Developer Trondheimsleia Kjernekraft AS

Reference NVE ref. 202508882-31

Date 1 Sept. 2025

Responsible agencies DSA, DSB and NVE

.

Justification for the recommendation for an

impact assessment programme for

Nuclear Power Plant at Taftøy

Industrial Park

Aure municipality in the county of Møre og Romsdal

Heim municipality in the county of Trøndelag

1

Summary

The Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (DSA), the Norwegian Directorate for

Civil Protection (DSB) and the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) have

submitted a recommendation to the Ministry of Energy, the Ministry of Health and Care

Services, the Ministry of Climate and Environment and the Ministry of Justice and Public

Security recommending that an assessment programme be established

The four ministries have commissioned the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority

(DSA), the Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection (DSB) and the Norwegian Water Resources

and Energy Directorate (NVE) to prepare a recommendation for the establishment of a

comprehensive programme for impact assessment of a proposed nuclear power plant at Taftøy

Industrial Park in the municipalities of Aure and Heim.

DSA, DSB and NVE have submitted the recommendation to the ministries. This is available in a

separate document.1

The assessment programme ensues from requirements in several Acts of law

The establishment of a nuclear power plant triggers requirements for licences and permits

pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act, the Pollution Control Act and the Energy Act. In accordance

with the Regulation on impact assessments pursuant to the Planning and Building Act,

assessments of the environmental and societal impacts of a nuclear power plant are therefore

required. An assessment programme is a review of the aspects that the developer must consider

before applying for a licence, permits and authorizations in line with the applicable regulations.

The aim is to ensure that environmental and societal aspects are taken into account and

safeguarded.

The contents of the recommendation

In this recommendation, we present the specific impacts that DSA, DSB and NVE find must be

assessed before a decision can be made on any applications for licences and permits pursuant to

the Nuclear Energy Act, the Energy Act and the Pollution Control Act.

The contents of this document

In this document, DSA, DSB and NVE describe the work process for our recommendation on

establishment of an assessment programme for a nuclear power plant at Taftøy Industrial Park. We

explain why we believe the requirements regarding impact assessments included in our

recommendation are necessary, and explain the background to the various requirements. The

requirements in the recommendation must be seen in light of this document. Furthermore, the

document contains a number of necessary delimitations of the assignment and identifies parallel

processes that we believe will be necessary.

There is a need for a comprehensive assessment programme

A nuclear power plant in Aure and Heim will have impacts locally, regionally and nationally.

Therefore, there are a number of topics and factors that it is important to find out more about in an

impact assessment. The proposed requirements regarding impact assessments are based, among

other things, on similar requirements for other types of energy plants, requirements in Norwegian

regulations and international best practice. At the same time, nuclear installations require special

1 NVE ref. 202508882-31

2

requirements regarding impact assessments related to nuclear safety, radiation protection,

emergency preparedness and response, radioactive pollution and waste. It is also important to

assess how compliance with Norway’s obligations regarding non-proliferation of nuclear material

that can be used for nuclear weapons can be ensured.

Although this assessment programme has been drawn up specifically for a nuclear power plant at

Taftøy Industrial Park, most of the proposed topics for assessment and requirements will

nevertheless also be relevant for other nuclear power plants.

Development of nuclear power should start with an overarching approach

Norway has had four research reactors, but has not previously established commercial nuclear

power. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) recommends that national programmes

should be developed to consider how nuclear power can be included in the power mix, and that

thorough assessments should be made before deciding where a specific plant should be located.

Norway does not currently have a national strategy for how nuclear power, if established, might be

included in our power production.

We believe that the development of nuclear power production in Norway should start with an

overarching, central-governmental approach, rather than a local initiative for a specific plant in a

given location. This is also in line with international recommendations from the IAEA.

Since our assignment has been to prepare a recommendation for an assessment programme for a

specific nuclear power project, no position has been taken on whether nuclear power should be

part of the Norwegian energy mix, no requirements have been set related to assessment of suitable

locations for the establishment of nuclear power plants in Norway, and it has not been assessed

what kind of nuclear power plant it is most appropriate to establish.

We recommend waiting for the report from the Nuclear Power Committee and the decision on

nuclear power

The Nuclear Power Committee has been set up to conduct a broad review and evaluate various

aspects of the possible future establishment of nuclear power in Norway. The agencies

recommend that the government postpone further consideration of this matter until the Nuclear

Power Committee has submitted its review, and until a decision has been made on whether

Norway is going to start producing commercial nuclear power. The establishment of a nuclear

power plant must also be presented to the Storting (Norwegian Parliament) before a licence can be

granted pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act.

If nuclear power plants are to be established in Norway, it will be important to undertake a

thorough assessment of the need to further develop the existing regulatory framework in line with

international recommendations, conventions and standards. Norway’s national nuclear

preparedness must also be reviewed, and it must be assessed whether there is a need to

strengthen the national nuclear preparedness, in line with a new risk landscape in Norway.

The agencies are of the opinion that there will be a need for thorough assessments of the

consequences for Norwegian municipalities of hosting a nuclear installation, including for the

municipal nuclear preparedness. Preparedness for nuclear incidents must be included in the

municipalities’ coordinated work on civil protection and emergency preparedness.

Relationship to the Act relating to national security (the Security Act)

3

A need has been identified that parts of the documentation that must be prepared in connection

with the assessment programme ought to be covered by the Security Act. This applies in particular

to information related to safety measures and security precautions, but also to technical

specifications of the facility in general (cf. the requirements concerning the duty of confidentiality

in Section 53 of the Nuclear Energy Act). This is especially relevant because the plant’s design is

expected to ensure that safety requirements are met. It must therefore be clarified whether all or

part of the facility will be covered by the requirements regarding classified procurements in

Chapter 9 of the Security Act. Any decision to designate the facility as nationally critical pursuant to

the Act will normally come later in the process.

In the assessment programme, we point out that the developer must assess the value of the

documentation included in the assessment programme. We therefore recommend that the

Ministry consider these issues.

An Espoo consultation should be conducted

DSA, DSB and NVE would also draw special attention to Norway’s obligations pursuant to the

Espoo Convention, whereby Norway as a state is obliged to notify other countries of planned

measures with potentially major transboundary environmental impacts. A nuclear power plant is a

measure that could have major transboundary consequences. It is also a requirement that both

government authorities and the general public in countries that may be affected by the proposed

project must be given the opportunity to comment on the assessment programme. The Norwegian

Environment Agency is Norway’s national single point of contact. DSA, DSB and NVE recommend

that an Espoo consultation be conducted on the recommendation for the assessment programme

before the programme is established.

4

Glossary of terms

Below is a list of the key terms used in this document and in the recommendation for the assessment

programme.

Adverse incidents: means accidents, deliberate adverse events, incidents that may affect the safety of the nuclear power plant, incidents that may lead to consequences for people, the environment and society, and incidents that may affect the security of the power supply.

Affected municipalities: Municipalities that may be affected by the proposed project. Which

municipalities these are, in addition to Heim and Aure, will vary depending on the assessment

topic and the area of influence of the impacts to be assessed.

Cascade effect: At a nuclear installation, a “cascade effect” is an incident where a small disturbance or change in one safety system leads to a series of subsequent, more serious incidents or impacts. It can start out quite minor, but grow to have major, significant consequences for the safety of the facility.

Characterization of waste: Characterization provides information on, among other things, the material composition, physical and chemical condition and properties of the waste, in addition to the activity content of the waste. Classification provides information about the waste category that the waste can be placed under. Classification and characterization of radioactive waste is discussed in Section 6.1 of the “Strategy for safe, secure and responsible management of radioactive waste in Norway”.

Criticality event: An uncontrolled nuclear chain reaction that can lead to elevated radiation levels

and releases of radioactive substances.

Decommissioning: A phase during the life cycle of a nuclear installation during which planned dismantling, demolition and other measures are carried out at the nuclear installation and contaminated soil is removed from the area, in order to bring about a safe condition and enable all or parts of the area to be released from regulatory control and used for other purposes.

Deliberate adverse actions: Deliberate adverse actions means, for example, theft of nuclear material, sabotage or threat of sabotage, explosion, physical deactivation of security functions, cyberattacks, terrorism or war caused by an actor with intent to cause harm.

Deliberate adverse events: Means incidents that occur as a result of intentional adverse actions such as theft of nuclear material, sabotage or threat of sabotage, explosion, physical deactivation of security functions, digital attacks, terrorism or war.

Grid connection: Grid infrastructure that is necessary for the transmission of power from the

nuclear power plant. The grid connection can 1) be part of the proposed project and owned and

operated by the developer, or 2) be owned and operated by other developers (Statnett, a regional

grid company or a local grid company).

Handling of radioactive waste: Common term for receipt, storage, treatment and other disposal of radioactive waste (cf. Section 16-3 (d) of the Waste Regulation).

Host municipalities: The municipalities in which the proposed project is planned to be located,

i.e. Heim and Aure. When the finer details of the proposed project are further specified, including

the location of the permanent waste management solution and the grid connection system, there

5

may be more host municipalities than currently indicated in the initial notification from Norsk

Kjernekraft.

Justification and optimization: Section 5 of the Radiation Protection Regulation stipulates requirements regarding the justification and optimization of use of radiation. According to the provision, justification means that the benefits of the use of radiation must outweigh the disadvantages it causes. Optimization means that exposure to ionizing radiation must be kept as low as practically possible, taking into account technological knowledge, social and economic factors.

Nuclear fuel: General understanding: Fuel intended for or used in a nuclear reactor. Spent fuel is nuclear fuel that has previously been in an operational reactor and been permanently removed. Nuclear fuel is defined in Section 1 (a) of the Nuclear Energy Activity Act: fissile material in the form of uranium or plutonium in metallic form, in an alloy or chemical compound, and such other fissile material as the Ministry may determine.

Nuclear incident: Nuclear incidents are defined as accidents, deliberate adverse events, and

incidents that can lead to increased radiation levels and acute radioactive contamination (i.e.

pollution), and incidents that can affect the operation and safety of the facility.

Nuclear installation: Nuclear installations are defined in Section 1 (e) of the Nuclear Energy Act as: factory for the production or processing of nuclear substances; factory for the separation of isotopes in nuclear fuel; factory for the reprocessing of irradiated nuclear fuel; facility for the storage of nuclear substances other than for facilities intended exclusively for use as temporary storage during transportation; facility for the disposal of nuclear substances; reactor, factory, facility or plant of the aforementioned kind that is being decommissioned; and, according to the Ministry’s further determination, other facility where there is nuclear fuel or a radioactive product.

Nuclear power plant: A nuclear installation (see the definition above) and power plant that

produces electrical energy using nuclear energy. Section 4, second paragraph, of the Nuclear

Energy Act uses a slightly different term in Norwegian. A nuclear power plant also includes the

necessary infrastructure and land use.

Nuclear preparedness: Norway’s national nuclear emergency preparedness system comprises

the Crisis Committee for Nuclear Preparedness, the Crisis Committee’s advisors, and the County

Governor as the Crisis Committee’s regional representative. The County Governor is responsible for

coordinating emergency preparedness at the regional level and coordinating with the municipal

authorities (cf. Royal Decree on the Mandate for the Crisis Committee for Nuclear Preparedness

etc. of 1 September 2013).

Nuclear safety: Nuclear safety encompasses all aspects of significance to the safety of a nuclear

installation, so that the facility can be operated safely, securely and responsibly. Nuclear safety

includes all measures to limit the negative effects of radiation on human health and the

environment, safeguarding the facility against deliberate acts, and measures to ensure that

nuclear and radioactive material cannot go astray and be used for non-peaceful purposes such as

nuclear weapons. In our context, the term nuclear safety often includes the terms nuclear safety,

nuclear security and safeguards as used in various regulatory requirements.

6

Occupational exposure: exposure of workers during their work, where the radiation source or exposure situation is an accountable part of the professional work and connected to this (cf. Section 4 (y) of the Radiation Protection Regulation).

Radiation protection: includes all measures to ensure responsible use of radiation, prevent harmful effects of radiation on human health, and contribute to the protection of the environment.

Radioactive pollution: Radiation from radioactive substances that is or could be harmful or

detrimental to the environment. This also includes radiation from naturally occurring radioactive

substances where human activity leads to increased radiation exposure of people or the

environment.

Radioactive waste: Objects of personal property or substances that are considered to constitute waste and contain, or are contaminated with, radioactive substances with a specific activity greater than or equal to the values specified in the Regulation on the application of the Pollution Control Act to radioactive pollution and radioactive waste (cf. Section 2, first paragraph (c) of the Regulation). This includes spent nuclear fuel.

Safeguards: Safeguards refers to the various security measures at nuclear facilities, monitoring of nuclear material (uranium (enriched, natural and depleted), plutonium and thorium) and activities to prevent misuse of nuclear facilities and diversion of nuclear material from peaceful uses.

Security: Security refers to the prevention of deliberate adverse events. Security includes physical and electronic measures to secure objects and infrastructure, as well as preventive security work within digital security, information security, personnel security, etc. Security also includes preparedness for deliberate adverse actions and events, including the implementation of additional measures in the event of a possible increased threat.

Stages or phases in the life cycle of a nuclear installation include: concept selection, site selection, construction, commissioning, operation, decommissioning and release from regulatory control.

The fuel cycle: Nuclear fuel cycle encompassing the course of all stages that the nuclear fuel

undergoes, from the extraction of fissile materials, conversion, enrichment, fuel production,

transport and storage to the final disposal of the spent nuclear fuel. The fuel cycle is characterized

as closed or open, depending on whether the spent fuel is sent for reprocessing or not.

The nuclear preparedness organization has been established to provide expertise to deal with

nuclear incidents and to ensure rapid implementation of measures to protect lives, health, the

environment and other important societal interests. Nuclear incidents are both accidents and

incidents resulting from intentional acts in peacetime, security policy crises and armed conflict (cf.

Royal Decree on the Mandate for the Crisis Committee for Nuclear Preparedness etc. of 1

September 2013).

The proposed project: The specific facility to which the recommendation for the assessment

programme and this document refer. The term also includes related activities.

Waste: Objects of personal property or substances that have been discarded, are going to be discarded or must be discarded (cf. Section 27, first paragraph, of the Pollution Control Act).

7

8

Contents 1 Introduction ________________________________________________________________ 12

1.1 The content and structure of the report _______________________________________ 12

1.2 Brief presentation of DSA, DSB and NVE _______________________________________ 12

1.3 Brief presentation of the proposed project _____________________________________ 14

1.4 Brief presentation of the process for licensing, authorization and permits for nuclear

power plants _________________________________________________________________ 15

2 About the assignment and necessary delimitations ______________________________ 15

2.1 DSA, DSB and NVE have been commissioned to make a recommendation for an impact

assessment programme ________________________________________________________ 15

2.2 Delimitations and parallel processes __________________________________________ 16

2.3 Notification requirements according to the Espoo Convention _____________________ 21

3 General presentation of the requirements in the recommendation for an impact

assessment programme __________________________________________________________ 22

3.1 The requirements in the assessment programme are linked to several laws and

regulations __________________________________________________________________ 22

3.2 Many of the requirements regarding impact assessments are based on standard

requirements for energy plants __________________________________________________ 25

3.3 Special requirements regarding impact assessments for a nuclear installation ________ 25

3.4 Relationship between a safety case for a nuclear installation and an impact assessment

for a nuclear power plant _______________________________________________________ 26

4 Involvement and participation in the work on the recommendation ________________ 27

5 Reasoning behind the requirements related to methods and participation __________ 28

5.1 General requirements and method requirements________________________________ 28

5.2 Participation _____________________________________________________________ 29

5.3 Environmental condition – the zero alternative _________________________________ 30

6 Reasoning behind the requirements related to description of the proposed project ___ 30

6.1 Description of the proposed project __________________________________________ 30

6.2 Justification for the proposed project _________________________________________ 30

6.3 Choice of location _________________________________________________________ 30

6.4 Land area requirements ____________________________________________________ 32

6.5 Grid infrastructure _________________________________________________________ 32

6.6 The construction phase ____________________________________________________ 33

6.7 Progress plan _____________________________________________________________ 33

9

7 Reasoning behind the requirements related to description of the nuclear installation and

nuclear safety __________________________________________________________________ 33

7.1 General information about the nuclear installation, technology and activities ________ 33

7.2 Nuclear safety, security and safeguards _______________________________________ 34

7.3 Nuclear fuel ______________________________________________________________ 35

8 Reasoning behind the requirements related to assessment of competence needs _____ 36

9 Reasoning behind the requirements related to assessment of radiation protection ___ 36

10 Reasoning behind the requirements related to assessment of radioactive pollution and

waste _________________________________________________________________________ 37

10.1 Releases of radioactive substances during operation of the nuclear installation _______ 37

10.2 Radioactive waste, including spent nuclear fuel _________________________________ 38

10.3 Other waste ______________________________________________________________ 39

11 Reasoning behind the requirements related to assessment of decommissioning ______ 40

12 Reasoning behind the requirements related to assessment of nuclear incidents and other

adverse incidents _______________________________________________________________ 41

13 Reasoning behind the requirements related to assessment of nuclear preparedness and

other emergency preparedness ___________________________________________________ 42

14 Reasoning behind the requirements related to assessment of energy production _____ 45

14.1 Power production _________________________________________________________ 45

14.2 Use of surplus heat ________________________________________________________ 45

15 Reasoning behind the requirements related to assessment of costs and financing ____ 46

16 Reasoning behind the requirements related to assessment of natural hazards and

vulnerability to climate change ___________________________________________________ 46

17 Reasoning behind the requirements related to assessment of other pollution and

emissions ______________________________________________________________________ 49

17.1 Other pollution of water and ground during operation ___________________________ 49

17.2 Noise ___________________________________________________________________ 49

18 Reasoning behind the requirements related to assessment of visual effects, landscape,

outdoor life and cultural heritage _________________________________________________ 50

19 Reasoning behind the requirements related to assessment of overarching environmental

targets and climate issues ________________________________________________________ 50

20 Reasoning behind the requirements related to assessment of biodiversity and the

aquatic environment ____________________________________________________________ 50

21 Reasoning behind the requirements related to assessment of public health issues ____ 51

22 Reasoning behind the requirements related to assessment of other public interests __ 51

10

22.1 Defence interests__________________________________________________________ 51

22.2 Other infrastructure _______________________________________________________ 52

22.3 Agriculture _______________________________________________________________ 52

22.4 Mineral resources _________________________________________________________ 52

22.5 Aquaculture and fisheries ___________________________________________________ 53

22.6 Local and regional businesses and the host municipalities’ economy _______________ 53

1 The Nuclear Energy Act and appurtenant regulations _____________________________ 54

1.1 General _________________________________________________________________ 54

1.2 Licence for nuclear installation ______________________________________________ 54

1.3 Authorization to operate ___________________________________________________ 55

1.4 Safety case _______________________________________________________________ 56

2 The Energy Act ______________________________________________________________ 56

2.1 Licence __________________________________________________________________ 56

2.2 Regulation on security and emergency preparedness in the power supply ___________ 57

2.3 Cost–benefit analysis for surplus heat _________________________________________ 58

3 The Planning and Building Act and appurtenant regulations _______________________ 59

3.1 Impact assessment ________________________________________________________ 59

3.2 Plan processing ___________________________________________________________ 59

4 The Radiation Protection Act and appurtenant Regulation ________________________ 60

4.1 General _________________________________________________________________ 60

4.2 Authorization and possible exemption from the Radiation Protection Act ____________ 60

5 The Pollution Control Act and appurtenant regulations ___________________________ 61

5.1 General _________________________________________________________________ 61

5.2 Licensing process for radioactive pollution and waste ____________________________ 61

5.3 Permit process for other pollution ____________________________________________ 62

6 The Security Act _____________________________________________________________ 62

7 The Civil Protection Act ______________________________________________________ 62

7.1 General _________________________________________________________________ 62

7.2 Municipal duties in respect of emergency preparedness __________________________ 62

7.3 Self-protection ___________________________________________________________ 63

8 The Norwegian Fire and Explosion Protection Act ________________________________ 64

8.1 General _________________________________________________________________ 64

11

8.2 Measures to prevent fire, explosion and other accidents __________________________ 64

8.3 Emergency preparedness and response _______________________________________ 65

8.4 The handling of hazardous substances ________________________________________ 66

9 The Act relating to supervision of electrical installations and equipment ____________ 68

10 International conventions, agreements and standards ___________________________ 68

10.1 International conventions __________________________________________________ 68

10.2 IAEA and its Safety Standards ________________________________________________ 69

12

1 Introduction

1.1 The content and structure of the report

The Ministry of Energy (ED), the Ministry of Health and Care Services (HOD), the Ministry of Climate

and Environment (KLD) and the Ministry of Justice and Public Security (JD) have commissioned the

Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (DSA), the Norwegian Directorate for Civil

Protection (DSB) and the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) to prepare a

recommendation for the establishment of a comprehensive programme for impact assessment of

a proposed nuclear power plant at Taftøy Industrial Park in the municipalities of Aure and Heim.

In this report, DSA, DSB and NVE describe the background to our recommendation. The main

purpose of this report is to explain the reasoning behind the requirements that have been included

in the recommendation and to provide supplementary information for the conduct of the

assessment programme. The report also contains information about delimitations in the work and

parallel processes that DSA, DSB and NVE have identified as necessary.

Chapter 1 contains general information about DSA, DSB and NVE, the proposed project in question,

and a brief introduction to the licensing, authorization and permit processes for nuclear power

plants. A more detailed overview of relevant laws and regulations is provided in Appendix 1. In

chapter 2, we present the assignment and explain the various delimitations and parallel processes.

In chapter 3, we present general information about the requirements in the recommendation,

including an overview of which parts of the assessment programme are necessary to meet

requirements pursuant to various Acts of law. Chapter 4 provides information on involvement and

participation in our work on the recommendation, while chapters 5 to 22 contain explanations of

the reasoning behind, and more detailed elaboration of, the specific requirements in our

recommendation.

This report must be read in the context of the recommended assessment programme. This is

available in a separate document.2

1.2 Brief presentation of DSA, DSB and NVE

The Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (DSA) is Norway’s national authority

and expert body in matters concerning radiation protection, nuclear safety, and non-proliferation

of nuclear arms, radioactive pollution and radioactive waste, including emergency preparedness in

response to acute radioactive pollution. DSA has powers pursuant to the Norwegian Radiation

Protection Act and the Norwegian Pollution Control Act. The Norwegian Nuclear Energy Act states

that DSA is the supreme expert body with regard to safety issues and cannot be overruled in this

area. DSA is also the competent authority for Norway’s non-proliferation obligations pursuant to

the Safeguards Agreement and Additional Protocol with the International Atomic Energy Agency

(IAEA). Activities in this area include monitoring Norway’s stock of nuclear material, nuclear

installations and activities in connection with these. DSA prepares and submits recommendations

regarding applications for licences for nuclear installations and permits for the production, trade,

treatment and transport of nuclear substances.

DSA is a government agency under the Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services (HOD). DSA

is also the Ministry of Climate and Environment (KLD)’s directorate in matters concerning

2 NVE ref. 202508882-31

13

radioactive pollution and radioactive waste, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ directorate within

the field of international collaboration on nuclear security. In addition, DSA performs directorate

tasks for the Ministry of Defence, including making recommendations on permission for military

nuclear-powered vessels to Norwegian enter ports and waters.

According to the Regulation on Impact Assessment, DSA is the competent authority for nuclear

power plants and facilities that handle nuclear fuel pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act, the

Pollution Control Act and the Radiation Protection Act, in addition to the Ministry of Health and

Care Services (HOD) and the Ministry of Climate and Environment (KLD).

DSA chairs, is a member of and acts as the secretariat for the Crisis Committee for Nuclear

Preparedness. Nuclear preparedness is cross-sectoral, based on civil–military collaboration, and

aims to coordinate measures in the acute phase of a nuclear incident (cf. Royal Decree on the

Mandate for the Crisis Committee for Nuclear Preparedness etc. of 1 September 2013).

The Directorate for Civil Protection (DSB) is required to maintain an overview of risks and

vulnerabilities in society, to act as a driving force in the work to prevent accidents, crises and other

adverse incidents, and to ensure good preparedness and effective handling of accidents and

disasters.

DSB administers several regulations that are likely to be affected by the establishment of nuclear

power in Norway. DSB has technical, administrative and supervisory responsibility pursuant to the

Fire and Explosion Prevention Act, the Act relating to supervision of electrical installations and

equipment, the Product Control Act and the Civil Protection Act.

According to the instructions for the ministries’ work on civil protection3, DSB must also support

the ministry’s coordination role within civil protection and emergency preparedness, and lay the

foundation for good, coordinated preventive work and good emergency preparedness within the

public administration and activities that are critical for society. DSB is organized under and reports

to the Ministry of Justice and Public Security

The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) is responsible for the

management of Norway’s energy resources and the security of the country’s power supply.

NVE has been designated as the licensing authority for a number of types of energy plants and has

been delegated authority to issue licences pursuant to the Energy Act. NVE works to promote for

socio-economically efficient production, transmission and sale of energy.

NVE is also Norway’s emergency preparedness authority pursuant to the Energy Act. As the

emergency preparedness authority, NVE leads the national power emergency preparedness, is

responsible for coordinating work on security and emergency preparedness in the power supply

through the Power Supply Emergency Preparedness Organization, and is responsible for ensuring

that the power supply is robust and can handle both intentional and unintentional incidents.

In addition, NVE has overarching responsibility for central-government administrative tasks in the

prevention of flood damage and accidents caused by slide events (landslides and avalanches). NVE

is organized under and reports to the Ministry of Energy.

3 The Civil Protection Instructions: https://lovdata.no/dokument/INS/forskrift/2017-09-01-1349.

14

1.3 Brief presentation of the proposed project

On 2 November 2023, Norsk Kjernekraft AS (hereinafter referred to as Norsk Kjernekraft) submitted

a notification to the Ministry of Energy (ED) with a proposal for an assessment programme for the

establishment of a nuclear power plant at Taftøy Industrial Park in Aure municipality in Møre og

Romsdal county and Heim municipality in Trøndelag county. The nuclear power plant itself is

planned to be located in Heim municipality, but the supporting infrastructure will be in Aure

municipality. The map in figure 1 shows the planned site for the proposed nuclear power plant.

The site covers an area of approximately 420 acres.

Figure 1: Location of the planned nuclear power plant. Source: Notification from Norsk Kjernekraft of 2 November 2023.

In the notification, Norsk Kjernekraft writes that the nuclear power plant will be based on small

modular reactors (SMR) located in separate buildings. There are several possible options, in terms

of both the type of reactor and the size of the power plant. The notification indicates a total

maximum installed capacity of up to 1,500 MW. According to Norsk Kjernekraft, this could result in

an annual power production of 12.5 TWh, which corresponds to approximately 8% of the total

annual power production in Norway today.

In addition to the reactor buildings, nuclear power plants entail a number of other buildings and

land uses, including substations, control buildings, buildings for steam turbines and generators,

storage areas for fuel and waste, cooling systems and service functions such as workshops, parking

lots and offices.

On 23 April 2025, Trondheimsleia kjernekraft AS was established as the developer. The company

was founded as a partnership between the future host municipalities, the local energy company

NEAS and Norsk Kjernekraft AS. 4

4 Trondheimsleia Kjernekraft AS established for a nuclear power plant in the municipalities of Heim and Aure

– Norsk Kjernekraft AS

15

For more information about the project, we refer to the notification.

1.4 Brief presentation of the process for licensing, authorization

and permits for nuclear power plants

A developer must obtain a number of different licences, authorizations and permits in order to be

able to build, operate and own a nuclear installation in Norway. For a nuclear power plant, the

most important processes are related to the Nuclear Energy Act and the Energy Act. In addition,

permits are required pursuant to other legislation, including the Pollution Control Act and the

Radiation Protection Act. In Appendix 1, we provide a brief description of the most relevant

regulations for nuclear installations in Norway today.

Nuclear power plants must be impact assessed in accordance with the Impact Assessment

Regulation. The Regulation contains requirements regarding the content of an impact assessment.

The purpose of the Impact Assessment Regulation is to ensure that consideration is given to the

environment and that society is taken into account during the preparation of plans and proposed

projects and when deciding whether plans or proposed projects can be implemented, and if so

under what conditions. An assessment programme serves as an elaboration and more detailed

specification of the requirements in the Regulation.

In the initial notification with a proposed assessment programme, Norsk Kjernekraft states that

they will prepare an impact assessment that will be approved in accordance with a separate

process. We would underline that there is no such separate approval process in the current

legislation. Impact assessments must be attached to any applications for a licence, authorizations

and permits pursuant to the relevant regulations, and are not processed separately.

With effect from 1 July 2025, the Energy Act has introduced a requirement that applications for a

licence must be submitted no later than two years after the assessment programme has been

established. It may take more time to assess the impacts of this proposed project, and we would

underline that the licensing authority can extend the deadline after receiving an application.

2 About the assignment and necessary

delimitations

2.1 DSA, DSB and NVE have been commissioned to make a

recommendation for an impact assessment programme

In a letter dated 8 April 20255, the Ministry of Energy (ED), the Ministry of Health and Care Services

(HOD), the Ministry of Climate and Environment (KLD) and the Ministry of Justice and Public

Security (JD) commissioned DSA, DSB and NVE to prepare a joint recommendation for the

establishment of a comprehensive programme for impact assessment of the project at Taftøy

Industrial Park in the municipalities of Aure and Heim for which Norsk Kjernekraft has submitted

an initial notification. The aim was to submit the recommendation to the ministries before the

summer, and no later than September 2025.

5NVE ref. 202508882-1 https://www.regjeringen.no/no/aktuelt/utredningsprogramme-for-etablering-av-

kjernekraftverk/id3096258/

16

The background for the assignment is an initial notification on a specific nuclear power plant with

a proposal for an assessment programme (cf. Section 1.3). According to the Regulation on Impact

Assessment, the establishment of nuclear power plants requires an impact assessment.6 There is

also a requirement for an impact assessment of facilities for the processing or disposal of

irradiated nuclear fuel or waste with high radioactivity and facilities for the storage of radioactive

waste.7

The purpose of the recommendation shall be to lay the foundations for an impact assessment that

sheds light on the impacts and consequences of the proposed project and provides a good and

justifiable basis for decision-making in any subsequent licensing processes pursuant to the Nuclear

Energy Act and the Energy Act, as well as for permits pursuant to the Pollution Control Act and

authorizations pursuant to the Radiation Protection Act.

2.2 Delimitations and parallel processes

2.2.1 We have not assessed whether, or where, Norway should establish

nuclear power plants

If nuclear power is to be introduced as part of the energy mix in Norway, it is crucial that this

happens in line with current regulations, international obligations and long-term national

strategies with broad political support. Nuclear power plants have an expected useful life of 60–80

years, necessitating long-term planning. International recommendations indicate that national

programmes should be developed before nuclear power is established and before assessments

and decisions on the specific location of a particular nuclear power plant are made. Norway

currently has no national strategy, for example in the form of a white paper, for how nuclear power

(if introduced) should be included in our power production.

In its consultation statement, the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI) writes that the

challenges associated with handling spent nuclear fuel, physical safeguards and non-proliferation

indicate that the question of nuclear power in Norway should be treated as a matter of principle

where all the long-term consequences for the nation are taken into account before proceeding

with plans for nuclear power in individual municipalities.

DSA, DSB and NVE support the international recommendations and believe that the development

of nuclear power production in Norway should start with an overall, governmental approach,

rather than with an initiative for a specific plant at a given location. Before specific locations are

determined, there should also be a comprehensive assessment of national needs and parameters

that will affect the location of the nuclear power plant.

However, our assignment has been to make a recommendation for an impact assessment

programme for a specific nuclear power project in the municipalities of Heim and Aure. An

important delimitation of the assignment is therefore that the requirements regarding impact

assessments only apply to this specific project. We have not considered whether nuclear power

should be part of the Norwegian energy mix, and we have not set requirements related to a general

assessment of suitable locations for the establishment of nuclear power plants elsewhere in

Norway. International best practice dictates that a set of criteria must first be developed at the

national level to start the process of identifying suitable sites for the construction of a nuclear

6 Cf. Section 6, first paragraph (c) of the Regulation on impact assessments (cf. Appendix I (2) b). 7 Cf. Section 6, first paragraph (c) of the Regulation (cf. Appendix I (3) a and b).

