Invitation to submit an expression of interest to benefit from a project under the UCPM Technical Assistance Financing Facility (TAFF)

1 2 3

Context

Strengthening financial resilience, making smart investments for disaster and climate resilience, and

enhancing institutional capacity and preparedness makes economic sense. There are however recurring

barriers, such as gaps in financial frameworks, limited institutional capacity, and difficulties in accessing EU funding,

identified in the report Understanding the Needs of Civil Protection Agencies under the Union Civil Protection

Mechanism (UCPM), conducted by the World Bank and DG ECHO. To be better prepared for disasters, there is a

need to scale up investments to bolster disaster prevention and preparedness across the EU and through the

UCPM. To address these needs, and in response to challenges identified in the report Economics for Disaster

Prevention and Preparedness, the Technical Assistance Financing Facility for Disaster Prevention and

Preparedness (TAFF) has been established to facilitate access to technical assistance and global knowledge on

prevention and preparedness for national civil protection and disaster risk management authorities to support

country and EU efforts on disaster risk management (DRM).

About

The overall objective of TAFF is to strengthen the knowledge and capacities of countries under the EU’s

UCPM for disaster and preparedness with a focus on:

Strengthening the capacity

of civil protection and other

‘relevant competent authorities

in scaling up disaster and

climate resilience in line with the

Union Disaster Resilience Goals,

the European Green Deal, the EU

Preparedness Union Strategy, as

well as the countries’ national

priorities.

Supporting investments

in disaster prevention

and preparedness

through the development

of a project pipeline and

enhanced administrative

capacity.

Improving the knowledge

base on disaster risk

management, and facilitate the

sharing of knowledge, good

practices and information.

TAFF has two components:

1. Component 1 – Country-specific technical assistance to strengthen the capacity of civil protection and

other relevant competent authorities under the UCPM in scaling up investments contributing to disaster and

climate resilience. Technical assistance includes various types of analytics, technical studies and

recommendations for plans and strategies, piloting of activities, and capacity-building/training activities. Key

areas of support include:

• Anticipate - improving anticipation and disaster risk management planning to proactively address potential

hazards;

• Prepare - raising risk awareness and preparedness levels among the population to effectively respond to

emergencies;

• Alert - enhancing early warning and hydro-meteorological systems for timely and accurate information

dissemination; and

• Secure - strengthening national civil protection systems to prevent and prepare for disasters.

Factsheet

2. Component 2 – Knowledge and capacity building to facilitate the transfer and sharing of knowledge among

countries on disaster risk management and facilitate the sharing of good practices across UCPM countries.

Knowledge products and activities include for example studies, collection of best practices and lessons learned,

practical guidance/knowledge notes, interactive workshops and technical deep dives/clinics, and training

programs. In 2025, TAFF workshop brought together over 120 participants, including ringing together more

than 120 participants from the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM), TAFF-supported projects, EU

institutions, and partner organisations. Also, a series of reports was published providing an overview of the risk

trends, key challenges, and key opportunities for strengthening resilience to wildfires and earthquakes.

How to Apply

Implementation arrangements: The World Bank/GFDRR teams implement, working closely with the beneficiaries

to ensure activities are aligned with their needs, and disseminate knowledge and lessons learned.

Eligible countries include EU Member States, Participating States of the UCPM, and Kosovo1 in view of their

ongoing efforts to join the UCPM.

Eligible entities include national level civil protection authorities or authorities with disaster risk management

(DRM) responsibilities of eligible countries, with the agreement of the national civil protection authorities.

Expressions of Interest and Shortlisting: Eligible entities can respond to a Call of Expressions of Interest (EoI)

which will be published on DG ECHO and GFDRR websites, by submitting an EoI. The EoI will be accepted on

annual basis within defined timeframes. EoIs outside this range, particularly due to emergency situations, will be

considered on a case-by-case basis. It is recommended for EoIs to be developed in coordination with the World

Bank/GFDRR teams.

Proposals and start of activities: Based on the shortlist of EoIs agreed with DG ECHO, the World Bank/GFDRR

teams, in coordination with beneficiary country and entity, develop - the full project proposal, and World

Bank/GFDRR teams start implementation in line with the agreed scope.

Project duration is expected between 18 and 24 months.

2024 Call of Expressions of Interest: Eight country-specific activities are being implemented in Albania,

Germany, Iceland, Kosovo, Moldova, North Macedonia, Romania, and Türkiye; as well as cross-cutting

analytical activities (EU-wide).

2025 Call of Expressions of Interest: Seven country-specific activities are being implemented in Croatia, Ireland,

Kosovo, Montenegro, Serbia, Sweden, and Türkiye; as well as cross-cutting analytical activities (EU-wide).

2026 Call of Expressions of Interest: The 2026 call is expected to be launched on January 30, 2026 with more

information available on the TAFF and DG ECHO webpages (links below).

Partnership

The TAFF for Disaster Prevention and Preparedness is a partnership between the European Commission through its Directorate-General for Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (DG ECHO), the World Bank and the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR). TAFF is fully funded by the EU and managed by the GFDRR and implemented by the World Bank.

1 This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.

Contact & Web

World Bank/GFDRR TAFF team (all operational matters) [email protected]

European Commission/DG ECHO (general feedback): [email protected]

https://www.gfdrr.org/en/taff https://civil-protection-knowledge-network.europa.eu/technical-assistance-financing-facility-taff

Electronically i ned on 29/01/2026 09:48 (UTC+01) in ccorda ce with Article 11 of Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2121

Summary: This guide provides key information about the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) Technical

Assistance Financing Facility (TAFF) for Disaster Prevention and Preparedness. It is relevant for UCPM

members, participating states, and Kosovo1, interested in responding to the Call for Expressions of Interest (EOI)

for TAFF. This guide provides a summary of TAFF objectives, activities, implementation arrangements, eligibility,

procedures for allocating funding and approval of activities, reporting, monitoring and evaluation, as well as

communications and visibility. In case of questions, please contact [email protected].

Table of Contents

Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 2

Objectives ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2

Types of activities ........................................................................................................................................................ 3

Implementation arrangements and principles ................................................................................................................ 3

Eligibility ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4

Selection of TAFF projects ............................................................................................................................................. 5

Following EOI shortlisting ............................................................................................................................................... 5

Timeline ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5

Monitoring, evaluation, and reporting ............................................................................................................................. 6

Communication and visibility .......................................................................................................................................... 6

List of acronyms and abbreviations

DG ECHO European Commission’s Directorate-General for Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations

DRGs (European Union) Disaster Resilience Goals

DRM Disaster risk management

EC European Commission

ECA Europe and Central Asia

EOI Expression of interest

EU European Union

GFDRR Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery

TAFF Technical Assistance Financing Facility

UCPM Union Civil Protection Mechanism

UCPKN Union Civil Protection Knowledge Network

1 This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo

Declaration of Independence.

Annex 2: TAFF Guide for Applicants – Expressions of Interest

2

Introduction

The Technical Assistance Financing Facility for Disaster Prevention and Preparedness (TAFF) is a partnership

between the European Commission through its Directorate-General for Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid

Operations (DG ECHO), the World Bank, and the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR).2

Launched in 2024, TAFF forms part of a range of initiatives focusing on prevention and preparedness led by DG ECHO

and the UCPM in line with the below EC policy framework. Per the UCPM financing decision for 2026, the TAFF budget

for 2026 is €4 million.

TAFF is a mechanism which allows national civil protection and disaster risk management (DRM) authorities

to access technical assistance and global knowledge on prevention and preparedness to support country

efforts on DRM. TAFF is aligned with:

• The EU-wide Disaster Resilience Goals (DRGs), with a focus on enhancing UCPM response capacity,

strengthening crisis and emergency preparedness of civil protection, improved risk analytics, anticipation

and planning, enhanced early warning systems, and increased risk awareness of the population, and

findings of the Niinistö Report, as well as the EU Preparedness Union Strategy which aims to boost the EU's

ability to anticipate, prevent, and respond to various threats.

• The World Bank’s strategy in the Europe and Central Asia (ECA) region, which focuses on supporting a

green transition, building and strengthening institutions, and boosting resilience.

• The GFDRR mission to support communities and countries to reduce risk, prepare for, and recover from

disaster by integrating DRM and climate change adaptation into development strategies and programs, and

contributing to country efforts in the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction

2015–2030.

Objectives

TAFF’s overarching objective is to strengthen the knowledge and capacities of countries under the UCPM for

disaster prevention and preparedness. This will be achieved by focusing on the following specific sub-objectives:

• To strengthen the capacity of civil protection and other relevant competent authorities in scaling up

disaster and climate resilience in line with the EU DRGs, the European Green Deal, the EU Preparedness

Union Strategy, as well as countries’ national priorities.

• To support investments in disaster prevention and preparedness through the development of a project

pipeline and enhanced administrative capacity.

• To improve the knowledge base on DRM, and facilitate the sharing of knowledge, good practices, and

information.

TAFF activities focus on four DRGs in particular – Anticipate, Prepare, Alert, and Secure, as shown in the figure

below.

2 GFDRR is a multi-donor partnership and grant making facility housed within the World Bank. It helps communities and countries

understand their climate and disaster risks, reduce and prepare, and to recover after an event.

3

Types of activities

Activities include various types of analytics, technical studies and recommendations for plans and strategies, piloting

of activities, and capacity-building/training activities to strengthen the capacity of civil protection and other relevant

competent authorities under the UCPM in scaling up investments contributing to disaster and climate resilience. An

indicative list is provided below, with more information in Annex 5. A list of ongoing and completed projects is included

Annex 6.

The expected budget for each activity will range between €250,000–€750,000, with an implementation timeline of

12 to 24 months (potential extension to maximum 30 months in total). Activities outside this range will be considered

on a case-by-case basis, please contact [email protected].

Implementation arrangements and principles

TAFF is funded by the EU and administratively managed by the GFDRR. Activities are implemented by World Bank

teams from the ECA Disaster Risk Management and Urban Resilience Unit, and with the technical support of the

GFDRR's global experts. Projects are carried out in coordination with the respective national counterparts, with DG

ECHO, and relevant stakeholders involved in disaster and climate resilience in the region.

The World Bank/GFDRR teams implement activities, working closely with the beneficiaries to ensure activities are

aligned with their needs, the global Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030, the EU DRGs

and the EU Preparedness Union Strategy, and the EU-World Bank shared priorities for disaster preparedness.

4

The implementation of activities by World Bank ECA DRM and GFDRR will be conducted taking into

consideration the priorities and activities of DG ECHO to ensure added-value and complementarity of the

implemented activities under TAFF, and to avoid duplication. TAFF projects are subject to quality-review by the World

Bank/GFDRR, and reporting, monitoring, and evaluation procedures.

All activities under the TAFF will be designed taking into account the following operating principles:

• Promote disaster and climate resilience and sustainable development – as part of that, also the greening

of civil protection sector, in line with shared global, EU, and World Bank efforts.

• Build country capacity and sustainability – the TAFF will aim to support countries develop new studies,

methodologies, assessments, etc., and it will do so by relying on country knowledge and building capacity on

the beneficiary side to be able to build on the results, once the technical assistance activities end.

• Provide added value to countries’ DRM program and coordination with other actors – e.g., strategic

value of activities in the country’s DRM program, and close coordination with technical and financial partners

already operating in the country on DRM issues.

• Integrate transversal issues, such as social inclusion and gender as a cross-cutting element of the TAFF

activities, including in its trainings, tools, and knowledge products to the extent possible.

• Do no harm, i.e., reduce to the maximum the environmental and social negative impacts of the projects.

• Promote dissemination of activities and findings through the Union Civil Protection Knowledge Network

(UCPKN).

Non-eligible activities under TAFF include the following: drafting of legislation, risk assessments for specific assets,

feasibility-level studies such as engineering assessments at asset level, developing technical specifications,

prioritization of specific investments (asset level), purchase of goods, software development of online applications,

websites, or software, etc. Civil works or purchase of equipment are not eligible. The World Bank does not engage in

providing technical assistance support on nuclear energy/management of nuclear hazards.

Eligibility

In order to be eligible for TAFF Component 1 activities, beneficiaries and affiliated entities must:

• be legal public entities (public bodies)

• be the national level civil protection authority or a national authority with DRM responsibilities of eligible

countries

• be established in one of the eligible countries, i.e.:

• EU Member States: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark,

Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg,

Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, and Sweden

• UCPM Participating Countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, the Republic of Moldova,

Montenegro, Republic of North Macedonia, Norway, Serbia, Türkiye, and Ukraine

• Other countries: Kosovo3 in view of their ongoing efforts to join the UCPM.

3 This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the

Kosovo Declaration of Independence.

5

Selection of TAFF projects

The selection of TAFF projects is on the basis of Expressions of Interest (EOIs). Relevant criteria and prioritization

principles (see Annex 3) are in place to ensure appropriate targeting and effectiveness of implemented activities.

Eligible countries may request country-specific technical assistance through an EOI per agreed template (see

Annex 3). Based on evaluation criteria described below, a shortlist of EOIs is prepared by the World Bank and GFDRR

team and reviewed with DG ECHO as part of TAFF annual review and planning meeting. The EOIs are accepted on

an annual basis within defined timeframes. EOIs outside this range, particularly due to emergency situations, capacity

constraints or small scope, will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

The evaluation criteria for the EOIs focus on (1) eligibility conditions (Yes/No questions) and several key

aspects including (2) quality; (3) relevance, and (4) impact. The assessment score for criteria 2, 3, and 4 takes into

consideration a minimum pass score for each and across. In case of over-demand, additional criteria will be applied for

shortlisting EOIs. The evaluation will only consider information provided in the EOI template as submitted. Applicants

should coordinate with World Bank teams before submitting the EOI. Details on the application of the criteria are

included in Annex 4.

The Call for EOIs will be published on the TAFF webpage hosted on the GFDRR website and DG ECHO website.

In order to be admissible, your EOI should be submitted to [email protected], within the deadline stipulated

in the call. It is necessary to strictly follow the template for the EOI.

Following EOI shortlisting

For approved shortlisted EOIs, technical assistance proposals are developed by the World Bank and GFDRR

teams in coordination with national counterpart(s). Projects are then implemented by the World Bank and

GFDRR. The shortlisted beneficiary will be contacted by the World Bank team. The World Bank will lead the

development of the technical proposal, based on the EOI, in coordination with the national counterpart(s). The design

will integrate the knowledge generation and sharing arrangements to ensure that the beneficiary country retains full

ownership of the project and its results. The development and implementation will be done in consultation with relevant

stakeholders and DG ECHO, to ensure alignment, added value, and avoid any duplication.

Timeline

The indicative timeline for the selection and implementation of activities is the following:

• 30 January 2026: Launch of the Call for EOI by DG ECHO and World Bank/GFDRR.

• 12 February 2026: Info Day online

• 27 March 2026: Deadline for submission of EOIs by Countries per Template (see separate Annex 3).

• 27 March – 14 April 2026: Shortlisting by World Bank/GFDRR per agreed criteria.

• 29 April 2026: Approval of shortlist as part of TAFF annual work plan and budget by DG ECHO.

• 6 May 2026: Official notification on shortlisting by DG ECHO and World Bank/GFDRR.

• 6 May – 10 June 2026: Proposals developed by World Bank/GFDRR for shortlisted proposals/countries in

coordination with respective counterparts and stakeholders.

• June – July 2026: Start of implementation of TAFF projects by the World Bank and GFDRR teams in

coordination with respective counterparts and stakeholders.

6

Monitoring, evaluation, and reporting

TAFF follows the standard evaluation requirements outlined in the World Bank Group Financial Framework

Partnership Agreement between the World Bank and the EU. A summary report is published on yearly basis. World

Bank and GFDRR teams regularly report on TAFF project implementation, and beneficiaries may be asked to join

meetings on occasions.

Communication and visibility

All activities financed under the TAFF will clearly indicate that they have received funding from the EU; all

program products and events financed under this initiative will carry EU, WB, and GFDRR logos. A dedicated

webpage is available for TAFF under the UCPKN website and the GFDRR website. Key outputs and information will

be shared via the UCPKN and may be conducted in collaboration with existing UCPKN initiatives. Beneficiary

organizations are expected to disseminate relevant outputs of their projects on their own websites and through their

own information channels.

Any questions about the template for the EOI (see Annex 3) or the procedure to follow can be addressed to [email protected].

Applicants are asked to send your questions at least seven days before the submission deadline. Electronically signed on 29/01/2026 09:48 (UTC+01) in accordance with Article 11 of Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2121

Official Use Only

Please fill in and share with [email protected], by March 27, 2026, 11:59 PM CET time

You may consult also the ‘Annex 2: TAFF Guide for Applicants – Expressions of Interest’ and ‘Questions and Answers’ Annex. General information

1. Project title (Fill in)

2. Proponent(s) Country: (Select relevant entry/delete not relevant) Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, Montenegro, Republic of North Macedonia, Norway, Serbia, Türkiye, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine, Kosovo

Lead Entity / Associated Entity: (Fill in)

3. TAFF Priority Areas Which TAFF priority/-ies will this activity most contribute to? (Mark as relevant, single or multiple)

• Anticipate - To improve risk assessments, anticipation, and disaster risk management planning

• Prepare - To increase risk awareness and preparedness of the population

• Alert - To enhance early warning

• Secure - To ensure a robust civil protection system

4. Type of activities Which type of activities is envisioned? (Mark as relevant, single or multiple)

• Analytics and technical studies

• Plans, strategies

• Piloting approaches

• Capacity-building/training

• Other (Please indicate type)

5. Indicative project timeframe

(Add in months or years)

Annex 3: TAFF Expression of Interest Template

Official Use Only

6. Indicative project budget estimate in EUR (if known)

Please note that TAFF assistance is provided in-kind through World Bank/Global Facility for Disaster Risk Reduction experts; funds are not directly provided to the shortlisted beneficiary institutions. There is no requirement for any co-financing. Staff of beneficiary entities are not renumerated for coordinating on TAFF projects. (Add indicative amount in EUR)

7. Endorsement of EOI Has this EOI been endorsed by the legal representative of the organisation requesting the activity? (Respond Yes/No)

8. Contact(s) Technical level contact(s) for this EOI (Please include name, title, institution, email and telephone number) Please note that TAFF assistance can be provided to national civil protection authorities or national-level authorities with mandated responsibilities in disaster risk management (provided it is endorsed by the national civil protection authority).

9. Consultation with World Bank country team

Has this EOI been discussed with the World Bank country team? (Respond Yes/No) Please indicate name (contact [email protected] in case questions on the country focal point)

Brief project description

Quality

a. Technical soundness What is/are the main project objective(s): (max. 150 words)

Please provide a short summary of proposed activities/components (max. 300 words)

b. Readiness Are the counterparts ready to start collaboration on this project or do any pre-conditions need to be met (such as completion of another activities, etc.) (max. 150 words)

Relevance

c. Targeting What are the key issues or challenges that the project will address (max. 150 words)

d. TAFF priorities How the proposal and its activities contribute to the achievement of the general and specific objectives of TAFF (max. 150 words)

e. Strategic relevance Which relevant strategic documents or initiatives does the project align with? (such as international/EU/national/sub-national or sectoral strategies, plans, regional mechanisms etc.) (max. 150 words)

Official Use Only

f. Operational relevance How does the project align with other projects or activities (past, ongoing, planned) or fill specific gaps? (max. 150 words)

Impact

g. Project impact What are the expected results and impact of the project / planned activities, and beneficiaries? (max. 300 words)

h. Dissemination How will project results be disseminated? (max. 150 words)

i. Sustainability How would the project results be used and sustained after the project’s completion? (max. 150 words)

Electronically signed on 29/01/2026 09:48 (UTC+01) in accordance with Article 11 of Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2121

Official Use Only

Summary: The following evaluation criteria facilitate the rating of the Expressions of Interest (EOIs) based on the set

objectives and priorities of the Technical Assistance Financing Facility (TAFF) for Disaster Prevention and

Preparedness. The criteria focus on (1) eligibility, and several key aspects including (2) quality; (3) relevance, and

(4) impact. The assessment score for criteria 2, 3, and 4 takes into consideration a minimum pass score for each and

across. In case of over-demand, additional criteria will be applied for the shortlisting of EOIs (additional information are

at the end of this Annex). The evaluation will only consider information provided in the EOI template as submitted.

1. Eligibility (Yes/No)

EOIs will be first checked against formal eligibility requirements (see Table 1). EOIs that are considered eligible

will be evaluated against the other set of criteria (see Table 2) and ranked according to their scores. EOIs that do not

fulfill the evaluation criteria will be disqualified.

Table 1. TAFF Eligibility check

Section Criteria Guidance

Eligibility

(Yes/ No/ To be

clarified)

Eligible country A country shall be eligible if established in one of the eligible countries,

i.e.:

• EU Member States: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of

Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany,

Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta,

Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain,

and Sweden.

• UCPM Participating Countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina,

Iceland, Montenegro, Republic of North Macedonia, Norway, Serbia,

Türkiye, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine.

• Other countries: Kosovo1 in view of their ongoing efforts to join the

UCPM.

Eligible entity Submitting entity, beneficiaries and affiliated entities must:

1 This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo

Declaration of Independence.

Annex 4: TAFF Evaluation of the Expressions of Interest

– Description of Evaluation Criteria

2

Official Use Only

• be legal public entities (public bodies)

• be the national level civil protection authority or a national authority with

disaster risk management (DRM) responsibilities of eligible countries

Eligible activities See eligible and non-eligible activities in Annex 5:

List of Potential Activities Supported under TAFF

Duration 12-24 months (potential extension to max 30 months total)

Budget between €250,000–€750,000

Endorsement Confirmation that the EOI is endorsed by a legal representative.

In case of a national authority with disaster risk management (DRM)

responsibilities of eligible countries, a confirmation email or an official

letter, for example) from a legal representative of the Civil Protection

Agency must be included.

Consultation with WB Information if the EOI was discussed with World Bank TAFF team

On time submission Before announced date/time (27 March 2026, 23:59 CET time) by Email

2. Quality (25 points)

Quality refers to commitment, technical feasibility, maturity, readiness, and sustainability of the project, specifically:

• Commitment: the EOI is signed by the head of the organization/legal representative and is supported by the

relevant Ministry (5 points).

• Technical soundness: description and soundness of the proposed project objective(s) and activities (10

points).

• Readiness: extent to which the counterparts are ready to start a collaboration on this project or do any pre-

conditions need to be met (such as completion of another activities, etc.) (10 points)

3. Relevance (35 points)

Relevance refers to strategic relevance of the proposed activity, specifically:

• Targeting: key challenges/issues that the project will address. (10 points).

• TAFF Objectives: Extent to which the EOI and its activities contribute to the achievement of the TAFF

objectives and priorities (10 points).

• Strategic relevance: Extent to which the proposed activities are aligned with existing strategic documents,

plans or initiatives, or demonstrate a clear and sound rationale (i.e., peer review recommendations,

evaluations, lessons learned, previous studies, etc.) (10 points).Operational relevance extent to which the

EOI is aligned with other projects or activities (past, ongoing, or planned) or fills specific gaps (including

alignment and avoiding duplication with other initiatives) (5 points).

4. Impact (30 points)

Impact refers to expected impact of the activity, specifically:

3

Official Use Only

• Impact of the project: Extent to which the EOI puts forward tangible and realistic impacts (10 points).

• Dissemination: Extent to which the dissemination strategy is clear and adequate to communicate on the

project results and to share results with other Participating States (10 points).

• Sustainability: Extent to which the EOI puts forward a convincing sustainability plan and demonstrates

commitment to build on the EOI results (10 points).

Assessment score: Each EOI will be assigned an assessment score. EOIs need to simultaneously meet two

requirements: (1) to reach the minimum pass score per EOI criteria, and (2) to reach at least 45 points in total for the

three EOI criteria. Only EOIs passing both thresholds will be considered for shortlisting — within the limits of the

available budget. Other EOIs will be rejected.

Table 2. TAFF Award Criteria

Criteria Minimum pass score Maximum score

Relevance 20 35

Quality 10 25

Impact 15 30

Sum across criteria 45 90

Additional criteria in case of over-demand (15 points)

In case of over-demand, the following additional criteria will be applied for the shortlisting of EOIs (based on information

provided in the EOI):

• Relevance to UCPM: extent to which the project deals with issues that are potentially relevant to multiple countries

in the UCPM (5 points).

• Contribution to DRM Knowledge base: extent to which the project introduces innovative approaches or deal with

topics that are emerging/have relevance for knowledge agenda on DRM (5 points).

• Potential synergies between projects: extent to which commonalities can contribute to synergies with other TAFF-

supported projects (5 points).

Any questions about the template for the EOI (see Annex 3) or the procedure to follow can be addressed to [email protected].

Applicants are asked to send your questions at least seven days before the submission deadline. Electronically signed on 29/01/2026 09:48 (UTC+01) in accordance with Article 11 of Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2121

Official Use Only

Activities focus primarily on disaster prevention and preparedness to promote a

balanced and holistic approach to disaster risk management (DRM).

Country-specific activities should be directly relevant for the four priority areas listed in the table, aligned with the EU Disaster Resilience Goals.

This includes, for example, analytics (i.e., diagnostics, technical studies, recommendations) and related technical assistance activities (i.e., trainings,

meetings, etc.) related to areas of topics such as risk analytics, strategic planning (DRM or disaster risk reduction [DRR] plans/strategies), investment

planning at portfolio level (not asset-level specific), critical entities resilience, risk awareness and risk communication, public perception surveys,

modernization of early warning systems (EWS) and hydrometeorological systems, preparedness capacities, damage and loss systems, resilient

recovery and reconstruction, post-disaster financing, and other topics.

Transversal issues such as social inclusion and gender will be integrated as a cross-cutting element of the TAFF activities, including into its

trainings, tools, and knowledge products to the extent possible.

Only World Bank-executed activities are eligible. Non-eligible activities include drafting of legislation, risk assessments for specific assets,

feasibility-level studies such as engineering assessments at asset level, developing technical specifications, prioritization of specific investments

(asset level), purchase of goods, software etc., development of online applications, websites, or software. Also, civil works or purchase of equipment.

The World Bank does not engage in providing support on nuclear energy/management of nuclear hazards.

Annex 5: TAFF List of Potential Activities Supported

Priority

area Objective Type of Activities Type of Output

1

Anticipate

To improve risk assessments,

anticipation, and disaster risk

management planning. Focus

on improved understanding of

risk, modelling of hazards,

development of impact

scenarios, use of risk

information for strategic and

investment planning, technical

and economic studies to

support the planning and

preparation of policies and

investments, in line with the

objectives of the EU Green Deal,

sharing and advising on

methodological approaches,

and best practice examples.

Risk analytics and use of information for DRM planning, e.g., risk analytics for specific hazards (floods, earthquake, landslide, wildfire; portfolio-wide (not asset level specific) vulnerability assessment of public facilities – i.e. schools, emergency response buildings based on construction characteristics, network assessments/criticality & vulnerability assessments e.g. related to transport sector/other sectors, rapid exposure mapping, guidance on risk analytics methodologies/available options, sharing of good practice and examples

Different types of technical

assessments (not at asset level) Different types of pre-feasibility level economic assessments – cost-benefit

assessment, Triple Dividend assessments related to civil protection/DRM sector (not to specific asset-level investment), poverty and disasters analytics, analytics related to climate mitigation and adaptation, costs/benefits of greening of civil protection sector, etc. sharing of good practice and examples

Development of recommendations for prioritization frameworks for investment programs (portfolio level) related to civil protection/DRM/and other critical sectors, sharing of good practice and examples

Prioritization frameworks and

recommendations

Support the preparation of national DRM/DRR, prevention or preparedness strategies/plans, hazard-specific/multi-hazard strategies and action plans, including diagnostic and consultations, DRM action plans for specific sectors studies related to implementation of EU Disaster Resilience Goals, etc.

Diagnostic /Action plans/ Roadmaps /

Technical reports

Technical review/recommendations related to country programs, including EU funds or funds available to countries from EC for DRM, sharing of good practice and examples

Technical review/recommendations/institutional capacity-building based on good practice and examples to inform the implementation of the Critical Entities Directive (or other DRM-related directives).

Seismic resilience and energy efficiency reviews for sectors, sharing of good practice and examples

Diagnostic on nature-based solutions and green infrastructure, reviews, sharing of good practice and examples

Diagnostic of land use planning regulation/building regulation with policy recommendations, urban resilience reviews, sharing of good practice and examples

Other sectoral risk analytics/planning related to urban, water, energy, transport, education, health, social protection, among others (cultural heritage tbc)

Any questions about the list of activities can be directed to [email protected].

Applicants are asked to send your questions at least seven days before the submission deadline.

2 Prepare To increase risk awareness and preparedness of the population. Focus on public awareness and preparedness, examples, pilots, scalable activities.

Support piloting of risk awareness activities (Analytics and related communication outputs, as well as support in dissemination): development of studies/analysis/recommendations related to communication strategies/actions plans, tools to disseminate risk information to support inclusive DRM, public perception surveys, materials or learning modules for capacity-building related to improved risk awareness, studies focusing on awareness of specific segments of population, such as people with disabilities or vulnerable groups etc., sharing of good practice and examples

Diagnostic /Action plans/ Roadmaps /

Technical reports

Promote open access to, and utilization of, risk information data, tools, and analytics, - i.e., studies for the development of a risk and crisis communication platforms, sharing of good practice, etc., sharing of good practice and examples.

Trainings on the above topics Trainings

3 Alert To enhance early warning: Focus on technical analysis on various aspects such as assessment and modernization of EWS and hydro- meteorological systems and communication (warning)

Technical reviews/technical assessments (diagnostics, proposed roadmaps, and advisory input to action plans) of EWS and national hydromet, focusing on all/select components, system review of climate services provided vis-a-vis user needs, coordination, etc., review of hydrometeorological investments, sharing of good practice and examples

Diagnostic /Action plans/ Roadmaps /

Technical reports Technical reviews focusing on enhancing human and technical aspects of public warning, sharing of good practice and examples

4 Secure To Ensure a robust civil protection system: Focus on technical analysis on various aspects such as civil protection systems, such as readiness to respond, preparedness for response and recovery planning, including financial, strategic and technical elements

Preparedness and response analytics, such as Ready2Respond Diagnostic, capacity review of existing arrangements, etc., sharing of good practice and examples Diagnostic

/Action plans/ Roadmaps /

Technical reports

Technical reviews and recommendations related to recovery, such as post-disaster financing/financing for recovery, damage and loss systems or methodologies, inclusive and gender responsive post disaster assessments, recovery planning frameworks, etc., sharing of good practice and examples

Trainings, e.g., for first responders on how to interact with people with disabilities Trainings

On demand - application of the Global Rapid post-disaster Damage Estimation (GRADE) approach assessment (2-3 weeks delivery)1

GRADE report

1 The GRADE approach (developed by the World Bank and GFDRR) can provide an initial rapid estimation of the physical post-disaster damage incurred by key sectors within two weeks of the disaster. The approach aims to create an independent, credible sectoral quantification of the spatial extent and severity of a disaster’s physical impact, addressing specific damage information needs in the first few weeks after a major disaster, and complementing the more comprehensive post-disaster needs assessment (PDNA) process. More information about the methodology are available here.

Overview of TAFF 2024 & 2025

Table of contents

2025 Enhancing Policy and Investments for EU Disaster and Climate Resilience – Phase 2

Croatia

Irland

Kosovo*

Montenegro

Serbia

Sweden

Türkiye

2024 Enhancing Policy and Investments for EU Disaster and Climate Resilience

Albania

Germany

Iceland

Kosovo*

Moldova

North Macedonia

Romania

Türkiye

*This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.

2025

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Enhancing Policy and Investments for EU Disaster and Climate Resilience – Phase 2

Overview

Grant Size €400,000

Duration June 2025 – December 2026

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard

Key word(s)

Preparedness in early-childhood and primary education; Disability-inclusive emergency preparedness and response; emergency operators; persons with disabilities; preparedness curriculum and training materials and teaching resources, and Emergency Preparedness and Response

Context Across the European Union, disaster risks are rising in frequency and complexity due to climate change, changing hazard landscapes, pandemics, and evolving geopolitical threats. In response, the European Commission launched the EU Preparedness Union Strategy (2025) to strengthen the Union’s capacity to anticipate, prevent, and manage crises through enhanced coordination, capabilities, and an integrated all-hazards, whole-of-government, and whole-of-society approach.

Recent crises, from the COVID-19 pandemic to accelerating climate impacts, have exposed gaps in preparedness. EU instruments such as the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) and rescEU which serve as a strategic reserve of European disaster response capabilities and stockpiles, fully funded by the EU, demonstrated added value. However, critical evidence and practice gaps persist, particularly in inclusive preparedness, embedding preparedness in education systems, and diagnosing systemic gaps in national preparedness and response. Given the diverse risk profiles, resources, and institutional arrangements across Member States and UCPM Participating States comparative analysis, cross-country learning, and cooperation are essential to guide policymaking, steer investment decisions, and the development of a coherent, evidence-based culture of preparedness in line with EU/UCPM legislation and frameworks.

Objective Provide targeted technical assistance to the European Commission, as well as to EU Member States and UCPM Participating States

• Generate practical, actionable evidence to inform policy reform, program design, and investment decisions on prevention and preparedness.

• Support strengthening Europe's ability to anticipate, prevent, prepare, and respond to crises

Component 2: Knowledge and capacity building

Key Activities and Expected Results

The technical assistance is structured around three key areas.

Area 1 focuses on integrating preparedness in early-childhood and primary education by conducting a comparative baseline across EU Member States, selected UCPM Participating States, and global comparators on how preparedness is embedded in early childhood and primary education. A repository of effective resources for dissemination will be available through the UCP Knowledge Network.

Area 2 focuses on inclusive preparedness and response through the development of a set of actions aiming at supporting persons with disabilities and response operators in emergency contexts.

Area 3 identifies best practices in emergency preparedness and response arrangements through a focused case study to assess current emergency preparedness and response arrangements, identify gaps and opportunities across risk assessment, planning, capabilities, communications, and inclusion, and provide prioritized recommendations and investment options. The case serves as a practical model for other EU Member States and UCPM Participating States.

In terms of expected results, the findings and recommendations from each area of work provide the European Commission and relevant national authorities with a robust evidence base to inform policy choices, curriculum and training design, investment prioritization, and inclusive operational practice. The process fosters collaboration among education and civil protection stakeholders, including organizations of persons with disabilities, build consensus around practical, scalable solutions, and facilitate knowledge transfer across EU Member States, UCPM Participating States, and global comparators. Ultimately, the technical assistance supports the development of EU-level guidance and tools, strengthen disability-inclusive preparedness and response, embed preparedness in early childhood and primary education, and equip countries with actionable diagnostics, contributing to a stronger culture of preparedness, improved disaster prevention and response, and enhanced resilience across the Union.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of this technical assistance will be disseminated among EU institutions, Member States, UCPM Participating States, and relevant international partners, deepening the collective knowledge base on disaster preparedness, inclusive response, and risk-informed education across Europe. This supports the ongoing efforts to strengthen national and EU strategies and facilitates the adoption of innovative, evidence-based practices in education, civil protection, and inclusion. By focusing on curriculum integration, inclusive operational guidance, training, and stakeholder engagement, the project improves the capacity of education systems, DRM and civil protection agencies, to respond to emergencies, ensuring that the benefits of the knowledge endure beyond its completion.

Given the alignment with EU and international standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this technical assistance are also relevant to other countries participating in the UCPM and the broader international community. Documented experiences and knowledge products can inform similar efforts in neighbouring countries and global comparators, contributing to the global DRM knowledge base and fostering improved coordination and resilience. In this way, the project’s outputs will support the implementation of the EU Preparedness Union Strategy, the Disaster Resilience Goals, and international frameworks such as the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and the Sustainable Development Goals, strengthening preparedness and resilience at national, regional, and global levels.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Elif Ayhan, Lead DRM Specialist, Cristina Otano, Senior Operations Officer, Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Senior DRM Specialist; and Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst, Anda Anica, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterparts: DG ECHO, [email protected]

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Croatia: Evidence for modernising the firefighting system in the Republic of Croatia

Overview

Grant Size €550,000

Duration June 2025 – June 2027

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard; Wildfire

Key word(s) Investment planning; Operational capacities; Public awareness activities; Training capacities

Context Croatia faces significant disaster risks, including earthquakes, as well as floods, extreme heat, droughts, and wildfires, many of which are projected to be exacerbated by climate change. Over the past decade, disasters have resulted in significant physical, social, and financial impacts, affecting people’s well-being. For example, the 2014 floods affected over 13000 people and caused over €300 million direct damage costs, while wildfires in 2017 burnt 86,576 ha (some 1.53 percent of the area of the Republic of Croatia) causing €109 million in losses.1 Croatia also faces significant seismic risks due to its location and vulnerable infrastructure and buildings, much of which was built prior to modern building codes. The 2020 earthquakes in Zagreb and Petrinja, which struck during the COVID-19 pandemic, brought an estimated €16.1 billion in damage and economic losses.2

Firefighting services play a critical role for ensuring Croatia’s resilience to disaster and climate risks. The Croatian Firefighting Association (HVZ) provide emergency response services in response to all hazards. Recent events and evolving risks highlight the need to strengthen preparedness and response capacities, including relevant policy and operational gaps, and prioritise actions and investments in firefighting services in line with data and analysis of the overarching gaps and opportunities as well as broader priorities for disaster and climate resilience.

