| Dokumendiregister | Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet |
| Viit | 2.1-3/13719-1 |
| Registreeritud | 17.04.2026 |
| Sünkroonitud | 22.04.2026 |
| Liik | Väljaminev kiri |
| Funktsioon | 2.1 Avaliku korra tagamine |
| Sari | 2.1-3 Juriidiliste ja füüsiliste isikute märgukirjad, selgitustaotlused, taotlused ja avaldused |
| Toimik | 2.1-3/2026 |
| Juurdepääsupiirang | Avalik |
| Juurdepääsupiirang | |
| Adressaat | UndressMe AI |
| Saabumis/saatmisviis | UndressMe AI |
| Vastutaja | Eduard Kamenski (Põhja prefektuur, teabebüroo, veebikogukonna grupp) |
| Originaal | Ava uues aknas |
Pärnu mnt 139 / 15060 Tallinn / [email protected] / www.politsei.ee
Registry code 70008747
FOR INTERNAL USE
Notation made on:
Final date:
Basis:
Holder of information: Police and Border
Guard Board
UndressMe AI
Your ref no
Our ref 17.04.2026 no 2.1-3/13719-1
Procedural notice and request for
assistance to counter the threat
Police and Border Guard Board of the Republic of Estonia (hereinafter referred to as PBGB) is
contacting the organization UndressMe AI as the operator of the artificial intelligence content
generation tool (hereinafter referred to as the Program) regarding information indicating
possible misuse of the Program for the creation of material depicting minors in sexually explicit
or suggestive contexts.
The purpose of this notice is to inform the service provider of the suspected misuse of its service
and to request the provider’s observations and information regarding the measures taken to
prevent such misuse.
1.1 Legal framework
According to § 178 of the Estonian Penal Code, it is prohibited to produce, acquire, store,
display or distribute material depicting a person under eighteen years of age in a pornographic
or erotic situation (Karistusseadustik, § 178).
The interpretation of erotic content involving minors has been clarified in Estonian case law.
The Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court has held that erotic content may also be present
where otherwise ordinary situations are depicted but the focus of the material is recognisably
directed towards the naked bodies of children and the representation has no other meaningful
context (Riigikohus, 2017). The Tallinn Circuit Court has further stated that erotic content may
occur even in depictions of ordinary life situations where the visual focus is deliberately
directed at children’s bodies in a sexualised manner (Tallinna Ringkonnakohus, 2022).
At the European Union level, Directive 2011/93/EU on combating the sexual abuse and sexual
exploitation of children defines child sexual abuse material as including any material depicting
a person under eighteen years of age in a real or simulated sexually explicit situation (European
Parliament & Council of the European Union, 2011). Recent legislative developments at the
European Union level further clarify that such material may also include realistic images or
pseudophotographs generated through artificial intelligence or similar technologies (European
Parliament, 2025).
Under § 6 subsection 1 of the Estonian Law Enforcement Act, a law enforcement agency is an
authority authorised by law to perform state supervision. Pursuant to § 6 subsection 2 of the
same Act, where the ascertainment and countering of a threat or elimination of a disturbance
FOR INTERNAL USE
2 (5)
does not fall within the competence of another authority, it is within the competence of the
police. In accordance with § 30 subsection 1 of the Law Enforcement Act, the police may
question a person if there is reason to believe that the person possesses information necessary
for preventing or countering a threat or eliminating a disturbance within the competence of the
authority (Korrakaitseseadus, § 6; § 30).
In accordance with § 40 subsection 1 of the Administrative Procedure Act, before issuing an
administrative act, an administrative authority shall grant the participant in proceedings the
opportunity to present their opinion and objections. Where such an opportunity has been granted
but the participant does not respond within the specified time limit, the authority may proceed
with issuing an administrative act on the basis of the information available (Haldusmenetluse
seadus, § 40).
In addition, pursuant to Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 (Digital Services Act),
the competent authority has the power to require providers of intermediary services and other
relevant persons to provide information necessary for the performance of supervisory tasks
without undue delay. Where such requested information is not provided, Article 51(2) of the
Digital Services Act empowers the competent authority to adopt enforcement measures,
including the issuance of binding orders to ensure compliance with applicable legal obligations
(European Parliament & Council of the European Union, 2022).
Accordingly, where the requested explanations or information are not provided within the
specified time limit, the competent authority is entitled to proceed with the issuance of a binding
administrative order in order to ensure compliance with applicable legal requirements and to
prevent the continued availability or dissemination of potentially unlawful content.
1.2 Information received by the Police and Border Guard Board
According to information received by PBGB, there are references indicating that the Program
operated by UndressMe AI may have been used to generate images depicting persons appearing
to be minors in sexually suggestive or pornographic situations. At this time we have information
about 3 of such cases.
The descriptions of the material indicate that the generated content depicting faces of real
persons appearing to be under the age of fourteen in pornographic situations.
Although PBGB has not at this stage captured specific URLs, image hashes or user account
identifiers associated with the content, the available information indicates that the material may
have been generated using the Program and shared through online environments.
Such content may fall within the scope of material depicting minors in pornographic or erotic
situations within the meaning of § 178 of the Penal Code.
