUL TRANSPORTURILOR SI INFRASTRUCTURII

RO 888053916

47 BEN RO-NCRIA COMPANIA NATIONALA DE ADMINISTRARE A INFRASTRUCTURII RUTIERE SA

RO 984896485

48 BEN RO-ITS ORGANIZATIA ROMANA PENTRU IMPLEMENTAREA SISTEMELOR INTELIGENTE DE TRANSPORT

RO 985882393

49 BEN RO-ELSOL ELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS SRL RO 984592487

50 BEN SK-MIN MINISTERSTVO DOPRAVY SR SK 992649986

51 BEN SI-MZI MINISTRSTVO ZA INFRASTRUKTURO SI 952242696

52 BEN SI-UM UNIVERZA V MARIBORU SI 999903646

53 BEN ES-DGT JEFATURA CENTRAL DE TRAFICO ES 962730433

54 BEN SE-TV TRAFIKVERKET - TRV SE 984295764

55 BEN SE-ST Samtrafiken i Sverige Aktiebolag*Interconnection in Sweden Limited Liability Company

SE 872315084

56 BEN XMD-MIN MINISTERUL INFRASTRUCTURII SI DEZVOLTARII REGIONALE

MD 884219700

57 BEN Y-UITP UNION INTERNATIONALE DES TRANSPORTS PUBLICS

BE 999945647

5

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

PARTICIPANTS

Grant Preparation (Beneficiaries screen) — Enter the info.

Number Role Short name Legal name Country PIC

58 BEN Y-ITxPT Information Technology for Public Transport BE 908239810

59 BEN Y-ERTICO EUROPEAN ROAD TRANSPORT TELEMATICS IMPLEMENTATION COORDINATION ORGANISATION - INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS & SERVICES EUROPE

BE 999785112

60 AP DE-AB DIE AUTOBAHN GMBH DES BUNDES DE 888874051

61 AP AT-BMIMI BUNDESMINISTERIUM FUER INNOVATION, MOBILITAET UND INFRASTRUKTUR

AT 999633695

62 AP BE-WAL SERVICE PUBLIC DE WALLONIE BE 999811884

63 AP BG-MIN MINISTERSTVO NA TRANSPORTA I SAOBSHTENIYATA

BG 954100440

64 AP BG-API Agentsia Patna Infrastruktura BG 881408640

65 AP EE-MIN-KLI KLIIMAMINISTEERIUM EE 941609750

66 AP FR-ASFA ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONNELLE DES SOCIETES FRANCAISES CONCESSIONNAIRES OU EXPLOITANTES D AUTOROUTES OU D OUVRAGES ROUTIERS

FR 999810817

67 AP IE-TII NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY IE 996493611

68 AP IE-NTA National Transport Authority IE 939093182

69 AP LU-MIN MINISTERE DE LA MOBILITE ET DES TRAVAUX PUBLICS

LU 879222648

70 AP PL-MIN MINISTERSTWO INFRASTRUKTURY PL 986541120

71 AP XIS-VEG VEGAGERDIN IS 951549340

72 AP XME-MIN MINISTARSTVO SAOBRACAJA I POMORSTVA ME 911469716

73 AP XNO-NPRA STATENS VEGVESEN NO 999661340

74 AP XCH-FEDRO Bundesamt für Strassen CH 896055252

75 AP XUK-DFT DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT UK 999476264

76 AP XUK-NH NATIONAL HIGHWAYS LIMITED UK 924758619

77 AP SE-STA TRANSPORTSTYRELSEN SE 917179039

6

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

LIST OF WORK PACKAGES

Work packages

Grant Preparation (Work Packages screen) — Enter the info.

Work Package No

Work Package name Lead Beneficiary Effort (Person- Months)

Start Month

End Month

Deliverables

WP1 WORKING GROUP 1 – GENERAL MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION

1 - DE-BAST 115.00 1 30 D1.1 – D1.2.1 Working Programme 2026 D1.2 – D1.2.2 Working Programme 2027 D1.3 – D1.2.3 Annual activity report 2025 D1.4 – D1.2.4 Annual activity report 2026 D1.5 – D1.2.5 Annual activity report 2027

WP2 WORKING GROUP 2 – MULTIMODAL MOBILITY

9 - BE-FED 172.00 1 30 D2.1 – D2.1.2 Toolkit for National/Regional user’s day application (in collaboration with WG8) D2.2 – D2.1.3 Final analysis of the implementation of the community strategy D2.3 – D2.2.1 Mapping of the EU-based requirements, governance and rules to implement MMTIS DR D2.4 – D2.2.2 Roadmap and recommendations to increase MMTIS data provision on the NAPs demonstrated by best practices D2.5 – D2.3.1 Map the existing cross- border services and platforms D2.6 – D2.3.2 RE-use demonstrator D2.7 – D2.4.1 Mapping of the access nodes identifiers in the Member States D2.8 – D2.4.2 Final analysis of the EU IDs for Multimodal Access Nodes

WP3 WORKING GROUP 3 – ROAD & TRAFFIC 42 - NL-MIN 108.00 1 30 D3.1 – D3.1.2 Toolkit for National / Regional user’s deployments application (in collaboration with WG8)

7

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Work packages

Grant Preparation (Work Packages screen) — Enter the info.

Work Package No

Work Package name Lead Beneficiary Effort (Person- Months)

Start Month

End Month

Deliverables

D3.2 – D3.1.3 Agreed sustainable process and governance structure on the arrangements between multi-country service providers and Member States D3.3 – D3.2.1 Roadmap for digital interactive traffic management D3.4 – D3.3.1 Roadmap for Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Data

WP4 WORKING GROUP 4 – DATA STANDARDS & ARCHITECTURE

24 - FR-MIN 618.00 1 30 D4.1 – D4.1.2 DATEX II version 4.1 D4.2 – D4.1.3 DATEX II Exchange 2026 D4.3 – D4.1.4 DATEX II version 4.2 D4.4 – D4.1.5 DATEX II recommended deployment roadmap of versions of standards and profiles. D4.5 – D4.2.1 NAP-centric mobility data ecosystem architecture with focus on EMDS setting. D4.6 – D4.2.2 NAP-centric mobility data ecosystem architecture in full trust setting D4.7 – D4.3.1 Sustainable governance and funding recommendations for the Transmodel ecosystem D4.8 – D4.3.2 Report on maintenance & update of Transmodel-based standards D4.9 – D4.3.3 Report on maintenance & update of Transmodel-based standards D4.10 – D4.3.4 Report on EU and national profiles for Transmodel-based standards D4.11 – D4.4.1 Report on maintenance & governance of mobilityDCAT-AP

8

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Work packages

Grant Preparation (Work Packages screen) — Enter the info.

Work Package No

Work Package name Lead Beneficiary Effort (Person- Months)

Start Month

End Month

Deliverables

D4.12 – D4.5.1 METR specifications compliant with EU requirements D4.13 – D4.5.2 European METR profile specifications D4.14 – D4.6.1 NAP Level of Service Framework (updated version) D4.15 – D4.6.2 NAP Reference Architecture: update and maintenance

WP5 WORKING GROUP 5 – DATA PROVISION & USE

14 - CY-PWD 216.00 1 30 D5.1 – D5.1.1 NAP data insights: overview on data availability and provision D5.2 – D5.1.2 Metadata-assisted reporting guidelines D5.3 – D5.1.3 Prototype of the Tool for Automated Metadata Harvesting, Validation and Assisted Report Generation. D5.4 – D5.2.1 Tools Governance and Recommended Practices D5.5 – D5.2.2 Tools Package on the NAP- Store Website D5.6 – D5.2.3 NAP-Store website D5.7 – D5.3.1 Data Dictionary D5.8 – D5.3.2 Implementation guidelines for the EU data quality framework

WP6 WORKING GROUP 6 – COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT & NATIONAL BODIES

8 - AT-ATE 149.00 1 30 D6.1 – D6.2.1Guidelines for national bodies for the implementation of the NAPCORE recommendations on Compliance Assessment D6.2 – D6.2.2 Report on development of multi-national or European level support system for National Bodies (ENBOSS)

9

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Work packages

Grant Preparation (Work Packages screen) — Enter the info.

Work Package No

Work Package name Lead Beneficiary Effort (Person- Months)

Start Month

End Month

Deliverables

D6.3 – D6.3.1 Guidelines for the electronic support of the compliance assessment process

WP7 WORKING GROUP 7 – GOVERNANCE & STRATEGY

8 - AT-ATE 175.00 1 30 D7.1 – D7.1.2 Collection of national implementation roadmaps D7.2 – D7.2.1 Recommendations for further action needed (Version 1) D7.3 – D7.2.2 Update recommendations for further action needed (Version 2) D7.4 – D7.3.1 Roadmap for long-lasting governance structure including topics and tasks to be covered D7.5 – D7.3.2 Supporting documents for long-lasting governance structure

WP8 WORKING GROUP 8 – DISSEMINATION & COMMUNICATION

1 - DE-BAST 321.00 1 30 D8.1 – D8.2.1 Guidelines for NAP operators based upon results and recommendations of NAPCORE, to support NAP operators in matters related to their daily operation, specific NAP tasks or general NAP setup, development and upgrade D8.2 – D8.3.1 Events – Mobility Data Days 2026 D8.3 – D8.3.2 Events – Mobility Data Days 2027 D8.4 – D8.4.1 Website Social Media and Service Desk D8.5 – D8.5.1 NAPCORE Academy Programme available

10

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Work package WP1 – WORKING GROUP 1 – GENERAL MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION

Work Package Number WP1 Lead Beneficiary 1 - DE-BAST

Work Package Name WORKING GROUP 1 – GENERAL MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION

Start Month 1 End Month 30

Objectives

The primary objective of WG1 "General Management & Administration", is to ensure the seamless execution of the project through effective coordination, administration, and internal alignment. Task 1.1 focuses on Project Coordination & Management, encompassing oversight of all project activities, maintaining compliance with timelines, budgets, and EU funding regulations, and ensuring consistent communication with stakeholders, including the European Commission. Task 1.2, Internal Alignment, aims to foster synergy among project partners by establishing clear workflows, roles, and responsibilities. This includes regular internal meetings, robust documentation practices, and alignment on key deliverables to ensure that all consortium members are working cohesively toward the project's objectives. WG1 provides the foundational structure and operational efficiency necessary for achieving the project's overall goals. Part of the task and objective of WG 1 is to manage the financial, budgetary situation of the project. This also includes the monitoring of the efforts (which translate to claimed costs) per partner and activity. The shares of the effort and thus budget per activity (and task) will be observed to make sure that all activities and tasks spend roughly their defined budget share. Even though this share might be re-evaluated and finetuned in coordination with DG MOVE and with a Steering Committee decision during the project runtime based upon validated needs and requirements, the initial approximate task budget allocations are to be taken as the basis and should generally be observed: WG 1 General Management & Administration; WG budget share 7.0%; Task budget share within WG 43.0%; Task share of total budget 3.1% Task 1.1 Project Coordination & Management; Task budget share within WG 32.0%; Task share of total budget 2.4% Task 1.2 Internal Alignment; Task budget share within WG 26.0%; Task share of total budget 1.9% WG 2 Multimodal Mobility; WG budget share 9.0%; Task budget share within WG 2.0%; Task share of total budget 0.2% Task 2.1 Domain & Community Management; Task budget share within WG 51.0%; Task share of total budget 4.6% Task 2.2 Theme: Multimodal Data Availability on the NAPs; Task budget share within WG 18.0%; Task share of total budget 1.7% Task 2.3 Theme: Multimodal Data (Re-Use); Task budget share within WG 13.0%; Task share of total budget 1.2% Task 2.4 Theme: EU IDs for Multimodal Access Nodes; Task budget share within WG 16.0%; Task share of total budget 1.5% WG 3 Road & Traffic; WG budget share 5.0%; Task budget share within WG 4.0%; Task share of total budget 0.2% Task 3.1 Domain & Community Management; Task budget share within WG 68.0%; Task share of total budget 3.2% Task 3.2 Theme: Digital Interactive Traffic Management; Task budget share within WG 13.0%; Task share of total budget 0.6% Task 3.3 Theme: Alternative Fuels; Task budget share within WG 14.0%; Task share of total budget 0.7% WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture; WG budget share 34.0%; Task budget share within WG 3.0%; Task share of total budget 0.9% Task 4.1 Road and Traffic Data Standard (DATEX II); Task budget share within WG 33.0%; Task share of total budget 11.3% Task 4.2 Mobility Data Ecosystem Architecture; Task budget share within WG 6.0%; Task share of total budget 2.1% Task 4.3 Multimodal Standards; Task budget share within WG 21.0%; Task share of total budget 7.3% Task 4.4 Metadata Specifications; Task budget share within WG 11.0%; Task share of total budget 3.7% Task 4.5 METR (Management of Electronic Traffic Regulations); Task budget share within WG 14.0%; Task share of total budget 4.8% Task 4.6 NAP Interoperability; Task budget share within WG 13.0%; Task share of total budget 4.3% WG 5 Data Provision & Use; WG budget share 11.0%; Task budget share within WG 3.0%; Task share of total budget 0.3% Task 5.1 NAP Data Insights and Reporting Support; Task budget share within WG 17.0%; Task share of total budget 2.0% Task 5.2 Tools; Task budget share within WG 50.0%; Task share of total budget 5.7% Task 5.3 Data Quality; Task budget share within WG 30.0%; Task share of total budget 3.4% WG 6 Compliance Assessment & National Bodies; WG budget share 7.0%; Task budget share within WG 2.0%; Task share of total budget 0.2%

11

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Task 6.1 Strategies for National Body Coordination and Non-Compliance Management; Task budget share within WG 44.0%; Task share of total budget 3.3% Task 6.2 Operational Support to National Bodies; Task budget share within WG 38.0%; Task share of total budget 2.8% Task 6.3 National Body Harmonisation and Alignment; Task budget share within WG 16.0%; Task share of total budget 1.2% WG 7 Governance & Strategy; WG budget share 9.0%; Task budget share within WG 3.0%; Task share of total budget 0.3% Task 7.1 Steering Committee & Advisory Board; Task budget share within WG 25.0%; Task share of total budget 2.2% Task 7.2 Strategy; Task budget share within WG 35.0%; Task share of total budget 3.2% Task 7.3 Long-Term Governance; Task budget share within WG 37.0%; Task share of total budget 3.3% WG 8 Dissemination & Communication; WG budget share 17.0%; Task budget share within WG 2.0%; Task share of total budget 0.3% Task 8.1 Overall Dissemination and Communication Management; Task budget share within WG 8.0%; Task share of total budget 1.4% Task 8.2 NAP Support Center; Task budget share within WG 10.0%; Task share of total budget 1.6% Task 8.3 Events; Task budget share within WG 24.0%; Task share of total budget 4.0% Task 8.4 Website, Social Media, and Service Desk; Task budget share within WG 9.0%; Task share of total budget 1.5% Task 8.5 Academy & Training; Task budget share within WG 47.0%; Task share of total budget 7.9%

Description

T1.1 PROJECT COORDINATION & MANAGEMENT The activity encompasses all project management related tasks. The following activities are covered in this task: · managing the project’s reporting and administrative requirements, including the compilation and creation of the annual activity reports 2025, 2026 and 2027 · consolidation of annual working programmes 2026 and 2027 · financial controlling (and reporting) · management of risks and quality · operation and management of the project’s internal collaboration tools · single-point-of-contact to and for the European Commission Every NAPCORE Beneficiary will be part of this task to cover their general administrative and reporting efforts of being part in NAPCORE.

T1.2 INTERNAL ALIGNMENT Ensuring the internal alignment between all project activities.

All Working Group Leads and Task leads are active members of Task 1.2. The Working Group Leads form the Core Alignment Team (CAT). The CAT is responsible for the internal alignment of all project activities. In at least monthly and mostly virtual meetings, the Core Alignment Team will get together, report and discuss on finished, ongoing and planned activities, important developments, challenges and issues. The team will discuss, align and decide on actions to be taken. The Core Alignment Team is the cross-WG coordination and alignment body for topics that do not require a further escalation to the Steering Committee. On occasion or for some in a more regular manner, also Task Leads, Team Leads, Ambassadors or Work Item Leads will join the CAT for meetings of an extended Alignment Team. The setup of the Alignment Team as well as the meeting frequencies will be decided by the CAT based on the needs at the time. In addition, the CAT identifies Cross-functional Teams for topics in need for dedicated action that spans multiple WGs under consideration of input and with guidance from the WG7 / the Steering Committee.

Work package WP2 – WORKING GROUP 2 – MULTIMODAL MOBILITY

Work Package Number WP2 Lead Beneficiary 9 - BE-FED

Work Package Name WORKING GROUP 2 – MULTIMODAL MOBILITY

Start Month 1 End Month 30

Objectives

12

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

In the framework of the ITS Directive and the MMTIS Delegated Regulation: - Implement and coordinate domain specific tasks and subjects related to multimodal mobility, encompassing all transport modes including cycling and walking, and including interaction with broader mobility related initiatives, including e.g. parking; - Share outcomes both within and beyond the NAPCORE community, ensuring broader awareness and harmonization of approaches among all stakeholders; - Promote and facilitate collaboration among NAP relevant stakeholders within the multimodal mobility sector. This includes engaging with external stakeholders to further develop strategies for data accessibility and usability, in particular community and domain management; - Study EU Identification System for Multimodal Mobility Access Nodes, in line with Annex III and the Working Programme of the revised ITS Directive. In comparison to the other priority actions of the ITS Directive, the implementation of the Delegated Regulation MMTIS addresses a vast range of stakeholders as well as transport modes, while the potential data re-users are less well defined and more scattered. Looking at the data providers, there can easily be more than 100 data providers for a small country. This is due to the scope of the Delegated Regulation, on the one hand touching all transport modes, and on the other hand aiming at bringing together transport operators to complete first and last mile trips, thus being situated mainly at the local and regional levels. Moreover, one policy does not fit all, since multinational and cross-border operating companies are active as well, obviously in long-distance modes, but also for cross-border trips. The same holds true for service providers, ranging from the local level, such as urban multimodal trip planners, to global players including big tech companies. This particularity needs a specifically tailored approach. One of our strengths is that we can build on the work done in the DATA4PT project. Its objective was to advance data- sharing practices in the public transport sector, in order to fulfil the needs of multimodal travel information service providers. Implementation and support developed in that project will find continuation within NAPCORE-X, and its experiences and recommendations will be inspiring. Domain Themes - A first set of domain themes is included in the following tasks. During the runtime of the project further domain themes can be added in an agile manner, whilst re-evaluating the effort to cover already existing domain themes. Each domain theme will be managed by a task lead possibly supported by an Ambassador or an Ambassador team for the domain theme. Domain theme participants will as well be involved in Cross-functional Teams across Working Groups

Description

T2.1 DOMAIN & COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT To coordinate domain specific activities, manage the relationships with and between different community stakeholders and foster strategical and tactical collaboration among stakeholders involved in multimodal mobility. Specific topics/communities will be addressed in the multimodal field, e.g. passenger public transport (metro, trams, bus etc.), rail, micro-mobility, maritime/inland waterways/navigation, air/aviation, (e-)bicycle, motorised two and three wheels, and car-related services (like parking, car-sharing, car-pooling, etc.). Close collaboration is foreseen with all Working Groups and activities, based on the topics that will be discussed with members of the different communities, e.g. through the Cross-functional Teams, the meetings of the CAT, and by organising common meetings when relevant. Objectives: - Develop an ecosystem with relevant multimodal mobility stakeholders to discuss work ongoing, requirements and contribute to relevant activities. This ecosystem will also offer the opportunity to support the work on common strategies and discuss responses on the challenges raised by external stakeholders.

- Facilitate engagement through regular communication, thematic workshops and quarterly update meetings: In order to ensure transparency and give NAPCORE's Follower partners, as well as external stakeholders, the opportunity to follow and contribute to the project's work, transversal meetings dedicated to multimodal themes will be organized on a regular basis. These meetings will provide an opportunity to present NAPCORE's ongoing work in the multimodal topics, and to gather feedback from participants on this work. It will also be an opportunity to identify areas where specific tasks or coordination may be needed in the future. - Organize, once a year, a Users’ days/NAP users Multimodal Forum (in-person or online) for actual and potential users of NAP data in multimodal mobility applications. At an international scale, such an event will be interesting for international and larger national stakeholders, to share their experiences and needs regarding the data available via the NAPs. The concept of such Users’ days could also be shared with the NAPCORE active partners, allowing them to apply a similar concept to the national or regional level.

T2.2 THEME: MULTIMODAL DATA AVAILABILITY ON THE NAPS

13

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Develop a strategy to increase the number of MMTIS data providers on the NAPs. Activities and results: - Map the EU-based requirements around data provision and clarify which obligations apply to which organisation, at which level of governance (national, local), and with which set of rules focusing on the scope of NAPCORE, i.e. MMTIS Delegated Regulation. This mapping will also address issues on data quality. - Map the various channels through which data is provided to the NAPs, with particular attention to similar existing databases in the Member States. This mapping will also include qualitative feedback from the data providers regarding their data provision to the NAPs (or their lack thereof). - Develop a roadmap to increase the number of MMTIS data providers on the NAPs, and to raise awareness on data quality, in line with the ambition to integrate all of them and taking into account the wide variety of stakeholders. Collect best practices and propose strategies to implement them at a larger scale, including communication towards data providers, with a specific attention for providers at a local level, both public and private.

T2.3 THEME: MULTIMODAL DATA (RE-)USE Foster re-using of data by multimodal mobility operators Activities and results: - Study existing international solutions in the multimodal field, where we find cross-border applications for multimodal journey planning in several regions of the Union. Those are often supported by national ministries or other government agencies/public authorities, and in some cases even by NAP operators. - Propose strategies to implement such solutions based on the lessons learned and to apply those solutions on a wider scale, if possible, integrating a large number of countries into such applications. This task will include feedback and experience sharing with multimodal mobility service providers. - Foster re-using of data by mobility operators, in their various mobility services, for instance by integrating planning, booking and ticketing into such services. Those mobility operators could also re-use data from other platforms or from the RTTI NAP. It could lead to more integrated and cross-border multimodal and unimodal services across Europe. - Activities will include providing an open-source demonstrator for multimodal data re-use purposes. Demonstrator will include capability to offer multimodal routing between different member states with standardised NAP data available.

T2.4 THEME: EU IDS FOR MULTIMODAL ACCESS NODES Study for an EU Identification System for Multimodal Mobility Access Nodes Activities and results: - To map existing access nodes identification schemes and tools in place to identify access nodes on a regional, international or Member State level. This mapping will take into account potential differences between transport modes and inquire whether or not multimodal access node ID systems exist as well. - To study, together with the concerned stakeholders, how an additional layer for an EU-wide identification system for multimodal mobility access nodes could be set up in a way that it is compatible with the existing systems in the Member States. To provide recommendations on what steps or requirements would be needed for a potential roll-out of the EU- wide access node ID system. This task is related to the obligation set out in the ITS Directive (2010/40/EU) to make data available in a digital machine- readable format for the data category concerning the location of those identified access nodes. One instrument helping to realize this new duty put on lots of data providers – given the numerous access nodes for all scheduled modes – will be such an “EU IDs”.

Work package WP3 – WORKING GROUP 3 – ROAD & TRAFFIC

Work Package Number WP3 Lead Beneficiary 42 - NL-MIN

Work Package Name WORKING GROUP 3 – ROAD & TRAFFIC

Start Month 1 End Month 30

Objectives

- To implement and coordinate domain specific tasks and subjects related to road & traffic information and management services, including interaction with broader mobility related initiatives, including e.g. cycling. - To promote and facilitate collaboration among NAP relevant stakeholders within the road and traffic sector, building on the achievements of NAPCORE. This includes engaging with external stakeholders to further develop coordinated strategies for data accessibility and usability.

14

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

- To share outcomes both within and beyond the NAPCORE community, ensuring broader awareness and harmonization of approaches among all stakeholders. - To develop common solutions and share best practices for NAP services that support road & traffic information and management data use cases. - To create awareness on future legislative actions from the EU affect the road traffic data domain, either being new legislation, or revision of existing. A concerted advice/recommendations/response from the NAPCORE community towards these actions with regard to the operational impact are foreseen. Domain Themes - A first set of domain themes is included in the following tasks. During the runtime of the project further domain themes can be added in an agile manner, whilst re-evaluating the effort to cover already existing domain themes. - Each domain theme will be managed by a task lead possibly supported by an Ambassador or an Ambassador team for the domain theme. Domain theme participants will as well be involved in Cross-functional Teams across the Working Groups.

Description

T3.1 DOMAIN & COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT To coordinate domain specific activities and foster strategical and tactical collaboration among stakeholders in road & traffic information and management sector. To enhance the management, quality, and availability of road and traffic data. This includes aligning with EU policies and ITS Delegated Regulations, managing domain-specific activities, and building a sustainable structure for public-private cooperation to support traffic information and management services. Activities: • Knowledge Agenda Development: - Develop and manage a knowledge agenda (roadmap) addressing key topics and themes derived from EU policies and RTTI, SRTI, and SSTP Delegated regulations, ensuring alignment with EU ITS Directives. • Stakeholder Engagement & Collaboration: - Promote and coordinate dialogue and interaction on the knowledge agenda (or roadmap), with relevant stakeholder groups to promote collaboration: ITS Service Providers, RTTI Task Force, TISA, DFRS, CCAM Partnership, C-Roads Platform, CEDR, POLIS, ERTICO and ERTICO related innovation platforms such as TN-ITS, TM2.0 etc. - Promote and coordinate collaboration with EU Corridor projects (like X4ITS, MATIS, MERIDIAN) and, where applicable, EU mobility data-generating projects, like potentially TISGRADE, to align scope, provide organisational and stakeholder support, and collect requirements for standardization in line with domain roadmap. - Establish a sustainable structure to facilitate and govern public-private agreements between EU-wide operating stakeholders in the domain and Member States. These agreements are in line with EU policy and regulations and can be settled in dedicated project settings, ensuring long-term alignment and sustainability. • Community Management: - Establish a network of representatives of national communities involved in the engagement of national stakeholders, inform and activate local participation in European activities. Each NAP (or NAP coordinating organisation) has a role to play in identifying the most suitable representative or organization of national communities in their country who can act as a contact person for a specific data domain. In particular, attention should be given to identifying the right organization to oversee the governance of national profiles in alignment with European standards. - A likely Ambassador (team) will be on RTTI, working closely with external initiatives like the RTTI Task Force or any Union funded project that takes up work in the field of RTTI. - Develop and coordinate an EU targeted outreach program tailored specifically for smaller operators, which can include workshops, toolkits and easy to use templates to help them align with NAPCORE or EU recommendations and standards. - For multi modal travel topics close collaboration with the WG2 activities will be established. • Communication & Capacity Building: - Facilitate engagement through regular communication and thematic workshops, at quarterly meetings (online or in person) to share updates, best practices, and results to keep the community informed. - Develop support materials for decision-makers and stakeholders to encourage the adoption of NAPCORE recommendations. - Provide training and education on road and traffic data standards at the national and local levels, following the recommendations from e.g. the declaration of Bucharest (DATEX II User forum 10-2024) via the NAPCORE Academy. Results: - A periodically updated roadmap for road and traffic information and management developments and their expected impacts on standards and architecture, including recommendations for improvements to NAP standards, data models, and Level of Service concepts. - Enhanced collaboration and alignment among stakeholders through shared best practices, strategies, and solutions for data use cases.

15

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

- Established agreements supporting EU policies and fostering long-term cooperation between stakeholders. - Comprehensive outreach materials and support tools tailored for decision-makers and smaller operators, which will be made available via the NAPCORE Academy. - A well-connected and informed community capable of reaching all relevant stakeholders for effective knowledge management and implementation. Improved data management practices ensuring high-quality, accessible, and interoperable road and traffic data to support traffic information and management services.

T3.2 THEME DIGITAL INTERACTIVE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT The primary goal is to foster public-private collaborations for the implementation of digital interactive traffic management. Digital interactive traffic management is multi-dimensional: collaboration between road operators to have joint traffic management operations across their operational borders (so not only national, but also on regional and even local level). The second dimension of interactive traffic management is about using the digital assets of service providers as active components in traffic management, with agreed and possibly contracted, guaranteed and possibly rewarded outcomes. This requires further and deeper elaborated collaboration between all actors in the value-chain.

This approach focuses on the application of digital technologies, systems, and services within a multi-party ecosystem aiming to support road traffic managers to optimize traffic flow, enhance safety, and reduce environmental impacts, while considering European policies on sustainability, mobility, and data sharing. This involves translating (digitizing or digitalizing) current and future traffic management policies, strategies, regulations, and processes into digital format, that facilitate data and information sharing between public authorities, private mobility providers, and road operators. The goal is to develop collaborative strategies and coordinated roadside and in-vehicle traffic management services, with support of the TM2.0 ERTICO Innovation Platform. Important developments like kerbside management and coherent public space management, dynamic usage of truck parking zones etc. will be taken on board in this theme, as interaction with the end-user (via service providers) are critical for the road operators to achieve their aims. By leveraging (real-time) data, predictive analytics, and connected infrastructure, digital traffic management enables improved coordination between travellers, vehicles, road operators, and the broader EU mobility system.

Activities: - Analyse requirements for transition to digital format and identify best practices in cooperation with Task 5.2 - Joint roadmap development for digital interactive traffic management and its use cases - Define and develop cross-border use cases where digital traffic management solutions can be applied and requiring harmonised approach. - Define the role of the NAP and features supporting Digital interactive traffic management use cases in accordance with EU mobility and digital policies and initiatives Results: - Cooperation agreements in line with EU policies and regulations - Recommendations for EU and stakeholders' initiatives - Recommendations for WG4 and WG5 on data standards and NAP architecture enhancement (features, data models, etc.) and NAP Level of Service

T3.3 THEME ALTERNATIVE FUELS To enhance stakeholder collaboration on the collection, management, and accessibility of data related to alternative fuels infrastructure (AFI) in line with the European Union's policies to facilitate transition to cleaner economies. This includes improving data-sharing frameworks and collaboration among public and private stakeholders, in alignment with the EU Delegated Regulation on RTTI and the EU Delegated Regulation on Alternative Fuels Infrastructure (EU DR AFIR), and to closely cooperate with the STF workgroup in DG MOVE and EAFO. The management of alternative fuels infrastructure related data focuses on the availability of static data and dynamic data concerning alternative fuels infrastructure, such locations, available facilities and operational status of (EV) recharging points and refuelling points. Coordination work with EAFO, FIER. AVERE, Eco-movement, etc. to consolidate the needs of users and third parties in the harmonisation work. Activities: - Define best practices for data collection, production, quality management, and sharing between stakeholders in compliance with EU policy and regulations on AFIR and RTTI. - Define the role of the NAP and features supporting management of AFI related data in accordance with EU mobility and digital policy, regulations and initiatives. - Act as a mediator between CPOs and NAPs to align on a common API standard used in the EU - Support the parallel running implementations on AF related data, collect feedback and iterate any issues back.

16

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Results: - Cooperation agreements in line with EU policies and regulations - Recommendations for EU and stakeholders' initiatives - Recommendations for WG4 and WG5 on data standards and NAP architecture enhancement (features, data models, API standard etc.) and NAP Level of Service - Deliverable: Roadmap for Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Data

Work package WP4 – WORKING GROUP 4 – DATA STANDARDS & ARCHITECTURE

Work Package Number WP4 Lead Beneficiary 24 - FR-MIN

Work Package Name WORKING GROUP 4 – DATA STANDARDS & ARCHITECTURE

Start Month 1 End Month 30

Objectives

Ensure proper data standards that are well aligned and harmonised in combination with a robust architecture across the domains of multimodal and road traffic data, the NAP’s itself as well as the architecture of the mobility data ecosystems as a whole. The work for a specific domain is done in a named task within this Working Group Each domain has an autonomous Change Management Board (CMB) that controls the scope of the standardisation effort for the domain. A Change Orchestration Board (COB) manages the cross-cutting interoperability aspects of the different domains and the overarching architecture and acts as the decisive body on the allocation of new topics for standardisation to tasks or proposal for new standards as such, taking the results of WG 4 in NAPCORE as a basis. Where standardisation action is required that does not fit in NAPCORE (for budget or scope reasons) this WG will bring it as input in the annual IT Rolling Plan from the Commission. All tasks operate according to a joint Terms of Reference / Rules of Procedure in order to be transparent and well- structured to address joint work items in a coherent manner. The process to allocate work is done in an agile way, in order to be capable to manage the content of the foreseen deliverables according to demands of the communities within the domains. There are several external stakeholder community platforms at European level that act as a funnel for use case and domain requirements to the standards. The CMB and Technical Board (TB) will be open to representation of these platforms to co-steer the developments of the standards and contribute to the technical work relevant for their community. The collaboration will be managed in Working Groups 2 and 3 as such and governed by the afore mentioned Terms of Reference. Community management in WG 2 and 3 will safeguard that relevant stakeholders can bring their inputs, also when no representation in the governance of the standards is in place.

NAPCORE Change Orchestration Board (COB) • Chaired by the Working Group leading Member State. • Consists of the CMB chairs (and their seconded experts) and Technical Board (TB) chairs. • Orchestrate harmonisation and alignment between standards and have a permanent monitoring of required standardisation needs. These include architectural aspects, data standards and profiles on the content side, and documentation, available deployment helpdesk etc on the support side. • Assignment of new topics to data standards involved. • Manage relationship with CEN and ISO for the relevant standards mainly focussing on CEN TC 278 and ISO TC 204.

D&A Stakeholder Advisory Board (data standards and architecture as subgroup of the AB on top level) The D&A Stakeholder Advisory Board will act as a platform to disseminate knowledge, experiences and receive feedback on new developments and dovetail on relevant issues or new developments in the sectors. Participants in the D&A STAB can be public and private organisations, mostly active outside NAPCORE. The D&A STAB will act as a subgroup of the Advisory Board in WG 7. However, participation in the D&A STAB is not limited to Advisory Board members. Objective: To stay connected to the “outside” environment regarding new developments and possible new requirements. The D&A STAB and its members have a limited task: Provide (asked for or not) advice to the COB and its CMB’s, both on strategic and technical level.

The organisation of the tasks: Each task has the same structure and governance. Change Management Board – CMB (one for each domain)

17

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

- Chaired by leading Member State also known as Task Leader. - Consists of representatives of the Member States with operational responsibility/interest for/in the standard, in combination with the mandate to control the budget allocation to work items of interest. - Define the functional scope and prioritise the work according to available budget and shown interest by active contributors. It decides on what is done. Constraints and preconditions of cross sectoral alignment as determined by the COB are taken on board without any further preconditions. - The annual workplan shall figure out the scope of work. A consolidated WG 4 annual workplan for standardisation related work shall be endorsed by the SCOM as well as modifications during the year. - Decides on the workplan progress report. - Mandate within the scope of the standards for the domain and the defined milestones and budgets. Task leader Is acting as CMB chairman and is responsible for - Daily management, administration, communication, etc. - Monitoring technical and functional progress and milestones defined in the task - Reporting to the CMB, including deviations and suggested mitigation actions related to the workplan. Technical Board – TB - TB is chaired by a senior expert, assigned by the CMB and for efficiency reasons preferably from the same Member State as the Task Lead. - Consisting of WG Leaders and active Beneficiaries in the task. - TB is responsible for quality of technical/content and how the assigned scope and work is executed within the constraints given. - Prepare annual progress report and draft workplan.

