Submission of the amendment of the ISF programme 2021-2027

EN 1 EN

SFC2021 Programme for AMIF, ISF and BMVI

CCI number 2021EE65ISPR001

Title in English ISF Programme for Estonia 2021-2027

Title in national language(s) ET - Sisejulgeolekufondi rakenduskava 2021-2027

Version 4.0

First year 2021

Last year 2027

Eligible from 1 Jan 2021

Eligible until 31 Dec 2029

Commission decision number

Commission decision date

Member State amending decision number

MS amending decision entry into force date

Non substantial transfer (Article 24(5) CPR) No

Clerical or editorial corrections (24/6) CPR) No

Thematic facility (Article 11 AMIF Reg., Article 8

BMVI Reg., Article 8 ISF Reg.)

Yes

Approved by monitoring committee Yes

EN 2 EN

Table of Contents

1. Programme strategy: main challenges and policy responses ..................................................................... 4

2. Specific Objectives & Technical Assistance ............................................................................................. 8 2.1. Specific objective: 1. Exchange of information .................................................................................. 9

2.1.1. Description of the specific objective ............................................................................................ 9 2.1.2. Indicators.................................................................................................................................... 13

Table 1: Output indicators ............................................................................................................... 13 Table 2: Result indicators ................................................................................................................ 14

2.1.3. Indicative breakdown of the programme resources (EU) by type of intervention .................... 15

Table 3: Indicative breakdown ......................................................................................................... 15 2.1. Specific objective: 2. Cross-border cooperation ............................................................................... 16

2.1.1. Description of the specific objective .......................................................................................... 16 2.1.2. Indicators.................................................................................................................................... 20

Table 1: Output indicators ............................................................................................................... 20

Table 2: Result indicators ................................................................................................................ 21

2.1.3. Indicative breakdown of the programme resources (EU) by type of intervention .................... 24

Table 3: Indicative breakdown ......................................................................................................... 24 2.1. Specific objective: 3. Preventing and combating crime.................................................................... 25

2.1.1. Description of the specific objective .......................................................................................... 25 2.1.2. Indicators.................................................................................................................................... 30

Table 1: Output indicators ............................................................................................................... 30 Table 2: Result indicators ................................................................................................................ 31

2.1.3. Indicative breakdown of the programme resources (EU) by type of intervention .................... 32 Table 3: Indicative breakdown ......................................................................................................... 32

2.2. Technical assistance: TA.36(5). Technical assistance - flat rate (Art. 36(5) CPR) .......................... 33

2.2.1. Description ................................................................................................................................. 33 2.2.2. Indicative breakdown of technical assistance pursuant to Article 37 CPR ............................... 34

Table 4: Indicative breakdown ......................................................................................................... 34

3. Financing plan .......................................................................................................................................... 35

3.1. Financial appropriations by year ....................................................................................................... 35 Table 5: Financial appropriations per year ...................................................................................... 35

3.2. Total financial allocations ................................................................................................................. 36 Table 6: Total financial allocations by fund and national contribution ........................................... 36

3.3. Transfers ........................................................................................................................................... 37

4. Enabling conditions ................................................................................................................................. 39 Table 9: Horizontal enabling conditions .................................................................................................. 39

5. Programme authorities ............................................................................................................................. 45

Table 10: Programme authorities ............................................................................................................. 45 6. Partnership ............................................................................................................................................... 46

7. Communication and visibility .................................................................................................................. 47 8. Use of unit costs, lump sums, flat rates and financing not linked to costs .............................................. 48

Appendix 1: Union contribution based on unit costs, lump sums and flat rates .......................................... 49 A. Summary of the main elements ........................................................................................................... 49 B. Details by type of operation ................................................................................................................ 50

C. Calculation of the standard scale of unit costs, lump sums or flat rates ............................................. 51 1. Source of data used to calculate the standard scale of unit costs, lump sums or flat rates (who

produced, collected and recorded the data, where the data is stored, cut-off dates, validation, etc.)

.......................................................................................................................................................... 51 2. Please specify why the proposed method and calculation based on Article 94(2) CPR is relevant

to the type of operation. ................................................................................................................... 52 3. Please specify how the calculations were made, in particular including any assumptions made in

terms of quality or quantities. Where relevant, statistical evidence and benchmarks should be used

and, if requested, provided in a format that is usable by the Commission. ..................................... 53

EN 3 EN

4. Please explain how you have ensured that only eligible expenditure was included in the

calculation of the standard scale of unit cost, lump sum or flat rate. ............................................... 54 5. Assessment of the audit authority(ies) of the calculation methodology and amounts and the

arrangements to ensure the verification, quality, collection and storage of data. ............................ 55 Appendix 2: Union contribution based on financing not linked to costs ..................................................... 56

A. Summary of the main elements ........................................................................................................... 56 B. Details by type of operation ................................................................................................................ 57

Appendix 3 ................................................................................................................................................... 58 Thematic facility (Article 11 AMIF Reg., Article 8 BMVI Reg., Article 8 ISF Reg.)............................ 58

DOCUMENTS ............................................................................................................................................. 60

EN 4 EN

1. Programme strategy: main challenges and policy responses

Reference: points (a)(iii), (iv), (v) and (ix) Article 22(3) of Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 (CPR)

In Estonia, there has been a significant change in the national strategic planning process compared to

the programming of the 2014-2020 period. All strategic planning of the national needs and their

financing is central; there is no separate process for programming the EU funds. The planning is source-

neutral; the mapping of important strategic goals is done without determining the source of budget. The

funding is decided on a rolling basis during the yearly budgeting exercises. This fundamental change in

process has also affected the compilation and structure of this programme.

The ISF programme is designed to address the most pressing challenges identified at the national level

and complement the national funding. Synergies and consistencies with other programmes and

instruments are sought, where possible. Security is addressed in several Union programmes, coherence

is integral with other EU funds e.g. AMIF and BMVI which all support actions contributing to the EU’s

overall security. Furthermore, synergies between the Justice programme and the Citizens, Equality,

Rights and Values Programme are relevant in terms of assisting and protecting the victims of crime and

judicial training to a lesser extent but also inter-agency cooperation between relevant law enforcement

authorities and ensuring connection of LEAs security-related IT-systems to ECRIS-TCN. Also, there is

synergy with the EU Customs Programme 2021-27 in terms of responding to security threats and cross-

border crime. Similarly, coherence with Cohesion Policy Funds, Horizon Europe and the Digital Europe

programme are kept in mind in relevant areas. Simultaneously with the programming of the ISF, the

planning of the use of Cohesion Policy Funds is carried out in Estonia, thereby the complementarity and

prevention of any overlaps on national level is ensured. The actions to be financed will depend on the

resources available and priorities at the time. The precise actions and the source of financing will be

agreed during the implementation of the programme in accordance with national procedures.

Synergies with other funds (e.g. AMIF, BMVI) and agencies’ toolbox will be sought and overlapping

avoided by the thorough communication between the ministries, the European Commission, agencies

and other relevant stakeholders.

The-long term umbrella strategy Estonia 2035 provides a coherent guidance for policy-makers in

different areas. The main national strategy covering the internal security goals is the Internal Security

Development Plan (ISDP). The ISDP has been developed in close partnership with all relevant partners

and stakeholders (please see Section 4 for more comprehensive overview concerning their input). The

priorities highlighted in the ISDP are creating secure living environment (incl. less violence); ensured

internal security (incl. fight against organised crime, readiness for crisis); fast and professional help;

citizenship, migration and identity administration policy that ensures Estonian development; smart and

innovative internal security.

The ISDP 2020-2030 takes into account the relevant EU policies and goals. In Estonia, the

responsibility for implementing various relevant policies is intertwined between several ministries and

areas of government. Complementarity is sought with national strategies: e.g. Digital Agenda 2020, the

general principles of Criminal Policy until 2030, National Security Concept of the Republic of Estonia,

the internal security strand in the National Defence Development Plan 2017-2026 and National

Radiation Safety Development Plan 2018‒2027.

The main keywords that describe the challenges in Estonia cover most of the ISF objectives:

cybercrime, money laundering and terrorist financing, terrorism and radicalization, serious and

organised crimes, drug trafficking, financial investigations, corruption, detection and confiscating of

criminal assets, trafficking in human beings, (sexual) abuse and exploitation of children, forensic

capacity, crisis prevention, emergency preparedness, resilience during crisis, repulsion of cyber-attacks,

chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) materials and explosives.

The measures to address these challenges include developments and continuity of information and

communication technologies, smart and innovative technological tools, increased analytical capacity,

(operational) cooperation within and between different parties and authorities as well as improved

national capabilities incl. through training and purchase of relevant equipment. Staffing the relevant

units with sufficient number of skilled professionals is also a necessity. Other keywords are prevention,

EN 5 EN

early warning and awareness raising. Security research plays an important role in developing innovative

methods or deploying new technologies.

The goals of the ISF programme can be achieved with the contribution from various authorities in their

area of responsibility. The involvement of civil society, other relevant partners and cooperation with the

private sector is similarly essential in this area - projects of this nature as well as cooperation with third

countries will also be considered when implementing the ISF programme. The support will be given as

grants.

As some of the challenges remain the same, the ISF 2021-27 programme will partly focus on similar

activities as those of ISFP in the period of 2014-2020.

ISF-Police 2014-2020 has provided valuable complementary resources for implementing the relevant

EU acquis. The current programme continues to ensure coherence with the application of the Union

acquis, and where appropriate, action plans, throughout the cycle of the programme and taking into

account the new emerging threats. A brief overview of the state of play in implementing the EU acquis

is as follows.

Estonia has been following the aims and actions of the EU Drugs Strategy 2013-2020 and the EU

Action Plan on Drugs 2017-2020 by implementing the national strategy document The White Paper on

Drug Prevention Policy, adopted in January 2014. Its main objective is to reduce drug use and the

resulting harms. It follows the EU’s balanced approach to drug policy and is structured around seven

pillars: (i) supply reduction; (ii) universal primary prevention; (iii) early detection and intervention; (iv)

harm reduction; (v) treatment and rehabilitation; (vi) resocialisation; and (vii) monitoring. The

implementation and funding of drug policy activities is done through national strategies that follow the

aims of White Paper and therefore the EU Drugs Strategy.

In terms of EU information systems, the required works stemming from the regulations are ongoing on

a national level.

The PNR database is being developed from the ISF 2014-2020. The PNR directive was transposed in

February 2019. The PIU unit was set up in May 2018 and from 15 August 2019 there is an automatic

comparison of passenger data with the SIS.

According to the PNR directive Annex I, list of the PNR data also consider API data as a part of the

PNR. The programme will ensure the processing of API data as a part of the PNR. API regulation

(Regulation (EU) 2025/13 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2024 on the

collection and transfer of advance passenger information for the prevention, detection, investigation and

prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime) implementation will also be addressed with the ISF

programme.

The SIS in the field of police cooperation has been developed under the ISF-Police. Interpol inquiries

have been integrated into SIERNE. The recommendations of Schengen Evaluation 2018 and 2023

reports were considered and kept in focus when planning for 2021-2027.

One of the recommendations from the Schengen Evaluation made to Estonia in 2018 is financed from

the ISF - development of an interactive e-learning solution on international police cooperation based on

practical situations and cases. (see the description of SO2). As for 2023 Schengen evaluation, the

recommendation on introducing an automated data loader to the Europol Information System will be

financed from the ISF programme.

The other needs stemming the Schengen evaluations in the field of SIS/SIRENE and Police Cooperation

will be mostly financed from the national budget, however ISF funding could be used where

appropriate.

The Prüm II regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/982 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13

March 2024 on the automated search and exchange of data for police cooperation) significantly

enhances and expands the existing automated data exchange mechanism established under the original

Prüm framework. Previously, European Union Member States’ law enforcement authorities could

exchange DNA profiles, dactyloscopic data and certain vehicle registration data through bilateral

channels with all Member States. The updated regulation adds facial images and police records to these

three existing categories, enabling the automatic and anonymized exchange of all five data types. This

advancement significantly facilitates the prevention, detection, and investigation of crimes, as well as

the search for missing persons and the identification of unknown human remains. Given the

aforementioned improvements, the Prüm II mechanism has the potential to be a true game-changer for

EN 6 EN

cross-border police co-operation. The Prüm II Regulation implementation will be addressed by the ISF

programme. (see the description of SO1).

Estonia participates actively in CEPOL cooperation. CEPOL National Unit is located in Police and

Border Guard College of Estonian Academy of Security Sciences (EASS). EASS is also the Framework

Partner of CEPOL. In Estonia cooperation with CEPOL is organised in the format of national network

consisting of 11 agencies having responsibilities in the field of law enforcement.

The training activities for law enforcement officials will take into account the outcomes of the EU

Strategic Training Needs Assessment 2022-2025 prepared by CEPOL, special attention will be given to

the core capability gaps.

The principles of the Directive (EU) 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council have

been taken over by the Emergency Act.

There are no problems with the transposition and implementation of EU acquis in Estonia regarding

anti-corruption measures. With the Act on Protection of Persons Who Report Work-Related Breaches of

European Union Law Estonia has transposed the Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons

who report breaches of Union law. There is no separate EU action plan on anti-corruption and until

April 2021 when EU Strategy to tackle Organised Crime 2021-2025 was adopted. It can be concluded

that activities of Estonia in the area are not in contradiction to EU strategic objectives.

The Commission’s 2021 Rule of Law report points out that the Estonian criminal justice system has

proven its effectiveness in identifying high-level corruption cases. Measures to strengthen the

preventive side include guidelines for lobbying and conflict of interests. The legislative procedure to

adopt comprehensive rules on whistleblowers protection is currently ongoing. The asset declaration

system was updated to oblige ministers’ political advisers to submit a declaration of financial interests.

The transposition of the EU acquis related to trafficking in human beings into Estonian law has been

carried out. Nevertheless, the implementation of measures by different authorities need to be further

improved as not all the special measures related to treatment of victims are implemented in everyday

work of authorities (e.g. special measures related to hearings). According to Article 2 of the Directive

2011/36/EU of 5 April 2011, Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the

following intentional acts are punishable: the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or

reception of persons, including the exchange or transfer of control over those persons, by means of the

threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of

power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve

the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation. Estonia is

dedicated to the full compliance with the definition of the Anti-trafficking Directive as a primary point

of reference.

Until April 2021 the latest EU level strategic guidelines in the area of trafficking in human beings were

provided in the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council

„Reporting on the follow-up to the EU Strategy towards the Eradication of trafficking in human beings

and identifying further concrete actions”. Estonia is taking relevant actions to address the three priorities

outlined in the communication and contributes in relation to the priorities set in the new EU Strategy on

Combatting Trafficking in Human Beings.

Estonia has transposed Directive 2021/555/EC defining a set of common minimum rules for the control

of the acquisition and possession of firearms in the EU, as well as the transfer of firearms to another EU

country into national law. The 2017 revision brings substantial improvements to security by making it

harder to acquire legally certain high capacity weapons, such as automatic firearms transformed into

semi-automatics. The firearms directive also strengthens cooperation between EU countries by

improving the exchange of information between EU countries (Estonia has been using IMI since

September 2019), and brings substantial improvements to traceability of firearms by improving the

tracking of legally held firearms, to reduce the risk of diversion into illegal markets. Commission

Implementing Directives (EU) 2019/69 and (EU) 2019/68 have also been transposed into Estonian law.

Estonia follows the implementing regulation on common minimum standards for deactivation of

firearms. All deactivated firearms are registered by the Estonian Police and their records are stored in

the register of service and civilian weapons.

EN 7 EN

The government of Estonia is in process of renewing its priorities for the fight against terrorism in the

Internal Security Development Plan (ISDP) 2020-2030. The Strategy will cover all the necessary factors

and developments regarding counter-terrorism and violent extremism. ISDP priorities are in conformity

with the UN CT Global Strategy, as well as the main principles and priorities of the UN, EU, CoE,

OSCE and international law (incl. the protection of human rights). The ISDP is partly restricted.

In December of 2018, the Estonian Parliament passed a bill, which implements UN resolution 2178, the

CoE’s Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism Additional Protocol (CETS 217) and EU Directive

2017/541 into national law. Among other things, the bill expanded the notion of victims of terrorism

and the elements of crime for the crime of terrorism. The Estonian Parliament adopted amendments to

the Penal Code, the Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Prevention Act and Victim Support

Act in December 2018 in accordance with the directive of the EU. The bill also brings Estonian

legislation in line with the UN resolution and additional protocol of the Council of Europe convention

on the prevention of terrorism. The Chemicals Act was amended with additional requirements to oblige

prior authorisation for handling hazardous chemicals and the state supervision and notification of

suspicious transactions as well as of loss and theft of the explosive precursor(s). The field of security of

radioactive sources is regulated by Radiation Act that is in accordance with EU Council directive

2013/59/Euratom and other international conventions and standards. Estonia is in the process of

developing additional capacity to identify and interrupt terrorism-related activities on the internet (the

EU initiative to counter terrorist content online in cooperation with private sector, incl. the EU Internet

Forum). The implementation of the Terrorist Content Online Regulation will be financed from the state

budget. Web constables (police officers working on the internet) cooperate with the Internet Referral

Unit of the Europol Counter Terrorism Centre (ECTC) on countering illegal web-content and the violent

propaganda.

The Anti Money Laundering Act which transposes the Fifth AMLD directive has been adopted in July

2020.

Regarding cybercrime, Estonia has set up legislation and implementation of Budapest Convention and

penalisation of illicit activities. Internal operative cooperation between law enforcement and judicial

authorities is working well and Estonia is looking forward to new legislation regarding the e-evidence.

Estonia has ratified the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual

Exploitation and Sexual Abuse (the Lanzarote Convention). Estonian law is in conformity with the

criminal law provisions of the Lanzarote Convention. The activities required for ratification of the

Convention are specified in the “Development Plan for Children and Families for 2012–2020” and in

the “Violence Prevention strategy for 2015–2020”. The topics are also covered in “Action Programme

of the Government of the Republic for 2019–2023”, which highlights combating sexual crimes related

to minors and targeting perpetrators.

Unfortunately it is not feasible to overcome all the current challenges described in the next section

solely with the help of the ISF funding. This programme seeks to address these to the maximum extent

possible while also leaving a degree of flexibility to be able to respond to future events and changing

priorities. The actions to be financed will depend on the resources available and priorities at the time.

The precise actions and the source of financing will be agreed during the implementation of the

programme in accordance with national procedures.

The programme design and strategy take into account the administrative capacity and governance rules

for efficiency and wherever possible simplification measures will be implemented to reduce the

administrative burden and enhanced efficiency, effectiveness and economy.

EN 8 EN

2. Specific Objectives & Technical Assistance

Reference: Article 22(2) and (4) CPR

Selected Specific objective or Technical assistance Type of action

1. Exchange of information Regular actions

1. Exchange of information Specific actions

1. Exchange of information Annex IV actions

1. Exchange of information Operating support

1. Exchange of information Emergency assistance

2. Cross-border cooperation Regular actions

2. Cross-border cooperation Specific actions

2. Cross-border cooperation Annex IV actions

2. Cross-border cooperation Operating support

2. Cross-border cooperation Emergency assistance

3. Preventing and combating crime Regular actions

3. Preventing and combating crime Specific actions

3. Preventing and combating crime Annex IV actions

3. Preventing and combating crime Operating support

3. Preventing and combating crime Emergency assistance

TA.36(5). Technical assistance - flat rate (Art.

36(5) CPR)

TA.37. Technical assistance - not linked to costs

(Art. 37 CPR)

EN 9 EN

2.1. Specific objective: 1. Exchange of information

2.1.1. Description of the specific objective

Creating and modernising different secure information systems and e-solutions is a key when ensuring

high level of security. As digitalisation has been one of Estonian flagships for years, it has resulted in a

shortage of funding and experienced developers in the market. At the same time, new requirements for

the Member States to ensure the full and uniform implementation of the Union acquis on security

supported information exchange and in relation to Europol data must be met. Gaps in the EU information

architecture must also be addressed with appropriate tools. Estonia has successfully set up and adapted

national IT systems to ensure the effective connection to security relevant Union information systems

and this is an on-going effort.

Estonia plans to use the ISF funding mainly for setting up, adapting and maintaining ICT systems

contributing to the objectives of the Fund. It is also necessary to guarantee training of the use of the

systems.

The current strategy is that the potential activities considered under this specific objective will mostly

focus on the implementation measure (d) (supporting relevant national measures) from Annex II of the

ISF regulation. Implementation measure (a) is also a priority - ensuring the uniform application of the

Union acquis on security by supporting the exchange of relevant information.

If the need arises, implementing measures (b) and (c) may also be considered at later stage of

implementation. There are no specific actions planned at the time of programming.

The planned addressing of the implementation measures in Annex II and examples of actions are as

follows.

(a) Ensuring the uniform application of the Union acquis on security by supporting the exchange of

relevant information for example via Prüm, EU PNR and SIS, including through the implementation of

recommendations from quality control and evaluation mechanisms such as the Schengen evaluation

mechanism and other quality control and evaluation mechanisms.

The current situation concerning the application of the relevant legislation (PNR, SIS, PRÜM) is

described in Section 1.

One of the priorities is to keep ensuring further developments and maintenance of the PNR. The PNR

database has been developed in the frame of the ISF 2014-2020 programme but continuous funding is

essential to build on the results of this project. Several study visits are planned in addition to further

developments to ensure the reliability of the system and guarantee the compliance with the requirements

of the PNR directive and API Regulation (EU) 2025/13. PNR database interacts with the Europol

Information System.

The new functionalities in SIS should be completed by 2022. Should there be any changes in the timeline

or new agreements on SIS in the future; ISF funding may be considered for this. In addition, the

proposed measures to establish the interoperability between EU large-scale information systems need to

be continuously addressed. Estonia plans to use the BMVI programme for this purpose. However, should

the need arise, developments necessary to meet the objectives of the ISF regulation may also be

considered from this programme.

The capacity to implement the Regulation on automated data exchange for police cooperation (Prüm II)

will be enhanced.

An indicative list of actions in connection with Annex III include:

 Setting up, adapting and maintaining ICT systems that contribute to the achievement of the ISF

objectives, training on the use of such systems, improving the interoperability components and

data quality of the systems;

 financing of equipment;

EN 10 EN

 training for staff and experts in relevant law enforcement and judicial authorities and

administrative agencies;

 financing the cost of staff involved in the actions that are supported by the Fund or actions that

are supported by the Fund or actions requiring involvement of staff for technical or security-

related reasons.

Other actions within the scope of ISF may be considered during the implementation of the programme,

depending on the actual needs and available resources.

An indicative list of actions in connection with Annex IV include:

 Projects which aim to improve the interoperability of EU information systems and national ICT

systems, insofar as provided for by Union or Member State law.

(d) Supporting relevant national measures including the interconnection of security-relevant national

databases and their connection to Union databases when foreseen in relevant legal bases, if relevant to

implement the specific objectives set out in Article 3(2)(a).

The main focus of this programme shall be on supporting the relevant national measures. There are

several challenges to better collect, analyse and share information within and between the relevant

competent authorities.

It is important that all offenses are dealt with as expeditiously as possible and that the competent

authorities have legitimate access to the necessary national and international databases. To this end, the

relevant (national) information systems and databases and their interoperability need to be developed,

taking into account information security measures and ensuring effective supervision and enforcement.

There are still areas in Estonia where data exchange is not digital and much work is done manually. The

criminal proceedings are not fully digitised which hinders the speed of expertise and does not provide the

maximum effective life cycle of evidence. The interaction between the police investigator and the

forensic scientist concerning a specific case file still needs to be improved with the use of technology.

There is a need for new nationwide monitoring application (e.g. people, vehicles, objects), connected to

the SIS and ensuring the fulfilment of international obligations in the fight against terrorism and serious

and covert crimes (e.g. cybercrime, money laundering, sexual offenses against children, etc.). Estonia

plans to invest both structural funds and national budget into this area; ISF funding is also considered.

There is a shortage of resources for the development of digital forensics in Estonia. As crimes move

more to the Internet and digitalisation increases, the capacity of the relevant authorities should be

increased to cope with the volume of work. There are shortcomings in ICT tools and sector-specific

training, which are often funded on a one-off basis, leading to a lack of systemic and sustainable

capacity. There is a need for automated solutions for the operative performance of works.

The surveillance capacity, incl. data gathering during surveillance activities, and relevant information

exchange within and by the criminal police needs to be improved, incl. the upgrading of the national

systems and purchasing relevant (ICT) equipment. The operational surveillance procedure tool used by

the Estonian law enforcement authorities needs to be updated. It is necessary to develop a new

surveillance module to conduct surveillance and tactical analysis as a whole in a single environment with

the possibility of performing various queries (incl. to relevant EU information systems) and exchanging

information. The surveillance system will be connected with the Europol Information System (EIS) and

the SIS.

Capacity needs to be enhanced to securely exchange information through SIENA and to enhance the

interoperability of the national Case Management System.

Money laundering, funding most of the serious and organised crime, is one of the main drivers in the

field. To enhance and facilitate the accountability of corporate service providers, financial institutions

EN 11 EN

and virtual currency service providers to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing, an

appropriate portal for reporting needs to be introduced.

Estonia outsourced a development of risk assessment methodology to put together a new risk assessment

for money laundering and terrorist financing in Estonia. Several working groups started in autumn 2019

and the national risk assessment was approved in April 2021.

According to the Schengen evaluation recommendation, the Police and Border Guard Board needs to

introduce an automated data loader to the Europol Information System.

Developing capacities of relevant authorities to deal with open source intelligence is a priority that needs

funding and different sources, incl. the ISF are considered for this purpose.

An indicative list of actions in connection with Annex III include:

 setting up, adapting and maintaining ICT systems that contribute to the achievement of the ISF

objectives, training on the use of such systems, improving the interoperability components and

data quality of the systems;

 financing of equipment;

 financing the cost of staff involved in the actions that are supported by the Fund or actions that

are supported by the Fund or actions requiring involvement of staff for technical or security-

related reasons.

Other actions within the scope of ISF may be considered during the implementation of the programme,

depending on the actual needs and available resources.

An indicative list of actions in connection with Annex IV include:

 projects which aim to improve the interoperability of EU information systems and national ICT

systems, insofar as provided for by Union or Member State law.

Operating support:

Estonia plans to use operating support to better contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the ISF

programme. The use of operating support enables to maintain capabilities which are crucial to the Union

as a whole.

It is necessary to increase the staffing of the national PIU within the Estonian Police and Border Guard

Board (PBGB). The PIU analyses passenger lists, processes post-hit information 24/7 and exchanges

information with their counterparts. Recruiting additional officials to the PIU is vital to ensure the

required level of data exchange.

There is a consistent need to ensure the maintenance of the PNR system (e.g. security and software

upgrades, infrastructure costs - costs required to maintain the servers, licenses, disk space, etc.)

In the field of digital forensics the yearly costs of special software (upgrades, fees, licences) must be

guaranteed to deal with the identification, collection, handling and storage of digital evidence.

In the field of cybercrime and OSINT, the yearly maintenance costs of special software and network

equipment must be covered to increase and maintain the capacity of the police to systematically manage,

analyze and extract incoming information.

For all the mentioned areas, the final beneficiary is the PBGB which is by the statute responsible for

security and public order in the state and the investigation and prevention of offences. Depending on

national arrangements, funding related to the maintenance of ICT systems may be directed to the IT and

Development Centre, Ministry of the Interior which by the statute is responsible for providing necessary

ICT services to the Ministry and its area of government.

The possibility of financing other activities is not ruled out.

EN 12 EN

Financial instruments: n/a.

