Teade

1

Lisa 7

Varjupaiga-, Rände- ja Integratsioonifond/ Sisejulgeolekufond

JUHISED EMBLEEMIDE JA STANDARDVÄRVIDE

KASUTAMISE KOHTA

1. EUROOPA LIIDU EMBLEEM

Euroopa Liidu logo saab alla laadida aadressilt:

http://europa.eu/about-eu/basic-information/symbols/flag/index_et.htm

SÜMBOLITE KIRJELDUS

Kaksteist kuldset tähte moodustavad taevasinisel taustal ringi, mis sümboliseerib Euroopa

rahvaste ühtsust. Tähekeste arv on kindlaks määratud – kaksteist on täiuslikkuse ja ühtsuse

sümbol.

HERALDILINE KIRJELDUS

Taevassinisel taustal on ring kaheteistkümnest kuldsest tähest, mille tipud kokku ei puutu.

GEOMEETRILINE KIRJELDUS

2

Embleemiks on sinine ristkülikukujuline lipp, mille laius on poolteist korda lipu kõrgus. Lipu

keskel asub kaksteist võrdsete vahedega kuldset tähte, mis moodustavad mõttelise ringjoone,

mille keskpunkt asub ristküliku diagonaalide ristumiskohas. Ringi raadius on 1/3 lipu

kõrgusest. Igal tähel on viis nurka, mis asuvad mõttelise ringjoone sees. Selle ringjoone raadius

on 1/18 lipu kõrgusest. Kõik tähed on püstiasendis, st. üks nurk on vertikaalselt suunaga üles

ning kahe külgmise nurga tippude vahele tõmmatud sirge asetseb lipumastiga risti. Tähering on

paigutatud selliselt, et iga täht vastab ühele täistunnile kella numbrilaual. Nende arv on

muutumatu.

VÄRVIDE KASUTAMINE

Embleemi värvid on järgmised: PANTONE REFLEX BLUE – ristküliku pinna jaoks;

PANTONE YELLOW – tähtede jaoks.

Neljavärviprotsess

Kui kasutatakse neljavärviprotsessi, ei ole võimalik kasutada kahte standardvärvi. Seepärast

tuleb need saavutada protsessis nelja värviga.

PANTONE YELLOW saadakse 100% „Process Yellow“ kasutamise teel.

PANTONE REFLEX BLUE saadakse, segades 100% „Process Cyan`i“ ja 80% „Process

Magenta't“.

Internet

PANTONE REFLEX BLUE vastab veebi värvipaleti värvile RGB:0/51/153

(kuueteistkümnendsüsteemis: 000099) ja PANTONE YELLOW vastab veebi värvipaleti

värvile RGB:255/204/0 (kuueteistkümnendsüsteemis: FFCC00)

Ühe värvi kasutamine

Kasutades ainult musta värvi, siis peab ristküliku raam olema must ning tähed tuleb trükkida

mustana valgel taustal.

3

Kasutades ainult sinist värvi (Reflex Blue), trükitakse kogu taust sinine ning tähed valgena

negatiivis.

Trükkimine värvilisele taustale

Kui värvilisest taustast loobuda ei saa, peab ristkülikule ümber trükkima valge piirjoone

laiusega 1/25 ristküliku kõrgusest.

2. MINISTEERIUMI LOGO

Siseministeeriumi logo kasutamine on reguleeritud valitsusasutuste ühise visuaalse identiteedi

stiilijuhisega. Ministeeriumi logode failide saamiseks palume pöörduda toetuslepingus

sätestatud kontaktisiku poole. Logode kasutamise infokandjatel peab eelnevalt

kooskõlastama Siseministeeriumiga.

Logo koosneb sümbolist, milleks on kolm lõvi ning asutuse nimetusest. Kolme lõviga logo

sümboliseerib valitsusasutuste avatust ja uuendusmeelsust.

Infokandjatel ja turundusprojektides (sh mapp, kuulutus, pressiteade, pressisein, flaier, voldik,

meened (nt pastapliiats, helkur), (väli)reklaam, veebibännerid, sotsiaalmeedia, plakatid, roll-

up, presentatsioonid jms) kasutatakse tavapäraselt kolme lõviga logo.

4

LOGODE VÄRVID

Kolme lõviga logo eeliskasutus on täisvärvides (PMS 285 C/U, CMYK 100/45/0/0, RGB

0/110/181; PMS Process Black C/U, CMYK 0/0/0/100, RGB 0/0/0. Virtuaalruumis kasutatakse

kahevärvilist RGB värvides logo. Trükkimisel võib kasutada nii Pantone- kui CMYKtrükki.

Viimasel juhul võib logo olla nii nelja- kui ühevärviline. Musta või valge ühevärvilise kolme

lõviga logo kasutamisel peab infokandja kujundus olema samuti ühevärviline.

LOGODE PAIGUTUS

Logod paigutatakse üldjuhul heledale taustale. Logo võib kasutada tumedal taustal, kui

trükitehniliselt ei ole võimalik luua valget tausta või kasutada Pantone- või CMYK trükki. Siis

kasutatakse logo trükkimisel kuldset või hõbedast fooliotrükki.

TURVAALA

Logode turvaalad on kindlaks määratud ruudustikuga, millel logod paiknevad.

5

MÕÕTMED

Logo minimaalse suuruse määrab ära sümboli kõrgus. Kolme lõviga logo miinimumkõrgus on

12 mm. Kui kujundus tingib miinimumist väiksema logo kasutamise, siis kasutatakse ainult

asutuse nimetust Roboto kirjatüübis või kolme lõvi.

3. INFOTAHVEL

Kui füüsilise objekti maksumus on üle 100 000 euro, paneb toetuse saaja üles alalise ja

silmapaistva tahvli 3 kuu jooksul pärast projekti lõppemist.

Infotahvel peab vastama järgmistele tingimustele:

 tahvel peab olema paigaldatud avalikkusele nähtavasse kohta, mis asub soetatud või

ehitatud objekti vahetus läheduses;

 tahvlil peab olema EL-i ja Siseministeeriumi logo, millele eraldatakse vähemalt 25%

tahvli pindalast;

 tahvlil peab olema projekti pealkiri ja tunnus proportsionaalselt samas suuruses

logodega;

 tahvlil peab olema tunnuslause: „Objekti soetamist/valmimist rahastasid Euroopa Liit

Varjupaiga-, Rände- ja Integratsioonifondi/ Sisejulgeolekufondi kaudu ning

Siseministeerium“.

6

Näidis.

PROJEKTI PEALKIRI JA

NUMBER Projekti pealkiri peab olema

samas proportsioonis logode

suurusega.

Logod peavad moodustama

25% infotahvli pindalast.

LISA 9

SISEJULGEOLEKUFONDI PERIOODI 2014–2020 KULUDE

ABIKÕLBLIKKUSE REEGLID

Juhend toetuse taotlejale ja projekti elluviijale

Muudatused võrreldes 17.10.2018. a kinnitatud versiooniga:

- täpsustatud alla 1500 eurose maksumusega asjade soetamise ja teenuste hankimise

põhimõtte sõnastust. Siseministeeriumile peab esitama tõendava dokumentatsiooni,

kui toodete või teenuste eeldatav maksumus ühe kalendriaasta jooksul on võrdne või

suurem kui 1500 eurot (ilma km-ta). Läbipaistvuse tagamiseks peab võtma erinevaid

pakkumisi või võrdlema hinnakirju olenemata maksumusest (p. 1.6);

- täpsustatud kulu tõendavatele dokumentidele märgitava teabe loetelu (p. 2.4);

- täpsustatud tööjõukulude abikõlblikkuse tingimuste sõnastust (p. 6.1.4 ja 6.1.6);

- kustutatud punkt 6.5 „Eksperditasud“, sest need kulud on abikõlblikud tööjõukulude

või muude otseste kuludena.

aprill 2019

2

Sisukord

SISSEJUHATUS ................................................................................................................... 3

KASUTATUD LÜHENDID ................................................................................................. 4

KASUTATUD MÕISTED .................................................................................................... 4

ÜLDREEGLID ...................................................................................................................... 6

1. PEAMISED PÕHIMÕTTED ....................................................................................... 6

2. PROJEKTI KULUSID TÕENDAVAD DOKUMENDID ......................................... 7

3. PARTNERLUS .............................................................................................................. 7

4. PROJEKTI EELARVE JA MITTETULUNDUSLIKKUSE PÕHIMÕTE ............. 8

5. HANGETE LÄBIVIIMINE .......................................................................................... 8

PROJEKTI ABIKÕLBLIKUD KULUD ............................................................................... 9

6. OTSESED ABIKÕLBLIKUD KULUD ....................................................................... 9

6.1 TÖÖJÕUKULUD ........................................................................................................... 9

6.2 SÕIDU- JA LÄHETUSKULUD .................................................................................. 11

6.3 SEADMETE SOETAMISE, ÜÜRIMISE JA LIISIMISE KULUD ............................. 11

6.4 KINNISVARA OSTMISE, EHITAMISE, RENOVEERIMISE VÕI ÜÜRIMISE

KULUD ........................................................................................................................ 13

6.5 EKSPERDITASUD ......................................... Tõrge! Järjehoidjat pole määratletud.

6.6 AVALIKUSTAMISEGA SEOTUD NÕUETEST TULENEVAD KULUD ............... 14

7. KAUDSED ABIKÕLBLIKUD KULUD ................................................................... 15

8. ABIKÕLBMATUD KULUD ...................................................................................... 15

9. DOKUMENTIDE SÄILITAMINE JA KONTROLLIMINE ................................. 16

LISA 1. Tööajatabeli/üleandmise-vastuvõtmise akti näidis ................................................ 18

LISA 2. Sõidupäeviku näidis 1 ............................................................................................ 19

LISA 3. Sõidupäeviku näidis 2 ............................................................................................ 20

3

SISSEJUHATUS

Juhend on koostatud toetuse taotlejale ja projekti elluviijale, selgitamaks Sisejulgeolekufondi

(edaspidi ISF) perioodi 2014–2020 kulude abikõlblikkuse reegleid.

Juhendis on abikõlblikkuse reegleid kirjeldatud ISF-i horisontaalse määruse artiklite 17, 18 ja

19 alusel ning lähtudes riigisisestest õigusaktidest. Vaidluste tekkimisel võetakse aluseks ISF-i

erimäärustes, horisontaalses määruses ning rakendus- ja delegeeritud aktides sätestatu.

Küsimustes, mida käesolevas juhendis ei käsitleta, peab konsulteerima Siseministeeriumi

(edaspidi SiM) välisvahendite osakonna kui ISF-i rakendamise eest vastutava asutusega, kes

vajadusel konsulteerib Euroopa Komisjoniga.

4

KASUTATUD LÜHENDID

AA Auditeerimisasutus

EK Euroopa Komisjon

EL Euroopa Liit

ISF Sisejulgeolekufond

JK Järelevalvekomisjon

MTA Maksu- ja Tolliamet

RHS Riigihangete seadus

SiM Siseministeerium

VA Vastutav asutus

VV Vabariigi Valitsus

KASUTATUD MÕISTED

Abikõlblik kulu Abikõlblikkuse reeglites nimetatud kulu, mis on kooskõlas

riigisiseste ja EL-i õigusaktidega, sh horisontaalse määrusega.

Abikõlblikkuse

periood

Toetuslepingus sätestatud rahaliste vahendite kasutamise alguse ja

lõpptähtaja vaheline periood. Ajavahemik, mille jooksul peab

projekti abikõlblik kulu olema tekkinud ja tegevused ellu viidud (s.o

tööd tehtud, teenused osutatud ja tooted tarnitud). Makseid võib teha

ka pärast abikõlblikkuse perioodi lõppu, kuid mitte peale projekti

lõpparuande esitamist. Projekti abikõlblikkuse perioodi algusaeg

sätestatakse toetuslepingus. ISF-i riikliku programmi abikõlblikkuse

periood kestab 1. jaanuarist 2014. a kuni 31. detsembrini 2022. a (s.t

toetuse saaja kulud peavad olema tekkinud antud ajavahemikul; VA-

l on õigus kulusid katta perioodil 1. jaanuarist 2014. a kuni 30. juunini

2023. a).

Auditeerimisasutus VV 13. novembri 2014. a korraldusega nr 482 on AMIF-i AA-ks

määratud SAO. AA on teistest osalevatest struktuuriüksustest

sõltumatu

Erimäärused 16. aprilli 2014. a Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus (EL) nr

515/2014, millega luuakse Sisejulgeolekufondi osana välispiiride ja

viisade rahastamisvahend ning tunnistatakse kehtetuks otsus

nr 574/2007/EÜ ja 16. aprilli 2014. a Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu

määrus (EL) nr 513/2014, millega luuakse Sisejulgeolekufondi osana

politseikoostöö, kuritegevuse tõkestamise ja selle vastu võitlemise

ning kriisiohje rahastamisvahend ning tunnistatakse kehtetuks

nõukogu otsus 2007/125/JHA.

Horisontaalne

määrus

Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 16. aprilli 2014. a määrus (EL) nr

514/2014, millega sätestatakse Varjupaiga-, Rände- ja

Integratsioonifondi ning politseikoostöö, kuritegevuse tõkestamise ja

selle vastu võitlemise ning kriisiohje rahastamisvahendi suhtes

kohaldatavad üldsätted.

Järelevalvekomisjon JK on loodud riiklike programmide rakendamise toetamiseks. JK

koosseis ja töökord kehtestatakse siseministri käskkirjaga.

5

Kaasfinantseering Eesti riigi eelarvest sihtotstarbeliselt eraldatud vahendid ISF-i toetuse

kasutamise kaasrahastamiseks, mis on minimaalselt 25% projekti

maksumusest.

Kontrolljälg Toetuse kasutamisel tehtud otsuseid ja tehinguid tõendav

dokumentatsioon. Elektroonilise menetluse korral peab kontrolljälje

arhiveerima kirjalikku taasesitamist võimaldavas vormis.

Kuluartikkel Projekti eelarve kululiigi alajaotus (nt tööjõukulude puhul:

projektijuhi töötasu, raamatupidaja töötasu, maksud jne).

Kulu tõendav

dokument

Majandustehingut kinnitav dokument, mis vastab raamatupidamise

seaduses nimetatud algdokumendi nõuetele ning palgaarvestuse

puhul palgaarvestust tõendav väljavõte (nt palgaleht).

Kululiik Projekti eelarve põhijaotus (nt tööjõukulud, sõidu- ja lähetuskulud

jne), mis jaguneb omakorda kuluartikliteks.

Partner Toetuse taotluses nimetatud, juriidiline isik, riigiasutus, kohaliku

omavalitsuse asutus või rahvusvaheline organisatsioon, kes osaleb

projekti rakendamisel ja kellel võivad tekkida kulud.

Projekt Kindlaks määratud tulemuse, eelarve ja piiritletud ajaraamiga tegevus

või seotud tegevuste kogum, millega kaasnevate kulude hüvitamiseks

toetust taotletakse või kasutatakse.

Projekti tunnus VA määratud unikaalne projekti number (nt ISFP-N).

Riiklik programm EK ja VV heaks kiidetud ISF-i vahendite kasutamise strateegiline

dokument, mille alusel kavandatakse ja viiakse ellu tegevusi. Leitav

www.sisejulgeolekufond.ee

Rikkumine ELi või riigisisese õigusakti mis tahes sätte rikkumine tegevuse või

tegevusetuse kaudu, mis kahjustab või kahjustaks ELi üldeelarvet

põhjendamatu kulu tõttu.

Toetus Rahaline abi, mis koosneb Eesti riigile antavast EL-i toetusest ja

kaasfinantseeringust.

Toetuse saaja Taotleja, kelle taotlus toetuse saamiseks on rahuldatud ning kellega

on sõlmitud toetusleping.

Toetuse taotleja Toetuse taotlejateks võivad olla avalik-õiguslikud juriidilised isikud,

eraõiguslikud juriidilised isikud, valitsusasutused, valitsusasutuste

hallatavad asutused või rahvusvahelised organisatsioonid, kelle

põhikirjalised eesmärgid toetavad projektis kavandatud tegevusi.

Toetusleping VA ja toetuse saaja vahel sõlmitud leping toetuse kasutamiseks,

eesmärgiga viia ellu taotluses toodud tegevused.

Vastutav asutus Vastavalt VV 13. novembri 2014. a korraldusele nr 482 on ISF-i VA

SiM. SiM-i põhimääruse kohaselt täidab ISF-i rakendamisel VA

peamisi ülesandeid välisvahendite osakond. Lisaks osaleb vastutava

asutuse ülesannete täitmisel RHO.

6

ÜLDREEGLID

1. PEAMISED PÕHIMÕTTED

1.1 Projekt on abikõlblik, kui toetuse kasutamise eesmärk ja toetatavad tegevused langevad

kokku ISF-i erimääruste jt õigusaktide ning riikliku programmiga.

1.2 Projekti elluviija peab kulude abikõlblikkuses veenduma nii projekti planeerimisel kui

elluviimisel. Toetuse saaja peab abikõlbmatud kulud katma oma vahenditest.

1.3 Projekti otseste eesmärkide saavutamata jätmine võib olla toetuse tagasinõudmise

aluseks.

1.4 Abikõlblikud on kulud, mis on:

 kooskõlas asjakohaste õigusaktide, juhendmaterjalide, taotluse rahuldamise otsuses

sätestatud nõuete ja toetuslepinguga;

 vajalikud projekti tegevuste elluviimiseks;

 põhjendatud ning mõistlikud, st vastavad usaldusväärse finantsjuhtimise põhimõttele;

 tekkinud abikõlblikkuse perioodil1;

 ette nähtud projekti eelarves;

 tegelikud ja vastavad toetuse saaja tehtud maksetele;

 kontrollitavad ja tõendatavad.

1.5 Projektiga seotud tehingud peavad olema eristatud toetuse saaja raamatupidamise

muudest tehingutest. Olenevalt organisatsioonis kasutusel olevast

raamatupidamistarkvarast võib projekti tehingute eristamiseks avada projektile eraldi

kulukonto või lisada projekti tehingute eristamiseks kontokoodidele vastavad tunnused.

1.6 Kulu tegemisel peab muu hulgas järgima RHS-i (nt konkurentsi korral olenemata

maksumusest küsima erinevaid pakkumusi/võrdlema hinnakirju). Kui toodete või

teenuste eeldatav maksumus ühe kalendriaasta jooksul on võrdne või suurem kui 1500

eurot ilma käibemaksuta, peab toetuse saaja esitama VA-le tõendava dokumentatsiooni,

nt hinnapäringu ja -pakkumused. Hinnapakkumused peavad olema kirjalikud, sisaldama

pakkuja nime, pakkumuse hinda, pakkumuse tegemise kuupäeva jms ja vastama

turuhindadele. Hinnapakkumuste asemel võib võrrelda ka hinnakirju, mis vastavad

pakkumustele esitatud nõuetele (sh peab nähtuma hinnakirjade võrdlemise kuupäev).

1.7 ISF-ist toetust saavaid tegevusi ja kulusid ei tohi rahastada muudest allikatest, et vältida

topeltrahastamist.

1.8 Projekti käigus isikuandmete kogumisel ja töötlemisel peab järgima isikuandmete kaitset

käsitlevaid õigusakte.

1 Toetuslepingu sõlmimise kuupäevad ei mõjuta abikõlblikkuse perioodi. Toetusleping SiM-i ja toetuse saaja vahel

sõlmitakse pärast taotluse heakskiitmist, kuid tegevused võivad olla abikõlblikud ka enne seda (kuid alates 1.

jaanuarist 2014. a). Toetuslepingus sätestatakse abikõlblikkuse perioodi algus vajadusel tagasiulatuvalt.

7

2. PROJEKTI KULUSID TÕENDAVAD DOKUMENDID

2.1 Kogu projektiga seonduv dokumentatsioon peab andma lihtsalt ja kiiresti ülevaate

projekti tegevustest.

2.2 Toetuse saaja peab tagama, et väljamaksmise aluseks olevad dokumendid vastavad

nõuetele, projekti raames tehtud kulud ja tegevused on abikõlblikud ning neid on

võimalik kontrollida.

2.3 Projekti kulu tõendavate dokumentide puhul peab jälgima, et need vastaksid

raamatupidamise seaduses sätestatud raamatupidamise algdokumendile esitatud nõuetele.

2.4 Lisaks peab projekti kulu tõendavatele dokumentidele olema märgitud järgmine

teave:

 projekti tunnus, (võimalusel märgib dokumendi väljastaja tunnuse dokumendile selle

koostamisel);

 teave projekti kuludesse arvestatud summade ja nende arvestusmeetodi kohta (kui

kohaldub);

 vajadusel muu lisateave, mis selgitab kulu seotust projektiga.

2.5 VA-le esitatud dokumendid peavad olema identsed nendega, mida säilitatakse toetuse

saaja raamatupidamises, ning aruannetes esitatud andmed peavad ühtima toetuse saaja

raamatupidamise andmetega.

2.6 VA võib küsida toetuse saaja raamatupidamisest väljavõtteid projektiga seotud tehingute

kohta.

2.7 Võõrkeelsete kulu tõendavate dokumentide esitamisel peab toetuse saaja olema valmis

kontrollimise eesmärgil esitama dokumendi tõlke.

2.8 Makseid võib teha ka pärast abikõlblikkuse perioodi lõppu, kuid mitte pärast

projekti lõpparuande esitamist.

3. PARTNERLUS

3.1 Organisatsioonid võivad taotlusi esitada eraldi või koos partneri(te)ga.

3.2 Partner peab vastama toetuse taotleja ja saajaga samadele nõuetele. Taotleja esitab koos

toetuse taotlusega partneri täidetud ja allkirjastatud vormikohase partnerluse kinnituse

ning eelarves märgib ka partnerite rahalise panuse (kui kohaldatav).

3.3 Toetuse saamisel laienevad partnerile toetuse saaja kohustused, v.a aruandluskohustus.

Toetuse saaja vastutab projekti kaasatud partnerite tegevuse koordineerimise eest.

3.4 Partner ja toetuse saaja võivad soovi korral vastastikuste õiguste, kohustuste ja partneri

rolli määratlemiseks sõlmida kirjaliku kokkuleppe.

3.5 Toetuse saaja vastutab toetuslepingu täitmisel nii enda kui projekti partneri eest.

8

3.6 Toetuse saaja peab edastama partnerile koopia SiM-ile esitatavatest projekti vahe- ja

lõpparuannetest. Olulised ettepanekud projekti muutmiseks (nt tegevuste, eelarve vms

osas) peavad olema partneritega kooskõlastatud enne nende esitamist SiM-ile. Kui sellist

kokkulepet ei suudeta saavutada, peab taotleja selle ära märkima muudatusettepanekute

esitamisel SiM-ile.

4. PROJEKTI EELARVE JA MITTETULUNDUSLIKKUSE

PÕHIMÕTE

4.1 Projektid, mida ISF-ist toetatakse, peavad olema mittetulunduslikud.

4.2 Projekti eelarve peab olema tasakaalus, st abikõlblikud kogukulud peavad olema võrdsed

kogutuludega. Kõik kulud peavad olema piisavalt täpsed, põhjendatud, läbipaistvad ja

detailselt kuluartiklite kaupa selgitatud. Kui toetuse saaja esitab aruandluse käigus SiM-

ile tõendavaid dokumente kulude kohta, mida eelarves ette nähtud ei ole, loetakse need

kulud abikõlbmatuks.

4.3 Kui projekti lõppedes ületavad tuluallikad kulusid, vähendatakse vastavalt sellele ISF-i

ja kaasfinantseeringu eraldist. Projekti tuluallikad peavad olema kajastatud toetuse saaja

raamatupidamises ning olema tuvastatavad ja kontrollitavad.

4.4 Projekti tulud koosnevad kõikidest projektile ISF-ist, avaliku või erasektori tehtud

rahalisest panusest, sealhulgas toetuse saaja enda panus, ning kõikidest projekti käigus

saadud sissetulekutest. Termin „tulud“ hõlmab projekti abikõlblikkusperioodi jooksul

saadud müügi- ja üüritulusid, tasusid teenuse osutamise eest, registreerimistasusid ja

muid samaväärseid tulusid.

5. HANGETE LÄBIVIIMINE 5.1 Projekti raames kulutuste tegemisel (asjade ostmisel, teenuste või ehitustööde tellimisel

või ideekonkursside korraldamisel) lähtutakse toetuslepingus, riigihangete seaduses,

SiM-i valitsemisala riigihangete läbiviimise korras (kui toetuse saajaks on SiM-i

haldusala asutus), asutuse sisemises riigihangete läbiviimise korras ning teistes

asjassepuutuvates riigisisestes ja ELi õigusaktides sätestatust.

5.2 Riigihangete, sh alla lihthanke piirmäära jäävate riigihangete läbiviimisel peab hankija

järgima riigihangete seaduses sätestatud riigihanke korraldamise üldpõhimõtteid, sh

tegutsema läbipaistvalt, kontrollitavalt ja proportsionaalselt, järgima isikute võrdse

kohtlemise põhimõtteid, tagama konkurentsi efektiivse ärakasutamise ning vältima

konkurentsi kahjustavat huvide konflikti.

5.3 Toetuse saaja võib kooskõlas riigihangete seadusega volitada hanke läbiviimise teisele

isikule. Riigihangete seaduse nõuetekohase järgimise, sh tehnilise kirjelduse koostamise

ja hanke läbiviimise eest vastutab toetuse saaja. SiM-i haldusala info- ja

kommunikatsioonitehnoloogia alaste hangete läbiviijaks on üldjuhul Siseministeeriumi

infotehnoloogia- ja arenduskeskus.

5.4 Hankija on kohustatud korraldama riigihanke piirmäära ületava riigihanke avatud või

piiratud hankemenetlusena, kui RHS-ist ei tulene teisiti. Kogu riigihankega seotud

9

menetlus peab olema dokumenteeritud (kontrollitavuse põhimõte) ning hanke käigus

hankija tehtud otsused põhjendatud. Toetuse saaja tagab, et hangetes ei ole tingimusi, mis

kasvõi teoreetiliselt piiravad võimalike pakkujate ligipääsu hankele2.

5.5 Riigihanke läbiviimisel võtab hankija arvesse ka seda, kas tegemist on kaitse- ja

julgeolekuotstarbelise hankega.

5.6 Kui hankija ei kasuta riigihanke piirmäära ületava riigihanke läbiviimiseks avatud või

piiratud hankemenetlust, peab muu menetlusliigi valik, sealhulgas riigihanke erandi

kasutamine, olema kooskõlas RHS-iga kirjalikult põhjendatud ning kinnitatud hanget

korraldava asutuse juhi või tema volitatud isiku poolt. 5.7 Riigihanke erandile tuginemine peab olema piiratud erandlike juhtumitega, üksnes

riigisaladuse olemasolu ei ole piisav põhjendus erandi korras riigihanke läbiviimiseks.

5.8 Kõikide kolmandate isikutega sõlmitud lepingute puhul peab toetuse saaja tagama, et

teine lepingupool kohustub esitama auditeerimis- ja kontrolliasutustele kogu vajaliku

teabe lepingu alusel tehtud tegevuste kohta.

PROJEKTI ABIKÕLBLIKUD KULUD

Projekti abikõlblikud kulud jagunevad otsesteks ja kaudseteks kuludeks.

Otsesed abikõlblikud kulud on kulud, mis on vajalikud projekti tegevuste elluviimiseks

ja eesmärgi saavutamiseks.

Kaudsed abikõlblikud kulud on kulud, mis on tehtud projektis elluviidavate tegevuste

toetamiseks. Kaudsete kulude osakaal nähakse ette projekti eelarves (vt täpsemalt punkti

7). Kaudseteks kuludeks on kindlaksmääratud protsent projekti otsestest abikõlblikest

kogukuludest.

6. OTSESED ABIKÕLBLIKUD KULUD

6.1 TÖÖJÕUKULUD

6.1.1 Ainult nende isikute tööjõukulud on abikõlblikud, kes on seotud projekti tegevustega

(tegelevad projektis otseselt projekti juhtimise, planeerimise, elluviimise või seirega) ja

kelle tööülesanded ei kuulu üldjuhul nende tavapäraste tööülesannete hulka.

Ametijuhendijärgsed tööülesanded on abikõlblikud juhul, kui projekti rakendamisega

kaasneb kirjalikult tõendatud töökoormuse tõus (vt lisaks punktis 6.1.3 toodud

täpsustust).

6.1.2 Tööjõukulude hulka loetakse:

 projekti personali töötasu, mis on kooskõlas toetuse saaja tavapärase töötasupoliitikaga

ning asutusesisese või keskmise palgatasemega;

2 Näiteks kohaliku registreeringu nõue, kogemus/esindus/hoolduskeskus mingis regioonis või riigis, konkreetse

standardi või lepingutüübi kogemus või tundmine (nt varasem FIDIC lepingu kogemus), kaubamärgi nimetamine

lisamata „või samaväärne“, keelenõue jms tingimus, mida on võimalik asendada analoogsega või tagada lepingu

sisuline täitmine muul pakkujale sobival viisil.

10

 seadusest tulenevad maksud ja maksed töötasudelt, kui toetuse saaja neid tegelikult

maksab. Eelarves ja kuluaruandes peab tööjõukulude kajastamisel eristama brutotöötasu

ja tööandja maksud;

 puhkusetasu proportsionaalselt projektis töötatud aja eest ja vastavalt seaduses

sätestatud korrale;

 teenistusest või töölt vabastamise, töölepingu või teenistussuhte lõpetamise ja muud

seadusest tulenevad hüvitised proportsionaalselt projekti heaks töötatud ajaga.

6.1.3 Projekti heaks võib töötada töölepingu alusel, avaliku teenistuja ametisse nimetamise

käskkirja või korralduse alusel või teenuse osutamise lepingu alusel. Teenuslepingu (nt

käsundusleping) alusel ei saa täita ametijuhendijärgseid ülesandeid. 6.1.4 Kui teenistuja töötab projekti heaks täistööajaga, võib kanda kõik töötasudega seotud kulud

projekti kuludesse ning tööajatabelit ei ole vaja täita

6.1.5 Kui projekti heaks töötamise alus on teenuse osutamise leping, peab esitama

üleandmise-vastuvõtmise akti.

6.1.6 Kui teenistujale makstakse projektist tunnitasu, peab esitama tööajatabeli (lisa 1, näidis),

kus märgitakse tehtud töö ja selleks kulutatud aeg. Kui isik osaleb paralleelselt mitmes

projektis, võib märkida eri projektide tööd samas tööajatabelis eraldi tulpades.

6.1.6.1 Tööajatabeli allkirjastavad isik, kelle tööaega tabel kajastab, ning projektijuht.

Projektijuhi tööajatabeli allkirjastab tema vahetu juht. Allkirjastatud tööajatabel on

töötasu maksmise aluseks.

6.1.7 Projekti jooksul välja teenitud puhkusepäevi ei rahastata pärast abikõlblikkuse perioodi

lõppu. Kui projekti abikõlblikkuse lõpuks ei ole kasutatud puhkust välja teenitud (st on

ette puhatud), loetakse abikõlblikuks vaid proportsionaalselt projekti heaks töötatud ajaga

välja teenitud puhkusetasu (st tasaarveldus toimub lõpparuandega).

6.1.8 Abikõlbmatud tööjõukulud on:

 töövõimetushüvitis (v.a juhul, kui hüvitist maksab toetuse saaja);

 sünnitushüvitis (v.a juhul, kui hüvitist maksab toetuse saaja);

 pensionile mineku hüvitis;

 muud toetused;

 ajutise töölepingu lõpetamise hüvitis, kui see ei ole lepingus ette nähtud;

 soodustused (nt auto kasutamise ja majutuskulud).

6.1.9 Töö- ja puhkusetasude tõendamiseks peab kuluaruandega esitama:

 töölepingu(te), avaliku teenistuja ametisse nimetamise käskkirja(de), korraldus(t)e või

teenuse osutamise lepingu(te) koopia(d), mille alusel arvestatakse isiku töötasu projekti

kuludesse;

 tööülesannete kirjelduse;

 töötasuarvestuse dokumendid, nt palgateatis;

 ÜVA/tööajatabeli, kui töötaja või ametnik töötab projektis töölepingu, käskkirja või

korralduse alusel, milles on sätestatud tunnitasu;

 tööde üleandmise-vastuvõtmise aktid, kui töötaja või ametnik töötab teenuse osutamise

lepingu alusel;

 puhkusetasu arvestuse;

 maksekorralduse koopiad või arvelduskonto väljavõtte töötasu maksmise ja maksude

tasumise kohta3;

 muud dokumendid.

3 Ei nõuta, kui toetuse saaja on Siseministeeriumi valitsemisala asutus.

11

6.2 SÕIDU- JA LÄHETUSKULUD

6.2.1 Sõidu- ja lähetuskulud on otseste kuludena abikõlblikud üksnes juhul, kui need on

kantud isikute eest, kes osalevad projekti tegevustes ning kelle lähetamine on projekti

elluviimiseks vajalik.

6.2.2 Sõidukulud on abikõlblikud vaid tegelikult tekkinud kulude alusel, lähtudes

majanduslikult soodsaimast võimalusest maksustamisele mittekuuluvate piirmäärade

ulatuses.

6.2.3 Ühissõiduki kasutamisel peab kulu tõendama ühissõiduki pileti, kviitungi või muu

dokumendiga.

6.2.4 Isikliku sõiduauto kasutamisel peab lähtuma VV 14.07.2006 määrusest nr 164

„Teenistus-, töö- või ametiülesannete täitmisel isikliku sõiduauto kasutamise kohta

arvestuse pidamise ja hüvitise maksmise kord“ ja organisatsiooni siseselt kehtestatud

isikliku sõiduauto kasutamise tingimustest. Kui organisatsiooni siseselt ei ole selliseid

tingimusi kehtestatud, võib arvestust pidades lähtuda abikõlblikkuse reeglitega

kehtestatud sõidupäeviku näidisest (lisa 2 või 3).

6.2.5 Lähetuskulud on abikõlblikud tegelike kulude või päevarahade alusel õigusaktides

maksustamisele mittekuuluvate piirmäärade ulatuses. Lähetuskulud hõlmavad üldjuhul

majutust, toitlustust, kohalikku transporti, päevaraha ning kindlustust (reisi-, reisitõrke-

, pagasikindlustus). Kui asutusesisene kord näeb ette päevarahade vähendamise, peab

lähtuma asutusesisesest korrast.

6.2.6 Väliseksperdi päevaraha määramisel võetakse aluseks EK kehtestatud Eesti päevaraha

ülemmäärad, olenemata sellest, millisest riigist välisekspert Eestisse tuleb. Päevaraha

hulka arvestatakse majutuse, toitlustuse ja kohaliku transpordiga seotud kulud. Kui

välisekspert ei ööbi Eestis, kuid viibib Eestis rohkem kui kuus tundi, on lubatud maksta

talle päevaraha kuni 50% ettenähtud määrast.

6.2.7 Sõidu- ja lähetuskulude tõendamiseks peab esitama:

 sõiduauto kasutamise õigust tõendava dokumendi koopia (nt volitus);

 sõiduauto kasutamise üle peetava arvestuse, nt sõidupäeviku;

 asutusesiseselt kehtestatud isikliku sõiduauto kasutamise ja kulude kompenseerimise

korra;

 hüvitise maksmist tõendava dokumendi (nt tööandja, asutuse juhi, juriidilise isiku

pädeva organi või tema volitatud isiku kirjalik otsus, käskkiri või korraldus);

 koopia kulu tõendavast dokumendist (sõidupilet, kviitung, arve või muu dokument);

 lähetuse korralduse;

 hinnapäringu ja pakkumused;

 vajadusel lähetuskulude aruande;

 kinnitatud maksekorralduste koopiad või arvelduskonto väljavõtte lähetuskulude

tasumise kohta4.

6.3 SEADMETE SOETAMISE, ÜÜRIMISE JA LIISIMISE KULUD

6.3.1 Seadmete (sh transpordivahendite, varustuse ja süsteemide) soetamise, üürimise ja

liisimise kulud on abikõlblikud ainult siis, kui need on projekti rakendamiseks olulise

4 Ei nõuta, kui toetuse saaja on Siseministeeriumi valitsemisala asutus.

12

tähtsusega. Seadmetel peavad olema projekti jaoks vajalikud tehnilised omadused ning

need peavad vastama kehtivatele normidele ja standarditele.

6.3.2 Valides liisimise, üürimise ja ostmise vahel, peab alati lähtuma kõige otstarbekamast

võimalusest.

6.3.3 Kui seadmeid soetatakse või kasutatakse paralleelselt erinevate projektide raames,

arvutatakse maksumust (täismaksumus või kulum) protsentuaalselt iga projekti peale

eraldi. Kokku ei tohi erinevate projektide peale seadme maksumus ületada 100%.

6.3.4 Üürimise ja liisimisega seotud kulud on abikõlblikud ainult projekti abikõlblikkuse

perioodil.

6.3.5 Seadmete liisimise lepingu sõlmimise tasu on abikõlblik.

6.3.6 Amortisatsioon:

 seadmed, mis osteti enne projekti algust, kuid mida kasutatakse projekti jaoks, on

abikõlblikud amortisatsiooni alusel. Need kulud ei ole abikõlblikud juhul, kui seadmed

osteti algselt EL-i toetuse eest;

 seadmete väärtus kantakse kuludesse vastavalt toetuse saaja suhtes kohaldatavatele

maksu- ja raamatupidamiseeskirjadele. Arvesse võib võtta ainult projekti kestusele

vastavat eseme tarbimisväärtuse vähenemise osa.

6.3.7 Seadmeid peab kasutama sihtotstarbeliselt projekti eesmärkide saavutamiseks pärast

nende soetamise (nt üleandmise-vastuvõtmise akti allkirjastamise) kuupäeva vähemalt:

6.3.7.1 kolm aastat või rohkem info- ja kommunikatsioonitehnoloogiaseadmete puhul

(sealhulgas süsteemid);

6.3.7.2 viis aastat või rohkem muud tüüpi seadmete puhul, nt varustus ja

transpordivahendid (v.a punktis 6.3.7.3 nimetatud);

6.3.7.3 kümme aastat helikopterite, lennukite, laevade ja hõljukite puhul.

6.3.8 Toetuse saaja vabaneb sihtotstarbelise kasutamise kohustusest ülalkirjeldatud punktides

nimetatud perioodide jooksul:

 vääramatust jõust tingitud asjaoludel;

 kui mõistlikkuse põhimõttest lähtudes ei saanud toetuse saajalt oodata, et ta

toetuslepingu sõlmimise ajal sihtotstarbelist kasutamist takistava asjaoluga arvestaks,

seda väldiks või takistavat asjaolu või selle tagajärge ületaks;

 kui seadme kasutusfunktsioonist tulenevalt on oht selle hävimisele enne sihtotstarbelise

kasutusaja lõppu.

6.3.9 Kulud selliste igapäevaste kontoriseadmete soetamiseks nagu printer, sülearvuti, faks,

koopiamasin, telefon jne, ei ole otseste kuludena abikõlblikud ning neid käsitatakse

kaudsete kuludena.

6.3.10 Kulude tõendamiseks peab esitama:

 hanke alusdokumendid või hinnapäringud;

 pakkumused;

 lepingu;

 arve või kviitungi;

 üleandmise-vastuvõtmise akti;

13

 kinnitatud maksekorralduse koopia või arvelduskonto väljavõtte arve tasumise kohta5;

 dokumendi, mis tõendab vara arvele võtmist (kui kohaldub);

 väljavõtte asutuse raamatupidamise sise-eeskirjade kohaldatavatest punktidest ning

amortisatsiooni arvestamise käigu.

6.4 KINNISVARA OSTMISE, EHITAMISE, RENOVEERIMISE VÕI ÜÜRIMISE

KULUD

6.4.1 Kinnisvara ostmise, ehitamise, renoveerimise või üürimise korral peavad kinnisvaral

olema projekti jaoks vajalikud tehnilised omadused ning see peab vastama kehtivatele

normidele ja standarditele.

6.4.2 Kui kinnisvara soetamine on projekti rakendamise jaoks olulise tähtsusega ning selges

seoses selle eesmärkidega, on juba valminud ehitiste ostmine või kinnisvara ehitamine

abikõlblik kogu- või osamaksumuse või kulumi alusel vastavalt allpool toodud

tingimustele:

a) sõltumatult kvalifitseeritud hindajalt või nõuetekohaselt volitatud asutuselt võetakse

tõend, milles kinnitatakse, et ostetava kinnisvara hind ei ületa turuväärtust ning

tõendatakse, et kinnisvara on vastavuses riigisiseste nõuetega, või täpsustatakse

asjaolusid, mis ei ole riigisiseste nõuetega vastavuses ja mida toetuse saaja kavatseb

projekti käigus parandada;

b) kinnisvara ei ole ostetud ELi toetuse eest enne projekti rakendamise algust;

c) kinnisvara kasutatakse selle ostmise või ehitamise korral vähemalt kümme aastat ja

renoveerimise ning kulumil põhineva rahastamise korral vähemalt viis aastat pärast

projekti lõppu üksnes projektis loetletud eesmärkide täitmiseks, v.a juhul, kui VA

annab konkreetselt teistsuguse loa (nt kogu- või osamaksumuse kaasrahastamise

korral);

d) kulumil põhineva kaasrahastamise korral on abikõlblik üksnes see osa kõnealuste

varade kulumist, mis tekkis selle kasutamise ajal projekti käigus ja varade tegeliku

kasutamise määr projekti huvides. Kulumit arvutatakse vastavalt riigisisestele

raamatupidamiseeskirjadele;

e) Kinnisvara üürimise, ostmise, ehitamise ja renoveerimise korral ei tohi selle eest

sihtotstarbelise kasutamise perioodil tulu teenida.

6.4.3 Kinnisvara soetamisel on lisaks objekti maksumusele abikõlblikud omandivahetusega

kaasnevad maksud, riigilõivud, notaritasud, lepingutasud ning muud õigusaktidest

tulenevad kinnisvara soetamisega seotud kulud (v.a maakleritasud).

Muud lisad võivad olla abikõlblikud seadmetena (nt hoone sisustus, projekti

elluviimiseks vajalik inventar jms). Need esemed, mida füüsiliselt ei ole võimalik

ehitisest eemaldada (nt liftid, sisseehitatud konditsioneerid jms), loetakse osaks

kinnisvara maksumusest.

6.4.4 Kinnisvara renoveerimise kulud on rahastamiseks abikõlblikud kogu- või osamaksumuse

või kulumi alusel. Renoveerimiskulude korral kohaldatakse ainult alapunkti 6.4.2

punktides c, d ja e esitatud tingimusi.

Kulumi arvestamisel lähtutakse selle EL-i liikmesriigi reeglitest, kelle territooriumil

kinnisvara asub. Liikmesriigi kolmandates riikides asuvate ehitiste suhtes kehtivad

liikmesriigi amortisatsiooni käsitlevad reeglid.

5 Ei nõuta, kui toetuse saaja on Siseministeeriumi valitsemisala asutus.

14

6.4.5 Lammutamise kulud on abikõlblikud, kui projekti rakendamise eelduseks ja edukaks

elluviimiseks on vajalik olemasoleva hoone (osaline) lammutamine enne uue ehitamist.

Lammutamise kulud peavad kajastuma hinnapakkumuses ja see peab moodustama osa

ehitusprojektis ettenähtud ehitustöödest.

6.4.6 Kinnisvara üürimine on kaasrahastamiseks abikõlblik, kui üürimise ja asjakohase projekti

eesmärgid on selgelt seotud ning järgitakse allpool toodud tingimusi:

 kinnisvara ei ole ostetud EL-i toetusega;

 kinnisvara peab kasutama üksnes projekti rakendamiseks. Vastasel juhul on abikõlblik

ainult see osa kuludest, mis vastab projektis kasutatule.

6.4.7 Kinnisvara ostmise, ehitamise, renoveerimise ja üürimise tõendamiseks peab

esitama:

 hanke alusdokumendid või hinnapäringud;

 sõltumatu kvalifitseeritud hindaja või volitatud asutuse väljastatud tõendi (kinnisvara

ostmise puhul);

 pakkumused;

 lepingu;

 arve;

 eseme üleandmise-vastuvõtmise akti;

 ehitus- ja kasutusloa;

 kinnitatud maksekorralduse koopia või arvelduskonto väljavõtte arve tasumise kohta6.

6.5 AVALIKUSTAMISEGA SEOTUD NÕUETEST TULENEVAD KULUD

6.5.1 Kui avalikustamisnõuete täitmisega seotud kulud soovitakse kanda projektist, peab need

projekti eelarves ette nägema.

6.5.2 Kulud, mis on vajalikud EL-i ja SiM-i kaasrahastamisega seotud avalikustamise nõuete

täitmiseks, näiteks EL-i ja SiM-i logode kasutamisega seotud kulud, kaasrahastamist

tähistava tahvli tootmine ja paigaldamine, on abikõlblikud otseste kuludena.

6.5.3 VA leevendab avalikustamise nõudeid, kui projektiga seotud teave on seadusest

tulenevalt piiratud selle konfidentsiaalse iseloomu tõttu, eelkõige seoses julgeoleku,

avaliku korra, kriminaaluurimiste ja isikuandmete kaitsega.

6.5.4 Täpsemad avalikustamise, läbipaistvuse tagamise ja info levitamisega seotud

kohustused sätestatakse toetuslepingus.

6.5.5 Avalikustamise kulude tõendamiseks peab esitama:

 hanke alusdokumendid või hinnapäringud;

 pakkumused;

 lepingu;

 arve;

 üleandmise-vastuvõtmise akti;

 foto avalikustamise nõuete täitmisest;

6 Ei nõuta, kui toetuse saaja on Siseministeeriumi valitsemisala asutus

15

 kinnitatud maksekorralduse koopia või arvelduskonto väljavõtte arve tasumise kohta7.

7. KAUDSED ABIKÕLBLIKUD KULUD

7.1 Projekti kaudsed abikõlblikud kulud on kulud, mida ei ole võimalik määratleda projekti

rakendamisega otseselt seotud kuludena, kuid toetavad projekti tegevuste elluviimist.

7.2 Kontorivarustuse ja -tarvete, külaliste vastuvõtmisega ja teenustega [nt sideteenused,

post, kontori koristamine, kommunaalkulud, töötajate koolitus (v.a, kui koolitus on

projekti peamine eesmärk), personaliotsing jms] kaasnevad kulud on kaudsed kulud.

7.3 Kaudsed kulud võivad olla maksimaalselt 2,5% otseste abikõlblike kulude

kogusummast. Kaudsete kulude osakaal määratakse toetuslepingus. Organisatsioonid,

mis saavad tegevustoetust ELi eelarvest, ei saa lisada kaudseid kulusid projekti

eelarvesse.

7.4 Kaudsed kulud hoitakse minimaalsed ja need ei tohi kajastuda projekti eelarves

samaaegselt ühegi otsese kulu real. Taotleja planeerib projekti eelarvesse kaudsetele

kuludele kavandatud summa, eraldi kuluartikleid välja tooma ei pea. Täpsema teabe

kaudsete kulude kohta esitab taotleja toetuse taotluses.

7.5 Lõpparuandes deklareeritud kaudsed kulud ei tohi ületada toetuslepingus määratud

abikõlblike otseste kulude protsenti, st kui otsesed kulud võrreldes planeeritud eelarvega

vähenevad, peab proportsionaalselt vähendama ka kaudseid kulusid.

7.6 Kaudsete kulude hulka ei saa arvata abikõlbmatuid kulusid. Kaudseid kulusid tõendavaid

dokumente ei pea aruandlusega esitama, kuid toetuse saaja peab neid säilitama

toetuslepingus sätestatud perioodi jooksul, kuna neid võidakse kontrollida.

8. ABIKÕLBMATUD KULUD

8.1 Abikõlbmatud on muu hulgas järgmised kulud:

 käibemaks (v.a juhul, kui toetuse saaja on selle tegelikult ja lõplikult tasunud ning saab

tõendada, et ei saa seda tagasi)8;

 hoonestamata maa ostmine;

 kui maa on vajalik projekti rakendamiseks, hoonestatud maa ostu summa, mis ületab

10% asjaomase projekti abikõlblikest kogukuludest;

 kasum kapitalilt;

 võlg ja võla teenindamise tasud, intressid, viivised;

 eraldised kahjudeks või tulevasteks kohustusteks;

 trahvid, rahalised karistused, kohtukulud;

 toetuse saaja deklareeritud ja mõne muu EL-i, välisabi või riigieelarvest toetust saava

projekti või programmi raames kaetud kulud;

 kindlustusettevõtete teenustega kaasnevad kulud;

 kindlustusmaksed (v.a kasko-, liiklus-, vara-, reisi-, ravi-, tööohutus-, tööandja

vastutuskindlustusmaksed ja töötasuga kaasnevad kindlustusmaksed);

7 Ei nõuta, kui toetuse saaja on Siseministeeriumi valitsemisala asutus. 8 Maksu- ja Tolliameti tõend

16

 projekti rakendamises osalevate ametnike/töötajate tööjõukulude osa, mis ei ole seotud

ISF-i rakendamisega;

 organisatsiooni juhtimisega seonduv tööjõukulu;

 hüvitised (v.a seaduslikud haigushüvitised, mida kannab tööandja ja mida

sotsiaalkindlustusskeem ei tagasta);

 vahendajate või konsultantide alltöövõtt, mille puhul tasu määratletakse protsendina

projekti kogukuludest (v.a juhul, kui toetuse saaja põhjendab selle maksmist töö või

osutatud teenuste tegeliku väärtusega);

 mitterahalised sissemaksed;

 muud abikõlblikkuse reeglitega vastuolus tehtud kulutused, sealhulgas ülemäärased ja

ebamõistlikud kulutused, üksnes projekti töötajate meelelahutusele tehtud kulutused

[mõistlikud kulud külaliste ühisüritustel, mis on projekti käigus õigustatud (nt projekti

lõpu tähistamine, juhtrühma koosolekud jms), on lubatud].

9. DOKUMENTIDE SÄILITAMINE JA KONTROLLIMINE

9.1 Dokumente säilitatakse vastavalt toetuse saaja sisemisele korrale kas paberkujul või

digitaalselt. Säilitatud dokumentide põhjal peab olema võimalik tuvastada kulu

abikõlblikkust.

9.2 Toetuse saaja peab toetuslepingus sätestatud tähtaja lõpuni alles hoidma ja

kontrollorganitele kättesaadavaks tegema kõik projektiga seotud dokumendid, eelkõige:

 raamatupidamise sise-eeskirjad ja asjaajamise kord;

 projekti raamatupidamise väljavõte;

 tööjõukuludega seotud dokumendid, sealhulgas lepingud, palgaarvestuse dokumendid,

tööajatabelid, puhkusetasude arvestamise käskkirjad, korraldused jms;

 teenuste osutamist, tööde tegemist või asjade ostmist tõendavad dokumendid, sealhulgas

lepingud, üleandmise-vastuvõtmise aktid, teenuse osutaja, tööde teostaja või tarnija

esitatud arved ja saatelehed jms;

 väljamakseid tõendavad dokumendid, sealhulgas maksekorralduste koopiad,

arvelduskonto väljavõtted;

 hangetega seotud dokumendid, sealhulgas hankedokumentatsioon, lepingud, aktid jms;

 tegevusi tõendavad dokumendid, sealhulgas üritusel osalejate nimekirjad, koolituste ja

seminaride materjalid, koosolekute protokollid ja memod jms;

 projektiga seotud dokumentatsioon (toetuse taotlus, taotluse rahuldamise otsus,

maksetaotlused, haldusotsus, toetusleping, aruanded, koosolekute protokollid, memod);

 projektiga seotud oluline kirjavahetus;

 muud dokumendid.

9.3 Toetuse saaja ja partnerid peavad võimaldama VA-l, AA-l ning nende volitatud isikutel

ja asutustel ning EK-l, Euroopa Kontrollikojal, Euroopa Pettustevastasel Ametil või

nende volitatud isikutel ja asutustel kontrollida toetuse kasutamisega seotud dokumente

ja projekti tegevusi ning tulemusi projekti toimumise ajal ning seitsme aasta jooksul

pärast projekti abikõlblikkuse perioodi lõpu kuupäeva.

9.4 Kui auditi või mõne muu kontrolli käigus ilmneb, et toetuse saajal puudub kulu tõendav

dokumentatsioon, loetakse see kulu abikõlbmatuks. Puudulikult vormistatud

dokumentide korral võib kontrollija tunnistada nendega seotud kulud abikõlbmatuteks.

Väiksemate vigade puhul aktsepteeritakse arvetele lisatud selgitusi või õiendeid. Kui VA

tunnistab projekti jooksul või pärast projekti toetuse saaja poolt abikõlblikuna

17

deklareeritud kulud abikõlbmatuks, peab toetuse saaja tegema raamatupidamises

paranduse.

9.5 Kui pärast lõpparuande kinnitamist avastatakse kontrollide käigus rikkumine, esitatakse

toetuse saajale toetuse ja kaasfinantseeringu tagasinõudmise otsus. Sellisel juhul pikeneb

dokumentide säilitamise kohustus vähemalt seitse aastat alates päevast, mil toetuse saaja

tagastab toetuse ja kaasfinantseeringu SiM-ile.

9.6 Toetuse saaja vastutab kaasatud partnerite projektiga seotud dokumentide säilitamise

eest.

18

LISA 1. Tööajatabeli/üleandmise-vastuvõtmise akti näidis

Tööajatabel/Üleandmise-vastuvõtmise akt

Projektis osaleja ees- ja perekonnanimi:

Kuupäev Töö kirjeldus Projektiga projekti tunnus seonduv töö (tundi)

KOKKU

Töötunnid kokku

Kinnitan, et tabelis esitatud andmed on õiged ning ülalnimetatud tööd ja tegevused on nõuetekohaselt tehtud. Allkiri: Kuupäev: Projektis osaleja ees- ja perekonnanimi:

Kinnitan, et ülalnimetatud tööd ja tegevused on käsundiandja poolt kontrollitud ning vastu võetud9. Projektijuht või vahetu juht / Allkirjaõiguslik isik10. Allkiri: Kuupäev: Ees- ja perekonnanimi:

9 Kursiivis tekst lisada ainult käsunduslepingu üleandmise-vastuvõtmise aktile. 10 Tööajatabeli allkirjastavad isik, kelle tööaega tabel kajastab, ning projektijuht (projekti rakendamise eest

vastutav isik). Projektijuhi tööajatabeli allkirjastab tema vahetu juht/allkirjaõiguslik isik. Üleandmise-

vastuvõtmise akti allkirjastab teenuse osutamise lepingus nimetatud allkirjaõiguslik isik.

19

LISA 2. Sõidupäeviku näidis 1

SÕIDUPÄEVIK Asutuse nimi:

Sõiduki omanik:

Sõiduki registreerimisnumber:

Sõiduki kasutaja nimi:

Projekti pealkiri ja tunnus:

Kuupäev Sõidu sihtkoht ja eesmärk

Hodomeeter Teekonna pikkus

(km) Algnäit Lõppnäit

Teekonna pikkus kokku (km):

1 km hind* (EUR):

Kogukulu (EUR):

Kinnitan, et kõik esitatud andmed on õiged. Koostaja nimi, amet.

Kuupäev Allkiri

Projektijuht või vahetu juht11 Kuupäev Allkiri

* Kuni 0,3 eurot, kui asutusesiseses korras ei ole sätestatud madalamat piirmäära.

11 Projektijuhi sõidupäeviku allkirjastab tema vahetu juht/allkirjaõiguslik isik.

20

LISA 3. Sõidupäeviku näidis 2

Sõidupäevik (keskmise kütusekulu põhine)

Asutuse nimi: Sõiduki omanik: Sõiduki registreerimisnumber: Sõiduki kasutaja nimi: Projekti pealkiri ja tunnus: Keskmine kütusekulu 100 km kohta:

Kuupäev Sõidu sihtkoht ja eesmärk

Hodomeeter Kütuse

liitri hind

Teekonna pikkus (km)

Kokku* Algnäit Lõppnäit

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Sõidukulu kokku 0

Kinnitan, et kõik esitatud andmed on õiged. Koostaja nimi, amet

Kuupäev Allkiri

Projektijuht või vahetu juht12 Kuupäev Allkiri

* läbitud teekond/keskmine kütusekulu 100 km kohta x kütuse liitri hind

12 Projektijuhi sõidupäeviku allkirjastab tema vahetu juht.

EN 1 EN

NATIONAL PROGRAMME ISF

IDENTIFICATION OF THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITIES

Competent authorities responsible for management and control systems

Authority Name of the authority Name of the person responsible

for the authority

Address E-mail address Date of

designation

Activities

delegated

Responsible

authority

The Foreign Financing Department of the

Ministry of the Interior

Secretary General Pikk 61

Tallinn

[email protected] 02-Jun-2015

Audit authority The Internal Audit Department of the

Ministry of the Interior

Minister of the Interior Pikk 61

Tallinn

[email protected]

Management and control system

The management and control system is described in the rules established for domestic implementation of the

Internal Security Fund (ISF). The management and control system of the General Programme on "Solidarity and

Management of Migration Flows" will be taken as the basis when preparing the system. The Foreign Financing

Department of the Ministry of the Interior performs the duties of the Responsible Authority (RA); head of the RA is

Secretary General. The Internal Audit Department of the Ministry of the Interior performs the duties of the Audit

Authority (AA); head of the AA is Minister of the Interior. The RA and the AA fulfil the task provided in the basic

acts; delegated authority will not be used.

EN 2 EN

CCI 2014EE65ISNP001

Title Eesti National Programme ISF

Version 5.1

First year 2014

Last year 2020

Eligible from 01-Jan-2014

EC Decision Number C(2019)8566

EC Decision Date 27-Nov-2019

EN 3 EN

COMPETENT AUTHORITIES RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 1 MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL SYSTEM .......................................................................................................................................................... 1

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4

2. BASELINE SITUATION IN THE MEMBER STATE............................................................................................................................ 5

SUMMARY OF THE CURRENT STATE OF PLAY AS OF DECEMBER 2013 IN THE MEMBER STATE FOR THE FIELDS RELEVANT TO THE FUND ...... 5 1 - SUPPORT A COMMON VISA POLICY ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 2 - BORDERS ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 3 - OPERATING SUPPORT .............................................................................................................................................................................. 18 5 - PREVENTING AND COMBATING CRIME .................................................................................................................................................... 19 6 - RISKS AND CRISIS ................................................................................................................................................................................... 23

5. COMMON INDICATORS AND PROGRAMME SPECIFIC INDICATORS ................................................................................... 30

6. FRAMEWORK FOR PREPARATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME BY THE MEMBER STATE .... 32

6.1 PARTNERSHIP INVOLVEMENT IN THE PREPARATION OF THE PROGRAMME .............................................................................................. 32 6.2 MONITORING COMMITTEE ...................................................................................................................................................................... 32 6.3 COMMON MONITORING AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................................... 32 6.4 PARTNERSHIP INVOLVEMENT IN THE IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE NATIONAL PROGRAMME ................... 32 6.5 INFORMATION AND PUBLICITY ............................................................................................................................................................... 33 6.6 COORDINATION AND COMPLEMENTARITY WITH OTHER INSTRUMENTS .................................................................................................. 33 6.7 BENEFICIARIES ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 33

6.7.1 List of main types of beneficiaries of the programme: .................................................................................................................. 33 6.7.2 Direct award (if applicable) .......................................................................................................................................................... 33

7. THE FINANCING PLAN OF THE PROGRAMME ............................................................................................................................. 35

TABLE 1: FINANCING PLAN ISF-BORDERS ................................................................................................................................................... 35 TABLE 2: FINANCIAL PLAN ISF-POLICE ...................................................................................................................................................... 36 TABLE 3: TOTAL ANNUAL EU COMMITMENTS (IN €) ................................................................................................................................... 37 JUSTIFICATION FOR ANY DEVIATION FROM THE MINIMUM SHARES SET IN THE SPECIFIC REGULATIONS ...................................................... 37

DOCUMENTS ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 38

LATEST VALIDATION RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................................... 39

EN 4 EN

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

During 2013 until 2015 compiled multi-annual programme of Estonia for the implementation of the ISF

(NP) supports the achievement of goals stated in national strategies: Main Guidelines of Estonia’s Security Policy

until 2015 (MGSP); Bases of Estonia’s Security Policy; Programme to Reduce Drug Use for 2013–2016;

Guidelines for Development of Criminal Policy until 2018; Action Plan of the Government of the Republic for

2011–2015 “Secure Estonia“; Development Plan for the Governing Area of the Ministry of the Interior (DPGA);

Development Plan of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) 2013–2016; Development Plan for the Governing

Area of the Ministry of Finance 2014–2017. By the time of the revision of the NP in 2017, some above mentioned

strategies have become outdated, and successive documents, which goals are in coherence with previous

strategies, have been adopted. For example Internal Security Strategy for 2015–2020, the Strategy for Preventing

Violence for 2015–2020, Chapter X “Internal Security and Legal Environment” of the Action Plan of the

Government of the Republic for 2016–2019, Development Plan for the MFA 2017-2020. Hereinafter, these

documents are not being referred to again. The measures planned in the programme must result in the increase of

the state’s capability in the field of visas, surveillance of the external border and border control, combating crime

and crisis management.

The expected results of the actions planned in the area of visas are completion of the developments related to

common Visa Information System of the European Union (VIS) in the visa register. It is important to make the

procedure for the approval of issuing visas sustainable by creating a comprehensive information system. The

information system helps to speed up the issuing of visas, to ensure better control and compliance with uniform

principles. The priority in the area of visa procedure is ensuring the forwarding of high-quality fingerprint files to

the central system of VIS. The replacement of depreciated computers of consular officials dealing with visa

procedure will ensure effective and operative visa procedure. The goal of training the officials is to contribute to

implementation of the EU common visa policy.

The programme provides for a number of actions that support increasing the surveillance of external borders and

border control capabilities. The actions contribute to the European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR), the

improvement of information exchange in border control and surveillance, ensuring control of the external border

in accordance with the common standards of the European Union (EU) and uniform application of the Schengen

acquis. Large part of the measures support and expand the present national capability to manage external borders.

The expected results of the actions financed by the programme in the field of combating crime are increasing the

capability of the police to handle cases of hidden and organised crimes more effectively, the effectiveness of

identification and solving crimes (including improving financial investigations), the possibilities for discovering

illicit goods, intensifying the prevention of terrorism and informing the public of various forms of human

trafficking. The achievement of the above mentioned goals including the improvement of information exchange is

supported by the developments of information and communication technologies (ICT).

In order to prevent risks and crises that endanger the population and to combat them, the programme puts

emphasis on increasing the capabilities in the field of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN)

materials and elimination of danger related to bombs, i.e. the area of demining. The expected results of the actions

contributing to the early warning are updating of the system of early warning in case of danger of radiation

(caused by man-made crisis), improvement of capability of repulsion of cyber-attacks aimed at critical

information systems of the providers of vital services, and increasing the possibilities of resolving crisis situations

and resource-demanding events. The actions should also increase capability to provide danger and risk

assessments related to demining incidents, and capabilities of crisis management and assessing security risks.

EN 5 EN

2. BASELINE SITUATION IN THE MEMBER STATE

Summary of the current state of play as of December 2013 in the Member State for the fields relevant to the

Fund

The external border of the EU in Estonia is guarded on land and in sea areas by patrols and with surveillance

systems based on cordons. The land section of the external border is partly covered by electronic and technical

surveillance. For the purpose of monitoring the sea area of the external border and for discovering objects, a

maritime surveillance system (20 radars) is used.

Patrol activities are performed on border sections not covered by technical surveillance. There are cordons and

service places for guarding the section between border points. The patrolling intensity depends on the risk

assessment given to the particular border section. There are five patrol ships, four helicopters and three patrol

aircrafts for patrolling the border in Estonia. On transboundary water bodies launches, motorboats and hovercrafts

are used. Most of the watercrafts and land vehicles, including special transport, were procured with the support of

Schengen Facility (SF) and are by now fully depreciated. The maintenance and repair expenses are high for this

old equipment. Replacement of these vehicles is needed to improve the readiness of reacting to border incidents

and ensures the patrolling capability. With decreasing manpower (personnel) the increased mobility of patrols

from new vehicles is important, as persons crossing the border illegally use often vehicles. In order to patrol in

areas with rough terrain and under difficult weather conditions (ice, snow, rain), special transport is needed (e.g.

all-terrain vehicles, snowmobiles, mountain bikes etc).

On the external border 43 border crossing points are open to international traffic, out of which 29 are in the sea or

transboundary water bodies’ ports, seven in airports, three on highway sections, two in railroad stations and in

two border crossing points border crossing is only possible on foot. In 2013, the number of persons who crossed

the border and went through border check was 8 142 176. The existing border check equipment which has been

purchased largely before 2007 needs replacement and additional equipment is necessary for the I and II level

border check. The capability of border crossing points and border guard stations to conduct document check

needs to be raised. New equipment increases the quality of the border check activities, contributes to solving

illegal border crossing incidents and therefore ensures security at the external border and smooth crossing of the

external borders in conformity with the Schengen acquis. In 2013, 128 persons crossed the border illegally for the

purpose of immigration and transit. There has been an increase in the instances of cross-border smuggling where

no unlawful border crossing takes place, but goods are given or thrown across the border by carriers.

Estonia is actively contributing in the joint operations coordinated by the FRONTEX. In 2013, 71 Estonian

experts took part in the operations, contributing 2260 operation days; airplane contributed 30 days and

observation bus 2018 days in Bulgaria and Greece. Estonia joined the EUROSUR in November 2012.

The development of the area has among others been financed with the External Borders Fund (EBF), the

European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument, the SF and the Phare programme resources. EBF support

was used for the renewal and launch of Estonian SIS central system (E-SIS), SIRENE workflow system and other

related information systems in connection to exchange of information with second generation Schengen

Information System (SIS II). Additional needs are related to the development of national IT-systems in relation to

SIS II. With the support of EBF also exchanging the software and database platform of the Border Control

Information System and creating the future interface possibilities with Entry/Exit System (EES) were financed.

The development of the area is based on national strategies: the MGSP and the annually renewed DPGA.

EN 6 EN

Estonia successfully passed the Schengen evaluations. The Estonian air and maritime border was assessed in 2012

and the land border in 2013. It was pointed out that the technical equipment of Estonia has reached a level that

allows the border guards to fulfil their duties effectively and efficiently. In addition it was noted that the constant

updating and upgrading of surveillance systems ensures the security of the external border at the required level.

128 employees in Estonian MFA are dealing with visa questions at the present moment (66 consuls, 16 expat

technical staff and 46 local technical staff). In order to implement the common visa policy and the Schengen

acquis in a correct and harmonised manner, joint training of consular, police and border guard officials and the

officials of the Ministry of the Interior (MoI) is needed. In 2006–2008 and in 2012, general seminars were held

for all the consular officials, and in 2009–2011, regional training for consular officials of foreign representations

handling visa proceedings were organised. No training to promote efficient inter-agency cooperation has been

previously conducted, while the number of visa applicants is growing by 15-20% a year (202 303 visa

applications were processed in the 24 foreign representations of Estonia), which requires a more innovative and

professional approach towards visa proceedings, including thought-out cooperation between authorities.

The computers used in visa proceedings are obsolete and need to be replaced. The ever increasing number of visa

applications poses a challenge. The majority of computers have been procured in 2005 or 2006. The currently

used computers may reduce the efficiency of visa proceedings and make the use of various databases in the

identification of persons difficult. In the past, computers have been replaced using SF resources.

Estonia joined VIS in 2011 and introduced the system in all of the foreign representations were visas are issued.

Estonia follows the VIS Global roll-out schedule, is successfully ending the VISMail2 project and ready to adopt

the VISMail2 at the end of roll-out.

No separate resources have been provided in 2013 for supporting a common visa policy. The administrative costs

related to issuing visas are financed from the state budget. Visa policy activities were not financed through

Estonian EBF national programme.

Combating the illicit trade in narcotics is a priority. There were 1 019 narcotics related crime detected in 2013.

Additional national resources have been allocated to the Criminal Police in order to focus on serious crimes and

organised groups related to narcotics. Special attention is paid to reducing the availability of strong and very

strong narcotics, in order to reduce the number of fatalities caused by narcotics. The task of the specialised

narcotics unit that was launched at the beginning of 2013 is to focus on primary-level drug dealers and on

removing narcotic substances from street sales. The tactics of combating narcotics in regards to street dealers and

organisers has been changed. There are changes in the mutual work distribution and cooperation between law

enforcement, criminal police and border guard units. Efficiency of cooperation with various partners (e.g. the Tax

and Customs Board) was increased. As a result of the cooperation the profiling of those persons who cross the

border and may be involved in the illicit trade of narcotics has been harmonised.

In 2013, preparations for White Paper of drug use reduction policy started and it was approved by the

Government in 2014. The policy document is knowledge-based guideline for the annual planning of activities in

the area of narcotics and is based on the EU Drugs Strategy for 2013–2020, drugs strategies of other countries,

scientific literature, thorough consultations with experts in the field and service providers in Estonia.

Contributions are made for launching and implementing a new early warning system for keeping track of new

psychoactive substances. A significant amount of resources have been allocated in 2013 for the purpose of

increasing the capability of the Central Criminal Police in processing crimes, including crimes related to

EN 7 EN

narcotics, and for the procurement of vehicles. Several supplementary trainings have been provided for police

officers of the drug crimes unit. In 2013, 43 drugs related training events were held for the Police and Border

Guard Board (PBGB) officials on 14 different topics, 507 PBGB officials participated with total of 4905

academic hours. Until now, no financial support has been applied from EU or other funds in the area of narcotics-

related crime.

In the beginning of 2014 an independent economic crimes bureau and analysis unit was established within the

Central Criminal Police. The aim of the economic crimes bureau is intensive fight against serious economic crime

(offences related to companies, bankruptcy, money laundering, fraud). In 2012 about 1,4 mln euros were

allocated for performance-related pay, surveillance activities and for recruiting of new officials in order to fight

serious and hidden organised crime. In 2013 almost 700 000 euros were allocated for the same purpose in order to

develop databases.

At the beginning of 2013, the Criminal Police had 17 officers handling digital evidence. Considering the data

volumes, the existing resources cannot ensure sufficient capability for the analysis and management of digital

evidence and that will have a negative impact on uncovering and solving crimes. Crime has increasingly moved

to the Internet and the number of data media containing digital evidence has doubled in Estonia in the past three

years, with the volumes of data to be analysed growing every year. No additional funding has been found at the

national level and no resources have been received from EU funds.

Practically all of the public services provided by the PBGB can only be rendered upon the availability of means

of transport. As at 1 January 2013, the average age of the vehicles of the PBGB is 10 years and a large number of

vehicles are therefore depreciated and need to be replaced.

There is a need to replace the majority of e-police equipment and to create a modern and secure technical

platform (software solutions for mobile use), in order to ensure a more operative management of the field work of

the entire PBGB as well as more rapid response capability and prevention of various incidents.

Crimes related to human trafficking are increased in particular at the expense of exploitation of minors (in 2013

the number of incidents was 18). In the previous years human trafficking crimes have been generally related to

violence against prostitutes. In 2013 cases of forced crimes have been emerged where criminals have forced the

victims to commit crimes (stealing, drug trafficking) by using violence. One of the problems is also lack of

awareness raising campaigns in the area of human trafficking. So far, campaigns have been financed from the

Nordic-Baltic Cooperation Programme at the beginning of the 2000s and from the Norwegian support programme

for 2009-2014 “Domestic and Gender-based Violence”.

The development of the areas described above is based on the following national strategies: MGSP; DPGA; the

Baltic Sea Strategy; the Programme to Reduce Drug Use for 2013–2016; Guidelines for Development of Criminal

Policy until 2018; the Action Plan of the Government of the Republic for 2011–2015 “Secure Estonia”; the

Development Plan for Reducing Violence for years 2010–2014.

According to an analysis of the current situation, the most problematic area among the services provided by the

Explosive Ordnance Disposal Centre (EODC) is CBRN due to deficient tools and lacking response capability.

The personnel protection equipment and technology used in the CBRN and explosive ordnance disposal area are

constantly developing, but keeping up to date with technological developments requires large-scale investments

which cannot be covered from the national budget. The needs for the development of the demining complex,

EN 8 EN

equipment and the explosive ordnance disposal information system DEMIS, for which resources are applied from

the ISF, are outlined under the priority activities listed in DPGA 2014–2017.

The budget of the EODC was 1 596 324 euros in 2011, 2 127 308 euros in 2012 and 2 050 890 euros in 2013. In

2011, there were no funds for investments, in 2012 201 918 euros and in 2013 78 000 euros were allocated. A

large part of the equipment currently in use has been received as aid from the United States (since 1998, the US

has supported with equipment in the extent of 4 743 815 US dollars). No support has been received under the

General Programme on Security and Safeguarding Liberties.

Planning activities in the explosive ordnance disposal area are based on the strategic guidelines of the area,

including DPGA and „Bases of Estonia’s Security Policy“, annual action plans and other area-specific documents

and principles, implemented by four regional bomb groups and the planning and chemistry unit.

In 2013, EODC responded 1479 calls, there were 3569 explosives and 3 explosive devices identified, bomb

technical inspections were conducted on 71 occasions and 29 CBRN calls were responded. In the framework of

the mission to assess counter-terrorism activities in Estonia in 2009, foreign experts considered the accessibility

of World War II explosive substances as one of the main internal security problems in Estonia. It is estimated that

the ammunition elimination service makes up at least 50% of the total volume of services of the EODC (the

number of explosives found is not decreasing). The workload is expected to increase considerably in connection

with Estonia’s EU presidency in 2018, as some of the meetings will be held in the country of presidency, which

means a potentially higher-risk period due to the profile of the persons visiting Estonia and the importance of the

events held here.

EN 9 EN

3. PROGRAMME OBJECTIVES

Specific objective 1 - Support a common visa policy

DPGA of the MoI 2014–2017 adopted on the basis of MGSP establishes the main goal of the area: ensuring higher

security of people and property, as well as constitutional order, domestic peace and stability in Estonia. For the

purpose of achievement of this goal DPGA lists important activities including, among other, the service of issuing

visas at the border (Aliens Act § 83: The Police and Border Guard Board shall make a decision on the issue of or

refusal to issue a visa to an alien at a border checkpoint in exceptional cases.). Ensuring the service of approval of

issuing visas and subsequent development of VIS are also emphasised as planned activities in DPGA. The latter

activities are also related to the Policy Dialogue held between the European Commission and Estonia aimed at

planning the internal security funds for the period 2014–2020, in the course of which complete implementation of

VIS and development of respective national information systems were set as the expected result and financial

priority.

The goals set in the Development Plan of the MFA 2013–2016 include readiness for annual processing of 151 000

visa applications. Effective processing of visa applications and provision of customer-friendly services to visa

applicants were set in the course of the Policy Dialogue as the expected result in the area of implementing the

common visa policy. In the course of the political dialogue the parties agreed that updating of the equipment

(computers) and training of consular officials shall be the financial priority. Costs are related to Schengen visa

processing, not consular services in general.

National objectives

National objective 1 - National capacity

The software of fingerprint scanners used by the MFA and PBGB in visa procedure does not work on the Windows

7 operating system. Purchasing fingerprint scanners of VIS will ensure forwarding of high-quality fingerprint files

to the central system of VIS, so that visa procedure could be performed according to the requirements of the Visa

Code and the Aliens Act (including taking of fingerprints) also after replacement of the Windows XP operating

system with Windows 7 on working computers.

The updating of computers of working places of the consular officials dealing with Schengen visa procedure is

necessary due to depreciation of the computers and in order to ensure effective and operative processing of visas.

Apart from issuing visas at the border, the PBGB has also other responsibilities in the process of issuing visas. The

consular officers are required to coordinate the issuing of a visa with the PBGB in order to identify whether there

are any grounds for the refusal of issuing visa (illegal migration, possible connection to cross-border crime, threat to

public order). Currently the coordination of issuing Schengen visas takes place using different systems in order to

identify the possible grounds for refusing the issuing of visa. Currently used systems will be unified and as a result

approval of visa issuing will be done using one system used by one unit of the PBGB.

In the national visa register the developments arising from the implementation of the Visa Code and VIS need to be

completed.

Funding priorities

The following main actions will be supported by the state budget and EU funds:

EN 10 EN

1. Purchasing fingerprint scanners of VIS used in visa procedure.

2. Updating of computers used for consular activities by Estonian Representations dealing with Schengen visa

procedure.

3. Developments of information systems (approval of visas).

4. Subsequent developments of the Visa Code and VIS in the visa register.

Results

 Unified Schengen visa approval system

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

National objective 2 - Union acquis

Officials of Estonian Representations, the MFA, the MoI and the PBGB need training supporting the

implementation of the common visa policy and correct and uniform application of the Schengen acquis. One of the

aims of the joint training for the authorities is better management of information and communication between the

authorities and internally. There is a need for knowledge concerning the areas of the authorities that are directly and

indirectly related to each other. Joint training fosters information exchange between authorities and improves

cooperation, helping to ensure uniform application of the Schengen acquis and implementation of the common visa

policy in a better way.

Knowledge of officials participating in the training will increase. A collection of best practices of consular

cooperation will be prepared with the topics covered during the trainings and to be used by a larger target group

during a longer period. In the collection possible weaknesses of implementing the EU common visa policy and

uniform application of the Schengen acquis by the Estonian authorities will be outlined and solutions are proposed.

A new form of cooperation between national authorities will be formed, which will presumably help to apply best

practices in work of the officials.

Funding priority

The following action will be funded by state and EU funds.

Joint trainings of the consular officials, the officials of PBGB and the MoI, which support implementation of the

common visa policy of the EU and uniform application of the Schengen acquis among authorities participating in

the training.

Examples of priority topics:

EN 11 EN

 Implementation of the common visa policy and correct and uniform application of the Schengen acquis in

order to ensure equal treatment (involve also authorities of Eastern Partnership countries);

 Identification of falsified documents;

 Evaluation of the risk of illegal immigration;

 Smuggling and illegal migration;

 Interviewing and profiling.

The action is financially divided between priorities related to acquis concerning visas and acquis concerning

external borders, as the action contributes to both goals. The apportionment will be made on the participant's main

tasks (e.g. visas or border).

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

National objective 3 - Consular cooperation

Actions with the given priority are not planned to be financed through ISF programme.

As the network of Estonian foreign representations is small, widening and better management of the network of visa

representation agreements is a priority; also we try to harmonize these agreements where it’s possible. No extra

resources have been planned for this purpose under the national budget; expenses are covered from funds intended

for everyday activity of the MFA.

Specific actions

Specific action 1 - Consular cooperation

1. Estonia is a partner in the specific action “Consular Cooperation Mechanism” for which Belgium will act as a

lead Member State. The project aims to set up a Consular Cooperation Mechanism on Schengen Visa Processing

(CCM) in commonly agreed third countries. This mechanism relies on three operational pillars:

 Joint assessment of risks and trends between MS at capitals and field level in visa abuse, document fraud

and irregular migration;

 Deployment of joint document verification officers or document verification services, to investigate the

authenticity and reliability of information submitted in the ambit of Schengen-visa applications;

Joint training of MS and consular staff in assessing supporting documents emitted by third countries, in analyzing

trends in Schengen-visa abuse, detecting false and forged identity and travel documents; and where relevant, joint

training of third countries’ authorities to reinforce the reliability of Schengen-visa source documents.

As a project partner, Estonia will participate in joint actions in commonly agreed third countries and be a co-

beneficiary of the grant. The apportionment between the partners will be made at the start of the project.

2. Schengen House Ulanbaatar, Mongolia, leading state Czech Republic: Estonia will be represented in the visa

issuance in Ulaanbaatar by Czech Republic. Partner states will participate only on non-cost basis.

EN 12 EN

3. The main objective of the action „Schengen Representation House in Kigali (Rwanda) and Bujumbura (Burundi)“

(led by Belgium) is to contribute to better services for visa applicants as well as to generate economies of scale on

processing of applications and issuing of visas in countries where Belgium represents a majority of MS. Bilateral

taskforces with project partners could also be set up to expand, standardize and follow up on existing representation

agreements. The partner organisations are co-beneficiary of the grant on non-cost basis.

The action partners will:

 Actively participate in the bilateral taskforces;

 Designate staff to train visa agents and local staff.

Specific objective 2 - Borders

MGSP establishes the following goals: the state is able to reliably identify persons staying in Estonia; possibilities

for illegal entry to Estonia and over-stay in Estonia are reduced. To achieve these goals the plan is to provide

unification of databases related to the identification of persons and identification documents and procedures related

to statuses of persons. This will increase effectiveness of activities aimed at prevention, combating and

identification of illegal immigration; increase the effectiveness of information exchange received from marine areas

between competent authorities; building of land section border, including river and lake border, of the external

border; enhance guarding of land border of the external border with the help of technical surveillance systems and

increase the use of modern technology during border control.

