| Dokumendiregister | Sotsiaalministeerium |
| Viit | 1.4-1.1/119-1 |
| Registreeritud | 14.01.2026 |
| Sünkroonitud | 15.01.2026 |
| Liik | Sissetulev kiri |
| Funktsioon | 1.4 EL otsustusprotsess ja rahvusvaheline koostöö |
| Sari | 1.4-1.1 Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu töös osalemise dokumendid |
| Toimik | 1.4-1.1/2026 |
| Juurdepääsupiirang | Avalik |
| Juurdepääsupiirang | |
| Adressaat | Riigikantselei |
| Saabumis/saatmisviis | Riigikantselei |
| Vastutaja | Elen Ohov (Sotsiaalministeerium, Kantsleri vastutusvaldkond, Euroopa Liidu ja väliskoostöö osakond) |
| Originaal | Ava uues aknas |
EN EN
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Brussels, 10.12.2025
COM(2025) 981 final
2025/0397 (COD)
Proposal for a
REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards
simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden
(Text with EEA relevance)
EN 0 EN
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
Union legislation should deliver its policy objectives efficiently, effectively and
transparently. ‘The Future of European Competitiveness’ report emphasised that the transition
to a low-carbon, resource-efficient, and circular economy will be essential for securing the
EU's long-term economic prosperity, resilience, and competitiveness.3 With the
Competitiveness Compass for the EU, the Commission presented its strategy for the next five
years for unlocking the full potential of this transition.4 Moreover, the Commission has since
strengthened targets to reduce administrative costs for business (together with public
authorities) and Small and Medium sized Entreprises by 25% and 35% respectively (1).
A solid body of Union environmental law now exists. The Commission takes seriously its
duty to manage these laws effectively and invests heavily in reviewing (2) their application to
ensure that they deliver as intended and that problematic issues are tackled early. Moreover,
the Commission is committed to ‘stress-test’ all EU laws under its current term of office. The
content of this proposal (and others in the ‘omnibus’ package) represents the initial outcome
of the Commission’s ongoing ‘stress-testing’ in the environment area (3) built on extensive
engagement with stakeholders through meetings at political level, roundtables,
implementation dialogues, call for evidence and inputs received from stakeholders, including
civil society, businesses and businesses associations, think tanks and public authorities. The
omnibus package addresses legislation related to the circular economy, the operation of
industrial installations, the management of geospatial data, and environmental permitting.
The above legislation are crucial parts of delivering the Union’s commitment to a fair green,
and digital transition and the shift towards a circular economy in particular. It is important
that this legislation works well, mobilises the Union’s assets like the single market and avoids
imposing unnecessary costs on business, public authorities and citizens.
This specific proposed Regulation aims to make targeted revisions to the following
instruments:
– Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries (4).
– Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 on reporting of environmental data from industrial
installations, establishing an Industrial Emissions Portal and repealing Regulation
(EC) No 166/2006 (5).
This proposal includes limited and targeted amendments to the above Regulations in the area
of environment. Further possible modifications of those Regulations are entirely outside of the
1 COM(2025) 47 final of 11 February 2025, A simpler and faster Europe: Communication on implementation
and simplification. 2 COM(2025) 420 final of 7 July 2025, 2025 Environmental Implementation Review - Environmental
implementation for prosperity and security. 3 Announced by President von der Leyen in her political guidelines 2024-2029 ‘Europe’s Choice’. 4 Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 concerning
batteries and waste batteries, amending Directive 2008/98/EC and Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and
repealing Directive 2006/66/EC; OJ L 191 28.7.2023, p.1. 5 Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on reporting of
environmental data from industrial installations, establishing an Industrial Emissions Portal and repealing
Regulation (EC) No 166/2006; OJ L, 2024/1244, 2.5.2024, p.1.
EN 1 EN
scope and aims of the present proposal. The need for such modifications may be assessed, as
appropriate, in the context of further stress-testing of EU environmental legislation announced
in the [Chapeau Communication] and in Commission work programme 2026. The
Commission will constructively engage with the co-legislators, in order to ensure that the
legislative process on the present proposal fully preserves its essential object and does not
distort it.
Batteries Regulation
Amending producer definition for distance contracts
For producers not established in the Member State where they sell batteries, Regulation (EU)
2023/1542 currently covers solely producers using distance contracts. It is necessary to ensure
that all operators irrespective of the selling technique used are covered by the definition of
producer in Regulation (EU) 2023/1542. The proposal therefore clarifies that a manufacturer,
importer or distributor or other natural or legal person that sells batteries in a Member State
and is established in another Member State or in a third country, qualifies as a producer,
irrespective of the selling technique used, including by means of distance contracts.
Adding a definition for substances of very high concern
Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 currently requires that batteries should bear a label
indicating the presence of hazardous substances. However, the definition of those substances
for labelling is unclear since the corresponding recital specifies that batteries should be
labelled with the amount of certain hazardous substances present. Therefore, the proposal
adds further precision on the scope of the substances that need to be labelled by referring to
substances of very high concern identified in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
and Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.
Exclusion of battery packs from removability and replaceability requirements
Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 currently requires light means of transport (LMT) batteries to be
removable and replaceable at cell level. This may create unexpected safety concerns when
faulty battery cells are not replaced in the right conditions. Thus, in order to achieve the right
balance between safety and repairability, LMT battery packs should be removable and
replaceable by independent professionals, but at module level instead of cell level.
Simplification of redundant reporting
The Commission is obligated to review and report every four years about the quality of the
information reported annually by the Member States concerning battery waste management.
In addition, the Commission should assess the organisation of data collection, data accuracy
and reliability and may make recommendations for improvement. The requirement for the
Commission to review and publish a report on data from Member States should be deleted to
allow for a more adaptable data review process. The Commission should retain the ability to
assess data as needed and discretionarily determine the appropriateness of the publication of a
report, considering data sensitivity, confidentiality, and alignment with evaluation and review
timelines.
Industrial emissions portal
Operators under the scope of the IEPR are required to report to competent authorities' data on
the use of water, energy and relevant raw materials. Article 6(9) allows Member States to
EN 2 EN
report on behalf of livestock and aquaculture operators in respect of releases to air, water, and
land.
Some Member States and stakeholders have questioned the feasibility of and burden
associated to the requirement for livestock and aquaculture operators to report on the use of
water, energy and relevant raw materials. In response, the Commission proposes exempting
livestock and aquaculture operators from reporting on water, energy and materials use.
Moreover, the Commission suggests allowing Member States to exempt operators of livestock
production and aquaculture installations from reporting on off-site transfers of waste, off-site
transfers of pollutants in wastewater, production volume and number of operating hours,
provided that this information can be gathered by Member States by other means. Should this
condition be met, Member States will be allowed to report more information than releases to
air, water and land on behalf of individual livestock and aquaculture operators.
There would be negligible environmental impact associated with this change which is about
decreasing burden for livestock and aquaculture operators by relying more on MS action for
gathering relevant information and improving the process for reporting.
The cost savings associated with the measure would be for farmers and aquaculture operators,
who would face reduced reporting requirements. Some of the data would be supplied by
Member States who will have this information available through their standard agricultural
analyses.
Consistency with other Union policies
This proposal is part of a package of measures aimed primarily at cutting red tape for
economic operators. It is entirely consistent with the Commission’s policies on better
regulation, and the objectives of the Competitiveness compass to promote greater
competitiveness and economic resilience in the EU. The rationalisation introduced by these
measures will not affect the achievement of the objectives in the concerned policy area nor the
rationale of the legislative acts
2. LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY
• Legal basis
The legal bases of the proposal are Articles 114 and 192(1) TFEU. These reflect the
underlying legal bases of the Regulations that the proposal intends to revise. The legal bases
of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries is Article 114, and
192(1) in respect of Articles 54 to 76 of that Regulation. The legal base of Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 (‘the Industrial Emissions Portal Regulation’) is Article 192(1).
• Subsidiarity (for non-exclusive competence)
The Batteries Regulation was adopted in recognition of the expected demand for batteries in
the coming years, the strategic role of batteries in the global transition towards decarbonised
economies and the need to establish a functioning internal market and to avoid market
distortions. As such the Batteries Regulation set out common rules on the sustainability,
performance, safety, collection, recycling and second life of batteries as well as on
information about batteries for end-users and economic operators. For these reasons, the
revision of the Regulation is similarly justified on subsidiarity grounds.
EN 3 EN
Industrial Emissions Portal Regulation: The Union and the Member States are Parties to the
Aarhus Convention, which recognises that increased public access to environmental
information and the dissemination of such information contribute to a greater awareness of
environmental matters, a free exchange of views, more effective participation by the public in
environmental decision-making and, ultimately, to a better environment. In addition, the
Union is a Party the UNECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers. There is a
strong argument that action at Union level was necessary to establish a portal for the reporting
of industrial emissions and clearly for any subsequent revision. Moreover, a consistent
approach across all Member States is likely to lead to increased efficiency in reporting
processes, and fairness for all operators wherever they are established in the Union.
• Proportionality
In the case of the circular economy legislation, the proposal would introduce alternative
means to deliver the policy objectives of ensuring that waste products are appropriately
managed at the end of their useful life
The choice to promote national reporting of emissions and resource use by livestock and
aquacultural operators is proportionate in that it intends to exploit processes that already exist
within the legislation thereby keeping changes to a minimum.
• Choice of the instrument
A proposal for Regulation is the appropriate choice of instrument given that the underlying
legislation that the proposal seeks to amend are also Regulations.