EN 13 EN

2.1. Specific objective 1. Exchange of information

2.1.2. Indicators

Reference: point (e) of Article 22(4) CPR

Table 1: Output indicators

ID Indicator Measurement unit Milestone (2024) Target (2029)

O.1.1 Number of participants in training activities number 12 237

O.1.2 Number of expert meetings/workshops/study visits number 2 11

O.1.3 Number of ICT systems set up/adapted/maintained number 3 10

O.1.4 Number of equipment items purchased number 6 98

EN 14 EN

2.1. Specific objective 1. Exchange of information

2.1.2. Indicators

Reference: point (e) of Article 22(4) CPR

Table 2: Result indicators

ID Indicator Measurement

unit Baseline

Measurement

unit for baseline

Reference

year(s) Target (2029)

Measurement

unit for target Source of data Comments

R.1.5 Number of ICT systems

made interoperable in the

Member States/ with

security- relevant EU and

decentralised information

systems/with international

databases

number 0 number 2021 4 number Project reports

R.1.6 Number of administrative

units that have set up new

or adapted existing

information exchange

mechanisms/procedures/to

ols/guidance for exchange

of information with other

Member States/EU

agencies/international

organisations/third

countries

number 0 number 2021 4 number Project reports

R.1.7 Number of participants

who consider the training

useful for their work

number 0 share 2021 177 number Participant

feedback survey

R.1.8 Number of participants

who report three months

after the training activity

that they are using the

skills and competences

acquired during the

training

number 0 share 2021 177 number Participant

feedback survey

EN 15 EN

2.1. Specific objective 1. Exchange of information

2.1.3. Indicative breakdown of the programme resources (EU) by type of intervention

Reference: Article 22(5) CPR; and Article 16(12) AMIF Regulation, Article 13(12) ISF Regulation or Article 13(18) BMVI Regulation

Table 3: Indicative breakdown

Type of intervention Code Indicative amount (Euro)

Type of action 001.ICT systems, interoperability, data quality (excluding equipment) 13,187,144.96

Type of action 002.Networks, centres of excellence, cooperation structures, joint

actions and operations

0.00

Type of action 003.Joint Investigation Teams (JITs) or other joint operations 0.00

Type of action 004.Secondment or deployment of experts 0.00

Type of action 005.Training 0.00

Type of action 006.Exchange of best practices, workshops, conferences, events,

awareness-raising campaigns, communication activities

0.00

Type of action 007.Studies, pilot projects, risk assessments 0.00

Type of action 008.Equipment 1,247,129.85

Type of action 009.Means of transport 0.00

Type of action 010.Buildings, facilities 0.00

Type of action 011.Deployment or other follow-up of research projects 0.00

EN 16 EN

2.1. Specific objective: 2. Cross-border cooperation

2.1.1. Description of the specific objective

Estonia is active both in bilateral and multilateral cross-border (operational) cooperation at Union level

to combat the important serious and organised crime threats to the EU.

There is tight cooperation in operational matters between the Estonian Criminal Police and their

counterparts in neighbouring countries in the area of drug trafficking. Several Joint Investigation teams

have been formed. In addition to competent authorities within and Between Member States, cooperation

with international organisations (Europol, Interpol, CEPOL, EMCDDA, UNODC, DEA, etc.) needs to

be enhanced. Both the Estonian police and customs authority have placed their Liaison Officers at

Europol to facilitate day-to-day information exchange. Trainings, exercises, mutual learning and

specialised exchange programmes are useful tools for this purpose. Focus must be on the current trends –

notably technological developments and the spread of synthetic opioids, incl. fentanyls. It is crucial to

respond better to a globalised drug market by strengthening partnerships between Member States’

authorities and other relevant partners, incl. third countries, where relevant.

In the fight against terrorism, the Estonian law enforcement agencies are supported by international

cooperation within the EU, the Counter Terrorism Group CTG, and the European Counter Terrorism

Centre at Europol, information exchange at Interpol, counter-terrorism cooperation with UN, NATO,

Council of Europe, OSCE and bilateral relations with partner countries.

Coordination and cooperation of law enforcement authorities and other competent authorities dealing

with organised crime is vital. In the framework of the EU Policy Cycle for organised and serious

international crime: EMPACT 2022+, Estonia is planning to Estonia participate in the operational action

plans for the following areas: excise fraud, Missing Trader Intra Community (MTIC) fraud, new

psychoactive substances and synthetic drugs, irregular migration, attacks against information systems

(cybercrime), sexual exploitation of children (cybercrime), fraud with non-cash means of payment

(cybercrime), firearms smuggling, environmental crime and organised property crime.

It is important for Estonia to emphasise the enhancement of EU inter-agency security cooperation (joint

activities, information sharing, etc.). Estonia itself has contributed to this when the first Europol-

FRONTEX Management Board joint meeting was organised under the auspices of the Estonian

Presidency of the Council of the EU and the cooperation principles and activities were agreed.

Under this specific objective Estonia plans to use the ISF funding mainly for increasing coordination and

improving inter-agency cooperation of competent authorities at national and Union level and with third

countries, where relevant.

The current strategy is that the potential activities of this specific objective will form the most modest

part of the programme. The planned focus of this specific objective is to contribute to implementing

measures (a): concerning the increased law enforcement operations between Member States, with special

emphasis on operational cooperation mechanisms in the context of EMPACT (b) and (c): improving

inter-agency cooperation at Union level between Member States, and the relevant Union bodies, offices

and agencies as well as at national level among the national authorities; also to increase coordination and

cooperation of law enforcement and other competent authorities within and between Member States.

The minimum percentage set for this SO is not reached. This decision stems from the nature and amount

of cross-border (joint) operations which cannot be forecast. These operations arise on a rolling basis in

each field and Estonia continues to finance these from the state budget when the need occurs or use

specially earmarked funds (e.g. funding provided by the Commission). Operational cooperation is of

utmost importance and Estonia has and will continue actively participate both in bilateral and

multilateral cross-border (operational) cooperation as described in the beginning of this Section.

Moreover, there are several actions planned under the SO3 which have a broader purpose and therefore

EN 17 EN

also contribute to the objectives of the SO2 (e.g. study visits and enhancing cooperation in the field of

preventing and tackling corruption, international cooperation in preventing and combating cybercrime).

The current strategy takes into account the country's actual needs and challenges. While using

additionally the state budget and other relevant funding possibilities, allocating resources for this specific

objective below the level stipulated in the ISF regulation does not jeopardise the achievement of the

objective.

The planned addressing of the implementation measures in Annex II and examples of actions are as

follows.

(a) Increasing the number of law enforcement operations involving two or more Member States,

including, where appropriate, operations involving other relevant actors, in particular through facilitating

and improving the use of joint investigation teams, joint patrols, hot pursuits, discreet surveillance and

other operational cooperation mechanisms in the context of the EU policy cycle, with special emphasis

on cross-border operations.

To reduce excise criminality and excise tax gap in the Baltic region and EU overall, the efficiency and

capabilities of the relevant authorities in fight against shadow economy (illegal tobacco, fuel, alcohol) is

planned to be increased with the support of ISF.

In cooperation with Spain, several EU member states and third countries (incl. Norway, UK, USA),

Frontex and Europol, an European Operational Team (EOT) will be established in the Spanish region

‘Costa del Sol’, to develop and implement a joint investigative and operational strategy against the main

criminal organisations.

An indicative list of actions in connection with Annex III include:

 providing support to thematic or cross-border networks of specialised national units and national

contact points to improve mutual confidence, the exchange and dissemination of know-how,

information, experience and best practices, the pooling of resources and expertise in joint centres

of excellence;

 education and training for staff and experts in relevant law enforcement authorities and

administrative agencies;

 financing of equipment.

Other actions within the scope of ISF may be considered during the implementation of the programme,

depending on the actual needs and available resources.

An indicative list of actions in connection with Annex IV include:

- Projects which aim to fight the most important threats posed by serious and organised crime, in the

framework of EU policy cycle/EMPACT operational actions.

(b) Increasing coordination and cooperation of competent authorities within and between Member States

and with other relevant actors, for example through networks of specialised national units, Union

networks and cooperation structures, Union centres.

Pursuant to Council Implementing Decision No. 10388/19, in the framework of the Schengen evaluation

of Estonian police co-operation, a recommendation has been made that Estonia should develop an

interactive and user-friendly e-learning solution on international police cooperation based on practical

situations and cases. This recommendation is planned to be addressed with the support of the ISF.

In 2019, the Estonian Social Insurance Board identified and assisted 67 victims or alleged victims of

trafficking in human beings. This is a significant increase compared to 2018 when 12 (alleged) victims

were identified. Investigative bodies and victim support organisations continuously carry out

international cooperation in criminal matters and in cases with suspicion of trafficking in human beings.

Cooperation is important to prevent exposure to human trafficking in host countries and to break up the

organised crime groups mediating prostitutes and illegal labour force to reduce trafficking problems in

Estonia. Therefore, one of the priorities for Estonia is operational level cooperation with third counties,

EN 18 EN

establishing and maintaining reliable contacts, providing training and introducing monitoring methods

developed by the Estonian Police and Border Guard Board and if necessary setting up JITs.

An indicative list of actions in connection with Annex III include:

 providing support to thematic or cross-border networks of specialised national units and national

contact points to improve mutual confidence, the exchange and dissemination of know-how,

information, experience and best practices, the pooling of resources and expertise in joint centres

of excellence;

 education and training for staff and experts in relevant law enforcement authorities and

administrative agencies.

Other actions within the scope of ISF may be considered during the implementation of the programme,

depending on the actual needs and available resources.

(c) Improving inter-agency cooperation at Union level between the Member States, and between

Member States, and relevant Union bodies, offices and agencies as well as at national level among the

competent authorities in each Member State.

It is essential to explore ways to improve the cross-border police and customs cooperation with the

involvement of relevant EU bodies (e.g. Europol, EUROJUST). Criminal investigation officers from

Estonian customs and police authorities need to be better prepared and informed to prevent and combat

all forms of serious and international crime (e.g. drugs, trafficking in human beings, firearms trafficking,

euro counterfeiting, money laundering). The secondment of officers for traineeships to the Estonian

Liaison Office of Europol is a useful way to promote and improve the effectiveness of transnational

operational cooperation (e.g. the use of Joint Investigation teams’ capabilities, Joint Analyst Teams

(JAT), Controlled Delivery (CD), and other possibilities offered by Europol, for example the Analysis

Work Files and SIENA network), cooperation with Europol Counter Terrorism Centre and its units, incl.

CBRN, demining and special tactics.

Estonian customs authorities would also benefit from closer operational cooperation with other EU

customs administrations for better gathering and analysing information; to identify targets of organised

crime; and gathering evidence in criminal proceedings. Study visits may be organised to serve this

purpose.

Enhancing preparedness, early warning and response to threats and crisis requires greater cooperation

between the authorities involved in CBRNe events, incl. the need to develop international cooperation

under the RescEU, EU CBRNe Action Plan and threat assessments on CBRNe and terrorism. Trainings,

guidelines, regulations, exercises, case studies, joint investigation teams, testings, participation in

seminars and conferences on a national level and abroad contribute to this end.

It is also necessary to enhance inter-agency cooperation between first responders in the rescue services

on how to safely react to calls concerning security incidents. This is an area which goes beyond the basic

training of rescue services but is essential when co-responding with the police services. The knowledge

and best practices of partners from other Member States is similarly crucial.

An indicative list of actions in connection with Annex III include:

 actions that improve resilience as regard emerging threats, including chemical, biological,

radiological and nuclear threats;

 providing support to thematic or cross-border networks of specialised national units and national

contact points to improve mutual confidence, the exchange and dissemination of know-how,

EN 19 EN

information, experience and best practices, the pooling of resources and expertise in joint centres

of excellence;

 education and training for staff and experts in relevant law enforcement authorities and

administrative agencies.

Other actions within the scope of ISF may be considered during the implementation of the programme,

depending on the actual needs and available resources.

Operating support:

The current strategy does not foresee using the operating support under this specific objective. However,

when the need occurs, operating support may be considered.

Financial instruments: n/a.

EN 20 EN

2.1. Specific objective 2. Cross-border cooperation

2.1.2. Indicators

Reference: point (e) of Article 22(4) CPR

Table 1: Output indicators

ID Indicator Measurement unit Milestone (2024) Target (2029)

O.2.1 Number of cross-border operations number 0 1

O.2.1.1 Of which number of joint investigation teams number 0 1

O.2.1.2 Of which number of EU policy cycle/EMPACT operational actions number 0 0

O.2.2 Number of expert meetings/workshops/study visits/common exercises number 37 92

O.2.3 Number of equipment items purchased number 32 80

O.2.4 Number of transport means purchased for cross-border operations number 0 0

EN 21 EN

2.1. Specific objective 2. Cross-border cooperation

2.1.2. Indicators

Reference: point (e) of Article 22(4) CPR

Table 2: Result indicators

ID Indicator Measurement

unit Baseline

Measurement

unit for baseline

Reference

year(s) Target (2029)

Measurement

unit for target Source of data Comments

R.2.5 The estimated value of

assets frozen in the

context of cross-border

operations

amount 0 euro 2021 0 amount Project report

R.2.6.1 Quantity of illicit drugs

seized in the context of

cross-border operations -

cannabis

kg 0 kg 2021 0 kg Project report

R.2.6.2 Quantity of illicit drugs

seized in the context of

cross-border operations -

opioids, including heroin

kg 0 kg 2021 0 kg Project report

R.2.6.3 Quantity of illicit drugs

seized in the context of

cross-border operations -

cocaine

kg 0 kg 2021 0 kg Project report

R.2.6.4 Quantity of illicit drugs

seized in the context of

cross-border operations -

synthetic drugs, including

amphetamine-type

stimulants (including

amphetamine and

methamphetamine) and

MDMA

kg 0 kg 2021 0 kg Project report

R.2.6.5 Quantity of illicit drugs

seized in the context of

cross-border operations -

new psychoactive

substances

kg 0 kg 2021 0 kg Project report

EN 22 EN

ID Indicator Measurement

unit Baseline

Measurement

unit for baseline

Reference

year(s) Target (2029)

Measurement

unit for target Source of data Comments

R.2.6.6 Quantity of illicit drugs

seized in the context of

cross-border operations -

other illicit drugs

kg 0 kg 2021 0 kg Project report

R.2.7.1 Quantity of weapons

seized in the context of

cross-border operations -

Weapons of war:

automatic firearms and

heavy firearms (anti-tank,

rocket launcher, mortar,

etc.)

number 0 number 2021 0 number Project report

R.2.7.2 Quantity of weapons

seized in the context of

cross-border operations -

Other short firearms:

revolvers and pistols

(including salute and

acoustic weapons)

number 0 number 2021 0 number Project report

R.2.7.3 Quantity of weapons

seized in the context of

cross-border operations -

Other long firearms: rifles

and shotguns (including

salute and acoustic

weapons)

number 0 number 2021 0 number Project report

R.2.8 Number of administrative

units that have

developed/adapted

existing

mechanisms/procedures/

tools/guidance for

cooperation with other

Member States/EU

agencies/international

organisations/third

countries

number 0 number 2021 22 number Project reports

EN 23 EN

ID Indicator Measurement

unit Baseline

Measurement

unit for baseline

Reference

year(s) Target (2029)

Measurement

unit for target Source of data Comments

R.2.9 Number of staff involved

in cross-border operations

number 0 number 2021 0 number Project report

R.2.10 Number of Schengen

Evaluation

Recommendations

addressed

number 0 number 2021 100 percentage Project report

EN 24 EN

2.1. Specific objective 2. Cross-border cooperation

2.1.3. Indicative breakdown of the programme resources (EU) by type of intervention

Reference: Article 22(5) CPR; and Article 16(12) AMIF Regulation, Article 13(12) ISF Regulation or Article 13(18) BMVI Regulation

Table 3: Indicative breakdown

Type of intervention Code Indicative amount (Euro)

Type of action 001.ICT systems, interoperability, data quality (excluding equipment) 0.00

Type of action 002.Networks, centres of excellence, cooperation structures, joint actions

and operations

0.00

Type of action 003.Joint Investigation Teams (JITs) or other joint operations 324,900.00

Type of action 004.Secondment or deployment of experts 0.00

Type of action 005.Training 456,056.20

Type of action 006.Exchange of best practices, workshops, conferences, events,

awareness-raising campaigns, communication activities

862,500.00

Type of action 007.Studies, pilot projects, risk assessments 0.00

Type of action 008.Equipment 113,945.00

Type of action 009.Means of transport 0.00

Type of action 010.Buildings, facilities 0.00

Type of action 011.Deployment or other follow-up of research projects 0.00

EN 25 EN

2.1. Specific objective: 3. Preventing and combating crime

2.1.1. Description of the specific objective

When aiming to strengthen the capabilities of the national authorities in relation to combatting and

preventing crime, having motivated, skilled and informed people is the key. Training, shared knowledge

and awareness raising are crucial in this respect. On the other hand, the need for modern technology,

incl. IT tools, and equipment cannot be overlooked.

The focus of this specific objective is planned to be on the implementing measures (a) increasing the law

enforcement training, exercises and mutual learning; and (d) acquiring relevant equipment to increase

preparedness, resilience and adequate response to security threats. The potential activities will also

address the implementing measures (b) and (c).

If the need arises, implementing measure (e) may also be considered at later stage of implementation.

The planned addressing of the implementation measures in Annex II and examples of actions are as

follows.

(a) Increasing training, exercises and mutual learning, specialised exchange programmes and sharing of

best practice in and between Member States’ competent authorities, including at local level, and with

third countries and other relevant actors.

There is constant need for systematic training in different areas. Training of law enforcement officers has

been an important part in the 2014-2020 ISFP programme and this is also a priority in 2021-2027 period.

Estonia has also benefited greatly from CEPOL trainings as different authorities have taken part in

CEPOL residential activities, webinars, online-trainings, workshops and exchange programs. However,

there is also a need for more specific trainings which CEPOL does not offer. Some specific trainings are

planned to be financed with the ISF support. The national CEPOL unit was consulted on the design of

training activities in the ISF programme to avoid overlaps. The principal rationale for including specific

training actions in the programme is that CEPOL generally organizes basic or intermediate level

trainings, there is less focus on more specific topics relevant for the advanced level specialists in the

narrower fields. In addition, the CEPOL trainings and study visits are for limited numbers of participants

per Member State and this is not always sufficient, especially for highly specialised units. In any event,

all training activities will be coordinated with CEPOL.

Effective fight against cybercrime requires targeted action and is one of the priorities in the ISF

programme. Various data thefts and data leaks, ransomware claims and online payment fraud have

become commonplace problems in Estonia. Citizens, businesses and public authorities need to be aware

of the dangers of ICT and be willing and able to protect themselves. Investigation of cybercrime requires

very specific knowledge and skills on how to use digital evidence. The relevant law enforcement

authorities need to be sufficiently staffed, trained and equipped to collect and analyse information at the

necessary level and ensure the sustainability of activities. In order to alleviate these shortcomings, it is

planned to finance activities under both measure (a) and measure (d) – trainings and study visits plus

necessary technology and equipment.

Awareness raising on anti-corruption activities have become more successful over the years. Corruption

offences registered in Estonia: 291 offences in 2017; 376 offences in 2018 and 72 offences in 2019.

Detection of high-profile corruption cases continues to be a priority. As corruption is increasingly hidden

in Estonia, there is a need for specialisation and systemic collection and analysis of information, which

can lead to better detection and prosecution of such crimes. Investigating corruption and other covert

crimes, requires the provision of tools and professional skills obtained through training, exchange of best

EN 26 EN

practice with external partners, large-scale capture of electronic information and analysis of evidence.

Emphasis is also on raising awareness and conducting studies in the field for better policy decisions.

The likelihood of CBRN incidents has been risen, therefore preparedness for CBRN incidents needs

more attention, including enhancing relevant know-how and skills in this field.

An indicative list of actions in connection with Annex III include:

 education and training for staff and experts in relevant law enforcement authorities and judicial

authorities and administrative agencies, taking into account operational needs and risks analyses,

in co-operation with CEPOL and, when applicable, the European Judicial Training Network;

 actions that improve resilience as regards emerging threats, including hybrid threats and

chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear threats;

 providing support to thematic or cross-border networks of specialised national units and national

contact points to improve mutual confidence, the exchange and dissemination of know-how,

information, experience and best practices, the pooling of resources and expertise in joint centres

of excellence;

 financing the cost of staff involved in the actions that are supported by the Fund or actions that

are supported by the Fund or actions requiring involvement of staff for technical or security-

related reasons.

Other actions within the scope of ISF may be considered during the implementation of the programme,

depending on the actual needs and available resources.

An indicative list of actions in connection with Annex IV include:

 Projects which aim to prevent and fight cybercrime, in particular child sexual exploitation online,

and crimes where the internet is the primary platform for evidence collection.

1. Exploiting synergies by pooling resources and knowledge and sharing best practices among

Member States and other relevant actors, including civil society through, for instance, the

creation of joint centres of excellence, the development of joint risk assessments, or common

operational support centres for jointly conducted operations.

Not all extremism leads to violence, but it is important for society, especially parents, teachers, youth

workers and officials, to set an example, and intervene to ensure security on both sides. It is important to

train primary officials and professionals to recognize the first signs of radicalisation and to be able to

assess risks and act accordingly in a sensitive way while respecting the fundamental rights of individuals.

More than 2000 first level practitioners have been trained in the past under the leadership of the Estonian

Ministry of the Interior and the Academy of Security Sciences. In the future, a more systematic approach

to training is planned. It is necessary to continue developing the expertise of various professionals, also

with the support of international networks such as RAN and ESCN, and to become familiar with

practices in partner countries.

To make full use of the potential of the Estonian Academy of Security Sciences (which is also the

CEPOL National Unit in Estonia), it could be developed into a center of excellence for internal security

(e.g in the domains of anti-radicalisation and counter-terrorism, fight against organised crime and

cybercrimes; the use of AI). The Center would support planning and strategic development in the field

through research, analysis and training, in coordination with CEPOL.

An indicative list of actions in connection with Annex III include:

EN 27 EN

 education and training for staff and experts in relevant law enforcement authorities and judicial

authorities and administrative agencies, taking into account operational needs and risks analyses,

in co-operation with CEPOL and , when applicable, the European Judicial Training Network;

 providing support to thematic or cross-border networks of specialised national units and national

contact points to improve mutual confidence, the exchange and dissemination of know-how,

information, experience and best practices, the pooling of resources and expertise in joint centres

of excellence.

Other actions within the scope of ISF may be considered during the implementation of the programme,

depending on the actual needs and available resources.

An indicative list of actions in connection with Annex IV include:

- projects which aim to prevent and counter radicalisation.

1. Promoting and developing measures, safeguards, mechanisms and best practices for the early

identification, protection and support of witnesses, whistle-blowers and victims of crime and to

develop partnerships between public authorities and other relevant actors to this effect.

The biggest challenge in Estonia in the fight against trafficking in human beings is the lack of funding of

prevention activities. Prevention and awareness-raising activities and training are provided on a small

scale and with small repetition interval. Joint trainings for officials dealing with trafficking in human

beings are necessary to raise the competence and improve the implementation of EU acquis. There is a

need for greater awareness of third-country nationals entering Estonia and education of young people at

school. Also the relevant training for law enforcement authorities. According to the data from the Labour

Inspectorate and the Social Insurance Board, the number of labour disputes with foreigners is increasing

and the number of foreigners seeking help from the anti-trafficking hotline is increasing. Educational

tools have been produced for schools (supported by the ISF 2014-2020 project), but to facilitate their

use, the training scope needs to be widened to include trainers going to schools to adequately change

young people's attitudes and future behaviors to prevent trafficking.

Also, the competence and skills of officials, volunteers and other notifiers involved in the fight against

trafficking in human beings will be increased on state and local level in order to increase the level of

identification of possible victims overall in Estonia.

It is necessary to carry out information campaigns, to work closely with communication companies and

education institutions to prevent the sexual abuse of children. The idea is to use different expertise and

activities for cross-cutting prevention. The purpose is to explore how prevention opportunities can

include different parties in new and innovating ways. There is also a need to raise the awareness (with

appropriate long-lasting material and campaigns being worked out) and skills (special trainings in

Europe and in Estonia) of adults who come into contact with young people to spot victims of abuse and

to provide appropriate assistance (such as police officers, child protection officers, teachers, doctors as

well as parents). We will offer special trainings to child hotline workers to give appropriate counselling

in case of child sexual abuse cases online. The trainings will take into account the Council Conclusions

on combatting the sexual abuse of children (12862/19). Raising the capability to identify victims would

lead to better safeguarding of children and apprehend offenders in early stages of the activities. The third

line of activities is to carry out research and evaluation of programs/services preventing the sexual abuse

of children in Estonia.

An indicative list of actions in connection with Annex III include:

 Actions that improve resilience as regards emerging threats, including trafficking via online

channels;

 education and training for staff and experts in relevant law enforcement authorities and judicial

authorities and administrative agencies, taking into account operational needs and risks analyses,

in co-operation with CEPOL and, when applicable, the European Judicial Training Network;

EN 28 EN

 providing support to thematic or cross-border networks of specialised national units and national

contact points to improve mutual confidence, the exchange and dissemination of know-how,

information, experience and best practices, the pooling of resources and expertise in joint centres

of excellence.

Other actions within the scope of ISF may be considered during the implementation of the programme,

depending on the actual needs and available resources.

An indicative list of actions in connection with Annex IV include:

 Projects which aim to prevent and fight cybercrime, in particular child sexual exploitation online,

and crimes where the internet is the primary platform for evidence collection.

1. Acquiring relevant equipment and setting up or upgrading specialised training facilities and other

essential security relevant infrastructure to increase preparedness, resilience, public awareness

and adequate response to security threats.

Preparedness for CBRNe and HAZMAT incidents need more attention, given the changed nature of

threats in Europe. It is estimated that over half a million World War II explosives are still in the Estonian

soil - the accessibility of these explosive substances is an essential internal security problem in Estonia

and carries high risk in terms of possible terrorism or lone offenders. Illegal e-commerce, incl. the import

of dangerous substances, are also increasing the likelihood of CBRNe incidents. Relevant know-how and

skills, technical ability, the availability of (personal protective) equipment, and specific vehicles (incl. in

the area of explosive ordnance disposal) are also crucial. It is closely related to protection of citizens and

infrastructure, crisis management and strategic communication. There were many similar actions carried

out from 2014-2020 ISF programme (e.g purchasing bomb robots and bomb suits) which have had a

major positive impact in the field.

ISF 2014-2020 supported the updating of the system of early warning in case of danger of radiation

(caused by man-made crisis, e.g. a dirty bomb). It is planned to further upgrade this system and include

new functionalities like the analysis of radioactive noble gases.

One area where Estonia plans to contribute more in the near future is the wider and more systematic use

of drones in the fight against crime. This would considerably improve the capacity to detect and react to

security incidents and contributes to the protection of people and public spaces. Professional capacity

building in this area will allow the police to react more effectively to security incidents and detect threats

in public space. It also supports the police in enhancing cooperation with European Union law

enforcement agencies in the fight against serious and organized crime.

Measures for physical protection of security relevant infrastructure and/or ensuring their resilience

during crisis are crucial. The continuity of the activities of the Police and Border Guard Board, the

Rescue Board or other institutions providing essential services in crisis situations must be ensured.

It is also important to enhance the forensic capacity to provide forensic expertise.

An indicative list of actions in connection with Annex III include:

 actions that improve resilience as regard emerging threats, including chemical, biological,

radiological and nuclear threats;

 financing of equipment and communication systems.

Other actions within the scope of ISF may be considered during the implementation of the programme,

depending on the needs and available resources.

EN 29 EN

Operating support:

Estonia plans to use operating support to better contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the ISF

programme. The use of operating support enables to maintain capabilities which are crucial to the Union

as a whole.

There is a need to increase the number of staff in the Central Criminal Police Cybercrime Bureau to

improve the capacity to collect and analyse the information. Staff costs will be covered by using the

operating support. The final beneficiary is the Police and Border Guard Board which is by the statute

responsible for security and public order in the state and the investigation and prevention of offences.

Financial instruments: n/a.

EN 30 EN

2.1. Specific objective 3. Preventing and combating crime

2.1.2. Indicators

Reference: point (e) of Article 22(4) CPR

Table 1: Output indicators

ID Indicator Measurement unit Milestone (2024) Target (2029)

O.3.1 Number of participants in training activities number 1,337 3,216

O.3.2 Number of exchange programmes/workshops/study visits number 28 71

O.3.3 Number of equipment items purchased number 37 75

O.3.4 Number of transport means purchased number 0 0

O.3.5 Number of items of infrastructure/security relevant facilities/tools/mechanisms

constructed/ purchased/upgraded number 0 0

O.3.6 Number of projects to prevent crime number 2 3

O.3.7 Number of projects to assist victims of crime number 0 1

O.3.8 Number of victims of crimes assisted number 0 0

EN 31 EN

2.1. Specific objective 3. Preventing and combating crime

2.1.2. Indicators

Reference: point (e) of Article 22(4) CPR

Table 2: Result indicators

ID Indicator Measurement

unit Baseline

Measurement

unit for baseline

Reference

year(s) Target (2029)

Measurement

unit for target Source of data Comments

R.3.9 Number of initiatives

developed / expanded to

prevent radicalisation

number 0 number 2021 0 number Project report

R.3.10 Number of initiatives

developed / expanded to

protect / support witnesses

and whistle- blowers

number 0 number 2021 0 number Project report

R.3.11 Number of critical

infrastructure/public

spaces with new/adapted

facilities protecting

against security related

risks

number 0 number 2021 0 number Project report

R.3.12 Number of participants

who consider the training

useful for their work

number 0 share 2021 2,023 number Participant

feedback survey

R.3.13 Number of participants

who report three months

after leaving the training

that they are using the

skills and competences

acquired during the

training

number 0 share 2021 941 number Participant

feedback survey

EN 32 EN

2.1. Specific objective 3. Preventing and combating crime

2.1.3. Indicative breakdown of the programme resources (EU) by type of intervention

Reference: Article 22(5) CPR; and Article 16(12) AMIF Regulation, Article 13(12) ISF Regulation or Article 13(18) BMVI Regulation

Table 3: Indicative breakdown

Type of intervention Code Indicative amount (Euro)

Type of action 001.ICT systems, interoperability, data quality (excluding equipment) 1,117,500.00

Type of action 002.Networks, centres of excellence, cooperation structures, joint

actions and operations

0.00

Type of action 003.Joint Investigation Teams (JITs) or other joint operations 0.00

Type of action 004.Secondment or deployment of experts 0.00

Type of action 005.Training 2,667,369.90

Type of action 006.Exchange of best practices, workshops, conferences, events,

awareness-raising campaigns, communication activities

562,500.00

Type of action 007.Studies, pilot projects, risk assessments 750,000.00

Type of action 008.Equipment 8,066,566.50

Type of action 009.Means of transport 0.00

Type of action 010.Buildings, facilities 0.00

Type of action 011.Deployment or other follow-up of research projects 0.00

EN 33 EN

2.2. Technical assistance: TA.36(5). Technical assistance - flat rate (Art. 36(5) CPR)

Reference: point (f) of Article 22(3), Article 36(5), Article 37, and Article 95 CPR

2.2.1. Description

Technical assistance is the precondition that sufficient means and resources are available to achieve the

objectives and indicators set in the ISFprogramme.