17

power plant, and that several different sites must be evaluated in parallel before a decision is

made to proceed with assessments of a specific location for a concrete nuclear power plant. This

has not yet happened in Norway.

2.2.2 Nuclear power requires further development of the regulatory

framework

If nuclear power plants are to be established in Norway, it will be important to make a thorough

assessment of the need to further develop the regulatory framework in line with international

recommendations. There will also be a need to consider whether changes need to be made to laws

and regulations to ensure that the establishment is in line with international conventions and

standards. We have not considered this as part of the work on the assessment programme, but

refer, among other things, to the Nuclear Power Committee, which is going to conduct a broad

review and evaluation of various aspects of the possible future establishment of nuclear power in

Norway.8

2.2.3 Nuclear power will require a review and assessment of the need to

strengthen national nuclear preparedness

Norway’s national nuclear emergency preparedness system comprises the Crisis Committee for

Nuclear Preparedness, the Crisis Committee’s advisors, and the County Governor as the Crisis

Committee’s regional representative. The County Governor is responsible for coordinating

emergency preparedness at the regional level and coordinating with the municipal authorities (cf.

Royal Decree on the Mandate for the Crisis Committee for Nuclear Preparedness etc. of 1

September 2013). If a nuclear power plant is to be established, Norway’s national nuclear

preparedness must be reviewed and it must be assessed whether there is a need to strengthen the

national nuclear preparedness, in line with a new risk landscape in Norway.

The nuclear preparedness organization has been established to provide expertise to deal with

nuclear incidents and to ensure rapid implementation of measures to protect lives, health, the

environment and other important societal interests. Nuclear incidents include both accidents and

incidents resulting from deliberate actions in peacetime, security policy crises and armed conflict.

DSA chairs, is a member and secretariat of the Crisis Committee for Nuclear Preparedness, which is

cross-sectoral and based on civil–military collaboration. DSB is a member of the Crisis Committee

for Nuclear Preparedness. The Crisis Committee for Nuclear Preparedness will coordinate

measures in the acute phase of a nuclear incident, and can advise on other consequence-reducing

measures. Norwegian nuclear preparedness is based on six dimensioning scenarios that can also

include nuclear incidents at a nuclear power plant. These are set by the government and can be

found on DSA’s website.

The Crisis Committee, the County Governor, the host municipalities and other relevant emergency

preparedness and response providers, as well as the Norwegian Civil Defence, must be involved in

the assessment work. Impacts on local, regional and national basic preparedness in general

(incidents other than fire, such as accidents, pollution, etc.) must be included in the assessment.

DSA has guidance related to nuclear emergency preparedness on its website.

8 Read more about this on the government’s website: Appointment of a public committee to investigate

nuclear power as a possible power source in Norway – regjeringen.no.

18

There will be a need for in-depth government studies of the consequences for Norwegian

municipalities of hosting a nuclear power plant, including for municipal nuclear preparedness.

Preparedness for nuclear incidents must be included in the municipalities’ coordinated work on

civil protection and emergency preparedness. DSA provides guidance on municipal nuclear

preparedness on its website.

2.2.4 Nuclear power requires collaboration between the developer and

host municipalities on risk and vulnerability analysis and emergency

preparedness

Civil protection and emergency preparedness are about preventing adverse incidents that can

threaten or affect society’s assets, and being prepared to deal with these kinds of incidents. As the

local planning authority, the municipal authority is responsible for ensuring that public safety is

taken into account in planning pursuant to the Planning and Building Act, and is responsible for

following up on the requirements regarding municipal duties in respect of emergency

preparedness in the Civil Protection Act.

The establishment of nuclear power will change the risk and vulnerability landscape in both the

host municipality(ies) and any adjacent municipalities. It is therefore very important that the

planning take into account what risk nuclear power represents, how this risk is to be followed up,

and who is responsible for it.

As a local authority, the municipal authority is the foundation of the national work on civil

protection and emergency preparedness. Its primary task is to protect the population, act as a

planning authority, safeguard important services, and ensure governance and crisis management

capabilities. The municipal authority must see the breadth of civil protection work in respect of

prevention, preparedness and crisis management.

The municipal duties in relation to of emergency preparedness assume that each municipal

authority must have a long-term perspective, must act preventively, must have good capacity in its

services and functions, and must have a generic emergency response system in order to be able

withstand and handle a range of different types of incidents. This means that the individual

municipal authority must be aware of how developments and changes in the local challenges will

also change the preconditions for civil protection.

Changes in the challenges, such as in connection with the establishment of nuclear power, will

lead to changes in the risks and vulnerabilities in the municipality, and it will be necessary to

update the municipal authority’s comprehensive risk and vulnerability analysis.

Therefore, before a nuclear power plant can be established, the developer must collaborate with

the host municipality(ies) to update the municipal authority’s overall risk and vulnerability

analysis, which will form the basis for a revised emergency preparedness plan and the municipal

authority’s work on civil protection and emergency preparedness in all sectors. The developer

must also collaborate with the fire and rescue service on the specific emergency preparedness and

response related to the facility.

The municipal authority has a responsibility to ensure that there is adequate preparedness for

“everyday incidents”. It is about the robustness of the municipal authority’s services and functions,

preventive activities and ability to respond, including the emergency and rescue services. This is

called basic preparedness.

19

The municipal fire and rescue service is a central part of the basic preparedness and the most

decentralized emergency service in Norway, due to its municipal organization. The basis for

organization, staffing and equipment is the minimum requirements in the Fire and Explosion

Protection Act and appurtenant Regulations, and the municipal authority’s comprehensive risk

and vulnerability analysis pursuant to the Civil Protection Act. The fire and rescue service is

tailored to local needs, based on peacetime and normal conditions.

The recommendation for an impact assessment programme includes a requirement that the

developer must obtain information from the County Governor and the municipal authorities and

assess what consequences the proposed project will have for emergency preparedness at various

levels. However, the assessment programme cannot set specific requirements regarding the

updating of the municipal authorities’ overall risk and vulnerability analysis or the risk and

vulnerability analysis, preventive analysis and preparedness analysis that will form the basis for

the staffing and equipment of the fire and rescue service. This is because we cannot impose

requirements on the host municipalities or other authorities as part of the assessment programme

for a specific developer. We would nevertheless stress the importance of the developer engaging in

dialogue with the municipal authorities and other relevant parties in the assessment work. At the

same time, it is important that the municipal authority updates its analyses to be aware of what

risks the proposed project represents and how these risks are to be followed up.

2.2.5 The level of detail in the requirements regarding impact assessments

is limited by the notification

The notification from Norsk Kjernekraft is fairly general in a number of areas. This applies, among

other things, to the size and scope of the facilities that will be included in the proposed project, the

number of nuclear reactors, technology, financing, industrial and nuclear expertise, as well as

waste management and emergency response resources. The lack of detail in the notification

means a number of additional assessments may be necessary, depending on the activity at the

nuclear installation.

2.2.6 The recommendation does not contain a complete list of

requirements for applications

The Impact Assessment Regulation only sets the framework for impact assessments, and not for

requirements related to applications pursuant to various different pieces of legislation. An impact

assessment does not in itself provide a sufficient decision-making basis for the processing of

applications pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act, the Energy Act or other regulatory frameworks.

In assessment programmes that are established as part of an application process, it is common to

include requirements regarding the content of the application, in addition to requirements

regarding the impact assessment. The recommendation for an impact assessment programme for

a nuclear power plant in the municipalities of Heim and Aure constitutes a comprehensive

assessment programme that will form the basis for several application processes. However, the

programme will not contain complete requirements for the applications, as there is still much that

is unclear related to both the proposed project and the regulatory processes for a nuclear power

plant.

In the assessment programme, we have stipulated a number of requirements for the description of

the proposed project that go beyond the requirements in the Regulation on Impact Assessment.

These are considered necessary to process applications pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act, the

20

Energy Act and other relevant regulatory frameworks. It is emphasized that these requirements are

not exhaustive. Depending on which applications become relevant, additional requirements may

be set for their content at a later date.

2.2.7 The recommendation does not include detailed requirements for

assessment of grid connection

NVE points out that there will be a need for a separate parallel process related to the assessment

and processing of new grid infrastructure pursuant to the Energy Act. The permitting process for

new grid infrastructure depends on the type and size of the grid infrastructure required9. The

notification indicates a wide range in total installed capacity for the nuclear power plant. Suitable

grid connection solutions and the need to upgrade regional and transmission grids are therefore

unclear. It is therefore also unclear which assessments and permitting processes are necessary for

the grid connection of the nuclear installation. In the work on this recommendation, it has

therefore not been possible to formulate detailed requirements regarding impact assessments

related to connection to the power grid.

On a general basis, NVE encourages applications for grid infrastructure and power generation

facilities to be submitted at the same time, for joint processing. Changes in the grid structure and

possible high installed capacity in the power plant could have a significant impact on the power

system in the region and elsewhere in the country, with both positive and negative effects. This

indicates that any application pursuant to the Energy Act for a nuclear power plant at Taftøy

Industrial Park ought to be processed at the same time as the application(s) for the necessary grid

facilities. If the grid connection involves power lines over 50 km at 132 kV voltage level or higher, as

of 1 June 2025 there is a requirement for a notification with a proposal for an assessment

programme for the grid solutions before a licence can be applied for.10

2.2.8 The recommendation does not include detailed requirements for the

assessment of a landfill facility for radioactive waste including spent

nuclear fuel

According to the Regulation on Impact Assessment, facilities for the disposal of radioactive waste

and spent nuclear fuel must be assessed through an impact assessment. The initial notification

with a proposed assessment programme does not include an assessment of landfill solutions for

radioactive waste, and there is therefore no requirement for an impact assessment of landfill

facilities at this time.

Requirements and considerations related to a landfill facility for radioactive waste or spent nuclear

fuel will be significantly different from those that apply to the establishment of a nuclear power

plant. Even if a landfill facility for radioactive waste and a nuclear power plant are co-located at the

same site, it will be necessary to conduct separate impact assessments for the landfill facility.

9 Read more about this on NVE’s website: Permitting process for grid infrastructure – NVE. 10 Read more about the requirements regarding notifications and licence applications on NVE’s website:

Requirements regarding an initial notification for grid infrastructure and Application for a licence for grid

infrastructure.

21

Although this phase does not set detailed requirements for the assessment of landfill solutions, the

assessment programme must describe how radioactive waste, including spent nuclear fuel, will be

handled. This also includes disposal solutions.

Radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel constitute one of the most long-lasting consequences of

the proposed project, as it will contain radionuclides with very long half-lives. It is therefore crucial

that impact assessments related to the management of radioactive waste are included in the

assessment programme, even if specific plans for a landfill facility are not covered by the

programme. See chapter 10 on radioactive pollution and waste, including spent nuclear fuel.

2.2.9 The recommendation does not include detailed requirements for the

decommissioning of the nuclear installation

According to the Impact Assessment Regulation, the decommissioning of nuclear power plants

must be impact assessed. The impact assessment must be carried out when it is decided that the

nuclear power plant is to be decommissioned. There is therefore no requirement for

decommissioning to be fully assessed in this assessment programme, but there is a requirement

for a description of the decommissioning plans. This is because a number of choices made in the

design phase of a new nuclear power plant will determine how the plant will eventually be

decommissioned. Reference is made to chapter 8 on decommissioning in the impact assessment

programme.

2.2.10 The recommendation does not include requirements ensuing

from municipal planning processes

It follows from the Planning and Building Act11 that there is no requirement for a zoning plan for

facilities for the production of energy that require a licence pursuant to the Energy Act. However,

municipalities can choose to have zoning plans drawn up for energy plants. On April 12, 2024, Heim

municipal authority announced the start of zoning work for an area zoning plan for Taftøy nuclear

power. No planning programme has been adopted for an area zoning plan. We have not included

requirements regarding impact assessments that will be part of a possible further zoning planning

process in our work. However, we recommend that the municipal authority consider the

requirements in our recommendation if they choose to proceed with the planning process.

2.3 Notification requirements according to the Espoo Convention

According to the Impact Assessment Regulation and the Espoo Convention, notifications of

projects that may have transboundary impacts must be sent for consultation to countries that

might be affected. It was clarified early in the work with the client that this should not be done as

part of the assignment. We have included some requirements for assessing transboundary

impacts, but this should be supplemented with any requirements obtained from other countries.

Nuclear power plants and other nuclear installations are important topics in connection with the

Espoo Convention, and it is established practice to consult widely on these kinds of matters. The

Norwegian Environment Agency has informed NVE that they have already been contacted by a

number of other European countries requesting information on this matter. In order to meet the

requirements of the Espoo Convention, a consultation of the assessment programme must be

11 Read more about this in Appendix 1.

22

carried out before the assessment programme is established. The Norwegian Environment Agency

is the national single point of contact for conducting these kinds of consultations.

3 General presentation of the requirements in the

recommendation for an impact assessment

programme

3.1 The requirements in the assessment programme are linked to

several laws and regulations

It follows from the assignment that, as far as possible, the recommendation should indicate which

parts of the assessment programme are necessary to meet the requirements pursuant to the

Nuclear Energy Act, the Energy Act, the Radiation Protection Act, the Pollution Control Act, the Fire

and Explosion Protection Act, the Civil Protection Act, the Act relating to supervision of electrical

installations and equipment and in some cases also the Security Act.

In the licensing processes pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act and the Energy Act, the competent

authority must assess all the effects the proposed project might have on the environment and for

society. In principle, therefore, all the requirements in the recommendation for an assessment

programme are relevant to meet the requirements in both the Nuclear Energy Act and the Energy

Act.

In addition, the Pollution Control Act triggers a requirement for an impact assessment in line with

Appendix 1 of the Regulation of Impact Assessment, on nuclear power. The same applies to

facilities that will be used to handle nuclear fuel and waste facilities for radioactive waste.

Many of these requirements are also linked to other legislation, and some of these Acts require

separate permit applications. The table below provides an overview of the parts of the assessment

programme that are necessary to meet the requirements of the other Acts of law mentioned in the

assignment letter, in addition to the Nuclear Energy Act, the Pollution Control Act and the Energy

Act. A more detailed description of the legislation is provided in Appendix 1.

Other legislation Requirements in the

recommendation

Remarks

The Radiation Protection

Act

Chapter 6

Authorization pursuant to the Radiation

Protection Regulation is required for all

activities that involve ionizing radiation.

DSA is the competent authority

responsible for issuing such authorization

pursuant to this Regulation.

The assessments described in chapter 7 of

the assessment programme will also be

relevant as part of the basis for processing

applications for licences pursuant to the

Nuclear Energy Act and the Energy Act.

23

The Norwegian Fire and

Explosion Protection Act

Section 7.1 and

Chapter 10

In addition, the

requirements in

chapter 3 regarding

description of the

proposed project are

relevant

Pursuant to the Norwegian Fire and

Explosion Prevention Act, DSB can require

that consent be obtained from DSB for the

handling of hazardous substances to

ensure the safety of the surroundings.

DSB and the municipalities can also issue

necessary orders for preventive and

emergency preparedness measures. It is a

prerequisite that there is collaboration

between the developer and the fire and

rescue service on the specific emergency

preparedness related to the facility, and

that the developer contributes to the

municipal authority’s analyses related to

staffing and equipment of the fire and

rescue service

The Civil Protection Act Section 2.5. There are no permit processes regulated

by the Civil Protection Act, but it is a

prerequisite that the developer

contributes to the municipal authority’s

comprehensive risk and vulnerability

analysis pursuant to the Civil Protection

Act

The Act relating to

supervision of electrical

installations and

equipment

Section 2.5. There are no licensing processes pursuant

to the Act relating to supervision of

electrical installations and equipment,

with the exception of requirements for

recognition of professional qualifications.

The Security Act Section 2.5. The application of the Security Act must

be further investigated when establishing

a nuclear power plant. There will be a

need at an early stage in the assessment

process to classify documentation on

technology and safety at the facility, in

addition to the provisions on

confidentiality in Section 53 of the

Nuclear Energy Act. It must also be

considered whether the actual

procurement of all or part of the facility

will fall under chapter 9 on security

classified procurements.

In Section 1, last paragraph, of the

Regulation on the physical protection of

nuclear material and nuclear facilities, it is

stated that nuclear materials and nuclear

24

facilities covered by the Regulation are to

be regarded as objects of critical national

importance. The Regulation refers to the

fact that the (former) Security Act and

Regulations issued pursuant thereto

apply to legal entities covered by the

Regulation. Any nuclear power plant will

fall within the scope of the Regulation.

According to Section 7-1, second

paragraph, of the (current) Security Act,

the ministries are responsible for

designating, classifying and maintaining

an overview of critical national objects

and infrastructure.

In addition to the Acts of law mentioned in the assignment letter, other laws and regulations are

also relevant. For example, the Nature Diversity Act provides the framework for many of the

requirements for assessing impacts on biodiversity. Separate permits related to different

legislation may also be required, depending on what emerges from the impact assessment.

Examples of such permits include permits for physical measures in watercourses in accordance

with the Act relating to salmonids and fresh-water fish etc. or the de-designation of cultural

heritage monuments through exemption from the Cultural Heritage Act. In the recommendation

for the assessment programme, we have set a requirement that the developer must describe all

the relevant Acts of law and rules, and how they plan to comply with these requirements.

Norway is party to a number of international conventions relating to nuclear safety, handling of

radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel, liability in the event of nuclear accidents and non-

proliferation of material that can be used for nuclear weapons, with additional protocols:

List of relevant international obligations (not exhaustive)12:

• Convention on Nuclear Safety13

• Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material 14

• Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident15

• Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive

Waste Management 16

• The Paris Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy and the Vienna

Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage17

12 Conventions on nuclear safety – DSA 13 Convention on Nuclear Safety of 20 September 1994 14 Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material of 2 August 1987 15 The Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident of 26 September 1986 16 Joint Convention on the safety of spent fuel management and on the safety of radioactive waste

management of 29 September 1997 17 Paris Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy of 29 July 1960

25

These obligations have been implemented in Norwegian regulations. Norway has also endorsed

the international safety standards developed by the IAEA. In 2019, Norway was evaluated by

experts affiliated with the IAEA, where a thorough review of the implementation of these standards

was carried out. The review resulted in a report with recommendations that Norway must follow

up. This included that Norway must develop a national strategy for safe, secure and responsible

management of radioactive waste in Norway18, and a national strategy for radiation protection and

nuclear safety19. These strategies have now been adopted by the government and provide

important parameters that are also significant to this programme.

A follow-up review will take place at the end of 2025. This is of significance for the interpretation of

the regulatory framework, and the developer should ensure they have thorough knowledge and

understanding of the international frameworks.

3.2 Many of the requirements regarding impact assessments are

based on standard requirements for energy plants

The proposed requirements regarding impact assessments are based on existing requirements

related to various authorization processes. Many of the requirements for assessing the impact on

environmental and societal interests are based on NVE’s standard requirements for other energy

initiatives, which are based on experience from the construction and operation of hydropower,

wind power and grid infrastructure. These requirements are largely based on the Norwegian

Environment Agency and the Directorate for Cultural Heritage’s Impact Assessment Handbook (M-

1941) and on dialogue with the Norwegian Environment Agency and other sector authorities.

The reason why many of the requirements are based on NVE’s standard requirements is that NVE

has extensive experience in establishing requirements regarding impact assessments pursuant to

the Regulation on Impact Assessment as the competent authority for energy plants. In recent

years, NVE has worked systematically on the development of standard requirements. Among other

things, the current standard requirements for onshore wind power plants were reviewed in

2021/2022 in dialogue with the relevant expert authorities.20 For topics that overlap with topics

that it is relevant to assess for other types of energy plants, NVE’s standard requirements have

therefore been used as a starting point, but with necessary adaptations that are relevant because

the proposed project is a nuclear power plant.

3.3 Special requirements regarding impact assessments for a

nuclear installation

The recommendation includes many requirements relating to assessments and descriptions to

ensure nuclear safety, civil protection, radiation protection and protection of the environment in

connection with the establishment of a nuclear installation. Several of the requirements

concerning nuclear safety, radiation protection, radioactive contamination and waste,

decommissioning and nuclear emergency preparedness follow from DSA’s regulations.

18 Read more about this on the government’s website: Strategy for safe, secure and responsible management

of radioactive waste in Norway – regjeringen.no. 19 Read more about this on the government’s website: Norway’s first national strategy for radiation

protection and nuclear safety – regjeringen.no 20 Read more about this on NVE’s website: nve.no/media/14070/forslag-til-mal-for-ku-krav-3997281_7_0.pdf.

26

DSA has not established an impact assessment programme pursuant to the current EIA regulations

from 2017, but when the regulatory framework was introduced, the government decided that the

existing nuclear installations at Halden and Kjeller should undergo an impact assessment. The

establishment of a combined storage and landfill facility for radioactive waste (“KLDRA”) in

Himdalen was subject to requirements regarding an impact assessment in the 1990s. Since the

Impact Assessment Regulation came into force in 2017, DSA has not established an assessment

programme for nuclear installations in Norway, but DSA has assessed the requirements concerning

impact assessments for the establishment of new waste facilities for radioactive waste. The

requirements regarding impact assessments in these areas follow international requirements and

guidance from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and are based on best practice from

other countries.

The special requirements regarding impact assessments include assessments and descriptions

related to nuclear safety at the facility, but also security and non-proliferation safeguards. This also

includes assessments and descriptions related to radiation protection, releases of radioactive

substances, management of radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel, and decommissioning.

Furthermore, this includes assessments and descriptions related to nuclear incidents and nuclear

preparedness.

The requirements for assessment are based on requirements set out in Norwegian regulations, the

Safety Standards drawn up by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and the “Strategy for

safe, secure and responsible management of radioactive waste in Norway”. There is a

comprehensive international framework of safety standards, guidelines and guidance from the

IAEA regarding nuclear installations. We have set a requirement that the studies to be carried out

must follow international best practice.

DSA has prepared general licence conditions, which are based on the IAEA’s Safety Standards. The

conditions are published in StrålevernHefte 2018:33 and provide guidelines for what an application

for a licence must contain and for DSA’s assessments of an application. In addition, DSA has

prepared a guide to the general licence conditions in DSA booklet no. 5. The licence conditions are

an important part of the basis for the requirements we have set for the impact assessment.

3.4 Relationship between a safety case for a nuclear installation

and an impact assessment for a nuclear power plant

An application for a licence pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act must include a safety case for a

nuclear installation that documents that the facility meets all the relevant safety requirements and

shows how the facility can be operated safely, securely and responsibly. A safety case must

describe in detail how the safety of the facility will be ensured throughout the entire lifetime of the

facility, and must document how the nuclear installation meets all the safety requirements. Some

issues that are relevant in an impact assessment may also be relevant in the safety case.

The safety case will contain, among other things, technical descriptions of the facility, safety

analyses, describe vulnerabilities and risk factors, include measures introduced to minimize risk,

operating regulations, contingency plans to deal with any incidents at the facility, and provide an

account of the necessary expertise and personnel. The safety case will also provide an assessment

of defence-in-depth, including how to handle deviations from normal operations, detect and

correct any safety-related deviations from normal operations, and describe active and passive

safety barriers including physical measures. The report will also consider different degrees of

protection and physical barriers to isolate radioactive material. Other measures to support

27

defence-in-depth also need to be identified in a safety case, including an account of the safety

margins in the design and operation of the facility and describing how cascade effects21 can be

avoided. The requirements regarding the content of a safety case will depend on the various stages

of development of a nuclear installation, from construction, to operation and later

decommissioning and dismantling of the facility.

A preliminary safety case is sufficient for an application to construct a nuclear power plant, but the

owner must submit a complete safety case for the plant in good time before the plant is put into

operation. The requirements for the safety case will also change when the facility is to be

decommissioned and dismantled in the future.

In order to ensure a comprehensive and consistent assessment of the impacts and safety of the

proposed project, it is important that there is consistency between the assessments made in the

impact assessment and those included in the safety case for the facility. The content, analyses and

assessments in the two documents must be mutually aligned, especially where there is an overlap

between, for example, environmental impacts and safety issues.

4 Involvement and participation in the work on the

recommendation

4.1.1 The notification has undergone consultation

The Ministry of Energy sent the notification with the proposed assessment programme for public

consultation on 21 May 2024 with a response deadline of 21 November 2024. A total of 53

consultation responses were submitted by the deadline, and these are available on the

government’s website.

The requirements regarding impact assessments in our recommendation are based, among other

things, on Norsk Kjernekraft’s proposal for an impact assessment programme and the input that

the Ministry of Energy received within the consultation deadline.

4.1.2 Involvement of expert authorities

The assignment letter states that advice and input must be obtained from the National Security

Authority (NSM), the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) and the National Police Directorate

(POD). Early on in the work, it was decided that DSA would assume responsibility for this

involvement.

DSA presented the assignment at the Authority Forum on 30 April 2025, which was attended by the

aforementioned agencies. On 10 June 2025, contact persons at NSM, PST and POD were sent the

chapter on civil protection from the draft recommendation on establishment of an impact

assessment programme for the project. They were asked to provide input on whether the chapter

addressed the need for investigation within the individual agency’s areas of responsibility, or

whether there was a need for changes or additions. NSM, PST and POD stated that they needed

more time and more comprehensive documentation to be able to make a proper professional

21 At a nuclear installation, a “cascade effect” is an incident where a small disturbance or change in one

safety system leads to a series of subsequent, more serious incidents or impacts. It can start out quite minor,

but grow to have major, significant consequences for the safety of the facility.

28

assessment of the proposed project. On 4 July 2025, DSA therefore sent a letter to NSM, PST and

POD, with a complete preliminary draft recommendation for the establishment of the impact

assessment programme. The deadline for feedback on this was set to 14 August 2025. DSA received

input from POD, and this input has been incorporated into the assessment programme.

On 7 May 2025, NVE sent a request for input to national agencies that had not received the

notification in the initial consultation, and received input from the Directorate of Fisheries, the

Norwegian Food Safety Authority and the Norwegian Coastal Administration. In addition, both NVE

and DSA have had dialogue with the Norwegian Environment Agency, which has contributed with

proposals for requirements regarding impact assessments related to pollution and biodiversity in

the sea, among other things.

The input from the expert authorities has been included in the assessment programme.

4.1.3 Involvement of the host municipalities and the developer

NVE, DSA and DSB had a joint meeting with the municipal authorities in Heim and Aure on 5 June

2025. The host municipalities were given the opportunity to provide new written input after the

meeting. The municipalities submitted input on June 18 and 20, 2025, respectively, and these have

been incorporated into the basis for the recommendation.

DSA, DSB and NVE have also been in dialogue with Norsk Kjernekraft during the work on the

recommendation, including at a meeting on 16 May 2025. At the meeting, Norsk Kjernekraft

announced that a separate company, Trondheimsleia Kjernekraft AS, has been established, which

will be the developer of the notified nuclear power plant.

DSB has informed the fire and rescue services in the host municipalities about the proposed

project and requested that the chief fire officers familiarize themselves with the proposal and

assess what consequences this will have for emergency preparedness, specifically the need for

equipment, expertise and cooperation between the fire and rescue services.

5 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

methods and participation

5.1 General requirements and method requirements

Chapter 2 of the recommendation for the assessment programme contains general requirements

for the impact assessment, requirements for presentation and compilation, requirements for

methodology and the underlying data, and requirements for participation. The reason why this is

presented here, and not reproduced under each thematic area of assessment, is that the chosen

layout results in less repetition and contributes to a more comprehensive assessment with a

common starting point for the various specific assessments and experts.

Among other things, the chapter requires Norsk Kjernekraft to investigate the effects of all parts of

the nuclear power plant with associated infrastructure and activities (section 2.1) and conduct the

assessment so that all the factors that affect and are included in the various assessments are

adequate and representative for the various alternatives that are being considered (e.g. choice of

technology, type of reactor, number to be built and order in which they are built) and for all phases

in the lifetime of the nuclear power plant (section 2.3). Furthermore, there is a requirement that

new topics be includes in the impact assessment if the further development of the project shows

29

that topics not covered by this programme become relevant, and to adapt and/or limit the

assessment if the further development of the project shows that certain individual topics or a

specified methodology are irrelevant to the decisions to be made (chapter 2.3).

In the notification, the proposed project is described in very general terms. We believe it is

important that it is a requirements that the impact assessment be carried out such that it is

sufficiently comprehensive. To ensure that the impact assessments are adequate for the chosen

project and at the same time reduce the need for additional assessments, the assessments must be

carried out so that they are as relevant and representative as possible for the chosen project. Once

the choice of design, the number of nuclear reactors and other support facilities as well as

associated activities has been decided, Norsk Kjernekraft must ensure that the assessments in the

reports are adequate and comprehensive.

Furthermore, a requirement has been included in section 2.3 of the recommendation that it must

be assessed whether regulatory or administrative requirements and considerations from one

authority related to the proposed project may entail a risk of contradiction or conflict with

requirements established or guidelines issued by other relevant authorities. This could, for

example, be guidelines or requirements issued by other authorities that conflict with requirements

from DSA and NVE. DSA has the authority to lodge objections pursuant to the Planning and

Building Act in the areas of nuclear safety and radioactive pollution, and NVE has the authority to

lodge objections in the areas of energy, slide events (landslides and avalanches), floods,

watercourses and groundwater. A holistic approach at an early stage will help to identify and

address this, and facilitate compliance.

5.2 Participation

The requirements for participation are based on NVE’s standard requirements for energy plants

and recommendations from the IAEA on the participation of stakeholders and affected parties in

connection with the establishment of a nuclear plant.

Since the proposed project is a nuclear installation, it is necessary to involve more parties than is

usually the case in energy cases. The recommendation therefore includes, among other things, a

requirement that the developer must establish extensive collaboration with local, regional and

national emergency response providers, as well as involve relevant national authorities. There is

also a requirement that the developer must draw up a separate plan for participation in dialogue

with the host municipalities at an early stage in the assessment work. We believe this is necessary

in order to ensure the necessary local support for the assessment work. As input to the

recommendation, the host municipalities have provided an overview of organizations and

companies that the developer must contact. This list is included in bullet point four in section 2.4

of the recommendation. We emphasize that this bullet point is not exhaustive. Norsk Kjernekraft is

responsible for making sure relevant stakeholders and affected parties are included in the work.

Broad involvement is key to ensuring diversity in the report. For example, stakeholder groups may

have special expertise related to the proposed project that can be useful, even if they are not

directly affected by the proposed project.

We also hold that there should be a requirement for an account of how the participation of affected

parties and stakeholders will be ensured throughout the entire lifetime of the nuclear installation,

from design until the plant is closed down and decommissioned.

We believe it is important that the participation work is documented for the public, and the

recommendation therefore includes requirements for this, including dates for meetings and visits.

30

5.3 Environmental condition – the zero alternative

Section 2.6 of the recommendation includes requirements for a description of the environmental

condition/zero alternative. This is a requirement that follows directly from Section 20 of the

Regulation on Impact Assessment, which states that the assessment must be based on a

description of the current environmental condition and an overview of how the environment is

expected to develop if the plan or proposed project is not implemented.

This requirement is necessary to meet requirements pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act and the

Energy Act. All the assessments included in the licensing authorities’ decision-making basis must

assess the effects compared with the same zero alternative. We emphasize that it is important to

have a realistic zero alternative for areas of influence both on land and at sea, and would stress

that the zero alternative must be based on the chapter on zero alternatives in the Norwegian

Environment Agency and the Directorate for Cultural Heritage’s Impact Assessment Handbook (M-

1941).

It is required that the background levels of radioactivity in the area for the proposed project and

areas near the proposed project must be described. This requirement is set to ensure that

radiation levels are well documented before activities with a radiation risk are carried out in the

area, and which will be important for subsequent requirements for the enterprise’s environmental

monitoring in licences and permits. This will also be important when the nuclear installation is to

be decommissioned and the areas are to be returned in the future.

6 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

description of the proposed project

6.1 Description of the proposed project

In section 3.1 of the recommendation, we have included requirements for an overall description of

the proposed project. The purpose of this is to provide a general, initial description of the facility,

as a basis for more detailed descriptions of the various parts of the facility.