3. RESULTS OF EX-POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER
CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
• Ex-post evaluations/fitness checks of existing legislation
Revisions of the Regulations on batteries and the industrial emissions portal were recently
adopted by the Legislator based on Commission’s proposals that were supported by impact
assessments. An evaluation cannot be carried out at this stage as too little time has passed, and
too little practical experience gained.
• Stakeholder consultations
The Commission engaged in a broad consultation with stakeholders, civil society, public
authorities and businesses, Member States and Members of the European Parliament,
including through its Implementation Dialogues, stakeholder roundtables and many
meetings (3). The staff working document accompanying this proposal provides more
information on the various consultation activities that have been undertaken to support the
preparation of this proposal.
The key consultation activities are summarised below.
The following consultation activities have been carried out to prepare this omnibus proposal:
– An online webinar on environmental reporting (carried out by the consultant)
on 13 February 2025 and an online survey of the participants to the above
webinar who had agreed to be contacted for its purpose.
EN 4 EN
– A call for evidence6 for the environmental omnibus open for feedback from 22
July 2025 to 10 September 2025.
– A high-level roundtable on simplifying environmental laws on 2 October 2025.
The general consultations about simplification of environmental legislation drew a lot of
attention, also from the wider public.
The above-mentioned online workshop held on 13 February 2025 had 500 registrants and
more than 300 active participants7. The follow-up targeted consultation led to more than 500
inputs, many of a specific nature. Several of the proposed simplifications in the omnibus are
reflected in the input received.
The call for evidence on environmental simplification drew most attention. The Commission
published a call for evidence on the environmental simplification package on the Have-Your-
Say website: Simplification of administrative burdens in environmental legislation. The
feedback period was from 22 July 2025 till 10 September 2025. All feedback is published on
the Have-Your-Say website.
There were 190 998 contributions to the call for evidence, of which 189 751 (99.3%) came
from citizens. 1 247 (0.7%) contributions came from organisations other than citizens,
including businesses and business associations, non-governmental organisations
(environmental and other), public authorities and academics. 622 attachments, mainly position
papers, were attached to these submissions, which often included specific suggestions.
From a business perspective, there is support for less burdensome regulation that leaves
business with flexibility to deliver both growth and sustainable production. There is a
perception of administrative obligations that are too prescriptive, and do not provide value
added.
On the side of civil society, there is support for a simplification that makes it easier to protect
the environment and social standards and avoid deregulation, for example by removing
redundancies and avoiding excessively detailed regulations. There is however concern that
efforts to simplify regulations could undermine environmental protections. Citizens urged the
EU to focus on enforcing existing laws rather than creating new simplifications.
It is useful to note that the Commission has conducted consultations and prepared an impact
assessment in support of the targeted revision of the Regulation on the registration, evaluation
and authorisation of chemicals which is expected to contain a substantial simplifying
component. Similarly, the Commission is currently preparing an impact assessment to support
the preparation of the Circular Economy Act in 2026. This assessment will utilise ongoing
consultation activities that will also cover simplification of existing (waste and circular
economy-related) legislation.
• Collection and use of expertise
As indicated above the Commission contracted an external service provider to provide
expertise related to this proposal. In particular, the contractor is screening the known body of
environmental laws to identify reporting and other administrative obligations together with
potential to simplify these obligations. In addition, the contractor has provided assistance in
quantifying the reductions in costs of possible measures to simplify provisions in the omnibus
package. All information provided by the contractor will be published.
6 Simplification of administrative burdens in environmental legislation 7 Environmental Reporting and Simplification - Trinomics
EN 5 EN
• Impact assessment
An impact assessment has not been prepared primarily because the proposed amendments are
highly specific with little choice available to remedy the underlying issues. A staff working
document does however accompany this proposal. It justifies the different elements of the
proposal and presents quantitative information about the expected impacts wherever possible.
It also presents the views and inputs of stakeholders which the Commission has received.
The consistency of this proposal with the climate-neutrality objective set out in Article 2(1)
and the Union 2030 and 2040 climate targets has been assessed. The proposal is consistent
with these objectives, as well as ensuring progress on adaptation.
• Regulatory fitness and simplification
Under the regulatory fitness and performance programme (REFIT), the Commission ensures
that its legislation is fit for purpose, targeted to the needs of stakeholders, and minimises
burdens while achieving its objectives. This proposal is therefore part of, and fully coherent
with, the REFIT programme in so far as it attempts to simplify certain administrative
procedures and reduce unnecessary costs for business.
The savings associated with the changes to the Regulations are estimated using the Standard
Cost Methodology and include EUR 70 million for the Industrial Emissions Portal. For the
Batteries Regulation, the benefit comes from clarifying the legal text.
• Fundamental rights
No adverse impacts expected.
4. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS
Not applicable.
5. OTHER ELEMENTS
• Implementation plans and monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements
The envisaged changes are very specific and directly applicable and will not need to be
supported by implementation plans. The impacts will of course be assessed in due course as
the underlying legislation is evaluation according to the usual way as part of the
Commission’s policy on better regulation across the policy cycle.
• Explanatory documents (for directives)
Not relevant for directly applicable Regulations.
• Detailed explanation of the specific provisions of the proposal
Article 1 sets out amendments to Regulation (EU) 2023/1542.
Article 2 sets out amendments to Regulation (EU) 2024/1244.
EN 6 EN
2025/0397 (COD)
Proposal for a
REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards
simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular
Article 114 and Article 192(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee1,
Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions2,
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure,
Whereas:
(1) The political guidelines for the Commission’s 2024-2029 term3 point to the goal of
simplifying legislation to eliminate any overlaps and contradictions while maintaining
high standards and staying the course on the goals set out in the European Green
Deal.4
(2) In response to the 2024 Draghi report5 pointing to regulatory obstacles and the
regulatory administrative burden as one of the key challenges notably for small and
medium sized enterprises (’SME’), the Competitiveness Compass6 identifies a set of
horizontal enablers to underpin competitiveness including simplifying regulatory
environment, reducing burden and favouring speed and flexibility.
1 OJ C , , p. . 2 OJ C , , p. . 3 Europe’s Choice, Political Guidelines for the next European Commission 2024−2029, Ursula von der
Leyen 4 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council,
the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 11 December
2019, ‘The European Green Deal’, COM/2019/640 final. 5 Draghi, M. (2024) The future of European competitiveness. Available at: The Draghi report on EU
competitiveness. 6 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European
Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 29 January 2025, A
competitiveness Compass for the EU, COM(2025) final.
EN 7 EN
(3) In its Communication of 11 February 2025 entitled ‘A simpler and faster Europe:
Communication on implementation and simplification’,7 the European Commission
set out a vision for an implementation and simplification agenda that delivers fast and
visible improvements for people and businesses on the ground. That requires more
than an incremental approach and the Union is to take bold action to achieve that goal.
The Commission, the European Parliament, the Council, Member States’ authorities at
all levels and stakeholders need to work together to streamline and simplify Union,
national and regional rules and to implement policies more effectively.
(4) In the context of the Commission’s commitment to reduce reporting burdens and
compliance costs, advance interoperability, and enhance competitiveness, it is
necessary to adapt certain provisions set out in Regulations (EU) 2023/15428 and (EU)
2024/12449 of the European Parliament and of the Council whilst maintaining the
policy objectives10 of the European Green Deal, and the Sustainable Finance Action
Plan11.
(5) With a view to maintaining coherence with the original instruments and in order to
preserve the legislative intent, amendments to Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 are based
on Article 114 of the Treaty and amendments to Chapter VIII of Regulation (EU)
2023/1542 and to Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 are based on Article 192(1) of the
Treaty.
(6) With a view to ensuring that all operators irrespective of the selling technique used are
covered by the definition of a producer in Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, it should be
clarified that a manufacturer, importer or distributor or other natural or legal person
that sells batteries in a Member State, and is established in another Member State or in
a third country, qualifies as a producer not only when selling by means of distance
contracts.
(7) Pursuant to Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, batteries should bear a label
indicating the presence of hazardous substances. In line with Recital (44) of that
regulation, it is necessary to add further precision on the scope of the substances that
need to be labelled by referring to substances of very high concern identified in
accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 or Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.
(8) The requirement for light means of transport (LMT) batteries and battery packs to be
removable and replaceable at cell level may create unexpected safety concerns when
7 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social
Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 11 February 2025, ‘A simpler and faster Europe: Communication on
implementation and simplification’, COM/2025/47 final. 8 Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 concerning
batteries and waste batteries, amending Directive 2008/98/EC and Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and
repealing Directive 2006/66/EC (OJ L 191, 28.7.2023, p. 1,
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1542/oj). 9 Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on
reporting of environmental data from industrial installations, establishing an Industrial Emissions Portal
and repealing Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 (OJ L, 2024/1244, 2.5.2024,
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1244/oj).
10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council,
the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 11 December
2019, ‘The European Green Deal’, COM/2019/640 final. 11 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council,
the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the
Regions of 8 March 2018, ‘Action Plan: Financing Sustainable Growth’, COM/2018/097 final.
EN 8 EN
faulty battery cells are not replaced in the right conditions. Thus, in order to achieve
the right balance between safety and repairability, it is appropriate to require that LMT
batteries and LMT battery packs be readily removable and replaceable by independent
professionals at module level.
