Dokumendiregister | Riigi Infosüsteemi Amet |
Viit | 4.2-39/25-0129/251192 |
Registreeritud | 30.07.2025 |
Sünkroonitud | 31.07.2025 |
Liik | Sissetulev kiri |
Funktsioon | 4.2 Riigi e-teenuste arendamise ja haldamise korraldamine |
Sari | 4.2-39 EL (kaas)finantseeritavad projektid |
Toimik | 4.2-39/25-0129 |
Juurdepääsupiirang | Avalik |
Juurdepääsupiirang | |
Adressaat | European Cybersecurity Competence Centre (ECCC) |
Saabumis/saatmisviis | European Cybersecurity Competence Centre (ECCC) |
Vastutaja | Teaduse ja arenduse koordineerimisosakond |
Originaal | Ava uues aknas |
Proposal Evaluation Form EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Digital Europe Programme (DIGITAL)
Evaluation Summary Report
Call: DIGITAL-ECCC-2024-DEPLOY-NCC-06
Type of action: DIGITAL-SIMPLE
Proposal number: 101226928
Proposal acronym: NCCEE2
Duration (months): 48
Proposal title: Cybersecurity Community Building and Continuation of the Estonian Coordination Centre Activities
Activity: DIGITAL-ECCC-2024-DEPLOY-NCC-06-MS-COORDINATION
N. Proposer name Country Total eligible
costs
% Grant Requested
%
1 RIIGI INFOSUSTEEMI AMET EE 2,282,438.4 42.55% 1,141,219.2 42.55%
2 ETTEVOTLUSE JA INNOVATSIOONI SIHTASUTUS EE 1,605,000 29.92% 802,500 29.92%
3 SIHTASUTUS TALLINNA TEADUSPARK TEHNOPOL EE 1,476,600 27.53% 738,300 27.53%
Total: 5,364,038.4 2,682,019.2
Abstract:
NCCEE2 is the next step of NCCEE project, moving towards a more capable cybersecurity community, a more sustainable impact in building those capabilities in Estonia and contributing to development of the cybersecurity sector. Building on the success of the activities of the previous, deployment oriented NCCEE project, it is paramount to continue on the path of advancing capabilities across the cybersecurity sector in Estonia. Moving from individual projects to a culture of innovation and capacity building to keep Estonia and Europe safe, NCCEE2 has the following objectives: 1. Creating sustained impact in capacity building in cybersecurity industry, research and technology alongside the cybersecurity community through events, knowledge sharing, sustainable innovation programs and facilitation of collaboration; 2. Promoting and encouraging a culture of innovation in cybersecurity, including increasing practical implementation of research outcomes, facilitating the participation in cross-border projects and entrepreneurship; 3. Increasing the number of specialists and youth acquiring knowledge and training in the field of cybersecurity, with a special focus on women and girls, while taking into account the needs of the cybersecurity community; 4. Promoting and supporting the uptake and dissemination of state-of-the-art cybersecurity solutions by all actors in society, with special attention paid to small and medium sized enterprises. NCCEE2 aims to enhance the existing capabilities of the Estonian and European cybersecurity community, guiding them towards market opportunities and future-proof solutions. The NCCEE2 consortium will leverage the experience from the NCCEE deployment project to expand the scope and focus on the long-term viability of the local National Coordination Centre, supporting the mission and strategic goals of the European Cybersecurity Competence Centre and Network of NCCs.
Evaluation Summary Report
Evaluation Result
Total score: 13.00 (Threshold: 10 )
Criterion 1 - Relevance
Score: (Threshold: 3 / 5.00 , Weight: - )4.50
101226928/NCCEE2-05/03/2025-10:28:18 1 / 4
Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)1742443 - 05/03/2025
The following aspects have been taken into account (Items 3 and 4 may not be applicable to all topics see call document): 1 - Alignment with the objectives and activities as described in the Call document 2 - Contribution to long-term policy objectives, relevant policies and strategies, and synergies with activities at European and national level 3 - Extent to which the project would reinforce and secure the digital technology supply chain in the EU 4 - Extent to which the project can overcome financial obstacles such as the lack of market finance The proposal intends to build on the previous Estonian NCCEE project, to achieve a more capable and sustainable cybersecurity community via market opportunities and future-proof solutions.
Four well-defined and concrete objectives are presented, which are aligned with the objectives and activities described in the Call document. These highlight the need for research, development, innovation and entrepreneurship in cybersecurity to tackle emerging threats.
Data is provided on the growing number of cyber incidents in Estonia, describing the significant challenges (highlighted in Estonia’s 2024-2030 Strategic Plan for Cybersecurity) within Estonia’s cybersecurity landscape.
The proposal demonstrates alignment with national priorities, including clear links to Estonia’s national cybersecurity strategy and the intention to establish connections with neighbouring NCCs, fostering cross-border collaboration.
The proposal adequately describes its contribution to the long-term policy objectives of the call’s domain, by indicating the way that the Estonian National Coordination Centre is focused to continue and enhance the efforts related to the “Estonia 2035” initiative with NCCEE2, ensuring - among other things - that the cyber risks of the digital society are well managed and that the Estonian cyberspace is highly reliable.
However, the links to long-term EU policies, such as the NIS2 Directive and the EU Cybersecurity Strategy are not sufficiently elaborated.
In addition, some of the objectives are not accompanied by measurable target levels.
Recommendations: - Provide a more elaborate and clear narrative about the proposal’s links to long-term EU policies. - Define appropriate KPIs for the project objectives, with realistic estimated target values and/or qualifications (for instance, whilst the proposal describes goals such as capacity building and SME support, it does not specify measurable targets in this regard), together with explicit links between the objectives and the WP structure.
Criterion 2 Implementation
Score: (Threshold: 3 / 5.00 , Weight: - )4.00
The following aspects have been taken into account: 1 - Maturity of the project 2 - Soundness of the implementation plan and efficient use of resources 3 - Capacity of the applicants, and when applicable the consortium as a whole, to carry out the proposed work The project builds on the NCCEE pilot project, leveraging on the results of this earlier project (including existing systems, processes and team). It therefore demonstrates an adequate level of maturity.
The provided implementation plan is largely sound and detailed, including a comprehensive 48 month plan, composed of 5 pertinent WPs that include tasks for monitoring performance, cooperation, resource utilisation, and dissemination.
However, interdependencies between WPs are not sufficiently clear, particularly considering that WPs tasks have a duration of 48 months (refer to table in page 63 /64). Also, milestones are not consistently specified for all WPs.
The presented approach to FSTP is adequate, however the selection process for FSTP beneficiaries is not sufficiently defined and the distributed method for fund allocation should be presented with further detail.
The consortium demonstrates that it possesses the necessary skills and capacity to carry out the project. The partners have complementary skills in Cybersecurity policy, national digital infrastructure, cybersecurity training, grant management and innovation support as well as supporting startups, and innovation testing.
Recommendations: - Revise the WPs task timeframe definition for achieving a more balanced and realistic time distribution. - Revise the Milestones Definitions for the WPs. - Provide a more detailed description of the FSTP selection and fund allocation processes.
Criterion 3 - Impact
Score: (Threshold: 3 / 5.00 , Weight: - )4.50
101226928/NCCEE2-05/03/2025-10:28:18 2 / 4
Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)1742443 - 05/03/2025
The following aspects have been taken into account (Item 3 may not be applicable to all topics see call document): 1 - Extent to which the project will achieve the expected outcomes and deliverables referred to in the call for proposals and, where relevant, the plans to disseminate and communicate project achievements 2 - Extent to which the project will strengthen competitiveness and bring important benefits for society 3 - Extent to which the project addresses environmental sustainability and the European Green Deal goals, in terms of direct effects and/or in awareness of environmental effects The proposal demonstrates to be very well placed to achieve the expected impacts of the Call, contributing towards the advancement of Estonia’s cybersecurity landscape and strengthen the EU’s broader digital security ecosystem.
The proposal presents clear and concrete expected outcomes and deliverables, with credible explanations of how they will support the achievement of the expected impacts, as outlined in the Call document.
A good dissemination and communication plan is also provided, however a comprehensive set of related KPIs, with appropriate quantitative baselines and target values, is not clearly presented.
The key contribution to competitiveness is through the support provided to start-ups and SMEs to enhance their cybersecurity. The described benefits for society include promoting cybersecurity education and workforce development, with a focus on diversity and inclusion as well as building a secure and digitally aware public environment, enhancing trust in digital systems and services.
The proposal also outlines several impactful activities, such as FSTP distribution, community-building events, and a youth-focused cybersecurity programme.
Recommendation: - For better monitoring of the project’s impact, the proposal should include a list of the Dissemination and Communication KPIs with quantitative estimations of appropriate indicators.
Scope of the application
Status: Yes
Comments (in case the proposal is out of scope) Not provided
Exceptional funding
Entities from countries mentioned in the work programme (if any) are only exceptionally eligible, if the granting authority considers their participation essential for the implementation of the action. Please list the concerned applicants and requested grant amount and explain the reasons why.
Based on the information provided, the following participants should receive exceptional funding: Not provided
Based on the information provided, the following participants should NOT receive exceptional funding: Not provided
Artificial Intelligence
Status: No
If YES, the technical robustness of the proposed system must be evaluated under the appropriate criterion.