6.2 Justification for the proposed project

Section 3.2 of the recommendation includes requirements for a justification for the proposed

project. This is a requirement that follows directly from the Impact Assessment Regulation and is

necessary to meet the requirements relating to the licensing processes pursuant to the Nuclear

Energy Act and the Energy Act.

We have also included a requirement to describe relevant alternatives to the proposed project,

including assessment of both alternative regional and national locations for a nuclear power plant

and relevant regional and national alternatives to nuclear power production. In the assessment of

relevant regional and national alternatives to nuclear power production, we believe that both

other types of power production, measures such as improving energy efficiency and other

measures that affect the need for new power production are relevant.

6.3 Choice of location

A nuclear power plant is usually planned to operate for at least 60 years. In addition, it takes

several years to plan and build it, and several years to dismantle and decommission it. The choice

31

of location and suitability of the site must therefore be carefully assessed, so that there can be

reasonable assurance that the nuclear power plant can be built, operated, decommissioned and

dismantled over time in a location without undue risk to human health, the environment or other

societal and commercial interests.

Requirement 5 of the IAEA Safety Requirements SSR-1 for site evaluation states that: “The site and

the region shall be investigated with regard to the characteristics that could affect the safety of the

nuclear installation and the potential radiological impact of the nuclear installation on people and

the environment.”

Before a licence pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act for the construction of a nuclear installation

can be granted, the following general questions must be answered:

• Can a nuclear installation be established and operated safely and securely at the proposed

site? Is the proposed site suitable for the planned activity?

• Will the impacts for people and the environment of the planned activity at the site in

question be acceptable?

An impact assessment is mainly intended to answer the second question, while the first is

addressed through a site evaluation as part of the work on the safety case for the facility. However,

the two questions are closely interlinked, and at this stage of the project (in connection with the

choice of location), assessments must be carried out that to some extent answer both questions.

SSR-1 also states that the following factors should be considered when evaluating the suitability of

a proposed site:

• The effects of natural and human induced external events occurring in the region that

might affect the site of the nuclear installation.

• The characteristics of the site and its environment that might influence the transfer of

radioactive material released from the nuclear installation to people and to the

environment.

• Demographic factors, such as the population density, population distribution and other

characteristics of the external zone, in so far as these might affect the feasibility of planning

effective emergency response actions, and the need to evaluate the risk to individuals and

to the population.

In order to be able to assess the suitability of the site in accordance with the constraints set out in

SSR-1, we hold that the assessment programme must require the developer to describe a number

of aspects of the site and its surroundings. A nuclear power plant needs, among other things,

continuous access to cooling water and stable electricity to ensure that safety is maintained at all

times and in the event of downtime, maintenance, fuel changes, etc. A key aspect that needs to be

investigated is therefore access to critical infrastructure, such as access to an adequate and safe

supply of cooling water, as well as a stable power supply to the nuclear installation. These factors

are crucial for both normal operations and in the event of adverse incidents. A thorough

description and assessment of these factors is therefore necessary in order to be able to conclude

whether the specific location is suitable for the establishment of a nuclear installation.

In addition, the justification for the choice of site for a nuclear power plant must show how

economic and societal factors have been taken into account, such as the need for power, grid

connection, logistics and transport, as well as access to human resources and expertise. The choice

32

of location must also be justified on the basis of other considerations, such as whether the nuclear

power plant is located near a national border or near other civilian or military installations that in

themselves may pose a risk or that have important national functions, making, for example,

evacuation difficult. The assessment must also take into account the fact that the threat situation

has changed and what this means for the location of the facility. This applies to the facility as a

target in times of crisis or war, the facility’s need for a stable supply of electricity and cooling

water, and the facility’s ability to supply electricity given its proximity to areas/activities that are

important for the total defence concept.

A nuclear power plant is also dependent on an external power supply, and will therefore be

dependent on a stable power supply also in to the power plant. Experience from Russia’s attacks

on nuclear power plants in Ukraine shows that loss of power to the nuclear power plant is an

important risk factor that must be taken into account.

International best practice and guidance from the IAEA indicate that, based on a national decision

to establish nuclear power, a set of criteria must be developed to identify suitable sites. These

criteria will be based on the considerations mentioned above, and a number of overall

assessments related to choice of location must be made before proceeding with a specific site.

6.4 Land area requirements

Section 3.4 of the recommendation contains a requirement that the land area requirements for the

nuclear installation must be described and quantified. This is a requirement that follows directly

from the Impact Assessment Regulation and is necessary to meet the requirements of the Nuclear

Energy Act, the Energy Act and other regulations.

6.5 Grid infrastructure

As stated in section 2.2.7, the recommendation does not include detailed requirements regarding

impact assessments related to connection to the grid. We nevertheless believe that there will be a

need for information about the necessary grid infrastructure and power supply to the power plant

in any applications for the nuclear plant pursuant to both the Energy Act and the Nuclear Energy

Act, and have therefore included assessment requirements related to this in section 3.5 of the

recommendation.

In line with the Regulation on assessments of energy needs, as a general rule, all proposed projects

in the power grid must be justified in a concept evaluation and selection study before a licence is

applied for. It is essential that Norsk Kjernekraft clarifies the necessary grid requirements based on

the specific size of the planned power plant, and that a concept evaluation and selection study is

carried out that justifies the need for grid infrastructure in accordance with the Regulation on

assessments of energy needs and appurtenant guidelines22. In the recommendation, we have

therefore assumed that a concept evaluation and selection study of this nature will be carried out.

We find it necessary that Norsk Kjernekraft, as part of the description of the proposed project, must

describe the facilities and solutions necessary to connect the power plant to the power grid, based

on the concept evaluation and selection study and the chosen concept. This includes both the

actual grid connection and any necessary upgrades to the existing grid in order for the connection

22 Read about this on NVE’s website: Regulation on assessments of energy needs: Concept evaluation and

selection studies.

33

to be operationally sound. This will contribute to a comprehensive overview of the scope of the

infrastructure that the establishment of the nuclear power plant will require.

Furthermore, we have ensured that the report makes a clear distinction between which of the grid

infrastructures are included in the application for a licence for a nuclear power plant pursuant to

the Energy Act, and which may be applied for by other players.

In its consultation response, Statnett has requested that Norsk Kjernekraft be required to assess

whether functional requirements for synchronous production facilities are sufficient for a nuclear

power plant of this size. NVE suggests that this be done in connection with the concept evaluation

and selection study and has therefore not proposed a separate requirement for it in this

assessment programme.

6.6 The construction phase

Section 3.6 of the recommendation contains requirements regarding a description of the

construction phase, i.e. the building of the nuclear installation. Licences pursuant to the Energy Act

normally require a detailed plan for this phase of the proposed project, among other things. In

deciding the licensing issue, the effects resulting from construction work are relevant. We have

therefore included a separate chapter with requirements for the study of the construction phase in

the recommendation.

6.7 Project timeline

We believe it is important that the impact assessment contain a realistic project timeline for the

planning, design and construction of the proposed project, including any plans for sequential

development of nuclear reactors. The plan must take into account what has been used as a basis in

the work on the technical studies. This is to ensure that time-dependent impacts are adequately

assessed in accordance with the assessment requirements.

7 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

description of the nuclear installation and nuclear

safety

7.1 General information about the nuclear installation,

technology and activities

Chapter 4 of the recommendation includes requirements regarding the description of the nuclear

installation, technology and activities. These are partly requirements that follow directly from the

Impact Assessment Regulation, but we have also included requirements in the recommendation

that go beyond this Regulation, and which are particularly important as the proposed project is

defined as a nuclear installation pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act. We believe this is necessary to

meet the requirements of the Nuclear Energy Act and the Energy Act, as well as the Pollution

Control Act and the Radiation Protection Act.

For a nuclear installation, we believe it is important that the impact assessment shows how

requirements relating to nuclear safety will be addressed in the design, construction, operation,

decommissioning and dismantling of the facility, including radiation protection for both

34

occupationally exposed workers and the general public, releases of radioactive substances,

management of radioactive waste, plans for environmental monitoring of radioactive substances,

plans for emergency preparedness and non-proliferation of nuclear material that could be used in

weapons, including safeguards and physical security measures at the facility.

There is an increased risk associated with transport of nuclear and radioactive material.

Requirements regarding a description of how nuclear and radioactive material will be transported

to and from the nuclear installation must therefore be included in the assessment programme.

Reference is also made to IAEA SSR-6 “Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material”,

which contains provisions, activity limits and requirements for the transport of radioactive

material, including controls, packaging, test procedure and administrative requirements. This is

important for requirements pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act, the Pollution Control Act and the

Radiation Protection Act.

The detailed requirements are also relevant to ensure compliance with requirements ensuing from

other regulations. The requirement regarding a description of how information security is to be

safeguarded is also necessary to meet the requirements of the Regulation on security and

emergency preparedness in the power supply. The requirement regarding a description of the

technical solution, other facilities and components is necessary in order to assess compliance with

the requirements for necessary safety measures to prevent fire and explosion pursuant to the fire

and explosion legislation. The requirement regarding a description of the handling of hazardous

substances at or near the facility will be necessary in order to be able to assess whether there is a

need for consent from DSB in accordance with the Regulation on the handling of hazardous

substances.

7.2 Nuclear safety, security and safeguards

Nuclear safety includes all measures at a nuclear installation that are intended to protect people,

society and the environment from the negative impacts that a nuclear installation can cause. This

involves preventing and/or reducing the consequences of accidents and other adverse incidents at

the nuclear installation, as well as ensuring safe operating conditions. Preventing and/or reducing

the consequences of accidents and other adverse incidents is closely linked to the choice of

technology etc. and the safety analyses for the nuclear installation in question, and must be

described in the impact assessment, but also be further elucidated and justified in connection with

the preparation of the safety case and an application for a licence pursuant to the Nuclear Energy

Act.

The recommendation requires that safety and security of the facility be described. This includes

both logical and physical security. In this context, reference is made to the fact that the Regulation

on the physical protection of nuclear material and nuclear facilities contain a number of

requirements designed to minimize the possibility of theft of nuclear material and sabotage

against nuclear facilities. Recommendations and guidelines relating to security at nuclear

installations are provided by the IAEA in Nuclear Security Series No. 13 “Physical Protection of

Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities” and Nuclear Security Series no. 35-G “Security during the

Lifetime of a Nuclear Facility”.

Based on the facility owner’s assessments and national threat assessments, DSA issues a decision

on a design basis threat to define which threats a nuclear installation must be able to withstand,

and which will form the basis for setting requirements regarding the design of security measures at

the facility. The recommendation therefore sets a requirement for thorough assessments of how

balanced protection can be achieved at the plant, including an adapted time-based security

35

analysis. The methodology for determining a design basis threat is based on internationally

recognized methodology from the IAEA.

The Regulation on the possession, sale and transport of nuclear material and dual-use equipment

regulates the obligations of owners of nuclear installations to keep material accounts and their

duties in connection with inspections and safeguards. DSA’s general licence condition no. 23 also

contains a requirement that the owner of a nuclear installation must ensure appropriate

arrangements for material accounting and safeguards. The background to the requirement for

material accounting and safeguards stems from the Safeguards Agreement and Additional

Protocol between Norway and the IAEA.23 The recommendation therefore includes a requirement

for a description of material accounts for nuclear material at the facility and how Norway’s

obligations under international agreements will be maintained.

Many existing nuclear installations were designed and built before the requirements regarding

inspections and safeguards came into effect. In some cases, this has made such controls difficult.

In the case of new nuclear power plants, we therefore believe that consideration must be given to

how the design of the plant can best facilitate the safeguarding of the material at the plant. We

have therefore included a requirement in the recommendation to describe how the design of the

facility addresses this. The IAEA provides guidance on how safeguards can be included from an

early stage in the process when designing new facilities and modifying existing facilities in

“Safeguards by design guidance”24.

Nuclear safety and the security of the facility is a recurring topic in several of the consultation

statements. NEAS AS asks, among other things, that the assessment programme focus on nuclear

safety, ensuring that the technology meets both national and international safety standards, in line

with the recommendations of the IAEA, including an assessment of the reliability and safety profile

of the SMR technology. Relevant consultation input has been assessed, and is considered to be

covered by the requirements regarding assessments set out in chapter 4 of the recommendation.

7.3 Nuclear fuel

Section 4.2 of the recommendation contains requirements for a description of the entire fuel cycle

from extraction to final disposal of spent nuclear fuel. There is also a requirement for a description

of the overall impact that the facility’s fuel cycle will have on the environment and society.

In addition, we hold that the assessment must describe what kind of nuclear fuel will be used at

the plant, how this nuclear fuel will be procured, produced and handled, and whether the

proposed project will include local production or whether fuel will be transported to and from the

plant. Spent nuclear fuel must be handled as radioactive waste, and it is therefore a requirement

that the assessment must also include a description of how spent nuclear fuel will be finally

disposed of.

The handling of spent nuclear fuel constitutes a significant risk factor at a nuclear installation and

must therefore be assessed in thorough detail. The handling of nuclear fuel will also be assessed by

DSA as part of the processing of an application for a licence pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act.

23 INFCIRC 177 and INFCIRC 177.Add.1 24 Safeguards by design | IAEA

36

8 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

assessment of competence needs Norway has never had commercial nuclear power before, and yet we will face major and

demanding tasks in the future related to the decommissioning of Norway’s nuclear research

activities at the Institute of Energy Technology’s premises in Kjeller and Halden. It may therefore

be challenging to secure sufficient expertise to establish, operate and decommission a commercial

nuclear power plant in Norway, at the same time as there is an urgent need to ensure the safe

operation of the existing facilities and make progress in the clean-up work. There is already a great

need in Norway for expertise related to the clean-up and management of radioactive waste.

DSA’s general licence condition no. 5 requires, among other things, that the owner of a nuclear

installation must have enough personnel with sufficient expertise at all levels of the organization at

all times. It is important to establish, maintain and further develop relevant expertise. This also

follows from international requirements and recommendations from the IAEA.

We therefore find it is important that the developer describe the need for expertise throughout the

entire lifetime of the facility and how they will ensure relevant expertise at the right time in the

various stages of the life cycle of the facility. This includes specialist expertise in the handling of

adverse incidents. The need for expertise will vary from the design and construction phases to the

decommissioning of the facility. The requirements are stated in chapter 5 of the recommendation.

9 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

assessment of radiation protection A nuclear power plant will entail a risk of exposure to radiation, and how suitable radiation

protection can be ensured during all the phases of the life cycle of the nuclear power plant must

therefore be assessed. This means, among other things, that assessments must be made of the

radiation exposure of all employees at the facility, a description of how radiation sources and

doses will be monitored, and an assessment of measures to reduce or prevent radiation exposure.

The requirements for assessment of radiation protection in the recommendation are set out in

chapter 6.

Section 5 of the Radiation Protection Act requires that all production, import, export, transport,

transfer, possession, installation, use, handling and waste management of radiation sources shall

be justifiable to ensure that risks do not arise to those performing any such activity, to other

persons or to the environment. Furthermore, Section 5 of the Radiation Protection Regulation

stipulates that all use of radiation must be justified and optimized. This means that the benefits

must be greater than the disadvantages caused by the radiation and that exposure to ionizing

radiation should be kept as low as practically possible, taking into account technological

knowledge, social and economic conditions.

Section 6 of the Radiation Protection Regulation also stipulates requirements in respect of dose

limits, limit values and action levels for individuals exposed to radiation. Among other things, it

requires the enterprise to plan the use of radiation and protective measures to ensure that non-

occupationally exposed employees and the public are not exposed to an effective dose exceeding

0.25 mSv per year.

37

Higher radiation dose limits are permitted for occupationally exposed workers. Occupationally

exposed workers are employees who are exposed to radiation during their work, where the

radiation source or exposure situation is an accountable part of the professional work and

connected to this. Requirements in respect of dose limits and limit values for occupational

exposure are set out in Section 32 of the Radiation Protection Regulation, and it must be described

how the developer intends to monitor and keep track of the exposure doses of exposed workers at

the nuclear power plant.

The IAEA provides guidelines and guidance on radiation protection, use, handling and transport of

radiation sources, primarily through its Safety Standards. Radiation protection aspects related to

normal operation, decommissioning and dismantling of the nuclear installation must be assessed

in line with these Safety Standards.

DSA’s general licence condition no. 12 requires the establishment and implementation of a

radiation protection programme for any nuclear installation.

The impact assessment must adequately prove that the radiation exposure, where applicable with

measures, is such that compliance with the aforementioned requirements in the Radiation

Protection Act and the Radiation Protection Regulation is ensured. We also hold that the developer

must assess measures at the facility that can reduce or prevent exposure to radiation (radiation

protection measures), how radiation doses should be monitored, how a radiation protection

programme should be developed at the specific enterprise, and how the design of the facility

should ensure radiation protection throughout all the operational phases of the facility.

Furthermore, we believe that modelling and analysis of exposure pathways for vulnerable groups

are relevant assessment approaches that can be used in the studies.

10 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

assessment of radioactive pollution and waste

10.1 Releases of radioactive substances during operation of the

nuclear installation

In its initial notification with a proposal for an assessment programme, Norsk Kjernekraft writes

that modern nuclear power plants have no significant releases. However, it is not specified what

insignificant releases there might nevertheless be.

Section 21 of the Impact Assessment Regulation requires that the impact assessment must include

an assessment of pollution. Requirements nos. 25 and 26 in IAEA SSR-1 “Site Evaluation for Nuclear

Installations” state that the dispersion in air and water of radioactive material released from the

nuclear installation in operational states and in accident conditions shall be assessed. We

therefore hold that the requirements included in section 7.1 of the recommendation on releases of

radioactive substances during operation of the nuclear installation are necessary. We would like to

point out that activities that may result in radioactive pollution require a permit from DSA pursuant

to the Pollution Control Act.

Although a nuclear power plant is considered to have low emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse

gases, a nuclear power plant will cause radioactive pollution in the form of releases of radioactive

substances as a consequence of activities at the plant. This might be releases of radioactive

substances to air and water. We hold that the developer must assess radioactive pollution that

38

may occur from all operating conditions at the facility. This may include releases of radioactive

substances during ordinary operation, shutdowns, maintenance, replacement of filters, ion

exchange resins, etc.

In Section 2 of the Regulation on the application of the Pollution Control Act to radioactive

pollution and waste, radioactive pollution is defined as “radiation from radioactive substances

which cause or may cause damage or nuisance to the environment. This also includes radiation

from naturally occurring radioactive substances where human activity leads to increased radiation

exposure of humans or the environment.” DSA may issue a permit pursuant to Section 11 of the

Pollution Control Act for activities that lead to or may lead to radioactive pollution, and may

stipulate further conditions in a permit pursuant to Section 16 of the Pollution Control Act to

prevent radioactive pollution from resulting in damage or nuisance. Appendix II of the Regulation

stipulates which releases always require a permit pursuant to Section 4 of the Regulation. It is

underlined that the summation rule applies if the release consists of several different

radionuclides.

We also find that it is necessary to require assessment of which pathways exist in the area for the

proposed project for spreading radioactive pollution in the environment, and what consequences

this pollution may have for human health and the environment. This includes the total load for

relevant recipients in the area for the proposed project. Furthermore, we propose a requirement

that it must be assessed how the enterprise will monitor its radioactive releases in an

environmental monitoring programme.

Releases of radioactive substances have also been a topic in several of the statements from

consulted parties. The Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (IKFF) requests,

among other things, more detailed information about the type of reactor and installed capacity,

and that the assessment programme should specify which substances the nuclear power plant will

release during operation, highlighting in particular the release of tritium to both the air and water.

Salfjord AS requests, among other things, an assessment of the impacts (direct and market-

related) for the aquaculture industry of releases of radioactive material in the area or the sea. The

County Governor of Trøndelag holds that it is important that the risk of pollution, and in particular

release of radioactive substances, be properly assessed, in relation to the impact on the water

quality of freshwater, groundwater and the sea, on biodiversity (vegetation and animals) and on

short-term and long-term damage to human health. We find that the consultation input has been

taken into account in chapter 7 of the recommendation on radioactive pollution and waste and in

chapter 17 on biodiversity. In respect of impacts for the aquaculture industry, we also refer to

section 19.5 of the recommendation on the assessment of impacts for aquaculture and fisheries.

In order to monitor any changes in radiation levels as a result of the proposed project and to clarify

whether releases of radioactive substances are above the limit values in Appendix II of the

Regulation on Radioactive Pollution and Waste, it is necessary to map the background radiation in

the area before the proposed project is implemented (the zero alternative). We find it is also

necessary to assess what measures can be implemented to ensure that releases are kept as low as

possible and how requirements for the use of best available technology (BAT), as well as the

principle that exposure should be kept as low as reasonably achievable (the ALARA principle) are to

be complied with.

10.2 Radioactive waste, including spent nuclear fuel

In the initial notification with a proposal for an assessment programme, Norsk Kjernekraft has not

presented any description of the estimated type and amount of radioactive waste that the

39

proposed project will generate. According to Section 19 of the Regulation on Impact Assessment,

an impact assessment must include a description of this. Section 7.2 of the recommendation

therefore includes a requirement for a description of radioactive waste and how this waste is going

to be handled. This also includes spent nuclear fuel from the nuclear power plant, which is

radioactive waste with high activity and high risk.

Nuclear power plants in operation will generate radioactive waste. Some of the waste will be low-

activity operational waste, while other radioactive waste, such as spent nuclear fuel, will require

management for a very long time into the future. The eventual closing down and decommissioning

of a nuclear power plant will also produce radioactive waste. Radioactive waste must be managed

safely, securely and responsibly in line with the regulatory framework and international

conventions and standards, and without placing undue burdens on future generations. The

amount of radioactive waste must be as small as practically possible, and there will be

minimization requirements in any licences and permits that might be granted. It is therefore essential that Norsk Kjernekraft assess how the radioactive waste, including spent nuclear fuel, produced as a result of the proposed project will be handled.

Principles for the management of radioactive waste are outlined in the “Strategy for safe, secure

and responsible management of radioactive waste in Norway”. Assessments of the management of

radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel must show that the management is in line with the

principles and strategy in general. Costs associated with the management of radioactive waste

have also been included in the requirements regarding impact assessments.

IAEAGSR Part 5 “Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste” and SSR-5 “Radioactive Waste

Disposal” contain, among other things, requirements for the handling of radioactive waste and will

be relevant to the impact assessment. An important requirement in GSR Part 5, which it will be

important to take into account in the assessment, is that the handling of radioactive waste from

the nuclear power plant must be compatible with the expected landfill solution, and that it has

been taken into account that the various steps in the handling of radioactive waste are mutually

interdependent. We therefore believe that the report must show how these requirements have

been taken into account, even if there is no requirement for a study of the final landfill solution.

Furthermore, several of the consultation statements point to the importance of assessing the

management of radioactive waste, and in particular spent nuclear fuel. The Norwegian Defence

Research Establishment (FFI) points out that end-of-life handling of nuclear fuel (and the financing

thereof) ought to be included in any assessment of the establishment of nuclear power in Norway.

The Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (IKFF) requests specification of how

much spent nuclear fuel the proposed project will produce. Norwegian Nuclear Decommissioning

(NND) requests that consideration be given to how the necessary infrastructure for waste

management and decommissioning can be planned for shared use. Regulations, responsibilities,

risks and opportunities should be clarified from an early stage. These comments have been taken

into account in the requirements regarding what must be assessed in section 7.2 of the

recommendation.

10.3 Other waste

The proposed project will also produce waste that is not radioactive. According to the Regulation

on Impact Assessment, assessments must provide an estimate of the type and quantity of waste,

residues, releases and pollution that will be produced during the construction and operational

phases. We have therefore included a requirement regarding this in our recommendation.

40

11 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

assessment of decommissioning A nuclear installation that is to be established must also take into account that at some point in the

future, the facility will no longer be in use and must be closed down and decommissioned. When

establishing a nuclear power plant, the various stages in the life cycle of the nuclear installation

must therefore be taken into account.25 This includes taking into account the future

decommissioning of the plant right from the design phase, a process that will extend over several

decades and generate large amounts of waste, including radioactive waste. This waste must be

handled safely, securely and responsibly. International best practice states that the design of the

facility must also plan for how the facility will be decommissioned. We therefore hold that the

decommissioning of the nuclear installation must be included in the assessment programme, and

have included requirements related to this in chapter 8 of the recommendation.

A decommissioning plan that describes in detail how the facility can be decommissioned and how

radioactive waste from the decommissioning will be handled must be included in an application

for a licence pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act. In addition, the description of the design of the

facility must describe how decommissioning will be organized at end of life. Decommissioning

plans must be prepared and approved by DSA, and updated every five years in line with general

licence condition no. 9. The plan must show that decommissioning of the facility can be carried out

safely, securely and responsibly in line with national priorities and applicable regulations, as well

as international best practice.

The IAEA’s Safety Standards have 15 requirements related to decommissioning that are mentioned

in GSR Part 6 “Decommissioning of Facilities”, which must be taken into account in the

assessment. During decommissioning, there will also be a risk of elevated radiation doses to both

employees and the general public, and this must also be assessed.

We believe that decommissioning plans must be described as part of the impact assessment

programme. At this stage of the process, a description at a general level covering plans for

decommissioning, including the necessary expertise, resources and financing, will be sufficient.

The desired end state for the area after decommissioning must be described, as this will be

important for the decommissioning plans. To ensure that there will be sufficient expertise during

the decommissioning of the plant, it must be described how this will be safeguarded throughout

the entire clean-up period.26

25 The stages or phases in the life cycle of a nuclear installation include: concept selection, site selection,

construction, commissioning, operation, decommissioning and release from regulatory control; see page 76

of “Strategy for safe, secure and responsible management of radioactive waste in Norway”. 26 See the explanation of word clean-up in “Strategy for safe, secure and responsible management of

radioactive waste in Norway”.

41

12 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

assessment of nuclear incidents and other

adverse incidents In the notification, Norsk Kjernekraft writes that emergency preparedness and accident risk will be

included in the impact assessment to a certain extent, and that these aspects will be assessed in

more detail in the safety cases that are required in connection with an application for a licence

pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act.

Section 21 of the Regulation on Impact Assessment requires that the assessment must identify and

describe the factors that may be affected by the proposed project, and to assess significant

impacts on the environment and society, including emergency preparedness and the risk of an

accident. The Nuclear Energy Act, the Radiation Protection Act and DSA’s general licence condition

no. 14 contain requirements related to emergency preparedness, including contingency plans.

Furthermore, the Pollution Control Act contains requirements related to emergency preparedness

against acute pollution, including the preparation of contingency plans and the duty to have an

emergency response system. There are strict requirements for emergency preparedness at an

enterprise that carries out activities that entail a risk of radiation and radioactive pollution. The

Energy Act also sets requirements for emergency preparedness and measures to manage and limit

the effects of extraordinary situations.

Nuclear power entails a risk of accidents and other incidents that can affect the safety of the plant.

Examples include loss of cooling water, reactor meltdowns and other criticality events that can

lead to elevated radiation levels and releases of radioactive substances. These kinds of accidents

and incidents can have major consequences for people, the environment and society. In the worst-

case scenario, a nuclear incident will result in acute radiation damage and the need to evacuate

the local population, making large areas uninhabitable and affecting agriculture and food

production through radioactive pollution. A nuclear incident can also have consequences for other

countries and the effects can last for decades. A well-known example of this is the Chernobyl

disaster in 1986.

The recommendation therefore requires that possible nuclear incidents at and in connection with

the facility must be described. The likelihood of such incidents occurring and the potential

consequences for people, the environment and society must also be assessed. The risk, probability

and impacts of nuclear incidents and other adverse incidents must be thoroughly assessed.

A nuclear incident at a nuclear installation includes accidents, deliberate adverse events, and

incidents that may result in increased levels of radiation and radioactive pollution in the form of

releases of radioactive substances, and incidents that may affect the operation and safety of the

facility. Fires and explosions at a nuclear power plant will be a nuclear incident, as this may affect

the operation and safety of the plant. Nuclear incidents include both accidents and incidents

resulting from deliberate actions in peacetime, security policy crises, and armed conflicts in line

with the Royal Decree on the Mandate for the Crisis Committee for Nuclear Preparedness etc. of 1

September 2013.

Other adverse incidents include accidents, deliberate adverse events, and incidents that may

endanger people, the environment and society, and incidents that may affect the power supply.

42

Deliberate adverse events may encompass both nuclear incidents and other adverse incidents.

This means incidents that occur as a result of intentional adverse actions such as theft of nuclear

material, sabotage or threat of sabotage, explosion, physical deactivation of security functions,

digital attacks, terrorism or war.

All transport of nuclear and radioactive material entails an increased risk, and it is therefore

required that this must be assessed separately. It is also a requirement that the developer must

assess which safety measures should be implemented to reduce the risk during transport.

The assessment of nuclear incidents must be based on best international practice, and it is a

requirement that internationally recognized methodology in line with the IAEA’s Safety Standards

be used in the assessment programme. The IAEA also provides guidance on the methods and

scenarios to be used in these kinds of assessments.

In our opinion, it is also important that the assessment programme include a requirement that a

risk and vulnerability analysis be carried out for the proposed project to identify possible nuclear

incidents and other adverse incidents, and the consequences thereof. In the risk and vulnerability

analysis, all internal and external risk and vulnerability factors that may be relevant to the safety of

establishing the proposed project at the specified site must be assessed, in line with international

best practice.

The establishment of a nuclear power plant will affect the areas of responsibility of many other

expert authorities, and we therefore find it necessary to make it a requirement that they be

involved. In our opinion, it is also important to require assessment of the impacts of an incident for

national security interests. In addition, the risk and vulnerability analysis must demonstrate how

the planned development will and might affect the surroundings and the security of the power

supply.

13 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

assessment of nuclear preparedness and other

emergency preparedness The Nuclear Energy Act and the Pollution Control Act both contain a requirement that a nuclear

installation in operation must have the necessary emergency preparedness plans. In general

licence condition no. 14, DSA sets requirements for emergency preparedness at these kinds of

facilities. We have therefore included a requirement in the assessment programme that the

enterprise must describe its emergency preparedness and its capacity to detect, minimize and

reduce the consequences of nuclear incidents and other adverse incidents throughout the entire

lifetime of the facility.

Norway aims to minimize the likelihood of radiation and nuclear incidents that may pose risks to

human health and the environment, and to ensure effective preparedness to manage and reduce

the consequences of such incidents should they occur39.

Norway has national nuclear preparedness that is cross-sectoral and based on civil–military

collaboration. According to Section 16 of the Radiation Protection Act, the King organizes

emergency preparedness against nuclear accidents and other incidents that might result in

radiation or the dispersal of radioactivity, in order to protect life, health, the environment or other

important societal interests. Responsibility for this has been delegated to the central-

governmental Crisis Committee for Nuclear Preparedness. This means that, during the acute phase

43

of a nuclear accident or other incident that could result in ionizing radiation or the dispersal of

radioactivity, the Crisis Committee may, without hindrance from any delegation of powers under

other laws, order state and municipal bodies to implement evacuation, area access restrictions

and measures to safeguard foodstuffs, including drinking water and the protection of animals. The

Crisis Committee shall furthermore be entitled to order private and public organizations to carry

out analyses and obtain information to enable a situation to be assessed. The organization,

mandate and delegation of authority are defined in Section 16 of the Radiation Protection Act.

Norway’s national nuclear emergency preparedness system comprises the Crisis Committee for

Nuclear Preparedness, the Crisis Committee’s advisors, and the County Governor as the Crisis

Committee’s regional representative. The County Governor is responsible for coordinating

emergency preparedness at the regional level and coordinating with the municipal authorities.

DSA chairs and is a member of and the secretariat for the Crisis Committee for Nuclear

Preparedness. DSB is also a member of the Crisis Committee for Nuclear Preparedness. We refer

here to the Royal Decree on the Mandate for the Crisis Committee for Nuclear Preparedness etc. of

1 September 2013.

The nuclear preparedness organization has been established to provide expertise to deal with

nuclear incidents and to ensure rapid implementation of measures to protect lives, health, the

environment and other important societal interests. Nuclear incidents include both accidents and

incidents resulting from deliberate actions in peacetime, security policy crises and armed conflict.