(9) Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 requires the Commission to publish a report on the results
of the review of the information made available by the Member States. In practice,
Article 76(4) has been too prescriptive and meant that analysis of data on
implementation is required at a time which does not align with evaluation cycles, and
only covers part of the information. This requirement should therefore be deleted,
allowing for more flexible data reviewing. Informed decision-making is integral to the
governance processes within the Union. Therefore, the Commission should continue
to review the data reported by the Member States.
(10) With a view to simplifying requirements on operators and companies, and reduce the
administrative burden stemming from reporting pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation
(EU) 2024/1244, while maintaining equivalent standards as regards the protection of
human health and the environment, it is appropriate to allow Member States to exempt
operators of livestock production and aquaculture installations from reporting on off-
site transfers of waste, off-site transfers of pollutants in wastewater, production
volume and number of operating hours, provided that this information can be gathered
by other means, in view of fulfilling the requirements set out in Article 7 of that
Regulation. Furthermore, to minimize the administrative burden on operators of
livestock production and aquaculture installations, they should not be required to
report on the use of water, energy and relevant raw materials.
(11) Regulations (EU) 2023/1542 and (EU) 2024/1244 should therefore be amended
accordingly,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2023/1542
Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 is amended as follows:
(1) Article 3(1) is amended as follows:
(a) in point (47), point (d) is replaced by the following:
‘(d) sells batteries, including those incorporated in appliances, light means of transport
or other vehicles, directly to end-users, whether or not they are private households, in
a Member State, and is established in another Member State or in a third country;’(b)
the following point (69) is added: ‘substance of very high concern’ means any
substance which fulfils the criteria laid down in Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No
1907/2006 and is identified in accordance with Article 59(1) of that Regulation, or any
substance which fulfils the criteria laid down in Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No
1907/2006 and listed in Annex VI of Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.’
(2) in Article 11, paragraph 5 is replaced by the following:
‘5. Any natural or legal person that places on the market products incorporating LMT
batteries shall ensure that those batteries, as well as individual battery modules included in the
EN 9 EN
battery pack, are readily removable and replaceable by an independent professional at any
time during the lifetime of the product;’
(3) in Article 76(4), the second, third and fourth sentences are deleted.
(4) in Annex VI Point 8 in Part A is replaced by the following:
‘8. the substances of very high concern in the meaning of Article 3 (1) (69) which are
present in the battery, other than mercury, cadmium and lead, with a concentration
equal or above 0,1%, weight on weight.’
(5)
Article 2
Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2024/1244
In Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1244, paragraph 9 is replaced by the following:
‘9. The reporting requirements set out in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (d) shall
not apply to operators of installations carrying out activities referred to in rows 2 and 7 of
Annex I (‘operators of livestock production and aquaculture installations’).
Member States may decide to quantify deliberate releases as referred to in paragraph 1, first
subparagraph, point (a), themselves on behalf of operators of livestock production and
aquaculture installations. In such cases, paragraphs 1 to 8 shall not apply to those operators in
respect of such releases.
Member States may decide to exempt operators of livestock production and aquaculture
installations from reporting on any of the items referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph,
points (b), (c), (e), (f) and (g), of this Article, provided that such information can be gathered
by Member States by other means in order to fulfil their obligations pursuant to Article 7. In
such cases, paragraphs 1 to 8 of this Article shall not apply to those operators in respect of
such items.’
Article 3
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in
the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels,
For the European Parliament For the Council
The President The President
EN 1 EN
LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL AND DIGITAL STATEMENT
1. FRAMEWORK OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE ................................................. 3
1.1. Title of the proposal/initiative ...................................................................................... 3
1.2. Policy area(s) concerned .............................................................................................. 3
1.3. Objective(s) .................................................................................................................. 3
1.3.1. General objective(s) ..................................................................................................... 3
1.3.2. Specific objective(s) ..................................................................................................... 3
1.3.3. Expected result(s) and impact ...................................................................................... 3
1.3.4. Indicators of performance ............................................................................................ 3
1.4. The proposal/initiative relates to: ................................................................................. 4
1.5. Grounds for the proposal/initiative .............................................................................. 4
1.5.1. Requirement(s) to be met in the short or long term including a detailed timeline for
roll-out of the implementation of the initiative ............................................................ 4
1.5.2. Added value of EU involvement (it may result from different factors, e.g.
coordination gains, legal certainty, greater effectiveness or complementarities). For
the purposes of this section 'added value of EU involvement' is the value resulting
from EU action, that is additional to the value that would have been otherwise
created by Member States alone. ................................................................................. 4
1.5.3. Lessons learned from similar experiences in the past .................................................. 4
1.5.4. Compatibility with the multiannual financial framework and possible synergies with
other appropriate instruments ....................................................................................... 5
1.5.5. Assessment of the different available financing options, including scope for
redeployment ................................................................................................................ 5
1.6. Duration of the proposal/initiative and of its financial impact .................................... 6
1.7. Method(s) of budget implementation planned ............................................................. 6
2. MANAGEMENT MEASURES................................................................................... 8
2.1. Monitoring and reporting rules .................................................................................... 8
2.2. Management and control system(s) ............................................................................. 8
2.2.1. Justification of the budget implementation method(s), the funding implementation
mechanism(s), the payment modalities and the control strategy proposed .................. 8
2.2.2. Information concerning the risks identified and the internal control system(s) set up
to mitigate them............................................................................................................ 8
2.2.3. Estimation and justification of the cost-effectiveness of the controls (ratio between
the control costs and the value of the related funds managed), and assessment of the
expected levels of risk of error (at payment & at closure) ........................................... 8
2.3. Measures to prevent fraud and irregularities ................................................................ 9
3. ESTIMATED FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE ............ 10
3.1. Heading(s) of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s)
affected ....................................................................................................................... 10
EN 2 EN
3.2. Estimated financial impact of the proposal on appropriations ................................... 12
3.2.1. Summary of estimated impact on operational appropriations.................................... 12
3.2.1.1. Appropriations from voted budget ............................................................................. 12
3.2.1.2. Appropriations from external assigned revenues ....................................................... 17
3.2.2. Estimated output funded from operational appropriations......................................... 22
3.2.3. Summary of estimated impact on administrative appropriations ............................... 24
3.2.3.1. Appropriations from voted budget .............................................................................. 24
3.2.3.2. Appropriations from external assigned revenues ....................................................... 24
3.2.3.3. Total appropriations ................................................................................................... 24
3.2.4. Estimated requirements of human resources.............................................................. 25
3.2.4.1. Financed from voted budget....................................................................................... 25
3.2.4.2. Financed from external assigned revenues ................................................................ 26
3.2.4.3. Total requirements of human resources ..................................................................... 26
3.2.5. Overview of estimated impact on digital technology-related investments ................ 28
3.2.6. Compatibility with the current multiannual financial framework.............................. 28
3.2.7. Third-party contributions ........................................................................................... 28
3.3. Estimated impact on revenue ..................................................................................... 29
4. DIGITAL DIMENSIONS .......................................................................................... 29
4.1. Requirements of digital relevance .............................................................................. 30
4.2. Data ............................................................................................................................ 30
4.3. Digital solutions ......................................................................................................... 31
4.4. Interoperability assessment ........................................................................................ 31
4.5. Measures to support digital implementation .............................................................. 32
EN 3 EN
1. FRAMEWORK OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE
1.1. Title of the proposal/initiative
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending
Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards
simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden
1.2. Policy area(s) concerned
Environment
European Green Deal
1.3. Objective(s)
1.3.1. General objective(s)
The general objectives pursued by this legislative proposal are to simplify and clarify
certain elements of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and (EU) 2024/1244 in order to
clarify producer and manufacturer obligations as regards batteries and alleviate
burden on certain operators under the scope of the IEPR as regards reporting. By
reducing the administrative burden and compliance costs associated with technical
and reporting requirements, this proposal intends to ensure the proportionality of the
framework, while maintaining high standards of environmental protection.
1.3.2. Specific objective(s)
The specific objectives of the proposed amendments to Regulation (EU) 2023/1542
included in this proposal aim to achieve the following results:
Amend the producer definition for distance contracts
Exclude battery packs from removability and replaceability requirements
Simplification of redundant reporting from the Commission
The specific objectives of the proposed amendments to Regulation (EU) 2024/1244
included in this proposal are as follows:
- exempting livestock and aquaculture operators from reporting on water, energy
and materials use.
- allowing Member States to exempt operators of livestock and aquaculture
installations from reporting on off-site transfers of waste, off-site transfers of
pollutants in wastewater, production volume and number of operating hours,
provided that this information can be gathered by Member States by other means.
Should this condition be met, Member States would be allowed to report on these
elements on behalf of individual livestock and aquaculture operators.
1.3.3. Expected result(s) and impact
Specify the effects which the proposal/initiative should have on the beneficiaries/groups targeted.
The proposed amendments to Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 will benefit a wide range
of stakeholders, including producers of batteries. Producers will have clarity that all
operators irrespective of the selling technique used are covered by the definition of
producer in Regulation (EU) 2023/1542. This will create legal certainty as to which
EN 4 EN
producers have extended producer responsibility. The exclusion of battery packs
from removability and replaceability requirements will create legal certainty for
battery manufacturers and address safety concerns when faulty battery cells are not
replaced in the right conditions.
The proposed amendments to Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 are expected to benefit
operators of livestock and aquaculture installations by alleviating their reporting
burden.
1.3.4. Indicators of performance
Specify the indicators for monitoring progress and achievements.
To monitor progress towards achieving the proposal’s specific objectives, the
Commission will explore the possibility of organising exchanges with Member
States in different formats, including by using the existing fora.1.4. The
proposal/initiative relates to:
a new action
a new action following a pilot project / preparatory action19
the extension of an existing action
a merger or redirection of one or more actions towards another/a new action
1.5. Grounds for the proposal/initiative
1.5.1. Requirement(s) to be met in the short or long term including a detailed timeline for
roll-out of the implementation of the initiative
N/A1.5.2. Added value of EU involvement (it may result from different factors,
e.g. coordination gains, legal certainty, greater effectiveness or complementarities).
For the purposes of this section 'added value of EU involvement' is the value
resulting from EU action, that is additional to the value that would have been
otherwise created by Member States alone.
Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 already contains a producer definition. The amendment
will provide legal certainty as to who is covered by the definition. The current
removability and replaceability requirement for light means of transport batteries
under Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 applied to the cell level. Battery manufactures will
have legal certainty about the level of removability and replaceability requirements
for light means of transport batteries and a coordinated approach will be taken across
the Union.
The amendments to Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 aim at ensuring coordination gains
and greater complementarity on reporting by clarifying what has to be reported by
livestock and aquaculture operators or by Member States.
1.5.3. Lessons learned from similar experiences in the past
N/A
19 As referred to in Article 58(2), point (a) or (b) of the Financial Regulation.
EN 5 EN
1.5.4. Compatibility with the multiannual financial framework and possible synergies with
other appropriate instruments
N/A
1.5.5. Assessment of the different available financing options, including scope for
redeployment
N/A
EN 6 EN
1.6. Duration of the proposal/initiative and of its financial impact
limited duration
– in effect from [DD/MM]YYYY to [DD/MM]YYYY
– financial impact from YYYY to YYYY for commitment appropriations and
from YYYY to YYYY for payment appropriations.
unlimited duration
– Implementation with a start-up period from YYYY to YYYY,
– followed by full-scale operation.
1.7. Method(s) of budget implementation planned20
Direct management by the Commission
– by its departments, including by its staff in the Union delegations;
– by the executive agencies
Shared management with the Member States
Indirect management by entrusting budget implementation tasks to:
– third countries or the bodies they have designated
– international organisations and their agencies (to be specified)
– the European Investment Bank and the European Investment Fund
– bodies referred to in Articles 70 and 71 of the Financial Regulation
– public law bodies
– bodies governed by private law with a public service mission to the extent that
they are provided with adequate financial guarantees
– bodies governed by the private law of a Member State that are entrusted with
the implementation of a public-private partnership and that are provided with
adequate financial guarantees
– bodies or persons entrusted with the implementation of specific actions in the
common foreign and security policy pursuant to Title V of the Treaty on
European Union, and identified in the relevant basic act
– bodies established in a Member State, governed by the private law of a
Member State or Union law and eligible to be entrusted, in accordance with
sector-specific rules, with the implementation of Union funds or budgetary
guarantees, to the extent that such bodies are controlled by public law bodies or
by bodies governed by private law with a public service mission, and are provided
with adequate financial guarantees in the form of joint and several liability by the
controlling bodies or equivalent financial guarantees and which may be, for each
action, limited to the maximum amount of the Union support.
Comments
20 Details of budget implementation methods and references to the Financial Regulation may be found on
the BUDGpedia site: https://myintracomm.ec.europa.eu/corp/budget/financial-rules/budget-
implementation/Pages/implementation-methods.aspx.
EN 7 EN
N/A
EN 8 EN
2. MANAGEMENT MEASURES
2.1. Monitoring and reporting rules
N/A
2.2. Management and control system(s)
2.2.1. Justification of the budget implementation method(s), the funding implementation
mechanism(s), the payment modalities and the control strategy proposed
N/A
2.2.2. Information concerning the risks identified and the internal control system(s) set up
to mitigate them
N/A
2.2.3. Estimation and justification of the cost-effectiveness of the controls (ratio between
the control costs and the value of the related funds managed), and assessment of the
expected levels of risk of error (at payment & at closure)
N/A
2.3. Measures to prevent fraud and irregularities
N/A
EN 9 EN
3. ESTIMATED FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE
3.1. Heading(s) of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget
line(s) affected
• Existing budget lines
In order of multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.
Heading of
multiannual
financial
framework
Budget line Type of
expenditure Contribution
Number
Diff./Non-
diff.21
from
EFTA
countries 22
from
candidate
countries
and
potential
candidates 23
From
other
third
countries
other assigned
revenue
N/A
Diff./Non
-diff. YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO
• New budget lines requested
In order of multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.
Heading of
multiannual
financial
framework
Budget line Type of
expenditure Contribution
Number
Diff./Non-
diff.
from
EFTA
countries
from
candidate
countries
and
potential
candidates
from
other
third
countries
other assigned
revenue
N/A
Diff./Non
-diff. YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO
21 Diff. = Differentiated appropriations / Non-diff. = Non-differentiated appropriations. 22 EFTA: European Free Trade Association. 23 Candidate countries and, where applicable, potential candidates from the Western Balkans.
EN 10 EN
3.2. Estimated financial impact of the proposal on appropriations
3.2.1. Summary of estimated impact on operational appropriations
– The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational appropriations
– The proposal/initiative requires the use of operational appropriations, as explained below
3.2.1.1. Appropriations from voted budget
EUR million (to three decimal places)
Heading of multiannual financial framework Number
DG: <…….> Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF
2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
Operational appropriations
Budget line Commitments (1a) 0.000
Payments (2a) 0.000
Budget line Commitments (1b) 0.000
Payments (2b) 0.000
Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes24
Budget line (3) 0.000
TOTAL appropriations
for DG <…….>
Commitments =1a+1b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
DG: <…….> Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF
2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
Operational appropriations
Budget line Commitments (1a) 0.000
24 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research.
EN 11 EN
Payments (2a) 0.000
Budget line Commitments (1b) 0.000
Payments (2b) 0.000
Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes25
Budget line (3) 0.000
TOTAL appropriations
for DG <…….>
Commitments =1a+1b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2024 2025 2026 2027
TOTAL operational appropriations
Commitments (4) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Payments (5) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed
from the envelope for specific programmes (6) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL appropriations under
HEADING <….> Commitments =4+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
of the multiannual financial framework Payments =5+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Heading of multiannual financial
framework Number
DG: <…….> Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF
2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
Operational appropriations
25 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research.
EN 12 EN
Budget line Commitments (1a) 0.000
Payments (2a) 0.000
Budget line Commitments (1b) 0.000
Payments (2b) 0.000
Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes26
Budget line (3) 0.000
TOTAL appropriations Commitments =1a+1b +3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
for DG <…….> Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
DG: <…….> Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF
2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
Operational appropriations
Budget line Commitments (1a) 0.000
Payments (2a) 0.000
Budget line Commitments (1b) 0.000
Payments (2b) 0.000
Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes27
Budget line (3) 0.000
TOTAL appropriations Commitments =1a+1b +3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
for DG <…….> Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF
2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
26 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research. 27 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research.
EN 13 EN
TOTAL operational appropriations
Commitments (4) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Payments (5) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed
from the envelope for specific programmes (6) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL appropriations under
HEADING <….> Commitments =4+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
of the multiannual financial framework Payments =5+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF
2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
• TOTAL operational appropriations (all
operational headings)
Commitments (4) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Payments (5) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
• TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed
from the envelope for specific programmes (all operational
headings)
(6) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL appropriations Under
Heading 1 to 6 Commitments =4+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
of the multiannual financial framework
(Reference amount) Payments =5+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Heading of multiannual financial framework 7 ‘Administrative expenditure’28
DG: <…….> Year Year Year Year TOTAL
MFF 2021-
2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
28 The necessary appropriations should be determined using the annual average cost figures available on the appropriate BUDGpedia webpage.
EN 14 EN
Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Other administrative expenditure 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL DG <…….> Appropriations 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
DG: <…….> Year Year Year Year TOTAL
MFF 2021-
2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Other administrative expenditure 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL DG <…….> Appropriations 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL appropriations under HEADING 7 of the multiannual financial
framework
(Total
commitments
= Total
payments)
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
EUR million (to three decimal places)
Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF
2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 7 Commitments 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
of the multiannual financial framework Payments 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
3.2.1.2. Appropriations from external assigned revenues
EUR million (to three decimal places)
Heading of multiannual financial framework Number
DG: <…….> Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF
2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
EN 15 EN
Operational appropriations
Budget line Commitments (1a) 0.000
Payments (2a) 0.000
Budget line Commitments (1b) 0.000
Payments (2b) 0.000
Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes29
Budget line (3) 0.000
TOTAL appropriations
for DG <…….>
Commitments =1a+1b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
DG: <…….> Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF
2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
Operational appropriations
Budget line Commitments (1a) 0.000
Payments (2a) 0.000
Budget line Commitments (1b) 0.000
Payments (2b) 0.000
Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes30
Budget line (3) 0.000
TOTAL appropriations
for DG <…….>
Commitments =1a+1b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2024 2025 2026 2027
TOTAL operational appropriations
Commitments (4) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Payments (5) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
29 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research. 30 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research.