PBGB also notes that according to the Terms of Service, the Program uses automated
mechanisms intended to detect attempts to upload images of minors and maintains logs of such
attempts for a period of up to six years. PBGB therefore requests confirmation whether such
detection mechanisms have identified any attempts to generate or upload content involving
minors and whether corresponding logs exist that could assist in assessing the potential misuse
of the Program related to Estonia.
1.3 Terms of service of the service provider
PBGB notes that the publicly available Terms of Service of the Program contain provisions
prohibiting the creation of such material.
FOR INTERNAL USE
3 (5)
In particular, the Terms of Service state that:
• uploading, attempting to create or generating content involving minors is strictly prohibited
• any content involving child abuse or exploitation, including images or artistic depictions of
minors in sexual or suggestive contexts, is prohibited
• users must not upload or generate reference images involving minors.
These provisions demonstrate that the service provider itself recognizes the risk of misuse of
the Program for generating content involving minors.
1.4 Possible misuse of the service
According to the information available to PBGB, the suspected misuse may involve:
• generating synthetic content depicting minors in pornographic situations
• generating content based on prompts describing minors in pornographic contexts
• sharing such generated material through external platforms.
Where such activity occurs, it may constitute the production or dissemination of material
depicting minors in erotic or pornographic situations within the meaning of § 178 of the Penal
Code.
In addition, where real or identifiable individuals are used as a reference for generating
synthetic sexual images, the conduct may also raise issues related to the unlawful use of another
person’s identity or personal data under § 157¹ and § 157² of the Penal Code.
1.5 Request for information
PBGB requests UndressMe AI to provide information and observations regarding the
following:
whether the service provider has detected attempts to generate images depicting minors
in sexual or suggestive contexts using the Program
what technical measures are implemented in the Program to prevent the creation of such
content
whether any content moderation or automated detection mechanisms are used to identify
prompts or generated images involving minors
whether the service provider retains logs, metadata or other information regarding
generated content which could assist in identifying such misuse
whether the service provider has previously reported similar incidents to competent
authorities.
whether the generation of content through the Program requires the use of Gems or other
paid tokens and whether records of such transactions are retained.
PBGB also requests information regarding whether the Program stores generated content or
corresponding hash values that could be used for identification of such material.
1.6 Request for cooperation
PBGB emphasizes that the purpose of this notice is to inform the service provider of potential
misuse of the Program and to encourage cooperation in preventing the generation or
dissemination of material harmful to children.
PBGB invites UndressMe AI to provide information on the measures taken or planned to
strengthen safeguards preventing the generation of such material.
PBGB also requests information regarding the appropriate contact channel for potential law
enforcement cooperation in the event that further investigation becomes necessary.
FOR INTERNAL USE
4 (5)
1.7 Deadline for response
PBGB requests UndressMe AI to submit its observations and the requested information within
30 days from the receipt of this notice.
Responses may be submitted electronically to the Police and Border Guard Board via the
designated contact channel [email protected]
2. Recommendations for internal review
In light of the information described above, PBGB recommends UndressMe AI to initiate an
internal review in order to assess whether the Program may have been used to generate content
involving minors in sexual or suggestive contexts.
PBGB recommends that the internal review includes,
where technically possible: verification of whether prompts or reference inputs
describing minors have been submitted to the Program
review of generated outputs that may depict minors in sexualized situations
assessment of whether such content may have been generated or stored within the
Program infrastructure
identification of user accounts involved in the generation or distribution of such material
preservation of relevant logs, metadata and other technical information that may assist
in determining the origin and distribution of the material.
PBGB further requests that any information identified during such review that may indicate the
creation or dissemination of child sexual abuse material be preserved in accordance with the
applicable legal requirements and, where relevant, communicated to the competent law
enforcement authorities.
The purpose of this request is to prevent the potential misuse of the Program and to support the
protection of children in online environments.
3 References
European Parliament. (2025). Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the
Council on combating child sexual abuse and child sexual exploitation. https://eur-
lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025AP0116
European Parliament, & Council of the European Union. (2011). Directive 2011/93/EU of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on combating the sexual abuse
and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography. https://eur-
lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/93/oj
European Parliament, & Council of the European Union. (2022). Regulation (EU) 2022/2065
of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a single market for
digital services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act). https://eur-
lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj
Riigikohus. (2017). Criminal Chamber judgment No. 1-16-5792
https://www.riigikohus.ee/et/lahendid?asjaNr=1-16-5792/101
Tallinna Ringkonnakohus. (2022). Judgment No. 1-21-7004.
https://www.riigiteataja.ee/kohtulahendid/detailid.html?id=312681027
Republic of Estonia. (2025). Penal Code.
https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/507052025001/consolide
Republic of Estonia (2023). Administrative Procedure Act.
https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/505122023003/consolide
FOR INTERNAL USE
5 (5)
Yours sincerely
(Digitally signed)
Eduard Kamenski
Senior Commissioner
North Prefecture, Information Bureau, Web
Community Group
Web Police Officer
Eduard Kamenski, +3726125840, [email protected]
| Nimi | K.p. | Δ | Viit | Tüüp | Org | Osapooled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vastuskiri | 20.04.2026 | 2 | 2.1-3/13719-2 | Sissetulev kiri | ppa | UndressMe Support |