Are security restrictions as per Article 12(5) and (6) applicable?
Status: Yes
If security restrictions apply and one (or more) applicants are found controlled from third countries (or third country entities), is the project feasible without the controlled entities? Yes
Can the work be taken over by one of the other participants or will it be necessary to add new ones? Yes
Not provided
Overall comments
101226928/NCCEE2-05/03/2025-10:28:18 3 / 4
Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)1742443 - 05/03/2025
Not provided
101226928/NCCEE2-05/03/2025-10:28:18 4 / 4
Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)1742443 - 05/03/2025
Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111
This electronic receipt is a digitally signed version of the document submitted by your
organisation. Both the content of the document and a set of metadata have been digitally
sealed.
This digital signature mechanism, using a public-private key pair mechanism, uniquely
binds this eReceipt to the modules of the Funding & Tenders Portal of the European
Commission, to the transaction for which it was generated and ensures its full integrity.
Therefore a complete digitally signed trail of the transaction is available both for your
organisation and for the issuer of the eReceipt.
Any attempt to modify the content will lead to a break of the integrity of the electronic
signature, which can be verified at any time by clicking on the eReceipt validation
symbol.
More info about eReceipts can be found in the FAQ page of the Funding & Tenders
Portal.
(https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/support/faq)
Lauri TANKLER RIIGI INFOSUSTEEMI AMET PARNU MNT 139 A 15169 TALLINN ESTONIA
Subject: Digital Europe Programme (DIGITAL) Call: DIGITAL-ECCC-2024-DEPLOY-NCC-06 Project: 101226928 — NCCEE2 GAP invitation letter
Dear Applicant,
I am writing in connection with your proposal for the above-mentioned call.
Having completed the evaluation, we are pleased to inform you that your proposal has passed this phase and that we would now like to start grant preparation.
Please find enclosed the evaluation summary report (ESR) for your proposal.
Invitation to grant preparation
Grant preparation will be based on the following:
1. Project:
Project number and name: 101226928 — NCCEE2
Topic: DIGITAL-ECCC-2024-DEPLOY-NCC-06-MS-COORDINATION — Deploying The Network of National Coordination Centres with Member States
Type of action: DIGITAL Simple Grants
Requested grant amount (proposal): 2 682 019.20 EUR
Maximum grant amount (after evaluation): 2 682 019.20 EUR
Project duration: 48 months
2. Timetable and deadlines:
Preparation of grant data and annexes: 3 weeks after receiving this letter
Declaration of honour (DoH): 6 weeks after receiving this letter
Signature: within 3 months after receiving this letter (planned date)
The grant agreement data and annexes (description of the action, estimated budget, etc.) must be based on the
1
Ref. Ares(2025)2149424 - 17/03/2025
proposal you submitted and the clarifications we requested (if any). You may normally NOT make changes to the project/project budget/consortium composition (except if required by us). Please immediately inform your project officer if you need to make a change (e.g. bankruptcy, etc.).
Once we have checked the information you have encoded, you will have 2 weeks to submit your final version — to bring it in line with our comments.
3. Participant Register
All partners participating as beneficiaries or affiliated entities must be registered and validated in the Participant Register.
Please note that some of your legal and financial data in this Register is read-only and can be updated only by a LEAR (via the Portal My Organisation(s) page). If you do not already have one, we will contact you soon for their nomination.
4. How to contact us
Project officer: Daniela BULARDA
Grant preparation and grant signature will be done exclusively through the Funding & Tenders Portal (login via your Portal account). The Portal allows you to upload documents, send Messages and Formal Notifications. Avoid contacting us via other means (email, letter, etc.); this will allow us to keep the full project file all in the same place.
Please note that affiliated entities cannot directly access the Portal Grant Management System; grant preparation will therefore have to be done by their beneficiaries for them.
5. Other
For more information on grant preparation, see the Online Manual.
Please note that this letter does NOT constitute a formal commitment for funding. The final decision on your project (including the grant amount to be awarded) can be taken only later, when we have finalised grant preparation and the checks that still need to be done (LEAR appointment, legal entity validation, financial capacity assessment, non-exclusion check, ethics review, security review, etc.).
We will try to proceed as swiftly as possible, but we rely on your good cooperation. If you do not reply to our requests or repeatedly miss grant preparation deadlines, we will consider that you are no longer interested in our grant (and reject your proposal).
More information on the evaluation of the call is published in a topic update in the Funding & Tenders Portal.
I would be grateful if you could inform everyone involved in your proposal of this letter.
For any questions, please contact us via your Funding & Tenders Portal account > My Project(s) > Actions > Manage Project > Process communications.
2
Yours faithfully,
Luca TAGLIARETTI Executive Director
Enclosure: Evaluation summary report (ESR)
3