Vastus pöördumisele

Dokumendiregister	Rahandusministeerium
Viit	12.2-7/41-2
Registreeritud	16.02.2026
Sünkroonitud	17.02.2026
Liik	Väljaminev kiri
Funktsioon	12.2 RIIGIHANGETEALANE TEGEVUS
Sari	12.2-7 Vaidlustuskomisjoni üldine kirjavahetus
Toimik	12.2-7/2026
Juurdepääsupiirang	Avalik
Juurdepääsupiirang
Adressaat	PLM Group Suomi Oy
Saabumis/saatmisviis	PLM Group Suomi Oy
Vastutaja	Mari-Ann Sinimaa (Rahandusministeerium, Kantsleri vastutusvaldkond, Ühisosakond, Dokumendihaldustalitus)
Originaal	Ava uues aknas

Failid

RE Reference number 305599.msg

image001.png

image002.png

RE Reference number 305599.msg

From: Riigihangete vaidlustuskomisjon - RAM <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:10:49 +0000
To: Henri Peltomaa <[email protected]>
Cc: Mari-Ann Sinimaa - RAM <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Reference number: 305599

Hello,

Dear Mr Peltomaa

With regard to your question concerning the public procurement procedure “3D printer” (reference number 305599), we kindly ask you to contact the contracting entity, i.e. ADDform OÜ.

The Public Procurement Review Committee (hereinafter the Review Committee) examines disputes related to public procurement; however, it cannot provide information or explanations regarding the specific circumstances of a particular procurement procedure (such information is simply not available to the Review Committee).

The Review Committee further clarifies that the ADDform OÜ procurement “3D printer” (reference number 305599) is a so-called beneficiary purchase (ADDform OÜ is not a contracting authority within the meaning of the Public Procurement Act), and therefore it cannot be challenged before the Review Committee.

Kind regards,

Taivo Kivistik

Member of the Review Committee

From: Henri Peltomaa <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2026 3:38 PM
To: Riigihangete vaidlustuskomisjon - RAM <[email protected]>
Subject: Reference number: 305599

Tähelepanu! Tegemist on välisvõrgust saabunud kirjaga.
Tundmatu saatja korral palume linke ja faile mitte avada.

Hello,

We submitted an offer to a public tender. Reference number is 305599.

I was reviewing our answers in the documents that were created after submitting. I noticed an odd thing. In the "grounds of exclusion and selection criteria" there was a question:

"Purely national exclusion grounds: restriction of the participant based on the residence or location of the entrepreneur. Does the entrepreneur violate the restriction imposed by the procurer to submit an offer or request?"

I interpret that this question is asking if our company violates the terms, and the answer is no.

Then when looking at the PDF document that was created after submitting the question has changed. Please see below:

"Ettevõtjalt oodatavad vastused:

1. The Tenderer confirms that they are not from a third world country:

Vastus: Ei"

Now it shows that we have answered "no" to a different question that originally was asked. And we interpret that answering "no" to this question is considered to be ground for exclusion.

A clarification for this topic would be highly appreciated.

Best Regards

Henri Peltomaa
Business Development Manager
+358 2970 500 124

Part of PLM Group Suomi Oy
FIN - Puutarhakatu 53, 20100 Turku
Tel: +358 2970500120- www.addinor.fi

Varaa aika tavataksesi minut

Seosed

Nimi	K.p.	Δ	Viit	Tüüp	Org	Osapooled
Reference number: 305599	16.02.2026	1	12.2-7/41-1	Sissetulev kiri	ram	PLM Group Suomi Oy