The government has assumed six dimensioning scenarios for Norwegian nuclear preparedness.

The establishment of nuclear power in Norway will affect the national nuclear preparedness. A

nuclear installation will be of great importance for national, regional and local emergency

preparedness, and the ability to handle a potential incident must therefore be assessed in

thorough detail. DSA has submitted a proposal to the Ministry of Climate and Environment (KLD)

that the provisions in Sections 43, 44, 46 and 47 of the Pollution Control Act relating to a municipal

emergency response system to deal with incidents of acute pollution, the duty to provide

assistance, etc. be made to apply to acute radioactive pollution. The matter is now under

consideration by the Ministry.

The establishment of the proposed nuclear power plant will change the risk and vulnerabilities in

the municipalities of Heim and Aure. These municipalities currently have no experience of hosting

a nuclear installation. DSA can set requirements regarding the coordination between the

enterprise’s emergency preparedness and the municipal emergency preparedness in light of

changes in the local risk situation. The Civil Protection Act requires municipal authorities to assess

risks and analyse vulnerabilities.

In municipalities that do not have nuclear installations, such as Heim and Aure, there is currently

insufficient knowledge and experience in the fire and rescue service related to responding to a

major nuclear incident at a nuclear power plant, and capability to handle this kind of incident

must be ensured (e.g. personnel, expertise, equipment, etc.). Pursuant to the Norwegian Fire and

Explosion Prevention Act, the municipalities must cooperate on local and regional solutions for

preventive and emergency preparedness tasks with the aim of making the best possible use of

overall resources. Due to the need for specialist knowledge in the fire and rescue services, it will

be necessary to collaborate on regional solutions in order to be able to fulfil the preventive and

emergency response tasks required by the establishment of a nuclear power plant.

44

Pursuant to the Fire and Explosion Protection Act, DSB can order the owner of any building,

storage facility, area, etc. that is considered to pose an extraordinary risk in the municipality to

establish its own fire and accident preparedness service, or pay for and maintain a necessary

upgrade of the municipal fire service. Fire and accident preparedness at the facility will be covered

by requirements in a licence granted pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act.

In the recommendation, we have therefore set a requirement that the developer must assess

which incidents they can handle themselves, i.e. “in-house”, and which will require input from the

national nuclear emergency response system, including local and regional emergency response

resources, in addition to the power supply emergency preparedness system and other emergency

response systems. We have also set a requirement that the developer must assess the

consequences for emergency and response providers, who must adapt their ability to handle in

the event that the facility is established.

We have also included a requirement that the developer must describe how the enterprise’s

emergency preparedness will be coordinated with the national nuclear emergency preparedness,

including local and regional emergency resources, in addition to the power supply emergency

preparedness system and other emergency preparedness. It is important to ensure that this is

done in close dialogue with the County Governor, the host municipalities and neighbouring

municipalities, as well as the emergency services and other preparedness players.

It is expected that the proposed project will result in increased costs related to the preparedness of

all the affected emergency response providers. We therefore find that this must be included in the

impact assessment.

The assessment of nuclear emergency preparedness must be based on best international practice,

and it is a requirement that the assessments must be based on the IAEA’s Safety Standards. The

IAEA provides guidelines and guidance on emergency preparedness and response (EPR) primarily

through its Safety Standards. The IAEA safety standard GSR Part 7 “Preparedness and Response for

a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency” stipulates the requirements for preparedness and response

to nuclear incidents or radioactive releases, regardless of the cause. Useful information can also be

found in the IAEA’s SSG-77 “Protection Against Internal and External Hazards in the Operation of

Nuclear Power Plants”.

Some of the consultation responses mention emergency preparedness and accident risk, largely

focusing on the fact that this is a topic that must be fully illuminated in the impact assessment. In

its consultation statement the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI) points out that it

is particularly important for nuclear power plants to also plan for so-called deliberate acts, i.e.

adverse events caused by state or non-state actors. FFI also writes that the establishment of a

nuclear power plant should include the development of plans for dealing with deliberate, adverse

actions throughout the entire crisis spectrum, and refers to the International Convention for the

Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism and the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear

Material and Nuclear Facilities. In addition, they state that the planning and establishment of local

emergency response resources should also take into account the consequences of any sabotage or

attack on nearby critical infrastructure, the risk of which is higher in places like a proposed

industrial park. Similarly, it must be taken into account that any attacks aimed at nearby targets

may have consequences for the nuclear power plant. In our opinion, FFI’s input, and the input from

other parties, is covered in chapter 10 of our recommendation for the assessment programme.

45

14 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

assessment of energy production

14.1 Power production

Since the benefits of a commercial nuclear power plant will mainly be related to power production,

an assessment of the proposed project’s power production will be an important part of the

decision-making basis in the licensing processes pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act and the

Energy Act. There is a lack of comparable figures for annual energy production that the licensing

authorities can use for comparison purposes. Production estimates are relevant as part of an

impact assessment, and will also be an important basis for socio-economic assessments in the

processing of any applications for a licence. In our opinion, it is therefore necessary to include

requirements related to power production, as stated in section 3.8 of the recommendation.

According to the notification, the nuclear power plant will have an installed capacity of between

300 and 1,500 MW and an annual power production of between 2.4 and 12 TWh per year. This is a

very wide range, and the impact assessment must specify the expected energy production in more

detail, based on the chosen technology (see chapters 6 and 7 above).

14.2 Use of surplus heat

In the notification, Norsk Kjernekraft writes that it will be relevant to consider the utilization of

surplus heat from the plant. The alternatives referred to are food production (greenhouses), fish

farming or hydrogen production. In their consultation statements, Aure Næringsforum (ANF),

Salfjord AS, Statnett SF, Tjeldbergodden Utvikling, Trøndelag County Authority and the County

Governor of Trøndelag all mention that the potential for utilization of surplus heat ought to be

assessed.

There is an estimated 20 TWh of surplus heat in Norway today, including several large sources of

surplus heat in the region where the nuclear power plant is planned. There have been many

attempts in Norway to utilize surplus heat, so far without success. The biggest barrier to the

utilization of surplus heat is access to external infrastructure and parties that can make use of the

heat, especially if the temperature is low.

We find it is essential that Norsk Kjernekraft prove the realism of any proposed utilization of

surplus heat from a future plant at Taftøy Industrial Park in the decision-making basis for

applications for licences. This is why section 3.12 of the recommendation includes a requirement

for Norsk Kjernekraft to describe parties that could make use of the surplus heat, and assess

possible measures and alternatives for facilitation (including district or local heating networks and

technical solutions to increase the temperature of the surplus heat).

In its consultation statement, Salfjord AS writes that the assessment should include potential and

costs, as well as market impacts for food producers in the same area. We hold that if the proposed

users of the surplus heat are food producers (greenhouses, aquaculture), the assessment must be

seen in the context of the requirements for assessment of the impacts on agriculture and

aquaculture.

If Norsk Kjernekraft goes ahead with the plans, in addition to conducting an impact assessment,

they will also be required to submit a separate cost–benefit analysis for the utilization of surplus

heat, or an application for exemption. The developer must also meet the requirements stipulated

46

in the Pollution Control Regulation regarding describing how the proposed project will ensure

utilization of surplus heat. Plants for the production of hydrogen and ammonia may be subject to

DSB’s requirement for consent pursuant to the Regulation on the handling of hazardous

substances. Read more about these processes in Appendix 1.

15 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

assessment of costs and financing The construction and operation of nuclear power plants for commercial power generation in

Norway is new. There is a lack of comparable cost figures that the authorities can use for

comparison purposes. Cost estimates are relevant as part of an impact assessment, and will also

be an important basis for socio-economic assessments in the processing of any applications for a

licence pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act and the Energy Act. There are also requirements

regarding compensation and insurance in Chapter 3 of the Nuclear Energy Act. We therefore hold it

is necessary to include a number of requirements relating to costs associated with the

construction, operation and decommissioning of the power plant, and have included these in

chapter 12 of the recommendation. Requirements for the description of financing must also cover

the financing of waste management, including the management of spent nuclear fuel.

A nuclear power plant is a thermal power plant with the ability to regulate power production. This

means that the plant can offer other types of system services than non-dispatchable power

production. We have therefore included a requirement in the recommendation that the developer

must describe how the proposed project can contribute with various system services and

participation in other balancing markets, including an estimation of revenues from this.

16 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

assessment of natural hazards and vulnerability

to climate change Natural hazards are defined as events that are triggered in nature and entail a risk to human life

and health or significant material assets.27 Facilities for the production of electrical energy are

exempt from the requirements of Chapters 20-25 and Chapters 27-31 of the Planning and Building

Act28. Installations for the transmission and production of electrical energy are, as far as applicable,

not exempt from the technical guidelines in the Norwegian Regulation on technical requirements

for construction works (TEK17). For the proposed project, Chapter 7 of TEK17 will define the

parameters for how protection against natural hazards is to be ensured, in addition to other

relevant legislation such as the Regulation on security and emergency preparedness in the power

supply, the Major Accident Regulation, the Energy Act, etc. For this reason, we find it necessary to

include requirements for assessments related to natural hazards in our recommendation. This also

follows from the Impact Assessment Regulation.

In addition, we require that the impact assessment must also comply with international safety

standards and requirements from the IAEA. In the wake of the Fukushima accident in 2011,

27 Cf. NVE Report 21/2023: The management regime for natural hazards in Norway – central government

responsibilities. 28 Section 4-3 of the Building Application Regulation – Lovdata

47

international recommendations relating to vulnerability to natural hazards and how climate

change can affect safety were tightened. The international standards complement the

requirements laid down in the Norwegian regulatory framework, as they require impact

assessment of a number of factors of particular relevance to a nuclear power plant. This includes,

among other things, wind phenomena, drought, loose materials entering the cooling water, etc.

The assessment programme refers to relevant documents from the IAEA.

In the recommendation, the requirement for protection against natural hazards is set at the level

stipulated in Sections 7-2 and 7-3, first paragraph, of the Norwegian Regulations on technical

requirements for construction works (TEK17). We consider that a natural disaster affecting this

proposed project could result in elevated radiation levels and serious pollution, and the

consequences of an incident could have particularly major and unacceptable consequences for

society. The requirement regarding protection against natural hazards applies to the nuclear

power plant, and the same requirement applies to associated buildings/infrastructure that are

critical to the safety and functioning of the power plant.

The consequences of climate change must also be assessed (cf. the central government planning

guidelines for climate and energy29 and the Regulation on Impact Assessment. This is explained in

more detail in the guides referred to below and in the county climate profiles that have been

prepared. The climate profiles will be an important part of the knowledge base. Consideration

must be given to whether there is a need to supplement national and regional information with

more detailed knowledge of local conditions, including previous adverse natural events.

The requirements imposed on the developer relate to how protection against natural hazards is to

be mapped and documented:

• Flooding and erosion

A river/stream runs alongside the proposed planning area that has a defined caution area

for flooding and erosion, where the maximum water level rise has been estimated to

approximately 2.8 metres (cf. NVE atlas30). The real risk of flooding and erosion must be

mapped.

To meet the requirement in Section 7-2, first paragraph, of the Norwegian Regulations on

technical requirements for construction works (TEK17), the proposed project must be sited

outside the area that will be flooded in the event of a probable maximum flood (PMF). The

method for mapping the risk of flooding and erosion must be done in accordance with NVE

Guide 3/2022.31

• Slide events in steep terrain

The proposed planning area is not within NVE’s caution areas for slide events (landslides

and avalanches) in steep terrain. A small possible rockfall detachment area (slopes lower

than 50 meters that are not captured by the caution map) has been identified through the

use of slope maps. No steep streams (over 10º) or debris fans have been identified. The real

risk of slide events in steep terrain must be mapped.

29 Central government planning guidelines for climate and energy – 1. Purpose – Lovdata. 30 https://atlas.nve.no/Html5Viewer/index.html?viewer=nveatlas. 31 NVE Guide 3/2022: Protection against flooding. Assessment of flood risk in zoning plans and building

applications.

48

Satisfactory protection against slide events and secondary effects of slide events is

specified as a greatest nominal annual probability of landslides and avalanches in Section

7-3 of the Norwegian Regulations on technical requirements for construction works

(TEK17). For first-stage measures, there must be no residual risk, and the proposed project

must be located in an area completely free of danger. The method for mapping slide events

in steep terrain must be carried out in accordance with NVE’s guidelines for assessing

safety against slide events in steep terrain.32

• Rockslides

NGU has carried out a national mapping of unstable rocks in Norway, which shows that it is

unlikely that rockslides or secondary effects following a rockslide (e.g. a displacement

wave) will affect the proposed planning area. However, it cannot be completely ruled out

based on the available data. The proposed planning area is located along a larger, regional

geological fault zone (Møre-Trøndelag fault complex), which could give rise to unstable

rock sections in the area. Given the nature of the proposed project, a more detailed

assessment of possible unstable rocks in the vicinity must be made using inSAR, terrain

models and aerial photography, with a particular focus on whether there are rocks that

could cause displacement waves that could affect the area in question.

• Quick clay landslide

The planned nuclear power plant is located in an area with the possibility of marine clay,

and an expert study must therefore be carried out to document sufficient safety against

quick clay landslides. The assessment must always be quality assured by an independent

third party. The assessment must adhere to the procedure in NVE 1/2019, and the expert

assessor must have education and experience according to the requirements in NVE

1/2019, paragraph 3.1.

The assessment must document that the nuclear power plant will be sited such that it

cannot be affected by quick clay landslides. The same requirements apply to associated

buildings/infrastructure that are critical to the safety and functioning of the power plant.

Adequate safety is documented if the assessment unambiguously shows that there is no

brittle failure material in potential release or runout areas that might affect the proposed

project, or that identified brittle failure material cannot form part of a landslide.

If the assessment identifies real danger zones that could affect the proposed project,

sufficient safety can still be achieved by physical safety measures to prevent the proposed

project from being affected by slide events.

• Safety measures to protect against natural hazards

If a protection system has to be built, it is a requirement that the system that does not

require maintenance and inspection in order for its risk-reducing effect to be maintained.

The protection system must therefore have the capacity to handle repeated slide events or

flood events without its capacity being compromised.

Even if the proposed project is to be sited in an area with no known danger, it must still be

ensured that the erection of buildings, infrastructure and interventions in the terrain will

not cause flooding and erosion conditions, the risk of slide events (landslides and

32 Assessing safety against slide events in steep terrain.

49

avalanches) and the risk of flooding to be exacerbated for others (cf. Section 7-1 second

paragraph, of the Norwegian Regulations on technical requirements for construction works

(TEK17)).

• Stormwater

Transformation of the proposed planning area from a natural area with a large proportion

of marshland to a commercial area will change the runoff pattern and groundwater level.

This could result in increased and more acute flooding in the watercourse that runs

alongside the proposed planning area, or surface water flooding in the proposed planning

area.

It must be assessed whether the proposed project can be built with satisfactory safety

against damage from stormwater without increasing the risk to third parties. The starting point must be the terrain’s natural ability to infiltrate, digest and remove large volumes of precipitation. Safe drainage of stormwater (flood paths) must be planned with sufficient capacity, all the way to the recipient (a river, lake or the sea).

17 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

assessment of other pollution and emissions

17.1 Other pollution of water and soil during operation

The requirements for assessing pollution of water and soil that are not radioactive releases (in

section 14.1 of the recommendation) follow from the Impact Assessment Regulation, and are

based on NVE’s standard requirements and the Norwegian Environment Agency and the

Directorate for Cultural Heritage’s Impact Assessment Handbook (M-1941).

The recommendation also contains a requirement for an assessment of the current pollution

situation in the area for the proposed project. In order for this investigation to be in line with

Section 17 of the Impact Assessment Regulation, it must be carried out by persons who have

knowledge of and experience in impact assessment and sampling of contaminated soil.

Any pollution of water and soil that may have negative consequences for the aquatic environment

and biodiversity in coastal and fresh waters must be used as the basis for the assessments related

to the requirements in chapter 12 (Aquatic environment and biodiversity in coastal and fresh

waters), so that an overall conclusion can be given about possible consequences for biodiversity.

17.2 Noise

It follows directly from the Impact Assessment Regulation that impacts related to noise must be

assessed. We have therefore included a requirement regarding this in section 14.2 of our

recommendation. The requirements for assessing noise are based on NVE’s standard requirements

for assessing other types of energy plants and the Norwegian Environment Agency and the

Directorate for Cultural Heritage’s Impact Assessment Handbook (M-1941).

50

18 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

assessment of visual effects, landscape, outdoor

life and cultural heritage It follows directly from the Impact Assessment Regulation that impacts related to landscapes,

outdoor recreation, cultural heritage and cultural environments must be assessed. We have

therefore included a requirement regarding this in chapter 15 of our recommendation. The

requirements are based on NVE’s standard requirements and the Norwegian Environment Agency

and the Directorate for Cultural Heritage’s Impact Assessment Handbook (M-1941). In the

assessment of impacts related to these topics, the visual effects of the proposed project are very

relevant, and visualizations showing the proposed project are also, in our opinion, important for

neighbours and the host municipalities, as well as others who are going to comment on any

applications for a licence. The requirements for visualization points have been set based on input

from the municipalities of Heim and Aure.

19 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

assessment of overarching environmental targets

and climate issues It follows directly from the Impact Assessment Regulation that impacts related to nationally and

internationally established environmental targets must be assessed. The same applies to

emissions of greenhouse gases. We have therefore included a requirement regarding this in

chapter 16 of our recommendation. The requirements for assessing climate impacts are based on

NVE’s standard requirements for assessing energy plants and the Norwegian Environment Agency

and the Directorate for Cultural Heritage’s Impact Assessment Handbook (M-1941), and must

include both positive and negative climate impacts. In addition, we have specified that expected

emissions from fuel production must be calculated.

20 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

assessment of biodiversity and the aquatic

environment It follows directly from the Impact Assessment Regulation that impacts related to biodiversity must

be assessed. We have therefore included a requirement regarding this in our recommendation. The

requirements for assessing the effects of biodiversity on land are gathered in chapter 17 of our

recommendation. These are based on NVE’s standard requirements and the Norwegian

Environment Agency and the Directorate for Cultural Heritage’s Impact Assessment Handbook (M-

1941), but supplemented with requirements relating to the effects of adverse incidents. We believe

this is necessary, because knowledge of how biodiversity can be affected by any radioactive

releases and other consequences of adverse incidents will be a relevant part of the decision-

making basis for applications for licences pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act and the Energy Act.

The requirements for assessing the aquatic environment and biodiversity in coastal and fresh

waters have been supplemented with new input from the Norwegian Environment Agency. This

51

applies, among other things, to marine habitats, where the Norwegian Environment Agency has

announced that a new instruction for mapping will be introduced in 2026. In our opinion, this

instruction should be used in the assessment work. Discharges of cooling water may have

significant effects on marine life, and marine mapping will therefore be a key part of the

biodiversity assessment.

Since 1986, DSA has carried out measurements of radioactivity in Norwegian nature. This includes

samples of soil, fungi and lichens, milk from grazing animals, and wildlife to keep track of how

radioactive substances from nuclear weapons testing in the 1950s and 60s and radioactive

contamination from the Chernobyl fallout have been absorbed into the food chain and remain in

the environment in Norway. Based on this, we have specified in the recommendation some species

that are of particular interest in terms of the impact of radioactive substances, and which must be

well mapped.

DSA currently monitors shellfish and fish in marine areas in the fjord, the sea and coastal areas.

Marine mammals may also be exposed to certain radioactive substances due to their long lifespan.

This is to keep track of how radioactive substances are absorbed in the marine ecosystem and may

be transferred to humans through the food chain. Marine mammals may also be exposed to certain

radioactive substances due to their long lifespan. Good knowledge of the current level of

radioactivity in the marine environment is relevant to the impact assessment, including as part of

the zero alternative. It will also be important in terms of monitoring doses from releases from the

nuclear power plant if a licence is granted, and for emergency preparedness purposes should an

incident occur at the plant. We therefore find that this must be assessed specifically.

21 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

assessment of public health issues It follows directly from the Impact Assessment Regulation that impacts related to consequences

for human health must be assessed. We have therefore included a requirement regarding this in

chapter 18 of our recommendation. There are more requirements than those stated in NVE’s

standard requirements for energy plants. This is mainly due to the fact that nuclear installations

entail a risk of exposure to radiation, and a different type of real and perceived risk of accident

than other types of energy plant. We believe this must be investigated and included in the

decision-making basis. The requirements for the study of public health in the recommendation are

based, among other things, on the input from the County Governor of Trøndelag and Trøndelag

County Authority to the proposed assessment programme.

22 Reasoning behind the requirements related to

assessment of other public interests

22.1 Defence interests

In its consultation response, the Ministry of Defence has requested that the impacts of a possible

serious accident for the use and operation of Ørland Air Base, which is located approximately 50

km as the crow flies from the proposed site, must be investigated, and in this connection the

“geological location of the facility” must be taken into account. In section 3.3, we have stipulated

that the assessment must include analysis of the consequences of locating a nuclear installation

close to critical national public functions, or other important infrastructure such as airports, ports,

52

hospitals, etc. In addition, we believe it is necessary to treat the interests of the Armed Forces as a

separate topic of assessment, and have therefore included this in section 19.1 of our

recommendation. The requirements are based on NVE’s standard requirements for assessing other

types of energy plants.

A nuclear power plant will pose a different type of risk than other energy facilities, and will be

designated as a critical national object in line with Section 7-1 of the Security Act.

Before a nuclear power plant can be established in Norway, we find that there must also be a

thorough assessment of the consequences of nuclear power for Norway’s defence capability, and

for Norway as a host for receiving allied troops (Host Nation Support). This must be done by

national authorities and is therefore not a requirement imposed on the developer.

22.2 Other infrastructure

Section 19.2 of the recommendation includes requirements related to a variety of topics. Based on

NVE’s standard requirements for the assessment of other types of energy plants, we believe it must

be required that the impacts on aviation and electronic communication are assessed. Based on

input from the Norwegian Coastal Administration, we have also included a requirement for

assessments of how the proposed project may affect traffic in the waters of Trondheimsleia. We

also hold that it is necessary to include a requirement that the impacts that the proposed project

might have on road traffic in the area, including effects on pedestrian and cycle paths and school

routes for children must be assessed (cf. the Impact Assessment Regulation). Trøndelag County

Authority has also highlighted the need to assess safety measures for infrastructure related to the

risk of accidents, which has been included in our recommendation.

22.3 Agriculture

It follows directly from the Impact Assessment Regulation that impacts related to soil resources

must be assessed. We have therefore included a requirement regarding this in section 19.3 of our

recommendation. The requirements in recommendation regarding assessment of the impact on

agriculture are more comprehensive than NVE’s standard requirements for assessing other types

of energy plants. The requirements are partly based on input from the Norwegian Food Safety

Authority and the County Governor of Trøndelag. We hold that it is necessary to assess how any

adverse events may affect agriculture locally, regionally and nationally, and that the developer

must describe the need for monitoring and contingency plans related to this.

Agriculture may be affected by political and market factors in addition to possible direct effects of

the nuclear installation. In our opinion, it is therefore also necessary to require an assessment of

whether the agricultural industries can be affected indirectly through, for example, import

restrictions, reduced demand or special documentation requirements.

22.4 Mineral resources

It follows directly from the Impact Assessment Regulation that impacts related to important

mineral resources must be assessed. We have therefore included a requirement regarding this in

section 15.2 of our recommendation. The requirements for assessing mineral resources are based

on NVE’s standard requirements for assessing other types of energy plants.

53

22.5 Aquaculture and fisheries

The requirements for assessing the impacts for aquaculture and fisheries in section 15.3 of the

recommendation are based on input from the Directorate of Fisheries and the Norwegian Food

Safety Authority. They are based on the planned discharge of cooling water, which could lead to

significant changes in the temperature of the seawater in the Trondheimsleia strait. In addition,

the industries may be affected by any accidents and, in the same way as the agricultural industries,

be affected indirectly through political and market factors. The Directorate of Fisheries

recommends that the industry be actively involved in the further planning and assessment work,

and we therefore find it is necessary to include a requirement regarding involvement of both local

and regional business interests and other business organizations.

22.6 Local and regional businesses and the host municipalities’

economy

In all of NVE’s assessment programmes for energy measures, there is a requirement to describe the

effects on local and regional businesses, focusing on jobs and the need for local and regional goods

and services. A nuclear power plant differs from most other types of energy project in that the

proposed project will be very extensive and will require more specialized goods and services. We

therefore hold it is necessary to require a specific assessment of whether and how local and

regional businesses can deliver sufficient goods and services.

The tourism industry may be affected both directly and indirectly by the proposed project,

including effects on the attractiveness of the area for tourists. Activities related to the nuclear

power plant can also have a positive impact on local tourism companies that supply goods and

services. We therefore hold it is necessary to include a requirement regarding an assessment of the

impact on the tourism industry.

A nuclear power plant is also an extensive intervention that will place demands on municipal

services. We therefore believe that it must be assessed whether the service offering is sufficient and

what requirements may be placed on the municipalities if the nuclear power plant is established. .

It must also be considered how the proposed project will affect the municipal economy through,

for example, property tax.

Aure næringsforum (ANF) requests that risk analyses and major accident potential with a focus on

existing regional businesses be analysed as part of the assessment. This has been taken into

account in the recommendation, through the requirement to assess the impact on local and

regional businesses, including other enterprises at Taftøy Industrial Park.

54

Appendix 1 – General

presentation of relevant

regulations In this Appendix, we describe the most relevant regulations for nuclear installations. This overview is

not exhaustive. In addition to the legislation and conventions etc. mentioned below, developers of

nuclear installations will also have to comply with other legislation, such as the Nature Diversity Act

and the Cultural Heritage Act.

1 The Nuclear Energy Act and appurtenant

regulations

1.1 General

Act no. 28 of 12 May 1972 on nuclear energy activities (the Nuclear Energy Act) The Act establishes a

licensing and permit regime, the purpose of which is to minimize risk and prevent loss of human

life and to prevent damage to health, the environment and material assets through the regulation

of nuclear installations, nuclear substances and related activities.

The Nuclear Energy Act is a framework law that authorizes the King to issue further regulations.

Four Regulations have been adopted pursuant to the Act:

• Regulation no. 1809 of 2 November 1984 on the physical protection of nuclear material and

nuclear facilities (Regulation relating to nuclear materials and facilities)

• Regulation no. 433 of 12 May 2000 on the possession, sale and transport of nuclear material

and dual-use equipment (Regulation relating to nuclear materials etc.)

• Regulation no. 1912 of 5 November 1985 on exemptions for small quantities of nuclear

substance and certain types of nuclear substance from the provisions of the Nuclear

Energy Activities Act (Regulation on exemptions from the Nuclear Energy Act).

• Regulation no. 1498 of 14 December 2001 on compensation for nuclear accidents

(Regulation on compensation for nuclear accidents).

These Regulations supplement the Nuclear Energy Act with more detailed requirements regarding

physical protection and safeguards, among other things.

1.2 Licence for nuclear installation

Section 4 of the Nuclear Energy Act states that a licence from the King is required to construct, own

or operate a nuclear installation. Section 4, second paragraph, of the Nuclear Energy Act further

stipulates that the matter must be submitted for consideration by the Storting. The provision

states that: “A licence for the construction of a nuclear power plant should not be granted before

the Storting has given its approval. The matter should be submitted to the Storting when

55

proposals for the construction site of the nuclear power plant are presented and the question of

the operator/ownership is clarified.”

According to Section 10 of the Nuclear Energy Act, DSA is the supreme competent body (“highest

specialist agency”) with regard to safety issues, and must prepare and submit recommendations

on all applications concerning licences and permits to the Ministry of Health and Care Services,

which then presents the case to the King in Council. Licences are granted subject to such

conditions as are considered necessary with regard to safety requirements and other public

interests in accordance with Section 8 of the Nuclear Energy Act, and DSA also provides a

recommendation on the specific conditions to be included in the licence.

For new nuclear installations, the Nuclear Energy Act defines a step-by-step process, where a

licence is first applied for to construct (build) the installation, and once it has been built, a licence

to operate the facility is applied for. A preliminary safety case is sufficient for an application to

construct a facility, but in good time before the nuclear installation is put into operation, the owner

must submit a complete safety analysis report on the installation pursuant to Section 11 (3) of the

Nuclear Energy Act. Before a facility is put into operation, the owner must, in addition to a licence,

have obtained authorization for operation from DSA in accordance with Section 11 (2) of the

Nuclear Energy Act .

An application for a licence pursuant to Section 7 (1) of the Nuclear Energy Act must contain

information about the details of the construction site, the purpose, nature and size of the facility,

and an account and evaluation of the facility’s safety features (safety case). Before the licence is

definitively granted, preliminary approval may be given of the construction site and other aspects

of the application for the licence (cf. Section 7 (1) of the Nuclear Energy Act).

It follows from Section 8 of the Nuclear Energy Act that the licence or permit shall be subject to

such conditions as are considered necessary with regard to safety requirements and the public

interest. DSA has prepared general licence conditions. These conditions are published in

StrålevernHefte 2018:33 and provide guidelines for what an application for a licence must contain

and for DSA’s assessments of an application. In addition, DSA has prepared a guide to the general

licence conditions in DSA booklet no. 5, which was published in 2022.

1.3 Authorization to operate

Section 11 (2) of the Nuclear Energy Act requires that the owner must have obtained authorization

from DSA before a nuclear installation is put into operation (operational authorization). Before

granting such authorization, DSA must be satisfied that:

• The technical standards of the installation, the operating regulations, safety measures and

emergency preparedness plans are sound.

• The management and personnel of the installation have the necessary qualifications and

clearly defined areas of responsibility.

• A guarantee has been provided pursuant to Section 35 of the Nuclear Energy Activities Act

(cf. Section 37).

• All the necessary authorizations have been obtained from the competent authorities in

accordance with other applicable legislation.

56

1.4 Safety case

A safety case for a nuclear installation must describe in detail how the safety of the facility will be

safeguarded throughout all phases of the life cycle of the facility33. The report is a comprehensive

document that describes all relevant safety aspects and measures to ensure that the facility can be

operated safely and securely. The report must document that the nuclear installation meets all the

safety requirements. A preliminary safety case is sufficient for an application for construction, but

the owner must submit a complete safety case for the facility in good time before the nuclear

installation is put into operation. The requirements for the safety case will also change when the

facility is to be closed down and decommissioned.

The safety case will contain, among other things, technical descriptions of the facility, safety

analyses, descriptions of vulnerabilities and risk factors, measures to be taken to minimize risk,

operating regulations, contingency plans to handle any incidents at the facility, and presentation

of the necessary expertise and personnel. The safety case will also provide an assessment of

defence-in-depth, including how to handle deviations from normal operations, detect and correct

any safety-related deviations from normal operations and describe active and passive safety

barriers including physical measures. The report will also assess different degrees of protection

and physical barriers to isolate radioactive material. Other measures to support defence in depth

must also be identified in a safety case, including accounts for safety margins in the design and

operation of the facility and describing how cascade effects34 can be avoided.

The IAEA has guidance on the content of a safety case, which can be found in the IAEA’s “Format

and Content of the Safety Analysis Report for Nuclear Power Plants” (SSG-61). The requirements

regarding the content of a safety case will depend on the various stages of development of a

nuclear installation, from construction, to operation and later decommissioning and dismantling

of the facility.

Appendix 2 “Summary of assessments needed through the lifetime of nuclear power plants”

summarizes the assessments that will be required at the various different stages in the life cycle of

the installation.

2 The Energy Act

2.1 Licence

In order to build, operate and own a nuclear power plant, a licence is required pursuant to the

Energy Act. In addition to the nuclear power plant itself requiring a licence, the power plant’s

connection to the grid also requires a licence pursuant to the Energy Act. The Ministry of Energy is

the competent authority for licensing processes for nuclear power plants pursuant to the Energy

33 The stages or phases in the life cycle of a nuclear installation include: concept selection, site selection,

construction, commissioning, operation, decommissioning and release from regulatory control; see page 76

of “Strategy for safe, secure and responsible management of radioactive waste in Norway”. 34 At a nuclear installation, a “cascade effect” is an incident where a small disturbance or change in one

safety system leads to a series of subsequent, more serious incidents or impacts.. It can start out quite minor,

but grow to have major, significant consequences for the safety of the facility.