TA is used for

 Preparation, implementation, monitoring and control

 Capacity building

 Evaluation and studies, data collection

 Information and communication

Preparation, implementation, monitoring and control

TA is used by the competent officials of Responsible Authority (RA) and Audit Authority (AA). In the

Ministry of the Interior there are approximately 10 RA officials responsible for implementation of

HOME funds and 2 AA auditors. The TA is used for the RA and AA personnel costs, training,

participation in workshops and meetings, etc.

Capacity building

Consultation and sharing of best practices are key factors in successful implementation so that applicants

and beneficiaries have the ability to prepare and implement projects. Therefore, the RA also ensures

continuous training, counselling and guidance of applicants and beneficiaries funded by the TA.

To reduce the burden on applicants and beneficiaries, the TA is used for novel IT solutions of

application, reporting and reimbursement. The SFOS information system will be introduced to simplify

the technical procedures, reduce the workload of applicants, beneficiaries and administration, and thus

contribute more to substantive activities. The principle of single entry is used as far as possible for

electronic applications. In addition, the information system enables the RA to monitor the achievement

of results, the progress of commitments and disbursements, the volumes and results of audits,

administrative, financial and on-the-spot controls, irregularities and recoveries.

Evaluation and studies, data collection

It is important to ensure that objectives are met in time and resources are used efficiently. Therefore two

evaluations are foreseen: the mid-term evaluation in 2024 and final evaluation in 2030. If needed,

resources could be used for studies and data collection.

Information and communication

The TA is also used for communication and publication activities (see p 7.)

EN 34 EN

2.2. Technical assistance TA.36(5). Technical assistance - flat rate (Art. 36(5) CPR)

2.2.2. Indicative breakdown of technical assistance pursuant to Article 37 CPR

Table 4: Indicative breakdown

Type of intervention Code Indicative amount (Euro)

Intervention field 034.Information and communication 17,614.71

Intervention field 035.Preparation, implementation, monitoring

and control

1,497,136.21

Intervention field 036.Evaluation and studies, data collection 123,292.86

Intervention field 037.Capacity building 123,292.96

EN 35 EN

3. Financing plan

Reference: point (g) Article 22(3) CPR

3.1. Financial appropriations by year

Table 5: Financial appropriations per year

Allocation type 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total

EN 36 EN

3.2. Total financial allocations

Table 6: Total financial allocations by fund and national contribution

Specific objective (SO) Type of action

Basis for calculation

Union support (total

or public)

Union contribution

(a)

National contribution

(b)=(c)+(d)

Indicative breakdown of national

contribution Total (e)=(a)+(b)

Co-financing rate

(f)=(a)/(e)

Public (c) Private (d)

Exchange of information Regular actions Total 4,527,605.86 1,509,202.00 1,509,202.00 0.00 6,036,807.86 74.9999994202%

Exchange of information Specific actions Total 162,764.95 18,085.00 18,085.00 0.00 180,849.95 89.9999972353%

Exchange of information Annex IV actions Total 5,501,636.25 1,833,878.75 1,833,878.75 0.00 7,335,515.00 75.0000000000%

Exchange of information Operating support Total 4,242,267.75 1,414,089.25 1,414,089.25 0.00 5,656,357.00 75.0000000000%

Total Exchange of information 14,434,274.81 4,775,255.00 4,775,255.00 0.00 19,209,529.81 75.1412187220%

Cross-border cooperation Regular actions Total 1,327,500.00 442,500.00 442,500.00 0.00 1,770,000.00 75.0000000000%

Cross-border cooperation Specific actions Total 429,901.20 47,766.80 47,766.80 0.00 477,668.00 90.0000000000%

Cross-border cooperation Annex IV actions Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Cross-border cooperation 1,757,401.20 490,266.80 490,266.80 0.00 2,247,668.00 78.1877572666%

Preventing and combating crime Regular actions Total 9,922,867.50 3,307,622.50 3,307,622.50 0.00 13,230,490.00 75.0000000000%

Preventing and combating crime Specific actions Total 436,068.90 48,452.10 48,452.10 0.00 484,521.00 90.0000000000%

Preventing and combating crime Annex IV actions Total 1,687,500.00 562,500.00 562,500.00 0.00 2,250,000.00 75.0000000000%

Preventing and combating crime Operating support Total 1,117,500.00 372,500.00 372,500.00 0.00 1,490,000.00 75.0000000000%

Total Preventing and combating crime 13,163,936.40 4,291,074.60 4,291,074.60 0.00 17,455,011.00 75.4163741289%

Technical assistance - flat rate (Art. 36(5)

CPR)

1,761,336.74 1,761,336.74 100.0000000000%

Grand total 31,116,949.15 9,556,596.40 9,556,596.40 0.00 40,673,545.55 76.5041471778%

EN 37 EN

3.3. Transfers

Table 7: Transfers between shared management funds1

Transferring fund Receiving fund

AMIF BMVI ERDF ESF+ CF EMFAF Total

ISF

1Cumulative amounts for all transfers during programming period.

EN 38 EN

Table 8: Transfers to instruments under direct or indirect management1

Instrument Transfer Amount

0.00

1Cumulative amounts for all transfers during programming period.

EN 39 EN

4. Enabling conditions

Reference: point (i) of Article 22(3) CPR

Table 9: Horizontal enabling conditions

Enabling

condition

Fulfilment of

enabling

condition

Criteria Fulfilment of

criteria Reference to relevant documents Justification

1. Effective

monitoring

mechanisms of

the public

procurement

market

Yes Monitoring mechanisms are in place that

cover all public contracts and their

procurement under the Funds in line with

Union procurement legislation. That

requirement includes:

1. Arrangements to ensure compilation of

effective and reliable data on public

procurement procedures above the Union

thresholds in accordance with reporting

obligations under Articles 83 and 84 of

Directive 2014/24/EU and Articles 99 and

100 of Directive 2014/25/EU.

Yes Public Procurement Register-

https://riigihanked.riik.ee;

Public Procurement Act-

www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/50509201700

3/consolide/current;

Competition Act-

www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/50509201700

3/consolide/current;

Information from the MoF-

https://fin.ee/riigihanked-riigiabi-

osalused/riigihanked#riigihangete-valdkon

Public contracts above the national

threshold and procurement under EU

procurement law are published and

executed on the central e-procurement

portal “Public Procurement Register”

managed by the Ministry of Finance (MoF)

in accordance with Reg (EU) 2019/1780.

MoF is responsible for monitoring,

reporting and consulting pursuant to Art 83

and 84 of EU 2014/24 and Art 99 and 100

of EU 2014/25. Monitoring and reporting

are based on data retrieved from the

Central Public Procurement Register.

2. Arrangements to ensure the data cover at

least the following elements:

a. Quality and intensity of competition:

names of winning bidder, number of initial

bidders and contractual value;

b. Information on final price after

completion and on participation of SMEs

as direct bidders, where national systems

provide such information.

Yes Public Procurement Register (PPR)-

https://riigihanked.riik.ee;

Information from the MoF-

https://www.fin.ee/riigihanked-riigiabi-

osalused-kinnisvara/riigihanked

a. the names of the successful tenderers,

the indicative number of tenderers and the

contract value shall be published in the

public procurement register in the form of

a contract award notice in accordance with

Commission Reg EU 2019/1780.

b. After completion of procurement, the

contracting authority will publish the

contract-specific information on the final

price in the public procurement register.

Information on the participation of SMEs

as direct tenderers is published in the

scheme award notice – 100 % of e-

procurement is carried out in a central

procurement register.

3. Arrangements to ensure monitoring and

analysis of the data by the competent

Yes Public Procurement Register (PPR)-

https://riigihanked.riik.ee

3. The authority responsible for state

supervison (monitoring) and analysis is the

EN 40 EN

Enabling

condition

Fulfilment of

enabling

condition

Criteria Fulfilment of

criteria Reference to relevant documents Justification

national authorities in accordance with

article 83 (2) of directive 2014/24/EU and

article 99 (2) of directive 2014/25/EU.

Public Procurement and State Aid

Department of the MoF:

https://www.rahandusministeerium.ee/sites

/default/files/rmv_traamat_unit_files/riigih

angete_ja_riigiabi_osakond_0.pdf;

Information from the MoF -

https://www.fin.ee/en/public-procurement-

state-aid-and-assets/public-procurement-

policy/state-supervision

Ministry of Finance. Monitoring

obligations are laid down in the Public

Procurement Act. 4 people are responsible

for monitoring and and one personis

responsible for the overall analysis of

public procurement data.

4. Arrangements to make the results of the

analysis available to the public in

accordance with article 83 (3) of directive

2014/24/EU and article 99 (3) directive

2014/25/EU.

Yes Public Procurement Register (PPR)-

https://riigihanked.riik.ee;

Public Procurement and State Aid

Department of the MoF:

https://www.rahandusministeerium.ee/sites

/default/files/rmv_traamat_unit_files/riigih

angete_ja_riigiabi_osakond_0.pdf;

Reports, data- https://fin.ee/riigihanked-

riigiabi-osalused/riigihanked#riigihangete-

valdkon

4. The yearly overview is published at

website of Ministry of Finance.

5. Arrangements to ensure that all

information pointing to suspected bid-

rigging situations is communicated to the

competent national bodies in accordance

with Article 83(2) of Directive

2014/24/EU and Article 99(2) of Directive

2014/25/EU.

Yes Public Procurement Register (PPR)-

https://riigihanked.riik.ee;

Public Procurement and State Aid

Department of the MoF:

https://www.rahandusministeerium.ee/sites

/default/files/rmv_traamat_unit_files/riigih

angete_ja_riigiabi_osakond_0.pdf;

Information from the MoF -

https://www.fin.ee/en/public-procurement-

state-aid-and-assets/public-procurement-

policy/state-supervision

The Public Procurement Act provides that

if circumstances that become known

during supervision may give rise to

suspicion of an offense that is not a

misdemeanor as provided for in § 213–215

of the Public Procurement Act, or if the

circumstances have the characteristics of a

possible corruption case, the Ministry of

Finance shall notify the investigating

authority or the prosecutor's office of the

circumstances known to it. In this sense,

the Competition Authority is also an

investigating authority and the competent

authority for supervising compliance with

the Competition Act (see § 54), which

EN 41 EN

Enabling

condition

Fulfilment of

enabling

condition

Criteria Fulfilment of

criteria Reference to relevant documents Justification

must be notified of violations. The website

of the Ministry of Finance contains

information that in the event of suspicion

of possible cooperation between

undertakings that harms competition, the

Competition Authority must be notified.

3. Effective

application and

implementation of

the Charter of

Fundamental

Rights

Yes Effective mechanisms are in place to

ensure compliance with the Charter of

Fundamental Rights of the European

Union ('the Charter') which include:

1. Arrangements to ensure compliance of

the programmes supported by the Funds

and their implementation with the relevant

provisions of the Charter.

Yes Constitution -

www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/530122020003/c

onsole

Act on the Implementation of ESI and

HOME Funds (ÜSS),

www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/11102022001

UN Reports – Estonia -

https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/tre

atybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno

=HRI%2fCORE%2fEST%2f2015&Lang=

en)

Gender Equality Act -

https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/1060720120

22?leiaKehtiv

Equal Treatment Act -

https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/1260420130

09?leiaKehtiv

Chancellor of Justice -

https://www.oiguskantsler.ee/et

To ensure consistency with the Charter

Estonia has a mechanism established

through national law and international

agreements. Among others Section I of the

Charter (dignity, § 1-5) in the Constitution

§ 10, 17, 18, 20, 29. Section II (freedoms,

§ 6-19) Constitution § 20, 26, 27, 29, 31,

32, 36-38, 40, 41, 43, 47, the Personal Data

Protection Act and the Act on Granting

International Protection to Aliens. Section

III (equality, § 20-26) § 12 and 28 of the

Constitution, the Equal Treatment Act, the

Gender Equality Act. Title IV (solidarity, §

27-38), § 27-29 of the Constitution,

Employment Contracts Act. Title V

(citizens' rights, § 39-46), § 3, 12, 34, 44,

46 of the Constitution, Administrative

Procedure Act. According to § 7 (3) of the

ÜSS, each Implementing Body centrally

coordinates and monitors in its field how

the support enables to maintain the base

principles of the strategy "Estonia 2035"

(including the values of the Charter) and

contributing to the achievement of goals.

The requirement of compliance with the

Charter is foreseen in the horizontal project

selection criteria. MA provides trainings

on fundamental rights.

2. Reporting arrangements to the

monitoring committee regarding cases of

non-compliance of operations supported by

the Funds with the Charter and complaints

Yes Monitoring Committee -

https://siseministeerium.ee/seirekomisjon

The monitoring committee includes

partners who monitor the implementation

of the Charter and whose task is to present

the consolidated vision and, if necessary,

EN 42 EN

Enabling

condition

Fulfilment of

enabling

condition

Criteria Fulfilment of

criteria Reference to relevant documents Justification

regarding the Charter submitted in

accordance with the arrangements made

pursuant to Article 69(7).

problems in their field to the monitoring

committee (e.g. the Commissioner for

Gender Equality and Equal Treatment, the

Estonian Chamber of Disabled People, the

Estonian Human Rights Centre).

Upon request of the partner overseeing the

implementation of the Charter, discussion

point is added to the agenda. In accordance

with the working procedures of the

monitoring committee, which were

approved at the first meeting, the

representative of the Chancellor of Justice

gives, if necessary, an overview of

complaints submitted to him/her where the

activities supported by the funds did not

comply with the Charter or the UN

Convention on the Rights of Persons with

Disabilities. The Secretariat of the

Monitoring Committee makes a request to

the Chancellor of Justice before the

meeting and, in the case, there are

complaints, the discussion point is added

to the agenda. The monitoring committee

has an e-mail address through which all

members of the monitoring committee can

open a discussion or propose agenda

points.

4. Implementation

and application of

the United

Nations

Convention on the

rights of persons

with disabilities

(UNCRPD) in

accordance with

Yes A national framework to ensure

implementation of the UNCRPD is in

place that includes:

1. Objectives with measurable goals, data

collection and monitoring mechanisms.

Yes Wellfare Development Plan -

https://www.sm.ee/et/heaolu-arengukava-

2023-2030

Estonia 2035 -

https://valitsus.ee/strateegia-eesti-2035-

arengukavad-ja-

planeering/strateegia/materjalid

Ensuring the protection of the rights of

people with disabilities is divided between

different strategies. The policy strategy for

the protection of the rights of people with

disabilities is set out in the “Wellfare

Development Plan 2023–2030”. The

challenges of the target group, policy

measures and relevant indicators are

described in the programmes of the same

development plan. The umbrella strategy

EN 43 EN

Enabling

condition

Fulfilment of

enabling

condition

Criteria Fulfilment of

criteria Reference to relevant documents Justification

Council Decision

2010/48/EC

“Estonia 2035” also covers requirements

of the UNCRPD.

Statistics on the situation of people with

disabilities are collected by Statistics

Estonia through the Estonian Social

Survey, the Estonian Labour Force Survey,

the Working Life Survey and the

Household Budget Survey, as well as

relevant health, ageing and pension

surveys. The Ministry of Social Affairs

publishes regular social welfare statistics

and, where necessary, conducts specific

surveys.

2. Arrangements to ensure that

accessibility policy, legislation and

standards are properly reflected in the

preparation and implementation of the

programmes.

Yes Advisory Board for Persons with

Disabilities -

https://www.oiguskantsler.ee/et/puuetega-

inimeste-n%C3%B5ukoda

Consumer Protection and Technical

Surveillance Authority (CPTSA)

(https://www.ttja.ee/ariklient/ehitised-

ehitamine/ligipaasetavus)

Requirements for buildings arising from

the special needs of people with disabilities

(https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/131052018

055)

Requirements for living space

(https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/103072015

034?leiaKehtiv)

Accessibility is a strategic goal and

fundamental principle of "Estonia 2035"

within the meaning of Article 9 of the

UNCRPD. In order to develop a

comprehensive accessibility policy, the

Government established an accessibility

task force in 2019. The Equality

Competence Centre provides advice to MA

and beneficiaries on accessibility and equal

opportunities and approves conditions of

giving support and monitors the

fullfillment of UNCRPD requirements.

In 2018, the regulations “Requirements for

buildings arising from the special needs of

people with disabilities” and

“Requirements for living space” entered

into force.

Since 1 January 2019, the Consumer

Protection and Technical Regulatory

Authority (CPTRA) monitors the

implementation of respective legislation on

EN 44 EN

Enabling

condition

Fulfilment of

enabling

condition

Criteria Fulfilment of

criteria Reference to relevant documents Justification

accessibility of the physical environment

and the EU Accessibility Directive (EU)

2019/882.

3. Reporting arrangements to the

monitoring committee regarding cases of

non-compliance of operations supported by

the Funds with the UNCRPD and

complaints regarding the UNCRPD

submitted in accordance with the

arrangements made pursuant to Article

69(7).

Yes Monitoring Commitee -

https://siseministeerium.ee/seirekomisjon

Advisory Board for Persons with

Disabilities -

https://www.oiguskantsler.ee/et/puuetega-

inimeste-n%C3%B5ukoda

Chancellor of Justice -

https://www.oiguskantsler.ee/

Act of Chancellor of Justice -

https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/%C3%95K

S

As of 1 January 2019, the Chancellor of

Justice (CJ) is responsible for promoting,

protecting and monitoring the

implementation of the UNCRPD. In 2019,

the Advisory Board for Persons with

Disabilities was established under the CJ,

with the aim of advising the CJ on the

promotion, protection and monitoring of

the rights of persons with disabilities.The

Advisory Board is established under

Article 33(3) of the UNCRPD.

For ISF projects, the contact point is the

monitoring committee (MC), which

consists of the relevant umbrella

organizations and, if necessary, the MA

expands the list of partners. The Estonian

Chamber of Disabled People, the CJ and

the Commissioner for Gender Equality and

Equal Treatment are invited to the

meetings of the monitoring committee.

Representative of the CJ provides, if

necessary, an overview of the complaints

at the MC meeting.

Members of the MC may propose

additional meetings or an additional

agenda item if a case arises in which an

activity supported by the funds does not

comply with the UNCRPD.

EN 45 EN

5. Programme authorities

Reference: point (k) of Article 22(3) and Articles 71 and 84 CPR

Table 10: Programme authorities

Programme Authority Name of the institution Contact name Position Email

Managing authority Estonian Ministry of the

Interior

Tarmo Miilits Permanent Secretary [email protected]

Audit authority Estonian Ministry of the

Interior

Tarmo Olgo Head of the Internal Audit

Department

[email protected]

Body which receives

payments from the

Commission

Estonian Ministry of

Finance

Marge Kaljas Advisor of the Treasury

Department

[email protected]

EN 46 EN

6. Partnership

Reference: point (h) of Article 22(3) CPR

The preparation of the ISF programme is based on the principle of transparency. All relevant

stakeholders were given an opportunity to contribute to resolving Estonia's current and future challenges

in implementing internal security policy.

In Estonia, the strategic planning of the national needs and their financing is centralized. There is no

separate process (incl. involvement of partners and stakeholders) for programming the EU funds. The

planning is source-neutral; the mapping of important strategic goals is done in the process of developing

national strategies.

The ISF programme for 2021-2027 has planned hand in hand with preparing the long-term national

umbrella strategy "Estonia 2035" and the “Internal Security Development Plan”. An overview of

compiling the strategies is found on following websites: https://www.riigikantselei.ee/et/Eesti2035 and

https://www.siseministeerium.ee/et/STAK2030.

The process started in the spring of 2018. At the end of 2018 and the beginning of 2019, consultations

with other ministries and umbrella organizations took place. Additionally, discussions were held in all

counties. County Security Councils, other institutions related to internal security in the county, interest

groups and representatives of civil society organizations, city and rural municipality leaders, and the

county development centers were invited to the discussions. In total, more than 100 stakeholders

contributed to preparing the long-term strategy. The discussions were summarized and used in the

preparation of the “Internal Security Development Plan 2020–2030”.

The development plan was submitted for public consultation through the dedicated web platform. The

same system was used to get an approval from all ministries and the Government Office, and an opinion

of the Association of Estonian Cities and Municipalities.

The financing for meeting the goals set in strategies are decided during the annual discussions of national

budget, which quarantees synergy with national and other resources and enables to avoid double

financing.

The implementation of the Internal Security Development Plan is monitored by the sectoral committee

which consists of representatives from relevant authorities, intermediate bodies and partners.

There is a common committee to monitor the implementation of the BMVI, ISF and AMIF. This

monitoring committee consists of the same parties which are members of the sectoral committees of the

Internal Security Decelopment Plan. In additon, bodies responsible for promoting social inclusion,

fundamental rights, rights of persons with disabilities, gender equality and non-discrimination are

involved.

EN 47 EN

7. Communication and visibility

Reference: point (j) of Article 22(3) CPR

The communication of EU funds aims to ensure target group awareness of EU support through

comprehensive, open and relevant communication.

A single website portal providing access to all programmes covered by CPR will be established by the

State Shared Service Centre (SSSC). The website portal will be made available in English and Russian

as well, since surveys show that the Russian-speaking population is less aware of support measures.

The Ministry of the Interior ensures the continuation of dedicated website for the HOME funds covering

the programmes’ objectives, activities, available fundidng opportunities and achievements. Estonia will

ensures transparency on the implementation of the national programme and publishes a list of actions

supported by each programme.

Both the single website portal as well as HOME funds website are designed and constructed to comply

with the WCAG 2.0 AA Accessibility Guidelines. This means that certain technical tools and content

creation principles have been used to help consumers with visual, hearing, physical, speech, cognitive,

language, learning, and neurological disabilities use the content of the website.

A Facebook page is used to communicate HOME funds’ open calls for proposals and achievements of

projects.

The communication coordinator in the SSSC will lead the national communication network to ensure

central visibility, transparency and communication acitivities. Furthermore, it will hold a yearly national

Europe Day in association with the European Commission Representation in Estonia.

A dedicated HOME funds communication officer is appointed within the Ministry of the Interior.

Technical Assistance is used for communication activities.

Indicators:

1. Audio storytelling through five (5) podcasts to rise awareness of the projects financed from the

HOME funds during the new period. Podcasts will be part of the regular podcasts published by the

Ministry of the Interior.

2. At least four (4) major information activities during the new period to present the achievements for

the target audience.

3. At least four (4) digital media content created, including visual content such as illustrations and

video materials to introduce the HOME funds in Estonia.

4. New social media channels (Facebook, Youtube) developed for the Home funds in Estonia to reach

out to a wider audience. Creating new content and cross-referencing on other similar social media

accounts to grow following.

EN 48 EN

8. Use of unit costs, lump sums, flat rates and financing not linked to costs

Reference: Articles 94 and 95 CPR

Intended use of Articles 94 and 95 CPR Yes No

From the adoption, the programme will make use of reimbursement of the

Union contribution based on unit costs, lump sums and flat rates under the

priority according to Article 94 CPR

From the adoption, the programme will make use of reimbursement of the

Union contribution based on financing not linked to costs according to Article

95 CPR

EN 49 EN

Appendix 1: Union contribution based on unit costs, lump sums and flat rates

A. Summary of the main elements

Specific objective

Estimated proportion of the

total financial allocation

within the specific objective

to which the SCO will be

applied in %

Type(s) of operation covered Indicator triggering reimbursement (2)

Unit of measurement for the

indicator triggering

reimbursement

Type of SCO

(standard scale of unit

costs, lump sums or

flat rates)

Amount (in EUR) or

percentage (in case of flat

rates) of the SCO Code(1) Description Code(2) Description

(1) This refers to the code in Annex VI of the AMIF, BMVI and ISF Regulations

(2) This refers to the code of a common indicator, if applicable

EN 50 EN

Appendix 1: Union contribution based on unit costs, lump sums and flat rates

B. Details by type of operation

EN 51 EN

C. Calculation of the standard scale of unit costs, lump sums or flat rates

1. Source of data used to calculate the standard scale of unit costs, lump sums or flat rates (who produced,

collected and recorded the data, where the data is stored, cut-off dates, validation, etc.)

EN 52 EN

2. Please specify why the proposed method and calculation based on Article 94(2) CPR is relevant to the

type of operation.

EN 53 EN

3. Please specify how the calculations were made, in particular including any assumptions made in terms

of quality or quantities. Where relevant, statistical evidence and benchmarks should be used and, if

requested, provided in a format that is usable by the Commission.

EN 54 EN

4. Please explain how you have ensured that only eligible expenditure was included in the calculation of

the standard scale of unit cost, lump sum or flat rate.

EN 55 EN

5. Assessment of the audit authority(ies) of the calculation methodology and amounts and the

arrangements to ensure the verification, quality, collection and storage of data.

EN 56 EN

Appendix 2: Union contribution based on financing not linked to costs

A. Summary of the main elements

Specific objective The amount covered by the

financing not linked to costs

Type(s) of operation covered

Conditions to be fulfilled/results to

be achieved triggering

reimbusresment by the Commission

Indicators Unit of measurement for the

conditions to be

fulfilled/results to be

achieved triggering

reimbursement by the

Commission

Envisaged type of reimbursement

method used to reimburse the

beneficiary(ies) Code(1) Description Code(2) Description

(1) Refers to the code in Annex VI of the AMIF, BMVI and ISF Regulations.

(2) Refers to the code of a common indicator, if applicable.

EN 57 EN

B. Details by type of operation

EN 58 EN

Appendix 3

Thematic facility (Article 11 AMIF Reg., Article 8 BMVI Reg., Article 8 ISF Reg.)

Procedure reference Programme version Status Accept/Decline date Comments

C(2025)8142 - 2 Dec 2025 - 1 3.0 Accepted 30 Apr 2026

Specific objective Modality Type of intervention Union contribution Pre-financing rate Description of the action

1. Exchange of information Specific actions 162,764.95 ISF/2026/SA/1.1.2 aims to support Member States to

implement the roll-out of SIENA.

TA.36(5). Technical assistance -

flat rate (Art. 36(5) CPR)

9,765.90 TA

Procedure reference Programme version Status Accept/Decline date Comments

C(2021)8460 - 26 Nov 2021 - 1 1.1 Accepted 16 Aug 2022

Specific objective Modality Type of intervention Union contribution Pre-financing rate Description of the action

2. Cross-border cooperation Specific actions 429,901.20 The objective of the Specific Action EMPACT is to develop complex

and long-term EMPACT activities and actions, laid down in the

operational action plans (OAPs) and implementing one or more common

horizontal strategic goals (CHSGs) contained in the EMPACT multi-

annual strategic plan (MASP) designed for the EMPACT cycle 2022- 2025 (reference: Council document 10109/21 of 23 June 2021 (EU

LIMITE).