Generic Task structure and work process Each task has the same structure in which the work scope and prioritisation is under control of the CMB, executed in a coordinated way in work items controlled by a TB. Each task will have at least the following subtasks: • Continue to develop and adapt the (de facto) standards by following the structured process of: o Stakeholder consultation to collect requirement in close collaboration WG 2 and/or WG 3 o Assessing functional demands stemming from the operational implementation of the ITS Directive, and its consecutive Delegated Regulations in the Member States, their modifications and other relevant regulations affecting the mobility data ecosystem. o Continue to support the full scope of the standards if they serve a wider scope than data provision according to the EU ITS Directive related Delegated Regulations. o Have expert teams in work items for requirement engineering and proposal drafting to hand over to CEN/ISO for formal standardisation process o Creating European domain consensus about modifications to the standards o Managing the implementation of the agreed modifications to the standards through either:

- drafting and submitting updates (or new parts) of standardised parts to CEN - submitting proposals for new (parts of) standards ICT-rolling workplan towards CEN

o Maintaining the existing (parts of the) standards according to the CEN revision scheme and process the comments into revised updates. o Make the digital artefacts on which the CEN publications are based publicly available. o Maintain and update the existing digital artifacts on which the CEN publications are based. o Offer a managed issue reporting and response process, supported with a standardised issue tracker for the reporting and tracing of issues. Scope of this process comprises the total environment of the managed standards, profiles, documentation and training material. There is a team to respond to the issues promptly and documented in the tool. o Mapping/alignment with other standards/specifications relevant in the domain and used for either service provision or data-ecosystems beyond the scope the ITS Directive • Define and maintain minimum EU profiles for the data categories as mentioned in the EU Delegated Regulations under a CMB controlled change management process (aligned on COB level) and provide adequate documentation both on semantical and technical level.

This essential implementation material supports the publication of data in line with the reference standards. It is the most prominent outcome for data holders implementing the Delegated Regulations. Complementary to CEN standards, the profiles are developed and maintained under the governance of NAPCORE. Currently some profiles are included in CEN deliverables, while national profiles are developed by Member States. This approach will be deprecated in future updates of these standards. • Develop a recommendation for the lifecycle of use of standards versions and versions of EU minimum profiles. The deployment of the standards in the Member States will become visible in the deployment roadmap in WG7.

18

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

• Technical and implementation support: - Staffing and organisation of the backend of the NAPCORE Helpdesk (as in WG 8): o Transmodel, NeTEx, SIRI, OJP generic and specifically on the MMTIS DR o DATEX II, TN-ITS generic and specifically on the RTTI, SRTI and SSTP DR o mobilityDCAT-AP • Create and maintain training material for the NAPCORE Academy (in WG 8) in context of NAPCORE Academy on four levels: Basics, Users, Masters and Experts, addressing the different target groups of policy makers/managers, functional domain experts/information architects and developers creating the software. Mirror sub task for the cross-cutting work that can be expanded with domain specific use cases both in WG 4 and in WG 5.

Description

T4.1 ROAD AND TRAFFIC DATA STANDARD DATEX II Development and maintenance of DATEX II standards (including TN-ITS) in the frame of CEN TC278/WG8 Continue developing standards for: o Data registration as required by the DR MMTIS, RTTI, SRTI and SSTP, in order to be able to be used by data holders and consumers addressing among others: cycling use cases, updates of objects in (HD) maps, feedback loop, AFIR regulated data. o Define and integrate the use of European Functional Road Classes to be used in the context of Traffic Circulation plans in line with the concepts that are agreed by the road operators in the RTTI Taskforce and the respective POLIS working groups. o Traffic management operations Alignment/harmonisation/coordination: - Liaison with DFRS, TISA, C-ROADS, Car2Car, APDS, STF working group data and others on the interoperability aspects of data concepts in relation to specific services and to provide DATEX II as interoperable reference standard where needed. - Mapping of DATEX II to the relevant datasets that originate from specific services to offer compliancy with the requirements from the relevant Delegated Regulations Standards developments: − Exchange updates to support the standardised NAP centric ecosystem. Domain specific updates to support the centre- to-centre communication taking digital interactive traffic management into account. Roadmap of DATEX II v.4 publications according to CEN timelines. Work will be done on the parts of in the yellow block representing the runtime of NAPCORE-X. The final order of which parts will be taken up when is to be determined by the CMB. Recommended Reference Profile developments: o Create new and maintain existing MMTIS, RTTI (including AFIR), SRTI, and SSTP minimum EU reference profiles for the relevant data types/categories when required by the stakeholder communities or modifications in the regulations. o Create and maintain ITS service specific profiles and support for the road operator defined ITS services like the EU- EIP ITS services. o Setup sustainable governance process on the EU profiles aligned with MMTIS profile governance o Produce documentation how to use the profiles and where needed: how to create national profiles Support and dissemination: In addition to the activities described at WG 4 level: Organise one DATEX II User Forum in close collaboration with WG 8

T4.2 MOBILITY DATA ECOSYSTEM ARCHITECTURE Design and manage the architecture for the NAP centric mobility data ecosystems deemed relevant by the Member States. The common European mobility data space (EMDS) and the European Access Point for Alternative Fuels Infrastructure are important developments to be addressed, as well as the provision of public authority data via the Open Data Portals. This task addresses the clarifications of the concepts in a NAP centric (federated) data-ecosystem and further elaborates the aspects of data integration and interoperability on conceptual level, but also on technical level, in taking into consideration the NAPCORE NAP Reference Architecture maintained in Taks 4.6 NAP Interoperability. Therefore, the standardisation aspects of the data-ecosystem as a whole are addressed in here including some cross- cutting topics on technical interoperability level such as exchange technology, patterns for synchronisation, cybersecurity and trust also in combination with domain specific developments that require similar concepts. Monitor and assess requirements stemming from ITS and related legislation Permanent process to monitor whether new topics that require either adaptation of the architectures or the data standards and profiles and data-exchange technology (and where applicable in combination cybersecurity solutions). Architectures of NAP-Centric mobility data ecosystems

19

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

The ITS Directive defines a mobility data ecosystem with the NAP as the central point of information on what data, with what meta properties is available and where to find it. Stakeholders are looking for a better understanding of what actors exist in the ecosystem, how they relate, how data is exposed, contracted and used. The common European mobility data space is one way to feed data into an ecosystem, however there are more relevant data ecosystems that use other building blocks. This task will provide the related business, process and technical architectures (based on FRAME NEXT) for the different ecosystems. An important subject is the standardisation of the concept of the feedback loop as mentioned in the regulations (to be aligned with other initiatives addressing this). The second iteration of the architecture will include the cybersecurity and trust building blocks that are required for an interoperable trustworthy value chain. Cybersecurity, trust and data authenticity All actors need to take cybersecurity measures in order to make the data provision safe and secure. Especially, to bring trustworthiness and confidence that data is really originating from a reliable source in an open data environment, there is a big interest in interoperable choices. This affects the trust levels among stakeholders down to the technical measures to achieve this. Without further alignment on this subject the implemented solutions will by definition be not interoperable, causing a lot of additional costs and potential failure of the concept. The outcomes of this work item will be integral part of the architectural deliverables of this task as well as the exchange specifications for the domain specific standards. Data publication/interchange/exchange alignment Standardised deployment of the technical interfaces (API’s) with regard to exchange technology and platforms, in combination with harmonised cybersecurity measures is a cross domain cutting effort to achieve interoperable access to the different data holder's data. At least standardised solutions for snapshot publications, delta publications and standardised push interfaces for low latency data services will be defined. (where possible cross domain, but at least within each domain). Staffing of this work item is addressed jointly with Tasks 4.1 and 4.3. The results will be reflected in the exchange specifications of the related standards in these working groups Joint toolkit for schema creation and creation of deployable technical artefacts such as profiles For both the multimodal as the road and traffic data domain tooling is required to get from the UML data models to the deployable artefacts such as schema-files and profile management. This activity will explore how the existing tooling can be merged into a joint tool and then have the COB and related CMB’s to decide to pursue this development. The result should be one open-source tool, under the governance of the COB. Staffing of this work item is addressed jointly with Tasks 4.1 and 4.3. (The validation tooling is developed in scope of task 5.2) Recommended use of version of standards roadmap over the data categories in the different Delegated Regulations Which version of the standards shall be used over time (fade in of new versions versus deprecation of older versions) will be provided in combination with the relevant recommended reference profiles or EU minimum profiles according to MMTIS. The recommendation which version of standards to use should be an important input to the national deployment roadmaps.

T4.3 MULTIMODAL STANDARDS Multimodal standards based on Transmodel are required by DR MMTIS to feed travel information services. By design, they can also ensure interoperability at the operational level. Specific travel information standards exist and they are often simpler, making them more attractive. However, interoperability at the operational level is essential to produce good-quality data. Standards can also reduce costs of implementation and improve the overall quality of the systems in the market. In this context, it is important to give MMTIS standards the credit they deserve. The goal of this task is to coordinate the efforts at EU level to pursue MMTIS standards development and encourage their implementation through the following actions: Alignment/harmonisation/coordination: - Setup sustainable governance and funding scheme for the Transmodel ecosystem, standards (Transmodel, NeTEx, SIRI, OJP, OpRa) and related profiles aligned with road and traffic ecosystem. - Define a strategy to align Transmodel-based standards with standards used in the rail sector and road traffic. - Liaison with existing open specifications GTFS/GBFS. - Mapping of NeTEx and SIRI with GBFS updated specs – potentially also with GTFS. - Liaison with projects where public transport standards are involved (participation in advisory boards). Standards developments: - Development, maintenance and update of Transmodel-based standards in collaboration with CEN TC278/WG3 and in coordination with WG2. - Development, maintenance and update of technical artefacts (schemas, examples, GitHub etc.) related to Transmodel- based standards. - Development of an interoperable standard for buying and booking tickets - Update standards to apply governance recommendations. Profile developments: - Create and maintain MMTIS minimum EU profiles for some data categories/types to be defined when relevant.

20

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

- Produce relevant documentation, examples and material to encourage adoption of standards. - Produce guidelines to support the production and the use of national profiles (common basis for cross-border interoperability, identification of what exists and could be re-used, etc.). Support and dissemination: In addition to the activities described at WG 4 level: Support training activities as described in WG 8

Produce examples to illustrate implementation of MMTIS.

T4.4 METADATA SPECIFICATIONS Definition and maintenance of common metadata catalogues, taking into account the need to contribute with harmonised metadata to the common European mobility data space. Monitor the use of metadata in the NAPs and their contribution to the common European mobility data space The initial release of mobilityDCAT-AP was elaborated and published under the former NAPCORE runtime. This new metadata specification has drawn a lot of attention in the NAP community and beyond, such as at the EMDS community. In particular, many NAPs are underway to implement mobilityDCAT-AP as part of their metadata structures, and the recent EMDS study “Study in support of the creation of the common European mobility data space” has explicitly recommended mobilityDCAT-AP as the base standard for the EMDS interlinking layer. Basing on this success story, the maintenance, governance, support and promotion activities for mobilityDCAT-AP will be seamlessly continued under the new project. The maintenance and governance part includes ongoing issue tracking on the mobilityDCAT-AP data model via the established GitHub collaboration platform, as well as the planning and online publication of future mobilityDCAT-AP versions. In this process, requirements and perspectives from EMDS stakeholders will be equally considered. The support and promotion part will ensure that all adopters of mobilityDCAT-AP will be supported via dedicated guidance (at webinars, wikis etc.), but also via bilateral consultations. This also includes a monitoring of the usage of mobilityDCAT-AP across Europe, and further elaboration of mobilityDCAT-AP integration in the EMDS deployments. The material will be produced here and made available via the NAPCORE Academy in Task 8.5. A new work item will deal with access mechanisms for metadata on NAPs and other platforms. This goes beyond the mobilityDCAT-AP data model as such, which rather describes the metadata contents in an interoperable manner. The access mechanism will also address the question, how to access metadata, once published in mobilityDCAT-AP, also in in interoperable manner. This work item will, among others, deep dive into API and harvesting technologies, and address situations where big amounts of metadata need to be efficiently accessed in federated or centralised systems. This work will also aim for a harmonisation of such technologies, both among NAPs and in the EMDS ecosystem. Further activities will include a wider outreach to and collaboration with actors outside the ITS/NAP domain, including stakeholders in interoperability, open data and semantic technologies. This includes the SEMIC/Interoperability group at DG DIGIT, but also other experts in the cited domains. The outreach will be organised via dedicated exchange meetings and conference contributions. Altogether, the following sub-tasks are foreseen under the metadata task: · Maintenance and governance of mobilityDCAT-AP (continued from NAPCORE) · Support and promotion activities for mobilityDCAT-AP (continued from NAPCORE) · Integration with EMDS ecosystem (continued from NAPCORE) · Harmonisation of access mechanisms for metadata (new) · Outreach and collaboration with stakeholders (continued/extended from NAPCORE)

T4.5 METR (MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRONIC TRAFFIC REGULATIONS) METR is a set of standards to align the total value chain of traffic rule maker to the end-user of traffic rules (either being traffic regulation orders, traffic laws or other orders) affecting the use of the roads (and public space) in their jurisdiction. The goal is to set up a trustable data value chain, that is fully auditable and is resilient in legal practice of enforcement in case of automated driving in the future. This requires reference architecture on business level, information level, exchange level, trust framework and cybersecurity concepts for the full ecosystem as a whole. To have an interoperable ecosystem, global concepts are required that need regionalisation per continent and from there profiling and mapping to national and local level. Having the reference to standardised roles, vocabularies, interactions between roles and systems including feedback is identified by several member states as seriously helpful in organising the implementation of the RTTI Delegated Regulation and a necessity to be organised in a structured way that creates interoperability of data provision in Europe. The global concept is developed and standardised in ISO. This task is to collect, assess and engineer the European requirements and ensure that the global concept supports these. This goes hand in hand with the development and standardisation of the European specific profiles standards complying with European legislation and policies like the ITS Directive, NIS2 Directive, Data Governance Act and the operational concepts and standards stemming from that. This task will address the development and maintenance of the METR standards in the frame of CEN TC278/WG17 in

21

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

collaboration with the corresponding work in ISO. The work in NAPCORE will focus on how to make METR work in a NAP centric data ecosystem (among others EMDS) using the EU standards like DATEX II, TN-ITS, as well as building on the trust framework developed for C-ITS. Therefore, the following activities will be taken on board: - Organise the European public stakeholder engagement and European governance on regional European scope and stakeholder position with regard to the following standards parts: o Part 1: Vocabulary o Part 2: Operational Concept (ConOps) o Part 3: System of System Requirements (SoSR) o Part 4: Regulation System Requirements (RSR) o Part 5: Distribution System Requirements (DSR) o Part 6: Consumer System Requirements (CSR) o Part 7: Discrepancy Handing System Requirements (DHSR) o Part 8: METR Data Requirements (MDR) o Part 9: METR Maps o Part 10: METR Cybersecurity (formal name TBD) o Part 11: ITS Station unit requirements

- Participate in the global METR management team that controls scope purpose and development strategy of the global METR initiatives. - Establish collaboration with stakeholder communities in Europe within the NAPCORE collaboration framework. - Organise EU stakeholder requirement collection - Set up central European requirement engineering team(s) that formulate EU positions, proposals and comments to be fed into formal CEN and ISO processes - Propose changes to DATEX II and TN-ITS specifications to fulfil METR requirements, as they are the reference standards for publishing this data. - Develop user guidance with regards to create the national and local policies. - Assess the conditions for access to the METR standard and specifications for European SMEs, local authorities and other stakeholders and facilitate ideally free access to them (e.g. by ensuring that the work is done under Vienna Agreement (which make them CEN standards as well) and also promoting the production of national standards and guidance).

T4.6 NAP INTEROPERABILITY Enhancing the interoperability and compatibility of National Access Points (NAPs) through standardized reference features (e.g., access, management, user interface) and harmonizing levels of service, while aligning with the NAPCORE NAP Reference Architecture and respecting the diverse architectural frameworks and investments of Member States. This requires aligning the development and updates of the NAP Reference Architecture with the assessment and analysis of the Level of Service (LoS) of NAPs, ensuring that both frameworks contribute to a more interoperable NAP ecosystem. A feedback loop between these two task branches is essential to continuously refine and harmonize their developments, addressing interoperability gaps and fostering coherent approaches across Member States. NAP Reference Architecture - Continue updating the NAP Reference Architecture to accommodate new multimodal and road and traffic data use cases and requirements also collected both in WG 2 and WG3, stemming from revisions of ITS Delegated Regulations (DRs), involved stakeholders, as well the need for interoperability within the NAP centric data ecosystem in collaboration with Task 4.2 (Mobility Data Ecosystem Architecture). - The update and maintenance activities include the continuous revision and adaptation of all architectural components, as well as the improvement and development of supporting tools and materials. - Monitor and analyse the use and implementation of the NAP Reference Architecture across the EU to provide input for ongoing updates and improvements. NAP Level of Service - Continuous maintenance and update of the NAP Level of Service KPI framework, considering market developments, stakeholders needs and NAP deployment roadmaps. - Updating the NLKF involves a comprehensive review of the framework’s Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). This includes revising their descriptions, adjusting relevance weights, and evaluating the inclusion or removal of specific features to ensure the framework aligns with market and legislative changes. - Carry out the yearly NAP Level of Service assessments with NAP operators to also ensure monitoring and continuous development of the harmonised description of NAP features and functionalities. - Identify gaps hindering NAP interoperability based on the outcome of Level of Service assessments.

22

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Work package WP5 – WORKING GROUP 5 – DATA PROVISION & USE

Work Package Number WP5 Lead Beneficiary 14 - CY-PWD

Work Package Name WORKING GROUP 5 – DATA PROVISION & USE

Start Month 1 End Month 30

Objectives

This Working Group has the objective to support the NAP's, data holders and data users with supporting toolkits to their role in the ecosystem. The NAP's act as central entity in the mobility data ecosystem as regulated by the ITS- Directive and therefore can oversee the data that is made available and tooling to create insights in the registered datasets will be developed. For data holders several tools are made available in which they can either create UVAR data, validate compliancy to standards, convert datasets, etc. These tools will be made available in a generic NAP-Store, so all stakeholders have access to the open-source tooling that is developed (in and outside the realm of NAPCORE). Data is useless if it is of insufficient quality. Quality has several dimensions and perceptions. In order to achieve an interoperable data ecosystem, common understanding of quality concepts and data items is required.

Description

T5.1 NAP DATA INSIGHTS AND REPORTING SUPPORT Task 5.1 intends to support Member States (MSs) in fulfilling their reporting obligations under the ITS Directive and connected Delegated Regulations (DRs), ensuring a coherent EU-wide approach, and enrich their overview on all aspects connected to data availability on the NAPs. Streamlining the strategies of assessment on data availability on the NAPs, through the analysis of different methods, including, voluntary surveys, showcases of individual NAPs and the adoption of the mobilityDCAT-AP, are key aspects considered. Two work items will be taken up: − Continuation of the work in the NAPCORE project to provide and improve MS’s insights and knowledge on, including but not limited to: o data availability of the different data categories/types connected to the different DRs, o standards and technical specifications (and corresponding versions) used, o geographical and network coverage. − Recommendations on processes and mechanisms for Member States. The reporting process regarding the implementation of the ITS-Directive and connected DRs (e.g., Progress and implementation reports) will benefit from specific guidelines to assist, simplify, align and ensure compliance in the MSs reporting obligations. This will be assisted through tooling which will be developed to harvest and validate automatically these data from the mobilityDCAT-AP publication on the NAP. Output of the tool is a metadata collection that can be used as base in the official MS reports to DG MOVE.

T5.2 TOOLS Facilitate the availability of digital tools assisting in the value chain from data holder to data consumer; envisioning one tool per use case. This will be achieved by marketing, development and maintenance of tools. The tools shall be available to and usable by any stakeholder across Europe, thus development of national tooling is out of scope. Collaboration with WG4 will be actively pursued to ensure the tools adhere to architectural requirements, such as interoperability, scalability, and compliance with EU data standards. There are following dimensions of the task: • Domains: such as DATEX II, TN-ITS, SIRI, NeTEx, UVARBOX etc. • Use case types: such as message profiling, schema generation, (structural and semantic) validation, message conversion; compliance of exchange protocols with standards and cybersecurity requirements; data quality assessment; collecting user’s perception of provided service etc. • Development stages: such as identification of a need, requirements engineering, feasibility study, pilot, production etc. • Communication and processes: such as governance, promoting good practices and marketing existence of the tools. Long term structured governance on the maintenance of this tooling shall be proposed, set up and run. A “NAP-Store” website shall be set up and maintained to promote existence of tools available (what includes relevant tools developed elsewhere). Tools developed within this task shall use an open-source license. Tools to develop, operate and maintain: - UVARBOX tools upgrade to DATEX II v3.6 or higher of the Traffic regulation model and expansion of the regulations and restrictions data types

23

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

- Conversion tools allowing upgrade of message schemas and messages to higher version of respective standards. - Conversion tools from domain specific standards to reference standards, namely converting parking information from APDS to NeTEx and DATEX II - Tools for data validation: o Structural conformance to a schema derived from unprofiled and profiled content model for respective domains/ standards o Additional basic semantical checks-based plausibility of the data. o Validation of cybersecurity aspects. Topics for requirement engineering and feasibility study: - Compliance certification programme and toolkit of data producing systems, including recommendations for development of such a toolkit - Enhanced and automated data quality assessment - Feedback mechanism/system to track how data consumers perceive the quality, completeness, and reliability of the data

T5.3 DATA QUALITY Ensure a coherent data quality approach across all NAP systems, implementing checks and standards where necessary. The work will focus on enabling automation of the processes, enhancing digitalization, and ensuring high-quality data through robust metadata management. The following subtasks will be addressed in a coherent manner: Data Dictionary Continuation of the NAPCORE work for further development of the Data Dictionary, considering the developments in the relevant domains and outcomes of the liaison processes with the stakeholder communities on one hand, and the formal standardisation of concepts on the other hand. The scope of the Data Dictionary should be expanded, among others by railway data, which due to its complexity requires dedicated attention. Specific focus should be placed on harmonizing data definitions and standards. Data quality frameworks Continuation of the NAPCORE and DATA4PT work, considering results from previous, ongoing and emerging EU- projects and platforms such as EU-EIP and C-ROADS, for further development of a sustainable coherent data quality framework for the full scope of the EU Delegated Regulations. This framework will incorporate automation in data validation processes, leveraging standardized metadata structures to evaluate dimensions such as accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and reliability. Automated workflows for data quality checks, compliance assessment, and reporting will be explored, in collaboration with National Bodies (NBs). Community management in WG 2 and 3 will ensure that the interdependencies between the other initiatives and NAPCORE are managed. The EU data quality framework will be developed per Delegated Regulation, considering the developments in the relevant domains. This is a strategic aspect of the Delegated Regulations. The data quality frameworks will address minimum quality requirements on data to be suitable for re-use in specific use cases. Data quality agreements to support service delivery. The framework should also build on existing cross-domain methodology developed in NAPCORE and used by DATEX@NAPs study, to ensure consistency across different data domains and transport modes. Alignment with Sectoral Data Quality Standards Alignment with the sectoral data quality standards such as the TISA 5-star rating model and comparable actions done in the RTTI-taskforce and emerging EU projects like TISGRADE. These agreements will aim to harmonize digital service delivery by integrating feedback loops for data providers, promoting standardized validation mechanisms, and fostering the adoption of automated quality evaluation tools. The framework should also emphasize the importance of data quality agreements to support interoperability and reusability in different transport domains. These agreements should address the minimum quality requirements necessary for effective service delivery and user confidence.

Work package WP6 – WORKING GROUP 6 – COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT & NATIONAL BODIES

Work Package Number WP6 Lead Beneficiary 8 - AT-ATE

Work Package Name WORKING GROUP 6 – COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT & NATIONAL BODIES

Start Month 1 End Month 30

Objectives

Coordinate with National Bodies to assess compliance and provide operational support.

24

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

The main objective of this Working Group is to further harmonise the compliance assessment process carried out by National Bodies/National Authorities for the Delegated Regulations (EU) Nr. 885/2013 (information services for safe and secure parking places for trucks and commercial vehicles), Nr. 886/2013 (provision of road safety-related minimum universal traffic information), Nr. 2022/670 (provision of EU-wide real-time traffic information services) and Nr. 2017/1926 (revised) (provision of EU-wide multimodal travel information services). This entails the coordination and further enhancement of National Bodies on a European level in order to evaluate and further refine harmonised strategies for compliance assessment and (multi-) national enforcement and evaluate strategies and recommendations for handling non-compliance in the Member States. Moreover, guidelines for the use of electronic tools to support the compliance assessment process will be developed and options for a possible multi-country/European body for National Body functions will be evaluated and defined. In addition, the Working Group will offer operational support to National Bodies through the possible further conceptualisation, development and implementation of ENBOSS (the European National BOdy Support System, as conceptualized in NAPCORE’s WG5), stakeholder communication the support of the implementation of the National Body Reference Architecture in the Member States and the continuous monitoring of the progress of National Bodies and compliance assessment across Europe. Finally, the National Body recommendations for harmonisation will be continuously enhanced and refined, taking into account the revision of Delegated Regulations as well as the evaluation of the compliance assessment process by National Bodies. In order to further improve the compliance assessment process, new quality packages as well as semi-automated tools, which can facilitate the process, will be analysed.

Description

T6.1 STRATEGIES FOR NATIONAL BODY COORDINATION AND NON-COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT Coordinate National Bodies on a European level to ensure compliance with standards and protocols, further refine and evaluate strategies for compliance assessment and identify enforcement options in case of non-compliance. o Evaluate and refine harmonised strategies for compliance assessment and enforcement: This task will build upon strategies and recommendations elaborated during the first phase of NAPCORE; these strategies will be evaluated and refined where necessary. Moreover, options for (multi-) national enforcement will be identified. Therefore, legal knowledge needs to be intensified. o Refine and evaluate strategies and actions for non-compliance: This task builds upon the process and recommendations drafted in M5.8 (Strategies and actions for non-compliance defined), which will be evaluated and refined as needed. Moreover, first steps will be taken to monitor and evaluate the implementation of non-compliance measures on the national level. The work will involve benchmarking on compliance strategies in other sectors and making an inventory of Member States having adopted national policies and assessing their impact and capacity for putting them forward as best practices. o Definition and evaluation of possible long-term, sustainable legal and organizational structures and governance options for a multi-country or European-level body to take on certain functions (to be defined) of MS National Bodies

T6.2 OPERATIONAL SUPPORT TO NATIONAL BODIES Provide operational support to existing and newly established National Bodies to promote and foster harmonisation o Support existing and newly established National Bodies with the implementation of the NAPCORE recommendations on Compliance Assessment. Providing expert advice and guidance to national bodies to ensure the proper application of the recommendations from the NAPCORE project. o Communication with international stakeholders on behalf of multiple/all National Bodies. This can include creating and regularly updating a stakeholder contact list to ensure its accuracy and relevance, as well as organizing stakeholder events and consultation activities. o Further conceptualisation, feasibility study or development, implementation, operation and management of a multi- national or European level support system for National Bodies (ENBOSS), as developed by NAPCORE and described in M5.10 (European National Bodies cooperation -Prototypical process for multi-national self-declarations and compliance assessment). o Continuous maturity level assessment of National Bodies and exchange of experiences between National Bodies: This task includes the continuous progress monitoring of National Bodies and will provide options for sharing good practices and exchanging experiences between National Bodies. o Support the implementation of the National Body Reference Architecture in the Member States: This task will build upon M5.9 (Development of National Body Reference Architecture); the goal is to further refine and implement the National Body Reference Architecture in the Member States.

T6.3 NATIONAL BODY HARMONISATION AND ALIGNMENT

25

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Work on enhanced harmonised recommendations and templates for compliance assessment to improve project deployment and national-level execution. o Analyse new quality packages for compliance assessment usage: This entails the definition of common evaluation criteria and the analysis of quality packages regarding their suitability to be included into the compliance assessment process and templates. o Test and implement semi-automated tools in the Compliance Assessment process: This will build upon the work on semi-automated tools carried out within the first phase of NAPCORE. The existing list of validator tools will be analysed; identification of which tools can be used at which process steps of the compliance assessment process o Develop guidelines for the electronic support of compliance assessment: This entails analysing tools and options for the electronic support of the compliance assessment process and developing recommendations/guidelines on the use of such tools o Continuous monitoring and evaluation of the compliance assessment process and adaptation of compliance assessment and self-declaration forms and templates: This task includes the adaptation of compliance assessment forms and templates according to revisions of the Delegated Regulations as well as the continuous evaluation of the compliance assessment process according to the experiences made by National Bodies.

Work package WP7 – WORKING GROUP 7 – GOVERNANCE & STRATEGY

Work Package Number WP7 Lead Beneficiary 8 - AT-ATE

Work Package Name WORKING GROUP 7 – GOVERNANCE & STRATEGY

Start Month 1 End Month 30

Objectives

Develop strategies for a NAPCORE long-term governance, ensuring the sustainability of the coordination of Member States in NAPCORE. This WG is dealing with all issues concerning the long-term set up of the National Access Points and National Bodies (NBs) harmonisation as well as with considering foreseeable future and upcoming requirements, challenges or developments that NAPs and NBs will face. The NAPs and NBs need to reflect on recent and future developments having implications on either their scope, functionality or operational level. Moreover, the position and role of the NAPs/NBs in European policies will be analysed and the embedding within relevant policies will be promoted. Additionally, the strategy of the NAP/NB platform concerning other mobility data related players, new technological developments as well as within the common European mobility data space will be developed. In addition, this WG is concerned with the organisation and management of Member State alignment and decision making regarding the harmonised operational deployment of National Access Points according to the ITS Directive and the establishment of sustainable coalitions with relevant major stakeholders, organisations, associations and projects in the mobility sector.

Description

T7.1 STEERING COMMITTEE & ADVISORY BOARD Manage the Steering Committee as main strategic steering and decision-making body regarding NAP/NB harmonisation. Each Member State and country implementing a National Access Point is part of the Steering Committee to endorse recommendations of strategic nature to facilitate harmonisation on topics listed in the ITS Directive Article 5.3, with the goal to include them in their national implementation roadmaps. In addition, this task manages the Advisory Board for governance and strategic input. o Organise Member State alignment and decision-making on the harmonised operational deployment of National Access Points according to the ITS Directive: Manage a Steering Body composed of EU Member States for strategic direction and approval of project results and organise at least two Steering Committee Meetings per year with representatives of every EU Member State and all additional project partners to receive input on strategy and governance, for approval of recommendations and results and alignment on the harmonised operational deployment of National Access Points according to the ITS Directive amongst all partners o Operational support of the Steering Committee: SCOM management, first-level support, setting up and managing Terms of Reference, organisation and post-preparation of Steering Committee Meetings o Identify the need for and subsequently define and agree on NAPCORE recommendations: This also involves increasing the level of commitment of the Member States towards the implementation of NAPCORE recommendations.

26

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Implementing roadmaps for each Member State shall serve as strategic guideline to achieve European NAP & NB harmonisation. The roadmaps shall include the definition of strategic objectives at mid (5 years) and longer (10 years) terms, in particular setting goals on data quality and availability, accessibility, and harmonisation of NAPs, while remaining compliant with EU legislation. o Within the first project year a guideline for designing national implementation roadmaps will be developed. The implementation roadmaps developed by the Member States will be collected iteratively on a quarterly basis and published in an aggregated manner in subsequent Steering Committee meetings. o Enable substantial coalitions with relevant major stakeholders, organisations, associations, projects and others for ITS Directive aims: Manage an Advisory Board with relevant sectoral associations including different sub-groups (e.g. on standardisation); organise at least two Advisory Board Meetings per year to facilitate dialogue with relevant external stakeholders on strategic topics; continuation and operationalisation of existing cooperation agreements, establishment of new cooperation agreements in conjunction with WG2 and WG3.

T7.2 STRATEGY Develop and execute strategies that align with the project's long-term goals. o Identify the need for action, create common strategies, define appropriate tasks among EU Member States, European Commission and NAP operators regarding challenges raised by global players and EU policy developments with relations to the ITS Directive and the NAPs; reach out and manage relations to relevant stakeholders: Possible strategies/ developments/topics could include: Common European mobility data space, AFIR Regulation(s), the Single Digital Gateway, GDPR, The New EU Urban Mobility Framework, TEN-T Regulation, Artificial Intelligence Act, High- Value Data sets, Data Governance Act, Data Act; the list of topics should be agile, allowing for the inclusion of new developments o Prioritize identified topics for work in other WGs, create common strategies, identify appropriate tasks among EU Member States, the European Commission, NAP operators and relevant stakeholders; Establish a process to identify, take up, and prioritise new topics of relevance for NAPs, National Bodies and support of the mobility data ecosystem in a flexible and agile way in cooperation with WG2 and WG3. o The NAP/NB platform also needs to locate itself within the common European mobility data space, e.g. regarding the participation in the interlinking layer. Hereto the key functions and benefits of the common European mobility data space will be collected, a possible ecosystem will be drafted and the potential role of the NAPs within this ecosystem will be defined in cooperation with WG3 and WG4 and with the Commission. To define interfaces with other stakeholders and initiatives the draft ecosystem will be exchanged and discussed with the relevant actors.

T7.3 LONG-TERM GOVERNANCE Create a sustainable, long-term governance structure to ensure the initiatives continuity beyond the initial implementation phase. o Based on the NAPCORE Outlook Paper 2024 – 2028 the Vision and the Mission of NAPCORE will be reflected and used as basis for defining strategic objectives at mid (5 years) and longer (10 years) terms, taking into consideration the implementation roadmaps of the Member States. o Assess the expectations of different stakeholders regarding the future responsibilities of NAPCORE, including those of the European Commission, in order to assess feasibility and propose a list of tasks and topics that could be covered by the future governance structure. o Define, agree on, and set up a roadmap towards a long-lasting sustainable governance structure that allows for a continuation of NAP/NB harmonisation activities beyond the timeframe of the project: This task builds upon, among others, NAPCORE’s M1.4 (Agreement on the long-term governance structure for the continuous operation of NAPCORE related tasks). The process of defining and setting up such a structure entails strategic coordination between the Member States (NAPs and National Bodies/Competent Authorities). o Lead discussions with Member States and the European Commission to identify the structure most appropriate to the objectives, expectations and financial possibilities of the partners. o Provide the necessary supporting documents for establishing a long-lasting sustainable governance structure and facilitate the process of the establishment of the long-lasting sustainable governance structure.

Work package WP8 – WORKING GROUP 8 – DISSEMINATION & COMMUNICATION

Work Package Number WP8 Lead Beneficiary 1 - DE-BAST

Work Package Name WORKING GROUP 8 – DISSEMINATION & COMMUNICATION

Start Month 1 End Month 30

27

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Objectives

The primary objective of WG8 "Dissemination & Communication" is to engage and inform stakeholders about NAPCORE-X's progress, achievements, and impact, ensuring transparency and fostering active participation. Task 8.1 focuses on managing all dissemination and communication activities to maintain consistency, clarity, and alignment with the project's strategic goals. Task 8.2, the NAP Support Center, provides targeted support and resources to NAPs, promoting effective implementation and collaboration. Task 8.3 emphasizes organizing impactful events, such as the NAPCORE Mobility Data Days, but also webinars, and virtual workshops, to create opportunities for dialogue, share results, and facilitate knowledge exchange with stakeholders. Task 8.4 ensures a strong digital presence through the creation and maintenance of a project website, active social media channels, and a Service Desk to provide timely updates and address inquiries. Finally, Task 8.5, Academy & Training, aims to build capacity and disseminate knowledge through structured training programs, ensuring the project’s outcomes are widely understood and leveraged both by all project partners and external stakeholders. These activities are designed to establish clear communication channels, foster stakeholder engagement, and ensure broad awareness of the project's achievements, while also acknowledging and making visible the essential support provided by EU funding.

Description

T8.1 OVERALL DISSEMINATION AND COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT Align all dissemination and communication activities of NAPCORE (including those related to the NAPCORE standards DATEX II, TN-ITS, NeTEx and SIRI) on a strategic level and handle all related challenges that are not covered in the other tasks of this Working Group. This includes: • Define a way and process to ensure coordinated and aligned stakeholder and community outreach and communication activities of all NAPCORE Working Groups and tasks • Create a Communication Strategy 2026-2027 and update it if there is a need for it • Registering a wordmark/trademark for “NAPCORE” and its logo • Oversee, manage and align activities of the tasks of this Working Group and communication related activities of other Working Groups

T8.2 NAP SUPPORT CENTER Provide support to the National Access Point operators for data sharing related topics and NAP updates. While the content of the guidance given by the NAP Support Center will mostly come from various NAPCORE Working Groups, this activity will manage its creation and dissemination. · Define priorities of most urgently needed guidance requirements for NAPs · Create guidance documentation, based upon results and recommendations of NAPCORE, to support NAP operators in matters related to their daily operation, specific NAP tasks or general NAP setup, development and upgrade. Develop a comprehensive knowledge base with FAQs, and troubleshooting tips · Act as point-of-contact and support service for enquiries from NAP operators related to matters related to NAP operations. Define, setup and manage proper processes for this support center · Define, setup and manage groups (e.g. for “new” NAPs) and (virtual) events of/for NAP operators to exchange best practices, define operational guidance and discuss other topics · Reach out to and possibly work with other WGs to gather or create information and content needed to support the NAPs

T8.3 EVENTS Organize and participate in relevant events to disseminate project results and engage with stakeholders. The organisation of events, including physical meetings of the different working groups, shall take place within the EU and shall take into account the practicability for all participants, in particular minimisation of travel times and emissions. Major key success factor of NAPCORE is the communication with the stakeholder community. This can be done via various channels, events being one of them. While the NAPCORE Mobility Data Days are by now an established, well- attended and influential event, also the active participation in other, major industry and stakeholder events is of utmost importance to: • Disseminate project results and with this increase knowledge about NAPCORE and its results to NAPCORE partners and to relevant parties in the industry/domain • Engage with NAPCORE partners and stakeholders alike and meet with key persons to gain insights from them, coordinate activities and discuss topics This task will be in charge for both organizing NAPCORE events as well as plan and organize the participation of NAPCORE representatives in external events of relevance. Organize the NAPCORE Mobility Data Days The NAPCORE Mobility Data Days, as the main annual NAPCORE event, gathering for showcasing NAPCORE results

28

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

and facilitating stakeholder involvement, are by now an established and important stakeholder and industry event, with more than 230 delegates from more than 30 countries attending the last editions. This task will organize the NAPCORE Mobility Data Days in 2026 and 2027. Locations of the event are to be decided at a later stage. Participate in major industry/stakeholder events Participation – as speaker or as participant only – in key industry and stakeholder events is crucial to community engagement, stakeholder information, partner coordination and more. This especially holds true for a coordination initiative like NAPCORE. A selection of known and scheduled key events 2026-2027 in the EU is: • Transport Research Arena TRA 2026 in Budapest, Hungary • Intertraffic 2026 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands More events will be scheduled at a later stage. Participation in those events will be evaluated and decided, based upon value towards NAPCORE’s goals, at times closer to the events. NAPCORE's success depends on discussing, establishing and promoting its results - such as data standards and profile recommendations - across a broad spectrum of stakeholders, some of whom are based internationally. While NAPCORE's focus is on EU engagement, certain high-impact industry events in the timeframe 2026-2027 are planned outside of the EU but are essential to gain access to, alignment and endorsement from international stakeholders within the ITS and mobility communities. Some of these global events provide unmatched opportunities for visibility and collaboration, complementing NAPCORE's EU-based activities and extending the project’s impact globally and in doing so, ensuring the use and longevity of NAPCORE’s recommendations and standards also in Europe. Attendance at non-EU events will be limited to strategically chosen gatherings that provide unique value, particularly in cases where no EU event can reach the same audience or offer similar benefits. These instances will involve a minimal delegation and will require approval from the NAPCORE Steering Committee and from the Commission services, ensuring the efficient use of resources and alignment with the NAPCORE's core objectives, which include the promotion of the use of NAPCORE standards internationally. Outside-EU Events of strategic importance for NAPCORE due to their attendees and impact in the ITS and Mobility community: • ITS World Congress 2026 in Gangneung, South Korea • ITS World Congress 2027 in Birmingham, UK Additionally, NAPCORE will selectively participate in other relevant, high-impact events across the EU, maximizing the value of each engagement and demonstrating clear alignment with both project objectives and grant authority expectations.

T8.4 WEBSITE, SOCIAL MEDIA AND SERVICE DESK Manage NAPCORE’s online presence, including the already existing NAPCORE website and social media channels. In addition, offering a contact point and support for general enquiries and issues. • Host, manage, maintain and optimize the NAPCORE website napcore.eu • Ensuring all content provided via the website is up to date and relevant • Manage the NAPCORE LinkedIn channel, including the creation of posts or relevant news • Setup and manage a help desk that includes o General contact e-mail address and contact form on the website o Act as first level support to general enquiries via e-mail, social media and the website o For questions that cannot be answered, identify and forward them to the right WG Lead (or identified contact point of the WGs) o Setup and maintain a published list of FAQs • Manage integration and possibly hosting of NAPCORE web-based tools (e.g. UVAR Box tool, ENBOSS) under the napcore.eu domain

T8.5 ACADEMY & TRAINING To ensure widespread understanding, adoption, and proficiency in the technologies and standards developed by NAPCORE (for example but not limited to: DATEX II, TN-ITS, NeTEx, SIRI, mobilityDCAT-AP), a NAPCORE Academy will be established as a cornerstone for educational outreach to stakeholders in the ITS domain but also for NAPCORE’s partners. This academy will act as a central knowledge hub, offering structured learning opportunities tailored to various stakeholder groups and knowledge levels across Europe. Through targeted training modules, workshops, and resources, the NAPCORE Academy will empower stakeholders to effectively implement and benefit from NAPCORE’s standards and recommendations, increasing Europe-wide competency levels. A specific focus will be put on supporting the local authorities to increase their data provision knowledge and capabilities. • Create a joint (including all NAPCORE standards and technologies) strategy and roadmap for a NAPCORE Academy including trainings • Curriculum Development o Identify core topics and structure learning paths for different stakeholder groups

29

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

o Collaborate with NAPCORE WGs to ensure content relevance and clarity • Resource Creation and Distribution o With input from other NAPCORE WGs, develop accessible materials, including guides, and case studies o Set up and maintain an online library for easy access to helpful material • Workshops and Training Sessions o Organize virtual workshops o Support training events of NAPCORE partners (and affiliated organisations) across Europe with templates, content, advice and expertise

30

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

STAFF EFFORT

Staff effort per participant

Grant Preparation (Work packages - Effort screen) — Enter the info.

Participant WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 Total Person-Months

1 - DE-BAST 44.00 2.00 2.00 43.00 1.00 3.00 6.00 26.00 127.00

2 - DE-HH 1.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 9.00

3 - DE-NRW-MIN 1.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 10.00

4 - DE-NVBW 1.00 2.00 6.00 1.00 10.00

5 - DE-RMS 1.00 7.00 8.00 2.00 18.00

6 - AT-MVO 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 7.00

7 - AT-ASFINAG 1.00 2.00 14.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 22.00

8 - AT-ATE 3.00 4.00 1.00 16.00 3.00 30.00 27.00 2.00 86.00

9 - BE-FED 3.00 13.00 19.00 1.00 36.00

10 - BE-FL 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00

11 - BE-NGI 1.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 1.00 20.00

12 - HR-CESTE 2.00 2.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 42.00 5.00 23.00 87.00

13 - HR-MMPI 1.00 2.00 1.00 10.00 1.00 4.00 3.00 9.00 31.00

14 - CY-PWD 4.00 4.00 5.00 13.00 21.00 10.00 3.00 60.00

15 - CZ-CDV 1.00 5.00 5.00 9.00 4.00 5.00 29.00

16 - CZ-MDCR 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 10.00

17 - CZ-CVUT 1.00 3.00 9.00 7.00 4.00 2.00 26.00

18 - CZ-TTR 2.00 15.00 26.00 2.00 5.00 50.00

19 - DK-DRD 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00

31

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Staff effort per participant

Grant Preparation (Work packages - Effort screen) — Enter the info.

Participant WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 Total Person-Months

20 - DK-TS 2.00 1.00 3.00

21 - EE-ETA 1.00 3.00 4.00 2.00 10.00

22 - FI-FINTRA 2.00 10.00 2.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 22.00

23 - FI-TRAFICOM 1.00 3.00 5.00 2.00 11.00

24 - FR-MIN 3.00 3.00 3.00 39.00 4.00 5.00 7.00 2.00 66.00

25 - FR-CEREMA 1.00 2.00 1.00 19.00 4.00 6.00 33.00

26 - FR-ART 1.00 5.00 6.00

27 - GR-MIN 1.00 3.00 2.00 27.00 2.00 46.00 81.00

29 - HU-KOZUT 3.00 9.00 3.00 9.00 24.00

31 - IT-MIN 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00

32 - IT-SINA 2.00 31.00 33.00

33 - IT-ASPI 1.00 3.00 21.00 2.00 4.00 31.00

34 - IT-MOVYON 1.00 1.00 8.00 4.00 14.00

35 - IT-5T 1.00 4.00 11.00 1.00 17.00

36 - IT-CEF 1.00 20.00 5.00 8.00 34.00

37 - IT-QM 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00

38 - IT-SINELEC 1.00 1.00 8.00 2.00 2.00 14.00

39 - LV-CELI 1.00 2.00 3.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 7.00 21.00

40 - LT-VIA 1.00 1.00 3.00 19.00 2.00 1.00 27.00

41 - MT-TRANSP 1.00 6.00 29.00 12.00 7.00 10.00 65.00

42 - NL-MIN 4.00 6.00 12.00 72.00 7.00 4.00 7.00 15.00 127.00

32

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Staff effort per participant

Grant Preparation (Work packages - Effort screen) — Enter the info.

Participant WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 Total Person-Months

43 - PL-GDNRM 1.00 2.00 12.00 1.00 1.00 17.00

44 - PT-IMT 1.00 3.00 2.00 11.00 1.00 18.00

45 - PT-ARMIS 3.00 59.00 9.00 3.00 74.00

46 - RO-MIN 1.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 2.00 13.00

47 - RO-NCRIA 1.00 3.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 6.00 20.00

48 - RO-ITS 2.00 2.00 5.00 7.00 2.00 5.00 2.00 25.00

49 - RO-ELSOL 1.00 4.00 2.00 10.00 4.00 21.00

50 - SK-MIN 1.00 2.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 12.00

53 - ES-DGT 1.00 3.00 7.00 7.00 2.00 20.00

57 - Y-UITP 2.00 16.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 10.00 33.00

58 - Y-ITxPT 2.00 11.00 5.00 6.00 24.00

59 - Y-ERTICO 1.00 1.00 2.00 10.00 5.00 2.00 13.00 34.00

60 - DE-AB 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00

61 - AT-BMIMI 2.00 2.00

62 - BE-WAL 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 7.00

64 - BG-API 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00

65 - EE-MIN-KLI 5.00 5.00

66 - FR-ASFA 1.00 1.00

67 - IE-TII 1.00 1.00 2.00 4.00

68 - IE-NTA 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00

69 - LU-MIN 1.00 1.00 2.00

33

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Staff effort per participant

Grant Preparation (Work packages - Effort screen) — Enter the info.

Participant WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 Total Person-Months

70 - PL-MIN 2.00 2.00 4.00

71 - XIS-VEG 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 8.00

72 - XME-MIN 2.00 2.00 5.00 5.00 14.00

73 - XNO-NPRA 30.00 3.00 48.00 20.00 13.00 15.00 1.00 130.00

74 - XCH-FEDRO 2.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 10.00

76 - XUK-NH 5.00 9.00 27.00 9.00 2.00 5.00 10.00 67.00

77 - SE-STA 1.00 1.00 2.00

Total Person-Months 115.00 172.00 108.00 618.00 216.00 149.00 175.00 321.00 1874.00

34

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

LIST OF DELIVERABLES

Deliverables

Grant Preparation (Deliverables screen) — Enter the info.

The labels used mean:

Public — fully open ( automatically posted online) Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement EU classified —RESTREINT-UE/EU-RESTRICTED, CONFIDENTIEL-UE/EU-CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET-UE/EU-SECRET under Decision 2015/444

Deliverable No

Deliverable Name Work Package No

Lead Beneficiary Type Dissemination Level Due Date (month)

D1.1 D1.2.1 Working Programme 2026 WP1 1 - DE-BAST R — Document, report PU - Public 6

D1.2 D1.2.2 Working Programme 2027 WP1 1 - DE-BAST R — Document, report PU - Public 18

D1.3 D1.2.3 Annual activity report 2025 WP1 1 - DE-BAST R — Document, report PU - Public 8

D1.4 D1.2.4 Annual activity report 2026 WP1 1 - DE-BAST R — Document, report PU - Public 20

D1.5 D1.2.5 Annual activity report 2027 WP1 1 - DE-BAST R — Document, report PU - Public 30

D2.1 D2.1.2 Toolkit for National/Regional user’s day application (in collaboration with WG8)

WP2 9 - BE-FED R — Document, report PU - Public 22

D2.2 D2.1.3 Final analysis of the implementation of the community strategy

WP2 9 - BE-FED R — Document, report PU - Public 30

D2.3 D2.2.1 Mapping of the EU-based requirements, governance and rules to implement MMTIS DR

WP2 57 - Y-UITP R — Document, report PU - Public 12

D2.4 D2.2.2 Roadmap and recommendations to increase MMTIS data provision on the NAPs demonstrated by best practices

WP2 57 - Y-UITP R — Document, report PU - Public 18

D2.5 D2.3.1 Map the existing cross-border services and platforms

WP2 22 - FI-FINTRA R — Document, report PU - Public 11

35

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Deliverables

Grant Preparation (Deliverables screen) — Enter the info.

The labels used mean:

Public — fully open ( automatically posted online) Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement EU classified —RESTREINT-UE/EU-RESTRICTED, CONFIDENTIEL-UE/EU-CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET-UE/EU-SECRET under Decision 2015/444

Deliverable No

Deliverable Name Work Package No

Lead Beneficiary Type Dissemination Level Due Date (month)

D2.6 D2.3.2 RE-use demonstrator WP2 22 - FI-FINTRA DEM — Demonstrator, pilot, prototype

PU - Public 18

D2.7 D2.4.1 Mapping of the access nodes identifiers in the Member States

WP2 57 - Y-UITP R — Document, report PU - Public 3

D2.8 D2.4.2 Final analysis of the EU IDs for Multimodal Access Nodes

WP2 57 - Y-UITP R — Document, report PU - Public 10

D3.1 D3.1.2 Toolkit for National /Regional user’s deployments application (in collaboration with WG8)

WP3 42 - NL-MIN DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

PU - Public 9

D3.2 D3.1.3 Agreed sustainable process and governance structure on the arrangements between multi-country service providers and Member States

WP3 42 - NL-MIN R — Document, report PU - Public 25

D3.3 D3.2.1 Roadmap for digital interactive traffic management

WP3 48 - RO-ITS R — Document, report PU - Public 16

D3.4 D3.3.1 Roadmap for Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Data

WP3 29 - HU-KOZUT R — Document, report PU - Public 9

D4.1 D4.1.2 DATEX II version 4.1 WP4 42 - NL-MIN DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

PU - Public 18

D4.2 D4.1.3 DATEX II Exchange 2026 WP4 42 - NL-MIN DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

PU - Public 18

36

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Deliverables

Grant Preparation (Deliverables screen) — Enter the info.

The labels used mean:

Public — fully open ( automatically posted online) Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement EU classified —RESTREINT-UE/EU-RESTRICTED, CONFIDENTIEL-UE/EU-CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET-UE/EU-SECRET under Decision 2015/444

Deliverable No

Deliverable Name Work Package No

Lead Beneficiary Type Dissemination Level Due Date (month)

D4.3 D4.1.4 DATEX II version 4.2 WP4 42 - NL-MIN DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

PU - Public 28

D4.4 D4.1.5 DATEX II recommended deployment roadmap of versions of standards and profiles.

WP4 42 - NL-MIN R — Document, report PU - Public 8

D4.5 D4.2.1 NAP-centric mobility data ecosystem architecture with focus on EMDS setting.

WP4 42 - NL-MIN R — Document, report PU - Public 9

D4.6 D4.2.2 NAP-centric mobility data ecosystem architecture in full trust setting

WP4 42 - NL-MIN R — Document, report PU - Public 27

D4.7 D4.3.1 Sustainable governance and funding recommendations for the Transmodel ecosystem

WP4 24 - FR-MIN R — Document, report PU - Public 24

D4.8 D4.3.2 Report on maintenance & update of Transmodel-based standards

WP4 24 - FR-MIN R — Document, report PU - Public 16

D4.9 D4.3.3 Report on maintenance & update of Transmodel-based standards

WP4 24 - FR-MIN R — Document, report PU - Public 28

D4.10 D4.3.4 Report on EU and national profiles for Transmodel-based standards

WP4 24 - FR-MIN R — Document, report PU - Public 12

D4.11 D4.4.1 Report on maintenance & governance of mobilityDCAT-AP

WP4 1 - DE-BAST R — Document, report PU - Public 28

37

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Deliverables

Grant Preparation (Deliverables screen) — Enter the info.

The labels used mean:

Public — fully open ( automatically posted online) Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement EU classified —RESTREINT-UE/EU-RESTRICTED, CONFIDENTIEL-UE/EU-CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET-UE/EU-SECRET under Decision 2015/444

Deliverable No

Deliverable Name Work Package No

Lead Beneficiary Type Dissemination Level Due Date (month)

D4.12 D4.5.1 METR specifications compliant with EU requirements

WP4 42 - NL-MIN R — Document, report PU - Public 17

D4.13 D4.5.2 European METR profile specifications

WP4 42 - NL-MIN R — Document, report PU - Public 29

D4.14 D4.6.1 NAP Level of Service Framework (updated version)

WP4 45 - PT-ARMIS R — Document, report PU - Public 16

D4.15 D4.6.2 NAP Reference Architecture: update and maintenance

WP4 45 - PT-ARMIS R — Document, report PU - Public 28

D5.1 D5.1.1 NAP data insights: overview on data availability and provision

WP5 52 - SI-UM R — Document, report PU - Public 9

D5.2 D5.1.2 Metadata-assisted reporting guidelines

WP5 52 - SI-UM R — Document, report PU - Public 19

D5.3 D5.1.3 Prototype of the Tool for Automated Metadata Harvesting, Validation and Assisted Report Generation.

WP5 52 - SI-UM DEM — Demonstrator, pilot, prototype

PU - Public 28

D5.4 D5.2.1 Tools Governance and Recommended Practices

WP5 18 - CZ-TTR R — Document, report PU - Public 18

D5.5 D5.2.2 Tools Package on the NAP-Store Website

WP5 18 - CZ-TTR DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

PU - Public 30

38

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Deliverables

Grant Preparation (Deliverables screen) — Enter the info.

The labels used mean:

Public — fully open ( automatically posted online) Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement EU classified —RESTREINT-UE/EU-RESTRICTED, CONFIDENTIEL-UE/EU-CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET-UE/EU-SECRET under Decision 2015/444

Deliverable No

Deliverable Name Work Package No

Lead Beneficiary Type Dissemination Level Due Date (month)

D5.6 D5.2.3 NAP-Store website WP5 18 - CZ-TTR DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

PU - Public 11

D5.7 D5.3.1 Data Dictionary WP5 51 - SI-MZI R — Document, report PU - Public 10

D5.8 D5.3.2 Implementation guidelines for the EU data quality framework

WP5 51 - SI-MZI R — Document, report PU - Public 28

D6.1 D6.2.1Guidelines for national bodies for the implementation of the NAPCORE recommendations on Compliance Assessment

WP6 12 - HR-CESTE DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

PU - Public 12

D6.2 D6.2.2 Report on development of multi- national or European level support system for National Bodies (ENBOSS)

WP6 12 - HR-CESTE R — Document, report PU - Public 18

D6.3 D6.3.1 Guidelines for the electronic support of the compliance assessment process

WP6 8 - AT-ATE R — Document, report PU - Public 21

D7.1 D7.1.2 Collection of national implementation roadmaps

WP7 8 - AT-ATE R — Document, report PU - Public 24

D7.2 D7.2.1 Recommendations for further action needed (Version 1)

WP7 12 - HR-CESTE R — Document, report PU - Public 12

D7.3 D7.2.2 Update recommendations for further action needed (Version 2)

WP7 12 - HR-CESTE R — Document, report PU - Public 28

D7.4 D7.3.1 Roadmap for long-lasting WP7 8 - AT-ATE R — Document, report PU - Public 18

39

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Deliverables

Grant Preparation (Deliverables screen) — Enter the info.

The labels used mean:

Public — fully open ( automatically posted online) Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement EU classified —RESTREINT-UE/EU-RESTRICTED, CONFIDENTIEL-UE/EU-CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET-UE/EU-SECRET under Decision 2015/444

Deliverable No

Deliverable Name Work Package No

Lead Beneficiary Type Dissemination Level Due Date (month)

governance structure including topics and tasks to be covered

D7.5 D7.3.2 Supporting documents for long- lasting governance structure

WP7 8 - AT-ATE R — Document, report PU - Public 28

D8.1 D8.2.1 Guidelines for NAP operators based upon results and recommendations of NAPCORE, to support NAP operators in matters related to their daily operation, specific NAP tasks or general NAP setup, development and upgrade

WP8 12 - HR-CESTE R — Document, report PU - Public 18

D8.2 D8.3.1 Events – Mobility Data Days 2026 WP8 32 - IT-SINA DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

PU - Public 18

D8.3 D8.3.2 Events – Mobility Data Days 2027 WP8 32 - IT-SINA DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

PU - Public 30

D8.4 D8.4.1 Website Social Media and Service Desk

WP8 32 - IT-SINA R — Document, report PU - Public 29

D8.5 D8.5.1 NAPCORE Academy Programme available

WP8 59 - Y-ERTICO DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

PU - Public 6

40

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Deliverable D1.1 – D1.2.1 Working Programme 2026

Deliverable Number D1.1 Lead Beneficiary 1 - DE-BAST

Deliverable Name D1.2.1 Working Programme 2026

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 6 Work Package No WP1

Description

A working programme of the planned work in all tasks of the project for the year 2026 [PDF; English]

Deliverable D1.2 – D1.2.2 Working Programme 2027

Deliverable Number D1.2 Lead Beneficiary 1 - DE-BAST

Deliverable Name D1.2.2 Working Programme 2027

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 18 Work Package No WP1

Description

A working programme of the planned work in all tasks of the project for the year 2027 [PDF; English]

Deliverable D1.3 – D1.2.3 Annual activity report 2025

Deliverable Number D1.3 Lead Beneficiary 1 - DE-BAST

Deliverable Name D1.2.3 Annual activity report 2025

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 8 Work Package No WP1

Description

The annual activity report provides an overview of the results, achievements and activities of the project for the year 2025 [PDF; English]

Deliverable D1.4 – D1.2.4 Annual activity report 2026

Deliverable Number D1.4 Lead Beneficiary 1 - DE-BAST

Deliverable Name D1.2.4 Annual activity report 2026

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 20 Work Package No WP1

Description

The annual activity report provides an overview of the results, achievements and activities of the project for the year 2026 [PDF; English]

41

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Deliverable D1.5 – D1.2.5 Annual activity report 2027

Deliverable Number D1.5 Lead Beneficiary 1 - DE-BAST

Deliverable Name D1.2.5 Annual activity report 2027

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 30 Work Package No WP1

Description

The annual activity report provides an overview of the results, achievements and activities of the project for the year 2027 [PDF; English]

Deliverable D2.1 – D2.1.2 Toolkit for National/Regional user’s day application (in collaboration with WG8)

Deliverable Number D2.1 Lead Beneficiary 9 - BE-FED

Deliverable Name D2.1.2 Toolkit for National/Regional user’s day application (in collaboration with WG8)

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 22 Work Package No WP2

Description

This toolkit should enable NAPCORE partners to replicate user’s day concept at national or regional levels. The toolkit will be electronic and written in English. [Toolkit; English]

Deliverable D2.2 – D2.1.3 Final analysis of the implementation of the community strategy

Deliverable Number D2.2 Lead Beneficiary 9 - BE-FED

Deliverable Name D2.1.3 Final analysis of the implementation of the community strategy

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 30 Work Package No WP2

Description

The report of achievements on community management in the multimodal field and recommendations for further collaborating with the communities. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D2.3 – D2.2.1 Mapping of the EU-based requirements, governance and rules to implement MMTIS DR

Deliverable Number D2.3 Lead Beneficiary 57 - Y-UITP

Deliverable Name D2.2.1 Mapping of the EU-based requirements, governance and rules to implement MMTIS DR

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 12 Work Package No WP2

42

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Description

The report will contain the EU-based requirements for data provision in the scope of MMTIS DR for different levels of governance and analyse the needs of mobility operators to comply with the MMTIS DR and data quality obligations. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D2.4 – D2.2.2 Roadmap and recommendations to increase MMTIS data provision on the NAPs demonstrated by best practices

Deliverable Number D2.4 Lead Beneficiary 57 - Y-UITP

Deliverable Name D2.2.2 Roadmap and recommendations to increase MMTIS data provision on the NAPs demonstrated by best practices

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 18 Work Package No WP2

Description

The report will analyse the status of multimodal NAPs and present mapping of different ways in which multimodal travel data (based on the MMTIS DR) is currently provided to the NAPs in the Member States. The report will also provide a set of technical and organisational recommendations/actions on how to increase the number of MMTIS data providers on the NAPs and propose a roadmap for implementing the actions. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D2.5 – D2.3.1 Map the existing cross-border services and platforms

Deliverable Number D2.5 Lead Beneficiary 22 - FI-FINTRA

Deliverable Name D2.3.1 Map the existing cross-border services and platforms

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 11 Work Package No WP2

Description

Report will consist of benchmark of functionalities and analysis of existing multimodal cross-border services and platforms. With this task it is also evaluated how services are using NAP datasets, what are the data standards and what are the key technologies behind the services (like routing engines, or ticketing API’s) and the opportunities for upscaling. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D2.6 – D2.3.2 RE-use demonstrator

Deliverable Number D2.6 Lead Beneficiary 22 - FI-FINTRA

Deliverable Name D2.3.2 RE-use demonstrator

Type DEM — Demonstrator, pilot, prototype

Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 18 Work Package No WP2

Description

Active partners will create a demonstrator which uses standardised NAP datasets and create cross-border journey planner demonstrator. The report will include experiences and documentation of solution and possible bottle necks of existing NAP data which hinders reusability. [English]

43

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Deliverable D2.7 – D2.4.1 Mapping of the access nodes identifiers in the Member States

Deliverable Number D2.7 Lead Beneficiary 57 - Y-UITP

Deliverable Name D2.4.1 Mapping of the access nodes identifiers in the Member States

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 3 Work Package No WP2

Description

This report will provide an overview of existing access nodes identifiers in the Member States. The mapping will consider the existing standards for data collection and info management (in coordination with standardisation bodies). [PDF; English]

Deliverable D2.8 – D2.4.2 Final analysis of the EU IDs for Multimodal Access Nodes

Deliverable Number D2.8 Lead Beneficiary 57 - Y-UITP

Deliverable Name D2.4.2 Final analysis of the EU IDs for Multimodal Access Nodes

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 10 Work Package No WP2

Description

This report will propose recommendations how an additional later for an EU-wide identification system for multimodal access nodes could be set up in a compatible way with existing systems. It will also provide recommendations on how to support the possible introduction of a unique EU identifying system for the access nodes. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D3.1 – D3.1.2 Toolkit for National /Regional user’s deployments application (in collaboration with WG8)

Deliverable Number D3.1 Lead Beneficiary 42 - NL-MIN

Deliverable Name D3.1.2 Toolkit for National /Regional user’s deployments application (in collaboration with WG8)

Type DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 9 Work Package No WP3

Description

A continuously extended toolkit of outreach materials for road and traffic information and traffic management actors in general, with specific attention to smaller operators in the domain in particular. Description of best practices is part of this deliverable. The toolkit will be maintained. [Website; English]

Deliverable D3.2 – D3.1.3 Agreed sustainable process and governance structure on the arrangements between multi-country service providers and Member States

Deliverable Number D3.2 Lead Beneficiary 42 - NL-MIN

44

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Deliverable Name D3.1.3 Agreed sustainable process and governance structure on the arrangements between multi-country service providers and Member States

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 25 Work Package No WP3

Description

Endorsed by SCOM and affected stakeholders, the governance process on the arrangements between MS and service providers with regard to obligations in the RTTI (and possibly others in the future) Delegated Regulation in combination with recommendations how to apply them nationally. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D3.3 – D3.2.1 Roadmap for digital interactive traffic management

Deliverable Number D3.3 Lead Beneficiary 48 - RO-ITS

Deliverable Name D3.2.1 Roadmap for digital interactive traffic management

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 16 Work Package No WP3

Description

The roadmap for deploying digital interactive traffic management and its use cases to facilitate data and information sharing between public authorities, private mobility providers, and road operators. It will also define cross-border use cases where digital traffic management solutions can be applied. It will identify the role of NAPs and features supporting digital interactive traffic management. For each use case a harmonised approach between the involved stakeholders will be described. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D3.4 – D3.3.1 Roadmap for Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Data

Deliverable Number D3.4 Lead Beneficiary 29 - HU-KOZUT

Deliverable Name D3.3.1 Roadmap for Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Data

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 9 Work Package No WP3

Description

Roadmap for alternative fuels infrastructure data will feed into the MS deployment roadmap. This deliverable is aiming to support the Member States to detail that roadmap by providing insights in best practices for data collection, production, quality management, and sharing between stakeholders in compliance with EU policy and regulations on AFIR and RTTI. As well as defining the role of the NAP and features supporting management of AFIR related data in accordance with EU mobility and digital policy, regulations and initiatives. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D4.1 – D4.1.2 DATEX II version 4.1

Deliverable Number D4.1 Lead Beneficiary 42 - NL-MIN

Deliverable Name D4.1.2 DATEX II version 4.1

Type DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 18 Work Package No WP4

45

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Description

Release of DATEX II version 4.1 including the related minimum and reference profiles. The related documentation on the portal and in the webtool. Including the updates of the training and education material for deployment support [Website; English]

Deliverable D4.2 – D4.1.3 DATEX II Exchange 2026

Deliverable Number D4.2 Lead Beneficiary 42 - NL-MIN

Deliverable Name D4.1.3 DATEX II Exchange 2026

Type DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 18 Work Package No WP4

Description

Release of DATEX II Exchange 2026 as an update of the DATEX II Exchange 2020. Also including message que specification, API specification and cyber security integration The related documentation on the portal and in the webtool Including the updates of the training and education material for deployment support. [Website; English]

Deliverable D4.3 – D4.1.4 DATEX II version 4.2

Deliverable Number D4.3 Lead Beneficiary 42 - NL-MIN

Deliverable Name D4.1.4 DATEX II version 4.2

Type DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 28 Work Package No WP4

Description

Release of DATEX II version 4.2 including the related minimum and reference profiles. The related documentation on the portal and in the webtool. Including the updates of the training and education material for deployment support [Website; English]

Deliverable D4.4 – D4.1.5 DATEX II recommended deployment roadmap of versions of standards and profiles.

Deliverable Number D4.4 Lead Beneficiary 42 - NL-MIN

Deliverable Name D4.1.5 DATEX II recommended deployment roadmap of versions of standards and profiles.

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 8 Work Package No WP4

Description

This deliverable provides the recommended versions to deploy in the data providing systems in combination with the related minimum EU and recommended service profiles. This deliverable serves as an input for the national deployment strategies. [PDF; English]

46

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Deliverable D4.5 – D4.2.1 NAP-centric mobility data ecosystem architecture with focus on EMDS setting.

Deliverable Number D4.5 Lead Beneficiary 42 - NL-MIN

Deliverable Name D4.2.1 NAP-centric mobility data ecosystem architecture with focus on EMDS setting.