57

Act. NVE is the competent authority for licensing processes for power lines and other grid

infrastructure.

In the licensing process pursuant to the Energy Act, the energy authorities assess whether the

specific plant is socio-economically rational. A nuclear power plant and the associated grid

connection can only be granted a licence pursuant to the Energy Act if the benefits to society are

considered to outweigh the disadvantages.

Licensing processes for nuclear power plants pursuant to the Energy Act start with a notification

with a proposal for an assessment programme, before the competent authority establishes an

assessment programme that must be completed before the developer can apply for a licence. The

impact assessment must be attached to the application for a licence pursuant to the Energy Act.

A nuclear power plant will be on such a scale that it will be necessary to take measures in the

regional grid, and possibly also in the transmission grid. The regional grid owner or Statnett must

therefore apply for a licence for grid infrastructure to connect the power plant to the grid. As part

of the preparatory work for a licence application, the grid company must carry out a concept

evaluation and selection study in accordance with the Regulation on assessments of energy needs.

If the developer of the nuclear power plant is also going to build and operate its own high-voltage

grid infrastructure, they must apply for a licence for these systems.

Power lines with a voltage of more than 132 kV and a length of 50 kilometres must have a separate

notification with a proposal for an assessment programme. For shorter lines/lines with lower

voltage levels, the licensing process starts with an application with an impact assessment.

The energy authorities can set a number of requirements for the licence applications, in addition to

the requirements for impact assessments set out in the assessment programme. While there are

guidelines for applications for a licence pursuant to the Energy Act for most other types of energy

plant, there are currently no such guidelines for applications for a nuclear power plant.

If a licence is granted, the developer may be required to prepare a detailed plan that must be

approved by the licensing authority before the nuclear power plant can be built. It is standard

practice in energy cases that NVE’s environmental supervision follows up the detailed plan during

the construction and operating period.

When the Ministry of Energy (ED) or NVE grants a licence pursuant to the Energy Act to build, own

or operate an electrical installation, it is the regulations administered by DSB that set the technical

requirements to ensure that the installation is able to withstand expected stresses and function as

intended.

2.2 Regulation on security and emergency preparedness in the

power supply

The Regulation on security and emergency preparedness in the power supply stipulates

requirements for facilities that are of significant importance to the power supply, and for the

companies that own and operate them. The requirements are set to ensure that the power supply

is maintained and that normal supply is restored in an efficient and safe manner during and after

extraordinary situations to reduce the impacts for society.

The Regulation includes requirements regarding:

58

• An internal emergency response organization and coordination with the Power Supply

Emergency Preparedness Organization to ensure effective handling of extraordinary

situations.

• Risk assessment and management to identify which extraordinary incidents the facility and

enterprise may be exposed to, and implement preventive measures.

• Contingency planning and exercises to be prepared to handle extraordinary incidents

efficiently.

• Repair preparedness in the form of secure access to the necessary spare parts and

materials, equipment and means of transport to effectively restore facilities and systems in

the event of failure of critical components.

• Access to expertise and personnel to ensure sound operation, efficient repair and handling

of extraordinary situations.

• Information security to protect information that could be used to harm the facility or

otherwise affect the security of supply.

• Connectivity that provides robust and redundant communication channels to ensure

efficient handling of extraordinary situations.

• Securing of digital information systems that may be of significant importance to operations

and constitute a vulnerability as a gateway to operational control systems.

• Securing of operational control systems to protect against physical and electronic adverse

events that may prevent monitoring, control and restoration of the energy supply. This

includes physical and logical protection, staffing, redundancy, personal risk assessment, as

well as requirements for the control and restriction of people accessing the systems.

• Design and equipment of the facility to protect against and limit the consequences of

deliberate adverse events and unintentional adverse incidents. This includes physical

protection against attacks, fire safety, detection, alerting and verification of adverse

incidents, backup power systems and redundancy in the facility.

As an emergency preparedness authority pursuant to the Energy Act, NVE has the power to require

different or additional security measures through an individual decision.

The Regulation classifies facilities and operational control systems into three categories, based on

their importance to the power supply. The highest class is class 3, and these facilities are subject to

the most stringent safety and redundancy requirements in the Regulation.

The Regulation’s requirements are currently not adapted to nuclear power plants. With the current

requirements, the nuclear power plant planned at Taftøy Industrial Park will automatically be

classified in class 2, pursuant to section 5-2, eighth paragraph, letter a of the Regulation, but NVE

will, based on the size and characteristics of the facility, consider classifying the plant in class 3,

pursuant to section 5-7.

2.3 Cost–benefit analysis for surplus heat

Section 7-2 of the Energy Act requires a developer to carry out a cost–benefit analysis of the

possibilities for utilizing surplus heat when planning thermal power plants with a total installed

thermal capacity of more than 20 MW. A nuclear power plant will fall under this provision and will

be obliged to obtain an approved cost–benefit analysis before construction begins (cf. Section 7-4,

first paragraph, first sentence). In an individual decision, the Ministry may stipulate that a plant

may not be built or upgraded without utilization of the surplus heat, if the cost–benefit analysis

shows that the benefits of this are greater than the costs. Implementation, approval and follow-up

59

of the cost–benefit analysis are specified in the Regulation on cost–benefit analysis of

opportunities to utilize surplus heat.

3 The Planning and Building Act and appurtenant

regulations

3.1 Impact assessment

Nuclear power plants and other nuclear reactors, as well as facilities intended for the disposal of

irradiated nuclear fuel, facilities intended exclusively for the disposal of radioactive waste, and

facilities intended exclusively for the storage (planned to last more than 10 years) of irradiated

nuclear fuel or radioactive waste at a location other than the production site must be impact

assessed in accordance with Section 6, first paragraph (c) of the Impact Assessment Regulation (cf.

Appendix I). The same applies to the decommissioning and closing down of nuclear power plants

and other nuclear reactors.

The purpose of this Regulation is to ensure that consideration is given to the environment and that

society is taken into account when the competent authority is to decide whether plans or

measures can be implemented, and if so under what conditions.

The requirements for the content of an impact assessment are set out in Chapter 5 of the Impact

Assessment Regulation. Key provisions are that the content and scope of the impact assessment

must be adapted to the specific proposed project and be relevant to the decisions to be made.

Impact assessments for nuclear power plants must be prepared in accordance with the

assessment programme established by the competent authority.

For nuclear power plants in particular, the impact assessment will form a key part of the decision-

making basis for applications for a licence pursuant to the Nuclear Energy Act and the Energy Act.

3.2 Plan processing

The municipality is the local planning authority under the Planning and Building Act, and is

responsible for preparing a municipal plan with a community section and an area section, and for

processing and adopting zoning plans. Facilities that are processed pursuant to the Energy Act are

exempt from certain requirements in the Planning and Building Act. Section 12-1, third paragraph,

of the Planning and Building Act stipulates that no zoning plan is required for facilities for the

production of energy that require a licence pursuant to the Energy Act.

However, a nuclear power plant cannot be built in conflict with municipal plans. If the construction

of a nuclear power plant is not in line with approved land use pursuant to the Planning and

Building Act, planning permission must be applied for the proposed project. Plan clarification can,

for example, take place through zoning or dispensation from the current plan status. Since power

generation facilities that are regulated pursuant to the Energy Act are exempt from the obligation

to have or prepare a zoning plan, the municipalities cannot require the developer to pay for a

zoning plan.

60

4 The Radiation Protection Act and appurtenant

Regulation

4.1 General

Nuclear facilities will be subject to Act no. 36 of 12 May 2000 on Radiation Protection and Use of

Radiation (the Radiation Protection Act), which regulates the use of ionizing and non-ionizing

radiation, radiation protection, medical use of radiation and emergency preparedness planning.

The purpose of the Radiation Protection Act is to prevent the harmful effects of radiation on

human health and contribute to the protection of the environment. Section 2 of the Radiation

Protection Act states that it applies to any production, import, export, transport, transfer,

possession, installation, use, handling and waste management of radiation sources, and to human

activities that result in increased levels of naturally ionizing radiation from the environment.

Regulation no. 1659 of 16 December 2016 on radiation protection and the use of radiation (the

Radiation Protection Regulation) supplements the Act with more detailed requirements for the

procurement, handling and use of both open and sealed radioactive sources. The regulations

governing radiation protection include rules on occupational exposure to ionizing radiation, which

will be relevant to employees at nuclear installations.

4.2 Authorization and possible exemption from the Radiation

Protection Act

According to DSA’s management practice, unused fuel in the form of encapsulated fuel rods is

regarded as encapsulated radioactive sources. Spent nuclear fuel, fuel that is not encapsulated

and activated materials may be considered open radioactive sources. Spent nuclear fuel will in all

cases count as radioactive waste.

According to Section 9 of the Radiation Protection Regulation, authorization from DSA is required

for various activities that involve ionizing radiation, and this will be applicable to nuclear

installations.

The nuclear installations that are established today are exempt from fulfilling some of the

provisions of the Radiation Protection Regulation, because the nature of the nuclear installations

means that the requirements cannot be met. Newly established nuclear power plants will also

need to apply for exemption from some of the requirements. DSA is the supervisory authority

pursuant to the Radiation Protection Act and the Radiation Protection Regulation, (cf. Section 18 of

the Radiation Protection Act). This means that DSA can make necessary decisions in individual

cases, including demanding rectification, shutdown and coercive fines. DSA has also published

guides that describe and clarify the provisions of the Radiation Protection Act and the Radiation

Protection Regulation.

61

5 The Pollution Control Act and appurtenant

regulations

5.1 General

The purpose of Act no. 6 of March 13, 1981 concerning protection against pollution and concerning

waste (the Pollution Control Act) is to protect the outdoor environment against pollution and to

reduce existing pollution, to reduce the quantity of waste and to promote better waste

management. Pollution is defined in Section 6 of the Pollution Control Act as

• the introduction of solids, liquids or gases to air, water or ground

• noise and vibrations

• light and other radiation to the extent determined by the pollution control authority

• effects of temperature

The Pollution Control Act has been made applicable to radioactive pollution and radioactive waste

through Regulation no. 1394 of 1 November 2010 on the application of the Pollution Control Act to

radioactive pollution and radioactive waste (Regulation on radioactive pollution and waste). This

means that the Pollution Control Act applies to all radioactive pollution and all radioactive waste

from nuclear installations.

In addition, Chapter 16 of Regulation no. 930 of 1 June 2004 on the recycling and treatment of

waste (the Waste Regulation) regulates the management of radioactive waste. The chapter lays

down rules to ensure that radioactive waste is handled responsibly and contains separate rules for

the export and import of radioactive waste. Regulation no. 931 of 1 June 2004 on pollution control

(the Pollution Control Regulation) establishes rules for applications for pollution permits and other

administrative provisions for radioactive pollution and waste.

Section 36A-10 of the Pollution Control Regulation requires the party responsible for operation to

ensure that surplus energy is utilized internally as far as possible. Furthermore, the Regulation

requires that the party responsible for operation, through measures in its own area, must facilitate

the external utilization of surplus energy, unless it can be demonstrated that this is not technically

possible or would entail disproportionately high costs.

5.2 Licensing process for radioactive pollution and waste

Any activity that may lead to radioactive pollution must apply for a permit pursuant to Section 11

of the Pollution Control Act. The operation of a nuclear power plant may lead to radioactive

pollution in the form of emissions to air and water, and therefore requires a permit pursuant to the

Pollution Control Act. A permit must be obtained before the polluting activities can be

commenced.

Sections 16-5 and 16-6 of the Waste Regulation require that anyone handling radioactive waste

must have a permit. In a permit to handle radioactive waste, DSA will set conditions to ensure safe

handling of the waste. The Regulation on radioactive pollution and waste defines limit values for

radioactive waste in Norway.

Nuclear power plants in operation will generate radioactive waste that requires special handling

and disposal, and a permit must be applied for in accordance with the Waste Regulation.

62

5.3 Permit process for other pollution

Activities with pollution that is not lawfully permitted pursuant to Sections 8 or 9 of the Pollution

Control Act must have a permit from the pollution control authority. For pollution that is not

radioactive, the relevant pollution control authority may be the Norwegian Environment Agency,

the County Governor or the local municipal authority.

6 The Security Act The purpose of the Security Act (Act relating to national security) is to protect Norway’s

sovereignty, territorial integrity and democratic system of government, and other national security

interests. It applies to both public and private enterprises that have an impact on national security,

including those that manage critical infrastructure. It regulates preventive security measures to

protect national security interests.

In Section 1 of the Regulation on the physical protection of nuclear material and nuclear facilities,

it is stated that nuclear material and nuclear facilities covered by the Regulation are to be regarded

as objects of critical national importance. The Regulation refers to the fact that the (former)

Security Act and Regulations issued pursuant thereto apply to legal entities covered by the

Regulation. Any nuclear power plant will fall within the scope of the Regulation. According to

Section 7-1, second paragraph, of the (current) Security Act, the ministries are responsible for

designating, classifying and maintaining an overview of critical national objects and infrastructure.

7 The Civil Protection Act

7.1 General

The purpose of the Civil Protection Act is to protect life, health, the environment, material assets

and critical infrastructure through the use of non-military means in the most serious incidents we

might face, such as when the realm is at war, war is imminent, or when the independence or

security of the realm is in danger. However, the Act also applies to adverse incidents in peacetime.

These are incidents that deviate from the norm and have led to or may lead to loss of life or

damage to health, the environment, material assets and critical infrastructure.

Critical infrastructure is defined in the Act as facilities, systems or parts thereof that are necessary

to maintain central societal functions, human health, safety, security and economic or social

welfare and where disruption or destruction of these could have significant consequences.

The Act contains both general provisions on the Norwegian Civil Defence and their tasks, the duties

of municipal authorities, municipal duties in respect of emergency preparedness, and civil

protection measures.

7.2 Municipal duties in respect of emergency preparedness

The Civil Protection Act sets requirements for the municipal authority as an emergency response

authority. Section 14 requires, among other things, that municipal authorities must map the

adverse incidents that may occur in the municipality. The municipal authority must assess the

likelihood of these events occurring and how the events may affect the municipality. The results of

this work must be assessed and compiled in a comprehensive risk and vulnerability analysis. This

comprehensive risk and vulnerability analysis must be updated in the event of changes in the risk

63

and vulnerability situation, and it must form the basis for the municipal authority’s work on civil

protection and emergency preparedness in all sectors. The establishment of a nuclear power plant

could change the risks and vulnerabilities in the municipality.

The requirements for the content of the comprehensive risk and vulnerability analysis that is to be

carried out pursuant to the Civil Protection Act are specified in more detail in the Regulation on

municipal duties in respect of emergency preparedness35 and appurtenant guidelines36. This states

that the municipal authority must, among other things, ensure that private-sector players are

invited to contribute to the work on the analysis. If a need for further detailed analyses is

identified, the municipal authority must either carry out additional analyses or get other relevant

parties to perform them.

According to Section 15 of the Civil Protection Act, the municipal authority must prepare an

emergency preparedness plan based on the comprehensive risk and vulnerability analysis. The

emergency preparedness plan must contain an overview of the measures the municipal authority

has prepared to deal with adverse incidents. If the municipal risk and vulnerability analysis

determines that an activity poses a particular risk to the surroundings, it can be ordered to

establish and pay for its own arrangements for alerting the general public pursuant to Section 16 of

the Civil Protection Act. No specific criteria have been drawn up for when it may be relevant to use

this provision, but it is stated in the Civil Defence Regulation37 that DSB can order an enterprise to

establish an alerting system of this nature.

7.3 Self-protection

Pursuant to Section 23 of the Civil Protection Act, enterprises can be required to prepare and

implement necessary self-protection measures against adverse incidents. This provision is further

elaborated on through the Industrial Protection Regulation38. The Ministry of Justice and Public

Security has appointed39 the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise (NHO) through the Norwegian

Industrial Safety Organization (NSO) to supervise compliance with the Civil Protection Act

pursuant to Section 23 and provisions issued pursuant thereto. NSO’s regulatory role is followed

up by DSB.

Nuclear power plant operations are not currently listed in any of the industry codes that are

obliged to have an industrial safety system if they employ a minimum of 40 employees, but in

Section 2, fourth paragraph, the Regulation authorizes NSO to order other enterprises to establish

an industrial safety system when this is deemed necessary based on the enterprise’s risk or

location.

35 Regulation no. 894 of 22 August 2011 on municipal duties in respect of emergency preparedness 36 Guide to the Regulation on municipal duties in respect of emergency preparedness:

https://www.dsb.no/siteassets/rapporter-og-

publikasjoner/veileder/veileder_til_forskrift_om_kommunal_beredskapsplikt.pdf 37 Regulation no. 253 of 14 February 2022 on civil defence 38 Regulation no. 1434 of 20 December 2011 on industrial protection 39 Regulation no. 329 of 16 April 2012 on the designation of supervisory authority pursuant to Section 23 of

the Civil Protection Act

64

8 The Norwegian Fire and Explosion Protection Act

8.1 General

The purpose of the Norwegian Fire and Explosion Protection Act is to safeguard human life, health,

the environment and material assets against fire, explosion, accidents involving hazardous

substances and dangerous goods and other acute accidents, as well as deliberate adverse events.

This is the main piece of legislation on protection against fire and explosion. It stipulates

obligations for both private individuals and businesses and sets requirements for the

implementation of fire and explosion protection work at central and local levels. The Act also

contains obligations concerning accident and injury prevention related to the handling of

hazardous substances and the transport of dangerous goods by road and rail, as well as

requirements for emergency preparedness and response to acute accidents where the fire service

has a duty to respond.

The Fire and Explosion Prevention Act also regulates the municipal authorities’ duties and powers,

including the duty to establish and operate a fire and rescue service. The preparatory works to the

Fire and Explosion Prevention Act do not mention nuclear emergency preparedness explicitly as a

task for the fire and rescue service. However, the fire and rescue service shall be an emergency

response force in the event of other acute accidents (cf. kommuneROS) and carry out specific tasks

in war and crisis situations. These tasks are not currently defined.

The fire and rescue service is a central part of the basic preparedness and the most decentralized

emergency service in Norway, due to its municipal organization. Due to the requirements

regarding response times, they arrive at the scene of the incident very quickly. There are 193 fire

and rescue services in Norway, consisting of approximately 12,000 employees: 4,200 full-time

employees and 7,800 part-time employees.

However, there are major differences in the capacity and organization of the fire and rescue

services. Approximately 90 fire and rescue services have less than one full-time equivalent, while

the 12 largest fire and rescue services employ more than 50 full-time equivalents each to be able to

perform their emergency response and preparedness tasks. The basis for organization, staffing and

equipment is the minimum requirements in the Fire and Explosion Protection Act and appurtenant

Regulations, and the municipal authority’s comprehensive risk and vulnerability analysis pursuant

to the Civil Protection Act. The fire and rescue service is tailored to local needs, based on

peacetime and normal conditions.

The municipal authority’s responsibility for the fire and rescue service, and their tasks, are mainly

regulated in Section 11 of the Fire and Explosion Prevention Act and appurtenant Regulations. The

main task is to carry out fire prevention tasks and to act as a responder in the event of a fire.

However, the fire and rescue service must also act as an emergency response force in the event of

other acute accidents where this is determined on the basis of the municipality’s risk and

vulnerability analysis.

8.2 Measures to prevent fire, explosion and other accidents

Pursuant to Section 6 of the Fire and Explosion Prevention Act, the owner of a nuclear power plant

is obliged to ensure that necessary safety measures are taken to prevent and limit fire, explosions

or other accidents. The duty is primarily related to ensuring that the object etc. has the necessary

safety measures, but it is also related to taking active action during a fire, explosion or accident to

65

limit the damage. Consequently, there will be a need for both technical and organizational

measures. Sections 4 and 5 of the Fire Prevention Regulation40 specify the owner’s preventive

duties in more detail. These include requirements relating to knowledge of fire safety in buildings

and requirements relating to inspections and maintenance of safety devices in buildings.

In general, there is a requirement that all buildings must be designed and constructed so that, in

the event of a fire, satisfactory safety is achieved for people in or on the building, for material

assets, and for the environment and society. However, these requirements are managed by the

Norwegian Building Authority (DIBK).

The obligation to carry out systematic health, safety and environmental work is laid down in

Section 8 of the Fire and Explosion Prevention Act, and is further elaborated on in underlying

Regulations, including the Internal Control Regulation41. According to the Norwegian Internal

Control Regulation, enterprises must identify hazards and problems and, on this basis, assess risk,

and prepare appurtenant plans and measures to reduce these risk factors. Pursuant to Section 19

of the Fire and Explosion Prevention Act, enterprises have a duty to ensure that safety in relation to

fire and explosion, etc. is followed up in a proper manner. Safety considerations must be

integrated into all phases of the enterprise, from planning and design to establishment, operation

and decommissioning.

According to Section 13 of the Act, the municipality must identify and keep records of special fire

objects, which may include buildings or businesses where a fire could lead to the loss of many lives

or cause great damage to health, the environment or material assets. The municipal authority

decides which enterprises are encompassed by Section 13, but DSB assumes that nuclear power

plants would be covered by Section 13.

Enterprises covered by Section 13 are subject to supervision by the fire and rescue service. The

inspection focuses on the enterprise’s own systems and procedures for preventing fires, and the

enterprise itself must document that systems have been established that adequately ensure

compliance with the Fire and Explosion Prevention Act and appurtenant Regulations.

According to Section 14, first paragraph, of the Act, the municipality may, in individual cases,

impose necessary fire protection measures for any building, storage facilities, areas, etc.

8.3 Emergency preparedness and response

According to Section 9 of the Fire and Explosion Prevention Act, the municipality must ensure the

establishment and operation of a fire and rescue service that can carry out preventive and

emergency response tasks in accordance with the Act in an effective and safe manner. To ensure

that the fire and rescue service is best adapted to the tasks they may face, the municipality must

carry out a risk and vulnerability analysis. This is elaborated on in the Fire and Rescue Service

Regulation42, where Chapter 2 states that the municipal authority must organize, staff and equip

40 Regulation no. 1710 of 17 December 2015 on fire prevention 41 Regulation no. 1127 of 6 December 1996 relating to systematic health, environmental and safety activities

in enterprises 42 Regulation no. 2755 of 15 September 2021 on the organization, staffing and equipment of the fire and

rescue service and emergency call centres

66

the fire and rescue service on the basis of a risk and vulnerability analysis, prevention analysis and

emergency preparedness analysis. Section 7 of the Regulation states that the fire and rescue

service must coordinate its risk and vulnerability analysis with the municipal authority’s

comprehensive risk and vulnerability analysis pursuant to Section 14 of the Civil Protection Act.

The nuclear power plant’s own risk assessment will be important for the municipal authority’s

basic preparedness and the organization of the fire and rescue service.

Pursuant to Section 14 of the Fire and Explosion Prevention Act, DSB may order the owner of any

building, storage facility, area, etc. that is considered to pose an extraordinary risk in the

municipality to establish its own fire and accident preparedness, or to pay for and maintain a

necessary upgrading of the municipal fire service. This provision assumes that the enterprise itself

will cover the costs of any need for increased preparedness.

According to Section 15 of the Fire and Explosion Prevention Act, municipal authorities must

cooperate on local and regional solutions for preventive and emergency preparedness and

response tasks with a view to ensuring the best possible use of the combined resources.

8.4 The handling of hazardous substances

The Fire and Explosion Protection Act regulates the handling of hazardous substances that are

categorized as flammable, explosive, pressurized or reactive pursuant to Section 4. The Act also

regulates the transport of dangerous goods by road and rail. Dangerous goods include all possible

goods that are defined as dangerous goods in the UN recommendations on the transport of

dangerous goods.

Pursuant to Section 19 of the Fire and Explosion Prevention Act, enterprises have a special duty to

ensure that safety in relation to fire, explosion, handling of hazardous substances and transport of

dangerous goods by road and rail is followed up in a proper manner. Safety considerations must

be integrated into all phases of the enterprise, from planning and design to establishment,

operation and decommissioning.

According to Section 20 of the Act, enterprises that handle hazardous substances or dangerous

goods must ensure that they are handled in such a way that people, the environment and the

surroundings are satisfactorily safeguarded by reducing the risk to a level that can reasonably be

achieved. This means that an assessment must be made of the costs associated with reducing the risk, compared with the safety benefit achieved. The cut-off point is ideally where the costs associated with additional technical or organizational measures to marginally reduce the risk are unreasonably high. Priority must be given to measures to reduce the risk to people. More detailed criteria for what constitutes acceptable risk are set out in Regulations.

According to the law, the satisfactory level of security must primarily be established through

technical and organizational measures in the enterprise. For the handling of certain types of

substances, however, this will not be sufficient to ensure an adequate level of safety, and land-use

restrictions must be established in areas surrounding the enterprise. Section 20 of the Fire and

Explosion Prevention Act states that such restrictions must be determined in accordance with the

provisions of the Planning and Building Act.

The handling of hazardous substances and transport of dangerous goods by road and rail are

further elaborated on in Regulations. Radioactive material does not fall under the definition of a

hazardous substance, but it is classified as dangerous goods. Section 30 of the Regulation on the

67

transport of dangerous goods by road and rail43 states that DSA is the technical and supervisory

authority for radioactive material in class 7.

The Regulation on the handling of hazardous substances44 regulates both the handling of

hazardous substances and the equipment and facilities, including pipelines and other associated

systems, used in their handling. Requirements are set for the design, construction, manufacture,

sale, installation, operation, modification, repair, maintenance and inspection of equipment and

facilities used in the handling of hazardous substances. There is also a requirement that the people

who perform these tasks must have the necessary expertise.

According to Section 17 of the Regulation, consent from DSB is required if an enterprise handles

hazardous substances in such large quantities that it is covered by the Major Accident Regulation45.

The Major Accident Regulation does not apply to radioactive substances or other sources of

ionizing radiation. However, radioactive substances are covered by the Regulation on the handling

of hazardous substances if they are pressurized and qualify as a pressurized substance. It is then

the risk associated with the pressurization that is the basis for the Regulation to apply, and not the

radiation hazard. The Regulation is currently being revised, and a clarification has been proposed

so that the Regulation does not regulate components, equipment or containers that are

specifically designed for nuclear use and which, in the event of a malfunction, may cause

radioactive releases.

Section 17, fourth paragraph, of the Regulation on the handling of hazardous substances allows

DSB to decide in special cases that enterprises that do not qualify as a major-accident enterprise

are to be covered by the requirement for consent, if the location and design of the enterprise and

the handling of hazardous substances so indicate. The requirement to obtain consent is based on

DSB wanting to ensure that the interests of third parties are satisfactorily safeguarded and that

adverse incidents do not lead to major consequences for society.

Section 14 of the Regulation states that the enterprise must identify hazards and problems with

regard to the handling of hazardous substances and, based on this, assess the risk. The assessment

must include both internal and external factors, including deliberate adverse actions. Based on

these assessments, plans must be developed and measures implemented to reduce the risk to an

acceptable level.

The technical solutions chosen for nuclear power plants will determine whether parts of the plant

will be pressurized with components, equipment or containers that are not specifically designed

for nuclear use. If a complex plant is established for the production of hot water or steam, which,

combined with other associated risks, poses a risk to the environment, DSB may decide that

consent must be obtained for various parts of the plant. Among other things, the developer has

proposed that heat generated from the nuclear power plant can be used to improve the efficiency

of hydrogen and ammonia production. DSB’s practice is that certain facilities or activities involving

hydrogen and ammonia may be subject to a requirement for consent.

43 Regulation no. 384 of 1 April 2009 on the transport of dangerous goods by road and rail 44 Regulation no. 602 of 8 June 2009 on the handling of flammable, reactive and pressurized substances as

well as equipment and facilities used in such handling 45 Regulation no. 569 of 3 June 2016 on measures to prevent and limit the consequences of major accidents

in enterprises where hazardous chemicals are present

68

9 The Act relating to supervision of electrical

installations and equipment The Act relating to supervision of electrical installations and equipment regulates both electrical

installations and electrical equipment. Electrical installations must be designed, constructed,

operated, maintained and monitored in such a way that they do not pose a danger life, health and

material assets. Electrical equipment must be in such a condition that, when in use, it does not

pose a danger life, health and material assets.

The Act is supplemented by a number of Regulations. Several of the Regulations are designed with

functional requirements that specify the hazards to be protected against and the level of safety

that must be achieved. National and international standards can be used as a method to meet the

requirements of the Regulation. However, the Regulations governing low-voltage electrical

installations and electrical supply systems contain specific technical requirements. Requirements

are set for the design, operation and maintenance of the installations. The requirements in the

technical regulations apply to all phases of the installation’s lifetime, from design, construction,

operation and maintenance.

A prerequisite for a high level of electrical safety is that the people who carry out work related to

electrical installations and equipment have the necessary qualifications and expertise. In Norway,

the electrical professions are therefore regulated by law, and specific qualification requirements

are set in the regulatory framework. People who have their education and professional experience

from Norway are by virtue of this qualified to exercise an electrical profession in Norway. This

applies to Norwegian citizens, EEA citizens and third-country nationals. However, people who have

their education and professional experience from another country, and who want to establish

themselves in Norway, must apply to DSB for recognition of their professional qualifications in

order to continue practising the profession in Norway. Applications are processed in accordance

with the legislation on recognition of professional qualifications46.

The legislation on supervision of electrical installations and equipment will be an important

regulatory framework for the electrical safety of nuclear power plants, as they are likely to have

extensive electrical installations for power generation, control systems and emergency power

supply. With the exception of the requirements for recognition of professional qualifications,

however, no authorization from DSB is required pursuant to the Act relating to supervision of

electrical installations and equipment.

10 International conventions, agreements and

standards

10.1 International conventions

Norway is a signatory to a number of international conventions and agreements relating to nuclear

safety, security, safeguards and the management of radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel. In

addition, there are conventions on the protection of the environment, international notification

and assistance, transport, and liability for nuclear damage. In order for the rules in international

46 Act no. 69 of 16 June 2017 relating to recognition of professional qualifications and appurtenant

Regulations

69

conventions to apply to the licensees, they must have been implemented in Norwegian

regulations, and the obligations that are exclusively relevant to nuclear installations are mainly

implemented in the Nuclear Energy Act, the Radiation Protection Act or the Pollution Control Act

and appurtenant Regulations.

10.2 IAEA and its Safety Standards

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has developed Safety Standards and the Nuclear

Security Series, which reflect international consensus on the requirements that must be met to

ensure safety and protect people and the environment from the harmful effects of ionizing

radiation. The Safety Standards are used by both regulators and licensees to promote safety and

make it easier for enterprises to demonstrate, and for regulators to verify, that nuclear facilities are

being operated safely and that there is a focus on safety.

The general licence conditions and appurtenant guidelines described above are largely based on

the IAEA’s Safety Standards. As a supervisory authority, DSA will consider the licensee and the

safety of the proposed project against the IAEA’s Safety Standards in all its assessments, including

the processing of applications for a licence. If the licensee follows and complies with all relevant

requirements in the IAEA’s Safety Standards, there will be a presumption that the requirements in

or pursuant to the Norwegian regulations are also met.

It will also be in the licensee’s interest to meet all relevant requirements in the IAEA’s Safety

Standards, because this will ensure that the licensee maintains safety in an acceptable manner. If

relevant requirements in the Safety Standards are not met, it is unlikely that operations are sound

and adequate safety is ensured. In that case, it could be difficult for the enterprise to document

that safety can still be regarded as adequately safeguarded.

It is a fundamental principle that the licensee is responsible for safety at the nuclear installation.

This also entails an obligation to keep abreast of international developments and ensure

compliance with the latest version of the IAEA’s Safety Standards. In addition to the IAEA’s Safety

Standards, the IAEA’s standards for security and safeguards (the “Nuclear Security Series”) will also

be relevant.

The structure of the IAEA’s Safety Standards series provides a practical overview of the most

important aspects of safety, particularly in terms of assessments of safety and consequences that

need to be taken into account in connection with nuclear installations. Appendix 2 “Summary of

assessments needed through lifetime of nuclear power plants” summarizes the assessments that

will be required at the various different stages.

