Dokumendiregister | Riigikohus |
Viit | 6-1/25-406-1 |
Registreeritud | 05.08.2025 |
Sünkroonitud | 06.08.2025 |
Liik | Sissetulev kiri |
Funktsioon | 6 Õigusemõistmise üldküsimused ja õigusteabe analüüs |
Sari | 6-1 Kirjavahetus kodanike ja asutustega õigusemõistmise üldküsimustes |
Toimik | 6-1/2025 |
Juurdepääsupiirang | Avalik |
Juurdepääsupiirang | |
Adressaat | Law Firm RIDD Vilnius |
Saabumis/saatmisviis | Law Firm RIDD Vilnius |
Vastutaja | Signe Rätsep (Riigikohus, Õigusteabe- ja Koolitusosakond) |
Originaal | Ava uues aknas |
From: Ariana PotaÅ
Law Firm RIDD Vilnius
Attorney-at-Law Irmantas Dobilas
Odminiu g. 8, LT-01122 Vilnius, Lithuania
Company code: 304632872
Email: [email protected]
Tel.: +370 655 22677
To:
The Supreme Court of Estonia
17 Lossi Street
50093 Tartu, Estonia
Tel.: +372 730 9002
Email: [email protected] , [email protected]
Vilnius, 8 th August 2025
Subject: Inquiry Regarding Estonian Judicial Practice on the Recognition and Enforcement
of Judgments Issued by Courts of the Russian Federation
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am writing on behalf of RIDD Vilnius, a professional law firm based in the Republic of Lithuania,
regarding legal proceedings concerning the recognition and enforcement of judgments rendered by
courts or arbitral tribunals of the Russian Federation, particularly in matters arising from
commercial legal relationships.
On 25 June 2024, the Republic of Lithuania formally denounced the Agreement between the
Republic of Lithuania and the Russian Federation on Legal Assistance in Civil, Family and
Criminal Matters, originally signed on 21 July 1992. Similar steps have reportedly been taken by
the Republic of Estonia and the Republic of Latvia.
In light of the termination of bilateral legal assistance agreements, questions have arisen concerning
the current position of Estonian courts regarding the recognition and enforcement of judgments
issued by courts of the Russian Federation—especially in commercial matters. As such issues fall
within the discretionary competence of national courts, we would appreciate your guidance on the
prevailing judicial practice in Estonia in this respect.
Accordingly, we respectfully request your position and, if available, any relevant jurisprudence or
procedural decisions related to the following question:
1. Do the courts of the Republic of Estonia (in particular, the Supreme Court of Estonia)
currently recognize and/or enforce judgments issued by courts of the Russian
Federation in commercial cases, and under what legal basis or conditions?
Should it be possible, we would also appreciate the opportunity to review copies of procedural
decisions issued by competent Estonian courts in such matters.
We thank you in advance for your time, cooperation, and consideration.
This request has been submitted electronically and is duly signed with a qualified electronic
signature.
ATTACHED:
1. Representation agreement, 1 page.
2. Translation of the representation agreement, 1 page.
Yours faithfully,
Irmantas Dobilas
Attorney-at-Law
RIDD Vilnius
Odminių g. 8, LT-01122 Vilnius, Lithuania
Tel.: +370 655 22677
Email: [email protected]
/Translation from the Lithuanian language/
AGREEMENT
To the Legal Services Agreement dated 27 th July, 2020
Vilnius
19 th June, 2025
The provisions of the Legal Services Agreement dated 27 th July, 2020, shall apply to this
agreement.
The attorney – at - law Irmantas Dobilas of the professional association RIDD Vilnius is hereby
authorized to represent
UAB Game Insight, legal entity code 303385312, registered office at Antakalnio str. 17,
Vilnius (hereinafter referred to as the Client),
general jurisdiction and administrative courts in all civil, administrative, and criminal
cases, tax and other disputes, in all pre-trial investigation institutions of the Republic of
Lithuania and at any level of the public prosecutor's office, as well as in all customs
institutions, and in relations with any other state or municipal institutions and/or other
third parties.
The attorney – at law shall be entitled to perform all procedural actions that the Client is entitled
to perform, including, but not limited to, the right to: 1) to file a claim, counterclaim, statement or complaint (application); 2) to withdraw, in whole or in part, the claim, complaint (request) and to acknowledge it; 3) to amend the basis or subject matter of a claim, complaint (request); 4) request that the case be transferred to another court or institution; 5) to conclude a settlement agreement;
6) appeal a court decision or ruling; 7) obtain a writ of execution and submit it for enforcement; 8) receive the money or other property awarded; 9) file a request for the renewal of proceedings
10) appeal the actions and decisions of the pre-trial investigation officer and the prosecutor, as well as the actions and decisions of the pre-trial investigation judge.
The attorney – at law is entitled to draft, sign, and submit all documents necessary for the performance of the above-mentioned tasks on behalf of the client.
The attorney – at - law has the right to authorize another person, including another attorney –
at law or a associate attorney, to perform the above actions.
On behalf
of the
client:
Attorney-at-law: