Review data check for publication
| Dokumendiregister | Rahandusministeerium |
| Viit | 12.2-7/347-1 |
| Registreeritud | 03.12.2025 |
| Sünkroonitud | 04.12.2025 |
| Liik | Sissetulev kiri |
| Funktsioon | 12.2 RIIGIHANGETEALANE TEGEVUS |
| Sari | 12.2-7 Vaidlustuskomisjoni üldine kirjavahetus |
| Toimik | 12.2-7/2025 |
| Juurdepääsupiirang | Avalik |
| Juurdepääsupiirang | |
| Adressaat | Network of First Instance Public Procurement Review Bodies |
| Saabumis/saatmisviis | Network of First Instance Public Procurement Review Bodies |
| Vastutaja | Angelika Timusk (Rahandusministeerium, Riigihangete vaidlustuskomisjon) |
| Originaal | Ava uues aknas |
Failid
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 14:49:58 +0000
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: D'ACUNTO Salvatore <[email protected]>; PALMERO ZURDO Javier <[email protected]>; FRICOVA Vitezslava <[email protected]>
Subject: [vako] Review data check for publication in the Single Market Scoreboard
Importance: High
Tähelepanu! Tegemist on välisvõrgust saabunud kirjaga. |
Dear members of the Network, Dear colleagues,
We are contacting you following our debate in Copenhagen about the forthcoming publication (early 2026) of the number of the first instance review decisions in the next year edition of the Single Market Scoreboard. Since we want to be sure that we publish correct data, we would like to share the input with you for the last check.
Please find enclosed 3 documents:
- 1. Detailed description of what should be counted among the first instance review decisions. Please read it carefully and let us know any questions you may have. The description takes into account the debates in the past, so it should reflect some of your national specificities, but if you still identify a case that is not covered, please let us know. If you cannot provide data as indicated, please let us know in order we include this information in the “disclaimer” that will be published together with the data.
- 2. Document containing “disclaimer” on the data. Please insert your disclaimer only if your data do not cover some of the decisions as indicated in the first document.
- 3. Table with data for 2023 and 2024 for your check and possible correction.
The number of the first instance review decisions will be presented together with the proportion of the first instance review decisions on the number of calls for competition from your respective countries taken from TED (you don’t need to give us this number). Therefore, there will be two graphs per year, absolute numbers + relative numbers.
We would be grateful if you could give us you feedback until the end of this week (5/12/2025) – please send your confirmation and/or your questions directly to Vita ([email protected]).
Thank you very much for your cooperation!
Network of First Instance Public Procurement Review Bodies
European Commission
Unit GROW.E2 – Enforcement II
B-1049 Brussels/Belgium
e-mail: [email protected]
Austria – Number of decisions is an estimate.
Belgium – The number of decisions covers only the judgments of the Belgian Council of State that reviews the public procurement decisions of administrative authorities. The public procurement decisions of contracting authorities that are not administrative authorities are reviewed by the ordinary courts and are not covered. The number covers the review of public contracts both above and below the EU thresholds.
Bulgaria – The number of decisions covers the review of public contracts both above and below the EU thresholds.
Denmark – The number of decisions covers cases adjudicated on the merits, decisions on rejection of ineligible complaints and decisions on interim measures (suspensive effect) containing an assessment of the case, which led to the withdrawal of the complaint before the review body’s final decision was made.
France – The number of decisions covers the review of public contracts both above and below the EU thresholds.
Germany – The number of decisions covers only decisions on merits and no other type of proceedings or closure.
Slovakia – The number of decisions does not cover the decisions on contract ineffectiveness.
2024
2023
AT
391
300
BE
452
363
BG
1091
701
CY
49
49
CZ
183
160
DE
474
549
DK
54
82
EE
133
102
EL
832
1020
ES
1665
FI
380
430
FR
650
HR
677
517
HU
482
344
IE
IS
44
47
IT
2735
LI
LT
303
288
LU
19
6
LV
244
280
MT
115
NL
98
112
NO
PL
3209
2449
PT
197
178
RO
3683
3057
SE
2816
2878
SI
98
98
SK
254
241
• First instance review decisions of all relevant bodies, regardless of whether they are administrative or judicial; regardless of whether they are national, regional or local. If you cannot provide numbers from all first instance review bodies, please let us know.
• Decisions that are taken in review procedures initiated upon complaint.
• Decisions of all types:
a. Decisions on review
b. Decisions on interim measures (if containing the assessment of the case and if they are the only decision taken in the procedure, not decisions on interim measures issued as a simple procedural decision within the main review procedure)
c. Decisions about suspension of the review for any reasons (i.e. withdrawal of the complaint, fee/deposit not paid, no legal standing, late submission of the complaint etc.)
• Decisions on review procedures on public contracts falling under the EU directives1 (i.e. above EU thresholds, including exemptions and exceptions). If you count above and below EU threshold public contracts together and you cannot disaggregate the result, please let us know.
• Decisions on review for before and after contract signature. If you cannot provide numbers of decisions after contract signature (decisions on contract ineffectiveness), please let us know.
•
Seosed
| Nimi | K.p. | Δ | Viit | Tüüp | Org | Osapooled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vastus pöördumisele | 03.12.2025 | 1 | 12.2-7/347-2 | Väljaminev kiri | ram | Network of First Instance Public Procurement Review Bodies |