Appendix 2 – Summary of assessments needed through the lifetime of nuclear power plants

Subject

General licence conditions

IAEA recommended requirements

Assessments needed…

For site selection For construction licence application For operating licence application During commissioning and operation

Management 2, 4, 7, 10, 15, 16, 20

GSR Part 2 A management system for site survey and evaluation activities

A management system applied to site characterization and facility design and suitable for construction, including quality assurance and working procedures

Established leadership, integrated management system and culture for safety

Application of leadership, integrated management system and culture for safety, updated on the basis of experience, feedback and continuous improvement

Site evaluation SSR-1 Screening assessment to identify natural and human induced external hazards that could affect the safety of the nuclear installation. (e.g. seismic assessment, tsunami risk, climate change, industrial development) Assessment of the interactions between the site and the proposed facility(-ies) to inform the facility safety case for operational states and accident conditions over the lifetime of the facility(-ies), and provide input to the reactor technology assessment (and later site-specific safety case)

Full safety assessment of proposed site for proposed design

Updated assessment of site with facility as built

Safety assessment 6, 18, 22 GSR Part 4 Screening or outline assessments of factors in this column, including possible conflicts between factors or measures (and with other factors or measures addressed in the impact assessment programme)

Assessment of all aspects of site and design safety and all plans, programmes and systems in this column

Assessment of all aspects of safety and all plans, programmes and systems in this column (SAR)

Updates of relevant assessments to reflect experience and incidents from operation or changes in the facility, procedures or technology. Periodic safety review (and associated reassessment) at defined periods or when instructed

Specific reports Generic safety report from reactor designer

Site-specific preliminary safety report(s)

Pre-construction safety report (PCSR)

Commissioning safety report

Operational safety case

Radiation protection 12, 8, 13, 17 GSR Part 3 Screening assessment of site- specific factors affecting potential doses to the public from any releases of radionuclides during operation and in the event of an accident or incident

Evaluation of measures in design to reduce doses to workers (ALARA) and radioactive releases (BAT) Generic or bounding assessment of potential doses to the public from any releases of radionuclides during operation and in the event of an accident or incident

Full radiation protection programme for workers in the facility and public outside the facility, in operation and in the event of an accident or incident

Updates of programme to reflect experience and incidents from operation or changes in the facility, procedures or technology. Periodic review (and associated reassessment) at defined periods or when instructed

1

Radioactive waste 13 GSR Part 5 Outline of the measures, including design principles, being applied to minimize and manage waste

Provisional waste management plan Evaluation of measures in the proposed design to minimize production of radioactive waste

Full waste management plan, including minimization

Updates of plan to reflect experience and incidents from operation or changes in the facility, procedures or technology (or wider strategy for radioactive waste)

Decommissioning 9 GSR Part 6 Outline of approach to how the facility will be decommissioned

Evaluation of measures in proposed design to facilitate decommissioning

Full decommissioning plan (including plan for managing decommissioning waste)

Periodic update of plan Final decommissioning plan before start of decommissioning

Emergency preparedness and response

7, 14 GSR Part 7 Screening assessment of site- specific factors affecting emergency planning

Provisional emergency plan Full emergency plan Implementation of plan if necessary. Updates of plan to reflect experience and incidents, changes in the facility, procedures, logistics or demography

Design 18, 20 SSR-2/1 Derivation of site-specific facility design parameters Screening assessment of reactor technologies

Basis for choice of technology Full safety assessment of proposed design at proposed site

Updated assessment of design as built Reassessment of design (and configuration management) for modifications to the facility or changes in operation

Commissioning and operation

7, 17, 19, 20, 21, 25

SSR-2/2 Outline of operational safety programme

Plan for operational safety, including for management of spent fuel at reactor

Full operational safety programme, including for management of spent fuel at reactor

Updates of programme to reflect experience and incidents from operation or changes in the facility, procedures or technology. Periodic review (and associated reassessment) at defined periods or when instructed

Transport SSR-6 Outline of potential transport routes for radioactive materials and waste, including consideration of external hazards and emergency response needs

Assessment of transport package design and compliance with regulatory requirements. Provisional transport and logistics plan for radioactive materials and waste

Full transport safety and security programme, including procedures for packaging, labelling, consignment, and emergency arrangements

Implementation of transport programme, periodic review and update of procedures, maintenance of transport records, and compliance with regulatory changes

Security 1, 24 NSS 13 Screening assessment of site- specific factors affecting security and application of security measures

Security assessment of proposed facility at proposed site

Security assessment of proposed management of the facility and associated materials

Updates to reflect experience and incidents from operation or changes in threats, the facility, procedures or technology.

Resources 3, 5, 11 GSR Part 1, GSR Part 2

Demonstration that necessary resources will be available

Plan for developing resources Programme for applying and maintaining resources

Maintaining resources to reflect operational demands and evolution

Safeguards 23 Preliminary engagement with national authority on safeguards obligations and initial declaration of intent for nuclear material use

Submission of facility design information to the regulator and IAEA. Integration of safeguards-by- design features

Full implementation of safeguards arrangements, including material accountancy, reporting, and access for inspections

Ongoing material accountancy and reporting, maintenance of safeguards equipment, updates to design information, and support for IAEA inspections and verification activities

Suur-Ameerika 1 / Tallinn 10122 / 626 2802/ [email protected] / www.kliimaministeerium.ee/

Registrikood 70001231

Vastavalt nimekirjale

03.12.2025 nr 6-3/25/5177-2

Norra tuumaelektrijaama rajamise piiriülene

keskkonnamõju hindamine

Norra on piiriülese keskkonnamõju konventsiooni (Espoo konventsiooni) alusel teavitanud Eestit

tuumaelektrijaama rajamise projekti keskkonnamõju hindamise (KMH) programmist.

Kirjale on lisatud Norra saadetud ingliskeelne teavitus koos KMH programmi materjalidega, mis

käsitlevad tuumaelektrijaama rajamist Lääne-Norrasse Aure ja Heimi piirkondadesse. Norra

teavituskirja kohaselt kavandatakse väikeseid moodultuumareaktoreid (võimsusega kuni 300 MW), mille kombineeritud elektrivõimsus on kuni 1500 MW. Lisainfo tegevuse kohta on Norra saadetud

KMH programmi materjalides (lisatud: Recommendatsion for Impact Assessment Program for a

Nuclear Power Plant in Taftøy Industrial Park in Heim og Aure Municipalities; Justification for the recommendation for an impact assessment programme for Nuclear Power Plant at Taftøy Industrial

Park).

Tulenevalt Norra määratud vastamistähtajast ootame hiljemalt 02.01.2026 põhjendatud arvamusi selle

kohta, kas Eesti peaks osalema Norra tuumaelektrijaama projekti piiriülese keskkonnamõju hindamise menetluses. Juhul, kui peate Eesti osalemist menetluses vajalikuks, on oodatud ka põhjendatud

arvamused selle kohta, milline oluline kahjulik piiriülene keskkonnamõju võib Eestile kaasneda, et

sellega saaks KMH läbiviimisel arvestada.

Lugupidamisega

(allkirjastatud digitaalselt)

Antti Tooming elurikkuse ja keskkonnakaitse asekantsler

Lisad: Norra teavituskiri; KMH programmi materjalid

Lilli Tamm, 626 9133 [email protected]

Postal address: PO Box 5672, Torgarden, N-7485 Trondheim | Tel: +47 73 58 05 00 E-mail: [email protected] | Internet: www.environmentagency.no | VAT.No.: 999 601 391 Visiting address Oslo: Grensesvingen 7, N-0661 Oslo | Visiting address Trondheim: Brattørkaia 15, N-7010 Trondheim

1

Trondheim, 25.11.2025

Notification according to Article 3 of the Convention

on Environmental Impact Assessment in a

Transboundary Context (Espoo Convention) regarding

proposed environmental impact assessment

programme for the establishment of a nuclear power

plant in Heim and Aure municipalities in western

Norway.

Pursuant to Article 3 of the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary

Context (Espoo Convention) and the Regulations on impact assessment § 34, Norway hereby

notifies Sweden, Denmark, Finland, United Kingdom, Estonia, Germany, Latvia, Poland and

Austria regarding the proposed impact assessment programme for the establishment of a

nuclear power plant in Heim and Aure municipalities in western Norway.

The Norwegian Environmental Agency is the responsible authority for fulfilling obligations for

environmental impact assessments in a transboundary context in Norway, according to the

Regulations on impact assessment § 35.

Nuclear energy in Norway

The Norwegian government is not considering or planning new projects of nuclear reactors. The

demand for low-emission energy production has led to an increasing interest of nuclear energy

in the general public and among private stakeholders. Nuclear energy in Norway was last

assessed in 1978.

Recognizing the increasing interest from both the general public and private stakeholders, the

Norwegian government has deemed it necessary to establish an updated and comprehensive

knowledge base to facilitate an informed societal debate on the potential role of nuclear energy

in Norway. Consequently, the government has appointed an independent public commission

(Kjernekraftutvalget) to assess the potential role of nuclear energy in the Norwegian energy

system. The committee is due to deliver its report by April 2026.

Your ref.: Our ref.: 2025/16030

2

It is important to emphasize that the development of an updated and robust knowledge base

does not constitute a decision to incorporate nuclear power into Norway’s energy supply. Any

such decision must be preceded by a broad and thorough public and political discourse.

Description of the project proposal

The increasing public interest in nuclear energy has led to initiatives from private stakeholders

who wish to explore the possibilities of establishing nuclear energy in Norway.

The proponent Norsk Kjernekraft AS notified the Ministry of Energy on 2nd of November 2023

with a proposed environmental impact assessment (EIA) programme for the establishment of

nuclear power plants in Taftøy industrial park, located in Aure municipality in Møre og Romsdal

county and Heim municipality in Trøndelag county on the Northwestern coast of Norway. The

nuclear power plant itself is planned to be situated in Heim municipality, but supporting

infrastructure may be located in Aure municipality.

On 23rd of April 2025, Trondheimsleia Kjernekraft AS was established as the responsible project

developer. This company was founded in partnership by the future host municipalities, a local

energy company NEAS, and Norsk Kjernekraft AS.

Norsk Kjernekraft AS states in the national notification that the nuclear power plant will be based

on small modular reactors (SMRs) of up to 300 MW, each placed in separate buildings. Several

alternatives are being considered, including reactor technologies and plant sizes. The notification

outlines a maximum installed capacity up to 1500 MW. According to Norsk Kjernekraft AS, this

could generate an annual power production of 12.5 TWh, equivalent to about 8% of Norway’s

total annual electricity production today.

Regulation related to impact assessments

The establishment of a nuclear power plant depends on a licence according to the Nuclear

Energy Act and the Energy Act, and a permit according to the Pollution Control Act and must

therefore be subject to an EIA. According to the Regulation on Impact Assessments, Annex I of

the regulation designates the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (DSA) as the

competent authority for nuclear power plants under both the Nuclear Energy Act and the

Pollution Control Act, alongside the Ministry of Health and Care Services and the Ministry of

Climate and Environment. The Ministry of Energy is the competent authority for the

environmental impact assessment of nuclear power plants under the Energy Act.

The EIA will form part of the basis for decision-making for any subsequent applications for a

license under the Nuclear Energy Act and the Energy Act, permits under the Pollution Control Act,

and other approvals under the Radiation Protection Act for the proposed project.

Description of the process

The Ministry of Energy issued an initial public hearing of the notification by Norsk Kjernekraft AS

in May 2024. At the time it was considered premature to submit the project proposal for

consultation with other countries.

3

In April 2025, the Ministry of Energy, Ministry of Health and Care Services, the Ministry of Climate

and Environment and the Ministry of Justice and Public Security instructed the Norwegian

Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (DSA), the Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection

(DSB), and the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) to prepare a joint

recommendation for establishing a comprehensive program for the impact assessment of the

project proposed by Norsk Kjernekraft AS in Taftøy Industrial Park in Heim and Aure

municipalities. The recommendation from DSA, DSB and NVE was submitted to the ministries on

September 1st, 2025. Its purpose is to provide a basis for an environmental impact assessment

that clarifies the consequences of the planned project for society and environment, while

ensuring a sound, and well-founded decision-making process in any subsequent licensing

process under the Nuclear Energy Act and the Energy Act, as well as for permits under the

Pollution Control Act and other approvals under the Radiation Protection Act.

Norway has not previously had nuclear reactors for power production, but four research reactors

have been in operation in Norway: one in Halden municipality and three in Lillestrøm

municipality. These reactors were used for research during various periods between 1951 and

2019 and are currently shut down while preparing for decommissioning.

The Norwegian Government established an independent public committee in June 2024 to

evaluate the potential role of nuclear power in Norway’s energy mix. The committee is set to

deliver their Official Norwegian Report (green paper) to the Ministry of Energy by April 1st, 2026.

In their joint recommendation for the environmental impact assessment program for the Heim

and Aure project, DSA, DSB, and NVE advised that any further consideration of the matter be

deferred until the committee has presented its findings and a national decision has been made

regarding commercial nuclear power in Norway. Furthermore, the establishment of a nuclear

power plant must be presented to the Norwegian Parliament before a license can be granted

under the Nuclear Energy Act.

Documents included in the notification are the following

• The recommendation for the impact assessment program of the project in Taftøy

industrial park in Heim and Aure municipalities, by DSA, DSB and NVE.

• The justification document for the recommendation for the impact assessment program

of the project in Taftøy industrial park in Heim and Aure municipalities, by DSA, DSB and

NVE.

Participating in the transboundary consultation

Norway kindly asks you to organize the public participation procedures in your country, and to do

the following:

• To please confirm receipt of this notification

• To indicate whether your country wishes to participate in the EIA

• procedure

• To distribute the documentation to the relevant parties

• To submit any comments to the proposed project and planning programme from the

relevant parties in your country

4

We ask that comments should be submitted no later than January 6th, 2026.Kindly send the

response to The Norwegian Environmental Agency [email protected], with copy to

[email protected], with the reference 2025/16030.

Best regards

Norwegian Environment Agency

Recommendation for Impact

Assessment Program for a

Nuclear Power Plant in Taftøy

Industrial Park in Heim og Aure

Municipalities Project proposer: Trondheimsleia Kjernekraft AS

Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5

1 Common Requirements for Methodology and Participation ....................................... 8

1.1 General Requirements for the Impact Assessment .............................................. 8

1.2 Requirements for Presentation and Compilation ................................................. 8

1.3 Methodology and Data Basis ................................................................................. 11

1.4 Stakeholder Involvement ....................................................................................... 12

1.5 Compliance with Relevant Legislation ................................................................. 12

1.6 Environmental Condition / Zero Alternative ......................................................... 13

2 Description of the Project .............................................................................................. 13

2.1 Project Description ................................................................................................. 13

2.2 Justification for the Project .................................................................................... 13

2.3 Site Location ........................................................................................................... 13

2.4 Land Use Requirements ......................................................................................... 14

2.5 Grid Infrastructure .................................................................................................. 15

2.6 Construction Phase ................................................................................................ 16

2.7 Project Timeline ...................................................................................................... 16

3 Nuclear Facility and Nuclear Safety ............................................................................. 16

3.1 General Information on the Facility, Technology, and Activities........................ 16

3.2 Nuclear Fuel ............................................................................................................ 17

3.3 Safety at the Facility (Safety) ................................................................................. 18

3.4 Security at the Facility ............................................................................................ 18

3.5 Non-Proliferation of Weapons-Usable Material and Safeguards ...................... 19

4 Competence Requirements .......................................................................................... 20

5 Radiation Protection ....................................................................................................... 20

6 Radioactive Pollution and Waste .................................................................................. 22

6.1 Emissions of Radioactive Substances During Operation of the Nuclear Facility 22

6.2 Radioactive Waste, Including Spent Nuclear Fuel .............................................. 23

6.3 Other Waste ............................................................................................................ 24

7 Decommissioning ........................................................................................................... 24

8 Nuclear Incidents and Other Undesirable Events ....................................................... 25

9 Nuclear Emergency Preparedness and Other Emergency Preparedness ................ 27

10 Energy Production .......................................................................................................... 28

10.1 Electricity Generation............................................................................................. 28

10.2 Utilization of Surplus Heat ..................................................................................... 29

11 Costs and Financing ....................................................................................................... 29

12 Natural Hazards and Vulnerability to Climate Change ............................................... 30

13 Other Pollution and Emissions ...................................................................................... 32

13.1 Water and Soil Pollution......................................................................................... 32

13.2 Noise ........................................................................................................................ 32

14 Visual Impacts, Landscape, Outdoor Recreation, and Cultural Heritage ................ 33

14.1 Landscape and Visualizations ............................................................................... 33

14.2 Cultural Heritage and Cultural Environments ..................................................... 34

14.3 Outdoor Recreation ................................................................................................ 34

15 Overarching Environmental Objectives and Climate Impacts ................................... 36

15.1 National and International Environmental Objectives ........................................ 36

15.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Benefits ............................................. 36

16 Biodiversity and Aquatic Environment .......................................................................... 36

16.1 General Methodology for Biodiversity Assessment ............................................ 36

16.2 Area Description and Natural Basis ...................................................................... 37

16.3 Protected Areas and Areas Subject to Land Use Restrictions ........................... 37

16.4 Terrestrial Habitat Types ........................................................................................ 37

16.5 Terrestrial Species, Their Functional Areas, and Landscape Ecological Connectivity ........................................................................................................................ 38

16.6 Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity in Coastal and Freshwater Systems .... 39

16.7 Geological Diversity ................................................................................................ 41

16.8 Ecosystem Services ............................................................................................... 41

16.9 Invasive Alien Species ............................................................................................ 41

16.10 Cumulative Impacts – Nature Diversity Act § 10.............................................. 42

17 Public Health ................................................................................................................... 42

18 Other Societal Interests ................................................................................................. 43

18.1 Defence Interests ................................................................................................... 43

18.2 Other Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 43

18.3 Agriculture ............................................................................................................... 44

18.4 Mineral Resources .................................................................................................. 44

18.5 Aquaculture and Fisheries ..................................................................................... 45

18.6 Local and Regional Business and Host Municipalities’ Economy ..................... 45

Appendix 1 ............................................................................................................................... 47

Introduction The Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (DSA), the Directorate for Civil

Protection (DSB), and the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) refer

to the assignment received from the Ministry of Energy (ED), the Ministry of Health and

Care Services (HOD), the Ministry of Climate and Environment (KLD), and the Ministry of Justice and Public Security (JD) in a letter dated 8 April 2025. In this assignment, we were

requested to prepare a recommendation for a joint impact assessment programme for a

nuclear power plant at Taftøy Industrial Park, located in the municipalities of Heim and Aure in Trøndelag and Møre og Romsdal counties. The original project developer was

Norsk Kjernekraft AS, but, on 23 April 2025, Trondheimsleia Kjernekraft AS was established

as the new developer. The company was founded in partnership between the prospective host municipalities, the local energy company, NEAS, and Norsk Kjernekraft AS.

DSA is the supreme nuclear safety authority in Norway and is the recommending authority

for licensing of nuclear facilities, as well as the permitting authority under the Pollution

Control Act. According to the Regulation on Impact Assessments (KU Regulation), Annex I,

DSA is the competent authority for nuclear power plants under the Nuclear Energy Act and

the Pollution Control Act, in addition to HOD and KLD. In a letter to DSA dated 3 December 2019, it was clarified that DSA is, as a general rule, the competent authority for impact

assessments for projects under the Nuclear Energy Act, the Radiation Protection Act, and

the Pollution Control Act. Under the KU Regulation, the Ministry of Energy is the

competent authority for impact assessments of nuclear power plants under the Energy

Act.

Nuclear Facilities Require Special Considerations A nuclear power plant is typically planned for operation over a minimum of 60 years. In

addition, several years are required for planning, construction, and eventual

decommissioning. Therefore, the location and suitability of the site must be carefully assessed to ensure reasonable certainty that the plant can be constructed, operated, and

decommissioned over time at the proposed site without undue risk to human health, the

environment, or other societal and commercial interests. The siting of a nuclear power plant must also consider economic and societal factors, such as power demand, electricity

infrastructure, logistics, transportation, emergency preparedness resources, and access to

human resources and expertise. Other considerations include proximity to national

borders or to other civilian or military installations that may pose risks or have critical national functions that could, for example, complicate evacuation procedures.

Risks associated with nuclear power plants encompass various aspects of facility safety, particularly in relation to operational safety. Strict measures must be implemented to

prevent accidents, such as criticality incidents involving elevated radiation levels and

releases of radioactive substances. Such events may have severe consequences for human health and the environment. In the worst-case scenario, a nuclear incident could

necessitate evacuation of large areas, significantly impact the environment and food

production, and affect other countries, as exemplified by the Chernobyl disaster in 1986.

There are also risks related to the handling and transport of spent nuclear fuel and other

radioactive waste. Unwanted incidents in these processes may lead to releases of radioactive substances. Additionally, there is a security risk that nuclear and radioactive

materials could be diverted and used for non-peaceful purposes, such as the development

of nuclear weapons. Other unwanted events may also result in radioactive contamination, both near the facility and across large geographical areas, depending on weather

conditions and dispersion patterns. Therefore, strict requirements are imposed to ensure

safe, secure, and responsible operation of a nuclear power plant. Safety must always be the highest priority.

Norway is party to several international conventions related to nuclear safety, the

handling of radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel, liability in the event of nuclear accidents, and non-proliferation of materials that can be used for nuclear weapons,

including additional protocols. These obligations are implemented in Norwegian

legislation. Norway has also adopted the international safety standards developed by the IAEA. In 2019, Norway was evaluated by IAEA-affiliated experts, who conducted a thorough

review of the implementation of these standards. The review resulted in a report with

recommendations that Norway must follow up. This is relevant for the interpretation of the regulatory framework, and the project developer should thoroughly familiarize

themselves with the international framework. A follow-up review is scheduled for late

2025.

Relationship Between an Impact Assessment and a Safety Case for a Nuclear Power

Plant

According to Section 4 of the Nuclear Energy Act, a license is required to construct, own, or operate a nuclear facility in Norway. An application for such a license must, pursuant to

Section 7 of the Act, include information about the construction site, the facility’s purpose,

nature and scope, and a presentation and assessment of the facility’s safety aspects

(safety case).

A safety case for a nuclear facility must detail how safety is ensured throughout all phases

of the facility’s lifetime. The safety case is a comprehensive document describing all

relevant safety aspects and measures to ensure safe, secure, and responsible operation. It

must demonstrate that the facility meets all safety requirements. For an application to

construct a nuclear power plant, a preliminary safety case is sufficient, but a complete safety case must be submitted well before the facility is commissioned. The requirements

for the safety case will also change when the facility is to be decommissioned.

The safety case will include, among other things, technical descriptions of the facility,

safety analyses, identification of vulnerabilities and risk factors, measures to minimize risk,

operational procedures, emergency preparedness plans for handling incidents at the

facility, and descriptions of required expertise and personnel. It will also assess defence-in- depth strategies, including how to manage deviations from normal operations, detect and

correct safety-related anomalies, and describe active and passive safety barriers, including

physical measures. The safety case will evaluate various levels of protection and physical

barriers to isolate radioactive material. Other measures supporting defence-in-depth must

also be identified, including explanations of safety margins in the design and operation of

the facility and descriptions of how cascade effects can be avoided. The content requirements for a safety case will vary depending on the development stage of the

facility, from construction to operation and eventual decommissioning.

Certain aspects relevant to the impact assessment may also be relevant to the safety case.

To ensure a holistic and consistent evaluation of the project’s impact and safety, it is

important that the assessments in the impact assessment align with those presented in the safety case. The content, analyses, and evaluations in both documents must support

each other, particularly where there is overlap, such as environmental impacts and safety

considerations.

The relationship between an impact assessment and a safety case for a nuclear power

plant is also discussed in Chapter 3.4 of the accompanying justification memorandum.

Content of This Document

The following chapters of this document constitute the recommendation from DSA, DSB,

and NVE for the impact assessment programme. The rationale for the requirements and methods included in the recommendation is presented in a separate document titled

Justification for Recommendation for Determination of Impact Assessment Programme for

Nuclear Power Plant at Taftøy Industrial Park. The requirements in the recommendation

must be viewed in light of this document.

1 Common Requirements for Methodology and Participation

1.1 General Requirements for the Impact Assessment

The project developer shall: • Conduct the impact assessment in accordance with the requirements set out in the

Regulation on Impact Assessments.

• Assess the impacts of all components of the nuclear power plant, including

associated infrastructure and activities, related to reactor buildings, turbine halls,

other buildings such as pump houses, roads, power lines, chimneys and/or

potential cooling towers, cooling systems, buildings/areas for storage and other

handling of radioactive waste and spent fuel, fences, other installations, and land use interventions (collectively referred to as “the project”).

• Assess positive and negative, direct and indirect, temporary and permanent, short-

term and long-term impacts. • Assess the cumulative impacts of the project on relevant topics, in the context of

existing, approved, or planned projects or measures within the area of influence, cf.

Section 21 of the Regulation on Impact Assessment.

• Evaluate relevant and realistic mitigation measures in accordance with the mitigation hierarchy, cf. the Impact Assessment Handbook M-1941 by the

Norwegian Environment Agency and the Directorate for Cultural Heritage, for all

phases of the facility’s lifetime. Any disadvantages associated with the mitigation measures shall also be assessed.

• Consider the need for baseline and follow-up studies, including how the conducted

assessments may contribute to potential research projects. • Assess transboundary impacts in accordance with the Espoo Convention.

• Assess each discipline/topic separately, while ensuring interdisciplinary coherence

where assessments complement each other or are necessary to fully understand

the consequences. • Include new topics in the impact assessment if further project development reveals

that topics not covered by this programme become relevant.

• Adapt and/or limit the scope of the assessment if further project development shows that specific topics or proposed methodologies are irrelevant to the

decisions to be made. Any deviations from the impact assessment programme

must be justified. • Base the planning and execution of the assessments on the evaluations and

justifications provided in the accompanying justification memorandum.

1.2 Requirements for Presentation and Compilation

The project developer shall:

• Prepare a compilation of the impact assessment to be presented in any

applications for licenses under the Energy Act and the Nuclear Energy Act, and for

necessary permits under the Pollution Control Act and approvals under the Radiation Protection Act and other relevant legislation. The compilation may be

presented in a separate summary report attached as an annex to the applications.

The compilation shall include: o References to relevant technical reports and chapters for further

information.

o An overview of the key values affected by the project, illustrated with maps. o Table(s) showing the impacts for each discipline/topic for each comparable

alternative.

o An overview and consolidated assessment of mitigation measures. A

distinction must be made between measures the developer plans to implement and measures not included in the plans but which may be

considered further during the permitting process.

o A description of the development plans sufficient for the reader to understand the design, extent, and scope of the project, and detailed

enough to assess its impacts on the environment and society.

• Prepare an English version of the impact assessment for use in the Espoo consultation. Translation into other languages may also be required, but this must

be clarified further in the permitting processes.

• Assess whether any information is subject to confidentiality, conduct a value

assessment, and, if applicable, label sensitive information with the correct legal basis and submit such information as separate documents.

• Include a description of the development plans in each technical report, sufficient

for the reader to understand the design, extent, and scope of the project, and detailed enough to assess its impacts on the environment and society.

• Prepare a table summarizing key data for the project, as illustrated below.

Parameter Unit Low estimate

High estimate

Potential remarks

Number and type of

reactors Number

Expected lifetime of

reactors Years

Expected lifetime of

the entire project Years

Type of nuclear fuel -

Annual consumption of nuclear fuel

Tonnes/year

Expected total

amount of spent nuclear fuel

Tonnes

Installed capacity per

reactor MW

Total installed

capacity MW

Annual electricity

production GWh

Full load hours Hours

Investment cost MNOK

Transformers Units

Height of cooling towers

m

Cooling water requirement

m3/s

Cooling water tunnel

length m

Cross-section of

cooling water tunnel m2

Internal grid – length km

Grid connection – length

km

Grid connection – voltage level

kV

1.3 Methodology and Data Basis

The project developer shall:

• Prepare assessments and conduct field investigations in accordance with

recognized methodology, international best practice, and by individuals with relevant professional expertise. The methods used, the individuals responsible for

the assessments and fieldwork, and their relevant qualifications must be clearly

stated. • Use the zero alternative as the baseline in all topic-spesific assessments, cf. the

Impact Assessment Handbook M-1941 by the Norwegian Environment Agency and

the Directorate for Cultural Heritage. The zero alternative refers to the current

environmental situation and its expected development based on other adopted

plans and measures, assuming the proposed project is not implemented. The zero

alternative shall serve as the reference scenario for evaluating the consequences of

the proposed project. • Conduct field surveys/inspections during relevant time periods. The timing, route,

and duration of inspections must be specified and justified.

• Collect knowledge from other nuclear power plants to document operational experience and impacts on people, the environment, and society, both during

normal operation and in the event of incidents.

• Adhere to the internationally recognized radiation protection principle that radiation use must be justified, exposure must be kept as low as reasonably

achievable (ALARA), and humans and the environment must be protected from the

harmful effects of radiation.

• Comply with the requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) SSR-1 “Site Evaluation of Nuclear Installations” and associated guidance

documents listed in the table in Annex 1.

• Ensure that the assessment covers all factors influencing and included in the various evaluations, and that these are representative of the nuclear facilities being

considered (e.g. technology choice, reactor type, reactor lifetime, number of

reactors to be built, construction sequence, and relevant support facilities), and of all phases of the facility’s lifetime.

• Describe key uncertainties, including technical limitations and knowledge gaps in

the data basis. It must be stated whether the technical assessor believes further

investigations are needed to support decisions on licenses, approvals, and permits. • Use relevant sources for the various assessment themes. All sources used must be

referenced.

• Systematize collected data in accordance with applicable standards and submit data to public databases where such systems are available, cf. Impact Assessment

Handbook M-1941.

• Assess whether regulatory or administrative requirements from one authority related to the project may pose a risk of conflict with requirements or guidance

issued by other relevant authorities.

1.4 Stakeholder Involvement

The project developer shall:

• Develop a stakeholder involvement plan early in the assessment process, in

dialogue with the host municipalities. • Involve relevant national, regional, and local authorities in the assessment process.

• Establish extensive cooperation with emergency response officers, fire and rescue

services, and the police in the host municipalities as part of the assessment. The County Governors of Trøndelag and Møre og Romsdal shall also be involved.

• Engage interest organizations, businesses, local experts, landowners, and rights

holders in the work on relevant assessment topics. This shall include, among

others:

o Friluftsrådet Nordmøre og Romsdal

o Hemne Hunting and Fishing Association

o Aure Hunting and Fishing Association o BirdLife Heim-Aure Local Chapter

o Nordlandet Outfield Association

o Nordlandet Community Association o Aure and Tustna Farmers’ Union

o Heim Farmers’ Union

o Aure Farmers and Smallholders’ Union o Aure Business Forum

o Heim Business Association

o Equinor

o Nearby aquaculture companies • Establish appropriate forms of consultation and communication with local and

regional stakeholders. This may include consultation groups, open office hours,

public site visits, and public meetings about the project and the assessment process.

• Describe how stakeholder involvement will be ensured throughout the entire

lifetime of the nuclear facility, in line with international best practice. • Describe how the requirements for stakeholder involvement have been met,

including dates of meetings, site visits, etc.

1.5 Compliance with Relevant Legislation

The project developer shall: • Describe how requirements in relevant legislation will be complied with.

Method: Reference is made to Annex 1 of the document Justification for Recommendation for a

description of applicable legislation. This description is not exhaustive.

1.6 Environmental Condition / Zero Alternative

The project developer shall:

• Describe the current environmental situation in the project area and adjacent

areas, including background levels of radioactivity in the project area and nearby regions.

• Assess how the environment is expected to develop if the project is not

implemented.

Method:

The environmental situation / zero alternative shall be defined in accordance with the

Impact Assessment Handbook M-1941 by the Norwegian Environment Agency and the

Directorate for Cultural Heritage.

2 Description of the Project

2.1 Project Description

The project developer shall:

• Describe the project area and present it on a map.

• Provide an overall description of the project, including design, construction,

operation, and decommissioning.

2.2 Justification for the Project

The project developer shall:

• Justify the need for a nuclear power plant in the region, and specifically in the host

municipalities (Heim and Aure). • Describe relevant alternatives to the project. This shall include an assessment of

both alternative regional and national locations for nuclear power plants, as well as

relevant regional and national alternatives to nuclear power generation.