Objective The objective is to provide technical assistance to the HVZ to identify and plan future actions and investments to modernise the firefighting system in Croatia. The project aims at generating technical and practical information and evidence that can underpin future prevention and preparedness reforms, actions, and investment decisions. The project helps fill existing information and knowledge gaps related to (1) operational capability of firefighting organisations (equipment, infrastructure, guidelines) to respond to natural hazards and emergencies; (2) conditions for education and

1 Posavec et al. 2023. 2 The March 2020 earthquake (M5.5) damaged and destroyed €10.7 billion worth of assets in the city of Zagreb, Zagreb and Krapina- Zagorje counties (Government of Croatia. 2020. Croatia Earthquake Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment 2020. Link.) The December 2020 earthquake2 (M6.2) damaged and destroyed €4.1 billion in physical assets in Sisak-Moslavina, Zagreb, Karlovac, and Krapina- Zagorje Counties and the City of Zagreb (Government of Croatia. 2021. Croatia December 2020 Earthquake Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment. Link.)

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

training of firefighters; (3) fire prevention and supervising the implementation of prescribed fire protection measures, among others through pre-defined priority actions on high risk (pilot) areas; (4) public awareness; and (5) advocacy.

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity is structured around five key areas. Area 1 focuses on a diagnostic review of the operational capabilities of firefighting organisations, generating information necessary to upgrade and modernise equipment, human resources, and strategic planning. Area 2 assesses the training capabilities of firefighting organisations, guiding improvements in education programs, facilities, and the recruitment of professional and volunteer forces. Area 3 evaluates fire prevention and preparedness measures, identifying opportunities to strengthen regulatory frameworks, spatial planning, and policy reforms. Area 4 includes public perception surveys, review of ongoing communication and public awareness efforts, with recommendations and select pilots to further raise public awareness to disasters. Area 5 centers on dissemination of knowledge and partnerships, ensuring that project outcomes and good practices are shared within Croatia as well as with other EU Member States, UCPM members, and the broader international community.

In terms of expected results, the findings and recommendations from each focus areas provide the HVZ and relevant authorities with a comprehensive evidence base to inform strategic investment, training, regulatory reforms, and public engagement. The process fosters collaboration among stakeholders, builds consensus on modernisation priorities, and facilitates knowledge transfer within Croatia and across borders. Ultimately, the project contributes to the modernisation of Croatia’s firefighting system, enhances disaster prevention and preparedness, and strengthens national and regional resilience.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among Croatian stakeholders and shared more broadly, deepening the knowledge base on firefighting modernisation and disaster risk management in Croatia. This supports the ongoing refinement of national strategies and facilitates the adoption of modern and innovative practices across the country. By focusing on operational capabilities, training, prevention, public awareness, and partnerships, the project helps embed sustainable improvements within the HVZ and relevant authorities, ensuring that the benefits of the project endure beyond its completion.

Given the alignment with EU and regional standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other EU Member States and countries participating in the UCPM. Documented experiences and knowledge products can inform similar modernisation efforts in neighbouring countries such as Albania and North Macedonia, as well as the broader UCPM community. In this way, the project’s outputs can contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management and foster improved coordination and resilience in line with the national priorities as set out by the National DRM Strategy (2023) and its Action Plan, as well as the European Union’s Disaster Resilience Goals and the EU Preparedness Strategy, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Senior DRM Specialist; Krunoslav Katic, Sr. DRM Specialist; Martina Vojkovic, DRM Expert, and Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterparts: Mario Starčević, Croatia Firefighting Association (HVZ)

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Ireland: Good Practice and Recommendations for Strengthening the National Strategic Policy Framework for Emergency Management

Overview

Grant Size €250,000

Duration June 2025 – June 2026

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard; Large-scale disasters

Key word(s) Strategic Emergency Management, emergency preparedness, national risk framework, disaster response coordination, resilience planning.

Context Ireland’s Strategic Emergency Management (SEM) Policy, adopted in 2017, sets out the national structures and roles for managing emergencies, aligned with the lead government department principle.1 It defines 50 emergency types, assigning lead government department responsibilities and outlines how these interact with broader government systems across risk assessment, preparedness, response coordination, and recovery. Since its adoption, the risk landscape has evolved, particularly in light of escalating climate-related threats such as flooding and severe storms. While Ireland has a well-established risk assessment model, recent events have highlighted the need to strengthen national preparedness for complex and cascading risks. Updating the SEM framework is now essential to reflect current and future challenges, resilience priorities, and addressing legislative or operational gaps or areas for improvement.

The Office of Emergency Planning (OEP) is the custodian of SEM policy in Ireland. The OEP manages and operates the National Emergency Coordination Centre and provides peer support to government departments and agencies in identifying capability gaps and informing capability development. The OEP’s remit extends to the arrangement of training and education relating to emergency management and offering advice and assistance if requested to government departments in relation to their emergency management functions

Objective The objective of the grant is to provide technical assistance to the OEP with respect to the national SEM policy and framework. This is done by (1) reviewing the existing National SEM structure and framework, and by (2) providing recommendations to inform and strengthen Ireland’s SEM.

1 Department of Defence; Office of Emergency Planning, 2017. Strategic Emergency Management (SEM): National Structures and Framework. Department of Defence. Link.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity comprises several elements. This includes a structured diagnostic review of the current SEM doctrine; review of relevant good practices from other countries and international organisations; and the development of technical recommendations including a roadmap. The recommendations and the roadmap cover both policy and operational aspects, outlining key opportunities, timelines, and so on. The Activity also includes consultations and various knowledge- transfer activities, as well as dissemination of the results through relevant platforms and mechanisms.

In terms of expected results, the findings can inform Ireland’s future actions, including legislative efforts, to enhance Ireland’s national preparedness capacity and disaster resilience. The review and recommendations can provide a solid knowledge base to inform a modernised, comprehensive SEM that reflects current risk context as well as practice in the field. The process and consultations, and the results of the analysis, can contribute to enhancing collaboration among stakeholders, strengthening a common understanding of the challenges and priorities, as well as contribute to sharing of knowledge within and beyond Ireland.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings will be disseminated among stakeholders and beyond, deepening the knowledge base on SEM in Ireland. This can inform and refine its strategies and facilitate the uptake of modern/innovative practices across Ireland.

Focusing on emergency planning and emergency systems as a topic of high relevance also to other countries, relevant findings, knowledge and information, including documented lessons learnt and good practice, can be useful to other Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) Member States and Participating States which seek to modernise their frameworks. In this way, the grant outputs can also contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management (DRM) and improved coordination on disaster preparedness, in line with the European Union (EU) Disaster Resilience Goals (DRGs) and the EU’s Preparedness Strategy.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Senior DRM Specialist, Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterpart: Office of Emergency Planning (OEP), Government of Ireland

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Kosovo: *

Enhancing National Crisis Preparedness and Wildfire Risk Management in Kosovo:*

Overview

Grant Size €350,000

Duration September 2025 – June 2027

Key hazard(s) Wildfires; Floods; Landslides; Earthquakes; Heatwaves; Droughts

Key word(s) Financial preparedness; Wildfire preparedness; Resilient Recovery; National Crisis Preparedness Plan

Context Kosovo’s geographical position and climate expose it to a diverse array of hazards, including floods, heavy snowfall, drought, forest fires, and earthquakes. The country is particularly vulnerable to flash floods in mountainous regions and riverine floods in plains, with severe events in recent years causing significant economic and social disruption. Forest fires are an increasing concern, with 43 percent of Kosovo’s territory covered by forests and nearly 8,000 hectares burned in 2021 alone. Extreme climate events frequently damage critical infrastructure, leading to cascading effects that heighten vulnerabilities in key sectors such as agriculture, forestry, and water. While Kosovo has made progress in strengthening its legal and institutional frameworks for disaster risk management and climate adaptation, most notably through the 2023 Law on Climate Change and the updated National Response Plan, implementation capacity remains limited, especially at the municipal level. Gaps persist in local hazard mapping, early warning systems, and the integration of climate and disaster risks into financial planning, and coordination between national and local governments is still evolving.

The Emergency Management Agency (EMA) under the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MoIA) is the main counterpart responsible for disaster risk management and emergency preparedness in Kosovo, working in close coordination with the Ministry of Environment, Spatial Planning and Infrastructure (MESPI), which leads on climate policy. Despite a clear strategic direction, Kosovo’s emergency preparedness and response (EP&R) system remains primarily response-oriented, with limited professional capacity and fragmented mandates. A 2021 diagnostic under the World Bank’s Ready2Respond framework highlighted the need for strategic investments in legislation, financing, equipment, and personnel to build a more robust and coordinated EP&R architecture.

Objective The objective of the grant is to support the Government of Kosovo in strengthening national crisis preparedness and wildfire resilience. This is achieved through: (i) developing recommendations for a National Crisis Preparedness Plan, including post-disaster financing mechanisms; and (ii) evaluating and improving frameworks for wildfire preparedness and forecasting.

* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity comprises two interlinked activities. The first focuses on a structured diagnostic review of Kosovo’s national crisis preparedness and emergency response systems. This includes a rapid assessment of existing legal and institutional frameworks, operational and financial readiness, and coordination mechanisms, conducted in close collaboration with the EMA and other key stakeholders. The process involves desk-based diagnostics, targeted consultations with government institutions, and a scenario-based tabletop simulation exercise to test real-time decision- making and resource mobilisation during emergencies such as wildfires, floods, earthquakes, and landslides. The findings are consolidated into a Preparedness Diagnostic Brief and an updated Readiness Scorecard, and inform the development of technical recommendations, including a National Crisis Preparedness Plan (CPP) and a prioritised emergency investment list. The recommendations and roadmap address both policy and operational aspects, outlining key opportunities for strengthening institutional, financial, and operational systems for rapid emergency response.

In terms of expected results, the Activity provides Kosovo’s authorities with a robust evidence base to inform future actions and investments in crisis preparedness and disaster resilience. The review and recommendations support the modernisation of national emergency management, enhance clarity around institutional mandates and coordination protocols, and facilitate the rapid mobilisation of resources in times of crisis. The process, including consultations and simulation exercises, fosters collaboration among stakeholders, strengthens a shared understanding of challenges and priorities, and contributes to knowledge transfer within Kosovo and with international partners. The second element, focused on wildfire preparedness, delivers a technical needs assessment and a roadmap for impact-based wildfire forecasting, complemented by capacity-building workshops. These outputs enable government agencies, emergency responders, and local authorities to improve wildfire response, integrate advanced forecasting tools, and position Kosovo to benefit from future investments in disaster risk reduction and resilience.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among stakeholders in Kosovo and shared more broadly, deepening the national knowledge base on DRM. This supports the ongoing refinement of Kosovo’s State Strategy for Reducing the Risk from Natural Disasters and other Disaster 2023-2028, as well as the strengthening of the Integrated Emergency Management System and the National Response Plan. By focusing on institutional capacity building, the development of a National Crisis Preparedness Plan (CPP), and improved system integration, the project helps embed sustainable improvements within relevant authorities, ensuring that the benefits of the project endure beyond its completion. The technical assistance supports the institutionalisation of DRR and the effective use of disaster risk information for emergency preparedness and response.

Given the alignment with EU and regional standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other countries participating in the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) and the broader region. Documented experiences and knowledge products can inform similar efforts to strengthen institutional frameworks and coordination in neighbouring countries and the UCPM community. In this way, the project’s outputs contribute to the global DRM knowledge base and foster improved coordination and resilience, supporting the EU’s Preparedness Strategy and advancing regional cooperation on disaster and climate resilience.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Anita Ellmauer-Klambauer, Urban Development Specialist, Henrike Brecht, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist, Guillermo Siercke, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist; [email protected]

Counterpart: Emergency Management Agency (EMA), Ministry of Internal Affairs (MoIA) and the Ministry of Environment, Spatial Planning and Infrastructure (MESPI), Government of Kosovo

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Montenegro: Enhancing Disaster Resilience and Continuity of IT Infrastructure and Services in the Operational Communication Center 112

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration September 2025 – September 2027

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard; Earthquakes; Floods; Wildfires

Key word(s) Reducing risk and mainstreaming; DRM Risk-Informed Decision Making; Disaster Preparedness; Resilient Recovery; Risk-informed decisions making

Context Montenegro’s National Disaster Risk Assessment (2021) highlights the country’s significant vulnerability to natural hazards, particularly earthquakes, floods, and wildfires, which threaten public safety, critical infrastructure, and societal resilience. The coastal and central regions are especially at risk from seismic activity, as evidenced by the devastating 1979 earthquake, while frequent floods and recurring wildfires further challenge the country’s emergency response capacity. A scenario developed for the National Disaster Risk Assessment underscores the high vulnerability of electronic communications and IT infrastructure, especially the Operational Communication Centre 112 (OCC 112), to both natural and man-made hazards. The assessment, together with the Law on Designation and Protection of Critical Infrastructure, the Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy, and the Law on Electronic Communications, defines the roles and responsibilities for disaster risk management and critical infrastructure protection. The evolving risk landscape, highlighted by recent stress tests and operational experience, has underscored the need to strengthen the resilience and continuity of the 112 system, particularly in the face of complex and cascading hazards.

The Directorate for Emergency Management is the custodian of the 112 system in Montenegro. It is responsible for the operation and modernisation of the Operational Communication Centre 112 (OCC 112), as well as for ensuring compliance with national and EU requirements for critical infrastructure protection and emergency communications. The Directorate leads efforts to identify capability gaps, inform strategic investments, and coordinate with other government agencies and stakeholders. The 112 Department supports the government’s vision to establish a robust public warning system by 2027 and facilitate the transition to Next Generation 112 (NG112), ensuring the continuous functioning of emergency services and enhancing national preparedness and response.

Objective The objective of this grant is to ensure disaster and climate resilience, functionality, and continuity of IT infrastructure and services in the Operational Communication Centre 112 (OCC 112) in Montenegro. This is achieved by focusing on three key activities: (1) a diagnostic analysis of the 112 system through a gap and needs assessment; (2) knowledge sharing through study visits to established 112 centres, and training; and (3) based on the diagnostic analysis, recommendations in the form of a roadmap with short/medium-long term priorities for stakeholders to

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

consider for the development of a roadmap for modernization of the operational communication centre (OCC) 112 and a Business Continuity Plan (BCP).

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity is structured around three key elements to strengthen the disaster and climate resilience, functionality, and continuity of IT infrastructure and services in Montenegro’s Operational Communication Centre 112 (OCC 112). The first component focuses on a comprehensive diagnostic analysis of the OCC 112 system, including stakeholder mapping, desk research, and a structured gap and needs assessment of current IT infrastructure and emergency operations. This analysis, informed by global best practices and a review of the regulatory framework, identifies vulnerabilities to hazards such as earthquakes, floods, and wildfires. Citizen engagement activities further assess access barriers and communication preferences, particularly for vulnerable groups. The activity also centres on knowledge sharing, with study visits to advanced 112 centres, workshops, and training sessions to exchange best practices in IT resilience and business continuity. Thematic roundtables and participation in EU and regional platforms will support the dissemination of findings and encourage replication. Building on these efforts, a technical roadmap will be developed for the phased modernisation of OCC 112, including recommendations for a Business Continuity Plan (BCP) and future interoperability with the Public Warning System and Next Generation 112 (NG112). The roadmap outlines short-, medium-, and long-term priorities and implementation strategies aligned with EU directives and best practices.

In terms of expected results, the findings and recommendations from each element of this activity provide Montenegro’s Ministry of Interior, Directorate for Emergency Management, and other stakeholders with a comprehensive evidence base to inform strategic investment, regulatory reforms, and public engagement. The process fosters collaboration among government agencies, private sector partners, telecom operators, and organisations of persons with disabilities, building consensus on modernisation priorities and facilitating knowledge transfer. Ultimately, the Activity contributes to the modernisation and resilience of Montenegro’s emergency communications system, enhances disaster prevention and preparedness, and strengthens national and regional resilience, benefiting over citizens and tourists alike.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among Montenegrin stakeholders and shared more broadly, deepening the national knowledge base on emergency communications modernisation and disaster risk management. This supports the ongoing refinement of Montenegro’s disaster risk reduction strategies and facilitates the adoption of modern, innovative, and inclusive practices across the country. The development of a Business Continuity Plan and a modernisation roadmap provide- a strategic framework for future investments, aligning Montenegro’s emergency communications infrastructure with EU Disaster Resilience Goals (DRGs) and the European Green Deal’s climate adaptation priorities. It also ensures alignment with key EU legislation, including the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC), NIS2 Directive, EU Civil Protection Mechanism (EUCPM), and the Accessibility Act.

Given the alignment with EU and regional standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other EU Member States and countries participating in the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM). Documented experiences and knowledge products can inform similar modernisation efforts in neighbouring countries and the broader UCPM community. In this way, the project’s outputs contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management and foster improved coordination and resilience, supporting the European Union’s Preparedness Strategy and advancing regional cooperation on disaster and climate resilience.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Sa i ra r r , Senior DRM Specialist, Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterparts: Directorate for Protection and Rescue – Department 112, Ministry of Interior, Government of Montenegro

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Serbia: Strengthening Emergency Management and Disaster Preparedness in Serbia

Overview

Grant Size €450,000

Duration September 2025 – September 2027

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard; Earthquakes; Landslides; Heavy rainfall; Floods; Heat waves; Droughts; Wildfires

Key word(s) Updating disaster risk assessment methodology; Strengthening protection and rescue planning at all government levels; Enhancing emergency preparedness and response capacity

Context Serbia’s disaster risk management framework has undergone significant evolution in recent years, particularly following the adoption of the “Guidelines and Methodology for Vulnerability (Risk) Assessment and Protection and Rescue Plans in Emergency Situations” in 2017, updated in 2019. This Methodology, mandated by the Law on Disaster Risk Reduction and Emergency Management, applies across all levels of government — national, provincial, and local — and is coordinated by the Sector for Emergency Management (SEM) within the Ministry of the Interior. The experience gained from implementing the Methodology has highlighted the need for refinement and simplification, especially to facilitate its practical application at the local self-government level. In response, the Government of Serbia is undertaking an update of the Methodology to enhance the quality and operational relevance of disaster risk assessments and protection and rescue planning. This update aims to strengthen the overall disaster risk management system, inform future investment planning, and serve as a foundation for risk-informed decision making, thereby improving preparedness and resilience at both local and national levels. The revised approach will also address financial preparedness, ensuring that Serbia is better equipped to respond to and recover from disasters and crises, and will align with the principles of the EU Civil Protection Mechanism and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction.

The SEM within the Ministry of the Interior is the central institution responsible for disaster risk management policy and operations in Serbia. As the custodian of the national Methodology, SEM leads the coordination, development, and monitoring of disaster risk assessment and protection and rescue planning across all levels of government. Building on lessons learned from recent disasters and an evolving risk landscape, SEM is committed to modernising and refining the Methodology to better address current and emerging hazards, including those driven by climate change.

Objective The objective of the grant is to enhance the overall disaster preparedness and community resilience in the Republic of Serbia through improvement of existing frameworks and resilience-building measures. The proposed activities and outputs under the grant are designed to enhance the Disaster Risk Assessments and Protection and Rescue plans, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of preventive measures and preparedness activities. Additionally, these

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

documents address financial aspects within the protection and rescue system, further strengthening the community's ability to withstand and recover from disasters.

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity is structured around two main elements. The first puts the focus on the review and updating of the Methodology for Disaster Risk Assessment and Protection and Rescue Plans in the Republic of Serbia. This involves a comprehensive diagnostic analysis of the existing methodology, identification of gaps, and the drafting of updated instructions to ensure alignment with current best practices and international standards. The second element centers on an assessment of national disaster risk management capabilities and response capacities, identifying gaps, and providing targeted recommendations for capability and capacity enhancement. Both components will include consultations with key stakeholders, knowledge-transfer activities, and dissemination of results through relevant platforms and mechanisms including expert seminars, workshops, and trainings.

In terms of expected results, the findings and recommendations from each component provide Serbian authorities with a robust evidence base to inform future policy, planning, and investment decisions in disaster risk management and emergency preparedness. The process fosters collaboration among stakeholders, builds consensus on priorities for strengthening Serbia’s disaster risk management system, and facilitates knowledge sharing within Serbia and with international partners. Ultimately, the Activity contributes to the modernisation of Serbia’s disaster risk assessment and emergency preparedness frameworks, enhancing national resilience and alignment with European and international standards.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among Serbian stakeholders and shared more broadly, deepening the knowledge base on disaster risk management and emergency preparedness in Serbia. This supports the ongoing refinement of national strategies, including the National Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction and Emergency Management, and facilitates the adoption of modern and harmonised practices across the country. By focusing on legal and institutional reform, risk assessment, and capacity building, the project helps embed sustainable improvements within relevant authorities, ensuring that the benefits of the project endure beyond its completion. The technical assistance provided also supports the operationalisation of the National Climate Change Adaptation Program and the National Strategy for Environmental Protection, aligning Serbia’s disaster risk management framework with the EU Green Agenda and other key national priorities.

Given Serbia’s membership in the EU Civil Protection Mechanism and its commitment to the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other EU Member States and countries participating in the UCPM. Documented experiences and knowledge products can inform similar legal and institutional modernisation efforts in neighbouring countries and the broader UCPM community. In this way, the project’s outputs contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management and foster improved coordination and resilience, supporting the European Union’s Preparedness Strategy and advancing regional cooperation on disaster and climate resilience.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Guillermo Siercke, Senior DRM Specialist, Tolkun Jukusheva, Senior DRM Specialist, [email protected] Counterpart: Sector for Emergency Management (SEM), Ministry of Interior, Republic of Serbia

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Sweden: Review of the state of the art of national disaster loss databases

Overview

Grant Size €250,000

Duration July 2025 – October 2026

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard; Large-scale disasters

Key word(s) Disaster loss database; DRM and Artificial intelligence; Standardisation of disaster data; Legal and institutional frameworks of risk data; Risk-informed and evidence-based decision-making

Context Sweden, like many European countries, faces a growing array of natural hazards, including floods, storms, wildfires, landslides, and climate-related events, as well as their potential cascading effects. Recent disasters such as Storm Hans and the Stenungsund Landslide in 2023 have underscored the urgent need for robust systems to record, analyse, and share disaster loss data to inform preparedness and response measures. In line with the European Union (EU) Preparedness Union Strategy and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR), Sweden is seeking to modernise its disaster data management by developing a national disaster loss database. Disaster damage and loss databases are a critical component of scientific knowledge on disaster impacts, supporting the identification of urgent and cost-effective resilience investments. These databases, which can include both historical and forward-looking data, are essential for assessing the geographic extent of events, calibrating hazard maps and early warnings, and conducting cost- benefit analyses of damages to lives, property, economic activity, social equity, health, the environment, and cultural heritage. They also enable continuous monitoring of progress in climate adaptation and disaster risk reduction, with novel technologies such as AI and machine learning enhancing their effectiveness. Within broader disaster risk management frameworks like the SFDRR, such databases are directly relevant for EU policies and directives, including national risk assessments and the Floods and Seveso Directives.

The Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB) is responsible for strengthening Sweden’s ability to prevent and manage major accidents and crises, safeguarding lives, social functions, and core societal values. The MSB, as the key agency for civil protection and emergency management, has systematically collected data from municipal emergency services for over 30 years and manages more data on extensive technological and natural events, supporting Sweden’s compliance with both national and EU requirements. As needs and technological solutions evolve continuously, the MSB is looking to review the state of the art in damage and loss data management.

Objective The objective of this project is to provide technical assistance to MSB with respect to the development of a national disaster loss database. This is achieved by (1) reviewing current good practice on establishing and maintaining disaster damage and loss data systems across EU member states (MS) and beyond for natural hazards and other large- scale disasters, and (2) providing recommendations of relevance for Sweden.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity is structured around two parts. First, it entails a review of international best practices in establishing and operating disaster damage and loss databases, with a focus on efficient reporting, integration of climate change considerations, and the use of innovative data management approaches. Second, it also involves an assessment of Sweden’s existing disaster damage and loss data collection systems, led by MSB, and the identification of technical options for improvement based on insights from the first component. The Activity also includes consultations and knowledge-sharing activities, with opportunities for participation from other countries through workshops to facilitate the exchange of experience and good practices.

In terms of expected results, the Activity provides MSB and relevant Swedish authorities with actionable recommendations to strengthen disaster loss data infrastructure and modernise existing systems. The findings support Sweden’s ability to meet EU and international reporting requirements, enhance risk management and preparedness, and foster collaboration and knowledge exchange both within Sweden and with international partners. Findings will be relevant to other countries looking to strengthen their disaster damage and loss data systems. Ultimately, the Activity contributes to improved disaster resilience in Sweden and benefits the broader EU community.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among stakeholders in Sweden and shared more broadly, deepening the national knowledge base on DRM. This study is closely aligned with national needs to improve the damage and loss database. By focusing on good practices and forward-looking recommendations, and through planned dissemination and exchange activities, the study is expected to inform future efforts in Sweden and potentially serve as a model for other countries in the EU and beyond. The project also fosters opportunities for collaboration with other countries engaged in building and managing comprehensive disaster loss databases. From a technical perspective, the study adopts a forward-looking approach that considers future needs related to climate change, modern data collection, and advanced analysis. The results contribute to broader objectives such as contingency planning, climate change adaptation, the green transition, and the improved use of data and innovative analytical tools for DRM. These efforts ensure that the benefits of the project endure beyond its completion, supporting the institutionalisation of DRR and the effective use of disaster risk information for emergency preparedness and response.

Given the alignment with EU and global standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other countries participating in the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) and the broader international community. Documented experiences and knowledge products from Sweden can inform similar efforts to strengthen institutional frameworks and coordination in neighbouring countries and across the UCPM network. In this way, the project’s outputs contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management and foster improved coordination and resilience, supporting the European Union’s Preparedness Strategy and advancing regional and international cooperation on disaster and climate resilience.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR TAFF: Jun Rentschler, Senior Economist, Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterpart: Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB), Government of Sweden

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Türkiye: Resilient ir: A Strategic and Inclusive Initiative for Multi- a ar Preparedness and Risk Reduction

Overview

ra t Si e €650,000

Duration September 2025 – September 2027

e a ar Multi- a ar art a e ro eteoro o i a i a ter a i e tria a i e t

Key word Multi- a ar ri a e e t art a e re are e Capacity building and crisis o i atio trai i era e ro i a ter re o e i a are e i a ter ri r a re i ie e o it - a e i a ter re are e i -informed decision-making

Context Türkiye’s third-largest city, İzmir, is highly exposed to a range of natural and human-made hazards, including earthquakes, tsunamis, flooding, landslides, rockfalls, and industrial accidents. The city’s location along active fault i e , it v era e oa t i e, a t e re e e o a or i tria o e a ia a a or a , ei te t e ri o disasters with potentially cascading effects. Recent events, such as the 2020 Samos Island earthquake, have underscored the city’s vulnerability and the urgent need to strengthen disaster resilience. The increasing frequency and intensity of climate-re ate a ar , i i eav rai a a ea eve ri e, rt er o o t e e ri e ite o oi e ort , challenges remain in prioritising and financing resilience investments, coordinating among institutions, and ensuring that disaster management strategies are inclusive and data-driven.

The Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (AFAD) leads disaster preparedness, response, and recovery efforts at the national level, coordinating with local authorities, first responders, and specialised teams such as the national medical rescue team (UMKE) and firefighters. o a over e t , arti ar t e ir Metro o ita M i i a it , t e State ra i or S , a t e rovi ia ire torate o viro e t, r a isation, and Climate Change, play a critical role in implementing risk-reduction measures, operating and maintaining critical infrastructure, and engaging with communities, working alongside specialised first responder teams. However, the city’s rapid urbanisation, the presence of informal settlements, and the proximity of industrial facilities to residential areas create additional layers of vulnerability. Coordination among agencies, integration of risk data into planning, and the inclusion of vulnerable groups, such as children, the elderly, and people with disabilities, remain ongoing challenges. Furthermore, public awareness of disaster risks and preparedness measures is uneven, and there are gaps in the dissemination of timely, accessible information before, during, and after emergencies. These factors collectively underscore the need for a holistic, multi- e tora a roa to i a ter a i ate re i ie e i ir, ro e i ro ust risk assessment, institutional collaboration,

and community engagement.

Objective The objective of the grant is to enhance İzmir’s resilience against a wide range of hazards including natural and human-made disasters and strengthen the capacity of disaster response personnel through training programs focused on risk-informed decision-making, crisis communication, psychological resilience, and raise public

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

awareness of especially on vulnerable individuals (children, elderly, people with disabilities, etc.). This objective is achieved by developing a comprehensive assessment and conducting capacity building activities through tailored activities for enhanced communication skills and crisis management measures focusing on vulnerable people. The analysis, findings, can inform national-level approaches on those key topics.

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity is structured around two interlinked elements i i e a o re e ive ia o ti o ir disaster risk profile, including multi- a ar ri a a i , ta e o er a i , a te i a a e o o i ea i i it studies. It also develops a strategic roadmap for disaster risk reduction, institutional coordination, and investment prioritisation, informed by international knowledge exchange and stakeholder consultations. This also centers on capacity building, communication, and public awareness, with activities including training needs assessments, certified training programs for disaster response teams, trauma-informed communication modules, psychosocial resilience seminars, and the development of public education materials. Special emphasis is placed on engaging and protecting vulnerable groups, such as children, the elderly, and people with disabilities, through inclusive outreach and simulation exercises. The Activity also includes dissemination of findings and lessons learned at local, national, and international levels.

In terms of expected results, t e tivit i rovi e , ir Metro o ita M i i a it , a ot er ta e o er it actionable recommendations and tools to strengthen disaster and climate resilience. The findings support evidence-based investment decisions, improved risk anticipation, and enhanced preparedness and response capacities, particularly for vulnerable populations. The process will foster collaboration among institutions, build consensus on priorities, and facilitate knowledge transfer within Türkiye and with international partners. Ultimately, the Activity contributes to a more re i ie t ir, i i ising loss of life and property, and serve as a model for disaster risk management and climate adaptation in other high-risk urban areas.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among stakeholders in İzmir and shared more broadly across Türkiye, deepening the national knowledge base on disaster risk reduction (DRR) and emergency management. This directly supports t e o oi re i e e t o ir i a ter re i ie e trate a t e tre t e i of local and national disaster management systems, including the integration of multi- a ar ri a e e t a inclusive preparedness planning. By focusing on institutional capacity building, technical and economic feasibility studies, and targeted training for crisis managers and first responders, the project helps embed sustainable improvements within relevant authorities. These efforts ensure that the benefits of the project endure beyond its completion, supporting the institutionalisation of DRR and the effective use of disaster risk information for emergency preparedness and response, particularly for vulnerable groups such as children, the elderly, and people with disabilities. The technical assistance also addresses gaps identified in recent disaster events and diagnostics, supporting the development of coordinated, data- driven approaches to increase disaster resilience at the city and national levels.

Given the alignment with EU and international standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other countries participating in the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) and the broader region. o e te e erie e a o e e ro t ro ir a i or i i ar e ort to strengthen institutional frameworks and coordination in neighbouring countries and across the UCPM network. In this way, the project’s outputs contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management and foster improved coordination and resilience, supporting the European Union’s Preparedness Strategy and advancing regional and international cooperation on disaster and climate resilience. The project’s focus on inclusive, evidence-based planning and cross-sectoral collaboration helps e re t at t e e o ear e i ir a e a a te a a e to e e it ot er i - risk urban areas in Türkiye and beyond.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Sa i ra Erdurmus, Senior DRM Specialist, Tugkan Tanir, DRM Analyst [email protected]

Counterpart: Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Government of Türkiye

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

2024

Last updated: September 2025

Enhancing Policy and Investments for EU Disaster and Climate Resilience Overview

Grant Size €250,000

Duration September 2024 – November 2025

Key hazard(s) Earthquakes; Wildfires

Key word(s) Smart governance; Smart policies and investments; Resilient Infrastructure; Disaster Resilience; Climate Resilience

Context Europe faces escalating losses from climate-related disasters as the continent warms faster than any other region in the world, translating into potentially more frequent and more impactful events. For example, in 2023, Europe experienced one of its worst wildfire seasons with over 500,000 ha burnt, 96,000 of which were in Greece alone. Alongside climate-sensitive threats, large parts of Europe also face earthquake risks, risks exacerbated by ageing infrastructure that predates modern building codes. Countries in the EU have been taking major steps to enhance their disaster and climate resilience, guided and supported by EU policy, funding, and technical assistance instruments. With the current EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF 2021-2027) at its midpoint and preparations for the next MFF (2028-2034) intensifying, there is the opportunity to further strengthen disaster risk management and resilience efforts across the EU. This is the moment to reflect on how to refine EU policy and funding frameworks to better promote strategic, risk-informed, performance-oriented, and sustainable investments that deliver social, economic, and environmental benefits. It is also worth exploring ways to incentivise reforms that address key bottlenecks for effective risk management and investment.

Objectives ● Share good practices and provide recommendations for incentivising effective investments in disaster and climate

resilience through the right framework conditions.

● Provide evidence to support a risk-informed approach to investments, particularly in wildfire and earthquake risk management, and offer guidance on potential investments.

Component 2: Knowledge and capacity building

Key Activities and Expected Results

Incentivising impactful investments in disaster resilience – setting the right framework

This Activity includes EU-wide analytics which supports discussions related to existing and future policies and instruments that can foster disaster and climate resilience. These efforts consider conditions and incentives, as well as ways to track progress towards strengthened disaster and climate resilience.

Investing in disaster resilience in the EU: identifying needs and priorities

This Activity includes EU-wide and country case study analytics. The results include a high-level overview of wildfire and earthquake risks and their management at the EU-level, complemented by a series of brief case studies on wildfire and earthquake risk management in selected EU Member States.

Sustainability and Coordination This project seeks to provide evidence, good practice examples, and recommendations to inform ongoing and future efforts to strengthen disaster and climate resilience in the EU. The findings aim to provide insights that can guide the refinement of policies and tools at both the EU and Member State levels in the current and forthcoming MFFs. With Component 2 focusing on earthquake and wildfire risks, the project considers and coordinates with other ongoing academic research, technical assistance (including other TAFF projects or other EU-funded grants), as well as initiatives led by the European Commission that could be leveraged to deepen understanding of the EU’s earthquake and wildfire risk profile and risk management capabilities. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government counterparts, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Senior DRM Specialist; Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst. [email protected] Counterparts: DG ECHO, [email protected] www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last updated: September 2025

Albania: Strengthening Albania’s Fire Risk Management and Search and Rescue Capacity

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration September 2024 – August 2026

Key hazard(s) Wildfires

Key word(s) Rescue capacity; Rescue services; Fire protection

Context Wildfire and general fire risk is a growing concern in Albania with heat stress increasing due to climate change. Albania is at high and continuous risk of forest fires, especially in the dry summer season June-September. According to World Bank estimates, 23 per cent of crop area in the country is already under medium to high wildfire risk with 10 municipalities having the highest level of exposure. In 2021 alone, 329 wildfires were recorded, burning a total of 31,275 ha of land. Data from Global Forest Watch shows that fires in Albania are the second leading cause of forest area loss in the country. From 2001 to 2023, the country lost 19.8 kha of tree cover from fires and 26.7 kha from all other drivers of loss. In Albania firefighting and rescue services are the responsibility of municipalities, which carry the mandate of first responders on all incidents posing a danger to the population or environment. While equipment at local levels has been upgraded over the past years, municipalities still lack the capacity and institutional structures to effectively fulfil their mandate to prevent and mitigate incidents. This leads to the need for intervention by the National Civil Protection Agency (NCPA) for even small and medium incidents. To address Albania’s limited capabilities in extinguishing fires, the country’s fire response capacity, infrastructure (e.g., fire stations), technology, and equipment for tracking and extinguishing fires require urgent strengthening.

Objective The objective of the grant is to support the government of Albania in strengthening its fire risk management and search and rescue capacity, thereby improving its ability to respond effectively and efficiently to general fires, wildfires, and emergencies. The results of this technical assistance will inform a proposed investment project in Albania on fire risk management.

Component 1: Country-Specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Institutional and capacity review of fire protection and rescue services (FP&RS)

This activity reviews the existing FP&RS capacity in Albania against international best practices to identify potential capacity strengthening, policy, and investment needs to improve the delivery of firefighting services in the country.

Road map for strengthening fire protection and rescue services

A road map is developed based on Albanian demography, the geographic distribution of damage and loss risks due to fires, and a consultation process with municipalities. The road map prioritises resources and interventions at the local level regarding infrastructure and equipment, and it supports the identification of needs for training in firefighting and search and rescue.

Strengthening wildfire risk management

This activity aims to strengthen wildfire fire risk management in Albania with activities covering forest fire risk assessment and mapping, analysis of current mechanisms to fight wildfires, a review of institutional coordination and community engagement mechanisms, and recommendations for increasing Albania’s capacity to combat wildfires.

Sustainability and Coordination This project is part of a broader collaboration between the World Bank, the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM), and the government of Albania to strengthen the country’s ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters. The objective of the grant is to support the government in strengthening its fire risk management capacity. The grant serves as a basis for the identification, prioritisation, and preparation of activities under a proposed World Bank Investment Project Financing (IPF) on fire risk management with the Ministry of Interior. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge being generated through collaborations between government actors, the World Bank, and the UCPM.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Henrike Brecht, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist, Guillermo Siercke, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist; Anita Ellmauer-Klambauer, Urban Development Specialist; Maksimiljan Dhima, Senior Disaster Risk Management Consultant. [email protected]

Counterparts: Ministry of Interior: Arben Cara, General Director for FPRS, Florenc Qosja, Advisor in the Cabinet of the Minister

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last update: September 2025

Germany: Return of Investments in Disaster Resilience Measures: Identifying potential measures and generating evidence to inform decision-making

Overview

Grant Size €250,000

Duration September 2024 – December 2025

Key hazard(s) Droughts; Floods; Health Emergencies; Heatwaves

Key word(s) Cost benefit analysis; Smart investments; Prioritisation

Context Germany is vulnerable to a series of disaster risks, particularly those exacerbated by climate change, such as floods, heatwaves, and droughts. To strengthen disaster resilience, the country has implemented various measures, including the Federal Government's German Strategy for Strengthening Resilience to Disasters. As one of the world’s leading economies, Germany’s recent experiences with devastating floods underscore the growing pressure on its disaster preparedness systems due to evolving climate risks. As part of the effort to scale up disaster and climate resilience, it is critical to evaluate and prioritise smart investments. Understanding the costs and benefits of such investments, including reduced losses, stimulated economic activities, and socioeconomic and environmental co-benefits, is critical to inform policy dialogue and planning.

Objective The grant's objective is to support Germany strengthen the economic case for ex-ante disaster preparedness and prevention.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Case studies of the socio-economic costs and benefits of disaster prevention measures

This Activity includes analytics to quantify the return of select investments in disaster prevention and preparedness measures, evaluating floods, heat waves, drought, and health emergencies, among others. The analysis can help inform dialogue and decisions related to public budgeting processes.

Risk communication, learning, and dissemination

This includes activities (such as presentations) to contribute to increasing the awareness of decision makers within Germany of the crucial role and range of benefits of ex-ante preparedness and prevention measures, as well as to capture and transfer lessons learned from Germany to peers in the European Union and beyond.

Sustainability and Coordination This project builds upon the insights and outcomes of preceding initiatives, notably integrating and operationalising the research from the Economics for Disaster Prevention and Preparedness (EDPP2) project. It aims to enrich the existing body of knowledge on smart investments in disaster prevention and preparedness by showcasing new case studies and examples from diverse interventions. For example, project activities can inform government efforts related to the implementation of the German Strategy for Strengthening Resilience to Disasters.

By providing key insights into the costs and benefits of resilience measures, the project also yields valuable insights for disaster resilience planning that are applicable to countries working towards Sendai Framework targets and the achievement of the Disaster Resilience Goals. The project's results not only inform the BBK’s efforts to promote a proactive preparedness approach within Germany's disaster resilience strategy but also serve as a resource for other national ministries and international stakeholders. These insights will be crucial for informing smart investments in resilience and will contribute to a global understanding of effective disaster prevention and preparedness, especially considering climate change and extreme weather events. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government counterparts, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Jun Rentschler, Senior Economist; Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst [email protected] Counterpart: Office of the National Focal Point for the Sendai Framework, [email protected], Germany www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

.

Last updated: September 2025

Iceland: Towards an Integrated Wildfire Risk Management

Overview

Grant Size €300,000

Duration September 2024 – November 2025

Key hazard(s) Wildfires

Key word(s) Integrated wildfire risk management; Smart governance; Smart policies and investments

Context Considering the growing impact of wildfires across Europe and expected impacts of climate change, the adoption and implementation of an integrated approach to wildfire risk management is becoming an increasingly important priority across Europe, including in Iceland. Although volcanic eruptions remain Iceland's predominant hazard, recent years have seen occasional wildfires in the southern, eastern, and western regions due to dry summer conditions. Wildfires are an increasing risk due to summer houses in forested areas. In the context of climate change, to effectively enhance Iceland's wildfire risk management capabilities necessitates a review of current arrangements and the identification of key gaps/challenges as well as opportunities to improve the framework for integrated wildfire risk management and to inform a future strategic framework and possible stakeholder-led actions.

Objective The grant objective is to provide analytics and recommendations for adopting an integrated wildfire risk management (IWFRM) approach in Iceland.

Key Activities and Expected Results

Developing a diagnostic analysis and roadmap of recommendations with short, medium, and long-term priorities This Activity includes analytics to review and assess the current state of wildfire risk management in Iceland, and to identify key gaps and opportunities for future action. A set of recommendations will be included in a roadmap with short, medium, and long-term priorities to inform stakeholder dialogue and eventual implementation. Consistent with the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) Wildfire Peer Review Assessment Framework (PRAF) and the goals of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 (SFDRR), and taking into account good practice across various initiatives and examples in Europe and beyond, the analysis will consider different facets of IWFRM. These include understanding of wildfire risk, risk reduction, prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery (including financial arrangements), as well as governance, coordination, and current initiatives and investments related to wildfire risk management. The results can inform policy dialogue and planning in Iceland and showcase to other countries practical way to diagnose and identify key areas for future action.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Sustainability and Coordination This project is aligned with priorities and ongoing disaster risk management related initiatives in Iceland, including the ongoing Host Nation project. The approach is fully aligned with the methodological approach of the UCPM Wildfire PRAF, as well as higher-level EU Disaster Resilience Goals, and the SFDRR. The project considers knowledge generated under previous wildfire PRAF and existing country wildfire risk management practice assessments, as well as EU/country-funded projects and initiatives such as FIRE-RES for fire resilient territories in Europe, and the SAFERS PROJECT. The findings of the project will contribute to the broader knowledge base on IWFRM to further inform and refine its strategies and facilitate the uptake of such practices across UCPM countries. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government actors, the World Bank, and the UCPM.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Senior DRM Specialist; Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst [email protected]

Counterparts: Ólafur Loftsson, Project Manager; Haukur Grönli, Civil Protection Department; Iceland Department of Civil Protection and Emergency Management.

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last updated: September 2025

Kosovo:* Improving Disaster Risk Understanding, Impact-Based Forecasting, and Early Warning in Kosovo*

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration August 2024 – August 2026

Key hazard(s) Earthquake; Floods; Heatwaves; Landslides; Wildfires

Key word(s) Early warning; Impact-based forecasting; Community engagement

Context Kosovo is prone to several geological and hydrometeorological hazards such as floods, heavy snowfall, droughts, forest fires, and earthquakes. These hazards affect Kosovo’s varied geography in different ways. Particularly in mountainous areas, Kosovo suffers from riverine and flash floods, and rural areas are often hit by landslides and drought; heat stress is increasing due to climate change with forest fires becoming more frequent and, as 43 per cent of the country is covered with forests, this is becoming a growing concern. In 2021 alone, 92 wildfires were recorded, burning 7,580 ha of land. To support Kosovo in enhancing its resilience against disasters, the country’s capacities on risk assessment, impact-based forecasting and early warning and community engagement require urgent strengthening.

Objective The objective of the grant is to support the government of Kosovo in strengthening its capacity to analyse disaster risks, its capabilities for impact-based forecasting and early warning, as well as efforts in community engagement and education, thereby improving its ability to respond effectively and efficiently to floods, wildfires, and other natural disasters.

*This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Enhancing risk and impact analytics to inform decision-making

This Activity aims to enhance the evidence base for decision-making on preparedness and resilience building, particularly the accessibility and usability of risk-related information. It supports the collection and digitisation of critical infrastructure data to strengthen disaster exposure assessments, the development of a guidebook for integrating risk analytics into databases and helps enhance the capacity of institutional stakeholders to maintain and develop these systems.

Strengthening capabilities for impact-based forecasting and early warning

This Activity aims to strengthen capabilities for impact-based forecasting and multi-hazard early warning systems for more effective preparedness systems, with a focus on enhancing the integration and interoperability of technical systems and support last mile communication to reach the most vulnerable. It supports a comprehensive gap analysis of existing systems, processes and institutional frameworks for climate and disaster information, the development of a guidance note, and helps enhance capacity of key stakeholders to improve impact-based forecasting and early warning.

Community engagement and education on disaster preparedness and response

This Activity aims to strengthen the government’s capacity to engage communities and raise public awareness to support community disaster preparedness and response, with a particular emphasis on flood and wildfire risks. It supports the development of a briefing note on community engagement and awareness, supports the training of officials in community outreach and emergency preparedness, as well as the development of educational programmes to raise public awareness about disaster risks.

Sustainability and Coordination The project supports the achievement of national strategies for emergency preparedness and response, including the State Strategy for Reducing the Risk from Natural Disasters and other Disaster 2023-2028. It is a joint initiative between the Kosovo Emergency Management Agency and the Kosovo Hydrometeorological Institute, thereby supporting cross-institutional collaboration for disaster risk management. The project also builds on previous and on-going donor- supported analytical and technical assistance programmes, ensuring continuity and complementarity. This includes the EU Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA)-financed technical assistance “Western Balkans Disaster Risk Management Programme”, implemented by the World Bank 2018-2021. The project aimed to enhance capacities for disaster risk reduction and resulted in the publication of Ready to Respond Reports that analysed gaps in disaster risk management systems. The project is embedded in ongoing strategic dialogues with the World Bank such as the Climate Change Development Reports country dialogues. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge being generated through collaborations between government actors, the World Bank, and the UCPM.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Henrike Brecht, Senior DRM Specialist, Guillermo Siercke, Senior DRM Specialist [email protected]

Counterparts: Nehat Kocinaj, Head of Division for legal issues public affairs and international cooperation, Emergency Management Agency (EMA), Government of Kosovo; Kosovo Emergency Management Agency (EMA), MOIA, Kosovo Hydrometeorological Institute (KHMI).

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last updated: September 2025

Moldova: Strengthening Moldova’s Disaster Risk Management and Resilience Project Management

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration September 2024 – September 2026

Key hazard(s) Earthquakes; Floods; Health Emergencies; Landslides

Key word(s) Health emergencies; hydrometeorological services; Risk assessments

Context Moldova faces significant challenges when managing natural hazards due to its limited resources and outdated infrastructure. The country has been particularly vulnerable to floods, droughts, and landslides, which have been exacerbated by climate change, as well as earthquakes. Moldova's disaster risk management efforts have been hampered by inadequate data for risk assessments, outdated hydrometeorological services, and insufficient preparedness within the health sector to handle large-scale emergencies. This grant addresses these gaps by developing detailed risk assessments, and by identifying opportunities to upgrade weather forecasting systems and strengthen the resilience of health infrastructure.

Objective The grant's objective is to enhance Moldova's emergency preparedness and response capacities concerning natural hazards and climate-related shocks. Prevention will also be increased by better risk assessment analytics developed under the grant.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Supporting the improvement of Moldova’s emergency preparedness and response capacity, including through the development of the methodology for the risk assessment process and disaster risk mapping

The activities encompass a multi-tiered approach over 24 months, aiming to develop and pilot a DRM risk assessment methodology at community, district, and national levels, with the involvement of central and local authorities. This includes creating and executing training programmes for risk assessment, conducting training sessions for various authorities, and organising a study tour for knowledge exchange with a country that has a similar disaster risk profile and a record of successful DRM implementation.

Supporting the improvement of Moldova’s hydromet system

This Activity supports the implementation of the Strengthening Moldova's Disaster Risk Management and Resilience Project and conducts a review of Moldova's ICT Hydromet system to identify opportunities to enhance the collection and transfer of weather observations to the WMO Information System in Toulouse, establish efficient data transfer procedures, and upgrade the Chisinau weather radar for full functionality. Health system disaster preparedness assessment

This activity will provide a summary report with risk assessments and priority recommendations for strengthening disaster preparedness in the health sector. The report will present the findings of a hazard exposure analysis of health facilities and their supporting infrastructure, including an analysis of access times to health facilities. The report will also contain an opportunity assessment for preparedness measures in health system planning, including the roles of hydro-met forecasting and DRM training for health sector professionals. Lastly, the report will highlight opportunities to better integrate health services into existing civil protection and emergency response frameworks.

Sustainability and Coordination This project is part of a broader collaboration between the government of Moldova, the World Bank, the European Commission’s Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (DG ECHO), and the EU’s Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) to strengthen the country’s ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters. This project complements ongoing projects and initiatives led by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and its subordinate units, as well as other line ministries to strengthen the resilience of critical emergency response infrastructure and systems. Findings and outputs of this grant activity will inform the design and implementation of ongoing and future World Bank lending operations, including a recently approved World Bank operation to strengthen Moldova's Disaster Risk Management and Resilience capacities. It also expands on recent analytical activities to assess gaps and opportunities in the face of climate change – including the Moldova Country Climate and Development Report (CCDR). Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between Government actors, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts World Bank/GFDRR Team: Guillermo Siercke, Senior DRM Specialist; Jun Rentschler, Senior Economist; Axel Baeumler, Senior Urban Specialist; Christoph Klaiber, Economist; [email protected]

Counterparts: Alexandru Oprea, Head of the Civil Protection and Emergency Situations Service, Ministry of Internal Affairs of Moldova; Alexandr Tatarov, Deputy Head of the Civil Protection and Emergency Situations Service, Ministry of Internal Affairs of Moldova; Ministry of Interior/General Inspectorate for Emergency Situations (GIES); Ministry of Agriculture; Ministry of Infrastructure; Ministry of the Environment; and Ministry of Health.

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last updated: September 2025

North Macedonia: Resilience Investments, Governance and Recovery for Disaster Risk Reduction

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration September 2024 – June 2026

Key hazard(s) Earthquakes; Floods; Heatwaves; Wildfires

Key word(s) Risk governance; Critical infrastructure; Resilient recovery

Context North Macedonia faces significant challenges from natural and human-made hazards, with climate-related events occurring more frequently and intensely and earthquakes continuing to be a major concern. More recently, in 2024, the country experienced intense wildfires, highlighting the continuing need for enhanced mitigation and preparedness. To address this, North Macedonia is working to overcome barriers and fill knowledge gaps identified in past national disaster risk management and climate change adaptation assessments, aiming to scale up prevention measures and strengthen preparedness. Challenges remain in addressing vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, improving recovery frameworks and enhancing coordination. The country is committed to building a proactive risk management framework at national and local levels, including clarifying stakeholder roles, improving operational planning and supporting cross-institutional coordination, enhancing preparedness and climate resilience, and aligning with EU standards.

Objective The objective of the project is to enhance societal and community resilience in North Macedonia by addressing seismic and climate-related risks through foundational and transformational risk reduction and resilience-building measures.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Transformative and anticipatory risk governance and enhanced preparedness To improve resilience building and enhance overall disaster preparedness in the country, this Activity establishes the foundation of transformative and anticipatory risk governance in protection and rescue. It supports a functional analysis of the existing DRM system to strengthen national strategies, deepens the understanding of risk and methodologies for hazard assessments to strengthen DRM and risk governance/planning, and builds capacity of stakeholders for enhanced preparedness from national to community level.

Scaling up prioritised prevention investments in critical infrastructure

This Activity focuses on significantly enhancing the resilience-building of critical infrastructure against climate and disaster risks, to be accomplished through strategic and prioritised investments in preventive measures with a focus on seismic resilience and energy efficiency. It supports analytics to enhance the understanding of the vulnerability of critical infrastructure assets, develops methodologies and tools to support disaster risk screening and develops proofing interventions, identifies pilot interventions at local level for critical infrastructure upgrading, and helps enhance technical capacity of institutional stakeholders in this field.

Establishing a resilient recovery framework

This Activity aims to develop a comprehensive framework that ensures communities can effectively recover and rebuild in the aftermath of disasters, focusing on long-term resilience and sustainability. It supports analytics to enhance the understanding of the vulnerability and needs of the population related to effective disaster recovery, identifies gaps in the policy and regulatory framework to inform the development of a robust post-disaster recovery framework, and helps build the capacity of DRM stakeholders to conduct PDNAs and resilient and inclusive disaster recovery.

Sustainability and Coordination The project builds on previous and on-going national and donor-supported technical assistance and investment programmes, ensuring continuity and maximising collective efforts towards common goals. The project strengthens DRM systems in line with global and regional frameworks and key national strategic priorities. It aligns with the EU's IPA CARE Programme, incorporates lessons from past projects (IPA Floods and Fires, CRISIS, ROSES etc.) and complements ongoing projects with the World Bank (Sustainable Municipal Development Project, North Macedonia Sustainability and Resilience DPO, Climate Change Development Reports country dialogues). Analytics under this project align with established methodologies, including UNDP Guidance Notes and European Commission studies and guidance notes for critical infrastructure resilience. The project also coordinate with various ongoing EU-funded studies and research under Track 1 ‘Technical assistance for disaster risk management’ (single-country) at both national and regional levels leveraging knowledge, good practices and lessons learned on DRM. The project promotes collaboration with a people- centred, inclusive, gender-sensitive and climate-risk informed holistic approach and, to foster ownership, supports community and stakeholder involvement. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government counterparts, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Noriko Oe, Senior Urban Development Specialist; [email protected]

Counterparts: Mrs Valentina Atanasovska, Head of International Cooperation Department, PRD; Protection and Rescue Directorate (PRD), the Crisis Management Centre (CMC), the Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (IZIIS), the Red Cross (RC), key ministries and local governments.

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last update: September 2025

Romania: Romanian Assistance for Post-Disaster Improvement and Development (RAPID)

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration August 2024 – June 2026

Key hazard(s) Droughts; Earthquakes; Floods; Heatwaves; Landslides

Key word(s) Post-disaster recovery; build back better; inclusive disaster recovery; disaster response and recovery

Context Romania is exposed to various natural hazards, including earthquakes, floods, forest fires, droughts, landslides, storms, and extreme temperature events. Aging infrastructure, particularly in cities and throughout transport systems, increases the country's vulnerability, as witnessed by the number of buildings impacted by the 1977 earthquake. Climate change is expected to intensify these risks, making multi-hazard prevention, preparedness, and response readiness a key focus of government reform and investments. In recent decades, Romania has taken major steps to improve its disaster risk management framework and system. Through the adoption of key strategic documents – including the National Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction (2024-2035), the National Strategy for Seismic Risk Reduction (2022-2050), and the National Strategy for Climate Change Adaptation (2024-2030) – the government is seeking to further strengthen its disaster and climate resilience, including improving the capacity of the national civil protection system and relevant institutions to manage disaster response and recovery in an effective and inclusive manner.

Objective The objective of this project is to strengthen the capacity of civil protection institutions to ensure an effective and inclusive disaster response and recovery, and to improve existing recovery frameworks.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Identifying gaps in Romania's current disaster recovery framework This Activity includes a diagnostic assessment of Romania's current disaster recovery framework, particularly concerning seismic and climate-related hazards. The assessment helps identify and proposes ways to address gaps in Romania’s post-disaster recovery framework, such as those related to governance and coordination, or different technical elements.

Strengthening the disaster recovery framework

Based on the diagnostic analysis, this Activity focuses on identifying technical recommendations in line with Build Back Better principles. Recommendations are supported by international good practice and examples related to post- disaster recovery. These activities can inform the development of a robust post-disaster recovery framework for Romania, aiming for resilience, sustainability, and alignment with international standards to mitigate future seismic and climate-related vulnerabilities.

Capacity building to improve recovery planning and execution

This component includes knowledge exchange events, training sessions for government officials and first responders, and institutional capacity building to improve recovery planning and execution and inclusiveness of response. The capacity building activities help facilitate inter-ministerial coordination and support the establishment of an overview of the requirements for critical disaster response and recovery resources.

Sustainability and Coordination This project forms part of broader World Bank DRM engagement in Romania, which encompasses a range of activities aimed at strengthening the country's ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters. This project also complements ongoing projects and initiatives led by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and its subordinate units, and other line ministries, to strengthen the resilience of critical emergency response infrastructure and systems. This includes investment financing through the Strengthening Disaster Risk Management Project, the Improving Resilience and Emergency Response Project, the Strengthening Preparedness and Critical Emergency Infrastructure Project, and the Romania Safer, Inclusive and Sustainable Schools Project. In addition, the results of this project also complement the reforms and expected results tracked under the Second Disaster Risk Management Development Policy Loan with a Catastrophe Draw Down Option (Cat DDO). In parallel, this project complements efforts led under a GFDRR grant through the Japan-World Bank Program for Mainstreaming DRM in developing countries, that is supporting Romania in addressing existing gaps in DRM policy development and emergency preparedness efforts, as well as in promoting and advancing investments in resilient public infrastructure. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government counterparts, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Alexandra Calin, DRM Specialist; Anda Anica, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterpart: Silviu Stoian, Deputy Chief, General Directorate for Civil Protection; Iordan Gavrila, Head of Service and Elena Treanta, Main Specialist Officer II, Coordination and Implementation of Resilience Requirements Service; Mihaela Trandafir, Main Specialist Officer I, Project Management Service, Decision Support Direction, under the Department for Emergency Situations (DES) under the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Romania.

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last update: September 2025

Türkiye: Enhancement of the Flood Early Warning System in Samsun and Communication Strategy Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration September 2024 – September 2025

Key hazard(s) Floods

Key word(s) Flood Risk Management; Early Warning System; Communication strategies; Public awareness and preparedness; Capacity Building

Context Enhanced accuracy and reliability of flood predictions through early warning systems (EWS) facilitate timely warnings and improved safety for at risk populations. At the same time, an effective communication strategy ensures the swift and efficient dissemination of risk information from EWS to decision-makers, as well as the broader public, enabling them to promptly initiate actions to mitigate the loss of life and property. In the context of climate change and increased flood risk, it is critical for countries, including Türkiye, to continue improving their EWS and related communications strategies. To minimise losses, the government is implementing a range of measures to improve flood predictions and reduce flood risk in Samsun Province. Sa it i o ate it i t e o arie o t e r a

a ra a e i r a ar a a river a i a ot rivers, along with other local streams, present a significant risk of flooding. A series of investments is planned in this area to manage flood risk and serve as an example for other areas in Türkiye.

Objective The objective of the project is to improve the EWS for floods in Samsun and to develop an effective communication strategy for disseminating information to the public at the city level, which will also serve as an example for other cities and at national level.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Technical evaluation of the current EWS and recommendations for improvement on the EWS-produced information

This Activity supports analysis of the current EWS and identify key recommendations for its improvement. It supports enhancements to the EWS in Samsun, improving the region's early warning capabilities and responsiveness to potential flood events. The analysis will also generate recommendations based on a good practice review that will inform and strengthen wider disaster response measures, thereby contributing to a more robust disaster risk management framework at the national level.

Evaluation of information dissemination methods for EWS and recommendations for an effective communication strategy for EWS-generated information

This Activity supports analysis to optimise the delivery and impact of EWS-generated warnings, ensuring that critical information reaches the relevant stakeholders in a timely, clear, and actionable manner. The analysis provides a set of technical recommendations for stakeholders to consider and be supplemented by capacity building.

Sustainability and Coordination This project complements government efforts to strengthen EWS capacity, and DRM more broadly, with a focus on flood resilience. Samsun is considered a potential model for the nation's other flood-prone areas, offering insights that could also be applicable to other hazards that Türkiye faces. This technical assistance also aligns with the World Bank- financed Flood and Drought Management Project (FDMP), which seeks to improve flood control measures for communities in targeted regions and enhance the country's overall capacity to manage flood and drought risks. A critical aspect of the FDMP is the strengthening of flood monitoring and forecasting systems, a task undertaken by the State Hydraulic Works and Directorate General for Water Management. The FDMP includes a thorough evaluation and refinement of existing flood forecasting and early warning systems, aiming to improve their optimization. This concerted effort is designed to meet Türkiye’s broader disaster resilience goals, as well as the FDMP's goals, and set the standard for flood risk management practices. This technical assistance grant supports these efforts by focusing on the existing EWS in Samsun, with the goal of refining the information produced, enhancing its dissemination, and establishing a communication strategy that could serve as a benchmark for other cities and at the national level. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government counterparts, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team a a , Se ior ater e o r e Ma a e e t S e ia i t Sa i ra r r , Se ior M S e ia i t Ma at a a at , Senior DRM Specialist; Tugkan Tanir, Urban Analyst;

[email protected] Counterpart: Azize Minaz, Engineer-Department of Flood Control in DSI; General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works Türkiye; Regional Directorate of State Hydraulic Works of Samsun; Disaster and Emergency Management Center (AFAD); MOAF (DG Water Management); Governorships; Municipalities; Provincial Directorates of the Ministry of Environment, Urbanisation and Climate Change; the Ministry of National Education; Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) active in the field of disaster response (UMKE, AKUT, etc.). www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

World Bank/GFDRR TAFF: [email protected]

1 2 3

Context

Strengthening financial resilience, making smart investments for disaster and climate resilience, and

enhancing institutional capacity and preparedness makes economic sense. There are however recurring

barriers, such as gaps in financial frameworks, limited institutional capacity, and difficulties in accessing EU funding,

identified in the report Understanding the Needs of Civil Protection Agencies under the Union Civil Protection

Mechanism (UCPM), conducted by the World Bank and DG ECHO. To be better prepared for disasters, there is a

need to scale up investments to bolster disaster prevention and preparedness across the EU and through the

UCPM. To address these needs, and in response to challenges identified in the report Economics for Disaster

Prevention and Preparedness, the Technical Assistance Financing Facility for Disaster Prevention and

Preparedness (TAFF) has been established to facilitate access to technical assistance and global knowledge on

prevention and preparedness for national civil protection and disaster risk management authorities to support

country and EU efforts on disaster risk management (DRM).

About

The overall objective of TAFF is to strengthen the knowledge and capacities of countries under the EU’s

UCPM for disaster and preparedness with a focus on:

Strengthening the capacity

of civil protection and other

‘relevant competent authorities

in scaling up disaster and

climate resilience in line with the

Union Disaster Resilience Goals,

the European Green Deal, the EU

Preparedness Union Strategy, as

well as the countries’ national

priorities.

Supporting investments

in disaster prevention

and preparedness

through the development

of a project pipeline and

enhanced administrative

capacity.

Improving the knowledge

base on disaster risk

management, and facilitate the

sharing of knowledge, good

practices and information.

TAFF has two components:

1. Component 1 – Country-specific technical assistance to strengthen the capacity of civil protection and

other relevant competent authorities under the UCPM in scaling up investments contributing to disaster and

climate resilience. Technical assistance includes various types of analytics, technical studies and

recommendations for plans and strategies, piloting of activities, and capacity-building/training activities. Key

areas of support include:

• Anticipate - improving anticipation and disaster risk management planning to proactively address potential

hazards;

• Prepare - raising risk awareness and preparedness levels among the population to effectively respond to

emergencies;

• Alert - enhancing early warning and hydro-meteorological systems for timely and accurate information

dissemination; and

• Secure - strengthening national civil protection systems to prevent and prepare for disasters.

Factsheet

2. Component 2 – Knowledge and capacity building to facilitate the transfer and sharing of knowledge among

countries on disaster risk management and facilitate the sharing of good practices across UCPM countries.

Knowledge products and activities include for example studies, collection of best practices and lessons learned,

practical guidance/knowledge notes, interactive workshops and technical deep dives/clinics, and training

programs. In 2025, TAFF workshop brought together over 120 participants, including ringing together more

than 120 participants from the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM), TAFF-supported projects, EU

institutions, and partner organisations. Also, a series of reports was published providing an overview of the risk

trends, key challenges, and key opportunities for strengthening resilience to wildfires and earthquakes.

How to Apply

Implementation arrangements: The World Bank/GFDRR teams implement, working closely with the beneficiaries

to ensure activities are aligned with their needs, and disseminate knowledge and lessons learned.

Eligible countries include EU Member States, Participating States of the UCPM, and Kosovo1 in view of their

ongoing efforts to join the UCPM.

Eligible entities include national level civil protection authorities or authorities with disaster risk management

(DRM) responsibilities of eligible countries, with the agreement of the national civil protection authorities.

Expressions of Interest and Shortlisting: Eligible entities can respond to a Call of Expressions of Interest (EoI)

which will be published on DG ECHO and GFDRR websites, by submitting an EoI. The EoI will be accepted on

annual basis within defined timeframes. EoIs outside this range, particularly due to emergency situations, will be

considered on a case-by-case basis. It is recommended for EoIs to be developed in coordination with the World

Bank/GFDRR teams.

Proposals and start of activities: Based on the shortlist of EoIs agreed with DG ECHO, the World Bank/GFDRR

teams, in coordination with beneficiary country and entity, develop - the full project proposal, and World

Bank/GFDRR teams start implementation in line with the agreed scope.

Project duration is expected between 18 and 24 months.

2024 Call of Expressions of Interest: Eight country-specific activities are being implemented in Albania,

Germany, Iceland, Kosovo, Moldova, North Macedonia, Romania, and Türkiye; as well as cross-cutting

analytical activities (EU-wide).

2025 Call of Expressions of Interest: Seven country-specific activities are being implemented in Croatia, Ireland,

Kosovo, Montenegro, Serbia, Sweden, and Türkiye; as well as cross-cutting analytical activities (EU-wide).

2026 Call of Expressions of Interest: The 2026 call is expected to be launched on January 30, 2026 with more

information available on the TAFF and DG ECHO webpages (links below).

Partnership

The TAFF for Disaster Prevention and Preparedness is a partnership between the European Commission through its Directorate-General for Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (DG ECHO), the World Bank and the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR). TAFF is fully funded by the EU and managed by the GFDRR and implemented by the World Bank.

1 This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.

Contact & Web

World Bank/GFDRR TAFF team (all operational matters) [email protected]

European Commission/DG ECHO (general feedback): [email protected]

https://www.gfdrr.org/en/taff https://civil-protection-knowledge-network.europa.eu/technical-assistance-financing-facility-taff

Electronically i ned on 29/01/2026 09:48 (UTC+01) in ccorda ce with Article 11 of Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2121

Summary: This guide provides key information about the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) Technical

Assistance Financing Facility (TAFF) for Disaster Prevention and Preparedness. It is relevant for UCPM

members, participating states, and Kosovo1, interested in responding to the Call for Expressions of Interest (EOI)

for TAFF. This guide provides a summary of TAFF objectives, activities, implementation arrangements, eligibility,

procedures for allocating funding and approval of activities, reporting, monitoring and evaluation, as well as

communications and visibility. In case of questions, please contact [email protected].

Table of Contents

Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 2

Objectives ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2

Types of activities ........................................................................................................................................................ 3

Implementation arrangements and principles ................................................................................................................ 3

Eligibility ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4

Selection of TAFF projects ............................................................................................................................................. 5

Following EOI shortlisting ............................................................................................................................................... 5

Timeline ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5

Monitoring, evaluation, and reporting ............................................................................................................................. 6

Communication and visibility .......................................................................................................................................... 6

List of acronyms and abbreviations

DG ECHO European Commission’s Directorate-General for Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations

DRGs (European Union) Disaster Resilience Goals

DRM Disaster risk management

EC European Commission

ECA Europe and Central Asia

EOI Expression of interest

EU European Union

GFDRR Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery

TAFF Technical Assistance Financing Facility

UCPM Union Civil Protection Mechanism

UCPKN Union Civil Protection Knowledge Network

1 This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo

Declaration of Independence.

Annex 2: TAFF Guide for Applicants – Expressions of Interest

2

Introduction

The Technical Assistance Financing Facility for Disaster Prevention and Preparedness (TAFF) is a partnership

between the European Commission through its Directorate-General for Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid

Operations (DG ECHO), the World Bank, and the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR).2

Launched in 2024, TAFF forms part of a range of initiatives focusing on prevention and preparedness led by DG ECHO

and the UCPM in line with the below EC policy framework. Per the UCPM financing decision for 2026, the TAFF budget

for 2026 is €4 million.

TAFF is a mechanism which allows national civil protection and disaster risk management (DRM) authorities

to access technical assistance and global knowledge on prevention and preparedness to support country

efforts on DRM. TAFF is aligned with:

• The EU-wide Disaster Resilience Goals (DRGs), with a focus on enhancing UCPM response capacity,

strengthening crisis and emergency preparedness of civil protection, improved risk analytics, anticipation

and planning, enhanced early warning systems, and increased risk awareness of the population, and

findings of the Niinistö Report, as well as the EU Preparedness Union Strategy which aims to boost the EU's

ability to anticipate, prevent, and respond to various threats.

• The World Bank’s strategy in the Europe and Central Asia (ECA) region, which focuses on supporting a

green transition, building and strengthening institutions, and boosting resilience.

• The GFDRR mission to support communities and countries to reduce risk, prepare for, and recover from

disaster by integrating DRM and climate change adaptation into development strategies and programs, and

contributing to country efforts in the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction

2015–2030.

Objectives

TAFF’s overarching objective is to strengthen the knowledge and capacities of countries under the UCPM for

disaster prevention and preparedness. This will be achieved by focusing on the following specific sub-objectives:

• To strengthen the capacity of civil protection and other relevant competent authorities in scaling up

disaster and climate resilience in line with the EU DRGs, the European Green Deal, the EU Preparedness

Union Strategy, as well as countries’ national priorities.

• To support investments in disaster prevention and preparedness through the development of a project

pipeline and enhanced administrative capacity.

• To improve the knowledge base on DRM, and facilitate the sharing of knowledge, good practices, and

information.

TAFF activities focus on four DRGs in particular – Anticipate, Prepare, Alert, and Secure, as shown in the figure

below.

2 GFDRR is a multi-donor partnership and grant making facility housed within the World Bank. It helps communities and countries

understand their climate and disaster risks, reduce and prepare, and to recover after an event.

3

Types of activities

Activities include various types of analytics, technical studies and recommendations for plans and strategies, piloting

of activities, and capacity-building/training activities to strengthen the capacity of civil protection and other relevant

competent authorities under the UCPM in scaling up investments contributing to disaster and climate resilience. An

indicative list is provided below, with more information in Annex 5. A list of ongoing and completed projects is included

Annex 6.

The expected budget for each activity will range between €250,000–€750,000, with an implementation timeline of

12 to 24 months (potential extension to maximum 30 months in total). Activities outside this range will be considered

on a case-by-case basis, please contact [email protected].

Implementation arrangements and principles

TAFF is funded by the EU and administratively managed by the GFDRR. Activities are implemented by World Bank

teams from the ECA Disaster Risk Management and Urban Resilience Unit, and with the technical support of the

GFDRR's global experts. Projects are carried out in coordination with the respective national counterparts, with DG

ECHO, and relevant stakeholders involved in disaster and climate resilience in the region.

The World Bank/GFDRR teams implement activities, working closely with the beneficiaries to ensure activities are

aligned with their needs, the global Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030, the EU DRGs

and the EU Preparedness Union Strategy, and the EU-World Bank shared priorities for disaster preparedness.

4

The implementation of activities by World Bank ECA DRM and GFDRR will be conducted taking into

consideration the priorities and activities of DG ECHO to ensure added-value and complementarity of the

implemented activities under TAFF, and to avoid duplication. TAFF projects are subject to quality-review by the World

Bank/GFDRR, and reporting, monitoring, and evaluation procedures.

All activities under the TAFF will be designed taking into account the following operating principles:

• Promote disaster and climate resilience and sustainable development – as part of that, also the greening

of civil protection sector, in line with shared global, EU, and World Bank efforts.

• Build country capacity and sustainability – the TAFF will aim to support countries develop new studies,

methodologies, assessments, etc., and it will do so by relying on country knowledge and building capacity on

the beneficiary side to be able to build on the results, once the technical assistance activities end.

• Provide added value to countries’ DRM program and coordination with other actors – e.g., strategic

value of activities in the country’s DRM program, and close coordination with technical and financial partners

already operating in the country on DRM issues.

• Integrate transversal issues, such as social inclusion and gender as a cross-cutting element of the TAFF

activities, including in its trainings, tools, and knowledge products to the extent possible.

• Do no harm, i.e., reduce to the maximum the environmental and social negative impacts of the projects.

• Promote dissemination of activities and findings through the Union Civil Protection Knowledge Network

(UCPKN).

Non-eligible activities under TAFF include the following: drafting of legislation, risk assessments for specific assets,

feasibility-level studies such as engineering assessments at asset level, developing technical specifications,

prioritization of specific investments (asset level), purchase of goods, software development of online applications,

websites, or software, etc. Civil works or purchase of equipment are not eligible. The World Bank does not engage in

providing technical assistance support on nuclear energy/management of nuclear hazards.

Eligibility

In order to be eligible for TAFF Component 1 activities, beneficiaries and affiliated entities must:

• be legal public entities (public bodies)

• be the national level civil protection authority or a national authority with DRM responsibilities of eligible

countries

• be established in one of the eligible countries, i.e.:

• EU Member States: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark,

Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg,

Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, and Sweden

• UCPM Participating Countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, the Republic of Moldova,

Montenegro, Republic of North Macedonia, Norway, Serbia, Türkiye, and Ukraine

• Other countries: Kosovo3 in view of their ongoing efforts to join the UCPM.

3 This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the

Kosovo Declaration of Independence.

5

Selection of TAFF projects

The selection of TAFF projects is on the basis of Expressions of Interest (EOIs). Relevant criteria and prioritization

principles (see Annex 3) are in place to ensure appropriate targeting and effectiveness of implemented activities.

Eligible countries may request country-specific technical assistance through an EOI per agreed template (see

Annex 3). Based on evaluation criteria described below, a shortlist of EOIs is prepared by the World Bank and GFDRR

team and reviewed with DG ECHO as part of TAFF annual review and planning meeting. The EOIs are accepted on

an annual basis within defined timeframes. EOIs outside this range, particularly due to emergency situations, capacity

constraints or small scope, will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

The evaluation criteria for the EOIs focus on (1) eligibility conditions (Yes/No questions) and several key

aspects including (2) quality; (3) relevance, and (4) impact. The assessment score for criteria 2, 3, and 4 takes into

consideration a minimum pass score for each and across. In case of over-demand, additional criteria will be applied for

shortlisting EOIs. The evaluation will only consider information provided in the EOI template as submitted. Applicants

should coordinate with World Bank teams before submitting the EOI. Details on the application of the criteria are

included in Annex 4.

The Call for EOIs will be published on the TAFF webpage hosted on the GFDRR website and DG ECHO website.

In order to be admissible, your EOI should be submitted to [email protected], within the deadline stipulated

in the call. It is necessary to strictly follow the template for the EOI.

Following EOI shortlisting

For approved shortlisted EOIs, technical assistance proposals are developed by the World Bank and GFDRR

teams in coordination with national counterpart(s). Projects are then implemented by the World Bank and

GFDRR. The shortlisted beneficiary will be contacted by the World Bank team. The World Bank will lead the

development of the technical proposal, based on the EOI, in coordination with the national counterpart(s). The design

will integrate the knowledge generation and sharing arrangements to ensure that the beneficiary country retains full

ownership of the project and its results. The development and implementation will be done in consultation with relevant

stakeholders and DG ECHO, to ensure alignment, added value, and avoid any duplication.

Timeline

The indicative timeline for the selection and implementation of activities is the following:

• 30 January 2026: Launch of the Call for EOI by DG ECHO and World Bank/GFDRR.

• 12 February 2026: Info Day online

• 27 March 2026: Deadline for submission of EOIs by Countries per Template (see separate Annex 3).

• 27 March – 14 April 2026: Shortlisting by World Bank/GFDRR per agreed criteria.

• 29 April 2026: Approval of shortlist as part of TAFF annual work plan and budget by DG ECHO.

• 6 May 2026: Official notification on shortlisting by DG ECHO and World Bank/GFDRR.

• 6 May – 10 June 2026: Proposals developed by World Bank/GFDRR for shortlisted proposals/countries in

coordination with respective counterparts and stakeholders.

• June – July 2026: Start of implementation of TAFF projects by the World Bank and GFDRR teams in

coordination with respective counterparts and stakeholders.

6

Monitoring, evaluation, and reporting

TAFF follows the standard evaluation requirements outlined in the World Bank Group Financial Framework

Partnership Agreement between the World Bank and the EU. A summary report is published on yearly basis. World

Bank and GFDRR teams regularly report on TAFF project implementation, and beneficiaries may be asked to join

meetings on occasions.

Communication and visibility

All activities financed under the TAFF will clearly indicate that they have received funding from the EU; all

program products and events financed under this initiative will carry EU, WB, and GFDRR logos. A dedicated

webpage is available for TAFF under the UCPKN website and the GFDRR website. Key outputs and information will

be shared via the UCPKN and may be conducted in collaboration with existing UCPKN initiatives. Beneficiary

organizations are expected to disseminate relevant outputs of their projects on their own websites and through their

own information channels.

Any questions about the template for the EOI (see Annex 3) or the procedure to follow can be addressed to [email protected].

Applicants are asked to send your questions at least seven days before the submission deadline. Electronically signed on 29/01/2026 09:48 (UTC+01) in accordance with Article 11 of Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2121

Official Use Only

Please fill in and share with [email protected], by March 27, 2026, 11:59 PM CET time

You may consult also the ‘Annex 2: TAFF Guide for Applicants – Expressions of Interest’ and ‘Questions and Answers’ Annex. General information

1. Project title (Fill in)

2. Proponent(s) Country: (Select relevant entry/delete not relevant) Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, Montenegro, Republic of North Macedonia, Norway, Serbia, Türkiye, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine, Kosovo

Lead Entity / Associated Entity: (Fill in)

3. TAFF Priority Areas Which TAFF priority/-ies will this activity most contribute to? (Mark as relevant, single or multiple)

• Anticipate - To improve risk assessments, anticipation, and disaster risk management planning

• Prepare - To increase risk awareness and preparedness of the population

• Alert - To enhance early warning

• Secure - To ensure a robust civil protection system

4. Type of activities Which type of activities is envisioned? (Mark as relevant, single or multiple)

• Analytics and technical studies

• Plans, strategies

• Piloting approaches

• Capacity-building/training

• Other (Please indicate type)

5. Indicative project timeframe

(Add in months or years)

Annex 3: TAFF Expression of Interest Template

Official Use Only

6. Indicative project budget estimate in EUR (if known)

Please note that TAFF assistance is provided in-kind through World Bank/Global Facility for Disaster Risk Reduction experts; funds are not directly provided to the shortlisted beneficiary institutions. There is no requirement for any co-financing. Staff of beneficiary entities are not renumerated for coordinating on TAFF projects. (Add indicative amount in EUR)

7. Endorsement of EOI Has this EOI been endorsed by the legal representative of the organisation requesting the activity? (Respond Yes/No)

8. Contact(s) Technical level contact(s) for this EOI (Please include name, title, institution, email and telephone number) Please note that TAFF assistance can be provided to national civil protection authorities or national-level authorities with mandated responsibilities in disaster risk management (provided it is endorsed by the national civil protection authority).

9. Consultation with World Bank country team

Has this EOI been discussed with the World Bank country team? (Respond Yes/No) Please indicate name (contact [email protected] in case questions on the country focal point)

Brief project description

Quality

a. Technical soundness What is/are the main project objective(s): (max. 150 words)

Please provide a short summary of proposed activities/components (max. 300 words)

b. Readiness Are the counterparts ready to start collaboration on this project or do any pre-conditions need to be met (such as completion of another activities, etc.) (max. 150 words)

Relevance

c. Targeting What are the key issues or challenges that the project will address (max. 150 words)

d. TAFF priorities How the proposal and its activities contribute to the achievement of the general and specific objectives of TAFF (max. 150 words)

e. Strategic relevance Which relevant strategic documents or initiatives does the project align with? (such as international/EU/national/sub-national or sectoral strategies, plans, regional mechanisms etc.) (max. 150 words)

Official Use Only

f. Operational relevance How does the project align with other projects or activities (past, ongoing, planned) or fill specific gaps? (max. 150 words)

Impact

g. Project impact What are the expected results and impact of the project / planned activities, and beneficiaries? (max. 300 words)

h. Dissemination How will project results be disseminated? (max. 150 words)

i. Sustainability How would the project results be used and sustained after the project’s completion? (max. 150 words)

Electronically signed on 29/01/2026 09:48 (UTC+01) in accordance with Article 11 of Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2121

Official Use Only

Summary: The following evaluation criteria facilitate the rating of the Expressions of Interest (EOIs) based on the set

objectives and priorities of the Technical Assistance Financing Facility (TAFF) for Disaster Prevention and

Preparedness. The criteria focus on (1) eligibility, and several key aspects including (2) quality; (3) relevance, and

(4) impact. The assessment score for criteria 2, 3, and 4 takes into consideration a minimum pass score for each and

across. In case of over-demand, additional criteria will be applied for the shortlisting of EOIs (additional information are

at the end of this Annex). The evaluation will only consider information provided in the EOI template as submitted.

1. Eligibility (Yes/No)

EOIs will be first checked against formal eligibility requirements (see Table 1). EOIs that are considered eligible

will be evaluated against the other set of criteria (see Table 2) and ranked according to their scores. EOIs that do not

fulfill the evaluation criteria will be disqualified.

Table 1. TAFF Eligibility check

Section Criteria Guidance

Eligibility

(Yes/ No/ To be

clarified)

Eligible country A country shall be eligible if established in one of the eligible countries,

i.e.:

• EU Member States: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of

Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany,

Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta,

Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain,

and Sweden.

• UCPM Participating Countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina,

Iceland, Montenegro, Republic of North Macedonia, Norway, Serbia,

Türkiye, the Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine.

• Other countries: Kosovo1 in view of their ongoing efforts to join the

UCPM.

Eligible entity Submitting entity, beneficiaries and affiliated entities must:

1 This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo

Declaration of Independence.

Annex 4: TAFF Evaluation of the Expressions of Interest

– Description of Evaluation Criteria

2

Official Use Only

• be legal public entities (public bodies)

• be the national level civil protection authority or a national authority with

disaster risk management (DRM) responsibilities of eligible countries

Eligible activities See eligible and non-eligible activities in Annex 5:

List of Potential Activities Supported under TAFF

Duration 12-24 months (potential extension to max 30 months total)

Budget between €250,000–€750,000

Endorsement Confirmation that the EOI is endorsed by a legal representative.

In case of a national authority with disaster risk management (DRM)

responsibilities of eligible countries, a confirmation email or an official

letter, for example) from a legal representative of the Civil Protection

Agency must be included.

Consultation with WB Information if the EOI was discussed with World Bank TAFF team

On time submission Before announced date/time (27 March 2026, 23:59 CET time) by Email

2. Quality (25 points)

Quality refers to commitment, technical feasibility, maturity, readiness, and sustainability of the project, specifically:

• Commitment: the EOI is signed by the head of the organization/legal representative and is supported by the

relevant Ministry (5 points).

• Technical soundness: description and soundness of the proposed project objective(s) and activities (10

points).

• Readiness: extent to which the counterparts are ready to start a collaboration on this project or do any pre-

conditions need to be met (such as completion of another activities, etc.) (10 points)

3. Relevance (35 points)

Relevance refers to strategic relevance of the proposed activity, specifically:

• Targeting: key challenges/issues that the project will address. (10 points).

• TAFF Objectives: Extent to which the EOI and its activities contribute to the achievement of the TAFF

objectives and priorities (10 points).

• Strategic relevance: Extent to which the proposed activities are aligned with existing strategic documents,

plans or initiatives, or demonstrate a clear and sound rationale (i.e., peer review recommendations,

evaluations, lessons learned, previous studies, etc.) (10 points).Operational relevance extent to which the

EOI is aligned with other projects or activities (past, ongoing, or planned) or fills specific gaps (including

alignment and avoiding duplication with other initiatives) (5 points).

4. Impact (30 points)

Impact refers to expected impact of the activity, specifically:

3

Official Use Only

• Impact of the project: Extent to which the EOI puts forward tangible and realistic impacts (10 points).

• Dissemination: Extent to which the dissemination strategy is clear and adequate to communicate on the

project results and to share results with other Participating States (10 points).

• Sustainability: Extent to which the EOI puts forward a convincing sustainability plan and demonstrates

commitment to build on the EOI results (10 points).

Assessment score: Each EOI will be assigned an assessment score. EOIs need to simultaneously meet two

requirements: (1) to reach the minimum pass score per EOI criteria, and (2) to reach at least 45 points in total for the

three EOI criteria. Only EOIs passing both thresholds will be considered for shortlisting — within the limits of the

available budget. Other EOIs will be rejected.

Table 2. TAFF Award Criteria

Criteria Minimum pass score Maximum score

Relevance 20 35

Quality 10 25

Impact 15 30

Sum across criteria 45 90

Additional criteria in case of over-demand (15 points)

In case of over-demand, the following additional criteria will be applied for the shortlisting of EOIs (based on information

provided in the EOI):

• Relevance to UCPM: extent to which the project deals with issues that are potentially relevant to multiple countries

in the UCPM (5 points).

• Contribution to DRM Knowledge base: extent to which the project introduces innovative approaches or deal with

topics that are emerging/have relevance for knowledge agenda on DRM (5 points).

• Potential synergies between projects: extent to which commonalities can contribute to synergies with other TAFF-

supported projects (5 points).

Any questions about the template for the EOI (see Annex 3) or the procedure to follow can be addressed to [email protected].

Applicants are asked to send your questions at least seven days before the submission deadline. Electronically signed on 29/01/2026 09:48 (UTC+01) in accordance with Article 11 of Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2121

Official Use Only

Activities focus primarily on disaster prevention and preparedness to promote a

balanced and holistic approach to disaster risk management (DRM).

Country-specific activities should be directly relevant for the four priority areas listed in the table, aligned with the EU Disaster Resilience Goals.

This includes, for example, analytics (i.e., diagnostics, technical studies, recommendations) and related technical assistance activities (i.e., trainings,

meetings, etc.) related to areas of topics such as risk analytics, strategic planning (DRM or disaster risk reduction [DRR] plans/strategies), investment

planning at portfolio level (not asset-level specific), critical entities resilience, risk awareness and risk communication, public perception surveys,

modernization of early warning systems (EWS) and hydrometeorological systems, preparedness capacities, damage and loss systems, resilient

recovery and reconstruction, post-disaster financing, and other topics.

Transversal issues such as social inclusion and gender will be integrated as a cross-cutting element of the TAFF activities, including into its

trainings, tools, and knowledge products to the extent possible.

Only World Bank-executed activities are eligible. Non-eligible activities include drafting of legislation, risk assessments for specific assets,

feasibility-level studies such as engineering assessments at asset level, developing technical specifications, prioritization of specific investments

(asset level), purchase of goods, software etc., development of online applications, websites, or software. Also, civil works or purchase of equipment.

The World Bank does not engage in providing support on nuclear energy/management of nuclear hazards.

Annex 5: TAFF List of Potential Activities Supported

Priority

area Objective Type of Activities Type of Output

1

Anticipate

To improve risk assessments,

anticipation, and disaster risk

management planning. Focus

on improved understanding of

risk, modelling of hazards,

development of impact

scenarios, use of risk

information for strategic and

investment planning, technical

and economic studies to

support the planning and

preparation of policies and

investments, in line with the

objectives of the EU Green Deal,

sharing and advising on

methodological approaches,

and best practice examples.

Risk analytics and use of information for DRM planning, e.g., risk analytics for specific hazards (floods, earthquake, landslide, wildfire; portfolio-wide (not asset level specific) vulnerability assessment of public facilities – i.e. schools, emergency response buildings based on construction characteristics, network assessments/criticality & vulnerability assessments e.g. related to transport sector/other sectors, rapid exposure mapping, guidance on risk analytics methodologies/available options, sharing of good practice and examples

Different types of technical

assessments (not at asset level) Different types of pre-feasibility level economic assessments – cost-benefit

assessment, Triple Dividend assessments related to civil protection/DRM sector (not to specific asset-level investment), poverty and disasters analytics, analytics related to climate mitigation and adaptation, costs/benefits of greening of civil protection sector, etc. sharing of good practice and examples

Development of recommendations for prioritization frameworks for investment programs (portfolio level) related to civil protection/DRM/and other critical sectors, sharing of good practice and examples

Prioritization frameworks and

recommendations

Support the preparation of national DRM/DRR, prevention or preparedness strategies/plans, hazard-specific/multi-hazard strategies and action plans, including diagnostic and consultations, DRM action plans for specific sectors studies related to implementation of EU Disaster Resilience Goals, etc.

Diagnostic /Action plans/ Roadmaps /

Technical reports

Technical review/recommendations related to country programs, including EU funds or funds available to countries from EC for DRM, sharing of good practice and examples

Technical review/recommendations/institutional capacity-building based on good practice and examples to inform the implementation of the Critical Entities Directive (or other DRM-related directives).

Seismic resilience and energy efficiency reviews for sectors, sharing of good practice and examples

Diagnostic on nature-based solutions and green infrastructure, reviews, sharing of good practice and examples

Diagnostic of land use planning regulation/building regulation with policy recommendations, urban resilience reviews, sharing of good practice and examples

Other sectoral risk analytics/planning related to urban, water, energy, transport, education, health, social protection, among others (cultural heritage tbc)

Any questions about the list of activities can be directed to [email protected].

Applicants are asked to send your questions at least seven days before the submission deadline.

2 Prepare To increase risk awareness and preparedness of the population. Focus on public awareness and preparedness, examples, pilots, scalable activities.

Support piloting of risk awareness activities (Analytics and related communication outputs, as well as support in dissemination): development of studies/analysis/recommendations related to communication strategies/actions plans, tools to disseminate risk information to support inclusive DRM, public perception surveys, materials or learning modules for capacity-building related to improved risk awareness, studies focusing on awareness of specific segments of population, such as people with disabilities or vulnerable groups etc., sharing of good practice and examples

Diagnostic /Action plans/ Roadmaps /

Technical reports

Promote open access to, and utilization of, risk information data, tools, and analytics, - i.e., studies for the development of a risk and crisis communication platforms, sharing of good practice, etc., sharing of good practice and examples.

Trainings on the above topics Trainings

3 Alert To enhance early warning: Focus on technical analysis on various aspects such as assessment and modernization of EWS and hydro- meteorological systems and communication (warning)

Technical reviews/technical assessments (diagnostics, proposed roadmaps, and advisory input to action plans) of EWS and national hydromet, focusing on all/select components, system review of climate services provided vis-a-vis user needs, coordination, etc., review of hydrometeorological investments, sharing of good practice and examples

Diagnostic /Action plans/ Roadmaps /

Technical reports Technical reviews focusing on enhancing human and technical aspects of public warning, sharing of good practice and examples

4 Secure To Ensure a robust civil protection system: Focus on technical analysis on various aspects such as civil protection systems, such as readiness to respond, preparedness for response and recovery planning, including financial, strategic and technical elements

Preparedness and response analytics, such as Ready2Respond Diagnostic, capacity review of existing arrangements, etc., sharing of good practice and examples Diagnostic

/Action plans/ Roadmaps /

Technical reports

Technical reviews and recommendations related to recovery, such as post-disaster financing/financing for recovery, damage and loss systems or methodologies, inclusive and gender responsive post disaster assessments, recovery planning frameworks, etc., sharing of good practice and examples

Trainings, e.g., for first responders on how to interact with people with disabilities Trainings

On demand - application of the Global Rapid post-disaster Damage Estimation (GRADE) approach assessment (2-3 weeks delivery)1

GRADE report

1 The GRADE approach (developed by the World Bank and GFDRR) can provide an initial rapid estimation of the physical post-disaster damage incurred by key sectors within two weeks of the disaster. The approach aims to create an independent, credible sectoral quantification of the spatial extent and severity of a disaster’s physical impact, addressing specific damage information needs in the first few weeks after a major disaster, and complementing the more comprehensive post-disaster needs assessment (PDNA) process. More information about the methodology are available here.

Overview of TAFF 2024 & 2025

Table of contents

2025 Enhancing Policy and Investments for EU Disaster and Climate Resilience – Phase 2

Croatia

Irland

Kosovo*

Montenegro

Serbia

Sweden

Türkiye

2024 Enhancing Policy and Investments for EU Disaster and Climate Resilience

Albania

Germany

Iceland

Kosovo*

Moldova

North Macedonia

Romania

Türkiye

*This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.

2025

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Enhancing Policy and Investments for EU Disaster and Climate Resilience – Phase 2

Overview

Grant Size €400,000

Duration June 2025 – December 2026

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard

Key word(s)

Preparedness in early-childhood and primary education; Disability-inclusive emergency preparedness and response; emergency operators; persons with disabilities; preparedness curriculum and training materials and teaching resources, and Emergency Preparedness and Response

Context Across the European Union, disaster risks are rising in frequency and complexity due to climate change, changing hazard landscapes, pandemics, and evolving geopolitical threats. In response, the European Commission launched the EU Preparedness Union Strategy (2025) to strengthen the Union’s capacity to anticipate, prevent, and manage crises through enhanced coordination, capabilities, and an integrated all-hazards, whole-of-government, and whole-of-society approach.

Recent crises, from the COVID-19 pandemic to accelerating climate impacts, have exposed gaps in preparedness. EU instruments such as the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) and rescEU which serve as a strategic reserve of European disaster response capabilities and stockpiles, fully funded by the EU, demonstrated added value. However, critical evidence and practice gaps persist, particularly in inclusive preparedness, embedding preparedness in education systems, and diagnosing systemic gaps in national preparedness and response. Given the diverse risk profiles, resources, and institutional arrangements across Member States and UCPM Participating States comparative analysis, cross-country learning, and cooperation are essential to guide policymaking, steer investment decisions, and the development of a coherent, evidence-based culture of preparedness in line with EU/UCPM legislation and frameworks.

Objective Provide targeted technical assistance to the European Commission, as well as to EU Member States and UCPM Participating States

• Generate practical, actionable evidence to inform policy reform, program design, and investment decisions on prevention and preparedness.

• Support strengthening Europe's ability to anticipate, prevent, prepare, and respond to crises

Component 2: Knowledge and capacity building

Key Activities and Expected Results

The technical assistance is structured around three key areas.

Area 1 focuses on integrating preparedness in early-childhood and primary education by conducting a comparative baseline across EU Member States, selected UCPM Participating States, and global comparators on how preparedness is embedded in early childhood and primary education. A repository of effective resources for dissemination will be available through the UCP Knowledge Network.

Area 2 focuses on inclusive preparedness and response through the development of a set of actions aiming at supporting persons with disabilities and response operators in emergency contexts.

Area 3 identifies best practices in emergency preparedness and response arrangements through a focused case study to assess current emergency preparedness and response arrangements, identify gaps and opportunities across risk assessment, planning, capabilities, communications, and inclusion, and provide prioritized recommendations and investment options. The case serves as a practical model for other EU Member States and UCPM Participating States.

In terms of expected results, the findings and recommendations from each area of work provide the European Commission and relevant national authorities with a robust evidence base to inform policy choices, curriculum and training design, investment prioritization, and inclusive operational practice. The process fosters collaboration among education and civil protection stakeholders, including organizations of persons with disabilities, build consensus around practical, scalable solutions, and facilitate knowledge transfer across EU Member States, UCPM Participating States, and global comparators. Ultimately, the technical assistance supports the development of EU-level guidance and tools, strengthen disability-inclusive preparedness and response, embed preparedness in early childhood and primary education, and equip countries with actionable diagnostics, contributing to a stronger culture of preparedness, improved disaster prevention and response, and enhanced resilience across the Union.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of this technical assistance will be disseminated among EU institutions, Member States, UCPM Participating States, and relevant international partners, deepening the collective knowledge base on disaster preparedness, inclusive response, and risk-informed education across Europe. This supports the ongoing efforts to strengthen national and EU strategies and facilitates the adoption of innovative, evidence-based practices in education, civil protection, and inclusion. By focusing on curriculum integration, inclusive operational guidance, training, and stakeholder engagement, the project improves the capacity of education systems, DRM and civil protection agencies, to respond to emergencies, ensuring that the benefits of the knowledge endure beyond its completion.

Given the alignment with EU and international standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this technical assistance are also relevant to other countries participating in the UCPM and the broader international community. Documented experiences and knowledge products can inform similar efforts in neighbouring countries and global comparators, contributing to the global DRM knowledge base and fostering improved coordination and resilience. In this way, the project’s outputs will support the implementation of the EU Preparedness Union Strategy, the Disaster Resilience Goals, and international frameworks such as the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and the Sustainable Development Goals, strengthening preparedness and resilience at national, regional, and global levels.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Elif Ayhan, Lead DRM Specialist, Cristina Otano, Senior Operations Officer, Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Senior DRM Specialist; and Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst, Anda Anica, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterparts: DG ECHO, [email protected]

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Croatia: Evidence for modernising the firefighting system in the Republic of Croatia

Overview

Grant Size €550,000

Duration June 2025 – June 2027

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard; Wildfire

Key word(s) Investment planning; Operational capacities; Public awareness activities; Training capacities

Context Croatia faces significant disaster risks, including earthquakes, as well as floods, extreme heat, droughts, and wildfires, many of which are projected to be exacerbated by climate change. Over the past decade, disasters have resulted in significant physical, social, and financial impacts, affecting people’s well-being. For example, the 2014 floods affected over 13000 people and caused over €300 million direct damage costs, while wildfires in 2017 burnt 86,576 ha (some 1.53 percent of the area of the Republic of Croatia) causing €109 million in losses.1 Croatia also faces significant seismic risks due to its location and vulnerable infrastructure and buildings, much of which was built prior to modern building codes. The 2020 earthquakes in Zagreb and Petrinja, which struck during the COVID-19 pandemic, brought an estimated €16.1 billion in damage and economic losses.2

Firefighting services play a critical role for ensuring Croatia’s resilience to disaster and climate risks. The Croatian Firefighting Association (HVZ) provide emergency response services in response to all hazards. Recent events and evolving risks highlight the need to strengthen preparedness and response capacities, including relevant policy and operational gaps, and prioritise actions and investments in firefighting services in line with data and analysis of the overarching gaps and opportunities as well as broader priorities for disaster and climate resilience.

Objective The objective is to provide technical assistance to the HVZ to identify and plan future actions and investments to modernise the firefighting system in Croatia. The project aims at generating technical and practical information and evidence that can underpin future prevention and preparedness reforms, actions, and investment decisions. The project helps fill existing information and knowledge gaps related to (1) operational capability of firefighting organisations (equipment, infrastructure, guidelines) to respond to natural hazards and emergencies; (2) conditions for education and

1 Posavec et al. 2023. 2 The March 2020 earthquake (M5.5) damaged and destroyed €10.7 billion worth of assets in the city of Zagreb, Zagreb and Krapina- Zagorje counties (Government of Croatia. 2020. Croatia Earthquake Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment 2020. Link.) The December 2020 earthquake2 (M6.2) damaged and destroyed €4.1 billion in physical assets in Sisak-Moslavina, Zagreb, Karlovac, and Krapina- Zagorje Counties and the City of Zagreb (Government of Croatia. 2021. Croatia December 2020 Earthquake Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment. Link.)

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

training of firefighters; (3) fire prevention and supervising the implementation of prescribed fire protection measures, among others through pre-defined priority actions on high risk (pilot) areas; (4) public awareness; and (5) advocacy.

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity is structured around five key areas. Area 1 focuses on a diagnostic review of the operational capabilities of firefighting organisations, generating information necessary to upgrade and modernise equipment, human resources, and strategic planning. Area 2 assesses the training capabilities of firefighting organisations, guiding improvements in education programs, facilities, and the recruitment of professional and volunteer forces. Area 3 evaluates fire prevention and preparedness measures, identifying opportunities to strengthen regulatory frameworks, spatial planning, and policy reforms. Area 4 includes public perception surveys, review of ongoing communication and public awareness efforts, with recommendations and select pilots to further raise public awareness to disasters. Area 5 centers on dissemination of knowledge and partnerships, ensuring that project outcomes and good practices are shared within Croatia as well as with other EU Member States, UCPM members, and the broader international community.

In terms of expected results, the findings and recommendations from each focus areas provide the HVZ and relevant authorities with a comprehensive evidence base to inform strategic investment, training, regulatory reforms, and public engagement. The process fosters collaboration among stakeholders, builds consensus on modernisation priorities, and facilitates knowledge transfer within Croatia and across borders. Ultimately, the project contributes to the modernisation of Croatia’s firefighting system, enhances disaster prevention and preparedness, and strengthens national and regional resilience.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among Croatian stakeholders and shared more broadly, deepening the knowledge base on firefighting modernisation and disaster risk management in Croatia. This supports the ongoing refinement of national strategies and facilitates the adoption of modern and innovative practices across the country. By focusing on operational capabilities, training, prevention, public awareness, and partnerships, the project helps embed sustainable improvements within the HVZ and relevant authorities, ensuring that the benefits of the project endure beyond its completion.

Given the alignment with EU and regional standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other EU Member States and countries participating in the UCPM. Documented experiences and knowledge products can inform similar modernisation efforts in neighbouring countries such as Albania and North Macedonia, as well as the broader UCPM community. In this way, the project’s outputs can contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management and foster improved coordination and resilience in line with the national priorities as set out by the National DRM Strategy (2023) and its Action Plan, as well as the European Union’s Disaster Resilience Goals and the EU Preparedness Strategy, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Senior DRM Specialist; Krunoslav Katic, Sr. DRM Specialist; Martina Vojkovic, DRM Expert, and Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterparts: Mario Starčević, Croatia Firefighting Association (HVZ)

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Ireland: Good Practice and Recommendations for Strengthening the National Strategic Policy Framework for Emergency Management

Overview

Grant Size €250,000

Duration June 2025 – June 2026

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard; Large-scale disasters

Key word(s) Strategic Emergency Management, emergency preparedness, national risk framework, disaster response coordination, resilience planning.

Context Ireland’s Strategic Emergency Management (SEM) Policy, adopted in 2017, sets out the national structures and roles for managing emergencies, aligned with the lead government department principle.1 It defines 50 emergency types, assigning lead government department responsibilities and outlines how these interact with broader government systems across risk assessment, preparedness, response coordination, and recovery. Since its adoption, the risk landscape has evolved, particularly in light of escalating climate-related threats such as flooding and severe storms. While Ireland has a well-established risk assessment model, recent events have highlighted the need to strengthen national preparedness for complex and cascading risks. Updating the SEM framework is now essential to reflect current and future challenges, resilience priorities, and addressing legislative or operational gaps or areas for improvement.

The Office of Emergency Planning (OEP) is the custodian of SEM policy in Ireland. The OEP manages and operates the National Emergency Coordination Centre and provides peer support to government departments and agencies in identifying capability gaps and informing capability development. The OEP’s remit extends to the arrangement of training and education relating to emergency management and offering advice and assistance if requested to government departments in relation to their emergency management functions

Objective The objective of the grant is to provide technical assistance to the OEP with respect to the national SEM policy and framework. This is done by (1) reviewing the existing National SEM structure and framework, and by (2) providing recommendations to inform and strengthen Ireland’s SEM.

1 Department of Defence; Office of Emergency Planning, 2017. Strategic Emergency Management (SEM): National Structures and Framework. Department of Defence. Link.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity comprises several elements. This includes a structured diagnostic review of the current SEM doctrine; review of relevant good practices from other countries and international organisations; and the development of technical recommendations including a roadmap. The recommendations and the roadmap cover both policy and operational aspects, outlining key opportunities, timelines, and so on. The Activity also includes consultations and various knowledge- transfer activities, as well as dissemination of the results through relevant platforms and mechanisms.

In terms of expected results, the findings can inform Ireland’s future actions, including legislative efforts, to enhance Ireland’s national preparedness capacity and disaster resilience. The review and recommendations can provide a solid knowledge base to inform a modernised, comprehensive SEM that reflects current risk context as well as practice in the field. The process and consultations, and the results of the analysis, can contribute to enhancing collaboration among stakeholders, strengthening a common understanding of the challenges and priorities, as well as contribute to sharing of knowledge within and beyond Ireland.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings will be disseminated among stakeholders and beyond, deepening the knowledge base on SEM in Ireland. This can inform and refine its strategies and facilitate the uptake of modern/innovative practices across Ireland.

Focusing on emergency planning and emergency systems as a topic of high relevance also to other countries, relevant findings, knowledge and information, including documented lessons learnt and good practice, can be useful to other Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) Member States and Participating States which seek to modernise their frameworks. In this way, the grant outputs can also contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management (DRM) and improved coordination on disaster preparedness, in line with the European Union (EU) Disaster Resilience Goals (DRGs) and the EU’s Preparedness Strategy.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Senior DRM Specialist, Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterpart: Office of Emergency Planning (OEP), Government of Ireland

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Kosovo: *

Enhancing National Crisis Preparedness and Wildfire Risk Management in Kosovo:*

Overview

Grant Size €350,000

Duration September 2025 – June 2027

Key hazard(s) Wildfires; Floods; Landslides; Earthquakes; Heatwaves; Droughts

Key word(s) Financial preparedness; Wildfire preparedness; Resilient Recovery; National Crisis Preparedness Plan

Context Kosovo’s geographical position and climate expose it to a diverse array of hazards, including floods, heavy snowfall, drought, forest fires, and earthquakes. The country is particularly vulnerable to flash floods in mountainous regions and riverine floods in plains, with severe events in recent years causing significant economic and social disruption. Forest fires are an increasing concern, with 43 percent of Kosovo’s territory covered by forests and nearly 8,000 hectares burned in 2021 alone. Extreme climate events frequently damage critical infrastructure, leading to cascading effects that heighten vulnerabilities in key sectors such as agriculture, forestry, and water. While Kosovo has made progress in strengthening its legal and institutional frameworks for disaster risk management and climate adaptation, most notably through the 2023 Law on Climate Change and the updated National Response Plan, implementation capacity remains limited, especially at the municipal level. Gaps persist in local hazard mapping, early warning systems, and the integration of climate and disaster risks into financial planning, and coordination between national and local governments is still evolving.

The Emergency Management Agency (EMA) under the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MoIA) is the main counterpart responsible for disaster risk management and emergency preparedness in Kosovo, working in close coordination with the Ministry of Environment, Spatial Planning and Infrastructure (MESPI), which leads on climate policy. Despite a clear strategic direction, Kosovo’s emergency preparedness and response (EP&R) system remains primarily response-oriented, with limited professional capacity and fragmented mandates. A 2021 diagnostic under the World Bank’s Ready2Respond framework highlighted the need for strategic investments in legislation, financing, equipment, and personnel to build a more robust and coordinated EP&R architecture.

Objective The objective of the grant is to support the Government of Kosovo in strengthening national crisis preparedness and wildfire resilience. This is achieved through: (i) developing recommendations for a National Crisis Preparedness Plan, including post-disaster financing mechanisms; and (ii) evaluating and improving frameworks for wildfire preparedness and forecasting.

* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity comprises two interlinked activities. The first focuses on a structured diagnostic review of Kosovo’s national crisis preparedness and emergency response systems. This includes a rapid assessment of existing legal and institutional frameworks, operational and financial readiness, and coordination mechanisms, conducted in close collaboration with the EMA and other key stakeholders. The process involves desk-based diagnostics, targeted consultations with government institutions, and a scenario-based tabletop simulation exercise to test real-time decision- making and resource mobilisation during emergencies such as wildfires, floods, earthquakes, and landslides. The findings are consolidated into a Preparedness Diagnostic Brief and an updated Readiness Scorecard, and inform the development of technical recommendations, including a National Crisis Preparedness Plan (CPP) and a prioritised emergency investment list. The recommendations and roadmap address both policy and operational aspects, outlining key opportunities for strengthening institutional, financial, and operational systems for rapid emergency response.