EN 16 EN
TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed
from the envelope for specific programmes (6) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL appropriations under
HEADING <….> Commitments =4+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
of the multiannual financial framework Payments =5+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Heading of multiannual financial framework Number
DG: <…….> Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF
2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
Operational appropriations
Budget line Commitments (1a) 0.000
Payments (2a) 0.000
Budget line Commitments (1b) 0.000
Payments (2b) 0.000
Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes31
Budget line (3) 0.000
TOTAL appropriations
for DG <…….>
Commitments =1a+1b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
DG: <…….> Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF
2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
Operational appropriations
Budget line Commitments (1a) 0.000
Payments (2a) 0.000
31 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research.
EN 17 EN
Budget line Commitments (1b) 0.000
Payments (2b) 0.000
Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes32
Budget line (3) 0.000
TOTAL appropriations
for DG <…….>
Commitments =1a+1b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF
2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
TOTAL operational appropriations
Commitments (4) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Payments (5) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed
from the envelope for specific programmes (6) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL appropriations under
HEADING <….> Commitments =4+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
of the multiannual financial framework Payments =5+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF
2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
• TOTAL operational appropriations (all
operational headings)
Commitments (4) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Payments (5) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
• TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed
from the envelope for specific programmes (all operational
headings)
(6) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
32 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research.
EN 18 EN
TOTAL appropriations under Headings 1
to 6 Commitments =4+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
of the multiannual financial framework (Reference
amount) Payments =5+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Heading of multiannual financial framework 7 ‘Administrative expenditure’33
EUR million (to three decimal places)
DG: <…….> Year Year Year Year TOTAL
MFF 2021-
2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Other administrative expenditure 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL DG <…….> Appropriations 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
DG: <…….> Year Year Year Year TOTAL
MFF 2021-
2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Other administrative expenditure 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL DG <…….> Appropriations 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL appropriations under HEADING 7 of the multiannual
financial framework
(Total
commitments
= Total
payments)
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
EUR million (to three decimal places)
Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF
33 The necessary appropriations should be determined using the annual average cost figures available on the appropriate BUDGpedia webpage.
EN 19 EN
2024 2025 2026 2027 2021-2027
TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 7 Commitments 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
of the multiannual financial framework Payments 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
3.2.2. Estimated output funded from operational appropriations (not to be completed for decentralised agencies)
Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to three decimal places)
Indicate
objectives and
outputs
Year 2024
Year 2025
Year 2026
Year 2027
Enter as many years as necessary to show the
duration of the impact (see Section1.6) TOTAL
OUTPUTS
Type34
Avera
ge
cost
N o
Cost N o
Cost N o
Cost N o
Cost N o
Cost N o
Cost N o
Cost Total
No
Total
cost
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 135…
- Output
- Output
- Output
Subtotal for specific objective No 1
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 2 ...
- Output
Subtotal for specific objective No 2
34 Outputs are products and services to be supplied (e.g. number of student exchanges financed, number of km of roads built, etc.). 35 As described in Section 1.3.2. ‘Specific objective(s)’
EN 20 EN
TOTALS
EN 21 EN
3.2.3. Summary of estimated impact on administrative appropriations
– The proposal/initiative does not require the use of appropriations of an
administrative nature
– The proposal/initiative requires the use of appropriations of an administrative
nature, as explained below
3.2.3.1. Appropriations from voted budget
VOTED APPROPRIATIONS Year Year Year Year TOTAL
2021 - 2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
HEADING 7
Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Other administrative expenditure 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Subtotal HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Outside HEADING 7
Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Other expenditure of an administrative nature 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Subtotal outside HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
3.2.3.2. Appropriations from external assigned revenues
EXTERNAL ASSIGNED REVENUES Year Year Year Year TOTAL
2021 - 2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
HEADING 7
Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Other administrative expenditure 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Subtotal HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Outside HEADING 7
Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Other expenditure of an administrative nature 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Subtotal outside HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
3.2.3.3. Total appropriations
TOTAL
VOTED APPROPRIATIONS
+
EXTERNAL ASSIGNED REVENUES
Year Year Year Year TOTAL
2021 -
2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
HEADING 7
Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Other administrative expenditure 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Subtotal HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Outside HEADING 7
Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
EN 22 EN
Other expenditure of an administrative nature 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Subtotal outside HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
The appropriations required for human resources and other expenditure of an administrative nature
will be met by appropriations from the DG that are already assigned to management of the action
and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together, if necessary, with any additional allocation
which may be granted to the managing DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of
budgetary constraints.
3.2.4. Estimated requirements of human resources
– The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human resources
– The proposal/initiative requires the use of human resources, as explained
below
3.2.4.1. Financed from voted budget
Estimate to be expressed in full-time equivalent units (FTEs)36
VOTED APPROPRIATIONS Year Year Year Year
2024 2025 2026 2027
Establishment plan posts (officials and temporary staff)
20 01 02 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices) 0 0 0 0
20 01 02 03 (EU Delegations) 0 0 0 0
01 01 01 01 (Indirect research) 0 0 0 0
01 01 01 11 (Direct research) 0 0 0 0
Other budget lines (specify) 0 0 0 0
• External staff (inFTEs)
20 02 01 (AC, END from the ‘global envelope’) 0 0 0 0
20 02 03 (AC, AL, END and JPD in the EU Delegations) 0 0 0 0
Admin. Support
line [XX.01.YY.YY]
- at Headquarters 0 0 0 0
- in EU Delegations 0 0 0 0
01 01 01 02 (AC, END - Indirect research) 0 0 0 0
01 01 01 12 (AC, END - Direct research) 0 0 0 0
Other budget lines (specify) - Heading 7 0 0 0 0
Other budget lines (specify) - Outside Heading 7 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0
3.2.4.2. Financed from external assigned revenues
EXTERNAL ASSIGNED REVENUES Year Year Year Year
2024 2025 2026 2027
Establishment plan posts (officials and temporary staff)
20 01 02 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices) 0 0 0 0
36 Please specify below the table how many FTEs within the number indicated are already assigned to the
management of the action and/or can be redeployed within your DG and what are your net needs.
EN 23 EN
20 01 02 03 (EU Delegations) 0 0 0 0
01 01 01 01 (Indirect research) 0 0 0 0
01 01 01 11 (Direct research) 0 0 0 0
Other budget lines (specify) 0 0 0 0
• External staff (in full time equivalent units)
20 02 01 (AC, END from the ‘global envelope’) 0 0 0 0
20 02 03 (AC, AL, END and JPD in the EU Delegations) 0 0 0 0
Admin. Support
line [XX.01.YY.YY]
- at Headquarters 0 0 0 0
- in EU Delegations 0 0 0 0
01 01 01 02 (AC, END - Indirect research) 0 0 0 0
01 01 01 12 (AC, END - Direct research) 0 0 0 0
Other budget lines (specify) - Heading 7 0 0 0 0
Other budget lines (specify) - Outside Heading 7 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0
3.2.4.3. Total requirements of human resources
TOTAL VOTED APPROPRIATIONS
+
EXTERNAL ASSIGNED REVENUES
Year Year Year Year
2024 2025 2026 2027
Establishment plan posts (officials and temporary staff)
20 01 02 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices) 0 0 0 0
20 01 02 03 (EU Delegations) 0 0 0 0
01 01 01 01 (Indirect research) 0 0 0 0
01 01 01 11 (Direct research) 0 0 0 0
Other budget lines (specify) 0 0 0 0
• External staff (in full time equivalent units)
20 02 01 (AC, END from the ‘global envelope’) 0 0 0 0
20 02 03 (AC, AL, END and JPD in the EU Delegations) 0 0 0 0
Admin. Support
line
[XX.01.YY.YY]
- at Headquarters 0 0 0 0
- in EU Delegations 0 0 0 0
01 01 01 02 (AC, END - Indirect research) 0 0 0 0
01 01 01 12 (AC, END - Direct research) 0 0 0 0
Other budget lines (specify) - Heading 7 0 0 0 0
Other budget lines (specify) - Outside Heading 7 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0
The staff required to implement the proposal (in FTEs):
To be covered by
current staff
available in the
Commission
services
Exceptional additional staff*
EN 24 EN
To be financed
under Heading 7
or Research
To be financed
from BA line
To be financed
from fees
Establishment
plan posts
N/A
External staff
(CA, SNEs, INT)
Description of tasks to be carried out by:
Officials and temporary staff N/A
External staff N/A
3.2.5. Overview of estimated impact on digital technology-related investments
Compulsory: the best estimate of the digital technology-related investments entailed
by the proposal/initiative should be included in the table below.
Exceptionally, when required for the implementation of the proposal/initiative, the
appropriations under Heading 7 should be presented in the designated line.
The appropriations under Headings 1-6 should be reflected as “Policy IT expenditure
on operational programmes”. This expenditure refers to the operational budget to be
used to re-use/ buy/ develop IT platforms/ tools directly linked to the implementation
of the initiative and their associated investments (e.g. licences, studies, data storage
etc). The information provided in this table should be consistent with details
presented under Section 4 “Digital dimensions”.
TOTAL Digital and IT appropriations
Year Year Year Year TOTAL
MFF
2021 -
2027 2024 2025 2026 2027
HEADING 7
IT expenditure (corporate) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Subtotal HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Outside HEADING 7
Policy IT expenditure on operational programmes
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Subtotal outside HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TOTAL 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
3.2.6. Compatibility with the current multiannual financial framework
The proposal/initiative:
– can be fully financed through redeployment within the relevant heading of the
multiannual financial framework (MFF)
– requires use of the unallocated margin under the relevant heading of the MFF
and/or use of the special instruments as defined in the MFF Regulation
EN 25 EN
– requires a revision of the MFF
3.2.7. Third-party contributions
The proposal/initiative:
– does not provide for co-financing by third parties
– provides for the co-financing by third parties estimated below:
Appropriations in EUR million (to three decimal places)
Year 2024
Year 2025
Year 2026
Year 2027
Total
Specify the co-financing body
TOTAL appropriations co-
financed
3.3. Estimated impact on revenue
– The proposal/initiative has no financial impact on revenue.