2.3 Site Location

The project developer shall:

• Describe past and current land use, as well as plans for development and

construction in the project area and adjacent areas. • Assess all relevant risk and vulnerability factors to determine whether the site is

suitable and safe for development, including potential impacts of climate change.

The analysis shall demonstrate how the planned development will and could affect

the surrounding environment.

• Describe the site’s proximity to other commercial or industrial activities and critical

societal functions, military installations, and other facilities of importance to

national security interests. • Justify the choice of location.

• Describe water sources and how the facility will be ensured a secure and stable

supply of cooling water, even under extreme conditions such as droughts and other adverse events, so that safety at the facility is maintained at all times and

significant impacts on power supply security are avoided.

• Describe access to electricity for the facility and how stable power supply will be ensured, including the need for backup power systems such as backup generators

and/or batteries to maintain operations, enable safe shutdown, and ensure safe

restart after shutdown.

• Describe and map relevant existing infrastructure in and around the project area (both natural and man-made), demographic conditions in adjacent areas,

emergency preparedness zones, and evacuation possibilities to safeguard

environmental and societal safety around the facility. This also includes access to firefighting water.

• Identify natural external conditions and hazards that may affect the safety of the

nuclear facility, such as seismic activity, tsunami risk, weather and precipitation patterns, flood and landslide risk, and climate change.

• Describe man-made external events such as aircraft crashes, accidents,

groundings, or other incidents related to nearby commercial or industrial activity

that may be relevant to the safety of the facility. • Assess how activities in and around the project area may affect safety, and how the

project may, in turn, influence activities in the area (mutual influence).

• Assess the location in terms of the ability to secure and monitor all access routes to and from the facility and its infrastructure, to prevent sabotage and theft.

• Assess the location in terms of risk of intentional adverse events during armed

conflict and war, such as attacks involving direct weapon effects including drones,

missiles, and artillery.

• Assess the location in terms of its potential implications for total defence

capabilities during crises and war.

• Describe the available emergency response capacities in the vicinity of the site for

managing accidents (e.g. hospitals, fire services, and other emergency services),

and for managing intentional adverse events such as sabotage or theft (e.g. the

police, and if applicable, the Armed Forces).

Method:

The description of water sources and secure water supply should include an assessment of alternative cooling solutions in the event of cooling water loss. The requirements in this

chapter shall be considered in conjunction with the requirements in Chapters 9 and 10.

2.4 Land Use Requirements

The project developer shall:

• Describe the required land area.

• Present the exact location of all facilities/components and land use interventions

included in the project on a map. • Specify which land use is temporary and which is permanent.

• Quantify the occupation of land-use types based on the national base map.

Method:

Land use requirements and land occupation shall be summarized in tables as illustrated

below. Land Requirements of the Project

Land-use Type

Temporary

Land

Requirement

(daa)

Permanent

Land

Requirement

(daa)

Potential

remarks

Land Occupation by Land-use Type

Land-use Type

Temporary Land

Requirement

(daa)

Permanent Land

Requirement

(daa)

Potential remarks

2.5 Grid Infrastructure

The project developer shall:

• Describe all grid infrastructure required to connect the power plant to the existing

or planned electricity grid, based on a concept selection study.

• Specify which grid infrastructure is included in the license application for the

nuclear power plant under the Energy Act, and which components, if any, will be applied for by other entities.

Method: The choice of grid connection solution shall be based on a concept selection study in

accordance with the Regulation on Energy Studies.

For grid infrastructure for which the project developer will apply for a license, the

description shall be prepared in accordance with NVE’s guidelines for preparing license applications for grid facilities.

2.6 Construction Phase

The project developer shall:

• Provide an overall description of how the construction work is planned to be

carried out, including the expected duration of the construction phase. • Specify the types of construction machinery that will be used.

• Describe the need for blasting, excavation, material extraction, and deposition.

• Describe transportation needs during the construction period, including the need for road upgrades and the upgrading/use of port facilities.

• Explain how the project is planned to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from

materials and construction-related transport.

2.7 Project Timeline

The project developer shall:

• Present a realistic timeline for the planning, design, and construction of the project,

including any plans for sequential development of nuclear reactors. • Describe the planned processes for obtaining the necessary licenses and other

permits.

3 Nuclear Facility and Nuclear Safety

3.1 General Information on the Facility, Technology,

and Activities

The project developer shall: • Describe the nuclear facility and all relevant aspects of significance for nuclear

safety.

• Describe and provide the rationale for the choice of reactor technology, including

the number and type of nuclear reactors.

• Describe the planned production capacity.

• Describe the expected lifetime of the various facilities/components included in the

project. • Explain how the chosen facility design and choice of nuclear fuel prevent

undesirable events, including sabotage and theft.

• Assess alternative facility designs to reduce the risk of undesirable events. • Describe other facilities, components, and land use interventions included in the

project, including support/auxiliary/subsidiary facilities necessary during one or

more phases of the project’s lifecycle. • Describe how the facility design will facilitate decommissioning and dismantling.

• Describe how the facility design will ensure safeguards and verification of nuclear

fuel. “Safeguards by Design” must be incorporated from the planning phase.

• Describe how nuclear and radioactive materials will be safely and securely

transported to and from the facility.

• Describe the activities planned during the operational phase of the facility. • Describe the need for spare equipment and storage space, as well as the

methodology for storing such equipment.

• Describe how nuclear safety (“Safety”, “Security”, and “Safeguards”) will be ensured at the facility, including information system security, personnel security,

etc.

• Describe which hazardous substances will be handled at or in the vicinity of the facility, and in what quantities.

• Describe the measures to be implemented, including land-use and spatial planning

measures, to ensure an adequate level of safety for the surroundings, including any

designated safety zones around the facility.

Method:

The assessment must demonstrate how the requirements and principles of nuclear safety, as set out in Norwegian nuclear legislation and international conventions and standards,

will be upheld throughout all stages of the facility’s lifecycle—from design, construction,

and operation to decommissioning. This includes radiation protection for both occupationally exposed individuals and the general public, emissions of radioactive

substances, handling of radioactive waste at the facility, plans for environmental

monitoring of radioactive substances, emergency preparedness plans, non-proliferation of

weapons-usable nuclear material, safeguards, and physical protection of the facility. Reference is also made to Chapters 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5 below.

In the description of the need for spare/emergency equipment, particular emphasis shall be placed on technology-specific components such as turbine parts and other equipment

that cannot be procured through cooperation with other power sector actors. Required

storage space and storage methodology for spare equipment must comply with recovery

requirements under the Power Preparedness Regulation.

Handling of hazardous substances shall be assessed against the DSB’s thematic report on

safety at facilities handling flammable, reactive, pressurized, and explosive substances, as

well as the guidelines for quantitative risk assessments for facilities handling hazardous

substances.

3.2 Nuclear Fuel

The project developer shall:

• Describe the nuclear fuel cycle from extraction to final disposal of spent nuclear

fuel. • Describe the overall impact of the fuel cycle on the environment and society.

• Explain how nuclear fuel will be handled and stored at the nuclear power plant

(including any treatment and storage of spent nuclear fuel), and assess the

environmental and societal impacts of these activities. This shall include both

unirradiated and spent nuclear fuel.

3.3 Safety at the Facility (Safety)

The project developer shall:

• Describe how safety at the facility will be ensured through the choice of technology,

design, construction, operation, and decommissioning, including defence-in-depth strategies, so that human health and the environment are protected from the

harmful effects of radiation throughout all operational phases and all stages of the

facility’s lifecycle. • Describe how safety will be ensured in accordance with the requirements of

Norwegian legislation, IAEA international safety standards, and guidance.

• Outline the contents of the safety case for the nuclear facility that are relevant to

the impact assessment. • Describe how safety culture and safety leadership will be developed and

maintained throughout the facility’s lifecycle.

• Describe the human resources, organizational structure, and competencies required to operate the facility in a safe, secure, and responsible manner.

• Describe how protective zones and evacuation zones will contribute to ensuring

safety at the facility based on radiation risk.

• Explain how safety functions at the facility will be maintained without conflicting

with physical protection measures, personnel safety, and safeguards systems

(interface between security/safeguards/safety).

Method:

The assessment must demonstrate how the requirements and principles of nuclear safety,

as set out in Norwegian nuclear legislation and international conventions and standards, will be upheld in the selection of technology, design, construction, operation, and

decommissioning of the facility. This includes radiation protection for both occupationally

exposed individuals and the general public, emissions of radioactive substances, plans for environmental monitoring of radioactive substances, emergency preparedness plans, non-

proliferation of weapons-usable nuclear material, safeguards, and physical protection of

the facility. It also includes requirements under radiation protection regulations and

pollution control regulations related to radioactive contamination and waste.

3.4 Security at the Facility

The project developer shall:

• Describe how a comprehensive security concept will ensure both logical and physical protection of the nuclear facility during its design, construction, operation,

decommissioning, dismantling, and waste management phases. The concept must

account for potential changes in the classification of nuclear material before and after irradiation in the reactor.

• Describe how information security, cybersecurity, and personnel security will be

maintained during planning, construction, operation, decommissioning,

dismantling, and waste management. • Specifically describe how reactor safety systems will be protected against sabotage

through digital attacks.

• Outline general procedures for sizing, adapting, and regularly testing the security system based on the regulatory design basis threat, as specified in the Regulation

on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities.

• Outline general procedures for monitoring the threat landscape based on national threat assessments and the local security situation, and for implementing

additional measures in response to increased threat levels.

• Describe how relevant authorities, including the police and the Armed Forces, will

be involved in developing security plans for the facility. This includes plans for peacetime, crisis, and wartime in accordance with the Object Security Directive,

and how the project developer will facilitate cooperation with these actors

regarding the facility’s security. • Describe how physical protection at the facility will be maintained without

conflicting with safety requirements, employee safety, or safeguards systems

(interface between security/safety/safeguards). • Describe principles for how the facility’s design will be adapted to ensure physical

protection (“Security by Design”), including access routes, clear zones, sensors,

building construction, and choice of materials.

Method:

Physical protection shall be assessed in accordance with requirements set out in

Norwegian nuclear legislation. In addition, IAEA recommendations shall be followed, including:

• Nuclear Security Series No. 13: Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear

Facilities

• Nuclear Security Series No. 27-G: Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear

Facilities (Implementation of INFCIRC/225/Revision 5)

• Nuclear Security Series No. 35-G: Security During the Lifetime of a Nuclear Facility

3.5 Non-Proliferation of Weapons-Usable Material and

Safeguards

The project developer shall:

• Describe how Norway’s international obligations related to the non-proliferation of

weapons-usable nuclear material, as well as activities, technologies, and knowledge (dual-use items) that may be used for non-peaceful purposes, will be

upheld throughout the design, construction, operation, decommissioning,

dismantling, and waste management phases of the facility. • Describe how the facility’s design will facilitate verification of nuclear fuel and other

nuclear material at the facility, to ensure that declared material accounts are

accurate (“Safeguards by Design”). This shall include design choices based on

economic and operational considerations, while ensuring nuclear safety, radiation

protection, safeguards, and security throughout the facility’s lifetime. • Describe how potentially conflicting objectives and measures related to safety,

security, and safeguards have been assessed (interface between

safety/security/safeguards).

Method:

Non-proliferation and safeguards shall be assessed in accordance with requirements set out in Norwegian nuclear legislation and international agreements, including:

• Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)

• Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement IAEA INFCIRC/177 between IAEA and Norway

• Additional Protocol to the Safeguards Agreement (INFCIRC/177/Add.1)

Relevant IAEA guidance includes:

• IAEA NP-T-2.8: Integrated Nuclear Safeguards – Guidance for the Design and Construction of New Nuclear Facilities

4 Competence Requirements The project developer shall:

• Describe the competence requirements for all phases of the nuclear facility’s lifecycle, at all organizational levels, and explain how access to sufficient expertise

will be ensured.

• Assess the need for competence in radiation protection, nuclear safety, radioactive

waste management, and nuclear emergency preparedness to ensure safety at the facility.

• Assess the availability of personnel with the necessary specialized expertise for

operation and incident management throughout all phases of the facility’s lifecycle.

Method:

In describing the competence requirements and access to sufficient expertise, it must be

taken into account that the nuclear facility, or parts thereof, may be subject to the

Norwegian Security Act and designated as a security-sensitive object. Consequently,

personnel must be eligible for security clearance.

5 Radiation Protection The project developer shall:

• Identify all sources of radiation at the nuclear facility throughout its entire lifecycle.

• Estimate radiation exposure during all operational phases and operational states,

as well as during decommissioning, for all workers at the facility.

• Describe how the developer will monitor radiation sources and doses to workers

during operation and decommissioning of the facility.

• Describe how radiation doses to occupationally exposed individuals at the facility will be monitored.

• Specify dose limits for exposure and reference levels for protective measures

during operation and decommissioning. • Identify radiation sources that may contribute to doses to occupationally exposed

individuals through various exposure pathways (inhalation, ingestion, and external

exposure) during normal operation and decommissioning of the facility. • Describe how radiation protection will be ensured at the facility, including how the

principle of optimizing protection for occupationally exposed individuals will be

implemented through a radiation protection programme.

• Assess radiation protection measures, including design principles applied in the facility’s layout and mitigation measures to reduce or prevent exposure. These

measures shall be described in light of the requirements for justification and

optimization. • Describe technical safety functions and other arrangements and measures that, in

the event of incidents or accidents, will ensure that radiation-related consequences

remain low. • Describe how radiation and shielding measures will be arranged to ensure that

non-occupationally exposed workers and the general public are not exposed to an

effective dose exceeding 0.25 mSv/year.

• Assess which monitoring solutions are best suited, considering that radiation from the facility will occur in various forms and that radioactive substances exist in

different chemical and physical states.

• Estimate radiation exposure during transport of nuclear and radioactive material to and from the facility.

Method:

Section 5 of the Radiation Protection Regulations requires justification and optimization of

radiation use. Justification means that the benefits of radiation use must outweigh the

disadvantages. Optimization means that exposure to ionizing radiation must be kept as

low as reasonably achievable, taking into account technological knowledge, social, and

economic factors. These principles must form the basis of the assessments.

The IAEA provides guidelines and recommendations on radiation protection, use, and transport of radiation sources, primarily through its safety standards. Radiation protection

aspects related to operation and decommissioning of the facility shall be assessed in

accordance with these standards.

Relevant IAEA safety standards include:

• SSR-2/1 (Rev. 1): Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design – requirements for nuclear

power plant design, including radiation protection. • SSG-90: Radiation Protection Aspects of Design for Nuclear Power Plants – guidance

on how to meet radiation protection requirements.

• GSR Part 3: Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic

Safety Standards – general requirements for radiation protection.

• GSG-7: Recommendations on how to meet occupational exposure requirements in GSR Part 3.

• SSR-6: Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material – requirements for

the transport of radioactive material.

Assessment approaches that may be used include:

• Modelling atmospheric/hydrological dispersion using established calculation tools and credible source terms.

• Analysing critical exposure pathways (inhalation, ingestion, and external exposure)

for vulnerable groups.

• Describing design principles relevant to radiation protection at the facility, including shielding, material selection (to minimize activation), ventilation, zoning,

radiation monitoring, etc., with associated modelling/assessment of radiation

exposure to facility personnel, the public, and the environment under various operational conditions.

6 Radioactive Pollution and Waste

6.1 Emissions of Radioactive Substances During

Operation of the Nuclear Facility

The project developer shall:

• Survey background radiation levels in the planning and influence area prior to construction of the facility.

• Identify and describe emissions of radioactive substances, including radionuclides,

emission points and recipients, the physical and chemical form of the emissions,

and whether any emissions may exceed the threshold values set out in Annex II of the Regulation on Radioactive Pollution and Waste.

• Describe geological conditions, including surface and groundwater characteristics,

that may influence the dispersion of radioactive substances in the environment. • Assess the consequences of emissions of radioactive substances during normal

operation for humans, the environment, and other societal interests. Emissions

must also be evaluated in light of the cumulative burden on relevant recipients. • Assess and describe measures to prevent or limit emissions of radioactive

substances during normal operation, and how best available techniques and

technologies will be applied.

• Describe how radioactive pollution from the facility will be monitored (environmental monitoring), including monitoring of conventional emissions to air

and water, as well as uptake in sediments and biota.

Method:

The assessment of radioactive emissions shall be based on mathematical modelling to

evaluate, for example, dispersion pathways of radionuclides in the environment, transfer of radionuclides in air, water, soil, and biota, uptake of radionuclides in humans and biota

within the food chain, and resulting radiation doses to humans from external and internal

exposure. Models must be adapted to the specific context and should be verified by a third party. Assumptions and parameter choices must be described in detail and clearly

referenced to ensure transparency and enable independent third-party review.

Models must include information on: • Activity of each radionuclide (source term), emission form, emission routes, and

environmental dispersion pathways.

• Environmental characteristics affecting radionuclide dispersion (e.g. wind speed

and direction, surface water currents, groundwater flow, soil and rock types, land use, chemical properties of soil and water).

• Demographic conditions, including locations of potentially exposed populations

and land use (e.g. residential, commercial, or recreational areas).

IAEA Safety Guides provide guidance on:

• Conducting consequence assessments for planned releases from site-based activities and releases due to accidents or other events (GSG-10).

• Aspects of site investigation and characterization relevant to such assessments

(currently NS-G-3.2; an updated version has been approved by the IAEA, but the

final draft is not yet available).

Background radiation mapping in the planning and influence area prior to project

establishment may include surveys of air, water, and biota to measure the presence of natural radionuclides (e.g. U-238, Th-232) and background radiation levels.

6.2 Radioactive Waste, Including Spent Nuclear Fuel

The project developer shall: • Provide an overview of the type and quantity of radioactive waste that may be

generated during the establishment of the nuclear facility.

• Provide an overview of the type and quantity of radioactive waste, including spent

nuclear fuel, that will be generated during operation of the facility. • Describe how radioactive waste, including spent nuclear fuel, will be classified and

characterized.

• Explain how the amount of radioactive waste generated at the facility will be minimized.

• Describe how radioactive waste from the facility, including spent nuclear fuel, will

be handled. This includes any storage and treatment that will take place at the facility. If handling and treatment are primarily to occur at a location other than the

facility, the handling at the facility and transport from the site must be assessed.

• Describe the planned disposal solution.

• Describe how radioactive waste, including spent nuclear fuel, will be managed to

align with the planned disposal solution, and demonstrate that the various steps in

the waste management process are interdependent and will follow one another in accordance with the planned lifespans of the respective facilities.

• Assess how necessary infrastructure for waste management and decommissioning

can be planned for shared use.

Method:

Assessment of handling, characterization, classification, and minimization of radioactive waste, including spent nuclear fuel, shall be conducted in accordance with applicable

regulations and international obligations, and in line with the Strategy for Safe, Secure and

Responsible Management of Radioactive Waste in Norway.

Relevant IAEA safety standards include:

• GSR Part 5: Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste

• SSR-5: Radioactive Waste Disposal

For security requirements related to spent fuel, see:

• NSS 13 (INFCIRC/225/Revision 5): Nuclear Security Recommendations on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities

6.3 Other Waste

The project developer shall:

• Describe the expected type and quantity of conventional and hazardous waste, and how this waste will be managed.

7 Decommissioning The project developer shall:

• Describe how the facility will be decommissioned once it is no longer in operation,

including plans for cessation of activities and waste management, including

handling of spent nuclear fuel (decommissioning strategy).

• Describe the desired end-state of the site following completion of decommissioning.

• Explain how the requirement to keep exposure to humans and the environment as

low as reasonably achievable will be upheld throughout the entire process of

shutdown and decommissioning. • Describe how the project will meet dose limitation requirements for occupationally

exposed individuals and the general public throughout the decommissioning phase

of the facility. • Assess the risks associated with decommissioning in terms of safety—i.e., risks to

humans, the environment, and society.

• Describe how sufficient competence and resources for decommissioning and waste

management will be ensured.

Method:

The description of decommissioning should be based on the principles outlined in the

Strategy for Safe, Secure and Responsible Management of Radioactive Waste in Norway. The description must demonstrate how requirements for “Safety”, “Security”) and

“Safeguards” will be upheld.

Relevant guidance includes:

• IAEA GSR Part 6: Decommissioning of Facilities – key requirements for

decommissioning.

• DSA Guide No. 16: Guide for Planning Cleanup of Norwegian Nuclear Facilities – provides guidance on decommissioning requirements that are also applicable to

nuclear power plants.

8 Nuclear Incidents and Other Adverse Events

The project developer shall:

• Describe potential nuclear incidents that may result in elevated radiation levels and acute radioactive contamination at or near the facility.

• Describe accidents, intentional adverse events, and other incidents that may pose a

risk of elevated radiation levels and acute radioactive contamination during transport of radioactive and nuclear material, including spent nuclear fuel and

radioactive waste to and from the facility.

• Describe other adverse events at or near the facility that may pose risks to human

health, the environment, and society and/or affect security of power supply. • Assess the likelihood of nuclear incidents at or near the facility.

• Assess the likelihood of nuclear incidents related to the transport of radioactive

and nuclear material, including spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste to and

from the facility.

• Assess the likelihood of other adverse events at or near the facility.

• Evaluate the consequences of nuclear incidents and other adverse events for humans, the environment, and society, including impacts on the power supply.

• Estimate radiation exposure resulting from nuclear incidents at the facility or

during transport to and from the facility, for personnel, the general public, and the

environment. • Assess the safety measures required to prevent and mitigate nuclear incidents and

other adverse events, and describe how the effectiveness of these measures will be

ensured at all times.

Method:

“Nuclear incidents” refer to accidents, intentional adverse events, and other occurrences

that may lead to elevated radiation levels and acute radioactive contamination, or affect

the operation and safety of the facility. “Other undesirable events” refer to accidents,

intentional adverse events, and incidents that may pose risks to humans, the environment, and society, or affect power supply security. These include events both within and outside

the project area, such as fire and explosion.

“Intentional adverse events” refer to incidents resulting from deliberate harmful actions,

such as theft of nuclear material, sabotage or threats of sabotage, explosions, physical

disabling of safety functions, cyberattacks, or terrorism, which may occur during peacetime, armed conflict, or war. Reference is made to the Royal Decree on the Mandate

and Composition of the Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Committee and its advisors, as

well as the mandate for the County Governor (Mandate for the Nuclear Emergency

Preparedness Committee, dated 1 September 2013).

The assessment of nuclear incidents shall include evaluation of various scenarios:

• Beyond Design Basis Accident (BDBA): Unlikely events outside the design basis. • Design Basis Accident (DBA): Events within the design basis that may occur but are

not considered likely during the facility’s lifetime.

• Anticipated Operational Occurrences (AOO): Expected operational events during the facility’s lifetime, with consequences within regulatory limits for emissions and

radiation doses to workers and the public.

Consequences and risk-reducing or mitigating measures must be assessed based on IAEA Safety Standard GSR Part 7: Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological

Emergency, and may also refer to IAEA SSG-77: Protection Against Internal and External

Hazards in the Operation of Nuclear Power Plants.

A Risk and Vulnerability Analysis (ROS analysis) must be conducted for the planned project

to identify potential nuclear and other undesirable events and their consequences. The

ROS analysis shall assess all internal and external risk and vulnerability factors relevant to

safety at the proposed site, in accordance with international best practice. The analysis

must demonstrate how the planned development may affect the surrounding

environment and security of power supply.

The assessment shall be conducted using recognized methodology for risk and

vulnerability analysis.

The ROS analysis shall cover the planning and influence area, including areas that may be

subject to mitigation measures, restrictions, or similar. The influence area for various types of incidents and accidents must be mapped and described.

A consolidated overview of findings from the analysis shall be prepared, including any

follow-up mitigation measures and identification of responsible parties.

Relevant authorities shall be involved in the preparation of the ROS analysis.

The assessment must consider the consequences of nuclear incidents in light of the

facility’s proximity to operations of national security significance or other critical infrastructure such as airports, ports, hospitals, etc.

9 Nuclear Emergency Preparedness and Other Emergency Preparedness

The project developer shall:

• Describe the facility’s preparedness and capacity to detect, minimize, and mitigate

the consequences of nuclear incidents and other adverse events throughout the facility’s lifetime.

• Describe how the project will affect national nuclear emergency preparedness.

• Specify which incidents the operator is expected to handle independently, and which require response from the national nuclear emergency preparedness system,

including local and regional emergency resources.

• Obtain information from the County Governors and assess the potential

consequences of the project for regional nuclear emergency preparedness. • Describe how the facility’s emergency preparedness can be coordinated with the

national nuclear emergency preparedness system, including regional and local

preparedness arrangements. • Describe how the project will affect power supply preparedness, including the type

of repair preparedness required to maintain electricity delivery.

• Identify incidents that may require support from external emergency resources in addition to those available to the operator.

• Assess the consequences for emergency response actors (e.g. fire and rescue

services, police, health services, and the Civil Defence), including the need for

increased capacity, new competence, new equipment, updates to emergency plans, and the need for integrated exercises arising from the project.

• Obtain information from host and neighbouring municipalities and assess the

potential consequences of the project for municipal emergency preparedness.

• Describe how the operator will notify DSA, emergency services, municipalities,

County Governors, NVE, and other relevant authorities in the event of an incident.

• Describe how the operator’s emergency preparedness can be coordinated with other relevant preparedness systems at the local, regional, and national levels.

• In dialogue with local, regional, and national emergency response actors, assess

the additional costs the project may entail for emergency preparedness.

Method:

The national nuclear emergency preparedness system includes the Nuclear Emergency

Preparedness Committee, its advisors, and the County Governor as the regional arm of the committee. The County Governor is responsible for coordinating preparedness at the

regional level and with municipalities.

The nuclear emergency preparedness organization is established to provide expertise for

managing nuclear incidents and to ensure rapid implementation of measures to protect

life, health, the environment, and other critical societal interests.

The Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Committee, County Governors, host municipalities,

and other relevant emergency authorities, including the Civil Defence, shall be involved in the assessment process. Impacts on local, regional, and national preparedness—including

fire and rescue services—shall be included in the assessment. DSA provides guidance on

nuclear emergency preparedness on its website, including the six scenario types that form the basis for national nuclear emergency preparedness planning.

The IAEA provides guidelines and recommendations on Emergency Preparedness and

Response (EPR) primarily through its safety standards. The IAEA Safety Standard GSR Part 7: Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency sets out the

requirements for preparedness and response to nuclear incidents or radioactive releases,

regardless of cause, and should form the basis for the assessment.

The facility is expected to be classified as Class 3 under the Power Contingency Regulation.

The project developer must therefore describe how all requirements applicable to a Class 3 facility will be met, including requirements related to physical protection, repair

preparedness, and information security.

Requirements in the Power Contingency Regulation concerning information security also apply to information during the planning and design phases of the nuclear facility. It is

essential that the project developer handles sensitive information in accordance with

these requirements from the outset of the project. This includes assessing whether special considerations must be made for information security and implementing appropriate

procedures, as well as evaluating how information security can be best ensured during the

planning phase.

10 Energy Production

10.1 Electricity Generation

The project developer shall:

• Calculate the expected annual net electricity production and the annual production

profile for the relevant development alternatives, and specify the assumptions

used in the calculation. Factors affecting production shall be described and assessed, including electrical losses, scheduled maintenance, downtime due to fuel

replacement, and any other relevant conditions.

Method:

The production profile shall be presented as an hourly time series of estimated output.

10.2 Utilization of Surplus Heat

The project developer shall:

• Describe the surplus heat from the nuclear power plant, including the estimated

annual amount of surplus heat (GWh/year), temperature, form (water, steam, exhaust gases, or air), and operating time for surplus heat production.

• Describe how the project will ensure internal and/or external utilization of surplus

heat, including any new land use required to realize the planned utilization, such as new industrial developments.

• Describe the technical measures that will ensure surplus heat can be delivered in a

form and at a temperature suitable for utilization.

• Assess potential external demand points for heat utilization, including possible

recipients such as industry, district heating systems, etc.

• Evaluate costs, potential revenues, and socio-economic profitability of surplus heat

utilization, compared to a zero alternative without utilization. • Assess direct and indirect impacts of heat utilization, including effects on local

businesses, additional land use, uncertainties, the project’s relationship to other

assessments, and cumulative impacts.

Method:

NVE’s guide for conducting cost-benefit analyses of surplus heat utilization (Cost-Benefit Analysis of Surplus Heat) shall be used.

When assessing technical measures to deliver surplus heat at a usable temperature, the

consequences for the facility’s energy production must be described.

When assessing demand points and potential recipients for heat utilization, the project

developer shall consider both existing and future locations suitable for businesses that can utilize the heat. The assessment shall include a realistic evaluation of which industries,

businesses, or recipients may benefit from the heat. If the developer plans to deliver

surplus heat for food production (e.g. greenhouses, aquaculture), measures to ensure reliable delivery must be described. Relevant municipalities, county authorities/County

Governors, grid operators, district heating companies (if applicable), and business

stakeholders shall be contacted to assess the impacts and opportunities for surplus heat

utilization.

11 Costs and Financing The project developer shall:

• Provide estimated investment costs for the project. The investment shall be

presented as a total cost with a breakdown of the following elements: o Nuclear facility including all necessary mechanical and electrotechnical

components, including transport and installation.

o Groundwork and site preparation, including any channels/tunnels for

cooling and port facilities.

o Grid connection solution to the external grid, including internal grid infrastructure and any customer-specific grid installations owned by the

grid operator.

o Reinforcement of existing grid infrastructure. The power plant’s share of costs for necessary upgrades (cf. grid connection charge).

o Land acquisition.

o Financing costs. o Project costs prior to investment decision: planning, process management,

assessments, etc.

o Project costs after investment decision: engineering, planning,

administration, etc. • Provide estimated annual fixed and variable operating and maintenance costs,

broken down by relevant cost categories, stated in øre/kWh and million NOK/year.

• Describe costs associated with decommissioning of the facility and restoration of the site.

• Estimate costs for nuclear fuel and handling of spent nuclear fuel, broken down by

storage and other waste management, including security measures. • Describe costs related to future reinvestments.

• Estimate revenues from electricity sales.

• Describe opportunities for providing system services and participating in other

balancing markets, and estimate potential revenues. Describe how much and how quickly production can be technically and economically regulated up or down.

• Describe how activities at the facility will be financed. Financing for

decommissioning and waste management shall be included in the description. • Describe how nuclear liability under Chapter 3 of the Nuclear Energy Act will be

addressed, including insurance or other guarantees to cover nuclear damage in the

event of an accident.

• Assess other relevant monetized socio-economic benefits and disadvantages, such

as costs related to grid reinforcement needs and the need to strengthen local,

regional, and national emergency preparedness.

12 Natural Hazards and Vulnerability to Climate Change

The project developer shall:

• Identify natural hazards and the impacts of climate change, including extreme weather events, that are relevant to the safety of the nuclear power plant, in

accordance with international recommendations from the IAEA.

• Assess the actual risk of storm surge, flooding, and erosion, and document that the project meets the safety requirements in accordance with Section 7-2, first

paragraph, of the Norwegian Building Regulations (TEK17).

• Assess the actual risk of landslides in steep terrain, and document that the project

meets the safety requirements in accordance with TEK17 § 7-3, first paragraph, and

§ 7-4. • Assess the actual risk of quick clay landslides, and document that the project meets

the safety requirements in accordance with TEK17 § 7-3 and its associated

guidance. • Identify other natural hazards, including events triggered by natural conditions that

may pose a risk to human life and health or significant material assets, if

information indicates that such hazards may be relevant in or near the planning area, in accordance with TEK17 § 7-1.

• Document that the construction site and adjacent terrain will not be subject to

damage or significant disadvantage as a result of the project, cf. TEK17 § 7-1,

second paragraph. • Assess whether risk-reducing measures are necessary. If so, it must be

demonstrated that such protective installations do not require maintenance or

inspection to maintain their risk-reducing effect.

Method:

IAEA SSG-18: Meteorological and Hydrological Hazards in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations provides guidance and recommendations on how to assess natural hazards

and climate change impacts for nuclear facilities, including the types of data to be used.