In terms of expected results, the Activity provides Kosovo’s authorities with a robust evidence base to inform future actions and investments in crisis preparedness and disaster resilience. The review and recommendations support the modernisation of national emergency management, enhance clarity around institutional mandates and coordination protocols, and facilitate the rapid mobilisation of resources in times of crisis. The process, including consultations and simulation exercises, fosters collaboration among stakeholders, strengthens a shared understanding of challenges and priorities, and contributes to knowledge transfer within Kosovo and with international partners. The second element, focused on wildfire preparedness, delivers a technical needs assessment and a roadmap for impact-based wildfire forecasting, complemented by capacity-building workshops. These outputs enable government agencies, emergency responders, and local authorities to improve wildfire response, integrate advanced forecasting tools, and position Kosovo to benefit from future investments in disaster risk reduction and resilience.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among stakeholders in Kosovo and shared more broadly, deepening the national knowledge base on DRM. This supports the ongoing refinement of Kosovo’s State Strategy for Reducing the Risk from Natural Disasters and other Disaster 2023-2028, as well as the strengthening of the Integrated Emergency Management System and the National Response Plan. By focusing on institutional capacity building, the development of a National Crisis Preparedness Plan (CPP), and improved system integration, the project helps embed sustainable improvements within relevant authorities, ensuring that the benefits of the project endure beyond its completion. The technical assistance supports the institutionalisation of DRR and the effective use of disaster risk information for emergency preparedness and response.

Given the alignment with EU and regional standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other countries participating in the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) and the broader region. Documented experiences and knowledge products can inform similar efforts to strengthen institutional frameworks and coordination in neighbouring countries and the UCPM community. In this way, the project’s outputs contribute to the global DRM knowledge base and foster improved coordination and resilience, supporting the EU’s Preparedness Strategy and advancing regional cooperation on disaster and climate resilience.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Anita Ellmauer-Klambauer, Urban Development Specialist, Henrike Brecht, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist, Guillermo Siercke, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist; [email protected]

Counterpart: Emergency Management Agency (EMA), Ministry of Internal Affairs (MoIA) and the Ministry of Environment, Spatial Planning and Infrastructure (MESPI), Government of Kosovo

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Montenegro: Enhancing Disaster Resilience and Continuity of IT Infrastructure and Services in the Operational Communication Center 112

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration September 2025 – September 2027

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard; Earthquakes; Floods; Wildfires

Key word(s) Reducing risk and mainstreaming; DRM Risk-Informed Decision Making; Disaster Preparedness; Resilient Recovery; Risk-informed decisions making

Context Montenegro’s National Disaster Risk Assessment (2021) highlights the country’s significant vulnerability to natural hazards, particularly earthquakes, floods, and wildfires, which threaten public safety, critical infrastructure, and societal resilience. The coastal and central regions are especially at risk from seismic activity, as evidenced by the devastating 1979 earthquake, while frequent floods and recurring wildfires further challenge the country’s emergency response capacity. A scenario developed for the National Disaster Risk Assessment underscores the high vulnerability of electronic communications and IT infrastructure, especially the Operational Communication Centre 112 (OCC 112), to both natural and man-made hazards. The assessment, together with the Law on Designation and Protection of Critical Infrastructure, the Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy, and the Law on Electronic Communications, defines the roles and responsibilities for disaster risk management and critical infrastructure protection. The evolving risk landscape, highlighted by recent stress tests and operational experience, has underscored the need to strengthen the resilience and continuity of the 112 system, particularly in the face of complex and cascading hazards.

The Directorate for Emergency Management is the custodian of the 112 system in Montenegro. It is responsible for the operation and modernisation of the Operational Communication Centre 112 (OCC 112), as well as for ensuring compliance with national and EU requirements for critical infrastructure protection and emergency communications. The Directorate leads efforts to identify capability gaps, inform strategic investments, and coordinate with other government agencies and stakeholders. The 112 Department supports the government’s vision to establish a robust public warning system by 2027 and facilitate the transition to Next Generation 112 (NG112), ensuring the continuous functioning of emergency services and enhancing national preparedness and response.

Objective The objective of this grant is to ensure disaster and climate resilience, functionality, and continuity of IT infrastructure and services in the Operational Communication Centre 112 (OCC 112) in Montenegro. This is achieved by focusing on three key activities: (1) a diagnostic analysis of the 112 system through a gap and needs assessment; (2) knowledge sharing through study visits to established 112 centres, and training; and (3) based on the diagnostic analysis, recommendations in the form of a roadmap with short/medium-long term priorities for stakeholders to

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

consider for the development of a roadmap for modernization of the operational communication centre (OCC) 112 and a Business Continuity Plan (BCP).

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity is structured around three key elements to strengthen the disaster and climate resilience, functionality, and continuity of IT infrastructure and services in Montenegro’s Operational Communication Centre 112 (OCC 112). The first component focuses on a comprehensive diagnostic analysis of the OCC 112 system, including stakeholder mapping, desk research, and a structured gap and needs assessment of current IT infrastructure and emergency operations. This analysis, informed by global best practices and a review of the regulatory framework, identifies vulnerabilities to hazards such as earthquakes, floods, and wildfires. Citizen engagement activities further assess access barriers and communication preferences, particularly for vulnerable groups. The activity also centres on knowledge sharing, with study visits to advanced 112 centres, workshops, and training sessions to exchange best practices in IT resilience and business continuity. Thematic roundtables and participation in EU and regional platforms will support the dissemination of findings and encourage replication. Building on these efforts, a technical roadmap will be developed for the phased modernisation of OCC 112, including recommendations for a Business Continuity Plan (BCP) and future interoperability with the Public Warning System and Next Generation 112 (NG112). The roadmap outlines short-, medium-, and long-term priorities and implementation strategies aligned with EU directives and best practices.

In terms of expected results, the findings and recommendations from each element of this activity provide Montenegro’s Ministry of Interior, Directorate for Emergency Management, and other stakeholders with a comprehensive evidence base to inform strategic investment, regulatory reforms, and public engagement. The process fosters collaboration among government agencies, private sector partners, telecom operators, and organisations of persons with disabilities, building consensus on modernisation priorities and facilitating knowledge transfer. Ultimately, the Activity contributes to the modernisation and resilience of Montenegro’s emergency communications system, enhances disaster prevention and preparedness, and strengthens national and regional resilience, benefiting over citizens and tourists alike.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among Montenegrin stakeholders and shared more broadly, deepening the national knowledge base on emergency communications modernisation and disaster risk management. This supports the ongoing refinement of Montenegro’s disaster risk reduction strategies and facilitates the adoption of modern, innovative, and inclusive practices across the country. The development of a Business Continuity Plan and a modernisation roadmap provide- a strategic framework for future investments, aligning Montenegro’s emergency communications infrastructure with EU Disaster Resilience Goals (DRGs) and the European Green Deal’s climate adaptation priorities. It also ensures alignment with key EU legislation, including the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC), NIS2 Directive, EU Civil Protection Mechanism (EUCPM), and the Accessibility Act.

Given the alignment with EU and regional standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other EU Member States and countries participating in the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM). Documented experiences and knowledge products can inform similar modernisation efforts in neighbouring countries and the broader UCPM community. In this way, the project’s outputs contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management and foster improved coordination and resilience, supporting the European Union’s Preparedness Strategy and advancing regional cooperation on disaster and climate resilience.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Sa i ra r r , Senior DRM Specialist, Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterparts: Directorate for Protection and Rescue – Department 112, Ministry of Interior, Government of Montenegro

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Serbia: Strengthening Emergency Management and Disaster Preparedness in Serbia

Overview

Grant Size €450,000

Duration September 2025 – September 2027

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard; Earthquakes; Landslides; Heavy rainfall; Floods; Heat waves; Droughts; Wildfires

Key word(s) Updating disaster risk assessment methodology; Strengthening protection and rescue planning at all government levels; Enhancing emergency preparedness and response capacity

Context Serbia’s disaster risk management framework has undergone significant evolution in recent years, particularly following the adoption of the “Guidelines and Methodology for Vulnerability (Risk) Assessment and Protection and Rescue Plans in Emergency Situations” in 2017, updated in 2019. This Methodology, mandated by the Law on Disaster Risk Reduction and Emergency Management, applies across all levels of government — national, provincial, and local — and is coordinated by the Sector for Emergency Management (SEM) within the Ministry of the Interior. The experience gained from implementing the Methodology has highlighted the need for refinement and simplification, especially to facilitate its practical application at the local self-government level. In response, the Government of Serbia is undertaking an update of the Methodology to enhance the quality and operational relevance of disaster risk assessments and protection and rescue planning. This update aims to strengthen the overall disaster risk management system, inform future investment planning, and serve as a foundation for risk-informed decision making, thereby improving preparedness and resilience at both local and national levels. The revised approach will also address financial preparedness, ensuring that Serbia is better equipped to respond to and recover from disasters and crises, and will align with the principles of the EU Civil Protection Mechanism and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction.

The SEM within the Ministry of the Interior is the central institution responsible for disaster risk management policy and operations in Serbia. As the custodian of the national Methodology, SEM leads the coordination, development, and monitoring of disaster risk assessment and protection and rescue planning across all levels of government. Building on lessons learned from recent disasters and an evolving risk landscape, SEM is committed to modernising and refining the Methodology to better address current and emerging hazards, including those driven by climate change.

Objective The objective of the grant is to enhance the overall disaster preparedness and community resilience in the Republic of Serbia through improvement of existing frameworks and resilience-building measures. The proposed activities and outputs under the grant are designed to enhance the Disaster Risk Assessments and Protection and Rescue plans, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of preventive measures and preparedness activities. Additionally, these

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

documents address financial aspects within the protection and rescue system, further strengthening the community's ability to withstand and recover from disasters.

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity is structured around two main elements. The first puts the focus on the review and updating of the Methodology for Disaster Risk Assessment and Protection and Rescue Plans in the Republic of Serbia. This involves a comprehensive diagnostic analysis of the existing methodology, identification of gaps, and the drafting of updated instructions to ensure alignment with current best practices and international standards. The second element centers on an assessment of national disaster risk management capabilities and response capacities, identifying gaps, and providing targeted recommendations for capability and capacity enhancement. Both components will include consultations with key stakeholders, knowledge-transfer activities, and dissemination of results through relevant platforms and mechanisms including expert seminars, workshops, and trainings.

In terms of expected results, the findings and recommendations from each component provide Serbian authorities with a robust evidence base to inform future policy, planning, and investment decisions in disaster risk management and emergency preparedness. The process fosters collaboration among stakeholders, builds consensus on priorities for strengthening Serbia’s disaster risk management system, and facilitates knowledge sharing within Serbia and with international partners. Ultimately, the Activity contributes to the modernisation of Serbia’s disaster risk assessment and emergency preparedness frameworks, enhancing national resilience and alignment with European and international standards.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among Serbian stakeholders and shared more broadly, deepening the knowledge base on disaster risk management and emergency preparedness in Serbia. This supports the ongoing refinement of national strategies, including the National Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction and Emergency Management, and facilitates the adoption of modern and harmonised practices across the country. By focusing on legal and institutional reform, risk assessment, and capacity building, the project helps embed sustainable improvements within relevant authorities, ensuring that the benefits of the project endure beyond its completion. The technical assistance provided also supports the operationalisation of the National Climate Change Adaptation Program and the National Strategy for Environmental Protection, aligning Serbia’s disaster risk management framework with the EU Green Agenda and other key national priorities.

Given Serbia’s membership in the EU Civil Protection Mechanism and its commitment to the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other EU Member States and countries participating in the UCPM. Documented experiences and knowledge products can inform similar legal and institutional modernisation efforts in neighbouring countries and the broader UCPM community. In this way, the project’s outputs contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management and foster improved coordination and resilience, supporting the European Union’s Preparedness Strategy and advancing regional cooperation on disaster and climate resilience.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Guillermo Siercke, Senior DRM Specialist, Tolkun Jukusheva, Senior DRM Specialist, [email protected] Counterpart: Sector for Emergency Management (SEM), Ministry of Interior, Republic of Serbia

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Sweden: Review of the state of the art of national disaster loss databases

Overview

Grant Size €250,000

Duration July 2025 – October 2026

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard; Large-scale disasters

Key word(s) Disaster loss database; DRM and Artificial intelligence; Standardisation of disaster data; Legal and institutional frameworks of risk data; Risk-informed and evidence-based decision-making

Context Sweden, like many European countries, faces a growing array of natural hazards, including floods, storms, wildfires, landslides, and climate-related events, as well as their potential cascading effects. Recent disasters such as Storm Hans and the Stenungsund Landslide in 2023 have underscored the urgent need for robust systems to record, analyse, and share disaster loss data to inform preparedness and response measures. In line with the European Union (EU) Preparedness Union Strategy and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR), Sweden is seeking to modernise its disaster data management by developing a national disaster loss database. Disaster damage and loss databases are a critical component of scientific knowledge on disaster impacts, supporting the identification of urgent and cost-effective resilience investments. These databases, which can include both historical and forward-looking data, are essential for assessing the geographic extent of events, calibrating hazard maps and early warnings, and conducting cost- benefit analyses of damages to lives, property, economic activity, social equity, health, the environment, and cultural heritage. They also enable continuous monitoring of progress in climate adaptation and disaster risk reduction, with novel technologies such as AI and machine learning enhancing their effectiveness. Within broader disaster risk management frameworks like the SFDRR, such databases are directly relevant for EU policies and directives, including national risk assessments and the Floods and Seveso Directives.

The Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB) is responsible for strengthening Sweden’s ability to prevent and manage major accidents and crises, safeguarding lives, social functions, and core societal values. The MSB, as the key agency for civil protection and emergency management, has systematically collected data from municipal emergency services for over 30 years and manages more data on extensive technological and natural events, supporting Sweden’s compliance with both national and EU requirements. As needs and technological solutions evolve continuously, the MSB is looking to review the state of the art in damage and loss data management.

Objective The objective of this project is to provide technical assistance to MSB with respect to the development of a national disaster loss database. This is achieved by (1) reviewing current good practice on establishing and maintaining disaster damage and loss data systems across EU member states (MS) and beyond for natural hazards and other large- scale disasters, and (2) providing recommendations of relevance for Sweden.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity is structured around two parts. First, it entails a review of international best practices in establishing and operating disaster damage and loss databases, with a focus on efficient reporting, integration of climate change considerations, and the use of innovative data management approaches. Second, it also involves an assessment of Sweden’s existing disaster damage and loss data collection systems, led by MSB, and the identification of technical options for improvement based on insights from the first component. The Activity also includes consultations and knowledge-sharing activities, with opportunities for participation from other countries through workshops to facilitate the exchange of experience and good practices.

In terms of expected results, the Activity provides MSB and relevant Swedish authorities with actionable recommendations to strengthen disaster loss data infrastructure and modernise existing systems. The findings support Sweden’s ability to meet EU and international reporting requirements, enhance risk management and preparedness, and foster collaboration and knowledge exchange both within Sweden and with international partners. Findings will be relevant to other countries looking to strengthen their disaster damage and loss data systems. Ultimately, the Activity contributes to improved disaster resilience in Sweden and benefits the broader EU community.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among stakeholders in Sweden and shared more broadly, deepening the national knowledge base on DRM. This study is closely aligned with national needs to improve the damage and loss database. By focusing on good practices and forward-looking recommendations, and through planned dissemination and exchange activities, the study is expected to inform future efforts in Sweden and potentially serve as a model for other countries in the EU and beyond. The project also fosters opportunities for collaboration with other countries engaged in building and managing comprehensive disaster loss databases. From a technical perspective, the study adopts a forward-looking approach that considers future needs related to climate change, modern data collection, and advanced analysis. The results contribute to broader objectives such as contingency planning, climate change adaptation, the green transition, and the improved use of data and innovative analytical tools for DRM. These efforts ensure that the benefits of the project endure beyond its completion, supporting the institutionalisation of DRR and the effective use of disaster risk information for emergency preparedness and response.

Given the alignment with EU and global standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other countries participating in the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) and the broader international community. Documented experiences and knowledge products from Sweden can inform similar efforts to strengthen institutional frameworks and coordination in neighbouring countries and across the UCPM network. In this way, the project’s outputs contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management and foster improved coordination and resilience, supporting the European Union’s Preparedness Strategy and advancing regional and international cooperation on disaster and climate resilience.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR TAFF: Jun Rentschler, Senior Economist, Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterpart: Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB), Government of Sweden

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Türkiye: Resilient ir: A Strategic and Inclusive Initiative for Multi- a ar Preparedness and Risk Reduction

Overview

ra t Si e €650,000

Duration September 2025 – September 2027

e a ar Multi- a ar art a e ro eteoro o i a i a ter a i e tria a i e t

Key word Multi- a ar ri a e e t art a e re are e Capacity building and crisis o i atio trai i era e ro i a ter re o e i a are e i a ter ri r a re i ie e o it - a e i a ter re are e i -informed decision-making

Context Türkiye’s third-largest city, İzmir, is highly exposed to a range of natural and human-made hazards, including earthquakes, tsunamis, flooding, landslides, rockfalls, and industrial accidents. The city’s location along active fault i e , it v era e oa t i e, a t e re e e o a or i tria o e a ia a a or a , ei te t e ri o disasters with potentially cascading effects. Recent events, such as the 2020 Samos Island earthquake, have underscored the city’s vulnerability and the urgent need to strengthen disaster resilience. The increasing frequency and intensity of climate-re ate a ar , i i eav rai a a ea eve ri e, rt er o o t e e ri e ite o oi e ort , challenges remain in prioritising and financing resilience investments, coordinating among institutions, and ensuring that disaster management strategies are inclusive and data-driven.

The Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (AFAD) leads disaster preparedness, response, and recovery efforts at the national level, coordinating with local authorities, first responders, and specialised teams such as the national medical rescue team (UMKE) and firefighters. o a over e t , arti ar t e ir Metro o ita M i i a it , t e State ra i or S , a t e rovi ia ire torate o viro e t, r a isation, and Climate Change, play a critical role in implementing risk-reduction measures, operating and maintaining critical infrastructure, and engaging with communities, working alongside specialised first responder teams. However, the city’s rapid urbanisation, the presence of informal settlements, and the proximity of industrial facilities to residential areas create additional layers of vulnerability. Coordination among agencies, integration of risk data into planning, and the inclusion of vulnerable groups, such as children, the elderly, and people with disabilities, remain ongoing challenges. Furthermore, public awareness of disaster risks and preparedness measures is uneven, and there are gaps in the dissemination of timely, accessible information before, during, and after emergencies. These factors collectively underscore the need for a holistic, multi- e tora a roa to i a ter a i ate re i ie e i ir, ro e i ro ust risk assessment, institutional collaboration,

and community engagement.

Objective The objective of the grant is to enhance İzmir’s resilience against a wide range of hazards including natural and human-made disasters and strengthen the capacity of disaster response personnel through training programs focused on risk-informed decision-making, crisis communication, psychological resilience, and raise public

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

awareness of especially on vulnerable individuals (children, elderly, people with disabilities, etc.). This objective is achieved by developing a comprehensive assessment and conducting capacity building activities through tailored activities for enhanced communication skills and crisis management measures focusing on vulnerable people. The analysis, findings, can inform national-level approaches on those key topics.

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity is structured around two interlinked elements i i e a o re e ive ia o ti o ir disaster risk profile, including multi- a ar ri a a i , ta e o er a i , a te i a a e o o i ea i i it studies. It also develops a strategic roadmap for disaster risk reduction, institutional coordination, and investment prioritisation, informed by international knowledge exchange and stakeholder consultations. This also centers on capacity building, communication, and public awareness, with activities including training needs assessments, certified training programs for disaster response teams, trauma-informed communication modules, psychosocial resilience seminars, and the development of public education materials. Special emphasis is placed on engaging and protecting vulnerable groups, such as children, the elderly, and people with disabilities, through inclusive outreach and simulation exercises. The Activity also includes dissemination of findings and lessons learned at local, national, and international levels.

In terms of expected results, t e tivit i rovi e , ir Metro o ita M i i a it , a ot er ta e o er it actionable recommendations and tools to strengthen disaster and climate resilience. The findings support evidence-based investment decisions, improved risk anticipation, and enhanced preparedness and response capacities, particularly for vulnerable populations. The process will foster collaboration among institutions, build consensus on priorities, and facilitate knowledge transfer within Türkiye and with international partners. Ultimately, the Activity contributes to a more re i ie t ir, i i ising loss of life and property, and serve as a model for disaster risk management and climate adaptation in other high-risk urban areas.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among stakeholders in İzmir and shared more broadly across Türkiye, deepening the national knowledge base on disaster risk reduction (DRR) and emergency management. This directly supports t e o oi re i e e t o ir i a ter re i ie e trate a t e tre t e i of local and national disaster management systems, including the integration of multi- a ar ri a e e t a inclusive preparedness planning. By focusing on institutional capacity building, technical and economic feasibility studies, and targeted training for crisis managers and first responders, the project helps embed sustainable improvements within relevant authorities. These efforts ensure that the benefits of the project endure beyond its completion, supporting the institutionalisation of DRR and the effective use of disaster risk information for emergency preparedness and response, particularly for vulnerable groups such as children, the elderly, and people with disabilities. The technical assistance also addresses gaps identified in recent disaster events and diagnostics, supporting the development of coordinated, data- driven approaches to increase disaster resilience at the city and national levels.

Given the alignment with EU and international standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other countries participating in the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) and the broader region. o e te e erie e a o e e ro t ro ir a i or i i ar e ort to strengthen institutional frameworks and coordination in neighbouring countries and across the UCPM network. In this way, the project’s outputs contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management and foster improved coordination and resilience, supporting the European Union’s Preparedness Strategy and advancing regional and international cooperation on disaster and climate resilience. The project’s focus on inclusive, evidence-based planning and cross-sectoral collaboration helps e re t at t e e o ear e i ir a e a a te a a e to e e it ot er i - risk urban areas in Türkiye and beyond.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Sa i ra Erdurmus, Senior DRM Specialist, Tugkan Tanir, DRM Analyst [email protected]

Counterpart: Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Government of Türkiye

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

2024

Last updated: September 2025

Enhancing Policy and Investments for EU Disaster and Climate Resilience Overview

Grant Size €250,000

Duration September 2024 – November 2025

Key hazard(s) Earthquakes; Wildfires

Key word(s) Smart governance; Smart policies and investments; Resilient Infrastructure; Disaster Resilience; Climate Resilience

Context Europe faces escalating losses from climate-related disasters as the continent warms faster than any other region in the world, translating into potentially more frequent and more impactful events. For example, in 2023, Europe experienced one of its worst wildfire seasons with over 500,000 ha burnt, 96,000 of which were in Greece alone. Alongside climate-sensitive threats, large parts of Europe also face earthquake risks, risks exacerbated by ageing infrastructure that predates modern building codes. Countries in the EU have been taking major steps to enhance their disaster and climate resilience, guided and supported by EU policy, funding, and technical assistance instruments. With the current EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF 2021-2027) at its midpoint and preparations for the next MFF (2028-2034) intensifying, there is the opportunity to further strengthen disaster risk management and resilience efforts across the EU. This is the moment to reflect on how to refine EU policy and funding frameworks to better promote strategic, risk-informed, performance-oriented, and sustainable investments that deliver social, economic, and environmental benefits. It is also worth exploring ways to incentivise reforms that address key bottlenecks for effective risk management and investment.

Objectives ● Share good practices and provide recommendations for incentivising effective investments in disaster and climate

resilience through the right framework conditions.

● Provide evidence to support a risk-informed approach to investments, particularly in wildfire and earthquake risk management, and offer guidance on potential investments.

Component 2: Knowledge and capacity building

Key Activities and Expected Results

Incentivising impactful investments in disaster resilience – setting the right framework

This Activity includes EU-wide analytics which supports discussions related to existing and future policies and instruments that can foster disaster and climate resilience. These efforts consider conditions and incentives, as well as ways to track progress towards strengthened disaster and climate resilience.

Investing in disaster resilience in the EU: identifying needs and priorities

This Activity includes EU-wide and country case study analytics. The results include a high-level overview of wildfire and earthquake risks and their management at the EU-level, complemented by a series of brief case studies on wildfire and earthquake risk management in selected EU Member States.

Sustainability and Coordination This project seeks to provide evidence, good practice examples, and recommendations to inform ongoing and future efforts to strengthen disaster and climate resilience in the EU. The findings aim to provide insights that can guide the refinement of policies and tools at both the EU and Member State levels in the current and forthcoming MFFs. With Component 2 focusing on earthquake and wildfire risks, the project considers and coordinates with other ongoing academic research, technical assistance (including other TAFF projects or other EU-funded grants), as well as initiatives led by the European Commission that could be leveraged to deepen understanding of the EU’s earthquake and wildfire risk profile and risk management capabilities. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government counterparts, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Senior DRM Specialist; Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst. [email protected] Counterparts: DG ECHO, [email protected] www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last updated: September 2025

Albania: Strengthening Albania’s Fire Risk Management and Search and Rescue Capacity

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration September 2024 – August 2026

Key hazard(s) Wildfires

Key word(s) Rescue capacity; Rescue services; Fire protection

Context Wildfire and general fire risk is a growing concern in Albania with heat stress increasing due to climate change. Albania is at high and continuous risk of forest fires, especially in the dry summer season June-September. According to World Bank estimates, 23 per cent of crop area in the country is already under medium to high wildfire risk with 10 municipalities having the highest level of exposure. In 2021 alone, 329 wildfires were recorded, burning a total of 31,275 ha of land. Data from Global Forest Watch shows that fires in Albania are the second leading cause of forest area loss in the country. From 2001 to 2023, the country lost 19.8 kha of tree cover from fires and 26.7 kha from all other drivers of loss. In Albania firefighting and rescue services are the responsibility of municipalities, which carry the mandate of first responders on all incidents posing a danger to the population or environment. While equipment at local levels has been upgraded over the past years, municipalities still lack the capacity and institutional structures to effectively fulfil their mandate to prevent and mitigate incidents. This leads to the need for intervention by the National Civil Protection Agency (NCPA) for even small and medium incidents. To address Albania’s limited capabilities in extinguishing fires, the country’s fire response capacity, infrastructure (e.g., fire stations), technology, and equipment for tracking and extinguishing fires require urgent strengthening.

Objective The objective of the grant is to support the government of Albania in strengthening its fire risk management and search and rescue capacity, thereby improving its ability to respond effectively and efficiently to general fires, wildfires, and emergencies. The results of this technical assistance will inform a proposed investment project in Albania on fire risk management.

Component 1: Country-Specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Institutional and capacity review of fire protection and rescue services (FP&RS)

This activity reviews the existing FP&RS capacity in Albania against international best practices to identify potential capacity strengthening, policy, and investment needs to improve the delivery of firefighting services in the country.

Road map for strengthening fire protection and rescue services

A road map is developed based on Albanian demography, the geographic distribution of damage and loss risks due to fires, and a consultation process with municipalities. The road map prioritises resources and interventions at the local level regarding infrastructure and equipment, and it supports the identification of needs for training in firefighting and search and rescue.

Strengthening wildfire risk management

This activity aims to strengthen wildfire fire risk management in Albania with activities covering forest fire risk assessment and mapping, analysis of current mechanisms to fight wildfires, a review of institutional coordination and community engagement mechanisms, and recommendations for increasing Albania’s capacity to combat wildfires.

Sustainability and Coordination This project is part of a broader collaboration between the World Bank, the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM), and the government of Albania to strengthen the country’s ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters. The objective of the grant is to support the government in strengthening its fire risk management capacity. The grant serves as a basis for the identification, prioritisation, and preparation of activities under a proposed World Bank Investment Project Financing (IPF) on fire risk management with the Ministry of Interior. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge being generated through collaborations between government actors, the World Bank, and the UCPM.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Henrike Brecht, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist, Guillermo Siercke, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist; Anita Ellmauer-Klambauer, Urban Development Specialist; Maksimiljan Dhima, Senior Disaster Risk Management Consultant. [email protected]

Counterparts: Ministry of Interior: Arben Cara, General Director for FPRS, Florenc Qosja, Advisor in the Cabinet of the Minister

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last update: September 2025

Germany: Return of Investments in Disaster Resilience Measures: Identifying potential measures and generating evidence to inform decision-making

Overview

Grant Size €250,000

Duration September 2024 – December 2025

Key hazard(s) Droughts; Floods; Health Emergencies; Heatwaves

Key word(s) Cost benefit analysis; Smart investments; Prioritisation

Context Germany is vulnerable to a series of disaster risks, particularly those exacerbated by climate change, such as floods, heatwaves, and droughts. To strengthen disaster resilience, the country has implemented various measures, including the Federal Government's German Strategy for Strengthening Resilience to Disasters. As one of the world’s leading economies, Germany’s recent experiences with devastating floods underscore the growing pressure on its disaster preparedness systems due to evolving climate risks. As part of the effort to scale up disaster and climate resilience, it is critical to evaluate and prioritise smart investments. Understanding the costs and benefits of such investments, including reduced losses, stimulated economic activities, and socioeconomic and environmental co-benefits, is critical to inform policy dialogue and planning.

Objective The grant's objective is to support Germany strengthen the economic case for ex-ante disaster preparedness and prevention.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Case studies of the socio-economic costs and benefits of disaster prevention measures

This Activity includes analytics to quantify the return of select investments in disaster prevention and preparedness measures, evaluating floods, heat waves, drought, and health emergencies, among others. The analysis can help inform dialogue and decisions related to public budgeting processes.

Risk communication, learning, and dissemination

This includes activities (such as presentations) to contribute to increasing the awareness of decision makers within Germany of the crucial role and range of benefits of ex-ante preparedness and prevention measures, as well as to capture and transfer lessons learned from Germany to peers in the European Union and beyond.

Sustainability and Coordination This project builds upon the insights and outcomes of preceding initiatives, notably integrating and operationalising the research from the Economics for Disaster Prevention and Preparedness (EDPP2) project. It aims to enrich the existing body of knowledge on smart investments in disaster prevention and preparedness by showcasing new case studies and examples from diverse interventions. For example, project activities can inform government efforts related to the implementation of the German Strategy for Strengthening Resilience to Disasters.

By providing key insights into the costs and benefits of resilience measures, the project also yields valuable insights for disaster resilience planning that are applicable to countries working towards Sendai Framework targets and the achievement of the Disaster Resilience Goals. The project's results not only inform the BBK’s efforts to promote a proactive preparedness approach within Germany's disaster resilience strategy but also serve as a resource for other national ministries and international stakeholders. These insights will be crucial for informing smart investments in resilience and will contribute to a global understanding of effective disaster prevention and preparedness, especially considering climate change and extreme weather events. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government counterparts, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Jun Rentschler, Senior Economist; Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst [email protected] Counterpart: Office of the National Focal Point for the Sendai Framework, [email protected], Germany www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

.

Last updated: September 2025

Iceland: Towards an Integrated Wildfire Risk Management

Overview

Grant Size €300,000

Duration September 2024 – November 2025

Key hazard(s) Wildfires

Key word(s) Integrated wildfire risk management; Smart governance; Smart policies and investments

Context Considering the growing impact of wildfires across Europe and expected impacts of climate change, the adoption and implementation of an integrated approach to wildfire risk management is becoming an increasingly important priority across Europe, including in Iceland. Although volcanic eruptions remain Iceland's predominant hazard, recent years have seen occasional wildfires in the southern, eastern, and western regions due to dry summer conditions. Wildfires are an increasing risk due to summer houses in forested areas. In the context of climate change, to effectively enhance Iceland's wildfire risk management capabilities necessitates a review of current arrangements and the identification of key gaps/challenges as well as opportunities to improve the framework for integrated wildfire risk management and to inform a future strategic framework and possible stakeholder-led actions.

Objective The grant objective is to provide analytics and recommendations for adopting an integrated wildfire risk management (IWFRM) approach in Iceland.

Key Activities and Expected Results

Developing a diagnostic analysis and roadmap of recommendations with short, medium, and long-term priorities This Activity includes analytics to review and assess the current state of wildfire risk management in Iceland, and to identify key gaps and opportunities for future action. A set of recommendations will be included in a roadmap with short, medium, and long-term priorities to inform stakeholder dialogue and eventual implementation. Consistent with the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) Wildfire Peer Review Assessment Framework (PRAF) and the goals of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 (SFDRR), and taking into account good practice across various initiatives and examples in Europe and beyond, the analysis will consider different facets of IWFRM. These include understanding of wildfire risk, risk reduction, prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery (including financial arrangements), as well as governance, coordination, and current initiatives and investments related to wildfire risk management. The results can inform policy dialogue and planning in Iceland and showcase to other countries practical way to diagnose and identify key areas for future action.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Sustainability and Coordination This project is aligned with priorities and ongoing disaster risk management related initiatives in Iceland, including the ongoing Host Nation project. The approach is fully aligned with the methodological approach of the UCPM Wildfire PRAF, as well as higher-level EU Disaster Resilience Goals, and the SFDRR. The project considers knowledge generated under previous wildfire PRAF and existing country wildfire risk management practice assessments, as well as EU/country-funded projects and initiatives such as FIRE-RES for fire resilient territories in Europe, and the SAFERS PROJECT. The findings of the project will contribute to the broader knowledge base on IWFRM to further inform and refine its strategies and facilitate the uptake of such practices across UCPM countries. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government actors, the World Bank, and the UCPM.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Senior DRM Specialist; Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst [email protected]

Counterparts: Ólafur Loftsson, Project Manager; Haukur Grönli, Civil Protection Department; Iceland Department of Civil Protection and Emergency Management.

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last updated: September 2025

Kosovo:* Improving Disaster Risk Understanding, Impact-Based Forecasting, and Early Warning in Kosovo*

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration August 2024 – August 2026

Key hazard(s) Earthquake; Floods; Heatwaves; Landslides; Wildfires

Key word(s) Early warning; Impact-based forecasting; Community engagement

Context Kosovo is prone to several geological and hydrometeorological hazards such as floods, heavy snowfall, droughts, forest fires, and earthquakes. These hazards affect Kosovo’s varied geography in different ways. Particularly in mountainous areas, Kosovo suffers from riverine and flash floods, and rural areas are often hit by landslides and drought; heat stress is increasing due to climate change with forest fires becoming more frequent and, as 43 per cent of the country is covered with forests, this is becoming a growing concern. In 2021 alone, 92 wildfires were recorded, burning 7,580 ha of land. To support Kosovo in enhancing its resilience against disasters, the country’s capacities on risk assessment, impact-based forecasting and early warning and community engagement require urgent strengthening.

Objective The objective of the grant is to support the government of Kosovo in strengthening its capacity to analyse disaster risks, its capabilities for impact-based forecasting and early warning, as well as efforts in community engagement and education, thereby improving its ability to respond effectively and efficiently to floods, wildfires, and other natural disasters.

*This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Enhancing risk and impact analytics to inform decision-making

This Activity aims to enhance the evidence base for decision-making on preparedness and resilience building, particularly the accessibility and usability of risk-related information. It supports the collection and digitisation of critical infrastructure data to strengthen disaster exposure assessments, the development of a guidebook for integrating risk analytics into databases and helps enhance the capacity of institutional stakeholders to maintain and develop these systems.

Strengthening capabilities for impact-based forecasting and early warning

This Activity aims to strengthen capabilities for impact-based forecasting and multi-hazard early warning systems for more effective preparedness systems, with a focus on enhancing the integration and interoperability of technical systems and support last mile communication to reach the most vulnerable. It supports a comprehensive gap analysis of existing systems, processes and institutional frameworks for climate and disaster information, the development of a guidance note, and helps enhance capacity of key stakeholders to improve impact-based forecasting and early warning.

Community engagement and education on disaster preparedness and response

This Activity aims to strengthen the government’s capacity to engage communities and raise public awareness to support community disaster preparedness and response, with a particular emphasis on flood and wildfire risks. It supports the development of a briefing note on community engagement and awareness, supports the training of officials in community outreach and emergency preparedness, as well as the development of educational programmes to raise public awareness about disaster risks.

Sustainability and Coordination The project supports the achievement of national strategies for emergency preparedness and response, including the State Strategy for Reducing the Risk from Natural Disasters and other Disaster 2023-2028. It is a joint initiative between the Kosovo Emergency Management Agency and the Kosovo Hydrometeorological Institute, thereby supporting cross-institutional collaboration for disaster risk management. The project also builds on previous and on-going donor- supported analytical and technical assistance programmes, ensuring continuity and complementarity. This includes the EU Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA)-financed technical assistance “Western Balkans Disaster Risk Management Programme”, implemented by the World Bank 2018-2021. The project aimed to enhance capacities for disaster risk reduction and resulted in the publication of Ready to Respond Reports that analysed gaps in disaster risk management systems. The project is embedded in ongoing strategic dialogues with the World Bank such as the Climate Change Development Reports country dialogues. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge being generated through collaborations between government actors, the World Bank, and the UCPM.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Henrike Brecht, Senior DRM Specialist, Guillermo Siercke, Senior DRM Specialist [email protected]

Counterparts: Nehat Kocinaj, Head of Division for legal issues public affairs and international cooperation, Emergency Management Agency (EMA), Government of Kosovo; Kosovo Emergency Management Agency (EMA), MOIA, Kosovo Hydrometeorological Institute (KHMI).

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last updated: September 2025

Moldova: Strengthening Moldova’s Disaster Risk Management and Resilience Project Management

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration September 2024 – September 2026

Key hazard(s) Earthquakes; Floods; Health Emergencies; Landslides

Key word(s) Health emergencies; hydrometeorological services; Risk assessments

Context Moldova faces significant challenges when managing natural hazards due to its limited resources and outdated infrastructure. The country has been particularly vulnerable to floods, droughts, and landslides, which have been exacerbated by climate change, as well as earthquakes. Moldova's disaster risk management efforts have been hampered by inadequate data for risk assessments, outdated hydrometeorological services, and insufficient preparedness within the health sector to handle large-scale emergencies. This grant addresses these gaps by developing detailed risk assessments, and by identifying opportunities to upgrade weather forecasting systems and strengthen the resilience of health infrastructure.

Objective The grant's objective is to enhance Moldova's emergency preparedness and response capacities concerning natural hazards and climate-related shocks. Prevention will also be increased by better risk assessment analytics developed under the grant.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Supporting the improvement of Moldova’s emergency preparedness and response capacity, including through the development of the methodology for the risk assessment process and disaster risk mapping

The activities encompass a multi-tiered approach over 24 months, aiming to develop and pilot a DRM risk assessment methodology at community, district, and national levels, with the involvement of central and local authorities. This includes creating and executing training programmes for risk assessment, conducting training sessions for various authorities, and organising a study tour for knowledge exchange with a country that has a similar disaster risk profile and a record of successful DRM implementation.

Supporting the improvement of Moldova’s hydromet system

This Activity supports the implementation of the Strengthening Moldova's Disaster Risk Management and Resilience Project and conducts a review of Moldova's ICT Hydromet system to identify opportunities to enhance the collection and transfer of weather observations to the WMO Information System in Toulouse, establish efficient data transfer procedures, and upgrade the Chisinau weather radar for full functionality. Health system disaster preparedness assessment

This activity will provide a summary report with risk assessments and priority recommendations for strengthening disaster preparedness in the health sector. The report will present the findings of a hazard exposure analysis of health facilities and their supporting infrastructure, including an analysis of access times to health facilities. The report will also contain an opportunity assessment for preparedness measures in health system planning, including the roles of hydro-met forecasting and DRM training for health sector professionals. Lastly, the report will highlight opportunities to better integrate health services into existing civil protection and emergency response frameworks.

Sustainability and Coordination This project is part of a broader collaboration between the government of Moldova, the World Bank, the European Commission’s Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (DG ECHO), and the EU’s Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) to strengthen the country’s ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters. This project complements ongoing projects and initiatives led by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and its subordinate units, as well as other line ministries to strengthen the resilience of critical emergency response infrastructure and systems. Findings and outputs of this grant activity will inform the design and implementation of ongoing and future World Bank lending operations, including a recently approved World Bank operation to strengthen Moldova's Disaster Risk Management and Resilience capacities. It also expands on recent analytical activities to assess gaps and opportunities in the face of climate change – including the Moldova Country Climate and Development Report (CCDR). Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between Government actors, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts World Bank/GFDRR Team: Guillermo Siercke, Senior DRM Specialist; Jun Rentschler, Senior Economist; Axel Baeumler, Senior Urban Specialist; Christoph Klaiber, Economist; [email protected]

Counterparts: Alexandru Oprea, Head of the Civil Protection and Emergency Situations Service, Ministry of Internal Affairs of Moldova; Alexandr Tatarov, Deputy Head of the Civil Protection and Emergency Situations Service, Ministry of Internal Affairs of Moldova; Ministry of Interior/General Inspectorate for Emergency Situations (GIES); Ministry of Agriculture; Ministry of Infrastructure; Ministry of the Environment; and Ministry of Health.

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last updated: September 2025

North Macedonia: Resilience Investments, Governance and Recovery for Disaster Risk Reduction

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration September 2024 – June 2026

Key hazard(s) Earthquakes; Floods; Heatwaves; Wildfires

Key word(s) Risk governance; Critical infrastructure; Resilient recovery

Context North Macedonia faces significant challenges from natural and human-made hazards, with climate-related events occurring more frequently and intensely and earthquakes continuing to be a major concern. More recently, in 2024, the country experienced intense wildfires, highlighting the continuing need for enhanced mitigation and preparedness. To address this, North Macedonia is working to overcome barriers and fill knowledge gaps identified in past national disaster risk management and climate change adaptation assessments, aiming to scale up prevention measures and strengthen preparedness. Challenges remain in addressing vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, improving recovery frameworks and enhancing coordination. The country is committed to building a proactive risk management framework at national and local levels, including clarifying stakeholder roles, improving operational planning and supporting cross-institutional coordination, enhancing preparedness and climate resilience, and aligning with EU standards.

Objective The objective of the project is to enhance societal and community resilience in North Macedonia by addressing seismic and climate-related risks through foundational and transformational risk reduction and resilience-building measures.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Transformative and anticipatory risk governance and enhanced preparedness To improve resilience building and enhance overall disaster preparedness in the country, this Activity establishes the foundation of transformative and anticipatory risk governance in protection and rescue. It supports a functional analysis of the existing DRM system to strengthen national strategies, deepens the understanding of risk and methodologies for hazard assessments to strengthen DRM and risk governance/planning, and builds capacity of stakeholders for enhanced preparedness from national to community level.

Scaling up prioritised prevention investments in critical infrastructure

This Activity focuses on significantly enhancing the resilience-building of critical infrastructure against climate and disaster risks, to be accomplished through strategic and prioritised investments in preventive measures with a focus on seismic resilience and energy efficiency. It supports analytics to enhance the understanding of the vulnerability of critical infrastructure assets, develops methodologies and tools to support disaster risk screening and develops proofing interventions, identifies pilot interventions at local level for critical infrastructure upgrading, and helps enhance technical capacity of institutional stakeholders in this field.

Establishing a resilient recovery framework

This Activity aims to develop a comprehensive framework that ensures communities can effectively recover and rebuild in the aftermath of disasters, focusing on long-term resilience and sustainability. It supports analytics to enhance the understanding of the vulnerability and needs of the population related to effective disaster recovery, identifies gaps in the policy and regulatory framework to inform the development of a robust post-disaster recovery framework, and helps build the capacity of DRM stakeholders to conduct PDNAs and resilient and inclusive disaster recovery.

Sustainability and Coordination The project builds on previous and on-going national and donor-supported technical assistance and investment programmes, ensuring continuity and maximising collective efforts towards common goals. The project strengthens DRM systems in line with global and regional frameworks and key national strategic priorities. It aligns with the EU's IPA CARE Programme, incorporates lessons from past projects (IPA Floods and Fires, CRISIS, ROSES etc.) and complements ongoing projects with the World Bank (Sustainable Municipal Development Project, North Macedonia Sustainability and Resilience DPO, Climate Change Development Reports country dialogues). Analytics under this project align with established methodologies, including UNDP Guidance Notes and European Commission studies and guidance notes for critical infrastructure resilience. The project also coordinate with various ongoing EU-funded studies and research under Track 1 ‘Technical assistance for disaster risk management’ (single-country) at both national and regional levels leveraging knowledge, good practices and lessons learned on DRM. The project promotes collaboration with a people- centred, inclusive, gender-sensitive and climate-risk informed holistic approach and, to foster ownership, supports community and stakeholder involvement. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government counterparts, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Noriko Oe, Senior Urban Development Specialist; [email protected]

Counterparts: Mrs Valentina Atanasovska, Head of International Cooperation Department, PRD; Protection and Rescue Directorate (PRD), the Crisis Management Centre (CMC), the Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (IZIIS), the Red Cross (RC), key ministries and local governments.

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last update: September 2025

Romania: Romanian Assistance for Post-Disaster Improvement and Development (RAPID)

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration August 2024 – June 2026

Key hazard(s) Droughts; Earthquakes; Floods; Heatwaves; Landslides

Key word(s) Post-disaster recovery; build back better; inclusive disaster recovery; disaster response and recovery

Context Romania is exposed to various natural hazards, including earthquakes, floods, forest fires, droughts, landslides, storms, and extreme temperature events. Aging infrastructure, particularly in cities and throughout transport systems, increases the country's vulnerability, as witnessed by the number of buildings impacted by the 1977 earthquake. Climate change is expected to intensify these risks, making multi-hazard prevention, preparedness, and response readiness a key focus of government reform and investments. In recent decades, Romania has taken major steps to improve its disaster risk management framework and system. Through the adoption of key strategic documents – including the National Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction (2024-2035), the National Strategy for Seismic Risk Reduction (2022-2050), and the National Strategy for Climate Change Adaptation (2024-2030) – the government is seeking to further strengthen its disaster and climate resilience, including improving the capacity of the national civil protection system and relevant institutions to manage disaster response and recovery in an effective and inclusive manner.

Objective The objective of this project is to strengthen the capacity of civil protection institutions to ensure an effective and inclusive disaster response and recovery, and to improve existing recovery frameworks.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Identifying gaps in Romania's current disaster recovery framework This Activity includes a diagnostic assessment of Romania's current disaster recovery framework, particularly concerning seismic and climate-related hazards. The assessment helps identify and proposes ways to address gaps in Romania’s post-disaster recovery framework, such as those related to governance and coordination, or different technical elements.

Strengthening the disaster recovery framework

Based on the diagnostic analysis, this Activity focuses on identifying technical recommendations in line with Build Back Better principles. Recommendations are supported by international good practice and examples related to post- disaster recovery. These activities can inform the development of a robust post-disaster recovery framework for Romania, aiming for resilience, sustainability, and alignment with international standards to mitigate future seismic and climate-related vulnerabilities.

Capacity building to improve recovery planning and execution

This component includes knowledge exchange events, training sessions for government officials and first responders, and institutional capacity building to improve recovery planning and execution and inclusiveness of response. The capacity building activities help facilitate inter-ministerial coordination and support the establishment of an overview of the requirements for critical disaster response and recovery resources.

Sustainability and Coordination This project forms part of broader World Bank DRM engagement in Romania, which encompasses a range of activities aimed at strengthening the country's ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters. This project also complements ongoing projects and initiatives led by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and its subordinate units, and other line ministries, to strengthen the resilience of critical emergency response infrastructure and systems. This includes investment financing through the Strengthening Disaster Risk Management Project, the Improving Resilience and Emergency Response Project, the Strengthening Preparedness and Critical Emergency Infrastructure Project, and the Romania Safer, Inclusive and Sustainable Schools Project. In addition, the results of this project also complement the reforms and expected results tracked under the Second Disaster Risk Management Development Policy Loan with a Catastrophe Draw Down Option (Cat DDO). In parallel, this project complements efforts led under a GFDRR grant through the Japan-World Bank Program for Mainstreaming DRM in developing countries, that is supporting Romania in addressing existing gaps in DRM policy development and emergency preparedness efforts, as well as in promoting and advancing investments in resilient public infrastructure. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government counterparts, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Alexandra Calin, DRM Specialist; Anda Anica, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterpart: Silviu Stoian, Deputy Chief, General Directorate for Civil Protection; Iordan Gavrila, Head of Service and Elena Treanta, Main Specialist Officer II, Coordination and Implementation of Resilience Requirements Service; Mihaela Trandafir, Main Specialist Officer I, Project Management Service, Decision Support Direction, under the Department for Emergency Situations (DES) under the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Romania.

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last update: September 2025

Türkiye: Enhancement of the Flood Early Warning System in Samsun and Communication Strategy Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration September 2024 – September 2025

Key hazard(s) Floods

Key word(s) Flood Risk Management; Early Warning System; Communication strategies; Public awareness and preparedness; Capacity Building

Context Enhanced accuracy and reliability of flood predictions through early warning systems (EWS) facilitate timely warnings and improved safety for at risk populations. At the same time, an effective communication strategy ensures the swift and efficient dissemination of risk information from EWS to decision-makers, as well as the broader public, enabling them to promptly initiate actions to mitigate the loss of life and property. In the context of climate change and increased flood risk, it is critical for countries, including Türkiye, to continue improving their EWS and related communications strategies. To minimise losses, the government is implementing a range of measures to improve flood predictions and reduce flood risk in Samsun Province. Sa it i o ate it i t e o arie o t e r a

a ra a e i r a ar a a river a i a ot rivers, along with other local streams, present a significant risk of flooding. A series of investments is planned in this area to manage flood risk and serve as an example for other areas in Türkiye.

Objective The objective of the project is to improve the EWS for floods in Samsun and to develop an effective communication strategy for disseminating information to the public at the city level, which will also serve as an example for other cities and at national level.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Technical evaluation of the current EWS and recommendations for improvement on the EWS-produced information

This Activity supports analysis of the current EWS and identify key recommendations for its improvement. It supports enhancements to the EWS in Samsun, improving the region's early warning capabilities and responsiveness to potential flood events. The analysis will also generate recommendations based on a good practice review that will inform and strengthen wider disaster response measures, thereby contributing to a more robust disaster risk management framework at the national level.

Evaluation of information dissemination methods for EWS and recommendations for an effective communication strategy for EWS-generated information

This Activity supports analysis to optimise the delivery and impact of EWS-generated warnings, ensuring that critical information reaches the relevant stakeholders in a timely, clear, and actionable manner. The analysis provides a set of technical recommendations for stakeholders to consider and be supplemented by capacity building.

Sustainability and Coordination This project complements government efforts to strengthen EWS capacity, and DRM more broadly, with a focus on flood resilience. Samsun is considered a potential model for the nation's other flood-prone areas, offering insights that could also be applicable to other hazards that Türkiye faces. This technical assistance also aligns with the World Bank- financed Flood and Drought Management Project (FDMP), which seeks to improve flood control measures for communities in targeted regions and enhance the country's overall capacity to manage flood and drought risks. A critical aspect of the FDMP is the strengthening of flood monitoring and forecasting systems, a task undertaken by the State Hydraulic Works and Directorate General for Water Management. The FDMP includes a thorough evaluation and refinement of existing flood forecasting and early warning systems, aiming to improve their optimization. This concerted effort is designed to meet Türkiye’s broader disaster resilience goals, as well as the FDMP's goals, and set the standard for flood risk management practices. This technical assistance grant supports these efforts by focusing on the existing EWS in Samsun, with the goal of refining the information produced, enhancing its dissemination, and establishing a communication strategy that could serve as a benchmark for other cities and at the national level. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government counterparts, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team a a , Se ior ater e o r e Ma a e e t S e ia i t Sa i ra r r , Se ior M S e ia i t Ma at a a at , Senior DRM Specialist; Tugkan Tanir, Urban Analyst;

[email protected] Counterpart: Azize Minaz, Engineer-Department of Flood Control in DSI; General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works Türkiye; Regional Directorate of State Hydraulic Works of Samsun; Disaster and Emergency Management Center (AFAD); MOAF (DG Water Management); Governorships; Municipalities; Provincial Directorates of the Ministry of Environment, Urbanisation and Climate Change; the Ministry of National Education; Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) active in the field of disaster response (UMKE, AKUT, etc.). www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

World Bank/GFDRR TAFF: [email protected]

Overview of TAFF 2024 & 2025

Table of contents

2025 Enhancing Policy and Investments for EU Disaster and Climate Resilience – Phase 2

Croatia

Irland

Kosovo*

Montenegro

Serbia

Sweden

Türkiye

2024 Enhancing Policy and Investments for EU Disaster and Climate Resilience

Albania

Germany

Iceland

Kosovo*

Moldova

North Macedonia

Romania

Türkiye

*This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.

2025

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Enhancing Policy and Investments for EU Disaster and Climate Resilience – Phase 2

Overview

Grant Size €400,000

Duration June 2025 – December 2026

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard

Key word(s)

Preparedness in early-childhood and primary education; Disability-inclusive emergency preparedness and response; emergency operators; persons with disabilities; preparedness curriculum and training materials and teaching resources, and Emergency Preparedness and Response

Context Across the European Union, disaster risks are rising in frequency and complexity due to climate change, changing hazard landscapes, pandemics, and evolving geopolitical threats. In response, the European Commission launched the EU Preparedness Union Strategy (2025) to strengthen the Union’s capacity to anticipate, prevent, and manage crises through enhanced coordination, capabilities, and an integrated all-hazards, whole-of-government, and whole-of-society approach.

Recent crises, from the COVID-19 pandemic to accelerating climate impacts, have exposed gaps in preparedness. EU instruments such as the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) and rescEU which serve as a strategic reserve of European disaster response capabilities and stockpiles, fully funded by the EU, demonstrated added value. However, critical evidence and practice gaps persist, particularly in inclusive preparedness, embedding preparedness in education systems, and diagnosing systemic gaps in national preparedness and response. Given the diverse risk profiles, resources, and institutional arrangements across Member States and UCPM Participating States comparative analysis, cross-country learning, and cooperation are essential to guide policymaking, steer investment decisions, and the development of a coherent, evidence-based culture of preparedness in line with EU/UCPM legislation and frameworks.

Objective Provide targeted technical assistance to the European Commission, as well as to EU Member States and UCPM Participating States

• Generate practical, actionable evidence to inform policy reform, program design, and investment decisions on prevention and preparedness.

• Support strengthening Europe's ability to anticipate, prevent, prepare, and respond to crises

Component 2: Knowledge and capacity building

Key Activities and Expected Results

The technical assistance is structured around three key areas.

Area 1 focuses on integrating preparedness in early-childhood and primary education by conducting a comparative baseline across EU Member States, selected UCPM Participating States, and global comparators on how preparedness is embedded in early childhood and primary education. A repository of effective resources for dissemination will be available through the UCP Knowledge Network.

Area 2 focuses on inclusive preparedness and response through the development of a set of actions aiming at supporting persons with disabilities and response operators in emergency contexts.

Area 3 identifies best practices in emergency preparedness and response arrangements through a focused case study to assess current emergency preparedness and response arrangements, identify gaps and opportunities across risk assessment, planning, capabilities, communications, and inclusion, and provide prioritized recommendations and investment options. The case serves as a practical model for other EU Member States and UCPM Participating States.

In terms of expected results, the findings and recommendations from each area of work provide the European Commission and relevant national authorities with a robust evidence base to inform policy choices, curriculum and training design, investment prioritization, and inclusive operational practice. The process fosters collaboration among education and civil protection stakeholders, including organizations of persons with disabilities, build consensus around practical, scalable solutions, and facilitate knowledge transfer across EU Member States, UCPM Participating States, and global comparators. Ultimately, the technical assistance supports the development of EU-level guidance and tools, strengthen disability-inclusive preparedness and response, embed preparedness in early childhood and primary education, and equip countries with actionable diagnostics, contributing to a stronger culture of preparedness, improved disaster prevention and response, and enhanced resilience across the Union.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of this technical assistance will be disseminated among EU institutions, Member States, UCPM Participating States, and relevant international partners, deepening the collective knowledge base on disaster preparedness, inclusive response, and risk-informed education across Europe. This supports the ongoing efforts to strengthen national and EU strategies and facilitates the adoption of innovative, evidence-based practices in education, civil protection, and inclusion. By focusing on curriculum integration, inclusive operational guidance, training, and stakeholder engagement, the project improves the capacity of education systems, DRM and civil protection agencies, to respond to emergencies, ensuring that the benefits of the knowledge endure beyond its completion.

Given the alignment with EU and international standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this technical assistance are also relevant to other countries participating in the UCPM and the broader international community. Documented experiences and knowledge products can inform similar efforts in neighbouring countries and global comparators, contributing to the global DRM knowledge base and fostering improved coordination and resilience. In this way, the project’s outputs will support the implementation of the EU Preparedness Union Strategy, the Disaster Resilience Goals, and international frameworks such as the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and the Sustainable Development Goals, strengthening preparedness and resilience at national, regional, and global levels.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Elif Ayhan, Lead DRM Specialist, Cristina Otano, Senior Operations Officer, Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Senior DRM Specialist; and Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst, Anda Anica, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterparts: DG ECHO, [email protected]

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Croatia: Evidence for modernising the firefighting system in the Republic of Croatia

Overview

Grant Size €550,000

Duration June 2025 – June 2027

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard; Wildfire

Key word(s) Investment planning; Operational capacities; Public awareness activities; Training capacities

Context Croatia faces significant disaster risks, including earthquakes, as well as floods, extreme heat, droughts, and wildfires, many of which are projected to be exacerbated by climate change. Over the past decade, disasters have resulted in significant physical, social, and financial impacts, affecting people’s well-being. For example, the 2014 floods affected over 13000 people and caused over €300 million direct damage costs, while wildfires in 2017 burnt 86,576 ha (some 1.53 percent of the area of the Republic of Croatia) causing €109 million in losses.1 Croatia also faces significant seismic risks due to its location and vulnerable infrastructure and buildings, much of which was built prior to modern building codes. The 2020 earthquakes in Zagreb and Petrinja, which struck during the COVID-19 pandemic, brought an estimated €16.1 billion in damage and economic losses.2

Firefighting services play a critical role for ensuring Croatia’s resilience to disaster and climate risks. The Croatian Firefighting Association (HVZ) provide emergency response services in response to all hazards. Recent events and evolving risks highlight the need to strengthen preparedness and response capacities, including relevant policy and operational gaps, and prioritise actions and investments in firefighting services in line with data and analysis of the overarching gaps and opportunities as well as broader priorities for disaster and climate resilience.

Objective The objective is to provide technical assistance to the HVZ to identify and plan future actions and investments to modernise the firefighting system in Croatia. The project aims at generating technical and practical information and evidence that can underpin future prevention and preparedness reforms, actions, and investment decisions. The project helps fill existing information and knowledge gaps related to (1) operational capability of firefighting organisations (equipment, infrastructure, guidelines) to respond to natural hazards and emergencies; (2) conditions for education and

1 Posavec et al. 2023. 2 The March 2020 earthquake (M5.5) damaged and destroyed €10.7 billion worth of assets in the city of Zagreb, Zagreb and Krapina- Zagorje counties (Government of Croatia. 2020. Croatia Earthquake Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment 2020. Link.) The December 2020 earthquake2 (M6.2) damaged and destroyed €4.1 billion in physical assets in Sisak-Moslavina, Zagreb, Karlovac, and Krapina- Zagorje Counties and the City of Zagreb (Government of Croatia. 2021. Croatia December 2020 Earthquake Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment. Link.)

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

training of firefighters; (3) fire prevention and supervising the implementation of prescribed fire protection measures, among others through pre-defined priority actions on high risk (pilot) areas; (4) public awareness; and (5) advocacy.

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity is structured around five key areas. Area 1 focuses on a diagnostic review of the operational capabilities of firefighting organisations, generating information necessary to upgrade and modernise equipment, human resources, and strategic planning. Area 2 assesses the training capabilities of firefighting organisations, guiding improvements in education programs, facilities, and the recruitment of professional and volunteer forces. Area 3 evaluates fire prevention and preparedness measures, identifying opportunities to strengthen regulatory frameworks, spatial planning, and policy reforms. Area 4 includes public perception surveys, review of ongoing communication and public awareness efforts, with recommendations and select pilots to further raise public awareness to disasters. Area 5 centers on dissemination of knowledge and partnerships, ensuring that project outcomes and good practices are shared within Croatia as well as with other EU Member States, UCPM members, and the broader international community.

In terms of expected results, the findings and recommendations from each focus areas provide the HVZ and relevant authorities with a comprehensive evidence base to inform strategic investment, training, regulatory reforms, and public engagement. The process fosters collaboration among stakeholders, builds consensus on modernisation priorities, and facilitates knowledge transfer within Croatia and across borders. Ultimately, the project contributes to the modernisation of Croatia’s firefighting system, enhances disaster prevention and preparedness, and strengthens national and regional resilience.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among Croatian stakeholders and shared more broadly, deepening the knowledge base on firefighting modernisation and disaster risk management in Croatia. This supports the ongoing refinement of national strategies and facilitates the adoption of modern and innovative practices across the country. By focusing on operational capabilities, training, prevention, public awareness, and partnerships, the project helps embed sustainable improvements within the HVZ and relevant authorities, ensuring that the benefits of the project endure beyond its completion.

Given the alignment with EU and regional standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other EU Member States and countries participating in the UCPM. Documented experiences and knowledge products can inform similar modernisation efforts in neighbouring countries such as Albania and North Macedonia, as well as the broader UCPM community. In this way, the project’s outputs can contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management and foster improved coordination and resilience in line with the national priorities as set out by the National DRM Strategy (2023) and its Action Plan, as well as the European Union’s Disaster Resilience Goals and the EU Preparedness Strategy, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Senior DRM Specialist; Krunoslav Katic, Sr. DRM Specialist; Martina Vojkovic, DRM Expert, and Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterparts: Mario Starčević, Croatia Firefighting Association (HVZ)

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Ireland: Good Practice and Recommendations for Strengthening the National Strategic Policy Framework for Emergency Management

Overview

Grant Size €250,000

Duration June 2025 – June 2026

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard; Large-scale disasters

Key word(s) Strategic Emergency Management, emergency preparedness, national risk framework, disaster response coordination, resilience planning.

Context Ireland’s Strategic Emergency Management (SEM) Policy, adopted in 2017, sets out the national structures and roles for managing emergencies, aligned with the lead government department principle.1 It defines 50 emergency types, assigning lead government department responsibilities and outlines how these interact with broader government systems across risk assessment, preparedness, response coordination, and recovery. Since its adoption, the risk landscape has evolved, particularly in light of escalating climate-related threats such as flooding and severe storms. While Ireland has a well-established risk assessment model, recent events have highlighted the need to strengthen national preparedness for complex and cascading risks. Updating the SEM framework is now essential to reflect current and future challenges, resilience priorities, and addressing legislative or operational gaps or areas for improvement.

The Office of Emergency Planning (OEP) is the custodian of SEM policy in Ireland. The OEP manages and operates the National Emergency Coordination Centre and provides peer support to government departments and agencies in identifying capability gaps and informing capability development. The OEP’s remit extends to the arrangement of training and education relating to emergency management and offering advice and assistance if requested to government departments in relation to their emergency management functions

Objective The objective of the grant is to provide technical assistance to the OEP with respect to the national SEM policy and framework. This is done by (1) reviewing the existing National SEM structure and framework, and by (2) providing recommendations to inform and strengthen Ireland’s SEM.

1 Department of Defence; Office of Emergency Planning, 2017. Strategic Emergency Management (SEM): National Structures and Framework. Department of Defence. Link.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity comprises several elements. This includes a structured diagnostic review of the current SEM doctrine; review of relevant good practices from other countries and international organisations; and the development of technical recommendations including a roadmap. The recommendations and the roadmap cover both policy and operational aspects, outlining key opportunities, timelines, and so on. The Activity also includes consultations and various knowledge- transfer activities, as well as dissemination of the results through relevant platforms and mechanisms.

In terms of expected results, the findings can inform Ireland’s future actions, including legislative efforts, to enhance Ireland’s national preparedness capacity and disaster resilience. The review and recommendations can provide a solid knowledge base to inform a modernised, comprehensive SEM that reflects current risk context as well as practice in the field. The process and consultations, and the results of the analysis, can contribute to enhancing collaboration among stakeholders, strengthening a common understanding of the challenges and priorities, as well as contribute to sharing of knowledge within and beyond Ireland.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings will be disseminated among stakeholders and beyond, deepening the knowledge base on SEM in Ireland. This can inform and refine its strategies and facilitate the uptake of modern/innovative practices across Ireland.

Focusing on emergency planning and emergency systems as a topic of high relevance also to other countries, relevant findings, knowledge and information, including documented lessons learnt and good practice, can be useful to other Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) Member States and Participating States which seek to modernise their frameworks. In this way, the grant outputs can also contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management (DRM) and improved coordination on disaster preparedness, in line with the European Union (EU) Disaster Resilience Goals (DRGs) and the EU’s Preparedness Strategy.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Senior DRM Specialist, Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterpart: Office of Emergency Planning (OEP), Government of Ireland

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Kosovo: *

Enhancing National Crisis Preparedness and Wildfire Risk Management in Kosovo:*

Overview

Grant Size €350,000

Duration September 2025 – June 2027

Key hazard(s) Wildfires; Floods; Landslides; Earthquakes; Heatwaves; Droughts

Key word(s) Financial preparedness; Wildfire preparedness; Resilient Recovery; National Crisis Preparedness Plan

Context Kosovo’s geographical position and climate expose it to a diverse array of hazards, including floods, heavy snowfall, drought, forest fires, and earthquakes. The country is particularly vulnerable to flash floods in mountainous regions and riverine floods in plains, with severe events in recent years causing significant economic and social disruption. Forest fires are an increasing concern, with 43 percent of Kosovo’s territory covered by forests and nearly 8,000 hectares burned in 2021 alone. Extreme climate events frequently damage critical infrastructure, leading to cascading effects that heighten vulnerabilities in key sectors such as agriculture, forestry, and water. While Kosovo has made progress in strengthening its legal and institutional frameworks for disaster risk management and climate adaptation, most notably through the 2023 Law on Climate Change and the updated National Response Plan, implementation capacity remains limited, especially at the municipal level. Gaps persist in local hazard mapping, early warning systems, and the integration of climate and disaster risks into financial planning, and coordination between national and local governments is still evolving.

The Emergency Management Agency (EMA) under the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MoIA) is the main counterpart responsible for disaster risk management and emergency preparedness in Kosovo, working in close coordination with the Ministry of Environment, Spatial Planning and Infrastructure (MESPI), which leads on climate policy. Despite a clear strategic direction, Kosovo’s emergency preparedness and response (EP&R) system remains primarily response-oriented, with limited professional capacity and fragmented mandates. A 2021 diagnostic under the World Bank’s Ready2Respond framework highlighted the need for strategic investments in legislation, financing, equipment, and personnel to build a more robust and coordinated EP&R architecture.

Objective The objective of the grant is to support the Government of Kosovo in strengthening national crisis preparedness and wildfire resilience. This is achieved through: (i) developing recommendations for a National Crisis Preparedness Plan, including post-disaster financing mechanisms; and (ii) evaluating and improving frameworks for wildfire preparedness and forecasting.

* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity comprises two interlinked activities. The first focuses on a structured diagnostic review of Kosovo’s national crisis preparedness and emergency response systems. This includes a rapid assessment of existing legal and institutional frameworks, operational and financial readiness, and coordination mechanisms, conducted in close collaboration with the EMA and other key stakeholders. The process involves desk-based diagnostics, targeted consultations with government institutions, and a scenario-based tabletop simulation exercise to test real-time decision- making and resource mobilisation during emergencies such as wildfires, floods, earthquakes, and landslides. The findings are consolidated into a Preparedness Diagnostic Brief and an updated Readiness Scorecard, and inform the development of technical recommendations, including a National Crisis Preparedness Plan (CPP) and a prioritised emergency investment list. The recommendations and roadmap address both policy and operational aspects, outlining key opportunities for strengthening institutional, financial, and operational systems for rapid emergency response.

In terms of expected results, the Activity provides Kosovo’s authorities with a robust evidence base to inform future actions and investments in crisis preparedness and disaster resilience. The review and recommendations support the modernisation of national emergency management, enhance clarity around institutional mandates and coordination protocols, and facilitate the rapid mobilisation of resources in times of crisis. The process, including consultations and simulation exercises, fosters collaboration among stakeholders, strengthens a shared understanding of challenges and priorities, and contributes to knowledge transfer within Kosovo and with international partners. The second element, focused on wildfire preparedness, delivers a technical needs assessment and a roadmap for impact-based wildfire forecasting, complemented by capacity-building workshops. These outputs enable government agencies, emergency responders, and local authorities to improve wildfire response, integrate advanced forecasting tools, and position Kosovo to benefit from future investments in disaster risk reduction and resilience.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among stakeholders in Kosovo and shared more broadly, deepening the national knowledge base on DRM. This supports the ongoing refinement of Kosovo’s State Strategy for Reducing the Risk from Natural Disasters and other Disaster 2023-2028, as well as the strengthening of the Integrated Emergency Management System and the National Response Plan. By focusing on institutional capacity building, the development of a National Crisis Preparedness Plan (CPP), and improved system integration, the project helps embed sustainable improvements within relevant authorities, ensuring that the benefits of the project endure beyond its completion. The technical assistance supports the institutionalisation of DRR and the effective use of disaster risk information for emergency preparedness and response.

Given the alignment with EU and regional standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other countries participating in the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) and the broader region. Documented experiences and knowledge products can inform similar efforts to strengthen institutional frameworks and coordination in neighbouring countries and the UCPM community. In this way, the project’s outputs contribute to the global DRM knowledge base and foster improved coordination and resilience, supporting the EU’s Preparedness Strategy and advancing regional cooperation on disaster and climate resilience.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Anita Ellmauer-Klambauer, Urban Development Specialist, Henrike Brecht, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist, Guillermo Siercke, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist; [email protected]

Counterpart: Emergency Management Agency (EMA), Ministry of Internal Affairs (MoIA) and the Ministry of Environment, Spatial Planning and Infrastructure (MESPI), Government of Kosovo

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Montenegro: Enhancing Disaster Resilience and Continuity of IT Infrastructure and Services in the Operational Communication Center 112

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration September 2025 – September 2027

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard; Earthquakes; Floods; Wildfires

Key word(s) Reducing risk and mainstreaming; DRM Risk-Informed Decision Making; Disaster Preparedness; Resilient Recovery; Risk-informed decisions making

Context Montenegro’s National Disaster Risk Assessment (2021) highlights the country’s significant vulnerability to natural hazards, particularly earthquakes, floods, and wildfires, which threaten public safety, critical infrastructure, and societal resilience. The coastal and central regions are especially at risk from seismic activity, as evidenced by the devastating 1979 earthquake, while frequent floods and recurring wildfires further challenge the country’s emergency response capacity. A scenario developed for the National Disaster Risk Assessment underscores the high vulnerability of electronic communications and IT infrastructure, especially the Operational Communication Centre 112 (OCC 112), to both natural and man-made hazards. The assessment, together with the Law on Designation and Protection of Critical Infrastructure, the Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy, and the Law on Electronic Communications, defines the roles and responsibilities for disaster risk management and critical infrastructure protection. The evolving risk landscape, highlighted by recent stress tests and operational experience, has underscored the need to strengthen the resilience and continuity of the 112 system, particularly in the face of complex and cascading hazards.

The Directorate for Emergency Management is the custodian of the 112 system in Montenegro. It is responsible for the operation and modernisation of the Operational Communication Centre 112 (OCC 112), as well as for ensuring compliance with national and EU requirements for critical infrastructure protection and emergency communications. The Directorate leads efforts to identify capability gaps, inform strategic investments, and coordinate with other government agencies and stakeholders. The 112 Department supports the government’s vision to establish a robust public warning system by 2027 and facilitate the transition to Next Generation 112 (NG112), ensuring the continuous functioning of emergency services and enhancing national preparedness and response.

Objective The objective of this grant is to ensure disaster and climate resilience, functionality, and continuity of IT infrastructure and services in the Operational Communication Centre 112 (OCC 112) in Montenegro. This is achieved by focusing on three key activities: (1) a diagnostic analysis of the 112 system through a gap and needs assessment; (2) knowledge sharing through study visits to established 112 centres, and training; and (3) based on the diagnostic analysis, recommendations in the form of a roadmap with short/medium-long term priorities for stakeholders to

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

consider for the development of a roadmap for modernization of the operational communication centre (OCC) 112 and a Business Continuity Plan (BCP).

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity is structured around three key elements to strengthen the disaster and climate resilience, functionality, and continuity of IT infrastructure and services in Montenegro’s Operational Communication Centre 112 (OCC 112). The first component focuses on a comprehensive diagnostic analysis of the OCC 112 system, including stakeholder mapping, desk research, and a structured gap and needs assessment of current IT infrastructure and emergency operations. This analysis, informed by global best practices and a review of the regulatory framework, identifies vulnerabilities to hazards such as earthquakes, floods, and wildfires. Citizen engagement activities further assess access barriers and communication preferences, particularly for vulnerable groups. The activity also centres on knowledge sharing, with study visits to advanced 112 centres, workshops, and training sessions to exchange best practices in IT resilience and business continuity. Thematic roundtables and participation in EU and regional platforms will support the dissemination of findings and encourage replication. Building on these efforts, a technical roadmap will be developed for the phased modernisation of OCC 112, including recommendations for a Business Continuity Plan (BCP) and future interoperability with the Public Warning System and Next Generation 112 (NG112). The roadmap outlines short-, medium-, and long-term priorities and implementation strategies aligned with EU directives and best practices.