DPGA of the MoI 2014–2017 adopted on the basis of MGSP establishes the main goal of the area: ensuring higher

security of people and property, as well as constitutional order, domestic peace and stability in Estonia. For the

purpose of achievement of this goal DPGA lists important activities including, among other, prevention, combating

and identification of illegal crossing of the state border. This is ensured by patrolling and inspecting the areas

between border crossing points, using service dogs, technical (electronic) means and transport means (including

aircrafts). EUROSUR is emphasized as the most important development in the coming years. In addition, DPGA

includes plans to purchase night vision and border control equipment, additional equipment for aircraft and fully

automated border control systems (ABC (Automated Border Control) gates), which can also be used for the future

Registered Traveller Programme (RTP) component of the Smart Borders initiative. According to DPGA, capability

to ensure surveillance of the external border must be supported by the replacement of depreciated land vehicles and

watercrafts. In order to ensure sustainability of the operative radio communication network, which makes border

control more effective, the development plan provides for the purchase of an additional central station and the

infrastructure supporting it.

In the DPGA, ensuring the service of surveillance of migration is stated as important activity in the area of

migration surveillance, including capability to perform during the years 2014–2017 at least 800 control actions

annually for controlling the fulfilment of basis for stay of aliens in Estonia. The main share of the persons staying in

the state illegally consists of persons abusing their visas.

The goals and the planned actions described in the strategy and the actions financed from the fund are to a large

extent included in the agreed minutes of the Policy Dialogue held between the European Commission and Estonia.

EN 13 EN

National objectives

National objective 1 - EUROSUR

In order to increase effectiveness of guarding the external land border of the EU, it is necessary to purchase

technical means: purchasing cameras and developing a mobile i.e. portable system based on modern technology,

which includes data exchange software, central management system and modern sensors connected into a single

network.

Manned patrolling will be step by step substituted with technical guarding, which will lead to the need for increased

response capability. The goal is to adopt the use of new technical means (equipment to detect) and to install,

according to the specific conditions of a respective border section, the technical guarding and surveillance

equipment that forms an integrated surveillance system.

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) will be purchased as additional means for the border guard and will be used as

any other patrolling equipment. Initial plan is to purchase multi-rotors running on batteries and equipped with day

and thermal cameras. Purpose is to procure end products and most important requirements are related to flight time,

optics and simplicity of operating (every border guard should be able to use the device after training). UAVs do not

require a permit by the Estonian Civil Aviation Administration, if they are used outside take-off and landing zones.

In order to ensure 24 hours a day patrolling capability (incl. during the dark), it is necessary to replace the existing

depreciated night vision equipment.

The infrastructure in the current server room, supporting the ICT services of the governing area of the MoI, is

outdated. In order to provide ICT services and ensure reliability and security of ICT systems, the establishment of

data centre is necessary. Risk of failures in ICT services resulting from hardware will be decreased with architecture

and hardware of the new server room in the data centre.

Funding priorities

The following main actions:

1. Night vision equipment.

2. Technical means for guarding the external land border.

3. Integration of the surveillance systems of the Eastern border.

4. Unmanned aerial vehicles. About 90% of financing within the framework of the ISF project (EU support and

co-financing by the state); about 10% from the state budget (used also for activities that are not eligible

under ISF).

5. Ensuring the reliability and security of ICT systems.

Areas which are eligible will be financed with ISF funds, dividing the financing between two financial instruments

(incl. co-financing by the state). Any ineligible part will be financed outside the ISF project from the state budget

(in case of mixed-use).

Results

EN 14 EN

 Full compliance and EUROSUR preparedness

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

National objective 2 - Information exchange

In order to handle cross-border crime, it is necessary to increase the effectiveness of solving crimes committed by

international mobile groups. Due to the transition to SIS II, it is necessary to perform system development according

to recommendations of EU-LISA (the EU Agency for large-scale IT systems) and internal needs, which in total

increases effective usage of the system.

Border guard units use hand terminals for maintaining communication. The connection in the forests of southeast

Estonia is poor and patrols do not have connection with control centres or each other. Therefore, vehicles must be

equipped with terminals that enable communication signal in case of failures in the operation of the operative radio

communication network.

Modern radio stations must be purchased for sea guarding centres (in case of available funds also for border

crossing points), centres and vessels must be equipped with databases for information and data exchange and with

failure-proof working means. As a result radio and data connection will improve.

For improving operative radio communication, it is necessary to widen the working area of the network. Additional

supporting stations and connections between them will be installed and connected to the common network; as a

result it will be possible to carry out border control in locations where the network does not work.

Funding priorities

The following main actions:

1. Activities related to the introduction of SIS II.

2. Ensuring connection of communication and data communication systems for border surveillance and

control.

3. Radio and data connection systems.

4. Widening the operative radio communication network: 90% eligible for financing within the framework of

the ISF project (incl. co-financing by the state), dividing the measures between two financial instruments,

and 10% outside the ISF project from the state budget, as 90% of the operative radio communication

network is used according to the ISF goals (mixed-use).

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

National objective 3 - Common Union standards

The creation of the central system for certificates will allow to control, in addition to other personal data,

correspondence of the fingerprints of the document user with the fingerprints entered in the document, and to ensure

the authenticity of the document during the performance of border control. The system will ensure a significantly

EN 15 EN

higher level of security and reliability compared to the present capability of identification of a person, practically

eliminating possibility to use a false identity. The availability of the certificates’ distribution system is a prerequisite

for effective use of ABC gates.

In order to ensure the provision of faster border control service to the EU citizens, ABC gates will be installed in the

border crossing points with high burden.

Funding priorities

The following main actions:

1. Distribution system for certificates (SPOC).

2. Fully automated border control systems.

Results

 Installation of ABC gates

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

National objective 4 - Union acquis

Preparation of the officials must correspond to the conditions of the EU and the Schengen common visa area, and

allow implementation of new border control measures. Professional personnel helps to ensure smooth crossing of

the border, prevention of illegal border crossing, high level and further development of services.

Officials of Estonian Representations, the MFA, the MoI and the PBGB require training supporting the

implementation of the common visa policy and correct and uniform application of the Schengen acquis. One of the

aims of the joint training for the authorities is better management of information and communication between the

authorities and internally. Joint training fosters information exchange and improves cooperation, helping to ensure

uniform application of the Schengen acquis and implementation of the common visa policy in a better way.

Knowledge of the officials will increase and a best practice handbook of consular cooperation for Schengen visas

will be prepared. A new form of cooperation between national authorities will help to apply best practices in the

work of the officials.

Funding priorities

The following main actions:

EN 16 EN

1. Training of the PBGB experts.

2. Joint trainings of the consular officials, the officials of PBGB and the MoI, which support implementation of

the common visa policy of the EU and uniform application of the Schengen acquis among authorities

participating in the training.

Examples of main topics:

 Implementation of the common visa policy and correct and uniform application of the Schengen acquis in

order to ensure equal treatment (involve also authorities of Eastern Partnership countries);

 Identification of falsified documents;

 Evaluation of the risk of illegal immigration;

 Smuggling and illegal migration;

 Interviewing and profiling.

The second action is financially divided into between priorities related to acquis concerning visas and acquis

concerning external borders, as the action contributes to both goals. The apportionment will be made based on the

participants’ main tasks (e.g. border management).

Result

 955 persons trained

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

National objective 5 - Future challenges

Actions with the given priority are not planned.

National objective 6 - National capacity

The smart borders package is an important initiative in the area of Schengen enabling effectively combat illegal

immigration and cross-border crime. The most important is the launch of EES and ETIAS.

Migration surveillance equipment requires updating. It is one of the compensatory measures to contribute to the

objective of promoting the development, implementation and enforcement of policies with a view to ensuring the

absence of any controls on persons, when crossing the internal borders. The absence of controls on persons when

crossing the internal borders, the risk of possible illegal migration is higher. Surveillance equipment is

also necessary flanking measure on document security and identity management within the territory of the state

which is performed based on a risk assessment.

EN 17 EN

In addition, there is no possibility to send inquiries to VIS on the basis of fingerprints and/or alpha-numeric data to

verify the basis for stay of an alien in Estonia and identify persons. For this purpose the function for sending

inquiries will be created into national information system.

The quality and speed of border control needs to be increased with modern equipment. To ensure connectivity with

new information systems, it is necessary to update computer equipment in vehicles.

Depreciated land vehicles and watercrafts (including equipment if required) need to be replaced in order to enhance

technical readiness, incl. in rough terrain and under difficult conditions. In order to ensure faster response to border

incidents and 24 hours a day readiness for patrolling, the equipment of helicopters will be updated.

Funding priorities

1. Development and implementation of the European Travel Information and Authorization System (ETIAS).

Funding for this priority will be provided as stipulated under Section 7.

2. Support to the quick and effective upgrading of the national components of the SIS, in line with the

requirements of Regulation (EU) 2018/1861. Funding for this priority will be provided as stipulated under

Section 7

3. Development and implementation of the EU EES. Funding for this priority will be provided as stipulated

under Section 7

4. Equipment for migration surveillance and updating of border control equipment

5. Creation of possibilities to make VIS enquiries within procedures of migration surveillance

6. IT developments

7. Replacement of patrol vehicles

8. Special transport for patrolling areas with rough terrain and under difficult weather conditions

9. Watercrafts

10. Updating of helicopter equipment

11. Secondment of ILOs

Results

 The percentage of solved illegal border crossings – at least on the level of 90%

 Satisfaction of the persons crossing the border with border check – 86%

 Increase the quality of border controls

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

Specific actions

Specific action 2 - FRONTEX equipment

1 coastal patrol boat CPB-RHIB (mono hull Rigid Inflatable Boat, incl. neccessay equipment) will be purchased

and put at the disposal of the EBCGA.

EN 18 EN

Technical description:

Length 9,5–12,00 m; beam 3–3,5 m; draft (hull) max 0,8 m; draft (outboard engines) max 1,0 m. Speed max > 55

knots – on the light weather conditions (wind less than 4m/s), with 50% fuel and at least 6 crewmembers (6x110kg)

on board. Speed 45 knots – on the light weather conditions (wind less than 4m/s), with 100% fuel and at least 17

crewmembers (17x110kg) on board. Economical cruising speed – builder and engine manufacturer calculation but

no less than 250 nm (nautical miles).

CPB shall have:

 Hull with 4 lifting eyes and the boat floatability in case of damage of one compartment, must be complayed

 Inflated collar

 Kiel protected by a full-lenght stainless steel inserts

 2-person console with frame and front window

 Easily removable wheelhouse to cover at least 4 (nearest to console) seats in patrolling situation

 3 four-stroke outboard engines with fast speed propellers to ensure reaching demanded max speed 55+ knots

like shown in characteristics

 High capacity 12V generators and multi battery isolators/relays to charge batteries

 Hydraulic steering

 At least 2 stainless steel fuel tanks below the deck

 Electric system that is powerful enough to ensure the use of all electric consumers simultaneously

 Non-slip coated deck

On-board equipment:

 Lighting navigation lights, search light with fixed mount and manual remote control, LED deck lights, work

lights, all lights out switch, storage compartment lights and with readiness for IR light in the mast

 Navigation equipment, IR camera, OLYMPIA-TRIUMPH boarding system for 15m operation

 Rails, cleats, frames

Additional necessary equipment:

 Trailer (usually comes with the boat), meant for transporting CPB-RHIB with following gear: support

wheel, winch with automatic lock, stand on proof mudguards, LED lights, waterproof wheel hubs, hot-dip

galvanized frame.

 Specialized vehicle for boat transportation in EE and to the EBCGA joint operations or rapid interventions

at EU external borders (N2).

Specific objective 3 - Operating support

EN 19 EN

National objectives

Specific actions

Specific objective 5 - Preventing and combating crime

“Bases of Estonia’s Security Policy” establishes the goal of preventing and combating terrorism in all of its forms,

preventing the influence of international organised crime, combating acquisition of illegal income and its

legalisation. The emphasis is put on the importance of combating cyber-crime as a part of combating terrorism and

international organised crime and ensuring the functioning of information and communication systems and financial

security.

According to “Guidelines for Development of the Criminal Policy Until 2018” the biggest threat to society is posed

by organised crime, including economic, corruption, cyber and human trafficking crimes, due to which increased

attention must be paid to the prevention of and response to the given crimes.

MGSP establishes the following goals: increasing effectiveness of prevention of and combating terrorist acts;

enhancing prevention of and combating intelligence and sabotage activities against Estonia; increasing the

effectiveness of confiscating criminally acquired income.

DPGA of the MoI 2014–2017 establishes the main goal of the area: ensuring higher security of people and property,

constitutional order, domestic peace and stability. DPGA lists activities that include, among other, resolving

violations of order through replacement of the depreciated e-police equipment, increasing capability to manage

digital evidence, to combat serious drug-related crime, to detect criminal income and increasing capability of pursuit

activities. The achievement of the general goal set by DPGA is supported by the development of ICT services and

ensuring sustainability of the operative radio communication network.

The Development Plan for the Governing Area of the Ministry of Finance 2014–2017 provides for adoption of new

solutions for customs control (incl. automatic number plate recognition system – ANTS) and purchasing X-ray

equipment.

The goals stated in the strategies and measures financed by ISF are related to priorities set during the Policy

Dialogue. The new MGSP and DPGA after 2017 will be in line with the ISF national programme.

Financing priorities of combating drug trafficking were agreed upon: supporting actions related to the purchase of

narcotic substance identification technology and equipment, as well as training focusing on the given area. It was

decided to finance from ISF: measures aimed at increasing the effectiveness of financial investigations in the area of

serious and organised crime; updating of the present information technologies and infrastructure; investments in

safe communication channels in order to ensure cyber security. Financing related to the European training scheme

in the area of law enforcement (LETS) is financed with the Estonian state budget.

Increasing capability of pursuit activities, capability of the drug police and the effectiveness of processing digital

evidence ensure the increase of knowledge and capability of about 20% of all the Central Criminal Police officials.

National objectives

National objective 1 - C - prevention and combating

In order to improve capability of police officials it is important to replace the depreciated e-police equipment and

finance related ICT development.

EN 20 EN

It is necessary to increase procedural capacity concerning serious hidden and organised crime: transferring the

mobile positioning system to a new platform, replacing pursuit vehicles, increasing effectiveness of processing

digital evidence (including ca 18 officials trained). Mainly units handling serious and hidden crimes, including

crimes against children, need digital evidence. The aforementioned activities contribute also to more effective

financial investigation in the context of FATF definition.

Evidential narcometer will be developed as a result of scientific research, which will be able to provide evidence-

based assessment of consuming drugs in larger group of narcotic substances and help at the location of incidents.

Development will be done by university researchers and potential solution could be capillary electrophoresis

technology. Also purchasing modern narcotics analysers is planned.

For the purpose of discovering illicit goods purchasing equipment and installing ANTS into customs vehicle is

required.

In order to identify and solve crimes, it is important to increase capability of searching material evidence in the

Internet and on information carriers, and to invest in safety of officials by purchasing equipment which can be used

at the scene of crime or in emergency situations. It is necessary to increase competence of the officials making

decisions about issuing visas based on risk analysis and improve language skills.

Data centre needs to be established in order to provide ICT services and ensure reliability and security of ICT

systems.

Funding priorities

1. Purchasing of e-police equipment and financing of related ICT development.

2. Increasing the effectiveness of processing digital evidence.

3. Purchase of pursuit vehicles.

4. Development of the evidential narcometer.

5. Purchase of narcotics analysers.

6. Identifying the location of terminal equipment and increasing effectiveness of pursuit capacity.

7. Purchase of portable X-ray equipment.

8. Purchase of ANTS for the customs vehicles.

9. Software for prevention of security threats and identification of crimes.

10. Investments in security of officials.

11. Prevention of terrorism.

12. Improving Arabic language skills.

13. Ensuring the reliability and security of ICT systems.

Areas which are eligible will be financed within the ISF dividing the financing between the two financial

instruments (incl. co-financing by the state). Any ineligible part will be financed outside the ISF project from the

state budget (Action 13).

Results

 Enhanced prevention of terrorism

EN 21 EN

 Update and modernise police tools and services

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

National objective 2 - C - exchange of information

Law enforcement communications and police communications are essential assets to the safety and security

initiatives in any community. Advancing police communications allow law enforcement to be more mobile and

more rapidly respond to incidents.

In order to improve the availability of operative radio communication it is necessary to widen the working area of

the operative radio communication network. For this purpose additional supporting stations and connections

between them will be installed and connected to the present common network. As a result, it will be possible to

carry out police duties and ensure public order in locations where at present network does not work.

Funding priorities

1) Widening the operative radio communication network: about 90% eligible for financing within the framework of

the ISF project (incl. EU support and co-financing by the state), dividing the measures between two financial

instruments, and 10% outside the ISF project from the state budget, as to the extent of 90% the network is used by

the governing area of the MoI according to the goals of ISF, but to the extent of 10% by the governing areas of other

ministries (mixed-use).