Other relevant IAEA safety standards and recommendations include NS-G-3.6:

Geotechnical Aspects of Site Evaluation and Foundations for Nuclear Power Plants, SSR-2/1: Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design and SSG-38: Construction for Nuclear Installations.

The assessment of actual natural hazards must take climate change into account. For landslides in steep terrain, the evaluation shall follow NVE’s guidelines for assessing

landslide safety NVEs veileder for utredning av sikkerhet mot skred i bratt terreng. Flood

and erosion risks shall be assessed in accordance with NVE’s guidelines for flood hazard

assessments NVEs veileder om utredning av flomfare. Quick clay landslide risk shall be

clarified in accordance with NVE’s Guide 1/2019 Safety Against Quick Clay Landslides NVEs veileder 1/2019 «Sikkerhet mot kvikkleireskred. Hazards from surface water shall be

assessed in accordance with NVE’s guidance on managing surface water in land-use

planning NVEs rettleiar for handtering av overvatn i arealplanar. For further information

and clarification of actual hazard levels, refer to NVE’s website on natural hazard

assessments. NVEs nettsider om utredning av naturfare

Basic requirements for mechanical resistance and stability of structures under TEK17 § 10-

2 Structural Safety may be met through design according to Eurocodes with national

annexes. An initial geotechnical assessment should be conducted to evaluate the suitability of the construction site and provide a basis for further design.

Natural hazard assessments must be reported to NVE in accordance with the Planning and Building Act § 2-4 and the Regulation on Mandatory Reporting of Ground Investigations

and Natural Hazard Assessments. Geotechnical ground investigations must be submitted

to NGU via NADAG. Information is available here: Meld inn naturfareutredninger - NVE

13 Other Pollution and Emissions

13.1 Water and Soil Pollution

The project developer shall:

• Map areas that may be affected by runoff from construction activities or by

discharges of oil and other chemicals. • Identify and map all waterworks, private wells, and designated backup water

sources, including associated catchment areas, that may be affected by runoff as

described above. • Describe potential discharges to water during both construction and operational

phases. In particular, discharges of cooling water—including volume, temperature,

and any pollutants in the cooling water—shall be described. • Assess the likelihood of pollution during construction and operation. Potential

impacts on aquatic environments and biodiversity in coastal and freshwater

systems shall be assessed under Chapter 17.6.

• Assess the risk of contaminated soil within the planning area. The current conditions must be investigated and documented.

• Evaluate how the project may affect drinking water sources and their associated

catchment areas.

Method:

Assessments of water and soil pollution that do not involve radioactive contamination shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Regulation on Impact

Assessment and using the methodology described in the Impact Assessment Handbook M-

1941 by the Norwegian Environment Agency and the Directorate for Cultural Heritage. The

assessment of soil contamination risk must also include radioactive pollution.

Owners/operators of waterworks, backup water sources, and private wells, as well as host

municipalities and the Norwegian Food Safety Authority, shall be contacted during the assessment. Information on current land use in the planning and influence area, and on

water area management plans, shall be obtained. If the mapping reveals water

sources/wells used for purposes other than drinking water, it may be necessary to assess potential impacts on these sources as well. Discharges shall be specified as precisely as

possible. Examples from other facilities with similar discharges and how these were

managed may be used.

13.2 Noise

The project developer shall:

• Assess whether and how noise from the facility may affect noise-sensitive buildings

during construction and operation.

• Prepare noise zone maps in accordance with guidelines and threshold values for

industrial noise. Buildings with a calculated noise level above Lden 40 dB shall be

indicated on the map. The noise level and distance to the relevant noise source shall be specified for all buildings with a noise level above Lden 40 dB.

• Calculate any significant cumulative noise from multiple sources.

Method:

The assessment shall follow the requirements and guidance in the Guideline for the

Treatment of Noise in Land Use Planning (T-1442) and the Guide to the Treatment of Noise in Land Use Planning (M-2061). The methodology used shall be explained. Noise zone maps

shall be prepared in accordance with the calculation methods described in the Norwegian

Environment Agency’s guide M-2061.

14 Visual Impacts, Landscape, Outdoor Recreation, and Cultural Heritage

14.1 Landscape and Visualizations

The project developer shall:

• Describe the landscape and landscape values within the project and influence

areas.

• Prepare a visibility map for the project.

• Produce photorealistic visualizations that provide a representative impression of the project’s visual impacts both near the site and from a distance.

• Assess how the project will affect the landscape and its values.

• Evaluate visual impacts on residential buildings, holiday homes, and other relevant structures, based on proximity to the project and viewing direction.

• Describe the effect of any obstruction lighting from point structures.

Method: The assessment shall be conducted using recognized methodology in accordance with the

Impact Assessment Handbook M-1941 by the Norwegian Environment Agency and the

Directorate for Cultural Heritage. Visualizations shall provide a representative view of the project from locations where people are present. Visualizations shall include the entire

project, cf. Chapter 3. Photo viewpoints and directions shall be shown on maps, and

visualizations shall be produced as photomontages and, if relevant, 3D models. Suggestions for photo viewpoints shall be obtained from affected municipalities (Aure,

Heim, and Hitra), owners/tenants of residential and holiday homes in the vicinity, and

relevant interest organizations. As a minimum, the project shall be visualized from/in the

following areas: • Osmarkfjellet

• Skålvassfjellet

• Storfonna

• Vardheia

• Trondheimsleia

Visual impacts shall also be assessed for other relevant topics, such as cultural environments and outdoor recreation.

14.2 Cultural Heritage and Cultural Environments

The project developer shall: • Provide an overview of known automatically protected cultural heritage sites,

modern cultural heritage sites, and formally protected cultural environments

within the project and influence areas, and present these on maps. • Assess how the project may affect cultural heritage and environments through

direct interventions/land use and indirectly through visual impacts, noise, or other

effects. Both near-field and distant impacts shall be considered.

• Produce visualizations where the project is expected to have significant visual impacts on important cultural heritage sites or environments.

• Assess the potential for discoveries of automatically protected cultural heritage

within the project and influence areas. • Consult with cultural heritage authorities to determine whether § 9 investigations

under the Cultural Heritage Act are required as part of the impact assessment.

Method:

The assessment shall be conducted using recognized methodology in accordance with the

Impact Assessment Handbook M-1941 by the Norwegian Environment Agency and the

Directorate for Cultural Heritage. Cultural heritage sites and environments shall be presented on maps alongside the project. Value maps and maps showing areas with

potential for new discoveries of automatically protected cultural heritage shall also be

prepared. If relevant LIDAR data exist for the project and influence areas, they shall be used in the assessment.

Cultural heritage authorities shall be contacted to assess the potential for discoveries of automatically protected cultural heritage in the planning and influence areas, to provide

information on the need for site inspections, and to identify any gaps in available

information.

Affected municipalities (Aure, Heim, and Hitra) shall be consulted to select representative

photo viewpoints for visualizations of valuable cultural heritage sites and environments.

14.3 Outdoor Recreation

The project developer shall:

• Describe current use of the project and influence areas for outdoor recreation,

including hunting, fishing, and marine-based recreational activities.

• Prepare a value map for outdoor recreation showing recreational areas, trails, and

important viewpoints within the project and influence areas.

• Refer to any municipal or regional plans for outdoor recreation in the project and influence areas.

• Assess how the project may affect outdoor recreation on land and at sea. Both

direct impacts, such as physical barriers and land use, and indirect impacts, such as visibility and noise, shall be considered. Impacts from potential undesirable events

shall also be assessed.

• Produce visualizations where the project is expected to have significant visual impacts on important recreational areas.

• Briefly describe alternative recreational areas offering similar activity

opportunities.

Method:

The assessment shall follow the methodology outlined in the Impact Assessment

Handbook M-1941 by the Norwegian Environment Agency and the Directorate for Cultural Heritage.

Outdoor recreation shall be described based on site visits and existing knowledge, including mapped recreational areas, state-secured recreational areas, and recreational

trails and routes listed in databases such as Naturbase, Turrutebasen, UT.no, and others.

For areas where recreational use has not been mapped, or where existing mapping is outdated or incomplete, an evaluation shall be made to determine whether the area is

important for outdoor recreation and whether the project may significantly affect this. If

so, mapping or supplementary mapping shall be conducted using the applicable methodology.

Relevant county authorities, municipalities, and local and regional outdoor recreation

organizations, hiking associations, and local experts shall be contacted to gather

information, cf. the list in Chapter 2.4 on stakeholder involvement.

Affected municipalities (Aure, Heim, and Hitra) shall be consulted to select representative

photo viewpoints for visualizations from important recreational areas.

The assessment of outdoor recreation shall also be based on information from relevant thematic studies that affect recreational experiences or infrastructure, including land use,

biodiversity, landscape, cultural heritage, and noise.

15 Overarching Environmental Objectives and Climate Impacts

15.1 National and International Environmental

Objectives

The project developer shall: • Describe, in general terms, which national and international environmental

objectives are relevant to the project.

• Assess how the project may affect these environmental objectives.

Method:

The assessment may be based on information from the Norwegian Environment Agency’s

website Miljøstatus. The evaluation of impacts on species management objectives shall be included as part of the biodiversity assessment, cf. Chapter 17.

15.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Benefits

The project developer shall:

• Provide an estimate of the project’s climate benefit from an energy system

perspective.

• Calculate expected greenhouse gas emissions from all processing of carbon-rich

materials associated with the project, including drainage of peatlands. • Describe and calculate expected greenhouse gas emissions from, among other

things, material use, fuel production, construction activities, and transport.

Method:

The assessment shall be conducted using recognized methodology in accordance with the

Impact Assessment Handbook M-1941 by the Norwegian Environment Agency and the Directorate for Cultural Heritage.

16 Biodiversity and Aquatic Environment

16.1 General Methodology for Biodiversity Assessment

The project developer shall:

• Follow the methodology outlined in the Impact Assessment Handbook M-1941 by

the Directorate for Cultural Heritage and the Norwegian Environment Agency.

• Prepare value maps showing protected areas, habitat types, species functional

areas/landscape ecological functional areas, species occurrences, and geological

diversity within the project’s influence area. • Prepare tables listing biodiversity elements that may be affected by the project.

• Assess the project in accordance with the principles in Sections 8 to 12 of the

Nature Diversity Act. • Evaluate whether and how undesirable events may affect the subtopics below,

based on the assessment of such events.

• Assess uncertainty and the potential for additional natural values beyond those already identified. If the entire area affected by the project is not mapped during

the assessment, this must be justified.

16.2 Area Description and Natural Basis

The project developer shall: • Provide a general ecological description of the affected natural areas, with

emphasis on the natural basis, main habitat types, previous interventions, and

other characteristic features of the area.

16.3 Protected Areas and Areas Subject to Land Use

Restrictions

The project developer shall:

• Provide an overview of existing and proposed protected areas, including names and conservation objectives, as well as selected habitat types within the project

and influence areas. These areas shall be shown on maps together with the project.

• Assess the project’s direct and indirect impacts on biodiversity within any

protected areas. It must be stated whether the project may conflict with the conservation objectives and the objectives described in management plans.

Method:

Assessments shall be based on available information, consultation with relevant

authorities, and supplementary mapping of selected habitat types where necessary.

16.4 Terrestrial Habitat Types

The project developer shall:

• Provide an overview of habitat type locations within the project and influence areas

that are red-listed according to the current Norwegian Red List for habitat types or

have key ecosystem functions, and that may be significantly affected by the

project.

• Conduct field mapping of habitat types in all parts of the project and influence

areas where no previous mapping has been carried out according to the Norwegian

Environment Agency’s instructions, or where existing mapping is outdated or incomplete.

• Assess how the project may affect habitat type locations due to land use,

fragmentation, or weakening/loss of landscape ecological connectivity.

Method:

Existing information on habitat types shall be obtained from public databases and any previous surveys.

Field mapping shall be conducted in accordance with the Norwegian Environment

Agency’s mapping instruction M-2209 (terrestrial). Fieldwork shall be carried out at a suitable time of year, considering the growing season for vascular plants and fungi where

relevant.

The term “influence area” in bullet points 1 and 2 above refers to the area in which the

project may affect habitat types through construction activities and regular operations.

16.5 Terrestrial Species, Their Functional Areas, and

Landscape Ecological Connectivity

The project developer shall:

• Provide an overview of red-listed species according to the current Norwegian Red

List for species, species prioritized under Section 23 of the Nature Diversity Act,

protected species, responsibility species, special ecological forms of species, and other species requiring special consideration, including those of national

management interest listed in Naturbase. The overview shall also include Least

Concern (LC) species if the project may significantly affect their populations. The overview shall cover species that may be significantly affected within the project

and influence areas, and shall include the following groups:

o Vascular plants, mosses, lichens, fungi, and their functional areas.

o Mammals (including otters), birds, insects, amphibians, and reptiles with

ecological and/or landscape ecological functional areas.

• Assess how the project may affect species and their ecological and landscape

ecological functional areas due to, for example, land use, fragmentation, disturbance, and collision risk.

Method: Existing information on relevant species shall be obtained from public databases, previous

surveys, relevant local and regional authorities (including the environmental departments

of County Governors for sensitive species data), interest organizations, and individuals with local expertise.

Field mapping shall be conducted in areas with insufficient data and potential for

decision-relevant species that may be significantly affected. Decision-relevant species

include red-listed species in categories CR, EN, VU, and NT, species prioritized under Section 23 of the Nature Diversity Act, protected species, responsibility species, special

ecological forms of species, and species requiring special consideration, as listed in

Naturbase. Mapping of sensitive bird species and other raptors shall be conducted during the breeding season.

16.6 Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity in Coastal

and Freshwater Systems

The project developer shall: • Map the planned project area in which physical interventions may affect coastal

and freshwater environments during the construction phase, including potential

removal of riparian vegetation.

• Define the influence area to be assessed, including delineation and mapping of coastal and freshwater bodies that may be affected during both construction and

operational phases.

• Clarify existing knowledge about habitat types, species, and their functional areas within the project and influence areas, and assess whether additional data is

needed.

• Conduct field surveys of decision-relevant limnic and marine species and habitat types within the project and influence areas.

• Determine the value of decision-relevant habitat types, species, and their

functional areas in the project and influence areas, using the valuation criteria

outlined in M-1941. • Assess the project’s direct and indirect impacts on decision-relevant habitat types,

species, and their functional areas during construction and operation. The

assessment shall also consider whether the project may affect biodiversity in designated or proposed marine protected areas, and whether it may conflict with

conservation objectives and management plans.

• Describe the consequences of the project during construction and operation,

including the need for mitigation measures to avoid or reduce negative

environmental impacts on decision-relevant habitat types, species, and their

functional areas.

• Clarify existing knowledge about the current ecological and chemical status of affected water bodies, and assess whether further data is needed.

• Report on existing environmental objectives for affected water bodies and assess

any consequences the project may have on these objectives. The project must be assessed in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Management Regulation, and

proposals for relevant monitoring studies shall be described.

Method:

To delineate the project and influence areas in coastal waters, data on current patterns

and other relevant environmental parameters must be collected. These data shall form the

basis for modelling dispersion and dilution in the recipient, and be used to estimate the

area potentially affected by cooling water discharge. Recognized dispersion models and relevant expertise in hydrodynamic modelling shall be used.

Field surveys shall be conducted by qualified personnel with documented expertise in

marine and limnic mapping, in accordance with Marin metodehåndbok NiN 3.0, The Institute of Marine Research’s metode for kartlegging av sårbare arter og naturtyper på

grunt vann (0-50 meter), Metodehåndbok limnisk NiN 3.0 and Faggrunnlag for

artskartlegging i Noreg (M-2881). Fieldwork shall be conducted during periods in which relevant biodiversity can be observed, primarily between April and September, and timed

according to species life cycles and local conditions.

Mapping and assessment of the aquatic environment shall follow the Veileder for klassifisering av miljøtilstand i kyst- og ferskvann (02:2018). In this context, “aquatic

environment” refers to the physical, chemical, and ecological status of a water body. A

water body is a defined and significant quantity of surface water—such as a lake, reservoir, river, stream, canal, fjord, or coastal stretch—or a defined volume of groundwater in one or

more aquifers. Results from new sampling shall be reported and registered in the database

Vannmiljø.

Field surveys shall be conducted in areas with insufficient data to gather information on

decision-relevant species and habitat types that may be negatively affected by the project.

Decision-relevant species include: • Red-listed species in categories CR, EN, VU, and NT

• Species prioritized under Section 23 of the Nature Diversity Act

• Protected species • Species of national responsibility

• Special ecological forms of species

• Species requiring special consideration, including those of national management

interest in Naturbase

• Species particularly vulnerable to radioactivity (e.g. molluscs, crustaceans, marine

mammals)

The overview shall also include Least Concern (LC) species if the project may negatively

affect them.

An assessment of uncertainty in the knowledge base shall be conducted, including uncertainty related to previous data collection, new sampling, data analysis, and any

knowledge gaps. If field surveys do not cover the entire affected area, this must be

justified. The potential for undocumented natural values shall also be assessed.

Interventions in freshwater (lakes, ponds, rivers, streams, and groundwater) requiring a

license under the Water Resources Act are described on NVE’s website

konsesjonspliktvurdering av vassdragstiltak, and in Veileder til vannressursloven og NVEs behandling av vassdrags- og grunnvannstiltak. If the project is not subject to licensing

under the Water Resources Act, it must be clarified under the Regulation on Permits for

Physical Measures in Watercourses. Application forms from relevant county authorities and

County Governors should be used. Sources such as Vann-Nett, Vannmiljø, and municipal

map services may be used. If uncertain about the appropriate authority, contact the

county authority or County Governor for clarification.

In Chapter 17.6, the term “influence area” refers to the area in which the project may affect

species and habitat types through construction activities and regular operations.

16.7 Geological Diversity

The project developer shall:

• Provide an overview of decision-relevant geotopes according to the current Norwegian Red List for habitat types and geological heritage within the project and

influence areas. Any valuable sites shall be shown on maps together with the

project.

• Assess how the project may affect geological diversity at both site and landscape levels.

Method: The assessment shall be based on existing information on geological diversity from public

databases and other relevant sources (e.g. NGU), as well as site visits if necessary.

Landforms shall be mapped according to DN Handbook 13 where remote sensing data are

not available.

16.8 Ecosystem Services

The project developer shall:

• Assess whether the project will affect fundamental ecosystem services such as climate regulation, stormwater management, erosion control, pollination, and

water purification.

16.9 Invasive Alien Species

The project developer shall:

• Provide an overview of occurrences of invasive alien species with a high risk of

spreading and negatively impacting biodiversity as a result of the project. • Assess where mapping should be conducted prior to the start of construction

activities, and which measures should be implemented in accordance with Section

24 of the Regulation on Alien Organisms.

Method:

The overview shall be based on the current list of alien species and draw on known and

available information from Naturbase and Artskart. Reference should also be made to the

report Håndtering av løsmasser med fremmede skadelige plantearter og forsvarlig

kompostering av planteavfall med fremmede skadelige plantearter.

16.10 Cumulative Impacts – Nature Diversity Act § 10

The developer shall:

• Assess whether the project, in combination with other projects, may cause

significant adverse effects on ecosystems, for example due to impacts on specific environmental values that affect the ecosystem as a whole.

• Evaluate the extent to which the project and other existing or planned

interventions may collectively influence the management objectives for species and habitat types as stated in §§ 4 and 5 of the Nature Diversity Act.

Method:

The guidance document Veileder Naturmangfoldloven kapittel II should form the basis for the assessments.

17 Public Health The developer shall:

• Assess whether and how the project may have local, regional, and national public health consequences. The following topics shall be considered:

o Health impacts related to local environmental quality, infrastructure, and

transport o Health impacts from radiation

o Health impacts from radioactive contamination and other pollution

o Health impacts from potential unwanted incidents

o Health impacts from noise o Mental health effects due to the possibility of unwanted incidents

• Evaluate any cumulative public health impacts of the project together with other

implemented, approved, or planned projects in the surrounding area.

Method:

Municipalities are the local public health authorities, and the developer shall engage in dialogue with the host municipalities during the assessment of health impacts. The County

Governors shall also be contacted. The assessment shall be based on the evaluations of

radiation protection (Chapter 6), radioactive contamination and waste (Chapter 7), nuclear

incidents and other unwanted events (Chapter 9), and visual impacts, landscape, outdoor recreation, and cultural heritage (Chapter 15).

18 Other Societal Interests

18.1 Defence Interests

The developer shall:

• Assess whether and how the project, including potential unwanted incidents, may

affect activities at Ørland Air Base.

• Assess whether and how the project, including potential unwanted incidents, may affect other defence facilities and operations.

• Assess whether and how the project, including potential unwanted incidents, may

affect Norway’s resilience. • Assess whether and how the safe operation of the facility may be influenced by

military activity during peace, crisis, or war.

Method:

The Norwegian Armed Forces, the Norwegian Defence Estates Agency, and the Norwegian

Defence Research Establishment shall be contacted as part of the impact assessment

process.

18.2 Other Infrastructure

The developer shall:

• Describe the need for marking aviation obstacles in accordance with the regulation on reporting, registration, and marking of aviation obstacles.

• Assess whether and how the project may affect communication, navigation, radar,

and surveillance systems related to civil aviation. • Assess whether and how the project may affect road traffic, including pedestrian

and bicycle paths and school routes for children.

• Assess whether and how the project may affect electronic communications.

• Assess whether and how the project may affect safe, environmentally friendly, and efficient navigation in the Trondheimsleia waterway.

• Assess the need for safety measures related to infrastructure in connection with the

risk of unwanted incidents, based on the assessment of such incidents.

Method:

Avinor, the Norwegian Defence Estates Agency, and the Civil Aviation Authority shall be contacted for an assessment of the project's potential impacts on aviation. The Norwegian

Public Roads Administration, county authorities, and host municipalities shall be

contacted for an assessment of potential impacts on road traffic. The Norwegian Coastal

Administration shall be contacted for an assessment of impacts on maritime navigation.

18.3 Agriculture

The developer shall:

• Describe agricultural land and activities within the planning and influence area.

• Assess impacts on agriculture and forestry, including operational disadvantages, loss of cultivated and cultivable land, grazing areas, types of forest affected, and

effects on production.

• Evaluate local, regional, and national impacts on agriculture resulting from potential unwanted incidents related to the project.

• Assess impacts on reindeer husbandry resulting from potential unwanted incidents

related to the project.

• Assess whether and how the agricultural sector may be indirectly affected, for

example through import restrictions, reduced demand, or specific documentation

requirements.

• Describe the need for monitoring and contingency plans to safeguard agricultural interests.

Method: Agricultural authorities in the host municipalities and at the County Governor’s office shall

be contacted for assessment of the project’s potential impacts on agriculture. The

assessment shall include potential impacts from the planned use of surplus heat, if relevant, cf. Chapter 11.2.

18.4 Mineral Resources

The developer shall:

• Describe all registered mineral deposits within the planning and influence area, including active extraction sites and areas with extraction rights. This information

shall be presented on maps.

• Assess potential impacts on future extraction of mineral resources.

Method:

Updated databases for gravel and crushed stone, industrial minerals, natural stone, and metals shall be used to investigate whether the project affects known mineral deposits,

registrations, prospects, or provinces.

Datasets from the Directorate of Mining (DMF) shall be used to determine whether the project affects mass extraction sites, mining rights, or abandoned mines. DMF also

provides datasets with exploration reports that may offer supplementary information

about mineral resources in the area.

When assessing the potential for mineral resource discoveries, it shall be considered

whether the existing knowledge base is sufficient to identify potential conflicts with

mineral resources without conducting further geological investigations.

In areas with rights under Chapter 4 (exploration rights) and Chapter 6 (extraction rights)

of the Minerals Act, the rights holder shall be contacted for information and assessment of the need for adjustments. In areas with active extraction, the operator shall be contacted.

In areas with abandoned mining operations, landowners and DMF should be contacted for

relevant information.

18.5 Aquaculture and Fisheries

The developer shall:

• Describe the aquaculture and fisheries industries within the project’s influence area.

• Assess whether and how the project may have direct impacts on existing and future

aquaculture and fisheries during both construction and operational phases.

• Assess whether and how the project may have indirect impacts on existing and future aquaculture and fisheries, for example through import restrictions, reduced

demand in sensitive markets, or specific documentation requirements.

• Assess whether and how the project may affect fish health and welfare. • Describe the need for monitoring and contingency plans to safeguard the interests

of the aquaculture and fisheries industries.

Method:

The assessment shall be conducted in accordance with guidance available on the

Arealplaner website (Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries), and the Yggdrasil mapping tool

shall be used.

Representatives from the aquaculture and fisheries sectors, including local and regional

fishermen’s associations, aquaculture companies, and other relevant industry organizations, shall be involved in the assessment process. The assessment shall include

potential impacts from the planned use of surplus heat, if relevant, cf. Chapter 11.2.

Sensitive markets refer to markets with very low tolerance for risks associated with

nuclear facilities. This includes, among others, certain markets in Asia.

18.6 Local and Regional Business and Host

Municipalities’ Economy

The developer shall: • Describe local and regional employment related to the project during both

construction and operational phases.

• Describe the anticipated need for local and regional goods and services, including new jobs, during construction and operation.

• Describe the existing capacity of relevant services in the host municipalities.

• Assess whether and how local and regional businesses can supply sufficient goods

and services to meet the project’s needs.

• Assess impacts on local and regional tourism, including both direct effects and indirect effects related to, for example, the area’s attractiveness to tourists. The

assessment shall also consider whether activity at the nuclear facility may have

positive effects for local tourism businesses through increased demand for goods and services.

• Assess whether and how the project may affect operations at Tjeldbergodden, for

example through safety requirements or safety zones. • Assess other impacts on local and regional businesses, including other actors in the

Taftøy industrial park.

• Describe factors that affect the host municipalities’ revenues and expenditures (e.g.

property tax). • Assess the demands the project places on private and municipal services and new

municipal infrastructure, excluding emergency preparedness.

Method:

Local and regional authorities, local/regional businesses, and regional tourism

organizations shall be contacted to gather information about the current situation and planned activities/developments. Municipal expenses related to emergency preparedness

shall be assessed under the section Nuclear Emergency Preparedness and Other

Preparedness, cf. Chapter 10. The assessment shall include potential impacts from the

planned use of surplus heat, if relevant, cf. Chapter 11.2.

Appendix 1

IAEA Requirements, Recommendations and Guides relevant for

constructing and operating a nuclear power plant

GSR Part 1 (Rev. 1)

Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework for Safety

SSG-16 (Rev. 1) Establishing the Safety Infrastructure for a Nuclear Power Programme SSG-12 Licensing Process for Nuclear Installations

GSR Part 2

Leadership and Management for Safety

GS-G-3.5 The Management System for Nuclear Installations SSG-72 The Operating Organization for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-75 Recruitment, Qualification and Training of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants

GSR Part 3

Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards

GSG-7 Occupational Radiation Protection GSG-8 Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment GSG-10 Prospective Radiological Environmental Impact Assessment for Facilities and Activities RS-G-1.8 Environmental and Source Monitoring for Purposes of Radiation Protection*

GSR Part 4 (Rev. 1)

Safety Assessment for Facilities and Activities

SSG-61 Format and Content of the Safety Analysis Report for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-2 (Rev. 1) Deterministic Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-3 (Rev. 1) Development and Application of Level 1 Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-4 Development and Application of Level 2 Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants* SSG-25 Periodic Safety Review for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-30 Safety Classification of Structures, Systems and Components in Nuclear Power Plants SSG-89 Evaluation of Seismic Safety for Nuclear Installations

GSR Part 5

Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste

GSG-1 Classification of Radioactive Waste SSG-40 Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste from Nuclear Power Plants and Research Reactors GSG-3 The Safety Case and Safety Assessment for the Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste WS-G-6.1 Storage of Radioactive Waste

GSR Part 6

Decommissioning of Facilities

SSG-47 Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants, Research Reactors and Other Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities WS-G-5.2 Safety Assessment for the Decommissioning of Facilities Using Radioactive Material

GSR Part 7

Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency

GS-G-2.1 Arrangements for Preparedness for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency GSG-2 Criteria for Use in Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency SSG-65 Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency Involving the Transport of Radioactive Material

SSR-1 Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations

SSG-35 Site Survey and Site Selection for Nuclear Installations NS-G-3.6 Geotechnical Aspects of Site Evaluation and Foundations for Nuclear Power Plants* SSG-9 (Rev. 1) Seismic Hazards in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations SSG-18 Meteorological and Hydrological Hazards in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations SSG-21 Volcanic Hazards in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations SSG-79 Hazards Associated with Human Induced External Events in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations NS-G-3.2 Dispersion of Radioactive Material in Air and Water and Consideration of Population Distribution in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Power Plants*

SSR-2/1 (Rev. 1)

Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design

SSG-27 (Rev. 1) Criticality Safety in the Handling of Fissile Material SSG-64 Protection against Internal Hazards in the Design of Nuclear Power Plants SSG-88 Design Extension Conditions and the Concept of Practical Elimination in the Design of Nuclear Power Plants SSG-90 Radiation Protection Aspects of Design for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-67 Seismic Design for Nuclear Installations SSG-68 Design of Nuclear Installations Against External Events Excluding Earthquakes SSG-52 Design of the Reactor Core for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-56 Design of the Reactor Coolant System and Associated Systems for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-34 Design of Electrical Power Systems for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-39 Design of Instrumentation and Control Systems for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-51 Human Factors Engineering in the Design of Nuclear Power Plants SSG-53 Design of the Reactor Containment and Associated Systems for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-62 Design of Auxiliary Systems and Supporting Systems for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-63 Design of Fuel Handling and Storage System for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-69 Equipment Qualification for Nuclear Installations

SSR-2/2 (Rev. 1)

Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Commissioning and Operation

SSG-38 Construction for Nuclear Installations SSG-28 Commissioning for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-76 Conduct of Operations at Nuclear Power Plants SSG-73 Core Management and Fuel Handling for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-77 Protection Against Internal and External Hazards in the Operation of Nuclear Power Plants

SSG-13 (Rev. 1) Chemistry Programme for Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants SSG-15 (Rev. 1) Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel SSG-50 Operating Experience Feedback for Nuclear Installations SSG-74 Maintenance, Testing, Surveillance and Inspection in Nuclear Power Plants SSG-48 Ageing Management and Development of a Programme for Long Term Operation of Nuclear Power Plants SSG-54 Accident Management Programmes for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-70 Operational Limits and Conditions and Operating Procedures for Nuclear Power Plants SSG-71 Modifications to Nuclear Power Plants

SSR-6 (Rev. 1)

Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material (2018 Edition)*

SSG-26 (Rev. 1) Advisory Material for the IAEA Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material (2018 Edition) SSG-86 Radiation Protection Programmes for the Transport of Radioactive Material

NSS No. 20

Objective and Essential Elements of a State's Nuclear Security Regime

NSS No. 19 Establishing the Nuclear Security Infrastructure for a Nuclear Power Programme

NSS No. 13

Nuclear Security Recommendations on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities (INFCIRC/225/Revision 5)

NSS No. 27-G Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities (Implementation of INFCIRC/225/Revision 5) NSS No. 35-G Security during the Lifetime of a Nuclear Facility NSS No. 7 Nuclear Security Culture NSS No. 8-G (Rev. 1) Preventive and Protective Measures Against Insider Threats NSS No. 26-G Security of Nuclear Material in Transport NSS No. 23-G Security of Nuclear Information NSS No. 42-G Computer Security for Nuclear Security NSS No. 33-T Computer Security of Instrumentation and Control Systems at Nuclear Facilities NSS No. 48-T Identification and Categorization of Sabotage Targets, and Identification of Vital Areas at Nuclear Facilities

Titles in bold indicate Guides that may be particularly relevant at early stages of evaluating the potential suitability of sites for nuclear power plants, including impact assessment.

Guides are listed in relation to Requirements or Recommendations to which they are most relevant, but some Guides may refer to a number of different higher-level publications. The order in which Guides are listed is intended to be broadly thematic, but does not indicate the relative importance of the different Guides. * IAEA standards and guidance are updated periodically, and many of the publications listed (especially Guides) are currently in various stages of revision. Titles marked with an asterisk indicate publications for which revised versions are expected to be published in the near future.