ISF/2022/SA/2.2.1/012 EMPACT EUR 54.000,00 - Spain is carrying

out the project CCH - EUROPEAN OPERATIONAL TEAM Costa del

Sol, mainly related to EMPACT CCH (Cannabis/Cocaine/Heroin), but also to EMPACT HRCN (High-Risk Criminal Networks), covering

strategic goals n°1, 2, 3, 4 and 8. The project partnership is composed of

Spain, Bulgaria, Estonia, Finland, France, the Netherlands, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Sweden, Slovenia, Denmark,

Iceland, Norway, Serbia, UK, USA, Frontex and Europol. The Pilot

Project is meant to establish a European Operational Team (EOT) in the Spanish region ‘Costa del Sol’, to develop and implement a joint

investigative and operational strategy against the main criminal

organisations and related High Value Targets (HVTs) affecting the EU Member States from the region. The activity of the EOT will be

primarily aimed at identifying, investigating and dismantling HVTs and

related organised criminal networks. The selection of HVTs and the establishment of related Operational Task Force (OTF) will be carried

out in accordance with Standard Operating Procedure developed jointly

by the EU Member States and Europol.

EN 59 EN

ISF/2022/SA/2.2.1/001 EMPACT EUR 375.901,20 - Estonia is carrying

out the project Tackling Excise Crime in the Baltic Region, related to

EMPACT Excise fraud, and covering strategic goals n°2 (mainly) but

also n° 3, 4 and 6. The project partnership is composed of Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia. The project is led by the Estonian Tax and

Customs Board (ETCB). It aims at reducing excise criminality and

excise tax gap in the Baltic region and EU overall, by increasing the efficiency and capabilities of the participating authorities in fight against

shadow economy (illegal tobacco, fuel, alcohol) in the EU/Baltic region.

3. Preventing and combating

crime

Specific actions 436,068.90 ISF/2022/SA/3.3.1/002 THB EUR 436.068,90 - In the framework of the

implementation of Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating

trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims (“EU Anti-

trafficking Directive”) and the EU Strategy on Combatting Trafficking in Human Beings (2021-2025), the objective of this specific action is to

provide assistance and support services for victims of trafficking in

human beings who hold the citizenship of an EU Member States or are long-term residents in one of the EU Member States participating in the

Internal Security Fund.

Estonia is carrying out the national project Alert helpers! –Building

collaborative capacity for identification and assistance of THB victims

in Estonia. The project aims at improving the competence of the professionals and volunteers in identifying vulnerable persons and

potential victims of human trafficking.

TA.36(5). Technical assistance

- flat rate (Art. 36(5) CPR)

51,958.20 TA

EN 60 EN

DOCUMENTS

Document title Document type Document date Local reference Commission reference Files Sent date Sent by

1

CCI number

Nimetus inglise keeles ISF programme for Estonia 2021-2027

Nimetus liikmesriigi keeles Sisejulgeolekufondi rakenduskava 2021-2027

Versioon 4.0

Esimene aasta 2021

Viimane aasta 2027

Rahastamiskõlblik alates 01.01.2021

Rahastamiskõlblik kuni 31.12.2029

Komisjoni otsuse number

Komisjoni otsuse kuupäev

Liikmesriigi muutmisotsuse number

Liikmesriigi muutmisotsuse

jõustumise kuupäev

Mitteoluline ümberpaigutamine

(ühissätete määruse artikli 24 lõige

5)

Ei

1. Programmi strateegia: peamised katsumused ja poliitilised lahendused

Viide: määruse (EL) 2021/1060 (ühissätete määrus) artikli 22 lõike 3 punkti a alapunktid iii, iv, v ja ix

Selles punktis selgitatakse, kuidas programm aitab lahendada riigi tasandil kindlaks tehtud

peamisi katsumusi, tuginedes kohalike, piirkondlike ja riiklike vajaduste hindamisele ja/või

strateegiatele. Antakse ülevaade asjaomase liidu õigustiku rakendamise seisust ning liidu

tegevuskavadega saavutatud edusammudest ning kirjeldatakse, kuidas fondi kaudu toetatakse

nende arendamist programmitöö perioodil.

Võrreldes programmitöö perioodiga 2014–2020 on strateegiline planeerimine Eestis

märkimisväärselt muutunud. Riiklike eesmärkide ja nende rahastamise strateegiline planeerimine

toimub keskselt. Euroopa Liidu (edaspidi ka EL) vahendite kavandamiseks ei ole eraldi protsessi

ja planeerimine on allikaneutraalne. Olulised strateegilised eesmärgid tehakse kindlaks eelarve

allikat määramata. Rahastamise üle otsustatakse iga-aastase eelarve koostamise käigus. Selline

põhjapanev muudatus on mõjutanud ka Sisejulgeolekufondi (edaspidi ISF) rakenduskava

koostamist ja ülesehitust.

2

ISFi rakenduskavas käsitletakse kõige pakilisemaid riiklikke probleeme ja ISF täiendab riiklikke

vahendeid. Kus vähegi võimalik, on rakenduskava koostoimes teiste programmide ja

rahastamisvahenditega. Julgeolekut käsitletakse mitmes ELi programmis. ISFi rakenduskava on

tihedalt seotud Varjupaiga-, Rände- ja Integratsioonifondi (edaspidi AMIF) ning piirihalduse ja

viisapoliitika rahastuga (edaspidi BMVI), millega toetatakse samuti ELi üldist julgeolekut

soodustavaid meetmeid. Lisaks on ISFi rakenduskaval koostoime õigusprogrammi ning kodanike,

võrdõiguslikkuse, õiguste ja väärtuste programmiga kuriteoohvrite abistamine ja kaitsmise ning

vähemal määral õiguskoolituse vallas ja ka asjaomaste õiguskaitseasutuste koostöö ja

õiguskaitseasutuste turvalisusega seotud IT-süsteemide ühendamine Euroopa karistusregistrite

infosüsteemiga kolmandate riikide kodanike kohta ehk ECRIS-TCNiga.

Rakenduskaval on koostoime ka tollikoostöö programmiga turvalisusega seotud ohtude ja

piiriülese kuritegevuse vastu võitlemise vallas. Samamoodi peetakse asjakohastes valdkondades

silmas sidusust ühtekuuluvuspoliitika fondide rakenduskavadega ning programmidega „Euroopa

horisont“ ja „Digitaalne Euroopa“. ISFi ja ühtekuuluvuspoliitika fonde kavandatakse Eestis samal

ajal. Seega on tagatud, et rakenduskavadtäiendavad üksteist ja välditakse tegevuste võimalikku

kattuvust. Rahastatavad meetmed sõltuvad olemasolevatest vahenditest ja prioriteetidest. Täpsed

meetmed ja rahastamisallikas lepitakse kokku riiklike protseduuride järgi. Välditakse kattumist ja

tagatakse koostoime teiste fondidega (nt AMIF ja BMVI) tihedas suhtluses ministeeriumide,

Euroopa Komisjoni, ametite ja teise asjaomaste sidusrühmadega.

Pikaajaline katusstrateegia „Eesti 2035“ annab valdkondade poliitikakujundajatele selged

suunised. Peamine riiklik strateegia, mis hõlmab sisejulgeoleku eesmärke, on siseturvalisuse

arengukava (edaspidi STAK). STAK on töötatud välja tihedas koostöös kõigi asjaomaste partnerite

ja sidusrühmadega. STAKi prioriteedid on turvalise elukeskkonna loomine, sh vägivalla

vähendamine, sisejulgeoleku tagamine, sh võitlus organiseeritud kuritegevusega ja kriisiks

valmisolek, kiire ja professionaalne abi, kodakondsus-, rände- ja identiteedihalduspoliitika, mis

tagab Eesti arengu, ning arukas ja uuenduslik sisejulgeolek.

STAKis 2020–2030 on võetud arvesse asjaomaseid ELi poliitikavaldkondi ja eesmärke. Eestis

vastutab asjakohase poliitika rakendamise eest mitu ministeeriumi. Riiklikud strateegiad

täiendavad üksteist, näiteks Eesti infoühiskonna arengukava 2020, kriminaalpoliitika põhialused

aastani 2030, Eesti julgeolekupoliitika alused, riigikaitse arengukava 2017–2026 ja kiirgusohutuse

riiklik arengukava 2018–2027.

Eesti katsumuste peamised märksõnad hõlmavad enamikku ISFi eesmärkidest: küberkuritegevus,

rahapesu ja terrorismi rahastamine, terrorism ja radikaliseerumine, raske ja organiseeritud

kuritegevus, uimastikaubandus, finantsuurimine, korruptsioon, kuritegeliku vara avastamine ja

konfiskeerimine, inimkaubandus, laste (seksuaalne) väärkohtlemine ja ärakasutamine,

kohtuekspertiisi suutlikkus, kriisiennetus, hädaolukorraks valmisolek, vastupidavus kriisi ajal ja

küberrünnakute ning keemiliste, bioloogiliste, radioloogiliste ja tuumaainete (edaspidi CBRN)

tõrjumine.

Probleemide lahendamiseks võetakse järgmisi meetmeid: info- ja sidetehnoloogia arendamine,

nutikad ja uuenduslikud tehnoloogilised vahendid, suurem analüütiline suutlikkus, (operatiivne)

koostöö ametiasutuste vahel ning parem riiklik suutlikkus, mis saavutatakse muu hulgas koolituse

ja asjakohase varustuse soetamise kaudu. Samuti on oluline, et asjaomastes üksustes oleks piisav

arv spetsialiste. Märksõnad on ka ennetamine, varajane hoiatamine ja teadlikkuse suurendamine.

Julgeolekuteemalised teadusuuringud on olulised, et töötada välja uuenduslikke meetodeid ja võtta

3

kasutusele uut tehnoloogiat. Võimalikud tulevased rakendusmeetmed on kooskõlas määruse

(EL)2021/1060 artikli 22 lõike 4 punktiga d tabelites 3, 6 ja 9 märgitud 0 euroga, et lisaraha

saamisel tagada võimalike kulude tagasiulatuv abikõlblikkus.

Tegevuste kavandamisel ja elluviimisel hinnatakse detailsemalt sihtrühmapõhise lähenemise

vajalikkust, et tagada meetmete maksimaalne mõju ja sobivus. Tegevuste elluviimisel austatakse

põhiõiguseid, sealhulgas andmekaitse, sooline võrdõiguslikkus, mittediskrimineerimine,

rahvusvaheline kaitse ning haavatavate isikute, sealhulgas laste ja puuetega isikute erivajadused.

ISFi rakenduskava eesmärke on võimalik saavutada vaid koostöös teiste ametiasutustega. Samuti

on oluline kaasata kodanikuühiskonda ja teisi asjaomaseid partnereid ning teha koostööd

erasektoriga. ISFi rakenduskava rakendamisel kaalutakse ka koostööd kolmandate riikidega.

Toetust antakse grantidena.

Kuna osad katsumused eelarveperioodi 2021-2027 on samad, mis perioodil 2014-2020,

rahastatakse osaliselt sarnaseid tegevusi.

Politseikoostöö, kuritegevuse tõkestamise ja selle vastu võitlemise ning kriisiohje

rahastamisvahendi (edaspidi ISF Police) programm 2014–2020 on andnud asjaomase ELi acquis’

rakendamiseks vajalikke lisavahendeid. Praeguses rakenduskavas toetatakse jätkuvalt ELi acquis’

ja vajaduse korral selle tegevuskavade rakendamist kogu programmitsükli vältel, võttes samas

arvesse uusi ohte. Lühiülevaade ELi acquis’ rakendamisest on järgmine.

Eesti on järginud ELi narkostrateegia 2013–2020 ja ELi narkootikumidealase tegevuskava 2017–

2020 eesmärke ja meetmeid, rakendades 2014. aasta jaanuaris vastu võetud riiklikku

strateegiadokumenti „Valge raamat uimastiennetuspoliitika kohta“. Selle peamine eesmärk on

vähendada uimastite kasutamist ja sellest tulenevat kahju. See järgib ELi tasakaalustatud

lähenemisviisi uimastipoliitikale ja toetub seitsmele sambale: i) pakkumise vähendamine; ii) üldine

esmane ennetamine; iii) varajane avastamine ja sekkumine; iv) kahju vähendamine; v) ravi ja

rehabilitatsioon; vi) resotsialiseerimine ja vii) järelevalve. Uimastipoliitika meetmeid rakendatakse

ja rahastatakse riiklike strateegiate kaudu, mis järgivad valge raamatu ja seega ELi narkostrateegia

eesmärke.

Mis puutub ELi infosüsteemidesse, siis EL määrustest tulenevaid töid tehakse riigi tasandil.

Lennureisijate broneeringuinfo andmebaasi ehk PNRi andmebaasi arendatakse ISFi programmi

2014–2020 raames. Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiv (EL) 2016/681, 27. aprill 2016, mis

käsitleb broneeringuinfo kasutamist terroriaktide ja raskete kuritegude ennetamiseks,

avastamiseks, uurimiseks ja nende eest vastutusele võtmiseks (edaspidi broneeringuinfo direktiiv),

võeti üle 2019. aasta veebruaris. Lennureisijate broneeringuinfo üksus loodi 2018. aasta mais ja

alates 15. augustist 2019 võrreldakse reisijate andmeid automaatselt Schengeni infosüsteemiga

(edaspidi SIS). Broneeringuinfo direktiivi I lisa kohaselt käsitatakse broneeringuinfo andmete

loetelus broneeringuinfo osana ka rakendusliidese andmeid. Programmis tagatakse rakendusliidese

andmete töötlemine broneeringuinfo osana. ISF programm adresseerib ka 19. detsembri 2024. aasta

Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määruse (EL) 2025/13, mis käsitleb resijaid käsitleva eelteabe

kogumist ja edastamist terroriaktide ja raskete kuritegude ennetamiseks, avastamiseks, uurimiseks

ja nende eest vastutsele võtmiseks (edaspidi API määrus), nõudeid.

4

Schengeni politseikoostöö infosüsteemi arendati ISF Police’i programmi raames. Interpoli

päringud on integreeritud SIRENEsse. 2018. ja 2023. aasta Schengeni hindamise soovitusi on

peetud silmas 2021-2027. aastate plaanide koostamisel.

Üht Eestile 2018. aasta Scengeni hindamise raames tehtud soovitust rahastatakse ISFist –

rahvusvaheliseks koostööks töötatakse välja interaktiivne ja kasutajakeskne e-õppe lahendus, mis

põhineb praktilistel olukordadel ja juhtumitel (vt erieesmärk 2). ISFist rahatatakse ka 2023. aasta

Schengeni hindamise käigus tehtud soovitust võtta kasutusele automaatne andmelaadija Europoli

infosüsteemiga suhtlemisel. Teisi vajadusi, mis tulenevad Schengeni ja Schevali hindamistest

SIS/SIRENE ja politseikoostöö valdkonnas, rahastatakse peamiselt riigieelarvest, kuid vajaduse

korral kasutatakse ka ISFi vahendeid.

Prüm II määrus (Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 13. märtsi 2024. aasta määrus (EL) 2024/982

politseikoostöö raames toimuva automatiseeritud andmete otsingu ja vahetuse kohta) tõhustab

oluliselt ja laiendab olemasolevat automatiseeritud andmevahetusmehhanismi, mis on loodud algse

Prümi raamistiku alusel. Varem võisid Euroopa Liidu liikmesriikide õiguskaitseasutused vahetada

kõigi liikmesriikidega kahepoolsete kanalite kaudu DNA-profiile, daktüloskoopilisi andmeid ja

teatud sõidukite registreerimise andmeid. Uuendatud määrus lisab neile kolmele olemasolevale

kategooriale näopildid ja politseiandmed, mis võimaldavad kõigi viie andmetüübi automaatset ja

anonüümset vahetamist. See hõlbustab oluliselt kuritegude ennetamist, avastamist ja uurimist,

samuti kadunud isikute otsimist ja tundmatute inimsäilmete tuvastamist. Eelmainitud täiendused

võimadavad piiriülest politseikoostööd oluliselt tõhustada. Prüm II määruse rakendamist

toetatakse ISF programmi raames.

Eesti osaleb aktiivselt Euroopa Liidu Õiguskaitsekoolituse Ameti (edaspidi CEPOL) koostöös.

CEPOLi riiklik üksus asub Sisekaitseakadeemias. Sisekaitseakadeemia on ka CEPOLi partner

Eestis. Eestis on koostöö CEPOLiga korraldatud võrgustikuna, kuhu kuulub 11 õiguskaitseasutust.

Sisejulgeolekufondi rakenduskava raames planeeritavad õiguskaitseametnike koolitused

arvestavad CEPOLi koostatud Euroopa Liidu strateegilise koolitusvajaduse hinnangu 2022-2025

tulemusi. Erilist tähelepanu pööratakse nimetatud koolitusvajaduse hinnangus toodud peamistele

võimelünkadele.

Hädaolukorra seadusega on võetud üle 14. detsembri 2022. aasta Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu

direktiiv (EL) 2022/2557.

Korruptsioonivastaseid meetmeid käsitleva ELi acquis’ ülevõtmise ja rakendamisega Eestis

probleeme ei ole. Tööalasest Euroopa Liidu õiguse rikkumisest teavitaja kaitse seadusega on Eesti

üle võtnud rikkumisest teatanud isikute kaitset käsitleva direktiivi (EL) 2019/1937. Eraldi ELi

korruptsioonivastast tegevuskava ei ole loodud. 2021. aasta aprillis võeti vastu ELi organiseeritud

kuritegevuse vastu võitlemise strateegia 2021–2025. Kokkuvõtvalt võib öelda, et Eesti tegevus

selles valdkonnas ei ole vastuolus ELi strateegiliste eesmärkidega.

Komisjoni 2021. aasta õigusriigi olukorda käsitlevas aruandes on märgitud, et Eesti

kriminaalõigussüsteem on tõestanud oma tõhusust korruptsioonijuhtumite kindlakstegemisel.

Ennetusmeetmed hõlmavad suuniseid lobitegevuse ja huvide konflikti kohta. Seadusandlik

menetlus rikkumisest teataja kaitset käsitlevate terviklike eeskirjade vastuvõtmiseks on käimas.

Varade deklareerimise süsteemi ajakohastati, et kohustada ministrite poliitilisi nõunikke esitama

majanduslike huvide deklaratsioone.

5

Inimkaubandusega seotud ELi acquis’ on võetud Eesti õigusesse üle. Sellest hoolimata tuleb

meetmete rakendamist asutustes veelgi parandada, sest mitte kõiki ohvrite kohtlemisega seotud

meetmeid ei rakendata asutuste igapäevases töös (nt meetmed, mis on seotud ärakuulamistega).

Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 5. aprilli 2011. aasta direktiivi 2011/36/EL artikli 2 järgi võtavad

liikmesriigid vajalikke meetmeid tagamaks, et karistatakse järgmisi tahtlikke tegusid: isikute

värbamine, transportimine, üleandmine, varjamine või vastuvõtmine, sealhulgas nende isikute üle

kontrolli vahetamine või üleandmine, ähvardades või kasutades vägivalda või muid

sunnimeetmeid, inimröövi, pettust, võimu või kaitsetu seisundi kuritarvitamist, raha või hüvitiste

võtmist või andmist, et saavutada teise isiku üle kontrolli omava isiku nõusolek ärakasutamise

eesmärgil. Eesti on pühendunud inimkaubanduse tõkestamise direktiivi kui esmase võrdluspunkti

täielikule järgimisele.

Kuni aprillini 2021 oli viimane ELi tasandi strateegiline inimkaubanduse teemaline juhis Euroopa

Parlamendile ja nõukogule komisjoni teatises „Aruanne inimkaubanduse kaotamist käsitleva ELi

strateegia järelmeetmete ning konkreetsete edasiste meetmete kohta“. Eesti võtab teatises

nimetatud kolme prioriteedi rakendamiseks asjakohased meetmed ja aitab saavutada uues

inimkaubanduse vastu võitlemise ELi strateegias sätestatud prioriteete.

Eesti riigisisene õigus on vastavuses direktiiviga (EL) 2021/555, milles on määratud kindlaks

tulirelvade omandamise ja omamise ning tulirelvade teise ELi riiki üleandmise kontrolli ühised

miinimumnõuded ELis. Tänu 2017. aasta revisjonile paraneb tuntavalt turvalisus, sest teatavate

suure võimsusega relvade, näiteks poolautomaatseks muudetud automaatsete tulirelvade

omandamine muutub õiguslikult keerulisemaks. Samuti tugevdab tulirelvade direktiiv koostööd

ELi riikide vahel, parandades teabevahetust (Eesti on siseturu infosüsteemi kasutanud alates 2019.

aasta septembrist), ning edendab märgatavalt tulirelvade jälgitavust, parandades seaduslikult

hoitavate tulirelvade jälgimist, et vähendada nende ebaseaduslikele turgudele sattumise ohtu.

Komisjoni rakendusdirektiivid (EL) 2019/69 ja (EL) 2019/68 on võetud üle ka Eesti õigusesse.

Eesti järgib tulirelvade deaktiveerimise ühiseid miinimumstandardeid käsitlevat rakendusmäärust.

Eesti politsei registreerib kõik deaktiveeritud tulirelvad ning nende andmed salvestatakse teenistus-

ja tsiviilrelvade registrisse.

Eesti valitsus uuendab STAKiga 2020–2030 oma terrorismivastase võitluse prioriteete. Strateegia

hõlmab kõiki terrorismivastase võitluse ja vägivaldse äärmusluse arengusuundi. STAKi

prioriteedid on kooskõlas Ühinenud Rahvaste Organisatsiooni (edaspidi ÜRO) ülemaailmse

terrorismivastase võitluse strateegiaga ning ÜRO, ELi, koostööpartnerluse, Euroopa Julgeoleku- ja

Koostööorganisatsiooni (edaspidi OSCE) ja rahvusvahelise õiguse peamiste põhimõtete ja

prioriteetidega (sh inimõiguste kaitse). STAK on osaliselt piiratud juurdepääsuga.

2018. aasta detsembris võttis Riigikogu vastu seaduseelnõu, millega rakendatakse riigisiseses

õiguses ÜRO resolutsiooni 2178, terrorismi ennetamise lisaprotokolli ja ELi direktiivi

(EL) 2017/541. Muu hulgas laiendati seaduseelnõus terrorismiohvrite mõistet ja

terrorismikuritegudega seotud kuritegevuse elemente. Riigikogu võttis 2018. aasta detsembris

kooskõlas ELi direktiiviga vastu karistusseadustiku, rahapesu ja terrorismi rahastamise tõkestamise

seaduse ning ohvrite toetamise seaduse muudatused. Samuti viidi seaduseelnõu kooskõlla ÜRO

resolutsiooni ja Euroopa Nõukogu terrorismi ennetamise konventsiooni lisaprotokolliga.

Kemikaaliseadust täiendati lisanõuetega, mis kohustavad küsima ohtlike kemikaalide käitlemiseks

luba, teostama riiklikku järelevalvet ja teatama kahtlastest tehingutest ning lõhkeaine kadumisest

ja vargusest. Radioaktiivsete kiirgusallikate julgeolek on reguleeritud kiirgusseaduses, mis on

6

kooskõlas ELi nõukogu direktiiviga 2013/59/Euratom ning muude rahvusvaheliste

konventsioonide ja standarditega. Eesti arendab lisasuutlikkust tuvastada ja tõkestada internetis

terroristlikke tegevusi (ELi algatus võidelda terroristliku infosisu vastu internetis koostöös

erasektori ja ELi internetifoorumiga). Terroristliku veebisisu vastase määruse rakendamist

rahastatakse riigieelarvest. Veebikonstaablid (internetis töötavad politseinikud) teevad koostööd

Europoli Euroopa terrorismivastase võitluse keskuse internetisisust teavitamise üksusega, et

võidelda ebaseadusliku veebisisu ja vägivaldse propaganda vastu.

Rahapesu ja terrorismi rahastamise tõkestamise seadus, millega võeti üle viies rahapesu

andmebüroo direktiiv, võeti vastu 2020. aasta juulis.

Küberkuritegevuse vallas on Eesti kehtestanud asjakohased õigusaktid, Budapesti konventsiooni

rakendamise ja ebaseadusliku tegevuse karistamise. Sisemine operatiivkoostöö õiguskaitse- ja

õigusasutuste vahel toimib hästi ning Eesti ootab uut e-tõendit käsitlevat õigusakti.

Eesti on ratifitseerinud Euroopa Nõukogu konventsiooni laste kaitse kohta seksuaalse

ärakasutamise ja kuritarvitamise eest ehk Lanzarote konventsiooni. Eesti õigus on kooskõlas

Lanzarote konventsiooni kriminaalõigussätetega. Konventsiooni ratifitseerimiseks vajalikud

tegevused on kirjas „Laste ja perede arengukavas aastateks 2012–2020“ ja „Vägivalla ennetamise

strateegias aastateks 2015–2020“. Teemasid on käsitletud ka Vabariigi Valitsuse

tegevusprogrammis 2019–2023, milles tõstetakse esile alaealistega seotud seksuaalkuritegude

vastane võitlus ja süütegude toimepanijate vastutusele võtmine.

Kahjuks ei ole võimalik tegeleda kõigi järgnevalt kirjeldatud katsumustega üksnes ISFi rahastuse

abil. Rakenduskava eesmärk on käsitleda probleeme võimalikult ulatuslikult, kuid samas

paindlikult, et reageerida tulevastele sündmustele ja muutuvatele prioriteetidele. Rahastatavad

meetmed sõltuvad ressurssidest ja prioriteetidest. Täpsed meetmed ja rahastamisallikad lepitakse

kokku riiklike protseduuride järgi.

Rakenduskavas võetakse arvesse haldussuutlikkust ja tõhusust ning võimaluse korral rakendatakse

lihtsustamismeetmeid, et vähendada halduskoormust ning suurendada mõjusust, tõhusust ja

säästlikkust.

2. Erieesmärgid

2.1. Erieesmärgi nimetus

Tõhustada ja hõlbustada teabevahetust pädevates asutustes ja asjaomastes liidu organites,

ametites ja asutustes ning nende vahel ning asjakohasel juhul kolmandate riikide ja

rahvusvaheliste organisatsioonidega

2.1.1. Erieesmärgi kirjeldus

Käesolevas punktis kirjeldatakse iga erieesmärgi puhul esialgset olukorda, peamisi katsumusi ja

pakutakse välja lahendused, mida fondist toetatakse. Siin kirjeldatakse, milliseid

rakendusmeetmeid fondi toetusel käsitletakse; samuti esitatakse esialgne loetelu meetmetest, mis

kuuluvad AMIFi, ISFi või BMVI määruse artiklite 3 ja 5 kohaldamisalasse. Täpsemalt:

tegevustoetuse puhul esitatakse selgitus kooskõlas AMIFi määruse artikliga 21, ISFi määruse

7

artikliga 16 või BMVI määruse artiklitega 16 ja 17. See sisaldab soovituslikku loetelu

toetusesaajatest koos nende seadusjärgsete kohustustega ja põhiülesandeid, mida tuleb toetada.

Rahastamisvahendite kavandatud kasutamine, kui kohaldatav.

Turvalisuse tagamise põhitegur on luua ja ajakohastada turvalisi infosüsteeme ja e-lahendusi. Kuigi

digiteerimine on juba aastaid olnud üks Eesti lipulaevadest, on see alarahastatud ja turul ei ole

piisavalt arendajaid. Samal ajal tuleb täita uusi liikmesriikidele esitatavaid nõudeid, et tagada

turvalisusega seotud teabevahetus ja Europoli andmeid käsitleva liidu acquis’ täielik ja ühetaoline

rakendamine. Ka ELi infosüsteemide puudujääkidega tegelemiseks tuleb suunata piisavalt

vahendeid. Eesti on edukalt loonud ja kohandanud riiklikke IT-süsteeme, et tagada tõhus ühendus

ELi turvalisusega seotud infosüsteemidega, ning sellega tegeletakse ka edaspidi.

Eesti kavatseb kasutada ISFi vahendeid peamiselt selleks, et luua, kohandada ja hooldada ISFi

eesmärkidele vastavaid info- ja sidesüsteeme. Samuti on vaja tagada süsteemide kasutamise

koolitus.

Erieesmärgi raames kaalutakse võimalikke tegevusi, mis keskenduvad peamiselt ISFi määruse

II lisa rakendusmeetmele d: toetada asjakohaseid riiklikke meetmeid. Rakendusmeede a on samuti

prioriteet: tagada liidu julgeolekualase acquis’ ühetaoline kohaldamine, toetades asjakohase teabe

vahetamist.

Vajaduse korral võib rakendusmeetmeid b ja c kaaluda rakendamise hilisemas etapis.

Rakenduskava koostamise ajal ei ole konkreetseid meetmeid planeeritud.

Kavatsetakse rakendada järgmisi ISFi määruse II lisas toodud meetmeid, sh teha järgmisi tegevusi.

a) Tagada liidu julgeolekuvaldkonna acquis’ ühtne kohaldamine, toetades asjakohase teabe

vahetamist näiteks Prümi lepingu, ELi broneeringuinfo ja SIS raames, sealhulgas

rakendades kvaliteedikontrolli- ja hindamismehhanismide, näiteks Schengeni hindamis- ja

järelevalvemehhanismi või muude kvaliteedikontrolli- ja hindamismehhanismide kaudu

saadud soovitusi.