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 9 Work Package No WP4

Description

This deliverable provides the architecture of the NAP centric mobility data ecosystem, with special focus on the mapping of roles and concepts and standards in the EMDS. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D4.6 – D4.2.2 NAP-centric mobility data ecosystem architecture in full trust setting

Deliverable Number D4.6 Lead Beneficiary 42 - NL-MIN

Deliverable Name D4.2.2 NAP-centric mobility data ecosystem architecture in full trust setting

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 27 Work Package No WP4

Description

This deliverable provides the architecture of the NAP centric mobility data ecosystem, with further detailing the trust and cybersecurity aspects of the parallel data distribution mechanisms that will exist next to each other in the mobility domain. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D4.7 – D4.3.1 Sustainable governance and funding recommendations for the Transmodel ecosystem

Deliverable Number D4.7 Lead Beneficiary 24 - FR-MIN

Deliverable Name D4.3.1 Sustainable governance and funding recommendations for the Transmodel ecosystem

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 24 Work Package No WP4

Description

This deliverable provides recommendations to improve the governance of Transmodel-based standards, including one or several paths to implement and fund after the end of the project a European platform for multimodal experts. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D4.8 – D4.3.2 Report on maintenance & update of Transmodel-based standards

Deliverable Number D4.8 Lead Beneficiary 24 - FR-MIN

Deliverable Name D4.3.2 Report on maintenance & update of Transmodel-based standards

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

47

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Due Date (month) 16 Work Package No WP4

Description

This report will compile major achievements on the development, maintenance & update of Transmodel-based standards and related artefacts, including new releases & functional upgrades. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D4.9 – D4.3.3 Report on maintenance & update of Transmodel-based standards

Deliverable Number D4.9 Lead Beneficiary 24 - FR-MIN

Deliverable Name D4.3.3 Report on maintenance & update of Transmodel-based standards

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 28 Work Package No WP4

Description

This update of D4.3.2 will compile major achievements on the development, maintenance & update of Transmodel- based standards and related artefacts, including new releases & functional upgrades. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D4.10 – D4.3.4 Report on EU and national profiles for Transmodel-based standards

Deliverable Number D4.10 Lead Beneficiary 24 - FR-MIN

Deliverable Name D4.3.4 Report on EU and national profiles for Transmodel-based standards

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 12 Work Package No WP4

Description

This deliverable provides a comparison on existing EU minimum and national profiles, along with guidelines on the development of national profiles in EU. The aim is to provide a basis for profiles development that would both fit the local implementation needs and foster data interoperability. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D4.11 – D4.4.1 Report on maintenance & governance of mobilityDCAT-AP

Deliverable Number D4.11 Lead Beneficiary 1 - DE-BAST

Deliverable Name D4.4.1 Report on maintenance & governance of mobilityDCAT-AP

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 28 Work Package No WP4

Description

This report will compile major achievements on the maintenance & governance of the mobilityDCAT-AP metadata specification, including new releases, functional upgrades and user support activities. [PDF; English]

48

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Deliverable D4.12 – D4.5.1 METR specifications compliant with EU requirements

Deliverable Number D4.12 Lead Beneficiary 42 - NL-MIN

Deliverable Name D4.5.1 METR specifications compliant with EU requirements

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 17 Work Package No WP4

Description

This report provides a full set of ISO (via CEN WG 17) specifications that fulfil the European requirements on global level and will serve as a basis for EU regionalised specifications based on EU legislation and data-standards. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D4.13 – D4.5.2 European METR profile specifications

Deliverable Number D4.13 Lead Beneficiary 42 - NL-MIN

Deliverable Name D4.5.2 European METR profile specifications

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 29 Work Package No WP4

Description

The European METR specifications to be standardised in CEN, in combination with user guidance on the mapping to the national and local situation, combined with supporting documentation. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D4.14 – D4.6.1 NAP Level of Service Framework (updated version)

Deliverable Number D4.14 Lead Beneficiary 45 - PT-ARMIS

Deliverable Name D4.6.1 NAP Level of Service Framework (updated version)

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 16 Work Package No WP4

Description

Report compiling the description of an updated version of the framework designed to assess the LoS of NAPs according to market and legislative developments across the mobility domain. The report must include the work methodology, a detailed description of the updated KPIs, a summary of aggregated results of NAP LoS self-assessments, and an analysis of gaps concerning NAP interoperability. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D4.15 – D4.6.2 NAP Reference Architecture: update and maintenance

Deliverable Number D4.15 Lead Beneficiary 45 - PT-ARMIS

Deliverable Name D4.6.2 NAP Reference Architecture: update and maintenance

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 28 Work Package No WP4

49

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Description

A report documenting the updates and maintenance tasks performed on the NAP Reference Architecture, along with the development and improvement of associated support tools and materials. The report should highlight key changes made to the architectural components of the NAP Reference Architecture during the NAPCORE-X period. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D5.1 – D5.1.1 NAP data insights: overview on data availability and provision

Deliverable Number D5.1 Lead Beneficiary 52 - SI-UM

Deliverable Name D5.1.1 NAP data insights: overview on data availability and provision

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 9 Work Package No WP5

Description

Deliverable focuses on strategies for the assessment of data availability in the NAP (e.g., voluntary reporting, surveys, definition of KPIs, showcases of individual NAPs, availability of mobilityDCAT-AP APIs) to increase Member States’ awareness on best practices, providing actionable recommendations on the topic. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D5.2 – D5.1.2 Metadata-assisted reporting guidelines

Deliverable Number D5.2 Lead Beneficiary 52 - SI-UM

Deliverable Name D5.1.2 Metadata-assisted reporting guidelines

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 19 Work Package No WP5

Description

Leveraging on mobilityDCAT-AP, the deliverable aims to assist, align and ensure compliance across all Member States when the ITS Directive and connected Delegated Regulations reporting obligations are concerned. Serving as the 'identification card' of the data it represents, and as a quality indicator for the corresponding datasets/services, metadata proves to be a valuable asset for supporting reporting purposes. The deliverable provides practical guidelines on how to effectively use metadata to streamline these processes, exploring, among other elements, data categorisation, standards and technical specifications, and geographical and network coverage. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D5.3 – D5.1.3 Prototype of the Tool for Automated Metadata Harvesting, Validation and Assisted Report Generation.

Deliverable Number D5.3 Lead Beneficiary 52 - SI-UM

Deliverable Name D5.1.3 Prototype of the Tool for Automated Metadata Harvesting, Validation and Assisted Report Generation.

Type DEM — Demonstrator, pilot, prototype

Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 28 Work Package No WP5

Description

Final prototype of the open-source Tool for automated metadata harvesting, validation and assisted report generation. At the final stage, prototype will enable the use of the harvested data to facilitate Member States reporting obligations to

50

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

DG-MOVE. Final prototype to be available in the “NAP-Store” (Task 5.2). The delivery of the prototype is accompanied by software documentation. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D5.4 – D5.2.1 Tools Governance and Recommended Practices

Deliverable Number D5.4 Lead Beneficiary 18 - CZ-TTR

Deliverable Name D5.2.1 Tools Governance and Recommended Practices

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 18 Work Package No WP5

Description

Description of governance of the tools and of recommended practices for tool developers. The recommended practices shall serve anyone (even out of T5.2 task) to develop an open-source tool efficiently. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D5.5 – D5.2.2 Tools Package on the NAP-Store Website

Deliverable Number D5.5 Lead Beneficiary 18 - CZ-TTR

Deliverable Name D5.2.2 Tools Package on the NAP-Store Website

Type DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 30 Work Package No WP5

Description

All the tools developed are advertised on the NAP-Store website. Namely: UVARBOX tools upgrade; Conversion tools for version upgrades; Conversion tools for APDS to NeTEx and DATEX II; and Tools for Data validation. [Website; English]

Deliverable D5.6 – D5.2.3 NAP-Store website

Deliverable Number D5.6 Lead Beneficiary 18 - CZ-TTR

Deliverable Name D5.2.3 NAP-Store website

Type DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 11 Work Package No WP5

Description

Website advertising existence of existing tools including searching and categorization. It shall include all the externally developed tools as well as tools developed during the project. [Website; English]

Deliverable D5.7 – D5.3.1 Data Dictionary

Deliverable Number D5.7 Lead Beneficiary 51 - SI-MZI

Deliverable Name D5.3.1 Data Dictionary

51

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 10 Work Package No WP5

Description

This report will document the comprehensive approach to the continuation of the development and enhancement of the Data Dictionary for the definition of all data categories included in the DRs supplementing the ITS Directive (2010/40/ EU), considering the latest developments in the connected domains. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D5.8 – D5.3.2 Implementation guidelines for the EU data quality framework

Deliverable Number D5.8 Lead Beneficiary 51 - SI-MZI

Deliverable Name D5.3.2 Implementation guidelines for the EU data quality framework

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 28 Work Package No WP5

Description

Building up on existing quality frameworks, this document serves as a guide for implementing a sustainable data quality framework, developed per Delegated Regulation, as a set of definitions and guidelines that outline quality expectations and assessment methods. It will include best practices, methodologies, and strategic considerations to support consistent and effective data quality management, enabling re-use and interoperability analysed in selected use cases. The document highlights the alignment with sectoral data quality standards. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D6.1 – D6.2.1Guidelines for national bodies for the implementation of the NAPCORE recommendations on Compliance Assessment

Deliverable Number D6.1 Lead Beneficiary 12 - HR-CESTE

Deliverable Name D6.2.1Guidelines for national bodies for the implementation of the NAPCORE recommendations on Compliance Assessment

Type DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 12 Work Package No WP6

Description

These guidelines will provide a practical guide covering all steps of and recommendations for the compliance assessment process. They shall be set up in an interactive and agile environment and be updated on a regular basis. [Website; English]

Deliverable D6.2 – D6.2.2 Report on development of multi-national or European level support system for National Bodies (ENBOSS)

Deliverable Number D6.2 Lead Beneficiary 12 - HR-CESTE

Deliverable Name D6.2.2 Report on development of multi-national or European level support system for National Bodies (ENBOSS)

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 18 Work Package No WP6

52

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Description

This report will elaborate on and explain the possible development process of multi-national or European-level support for NB in detail. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D6.3 – D6.3.1 Guidelines for the electronic support of the compliance assessment process

Deliverable Number D6.3 Lead Beneficiary 8 - AT-ATE

Deliverable Name D6.3.1 Guidelines for the electronic support of the compliance assessment process

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 21 Work Package No WP6

Description

In this report the use of electronic tools during the compliance assessment process will be evaluated. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D7.1 – D7.1.2 Collection of national implementation roadmaps

Deliverable Number D7.1 Lead Beneficiary 8 - AT-ATE

Deliverable Name D7.1.2 Collection of national implementation roadmaps

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 24 Work Package No WP7

Description

Collection of national implementation roadmaps and publication of aggregated roadmaps content [PDF; English]

Deliverable D7.2 – D7.2.1 Recommendations for further action needed (Version 1)

Deliverable Number D7.2 Lead Beneficiary 12 - HR-CESTE

Deliverable Name D7.2.1 Recommendations for further action needed (Version 1)

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 12 Work Package No WP7

Description

Recommendations for further actions needed will be delivered towards NAPCORE WG1 as basis for setting up proper structures or measures to address gaps properly and towards the European Commission or other actors [PDF; English]

Deliverable D7.3 – D7.2.2 Update recommendations for further action needed (Version 2)

Deliverable Number D7.3 Lead Beneficiary 12 - HR-CESTE

Deliverable Name D7.2.2 Update recommendations for further action needed (Version 2)

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 28 Work Package No WP7

53

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Description

Recommendations for further actions needed will be delivered towards NAPCORE WG1 as basis for setting up proper structures or measures to address gaps properly and towards the European Commission or other actors [PDF; English]

Deliverable D7.4 – D7.3.1 Roadmap for long-lasting governance structure including topics and tasks to be covered

Deliverable Number D7.4 Lead Beneficiary 8 - AT-ATE

Deliverable Name D7.3.1 Roadmap for long-lasting governance structure including topics and tasks to be covered

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 18 Work Package No WP7

Description

Roadmap containing topics and tasks that should be covered by the long-lasting governance structure will be developed and agreed with the Steering Committee [PDF; English]

Deliverable D7.5 – D7.3.2 Supporting documents for long-lasting governance structure

Deliverable Number D7.5 Lead Beneficiary 8 - AT-ATE

Deliverable Name D7.3.2 Supporting documents for long-lasting governance structure

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 28 Work Package No WP7

Description

Supporting documents for the set-up of a long-lasting governance structure will be provided to the Steering Committee [PDF; English]

Deliverable D8.1 – D8.2.1 Guidelines for NAP operators based upon results and recommendations of NAPCORE, to support NAP operators in matters related to their daily operation, specific NAP tasks or general NAP setup, development and upgrade

Deliverable Number D8.1 Lead Beneficiary 12 - HR-CESTE

Deliverable Name D8.2.1 Guidelines for NAP operators based upon results and recommendations of NAPCORE, to support NAP operators in matters related to their daily operation, specific NAP tasks or general NAP setup, development and upgrade

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 18 Work Package No WP8

Description

These guidelines will outline best practices for maintaining and updating National Access Points (NAPs) to ensure data accuracy and facilitate efficient data exchange and communication. They will provide instructions on managing data discovery, ensuring interoperability, and complying with European regulations. The guidelines will also offer

54

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

a framework for establishing new NAPs or upgrading existing ones, including recommendations on infrastructure, governance, and the implementation of new technologies to enhance service levels. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D8.2 – D8.3.1 Events – Mobility Data Days 2026

Deliverable Number D8.2 Lead Beneficiary 32 - IT-SINA

Deliverable Name D8.3.1 Events – Mobility Data Days 2026

Type DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 18 Work Package No WP8

Description

After the event will be drafted a Report with the final programme and social media posts on website and LinkedIn. All the presentations shared during the event and the materials produced such as videos and photos will be uploaded on the website in the page “proceedings”. [Website; English]

Deliverable D8.3 – D8.3.2 Events – Mobility Data Days 2027

Deliverable Number D8.3 Lead Beneficiary 32 - IT-SINA

Deliverable Name D8.3.2 Events – Mobility Data Days 2027

Type DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 30 Work Package No WP8

Description

After the event a report will be drafted including the final programme and social media posts on the website and LinkedIn. All the presentations shared during the event and the materials produced such as videos and photos will be uploaded on the website in the page “proceedings”. [Website; English]

Deliverable D8.4 – D8.4.1 Website Social Media and Service Desk

Deliverable Number D8.4 Lead Beneficiary 32 - IT-SINA

Deliverable Name D8.4.1 Website Social Media and Service Desk

Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 29 Work Package No WP8

Description

A “Social Media Report” will resume all the activities carried out during the project. [PDF; English]

Deliverable D8.5 – D8.5.1 NAPCORE Academy Programme available

Deliverable Number D8.5 Lead Beneficiary 59 - Y-ERTICO

Deliverable Name D8.5.1 NAPCORE Academy Programme available

55

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Type DEC —Websites, patent filings, videos, etc

Dissemination Level PU - Public

Due Date (month) 6 Work Package No WP8

Description

The NAPCORE Website will feature a section with the foreseen program of the NAPCORE Academy, showing topics and dates (indicative for long-term events) of training opportunities for NAPCORE partners and external stakeholders. [Website; English]

56

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

LIST OF MILESTONES

(None)

LIST OF CRITICAL RISKS

Critical risks & risk management strategy

Grant Preparation (Critical Risks screen) — Enter the info.

Risk number

Description Work Package No(s)

Proposed Mitigation Measures

1 Expectations regarding the work that will be carried out and the topics that will be covered by NAPCORE-X cannot be met. (likelihood=medium, impact=medium)

WP1 The proposal (and later the Grant Agreement) manages expectations already to a high degree. It sets reasonable expectations with clear objectives, framework and work processes. Deliverables are set, resources are clearly identified and work distributed among the different working groups, tasks and partners. Particular attention will be paid to communication via WG8. Also, it will be clearly indicated to participants that NAPCORE-X is a new stage of coordination, but that the objective is to develop a sustainable governance structure. This structure would potentially allow to put on the long-term agenda the topics and questions that will not be/would not be addressed in this phase of the project. Lastly, frequent communication with DG MOVE as main stakeholder is set up. For this, there will be four opportunities set up: • the meetings of the Core Alignment Team (at least monthly, most often every two weeks) • The meetings of the Steering Committee • Ad-hoc meetings on special topics as requested by DG MOVE or the NAPCORE Core Alignment Team • Communication via phone, mail, web meetings with the single-point-of-contact (project coordinator)

2 Changes in the political situation of Member States which could lead to non-attendance in the project. (likelihood=low, impact=medium)

WP1 Beneficiaries will establish necessary links at political and working levels in order to overcome critical situations. Project’s success is not bound by the attendance of single countries, as all tasks are covered

57

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Critical risks & risk management strategy

Grant Preparation (Critical Risks screen) — Enter the info.

Risk number

Description Work Package No(s)

Proposed Mitigation Measures

by multiple active partners (mostly more than 14), so single sudden no-attendance can be compensated.

3 National budgets will be decreased within the project. (likelihood=low, impact=medium)

WP1 Changes in national budget allocation have to be reported by the Beneficiaries within the annual requested Progress Report. Project’s success is not bound by the attendance of single countries, as all tasks are covered by multiple active partners (mostly more than 14), so single sudden no-attendance can be compensated.

4 A partner or Member State does not involve in NAPCORE-X the best available resources or does not perform effectively and in line with the other partners’ expectations. (likelihood=low, impact=low)

WP1 Strong involvement of Member States and partners ensures commitment to the tasks to be performed and the allocation of the best resources available. In a final escalation scenario reporting about underperformance contributes to awareness building and to support Member States decisions on resources.

5 Discontinuous communication flow (internal and external). (likelihood=low, impact=low)

WP8 Mailing lists for all roles and bodies are continuously updated. Information flow processes are set up and monitored by the Project Management and Work Package Leaders, especially WG8. All project partners are invited to events by the NAPCORE Academy, regular SCOM or consortium meetings. Continuous exchange and community management as specific tasks within the Project.

6 A heterogeneous project consortium (cultural aspects) is hindering decision processes. (likelihood=low, impact=low)

WP1 Strong Project Management with support from the National Coordinators/ Beneficiaries leads to harmonisation and consideration of all countries’ views.

7 Deviations from the projects activities’ work plans are identified too late and no action can be started. (likelihood=low, impact=medium)

WP1 Reporting and monitoring tools are developed by the Project Management and regular reporting towards the Beneficiaries and Work Package Leaders is undertaken. Furthermore, Beneficiaries and Work Package Leaders will provide a periodically update of the reporting and monitoring tools. This ensures a timely identification of deviations. Deviations that result in a budget reallocation need to ensure that budgets between activities are still intact.

8 NAPCORE-X results are not visible for the WP8 Three measures are undertaken to avoid that risk: 1. Involvement of external stakeholders already in the preparatory phase

58

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Critical risks & risk management strategy

Grant Preparation (Critical Risks screen) — Enter the info.

Risk number

Description Work Package No(s)

Proposed Mitigation Measures

outside world, including external stakeholders. (likelihood=low, impact=medium)

2. Active dissemination events (NAPCORE Mobility Data Days) are planned to attract and inform external stakeholders 3. Participation in key international events to make NAPCORE more visible to the extended stakeholder community. The close link and exchange with other European projects (X4ITS, MATIS, MERIDIAN) and initiatives (C-Roads platform) as well as the Advisory Board will ensure a broader dissemination strategy including a broader involvement of external stakeholders

9 Member States not active in the tasks are not well aquianted with the outcomes and are blocking the decisision making process. (likelihood=low, impact=low)

WP7, WP8 The Academy (Task 8.5) will offer easy access to information on all tasks for the project partners. The governance of the Steering Committee as laid out in the Consortium Agreement Terms of Reference will foresee situations of individual

10 There is no funded project to fund NAPCORE after 2027. (likelihood=medium, impact=medium)

WP7 A specific task (7.3) is dedicated to prepare NAPCORE for a situation of funding gaps.

11 Different/opposite interests, objectives and strategies (sometimes commercial) of the stakeholders, making discussion and/or consensus complex or impossible. (likelihood=medium, impact=medium)

WP6, WP2, WP1, WP7, WP5, WP4, WP8, WP3

A clear framework will be set by the WG/tasks leaders regarding meetings, communication, what is expected from participants, the possibilities and limits of the exercise etc. The WG/task leaders will insist that during meetings and the entire collaboration process, each stakeholder must have the opportunity to participate and give their opinion, but will indicate that NAPCORE-X will remain in control of its work and its results, keeping the common interests of NAPCORE-X partners at the centre of the reflection. This framework will be regularly recalled throughout the project. Thus, by participating in the activities, stakeholders will know the rules and framework of the discussions and will have to adhere to them.

12 Vast range of stakeholders and transport modes concerned by MMTIS DR. (likelihood=medium, impact=medium)

WP2 A strategy will be established to work in thematic subgroups for instance public transport (metro, trams, buses, etc.), rail, micromobility, maritime/navigation, air/aviation, bicycle, and car-related services (like parking, car-sharing, etc.). These subgroups will allow to work with each community more adequately, making the work process more efficient. This will also allow to adapt the content to the realities reported by the different stakeholders and to be able to address more specific questions for a mode of transport or a type of participants. Each group will have to establish a list of priority topics that will be addressed during NAPCORE-X. Topics that are not addressed in NAPCORE-X may still be retained

59

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

Critical risks & risk management strategy

Grant Preparation (Critical Risks screen) — Enter the info.

Risk number

Description Work Package No(s)

Proposed Mitigation Measures

for possible consideration later, as part of work programme of the long-term governance structure.

13 There is an overlap between the coordinative efforts in NAPCORE-X with other initiatives by Member States or others. (likelihood=medium, impact=medium)

WP2, WP1, WP3 There should not be any activities that do the same as NAPCORE-X. There will be constant efforts to identify relevant stakeholder activities, initiatives and projects in the multimodal mobility domain as well as in the road and traffic domain (WG2 and WG3). If an activity or initiative is identified, the domain management tasks in Tasks 2.1 and 3.1 will identify further actions that could lead from no action and further observation to setting up a dedicated theme or Ambassador team to align with the identified group. Further alignment and escalation will be done in the Core Alignment Team and, if necessary, the strategic Task 7.2 or the Steering Committee.

60

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

ANNEX 1

Connecting Europe Facility (CEF)

Description of the action (DoA) “NAPCORE-X”

Part B

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................................... 2 2. WORK PLAN, WORK PACKAGES, ACTIVITIES, RESOURCES AND TIMING ......................................................... 4

2.1 Work plan .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Work packages, activities, resources and timing ...................................................................................................... 5

ANNEXES .............................................................................................................................................................................. 53

1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Project description, scope and objectives

Describe the project scope, main goals and objectives, as well as the technical data.

Please use the following structure:

− Overall objective

− General description and context — describe the context, including how the project fits into political priorities and (if applicable) complements other CEF projects

− Location (if appropriate) — mention where the project will be implemented

− Justification — describe the current situation and needs analysis

− Specific objectives — list and link them to the work packages used in section 4

− Expected outcomes and results — include facts and statistics.

NAPCORE-X is the project to continue the operation and management of the National Access Point Coordination Organisation for Europe (“NAPCORE”). In addition, it takes up the work previously managed by the EC-funded projects DATEX II, TN-ITS and DATA4PT.

In June 2024 NAPCORE created a vision for itself, which provides the foundation of the objectives and activities for this proposal as well:

Working on a digital foundation for modern, data-driven and multimodal mobility across Europe facilitates and enhances the provision, accessibility and use of harmonised mobility data. Cooperation among EU Member States on all aspects of mobility data exchange contributes to safe, sustainable and seamless mobility in Europe.

More concretely, we follow the following mission statements:

• To coordinate the alignment of operational aspects of the implementation of the Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) Directive as mentioned in Article 5.3 amongst the Member States;

• To advise the European Commission and the Member States on the effects of other (besides the ITS Directive) and future legislation in relation to the mobility data domain;

• To monitor, evaluate, assess and possibly propose action dealing with relevant European technological and societal developments relevant for the mobility data domain as well as to track relevant global developments;

• To establish coordination and facilitate cooperation between relevant stakeholders;

• To develop and offer tools and processes as well as to share best practices supporting National Access Points (NAPs) and National Bodies (NBs) on a European level;

• To share findings and results within and beyond the NAPCORE community to ensure broader awareness and harmonization among stakeholders.

The need and justification for NAPCORE-X is given by the revised Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the framework for the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in the field of road transport and for interfaces with other modes of transport (the ITS Directive), Article 5 (3), in which a cooperation and coordination of Member States on matters related to mobility data exchange via the National Access Points is mandated. NAPCORE, enabled through this NAPCORE-X project, is the organisational structure in which this coordination takes place.

Building upon the main objective of integrating the outcomes of the CEF Programme Support Actions NAPCORE and Data4PT to further support the harmonised implementation of Delegated Regulations adopted under the ITS Directive, the specific objectives of the project are:

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

• to support implementation of the requirements to make infrastructure, safety, traffic and travel

data accurate and accessible to users (such as transport authorities or service providers) via the

NAPs, i.e. all NAPs and associated data stemming from the implementation of the Delegated

Regulations adopted under the ITS Directive, including their possible revision during the lifetime

of this action, in the framework of the implementation of the working programme of the ITS

Directive,

• to support implementation of the requirements to make data available to users as mandated by

the revised ITS Directive,

• to further support the coordination and harmonisation of a standardised NAP data distribution

ecosystem throughout the EU and Europe, contributing to the creation of a digital twin of the

physical transport infrastructure and its operations, providing for a data layer supporting transport

services,

• to further enable seamless and efficient multimodal travel across Europe by facilitating the

development and deployment of harmonized European public data standards for use in

multimodal travel information services for door-to-door mobility applications.

These objectives will be achieved by coordinating aspects regarding the:

• data exchange according to the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1926 and 2024/490 (MMTIS)

 in WG2, WG4 (especially Task 4.3), WG5

• data exchange according to Delegated Regulations (EU) 885/2013, 886/2013, 2015/962 and 2022/670 (SRTI, RTTI and SSTP)

 in WG3, WG4 (especially Task 4.1, Task 4.5), WG5

• operation and interoperability of European NAPs

 in WG4 (especially Task 4.2, Task 4.4, Task 4.6), WG5, WG8 (especially Task 8.2)

• availability and quality

 in WG5 (especially Task 5.1, Task 5.3)

• operation of National Bodies

 in WG 6

• stakeholder reach out and capacity building

 in WG 8

• management and strategy of NAPCORE

 in WG 1, WG 7.

The expected outcome is a more harmonized landscape for mobility data exchange in Europe. The NAPs will have guidelines and recommendations for implementations and upgrades leading towards more interoperable NAPs than it would be possible without the NAP coordination via NAPCORE(-X). Furthermore, standards in the field of mobility data will be further developed (i.e. DATEX II, TN-ITS, NeTEx, SIRI, mobilityDCAT-AP), making sure they are aligned amongst each other, include newest requirements and support the EU Member States’ use cases when it comes to data provisions in line with the Delegated Regulations of the ITS Directive.

Also, the setup of National Implementation Roadmaps for the NAPs will be facilitated by delivering a framework and guidelines. Moreover, the collection, alignment and reporting on the roadmaps will be managed via NAPCORE-X (while the actual setup and the implementation remains a MS responsibility).

The project has an almost pan-European coverage, with all Member States of the European Union and Moldova represented as project partners. Furthermore, other European countries are associated as well: Switzerland, Norway, the United Kingdom, Iceland and Montenegro. The Balkan region is involved through the Transport Community as Active Observers.

NAPCORE-X will put a focus on the facilitation of mobility data exchange via the NAPs on the TEN-T network with its urban nodes, as defined in the ITS Directive and its Delegated Regulations, however, all parts of the transportation network will be considered (in line with the provisions in the beforementioned legislation).

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

4

#@WRK-PLA-WP@#

2. WORK PLAN, WORK PACKAGES, ACTIVITIES, RESOURCES AND TIMING

2.1 Work plan

Work plan

Provide a brief description of the overall structure of the work plan (list of work packages or graphical presentation (Pert chart or similar)).

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

5

The structure of the project is composed of eight Working Groups and the NAPCORE Steering Committee, the project’s decision-making body, encompassing all Member States. Each Working Group - led by a beneficiary from the public sector - consists of several tasks, which are led by various partners, reflecting the pan-European scope of the project. The matrix structure, as shown above, allows for the necessary agility and coordination between the Working Groups.

The organisational and governance structure will support the ambition of stronger coordination amongst the Member States, requiring an increased level of commitment. The newly amended ITS Directive calls (in article 5.3) for a Member State coordination on operational aspects of the implementation of the specifications adopted by the Commission. The current NAPCORE project has already established a decision-making body in the governance structure (the Steering Committee) that in essence already accomplishes this. However, with the additional mandate/requirements from the ITS Directive, we will need to strengthen this role even more. An increased level of commitment and an increased level of focus of NAPCORE needs to go along with this additional mandate and role.

At the same time, it has become apparent that the organisational and governance structure that was built up in the first phase of NAPCORE was generally effective, but not ideal in dealing with upcoming new developments, changes in priority (from NAPCORE partners, Member States or EC/DG MOVE) or ad-hoc issues. For this reason, we introduce a more flexible/agile process regarding structure governance and budget assignment to work items, based on clear agile process(es) for prioritization of areas of activity. This way NAPCORE becomes capable to respond to emerging topics that need a response from NAPCORE but are not known today.

2.2 Work packages, activities, resources and timing

WORK PACKAGES

Work packages

This section concerns a detailed description of the project activities.

Group your activities into work packages. A work package means a major sub-division of the project. For each work package, enter an objective (expected outcome) and list the activities, milestones and deliverables that belong to it. The grouping should be logical and guided by identifiable outputs.

Projects should normally have a minimum of 2 work packages. WP1 should cover the management and coordination activities (meetings, coordination, project monitoring and evaluation, financial management, progress reports, etc) and all the activities which are cross-cutting and therefore difficult to assign to another specific work package (do not try splitting these activities across different

work packages). WP2 and further WPs should be used for the other project activities. You can create as many work packages as needed by copying WP1.

For very simple projects, it is possible to use a single work package for the entire project (WP1 with the project acronym as WP name).

Work packages covering financial support to third parties ( only allowed if authorised in the Call document) must describe the conditions for implementing the support (for grants: max amounts per third party; criteria for calculating the exact amounts, types of activity that qualify (closed list), persons/categories of persons to be supported and criteria and procedures for giving support; for

prizes: eligibility and award criteria, amount of the prize and payment arrangements).

Enter each activity/milestone/output/outcome/deliverable only once (under one work package).

Ensure consistency with the detailed budget table per WP/calculator (if applicable) (n/a for prefixed Lump Sum Grants)

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

6

Objectives

. Describe the objective of the work package and how it contributes/relates to the overall and specific objectives of the project.

State if there are links to other work packages (or conversely that there are no links to any other work package).

Activities (WP description)

Provide a concise overview of the work (planned tasks). Be specific and give a short name and number for each task.

Mention for each task links with tasks planned under other work packages. Flag tasks which are on the critical path.

Show who is participating in each task: Coordinator (COO), Beneficiaries (BEN), Affiliated Entities (AE), Associated Partners (AP), indicating in bold the task leader.

Add information on other participants’ involvement in the project e.g. subcontractors.

Complete the column on subcontracting. Subcontracts must be awarded using your usual purchasing practices – provided that they ensure best value for money and no conflict of interests. If you are a public procurer (‘contracting authority/entity’ within the meaning of the EU Directives on public procurement), you must also comply with the applicable national law on public procurement.”

Note:

The Coordinator remains fully responsible for the coordination tasks, even if they are delegated to someone else. Coordinator tasks cannot be subcontracted.

Milestones and deliverables (outputs/outcomes)

Milestones are control points in the project that help to chart progress. They are not needed for CEF TA projects. You can leave the section on milestones empty.

Means of verification are how you intend to prove that a milestone has been reached. If appropriate, you can also refer to indicators. They should be easy and concrete. Examples of means of verification include: publication of the tender notice, signature of a contract by the last party, acceptance/approval of final report/outcome, etc. A deliverable can be also used as a mean of verification

for a milestone.

Deliverables are project outputs which are submitted to show project progress (any format) and achievement of the technical work. Refer on ly to major outputs. Do not include minor sub-items, internal working papers, meeting minutes, etc.

Examples of deliverables for works projects include: constructed rail section, built bridge, deployed charging stations, concluded contract, published manuals, construction of the transmission line [name of the line], commissioning of the transmission line [name of the line], constructed transmission tower, deployed submarine cable, etc. For deliverables which are physical investments, provide in the ‘Description’ field the type of document you will use to prove the completion of the deliverable (e.g. acceptance note, test protocol, certificate of completion, handover certificate, etc).

Examples of deliverables for studies include: a technical design, an engineering design, a completed analysis, an environmental report, data collection, creation of a model and description of

scenarios, etc. For such deliverables, provide in the ‘Description’ field: confirmation of completion and/or approval of technical design, copy of environmental report, etc.

For deliverables such as meetings, events, seminars, trainings, workshops, webinars, conferences, etc., enter each deliverable separately and provide the following in the 'Description' field: invitation,

agenda, signed presence list,report of the event, presentations.

For deliverables such as manuals, toolkits, guides, reports, leaflets, brochures, training materials etc., add in the ‘Description’ field: format (electronic or printed), language(s), approximate number of pages and estimated number of copies of publications (if any).

For each deliverable you will have to indicate a due month by when you commit to upload it in the Portal. The due month of the deliverable cannot be outside the duration of the work package and must be in line with the timeline provided below. Month 1 marks the start of the project and all deadlines should be related to this starting date.

The labels used mean:

Public — fully open ( automatically posted online on the Project Results platforms)

Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

7

EU classified — RESTREINT-UE/EU-RESTRICTED, CONFIDENTIEL-UE/EU-CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET-UE/EU-SECRET under Decision 2015/444. For items classified under other rules (e.g. national or international organisation), please select the equivalent EU classification level.

Please note that milestones/deliverables should relate to the project work. Periodic reports or final reports linked to payments should NOT be included.

Work Package 1

Work Package 1: WORKING GROUP 1 – GENERAL MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION

Duration: M1 – M30 Lead Beneficiary: DE-BAST

Objectives

The primary objective of WG1 "General Management & Administration", is to ensure the seamless execution of the project through effective coordination, administration, and internal alignment. Task 1.1 focuses on Project Coordination & Management, encompassing oversight of all project activities, maintaining compliance with timelines, budgets, and EU funding regulations, and ensuring consistent communication with stakeholders, including the European Commission.

Task 1.2, Internal Alignment, aims to foster synergy among project partners by establishing clear workflows, roles, and responsibilities. This includes regular internal meetings, robust documentation practices, and alignment on key deliverables to ensure that all consortium members are working cohesively toward the project's objectives. WG1 provides the foundational structure and operational efficiency necessary for achieving the project's overall goals.

Part of the task and objective of WG 1 is to manage the financial, budgetary situation of the project. This also includes the monitoring of the efforts (which translate to claimed costs) per partner and activity. The shares of the effort and thus budget per activity (and task) will be observed to make sure that all activities and tasks spend roughly their defined budget share. Even though this share might be re-evaluated and finetuned in coordination with DG MOVE and with a Steering Committee decision during the project runtime based upon validated needs and requirements, the initial approximate task budget allocations are to be taken as the basis and should generally be observed:

Number Name WG budget

share Task budget share

within WG Task budget share

of total budget

WG 1 General Management & Administration

7%

43% 3.1%

Task 1.1 Project Coordination & Management 32% 2.4%

Task 1.2 Internal Alignment 26% 1.9%

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

8

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility

9%

2% 0.2%

Task 2.1 Domain & Community Management 51% 4.6%

Task 2.2 Theme: Multimodal Data Availability on the NAPs 18% 1.7%

Task 2.3 Theme: Multimodal Data (Re-Use) 13% 1.2%

Task 2.4 Theme: EU IDs for Multimodal Access Nodes 16% 1.5%

WG 3 Road & Traffic

5%

4% 0.2%

Task 3.1 Domain & Community Management 68% 3.2%

Task 3.2 Theme: Digital Interactive Traffic Management 13% 0.6%

Task 3.3 Theme: Alternative Fuels 14% 0.7%

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture

34%

3% 0.9%

Task 4.1 Road and Traffic Data Standard (DATEX II) 33% 11.3%

Task 4.2 Mobility Data Ecosystem Architecture 6% 2.1%

Task 4.3 Multimodal Standards 21% 7.3%

Task 4.4 Metadata Specifications 11% 3.7%

Task 4.5 METR (Management of Electronic Traffic Regulations)

14% 4.8%

Task 4.6 NAP Interoperability 13% 4.3%

WG 5 Data Provision & Use

11%

3% 0.3%

Task 5.1 NAP Data Insights and Reporting Support 17% 2.0%

Task 5.2 Tools 50% 5.7%

Task 5.3 Data Quality 30% 3.4%

WG 6 Compliance Assessment & National Bodies

7%

2% 0.2%

Task 6.1 Strategies for National Body Coordination and Non- Compliance Management

44% 3.3%

Task 6.2 Operational Support to National Bodies 38% 2.8%

Task 6.3 National Body Harmonisation and Alignment 16% 1.2%

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

9

WG 7 Governance & Strategy

9%

3% 0.3%

Task 7.1 Steering Committee & Advisory Board 25% 2.2%

Task 7.2 Strategy 35% 3.2%

Task 7.3 Long-Term Governance 37% 3.3%

WG 8 Dissemination & Communication

17%

2% 0.3%

Task 8.1 Overall Dissemination and Communication Management

8% 1.4%

Task 8.2 NAP Support Center 10% 1.6%

Task 8.3 Events 24% 4.0%

Task 8.4 Website, Social Media, and Service Desk 9% 1.5%

Task 8.5 Academy & Training 47% 7.9%

Activities (WP description)

Task No (continuous

numbering linked to

WP)

Task Name Description Participants

Name Role (COO, BEN, AE, AP, OTHER)

T1.1 PROJECT COORDINATION & MANAGEMENT

The activity encompasses all project management related tasks.