– The proposal/initiative has the following financial impact:
– on own resources
– on other revenue
– please indicate, if the revenue is assigned to expenditure lines
EUR million (to three decimal places)
Budget revenue line:
Appropriations
available for the
current financial
year
Impact of the proposal/initiative37
Year 2024 Year 2025 Year 2026 Year 2027
Article ………….
For assigned revenue, specify the budget expenditure line(s) affected.
N/A
Other remarks (e.g. method/formula used for calculating the impact on revenue or
any other information).
N/A
4. DIGITAL DIMENSIONS
4.1. Requirements of digital relevance
Reference to
the
requirement
Requirement
description
Actor affected
or concerned
High-level
processes
Category (Data
/ Digital
solution /
37 As regards traditional own resources (customs duties, sugar levies), the amounts indicated must be net
amounts, i.e. gross amounts after deduction of 20% for collection costs.
EN 26 EN
(Article/paragr
aph)
Digital public
service /
Process
digitalisation)
Art. 1(3) [Art.
76(4) of
Regulation (EU)
2023/1542]
Replaces the
prescriptive
obligation for
the Commission
to publish a
periodic report
on Member
States’ data
with a more
flexible system
allowing
adaptive data
review and
optional
publication.
Digital
relevance:
modifies
existing EU-
level data-
management
and reporting
processes.
European
Commission /
Member States
Data review and
publication
Data
Art. 2 [Art. 6(9)
of Regulation
(EU) 2024/1244
]
Allows Member
States to gather
and submit data
on emissions,
waste transfers,
production
volumes and
operating hours
by alternative
digital or
administrative
means,
exempting
certain
operators.
Digital
relevance:
modifies data-
collection and
Member States;
Livestock and
aquaculture
operators;
European
Commission
Environmental
data collection
and reporting
Data / Digital
Public Service
EN 27 EN
transmission
processes within
the Industrial
Emissions
Portal system.
4.2. Data
Type of data Reference(s) Standards/specifications (if
applicable)
Environmental and industrial
emissions data
Art. 2 [Art. 6(9) of Regulation
(EU) 2024/1244 ]
Existing Industrial Emissions
Portal data formats
(XML/CSV); aligned with
Aarhus and UNECE PRTR
Protocol
Alignment with the European Data Strategy
Explain how the requirement(s) are aligned with the European Data Strategy
The proposal advances the European Data Strategy by ensuring adaptive and proportionate
data management, while simplifying redundant reporting. It maintains interoperability and
transparency under the Aarhus Convention and PRTR Protocol.
Alignment with the once-only principle
Explain how the once-only principle has been considered how the possibility to reuse existing
data explored
The proposal advances the European Data Strategy by ensuring adaptive and proportionate
data management, while simplifying redundant reporting. It maintains interoperability and
transparency under the Aarhus Convention and PRTR Protocol.
Explain how newly created data is findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable, and
meets high-quality standards
Modified data remains findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable within current
reporting frameworks.
Data flows
EN 28 EN
Type of data Referenc
e(s) to
the
requirem
ent(s)
Actor
who
provides
the data
Actor
who
receives
the data
Trigger for
the data
exchange
Frequency
(if
applicable)
Industrial emissions &
waste transfer data
Art. 2 [Art.
6(9) of
Regulation
(EU)
2024/1244 ]
Operators /
Member
States
Commissio
n / EEA
Environmenta
l reporting
cycle
Annual / as
collected
Battery waste
management data
Art. 1(3)
[Art. 76(4)
of
Regulation
(EU)
2023/1542]
Member
States
European
Commissio
n
Reporting
period
As
determined
4.3. Digital solutions
For each digital solution, explain how the digital solution complies with the requirements and
obligations of the EU cybersecurity framework, and other applicable digital policies and
legislative enactments (such as eIDAS, Single Digital Gateway, etc.).
Digital
solution
Reference(s
) to the
requiremen
ts
Main
mandated
functionaliti
es
Responsib
le body
How is
accessibili
ty catered
for?
How is
reusability
considered
?
Use of AI
technologi
es
Industria
l
Emissio
ns Portal
Art. 2 [Art.
6(9) of
Regulation
(EU)
2024/1244 ]
Data
collection,
validation,
and
publication;
alternative
reporting
methods by
MS.
EEA /
European
Commissi
on
Public
access per
Aarhus
and PRTR
Reuse of
existing
portal
infrastructu
re
None
— — —
EN 29 EN
Industrial Emissions Portal
Digital and/or sectorial policy
(when these are applicable)
Explanation on how it aligns
AI Act No AI use foreseen.
EU Cybersecurity framework Compliant with Reg. (EU) 2019/881; ISO/IEC
27001 standards.
eIDAS Access controlled via EU Login for national
authorities.
Single Digital Gateway and IMI Not applicable.
Others -
4.4. Interoperability assessment
Assess the impact of the requirement(s) on cross-border interoperability
Industrial Emissions Portal
Assessment Measures Potential remaining barriers
Assess the alignment
with existing digital and
sectorial policies
Please list the
applicable digital and
sectorial policies
identified
The proposal does not
introduce external
digital/sectorial policy
instruments as binding
measures.
Timing and frequency of MS-level
alternative data collection may
differ.
Assess the
organisational measures Conditional operator
exemptions for items (b),
MS capacity and internal
Digital public
service
Description Reference(s) Interoperable
Europe
Solution(s)
(NOT
APPLICABLE
)
Other
interoperabilit
y solution(s)
Industrial
Emissions
Portal
Cross-border
environmental
data exchange
between MS
and EU
institutions.
Art. 2 [Art. 6(9)
of Regulation
(EU) 2024/1244
]
Aarhus/PRTR
protocol
standards;
INSPIRE
metadata rules
EN 30 EN
for a smooth cross-
border digital public
services delivery
Please list the
governance measures
foreseen
(c), (e), (f), (g) when
Member States can obtain
the data to fulfil Article 7
obligations; operators are
relieved from Article 6(1)–
(8) duties for those items,
formalising a governance
handover to Member States
if they can gather such
information by other
means.
(Article 2 of the proposal
→ Article 6(9), third
subparagraph (link to
Article 7).
governance structures may vary,
creating unevenness in how
consistently and promptly MS can
assume “on behalf of” reporting.
Without uniform guidance in the
proposal on coordination
mechanisms, cross-border
escalation/issue handling may
differ across Member States.
Assess the measures
taken to ensure a
shared understanding
of the data
Please list such
measures
The proposal ties
alternative MS reporting to
specific data items
enumerated in Article 6(1)
thereby preserving the
shared meaning of which
datasets are in scope even
when operators are
exempted.
(Article 2 of the proposal
→ Article 6(9), second and
third subparagraphs).
Link to MS obligations
under Article 7 ensures a
common understanding of
what must be compiled and
delivered.
(Article 2 of the proposal
→ Article 6(9), third
subparagraph).
The proposal does not prescribe
harmonised calculation methodologies
or data dictionaries for the MS-
collected “other means” data, so there
could be different approaches.
Mapping between operator-level
semantics and MS-aggregated data
may differ across among MS.
Assess the use of
commonly agreed open
technical specifications
and standards
Please list such
measures
No additional technical
specifications or standards
are introduced by this
proposal for the Industrial
Emissions Portal. The
amendment strictly
concerns who reports and
under what conditions, not
In the absence technical
prescriptions, MS implementations
of “other means” may rely on
heterogeneous formats/tools.
EN 31 EN
how (format/standard).
4.5. Measures to support digital implementation
NB: In case the initial Commission proposal evolves considerably during the legislative
negotiations, it should be considered to update information laid down in the LFDS for any
financial and/or digital aspects, as necessary, with the aim to support the negotiation process
and create clarity for all parties concern
Description of
the measure
Reference(s) Commission
role
Actors to be
involved
Indicative
timeline
Review of data
publication
practices under
Batteries
Regulation
Art. 1(3) [Art.
76(4) of
Regulation (EU)
2023/1542]
Simplification
of redundant
reporting.
Commission 2026 – 2027
Resolutsiooni liik: Riigikantselei resolutsioon Viide: Kliimaministeerium / / ; Riigikantselei / / 2-5/26-00082
Resolutsiooni teema: Keskkonnaõiguse lihtsustamise omnibus
Adressaat: Kliimaministeerium Ülesanne: Tulenevalt Riigikogu kodu- ja töökorra seaduse § 152` lg 1 p 2 ning Vabariigi Valitsuse reglemendi § 3 lg 4 palun valmistada ette Vabariigi Valitsuse seisukohtade ja otsuste eelnõud järgmiste algatuste kohta, kaasates seejuures olulisi huvigruppe ja osapooli:
- Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden, COM(2025)981
- Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL suspending the application of the rules on the appointment of an authorised representative for extended producer responsibility for batteries and waste batteries and packaging and packaging waste,COM(2025)982
- Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL suspending the application of the rules on the appointment of authorised representatives for extended producer responsibility for waste, waste electrical and electronical equipment and single use plastic waste.COM(2025)983
- Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on speeding-up environmental assessments,COM(2025)984
- Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2007/2/EC as regards simplification of certain requirements for the establishment of the Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the Union,COM(2025)985
- Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, (EU) 2015/2193 and (EU) 2024/1785 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden,COM(2025)986
EISi toimiku nr: 26-0012 Tähtaeg: 13.02.2026
Adressaat: Justiits- ja Digiministeerium, Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium, Rahandusministeerium, Regionaal- ja Põllumajandusministeerium, Sotsiaalministeerium Ülesanne: Palun esitada oma sisend Kliimaministeeriumile seisukohtade kujundamiseks antud eelnõu kohta (eelnõude infosüsteemi (EIS) kaudu). Tähtaeg: 28.01.2026
Lisainfo: Eelnõusid on kavas arutada valitsuse 26.02.2026 istungil ja Vabariigi Valitsuse reglemendi § 6 lg 6 kohaselt sellele eelneval nädalal (18.02.2026) EL koordinatsioonikogus. Esialgsed materjalid EL koordinatsioonikoguks palume esitada hiljemalt 13.02.2026.