Asjakohaste õigusaktide kohaldamise praegust olukorda (PNR, SIS, Prüm) on kirjeldatud punktis

1.

Üks prioriteete on endiselt tagada PNRi andmebaasi edasine areng ja haldamine. PNRi andmebaas

on töötatud välja ISFi programmi 2014–2020 raames, kuid projekti tulemuste kestlikuks arenguks

on vaja tagada pidev rahastamine. Et tagada andmebaasi usaldusväärsus ja broneeringuinfo

direktiivi ning API määruse nõuete täitmine, arendatakse andmebaasi edasi ning korraldatakse

õppevisiite. PNRi andmebaas suhtleb Europoli infosüsteemiga.

SIS uued funktsioonid töötatakse välja 2022. aastal. Kui tulevikus SIS ajakava muudetakse või

sõlmitakse uusi lepinguid, võib nendega tegelemiseks kaaluda ISFi rahastust. Lisaks tuleb pidevalt

käsitleda kavandatavaid meetmeid ELi suuremahuliste infosüsteemide koostalitlusvõime

loomiseks. Eesti kavatseb selleks kasutada BMVI vahendeid. Vajaduse korral võib ISFi määruse

eesmärkide saavutamiseks vajalikke arendusprojekte rahastada ISFist.

Rahastatakse ka Prümi II määruse nõuete täitmisega seotud projekte.

ISF määruse III lisaga seotud meetmete esialgne loetelu:

8

- võtta kasutusele, kohandada ja hooldada käesoleva määruse eesmärkide saavutamisele kaasa

aitavaid IKT-süsteeme, pakkuda selliste süsteemide kasutamisalast koolitust ning nende

komponentide koostalitlusvõimet ja andmete kvaliteeti testida ja parandada;

-seadmete soetamine;

-asjaomaste õiguskaitse- ja kohtuasutuste ning haldusasutuste töötajate ja ekspertide haridus ja

koolitus;

- töötajate kulude rahastamine, kes on seotud fondist toetatavate meetmetega, või meetmetega, mis

nõuavad töötajate kaasamist tehnilistel või julgeolekuga seotud põhjustel.

Rakenduskava rakendamisel võib sõltuvalt tegelikest vajadustest ja olemasolevatest ressurssidest

kaaluda ka teiste ISFi meetmete rakendamist.

ISF määruse IV lisaga seotud meetmete esialgne loetelu:

- projektid, mille eesmärk on ELi infosüsteemide ja riiklikke IKT-süsteemide koostalitlusvõime

parandamine liidu või liikmesriigi õiguses sätestatud ulatuses.

d) Toetada asjakohaseid riiklikke meetmeid, sealhulgas turvalisusega seotud riiklike

andmebaaside omavahelist seotust ja kõnealuste andmebaaside sidumist liidu

andmebaasidega, kui see on asjaomaste õiguslike alustega ette nähtud ja vajalik artikli 3

lõike 2 punktis a sätestatud erieesmärkide rakendamiseks.

Rakenduskava peamine eesmärk on toetada asjakohaseid riiklikke meetmeid. Katsumus on, kuidas

teavet paremini koguda, analüüsida ning asjaomaste pädevate asutuste sees ja vahel vahetada.

On oluline, et kõiki kuritegusid menetletaks võimalikult kiiresti ning pädevatel asutustel oleks

õiguspärane juurdepääs vajalikele riiklikele ja rahvusvahelistele andmebaasidele. Selleks tuleb

töötada välja asjakohased (riiklikud) infosüsteemid ja andmebaasid ning tagada nende

koostalitlusvõime, võttes arvesse infoturbemeetmeid ja tagades tõhusa järelevalve.

Eestis on veel valdkondi, kus andmevahetus ei ole digitaalne ja tehakse palju tööd käsitsi.

Kriminaalmenetlus ei ole täielikult digiteeritud ja see mõjutab menetluse kiirust. Politseiuurija ja

kohtuekspertiisi teadlase suhtlust konkreetse juhtumi kohta tuleb tehnoloogia kasutamise abil veel

parandada. Vaja on uut üleriigilist seiret (nt inimeste, sõidukite ja esemete üle), mis oleks

ühendatud SISga ning tagaks rahvusvaheliste kohustuste täitmise võitluses terrorismi ning raskete

ja varjatud kuritegude vastu (nt küberkuritegevus, rahapesu ja lastevastased seksuaalkuriteod).

Eesti kavatseb sellesse valdkonda investeerida nii struktuurifondide kui ka riigieelarve vahendeid,

kaalutakse ka ISFi vahendite kasutamist.

Eestis on digitaalse kohtuekspertiisi arendamises vajakajäämisi. Kuna kuriteod liiguvad rohkem

internetti, suureneb digiteerituse vajalikkus. Seega tuleks suurendada asjaomaste asutuste

suutlikkust tulla töömahuga toime. IKT-seadmete ja sektoripõhiste koolituste ebajärjekindel

rahastamine ei taga valdkonna kestlikku ja süsteemset arengut. Operatiivseks töötamiseks on vaja

automatiseeritud lahendusi.

Tuleb suurendada järelevalvesuutlikkust, sh parandada andmete kogumist ja asjakohast

teabevahetust nii keskkriminaalpolitsei sees kui ka teiste asutustega. Muu hulgas tuleb

ajakohastada riiklikke süsteeme ja soetada vajalikke IKT-seadmeid. Operatiivse järelevalve

tööriist, mida Eesti õiguskaitseorganid praegu kasutavad, vajab ajakohastamist. On vaja töötada

välja uus järelevalvemoodul, et teha seiret ja taktikalist analüüsi tervikuna ühes keskkonnas koos

9

võimalusega teha eri päringuid (sh asjaomastes ELi infosüsteemides) ning vahetada infot.

Operatiivse järelevalve tööriist suhtleb Europoli infosüsteemiga ja Schengeni infosüsteemiga.

Toetatakse ühendamist platvorm SIENA’ga, mida EL liikmesriikide õiguskaitseasutused

kasutavad kuritegevusega seotud teabe operatiivseks vahetamiseks.

Rahapesu, mis rahastab suuremat osa raskest ja organiseeritud kuritegevusest, on üks selle

valdkonna peamisi liikumapanevaid jõude. Selleks, et suurendada ja hõlbustada ettevõtete,

teenuseosutajate, finantseerimisasutuste ja virtuaalvaluuta teenuse osutajate vastutust rahapesu ja

terrorismi rahastamise ennetamisel, tuleb luua asjakohane aruandlusportaal.

Eesti tellis riskihindamise metoodika, et koostada Eestis uus rahapesu ja terrorismi rahastamise

riskihindamine. Mitu töörühma alustas tööd 2019. aasta sügisel ja riiklik riskihindamine kiideti

heaks 2021. aasta aprillis.

Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet võtab kasutusele automaatse andmelaadija Europoli infosüsteemiga

suhtlemisel.

Asjaomaste asutuste suutlikkuse arendamine, et tegeleda luureandmetega avalikest allikatest

(edaspidi OSINT), on prioriteet, mis vajab eri rahastusallikaid, mh kaalutakse selleks kasutada ISFi

vahendeid.

ISF määruse III lisaga seotud meetmete esialgne loetelu:

- võtta kasutusele, kohandada ja hooldada käesoleva määruse eesmärkide saavutamisele kaasa

aitavaid IKT-süsteeme, pakkuda selliste süsteemide kasutamisalast koolitust ning nende

komponentide koostalitlusvõimet ja andmete kvaliteeti testida ja parandada;

- seadmete rahastamine;

- töötajate kulude rahastamine, kes on seotud fondist toetatavate meetmetega, või meetmetega, mis

nõuavad töötajate kaasamist tehnilistel või julgeolekuga seotud põhjustel.

Rakenduskava rakendamisel võib sõltuvalt tegelikest vajadustest ja olemasolevatest ressurssidest

kaaluda ka teiste ISFi meetmete rakendamist.

ISF määruse IV lisaga seotud meetmete esialgne loetelu:

- projektid, mille eesmärk on ELi infosüsteemide ja riiklikke IKT-süsteemide koostalitlusvõime

parandamine liidu või liikmesriigi õiguses sätestatud ulatuses.

Tegevustoetus

Eesti kavatseb kasutada tegevustoetust, et aidata saavutada ISFi rakenduskava eesmärke.

Tegevustoetus võimaldab säilitada kogu liidu jaoks olulist suutlikkust.

Politsei- ja Piirivalveametis (edaspidi PPA) on vaja suurendada riikliku broneeringuinfo üksuse

(edaspidi PIU) personali. PIU analüüsib reisijate nimekirju, töötleb teavet ööpäev ringi ja vahetab

seda oma kolleegidega. Vajaliku andmevahetuse taseme tagamiseks on hädavajalik värvata PIUsse

ametnikke juurde.

Tuleb tagada PNRi andmebaasi pidev hooldus (nt turva- ja tarkvarauuendused ning taristukulud,

sh serverite ja litsentside hooldamise kulud).

10

Digitaalse kriminalistika valdkonnas tuleb näha ette iga-aastased eritarkvara (uuendused, tasud,

litsentsid) kulud, et tagada digitõendite tuvastamine, kogumine, käitlemine ja säilitamine.

Küberkuritegevuse ja OSINTi valdkonnas tuleb katta eritarkvara ja võrguseadmete iga-aastased

hoolduskulud, et suurendada ja säilitada politsei suutlikkust teavet süstemaatiliselt hallata ja

analüüsida.

Kõigis nimetatud valdkondades on lõplik toetusesaaja PPA, kes vastutab seaduse järgi riigi

turvalisuse ja avaliku korra eest ning kuritegude uurimise ja ennetamise eest. Sõltuvalt riiklikust

korrast võib info- ja sidetehnoloogia süsteemide hooldusega seotud rahastust suunata

Siseministeeriumi infotehnoloogia ja arenduskeskusele, kes vastutab põhimääruse kohaselt

ministeeriumile ja selle haldusala asutustele vajalike IKT-teenuste osutamise eest.

Teiste tegevuste rahastamise võimalus ei ole välistatud.

Finantsinstrumendid. Ei kohaldata.

11

2.1.2. Näitajad

Viide: ühissätete määruse artikli 22 lõike 4 punkt e

Tabel 1. Väljundnäitajad

Erieesmärk Tunnuskood Näitaja Mõõtühik Vahe-eesmärk (2024) Sihtväärtus

(2029)

SO1 O.1.1 Koolitustegevuses osalejate arv Arv 12 237

SO1 O.1.2 Ekspertide kohtumiste / õpikodade /

õppekülastuste arv

Arv 2 11

SO1 O.1.3 Välja töötatud / kohandatud / hooldatud IKT-

süsteemide arv

Arv 3 10

SO1 O.1.4 Ostetud seadmete arv Arv 6 98

Tabel 2. Tulemusnäitajad

Eri-

eesmärk

Tunnus-

kood

Näitaja Mõõtühik Lähte-

tase

Lähtetaseme

mõõtühik

Võrdlus-

aasta(d)

Sihtväärtus

(2029)

Sihtväärtuse

mõõtühik

Andmete allikas

SO1 R.1.5 Liikmesriikides /

julgeolekuga seotud ELi ja

detsentraliseeritud

infosüsteemidega /

rahvusvaheliste

andmebaasidega

koostalitlusvõimeliseks

muudetud IKT-süsteemide

arv

Arv 0 Arv 2021 4 Absoluutarv Projektide aruanded

12

SO1 R.1.6 Selliste haldusüksuste arv,

mis on välja töötanud või

ajakohastanud

olemasolevaid

teabevahetusmehhanisme/

menetlusi/vahendeid/

juhiseid teabe

vahetamiseks teiste

liikmesriikidega / liidu

organite, ametite või

asutustega / kolmandate

riikidega / rahvusvaheliste

organisatsioonidega

Arv 0 Arv 2021 4 AbsoluutarvProjektide aruanded

SO1 R.1.7 Nende osalejate arv, kes

peavad koolitust oma töö

jaoks kasulikuks

Arv 0 Osakaal 2021 177 AbsoluutarvKoolitustel osalejate

tagasisidelehed,

projektide aruanded

SO1 R.1.8 Nende osalejate arv, kes

teatavad kolm kuud pärast

koolitust, et nad kasutavad

koolituse käigus

omandatud oskusi ja

pädevust

Arv 0 Osakaal 2021 177 AbsoluutarvKoolitustel osalejate

tagasisidelehed,

projektide aruanded

13

2.1.3. Programmile eraldatud vahendite (EL) esialgne jaotus sekkumise liigi kaupa

Viide: ühissätete määruse artikli 22 lõige 5, AMIFi määruse artikli 16 lõige 12, ISFi määruse artikli 13 lõige 12 või BMVI määruse artikli 13 lõige 18

Tabel 3. Esialgne jaotus

Erieesmärk Sekkumise liik Kood Esialgne summa (eurodes)

SO1 IKT-süsteemid, koostalitlusvõime, andmekvaliteet (välja arvatud seadmed) 001 13 187 144,96

SO1 Võrgustikud, tippkeskused, koostööstruktuurid, ühismeetmed ja -operatsioonid 002 0

SO1 Ühised uurimisrühmad või muud ühisoperatsioonid 003 0

SO1 Ekspertide lähetamine või kasutamine 004 0

SO1 Koolitus 005 0

SO1 Parimate tavade vahetamine, õpikojad, konverentsid, üritused, teadlikkuse

suurendamise kampaaniad, teavitusmeetmed

006 0

SO1 Uuringud, katseprojektid, riskide hindamine 007 0

SO1 Seadmed 008 1 247 129,85

SO1 Transpordivahendid 009 0

SO1 Hooned, rajatised 010 0

SO1 Teadusprojektide rakendamine või muud järelmeetmed 011 0

14

2.2. Erieesmärgi nimetus

Parandada ja tõhustada piiriülest koostööd, sealhulgas ühisoperatsioone pädevate asutuste

vahel seoses terrorismi ning raske ja organiseeritud kuritegevusega, millel on piiriülene mõõde

2.2.1. Erieesmärgi kirjeldus

Käesolevas punktis kirjeldatakse iga erieesmärgi puhul esialgset olukorda, peamisi katsumusi ja

pakutakse välja lahendused, mida fondist toetatakse. Siin kirjeldatakse, milliseid

rakendusmeetmeid fondi toetusel käsitletakse; samuti esitatakse esialgne loetelu meetmetest, mis

kuuluvad AMIFi, ISFi või BMVI määruse artiklite 3 ja 5 kohaldamisalasse. Täpsemalt:

tegevustoetuse puhul esitatakse selgitus kooskõlas AMIFi määruse artikliga 21, ISFi määruse

artikliga 16 või BMVI määruse artiklitega 16 ja 17. See sisaldab soovituslikku loetelu

toetusesaajatest koos nende seadusjärgsete kohustustega ja põhiülesandeid, mida tuleb toetada.

Rahastamisvahendite kavandatud kasutamine, kui kohaldatav.

Eesti on liidu tasandil aktiivne nii kahepoolses kui ka mitmepoolses piiriüleses koostöös, et

võidelda raske ja organiseeritud kuritegevusega.

Eesti keskkriminaalpolitseil on naaberriikide koostööpartneritega hea koostöö uimastiäri vastu

võitlemises, rajatud on mitu ühist uurimisrühma. Liikmesriikide asutustevahelise koostöö kõrval

tuleb parandada koostööd rahvusvaheliste organisatsioonidega (Europol, Interpol, CEPOL,

Euroopa Narkootikumide ja Narkomaania Seirekeskus, ÜRO narkootikumide ja kuritegevuse

büroo jne). Nii Eesti politseil kui ka tollil on Europolis oma kontaktametnikud, et hõlbustada

igapäevast teabevahetust. Selleks organiseeritakse koolitusi, vastastikust õppimist ja spetsiaalseid

vahetusprogramme. Keskenduda tuleb praegustele suundumustele, eelkõige tehnoloogia arengule

ja sünteetiliste opioidide, sh fentanüülide levikule. Oluline on üleilmastunud uimastiturule

paremini reageerida, tugevdades partnerlust liikmesriikide ametiasutuste ja teiste asjaomaste

partnerite vahel, sealhulgas vajaduse korral kolmandate riikidega.

Terrorismivastases võitluses toetavad Eesti õiguskaitseasutusi rahvusvaheline koostöö ELis, sh

terrorismivastase võitluse rühma ja Europoli Euroopa terrorismivastase võitluse keskusega,

teabevahetus Interpolis, terrorismivastane koostöö ÜRO, NATO, Euroopa Nõukogu ja OSCEga

ning kahepoolsed suhted partnerriikidega.

Koordineerimine ja koostöö õiguskaitseasutuste ja teiste organiseeritud kuritegevuse vastu

võitlevate pädevate asutustega on oluline. ELi poliitikatsükli organiseeritud ja raske rahvusvahelise

kuritegevusega võitlemiseks EMPACT 2022+ raames on Eestil kavas osaleda järgmiste

valdkondade tegevustes: aktsiisipettused, varifirmadega seotud ühendusesisene pettus, uued

psühhoaktiivsed ained ja sünteetilised uimastid, ebaseaduslik ränne, infosüsteemide vastu suunatud

rünnakud (küberkuritegevus), laste seksuaalne ärakasutamine (küberkuritegevus), pettused

mittesularahaliste maksevahenditega (küberkuritegevus), tulirelvade salakaubavedu,

keskkonnakuritegevus ja organiseeritud varavastane kuritegevus.

Eesti jaoks on oluline rõhutada ELi institutsioonidevahelise julgeolekukoostöö tugevdamist

(ühistegevus, teabevahetus jne). Eesti aitas sellele kaasa, kui korraldas ELi nõukogu

eesistujariigina Europoli ja Frontexi juhatuse esimese ühiskoosoleku, kus lepiti kokku

koostööpõhimõtetes ja -tegevustes.

Erieesmärgi 2 raames kavatseb Eesti kasutada ISFi vahendeid peamiselt selleks, et parandada

asutustevahelist koostööd ja koordineeritust riiklikul ja liidu tasandil ning vajaduse korral ka

kolmandate riikidega.

15

Praeguste plaanide kohaselt moodustavad selle erieesmärgi tegevused rakenduskavast väikese osa.

Kõnealune erieesmärk aitab rakendada meetmeid a: suurendada õiguskaitseoperatsioonide arvu

kahe või enama liikmesriiki vahel, sealhulgas vajaduse korral operatsioone, mis hõlmavad teisi

asjaomaseid osalisi, eelkõige hõlbustades ja parandades ühiste uurimisrühmade kasutamist, ühiseid

patrulle, jälitustegevust, varjatud jälgimist ja muid operatiivkoostöömehhanisme ELi poliitikatsükli

raames, pannes erilist rõhku piiriülestele operatsioonidele; b ja c: parandada koostööd

liikmesriikide ning liidu asutuste ja ametite vahel ning liikmesriikide asutuste vahel, samuti

õiguskaitseasutuste ja teiste pädevate asutuste vahelist koordineerimist ning koostööd

liikmesriikides ja nende vahel.

Erieesmärgi jaoks ISFi määruses seatud rahastamise miinimumprotsenti ei saavutata. Otsus tuleneb

piiriüleste (ühiste) tegevuste laadist ja mahust, mida ei ole võimalik prognoosida. Selliseid tegevusi

tehakse pidevalt igas valdkonnas, ja kui tekib vajadus, rahastab Eesti neid edasi riigieelarvest või

kasutab sihtotstarbelisi vahendeid (nt komisjonipoolne rahastamine). Operatiivkoostöö on väga

tähtis ja Eesti jätkab aktiivset osalemist nii kahe- kui ka mitmepoolses piiriüleses koostöös, nagu

eespool kirjeldatud. Lisaks on erieesmärgi 3 raames kavandatud meetmed, millel on laiem eesmärk

ja mis aitavad saavutada erieesmärgi 2 sihte (nt õppereisid ja koostöö korruptsiooni ennetamiseks

ja selle vastu võitlemiseks ning rahvusvaheline koostöö küberkuritegevuse ennetamiseks ja selle

vastu võitlemiseks).

Rakenduskavas on arvestatud riigi tegelikke vajadusi ja katsumusi. Kui eraldada erieesmärgi jaoks

ISFi rakenduskava raames vähem vahendeid, kui on nähtud ette ISFi määruses, ei ohusta see

erieesmärgi saavutamist, kuna selleks kasutatakse ka riigieelarve vahendeid ja muid asjakohaseid

rahastamisvõimalusi.

ISFi määruse II lisas toodud meetmete rakendamiseks tehakse järgmisi tegevusi.

a) Suurendada õiguskaitseoperatsioonide arvu kahe või enama liikmesriiki vahel, sealhulgas

vajaduse korral operatsioone, mis hõlmavad teisi asjaomaseid osalisi, eelkõige hõlbustades ja

parandades ühiste uurimisrühmade kasutamist, ühiseid patrulle, jälitustegevust, varjatud

jälgimist ja muid operatiivkoostöömehhanisme ELi poliitikatsükli raames, pannes erilist

rõhku piiriülestele operatsioonidele.

Aktsiisikuritegevuse ja aktsiisimaksu lõhe vähendamiseks Balti regioonis ja ELis tervikuna on

kavas suurendada asjaomaste asutuste tõhusust ja suutlikkust võitluses varimajandusega

(ebaseaduslik tubakas, kütus, alkohol).

Koostöös Hispaania, mitmete ELi liikmesriikide ja kolmandate riikidega (sh Norra,

Ühendkuningriik, USA), Frontexi ja Europoliga luuakse Euroopa operatiivrühm Hispaania Costa

del Soli piirkonnas, et töötada välja ja rakendada ühine uurimis- ja tegevusstrateegia peamiste

kuritegelike ühenduste vastu.

ISF määruse III lisaga seotud meetmete esialgne loetelu:

- toetus spetsialiseerunud riigisiseste üksuste valdkondlikele ja valdkonnaülestele võrgustikele ning

riiklikele kontaktpunktidele, et parandada vastastikust usaldust, oskusteabe, teabe, kogemuste ja

parimate tavade vahetamist ja levitamist ning ressursside ja eksperditeadmiste koondamist

ühistesse pädevuskeskustesse;

- asjaomaste õiguskaitse- ja kohtuasutuste ning haldusasutuste töötajate ja ekspertide haridus ja

koolitus;

16

- seadmete rahastamine.

Rakenduskava rakendamisel võib sõltuvalt tegelikest vajadustest ja olemasolevatest ressurssidest

kaaluda ka teiste ISFi meetmete rakendamist.

ISF määruse IV lisaga seotud meetmete esialgne loetelu:

- projektid, mille eesmärk on võidelda raskest ja organiseeritud kuritegevusest tulenevate kõige

suuremate ohtudega ELi poliitikatsükli / EMPACTi operatiivmeetmete raames.

b) Parandada pädevate asutuste vahelist koordineerimist ja suurendada koostööd nii

liikmesriikides kui ka nende vahel ja teiste asjaomaste osalejatega, näiteks spetsialiseerunud

riiklike üksuste võrgustike, liidu võrgustike ja koostööstruktuuride ning liidu keskuste

kaudu.

Nõukogu rakendusotsuse nr 10388/19 kohaselt soovitati Eestil Schengeni hindamise käigus

töötada politseikoostöö raames välja interaktiivne ja kasutajakeskne e-õppe lahendus, mis põhineb

praktilistel olukordadel ja juhtumitel. Soovitust plaanitakse rakendada ISFi vahendite toel.

2019. aastal tuvastas ja abistas Sotsiaalkindlustusamet 67 inimkaubanduse ohvrit või väidetavat

ohvrit. See on märkimisväärne kasv võrreldes 2018. aastaga, mil tuvastati 12 (väidetavat) ohvrit.

Uurimisorganid ja ohvriabiorganisatsioonid teevad pidevalt rahvusvahelist koostööd

kriminaalasjades ja inimkaubanduse kahtluse korral. Koostöö on oluline, et hoida vastuvõtvates

riikides ära inimkaubandus ja peatada kuritegelikud organisatsioonid, kes vahendavad prostituute

ja ebaseaduslikku tööjõudu. Eestis on üks prioriteet operatiivtasandi koostöö ELi väliste

partneritega, et luua ja säilitada usaldusväärseid kontakte, pakkuda koolitust, tutvustada PPA välja

töötatud seiremeetodeid ning vajaduse korral luua ühiseid uurimismeeskondi.

ISF määruse III lisaga seotud meetmete esialgne loetelu:

- toetus spetsialiseerunud riigisiseste üksuste valdkondlikele ja valdkonnaülestele võrgustikele ning

riiklikele kontaktpunktidele, et parandada vastastikust usaldust, oskusteabe, teabe, kogemuste ja

parimate tavade vahetamist ja levitamist ning ressursside ja eksperditeadmiste koondamist

ühistesse pädevuskeskustesse;

- asjaomaste õiguskaitse- ja kohtuasutuste ning haldusasutuste töötajate ja ekspertide haridus ja

koolitus.

Rakenduskava rakendamisel võib sõltuvalt tegelikest vajadustest ja olemasolevatest ressurssidest

kaaluda ka teiste ISFi meetmete rakendamist.

c) Parandada liidu tasandil asutustevahelist koostööd liikmesriikide vahel ning liikmesriikide

ja asjaomaste liidu organite, ametite ja asutuste vahel, samuti koostööd riiklikul tasandil iga

liikmesriigi pädevate asutuste vahel.

Oluline on uurida võimalusi parandada piiriülest politsei- ja tollikoostööd, kaasates selleks

asjaomaseid ELi asutusi (nt Europol ja Eurojust). Eesti tolli ja politsei kriminaaluurijad peavad

olema paremini ettevalmistatud ja informeeritud, et ennetada kõiki raskeid ja rahvusvahelisi

kuritegusid ning nende vastu võidelda (nt uimastikuriteod, inimkaubandus, tulirelvakaubandus,

euro võltsimine ja rahapesu). Ametnike praktika Europoli Eesti kontaktasutuses on kasulik viis,

kuidas edendada ja parandada riikide operatiivkoostööd (nt ühiste uurimisrühmade, ühiste

analüüsimeeskondade, kontrollialuste saadetiste ja muude Europoli pakutavate võimaluste, näiteks

17

analüüsitöö failide ja turvalise teabevahetusvõrgu kasutamine) ning koostööd Europoli Euroopa

terrorismivastase võitluse keskusega, sh CBRN, demineerimise ja eritaktika valdkonnas.

Eesti tolliasutustele on kasulik tihedam operatiivkoostöö teiste ELi tolliametitega, et koguda ja

analüüsida paremini teavet, teha kindlaks organiseeritud kuritegevuse sihid ning koguda tõendeid

kriminaalmenetluses. Sel eesmärgil võidakse korraldada õppekülastusi.

Et valmisolekut, varajast hoiatamist ning ohule ja kriisidele reageerimist tõhustada, on vaja

suurendada koostööd CBRN sündmustes osalevate ametiasutuste vahel, sh arendada rahvusvahelist

koostööd RescEU, ELi CBRN tegevuskava ning CBRN ja terrorismiohtude hindamise raames.

Sellele aitavad kaasa koolitused, suunised, määrused, väljaõpe, juhtumiuuringud, ühised

uurimismeeskonnad, testid ning nii riiklikud kui ka välismaised seminarid ja konverentsid.

Samuti on vaja tõhustada asutustevahelist koostööd päästeasutuste esmareageerijate vahel, et

turvaintsidentidega seotud väljakutsetele ohutult reageerida. See on päästeasutuste põhiväljaõppest

põhjalikum, kuid tähtis, sest on seotud ka politseiteenistusega. Samavõrd olulised on teiste

liikmesriikide partnerite teadmised ja parimad tavad.

ISF määruse III lisaga seotud meetmete esialgne loetelu:

- meetmed, mis parandavad vastupanuvõimet tekkivatele ohtudele, mille hulgas on keemiline,

bioloogiline, radioloogiline ja tuumaoht;

- toetus spetsialiseerunud riigisiseste üksuste valdkondlikele ja valdkonnaülestele võrgustikele ning

riiklikele kontaktpunktidele, et parandada vastastikust usaldust, oskusteabe, teabe, kogemuste ja

parimate tavade vahetamist ja levitamist ning ressursside ja eksperditeadmiste koondamist

ühistesse pädevuskeskustesse;

- asjaomaste õiguskaitse- ja kohtuasutuste ning haldusasutuste töötajate ja ekspertide haridus ja

koolitus.

Rakenduskava rakendamise käigus võib sõltuvalt tegelikest vajadustest ja olemasolevatest

ressurssidest kaaluda ka teiste ISFi meetmete rakendamist.

Tegevustoetus. Praegu ei nähta selle erieesmärgi raames tegevustoetuse kasutamist ette. Vajaduse

korral võidakse seda siiski kaaluda.