The following activities are covered in this task:

• managing the project’s reporting and administrative

requirements, including the compilation and creation of the

annual activity reports 2025, 2026 and 2027

• consolidation of annual working programmes 2026 and 2027

• financial controlling (and reporting)

• management of risks and quality

DE-BASt DE-HH DE-NRW-MIN DE-NVBW DE-RMS AT-MVO AT-ASFINAG AT-ATE BE-FED BE-FL BE-NGI HR-CESTE

COO BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

10

• operation and management of the project’s internal

collaboration tools

• single-point-of-contact to and for the European Commission

Every NAPCORE Beneficiary will be part of this task to cover their

general administrative and reporting efforts of being part in NAPCORE.

HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-MDCR CZ-CVUT CZ-TTR DK-DRD DK-TS EE-ETA FI-FINTRA FI-TRAFICOM FR-MIN FR-CEREMA FR-ART GR-MIN HU-EKM HU-KOZUT IT-MIN IT-SINA IT-ASPI IT-MOVYON IT-5T IT-CEF IT-QM IT-SINELEC LV-CELI LT-VIA MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PL-GDNRM PT-IMT PT-ARMIS RO-MIN RO-NCRIA RO-ITS RO-ELSOL SK-MIN SI-MZI SI-UM ES-DGT SE-TV

BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

11

SE-ST SE-STA

XMD-MIN

Y-UITP Y-ITxPT Y-ERTICO

BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN

T1.2 INTERNAL ALIGNMENT

Ensuring the internal alignment between all project activities.

All Working Group Leads and Task leads are active members of Task

1.2. The Working Group Leads form the Core Alignment Team (CAT).

The CAT is responsible for the internal alignment of all project activities.

In at least monthly and mostly virtual meetings, the Core Alignment

Team will get together, report and discuss on finished, ongoing and

planned activities, important developments, challenges and issues. The

team will discuss, align and decide on actions to be taken. The Core

Alignment Team is the cross-WG coordination and alignment body for

topics that do not require a further escalation to the Steering Committee.

On occasion or for some in a more regular manner, also Task Leads,

Team Leads, Ambassadors or Work Item Leads will join the CAT for

meetings of an extended Alignment Team. The setup of the Alignment

Team as well as the meeting frequencies will be decided by the CAT

based on the needs at the time.

In addition, the CAT identifies Cross-functional Teams for topics in need

for dedicated action that spans multiple WGs under consideration of

input and with guidance from the WG7 / the Steering Committee.

DE-BASt AT-ATE BE-FED HR-CESTE CY-PWD CZ-TTR FI-FINTRA FR-MIN HU-KOZUT IT-SINA NL-MIN PT-ARMIS RO-ITS SI-MZI SI-UM Y-UITP Y-ERTICO

COO BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

Work Package 2

Work Package 2: WORKING GROUP 2 – MULTIMODAL MOBILITY

Duration: M1 – M30 Lead Beneficiary: BE-FED

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

12

Objectives

In the framework of the ITS Directive and the MMTIS Delegated Regulation:

- Implement and coordinate domain specific tasks and subjects related to multimodal mobility, encompassing all transport modes including cycling and walking,

and including interaction with broader mobility related initiatives, including e.g. parking;

- Share outcomes both within and beyond the NAPCORE community, ensuring broader awareness and harmonization of approaches among all stakeholders;

- Promote and facilitate collaboration among NAP relevant stakeholders within the multimodal mobility sector. This includes engaging with external stakeholders to

further develop strategies for data accessibility and usability, in particular community and domain management;

- Study EU Identification System for Multimodal Mobility Access Nodes, in line with Annex III and the Working Programme of the revised ITS Directive.

In comparison to the other priority actions of the ITS Directive, the implementation of the Delegated Regulation MMTIS addresses a vast range of stakeholders as well as

transport modes, while the potential data re-users are less well defined and more scattered. Looking at the data providers, there can easily be more than 100 data

providers for a small country. This is due to the scope of the Delegated Regulation, on the one hand touching all transport modes, and on the other hand aiming at

bringing together transport operators to complete first and last mile trips, thus being situated mainly at the local and regional levels. Moreover, one policy does not fit all,

since multinational and cross-border operating companies are active as well, obviously in long-distance modes, but also for cross-border trips. The same holds true for

service providers, ranging from the local level, such as urban multimodal trip planners, to global players including big tech companies. This particularity needs a

specifically tailored approach.

One of our strengths is that we can build on the work done in the DATA4PT project. Its objective was to advance data-sharing practices in the public transport sector, in

order to fulfil the needs of multimodal travel information service providers. Implementation and support developed in that project will find continuation within NAPCORE-X,

and its experiences and recommendations will be inspiring.

Domain Themes

- A first set of domain themes is included in the following tasks. During the runtime of the project further domain themes can be added in an agile manner, whilst

re-evaluating the effort to cover already existing domain themes.

Each domain theme will be managed by a task lead possibly supported by an Ambassador or an Ambassador team for the domain theme. Domain theme participants will

as well be involved in Cross-functional Teams across Working Groups

Activities (WP description)

Task No (continuous numbering linked to

WP)

Task Name Description Participants

Name Role (COO, BEN, AE, AP,

OTHER)

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

13

T2.1 DOMAIN & COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT

To coordinate domain specific activities, manage the relationships with and between different community stakeholders and foster strategical and tactical collaboration among stakeholders involved in multimodal mobility.

Specific topics/communities will be addressed in the multimodal field, e.g. passenger public transport (metro, trams, bus etc.), rail, micro-mobility, maritime/inland waterways/navigation, air/aviation, (e-)bicycle, motorised two and three wheels, and car-related services (like parking, car-sharing, car-pooling, etc.).

Close collaboration is foreseen with all Working Groups and activities, based on the topics that will be discussed with members of the different communities, e.g. through the Cross-functional Teams, the meetings of the CAT, and by organising common meetings when relevant.

Objectives:

- Develop an ecosystem with relevant multimodal mobility

stakeholders to discuss work ongoing, requirements and

contribute to relevant activities. This ecosystem will also offer

the opportunity to support the work on common strategies and

discuss responses on the challenges raised by external

stakeholders.

- Facilitate engagement through regular communication, thematic

workshops and quarterly update meetings: In order to ensure

transparency and give NAPCORE's Follower partners, as well

as external stakeholders, the opportunity to follow and contribute

to the project's work, transversal meetings dedicated to

multimodal themes will be organized on a regular basis. These

meetings will provide an opportunity to present NAPCORE's

ongoing work in the multimodal topics, and to gather feedback

from participants on this work. It will also be an opportunity to

identify areas where specific tasks or coordination may be

needed in the future.

- Organize, once a year, a Users’ days/NAP users Multimodal

Forum (in-person or online) for actual and potential users of

NAP data in multimodal mobility applications. At an international

scale, such an event will be interesting for international and

DE-BASt DE-HH DE-NRW-MIN DE-NVBW DE-RMS AT-MVO AT-ATE BE-FED BE-FL BG-MIN HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-MDCR DK-TS FI-FINTRA FI-TRAFICOM FR-MIN FR-CEREMA GR-MIN HU-KOZUT IT-MIN IT-5T LV-CELI MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PL-MIN PT-IMT PT-ARMIS RO-MIN RO-NCRIA RO-ITS RO-ELSOL SK-MIN SI-MZI SE-ST XUK-NH XME-MIN XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA

COO BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP AP

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

14

larger national stakeholders, to share their experiences and

needs regarding the data available via the NAPs. The concept of

such Users’ days could also be shared with the NAPCORE

active partners, allowing them to apply a similar concept to the

national or regional level.

Y-UITP Y-ITxPT Y-ERTICO

BEN BEN BEN

T2.2 THEME: MULTIMODAL DATA AVAILABILITY ON THE NAPS

Develop a strategy to increase the number of MMTIS data providers on the NAPs.

Activities and results:

- Map the EU-based requirements around data provision and

clarify which obligations apply to which organisation, at which

level of governance (national, local), and with which set of rules

focusing on the scope of NAPCORE, i.e. MMTIS Delegated

Regulation. This mapping will also address issues on data

quality.

- Map the various channels through which data is provided to the

NAPs, with particular attention to similar existing databases in

the Member States. This mapping will also include qualitative

feedback from the data providers regarding their data provision

to the NAPs (or their lack thereof).

- Develop a roadmap to increase the number of MMTIS data

providers on the NAPs, and to raise awareness on data quality,

in line with the ambition to integrate all of them and taking into

account the wide variety of stakeholders. Collect best practices

and propose strategies to implement them at a larger scale,

including communication towards data providers, with a specific

attention for providers at a local level, both public and private.

DE-BASt DE-NRW-MIN DE-NVBW DE-RMS AT-MVO AT-ATE AT-BMIMI BE-FED BE-FL BE-NGI HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-MDCR CZ-CVUT DK-TS FI-FINTRA FI-TRAFICOM FR-MIN GR-MIN HU-KOZUT IE-NTA IT-5T IT-CEF IT-SINELEC LV-CELI LT-VIA NL-MIN PT-ARMIS RO-NCRIA RO-ITS RO-ELSOL SK-MIN SI-UM

COO BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

15

SE-ST XUK-NH XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA Y-UITP Y-ERTICO

BEN AP AP AP BEN BEN

T2.3 THEME: MULTIMODAL DATA (RE-)USE

Foster re-using of data by multimodal mobility operators

Activities and results:

- Study existing international solutions in the multimodal field,

where we find cross-border applications for multimodal journey

planning in several regions of the Union. Those are often

supported by national ministries or other government

agencies/public authorities, and in some cases even by NAP

operators.

- Propose strategies to implement such solutions based on the

lessons learned and to apply those solutions on a wider scale, if

possible, integrating a large number of countries into such

applications. This task will include feedback and experience

sharing with multimodal mobility service providers.

- Foster re-using of data by mobility operators, in their various

mobility services, for instance by integrating planning, booking

and ticketing into such services. Those mobility operators could

also re-use data from other platforms or from the RTTI NAP. It

could lead to more integrated and cross-border multimodal and

unimodal services across Europe.

- Activities will include providing an open-source demonstrator for

multimodal data re-use purposes. Demonstrator will include

capability to offer multimodal routing between different member

states with standardised NAP data available.

DE-HH DE-NRW-MIN DE-NVBW DE-RMS AT-MVO AT-ATE AT-BMIMI BE-FED BE-FL HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-MDCR CZ-CVUT DK-TS FI-FINTRA FI-TRAFICOM FR-MIN HU-KOZUT LV-CELI LT-VIA MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PT-ARMIS RO-NCRIA RO-ITS RO-ELSOL SK-MIN SI-UM SE-ST XUK-NH XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA

BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

16

Y-UITP Y-ITxPT

BEN BEN

T2.4 THEME: EU IDS FOR MULTIMODAL ACCESS NODES

Study for an EU Identification System for Multimodal Mobility Access Nodes

Activities and results:

- To map existing access nodes identification schemes and tools

in place to identify access nodes on a regional, international or

Member State level. This mapping will take into account

potential differences between transport modes and inquire

whether or not multimodal access node ID systems exist as well.

- To study, together with the concerned stakeholders, how an

additional layer for an EU-wide identification system for

multimodal mobility access nodes could be set up in a way that it

is compatible with the existing systems in the Member States.

To provide recommendations on what steps or requirements

would be needed for a potential roll-out of the EU-wide access

node ID system.

This task is related to the obligation set out in the ITS Directive (2010/40/EU) to make data available in a digital machine-readable format for the data category concerning the location of those identified access nodes. One instrument helping to realize this new duty put on lots of data providers – given the numerous access nodes for all scheduled modes – will be such an “EU IDs”.

DE-RMS AT-MVO AT-BMIMI BE-FED BE-FL HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-MDCR CZ-CVUT DK-TS FI-FINTRA FR-MIN HU-KOZUT LV-CELI MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PL-MIN PT-ARMIS RO-NCRIA RO-ITS RO-ELSOL SK-MIN SI-MZI SE-ST XUK-NH XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA Y-UITP

BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP BEN

Work Package 3

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

17

Work Package 3: WORKING GROUP 3 – ROAD & TRAFFIC

Duration: M1 – M30 Lead Beneficiary: NL-MIN

Objectives

▪ To implement and coordinate domain specific tasks and subjects related to road & traffic information and management services, including interaction with broader

mobility related initiatives, including e.g. cycling.

▪ To promote and facilitate collaboration among NAP relevant stakeholders within the road and traffic sector, building on the achievements of NAPCORE. This

includes engaging with external stakeholders to further develop coordinated strategies for data accessibility and usability.

▪ To share outcomes both within and beyond the NAPCORE community, ensuring broader awareness and harmonization of approaches among all stakeholders.

▪ To develop common solutions and share best practices for NAP services that support road & traffic information and management data use cases.

▪ To create awareness on future legislative actions from the EU affect the road traffic data domain, either being new legislation, or revision of existing. A concerted

advice/recommendations/response from the NAPCORE community towards these actions with regard to the operational impact are foreseen.

Domain Themes

▪ A first set of domain themes is included in the following tasks. During the runtime of the project further domain themes can be added in an agile manner, whilst re-

evaluating the effort to cover already existing domain themes.

▪ Each domain theme will be managed by a task lead possibly supported by an Ambassador or an Ambassador team for the domain theme. Domain theme

participants will as well be involved in Cross-functional Teams across the Working Groups.

Activities (WP description)

Task No (continuous

numbering linked to

WP)

Task Name Description Participants

Name Role

(COO, BEN, AE, AP, OTHER)

T3.1 DOMAIN & COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT

To coordinate domain specific activities and foster strategical and tactical

collaboration among stakeholders in road & traffic information and management

sector. To enhance the management, quality, and availability of road and traffic

data. This includes aligning with EU policies and ITS Delegated Regulations,

managing domain-specific activities, and building a sustainable structure for

DE-BASt DE-AB DE-HH DE-NRW-MIN AT-ASFINAG AT-ATE BE-FL

COO AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

18

public-private cooperation to support traffic information and management

services.

Activities:

• Knowledge Agenda Development:

- Develop and manage a knowledge agenda (roadmap) addressing

key topics and themes derived from EU policies and RTTI, SRTI,

and SSTP Delegated regulations, ensuring alignment with EU ITS

Directives.

• Stakeholder Engagement & Collaboration:

- Promote and coordinate dialogue and interaction on the

knowledge agenda (or roadmap), with relevant stakeholder groups

to promote collaboration: ITS Service Providers, RTTI Task Force,

TISA, DFRS, CCAM Partnership, C-Roads Platform, CEDR,

POLIS, ERTICO and ERTICO related innovation platforms such

as TN-ITS, TM2.0 etc.

- Promote and coordinate collaboration with EU Corridor projects

(like X4ITS, MATIS, MERIDIAN) and, where applicable, EU

mobility data-generating projects, like potentially TISGRADE, to

align scope, provide organisational and stakeholder support, and

collect requirements for standardization in line with domain

roadmap.

- Establish a sustainable structure to facilitate and govern public-

private agreements between EU-wide operating stakeholders in

the domain and Member States. These agreements are in line

with EU policy and regulations and can be settled in dedicated

project settings, ensuring long-term alignment and sustainability.

• Community Management:

- Establish a network of representatives of national communities

involved in the engagement of national stakeholders, inform and

activate local participation in European activities. Each NAP (or

NAP coordinating organisation) has a role to play in identifying the

most suitable representative or organization of national

BE-WAL BG-MIN BG-API HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-MDCR CZ-CVUT EE-ETA FI-FINTRA FI-TRAFICOM FR-MIN FR-CEREMA GR-MIN HU-KOZUT IE-TII IT-MIN IT-ASPI IT-MOVYON IT-5T IT-QM IT-SINELEC LV-CELI LT-VIA NL-MIN PL-MIN PL-GDNRM PT-IMT PT-ARMIS RO-MIN RO-NCRIA RO-ITS RO-ELSOL SK-MIN SI-MZI SI-UM ES-DGT XUK-NH XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA

AP AP AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

19

communities in their country who can act as a contact person for a

specific data domain. In particular, attention should be given to

identifying the right organization to oversee the governance of

national profiles in alignment with European standards.

- A likely Ambassador (team) will be on RTTI, working closely with

external initiatives like the RTTI Task Force or any Union funded

project that takes up work in the field of RTTI.

- Develop and coordinate an EU targeted outreach program tailored

specifically for smaller operators, which can include workshops,

toolkits and easy to use templates to help them align with

NAPCORE or EU recommendations and standards.

- For multi modal travel topics close collaboration with the WG2

activities will be established.

• Communication & Capacity Building:

- Facilitate engagement through regular communication and

thematic workshops, at quarterly meetings (online or in person) to

share updates, best practices, and results to keep the community

informed.

- Develop support materials for decision-makers and stakeholders

to encourage the adoption of NAPCORE recommendations.

- Provide training and education on road and traffic data standards

at the national and local levels, following the recommendations

from e.g. the declaration of Bucharest (DATEX II User forum 10-

2024) via the NAPCORE Academy.

Results:

- A periodically updated roadmap for road and traffic information and

management developments and their expected impacts on standards

and architecture, including recommendations for improvements to NAP

standards, data models, and Level of Service concepts.

- Enhanced collaboration and alignment among stakeholders through

shared best practices, strategies, and solutions for data use cases.

- Established agreements supporting EU policies and fostering long-

term cooperation between stakeholders.

XIS-VEG Y-ERTICO

AP BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

20

- Comprehensive outreach materials and support tools tailored for

decision-makers and smaller operators, which will be made available

via the NAPCORE Academy.

- A well-connected and informed community capable of reaching all

relevant stakeholders for effective knowledge management and

implementation.

Improved data management practices ensuring high-quality, accessible, and interoperable road and traffic data to support traffic information and management services.

T3.2 THEME DIGITAL INTERACTIVE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

The primary goal is to foster public-private collaborations for the implementation

of digital interactive traffic management. Digital interactive traffic management

is multi-dimensional: collaboration between road operators to have joint traffic

management operations across their operational borders (so not only national,

but also on regional and even local level). The second dimension of interactive

traffic management is about using the digital assets of service providers as

active components in traffic management, with agreed and possibly contracted,

guaranteed and possibly rewarded outcomes.

This requires further and deeper elaborated collaboration between all actors in

the value-chain.

This approach focuses on the application of digital technologies, systems, and

services within a multi-party ecosystem aiming to support road traffic managers

to optimize traffic flow, enhance safety, and reduce environmental impacts,

while considering European policies on sustainability, mobility, and data

sharing.

This involves translating (digitizing or digitalizing) current and future traffic

management policies, strategies, regulations, and processes into digital format,

that facilitate data and information sharing between public authorities, private

mobility providers, and road operators. The goal is to develop collaborative

strategies and coordinated roadside and in-vehicle traffic management

services, with support of the TM2.0 ERTICO Innovation Platform. Important

developments like kerbside management and coherent public space

management, dynamic usage of truck parking zones etc. will be taken on board

in this theme, as interaction with the end-user (via service providers) are critical

for the road operators to achieve their aims.

DE-BASt AT-ASFINAG AT-ATE BE-WAL BG-API HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CVUT EE-ETA FI-FINTRA FR-MIN FR-CEREMA GR-MIN HU-KOZUT IT-ASPI IT-MOVYON IT-QM IT-SINELEC LV-CELI LU-MIN NL-MIN PL-MIN PL-GDNRM RO-MIN RO-NCRIA RO-ITS RO-ELSOL SI-MZI SI-UM

COO BEN BEN AP AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

21

By leveraging (real-time) data, predictive analytics, and connected

infrastructure, digital traffic management enables improved coordination

between travellers, vehicles, road operators, and the broader EU mobility

system.

Activities:

- Analyse requirements for transition to digital format and identify best

practices in cooperation with Task 5.2

- Joint roadmap development for digital interactive traffic management

and its use cases

- Define and develop cross-border use cases where digital traffic

management solutions can be applied and requiring harmonised

approach.

- Define the role of the NAP and features supporting Digital interactive

traffic management use cases in accordance with EU mobility and

digital policies and initiatives

Results:

- Cooperation agreements in line with EU policies and regulations

- Recommendations for EU and stakeholders' initiatives

- Recommendations for WG4 and WG5 on data standards and NAP

architecture enhancement (features, data models, etc.) and NAP Level

of Service

ES-DGT XUK-NH XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA XIS-VEG Y-UITP Y-ERTICO

BEN AP AP AP AP BEN BEN

T3.3 THEME ALTERNATIVE FUELS

To enhance stakeholder collaboration on the collection, management, and accessibility of data related to alternative fuels infrastructure (AFI) in line with the European Union's policies to facilitate transition to cleaner economies. This includes improving data-sharing frameworks and collaboration among public and private stakeholders, in alignment with the EU Delegated Regulation on RTTI and the EU Delegated Regulation on Alternative Fuels Infrastructure (EU DR AFIR), and to closely cooperate with the STF workgroup in DG-MOVE and EAFO.

The management of alternative fuels infrastructure related data focuses on the availability of static data and dynamic data concerning alternative fuels infrastructure, such locations, available facilities and operational status of (EV) recharging points and refuelling points. Coordination work with EAFO, FIER.

DE-BASt DE-NVBW AT-ATE BE-FL HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CVUT CZ-TTR EE-ETA FI-FINTRA FI-TRAFICOM FR-MIN HU-KOZUT

COO BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

22

AVERE, Eco-movement, etc. to consolidate the needs of users and third parties in the harmonisation work.

Activities:

- Define best practices for data collection, production, quality

management, and sharing between stakeholders in compliance with

EU policy and regulations on AFIR and RTTI.

- Define the role of the NAP and features supporting management of

AFI related data in accordance with EU mobility and digital policy,

regulations and initiatives.

- Act as a mediator between CPOs and NAPs to align on a common API

standard used in the EU

- Support the parallel running implementations on AF related data,

collect feedback and iterate any issues back.

Results:

- Cooperation agreements in line with EU policies and regulations

- Recommendations for EU and stakeholders' initiatives

- Recommendations for WG4 and WG5 on data standards and NAP

architecture enhancement (features, data models, API standard etc.)

and NAP Level of Service

- Deliverable: Roadmap for Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Data

IT-ASPI LV-CELI LT-VIA LU-MIN NL-MIN PL-MIN RO-MIN RO-NCRIA RO-ITS SI-MZI ES-DGT XUK-NH

BEN BEN BEN AP BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP

Work Package 4

Work Package 4: WORKING GROUP 4 – DATA STANDARDS & ARCHITECTURE

Duration: M1 – M30 Lead Beneficiary: FR-MIN

Objectives

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

23

Ensure proper data standards that are well aligned and harmonised in combination with a robust architecture across the domains of multimodal and road traffic data, the NAP’s itself as well as the architecture of the mobility data ecosystems as a whole. The work for a specific domain is done in a named task within this Working Group

Each domain has an autonomous Change Management Board (CMB) that controls the scope of the standardisation effort for the domain. A Change Orchestration Board (COB) manages the cross-cutting interoperability aspects of the different domains and the overarching architecture and acts as the decisive body on the allocation of new topics for standardisation to tasks or proposal for new standards as such, taking the results of WG 4 in NAPCORE as a basis. Where standardisation action is required that does not fit in NAPCORE (for budget or scope reasons) this WG will bring it as input in the annual IT Rolling Plan from the Commission.

All tasks operate according to a joint Terms of Reference / Rules of Procedure in order to be transparent and well-structured to address joint work items in a coherent manner. The process to allocate work is done in an agile way, in order to be capable to manage the content of the foreseen deliverables according to demands of the communities within the domains.

There are several external stakeholder community platforms at European level that act as a funnel for use case and domain requirements to the standards. The CMB and Technical Board (TB) will be open to representation of these platforms to co-steer the developments of the standards and contribute to the technical work relevant for their community. The collaboration will be managed in Working Groups 2 and 3 as such and governed by the afore mentioned Terms of Reference. Community management in WG 2 and 3 will safeguard that relevant stakeholders can bring their inputs, also when no representation in the governance of the standards is in place.

NAPCORE COB

CMB MM

TB

MM

CMB DATEX II

TB

DATEX II

CMB NAP

TB

NAP

CMB METR

TB

METR

CMB MobilityDCATAP

TB MobilityDCATAP

TB

architecture

TB

cross cutting

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

24

• NAPCORE Change Orchestration Board (COB) • Chaired by the Working Group leading Member State. • Consists of the CMB chairs (and their seconded experts) and Technical Board (TB) chairs. • Orchestrate harmonisation and alignment between standards and have a permanent monitoring of required standardisation needs. These include architectural

aspects, data standards and profiles on the content side, and documentation, available deployment helpdesk etc on the support side. • Assignment of new topics to data standards involved. • Manage relationship with CEN and ISO for the relevant standards mainly focussing on CEN TC 278 and ISO TC 204.

• D&A Stakeholder Advisory Board (data standards and architecture as subgroup of the AB on top level)

The D&A Stakeholder Advisory Board will act as a platform to disseminate knowledge, experiences and receive feedback on new developments and dovetail on relevant issues or new developments in the sectors. Participants in the D&A STAB can be public and private organisations, mostly active outside NAPCORE. The D&A STAB will act as a subgroup of the Advisory Board in WG 7. However, participation in the D&A STAB is not limited to Advisory Board members.

Objective: To stay connected to the “outside” environment regarding new developments and possible new requirements. The D&A STAB and its members have a limited task: Provide (asked for or not) advice to the COB and its CMB’s, both on strategic and technical level.

The organisation of the tasks: Each task has the same structure and governance.

• Change Management Board – CMB (one for each domain)

- Chaired by leading Member State also known as Task Leader.

- Consists of representatives of the Member States with operational responsibility/interest for/in the standard, in combination with the mandate to control the budget allocation to work items of interest.

- Define the functional scope and prioritise the work according to available budget and shown interest by active contributors. It decides on what is done. Constraints and preconditions of cross sectoral alignment as determined by the COB are taken on board without any further preconditions.

- The annual workplan shall figure out the scope of work. A consolidated WG 4 annual workplan for standardisation related work shall be endorsed by the SCOM as well as modifications during the year.

- Decides on the workplan progress report.

- Mandate within the scope of the standards for the domain and the defined milestones and budgets.

• Task leader Is acting as CMB chairman and is responsible for

- Daily management, administration, communication, etc.

- Monitoring technical and functional progress and milestones defined in the task

- Reporting to the CMB, including deviations and suggested mitigation actions related to the workplan.

• Technical Board – TB

- TB is chaired by a senior expert, assigned by the CMB and for efficiency reasons preferably from the same Member State as the Task Lead.

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

25

- Consisting of WG Leaders and active Beneficiaries in the task.

- TB is responsible for quality of technical/content and how the assigned scope and work is executed within the constraints given.

- Prepare annual progress report and draft workplan. Generic Task structure and work process Each task has the same structure (see diagram above) in which the work scope and prioritisation is under control of the CMB, executed in a coordinated way in work items controlled by a TB. Each task will have at least the following subtasks:

• Continue to develop and adapt the (de facto) standards by following the structured process of:

o Stakeholder consultation to collect requirement in close collaboration WG 2 and/or WG 3

o Assessing functional demands stemming from the operational implementation of the ITS Directive, and its consecutive Delegated Regulations in the Member States, their modifications and other relevant regulations affecting the mobility data ecosystem.

o Continue to support the full scope of the standards if they serve a wider scope than data provision according to the EU ITS Directive related Delegated Regulations.

o Have expert teams in work items for requirement engineering and proposal drafting to hand over to CEN/ISO for formal standardisation process

o Creating European domain consensus about modifications to the standards o Managing the implementation of the agreed modifications to the standards through either:

▪ drafting and submitting updates (or new parts) of standardised parts to CEN

▪ submitting proposals for new (parts of) standards ICT-rolling workplan towards CEN

o Maintaining the existing (parts of the) standards according to the CEN revision scheme and process the comments into revised updates. o Make the digital artefacts on which the CEN publications are based publicly available. o Maintain and update the existing digital artifacts on which the CEN publications are based. o Offer a managed issue reporting and response process, supported with a standardised issue tracker for the reporting and tracing of issues. Scope of this

process comprises the total environment of the managed standards, profiles, documentation and training material. There is a team to respond to the

issues promptly and documented in the tool.

o Mapping/alignment with other standards/specifications relevant in the domain and used for either service provision or data-ecosystems beyond the scope the ITS Directive

• Define and maintain minimum EU profiles for the data categories as mentioned in the EU Delegated Regulations under a CMB controlled change management

process (aligned on COB level) and provide adequate documentation both on semantical and technical level.

This essential implementation material supports the publication of data in line with the reference standards. It is the most prominent outcome for data holders implementing the Delegated Regulations. Complementary to CEN standards, the profiles are developed and maintained under the governance of NAPCORE. Currently some profiles are included in CEN deliverables, while national profiles are developed by Member States. This approach will be deprecated in future updates of these standards.

• Develop a recommendation for the lifecycle of use of standards versions and versions of EU minimum profiles. The deployment of the standards in the Member

States will become visible in the deployment roadmap in WG7.

• Technical and implementation support:

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

26

- Staffing and organisation of the backend of the NAPCORE Helpdesk (as in WG 8):

o Transmodel, NeTEx, SIRI, OJP generic and specifically on the MMTIS DR

o DATEX II, TN-ITS generic and specifically on the RTTI, SRTI and SSTP DR

o mobilityDCAT-AP

• Create and maintain training material for the NAPCORE Academy (in WG 8) in context of NAPCORE Academy on four levels: Basics, Users, Masters and

Experts, addressing the different target groups of policy makers/managers, functional domain experts/information architects and developers creating the

software.

Mirror sub task for the cross-cutting work that can be expanded with domain specific use cases both in WG 4 and in WG 5.

Activities (WP description)

Task No (continuous numbering linked to

WP)

Task Name Description Participants

Name Role

(COO, BEN, AE, AP, OTHER)

T4.1 ROAD AND TRAFFIC DATA STANDARD DATEX II

Development and maintenance of DATEX II standards (including TN-ITS) in the frame of CEN TC278/WG8

Continue developing standards for: o Data registration as required by the DR MMTIS, RTTI, SRTI and SSTP,

in order to be able to be used by data holders and consumers addressing

among others: cycling use cases, updates of objects in (HD) maps,

feedback loop, AFIR regulated data.

o Define and integrate the use of European Functional Road Classes to be

used in the context of Traffic Circulation plans in line with the concepts

that are agreed by the road operators in the RTTI Taskforce and the

respective POLIS working groups.

o Traffic management operations

Alignment/harmonisation/coordination: - Liaison with DFRS, TISA, C-ROADS, Car2Car, APDS, STF working

group data and others on the interoperability aspects of data concepts in

relation to specific services and to provide DATEX II as interoperable

reference standard where needed.

DE-BASt DE-AB AT-ASFINAG AT-ATE BE-NGI BG-API HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CVUT CZ-TTR DK-DRD FI-FINTRA FR-CEREMA HU-KOZUT IE-TII IT-ASPI IT-MOVYON IT-5T IT-QM IT-SINELEC LV-CELI LU-MIN

COO AP BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

27

- Mapping of DATEX II to the relevant datasets that originate from specific

services to offer compliancy with the requirements from the relevant

Delegated Regulations

Standards developments: − Exchange updates to support the standardised NAP centric ecosystem.

Domain specific updates to support the centre-to-centre communication

taking digital interactive traffic management into account.

Roadmap of DATEX II v.4 publications according to CEN timelines. Work will be done on the parts of in the yellow block representing the runtime of NAPCORE-X. The final order of which parts will be taken up when is to be determined by the CMB.

Recommended Reference Profile developments: o Create new and maintain existing MMTIS, RTTI (including AFIR), SRTI,

and SSTP minimum EU reference profiles for the relevant data

types/categories when required by the stakeholder communities or

modifications in the regulations.

o Create and maintain ITS service specific profiles and support for the road

operator defined ITS services like the EU-EIP ITS services.

o Setup sustainable governance process on the EU profiles aligned with

MMTIS profile governance

o Produce documentation how to use the profiles and where needed: how

to create national profiles

Support and dissemination:

In addition to the activities described at WG 4 level: Organise one DATEX II User Forum in close collaboration with WG 8

MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PL-MIN PL-GDNRM PT-ARMIS RO-NCRIA RO-ELSOL SK-MIN SI-MZI SI-UM ES-DGT SE-TV XUK-NH XME-MIN XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA XIS-VEG Y-UITP Y-ITxPT Y-ERTICO

BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP AP AP BEN BEN BEN

T4.2 MOBILITY DATA ECOSYSTEM ARCHITECTU RE

Design and manage the architecture for the NAP centric mobility data ecosystems deemed relevant by the Member States. The common European mobility data space (EMDS) and the European Access Point for Alternative Fuels Infrastructure are important developments to be addressed, as well as the provision of public authority data via the Open Data Portals. This task addresses the clarifications of the concepts in a NAP centric (federated) data-ecosystem and further elaborates the aspects of data integration and interoperability on conceptual level, but also on technical level, in taking into consideration the NAPCORE NAP Reference Architecture maintained in Taks 4.6 NAP Interoperability. Therefore, the standardisation aspects of the data-ecosystem as a whole are addressed in here

DE-BASt AT-ATE BE-NGI HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CVUT CZ-TTR DK-DRD FI-FINTRA

COO BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

28

including some cross-cutting topics on technical interoperability level such as exchange technology, patterns for synchronisation, cybersecurity and trust also in combination with domain specific developments that require similar concepts.

Monitor and assess requirements stemming from ITS and related legislation

Permanent process to monitor whether new topics that require either adaptation of the architectures or the data standards and profiles and data- exchange technology (and where applicable in combination cybersecurity solutions).