In terms of expected results, the findings and recommendations from each element of this activity provide Montenegro’s Ministry of Interior, Directorate for Emergency Management, and other stakeholders with a comprehensive evidence base to inform strategic investment, regulatory reforms, and public engagement. The process fosters collaboration among government agencies, private sector partners, telecom operators, and organisations of persons with disabilities, building consensus on modernisation priorities and facilitating knowledge transfer. Ultimately, the Activity contributes to the modernisation and resilience of Montenegro’s emergency communications system, enhances disaster prevention and preparedness, and strengthens national and regional resilience, benefiting over citizens and tourists alike.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among Montenegrin stakeholders and shared more broadly, deepening the national knowledge base on emergency communications modernisation and disaster risk management. This supports the ongoing refinement of Montenegro’s disaster risk reduction strategies and facilitates the adoption of modern, innovative, and inclusive practices across the country. The development of a Business Continuity Plan and a modernisation roadmap provide- a strategic framework for future investments, aligning Montenegro’s emergency communications infrastructure with EU Disaster Resilience Goals (DRGs) and the European Green Deal’s climate adaptation priorities. It also ensures alignment with key EU legislation, including the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC), NIS2 Directive, EU Civil Protection Mechanism (EUCPM), and the Accessibility Act.

Given the alignment with EU and regional standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other EU Member States and countries participating in the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM). Documented experiences and knowledge products can inform similar modernisation efforts in neighbouring countries and the broader UCPM community. In this way, the project’s outputs contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management and foster improved coordination and resilience, supporting the European Union’s Preparedness Strategy and advancing regional cooperation on disaster and climate resilience.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Sa i ra r r , Senior DRM Specialist, Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterparts: Directorate for Protection and Rescue – Department 112, Ministry of Interior, Government of Montenegro

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Serbia: Strengthening Emergency Management and Disaster Preparedness in Serbia

Overview

Grant Size €450,000

Duration September 2025 – September 2027

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard; Earthquakes; Landslides; Heavy rainfall; Floods; Heat waves; Droughts; Wildfires

Key word(s) Updating disaster risk assessment methodology; Strengthening protection and rescue planning at all government levels; Enhancing emergency preparedness and response capacity

Context Serbia’s disaster risk management framework has undergone significant evolution in recent years, particularly following the adoption of the “Guidelines and Methodology for Vulnerability (Risk) Assessment and Protection and Rescue Plans in Emergency Situations” in 2017, updated in 2019. This Methodology, mandated by the Law on Disaster Risk Reduction and Emergency Management, applies across all levels of government — national, provincial, and local — and is coordinated by the Sector for Emergency Management (SEM) within the Ministry of the Interior. The experience gained from implementing the Methodology has highlighted the need for refinement and simplification, especially to facilitate its practical application at the local self-government level. In response, the Government of Serbia is undertaking an update of the Methodology to enhance the quality and operational relevance of disaster risk assessments and protection and rescue planning. This update aims to strengthen the overall disaster risk management system, inform future investment planning, and serve as a foundation for risk-informed decision making, thereby improving preparedness and resilience at both local and national levels. The revised approach will also address financial preparedness, ensuring that Serbia is better equipped to respond to and recover from disasters and crises, and will align with the principles of the EU Civil Protection Mechanism and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction.

The SEM within the Ministry of the Interior is the central institution responsible for disaster risk management policy and operations in Serbia. As the custodian of the national Methodology, SEM leads the coordination, development, and monitoring of disaster risk assessment and protection and rescue planning across all levels of government. Building on lessons learned from recent disasters and an evolving risk landscape, SEM is committed to modernising and refining the Methodology to better address current and emerging hazards, including those driven by climate change.

Objective The objective of the grant is to enhance the overall disaster preparedness and community resilience in the Republic of Serbia through improvement of existing frameworks and resilience-building measures. The proposed activities and outputs under the grant are designed to enhance the Disaster Risk Assessments and Protection and Rescue plans, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of preventive measures and preparedness activities. Additionally, these

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

documents address financial aspects within the protection and rescue system, further strengthening the community's ability to withstand and recover from disasters.

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity is structured around two main elements. The first puts the focus on the review and updating of the Methodology for Disaster Risk Assessment and Protection and Rescue Plans in the Republic of Serbia. This involves a comprehensive diagnostic analysis of the existing methodology, identification of gaps, and the drafting of updated instructions to ensure alignment with current best practices and international standards. The second element centers on an assessment of national disaster risk management capabilities and response capacities, identifying gaps, and providing targeted recommendations for capability and capacity enhancement. Both components will include consultations with key stakeholders, knowledge-transfer activities, and dissemination of results through relevant platforms and mechanisms including expert seminars, workshops, and trainings.

In terms of expected results, the findings and recommendations from each component provide Serbian authorities with a robust evidence base to inform future policy, planning, and investment decisions in disaster risk management and emergency preparedness. The process fosters collaboration among stakeholders, builds consensus on priorities for strengthening Serbia’s disaster risk management system, and facilitates knowledge sharing within Serbia and with international partners. Ultimately, the Activity contributes to the modernisation of Serbia’s disaster risk assessment and emergency preparedness frameworks, enhancing national resilience and alignment with European and international standards.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among Serbian stakeholders and shared more broadly, deepening the knowledge base on disaster risk management and emergency preparedness in Serbia. This supports the ongoing refinement of national strategies, including the National Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction and Emergency Management, and facilitates the adoption of modern and harmonised practices across the country. By focusing on legal and institutional reform, risk assessment, and capacity building, the project helps embed sustainable improvements within relevant authorities, ensuring that the benefits of the project endure beyond its completion. The technical assistance provided also supports the operationalisation of the National Climate Change Adaptation Program and the National Strategy for Environmental Protection, aligning Serbia’s disaster risk management framework with the EU Green Agenda and other key national priorities.

Given Serbia’s membership in the EU Civil Protection Mechanism and its commitment to the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other EU Member States and countries participating in the UCPM. Documented experiences and knowledge products can inform similar legal and institutional modernisation efforts in neighbouring countries and the broader UCPM community. In this way, the project’s outputs contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management and foster improved coordination and resilience, supporting the European Union’s Preparedness Strategy and advancing regional cooperation on disaster and climate resilience.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Guillermo Siercke, Senior DRM Specialist, Tolkun Jukusheva, Senior DRM Specialist, [email protected] Counterpart: Sector for Emergency Management (SEM), Ministry of Interior, Republic of Serbia

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Sweden: Review of the state of the art of national disaster loss databases

Overview

Grant Size €250,000

Duration July 2025 – October 2026

Key hazard(s) Multi-hazard; Large-scale disasters

Key word(s) Disaster loss database; DRM and Artificial intelligence; Standardisation of disaster data; Legal and institutional frameworks of risk data; Risk-informed and evidence-based decision-making

Context Sweden, like many European countries, faces a growing array of natural hazards, including floods, storms, wildfires, landslides, and climate-related events, as well as their potential cascading effects. Recent disasters such as Storm Hans and the Stenungsund Landslide in 2023 have underscored the urgent need for robust systems to record, analyse, and share disaster loss data to inform preparedness and response measures. In line with the European Union (EU) Preparedness Union Strategy and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR), Sweden is seeking to modernise its disaster data management by developing a national disaster loss database. Disaster damage and loss databases are a critical component of scientific knowledge on disaster impacts, supporting the identification of urgent and cost-effective resilience investments. These databases, which can include both historical and forward-looking data, are essential for assessing the geographic extent of events, calibrating hazard maps and early warnings, and conducting cost- benefit analyses of damages to lives, property, economic activity, social equity, health, the environment, and cultural heritage. They also enable continuous monitoring of progress in climate adaptation and disaster risk reduction, with novel technologies such as AI and machine learning enhancing their effectiveness. Within broader disaster risk management frameworks like the SFDRR, such databases are directly relevant for EU policies and directives, including national risk assessments and the Floods and Seveso Directives.

The Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB) is responsible for strengthening Sweden’s ability to prevent and manage major accidents and crises, safeguarding lives, social functions, and core societal values. The MSB, as the key agency for civil protection and emergency management, has systematically collected data from municipal emergency services for over 30 years and manages more data on extensive technological and natural events, supporting Sweden’s compliance with both national and EU requirements. As needs and technological solutions evolve continuously, the MSB is looking to review the state of the art in damage and loss data management.

Objective The objective of this project is to provide technical assistance to MSB with respect to the development of a national disaster loss database. This is achieved by (1) reviewing current good practice on establishing and maintaining disaster damage and loss data systems across EU member states (MS) and beyond for natural hazards and other large- scale disasters, and (2) providing recommendations of relevance for Sweden.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity is structured around two parts. First, it entails a review of international best practices in establishing and operating disaster damage and loss databases, with a focus on efficient reporting, integration of climate change considerations, and the use of innovative data management approaches. Second, it also involves an assessment of Sweden’s existing disaster damage and loss data collection systems, led by MSB, and the identification of technical options for improvement based on insights from the first component. The Activity also includes consultations and knowledge-sharing activities, with opportunities for participation from other countries through workshops to facilitate the exchange of experience and good practices.

In terms of expected results, the Activity provides MSB and relevant Swedish authorities with actionable recommendations to strengthen disaster loss data infrastructure and modernise existing systems. The findings support Sweden’s ability to meet EU and international reporting requirements, enhance risk management and preparedness, and foster collaboration and knowledge exchange both within Sweden and with international partners. Findings will be relevant to other countries looking to strengthen their disaster damage and loss data systems. Ultimately, the Activity contributes to improved disaster resilience in Sweden and benefits the broader EU community.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among stakeholders in Sweden and shared more broadly, deepening the national knowledge base on DRM. This study is closely aligned with national needs to improve the damage and loss database. By focusing on good practices and forward-looking recommendations, and through planned dissemination and exchange activities, the study is expected to inform future efforts in Sweden and potentially serve as a model for other countries in the EU and beyond. The project also fosters opportunities for collaboration with other countries engaged in building and managing comprehensive disaster loss databases. From a technical perspective, the study adopts a forward-looking approach that considers future needs related to climate change, modern data collection, and advanced analysis. The results contribute to broader objectives such as contingency planning, climate change adaptation, the green transition, and the improved use of data and innovative analytical tools for DRM. These efforts ensure that the benefits of the project endure beyond its completion, supporting the institutionalisation of DRR and the effective use of disaster risk information for emergency preparedness and response.

Given the alignment with EU and global standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other countries participating in the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) and the broader international community. Documented experiences and knowledge products from Sweden can inform similar efforts to strengthen institutional frameworks and coordination in neighbouring countries and across the UCPM network. In this way, the project’s outputs contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management and foster improved coordination and resilience, supporting the European Union’s Preparedness Strategy and advancing regional and international cooperation on disaster and climate resilience.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR TAFF: Jun Rentschler, Senior Economist, Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterpart: Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB), Government of Sweden

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Official Use Only

Last update: September 2025

Türkiye: Resilient ir: A Strategic and Inclusive Initiative for Multi- a ar Preparedness and Risk Reduction

Overview

ra t Si e €650,000

Duration September 2025 – September 2027

e a ar Multi- a ar art a e ro eteoro o i a i a ter a i e tria a i e t

Key word Multi- a ar ri a e e t art a e re are e Capacity building and crisis o i atio trai i era e ro i a ter re o e i a are e i a ter ri r a re i ie e o it - a e i a ter re are e i -informed decision-making

Context Türkiye’s third-largest city, İzmir, is highly exposed to a range of natural and human-made hazards, including earthquakes, tsunamis, flooding, landslides, rockfalls, and industrial accidents. The city’s location along active fault i e , it v era e oa t i e, a t e re e e o a or i tria o e a ia a a or a , ei te t e ri o disasters with potentially cascading effects. Recent events, such as the 2020 Samos Island earthquake, have underscored the city’s vulnerability and the urgent need to strengthen disaster resilience. The increasing frequency and intensity of climate-re ate a ar , i i eav rai a a ea eve ri e, rt er o o t e e ri e ite o oi e ort , challenges remain in prioritising and financing resilience investments, coordinating among institutions, and ensuring that disaster management strategies are inclusive and data-driven.

The Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (AFAD) leads disaster preparedness, response, and recovery efforts at the national level, coordinating with local authorities, first responders, and specialised teams such as the national medical rescue team (UMKE) and firefighters. o a over e t , arti ar t e ir Metro o ita M i i a it , t e State ra i or S , a t e rovi ia ire torate o viro e t, r a isation, and Climate Change, play a critical role in implementing risk-reduction measures, operating and maintaining critical infrastructure, and engaging with communities, working alongside specialised first responder teams. However, the city’s rapid urbanisation, the presence of informal settlements, and the proximity of industrial facilities to residential areas create additional layers of vulnerability. Coordination among agencies, integration of risk data into planning, and the inclusion of vulnerable groups, such as children, the elderly, and people with disabilities, remain ongoing challenges. Furthermore, public awareness of disaster risks and preparedness measures is uneven, and there are gaps in the dissemination of timely, accessible information before, during, and after emergencies. These factors collectively underscore the need for a holistic, multi- e tora a roa to i a ter a i ate re i ie e i ir, ro e i ro ust risk assessment, institutional collaboration,

and community engagement.

Objective The objective of the grant is to enhance İzmir’s resilience against a wide range of hazards including natural and human-made disasters and strengthen the capacity of disaster response personnel through training programs focused on risk-informed decision-making, crisis communication, psychological resilience, and raise public

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

awareness of especially on vulnerable individuals (children, elderly, people with disabilities, etc.). This objective is achieved by developing a comprehensive assessment and conducting capacity building activities through tailored activities for enhanced communication skills and crisis management measures focusing on vulnerable people. The analysis, findings, can inform national-level approaches on those key topics.

Key Activities and Expected Results

The Activity is structured around two interlinked elements i i e a o re e ive ia o ti o ir disaster risk profile, including multi- a ar ri a a i , ta e o er a i , a te i a a e o o i ea i i it studies. It also develops a strategic roadmap for disaster risk reduction, institutional coordination, and investment prioritisation, informed by international knowledge exchange and stakeholder consultations. This also centers on capacity building, communication, and public awareness, with activities including training needs assessments, certified training programs for disaster response teams, trauma-informed communication modules, psychosocial resilience seminars, and the development of public education materials. Special emphasis is placed on engaging and protecting vulnerable groups, such as children, the elderly, and people with disabilities, through inclusive outreach and simulation exercises. The Activity also includes dissemination of findings and lessons learned at local, national, and international levels.

In terms of expected results, t e tivit i rovi e , ir Metro o ita M i i a it , a ot er ta e o er it actionable recommendations and tools to strengthen disaster and climate resilience. The findings support evidence-based investment decisions, improved risk anticipation, and enhanced preparedness and response capacities, particularly for vulnerable populations. The process will foster collaboration among institutions, build consensus on priorities, and facilitate knowledge transfer within Türkiye and with international partners. Ultimately, the Activity contributes to a more re i ie t ir, i i ising loss of life and property, and serve as a model for disaster risk management and climate adaptation in other high-risk urban areas.

Sustainability and Coordination The findings and outputs of the project will be disseminated among stakeholders in İzmir and shared more broadly across Türkiye, deepening the national knowledge base on disaster risk reduction (DRR) and emergency management. This directly supports t e o oi re i e e t o ir i a ter re i ie e trate a t e tre t e i of local and national disaster management systems, including the integration of multi- a ar ri a e e t a inclusive preparedness planning. By focusing on institutional capacity building, technical and economic feasibility studies, and targeted training for crisis managers and first responders, the project helps embed sustainable improvements within relevant authorities. These efforts ensure that the benefits of the project endure beyond its completion, supporting the institutionalisation of DRR and the effective use of disaster risk information for emergency preparedness and response, particularly for vulnerable groups such as children, the elderly, and people with disabilities. The technical assistance also addresses gaps identified in recent disaster events and diagnostics, supporting the development of coordinated, data- driven approaches to increase disaster resilience at the city and national levels.

Given the alignment with EU and international standards, the approaches, good practices, and lessons learned through this project are also relevant to other countries participating in the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) and the broader region. o e te e erie e a o e e ro t ro ir a i or i i ar e ort to strengthen institutional frameworks and coordination in neighbouring countries and across the UCPM network. In this way, the project’s outputs contribute to the global knowledge base on disaster risk management and foster improved coordination and resilience, supporting the European Union’s Preparedness Strategy and advancing regional and international cooperation on disaster and climate resilience. The project’s focus on inclusive, evidence-based planning and cross-sectoral collaboration helps e re t at t e e o ear e i ir a e a a te a a e to e e it ot er i - risk urban areas in Türkiye and beyond.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Sa i ra Erdurmus, Senior DRM Specialist, Tugkan Tanir, DRM Analyst [email protected]

Counterpart: Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Government of Türkiye

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

2024

Last updated: September 2025

Enhancing Policy and Investments for EU Disaster and Climate Resilience Overview

Grant Size €250,000

Duration September 2024 – November 2025

Key hazard(s) Earthquakes; Wildfires

Key word(s) Smart governance; Smart policies and investments; Resilient Infrastructure; Disaster Resilience; Climate Resilience

Context Europe faces escalating losses from climate-related disasters as the continent warms faster than any other region in the world, translating into potentially more frequent and more impactful events. For example, in 2023, Europe experienced one of its worst wildfire seasons with over 500,000 ha burnt, 96,000 of which were in Greece alone. Alongside climate-sensitive threats, large parts of Europe also face earthquake risks, risks exacerbated by ageing infrastructure that predates modern building codes. Countries in the EU have been taking major steps to enhance their disaster and climate resilience, guided and supported by EU policy, funding, and technical assistance instruments. With the current EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF 2021-2027) at its midpoint and preparations for the next MFF (2028-2034) intensifying, there is the opportunity to further strengthen disaster risk management and resilience efforts across the EU. This is the moment to reflect on how to refine EU policy and funding frameworks to better promote strategic, risk-informed, performance-oriented, and sustainable investments that deliver social, economic, and environmental benefits. It is also worth exploring ways to incentivise reforms that address key bottlenecks for effective risk management and investment.

Objectives ● Share good practices and provide recommendations for incentivising effective investments in disaster and climate

resilience through the right framework conditions.

● Provide evidence to support a risk-informed approach to investments, particularly in wildfire and earthquake risk management, and offer guidance on potential investments.

Component 2: Knowledge and capacity building

Key Activities and Expected Results

Incentivising impactful investments in disaster resilience – setting the right framework

This Activity includes EU-wide analytics which supports discussions related to existing and future policies and instruments that can foster disaster and climate resilience. These efforts consider conditions and incentives, as well as ways to track progress towards strengthened disaster and climate resilience.

Investing in disaster resilience in the EU: identifying needs and priorities

This Activity includes EU-wide and country case study analytics. The results include a high-level overview of wildfire and earthquake risks and their management at the EU-level, complemented by a series of brief case studies on wildfire and earthquake risk management in selected EU Member States.

Sustainability and Coordination This project seeks to provide evidence, good practice examples, and recommendations to inform ongoing and future efforts to strengthen disaster and climate resilience in the EU. The findings aim to provide insights that can guide the refinement of policies and tools at both the EU and Member State levels in the current and forthcoming MFFs. With Component 2 focusing on earthquake and wildfire risks, the project considers and coordinates with other ongoing academic research, technical assistance (including other TAFF projects or other EU-funded grants), as well as initiatives led by the European Commission that could be leveraged to deepen understanding of the EU’s earthquake and wildfire risk profile and risk management capabilities. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government counterparts, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Senior DRM Specialist; Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst. [email protected] Counterparts: DG ECHO, [email protected] www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last updated: September 2025

Albania: Strengthening Albania’s Fire Risk Management and Search and Rescue Capacity

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration September 2024 – August 2026

Key hazard(s) Wildfires

Key word(s) Rescue capacity; Rescue services; Fire protection

Context Wildfire and general fire risk is a growing concern in Albania with heat stress increasing due to climate change. Albania is at high and continuous risk of forest fires, especially in the dry summer season June-September. According to World Bank estimates, 23 per cent of crop area in the country is already under medium to high wildfire risk with 10 municipalities having the highest level of exposure. In 2021 alone, 329 wildfires were recorded, burning a total of 31,275 ha of land. Data from Global Forest Watch shows that fires in Albania are the second leading cause of forest area loss in the country. From 2001 to 2023, the country lost 19.8 kha of tree cover from fires and 26.7 kha from all other drivers of loss. In Albania firefighting and rescue services are the responsibility of municipalities, which carry the mandate of first responders on all incidents posing a danger to the population or environment. While equipment at local levels has been upgraded over the past years, municipalities still lack the capacity and institutional structures to effectively fulfil their mandate to prevent and mitigate incidents. This leads to the need for intervention by the National Civil Protection Agency (NCPA) for even small and medium incidents. To address Albania’s limited capabilities in extinguishing fires, the country’s fire response capacity, infrastructure (e.g., fire stations), technology, and equipment for tracking and extinguishing fires require urgent strengthening.

Objective The objective of the grant is to support the government of Albania in strengthening its fire risk management and search and rescue capacity, thereby improving its ability to respond effectively and efficiently to general fires, wildfires, and emergencies. The results of this technical assistance will inform a proposed investment project in Albania on fire risk management.

Component 1: Country-Specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Institutional and capacity review of fire protection and rescue services (FP&RS)

This activity reviews the existing FP&RS capacity in Albania against international best practices to identify potential capacity strengthening, policy, and investment needs to improve the delivery of firefighting services in the country.

Road map for strengthening fire protection and rescue services

A road map is developed based on Albanian demography, the geographic distribution of damage and loss risks due to fires, and a consultation process with municipalities. The road map prioritises resources and interventions at the local level regarding infrastructure and equipment, and it supports the identification of needs for training in firefighting and search and rescue.

Strengthening wildfire risk management

This activity aims to strengthen wildfire fire risk management in Albania with activities covering forest fire risk assessment and mapping, analysis of current mechanisms to fight wildfires, a review of institutional coordination and community engagement mechanisms, and recommendations for increasing Albania’s capacity to combat wildfires.

Sustainability and Coordination This project is part of a broader collaboration between the World Bank, the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM), and the government of Albania to strengthen the country’s ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters. The objective of the grant is to support the government in strengthening its fire risk management capacity. The grant serves as a basis for the identification, prioritisation, and preparation of activities under a proposed World Bank Investment Project Financing (IPF) on fire risk management with the Ministry of Interior. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge being generated through collaborations between government actors, the World Bank, and the UCPM.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR team: Henrike Brecht, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist, Guillermo Siercke, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist; Anita Ellmauer-Klambauer, Urban Development Specialist; Maksimiljan Dhima, Senior Disaster Risk Management Consultant. [email protected]

Counterparts: Ministry of Interior: Arben Cara, General Director for FPRS, Florenc Qosja, Advisor in the Cabinet of the Minister

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last update: September 2025

Germany: Return of Investments in Disaster Resilience Measures: Identifying potential measures and generating evidence to inform decision-making

Overview

Grant Size €250,000

Duration September 2024 – December 2025

Key hazard(s) Droughts; Floods; Health Emergencies; Heatwaves

Key word(s) Cost benefit analysis; Smart investments; Prioritisation

Context Germany is vulnerable to a series of disaster risks, particularly those exacerbated by climate change, such as floods, heatwaves, and droughts. To strengthen disaster resilience, the country has implemented various measures, including the Federal Government's German Strategy for Strengthening Resilience to Disasters. As one of the world’s leading economies, Germany’s recent experiences with devastating floods underscore the growing pressure on its disaster preparedness systems due to evolving climate risks. As part of the effort to scale up disaster and climate resilience, it is critical to evaluate and prioritise smart investments. Understanding the costs and benefits of such investments, including reduced losses, stimulated economic activities, and socioeconomic and environmental co-benefits, is critical to inform policy dialogue and planning.

Objective The grant's objective is to support Germany strengthen the economic case for ex-ante disaster preparedness and prevention.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Case studies of the socio-economic costs and benefits of disaster prevention measures

This Activity includes analytics to quantify the return of select investments in disaster prevention and preparedness measures, evaluating floods, heat waves, drought, and health emergencies, among others. The analysis can help inform dialogue and decisions related to public budgeting processes.

Risk communication, learning, and dissemination

This includes activities (such as presentations) to contribute to increasing the awareness of decision makers within Germany of the crucial role and range of benefits of ex-ante preparedness and prevention measures, as well as to capture and transfer lessons learned from Germany to peers in the European Union and beyond.

Sustainability and Coordination This project builds upon the insights and outcomes of preceding initiatives, notably integrating and operationalising the research from the Economics for Disaster Prevention and Preparedness (EDPP2) project. It aims to enrich the existing body of knowledge on smart investments in disaster prevention and preparedness by showcasing new case studies and examples from diverse interventions. For example, project activities can inform government efforts related to the implementation of the German Strategy for Strengthening Resilience to Disasters.

By providing key insights into the costs and benefits of resilience measures, the project also yields valuable insights for disaster resilience planning that are applicable to countries working towards Sendai Framework targets and the achievement of the Disaster Resilience Goals. The project's results not only inform the BBK’s efforts to promote a proactive preparedness approach within Germany's disaster resilience strategy but also serve as a resource for other national ministries and international stakeholders. These insights will be crucial for informing smart investments in resilience and will contribute to a global understanding of effective disaster prevention and preparedness, especially considering climate change and extreme weather events. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government counterparts, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Jun Rentschler, Senior Economist; Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst [email protected] Counterpart: Office of the National Focal Point for the Sendai Framework, [email protected], Germany www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

.

Last updated: September 2025

Iceland: Towards an Integrated Wildfire Risk Management

Overview

Grant Size €300,000

Duration September 2024 – November 2025

Key hazard(s) Wildfires

Key word(s) Integrated wildfire risk management; Smart governance; Smart policies and investments

Context Considering the growing impact of wildfires across Europe and expected impacts of climate change, the adoption and implementation of an integrated approach to wildfire risk management is becoming an increasingly important priority across Europe, including in Iceland. Although volcanic eruptions remain Iceland's predominant hazard, recent years have seen occasional wildfires in the southern, eastern, and western regions due to dry summer conditions. Wildfires are an increasing risk due to summer houses in forested areas. In the context of climate change, to effectively enhance Iceland's wildfire risk management capabilities necessitates a review of current arrangements and the identification of key gaps/challenges as well as opportunities to improve the framework for integrated wildfire risk management and to inform a future strategic framework and possible stakeholder-led actions.

Objective The grant objective is to provide analytics and recommendations for adopting an integrated wildfire risk management (IWFRM) approach in Iceland.

Key Activities and Expected Results

Developing a diagnostic analysis and roadmap of recommendations with short, medium, and long-term priorities This Activity includes analytics to review and assess the current state of wildfire risk management in Iceland, and to identify key gaps and opportunities for future action. A set of recommendations will be included in a roadmap with short, medium, and long-term priorities to inform stakeholder dialogue and eventual implementation. Consistent with the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) Wildfire Peer Review Assessment Framework (PRAF) and the goals of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 (SFDRR), and taking into account good practice across various initiatives and examples in Europe and beyond, the analysis will consider different facets of IWFRM. These include understanding of wildfire risk, risk reduction, prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery (including financial arrangements), as well as governance, coordination, and current initiatives and investments related to wildfire risk management. The results can inform policy dialogue and planning in Iceland and showcase to other countries practical way to diagnose and identify key areas for future action.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Sustainability and Coordination This project is aligned with priorities and ongoing disaster risk management related initiatives in Iceland, including the ongoing Host Nation project. The approach is fully aligned with the methodological approach of the UCPM Wildfire PRAF, as well as higher-level EU Disaster Resilience Goals, and the SFDRR. The project considers knowledge generated under previous wildfire PRAF and existing country wildfire risk management practice assessments, as well as EU/country-funded projects and initiatives such as FIRE-RES for fire resilient territories in Europe, and the SAFERS PROJECT. The findings of the project will contribute to the broader knowledge base on IWFRM to further inform and refine its strategies and facilitate the uptake of such practices across UCPM countries. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government actors, the World Bank, and the UCPM.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Senior DRM Specialist; Soraya Ridanovic, DRM Analyst [email protected]

Counterparts: Ólafur Loftsson, Project Manager; Haukur Grönli, Civil Protection Department; Iceland Department of Civil Protection and Emergency Management.

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last updated: September 2025

Kosovo:* Improving Disaster Risk Understanding, Impact-Based Forecasting, and Early Warning in Kosovo*

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration August 2024 – August 2026

Key hazard(s) Earthquake; Floods; Heatwaves; Landslides; Wildfires

Key word(s) Early warning; Impact-based forecasting; Community engagement

Context Kosovo is prone to several geological and hydrometeorological hazards such as floods, heavy snowfall, droughts, forest fires, and earthquakes. These hazards affect Kosovo’s varied geography in different ways. Particularly in mountainous areas, Kosovo suffers from riverine and flash floods, and rural areas are often hit by landslides and drought; heat stress is increasing due to climate change with forest fires becoming more frequent and, as 43 per cent of the country is covered with forests, this is becoming a growing concern. In 2021 alone, 92 wildfires were recorded, burning 7,580 ha of land. To support Kosovo in enhancing its resilience against disasters, the country’s capacities on risk assessment, impact-based forecasting and early warning and community engagement require urgent strengthening.

Objective The objective of the grant is to support the government of Kosovo in strengthening its capacity to analyse disaster risks, its capabilities for impact-based forecasting and early warning, as well as efforts in community engagement and education, thereby improving its ability to respond effectively and efficiently to floods, wildfires, and other natural disasters.

*This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Enhancing risk and impact analytics to inform decision-making

This Activity aims to enhance the evidence base for decision-making on preparedness and resilience building, particularly the accessibility and usability of risk-related information. It supports the collection and digitisation of critical infrastructure data to strengthen disaster exposure assessments, the development of a guidebook for integrating risk analytics into databases and helps enhance the capacity of institutional stakeholders to maintain and develop these systems.

Strengthening capabilities for impact-based forecasting and early warning

This Activity aims to strengthen capabilities for impact-based forecasting and multi-hazard early warning systems for more effective preparedness systems, with a focus on enhancing the integration and interoperability of technical systems and support last mile communication to reach the most vulnerable. It supports a comprehensive gap analysis of existing systems, processes and institutional frameworks for climate and disaster information, the development of a guidance note, and helps enhance capacity of key stakeholders to improve impact-based forecasting and early warning.

Community engagement and education on disaster preparedness and response

This Activity aims to strengthen the government’s capacity to engage communities and raise public awareness to support community disaster preparedness and response, with a particular emphasis on flood and wildfire risks. It supports the development of a briefing note on community engagement and awareness, supports the training of officials in community outreach and emergency preparedness, as well as the development of educational programmes to raise public awareness about disaster risks.

Sustainability and Coordination The project supports the achievement of national strategies for emergency preparedness and response, including the State Strategy for Reducing the Risk from Natural Disasters and other Disaster 2023-2028. It is a joint initiative between the Kosovo Emergency Management Agency and the Kosovo Hydrometeorological Institute, thereby supporting cross-institutional collaboration for disaster risk management. The project also builds on previous and on-going donor- supported analytical and technical assistance programmes, ensuring continuity and complementarity. This includes the EU Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA)-financed technical assistance “Western Balkans Disaster Risk Management Programme”, implemented by the World Bank 2018-2021. The project aimed to enhance capacities for disaster risk reduction and resulted in the publication of Ready to Respond Reports that analysed gaps in disaster risk management systems. The project is embedded in ongoing strategic dialogues with the World Bank such as the Climate Change Development Reports country dialogues. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge being generated through collaborations between government actors, the World Bank, and the UCPM.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Henrike Brecht, Senior DRM Specialist, Guillermo Siercke, Senior DRM Specialist [email protected]

Counterparts: Nehat Kocinaj, Head of Division for legal issues public affairs and international cooperation, Emergency Management Agency (EMA), Government of Kosovo; Kosovo Emergency Management Agency (EMA), MOIA, Kosovo Hydrometeorological Institute (KHMI).

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last updated: September 2025

Moldova: Strengthening Moldova’s Disaster Risk Management and Resilience Project Management

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration September 2024 – September 2026

Key hazard(s) Earthquakes; Floods; Health Emergencies; Landslides

Key word(s) Health emergencies; hydrometeorological services; Risk assessments

Context Moldova faces significant challenges when managing natural hazards due to its limited resources and outdated infrastructure. The country has been particularly vulnerable to floods, droughts, and landslides, which have been exacerbated by climate change, as well as earthquakes. Moldova's disaster risk management efforts have been hampered by inadequate data for risk assessments, outdated hydrometeorological services, and insufficient preparedness within the health sector to handle large-scale emergencies. This grant addresses these gaps by developing detailed risk assessments, and by identifying opportunities to upgrade weather forecasting systems and strengthen the resilience of health infrastructure.

Objective The grant's objective is to enhance Moldova's emergency preparedness and response capacities concerning natural hazards and climate-related shocks. Prevention will also be increased by better risk assessment analytics developed under the grant.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Supporting the improvement of Moldova’s emergency preparedness and response capacity, including through the development of the methodology for the risk assessment process and disaster risk mapping

The activities encompass a multi-tiered approach over 24 months, aiming to develop and pilot a DRM risk assessment methodology at community, district, and national levels, with the involvement of central and local authorities. This includes creating and executing training programmes for risk assessment, conducting training sessions for various authorities, and organising a study tour for knowledge exchange with a country that has a similar disaster risk profile and a record of successful DRM implementation.

Supporting the improvement of Moldova’s hydromet system

This Activity supports the implementation of the Strengthening Moldova's Disaster Risk Management and Resilience Project and conducts a review of Moldova's ICT Hydromet system to identify opportunities to enhance the collection and transfer of weather observations to the WMO Information System in Toulouse, establish efficient data transfer procedures, and upgrade the Chisinau weather radar for full functionality. Health system disaster preparedness assessment

This activity will provide a summary report with risk assessments and priority recommendations for strengthening disaster preparedness in the health sector. The report will present the findings of a hazard exposure analysis of health facilities and their supporting infrastructure, including an analysis of access times to health facilities. The report will also contain an opportunity assessment for preparedness measures in health system planning, including the roles of hydro-met forecasting and DRM training for health sector professionals. Lastly, the report will highlight opportunities to better integrate health services into existing civil protection and emergency response frameworks.

Sustainability and Coordination This project is part of a broader collaboration between the government of Moldova, the World Bank, the European Commission’s Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (DG ECHO), and the EU’s Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) to strengthen the country’s ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters. This project complements ongoing projects and initiatives led by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and its subordinate units, as well as other line ministries to strengthen the resilience of critical emergency response infrastructure and systems. Findings and outputs of this grant activity will inform the design and implementation of ongoing and future World Bank lending operations, including a recently approved World Bank operation to strengthen Moldova's Disaster Risk Management and Resilience capacities. It also expands on recent analytical activities to assess gaps and opportunities in the face of climate change – including the Moldova Country Climate and Development Report (CCDR). Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between Government actors, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts World Bank/GFDRR Team: Guillermo Siercke, Senior DRM Specialist; Jun Rentschler, Senior Economist; Axel Baeumler, Senior Urban Specialist; Christoph Klaiber, Economist; [email protected]

Counterparts: Alexandru Oprea, Head of the Civil Protection and Emergency Situations Service, Ministry of Internal Affairs of Moldova; Alexandr Tatarov, Deputy Head of the Civil Protection and Emergency Situations Service, Ministry of Internal Affairs of Moldova; Ministry of Interior/General Inspectorate for Emergency Situations (GIES); Ministry of Agriculture; Ministry of Infrastructure; Ministry of the Environment; and Ministry of Health.