Kinnitaja: Merli Vahar, Euroopa Liidu asjade direktori asetäitja Kinnitamise kuupäev: 14.01.2026 Resolutsiooni koostaja: Sandra Metste [email protected],
.
13.01.2026
Keskkonnaõiguse lihtsustamise omnibus
Otsuse ettepanek koordinatsioonikogule
Kujundada seisukoht
Kaasvastutaja sisendi tähtpäev 28.01.2026
KOKi esitamise tähtpäev 18.02.2026
VV esitamise tähtpäev 26.02.2026
Vastutav ministeerium: Kliimaministeerium
Kaasvastutajad: Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium, Regionaal- ja Põllumajandusministeerium, Rahandusministeerium, Justiits- ja Digiministeerium, Sotsiaalministeerium
Seisukoha valitsusse toomise alus ja põhjendus
Algatuse reguleerimisala nõuab vastavalt Eesti Vabariigi põhiseadusele seaduse või Riigikogu otsuse vastuvõtmist, muutmist või kehtetuks tunnistamist (RKKTS § 152¹ lg 1 p 1);
Algatuse vastuvõtmisega kaasneks oluline majanduslik või sotsiaalne mõju (RKKTS § 152¹ lg 1 p 2);
Seisukoha võtmist peab oluliseks peaminister või minister (VVS § 20¹ lg 2);
Sisukokkuvõte
Euroopa Komisjon avaldas 10. detsembril 2025 keskkonnaõiguse lihtsustamise paketi (omnibusi), mis sisaldab ettepanekuid tööstusheite, ringmajanduse, keskkonnamõju hindamise ja georuumiliste andmete valdkonna lihtsustamiseks. Muudatused aitavad vähendada ettevõtjate halduskoormust, säilitades samal ajal ELi ambitsioonikad eesmärgid kaitsta keskkonda ja inimeste tervist. Sellega kiirendatakse ja ühtlustatakse kõigi projektide loamenetlusi, eelkõige strateegilistes sektorites, nagu strateegilised digiprojektid, kriitilise tähtsusega toorainete projektid ja taskukohased eluasemed, hõlbustades üleminekut puhtale ja digitaalsele majandusele ELis. Eeskirjade lihtsustamine ja halduskoormuse vähendamine on ülimalt oluline keskkonnaeesmärkide saavutamise ja ELi konkurentsivõime tugevdamise jaoks.
2
Algatus on osa laiemast tegevusest kooskõlas ELi konkurentsivõime kompassiga. See aitab vähendada bürokraatiat ning toetab ELi konkurentsi- ja vastupanuvõimet, edendades samal ajal kestlikku kasvu.
Keskkonnaõiguse lihtsustamise omnibus koosneb teatisest ja kuuest seadusandlikust ettepanekust, mis hõlmavad järgmisi sihipäraseid seadusandlikke muudatusi:
1. Teatis (COM (2025) 980) käsitleb Euroopa Komisjoni keskkonnaõiguse lihtsustamise ja halduskoormuse vähendamise suunda, eesmärgiga tugevdada ELi kestlikku konkurentsivõimet ilma keskkonnaeesmärke nõrgestamata. Teatis annab keskkonnaõiguse lihtsustamise paketile poliitilise raamistiku, mis keskendub tööstusheidete, ringmajanduse, ruumiandmete ja keskkonnamõjude hindamise lihtsustamisele. Samuti kirjeldab see edasisi samme keskkonnaõiguse stressitestimiseks ja tulevasteks algatusteks, sh ringmajanduse ja kemikaalipoliitika valdkonnas.
2. Määruse ettepanek (COM (2025) 981), millega lihtsustatakse kehtivat patareide ja patarei jäätmete määrust (EL) 2023/1542 seoses tootja mõiste täpsustamise, ohtlike ainete määratluse ja kergtranspordivahendite akude eemaldatavuse nõuete muutmisega, ning tööstusheite portaali määrust (EL) 2024/1244, mille puhul tehakse ettepanek vabastada loomakasvatus- ja vesiviljelusettevõtjad kohustusest esitada aruandeid vee-, energia- ja materjalikasutuse kohta. Samuti luuakse liikmesriikidele võimalus vabastada loomakasvatuse ja vesiviljeluse rajatiste käitajad teatud aruandluskohustustest, kui need andmed on võimalik koguda teistmoodi.
3. Määruse ettepanek (COM (2025) 982), millega peatatakse patareide ja akude ning nende jäätmete ja pakendi- ja pakendijäätmete laiendatud tootjavastutuse jaoks volitatud esindaja määramise kohustus EL ettevõtetele kuni 1. jaanuarini 2035. Säilitatakse kehtivad sätted, mis käsitlevad kolmandates riikides asuvate tootjate laiendatud tootjavastutuse jaoks volitatud esindaja määramist.
4. Direktiivi ettepanek (COM (2025) 983), millega peatatakse jäätmete, elektri- ja elektroonikaseadmete jäätmete ühekordselt kasutatavate plastijäätmete laiendatud tootjavastutuse esindajate määramise kohustus EL ettevõtetele kuni 1. jaanuarini 2035. Kolmandate riikide ettevõtetele nähakse aga jätkuvalt vajadust esindaja määramist kohaldada.
5. Keskkonnale avalduvate mõjude hindamise kiirendamise määruse ettepanekus (COM (2025) 984) nähakse veepoliitika raamdirektiivi, strateegilise keskkonnamõju hindamise direktiivi, linnudirektiivi, keskkonnamõju hindamise direktiivi ja elupaigadirektiivi lubade koordineeritud ja/või ühiste menetluste rakendamist. Liikmesriikides tuleb luua (ka piiriüleste projektide korral) üks kontaktpunkt, kes läbi menetluse on vastutav hindamise hõlbustamise ja koordineerimise eest. Lisaks käiakse välja tähtajad projektide eelhindamise ja
3
mõjuhindamise ning avaliku kaasamise osas. Nähakse ka ette järk- järguline keskkonnamõjude hindamise digitaliseerimine.
6. Ettepanek INSPIRE ruumiandmete direktiivi 2007/2/EÜ lihtsustamiseks (COM (2025) 985), millega eemaldatakse andmete ja andmete jagamise tehnilised nõuded ning viiakse need kooskõlla uuema horisontaalse ELi andmeõigusega.
7. Direktiivi ettepanek COM (2025) 986), millega vähendatakse halduskoormust ja muudetakse jäätmedirektiivi (2008/98/EÜ), tööstusheite direktiivi (2010/75/EL ja 2024/1785), keskmise võimsusega põletusseadmete direktiivi (EL) 2015/2193. Algatus sisaldab näiteks ettepanekut tühistada jäätmedirektiivi alusel loodud toodetes sisalduvate väga ohtlike ainete (SCIP) andmebaas. Lisaks soovitakse anda ettevõtetele suurem paindlikkus tööstusheidete direktiivi kohaste keskkonnajuhtimissüsteemide (KKJS) rakendamisel. Näiteks kaotatakse nõue lisada ümberkujundamiskavad. Käitajatele antakse rohkem aega KKJS ettevalmistamiseks ja KKJS-i puhul ei ole enam vaja sõltumatuid auditeid. Pakutakse ka leevendused vesinikupõhiste tööstusprotsesside kasutuselevõtu hõlbustamiseks ning täpsustused CO2 püüdmistehnoloogiate kasutuselevõtu võimaldamiseks. Samuti nähakse ette erand keskmise võimsusega põletusseadmetele, mida kasutatakse üksnes aeg-ajalt varugeneraatoritena hädaolukordades ja elektrikatkestuste ajal.
Kas EL algatus reguleerib karistusi või haldustrahve? Ei
Kas nähakse ette uue asutuse loomine (järelevalvelised või muud asutused)? Jah
Ei ole välistatud, sest keskkonnale avalduvate mõjude hindamise kiirendamise määruse ettepanekus (COM (2025) 984) nähakse ette liikmesriikides kontaktpunkti loomist (ka piiriüleste projektide korral), mille eesmärk on koordineerida erinevate EL keskkonnadirektiivide kohaseid keskkonnamõju hindamisi ühtses loamenetluses, et vähendada dubleerimist ja kiirendada menetlusi.