2) Setting up of new and development of existing Passenger Information Units (PIU) at national level to develop

and implement a Passenger Name Record IT System, as referred to in paragraph 1 (e) of Article 4 of Regulation

(EU) No 513/2014.

3) Developing the necessary IT solutions to increase the exchange of information with other EU Member States and

the interoperability with the IT systems and databases developed by the EU or other EU Member States.

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

National objective 3 - C - training

In order to increase capability for pursuit activities it is necessary to modernise activities related to the management

of persons involved in secret cooperation, including the training system. Introduction of best European practices

will lead to the increase in quality of information obtained from persons involved in secret cooperation and creation

of better possibilities for finding evidence and sources in the course of criminal procedure, as well as better

identification of criminal income. Also the danger of corruption reduces among pursuit officials, awareness of

activities in the given area and security of officials increases. The activity contributes also to more effective

financial investigation in the context of FATF definition.

EN 22 EN

It is important to reduce the offer of drugs that pose the most danger to people. In order to achieve this goal, the

drug police officers must be capable of identifying drug labs and synthetic drugs, first and foremost fentanyl, but

also other drugs such as cocaine, cannabis and heroin. The achievement of the goal will be assisted by introducing

activity model of drug police for increasing capability of police officers and trainings to be carried out for the

implementation of it.

Funding priorities

1. Increasing capability of pursuit activities through training.

2. Increasing capability of the drug police through development and implementation of a modern training

programme.

Results

 ca 165 officials trained

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

National objective 4 - C - victim support

Awareness campaign organised as a result of wider cross-area cooperation is the best method to inform the

population of different human trafficking forms existing in Estonia, possibilities for receiving help and roles of the

parties acting in the given area in managing cases of human trafficking. The campaign will result in increasing

people’s awareness of human trafficking as a crime, its different forms, and possibilities for receiving help. In

addition, there will be an increase in the number of people turning to aid organisations and state authorities in order

to find a solution to a possible case of human trafficking.

Funding priorities

1. awareness campaign with three focus topics: exploitation of labour, increasing awareness among adult

population about employment; mediation and forced labour, and directing victims to victim support services;

sexual exploitation from the position of demand; minors as victims of forced begging;

2. pre- and post-campaign research aimed at assessment of awareness level of the population;

3. thematic analysis seminar for specialists in the given area following the completion of campaigns.

Results

 Higher awareness of people trafficking

 More victims identified

EN 23 EN

 More persons seeking assistance

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

National objective 5 - C - threat and risk assessment

Actions with the given priority are not planned to be financed through the ISF programme.

In 2014, an independent economic crimes bureau and analysis unit was established within the Central Criminal

Police with national budget. The aim of the economic crimes bureau is intensive fight against serious economic

crime (offences related to companies, bankruptcy, money laundering, frauds etc.). Establishment of the bureau

brought along clear problem and field-based approach regarding economic crime and increased the capability of

Central Criminal Police to develop comprehensive threat and risk assessments in relation to crimes which are most

damaging to economic environment.

Combating the illicit trade in narcotics is a priority. Additional national resources have been allocated to the Central

Criminal Police in order to focus heavily on serious crimes and organised groups related to narcotics. Establishment

of the specialised narcotics unit that was launched at the beginning of 2013 increased the capability of Central

Criminal Police to develop comprehensive threat and risk assessments in relation to drug-related crimes.

Specific actions

Specific objective 6 - Risks and crisis

“Bases of Estonia’s Security Policy” adopted by the resolution of the Parliament establishes the goal of ensuring

safe environment, security of residents, prevention and management of dangers to security, as well as reliability of

vital services. In order to achieve these goals it is necessary, among other, to ensure protection of the population in

emergencies, as well as prevention of threat of terrorism that may involve CBRN and explosive substances. The

emphasis is put on the significance of sustainability of fight against cyber-crime, especially protecting the

functioning of information and communication systems of vital services. The system of early warning on radiation

threat holds an important role in development of radiation protection and radiation security.

MGSP establishes common principles and long-term goals of the security policy, achievement of which must be

assisted by public, non-profit and private sector.

DPGA of the MoI 2014–2017 adopted on the basis of MGSP establishes the main goal of the area: ensuring higher

security of people and property. For the purpose of achievement of this goal DPGA lists important activities

including, among other, service for elimination of bomb and explosion threat (incl. development of the rescue

information system application DEMIS) and the service for elimination of CBRN threat. The necessity for a

demining complex, as well as a bomb container, a radio wave jammer, small bomb disposal robots and protective

equipment for deminers is emphasised. Achievement of these goals will be assisted by the development of ICT

services.

The goals stated in the strategic documents and the actions financed by ISF are also related to the goals set in the

course of the Policy Dialogue held between the European Commission and Estonia. Also the new MGSP and

DPGA after 2017 will be in line with the ISF national programme.

EN 24 EN

Increasing the capability of CBRN was considered as an important topic from the positions of response and

investigation capability. The following expected results and financing priorities were agreed upon: increasing

readiness for the management of CBRN and ensuring capability for performance of neutralisation of CBRN

materials, mines and other explosive materials; purchase of protective equipment and development of information

systems; construction of the CBRN and demining complex; increasing processing capability of the relevant

authorities. Contributing to cyber security and system of early warning on radiation threat was also indicated

separately. As the ISF funds are limited, cyber security activities are mostly financed through state budget. In the

PBGB the number of officials engaged with cyber-crimes and the capacity of the officials to handle digital data

carriers (including evidence) will be increased. In addition, the technological capacity will be raised through using

modern hard- and software; also storage conditions of the digital evidence will be improved.

National objectives

National objective 1 - R - prevention and combating

Estonia lacks equipment for identification of chemical and biological substances, equipment for responding to

CBRN emergency incidents, and the CBRN bus is not completely equipped. There is no access to the database of

weapons of mass destruction. Therefore, it is partly not possible to analyse chemical and biological weapons that

could pose danger to security.

In order to ensure safety of deminers during neutralisation of dangerous explosives, it is necessary to purchase bomb

suits. In order to neutralise or remove explosive devices from locations that are narrow or hard to access, and to

organise observation of the incident location in case of armed crime or other dangerous situations, it is necessary to

purchase small bomb disposal robots.

The need for more effective elimination of explosion threat will be addressed by purchasing reactive radio wave

jammer in case of available resources. For safe transport of explosives there is a need for a closed bomb container,

which will be purchased in case of available resources.

Funding priorities

The following main actions (areas of activities) will be considered as main financial priorities (depending on the

need and availability of resources also other eligible activities could be considered):

1. Increasing the capability of CBRN.

2. Purchasing heavy bomb suits.

3. Purchasing small bomb disposal robots.

Results

 Increasing the capability of CBRN

 Ensuring public safety

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

EN 25 EN

National objective 2 - R - exchange of information

Action “Development of the DEMIS application of the rescue information system” which is placed under national

objective “R - Threat and risk assessment” contributes also to the objective outlined in the Article 3 (3) (b) of the

ISF-Police regulation.

Implementation of measures related to prevention and combating of terrorism is financed with national budget

resources: preventing and combating financing and supporting of terrorism; necessary information gathering and

processing it in order to prevent terrorism.

National objective 3 - R - training

In order to increase the capability of CBRN it is necessary to raise the qualification of officials through participation

in cooperation projects and conducting trainings. Potential trainings, for example, in the European CBRNE Centre

of the Umeå University in Sweden or practical seminars in UK and USA will be carried out. Possible participation

at symposiums or conferences and in the Joint CBRN Defence Centre of Excellence programme are considered.

Funding priority

 Training officials for CBRN tasks

Result

 44 officials

 Increasing the capability of CBRN

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

National objective 4 - R - victim support

Actions with the given priority are not planned to be financed through the ISF programme.

Measures in the area of preventing and combating terrorism are financed from national budget. The details on the

measures are not public information.

National objective 5 - R - infrastructure

Most of the buildings of the Estonian EODC of the Rescue Board are in barely satisfactory or poor condition. None

of the buildings used were built specifically taking into account demining or CBRN area. The response squad of the

Northern Estonian bomb group is located in the former garage complex in the city centre of Tallinn.

EN 26 EN

There are no destruction places established by the state, and destruction of explosives takes place according to

agreements with land owners. Construction of a CBRN and a demining complex or renovating suitable existing

facility outside the city centre is necessary in order to organise safe performance of activities of the demining area in

one complex at least in Northern Estonia, and to move the centre away from city centre of Tallinn. The complex

would include storage and maintenance facilities for explosives and CBRN, destruction place, lab for research of

explosive devices and CBRN. The storage facility of the complex would be used besides the Rescue Board also by

other authorities.

The complex will ensure safe handling and uniform storage of special materials, as well as operative readiness for

response. This will increase capabilities in the area of demining and CBRN, which will also be necessary during the

Estonian Presidency of the Council of the European Union.

Funding priority:

Constructing of the CBRN and demining complex or renovating suitable existing facility outside the city centre for

the same purpose.

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

National objective 6 - R - early warning and crisis

The software, equipment and communication systems of the system of early warning on radiation threat must be

modernised. Functioning of the system without failures helps to ensure early identification and warning of the

population in case of dangerous cross-border radiation accidents.

In order to ensure identification and analysis of cyber-attacks aimed at critical information systems of vital service

providers, it is necessary to develop terms of reference and a prototype of the respective surveillance system. This

would provide the basis for acquisition of attack identification means for providers of vital services, establish the

maintenance of the system and analyse risks. Development of the centralised surveillance system and analysis

capability will help to prevent and more effectively repel cyber-attacks.

The infrastructure in the current server room, supporting the ICT services of the governing area of the MoI, is

outdated. In order to provide ICT services and ensure reliability and security of ICT systems, the establishment of

data centre is necessary. Risk of failures in ICT services resulting from hardware will be decreased with architecture

and hardware of the new server room in the data centre.

Funding priorities

1. Modernisation of the software, equipment and communication systems of the system of early warning on

radiation threat.

2. Security surveillance of the networks of the vital service providers depending on information systems, incl.

industrial automated control systems, aimed at identification of cyber-attacks and malware.

3. Ensuring the reliability and security of ICT systems.

EN 27 EN

Action 3 involves all the areas in the governing area of the MoI. Areas which are eligible will be financed within the

framework of ISF dividing the financing between two financial instruments (incl. co-financing by the state).

Ineligible part will be financed outside the ISF project from the state budget. The apportionment will be made

during the programme and adjusted for actual use.

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

National objective 7 - R - threat and risk assessment

One of the significant factors hindering the performance of EODC is the limited functionality of the rescue

information system application DEMIS. The DEMIS software is used for collection, storage, search and statistical

analysis of the data obtained during a demining event and it includes the data concerning explosives-related calls in

Estonia of the past 20 years. In case of failure of the information system the data that has been collected may

disappear. The software is built on a platform that does not correspond to the requirements of the three level

baseline security system of ICT systems (ISKE). Major problems are caused by ageing of the map bases and

absence of a possibility to change parameters of search fields, which in turn have a direct influence on analysis

capability of the EODC. Widening the possibilities to make enquiries and higher quality of information collection

reduces risks of possible errors during demining work, increases effectiveness, and allows more effective planning

of training and protecting information related to criminal procedure.

In order to increase capability of the Rescue Board and the ERC to assess security risks and perform crisis

management, it is necessary to develop and implement a technical solution supporting performance of tactical and

strategic management: database information system.

Funding priorities

1. Development of the DEMIS application of the rescue information system.

2. Development of the database information system for the Rescue Board and the Emergency Response Centre.

Depending on the needs and available resources other actions may be considered.

Specific actions

EN 28

EN

INDICATIVE TIMETABLE Specific objective NO/SA Main

action

Name of action Start of

planning

phase

Start of

implementation

phase

Start of

closing

phase

SO1 - Support a

common visa

policy

NO1 - National

capacity

1 Purchasing fingerprint scanners of VIS

used in visa procedure.

2014 2015 2016

SO1 - Support a

common visa

policy

NO1 - National

capacity

2 Updating of computers used for

Schengen consular activities by

Estonian Representations.

2014 2015 2016

SO1 - Support a

common visa

policy

NO1 - National

capacity

3 Developments of information systems

(approval of visas).

2014 2016 2017

SO1 - Support a common visa

policy

NO2 - Union acquis 1 Joint trainings of the consular officials, the officials of PBGB and the MoI.

2014 2015 2017

SO2 - Borders NO1 - EUROSUR 1 Night vision equipment. 2015 2015 2018

SO2 - Borders NO1 - EUROSUR 2 Technical means for guarding the external land border.

2018 2018 2020

SO2 - Borders NO1 - EUROSUR 3 Integration of the surveillance systems

of the Eastern border.

2016 2018 2022

SO2 - Borders NO2 - Information exchange

1 Activities related to the introduction of SIS II.

2014 2016 2018

SO2 - Borders NO2 - Information

exchange

2 Widening the operative radio

communication network.

2015 2016 2018

SO2 - Borders NO2 - Information exchange

3 Radio and data connection systems. 2014 2015 2016

SO2 - Borders NO3 - Common

Union standards

1 Distribution system for certificates

(SPOC).

2016 2016 2019

SO2 - Borders NO3 - Common Union standards

2 Fully automated border control systems. 2016 2018 2022

SO2 - Borders NO4 - Union acquis 1 Training of the PBGB experts. 2014 2015 2021

SO2 - Borders NO4 - Union acquis 2 Joint trainings of the consular officials,

the officials of PBGB and the MoI.

2014 2015 2021

SO2 - Borders NO6 - National

capacity

1 Equipment for migration surveillance

and updating of border control

equipment.

2015 2015 2020

SO2 - Borders NO6 - National

capacity

2 EES, SIS and ETIAS system

development.

2018 2019 2022

SO2 - Borders NO6 - National

capacity

3 Replacement of patrol vehicles. 2014 2015 2016

SO2 - Borders SA2 - FRONTEX

equipment

1 Purchase of a CPB-RHIB 2018 2018 2020

SO5 - Preventing

and combating crime

NO1 - C - prevention

and combating

1 Purchasing of e-police equipment and

financing of related ICT development.

2014 2015 2019

SO5 - Preventing

and combating crime

NO1 - C - prevention

and combating

2 Increasing the effectiveness of

processing digital evidence.

2014 2015 2017

SO5 - Preventing

and combating

crime

NO1 - C - prevention

and combating

3 Purchase of pursuit vehicles. 2014 2015 2020

SO5 - Preventing

and combating

crime

NO2 - C - exchange

of information

1 Widening the operative radio

communication network.

2016 2016 2018

SO5 - Preventing and combating

crime

NO2 - C - exchange of information

2 Development and implementation of the PNR system.

2016 2017 2021

SO5 - Preventing

and combating

crime

NO3 - C - training 1 Increasing capability of pursuit

activities through training.

2014 2015 2018

SO5 - Preventing and combating

crime

NO3 - C - training 2 Increasing capability of the drug police through modern training programme.

2014 2015 2017

SO5 - Preventing

and combating crime

NO4 - C - victim

support

1 Awareness activities aimed at

prevention of human trafficking and support of victims.

2014 2015 2017

SO6 - Risks and

crisis

NO1 - R - prevention

and combating

1 Increasing the capability of CBRN. 2014 2015 2021

SO6 - Risks and crisis

NO1 - R - prevention and combating

2 Purchasing heavy bomb suits. 2014 2015 2016

EN 29

EN

Specific objective NO/SA Main

action

Name of action Start of

planning

phase

Start of

implementation

phase

Start of

closing

phase

SO6 - Risks and

crisis

NO1 - R - prevention

and combating

3 Purchasing small bomb disposal robots. 2015 2015 2016

SO6 - Risks and crisis

NO3 - R - training 1 Increasing the capability of CBRN. 2016 2016 2020

SO6 - Risks and

crisis

NO5 - R -

infrastructure

1 Construction of the CBRN and

demining complex or renovating

suitable existing facility.

2016 2017 2020

SO6 - Risks and

crisis

NO6 - R - early

warning and crisis

1 Modernisation of the system of early

warning on radiation threat.

2019 2019 2020

SO6 - Risks and crisis

NO6 - R - early warning and crisis

2 Security surveillance of the networks of the vital service providers.

2017 2017 2019

SO6 - Risks and

crisis

NO6 - R - early

warning and crisis

3 Ensuring reliability of the ICT systems. 2015 2015 2017

SO6 - Risks and crisis

NO7 - R - threat and risk assessment

1 Development of the DEMIS application of the rescue information system.

2015 2015 2018

SO6 - Risks and

crisis

NO7 - R - threat and

risk assessment

2 Development of the database

information system for the Rescue

Board and the ERC.