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last updated: September 2025

North Macedonia: Resilience Investments, Governance and Recovery for Disaster Risk Reduction

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration September 2024 – June 2026

Key hazard(s) Earthquakes; Floods; Heatwaves; Wildfires

Key word(s) Risk governance; Critical infrastructure; Resilient recovery

Context North Macedonia faces significant challenges from natural and human-made hazards, with climate-related events occurring more frequently and intensely and earthquakes continuing to be a major concern. More recently, in 2024, the country experienced intense wildfires, highlighting the continuing need for enhanced mitigation and preparedness. To address this, North Macedonia is working to overcome barriers and fill knowledge gaps identified in past national disaster risk management and climate change adaptation assessments, aiming to scale up prevention measures and strengthen preparedness. Challenges remain in addressing vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, improving recovery frameworks and enhancing coordination. The country is committed to building a proactive risk management framework at national and local levels, including clarifying stakeholder roles, improving operational planning and supporting cross-institutional coordination, enhancing preparedness and climate resilience, and aligning with EU standards.

Objective The objective of the project is to enhance societal and community resilience in North Macedonia by addressing seismic and climate-related risks through foundational and transformational risk reduction and resilience-building measures.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Transformative and anticipatory risk governance and enhanced preparedness To improve resilience building and enhance overall disaster preparedness in the country, this Activity establishes the foundation of transformative and anticipatory risk governance in protection and rescue. It supports a functional analysis of the existing DRM system to strengthen national strategies, deepens the understanding of risk and methodologies for hazard assessments to strengthen DRM and risk governance/planning, and builds capacity of stakeholders for enhanced preparedness from national to community level.

Scaling up prioritised prevention investments in critical infrastructure

This Activity focuses on significantly enhancing the resilience-building of critical infrastructure against climate and disaster risks, to be accomplished through strategic and prioritised investments in preventive measures with a focus on seismic resilience and energy efficiency. It supports analytics to enhance the understanding of the vulnerability of critical infrastructure assets, develops methodologies and tools to support disaster risk screening and develops proofing interventions, identifies pilot interventions at local level for critical infrastructure upgrading, and helps enhance technical capacity of institutional stakeholders in this field.

Establishing a resilient recovery framework

This Activity aims to develop a comprehensive framework that ensures communities can effectively recover and rebuild in the aftermath of disasters, focusing on long-term resilience and sustainability. It supports analytics to enhance the understanding of the vulnerability and needs of the population related to effective disaster recovery, identifies gaps in the policy and regulatory framework to inform the development of a robust post-disaster recovery framework, and helps build the capacity of DRM stakeholders to conduct PDNAs and resilient and inclusive disaster recovery.

Sustainability and Coordination The project builds on previous and on-going national and donor-supported technical assistance and investment programmes, ensuring continuity and maximising collective efforts towards common goals. The project strengthens DRM systems in line with global and regional frameworks and key national strategic priorities. It aligns with the EU's IPA CARE Programme, incorporates lessons from past projects (IPA Floods and Fires, CRISIS, ROSES etc.) and complements ongoing projects with the World Bank (Sustainable Municipal Development Project, North Macedonia Sustainability and Resilience DPO, Climate Change Development Reports country dialogues). Analytics under this project align with established methodologies, including UNDP Guidance Notes and European Commission studies and guidance notes for critical infrastructure resilience. The project also coordinate with various ongoing EU-funded studies and research under Track 1 ‘Technical assistance for disaster risk management’ (single-country) at both national and regional levels leveraging knowledge, good practices and lessons learned on DRM. The project promotes collaboration with a people- centred, inclusive, gender-sensitive and climate-risk informed holistic approach and, to foster ownership, supports community and stakeholder involvement. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government counterparts, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Noriko Oe, Senior Urban Development Specialist; [email protected]

Counterparts: Mrs Valentina Atanasovska, Head of International Cooperation Department, PRD; Protection and Rescue Directorate (PRD), the Crisis Management Centre (CMC), the Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (IZIIS), the Red Cross (RC), key ministries and local governments.

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last update: September 2025

Romania: Romanian Assistance for Post-Disaster Improvement and Development (RAPID)

Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration August 2024 – June 2026

Key hazard(s) Droughts; Earthquakes; Floods; Heatwaves; Landslides

Key word(s) Post-disaster recovery; build back better; inclusive disaster recovery; disaster response and recovery

Context Romania is exposed to various natural hazards, including earthquakes, floods, forest fires, droughts, landslides, storms, and extreme temperature events. Aging infrastructure, particularly in cities and throughout transport systems, increases the country's vulnerability, as witnessed by the number of buildings impacted by the 1977 earthquake. Climate change is expected to intensify these risks, making multi-hazard prevention, preparedness, and response readiness a key focus of government reform and investments. In recent decades, Romania has taken major steps to improve its disaster risk management framework and system. Through the adoption of key strategic documents – including the National Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction (2024-2035), the National Strategy for Seismic Risk Reduction (2022-2050), and the National Strategy for Climate Change Adaptation (2024-2030) – the government is seeking to further strengthen its disaster and climate resilience, including improving the capacity of the national civil protection system and relevant institutions to manage disaster response and recovery in an effective and inclusive manner.

Objective The objective of this project is to strengthen the capacity of civil protection institutions to ensure an effective and inclusive disaster response and recovery, and to improve existing recovery frameworks.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Identifying gaps in Romania's current disaster recovery framework This Activity includes a diagnostic assessment of Romania's current disaster recovery framework, particularly concerning seismic and climate-related hazards. The assessment helps identify and proposes ways to address gaps in Romania’s post-disaster recovery framework, such as those related to governance and coordination, or different technical elements.

Strengthening the disaster recovery framework

Based on the diagnostic analysis, this Activity focuses on identifying technical recommendations in line with Build Back Better principles. Recommendations are supported by international good practice and examples related to post- disaster recovery. These activities can inform the development of a robust post-disaster recovery framework for Romania, aiming for resilience, sustainability, and alignment with international standards to mitigate future seismic and climate-related vulnerabilities.

Capacity building to improve recovery planning and execution

This component includes knowledge exchange events, training sessions for government officials and first responders, and institutional capacity building to improve recovery planning and execution and inclusiveness of response. The capacity building activities help facilitate inter-ministerial coordination and support the establishment of an overview of the requirements for critical disaster response and recovery resources.

Sustainability and Coordination This project forms part of broader World Bank DRM engagement in Romania, which encompasses a range of activities aimed at strengthening the country's ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters. This project also complements ongoing projects and initiatives led by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and its subordinate units, and other line ministries, to strengthen the resilience of critical emergency response infrastructure and systems. This includes investment financing through the Strengthening Disaster Risk Management Project, the Improving Resilience and Emergency Response Project, the Strengthening Preparedness and Critical Emergency Infrastructure Project, and the Romania Safer, Inclusive and Sustainable Schools Project. In addition, the results of this project also complement the reforms and expected results tracked under the Second Disaster Risk Management Development Policy Loan with a Catastrophe Draw Down Option (Cat DDO). In parallel, this project complements efforts led under a GFDRR grant through the Japan-World Bank Program for Mainstreaming DRM in developing countries, that is supporting Romania in addressing existing gaps in DRM policy development and emergency preparedness efforts, as well as in promoting and advancing investments in resilient public infrastructure. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government counterparts, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team: Alexandra Calin, DRM Specialist; Anda Anica, DRM Analyst; [email protected]

Counterpart: Silviu Stoian, Deputy Chief, General Directorate for Civil Protection; Iordan Gavrila, Head of Service and Elena Treanta, Main Specialist Officer II, Coordination and Implementation of Resilience Requirements Service; Mihaela Trandafir, Main Specialist Officer I, Project Management Service, Decision Support Direction, under the Department for Emergency Situations (DES) under the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Romania.

www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

Last update: September 2025

Türkiye: Enhancement of the Flood Early Warning System in Samsun and Communication Strategy Overview

Grant Size €500,000

Duration September 2024 – September 2025

Key hazard(s) Floods

Key word(s) Flood Risk Management; Early Warning System; Communication strategies; Public awareness and preparedness; Capacity Building

Context Enhanced accuracy and reliability of flood predictions through early warning systems (EWS) facilitate timely warnings and improved safety for at risk populations. At the same time, an effective communication strategy ensures the swift and efficient dissemination of risk information from EWS to decision-makers, as well as the broader public, enabling them to promptly initiate actions to mitigate the loss of life and property. In the context of climate change and increased flood risk, it is critical for countries, including Türkiye, to continue improving their EWS and related communications strategies. To minimise losses, the government is implementing a range of measures to improve flood predictions and reduce flood risk in Samsun Province. Sa it i o ate it i t e o arie o t e r a

a ra a e i r a ar a a river a i a ot rivers, along with other local streams, present a significant risk of flooding. A series of investments is planned in this area to manage flood risk and serve as an example for other areas in Türkiye.

Objective The objective of the project is to improve the EWS for floods in Samsun and to develop an effective communication strategy for disseminating information to the public at the city level, which will also serve as an example for other cities and at national level.

Component 1: Country-specific technical assistance

Key Activities and Expected Results

Technical evaluation of the current EWS and recommendations for improvement on the EWS-produced information

This Activity supports analysis of the current EWS and identify key recommendations for its improvement. It supports enhancements to the EWS in Samsun, improving the region's early warning capabilities and responsiveness to potential flood events. The analysis will also generate recommendations based on a good practice review that will inform and strengthen wider disaster response measures, thereby contributing to a more robust disaster risk management framework at the national level.

Evaluation of information dissemination methods for EWS and recommendations for an effective communication strategy for EWS-generated information

This Activity supports analysis to optimise the delivery and impact of EWS-generated warnings, ensuring that critical information reaches the relevant stakeholders in a timely, clear, and actionable manner. The analysis provides a set of technical recommendations for stakeholders to consider and be supplemented by capacity building.

Sustainability and Coordination This project complements government efforts to strengthen EWS capacity, and DRM more broadly, with a focus on flood resilience. Samsun is considered a potential model for the nation's other flood-prone areas, offering insights that could also be applicable to other hazards that Türkiye faces. This technical assistance also aligns with the World Bank- financed Flood and Drought Management Project (FDMP), which seeks to improve flood control measures for communities in targeted regions and enhance the country's overall capacity to manage flood and drought risks. A critical aspect of the FDMP is the strengthening of flood monitoring and forecasting systems, a task undertaken by the State Hydraulic Works and Directorate General for Water Management. The FDMP includes a thorough evaluation and refinement of existing flood forecasting and early warning systems, aiming to improve their optimization. This concerted effort is designed to meet Türkiye’s broader disaster resilience goals, as well as the FDMP's goals, and set the standard for flood risk management practices. This technical assistance grant supports these efforts by focusing on the existing EWS in Samsun, with the goal of refining the information produced, enhancing its dissemination, and establishing a communication strategy that could serve as a benchmark for other cities and at the national level. Overall, the activities benefit from the knowledge generated through collaborations between government counterparts, the World Bank, and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.

Contacts

World Bank/GFDRR Team a a , Se ior ater e o r e Ma a e e t S e ia i t Sa i ra r r , Se ior M S e ia i t Ma at a a at , Senior DRM Specialist; Tugkan Tanir, Urban Analyst;

[email protected] Counterpart: Azize Minaz, Engineer-Department of Flood Control in DSI; General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works Türkiye; Regional Directorate of State Hydraulic Works of Samsun; Disaster and Emergency Management Center (AFAD); MOAF (DG Water Management); Governorships; Municipalities; Provincial Directorates of the Ministry of Environment, Urbanisation and Climate Change; the Ministry of National Education; Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) active in the field of disaster response (UMKE, AKUT, etc.). www.gfdrr.org/en/taff

World Bank/GFDRR TAFF: [email protected]

Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111

Official Use Only

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EUROPEAN CIVIL PROTECTION AND HUMANITARIAN AID

OPERATIONS (ECHO) Strategy and Policy

Prevention and Preparedness Capacity Building

Brussels,

CORRESPONDENCE SLIP

Addressees: Directors-General for Civil Protection of the Member States and

Participating States of the Union Civil Protection Mechanisms;

Directors-General for Civil Protection of Kosovo (1);

Members of the Civil Protection Committee; Member States’

Permanent Representations and Participating States’ Permanent

Missions to the EU; Disaster Prevention Expert Group; Members of

the Union Civil Protection Knowledge Network Board

Subject: Invitation to submit an expression of interest to benefit from a project

under the Technical Assistance Financing Facility (TAFF)

Dear Directors-General,

This is an invitation to submit expressions of interest under the UCPM Technical

Assistance Financing Facility for Disaster Prevention and Preparedness (TAFF).

TAFF is an innovative technical assistance instrument launched in 2024 as a partnership

between the European Commission (DG ECHO) and the World Bank Group and its Global

Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR). TAFF aims to support EU

Member States and Participating States of the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM)

as well as Kosovo to increase their technical capacity for disaster prevention and

preparedness and support the implementation of the Union Disaster Resilience Goals. The

Facility provides access to tailor-made technical support through leading global expertise

on disaster and climate resilience.

The work programme (2) of the UCPM for 2021-2027 provides for a funding opportunity

to indirectly support Member States’ efforts in the field of disaster risk management

(1) This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and

the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence

(2) Commission Implementing Decision C(2025) 6902 final of 17.10.2025 on the financing of the Union

Civil Protection Mechanism and adopting a multiannual work programme for 2021-2027, repealing and

replacing Implementing Decision C(2024) 7235.

2

Official Use Only

(Action 5.4, Technical Assistance Financing Facility). As stipulated in the same document

(art. 5.5), the World Bank Group/GFDRR will implement activities of this action, given

the robust technical expertise and global practice of this organisation on disaster prevention

and preparedness and climate resilience.

The purpose of this action is to help national civil protection and other disaster risk

management authorities fill technical and/or financial gaps to preparing investments or to

strengthening their institutional and policy framework for disaster risk management.

Currently, 14 country-based TAFF projects are in implementation, with one project that

ended in 2025 (Iceland). A full overview of current TAFF engagement is presented in the

TAFF booklet (Annex 6).

Enclosed, you will find the guide for applicants setting out the scope and procedure for this

funding opportunity, the evaluation criteria as well as the template to be used for your

expression of interest. An overview of projects from the 2024 and 2025 calls is also

annexed.

The call for expressions of interest will be published on the TAFF and the UCP Knowledge

Network websites.

Your expression of interest should be submitted to [email protected], and

consulted with the World Bank/GFDRR prior to submission.

The deadline for submitting expressions of interest is 27 March 2026 at 23.59 CET.

Questions on eligibility and procedure should likewise be addressed to

[email protected] well in advance of the deadline for submitting expressions

of interest.

An on-line information day on Track 1 grants and TAFF will be organised on

Thursday 12 February 2026 from 10:00 to 12:30 CET. The agenda and other practical

details on the live streaming event will be published on the Union Civil Protection

Knowledge Network website. Participants will be able to ask questions via a dedicated

session on slido.com.

Yours faithfully,

[e-signed]

Contact: ECHO-CP-P&[email protected]

Erwan MARTEIL

Head of Unit

3

Official Use Only

Enclosures:

Annex 1: TAFF Factsheet

Annex 2: Guide for applicants

Annex 3: TAFF Expression of Interest (EOI) Template

Annex 4: TAFF Evaluation of the EOI Criteria

Annex 5: TAFF Indicative Table of Activities

Annex 6: TAFF Booklet with an overview of 2025 and 2024 projects

Questions and Answers

Agenda of the Info Day – 12 February 2026 (see next page)

4

Official Use Only

- INFORMATION DAY -

THURSDAY 12 FEBRUARY 2026, 10:00 – 12:30 CET

WEB STREAMING

10:00 Welcome of participants and preliminary remarks

Erwan Marteil, Head of Unit, B.3 Prevention and Preparedness Capacity Building, DG ECHO,

European Commission

10:10

10:20

Overview of Track 1 grants

Cristina Brailescu, Team Leader, DG ECHO B.3 Prevention and Preparedness Capacity Building

Overview of the call for proposals: call document and recommendations for a good

proposal

Juan Francisco Galvan Montero, Planning and Programming Officer, DG ECHO B.3

Application process: online platform and application form

Cristina Colaco, Call Coordinator, DG ECHO B.3

Questions & answers – slido.com

11:20 Wellbeing break

11:25 Introduction to the Technical Assistance Financing Facility (TAFF)

Christian Aagaard, Call Coordinator, DG ECHO B.3

Overview of the 2026 TAFF call for Expression of Interest, including process and form

Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Sr. Disaster Risk Management Specialist, World Bank; and Cristina Otano, Sr.

Operations Officer, Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR)

Questions & answers – slido.com

12:25

– 12.30

Concluding remarks

Electronically signed on 29/01/2026 09:48 (UTC+01) in accordance with Article 11 of Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2121

Official Use Only

Further information about the Technical Assistance Financing Facility for Disaster Prevention

and Preparedness is available on the webpage of the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction

and Recovery (GFDRR) website and the Union Civil Protection Knowledge Network (UCPKN)

website. Should you have any further questions or require additional information, please reach

out to us at [email protected].

Eligible Entities

Are only national authorities eligible to apply for TAFF, or can regional or municipal

authorities with disaster risk management responsibilities also apply?

Only national level civil protection authorities or authorities with disaster risk management

responsibilities from eligible countries are eligible to submit Expressions of Interest (EOI) for

TAFF. While regional or municipal authorities cannot submit expressions of interest as primary

applicants, they can be associated with activities proposed by national authorities or projects

may address specific regional challenges within a country, ensuring alignment with national

strategies.

Are national scientific organizations mandated by law to deal with specific disaster risk

management responsibilities considered eligible to submit an expression of interest for

TAFF?

National scientific organizations are not eligible to submit Expressions of Interest (EOI) for

TAFF. Only national civil protection authorities or authorities with disaster risk management

responsibilities are eligible to submit EOI for TAFF. However, national authorities can

coordinate/collaborate with scientific organizations on proposed activities to be implemented

by the World Bank/Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR), particularly

in areas where there are gaps/needs. Any involvement of scientific organizations must be

facilitated through the national authority and align with TAFF overarching objective.

Are national NGOs eligible?

National NGOs are not eligible to apply for TAFF as primary applicants Only national civil

protection authorities or authorities with disaster risk management responsibilities are eligible

to submit EOI for TAFF. NGOs may contribute to activities in collaboration with eligible national

authorities, provided that their participation is facilitated by the national authority and align with

TAFF overarching objective. No direct technical assistance can be provided to NGOs.

Questions and Answers

Official Use Only

Submission of Expressions of Interest

If my team wants to submit a project, what should we do?

The Call for Expressions of Interest and the Template for Expressions of Interest (EOI) are

available on the TAFF webpage (hosted by GFDRR) as well as on the UCPKN website. All

EOIs should be submitted to [email protected], within the deadline stipulated in

the call (by March 27, 2026, at 23:59 CET) following the template for the EOI. Please check

that your organization is an eligible entity. For any questions about the template for the EOI

(see Annex 3) or the procedure to follow, please contact [email protected].

How should beneficiaries estimate costs for projects managed by the World Bank?

Beneficiaries can provide an indicative estimate of the costs considering the implementation

timeline (up to 24 months) and the expected budget of activities ranging between €250,000 to

€750,000. The indicative cost helps to form a general idea of the project's financial scope and

feasibility of implementation. Once an Expressions of Interest (EOI) is approved, World Bank

teams will collaborate with beneficiaries to prepare a more detailed and accurate costing.

How can authorities with disaster risk management responsibilities prove that the

application is endorsed by the ministry?

EOIs submitted by eligible authorities with disaster risk management responsibilities other than

national civil protection (CP) authorities need endorsement by the CP agencies/ministries.

Authorities can prove that an Expression of Interest (EOI) for the TAFF is endorsed by including

confirmation from a legal representative of the agency/ministry in their EOI. This confirmation

can take various forms, such as an email or an official letter. The communication should state

the title of the project and the endorsing authority. It should also confirm that the proposed

project is in line with national priorities and needs. For instance, an email from the ministry

might state: "We hereby confirm that the project titled [Project Title] is endorsed by [Ministry

Name] and is consistent with our national disaster risk management priorities as noted in

[reference to strategy/plan for example], addressing the identified needs of [brief description

of needs]."

Types of Activities

Is the preparation of a project proposal and advice on possible funding opportunities

for that particular project idea an eligible activity under TAFF?

Entities interested in such assistance should contact [email protected] to discuss

their specific needs and to confirm what is eligible under TAFF. Examples of ongoing TAFF-

supported projects from the 2024 and 2025 calls can be accessed on TAFF website.

Official Use Only

Would the development of simplified cost option methodologies for disaster shelters

be eligible under the TAFF? How about detailed guidelines?

TAFF technical assistance implemented by the World Bank/ GFDRR can, in general, support

the development of methodologies and guidelines, such as for disaster shelters or other topics.

The eligibility will depend on the specific context and needs of the project. Entities interested

in such assistance should contact [email protected] to discuss specific needs and

to confirm eligibility under TAFF.

If the risk assessment for specific assets is a non-eligible activity, does that mean that

national risk analysis is also non-eligible?

National risk assessments are generally eligible under TAFF technical assistance executed by

the World Bank/Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR), but it is

important to consider the scope and cost parameters of the proposed activity and those of

TAFF. Comprehensive and granular risk assessments (with modelling, quantitative analysis,

etc.) are likely to exceed the funding limits under TAFF. TAFF activities include various types

of analytics, technical studies and recommendations for plans and strategies, piloting of

activities, development of different types of guidelines and/or support technical review and

provide recommendations, and capacity-building/training activities. A list of indicative activities

is provided below and in Annex 5 on the TAFF website. Entities interested in such assistance

should contact [email protected] to discuss their specific needs and to confirm

what is eligible under TAFF.

What about more technical trainings on information and communication technology

(ICT) processes and documentation, as well as DRM ICT project outsourcing for DRM

ICT project implementation?

The TAFF can in principle provide various trainings, with different levels of technical focus. The

eligibility will depend on the specific context and needs of the project. Entities interested in

such assistance should contact [email protected] to discuss their specific needs

and to confirm what is eligible under TAFF.

Official Use Only

Implementation of activities

Will the TAFF beneficiaries be involved in the selection of experts, and to what extent?

Is TAFF beneficiaries’ acceptance/agreement be required in order to engage expert(s)?

TAFF technical assistance is implemented (executed) by the World Bank/ GFDRR. Once

activities are approved (following shortlisting of EOIs), as part of the teams’ mobilisation,

beneficiaries would be asked for recommendations. While these recommendations are an

important consideration, the ultimate decision on which experts to mobilise rests with the World

Bank/GFDRR as implementing entities that ensure quality, timeliness, budget, as well as

reporting and all fiduciary aspects.

Do projects require co-financing?

No, TAFF activities do not require any co-financing. They are fully financed by the EC through

DG ECHO, and they are implemented by the World Bank/ GFDRR.

Do shortlisted beneficiary national authorities receive a grant from DG ECHO?

No, TAFF activities are implemented (executed) by the World Bank/ GFDRR, which is

responsible for the delivery of the technical assistance, project management, mobilisation of

experts, reporting (including to DG ECHO), and all fiduciary aspects. Staff of beneficiary

entities are not renumerated for coordination on TAFF projects.

Contact points

Who are the World Bank ECA Regional/Country Focal Points?

Applicants are encouraged to reach out to the following World Bank ECA Regional Focal Points

in preparation of their Expressions of Interest:

• EU Member States: Zuzana Stanton-Geddes [email protected]

• Poland: Jun Rentschler [email protected]

• Romania: Alexandra Calin [email protected]

• Ukraine: Oleksandra Shatyrko [email protected]

• Moldova: Guillermo Siercke [email protected]

• Albania and Serbia: Henrike Brecht [email protected]

• Kosovo: Anita Ellmauer Klambauer [email protected]

• North Macedonia: Noriko Oe [email protected]

• Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Türkiye: Salih Erdurmus

[email protected] and Tugkan Tanir [email protected]

Indicative timeline and Further information:

March 27, 2026:

Deadline for the submission of Expressions

of Interest by Countries.

April 29, 2026:

Official notification on shortlisting by DG

ECHO and World Bank/GFDRR.

World Bank/GFDRR TAFF team: [email protected] or https://www.gfdrr.org/en/taff European Commission/DG ECHO: [email protected] or https://civil-protection-knowledge-

network.europa.eu/technical-assistance-financing-facility-taff

Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111

Official Use Only

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EUROPEAN CIVIL PROTECTION AND HUMANITARIAN AID

OPERATIONS (ECHO) Strategy and Policy

Prevention and Preparedness Capacity Building

Brussels,

CORRESPONDENCE SLIP

Addressees: Directors-General for Civil Protection of the Member States and

Participating States of the Union Civil Protection Mechanisms;

Directors-General for Civil Protection of Kosovo (1);

Members of the Civil Protection Committee; Member States’

Permanent Representations and Participating States’ Permanent

Missions to the EU; Disaster Prevention Expert Group; Members of

the Union Civil Protection Knowledge Network Board

Subject: Invitation to submit an expression of interest to benefit from a project

under the Technical Assistance Financing Facility (TAFF)

Dear Directors-General,

This is an invitation to submit expressions of interest under the UCPM Technical

Assistance Financing Facility for Disaster Prevention and Preparedness (TAFF).

TAFF is an innovative technical assistance instrument launched in 2024 as a partnership

between the European Commission (DG ECHO) and the World Bank Group and its Global

Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR). TAFF aims to support EU

Member States and Participating States of the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM)

as well as Kosovo to increase their technical capacity for disaster prevention and

preparedness and support the implementation of the Union Disaster Resilience Goals. The

Facility provides access to tailor-made technical support through leading global expertise

on disaster and climate resilience.

The work programme (2) of the UCPM for 2021-2027 provides for a funding opportunity

to indirectly support Member States’ efforts in the field of disaster risk management

(1) This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and

the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence

(2) Commission Implementing Decision C(2025) 6902 final of 17.10.2025 on the financing of the Union

Civil Protection Mechanism and adopting a multiannual work programme for 2021-2027, repealing and

replacing Implementing Decision C(2024) 7235.

2

Official Use Only

(Action 5.4, Technical Assistance Financing Facility). As stipulated in the same document

(art. 5.5), the World Bank Group/GFDRR will implement activities of this action, given

the robust technical expertise and global practice of this organisation on disaster prevention

and preparedness and climate resilience.

The purpose of this action is to help national civil protection and other disaster risk

management authorities fill technical and/or financial gaps to preparing investments or to

strengthening their institutional and policy framework for disaster risk management.

Currently, 14 country-based TAFF projects are in implementation, with one project that

ended in 2025 (Iceland). A full overview of current TAFF engagement is presented in the

TAFF booklet (Annex 6).

Enclosed, you will find the guide for applicants setting out the scope and procedure for this

funding opportunity, the evaluation criteria as well as the template to be used for your

expression of interest. An overview of projects from the 2024 and 2025 calls is also

annexed.

The call for expressions of interest will be published on the TAFF and the UCP Knowledge

Network websites.

Your expression of interest should be submitted to [email protected], and

consulted with the World Bank/GFDRR prior to submission.

The deadline for submitting expressions of interest is 27 March 2026 at 23.59 CET.

Questions on eligibility and procedure should likewise be addressed to

[email protected] well in advance of the deadline for submitting expressions

of interest.

An on-line information day on Track 1 grants and TAFF will be organised on

Thursday 12 February 2026 from 10:00 to 12:30 CET. The agenda and other practical

details on the live streaming event will be published on the Union Civil Protection

Knowledge Network website. Participants will be able to ask questions via a dedicated

session on slido.com.

Yours faithfully,

[e-signed]

Contact: ECHO-CP-P&[email protected]

Erwan MARTEIL

Head of Unit

3

Official Use Only

Enclosures:

Annex 1: TAFF Factsheet

Annex 2: Guide for applicants

Annex 3: TAFF Expression of Interest (EOI) Template

Annex 4: TAFF Evaluation of the EOI Criteria

Annex 5: TAFF Indicative Table of Activities

Annex 6: TAFF Booklet with an overview of 2025 and 2024 projects

Questions and Answers

Agenda of the Info Day – 12 February 2026 (see next page)

4

Official Use Only

- INFORMATION DAY -

THURSDAY 12 FEBRUARY 2026, 10:00 – 12:30 CET

WEB STREAMING

10:00 Welcome of participants and preliminary remarks

Erwan Marteil, Head of Unit, B.3 Prevention and Preparedness Capacity Building, DG ECHO,

European Commission

10:10

10:20

Overview of Track 1 grants

Cristina Brailescu, Team Leader, DG ECHO B.3 Prevention and Preparedness Capacity Building

Overview of the call for proposals: call document and recommendations for a good

proposal

Juan Francisco Galvan Montero, Planning and Programming Officer, DG ECHO B.3

Application process: online platform and application form

Cristina Colaco, Call Coordinator, DG ECHO B.3

Questions & answers – slido.com

11:20 Wellbeing break

11:25 Introduction to the Technical Assistance Financing Facility (TAFF)

Christian Aagaard, Call Coordinator, DG ECHO B.3

Overview of the 2026 TAFF call for Expression of Interest, including process and form

Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Sr. Disaster Risk Management Specialist, World Bank; and Cristina Otano, Sr.

Operations Officer, Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR)

Questions & answers – slido.com

12:25

– 12.30

Concluding remarks

Electronically signed on 29/01/2026 09:48 (UTC+01) in accordance with Article 11 of Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2121

Official Use Only

Further information about the Technical Assistance Financing Facility for Disaster Prevention

and Preparedness is available on the webpage of the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction

and Recovery (GFDRR) website and the Union Civil Protection Knowledge Network (UCPKN)

website. Should you have any further questions or require additional information, please reach

out to us at [email protected].

Eligible Entities

Are only national authorities eligible to apply for TAFF, or can regional or municipal

authorities with disaster risk management responsibilities also apply?

Only national level civil protection authorities or authorities with disaster risk management

responsibilities from eligible countries are eligible to submit Expressions of Interest (EOI) for

TAFF. While regional or municipal authorities cannot submit expressions of interest as primary

applicants, they can be associated with activities proposed by national authorities or projects

may address specific regional challenges within a country, ensuring alignment with national

strategies.

Are national scientific organizations mandated by law to deal with specific disaster risk

management responsibilities considered eligible to submit an expression of interest for

TAFF?

National scientific organizations are not eligible to submit Expressions of Interest (EOI) for

TAFF. Only national civil protection authorities or authorities with disaster risk management

responsibilities are eligible to submit EOI for TAFF. However, national authorities can

coordinate/collaborate with scientific organizations on proposed activities to be implemented

by the World Bank/Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR), particularly

in areas where there are gaps/needs. Any involvement of scientific organizations must be

facilitated through the national authority and align with TAFF overarching objective.

Are national NGOs eligible?

National NGOs are not eligible to apply for TAFF as primary applicants Only national civil

protection authorities or authorities with disaster risk management responsibilities are eligible

to submit EOI for TAFF. NGOs may contribute to activities in collaboration with eligible national

authorities, provided that their participation is facilitated by the national authority and align with

TAFF overarching objective. No direct technical assistance can be provided to NGOs.

Questions and Answers

Official Use Only

Submission of Expressions of Interest

If my team wants to submit a project, what should we do?

The Call for Expressions of Interest and the Template for Expressions of Interest (EOI) are

available on the TAFF webpage (hosted by GFDRR) as well as on the UCPKN website. All

EOIs should be submitted to [email protected], within the deadline stipulated in

the call (by March 27, 2026, at 23:59 CET) following the template for the EOI. Please check

that your organization is an eligible entity. For any questions about the template for the EOI

(see Annex 3) or the procedure to follow, please contact [email protected].

How should beneficiaries estimate costs for projects managed by the World Bank?

Beneficiaries can provide an indicative estimate of the costs considering the implementation

timeline (up to 24 months) and the expected budget of activities ranging between €250,000 to

€750,000. The indicative cost helps to form a general idea of the project's financial scope and

feasibility of implementation. Once an Expressions of Interest (EOI) is approved, World Bank

teams will collaborate with beneficiaries to prepare a more detailed and accurate costing.

How can authorities with disaster risk management responsibilities prove that the

application is endorsed by the ministry?

EOIs submitted by eligible authorities with disaster risk management responsibilities other than

national civil protection (CP) authorities need endorsement by the CP agencies/ministries.

Authorities can prove that an Expression of Interest (EOI) for the TAFF is endorsed by including

confirmation from a legal representative of the agency/ministry in their EOI. This confirmation

can take various forms, such as an email or an official letter. The communication should state

the title of the project and the endorsing authority. It should also confirm that the proposed

project is in line with national priorities and needs. For instance, an email from the ministry

might state: "We hereby confirm that the project titled [Project Title] is endorsed by [Ministry

Name] and is consistent with our national disaster risk management priorities as noted in

[reference to strategy/plan for example], addressing the identified needs of [brief description

of needs]."

Types of Activities

Is the preparation of a project proposal and advice on possible funding opportunities

for that particular project idea an eligible activity under TAFF?

Entities interested in such assistance should contact [email protected] to discuss

their specific needs and to confirm what is eligible under TAFF. Examples of ongoing TAFF-

supported projects from the 2024 and 2025 calls can be accessed on TAFF website.

Official Use Only

Would the development of simplified cost option methodologies for disaster shelters

be eligible under the TAFF? How about detailed guidelines?

TAFF technical assistance implemented by the World Bank/ GFDRR can, in general, support

the development of methodologies and guidelines, such as for disaster shelters or other topics.

The eligibility will depend on the specific context and needs of the project. Entities interested

in such assistance should contact [email protected] to discuss specific needs and

to confirm eligibility under TAFF.

If the risk assessment for specific assets is a non-eligible activity, does that mean that

national risk analysis is also non-eligible?

National risk assessments are generally eligible under TAFF technical assistance executed by

the World Bank/Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR), but it is

important to consider the scope and cost parameters of the proposed activity and those of

TAFF. Comprehensive and granular risk assessments (with modelling, quantitative analysis,

etc.) are likely to exceed the funding limits under TAFF. TAFF activities include various types

of analytics, technical studies and recommendations for plans and strategies, piloting of

activities, development of different types of guidelines and/or support technical review and

provide recommendations, and capacity-building/training activities. A list of indicative activities

is provided below and in Annex 5 on the TAFF website. Entities interested in such assistance

should contact [email protected] to discuss their specific needs and to confirm

what is eligible under TAFF.

What about more technical trainings on information and communication technology

(ICT) processes and documentation, as well as DRM ICT project outsourcing for DRM

ICT project implementation?

The TAFF can in principle provide various trainings, with different levels of technical focus. The

eligibility will depend on the specific context and needs of the project. Entities interested in

such assistance should contact [email protected] to discuss their specific needs

and to confirm what is eligible under TAFF.

Official Use Only

Implementation of activities

Will the TAFF beneficiaries be involved in the selection of experts, and to what extent?

Is TAFF beneficiaries’ acceptance/agreement be required in order to engage expert(s)?

TAFF technical assistance is implemented (executed) by the World Bank/ GFDRR. Once

activities are approved (following shortlisting of EOIs), as part of the teams’ mobilisation,

beneficiaries would be asked for recommendations. While these recommendations are an

important consideration, the ultimate decision on which experts to mobilise rests with the World

Bank/GFDRR as implementing entities that ensure quality, timeliness, budget, as well as

reporting and all fiduciary aspects.

Do projects require co-financing?

No, TAFF activities do not require any co-financing. They are fully financed by the EC through

DG ECHO, and they are implemented by the World Bank/ GFDRR.

Do shortlisted beneficiary national authorities receive a grant from DG ECHO?

No, TAFF activities are implemented (executed) by the World Bank/ GFDRR, which is

responsible for the delivery of the technical assistance, project management, mobilisation of

experts, reporting (including to DG ECHO), and all fiduciary aspects. Staff of beneficiary

entities are not renumerated for coordination on TAFF projects.

Contact points

Who are the World Bank ECA Regional/Country Focal Points?

Applicants are encouraged to reach out to the following World Bank ECA Regional Focal Points

in preparation of their Expressions of Interest:

• EU Member States: Zuzana Stanton-Geddes [email protected]

• Poland: Jun Rentschler [email protected]

• Romania: Alexandra Calin [email protected]

• Ukraine: Oleksandra Shatyrko [email protected]

• Moldova: Guillermo Siercke [email protected]

• Albania and Serbia: Henrike Brecht [email protected]

• Kosovo: Anita Ellmauer Klambauer [email protected]

• North Macedonia: Noriko Oe [email protected]

• Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Türkiye: Salih Erdurmus

[email protected] and Tugkan Tanir [email protected]

Indicative timeline and Further information:

March 27, 2026:

Deadline for the submission of Expressions

of Interest by Countries.

April 29, 2026:

Official notification on shortlisting by DG

ECHO and World Bank/GFDRR.

World Bank/GFDRR TAFF team: [email protected] or https://www.gfdrr.org/en/taff European Commission/DG ECHO: [email protected] or https://civil-protection-knowledge-

network.europa.eu/technical-assistance-financing-facility-taff