Finantsinstrumendid. Ei kohaldata.

18

2.2.2. Näitajad

Viide: ühissätete määruse artikli 22 lõike 4 punkt e

Tabel 4. Väljundnäitajad

Erieesmärk Tunnuskood Näitaja Mõõtühik Vahe-eesmärk (2024) Sihtväärtus (2029)

SO2 O.2.1 Piiriüleste operatsioonide arv, millest

omakorda

Arv 0 1

SO2 O.2.1.1. ühiste uurimisrühmade arv Arv 0 1

SO2 O.2.2 Ekspertide kohtumiste / õpikodade /

õppekülastuste / ühisõppuste arv

Arv 37 92

SO2 O.2.3 Ostetud seadmete arv Arv 32 80

Tabel 5. Tulemusnäitajad

Eri-

eesmärk

Tunnus-

kood

Näitaja Mõõtühik Lähte-

tase

Lähtetaseme

mõõtühik

Võrdlus-

aasta(d)

Sihtväärtus

(2029)

Sihtväärtuse

mõõtühik

Andmete allikas

SO2 R.2.8 Selliste haldusüksuste arv,

kes on hiljuti välja

töötanud / kohandanud

olemasolevaid

mehhanisme/menetlusi/

vahendeid/juhiseid

koostööks teiste

liikmesriikidega / liidu

organite, ametite või

asutustega / kolmandate

Arv 0 Arv 2021 22 Arv Projektide aruanded

19

riikidega / rahvusvaheliste

organisatsioonidega

SO2 R.2.10 Nende Schengeni

hindamise raames antud

soovituste arv, mida on

arvesse võetud

Arv 0 Arv 2021 1 Arv Projektide aruanded

2.2.3. Programmile eraldatud vahendite (EL) esialgne jaotus sekkumise liigi kaupa

Viide: ühissätete määruse artikli 22 lõige 5, AMIFi määruse artikli 16 lõige 12, ISFi määruse artikli 13 lõige 12 või BMVI määruse artikli 13 lõige 18

Tabel 6. Esialgne jaotus

Erieesmärk Sekkumise liik Kood Esialgne summa (eurodes)

SO2 IKT-süsteemid, koostalitlusvõime, andmekvaliteet (välja arvatud seadmed) 001 0

SO2 Võrgustikud, tippkeskused, koostööstruktuurid, ühismeetmed ja -operatsioonid 002 0

SO2 Ühised uurimisrühmad või muud ühisoperatsioonid 003 324 900

SO2 Ekspertide lähetamine või kasutamine 004 0

SO2 Koolitus 005 456 056,2

SO2 Parimate tavade vahetamine, õpikojad, konverentsid, üritused, teadlikkuse

suurendamise kampaaniad, teavitusmeetmed

006 862 500

SO2 Uuringud, katseprojektid, riskide hindamine 007 0

20

SO2 Seadmed 008 113 945

SO2 Transpordivahendid 009 0

SO2 Hooned, rajatised 010 0

SO2 Teadusprojektide rakendamine või muud järelmeetmed 011 0

21

2.3. Erieesmärgi nimetus

Toetada liikmesriikide suutlikkuse suurendamist kuritegevuse, terrorismi ja radikaliseerumise

ennetamisel ja nende vastu võitlemisel ning julgeolekuintsidentide, riskide ja kriiside

juhtimisel, muu hulgas eri liikmesriikide avaliku sektori asutuste, asjaomaste liidu organite,

ametite või asutuste, kodanikuühiskonna ja erasektori partnerite tihedama koostöö kaudu

2.3.1. Erieesmärgi kirjeldus

Käesolevas punktis kirjeldatakse iga erieesmärgi puhul esialgset olukorda, peamisi katsumusi ja

pakutakse välja lahendused, mida fondist toetatakse. Siin kirjeldatakse, milliseid

rakendusmeetmeid fondi toetusel käsitletakse; samuti esitatakse esialgne loetelu meetmetest, mis

kuuluvad AMIFi, ISFi või BMVI määruse artiklite 3 ja 5 kohaldamisalasse. Täpsemalt:

tegevustoetuse puhul esitatakse selgitus kooskõlas AMIFi määruse artikliga 21, ISFi määruse

artikliga 16 või BMVI määruse artiklitega 16 ja 17. See sisaldab soovituslikku loetelu

toetusesaajatest koos nende seadusjärgsete kohustustega ja põhiülesandeid, mida tuleb toetada.

Rahastamisvahendite kavandatud kasutamine, kui kohaldatav.

Et tugevdada riigi ametiasutuste suutlikkust võidelda kuritegevuse vastu ja seda ennetada, on

põhiline, et inimesed oleksid motiveeritud, kvalifitseeritud ja informeeritud. Seega on oluline

korraldada koolitusi, jagada teadmisi ja suurendada teadlikkust. Samuti ei saa eirata vajadust

ajakohase tehnoloogia, sh IT-tööriistade ja -seadmete järele.

Erieesmärgi raames on kavas rakendada järgmisi meetmeid: a) õiguskaitse koolitused, õppused ja

vastastikune õpe ning d) asjakohaste seadmete hankimine, et suurendada valmisolekut,

vastupidavust ja piisavat reageerimist julgeolekuohtudele. Võimalikes tegevustes rakendatakse ka

meetmeid b ja c.

Vajaduse korral võib rakenduskava elluviimise hilisemas staadiumis kaaluda meetme e

rakendamist. Rakenduskava koostamise ajal ei ole selle meetme tegevusi ette nähtud.

ISFi määruse II lisas toodud meetmete rakendamiseks tehakse järgmisi tegevusi.

a) Suurendada koolituse, õppuste, vastastikuse õppe võimaluste ja spetsiaalsete

vahetusprogrammide pakkumist ja parimate tavade jagamist liikmesriikide pädevates

asutustes ja nende vahel, sealhulgas kohalikul tasandil ning koostöös kolmandate riikidega

ja muude asjaomaste osalejatega.

Eri valdkondades on pidev vajadus süstemaatilise koolituse järele. Õiguskaitseametnike koolitus

on olnud oluline ISF Police’i programmis 2014–2020 ning see on prioriteetne ka perioodil 2021–

2027. Samuti on Eesti saanud palju kasu CEPOLi koolitustest, kuna asutused on osalenud CEPOLi

veebiseminaridel, e-koolitustes, töötubades, vahetusprogrammides ja elanikele mõeldud

tegevustes. Siiski on vaja ka erikoolitusi, mida CEPOL ei paku. Erikoolitusi kavatsetakse rahastada

ISFi toel. ISFi rakenduskava koolitustegevuste kavandamisel konsulteeriti CEPOLi riikliku

üksusega, et vältida kattumist. Erikoolitusi on kavas rahastada ISFi rakenduskavast, kuna CEPOL

korraldab üldiselt alg- või kesktaseme koolitusi ja keskendub vähem konkreetsematele teemadele,

mis on mõeldud kitsamate valdkondade tippspetsialistidele. Lisaks on CEPOLi koolituste ja

õppekülastuste osalejate arv piiratud ning ei ole alati piisav, eriti spetsialiseerunud üksuste puhul.

Tõhus küberkuritegevuse vastane võitlus nõuab sihipäraseid meetmeid ja on üks ISFi rakenduskava

prioriteete. Andmevargus ja -lekked, lunarahanõuded ning veebipõhised maksepettused on

muutunud Eestis tavaliseks probleemiks. Kodanikud, ettevõtted ja riigiasutused peavad olema

teadlikud IKT ohtudest ning valmis ja võimelised end kaitsma. Küberkuritegevuse uurimiseks on

22

vaja digitõendite kasutamise eriteadmisi ja -oskusi. Asjaomastes õiguskaitseasutustes peab olema

piisavalt inimesi, kes on koolitatud ja valmistatud ette selleks, et koguda ja analüüsida vajalikku

teavet ning tagada tegevuste kestlikkus. Selleks on kavas rahastada nii meetme a kui ka meetme d

tegevusi: koolitusi ja õppekülastusi ning vajaliku tehnoloogia ja seadmete soetamist.

Aastate jooksul on teadlikkus korruptsioonivastasest tegevusest kasvanud. Eestis registreeriti 2017.

aastal 291, 2018. aastal 376 ja 2019. aastal 72 korruptsioonikuritegu. Raskete

korruptsioonijuhtumite avastamine on endiselt prioriteet. Kuna korruptsioon on Eestis üha enam

peidetud, on vaja spetsialiseeruda ning süstemaatiliselt koguda ja analüüsida teavet, mis võib aidata

selliseid kuritegusid paremini avastada ja isikuid nende eest vastutusele võtta. Korruptsiooni ja

teiste varjatud kuritegude uurimiseks on vaja koolitusi, parimate tavade vahetamist

välispartneritega, elektroonilise teabe ulatuslikku kogumist ja tõendite analüüsi. Rõhk on ka

teadlikkuse suurendamisel ja valdkonnauuringutel, et teha paremaid poliitilisi otsuseid.

CBRN-i intsidentide tõenäosus on tõusnud, mistõttu vajab valmisolek CBRN-i intsidentideks

suuremat tähelepanu, sealhulgas vastava oskusteabe ja oskuste tõhustamist selles valdkonnas.

ISF määruse III lisaga seotud meetmete esialgne loetelu:

- asjaomaste õiguskaitse- ja kohtuasutuste ning haldusasutuste töötajate ja ekspertide haridus ja

koolitus, võttes arvesse operatiivvajadusi ja riskianalüüse, tehes koostööd CEPOLiga ja vastavalt

vajadusele Euroopa õigusalase koolituse võrgustikuga, sealhulgas haridus ja koolitus

ennetuspoliitika alal, pöörates erilist tähelepanu põhiõigustele ja mittediskrimineerimisele;

- toetus spetsialiseerunud riigisiseste üksuste valdkondlikele ja valdkonnaülestele võrgustikele ning

riiklikele kontaktpunktidele, et parandada vastastikust usaldust, oskusteabe, teabe, kogemuste ja

parimate tavade vahetamist ja levitamist ning ressursside ja eksperditeadmiste koondamist

ühistesse pädevuskeskustesse;

- töötajate kulude rahastamine, kes on seotud fondist toetatavate meetmetega, või meetmetega, mis

nõuavad töötajate kaasamist tehnilistel või julgeolekuga seotud põhjustel.

Rakenduskava rakendamise käigus võib sõltuvalt tegelikest vajadustest ja olemasolevatest

ressurssidest kaaluda ka teiste ISFi meetmete rakendamist.

ISF määruse IV lisaga seotud meetmete esialgne loetelu:

- projektid, mille eesmärk on ennetada ja tõkestada küberkuritegevust, eelkõige internetis toimuvat

laste seksuaalset kuritarvitamist, ning kuritegusid, mille puhul internet on peamine tõendite

kogumise platvorm.

b) Kasutada ära liikmesriikide ja muude asjaomaste osalejate, sealhulgas

kodanikuühiskonna ressursside ja teadmiste ühendamisel ning parimate tavade jagamisel

tekkivat koosmõju, näiteks ühiste pädevuskeskuste loomise, ühiste riskihindamiste

väljatöötamise või ühisoperatsioonide korraldamiseks loodavate ühiste tugikeskuste kaudu.

Mitte kogu äärmuslus ei too kaasa vägivalda, kuid ühiskonnale, eriti vanematele, õpetajatele,

noorsootöötajatele ja ametnikele, on oluline olla eeskujuks ja sekkuda, et tagada mõlema poole

turvalisus. Tähtis on ametnikke ja spetsialiste koolitada, et nad tunneksid ära radikaliseerumise

esimesed märgid ning suudaksid hinnata riske ja nende põhjal delikaatselt tegutseda, austades

samal ajal üksikisikute põhiõigusi. Siseministeeriumi ja Sisekaitseakadeemia juhtimisel on

koolitatud üle 2000 esmataseme praktiku. Tulevikus kavandatakse koolitustele läheneda

süstemaatilisemalt. On vaja jätkata spetsialistide asjatundlikkuse arendamist, toetades ka

23

rahvusvahelisi võrgustikke, nagu radikaliseerumisalase teadlikkuse võrgustik ja Euroopa

strateegilise teabevahetuse võrgustik, ning tutvuda partnerriikide tavadega. Et kasutada

Sisekaitseakadeemia kui CEPOLi Eesti riikliku üksuse potentsiaali täielikult ära, võiks selle

kujundada siseturvalisuse tippkeskuseks, näiteks radikaliseerumise ja terrorismivastase võitluse,

organiseeritud kuritegevuse ja küberkuritegevuse vastase võitluse ning tehisintellekti kasutamise

valdkonnas. Keskus toetaks valdkonna planeerimist ja strateegilist arengut teadusuuringute,

analüüsi ja koolituse kaudu.

ISF määruse III lisaga seotud meetmete esialgne loetelu:

- asjaomaste õiguskaitse- ja kohtuasutuste ning haldusasutuste töötajate ja ekspertide haridus ja

koolitus, võttes arvesse operatiivvajadusi ja riskianalüüse, tehes koostööd CEPOLiga ja vastavalt

vajadusele Euroopa õigusalase koolituse võrgustikuga, sealhulgas haridus ja koolitus

ennetuspoliitika alal, pöörates erilist tähelepanu põhiõigustele ja mittediskrimineerimisele;

- toetus spetsialiseerunud riigisiseste üksuste valdkondlikele ja valdkonnaülestele võrgustikele ning

riiklikele kontaktpunktidele, et parandada vastastikust usaldust, oskusteabe, teabe, kogemuste ja

parimate tavade vahetamist ja levitamist ning ressursside ja eksperditeadmiste koondamist

ühistesse pädevuskeskustesse.

Rakenduskava rakendamise käigus võib sõltuvalt tegelikest vajadustest ja olemasolevatest

ressurssidest kaaluda ka teiste ISFi meetmete rakendamist.

ISF määruse IV lisaga seotud meetmete esialgne loetelu:

- projektid, mille eesmärk on radikaliseerumist ennetada ja selle vastu võidelda.

c) Edendada ja arendada meetmeid, kaitsemeetmeid, mehhanisme ja parimaid tavasid, et

varakult kindlaks teha, kaitsta ja toetada tunnistajaid, õigusrikkumisest teatajaid ja

kuriteoohvreid ning luua selleks partnerlussuhteid ametiasutuste ja muude asjaomaste

osalejate vahel.

Eesti suurim katsumus inimkaubanduse vastases võitluses on see, et ennetustegevust ei rahastata

piisavalt. Ennetamine, teadlikkuse suurendamine ja koolitus toimuvad väikeses mastaabis ja

aeglaselt. Inimkaubanduse vastu võitlevatele ametnikele on vaja ühiskoolitusi, et suurendada

pädevust ja parandada ELi acquis’ rakendamist. Vaja on suurendada Eestisse sisenevate

kolmandate riikide kodanike ja koolinoorte teadlikkust. Samuti on asjakohane koolitada

õiguskaitseasutusi. Tööinspektsiooni ja Sotsiaalkindlustusameti andmetel on suurenenud

välismaalastega seotud töövaidluste arv ning nende välismaalaste arv, kes otsivad abi

inimkaubanduse vastase võitluse abitelefonilt. Koolide jaoks on töötatud välja koolitusvahendid,

mida toetati ISFi programmi 2014–2020 projekti raames, kuid koolitust tuleb laiendada, et hõlmata

ka koolidesse suunduvaid koolitajaid, kes muudaksid noorte suhtumist ja käitumist tulevikus, et

hoida ära inimkaubandust.

Samuti suurendatakse riiklikul ja kohalikul tasandil inimkaubanduse vastase võitlusega tegelevate

ametnike, vabatahtlike ja teiste teatajate pädevust ja oskusi, et tõsta võimalike ohvrite tuvastamise

taset Eestis tervikuna.

On vaja teha teavituskampaaniaid ning tihedat koostööd kommunikatsiooniettevõtete ja

haridusasutustega, et hoida ära laste seksuaalset kuritarvitamist. Valdkondadevaheliseks

ennetamiseks on kavas kasutada eksperditeadmisi ja tegevusi. Eesmärk on uurida, kuidas pooli

ennetustegevustega uuel ja uuenduslikul viisil hõlmata. Samuti on vaja suurendada teadlikkust

24

täiskasvanute seas, kes puutuvad kokku noorte väärkohtlemise ohvritega ja annavad neile

asjakohast abi (nt politseinikud, lastekaitseametnikud, õpetajad, arstid ja vanemad). Pakume laste

abitelefonide töötajatele erikoolitusi, kuidas anda nõu internetis toime pandud laste seksuaalse

kuritarvitamise juhtumite kohta. Koolitustel võetakse arvesse nõukogu järeldusi laste seksuaalse

kuritarvitamise vastu võitlemise kohta (12862/19). Kui ohvrite tuvastamise suutlikkus kasvab,

paraneb tegevuse varajases etapis ka laste kaitse ja kurjategijate kinnipidamine. Kolmas

tegevussuund on uurida ja hinnata programme ja teenuseid, mis takistavad laste seksuaalset

kuritarvitamist Eestis.

ISF määruse III lisaga seotud meetmete esialgne loetelu:

- meetmed, mis parandavad vastupanuvõimet tekkivatele ohtudele, mille hulgas on veebipõhiste

kanalite kaudu toimuv ebaseaduslik kauplemine;

- asjaomaste õiguskaitse- ja kohtuasutuste ning haldusasutuste töötajate ja ekspertide haridus ja

koolitus, võttes arvesse operatiivvajadusi ja riskianalüüse, tehes koostööd CEPOLiga ja vastavalt

vajadusele Euroopa õigusalase koolituse võrgustikuga, sealhulgas haridus ja koolitus

ennetuspoliitika alal, pöörates erilist tähelepanu põhiõigustele ja mittediskrimineerimisele;

- toetus spetsialiseerunud riigisiseste üksuste valdkondlikele ja valdkonnaülestele võrgustikele ning

riiklikele kontaktpunktidele, et parandada vastastikust usaldust, oskusteabe, teabe, kogemuste ja

parimate tavade vahetamist ja levitamist ning ressursside ja eksperditeadmiste koondamist

ühistesse pädevuskeskustesse.

Rakenduskava rakendamise käigus võib sõltuvalt tegelikest vajadustest ja olemasolevatest

ressurssidest kaaluda ka teiste ISFi meetmete rakendamist.

ISF määruse IV lisaga seotud meetmete esialgne loetelu:

- projektid, mille eesmärk on ennetada ja tõkestada küberkuritegevust, eelkõige internetis toimuvat

laste seksuaalset kuritarvitamist, ning kuritegusid, mille puhul internet on peamine tõendite

kogumise platvorm.

d) Omandada vajalikke seadmeid ning rajada või ajakohastada spetsiaalseid õppevahendeid

ja muud olulist julgeolekuga seotud taristut, et suurendada valmisolekut, vastupidavust ja

avalikkuse teadlikkust ning reageerida adekvaatselt julgeolekuohtudele.

CBRN ning ohtlike materjalide intsidentideks valmisolekule tuleb pöörata rohkem tähelepanu,

võttes arvesse ohtude muutumist Euroopas. Hinnangute kohaselt on Eestis ikka üle poole miljoni

teise maailmasõja aegse lõhkekeha. Nendele ligipääs on Eesti siseturvalisuse seisukohalt suur

probleem ning kujutab endast võimalike terroriaktide ja üksikkurjategijate poolest ohtu.

Ebaseaduslik e-kaubandus, sh ohtlike ainete import, suurendab ka CBRN intsidentide tõenäosust.

Asjakohane oskusteave ja oskused, tehniline suutlikkus, (isikukaitse)vahendite kättesaadavus ja

erisõidukid (sh lõhkeainete kõrvaldamise valdkonnas) on samuti olulised. See on tihedalt seotud

kodanike ja taristu kaitsega, kriisiohjega ja strateegilise kommunikatsiooniga. ISFi programmi

2014–2020 raames tehti hulk sarnaseid tegevusi (nt pommirobotite ja pommiülikondade ostmine),

millel oli kõnealuses valdkonnas väga hea mõju.

ISFi programmis 2014–2020 toetati kiirgusohu, inimese põhjustatud kriisis näiteks radioaktiivse

pommi eest varajase hoiatamise süsteemi ajakohastamist. Süsteemi plaanitakse veelgi uuendada ja

lisada uusi funktsioone, näiteks radioaktiivsete väärisgaaside analüüs.

25

Valdkond, kuhu Eesti kavatseb lähitulevikus rohkem panustada, on mehitamata õhusõidukite laiem

ja süstemaatilisem kasutamine kuritegevusvastases võitluses. See parandaks märkimisväärselt

suutlikkust avastada ja reageerida turvalisusintsidentidele ning aitaks kaitsta inimesi ja avalikku

ruumi. Samuti aitab see politseil tugevdada koostööd ELi õiguskaitseasutustega võitluses raske ja

organiseeritud kuritegevusega.

Turvalisusega seotud taristu füüsiline kaitse ja/või vastupidavuse tagamine on kriisi ajal ülioluline.

Tuleb tagada PPA, Päästeameti ja teiste kriisiolukordades olulisi teenuseid osutavate

institutsioonide tegevuse järjepidevus. Samuti on tähtis suurendada kohtuekspertiisi suutlikkust.

ISF määruse III lisaga seotud meetmete esialgne loetelu:

- meetmed, mis parandavad vastupanuvõimet tekkivatele ohtudele, mille hulgas on keemiline,

bioloogiline, radioloogiline ja tuumaoht;

- seadmete ja sidesüsteemide rahastamine.

Rakenduskava rakendamise käigus võib sõltuvalt tegelikest vajadustest ja olemasolevatest

ressurssidest kaaluda ka teiste ISFi meetmete rakendamist.

Tegevustoetus. Eesti kavatseb kasutada tegevustoetust, et aidata saavutada ISFi rakenduskava

eesmärke. Tegevustoetus võimaldab säilitada kogu liidu jaoks olulist suutlikkust.

On vaja suurendada keskkriminaalpolitsei küberkuritegude büroo töötajate arvu, et parandada

teabe kogumise ja analüüsimise suutlikkust. Personalikulud kaetakse tegevustoetusest. Lõplik

kasusaaja on PPA, kes vastutab seaduse järgi riigi turvalisuse ja avaliku korra eest ning kuritegude

uurimise ja ennetamise eest.

Finantsinstrumendid. Ei kohaldata.

26

2.3.2. Näitajad

Viide: ühissätete määruse artikli 22 lõike 4 punkt e

Tabel 7. Väljundnäitajad

Erieesmärk Tunnuskood Näitaja Mõõtühik Vahe-eesmärk (2024) Sihtväärtus (2029)

SO3 O.3.1 Koolitustegevuses osalejate arv Arv 1337 3216

SO3 O.3.2 Vahetusprogrammide/õpikodade/

õppekülastuste arv

Arv 28 71

SO3 O.3.3 Ostetud seadmete arv Arv 37 75

SO3 O.3.6 Projektide arv kuritegevuse ennetamiseks Arv 2 3

SO3 O.3.7 Projektide arv kuriteoohvrite abistamiseks Arv 0 1

Tabel 8. Tulemusnäitajad

Eri-

eesmärk

Tunnus-

kood

Näitaja Mõõtühi

k

Lähte-

tase

Lähtetaseme

mõõtühik

Võrdlus-

aasta(d)

Sihtväärtus

(2029)

Sihtväärtuse

mõõtühik

Andmete allikas

SO3 R.3.12 Nende osalejate arv, kes peavad

koolitust oma töö jaoks

kasulikuks

Arv 0 Osakaal 2021 2023 Arv Koolitustel osalejate

tagasisidelehed, projektide

aruanded

SO3 R.3.13 Nende osalejate arv, kes

teatavad kolm kuud pärast

koolituse läbimist, et nad

kasutavad koolituse käigus

omandatud oskusi ja pädevust

Arv 0 Osakaal 2021 941 Arv Koolitustel osalejate

tagasisidelehed, projektide

aruanded

27

2.3.3. Programmile eraldatud vahendite (EL) esialgne jaotus sekkumise liigi kaupa

Viide: ühissätete määruse artikli 22 lõige 5, AMIFi määruse artikli 16 lõige 12, ISFi määruse artikli 13 lõige 12 või BMVI määruse artikli 13 lõige 18

Tabel 9. Esialgne jaotus

Erieesmärk Sekkumise liik Kood Esialgne summa (eurodes)

SO3 IKT-süsteemid, koostalitlusvõime, andmekvaliteet (välja arvatud seadmed) 001 1 117 500

SO3 Võrgustikud, tippkeskused, koostööstruktuurid, ühismeetmed ja -operatsioonid 002 0

SO3 Ühised uurimisrühmad või muud ühisoperatsioonid 003 0

SO3 Ekspertide lähetamine või kasutamine 004 0

SO3 Koolitus 005 2 667 369,9

SO3 Parimate tavade vahetamine, õpikojad, konverentsid, üritused, teadlikkuse

suurendamise kampaaniad, teavitusmeetmed

006 562 500

SO3 Uuringud, katseprojektid, riskide hindamine 007 750 000

SO3 Seadmed 008 8 066 566,5

SO3 Transpordivahendid 009 0

SO3 Hooned, rajatised 010 0

SO3 Teadusprojektide rakendamine või muud järelmeetmed 011 0

28

2.4. Tehniline abi

2.4.1. Kirjeldus

Viide: ühissätete määruse artikli 22 lõike 3 punkt f, artikli 36 lõige 5 ja artikkel 95

ISFi rakenduskavas seatud eesmärkide ja näitajate saavutamiseks peab olema piisavalt vahendeid.

Ühissätete määruse artikli 36 lõike 5 alusel eraldatavat tehnilist abi kasutatakse:

 programmitöö ettevalmistamiseks, rakendamiseks, seireks ja kontrolliks;

 suutlikkuse suurendamiseks;

 hindamiseks ja uuringuteks, andmete kogumiseks;

 teavitus- ja teavitamistegevusteks.

Ettevalmistamine, rakendamine, seire ja kontroll

Tehnilist abi kasutavad korraldusasutuse ja auditeerimisasutuse pädevad ametnikud. Siseministeeriumis töötab kuni kümme korraldusasutuse ametnikku, kes

vastutavad AMIFi, ISFi ja BMVI vahendite kasutamise eest, ja kaks auditeerimisasutuse audiitorit. Tehnilist abi kasutatakse korraldusasutuse ja

auditeerimisasutuse personalikuludeks, koolituseks, seminaridel ja kohtumistel osalemiseks jne.

Suutlikkuse suurendamine

Et taotlejad ja toetusesaajad saaksid projekte koostada ja ellu viia, on vaja neid nõustada ja jagada parimaid tavasid. Seepärast tagab korraldusasutus tehnilise

abiga ka taotlejate ja toetusesaajate pideva koolituse, nõustamise ja juhendamise BMVI rahastuse kasutamise vallas, sh suurendades teadlikkust põhiõiguste

kaitsest ja võrdse kohtlemise tagamisest.

Taotlejate ja toetusesaajate koormuse vähendamiseks kasutatakse tehnilist abi uute IT-lahenduste jaoks, mille kaudu hakkab käima taotlemine, aruandlus ja kulude

hüvitamine. Infosüsteem e-SFOS ehk toetuse haldamise register võetakse kasutusele selleks, et lihtsustada tehnilisi menetlusi, vähendada taotlejate, toetusesaajate

ja haldusasutuste töökoormust ning aidata seega rohkem kaasa sisulistele tegevustele. E-rakendustes kasutatakse nii palju kui võimalik ühekordse sisestamise

põhimõtet. Lisaks võimaldab infosüsteem korraldusasutusel jälgida tulemuste saavutamist, kulukohustuste ja väljamaksete edenemist, auditite mahtu ja tulemusi,

haldus-, finants- ja kohapealseid kontrolle, eeskirjade eiramist ning tagasinõudeid.

29

Hindamine ja uuringud, andmete kogumine

Oluline on tagada eesmärkide õigeaegne täitmine ja vahendite tõhus kasutamine. Seetõttu on nähtud ette kaks hindamist: vahehindamine 2024. aastal ja

lõpphindamine 2030. aastal. Vajaduse korral kasutatakse tehnilist abi ka lisauuringuteks ja andmete kogumiseks.

Teave ja teavitamine

Tehnilist abi kasutatakse ka teavitamistegevusteks (vt punkt 7).

Ühissätete määruse artiklis 37 sätestatud tehnilist abi ei ole plaanis kasutada.