Kas lahenduse rakendamine vajab IT-arendusi? Jah
Keskkonnale avalduvate mõjude hindamise kiirendamise määruse ettepanekus (COM (2025) 984) nähakse ette keskkonnalubade ja keskkonnamõjude hindamise infosüsteemide arendamist, sh menetluste digitaliseerimist, andmete korduvkasutust ja infosüsteemide koostalitlusvõimet. IT-arenduste eesmärk on sealjuures kiirendada ja ühtlustada loamenetlusi, vähendada dubleerimist ning parandada avalikkuse ja projektide läbipaistvust.
Direktiivi ettepanekus (COM (2025) 986), mis on suunatud jäätmete ja tööstusheite valdkonna lihtsustamisele, nähakse ette toodetes sisalduvate väga ohtlike ainete (SCIP) andmebaasi asendamine uute digitaalsete lahendustega. Uued lahendused nagu digitaalne tootepass ja ainete ühekordse hindamise mudel võivad vajada andmesüsteemide arendamist ning koostalitlusvõime lahendusi.
4
Eesmärgid
Eesmärk 1: Keskkonnamõju hindamise ühtlustamine loamenetlustes
Projektiarendajate jaoks muutuvad menetlused lihtsamaks ja kiiremaks ning loomisel on ühtsed kontaktpunktid, digiteenused ja kiirmenetluse võimalused. See kiirendab ELi majanduse jaoks vajalikke olulisi projekte. Peale selle sisaldab ettepanek täiendavaid kiirendavaid meetmeid strateegiliste sektorite ja projektide jaoks, mis aitavad kaasa süsinikuheite vähendamisele ja ressursitõhususele ning taskukohaste eluasemete rajamisele.
Eesmärk 2: Tööstusheitenormide lihtsustamine ettevõtetele ja põllumajandustootjatele
Ettevõtjad saavad suurema paindlikkuse keskkonnajuhtimissüsteemide rakendamisel tööstusheidete direktiivi alusel. Näiteks kaotatakse ümberkujundamis- kavade lisamise nõue. Ettevõtjatele antakse rohkem aega keskkonnajuhtimissüsteemide ettevalmistamiseks. Keskkonnajuhtimissüsteemi sõltumatut auditit ei ole enam vaja. Põllumajandustootjad ja vesiviljelusettevõtjad vabastatakse teatavatest aruandluskohustustest, et leevendada nende halduskoormust. Peale selle lihtsustatakse põllumajandustegevuse ulatuse kriteeriume ja vähendatakse dubleerimist mahepõllumajandusettevõtete puhul.
Eesmärk 3: Digilahenduste tõhustamine toodetes sisalduvate probleemsete ainete registreerimiseks
Toodetes sisalduvate probleemsete ainete andmebaasi (SCIP) kulud on olnud ebaproportsionaalselt suured ning selle funktsioonid asendatakse tõhusamate digilahendustega, nagu digitaalne tootepass ja ainete ühekordse hindamise mudel. Seepärast teeb komisjon ettepaneku muuta jäätmete raamdirektiivi, et tunnistada andmebaas senisel kujul kehtetuks.
Eesmärk 4: Laiendatud tootjavastutuse lihtsustamine
Praegu nõutakse patareisid, akusid, pakendeid, elektroonikaseadmeid, ühekordselt kasutatavaid plasttooteid ja jäätmeid käsitlevates õigusaktides, et ELis asuvad ettevõtjad määraksid oma laiendatud tootjavastutusega seotud kohustuste täitmiseks volitatud esindaja. Ettevõtjad peavad looma sellise süsteemi igas liikmesriigis, mis ei ole nende asukohariik, kuid kus nad müüvad oma tooteid. See kohustus peatatakse Euroopa tootjate jaoks, kuni ühtlustatakse ringmajanduse õigusakti kohaseid laiendatud tootjavastutuse süsteeme. See vähendab ELis ettevõtlusega tegelemise kulusid.
Eesmärk 5: Juurdepääsu lihtsustamine georuumilistele andmetele
Praegused INSPIRE direktiivi kohased georuumiliste andmete tehnilised nõuded viiakse täielikult kooskõlla horisontaalsete õigusaktidega, millega reguleeritakse kvaliteetseid avaliku sektori georuumilisi andmeid. Selline lihtsustamine vähendab avaliku sektori
5
asutuste nõuete täitmisega seotud kulusid ja hõlbustab kõigi avaliku ja erasektori kasutajate juurdepääsu väärtuslikele georuumiliste andmete kogumitele.
Mõju ja sihtrühm
Mõju valdkonnad
Sotsiaalala
Tööturg ja -keskkond
Sihtrühm: Ettevõtted, elanikud
Mõju sihtrühmale: Algatus (COM (2025) 986) näeb ette SCIP andmebaasi senisel kujul lõpetamise ja selle funktsioonide asendamise uute tõhusamate digilahendustega (nt digitaalne tootepass, ainete ühekordse hindamise mudel). SCIP andmebaas on olnud abivahend jäätmekäitlejatele ja ringmajandussektori töötajatele, et tuvastada ohtlikke aineid toodete elutsükli lõpus. SCIP andmebaas pakub ka avalikku ja tsentraliseeritud infot toodetes sisalduvate väga ohtlike ainete kohta. Andmebaasi kaotamine võib ajutiselt vähendada tööohutusalase info kättesaadavust, kui alternatiivsed lahendused ei ole veel täielikult rakendunud.
Majandus
Ettevõtlus
Sihtrühm: Ettevõtted
Mõju sihtrühmale: Algatuste rakendamine ei too ettevõtetele kaasa olulisi täiendavaid majanduslikke kulusid, vastupidi, enamik ettepanekuid vähendab haldus- ja aruandluskulusid. Võimalikud kulud on üksikud ja üleminekulised, peamiselt seotud uute digilahendustega kohanemisega.
Halduskoormus
Kas lahendusega kaasneb mõju halduskoormusele? Jah
Kas ettevõtetele halduskoormus: Nii kasvab kui kahaneb
Mõju sihtrühmale: Algatused vähendavad ettevõtete aruandlus- ja halduskohustusi (nt laiendatud tootjavastutuse volitatud esindaja kohustuse peatamine, tööstusheite ja jäätmealase aruandluse lihtsustamine, SCIP andmebaasi kaotamine, loamenetluste kiirendamine ja ühtlustamine). Võimalikud uute digilahendustega kohanemise kulud on ajutised ega muuda üldist suunda, milleks on halduskoormuse vähenemine.
Kas avaliku sektori töökoormus: Nii kasvab kui kahaneb
6
Mõju sihtrühmale: Algatuste rakendamine võib lühiajaliselt suurendada töökoormust (nt menetluste ümberkorraldamine, kontaktpunkti määramine, uute digilahenduste juurutamine). Pikemas perspektiivis vähendab ühtlustatud ja digiteeritud menetlus dubleerimist, parandab andmete korduvkasutust ning lihtsustab haldusprotsesse, mille tulemusel avaliku sektori töökoormus väheneb.
Põllu-, metsa- ja kalamajandus ning toiduainetööstus
Sihtrühm: Põllumajandus-, kalandus- ja metsandusettevõtted
Mõju sihtrühmale: Põllumajandustootjad ja vesiviljelusettevõtjad vabastatakse teatavatest aruandluskohustustest, et leevendada nende halduskoormust. Peale selle lihtsustatakse põllumajandustegevuse ulatuse kriteeriume ja vähendatakse dubleerimist mahepõllumajandusettevõtete puhul.
Keskkond
Jäätmed ja ringmajandus
Sihtrühm: Ettevõtted
Mõju sihtrühmale: Algatustel on jäätmete ja ringmajandusega tegelevatele ettevõtetele valdavalt positiivne mõju, kuna vähenevad aruandlus- ja halduskohustused ning kiirenevad loamenetlused: kaotatakse SCIP andmebaasi kasutamise kohustus, ühtlustatakse ja lihtsustatakse laiendatud tootjavastutuse aruandlust, peatatakse ELi ettevõtetele volitatud esindaja määramise kohustus, lihtsustatakse tööstusheidete direktiivi kohaseid nõudeid ning ringmajanduse ja jäätmekäitluse projektide loamenetlused muutuvad kiiremaks ja paremini koordineerituks.
Riigivalitsemine
Riigieelarve
Kas lahendusega kaasneb mõju riigieelarve kuludele? Jah
Selgitus: Algatustega võib kaasneda lühiajaline ja piiratud mõju riigieelarve kuludele (peamiselt seoses menetluste ümberkorraldamise ja IT-süsteemide kohandustega), kuid pikemas perspektiivis on mõju neutraalne või kulusid vähendav.
Kaasamine
Kaasata kõik asjassepuutuvad huvirühmad.
Eelnõude infosüsteemis (EIS) on antud täitmiseks ülesanne. Eelnõu toimik: 19.1.1/26-0012 - COM(2025) 981 Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden Arvamuse andmine eelnõu kohta Kultuuriministeeriumile vastavalt Riigikantselei 14.01.2026 resolutsioonile. Osapooled: Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium; Justiits- ja Digiministeerium; Regionaal- ja Põllumajandusministeerium; Rahandusministeerium; Sotsiaalministeerium Tähtaeg: 28.01.2026 23:59 Link eelnõu toimiku vaatele: https://eelnoud.valitsus.ee/main/mount/docList/14c429f1-7abe-4f9e-bc3a-d2d13febf335 Link menetlusetapile: https://eelnoud.valitsus.ee/main/mount/docList/14c429f1-7abe-4f9e-bc3a-d2d13febf335?activity=2 Eelnõude infosüsteem (EIS) https://eelnoud.valitsus.ee/main