2015 2015 2019

EN 30 EN

5. COMMON INDICATORS AND PROGRAMME SPECIFIC INDICATORS:

Specific objective 1 - Support a common visa policy

Indicator Measurement

unit

Baseline

value

Target

value

Source of

data

C1 - Number of consular cooperation activities developed with the help of the Fund Number 0.00 0.00 Projects

C2.1 - Number of staff trained in common visa policy related aspects with the help of the

Fund

Number 0.00 255.00 Projects

C2.2 - Number of training courses (hours completed) Number 0.00 500.00 Projects

C3 - Number of specialised posts in third countries supported by the Fund Number 0.00 0.00 Projects

C4.1 - Number of consulates developed or upgraded with the help of the Fund out of the

total number of consulates

Number 0.00 18.00 Projects

C4.2 - Percentage of consulates developed or upgraded with the help of the Fund out of the

total number of consulates

% 0.00 78.00 Projects

Specific objective 2 - Borders

Indicator Measurement

unit

Baseline

value

Target value Source of data

C1.1 - Number of staff trained in borders management related aspects with the help

of the Fund

Number 0.00 955.00 Projects

C1.2 - Number of training courses in borders management related aspects with the

help of the Fund

Number 0.00 80.00 Projects

C2 - Number of border control (checks and surveillance) infrastructure and means

developed or upgraded with the help of the Fund

Number 0.00 1,300.00 Projects

C3.1 - Number of border crossings of the external borders through ABC gates

supported from the Fund

Number 0.00 1,095,000.00 Projects

C3.2 - Total number of border crossings Number 0.00 54,000,000.00 Projects

C4 - Number of national border surveillance infrastructure established/further

developed in the framework of EUROSUR

Number 0.00 0.00 Projects

C5 - Number of incidents reported by the Member State to the European Situational

Picture

Number 0.00 4,000.00 National Situational

Picture

EN 31 EN

Specific objective 5 - Preventing and combating crime

Indicator Measurement

unit

Baseline

value

Target value Source of

data

C1 - Number of JITs and EMPACT operational projects supported by the Fund, including the

participating Member States and authorities

Number 0.00 0.00 Projects

C2.1 - Number of law enforcement officials trained on cross-border-related topics with the help of

the Fund

Number 0.00 183.00 Projects

C2.2 - Duration of the training (carried out) on cross-border related topics with the help of the fund Person days 0.00 3,500.00 Projects

C3.1 - Number of projects in the area of crime prevention Number 0.00 18.00 Projects

C3.2 - Financial value of projects in the area of crime prevention EUR 0.00 12,500,000.00 Projects

C4 - Number of projects supported by the Fund, aiming to improve law enforcement information

exchanges which are related to Europol data systems, repositories or communication tools (e.g.

data loaders, extending access to SIENA, projects aiming to improving input to analysis work files

etc.)

Number 0.00 0.00 Projects

Specific objective 6 - Risks and crisis

Indicator Measurement

unit

Baseline

value

Target

value

Source of

data

C1 - Number of tools put in place or upgraded with the help of the Fund to facilitate the protection

of critical infrastructure by Member States in all sectors of the economy

Number 0.00 218.00 Projects

C2 - Number of projects relating to the assessment and management of risks in the field of internal

security supported by the Fund

Number 0.00 10.00 Projects

C3 - Number of expert meetings, workshops, seminars, conferences, publications, websites and

(online) consultations organised with the help of the Fund

Number 0.00 52.00 Projects

EN 32 EN

6. FRAMEWORK FOR PREPARATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME BY THE

MEMBER STATE

6.1 Partnership involvement in the preparation of the programme

Upon the initiative of the MoI working groups based on financial instruments were created in order to

identify the needs and goals in different governing areas of the state and prepare the national ISF multi-

annual programme for the EU budget period 2014–2020. The working groups included representatives of

ministries and public sector authorities according to the respective area. As a form of organising the work of

the working groups it was decided to use meetings and electronic exchange of information via the mailing list

of the group. The authorities involved in the working groups made proposals, from which the actions

corresponding to the goals of ISF and needs of the state were chosen.

6.2 Monitoring committee

In order to support the implementation of ISF a Monitoring Committee will be created, which is composed of

high officials of the Ministry of the Interior and representatives of the beneficiaries. Monitoring Committee

will be assigned the task of assessing project proposals and proposals for making amendments during project

implementation presented by the final beneficiaries. If necessary, the Monitoring Committee will assess the

level of success of implementing the ISF, make proposals for increasing effectiveness of implementation and

decide on individual questions related to the implementation of the fund. The composition and working

arrangements of the committee will be described in more detail in the rules established for internal

implementation of the fund.

6.3 Common monitoring and evaluation framework

The system for monitoring and evaluation of the ISF implementation will be based on the rules established

by the European Commission aimed at the development of common monitoring and evaluation framework.

First level monitoring concerning the final beneficiaries is performed through reporting and on-the-spot

controls by the responsible authority for the implementation of the fund, Foreign Financing Department of

the Ministry of the Interior. Second level control is performed by the Financial Department of the Ministry of

the Interior. The audit authority performs audits and on-the-spot controls.

During the evaluation of implementing the fund, assessment experts who are independent from the

responsible and the audit authority and base the evaluation on guidelines of the European Commission are

used. The responsible authority ensures the collection of data (incl. indicators) required for evaluation.

The information related to monitoring and evaluation will be described in more detail in the rules established

for domestic implementation of the fund.

6.4 Partnership involvement in the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the national programme

Partners are involved during preparation, implementation and evaluation stages of the ISF multi-annual

programme. Involvement of partners is based on internal rules and practices. During the preparation of the

programme, ministries and public sector authorities that are potential final beneficiaries were involved.

EN 33 EN

During implementation and evaluation the partners involved will be ministries and, where necessary, experts.

When partners are selected, the possibility of conflict of interest is prevented at all stages (preparation,

implementation and evaluation).

6.5 Information and publicity

Estonia will ensure that a website or a website portal is provided with information on and access to the

national programme; inform potential beneficiaries about funding opportunities under the national

programme; and publicise to Union citizens the role and achievements of the Specific Regulations through

information and communication actions on the results and impact of the national programme.

Estonia will ensure transparency on the implementation of the national programme and maintain a list of

actions supported by each national programme which will be accessible through the website or the website

portal.

Further information and publicity actions may also be carried out during the course of the programme.

6.6 Coordination and complementarity with other instruments

ISF support will be allocated for actions that are generally not eligible for financing from other financial

instruments of the EU. Nonetheless, during drafting of the actions in the programme, planning of the

structural funds of the EU was followed in order to prevent overlapping, e.g. European Maritime and

Fisheries Fund. When a project application is submitted, the responsible authority determines from which

project of a similar area the final beneficiary has previously received support, or whether the final beneficiary

is applying for it in the future.

6.7 Beneficiaries

6.7.1 List of main types of beneficiaries of the programme:

State/federal authorities

Non-Governmental organisations

Education/research organisations

6.7.2 Direct award (if applicable)

The responsible authority allocates the support directly, if the nature of the project requires, or if the project

can be realised only by the state authority which based on its technical expertise and administrative powers

has the required competence and holds a monopoly position. The reason for direct award of the support is

added to the financing decision.

EN 34 EN

EN 35 EN

7. THE FINANCING PLAN OF THE PROGRAMME

Table 1: Financing plan ISF-Borders

Specific objective / national objective Total

SO1.NO1 National capacity 690,000.00

SO1.NO2 Union acquis 112,500.00

SO1.NO3 Consular cooperation

TOTAL NO SO1 Support a common visa policy 802,500.00

SO1.SA1 Consular cooperation

TOTAL SO1 Support a common visa policy 802,500.00

SO2.NO1 EUROSUR 5,102,039.40

SO2.NO2 Information exchange 1,250,625.00

SO2.NO3 Common Union standards 525,000.00

SO2.NO4 Union acquis 517,500.00

SO2.NO5 Future challenges

SO2.NO6 National capacity 26,827,457.27

TOTAL NO SO2 Borders 34,222,621.67

SO2.SA2 FRONTEX equipment 1,211,619.60

TOTAL SO2 Borders 35,434,241.27

TOTAL SO3 Operating support 0.00

Technical assistance borders 1,589,087.60

TOTAL 37,825,828.87

(1) The amount under SO2 / NO6 includes an envelope of EUR 6 412 600 to be spent in accordance

with Article 64(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/2226. This specific allocation can support 100% of

those costs (including costs of operating the system) and is provided exclusively for this purpose. It cannot

be used to cover other needs/costs, including those referred to in subparagraphs a) to g) of article 64(2) and

article 64 (3). This specific allocation shall not be taken into consideration in the calculation that determines

the percentage of funding that may be used to finance operating support, according to Article 10 (1) of

Regulation (EU) No 515/2014.

(2) The amount under SO2 / NO6 includes an envelope of EUR 3 216 666,66 that shall be used to

support exclusively the costs incurred by Member States in accordance with Article 85(1) of Regulation

(EU) 2018/1240. Such costs can be fully supported (up to 100%) by this extra allocation. This extra

allocation cannot be used to cover other costs, including those referred to in Article 85(2) points a) to d) of

Regulation (EU) 2018/1240, as well as ETIAS’ operating costs.

(3) The amount under SO2 / NO6 includes an envelope of EUR 1 227 000 that shall be used to support

the costs incurred by Member States for the quick and effective upgrading of the national components of

the SIS, in line with the requirements of Regulation (EU) 2018/1861. Such costs can be fully supported (up

to 100%) by this extra allocation.

EN 36 EN

Table 2: Financial Plan ISF-Police

Specific objective / national objective Total

SO5.NO1 C - prevention and combating 6,772,771.05

SO5.NO2 C - exchange of information 2,504,515.00

SO5.NO3 C - training 457,500.00

SO5.NO4 C - victim support 63,750.00

SO5.NO5 C - threat and risk assessment

TOTAL SO5 Preventing and combating crime 9,798,536.05

SO6.NO1 R - prevention and combating 817,500.00

SO6.NO2 R - exchange of information

SO6.NO3 R - training 187,500.00

SO6.NO4 R - victim support

SO6.NO5 R - infrastructure 2,377,623.55

SO6.NO6 R - early warning and crisis 983,485.95

SO6.NO7 R - threat and risk assessment 315,000.00

TOTAL SO6 Risks and crisis 4,681,109.50

Technical assistance police 874,013.45

TOTAL 15,353,659.00

EN 37 EN

Table 3: Total annual EU commitments (in €)

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 TOTAL

ISF-Borders 0.00 5,086,042.00 4,756,045.00 3,523,198.00 9,647,431.59 8,810,470.33 6,002,641.95 37,825,828.87

ISF-Police 0.00 3,039,804.00 2,589,559.00 4,062,585.00 1,887,237.00 1,887,237.00 1,887,237.00 15,353,659.00

Justification for any deviation from the minimum shares set in the Specific Regulations

ETIAS, EES and SIS top-up will be used for SO2 NO6 in line with the EU regulations, therefore the

programme will deviate from the threshold of minimum 5% for SO1 NO3+SO2 NO2+SO2 NO3.

EN 38 EN

DOCUMENTS

Document title Document type Document date Local reference Commission reference Files Sent date Sent By

EN 39 EN

LATEST VALIDATION RESULTS Severity Code Message

Info Programme version has been validated.

Warning 2.15 New EC decision is required for versions > 1. New EC decision is required when fields belonging to the EC decision are modified/added/removed. These fields are all fields except those used in the Authorities section

and the Management and Control System field. For the Financial Plan, amounts within a Specific Objective can be modified without the need for a new EC Decision, as long as the total per Specific Objective stays the same.

Warning 2.24.3 SO1.NO3 (Consular cooperation) + SO2.NO2 (Information exchange) + SO2.NO3 (Common Union standards) (1,775,625.00) should be minimum 5 % of Total Borders Allocation (NOSO1 + NOSO2 + NOSO3 + TA)

(1,891,291.44).

Pikk 61 / 15065 Tallinn / 612 5008 / [email protected] / www.siseministeerium.ee

Registrikood 70000562

Pr Krista Aas

Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet

30.04.2020 nr 14-8.7/795-1

Sisejulgeolekufondist rahastuse taotlemine

Austatud proua Aas

Tuletame meelde, et SiM ootab esimesel võimalusel lisavajaduskaarte ja Sisejulgeolekufondi

välispiiri ja viisade rahastamisvahendi (ISF-B) projektitaotlusi kohustuslike arendustega seotud

vajaduste kohta (SISi arendustega kaasnevad kulud ja ETIASe juurdepääsupunkt), mille kohta

ei ole RES/RE protsessis 2021-2024 lisavajaduskaarti esitatud.

Oleme veelkord üle vaadanud RES 2021–2024 raames esitatud PPA lisavajaduskaardid. Kuna

riigieelarvest ei ole suure tõenäosusega võimalik 2021. a ja 2022. a täiendavat raha

kaasfinantseerimiskohustuse täitmiseks eraldada (täiendav kaasfinantseerimisvajadus tuleneb

Euroopa Komisjoni täiendavatest eraldistest), täidetakse kaasfinantseerimiskohustus

Siseministeeriumi valitsemisala investeeringute reservi abil.

Teil on võimalik taotleda raha järgmiste vajaduste katmiseks:

1) ISF-B (abikõlblikud on Euroopa Liidu välispiiri haldamiseks tehtavad kulud kuni

31.12.2022):

Lisavajadus Kogumaksumus,

€

Võimalik EL toetus

ISF-Bst 75%, €

Võimalik riiklik

kaasfinantseering

25%, €

1. SIS arendustega

kaasnevad kulud

SiM eraldab

kuni 300 000

225 000 75 000

2. ETIASe juurdepääsupunkt

SiM eraldab

kuni 300 000

225 000 75 000

3. Idapiiri seiretehnika

testimine

240 000 180 000 60 000

4. Veesõidukite soojus- ja

öövaatlusseadmed

742 000 556 500 185 500

5. Automatiseeritud

piiriületus sõidukitele

(Luhamaa)

185 993 139 494,75 46 498,25

Pikk 61 / 15065 Tallinn / 612 5008 / [email protected] / www.siseministeerium.ee

Registrikood 70000562

6. Mehitamata

automatiseeritud

piiriületus (Saatse)

SiM eraldab

kuni

206 200

154 650 51 550

7. EL välispiiri valvamiseks

kiisireservi varustus jm

kulud (sidevahendid,

sõidukid, koolitused vms)

SiM eraldab

kuni

714 840

536 130 178 710

KOKKU 2 689 033 2 016 774,75 672 258,25

2) Sisejulgeolekufondi politseikoostöö, kuritegevuse tõkestamise ja selle vastu võitlemise

ning kriisiohje rahastamisvahendist (ISF-P) on võimalik toetust taotleda järgmise

lisavajaduse katmiseks (abikõlblikud on terrorismi tõkestamiseks ja raske kuritegevusega

võitlemiseks tehtud kulud kuni 31.12.2022):

PPA lisavajadus Kogumaksumus Võimalik ISF-P

toetus 75%, €

Võimalik riiklik

kaasfinantseering

25%, €

1. PPA küberüksuse

võimekuse

suurendamine

(lisataotluses toodud

vajalikud

investeeringud)

SiM eraldab

kuni

81 000

60 750 20 250

Kirjale on lisatud taotlemiseks vajalikud vormid. Taotlused palume esitada esimesel

võimalusel. Taotlusi hindab järelevalvekomisjon ja lõpliku rahastamisotsuse teeb kantsler.

Lugupidamisega

(allkirjastatud digitaalselt)

Piret Lilleväli

varade, planeerimise ja tehnoloogia

asekantsler

Teadmiseks: Päästeamet

Lisad:

1. ISF-i toetuse taotlemise vorm;

2. ISF-i projekti tegevuskava ja tulemuste vorm;

3. ISF-i eelarve, rahastusallikate ja maksetaotluse vorm;

4. partnerluse kinnituse vorm;

Pikk 61 / 15065 Tallinn / 612 5008 / [email protected] / www.siseministeerium.ee

Registrikood 70000562

5. ISF-i toetuslepingu projekt;

6. ISF-i abikõlblikkuse reeglid;

7. juhised embleemide ja standardvärvide kohta;

8. ISF-i riiklik programm (inglise keeles);

Aivi Kuivonen 6125179

[email protected]