2.4.2. Tehnilise abi esialgne jaotus vastavalt artikli 36 lõikele 5 ja artiklile 37

Tabel 10. Esialgne jaotus

Sekkumise liik Kood Esialgne summa (eurodes)

Teave ja teavitamine 001 17 614,71

Ettevalmistamine, rakendamine, seire ja kontroll 002 1 497 136,21

Hindamine ja uuringud, andmete kogumine 003 123 292,86

Suutlikkuse suurendamine 004 123 292,96

30

3. Rahastamiskava

Viide: ühissätete määruse artikli 22 lõike 3 punkt g

Tabel 12. Kõik rahalised eraldised fondide ja liikmesriigi osaluste kaupa

Erieesmärk

Meetme liik Liidu toetuse

arvutamise alus

(kogusumma või

avalik sektor)

Liidu osalus (a) Liikmesriigi osalus

(b)=(c)+(d)

Liikmesriigi osaluse esialgne

jaotus

Kokku

e=(a)+(b)

Kaasrahastami

s-määr

(f)=(a)/(e)

avalik c) era-

sektor

d)

Erieesmärk 1 Tavategevusedkogusumma 4 527 605,86 1 509 202 1 509 202 0 6 036 807,86 75

Erimeetme projektid - 162 764,95 18 085 18 085 0 180 849,95 90

Lisa IV tegevusedkogusumma 5 501 636,25 1 833 878,75 1 833 878,75 0 7 335 515,00 75

Tegevustoetuskogusumma 4 242 267,75 1 414 089,25 1 414 089,25 0 5 656 357 75

Erieesmärk 1

kokku

14 434 274,19 4 775 255 4 775 255 0 19 209 529,81

Erieesmärk 2 Tavategevusedkogusumma 1 327 500,00 442 500,00

442 500,00 0 1 770 000,00 75

Erimeetme projektid- 429 901,20 47 766,80 47 766,80 0 477 668,00 90

Lisa IV tegevusedkogusumma 0 0 0 0 0 75

31

Erieesmärk 2

kokku

1 757 401,20 490 266,80 490 266,80 0 2 247 668,00

Erieesmärk 3 Tavategevusedkogusumma 9 922 867,50 3 307 622,50 3 307 622,50 0 13 230 490,00 75

Erimeetme projektid- 436 068,90 48 452,10 48 452,10 0 484 521,00 90

Lisa IV tegevused kogusumma 1 687 500,00 562 500,00 562 500,00 0 2 250 000,00 75

Tegevustoetus kogusumma 1 117 500,00 372 500,00 372 500,00 0 1 490 000,00 75

Erieesmärk 3

kokku

13 163 936,40 4 291 074,60 4 291 074,60 0 17 455 011,00

Ühissätete

määruse

artikli 36

lõike 5 kohane

tehniline abi

kogusumma 1 761 336,74 1 761 336,74 100

Ühissätete

määruse

artikli 37

kohane

tehniline abi

- - - - - - - -

Kogusumma 31 116 949,15 9 556 596,4 9 556 596,4 0.00 40 673 545,55

32

3.3. Ümberpaigutamised

ISFist teistesse fondidesse ja teistest fondidest ISFi ümberpaigutamist ei plaanita.

Tabel 13. Eelarve jagatud täitmise korras hallatavate fondide vahelised ümberpaigutamised1

Saaja

fond/vahend

Ümberpaigutatav

fond/vahend

AMIF ISF BMVI ERF ESF+ Ühtekuuluvus-

fond

EMKVF Kokku

AMIF - - - - - - -

ISF - - - - - - -

BMVI - - - - - - -

Kokku - - - - - - - -

4. Eeltingimused

Viide: ühissätete määruse artikli 22 lõike 3 punkt i

Tabel 14. Horisontaalsed eeltingimused

Eeltingimus Eel-

tingimuse

täitmine

Kriteeriumid Kriteeriu-

mide

täitmine

Viide asjakohastele

dokumentidele

Põhjendus

1 Kõikide programmitöö perioodil tehtavate ümberpaigutamiste kumulatiivsed summad.

33

Tõhusad

järelevalve-

mehhanismid

riigihangete turu

jaoks

JAH Kehtestatud on

järelevalvemehhanismid,

mis hõlmavad kõiki

riigihankelepinguid ja

nende hankeid fondidest,

kooskõlas ELi

hankeõigusega. Selleks on

vaja järgmist:

1. meetmed, mis

tagavad tõhusate ja

usaldusväärsete

andmete kogumise

riigihankemenetluste

kohta, mis ületavad

ELi lävendeid,

kooskõlas direktiivi

2014/24/EL artiklitest

83 ja 84 ning

direktiivi 2014/25/EL

artiklitest 99 ja 100

tuleneva aruandlus-

kohustusega;

2. meetmed andmete

tagamiseks vähemalt

järgmiste aspektide

jaoks:

a. konkurentsi kvaliteet

ja intensiivsus:

võitnud pakkujate

nimed, esialgne

pakkujate arv ja

lepinguline

maksumus;

1. JAH

2. JAH

3. JAH

4. JAH

5. JAH

Riigihangete register

(https://riigihanked.riik.ee)

Riigihangete seadus

(https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/1 13032019145?leiaKehtiv)

Konkurentsiseadus (https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/1 02062021018?leiaKehtiv)

Rahandusministeeriumi info (https://www.fin.ee/riigihanked- riigiabi-osalused- kinnisvara/riigihanked

1. Kõik ELi hankeõiguse kohaselt riiklikku lävendit ületavad

riigihankelepingud ja nende hanked fondidest avaldatakse ja

teostatakse e-riigihangete keskportaalis „Riigihangete register“

(https://riigihanked.riik.ee), mida haldab Rahandusministeerium.

Riigihangete seaduse kohaselt vastutab Rahandusministeerium

järelevalve, aruandluse ja nõustamise eest vastavalt direktiivi

2014/24/EL artiklitele 83 ja 84 ning direktiivi 2014/25/EL

artiklitele 99 ja 100. Järelevalve ja aruandlus põhinevad kesksest

riigihangete registrist hangitud andmetel.

2. a. Võitnud pakkujate nimed, esialgne pakkujate arv ja

lepinguline maksumus avaldatakse riigihangete registris lepingu

sõlmimise teatena komisjoni 23 septembri 2019. aasta

rakendusmääruse (EL) 2019/1780 alusel.

2. b. Hankija kohustus on pärast hanke lõpuleviimist avaldada

täidetud lepingust tulenev teave lõpliku hinna kohta riigihangete

registris. Teave VKEde kui otsepakkujate osalemise kohta

avaldatakse registris lepingu sõlmimise teates – 100% e-hankeid

teostatakse keskses hankeregistris.

3. Järelevalve (seire) ja analüüsi eest vastutav asutus on

Rahandusministeerium. Järelevalvega seotud kohustused on

sätestatud riigihangete seaduses. Järelevalve eest vastutavad neli

inimest ja riigihangete andmete üldanalüüsi eest üks inimene.

4. Riigihangete statistika ja ülevaade on avaldatud

Rahandusministeeriumi veebilehel (https://fin.ee/riigihanked-

riigiabi-osalused/riigihanked).

5. Riigihangete seaduses on säte, et kui järelevalve käigus

teatavaks saanud asjaolud võivad anda aluse süüteokahtluseks, mis

ei ole riigihangete seaduse §-des 213–215 sätestatud väärteona, või

asjaoludel on võimaliku korruptsioonijuhtumi tunnused, teavitab

Rahandusministeerium uurimisasutust või prokuratuuri talle

teadaolevatest asjaoludest. Konkurentsiamet on selles tähenduses

ka uurimisasutus ja pädev asutus konkurentsiseaduse (vt § 54)

järgimise üle järelevalve teostamisel, keda tuleb teavitada

34

b. teave lõpliku hinna

kohta pärast valituks

osutumist ja VKEde

kui otsepakkujate

osalemise kohta, kui

sellist teavet pakuvad

riiklikud süsteemid;

3. meetmed pädevate

riigiasutuste jaoks

andmeseire ja

-analüüsi tagamiseks

kooskõlas direktiivi

2014/24/EL artikli 83

lõikega 2 ja direktiivi

2014/25/EL artikli 99

lõikega 2;

4. analüüsitulemuste

üldsusele

kättesaadavaks

tegemise kord

kooskõlas direktiivi

2014/24/EL artikli 83

lõikega 3 ja direktiivi

2014/25/EL artikli 99

lõikega 3;

5. meetmed tagamaks, et

kogu teave, mis viitab

võimalikule

pakkumis-

mahhinatsioonile,

edastatakse

pädevatele

riigiasutustele

kooskõlas direktiivi

rikkumistest. Rahandusministeeriumi veebilehel on info, et

ettevõtjate võimaliku konkurentsi kahjustava koostöö kahtluse

korral tuleb teavitada Konkurentsiametit.

35

2014/24/EL artikli 83

lõikega 2 ja direktiivi

2014/25/EL artikli 99

lõikega 2.

Euroopa Liidu

põhiõiguste harta

tõhus kohaldamine

ja rakendamine

JAH Et tagada Euroopa Liidu

põhiõiguste harta

järgimine, on olemas

tõhusad mehhanismid, mis

hõlmavad järgmist:

1. kord, mis tagab

fondidest toetatavate

programmide vastavuse

ja nende rakendamise

harta asjakohaste sätete

kohaselt;

2. kord anda

seirekomisjonile aru

juhtumitest, mis on

seotud fondide

toetatavate tegevuste

mittevastavusega

hartaga.

1. JAH

2. JAH

Perioodi 2021–2027 Euroopa

Liidu ühtekuuluvus- ja

siseturvalisuspoliitika fondide

rakendamise seadus ÜSS 2021-

2027 (jõustunud 21.03.2022)

(https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/13

0062023056?leiaKehtiv)

ÜRO ühine põhidokument, mis on

osa osalisriikide aruannetest –

Eesti

(https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layo

uts/15/treatybodyexternal/Downlo

ad.aspx?symbolno=HRI%2fCOR

E%2fEST%2f2015&Lang=en)

Eesti 2035

(https://valitsus.ee/strateegia-eesti-

2035-arengukavad-ja-

planeering/strateegia/materjalid/m

aterjalid)

Soolise võrdõiguslikkuse seadus

(https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/12

6042013009?leiaKehtiv)

1. Eestis on siseriikliku õiguse ja rahvusvaheliste lepingutega

loodud mehhanism harta järgimiseks, sh jaotis I (väärikus, § 1-5)

EV põhiseadus (PS) § 10, 17, 18, 20, 29. Jaotis II (vabadused, § 6-

19) PS § 20, 26, 27, 29, 31, 32, 36-38, 40, 41, 43, 47, Isikuandmete

kaitse seaduse ja Välismaalasele rahvusvahelise kaitse andmise

seadusega. Jaotis III (võrdsus, § 20-26) PS § 12 ja 28, võrdse

kohtlemise seaduse, soolise võrdõiguslikkuse seadusega. Jaotis IV

(solidaarsus, § 27-38), PS § 27-29, Töölepinguseadus. Jaotis V

(kodanike õigused, §39-46), PS § 3, 12, 34, 44, 46,

Haldusmenetluse seadus.

ÜSS 2021-2027 § 7 (3) järgi rakendusasutus koordineerib ja seirab

keskselt oma valdkonnas toetustega strateegia „Eesti 2035“

aluspõhimõtete hoidmisele (sh harta väärtused) ja sihtide

saavutamisele kaasaaitamist. Hartaga kooskõla nõue on läbivates

projektivalikukriteeriumides.

Korraldusasutus ja võrdõiguslikkuse kompetentsikeskus tagavad

koolitused EL põhiõiguste harta nõuetega arvestamiseks.

2. Seirekomisjoni kuuluvad partnerid, kes jälgivad harta täitmist

ning kelle ülesanne on esitada oma valdkonna konsolideeritud

visioon ja vajaduse korral probleemid seirekomisjonile (nt soolise

võrdõiguslikkuse ja võrdse kohtlemise volinik, Eesti Puuetega

Inimeste Koda ning õiguskantsler). Seirekomisjoni päevakorda

lisatakse punkt harta täitmist jälgiva partneri ettepanekul.

.

Kõigil komisjoni liikmetel on võimalik avada arutelu jooksvalt või

lisada arutelupunktid seirekomisjoni koosoleku päevakorda, kui

peaks ilmnema juhtum, mille puhul ei vasta ISFist toetatav tegevus

ELi põhiõiguste hartale, sh mis tahes kahtluse korral, et hoolimata

36

Võrdse kohtlemise seadus (https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/1 06072012022?leiaKehtiv)

Õiguskantsler

(https://www.oiguskantsler.ee/et)

Lasteombudsman

(https://www.oiguskantsler.ee/et/l

aste-ja-noorte-%C3%B5igused)

Seirekomisjoni kooseis ja liikmed

https://siseministeerium.ee/seireko

misjon

kõigist kehtivatest menetlusnõuetest võib esineda harta

mittejärgimist.

Puuetega inimeste

õiguste

konventsiooni

(PIK) kohaldamine

ja rakendamine

kooskõlas nõukogu

otsusega

2010/48/EÜ

JAH Et tagada puuetega

inimeste õiguste

konventsiooni

rakendamine, on olemas

riiklik raamistik, mis

hõlmab järgmist:

1. mõõdetavate

tulemustega

eesmärgid,

andmekogumise ja

-seire mehhanismid;

2. meetmed, et tagada

ligipääsetavus-

poliitika, õigusaktide

ja standardite

nõuetekohane

arvessevõtmine

programmide

1. JAH

2. JAH

3. JAH

1. Heaolu arengukava 2023-2030

(https://www.sm.ee/et/heaolu-

arengukava-2023-2030)

Strateegia „Eesti 2035“

(https://valitsus.ee/strateegia-

eesti-2035-arengukavad-ja-

planeering/strateegia/materjalid)

2. Ligipääsetavuse rakkerühm

(https://www.riigikantselei.ee/ligi

paasetavus)

TTJA

(https://www.ttja.ee/ariklient/ehiti

sed-ehitamine/ligipaasetavus)

1. Puuetega inimeste õiguste kaitse tagamine on jagatud eri

strateegiate vahel. Puuetega inimeste õiguste kaitse poliitika

strateegia on seatud „Heaolu arengukavas 2023–2030“. Sihtrühma

ees seisvaid probleeme, poliitikameetmeid ja asjakohaseid

näitajaid on kirjeldatud sama arengukava programmides. Samuti

katab PIK nõudeid strateegia „Eesti 2035“.

Statistikat puudega inimeste olukorrast kogub Statistikaamet Eesti

sotsiaaluuringu, Eesti tööjõu-uuringu, tööelu uuringu ja leibkonna

eelarve uuringu kaudu ning asjakohaste tervise-, vananemis- ja

pensioniteemaliste uuringutega. Sotsiaalministeerium avaldab

regulaarset sotsiaalhoolekande statistikat ja vajaduse korral teeb

konkreetseid uuringuid.

2. Ligipääsetavus on „Eesti 2035“ strateegiline siht ja

aluspõhimõte PIK artikli 9 tähenduses. Tervikliku

ligipääsetavuspoliitika väljatöötamiseks lõi Vabariigi Valitsus

2019. aastal ligipääsetavuse rakkerühma. Võrdõiguslikkuse

kompetentsikeskus annab korraldus- ja rakendusasutustele ning

toetuse taotlejatele/saajatele ligipääsetavuse ja võrdsete võimaluste

37

väljatöötamisel ja

rakendamisel;

3. meetmed, mille

kohaselt antakse

seirekomisjonile aru

juhtumitest, mille

puhul ei vasta

fondidest toetatav

tegevus ÜRO

puuetega inimeste

õiguste

konventsioonile, ning

kõnealust

konventsiooni

käsitletavatest

kaebustest, mis on

esitatud artikli 69

lõikes 7 ette nähtud

korra kohaselt.

Puudega inimeste erivajadustest

tulenevad nõuded ehitisele

(https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/13

1052018055)

Nõuded eluruumile

(https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/10

3072015034?leiaKehtiv)

3.

Puuetega inimeste nõukoda

(https://www.oiguskantsler.ee/et/p

uuetega-inimeste-

n%C3%B5ukoda)

Õiguskantsler

(https://www.oiguskantsler.ee/)

Õiguskantsleri seadus

(https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/%

C3%95KS)

kohta nõu ning kooskõlastab meetmepõhiseid õigusakte. 2018.

aastal jõustusid määrused „Puudega inimeste erivajadustest

tulenevad nõuded ehitisele“ ja „Eluruumile esitatavad nõuded“.

Alates 1. jaanuarist 2019 teostab määruste kohaldamise üle

riiklikku järelevalvet Tarbijakaitse ja Tehnilise Järelevalve Amet.

TTJA teostab järelevalvet füüsilise keskkonna ligipääsetavuse üle

ning on kavandatud ka teostama järelevalvet EL Ligipääsetavuse

direktiivi (EL) 2019/882 üle. Võrdõiguslikkuse kompetentsikeskus

kontrollib, et Eesti seadusi ÜRO PIK valguses täidetaks kõigil

tasanditel EL meetmete rakendamisel.

3. Alates 1. jaanuarist 2019 täidab õiguskantsler puuetega inimeste

õiguste konventsiooni rakendamise edendamise, kaitse ja seire

ülesandeid. 2019. aastal moodustati õiguskantsleri juurde puuetega

inimeste nõukoda, mille eesmärk on nõustada õiguskantslerit

puuetega inimeste õiguste edendamise, kaitse ja järelevalve

teemal. Nõukoda on moodustatud ÜRO PIK artikli 33 lõike 3

alusel.

ISFi projektide puhul on arutelude kontaktpunkt seirekomisjon,

mis koosneb asjaomastest katusorganisatsioonidest ja vajaduse

korral laiendab Siseministeerium partnerite nimekirja.

Seirekomisjoni kohtumistele on kaasatud Eesti Puuetega Inimeste

Koda, õiguskantsler ning soolise võrdõiguslikkuse ja võrdse

kohtlemise volinik.

Seirekomisjoni tööprotseduuride kohaselt, mis kinnitati

seirekomisjoni 25.10.2022 koosolekul, annab õiguskantsleri

esindaja vajadusel seirekomisjoni koosolekul ülevaate esitatud

kaebustest, mille puhul ei vasta fondidest toetatav tegevus ÜRO

puuetega inimeste õiguste konventsioonile.

Seirekomisjoni liige (nt EPIK, soolise võrdõiguslikkuse ja võrdse

kohtlemise volinik) võib teha seirekomisjoni esimehele

põhjendatud ettepaneku seirekomisjoni kokkukutsumiseks või

esitada täiendava päevakorra punkti ettepaneku kui peaks ilmnema

38

juhtum, mille puhul ei vasta fondidest toetatav tegevus ÜRO

puuetega inimeste õiguste konventsioonile.

39

5. Programmi haldavad asutused Viide: ühissätete määruse artikli 22 lõike 3 punkt k ning artiklid 71 ja 84

Tabel 15. Programmi haldavad asutused

Asutuse nimetus Kontaktisiku nimi ja

ametikoht

E-post

Korraldusasutus Siseministeerium Tarmo Miilits, kantsler [email protected]

Auditeerimisasutus Siseministeerium Tarmo Olgo, siseauditi

osakonna juhataja

[email protected]

Asutus, kellele

laekuvad komisjoni

maksed

Rahandusministeerium Marge Kaljas, riigikassa

osakonna nõunik

[email protected]

6. Partnerlus

Viide: ühissätete määruse artikli 22 lõike 3 punkt h

ISFi rakenduskava koostamine põhineb avatusel. Eesti sisejulgeolekupoliitika praeguste ja

tulevaste katsumuste väljaselgitamisse ja lahenduste pakkumisse kaasati kõik asjaomased

sidusrühmad.

ELi vahendite kavandamiseks ei ole eraldi protsessi. Planeerimine on allikaneutraalne. Riiklike

vajaduste ja nende rahastamise strateegiline planeerimine toimub keskselt (sh partnerite ja

sidusrühmade kaasamine).

ELi eelarveperioodi 2021–2027 on kavandatud käsikäes pikaajalise riikliku katusstrateegia

„Eesti 2035“ ja STAKi koostamisega. Ülevaate strateegiate koostamisest leiab veebilehtedelt

https://valitsus.ee/strateegia-eesti-2035-arengukavad-ja-planeering/strateegia ja

https://siseministeerium.ee/ministeerium-ja-kontaktid/kaasamine-osalemine/siseturvalisuse-

arengukava-2020-2030.

Protsess algas 2018. aasta kevadel. 2018. aasta lõpus ja 2019. aasta alguses konsulteeriti teiste

ministeeriumide ja katusorganisatsioonidega. Lisaks peeti arutelusid kõigis maakondades.

Aruteludele kutsuti maakondlikud turvalisuse nõukogud, muud maakondade turvalisusega

seotud institutsioonid, huvirühmad ja kodanikuühiskonna organisatsioonide esindajad, linna- ja

vallajuhid ning maakonna arenduskeskused. Aruteludest tehti kokkuvõte ja neid kasutati

STAK 2020–2030 koostamisel.

Arengukava esitati avalikuks aruteluks spetsiaalse veebiplatvormi kaudu. Sama süsteemi

kasutati, et saada kõigi ministeeriumide ja Riigikantselei heakskiit ning Eesti Linnade ja

Omavalitsuste Liidu arvamus.

See, kuidas strateegiates seatud eesmärkide saavutamist rahastatakse, otsustatakse iga-aastasel

riigieelarve arutelul, mis tagab koostoime riiklike ja muude vahenditega ning võimaldab vältida

topeltrahastamist.

40

STAKi rakendamist jälgib valdkondlik komitee, mis koosneb asjaomaste asutuste ja partnerite

esindajatest.

Et BMVI, ISFi ja AMIFi rakendamist jälgida, on loodud ühine seirekomisjon. See koosneb

samadest osalejatest, kes on STAKi valdkondlike komiteede liikmed. Lisaks on hõlmatud

sotsiaalse kaasatuse, põhiõiguste, puuetega inimeste õiguste, soolise võrdõiguslikkuse ja

mittediskrimineerimise edendamise eest vastutavad asutused.

7. Teabevahetus ja nähtavus

Viide: ühissätete määruse artikli 22 lõike 3 punkt j

ELi fondidest teavitamise eesmärk on tagada avatud ja asjakohase teabevahetuse kaudu

avalikkuse teadlikkus ELi toetusest.

Riigi Tugiteenuste Keskus (edaspidi RTK) on loonud ühtse veebiportaali, mis võimaldab

juurdepääsu kõigile ühissätete määrusega hõlmatud programmidele. Veebiportaal tehakse

kättesaadavaks ka inglise ja vene keeles, kuna uuringud näitavad, et vene keelt kõnelev

elanikkond on toetusmeetmetest vähem teadlik.

Et tagada rakenduskava elluviimise läbipaistvus, on Siseministeerium loonud

siseturvalisuspoliitika fondidele pühendatud veebilehe, kus avaldatakse rakenduskava

eesmärgid, tegevused ja tulemused.

Ühtne veebiportaal ja siseturvalisuspoliitika fondide veebileht vastab WCAG 2.0 AA

juurdepääsetavuse suunistele. See tähendab, et on rakendatud tehnilisi lahendusi ja sisuloome

põhimõtteid, mis aitavad kasutada veebilehte nägemis-, kuulmis-, füüsilise, kõne-, kognitiivse,

keele-, õppimis- ja neuroloogilise puudega inimestel.

Siseturvalisuspoliitika fondide taotlusvoorude ja projektide tulemuste edastamiseks kasutatakse

ka sotsiaalmeediat.

RTK teabevahetuskoordinaator juhib ELi fondide riiklikku kommunikatsioonivõrgustikku.

Siseministeeriumis nimetatakse siseturvalisuspoliitika fondide kommunikatsiooniametnik.

Kommunikatsioonitegevusteks kasutatakse tehnilist abi.

Näitajad

1. Audiolugude jutustamine viie taskuringhäälingu kaudu, et suurendada teadlikkust

projektidest, mida rahastatakse siseturvalisuspolitika fondidest. Netisaated on osa

Siseministeeriumi avaldatud regulaarsetest netisaadetest.

2. Vähemalt neli olulist teavitustegevust, et tutvustada saavutusi sihtrühmale.

3. Digitaalse meediasisu, sealhulgas visuaalsisu, näiteks illustratsioonide ja

videomaterjalide loomine vähemalt neli korda. Kogu avalikustatav meediasisu on

esitatud ja kättesaadav ligipääsetaval moel. Sõltuvalt digitaalse meediasisu olemusest

41

kasutatakse teabe edastamiseks kirjeldustõlget, sisule lisatakse subtiitrid ja/või

viipetõlge.

Eesti siseturvalisuspoliitika fondide jaoks sotsiaalmeediakanalite (nt Facebook ja Youtube)

kasutamine, et jõuda laiema publikuni. Sisu loomine ja ristviitamine sotsiaalmeediakontodel.

42

Lisa: Temaatiline rahastu

Erieesmärk Liik EL toetus Tegevuse kirjeldus

2.Piiriülene koostöö Erimeede 429 901,2 Erimeetme EMPACT eesmärk on töötada välja terviklikud ja pikaajalised tegevused ja meetmed, mis on

sätestatud tegevuskavades ning ühe või mitme horisontaalse strateegilise eesmärgi rakendamine EMPACTi

mitmeaastases strateegilises kavas, mis on kavandatud EMPACTi tsükli 2022-2025 jaoks (viide: nõukogu 23.

juuni 2021. aasta dokument 10109/21.

ISF/2022/SA/2.2/012 EMPACT 54 000 eurot - Hispaania viib ellu projekti “CCH - EUROOPA ühine

uurimisrühm Costa del Sol’is”, mis on peamiselt seotud EMPACT narkokuritgudega, kuid ka EMPACTi kõrge

riskiga kriminaalvõrgustikega, mis hõlmab strateegilisi eesmärke nr 1, 2, 3, 4 ja 8. Projekti partneriteks on

Hispaania, Bulgaaria, Eesti, Soome, Prantsusmaa, Holland, Leedu, Läti, Poola, Portugal, Rumeenia, Rootsi,

Sloveenia, Taani, Islandi, Norra, Serbia, Suurbritannia, USA, Frontex ja Europol. Pilootprojekti eesmärk on luua

Euroopa uurimisrühm Hispaania piirkonnas Costa del Sol, et töötada välja ja rakendada ühine uurimis- ja

tegevusstrateegia peamiste kuritegelike ühenduste vastu, mis mõjutavad ELi liikmesriike kõnealusest piirkonnast.

Uurimisühma tegevus on suunatud eelkõige raskete kuritegude ja nendega seotud organiseeritud kuritegelike

võrgustike tuvastamisele, uurimisele ja hävitamisele. Tegevused toimuvad vastavalt ELi liikmesriikide ja

Europoli poolt ühiselt välja töötatud töökorrale.

ISF/2022/SA/2.2/001 EMPACT 375 901,2 eurot - Eesti viib ellu projekti "Aktsiisikuritegude vastu võitlemine

Balti regioonis", mis on seotud EMPACTi aktsiisipettustega ning hõlmab strateegilisi eesmärke nr 2, 3, 4 ja 6.

Projektis osalevad Eesti, Leedu ja Läti. Projekti juhib Eesti Maksu- ja Tolliamet. Projekti eesmärk on vähendada

aktsiisikuritegevust ja aktsiisimaksude erinevust Balti regioonis ja ELis tervikuna, suurendades osalevate

ametiasutuste tõhusust ja suutlikkust võitluses varimajandusega (ebaseaduslik tubakas, kütus, alkohol).

3.Kuritegevuse

ennetamine ja sellega

võitlemine

Erimeede 436 068,9 ISF/2022/SA/3.3.1/002 THB 436 068,9 eurot – Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogi direktiivi 2011/36/EL, milles

käsitletakse inimkaubanduse tõkestamist ja sellevastast võitlust ning inimkaubanduse ohvrite kaitset ja

Inimkaubanduse vastu võitlemise ELi strateegia 2021-2025 rakendamise raames on käesoleva erimeetme eesmärk

pakkuda abi ja tugiteenuseid inimkaubanduse ohvritele, kellel on ELi liikmesriigi kodakondsus või kel on

pikaajaline elamisluba ühes sisejulgeolekufondis osalevas ELi liikmesriigis.

43

Eesti viib läbi riiklikku projekti “Koostöövõime arendamine inimkaubanduse ohvrite tuvastamiseks ja

abistamiseks Eestis”. Projekti eesmärk on parandada spetsialistide ja vabatahtlike pädevust haavatavate isikute ja

võimalike inimkaubanduse ohvrite tuvastamisel.

1. Teabevaehtuse

tõhustamine ja

hõlbustamine

Erimeede 162 764,95 ISF/2026/SA/1.1.2 toetab SIENA rakendamist liikmesriikides.

aims to support Members Stares to roll-out SIENA.