Architectures of NAP-Centric mobility data ecosystems

The ITS Directive defines a mobility data ecosystem with the NAP as the central point of information on what data, with what meta properties is available and where to find it. Stakeholders are looking for a better understanding of what actors exist in the ecosystem, how they relate, how data is exposed, contracted and used. The common European mobility data space is one way to feed data into an ecosystem, however there are more relevant data ecosystems that use other building blocks. This task will provide the related business, process and technical architectures (based on FRAME NEXT) for the different ecosystems. An important subject is the standardisation of the concept of the feedback loop as mentioned in the regulations (to be aligned with other initiatives addressing this). The second iteration of the architecture will include the cybersecurity and trust building blocks that are required for an interoperable trustworthy value chain.

Cybersecurity, trust and data authenticity

All actors need to take cybersecurity measures in order to make the data provision safe and secure. Especially, to bring trustworthiness and confidence that data is really originating from a reliable source in an open data environment, there is a big interest in interoperable choices. This affects the trust levels among stakeholders down to the technical measures to achieve this. Without further alignment on this subject the implemented solutions will by definition be not interoperable, causing a lot of additional costs and potential failure of the concept. The outcomes of this work item will be integral part of the architectural deliverables of this task as well as the exchange specifications for the domain specific standards.

Data publication/interchange/exchange alignment

FR-MIN HU-KOZUT IT-ASPI IT-CEF IT-SINELEC LV-CELI LT-VIA MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PL-MIN PT-ARMIS RO-NCRIA RO-ITS RO-ELSOL SI-UM ES-DGT SE-TV XUK-NH XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA Y-UITP Y-ITxPT Y-ERTICO

BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

29

Standardised deployment of the technical interfaces (API’s) with regard to exchange technology and platforms, in combination with harmonised cybersecurity measures is a cross domain cutting effort to achieve interoperable access to the different data holder's data. At least standardised solutions for snapshot publications, delta publications and standardised push interfaces for low latency data services will be defined. (where possible cross domain, but at least within each domain).

Staffing of this work item is addressed jointly with Tasks 4.1 and 4.3. The results will be reflected in the exchange specifications of the related standards in these working groups

Joint toolkit for schema creation and creation of deployable technical artefacts such as profiles

For both the multimodal as the road and traffic data domain tooling is required to get from the UML data models to the deployable artefacts such as schema- files and profile management. This activity will explore how the existing tooling can be merged into a joint tool and then have the COB and related CMB’s to decide to pursue this development. The result should be one open-source tool, under the governance of the COB. Staffing of this work item is addressed jointly with Tasks 4.1 and 4.3. (The validation tooling is developed in scope of task 5.2)

Recommended use of version of standards roadmap over the data categories in the different Delegated Regulations

Which version of the standards shall be used over time (fade in of new versions versus deprecation of older versions) will be provided in combination with the relevant recommended reference profiles or EU minimum profiles according to MMTIS. The recommendation which version of standards to use should be an important input to the national deployment roadmaps.

T4.3 MULTIMODAL STANDARDS

Multimodal standards based on Transmodel are required by DR MMTIS to feed

travel information services. By design, they can also ensure interoperability at the

operational level. Specific travel information standards exist and they are often

simpler, making them more attractive. However, interoperability at the operational

level is essential to produce good-quality data. Standards can also reduce costs of

implementation and improve the overall quality of the systems in the market. In

this context, it is important to give MMTIS standards the credit they deserve.

DE-BASt DE-HH DE-NRW-MIN DE-RMS AT-MVO AT-ATE AT-BMIMI BE-FED

COO BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

30

The goal of this task is to coordinate the efforts at EU level to pursue MMTIS

standards development and encourage their implementation through the following

actions:

Alignment/harmonisation/coordination:

- Setup sustainable governance and funding scheme for the Transmodel

ecosystem, standards (Transmodel, NeTEx, SIRI, OJP, OpRa) and

related profiles aligned with road and traffic ecosystem.

- Define a strategy to align Transmodel-based standards with standards

used in the rail sector and road traffic.

- Liaison with existing open specifications GTFS/GBFS.

- Mapping of NeTEx and SIRI with GBFS updated specs – potentially also

with GTFS.

- Liaison with projects where public transport standards are involved

(participation in advisory boards).

Standards developments:

- Development, maintenance and update of Transmodel-based standards

in collaboration with CEN TC278/WG3 and in coordination with WG2.

- Development, maintenance and update of technical artefacts (schemas,

examples, GitHub etc.) related to Transmodel-based standards.

- Development of an interoperable standard for buying and booking tickets

- Update standards to apply governance recommendations.

Profile developments:

- Create and maintain MMTIS minimum EU profiles for some data

categories/types to be defined when relevant.

- Produce relevant documentation, examples and material to encourage

adoption of standards.

- Produce guidelines to support the production and the use of national

profiles (common basis for cross-border interoperability, identification of

what exists and could be re-used, etc.).

Support and dissemination: In addition to the activities described at WG 4 level: Support training activities as

described in WG 8

Produce examples to illustrate implementation of MMTIS.

BE-NGI HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-CVUT DK-TS FI-FINTRA FR-MIN FR-CEREMA HU-KOZUT IE-NTA IT-5T IT-CEF IT-SINELEC LV-CELI LT-VIA MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PL-MIN PT-ARMIS RO-NCRIA RO-ITS RO-ELSOL SK-MIN SI-UM SE-ST XUK-NH XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA Y-UITP Y-ITxPT Y-ERTICO

BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

31

T4.4 METADATA SPECIFICATI ONS

Definition and maintenance of common metadata catalogues, taking into account the need to contribute with harmonised metadata to the common European mobility data space. Monitor the use of metadata in the NAPs and their contribution to the common European mobility data space

The initial release of mobilityDCAT-AP was elaborated and published under the former NAPCORE runtime. This new metadata specification has drawn a lot of attention in the NAP community and beyond, such as at the EMDS community. In particular, many NAPs are underway to implement mobilityDCAT-AP as part of their metadata structures, and the recent EMDS study “Study in support of the creation of the common European mobility data space” has explicitly recommended mobilityDCAT-AP as the base standard for the EMDS interlinking layer.

Basing on this success story, the maintenance, governance, support and promotion activities for mobilityDCAT-AP will be seamlessly continued under the new project. The maintenance and governance part includes ongoing issue tracking on the mobilityDCAT-AP data model via the established GitHub collaboration platform, as well as the planning and online publication of future mobilityDCAT-AP versions. In this process, requirements and perspectives from EMDS stakeholders will be equally considered.

The support and promotion part will ensure that all adopters of mobilityDCAT-AP will be supported via dedicated guidance (at webinars, wikis etc.), but also via bilateral consultations. This also includes a monitoring of the usage of mobilityDCAT-AP across Europe, and further elaboration of mobilityDCAT-AP integration in the EMDS deployments. The material will be produced here and made available via the NAPCORE Academy in Task 8.5.

A new work item will deal with access mechanisms for metadata on NAPs and other platforms. This goes beyond the mobilityDCAT-AP data model as such, which rather describes the metadata contents in an interoperable manner. The access mechanism will also address the question, how to access metadata, once published in mobilityDCAT-AP, also in in interoperable manner. This work item will, among others, deep dive into API and harvesting technologies, and address situations where big amounts of metadata need to be efficiently accessed in federated or centralised systems. This work will also aim for a harmonisation of such technologies, both among NAPs and in the EMDS ecosystem.

DE-BASt AT-ATE BE-NGI HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-TTR DK-DRD EE-ETA FI-FINTRA FR-MIN GR-MIN HU-KOZUT IT-CEF LV-CELI LT-VIA LU-MIN NL-MIN PL-MIN PT-ARMIS RO-NCRIA RO-ELSOL SI-MZI SI-UM ES-DGT SE-TV XUK-NH XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA XIS-VEG Y-ITxPT Y-ERTICO

COO BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP AP BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

32

Further activities will include a wider outreach to and collaboration with actors outside the ITS/NAP domain, including stakeholders in interoperability, open data and semantic technologies. This includes the SEMIC/Interoperability group at DG DIGIT, but also other experts in the cited domains. The outreach will be organised via dedicated exchange meetings and conference contributions.

Altogether, the following sub-tasks are foreseen under the metadata task:

• Maintenance and governance of mobilityDCAT-AP (continued from

NAPCORE)

• Support and promotion activities for mobilityDCAT-AP (continued from

NAPCORE)

• Integration with EMDS ecosystem (continued from NAPCORE)

• Harmonisation of access mechanisms for metadata (new)

• Outreach and collaboration with stakeholders (continued/extended from

NAPCORE)

T4.5 METR (MANAGEME NT OF ELECTRONIC TRAFFIC REGULATION S)

METR is a set of standards to align the total value chain of traffic rule maker to the end-user of traffic rules (either being traffic regulation orders, traffic laws or other orders) affecting the use of the roads (and public space) in their jurisdiction. The goal is to set up a trustable data value chain, that is fully auditable and is resilient in legal practice of enforcement in case of automated driving in the future.

This requires reference architecture on business level, information level, exchange level, trust framework and cybersecurity concepts for the full ecosystem as a whole. To have an interoperable ecosystem, global concepts are required that need regionalisation per continent and from there profiling and mapping to national and local level.

Having the reference to standardised roles, vocabularies, interactions between roles and systems including feedback is identified by several member states as seriously helpful in organising the implementation of the RTTI Delegated Regulation and a necessity to be organised in a structured way that creates interoperability of data provision in Europe.

The global concept is developed and standardised in ISO. This task is to collect, assess and engineer the European requirements and ensure that the global concept supports these. This goes hand in hand with the development and standardisation of the European specific standards complying with European legislation and policies like the ITS Directive, NIS2 Directive, Data Governance Act and the operational concepts and standards stemming from that.

DE-BASt DE-AB DE-NRW-MIN AT-ASFINAG AT-ATE HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-CVUT CZ-TTR DK-DRD FI-FINTRA FR-CEREMA HU-KOZUT IT-ASPI IT-MOVYON IT-SINELEC LV-CELI NL-MIN PL-MIN PL-GDNRM PT-ARMIS RO-NCRIA RO-ITS

COO AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

33

This task will address the development and maintenance of the METR standards in the frame of CEN TC278/WG17 in collaboration with the corresponding work in ISO. The work in NAPCORE will focus on how to make METR work in a NAP centric data ecosystem (among others EMDS) using the EU standards like DATEX II, TN-ITS, as well as building on the trust framework developed for C-ITS. Therefore, the following activities will be taken on board:

- Organise the European public stakeholder engagement and European

governance on regional European scope and stakeholder position with

regard to the following standards parts:

o Part 1: Vocabulary

o Part 2: Operational Concept (ConOps)

o Part 3: System of System Requirements (SoSR)

o Part 4: Regulation System Requirements (RSR)

o Part 5: Distribution System Requirements (DSR)

o Part 6: Consumer System Requirements (CSR)

o Part 7: Discrepancy Handing System Requirements (DHSR)

o Part 8: METR Data Requirements (MDR)

o Part 9: METR Maps

o Part 10: METR Cybersecurity (formal name TBD)

o Part 11: ITS Station unit requirements

- Participate in the global METR management team that controls scope

purpose and development strategy of the global METR initiatives.

- Establish collaboration with stakeholder communities in Europe within the

NAPCORE collaboration framework.

- Organise EU stakeholder requirement collection

- Set up central European requirement engineering team(s) that formulate

EU positions, proposals and comments to be fed into formal CEN and

ISO processes

- Propose changes to DATEX II and TN-ITS specifications to fulfil METR

requirements, as they are the reference standards for publishing this

data.

RO-ELSOL SI-MZI ES-DGT XUK-NH XNO-NPRA Y-ERTICO

BEN BEN BEN AP AP BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

34

- Develop user guidance with regards to create the national and local

policies.

- Assess the conditions for access to the METR standard and

specifications for European SMEs, local authorities and other

stakeholders and facilitate ideally free access to them (e.g. by ensuring

that the work is done under Vienna Agreement (which make them CEN

standards as well) and also promoting the production of national

standards and guidance).

T4.6 NAP INTEROPERA BILITY

Enhancing the interoperability and compatibility of National Access Points (NAPs)

through standardized reference features (e.g., access, management, user

interface) and harmonizing levels of service, while aligning with the NAPCORE

NAP Reference Architecture and respecting the diverse architectural frameworks

and investments of Member States.

This requires aligning the development and updates of the NAP Reference

Architecture with the assessment and analysis of the Level of Service (LoS) of

NAPs, ensuring that both frameworks contribute to a more interoperable NAP

ecosystem. A feedback loop between these two task branches is essential to

continuously refine and harmonize their developments, addressing interoperability

gaps and fostering coherent approaches across Member States.

NAP Reference Architecture

- Continue updating the NAP Reference Architecture to accommodate new

multimodal and road and traffic data use cases and requirements also

collected both in WG 2 and WG3, stemming from revisions of ITS

Delegated Regulations (DRs), involved stakeholders, as well the need for

interoperability within the NAP centric data ecosystem in collaboration

with Task 4.2 (Mobility Data Ecosystem Architecture).

- The update and maintenance activities include the continuous revision

and adaptation of all architectural components, as well as the

improvement and development of supporting tools and materials.

- Monitor and analyse the use and implementation of the NAP Reference

Architecture across the EU to provide input for ongoing updates and

improvements.

NAP Level of Service

DE-BASt AT-ATE BE-NGI BG-API HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CVUT CZ-TTR DK-DRD FI-FINTRA FR-MIN GR-MIN HU-KOZUT IT-ASPI IT-5T IT-CEF IT-SINELEC LV-CELI LT-VIA MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PL-MIN PT-ARMIS RO-NCRIA RO-ITS SK-MIN SI-MZI SI-UM ES-DGT SE-TV

COO BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

35

- Continuous maintenance and update of the NAP Level of Service KPI

framework, considering market developments, stakeholders needs and

NAP deployment roadmaps.

- Updating the NLKF involves a comprehensive review of the framework’s

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). This includes revising their

descriptions, adjusting relevance weights, and evaluating the inclusion or

removal of specific features to ensure the framework aligns with market

and legislative changes.

- Carry out the yearly NAP Level of Service assessments with NAP

operators to also ensure monitoring and continuous development of the

harmonised description of NAP features and functionalities.

- Identify gaps hindering NAP interoperability based on the outcome of

Level of Service assessments.

XUK-NH XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA XIS-VEG Y-ERTICO

AP AP AP AP BEN

Work Package 5

Work Package 5: WORKING GROUP 5 – DATA PROVISION & USE

Duration: M1 – M30 Lead Beneficiary: CY-PWD

Objectives

This Working Group has the objective to support the NAP's, data holders and data users with supporting toolkits to their role in the ecosystem. The NAP's act as central entity in the mobility data ecosystem as regulated by the ITS-Directive and therefore can oversee the data that is made available and tooling to create insights in the registered datasets will be developed. For data holders several tools are made available in which they can either create UVAR data, validate compliancy to standards, convert datasets, etc. These tools will be made available in a generic NAP-Store, so all stakeholders have access to the open-source tooling that is developed (in and outside the realm of NAPCORE). Data is useless if it is of insufficient quality. Quality has several dimensions and perceptions. In order to achieve an interoperable data ecosystem, common understanding of quality concepts and data items is required.

Activities (WP description)

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

36

Task No (continuous numbering linked to

WP)

Task Name Description Participants

Name Role

(COO, BEN, AE, AP, OTHER)

T5.1 NAP DATA INSIGHTS AND REPORTING SUPPORT

Task 5.1 intends to support Member States (MSs) in fulfilling their reporting obligations under the ITS Directive and connected Delegated Regulations (DRs), ensuring a coherent EU-wide approach, and enrich their overview on all aspects connected to data availability on the NAPs. Streamlining the strategies of assessment on data availability on the NAPs, through the analysis of different methods, including, voluntary surveys, showcases of individual NAPs and the adoption of the mobilityDCAT-AP, are key aspects considered.

Two work items will be taken up:

− Continuation of the work in the NAPCORE project to provide and

improve MS’s insights and knowledge on, including but not limited to:

o data availability of the different data categories/types connected to

the different DRs,

o standards and technical specifications (and corresponding versions)

used,

o geographical and network coverage.

− Recommendations on processes and mechanisms for Member States.

The reporting process regarding the implementation of the ITS-Directive

and connected DRs (e.g., Progress and implementation reports) will

benefit from specific guidelines to assist, simplify, align and ensure

compliance in the MSs reporting obligations. This will be assisted

through tooling which will be developed to harvest and validate

automatically these data from the mobilityDCAT-AP publication on the

NAP. Output of the tool is a metadata collection that can be used as

base in the official MS reports to DG MOVE.

AT-MVO AT-ASFINAG AT-ATE BE-NGI HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CVUT CZ-TTR EE-ETA FI-FINTRA FI-TRAFICOM FR-MIN GR-MIN HU-KOZUT LV-CELI LT-VIA LU-MIN MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PT-ARMIS RO-NCRIA SI-MZI SI-UM ES-DGT SE-ST XUK-NH XNO-NPRA Y-ERTICO

BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP BEN

T5.2 TOOLS Facilitate the availability of digital tools assisting in the value chain from data holder to data consumer; envisioning one tool per use case. This will be achieved by marketing, development and maintenance of tools. The tools shall be available to and usable by any stakeholder across Europe, thus development of national tooling is out of scope. Collaboration with WG4 will be actively pursued to ensure

DE-BASt DE-NVBW AT-ATE BE-NGI HR-CESTE

COO BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

37

the tools adhere to architectural requirements, such as interoperability, scalability, and compliance with EU data standards.

There are following dimensions of the task:

• Domains: such as DATEX II, TN-ITS, SIRI, NeTEx, UVARBOX etc.

• Use case types: such as message profiling, schema generation,

(structural and semantic) validation, message conversion; compliance of

exchange protocols with standards and cybersecurity requirements; data

quality assessment; collecting user’s perception of provided service etc.

• Development stages: such as identification of a need, requirements

engineering, feasibility study, pilot, production etc.

• Communication and processes: such as governance, promoting good

practices and marketing existence of the tools.

Long term structured governance on the maintenance of this tooling shall be proposed, set up and run.

A “NAP-Store” website shall be set up and maintained to promote existence of tools available (what includes relevant tools developed elsewhere).

Tools developed within this task shall use an open-source license.

Tools to develop, operate and maintain:

- UVARBOX tools upgrade to DATEX II v3.6 or higher of the Traffic regulation

model and expansion of the regulations and restrictions data types

- Conversion tools allowing upgrade of message schemas and messages to

higher version of respective standards.

- Conversion tools from domain specific standards to reference standards,

namely converting parking information from APDS to NeTEx and DATEX II

- Tools for data validation:

o Structural conformance to a schema derived from unprofiled and

profiled content model for respective domains/standards

o Additional basic semantical checks-based plausibility of the data.

o Validation of cybersecurity aspects.

Topics for requirement engineering and feasibility study: - Compliance certification programme and toolkit of data producing systems,

including recommendations for development of such a toolkit

- Enhanced and automated data quality assessment

HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-CVUT CZ-TTR EE-ETA FI-FINTRA FR-MIN FR-CEREMA GR-MIN HU-KOZUT IT-ASPI IT-CEF IT-QM IT-SINELEC LV-CELI MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PT-ARMIS RO-NCRIA RO-ELSOL SI-MZI SI-UM ES-DGT SE-ST XUK-NH XNO-NPRA Y-ITxPT Y-ERTICO

BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

38

- Feedback mechanism/system to track how data consumers perceive the

quality, completeness, and reliability of the data

T5.3 DATA QUALITY

Ensure a coherent data quality approach across all NAP systems, implementing checks and standards where necessary. The work will focus on enabling automation of the processes, enhancing digitalization, and ensuring high-quality data through robust metadata management. The following subtasks will be addressed in a coherent manner:

Data Dictionary

Continuation of the NAPCORE work for further development of the Data Dictionary, considering the developments in the relevant domains and outcomes of the liaison processes with the stakeholder communities on one hand, and the formal standardisation of concepts on the other hand. The scope of the Data Dictionary should be expanded, among others by railway data, which due to its complexity requires dedicated attention. Specific focus should be placed on harmonizing data definitions and standards.

Data quality frameworks

Continuation of the NAPCORE and DATA4PT work, considering results from previous, ongoing and emerging EU-projects and platforms such as EU-EIP and C-ROADS, for further development of a sustainable coherent data quality framework for the full scope of the EU Delegated Regulations. This framework will incorporate automation in data validation processes, leveraging standardized metadata structures to evaluate dimensions such as accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and reliability. Automated workflows for data quality checks, compliance assessment, and reporting will be explored, in collaboration with National Bodies (NBs). Community management in WG 2 and 3 will ensure that the interdependencies between the other initiatives and NAPCORE are managed.

The EU data quality framework will be developed per Delegated Regulation, considering the developments in the relevant domains. This is a strategic aspect of the Delegated Regulations. The data quality frameworks will address minimum quality requirements on data to be suitable for re-use in specific use cases. Data quality agreements to support service delivery.

The framework should also build on existing cross-domain methodology developed in NAPCORE and used by DATEX@NAPs study, to ensure consistency across different data domains and transport modes.

DE-BASt DE-AB DE-HH DE-NRW-MIN DE-NVBW DE-RMS AT-MVO AT-ASFINAG AT-ATE BE-NGI BG-API HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CVUT CZ-TTR DK-DRD EE-ETA FI-FINTRA FR-MIN FR-CEREMA GR-MIN HU-KOZUT IT-ASPI IT-5T IT-SINELEC LV-CELI LU-MIN MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PL-GDNRM PT-ARMIS RO-NCRIA RO-ITS RO-ELSOL SI-MZI SI-UM ES-DGT SE-TV

COO AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

39

Alignment with Sectoral Data Quality Standards

Alignment with the sectoral data quality standards such as the TISA 5-star rating model and comparable actions done in the RTTI-taskforce and emerging EU projects like TISGRADE. These agreements will aim to harmonize digital service delivery by integrating feedback loops for data providers, promoting standardized validation mechanisms, and fostering the adoption of automated quality evaluation tools. The framework should also emphasize the importance of data quality agreements to support interoperability and reusability in different transport domains. These agreements should address the minimum quality requirements necessary for effective service delivery and user confidence.

SE-ST XUK-NH XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA Y-UITP Y-ITxPT Y-ERTICO

BEN AP AP AP BEN BEN BEN

Work Package 6

Work Package 6: WORKING GROUP 6 – COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT & NATIONAL BODIES

Duration: M1 – M30 Lead Beneficiary: AT-ATE

Objectives

Coordinate with National Bodies to assess compliance and provide operational support.

The main objective of this Working Group is to further harmonise the compliance assessment process carried out by National Bodies/National Authorities for the Delegated Regulations (EU) Nr. 885/2013 (information services for safe and secure parking places for trucks and commercial vehicles), Nr. 886/2013 (provision of road safety-related minimum universal traffic information), Nr. 2022/670 (provision of EU-wide real-time traffic information services) and Nr. 2017/1926 (revised) (provision of EU-wide multimodal travel information services).

This entails the coordination and further enhancement of National Bodies on a European level in order to evaluate and further refine harmonised strategies for compliance assessment and (multi-) national enforcement and evaluate strategies and recommendations for handling non-compliance in the Member States. Moreover, guidelines for the use of electronic tools to support the compliance assessment process will be developed and options for a possible multi-country/European body for National Body functions will be evaluated and defined.

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

40

In addition, the Working Group will offer operational support to National Bodies through the possible further conceptualisation, development and implementation of ENBOSS (the European National BOdy Support System, as conceptualized in NAPCORE’s WG5), stakeholder communication the support of the implementation of the National Body Reference Architecture in the Member States and the continuous monitoring of the progress of National Bodies and compliance assessment across Europe.

Finally, the National Body recommendations for harmonisation will be continuously enhanced and refined, taking into account the revision of Delegated Regulations as well as the evaluation of the compliance assessment process by National Bodies. In order to further improve the compliance assessment process, new quality packages as well as semi-automated tools, which can facilitate the process, will be analysed.

Activities (WP description)

Task No (continuous numbering

linked to WP)

Task Name Description Participants

Name Role

(COO, BEN, AE, AP, OTHER)

T6.1 STRATEGIES FOR NATIONAL BODY COORDINATION AND NON- COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT

Coordinate National Bodies on a European level to ensure compliance with standards and protocols, further refine and evaluate strategies for compliance assessment and identify enforcement options in case of non- compliance.

o Evaluate and refine harmonised strategies for compliance

assessment and enforcement: This task will build upon strategies

and recommendations elaborated during the first phase of

NAPCORE; these strategies will be evaluated and refined where

necessary. Moreover, options for (multi-) national enforcement will

be identified. Therefore, legal knowledge needs to be intensified.

o Refine and evaluate strategies and actions for non-compliance:

This task builds upon the process and recommendations drafted in

M5.8 (Strategies and actions for non-compliance defined), which

will be evaluated and refined as needed. Moreover, first steps will

be taken to monitor and evaluate the implementation of non-

compliance measures on the national level. The work will involve

benchmarking on compliance strategies in other sectors and

making an inventory of Member States having adopted national

policies and assessing their impact and capacity for putting them

forward as best practices.

o Definition and evaluation of possible long-term, sustainable legal

and organizational structures and governance options for a multi-

DE-BASt AT-ATE BE-FED BE-NGI BG-API HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-MDCR CZ-CVUT DK-TS EE-ETA FI-TRAFICOM FR-ART GR-MIN HU-KOZUT IT-MIN LV-CELI MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PL-MIN PT-IMT RO-MIN

COO BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

41

country or European-level body to take on certain functions (to be

defined) of MS National Bodies

RO-NCRIA SK-MIN SI-MZI SI-UM SE-STA XUK-NH XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA

BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP AP

T6.2 OPERATIONAL SUPPORT TO NATIONAL BODIES

Provide operational support to existing and newly established National Bodies to promote and foster harmonisation

o Support existing and newly established National Bodies with the

implementation of the NAPCORE recommendations on

Compliance Assessment. Providing expert advice and guidance to

national bodies to ensure the proper application of the

recommendations from the NAPCORE project.

o Communication with international stakeholders on behalf of

multiple/all National Bodies. This can include creating and regularly

updating a stakeholder contact list to ensure its accuracy and

relevance, as well as organizing stakeholder events and

consultation activities.

o Further conceptualisation, feasibility study or development,

implementation, operation and management of a multi-national or

European level support system for National Bodies (ENBOSS), as

developed by NAPCORE and described in M5.10 (European

National Bodies cooperation -Prototypical process for multi-national

self-declarations and compliance assessment).

o Continuous maturity level assessment of National Bodies and

exchange of experiences between National Bodies: This task

includes the continuous progress monitoring of National Bodies

and will provide options for sharing good practices and exchanging

experiences between National Bodies.

o Support the implementation of the National Body Reference

Architecture in the Member States: This task will build upon M5.9

(Development of National Body Reference Architecture); the goal is

DE-BASt AT-ATE BE-NGI HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-CVUT DK-TS EE-ETA FI-TRAFICOM FR-ART GR-MIN HU-KOZUT LV-CELI MT-TRANSP PL-MIN PT-IMT RO-MIN RO-NCRIA SK-MIN SI-MZI SE-STA XUK-NH XNO-NPRA

COO BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

42

to further refine and implement the National Body Reference

Architecture in the Member States.

T6.3 NATIONAL BODY HARMONISATION AND ALIGNMENT

Work on enhanced harmonised recommendations and templates for compliance assessment to improve project deployment and national-level execution.

o Analyse new quality packages for compliance assessment usage:

This entails the definition of common evaluation criteria and the

analysis of quality packages regarding their suitability to be

included into the compliance assessment process and templates.

o Test and implement semi-automated tools in the Compliance

Assessment process: This will build upon the work on semi-

automated tools carried out within the first phase of NAPCORE.

The existing list of validator tools will be analysed; identification of

which tools can be used at which process steps of the compliance

assessment process

o Develop guidelines for the electronic support of compliance

assessment: This entails analysing tools and options for the

electronic support of the compliance assessment process and

developing recommendations/guidelines on the use of such tools

o Continuous monitoring and evaluation of the compliance

assessment process and adaptation of compliance assessment

and self-declaration forms and templates: This task includes the

adaptation of compliance assessment forms and templates

according to revisions of the Delegated Regulations as well as the

continuous evaluation of the compliance assessment process

according to the experiences made by National Bodies.

DE-BASt AT-ATE BE-NGI HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-MDCR CZ-TTR DK-TS FI-TRAFICOM FR-ART GR-MIN HU-KOZUT LV-CELI MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PL-MIN PT-IMT RO-MIN RO-NCRIA SK-MIN SI-MZI SE-STA XUK-NH XNO-NPRA Y-ERTICO

COO BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP BEN

Work Package 7

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

43

Work Package 7: WORKING GROUP 7 – GOVERNANCE & STRATEGY

Duration: M1 – M30 Lead Beneficiary: AT-ATE

Objectives

Develop strategies for a NAPCORE long-term governance, ensuring the sustainability of the coordination of Member States in NAPCORE.

This WG is dealing with all issues concerning the long-term set up of the National Access Points and National Bodies (NBs) harmonisation as well as with considering foreseeable future and upcoming requirements, challenges or developments that NAPs and NBs will face. The NAPs and NBs need to reflect on recent and future developments having implications on either their scope, functionality or operational level. Moreover, the position and role of the NAPs/NBs in European policies will be analysed and the embedding within relevant policies will be promoted. Additionally, the strategy of the NAP/NB platform concerning other mobility data related players, new technological developments as well as within the common European mobility data space will be developed.

In addition, this WG is concerned with the organisation and management of Member State alignment and decision making regarding the harmonised operational deployment of National Access Points according to the ITS Directive and the establishment of sustainable coalitions with relevant major stakeholders, organisations, associations and projects in the mobility sector.

Activities (WP description)

Task No (continuous numbering

linked to WP)

Task Name Description Participants

Name Role

(COO, BEN, AE, AP, OTHER)

T7.1 STEERING COMMITTEE & ADVISORY BOARD

Manage the Steering Committee as main strategic steering and decision-

making body regarding NAP/NB harmonisation. Each Member State and

country implementing a National Access Point is part of the Steering Committee

to endorse recommendations of strategic nature to facilitate harmonisation on

topics listed in the ITS Directive Article 5.3, with the goal to include them in their

national implementation roadmaps.

In addition, this task manages the Advisory Board for governance and strategic

input.

o Organise Member State alignment and decision-making on the

harmonised operational deployment of National Access Points

DE-BASt AT-ASFINAG AT-ATE AT-BMIMI BE-FED BE-FL BG-MIN HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-MDCR DK-DRD

COO BEN BEN AP BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

44

according to the ITS Directive: Manage a Steering Body composed of

EU Member States for strategic direction and approval of project

results and organise at least two Steering Committee Meetings per

year with representatives of every EU Member State and all additional

project partners to receive input on strategy and governance, for

approval of recommendations and results and alignment on the

harmonised operational deployment of National Access Points

according to the ITS Directive amongst all partners

o Operational support of the Steering Committee: SCOM management,

first-level support, setting up and managing Terms of Reference,

organisation and post-preparation of Steering Committee Meetings

o Identify the need for and subsequently define and agree on NAPCORE

recommendations: This also involves increasing the level of

commitment of the Member States towards the implementation of

NAPCORE recommendations. Implementing roadmaps for each

Member State shall serve as strategic guideline to achieve European

NAP & NB harmonisation. The roadmaps shall include the definition of

strategic objectives at mid (5 years) and longer (10 years) terms, in

particular setting goals on data quality and availability, accessibility,

and harmonisation of NAPs, while remaining compliant with EU

legislation.

o Within the first project year a guideline for designing national

implementation roadmaps will be developed. The implementation

roadmaps developed by the Member States will be collected iteratively

on a quarterly basis and published in an aggregated manner in

subsequent Steering Committee meetings.

o Enable substantial coalitions with relevant major stakeholders,

organisations, associations, projects and others for ITS Directive aims:

Manage an Advisory Board with relevant sectoral associations

including different sub-groups (e.g. on standardisation); organise at

least two Advisory Board Meetings per year to facilitate dialogue with

relevant external stakeholders on strategic topics; continuation and

operationalisation of existing cooperation agreements, establishment

of new cooperation agreements in conjunction with WG2 and WG3.

EE-MIN-KLI FI-TRAFICOM FR-MIN FR-CEREMA GR-MIN HU-EKM HU-KOZUT IE-DOT IT-MIN LV-CELI LT-VIA LU-MIN MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PL-MIN PL-GDNRM PT-IMT PT-ARMIS RO-MIN RO-NCRIA RO-ITS SK-MIN SI-MZI SI-UM ES-DGT SE-TV XMD-MIN XUK-DFT XUK-NH XME-MIN XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA

AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP AP AP

T7.2 STRATEGY Develop and execute strategies that align with the project's long-term goals. DE-BASt

DE-NVBW COO BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

45

o Identify the need for action, create common strategies, define

appropriate tasks among EU Member States, European Commission

and NAP operators regarding challenges raised by global players and

EU policy developments with relations to the ITS Directive and the

NAPs; reach out and manage relations to relevant stakeholders:

Possible strategies/developments/topics could include: Common

European mobility data space, AFIR Regulation(s), the Single Digital

Gateway, GDPR, The New EU Urban Mobility Framework, TEN-T

Regulation, Artificial Intelligence Act, High-Value Data sets, Data

Governance Act, Data Act; the list of topics should be agile, allowing

for the inclusion of new developments

o Prioritize identified topics for work in other WGs, create common

strategies, identify appropriate tasks among EU Member States, the

European Commission, NAP operators and relevant stakeholders;

Establish a process to identify, take up, and prioritise new topics of

relevance for NAPs, National Bodies and support of the mobility data

ecosystem in a flexible and agile way in cooperation with WG2 and

WG3.

o The NAP/NB platform also needs to locate itself within the common

European mobility data space, e.g. regarding the participation in the

interlinking layer. Hereto the key functions and benefits of the common

European mobility data space will be collected, a possible ecosystem

will be drafted and the potential role of the NAPs within this ecosystem

will be defined in cooperation with WG3 and WG4 and with the

Commission. To define interfaces with other stakeholders and

initiatives the draft ecosystem will be exchanged and discussed with

the relevant actors.

AT-ASFINAG AT-ATE AT-BMIMI BE-FED BE-FL HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-MDCR CZ-CVUT FI-FINTRA FR-MIN FR-CEREMA HU-KOZUT IT-ASPI LV-CELI LT-VIA MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PT-IMT PT-ARMIS RO-MIN RO-NCRIA RO-ITS SK-MIN SI-MZI ES-DGT SE-TV XUK-DFT XUK-NH XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA Y-UITP Y-ERTICO

BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP AP BEN BEN

T7.3 LONG-TERM GOVERNANCE

Create a sustainable, long-term governance structure to ensure the initiatives continuity beyond the initial implementation phase.

o Based on the NAPCORE Outlook Paper 2024 – 2028 the Vision and

the Mission of NAPCORE will be reflected and used as basis for

DE-BASt AT-ATE AT-BMIMI BE-FED BE-FL

COO BEN AP BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

46

defining strategic objectives at mid (5 years) and longer (10 years)

terms, taking into consideration the implementation roadmaps of the

Member States.

o Assess the expectations of different stakeholders regarding the future

responsibilities of NAPCORE, including those of the European

Commission, in order to assess feasibility and propose a list of tasks

and topics that could be covered by the future governance structure.

o Define, agree on, and set up a roadmap towards a long-lasting

sustainable governance structure that allows for a continuation of

NAP/NB harmonisation activities beyond the timeframe of the project:

This task builds upon, among others, NAPCORE’s M1.4 (Agreement

on the long-term governance structure for the continuous operation of

NAPCORE related tasks). The process of defining and setting up such

a structure entails strategic coordination between the Member States

(NAPs and National Bodies/Competent Authorities).

o Lead discussions with Member States and the European Commission

to identify the structure most appropriate to the objectives,

expectations and financial possibilities of the partners.

o Provide the necessary supporting documents for establishing a long-

lasting sustainable governance structure and facilitate the process of

the establishment of the long-lasting sustainable governance structure.

HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-MDCR DK-DRD FI-FINTRA FR-MIN FR-CEREMA GR-MIN HU-KOZUT IT-ASPI LV-CELI LT-VIA MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PL-MIN PT-IMT RO-MIN RO-NCRIA RO-ITS SI-MZI ES-DGT XUK-DFT XUK-NH XNO-NPRA Y-UITP Y-ITxPT Y-ERTICO

BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP BEN BEN BEN

Work Package 8

Work Package 8: WORKING GROUP 8 – DISSEMINATION & COMMUNICATION

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

47

Duration: M1 – M30 Lead Beneficiary: DE-BAST

Objectives

The primary objective of WG8 "Dissemination & Communication" is to engage and inform stakeholders about NAPCORE-X's progress, achievements, and impact, ensuring transparency and fostering active participation. Task 8.1 focuses on managing all dissemination and communication activities to maintain consistency, clarity, and alignment with the project's strategic goals. Task 8.2, the NAP Support Center, provides targeted support and resources to NAPs, promoting effective implementation and collaboration. Task 8.3 emphasizes organizing impactful events, such as the NAPCORE Mobility Data Days, but also webinars, and virtual workshops, to create opportunities for dialogue, share results, and facilitate knowledge exchange with stakeholders. Task 8.4 ensures a strong digital presence through the creation and maintenance of a project website, active social media channels, and a Service Desk to provide timely updates and address inquiries. Finally, Task 8.5, Academy & Training, aims to build capacity and disseminate knowledge through structured training programs, ensuring the project’s outcomes are widely understood and leveraged both by all project partners and external stakeholders. These activities are designed to establish clear communication channels, foster stakeholder engagement, and ensure broad awareness of the project's achievements, while also acknowledging and making visible the essential support provided by EU funding.

Activities (WP description)

Task No (continuous numbering

linked to WP)

Task Name Description Participants

Name Role

(COO, BEN, AE, AP, OTHER)

T8.1 OVERALL DISSEMINATION AND COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT

Align all dissemination and communication activities of NAPCORE (including those related to the NAPCORE standards DATEX II, TN-ITS, NeTEx and SIRI) on a strategic level and handle all related challenges that are not covered in the other tasks of this Working Group.

This includes:

• Define a way and process to ensure coordinated and aligned

stakeholder and community outreach and communication activities

of all NAPCORE Working Groups and tasks

• Create a Communication Strategy 2026-2027 and update it if there

is a need for it

• Registering a wordmark/trademark for “NAPCORE” and its logo

• Oversee, manage and align activities of the tasks of this Working

Group and communication related activities of other Working

Groups

DE-BASt BE-FED HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CZ-MDCR HU-KOZUT IT-SINA NL-MIN Y-UITP Y-ITxPT Y-ERTICO

COO BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

48

T8.2 NAP SUPPORT CENTER

Provide support to the National Access Point operators for data sharing related topics and NAP updates.

While the content of the guidance given by the NAP Support Center will mostly come from various NAPCORE Working Groups, this activity will manage its creation and dissemination.

• Define priorities of most urgently needed guidance requirements

for NAPs

• Create guidance documentation, based upon results and

recommendations of NAPCORE, to support NAP operators in

matters related to their daily operation, specific NAP tasks or

general NAP setup, development and upgrade. Develop a

comprehensive knowledge base with FAQs, and troubleshooting

tips

• Act as point-of-contact and support service for enquiries from NAP

operators related to matters related to NAP operations. Define,

setup and manage proper processes for this support center

• Define, setup and manage groups (e.g. for “new” NAPs) and

(virtual) events of/for NAP operators to exchange best practices,

define operational guidance and discuss other topics

• Reach out to and possibly work with other WGs to gather or create

information and content needed to support the NAPs

DE-BASt AT-ATE HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CZ-CDV CZ-TTR IT-CEF MT-TRANSP

COO BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

T8.3 EVENTS Organize and participate in relevant events to disseminate project results and engage with stakeholders.

The organisation of events, including physical meetings of the different working groups, shall take place within the EU and shall take into account the practicability for all participants, in particular minimisation of travel times and emissions.

Major key success factor of NAPCORE is the communication with the stakeholder community. This can be done via various channels, events being one of them. While the NAPCORE Mobility Data Days are by now an established, well-attended and influential event, also the active participation in other, major industry and stakeholder events is of utmost importance to:

DE-BASt DE-AB DE-HH DE-NRW-MIN DE-NVBW DE-RMS AT-MVO AT-ASFINAG AT-ATE AT-BMIMI BE-FED BE-FL BE-NGI BE-WAL BG-MIN BG-API

COO AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

49

• Disseminate project results and with this increase knowledge about

NAPCORE and its results to NAPCORE partners and to relevant

parties in the industry/domain

• Engage with NAPCORE partners and stakeholders alike and meet

with key persons to gain insights from them, coordinate activities

and discuss topics

This task will be in charge for both organizing NAPCORE events as well as plan and organize the participation of NAPCORE representatives in external events of relevance.

Organize the NAPCORE Mobility Data Days

The NAPCORE Mobility Data Days, as the main annual NAPCORE event, gathering for showcasing NAPCORE results and facilitating stakeholder involvement, are by now an established and important stakeholder and industry event, with more than 230 delegates from more than 30 countries attending the last editions. This task will organize the NAPCORE Mobility Data Days in 2026 and 2027. Locations of the event are to be decided at a later stage.

Participate in major industry/stakeholder events

Participation – as speaker or as participant only – in key industry and stakeholder events is crucial to community engagement, stakeholder information, partner coordination and more. This especially holds true for a coordination initiative like NAPCORE. A selection of known and scheduled key events 2026-2027 in the EU is:

• Transport Research Arena TRA 2026 in Budapest, Hungary

• Intertraffic 2026 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands

More events will be scheduled at a later stage. Participation in those events will be evaluated and decided, based upon value towards NAPCORE’s goals, at times closer to the events.

NAPCORE's success depends on discussing, establishing and promoting its results - such as data standards and profile recommendations - across a broad spectrum of stakeholders, some of whom are based internationally. While NAPCORE's focus is on EU engagement, certain high-impact industry events in the timeframe 2026-2027 are planned outside of the EU but are essential to gain access to, alignment and endorsement from international

HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-MDCR CZ-CVUT CZ-TTR DK-DRD DK-TS EE-ETA EE-MIN-KLI FI-FINTRA FI-TRAFICOM FR-MIN FR-CEREMA FR-ART GR-MIN HU-EKM HU-KOZUT IE-TII IE-DOT IE-NTA IT-MIN IT-SINA IT-ASPI IT-MOVYON IT-5T IT-CEF IT-QM IT-SINELEC LV-CELI LT-VIA LU-MIN MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PL-MIN PL-GDNRM PT-IMT PT-ARMIS RO-MIN RO-NCRIA

BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

50

stakeholders within the ITS and mobility communities. Some of these global events provide unmatched opportunities for visibility and collaboration, complementing NAPCORE's EU-based activities and extending the project’s impact globally and in doing so, ensuring the use and longevity of NAPCORE’s recommendations and standards also in Europe.

Attendance at non-EU events will be limited to strategically chosen gatherings that provide unique value, particularly in cases where no EU event can reach the same audience or offer similar benefits. These instances will involve a minimal delegation and will require approval from the NAPCORE Steering Committee and from the Commission services, ensuring the efficient use of resources and alignment with the NAPCORE's core objectives, which include the promotion of the use of NAPCORE standards internationally.

Outside-EU Events of strategic importance for NAPCORE due to their attendees and impact in the ITS and Mobility community:

• ITS World Congress 2026 in Gangneung, South Korea

• ITS World Congress 2027 in Birmingham, UK

Additionally, NAPCORE will selectively participate in other relevant, high- impact events across the EU, maximizing the value of each engagement and demonstrating clear alignment with both project objectives and grant authority expectations.

RO-ITS RO-ELSOL SK-MIN SI-MZI SI-UM ES-DGT SE-TV SE-ST SE-STA XMD-MIN XUK-DFT XUK-NH XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA XIS-VEG Y-UITP Y-ITxPT Y-ERTICO

BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN AP AP AP AP AP BEN BEN BEN

T8.4 WEBSITE, SOCIAL MEDIA AND SERVICE DESK

Manage NAPCORE’s online presence, including the already existing NAPCORE website and social media channels. In addition, offering a contact point and support for general enquiries and issues.

• Host, manage, maintain and optimize the NAPCORE website

napcore.eu

• Ensuring all content provided via the website is up to date and

relevant

• Manage the NAPCORE LinkedIn channel, including the creation of

posts or relevant news

• Setup and manage a help desk that includes

o General contact e-mail address and contact form on the

website

o Act as first level support to general enquiries via e-mail,

social media and the website

DE-BASt AT-ATE HR-CESTE HR-MMPI GR-MIN IT-SINA MT-TRANSP Y-ITxPT

COO BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

51

o For questions that cannot be answered, identify and

forward them to the right WG Lead (or identified contact

point of the WGs)

o Setup and maintain a published list of FAQs

• Manage integration and possibly hosting of NAPCORE web-based

tools (e.g. UVAR Box tool, ENBOSS) under the napcore.eu domain

T8.5 ACADEMY & TRAINING

To ensure widespread understanding, adoption, and proficiency in the technologies and standards developed by NAPCORE (for example but not limited to: DATEX II, TN-ITS, NeTEx, SIRI, mobilityDCAT-AP), a NAPCORE Academy will be established as a cornerstone for educational outreach to stakeholders in the ITS domain but also for NAPCORE’s partners. This academy will act as a central knowledge hub, offering structured learning opportunities tailored to various stakeholder groups and knowledge levels across Europe. Through targeted training modules, workshops, and resources, the NAPCORE Academy will empower stakeholders to effectively implement and benefit from NAPCORE’s standards and recommendations, increasing Europe-wide competency levels. A specific focus will be put on supporting the local authorities to increase their data provision knowledge and capabilities.

• Create a joint (including all NAPCORE standards and

technologies) strategy and roadmap for a NAPCORE Academy

including trainings

• Curriculum Development

o Identify core topics and structure learning paths for

different stakeholder groups

o Collaborate with NAPCORE WGs to ensure content

relevance and clarity

• Resource Creation and Distribution

o With input from other NAPCORE WGs, develop

accessible materials, including guides, and case studies

o Set up and maintain an online library for easy access to

helpful material

• Workshops and Training Sessions

o Organize virtual workshops

o Support training events of NAPCORE partners (and

affiliated organisations) across Europe with templates,

content, advice and expertise

DE-BASt DE-AB DE-HH DE-NRW-MIN DE-NVBW DE-RMS AT-MVO AT-ASFINAG AT-ATE AT-BMIMI BE-FED BE-FL BE-NGI BE-WAL BG-MIN BG-API HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-MDCR CZ-CVUT CZ-TTR DK-DRD DK-TS EE-ETA EE-MIN-KLI FI-FINTRA FI-TRAFICOM FR-MIN FR-CEREMA FR-ART GR-MIN HU-EKM

COO AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN AP AP AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

52

HU-KOZUT IE-TII IE-DOT IE-NTA IT-MIN IT-SINA IT-ASPI IT-MOVYON IT-5T IT-CEF IT-QM IT-SINELEC LV-CELI LT-VIA LU-MIN MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PL-MIN PL-GDNRM PT-IMT PT-ARMIS RO-MIN RO-NCRIA RO-ITS RO-ELSOL SK-MIN SI-MZI SI-UM ES-DGT SE-TV SE-ST SE-STA XMD-MIN XUK-DFT XUK-NH XME-MIN XCH-FEDRO XNO-NPRA XIS-VEG Y-UITP

BEN AP BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN BEN AP BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN AP BEN AP AP AP AP AP AP BEN

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

53

Y-ITxPT Y-ERTICO

BEN BEN

ANNEXES

LIST OF ANNEXES

Subcontracting table

SUBCONTRACTING TABLE

Subcontracting

Give details on subcontracted action tasks (if any).

Subcontracts must be awarded using your usual purchasing practices – provided that they ensure best value for money and no conflict of interests. If you are a ‘contracting authority/entity’ within the meaning of the EU Directives on public procurement, you must also comply with the applicable national law on public procurement.

Note: The coordinator remains fully responsible for the coordination tasks, even if they are delegated to someone else. Coordinator tasks cannot be subcontracted.

Task number to be

subcontracted (follow the

numbering in the

grant agreement)

Name of task to be subcontracted Description (Describe briefly the part of the task to be subcontracted and indicate the BEN/AE responsible)

Estimated Costs (EUR)

T1 GENERAL MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION

Setting up a project secretariat for administrative support to manage the project. In addition, operating a digital tool infrastructure for document sharing and video conferencing.

DE-BAST 280.900,00 €

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

54

T1.1 PROJECT COORDINATION & MANAGEMENT

Setting up a project secretariat for administrative support to manage the project. In addition, operating a digital tool infrastructure for document sharing and video conferencing.

DE-BAST

15.583,10 €

While the Ministry is committed to fulfilling its obligations under the ITS Directive and contributing to the EC strategy for harmonized data exchange, the current human resources within the PWD lack both the capacity and the specialized expertise required to meet the project's comprehensive demands without external support. For all tasks a percentage was always applied to the budget for the beneficiary because the beneficiary will have a coordination and monitoring role over the services provided by the subcontracted entities. Due to this, external expertise will support T1.1 project management activities, including reporting, financial controlling, and internal collaboration tools, allowing the consortium to focus on strategic priorities.

CY-PWD

2.430,00 €

Financial reporting FR-MIN 1.670,46 €

Technical support in meetings and developing of the work ES-DGT 1.620,00 €

T1.2 INTERNAL ALIGNMENT Subcontracting will facilitate the participation in the cross-functional teams, as Working Group 5 leaders, ensuring effective alignment across workgroups through structured meeting management, documentation, and operational support.

CY-PWD

13.532,75 €

Support for internal alignment and participation to CAT meetings (reporting WG4).

FR-MIN 8.903,00 €

T2.1 DOMAIN & COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT

Data experts in Hamburg for active mobility data e.g. cycling data supporting the work on standardization, new data and multimodal mobility

DE-HH 11.901,50 €

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

55

The coordination of stakeholders in multimodal mobility requires careful planning and execution, covering areas such as public transport, micromobility, air/maritime services, and car-related services. Subcontracting allows Cyprus to engage professionals with proven expertise in managing, together with the beneficiary, diverse communities and fostering strategic collaboration. This ensures Cyprus can meet its obligations while contributing meaningfully to NAPCORE’s efforts to unify European mobility data initiatives. Through workshops, forums, and thematic meetings, Cyprus can leverage this partnership to strengthen local and regional collaboration while aligning with broader EU strategies. Furthermore, the involvement of a subcontractor in this task is essential to establishing an efficient approach that directly supports Task 2.2, where the PWD has limited personnel numbers.

CY-PWD

13.134,70 €

TECHNICAL SUPPORT GR-MIN 10.286,00 €

Domain experts NL-MIN 18.914,70 €

Technical support to the Ministry by coordinating stakeholder engagement in multimodal mobility, fostering collaboration to improve transport services.

SI-MZI 13.826,00 €

T2.2 THEME: MULTIMODAL DATA AVAILABILITY ON THE NAPS

Mapping EU-based-requirements around data provision, focused on MMTIS requirements in Germany.

DE-RMS 5.141,50 €

Enhancing multimodal data availability involves identifying gaps, increasing data provider participation, and ensuring adherence to quality standards. Subcontracting brings in experts in data mapping, which are not present within the PWD, and comprehensive strategies together with the beneficiary to run awareness campaigns and build roadmaps that address both national needs and EU-wide expectations. This ensures Cyprus can strengthen its contributions to

CY-PWD

5.600,25 €

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

56

the availability of multimodal data on European NAPs, aligning with EU standards and goals.

Domain experts NL-MIN 1.169,90 €

Technical multimodal standardisation input to T2.2 deliverables Y-UITP 4.997,80 €

T2.3 THEME: MULTIMODAL DATA (RE-)USE

Consulting services for task lead support and development of the demonstrator.

FI-FINTRA 39.561,00 €

NAP experts sharing best practices on MMTIS data re-use FR-MIN 5.635,50 €

T2.4 THEME: EU IDS FOR MULTIMODAL ACCESS NODES

Help to provide recommendations on how to define unique EU identifiers.

DE-RMS 5.517,99 €

Technical experts supporting in the technical work for creating a EU- wide access nodes multimodal database

FR-MIN 16.454,95 €

Domain experts NL-MIN 9.046,80 €

Technical input to T2.4 deliverables Y-UITP 4.365,60 €

T3.1 DOMAIN & COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT

Data experts in Hamburg for active mobility data e.g. cycling data supporting the work on standardization, possible new road and traffic data and cycling comfort- and safety data

DE-HH 7.265,00 €

Subcontracting the management of road and traffic data communities provides Cyprus with the capacity to address stakeholder needs effectively. The subcontracted, together with the beneficiary, can develop knowledge agendas, facilitate public-private collaborations, and integrate local practices into EU frameworks. This targeted approach enhances Cyprus’ role in driving innovative traffic management solutions within NAPCORE. Additionally, engaging a

CY-PWD

12.500,10 €

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

57

subcontractor for this task is crucial to developing an effective strategy that will also enhance the execution of Tasks 3.3 and 3.4, an area where the PWD similarly lacks in personnel numbers. Effective management of road and traffic data requires precise coordination of datasets, ensuring they are both accurate and interoperable. By subcontracting, Cyprus gains access to specialists who can refine data quality frameworks and implement EU-mandated standards. This task supports improved traffic management and safer, more efficient transportation networks.

Assistance for the representation of the national community to ensure a smooth collaboration between stakeholders, participation to the elaboration of deliverables Support for the collaboration between Napcore and C-Roads

FR-MIN

8.245,00 €

TECHNICAL SUPPORT GR-MIN 6.300,00 €

Domain experts NL-MIN 52.689,00 €

Technical support to the Ministry through developing a knowledge agenda on traffic data, promoting EU policy alignment, and enhancing public-private cooperation to improve traffic management and road data quality.

SI-MZI

13.158,00 €

Technical support in meetings and developing of the work ES-DGT 10.431,90 €

T3.2 THEME DIGITAL INTERACTIVE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

Subcontracting the development of digital traffic management solutions enables Cyprus to harness expertise in emerging technologies, such as real-time data analytics and cross-border systems integration. As this expertise is unavailable within the PWD, subcontracting is essential to ensure effective execution. This specialist-based approach allows the country to implement advanced

CY-PWD

3.820,90 €

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

58

traffic flow strategies that align with EU sustainability goals and promote seamless mobility.

Support for presentation of best practices in relation with digital traffic management

FR-MIN 3.963,00 €

Technical support to the Ministry by creating cross-border digital traffic management strategies, aligning them with EU mobility policies, and improving the coordination between public authorities, private providers, and road operators.

SI-MZI

4.022,00 €

Technical support in meetings and developing of the work ES-DGT 3.276,90 €

T3.3 THEME ALTERNATIVE FUELS The adoption of alternative fuels is a cornerstone of EU environmental policy. Subcontracting this task ensures that Cyprus can develop robust systems for collecting and managing data on alternative fuel infrastructure. Additionally, provides the necessary technical support, while the PWD’s involvement ensures that the outputs are tailored to Cyprus context. This collaboration is vital to align national efforts with EU policies on clean energy and sustainable transportation.

CY-PWD 7.127,85 €

Technical support to the Ministry in managing AFI-related data in compliance with EU policies, fostering stakeholder collaboration, and improving the accessibility of dynamic data on recharging and refueling points.

SI-MZI 0,00 €

T4 DATA STANDARDS & ARCHITECTURE

Assistance to the Chair of the Change Orchestration Board, moderation, elaboration of supports and minutes. Interaction with stakeholders to ensure alignment and harmonisation of data exchange standards, in relation with the architecture and interoperability of the NAPs.

FR-MIN

75.000,00 €

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

59

Technical standardization experts supporting in the technical work for TN-ITS maintenance and development including formal standardization with CEN

Y-ERTICO 21.109,44 €

T4.1 ROAD AND TRAFFIC DATA STANDARD DATEX II

Technical standardization experts supporting in the technical work for DATEX II maintenance and development

DE-BAST 148.806,95 €

Technical support of experts for DATEX II standardisation HR-CESTE 18.043,20 €

Maintaining and updating DATEX II standards requires advanced technical expertise that is not available within the PWD. Subcontracting allows Cyprus to stay ahead of regulatory updates and leverage specialized expertise to implement these standards effectively, enhancing the consistency of its road traffic data.

CY-PWD

50.684,62 €

Technical standardization experts supporting in the technical work for DATEX II maintenance and development

FR-Cerema 15.006,75 €

Technical standardization expert support NL-MIN 53.928,00 €

Technical standardization experts supporting in the technical work for DATEX II maintenance and development.

SE-TV 50.033,50 €

T4.2 MOBILITY DATA ECOSYSTEM ARCHITECTURE

Designing a robust data architecture involves advanced technical skills, particularly in cybersecurity and interoperability challenges that exceed the PWD’s current capabilities. Subcontracting this task ensures that Cyprus can contribute to the European Mobility Data Space with secure, scalable, and innovative data solutions.

CY-PWD

13.575,50 €

T4.3 MULTIMODAL STANDARDS Bringing in expertise on multimodal standards, particularly those related to public transport. Focus on Transmodel and representation of national requirements.

DE-RMS 6.346,96 €

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

60

Technical standardization experts supporting in the technical work for maintenance and development of Transmodel-based standards and related objects. Task leader assistance

FR-MIN

188.663,35 €

Technical standardization expert support NL-MIN 60.669,90 €

Technical contribution to multimodal standards tasks from UITP/DATA4PT perspective

Y-UITP 3.490,50 €

T4.4 METADATA SPECIFICATIONS Experts on meta data standards, to support the further development and maintenance of mobilityDCAT-AP

DE-BAST 118.384,50 €

T4.5 METR (MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRONIC TRAFFIC REGULATIONS)

Technical standardization experts supporting in the technical and organisational aspects of METR, including the standardisation aspects of it

DE-BAST 39.847,60 €

Technical standardization experts supporting in the technical work for development

FR-Cerema 4.936,32 €

Technical standardization expert support NL-MIN 51.183,75 €

Technical support to the Ministry by developing and aligning EU traffic regulation standards, ensuring interoperability of traffic rule data, and supporting automated driving legislation.

SI-MZI 35.896,00 €

T4.6 NAP INTEROPERABILITY Technical support of experts related to NPT interoperability HR-CESTE 9.513,70 €

T5 DATA PROVISION & USE As leaders of WG5, subcontracting is critical to ensure the successful delivery of its tasks due to the specialized expertise and resources required for Tasks 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3.

CY-PWD 33.250,00 €

T5.1 Producing detailed insights into data availability and compliance requires a high level of precision and analytical skills. Subcontracting

CY-PWD 11.261,30 €

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

61

NAP DATA INSIGHTS AND REPORTING SUPPORT

ensures Cyprus can meet DG-MOVE requirements efficiently while providing valuable contributions to EU data monitoring systems.

Reporting and insights about data availability on the NAPs FR-MIN 7.608,48 €

Technical support in prototype development, using an experienced R&D sub-contractor (Semantic technologies, APIs, webservice development, etc.)

SI-UM 40.857,00 €

Technical support in meetings and developing of the work ES-DGT 7.885,80 €

T5.2 TOOLS Technical development of open source tools DE-NVBW 44.590,50 €

Developing tools for NAP operations requires significant technical resources and expertise, which the PWD lacks. Subcontracting enables the creation, together with the NAPCORE community, of state-of-the- art tools while ensuring that PWD is actively involved in their development. This collaboration ensures the tools are tailored also to Cyprus' needs and contribute to strengthening CyNAP functionality.

CY-PWD

44.007,88 €

TECHNICAL SUPPORT GR-MIN 28.636,79 €

Technical expert support NL-MIN 12.386,25 €

Technical support in meetings and developing of the work ES-DGT 18.311,40 €

T5.3 DATA QUALITY Data experts in Hamburg for the evaluation of data quality of cycling data supporting the development of a Data Dictionary and the data quality framework

DE-HH 12.086,25 €

Technical data quality and standardisation experts developing processes and tools

DE-NVBW 9.618,30 €

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

62

Subcontracting the development of data quality frameworks, which the PWD is not equipped to handle internally, ensures Cyprus can deliver reliable, high-standard data to its NAP, meeting the expectations of both national stakeholders and EU policies. This builds trust in the system and enhances data usability across platforms.

CY-PWD

13.865,25 €

TECHNICAL SUPPORT GR-MIN 45.002,66 €

Technical support in meetings and developing of the work ES-DGT 5.865,30 €

Technical contribution to multimodal aata quality discussions from UITP/DATA4PT perspective

Y-UITP 1.577,55 €

T6.1 STRATEGIES FOR NATIONAL BODY COORDINATION AND NON-COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT

Support for the national implementation of the national body tasks FI- Traficom 19.734,96 €

Technical support to the Ministry by coordinating compliance strategies across EU member states, refining enforcement measures, and proposing governance structures to ensure adherence to EU transport data standards.

SI-MZI

22.024,00 €

T6.2 OPERATIONAL SUPPORT TO NATIONAL BODIES

Development and creation of tools for international CA (ENBOSS) HR-CESTE 123.319,50 €

T7.1 STEERING COMMITTEE & ADVISORY BOARD

The presence of a trusted external subcontracted entity is essential to ensure efficient coordination, adherence to EU legislation, and the delivery of high-quality strategic and operational outcomes, while allowing the beneficiary to concentrate on governance and oversight responsibilities.

CY-PWD

4.452,00 €

Support for the preparation of the SCOMs FR-MIN 3.988,75 €

TECHNICAL SUPPORT GR-MIN 3.000,31 €

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

63

Technical support in meetings and developing of the work ES-DGT 4.452,00 €

T7.2 STRATEGY Creating a forward-looking strategy for NAPCORE-X involves understanding evolving EU policies and integrating them with national priorities. Subcontracting provides the expertise needed to ensure that Cyprus' strategy is both innovative and aligned with broader European objectives. Furthermore, the involvement of a subcontractor in this task is essential to integrate inputs and knowledge from all previously mentioned tasks, ensuring a comprehensive and effective approach to strategy development.

CY-PWD

20.668,20 €

Assistance in supporting French positions FR-MIN 40.074,80 €

Technical support in meetings and developing of the work ES-DGT 13.286,70 €

T7.3 LONG-TERM GOVERNANCE Establishing a governance model for NAPCORE requires a deep understanding of European mobility systems and a long-term vision. Subcontracting enables Cyprus to develop a robust governance framework, ensuring its active participation in shaping the future of interoperable data ecosystems in Europe. The subcontractor's involvement is also critical to leverage the insights and knowledge gained from all the previously discussed tasks, enabling a cohesive approach to long-term governance and ensuring alignment with EU goals and Cyprus’ development needs.

CY-PWD

21.042,50 €

Technical support in meetings and developing of the work ES-DGT 13.608,90 €

T8.1 OVERALL DISSEMINATION AND COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT

A communications agency will support the creation of the overall communication strategy and the alignment between the various activities in this working group from a communications perspective.

DE-BAST 47.604,20 €

T8.2 NAP SUPPORT CENTER Help organize the information available into suitable formats for the NAP operators. Furthermore, organize the information available and

DE-BAST 15.975,75 €

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

64

gathered here into the various other communication channels to different external stakeholders as well.

Expert technical support along with the development and establishment of a NAP support center

HR-CESTE 49.317,75 €

T8.3 EVENTS Support the presence of NAPCORE at events, especially if exhibition booths or similar are planned.

DE-BAST 10.327,65 €

TECHNICAL SUPPORT GR-MIN 110.007,20 €

Organisation of NAPCORE events IT-SINA 15.428,40 €

Event support NL-MIN 89.849,70 €

Technical support to the Ministry by organizing key events, including Mobility Data Days, to disseminate project outcomes, engage stakeholders, and promote EU-aligned transport data standards and best practices.

SI-MZI

T8.4 WEBSITE, SOCIAL MEDIA AND SERVICE DESK

Support in the creation of suitable content for social media, support in the communication with externals via the service desk and social media

DE-BAST 16.974,90 €

TECHNICAL SUPPORT GR-MIN 14.999,12 €

Hosting, management and upgrade of the NAPCORE website. IT-SINA 9.194,60 €

T8.5 ACADEMY & TRAINING Align the academy and training activities with the overall communication and dissemination activities.

DE-BAST 10.558,00 €

Technical support to the Ministry by establishing the NAPCORE Academy to provide structured training on ITS standards and

SI-MZI 16.859,00 €

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

65

HISTORY OF CHANGES

VERSION PUBLICATION

DATE CHANGE

1.0 13.05.2025 Initial version (new MFF) of Grant Agreement based upon the proposal with the following changes:

Addition of task budget split in WG1 objective (based upon the proposed budget)

Addition of annual activity reports for 2025, 2026 and 2027 in Task 1.1 description and as deliverables (D1.2.3, D1.2.4 and D1.2.5

respectively)

Addition of extra text in Task 7.1 regarding national implementation roadmaps

Addition of an extra item in the task description for Task 4.5 (METR) in regards to making sure that work results in the METR ISO standard

are accessible for European stakeholders for free

Change of former Beneficiary SE-STA to Associated Partner status

Change of the Task lead of Task 7.2 from formerly BE-FED to HR-CESTE

Change of short name for the Associated Partner AT-BMIMI (AT-BMK) to reflect the change in the ministry’s name

technologies, enhancing the Ministry's capacity to implement EU policies and improve national data management practices.

Technical contribution to UITP dissemination work Y-UITP 1.421,48 €

T8.5-follow ACADEMY & TRAINING Supporting at events and Tasks to be followed DE-HH 3.199,50 €

For areas where Cyprus will primarily act as a follower, subcontracting remains essential to attend the online meetings and provide the technical and administrative contributions necessary to align with the broader goals of NAPCORE-X.

CY-PWD

13.564,10 €

TECHNICAL SUPPORT GR-MIN 251,73 €

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

EU Grants: Description of the action (DoA) — Annex 1 (CEF): V1.0 – 01.09.2021

66

Addition and clarification in the description text of Task 4.3 to include the support of training activities of WG 8 on multimodal standards

General spelling corrections and minor additions for clarification throughout the document

Clarification in Task 8.3 regarding events organized by NAPCORE to take place in the EU and consider costs and emissions

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Grant Agreement number: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

ANNEX 1

DETAILED BUDGET BREAKDOWN PER REPORTING PERIOD

Estimated eligible costs (per budget category) Estimated EU contribution

Direct costs Indirect costs EU contribution to eligible costs

A. Personnel costs B.

Subcontracting costs

C. Purchase costs D. Other cost categories E. Indirect costs

Total costs Funding rate % Maximum EU

contribution Requested EU contribution

Total requested EU contribution

C.1 Travel and subsistence A.1 Employees (or equivalent)

A.2 Natural persons under direct contract

A.3 Seconded persons

A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries

Travel Accommodation Subsistence

C.2 Equipment C.3 Other goods, works and services

D.1 Financial support to third parties

Forms of funding Actual costs Unit costs (usual

accounting practices)

Unit costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Flat-rate costs

a1 a2 a3 b c1a c1b c1c c2 c3 d1a

e = flat-rate * (a1 + a2 + a3 + b + c1a + c1b + c1c + c2 + c3 + d1a)

f = a+b+c+d+e U g = f * U% h m

Reporting period 1

1 - DE-BAST 436 678.00 0.00 0.00 705 000.00 62 019.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 203 697.00 85 1 023 142.45 1 023 142.45 1 023 142.45

2 - DE-HH 24 608.00 0.00 0.00 34 452.00 6 849.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65 909.00 85 56 022.65 56 022.65 56 022.65

3 - DE-NRW-MIN 80 103.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 585.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 88 688.00 85 75 384.80 75 384.80 75 384.80

4 - DE-NVBW 33 415.00 0.00 0.00 54 209.00 8 211.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95 835.00 85 81 459.75 81 459.75 81 459.75

5 - DE-RMS 142 731.00 0.00 0.00 17 000.00 12 748.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 172 479.00 85 146 607.15 146 607.15 146 607.15

6 - AT-MVO 47 768.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 311.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54 079.00 85 45 967.15 45 967.15 45 967.15

7 - AT-ASFINAG 180 977.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14 128.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 195 105.00 85 165 839.25 165 839.25 165 839.25

8 - AT-ATE 724 064.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45 518.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 769 582.00 85 654 144.70 654 144.70 654 144.70

9 - BE-FED 223 682.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19 610.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 243 292.00 85 206 798.20 206 798.20 206 798.20

10 - BE-FL 33 123.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 246.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38 369.00 85 32 613.65 32 613.65 32 613.65

11 - BE-NGI 169 538.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 949.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 183 487.00 85 155 963.95 155 963.95 155 963.95

12 - HR-CESTE 159 769.00 0.00 0.00 205 000.00 25 016.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 389 785.00 85 331 317.25 331 317.25 331 317.25

13 - HR-MMPI 111 756.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14 495.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 126 251.00 85 107 313.35 107 313.35 107 313.35

14 - CY-PWD 10 007.00 0.00 0.00 284 500.00 6 160.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300 667.00 85 255 566.95 255 566.95 255 566.95

15 - CZ-CDV 121 669.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 134.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 134 803.00 85 114 582.55 114 582.55 114 582.55

16 - CZ-MDCR 40 340.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 690.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47 030.00 85 39 975.50 39 975.50 39 975.50

17 - CZ-CVUT 111 154.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 899.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 123 053.00 85 104 595.05 104 595.05 104 595.05

18 - CZ-TTR 215 551.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16 509.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 232 060.00 85 197 251.00 197 251.00 197 251.00

19 - DK-DRD 50 197.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 427.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56 624.00 85 48 130.40 48 130.40 48 130.40

20 - DK-TS 38 054.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 114.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43 168.00 85 36 692.80 36 692.80 36 692.80

21 - EE-ETA 38 187.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 487.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43 674.00 85 37 122.90 37 122.90 37 122.90

22 - FI-FINTRA 135 215.00 0.00 0.00 40 000.00 15 320.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190 535.00 85 161 954.75 161 954.75 161 954.75

23 - FI-TRAFICOM 61 600.00 0.00 0.00 20 000.00 7 557.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 89 157.00 85 75 783.45 75 783.45 75 783.45

24 - FR-MIN 23 710.00 0.00 0.00 467 000.00 32 560.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 523 270.00 85 444 779.50 444 779.50 444 779.50

25 - FR-CEREMA 219 643.00 0.00 0.00 20 000.00 17 291.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 256 934.00 85 218 393.90 218 393.90 218 393.90

26 - FR-ART 38 643.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 142.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43 785.00 85 37 217.25 37 217.25 37 217.25

27 - GR-MIN 76 682.00 0.00 0.00 222 223.00 20 116.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 319 021.00 85 271 167.85 271 167.85 271 167.85

28 - HU-EKM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 85 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 1 of 3

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Grant Agreement number: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

Estimated eligible costs (per budget category) Estimated EU contribution

Direct costs Indirect costs EU contribution to eligible costs

A. Personnel costs B.

Subcontracting costs

C. Purchase costs D. Other cost categories E. Indirect costs

Total costs Funding rate % Maximum EU

contribution Requested EU contribution

Total requested EU contribution

C.1 Travel and subsistence A.1 Employees (or equivalent)

A.2 Natural persons under direct contract

A.3 Seconded persons

A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries

Travel Accommodation Subsistence

C.2 Equipment C.3 Other goods, works and services

D.1 Financial support to third parties

Forms of funding Actual costs Unit costs (usual

accounting practices)

Unit costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Flat-rate costs

a1 a2 a3 b c1a c1b c1c c2 c3 d1a

e = flat-rate * (a1 + a2 + a3 + b + c1a + c1b + c1c + c2 + c3 + d1a)

f = a+b+c+d+e U g = f * U% h m

29 - HU-KOZUT 86 253.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9 245.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95 498.00 85 81 173.30 81 173.30 81 173.30

30 - IE-DFT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 85 0.00 0.00 0.00

31 - IT-MIN 29 990.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 463.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35 453.00 85 30 135.05 30 135.05 30 135.05

32 - IT-SINA 149 865.00 0.00 0.00 25 000.00 11 636.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 186 501.00 85 158 525.85 158 525.85 158 525.85

33 - IT-ASPI 156 216.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12 947.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 169 163.00 85 143 788.55 143 788.55 143 788.55

34 - IT-MOVYON 72 244.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 111.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79 355.00 85 67 451.75 67 451.75 67 451.75

35 - IT-5T 88 960.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 274.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 97 234.00 85 82 648.90 82 648.90 82 648.90

36 - IT-CEF 178 649.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 283.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 191 932.00 85 163 142.20 163 142.20 163 142.20

37 - IT-QM 14 846.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 274.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18 120.00 85 15 402.00 15 402.00 15 402.00

38 - IT-SINELEC 71 452.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 440.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 78 892.00 85 67 058.20 67 058.20 67 058.20

39 - LV-CELI 74 665.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9 793.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 84 458.00 85 71 789.30 71 789.30 71 789.30

40 - LT-VIA 96 348.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 827.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 107 175.00 85 91 098.75 91 098.75 91 098.75

41 - MT-TRANSP 296 501.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23 302.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 319 803.00 85 271 832.55 271 832.55 271 832.55

42 - NL-MIN 720 118.00 0.00 0.00 350 000.00 66 415.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 136 533.00 85 966 053.05 966 053.05 966 053.05

43 - PL-GDNRM 74 614.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 324.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 82 938.00 85 70 497.30 70 497.30 70 497.30

44 - PT-IMT 69 866.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 097.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 77 963.00 85 66 268.55 66 268.55 66 268.55

45 - PT-ARMIS 302 755.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19 933.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 322 688.00 85 274 284.80 274 284.80 274 284.80

46 - RO-MIN 46 584.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 354.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53 938.00 85 45 847.30 45 847.30 45 847.30

47 - RO-NCRIA 68 651.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9 140.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 77 791.00 85 66 122.35 66 122.35 66 122.35

48 - RO-ITS 87 572.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 508.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 080.00 85 84 218.00 84 218.00 84 218.00

49 - RO-ELSOL 75 847.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 749.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 84 596.00 85 71 906.60 71 906.60 71 906.60

50 - SK-MIN 49 404.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 489.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56 893.00 85 48 359.05 48 359.05 48 359.05

51 - SI-MZI 100 843.00 0.00 0.00 105 786.00 15 277.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 221 906.00 85 188 620.10 188 620.10 188 620.10

52 - SI-UM 179 371.00 0.00 0.00 40 857.00 17 832.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 238 060.00 85 202 351.00 202 351.00 202 351.00

53 - ES-DGT 13 546.00 0.00 0.00 78 738.00 10 266.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 102 550.00 85 87 167.50 87 167.50 87 167.50

54 - SE-TV 97 409.00 0.00 0.00 50 000.00 11 427.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 158 836.00 85 135 010.60 135 010.60 135 010.60

55 - SE-ST 118 740.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 161.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 129 901.00 85 110 415.85 110 415.85 110 415.85

56 - XMD-MIN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 85 0.00 0.00 0.00

57 - Y-UITP 260 333.00 0.00 0.00 16 000.00 20 873.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 297 206.00 85 252 625.10 252 625.10 252 625.10

58 - Y-ITxPT 208 628.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15 812.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 224 440.00 85 190 774.00 190 774.00 190 774.00

59 - Y-ERTICO 261 858.00 0.00 0.00 20 000.00 22 237.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 304 095.00 85 258 480.75 258 480.75 258 480.75

60 - DE-AB

61 - AT-BMIMI

Page 2 of 3

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Grant Agreement number: 101234721 — 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X — CEF-T-2025-TAGENDG

CEF MGA — Multi & Mono: v1.0

Estimated eligible costs (per budget category) Estimated EU contribution

Direct costs Indirect costs EU contribution to eligible costs

A. Personnel costs B.

Subcontracting costs

C. Purchase costs D. Other cost categories E. Indirect costs

Total costs Funding rate % Maximum EU

contribution Requested EU contribution

Total requested EU contribution

C.1 Travel and subsistence A.1 Employees (or equivalent)

A.2 Natural persons under direct contract

A.3 Seconded persons

A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries

Travel Accommodation Subsistence

C.2 Equipment C.3 Other goods, works and services

D.1 Financial support to third parties

Forms of funding Actual costs Unit costs (usual

accounting practices)

Unit costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Flat-rate costs

a1 a2 a3 b c1a c1b c1c c2 c3 d1a

e = flat-rate * (a1 + a2 + a3 + b + c1a + c1b + c1c + c2 + c3 + d1a)

f = a+b+c+d+e U g = f * U% h m

62 - BE-WAL

63 - BG-MIN

64 - BG-API

65 - EE-MIN-KLI

66 - FR-ASFA

67 - IE-TII

68 - IE-NTA

69 - LU-MIN

70 - PL-MIN

71 - XIS-VEG

72 - XME-MIN

73 - XNO-NPRA

74 - XCH-FEDRO

75 - XUK-DFT

76 - XUK-NH

77 - SE-STA

Total 7 600 992.00 0.00 0.00 2 755 765.00 806 580.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 163 337.00 9 488 836.45 9 488 836.45 9 488 836.45

Page 3 of 3

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Project number: SEP-211111485 Project acronym: 25-EU-TG-NAPCORE-X

START (DETAILED BUDGET TABLE PER WP)

PROJECT DATA

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Work package name Funding Rate WG 1 General Management & Administration 85% WG 2 Multimodal Mobility 85% WG 3 Road & Traffic 85% WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture 85% WG 5 Data Provision & Use 85% WG 6 Compliance Assessment & National Bodies 85% WG 7 Governance & Strategy 85% WG 8 Dissemination & Communication 85%

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

Participant name DE-BASt DE-AB DE-HH DE-NRW-MIN DE-NVBW DE-RMS AT-MVO AT-ASFINAG AT-ATE AT-BMK BE-FED BE-FL BE-NGI BE-WAL BG-MIN BG-API HR-CESTE HR-MMPI CY-PWD CZ-CDV CZ-MDCR CZ-CVUT CZ-TTR DK-DRD DK-TS EE-ETA EE-MIN-KLI FI-FINTRA FI-TRAFICOM FR-MIN FR-CEREMA FR-ART FR-ASFA GR-MIN HU-EKM HU-KOZUT IE-TII IE-DOT IE-NTA IT-MIN IT-SINA IT-ASPI IT-MOVYON IT-5T IT-CEF IT-QM IT-Sinelec LV-CELI LT-VIA

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

LU-MIN MT-TRANSP NL-MIN PL-MIN PL-GDNRM PT-IMT PT-ARMIS RO-MIN RO-NCRIA RO-ITS RO-ELSOL SK-MIN SI-MZI SI-UM ES-DGT SE-TV SE-ST SE-STA XIS-VEG XMD-MIN XME-MIN XNO-NPRA XCH-FEDRO XUK-DFT XUK-NH Y-UITP Y-ITxPT Y-ERTICO

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

PROJECT DATA SEP-

211111485 25-EU-TG-

NAPCORE-X

Work Package Participant Reporting period 1

Reporting period 2

Reporting period 3

Reporting period 4

Reporting period 5

Total costs

Funding rate (for work package)

EU contribution

WG 1 General Management & Administration DE-BASt 251737 167826 0 0 0

419.563,00 85% 356.628,55

WG 1 General Management & Administration DE-AB 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration DE-HH 3037 2025 0 0 0

5.062,00 85% 4.302,70

WG 1 General Management & Administration DE-NRW-MIN 3037 2025 0 0 0

5.062,00 85% 4.302,70

WG 1 General Management & Administration DE-NVBW 3037 2025 0 0 0

5.062,00 85% 4.302,70

WG 1 General Management & Administration DE-RMS 3037 2025 0 0 0

5.062,00 85% 4.302,70

WG 1 General Management & Administration AT-MVO 3037 2025 0 0 0

5.062,00 85% 4.302,70

WG 1 General Management & Administration AT-ASFINAG 3037 2025 0 0 0

5.062,00 85% 4.302,70

WG 1 General Management & Administration AT-ATE 13720 9148 0 0 0

22.868,00 85% 19.437,80

WG 1 General Management & Administration AT-BMK 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration BE-FED 13720 9148 0 0 0

22.868,00 85% 19.437,80

WG 1 General Management & Administration BE-FL 3037 2025 0 0 0

5.062,00 85% 4.302,70

WG 1 General Management & Administration BE-NGI 3037 2025 0 0 0

5.062,00 85% 4.302,70

WG 1 General Management & Administration BE-WAL 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration BG-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration BG-API 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration HR-CESTE 3951 2635 0 0 0

6.586,00 85% 5.598,10

WG 1 General Management & Administration HR-MMPI 1815 1210 0 0 0

3.025,00 85% 2.571,25

WG 1 General Management & Administration CY-PWD 10977 7318 0 0 0

18.295,00 85% 15.550,75

WG 1 General Management & Administration CZ-CDV 1822 1215 0 0 0

3.037,00 85% 2.581,45

WG 1 General Management & Administration CZ-MDCR 4431 2954 0 0 0

7.385,00 85% 6.277,25

WG 1 General Management & Administration CZ-CVUT 1822 1215 0 0 0

3.037,00 85% 2.581,45

WG 1 General Management & Administration CZ-TTR 5027 3352 0 0 0

8.379,00 85% 7.122,15

WG 1 General Management & Administration DK-DRD 3037 2025 0 0 0

5.062,00 85% 4.302,70

WG 1 General Management & Administration DK-TS 3037 2025 0 0 0

5.062,00 85% 4.302,70

WG 1 General Management & Administration EE-ETA 1822 1215 0 0 0

3.037,00 85% 2.581,45

WG 1 General Management & Administration EE-MIN-KLI 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration FI-FINTRA 8379 5586 0 0 0

13.965,00 85% 11.870,25

WG 1 General Management & Administration FI-TRAFICOM 3037 2025 0 0 0

5.062,00 85% 4.302,70

WG 1 General Management & Administration FR-MIN 13720 9148 0 0 0

22.868,00 85% 19.437,80

WG 1 General Management & Administration FR-CEREMA 3037 2025 0 0 0

5.062,00 85% 4.302,70

WG 1 General Management & Administration FR-ART 3037 2025 0 0 0

5.062,00 85% 4.302,70

WG 1 General Management & Administration FR-ASFA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration GR-MIN 1822 1215 0 0 0

3.037,00 85% 2.581,45

WG 1 General Management & Administration HU-EKM 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration HU-KOZUT 6849 4567 0 0 0

11.416,00 85% 9.703,60

WG 1 General Management & Administration IE-TII 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration IE-DOT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration IE-NTA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration IT-MIN 2430 1620 0 0 0

4.050,00 85% 3.442,50

WG 1 General Management & Administration IT-SINA 6703 4469 0 0 0

11.172,00 85% 9.496,20

WG 1 General Management & Administration IT-ASPI 2430 1620 0 0 0

4.050,00 85% 3.442,50

WG 1 General Management & Administration IT-MOVYON 2430 1620 0 0 0

4.050,00 85% 3.442,50

WG 1 General Management & Administration IT-5T 2430 1620 0 0 0

4.050,00 85% 3.442,50

WG 1 General Management & Administration IT-CEF 2430 1620 0 0 0

4.050,00 85% 3.442,50

WG 1 General Management & Administration IT-QM 2430 1620 0 0 0

4.050,00 85% 3.442,50

WG 1 General Management & Administration IT-Sinelec 2430 1620 0 0 0

4.050,00 85% 3.442,50

WG 1 General Management & Administration LV-CELI 1822 1215 0 0 0

3.037,00 85% 2.581,45

WG 1 General Management & Administration LT-VIA 1822 1215 0 0 0

3.037,00 85% 2.581,45

WG 1 General Management & Administration LU-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration MT-TRANSP 1822 1215 0 0 0

3.037,00 85% 2.581,45

BUDGET BREAKDOWN PER WORK PACKAGE AND PARTICIPANT Reporting period can be added/deleted as needed

Project number:

Project acronym:

DETAILED BUDGET TABLE PER WP

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2 25

WG 1 General Management & Administration NL-MIN 16750 11168 0 0 0

27.918,00 85% 23.730,30

WG 1 General Management & Administration PL-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration PL-GDNRM 1822 1215 0 0 0

3.037,00 85% 2.581,45

WG 1 General Management & Administration PT-IMT 2430 1620 0 0 0

4.050,00 85% 3.442,50

WG 1 General Management & Administration PT-ARMIS 6703 4469 0 0 0

11.172,00 85% 9.496,20

WG 1 General Management & Administration RO-MIN 1822 1215 0 0 0

3.037,00 85% 2.581,45

WG 1 General Management & Administration RO-NCRIA 1822 1215 0 0 0

3.037,00 85% 2.581,45

WG 1 General Management & Administration RO-ITS 5027 3352 0 0 0

8.379,00 85% 7.122,15

WG 1 General Management & Administration RO-ELSOL 1822 1215 0 0 0

3.037,00 85% 2.581,45

WG 1 General Management & Administration SK-MIN 1822 1215 0 0 0

3.037,00 85% 2.581,45

WG 1 General Management & Administration SI-MZI 6703 4469 0 0 0

11.172,00 85% 9.496,20

WG 1 General Management & Administration SI-UM 6703 4469 0 0 0

11.172,00 85% 9.496,20

WG 1 General Management & Administration ES-DGT 2430 1620 0 0 0

4.050,00 85% 3.442,50

WG 1 General Management & Administration SE-TV 3037 2025 0 0 0

5.062,00 85% 4.302,70

WG 1 General Management & Administration SE-ST 3037 2025 0 0 0

5.062,00 85% 4.302,70

WG 1 General Management & Administration SE-STA 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration XIS-VEG 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration XMD-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration XME-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration XNO-NPRA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration XCH-FEDRO 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration XUK-DFT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration XUK-NH 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 1 General Management & Administration Y-UITP 10903 7269 0 0 0

18.172,00 85% 15.446,20

WG 1 General Management & Administration Y-ITxPT 2430 1620 0 0 0

4.050,00 85% 3.442,50

WG 1 General Management & Administration Y-ERTICO 6703 4469 0 0 0

11.172,00 85% 9.496,20

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility DE-BASt 13500 9001 0 0 0

22.501,00 85% 19.125,85

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility DE-AB 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility DE-HH 14281 9522 0 0 0

23.803,00 85% 20.232,55

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility DE-NRW-MIN 16069 10714 0 0 0

26.783,00 85% 22.765,55

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility DE-NVBW 13500 9001 0 0 0

22.501,00 85% 19.125,85

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility DE-RMS 38053 25369 0 0 0

63.422,00 85% 53.908,70

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility AT-MVO 10077 6719 0 0 0

16.796,00 85% 14.276,60

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility AT-ASFINAG 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility AT-ATE 22282 14856 0 0 0

37.138,00 85% 31.567,30

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility AT-BMK 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility BE-FED 70197 46798 0 0 0

116.995,00 85% 99.445,75

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility BE-FL 6615 4411 0 0 0

11.026,00 85% 9.372,10

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility BE-NGI 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility BE-WAL 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility BG-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility BG-API 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility HR-CESTE 5329 3553 0 0 0

8.882,00 85% 7.549,70

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility HR-MMPI 5159 3440 0 0 0

8.599,00 85% 7.309,15

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility CY-PWD 11832 7889 0 0 0

19.721,00 85% 16.762,85

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility CZ-CDV 12940 8627 0 0 0

21.567,00 85% 18.331,95

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility CZ-MDCR 7940 5294 0 0 0

13.234,00 85% 11.248,90

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility CZ-CVUT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility CZ-TTR 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility DK-DRD 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility DK-TS 16069 10714 0 0 0

26.783,00 85% 22.765,55

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility EE-ETA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility EE-MIN-KLI 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility FI-FINTRA 51495 34331 0 0 0

85.826,00 85% 72.952,10

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility FI-TRAFICOM 13500 9001 0 0 0

22.501,00 85% 19.125,85

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility FR-MIN 14901 9934 0 0 0

24.835,00 85% 21.109,75

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility FR-CEREMA 9454 6303 0 0 0

15.757,00 85% 13.393,45

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility FR-ART 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility FR-ASFA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility GR-MIN 6171 4115 0 0 0

10.286,00 85% 8.743,10

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility HU-EKM 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility HU-KOZUT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility IE-TII 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility IE-DOT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility IE-NTA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility IT-MIN 7523 5016 0 0 0

12.539,00 85% 10.658,15

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility IT-SINA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility IT-ASPI 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility IT-MOVYON 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility IT-5T 14581 9722 0 0 0

24.303,00 85% 20.657,55

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility IT-CEF 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility IT-QM 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility IT-Sinelec 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility LV-CELI 5592 3729 0 0 0

9.321,00 85% 7.922,85

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility LT-VIA 2347 1566 0 0 0

3.913,00 85% 3.326,05

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility LU-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility MT-TRANSP 18427 12286 0 0 0

30.713,00 85% 26.106,05

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility NL-MIN 33771 22515 0 0 0

56.286,00 85% 47.843,10

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility PL-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility PL-GDNRM 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility PT-IMT 7523 5016 0 0 0

12.539,00 85% 10.658,15

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility PT-ARMIS 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility RO-MIN 5592 3729 0 0 0

9.321,00 85% 7.922,85

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility RO-NCRIA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility RO-ITS 3809 2540 0 0 0

6.349,00 85% 5.396,65

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility RO-ELSOL 9130 6088 0 0 0

15.218,00 85% 12.935,30

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility SK-MIN 5592 3729 0 0 0

9.321,00 85% 7.922,85

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility SI-MZI 8295 5531 0 0 0

13.826,00 85% 11.752,10

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility SI-UM 5212 3475 0 0 0

8.687,00 85% 7.383,95

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility ES-DGT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility SE-TV 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility SE-ST 22101 14734 0 0 0

36.835,00 85% 31.309,75

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility SE-STA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility XIS-VEG 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility XMD-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility XME-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility XNO-NPRA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility XCH-FEDRO 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility XUK-DFT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility XUK-NH 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility Y-UITP 83712 55808 0 0 0

139.520,00 85% 118.592,00

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility Y-ITxPT 11385 7590 0 0 0

18.975,00 85% 16.128,75

WG 2 Multimodal Mobility Y-ERTICO 3196 2132 0 0 0

5.328,00 85% 4.528,80

WG 3 Road & Traffic DE-BASt 8718 5812 0 0 0

14.530,00 85% 12.350,50

WG 3 Road & Traffic DE-AB 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic DE-HH 8718 5812 0 0 0

14.530,00 85% 12.350,50

WG 3 Road & Traffic DE-NRW-MIN 5778 3853 0 0 0

9.631,00 85% 8.186,35

WG 3 Road & Traffic DE-NVBW 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic DE-RMS 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic AT-MVO 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic AT-ASFINAG 11474 7650 0 0 0

19.124,00 85% 16.255,40

WG 3 Road & Traffic AT-ATE 7885 5258 0 0 0

13.143,00 85% 11.171,55

WG 3 Road & Traffic AT-BMK 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic BE-FED 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic BE-FL 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic BE-NGI 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

WG 3 Road & Traffic BE-WAL 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic BG-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic BG-API 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic HR-CESTE 2486 1658 0 0 0

4.144,00 85% 3.522,40

WG 3 Road & Traffic HR-MMPI 2263 1509 0 0 0

3.772,00 85% 3.206,20

WG 3 Road & Traffic CY-PWD 14809 9874 0 0 0

24.683,00 85% 20.980,55

WG 3 Road & Traffic CZ-CDV 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic CZ-MDCR 3427 2285 0 0 0

5.712,00 85% 4.855,20

WG 3 Road & Traffic CZ-CVUT 8078 5386 0 0 0

13.464,00 85% 11.444,40

WG 3 Road & Traffic CZ-TTR 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic DK-DRD 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic DK-TS 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic EE-ETA 8228 5486 0 0 0

13.714,00 85% 11.656,90

WG 3 Road & Traffic EE-MIN-KLI 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic FI-FINTRA 8677 5786 0 0 0

14.463,00 85% 12.293,55

WG 3 Road & Traffic FI-TRAFICOM 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic FR-MIN 14649 9767 0 0 0

24.416,00 85% 20.753,60

WG 3 Road & Traffic FR-CEREMA 5778 3853 0 0 0

9.631,00 85% 8.186,35

WG 3 Road & Traffic FR-ART 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic FR-ASFA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic GR-MIN 3780 2520 0 0 0

6.300,00 85% 5.355,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic HU-EKM 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic HU-KOZUT 22590 15061 0 0 0

37.651,00 85% 32.003,35

WG 3 Road & Traffic IE-TII 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic IE-DOT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic IE-NTA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic IT-MIN 4602 3069 0 0 0

7.671,00 85% 6.520,35

WG 3 Road & Traffic IT-SINA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic IT-ASPI 9139 6093 0 0 0

15.232,00 85% 12.947,20

WG 3 Road & Traffic IT-MOVYON 4602 3069 0 0 0

7.671,00 85% 6.520,35

WG 3 Road & Traffic IT-5T 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic IT-CEF 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic IT-QM 4602 3069 0 0 0

7.671,00 85% 6.520,35

WG 3 Road & Traffic IT-Sinelec 4602 3069 0 0 0

7.671,00 85% 6.520,35

WG 3 Road & Traffic LV-CELI 6465 4310 0 0 0

10.775,00 85% 9.158,75

WG 3 Road & Traffic LT-VIA 6465 4310 0 0 0

10.775,00 85% 9.158,75

WG 3 Road & Traffic LU-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic MT-TRANSP 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic NL-MIN 63465 42310 0 0 0

105.775,00 85% 89.908,75

WG 3 Road & Traffic PL-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic PL-GDNRM 5040 3361 0 0 0

8.401,00 85% 7.140,85

WG 3 Road & Traffic PT-IMT 4602 3069 0 0 0

7.671,00 85% 6.520,35

WG 3 Road & Traffic PT-ARMIS 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic RO-MIN 3427 2285 0 0 0

5.712,00 85% 4.855,20

WG 3 Road & Traffic RO-NCRIA 6804 4536 0 0 0

11.340,00 85% 9.639,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic RO-ITS 11896 7931 0 0 0

19.827,00 85% 16.852,95

WG 3 Road & Traffic RO-ELSOL 5190 3461 0 0 0

8.651,00 85% 7.353,35

WG 3 Road & Traffic SK-MIN 3427 2285 0 0 0

5.712,00 85% 4.855,20

WG 3 Road & Traffic SI-MZI 10308 6872 0 0 0

17.180,00 85% 14.603,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic SI-UM 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic ES-DGT 9139 6093 0 0 0

15.232,00 85% 12.947,20

WG 3 Road & Traffic SE-TV 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic SE-ST 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic SE-STA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic XIS-VEG 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic XMD-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic XME-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic XNO-NPRA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

WG 3 Road & Traffic XCH-FEDRO 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic XUK-DFT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic XUK-NH 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic Y-UITP 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic Y-ITxPT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 3 Road & Traffic Y-ERTICO 12633 8423 0 0 0

21.056,00 85% 17.897,60

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture DE-BASt 242808 161872 0 0 0

404.680,00 85% 343.978,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture DE-AB 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture DE-HH 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture DE-NRW-MIN 24487 16326 0 0 0

40.813,00 85% 34.691,05

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture DE-NVBW 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture DE-RMS 47602 31735 0 0 0

79.337,00 85% 67.436,45

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture AT-MVO 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture AT-ASFINAG 77452 51636 0 0 0

129.088,00 85% 109.724,80

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture AT-ATE 85712 57142 0 0 0

142.854,00 85% 121.425,90

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture AT-BMK 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture BE-FED 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture BE-FL 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture BE-NGI 43200 28801 0 0 0

72.001,00 85% 61.200,85

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture BE-WAL 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture BG-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture BG-API 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture HR-CESTE 26326 17551 0 0 0

43.877,00 85% 37.295,45

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture HR-MMPI 23905 15938 0 0 0

39.843,00 85% 33.866,55

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture CY-PWD 39605 26404 0 0 0

66.009,00 85% 56.107,65

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture CZ-CDV 14210 9474 0 0 0

23.684,00 85% 20.131,40

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture CZ-MDCR 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture CZ-CVUT 26139 17427 0 0 0

43.566,00 85% 37.031,10

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture CZ-TTR 42710 28474 0 0 0

71.184,00 85% 60.506,40

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture DK-DRD 12141 8095 0 0 0

20.236,00 85% 17.200,60

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture DK-TS 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture EE-ETA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture EE-MIN-KLI 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture FI-FINTRA 21165 14111 0 0 0

35.276,00 85% 29.984,60

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture FI-TRAFICOM 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture FR-MIN 185433 123623 0 0 0

309.056,00 85% 262.697,60

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture FR-CEREMA 89987 59992 0 0 0

149.979,00 85% 127.482,15

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture FR-ART 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture FR-ASFA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture GR-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture HU-EKM 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture HU-KOZUT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture IE-TII 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture IE-DOT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture IE-NTA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture IT-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture IT-SINA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture IT-ASPI 70075 46718 0 0 0

116.793,00 85% 99.274,05

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture IT-MOVYON 28201 18801 0 0 0

47.002,00 85% 39.951,70

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture IT-5T 37489 24993 0 0 0

62.482,00 85% 53.109,70

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture IT-CEF 68820 45881 0 0 0

114.701,00 85% 97.495,85

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture IT-QM 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture IT-Sinelec 28201 18801 0 0 0

47.002,00 85% 39.951,70

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture LV-CELI 11156 7438 0 0 0

18.594,00 85% 15.804,90

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture LT-VIA 45407 30272 0 0 0

75.679,00 85% 64.327,15

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture LU-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture MT-TRANSP 85653 57103 0 0 0

142.756,00 85% 121.342,60

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture NL-MIN 387664 258444 0 0 0

646.108,00 85% 549.191,80

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture PL-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture PL-GDNRM 35778 23853 0 0 0

59.631,00 85% 50.686,35

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture PT-IMT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture PT-ARMIS 154820 103214 0 0 0

258.034,00 85% 219.328,90

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture RO-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture RO-NCRIA 11156 7438 0 0 0

18.594,00 85% 15.804,90

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture RO-ITS 17937 11958 0 0 0

29.895,00 85% 25.410,75

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture RO-ELSOL 24852 16569 0 0 0

41.421,00 85% 35.207,85

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture SK-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture SI-MZI 21537 14359 0 0 0

35.896,00 85% 30.511,60

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture SI-UM 58124 38750 0 0 0

96.874,00 85% 82.342,90

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture ES-DGT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture SE-TV 72181 48122 0 0 0

120.303,00 85% 102.257,55

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture SE-ST 23751 15834 0 0 0

39.585,00 85% 33.647,25

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture SE-STA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture XIS-VEG 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture XMD-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture XME-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture XNO-NPRA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture XCH-FEDRO 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture XUK-DFT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture XUK-NH 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture Y-UITP 6981 4654 0 0 0

11.635,00 85% 9.889,75

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture Y-ITxPT 61063 40710 0 0 0

101.773,00 85% 86.507,05

WG 4 Data Standards & Architecture Y-ERTICO 52773 35183 0 0 0

87.956,00 85% 74.762,60

WG 5 Data Provision & Use DE-BASt 6412 4275 0 0 0

10.687,00 85% 9.083,95

WG 5 Data Provision & Use DE-AB 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use DE-HH 9669 6446 0 0 0

16.115,00 85% 13.697,75

WG 5 Data Provision & Use DE-NRW-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use DE-NVBW 36139 24093 0 0 0

60.232,00 85% 51.197,20

WG 5 Data Provision & Use DE-RMS 12925 8617 0 0 0

21.542,00 85% 18.310,70

WG 5 Data Provision & Use AT-MVO 14508 9673 0 0 0

24.181,00 85% 20.553,85

WG 5 Data Provision & Use AT-ASFINAG 6412 4275 0 0 0

10.687,00 85% 9.083,95

WG 5 Data Provision & Use AT-ATE 14508 9673 0 0 0

24.181,00 85% 20.553,85

WG 5 Data Provision & Use AT-BMK 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use BE-FED 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use BE-FL 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use BE-NGI 34293 22863 0 0 0

57.156,00 85% 48.582,60

WG 5 Data Provision & Use BE-WAL 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use BG-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use BG-API 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use HR-CESTE 3506 2338 0 0 0

5.844,00 85% 4.967,40

WG 5 Data Provision & Use HR-MMPI 3178 2119 0 0 0

5.297,00 85% 4.502,45

WG 5 Data Provision & Use CY-PWD 63813 42542 0 0 0

106.355,00 85% 90.401,75

WG 5 Data Provision & Use CZ-CDV 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use CZ-MDCR 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use CZ-CVUT 20455 13638 0 0 0

34.093,00 85% 28.979,05

WG 5 Data Provision & Use CZ-TTR 72592 48396 0 0 0

120.988,00 85% 102.839,80

WG 5 Data Provision & Use DK-DRD 6412 4275 0 0 0

10.687,00 85% 9.083,95

WG 5 Data Provision & Use DK-TS 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use EE-ETA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use EE-MIN-KLI 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use FI-FINTRA 11899 7934 0 0 0

19.833,00 85% 16.858,05

WG 5 Data Provision & Use FI-TRAFICOM 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use FR-MIN 20245 13498 0 0 0

33.743,00 85% 28.681,55

WG 5 Data Provision & Use FR-CEREMA 19785 13190 0 0 0

32.975,00 85% 28.028,75

WG 5 Data Provision & Use FR-ART 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use FR-ASFA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)4662383 - 11/06/2025

WG 5 Data Provision & Use GR-MIN 65435 43624 0 0 0

109.059,00 85% 92.700,15

WG 5 Data Provision & Use HU-EKM 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use HU-KOZUT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use IE-TII 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use IE-DOT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use IE-NTA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use IT-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use IT-SINA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use IT-ASPI 5110 3407 0 0 0

8.517,00 85% 7.239,45

WG 5 Data Provision & Use IT-MOVYON 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use IT-5T 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use IT-CEF 15807 10539 0 0 0

26.346,00 85% 22.394,10

WG 5 Data Provision & Use IT-QM 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use IT-Sinelec 5110 3407 0 0 0

8.517,00 85% 7.239,45

WG 5 Data Provision & Use LV-CELI 4817 3212 0 0 0

8.029,00 85% 6.824,65

WG 5 Data Provision & Use LT-VIA 4817 3212 0 0 0

8.029,00 85% 6.824,65

WG 5 Data Provision & Use LU-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use MT-TRANSP 34985 23324 0 0 0

58.309,00 85% 49.562,65

WG 5 Data Provision & Use NL-MIN 36139 24093 0 0 0

60.232,00 85% 51.197,20

WG 5 Data Provision & Use PL-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use PL-GDNRM 3807 2539 0 0 0

6.346,00 85% 5.394,10

WG 5 Data Provision & Use PT-IMT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use PT-ARMIS 23522 15682 0 0 0

39.204,00 85% 33.323,40

WG 5 Data Provision & Use RO-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use RO-NCRIA 8625 5750 0 0 0

14.375,00 85% 12.218,75

WG 5 Data Provision & Use RO-ITS 3807 2539 0 0 0

6.346,00 85% 5.394,10

WG 5 Data Provision & Use RO-ELSOL 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use SK-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use SI-MZI 25950 17301 0 0 0

43.251,00 85% 36.763,35

WG 5 Data Provision & Use SI-UM 48493 32329 0 0 0

80.822,00 85% 68.698,70

WG 5 Data Provision & Use ES-DGT 21375 14250 0 0 0

35.625,00 85% 30.281,25

WG 5 Data Provision & Use SE-TV 9669 6446 0 0 0

16.115,00 85% 13.697,75

WG 5 Data Provision & Use SE-ST 26197 17465 0 0 0

43.662,00 85% 37.112,70

WG 5 Data Provision & Use SE-STA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use XIS-VEG 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use XMD-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use XME-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use XNO-NPRA 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use XCH-FEDRO 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use XUK-DFT 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use XUK-NH 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use Y-UITP 6310 4207 0 0 0

10.517,00 85% 8.939,45

WG 5 Data Provision & Use Y-ITxPT 28872 19248 0 0 0

48.120,00 85% 40.902,00

WG 5 Data Provision & Use Y-ERTICO 27375 18250 0 0 0

45.625,00 85% 38.781,25

WG 6 Compliance Assessment & National Bodies DE-BASt 16542 11029 0 0 0

27.571,00 85% 23.435,35

WG 6 Compliance Assessment & National Bodies DE-AB 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 6 Compliance Assessment & National Bodies DE-HH 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 6 Compliance Assessment & National Bodies DE-NRW-MIN 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 6 Compliance Assessment & National Bodies DE-NVBW 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 6 Compliance Assessment & National Bodies DE-RMS 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00

WG 6 Compliance Assessment & National Bodies AT-MVO 0 0 0 0 0

0,00 85% 0,00