Tehniline abi 61 724,1

Summary of the proposed amendment

Estonia proposes a Thematic Facility amendment of the Internal Security Fund (ISF) programme for the inclusion of the specific action project

“SIENA-roll-out support” selected by the Commission (Ref. Ares(2026)2107944) and related adjustments.

The target values of the relevant indicators are increased in line with the expected outputs and results of the specific action.

Non-substantial changes are made for transferring allocations between types of actions within the same Specific Objective. All proposed

amendments are in line with the enabling conditions and horizontal principles referred to in Regulation (EU) 2021/1060.

The proposed amendment has been approved by the Monitoring Committee on 15.05.2026 (Protocol No 14-13.2/204-1; signed on 21.05.2026)

For inclusion of the specific action project “SIENA-roll-out support”, adjustments have been made in the narrative part of the programme (SO1)

as well as in the financing, indicators and technical assistance tables.

In addition, distribution of funds between the types of intervention within SO1 has been changed to allow to purchase more equipment under the

Prüm II project for the Police and Border Guard. Under SO2 funds have been reallocated between types of intervention within the same SO to

allow the Tax and Customs Board to purchase additional equipment in the frame of the Specific Action EMPACT project. The allocation for

equipment in the whole programme is still well under the 35% ceiling.

Also, the target value of the result indicator “Number of Schengen evaluation recommendations addressed” has been changed as it refers to

percentage points.

In the table of total financial allocations, operating support under SO1 has been decreased by 62 000 eur to allow more funds for regular actions.

Specific objective SO1 SO1 SO1 SO1 SO1 SO1 SO1 SO1

Type of indicator Output indicator Output indicator Once in the end of the project Output indicator Result indicator Result indicator Result indicator Result indicator

Indicator code O.1.1 O.1.2 O.1.3 O.1.4 R.1.5 R.1.6 R.1.7 R.1.8

Indicator name Number of participants in training activities Number of expert meetings/workshops/study visits Number of ICT systems set up/adapted/maintained Number of equipment items purchased

Number of ICT systems made interoperable in the Member

States/ with security relevant EU and decentralized information

systems/with international databases

Number of administrative units that have set up new or adapted existing information exchange

mechanisms/procedures/tools/guidance for exchange of information with other Member

States/EU agencies/international organisations/third countries

Number of participants who consider the training useful

for their work

Number of participants who report three months after

the training activity that they are using the skills and

competences acquired during the training

Measurement unit Absolute number Absolute number Absolute number of ICT systems Absolute number of equipment Absolute number of ICT systems made interoperable Absolute number of administrative units Absolute number Absolute number

Milestone 2024 12 2 3 6 0 0 0 0

Target 2029 237 11 10 98 4 4 177 177

The criteria applied by the Member State to select

indicators CPR art 17 (1) a) (why the indicator has

been selected)

To improve and facilitate the exchange of

information between and within competent

authorities and relevant Union bodies, offices and

agencies and with third countries and international

organisations, it is important that the officials of the

Police and Border Guard Board have up to date

knowledge in the area of digital criminalistics, the

specialists of the Estonian Forensic Science Institute

are trained to use PRÜM biometrics software and

the users of SIENA have been trained.

To improve and facilitate the exchange of

information between and within competent

authorities and relevant Union bodies, offices and

agencies and with third countries and international

organisations, it is important to conduct expert

meetings/ workshops/ study visits for the officials

of the Police and Border Guard Board on PNR

(Passenger Name Record), including API regulation

implementation.

To improve and facilitate the exchange of information between and within

competent authorities and relevant Union bodies, offices and agencies and

with third countries and international organisations, it is vital to maintain,

update and develop the ICT-systems, e.g. the PNR (Passenger Name Record)

database, SIRENE workflow system (iSPOC), the monitoring system of the

Police and Border Guard Board, the Criminal Police system, The Cyber Unit

system, the surveillance system (incl. data gathering during surveillance

activities, and relevant information exchange within and by the criminal

police needs to be improved via development of the ICT system), to prevent

money laundering, an appropriate portal for reporting needs to be

introduced. Also, an automated data loader to the Europol Information

System and Prüm II related IT-developments will be financed. National CMS

will be developed for SIENA.

To improve and facilitate the exchange of

information between and within competent

authorities and relevant Union bodies, offices and

agencies and with third countries and international

organisations, equipment has to be procured to

increase the capacity of digital criminalistics and

hardware has to be procured for SIENA roll-out.

To improve and facilitate the exchange of information between

and within competent authorities and relevant Union bodies,

offices and agencies and with third countries and international

organisations, the surveillance system will communicate with

other systems, and the KAIRI system of the Police and Border

Guard Board shall interoperate with the Schengen Information

System. An automated data loader will be introduced to the

Europol Information System. The developed software will be

connected with Prüm II system. EU-Restricted SIENA connection

will be made.

To improve and facilitate the exchange of information between and within competent

authorities and relevant Union bodies, offices and agencies and with third countries and

international organisations, the PNR unit in the Border Guard Board will be adapted. The units

in the Border Guard Board responsible for the EIS automated data loader, Prüm data exchange

and SIENA roll-out will be adapted.

To improve and facilitate the exchange of information

between and within competent authorities and relevant

Union bodies, offices and agencies and with third

countries and international organisations, the Estonian

officials will be trained and the number of officials who

consider the training useful for their work will be shown.

To improve and facilitate the exchange of information

between and within competent authorities and relevant

Union bodies, offices and agencies and with third

countries and international organisations, the Estonian

officials will be trained, and the number of officials who

use the skills and competences three months after the

trainings will be shown.

Data or evidence used, data quality assurance and

the calculation method (CPR art 17 (1) b)

32 persons will be trained for 160 000 eur in digital

criminalistics. The calculation has been made

according to similar trainings in the past. 5 persons

will be trained to use PRÜM biometrics software in

the Estonian Forensic Science Institute for 13 000

eur. 200 persons will be trained to use SIENA for 5

000 eur.

The persons involved in PNR implementation will

participate in study visits. The calculation is made

on the basis of similar study visits/workshops in the

past.

The price of the ICT developments/maintenance is based on expert

judgement - further development and maintenance of PNR, incl. API

regulation requirements (5 424 205 eur); development of the surveillance IS

(2 322 612 eur); portal for preventing money laundering (200 000 eur);

operating support for OSINT (1 000 000 eur); OSINT developments (1 330 000

eur); Cyber unit ICT (1 000 000); digital criminalistics ( 1 727 055 eur); KAIRI

developments (1 440 000 eur); development of SIRENE workflow system

(iSPOC) (1 500 000 eur); data loader to the Europol Information System (184

285 eur); Prüm II related IT-developments (1 236 807 eur); national CMS

development for SIENA (165 849,94 eur). The calculations are based on

expert judgements.

Equipment will be purchased for enhancing digital

criminalistics (521 135 eur) and for implementing

Prüm II requirements (e.g. fingerprint scanners,

cameras) (522 000 eur); hardware will be

purchased for SIENA roll-out (10 000 eur). The price

is based on expert judgement.

Four units in the Police and Border Guard Board will be adapted.

It is estimated that ca 75% of the participants of the

trainings will consider the training useful, based on the

evaluations of the previous trainings

The baseline is set on the basis on the evaluations of

previous trainings. However, proceeding on the content

of the training, it is foreseen, that for this training even

more officials will use the knowledge obtained at the

trainings, than in previous trainings used for setting the

baseline.

Factors that may influence the achievement of the

milestones and targets and how they were taken

into account (CPR art 17 (1) c)

Cancellation of trainings (due to a pandemic or

other unforeseen circumstances); no suitable

training experts / trainers can be found or it will

take longer than expected, e.g. failure of

procurements; trainees leave before the end of the

project; the trainees have not enough time to

participate in the trainings. The number of trainees

may rise/decrease due to the changes in work

processes. The new PRÜM biometrics software will

not be procured in time to train the users.

Cancellation of expert meetings/workshops/study

visits (due to a pandemic or other unforeseen

circumstances); no suitable partners will be found -

lack of interest from partners' side; travel costs

may rise considerably and will not allow to conduct

as many meetings as foreseen. During project

implementation it may turn out, that it is possible

to reach the objective with less number of

meetings/study visits.

Difficulties in employing qualified staff; experienced staff leaves; the prices of

ICT development will rise considerably; the scope of the development may

change over the years; difficulties with procurement; more time will be

needed for development than initially foreseen

Difficulties with procurement - procurement

failure, market failure; difficulties with providing

necessary supplies; the prices will rise

considerably; the software will not comply 100% to

our needs

The information exchange can be hindered by failure of study visits; travel costs may rise

considerably and will not allow to conduct as many meetings as foreseen.

The content of the training or the trainer is not what the

trainees expect. The e-training may not be as useful as

the contact training (in case of pandemic).

The content of the training or the trainer is not what the

trainees expect. The e-training may not be as useful as

the contact training (in case of pandemic).

Definition and concepts

Participant means a natural person benefiting

directly from an operation (project) without being

responsible for initiating or both initiating and

implementing the operation (project) as set out in

Art. 2(40) CPR. For the purpose of this indicator a

participant means a law enforcement official or an

employee of a public authority (‘staff’). Time

measurement: When a participant enters the

project

For the purpose of this indicator,

meetings/workshops/study visits mean a mutual

learning exercise to share knowledge and good

practices. It covers national and international

activities carried out in an ISF funded project.

Time measurement: upon project closure. The

duration of the activity is not relevant for reporting

it under this indicator.

An ICT system includes hardware, software and data.

This indicator covers newly set up/adapted/maintained ICT systems. Setting

up an ICT system means putting in place a new ICT system. ICT system

adapted/maintained covers any modification after the ICT system delivery to

correct faults, improve performance or other attributes, including adding new

functions to an existing ICT system or upgrade the hardware.

Time measurement: upon project closure.

For the purpose of this indicator, equipment means

any tangible asset to which an inventory number is

assigned according to the national rules.

This indicator coves equipment purchased for ICT

systems.

Making systems interoperable means that the systems are able

to exchange and make use of information/data. This could

include e.g. direct access to multiple EU/international data

systems and relevant national systems via one single search

system, enabling the Passenger Information Unit (PIU) to

exchange certain data with national police systems or with PIUs

in other countries, enabling the police systems to query

‘administrative’ systems at EU-LISA (law enforcement access) or

enabling the API systems to query EU and International

databases.

The indicator covers interoperability between national ICT

systems, and between national systems and EU, decentralized

ones and international databases.

For the purpose of this indicator ‘security relevant system’ means

a system within the scope of the Fund.

Decentralized information system cover interconnected national

systems or systems set up following EU legislation e.g. Prüm

automated data exchange system or PNR. Communication

networks can be considered decentralised systems if they

provide added functionality (e.g. strong encryption, high-

availability, cooperation applications) compared to

communications infrastructure (e.g. public 4G operator, internet

provider, backbone communication link).

International database means Interpol Stolen and Lost Travel

Documents (SLTD), INTERPOL Stolen Motor Vehicle (SMV),

Interpol weapons and equivalents.

Administrative unit means a section of a public authority involved in information exchange

among and within law enforcement and other competent authorities and other Member States,

relevant Union bodies as well as with third countries and international organisations.

• Passenger Information Unit (PIU);

• If an administrative unit is part of a bigger administrative unit at a higher level, the higher level

unit is reported and not its individual components.

Participant means a natural person benefiting directly

from an operation (project) without being responsible for

initiating or both initiating and implementing the

operation (project) as set out in Art. 2(40) CPR. For the

purpose of this indicator a participant means a law

enforcement official or an employee of a public authority

(‘staff’).

In order to determine whether a participant considers

the training useful, each participant needs to be asked for

her/his opinion.

Time measurement: Immediately after the participant

has received the training.

Participant means a natural person benefiting directly

from an operation (project) without being responsible

for initiating or both initiating and implementing the

operation (project) as set out in Art. 2(40) CPR. For the

purpose of this indicator a participant means a law

enforcement official or an employee of a public

authority.

In order to determine whether a participant uses the

skills and competences, each participant needs to be

asked for her/his opinion.

Time measurement: 3 months after the participant

received the training.

Data collection Project interim and final reports Project interim and final reports Project final report Project interim and final reports Project final report Project final report Project interim and final reports Project interim and final reports

Time measurement achieved During project periodic reporting During project periodic reporting During project periodic reporting During project periodic reporting Once in the end of the project Once in the end of the project In the end of the training 3-6 months after the participant received the training.

Aggregation issues

If the same person participates in different

trainings during one project, he/she is reported

only once in the project.

If a person leaves one project and starts in a

different project, it is considered and recorded as a

new participation.

Each activity should only be reported once within

one single project even if within this activity there

are several components (e.g. a study visit includes

several workshops).

Each ICT system is counted once within one project, and not the number of

adaptations or maintainance.

Each piece of equipment is counted once within

one project (identified by inventory numbers).

Each ICT system is reported once regardless of the number of

systems with which it has been made interoperable.

The target and reported data cannot be higher than the target

and reported data for associated output indicator (Number of ICT

systems set up/adapted/maintained).

Each administrative unit is reported once regardless of how many mechanisms, procedures etc.

this unit has set up within one project.

Immediately after a participant has received the training,

his/her result is recorded and reported under this

indicator. If a participant attended several training

activities within the same project, the average result has

to be calculated and is to be reported in the end of the

project. A result means the participants’ assessment of

whether he/she considers training useful for work. The

target and reported data cannot be higher than the

target and reported data for the associated output

indicator (number of participants in training activities).

Between 3-6 months after a participant has received the

training, his/her result is recorded and reported under

this indicator.

If a participant attended several training activities within

the same project, the overall result for each participant

is calculated by establishing the average of the

individual results reported . This step is carried out upon

project closure.

The overall result is considered to be positive when the

majority of responses (> 50%) from the participant

indicated that he/she is using the skills and

competences acquired during the training activity. If the

overall result is 50:50 (e.g. two positive and two

negative responses), the most recent result recorded is

reported as overall result for this participant. A result

means the participants’ assessment of whether he/she

is using competences and skills acquired during the

training.

Reporting Each participant is reported only once within the

project.

Each activity is reported only once within the

project. Each ICT system is counted once within one project Each piece of equipment is counted only once. Each ICT system is reported only once Each administrative unit is reported once N/A N/A

References Participant lists of trainings e.g. meeting protocols, data from administrative

portal of civil servants and officials Project report Project report Project final report Project final report Participant feedback survey Participant feedback survey

Entity responsible for collecting

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms

of Support. The beneficiary on the project level,

Responsible Authority on the SFC level based on

beneficiaries' reports.

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms

of Support. The beneficiary on the project level,

Responsible Authority on the SFC level based on

beneficiaries' reports.

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms of Support. The

beneficiary on the project level, Responsible Authority on the SFC level based

on beneficiaries' reports

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms

of Support. The beneficiary on the project level,

Responsible Authority on the SFC level based on

beneficiaries' reports (Police and Border Guard

Board)

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms of Support.

The beneficiary on the project level, Responsible Authority on

the SFC level based on beneficiaries' reports (Police and Border

Guard Board).

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms of Support. The beneficiary on the project

level, Responsible Authority on the SFC level based on beneficiaries' report.

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms of

Support. The beneficiary on the project level, Responsible

Authority on the SFC level based on beneficiaries'

reports.

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms of

Support. The beneficiary on the project level,

Responsible Authority on the SFC level based on

beneficiaries' reports.

Amount of EU contribution 129 750 60 000 12 885 509 782 351 The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order

not to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here.

The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not to count the cost twice, no

cost is shown here.

The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In

order not to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here.

The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator.

In order not to count the cost twice, no cost is shown

here.

Amount of EU contribution in case of Specific

Action 4 500 149 265 9 000

Proportion of EU contribution 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75

Proportion of EU contribution in case of Specific

Action 90 90 90 90 90 90 90

National contribution 43 250 20 000 4 295 170 260 784 The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order

not to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here.

The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not to count the cost twice, no

cost is shown here.

The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In

order not to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here.

The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator.

In order not to count the cost twice, no cost is shown

here.

National contributin in case of Specific Action 500 16 585 1 000

Baneficiary's own contribution 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total cost of intervention 178 000 80 000 17 346 529 1 053 135 The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order

not to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here.

The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not to count the cost twice, no

cost is shown here.

The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In

order not to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here.

The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator.

In order not to count the cost twice, no cost is shown

here.

Planned unit cost n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

SO2 SO2 SO2 SO2 SO2 SO2 SO2 SO2 SO2 SO2 SO3 SO3

Output indicator Output indicator Output indicator Output indicator Result indicator Result indicator Result indicator Result indicator Result indicator Result indicator Output indicator Output indicator

O.2.1, * covers also O.2.1.1 and O.2.1.2 O.2.2 O.2.3 O.2.4 R.2.5 R.2.6 R.2.7 R.2.8 R.2.9 R.2.10 O.3.1 O.3.2

Number of cross-border operations;

*includes also target value for O.2.1.1.

number of joint investigation teams. No

target value is set for O.2.1.2

Number of expert meetings/workshops/study visits/common

exercises Number of equipment items purchased

Number of transport means

purchased for cross-border

operations

The estimated value of assets

frozen in the context of cross-

border co-operations

Quantity of illicit drugs seized

in the context of cross-border

operations

Quantity of weapons seized in

the context of cross-border

operations

Number of administrative units that have developed/adapted

existing mechanisms/procedures/ tools/guidance for cooperation

with other Member States/EU agencies/international

organisations/third countries

Number of staff involved in

cross-border operations

Number of Schengen evaluation

recommendations addressed Number of participants in training activities Number of exchange programmes/workshops/study visits

Absolute number Absolute number of meetings/workshops/study visits/common

exercises Absolute number of equipment Absolute number n/a n/a n/a Absolute number of administrative units n/a per cent Absolute number of participants

Absolute number of exchange programmes/workshops/study

visits

0 37 32 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 n/a n/a 1 337 28

1 92 80 n/a n/a n/a n/a 22 n/a 100 3 216 71

Estonian participates in the EMPACT co-

operation project which is co-ordinated

by Spain.

To improve and intensify cross-border cooperation, including joint

operations, between competent authorities in relation to terrorism

and serious and organised crime with a cross-border dimension,

expert meetings/workshops/study visits/common exercises will be

conducted. The co-operation with the Europol communications

bureau will take place; training visits with /to Moldova and the

Ukraine to prevent trafficking in human beings will be organised;

common exercises in the area of CBRN are will be conducted for the

Internal Security Service; meetings in the frame of the EMPACT

project implemented by the Tax and Customs Board will take place.

To improve and intensify cross-border cooperation, including joint

operations, between competent authorities in relation to terrorism

and serious and organised crime with a cross-border dimension,

equipment will be purchased to facilitate the training on reacting to

abusive and terroristic actions.

Due to limited funds, Estonia is

not planning to finance

transport means from ISF

n/a n/a n/a

To improve and intensify cross-border cooperation, including joint

operations, between competent authorities in relation to

terrorism and serious and organised crime with a cross-border

dimension, administrative units will be developed/adapted as a

result of the trainings on reacting to terroristic actions; as a result

of the co-operation in the area of trafficking in human beings and

as a result of the common exercises in the area of CBRN.

n/a

A recommendation has been

made that Estonia should

develop an interactive and user-

friendly e-learning solution on

international police cooperation

based on practical situations and

cases.

To support the strengthening of Member States’ capabilities in

relation to preventing and combating crime, terrorism and

radicalisation as well as managing security-related incidents,

risks and crises, it is necessary to support trainings of the Centre

of Excellence of the Estonian Academy of Security Sciences; the

trainings on demining for the Estonian Rescue Board; trainings

in the area of preventing trafficking in human beings and

preventing corruption; training of the cyber unit of the Police

and Border Guard Board; trainings for the court officials and the

prosecutors in the area of cybercrime, digital evidence, etc.

To support the strengthening of Member States’ capabilities in

relation to preventing and combating crime, terrorism and

radicalisation as well as managing security-related incidents, risks

and crises, exchange programmes/workshops/study visits will be

conducted by the Competence Centre of the Estonian Academy of

Security Sciences; by the Ministry of Justice in the area of

preventing trafficking in human beings and in the area of

cybercrime, digital evidence, etc.

Estonian Police officer participates in 1

joint investigation team for 1 year (60

000 eur). The cost has been calculated

based on similar activities implemented

before.

33 study visits are planned for co-operation with Europol (350 000

eur); 40 seminars are planned to respond to terrorist actions (500

000 eur); 10 study visits will be organised for preventing trafficking

in human beings (200 000 eur); 4 common exercises in the area of

CBRN are will be conducted for the Internal Security Service (600

000 eur); 5 meetings/workshops in the frame of the EMPACT project

implemented by the Tax and Customs Board 301 000 eur). The

calculations are based on similar visits/common exercises carried

out before.

80 pieces of equipment will be purchased for the Tax and Customs

Board in the frame of the Specific Action project to support criminal

investigations.

n/a n/a n/a n/a

8 administrative units will be developed as a result of the expert

meetings/study visits conducted for preparing for terroristic

actions; 7 units will be developed during the CBRN- co-operation

and 3 units in the frame of cooperation with Moldova and the

Ukraine; 4 units will be adapted in the Tax and Customs Board.

n/a

An e-learning solution on

international police cooperation

will be developed.

In the frame of the trainings of the Centre of Excellence of the

Estonian Academy of Security Sciences 1 000 persons will be

trained ( 128 000 eur); all of the 81 persons of the demining unit

of the Estonian Rescue Board will be trained (700 000 eur); 390

officials will be trained in the area of preventing trafficking in

human beings and preventing corruption (105 000 eur); 50

persons will be trained in the cyber unit of the Police and

Border Guard Board (826 500 eur); 245 court officials and the

prosecutors will be trained in the area of cybercrime, digital

evidence, etc.(209 542 eur); 350 professionals will be trained in

the area of fighting trafficking in human beings (484 521 eur);

1100 persons will be trained in CBRN (503 811 eur) . The

calculations have been made on the basis of previous trainings.

Exchange programmes/workshops/study visits will be conducted

by the Competence Centre of the Estonian Academy of Security

Sciences (25 for 123 374 eur); 13 in the CBRN area by the Estonian

Internal Security Service (65 000 eur); 8 in the CBRN area by the

Estonian Academy of Security Sciences (69 757); 6 by the Ministry

of Justice in the area of preventing trafficking in human beings

(139 000 eur) and 19 in the area of cybercrime, digital evidence,

etc. for court officials and prosecutors (90 458 eur). The

calculations have been made on the basis of previous exchange

programmes/workshops/study visits.

Cancellation of the visit to Spain due to a

pandemic or other unforeseen

circumstances.

Cancellation of expert meetings/workshops/study visits (due to a

pandemic or other unforeseen circumstances); no suitable partners

will be found - lack of interest from partners' side; travel costs may

rise considerably and will no allow to conduct as many meetings as

foreseen. During project implementation it may turn out tat it is

possible to reach the objective with less number of meetings/study

visits. The potential participants are occupied with extaordinary

work obligations, and therefore cannot participate in the study

visits/activities.

Difficulties with procurement - procurement failure, market failure;

difficulties with providing necessary supplies; the prices will rise

considerably. During project implementation, it may turn out that it

is possible to reach the objective with less number of equipment.

n/a n/a n/a n/a

Cancellation of expert meetings/workshops/study visits (due to a

pandemic or other unforeseen circumstances); no suitable

partners will be found - lack of interest from partners' side. Travel

costs may rise considerably and will not allow to conduct as many

meetings as foreseen.

n/a No suitable experts could be

found.

Cancellation of trainings (due to a pandemic or other

unforeseen circumstances); no suitable training experts /

trainers can be found or it will take longer than expected, e.g.

failure of procurements; trainees leave before the end of the

project; the trainees have not enough time to participate in the

trainings. The number of trainees may change - it is not possible

to predict the exact number of trainees. High workload of

judges and prosecutors prevent them from participating in

trainings.

Cancellation of expert meetings/workshops/study visits (due to a

pandemic or other unforeseen circumstances); no suitable

partners will be found - lack of interest from partners' side; travel

costs may rise considerably and will no allow to conduct as many

meetings as foreseen. During project implementation, it may turn

out that it is possible to reach the objective with less number of

meetings/study visits.

Joint police co-operation with other

member states. Time measurement:

Upon project closure.

The duration of the activity is not

relevant for reporting under this

indicator.

For the purpose of this indicator, meetings/workshops/study

visits/common exercises mean a mutual learning exercise to share

knowledge and good practices. Time measurement: Upon project

closure.

The duration of the activity is not relevant for reporting under this

indicator.

Equipment means a tangible asset to which an inventory number is

assigned. This indicator does not cover intangible assets. n/a n/a n/a n/a

An administrative unit means a section of a public authority.

Time measurement: upon project closure.

If an administrative unit is part of a bigger administrative unit at a

higher level, which is also to be reported, the higher level unit is

reported and not its individual components.

n/a

2018 Schengen evaluation

recommendations wil be

targeted

Participant means a natural person benefiting directly from an

operation (project) without being responsible for initiating or

both initiating and implementing the operation (project) as set

out in Art. 2(36) CPR. For the purpose of this indicator a

participant means a law enforcement official or an employee of

a public authority (‘staff’).

Time measurement of achieved value: when a participant

enters the project.

For the purpose of this indicator, exchange

programmes/workshops/study visits mean a mutual learning

exercise to share knowledge and good practices.

Time measurement of achieved value: upon project completion

Project final report Project interim and final reports Project interim and final reports n/a n/a n/a n/a Project final report n/a Project final report Project interim and final reports Project interim and final reports

At the end of the project During project periodic reporting During project periodic reporting n/a n/a n/a n/a Once in the end of the project n/a Once in the end of the project During periodic project reporting During periodic project reporting

Each operation is reported only once.

Within one project, each activity is reported only once even if within

this activity there are several elements e.g. a study visit consists of

several workshops.

n/a n/a n/a n/a

Each administrative unit is reported only once regardless of how

many mechanisms, procedures etc. this unit has set up in a single

project.

n/a Each targeted recommendation

is counted only once.

If the same person participates in different trainings during one

project, he/she is reported only once in the project.

If a person leaves one project and starts in a different project, it

is considered and recorded as a new participation.

Each activity is reported only once, even if within this activity there

are several elements, e.g. a study visits contains several

workshops.

n/a Each activity is counted once Each equipment is counted only once n/a n/a n/a n/a N/A n/a Each targeted recommendation

is counted only once. Each participant is reported only once within the project. Each activity is reported only once

Project final report

e.g. meeting protocols, data from administrative portal of civil

servants and officials

Project report

n/a n/a n/a n/a Project report n/a Project final report Participant lists of trainings e.g. meeting protocols, data from administrative portal of civil

servants and officials

The collection of the data is stipulated in

the Contract concluded with the

beneficiary. The beneficiary on the

project level, Responsible Authority on

the SFC level based on beneficiaries'

reports.

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms of Support/in

case of Specific Actions Contract concluded with the beneficiary. The

beneficiary on the project level, Responsible Authority on the SFC

level based on beneficiaries' reports.

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms of Support/in

case of Specific Actions Contract concluded with the beneficiary. The

beneficiary on the project level, Responsible Authority on the SFC

level based on beneficiaries' reports.

n/a n/a n/a n/a

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms of Support.

The beneficiary on the project level, Responsible Authority on the

SFC level based on beneficiaries' reports.

n/a

The collection of the data is

stipulated in the Terms of

Support. The beneficiary on the

project level, Responsible

Authority on the SFC level based

on beneficiaries' reports.

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms of Support.

The beneficiary on the project level, Responsible Authority on

the SFC level based on beneficiaries' reports.

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms of Support.

The beneficiary on the project level, Responsible Authority on the

SFC level based on beneficiaries' reports.

0 1 237 500 0 0 0 0 0 The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not

to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here. 0 90 000 2 231 301,00 365 692

54 000 270 900 105 001 436 068,90

0 75 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 75 75,00 75

90 90 90 90,00

0 412 500 0 0 0 0 0 The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not

to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here. 0 30 000 743 767,00 121 897

6 000 30 100 11 667 48 452,10

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,00 0

60 000 1 951 000 116 668 0 0 0 0 The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not

to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here. 0 120 000 3 459 589,00 487 589

n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

1 076

SO3 SO3 SO3 SO3 SO3 SO3 SO3 SO3 SO3 SO3 SO3

Output indicator Output indicator Output indicator Output indicator Output indicator Output indicator Result indicator Result indicator Result indicator Result indicator Result indicator

O.3.3 O.3.4 O.3.5 O.3.6 O.3.7 O.3.8 R.3.9 R.3.10 R.3.11 R.3.12 R.3.13

Number of equipment items purchased Number of transport means

purchased

Number of items of infrastructure/security

relevant facilities/tools/mechanisms

constructed/ purchased/upgraded

Number of projects to prevent crime Number of projects to assist victims of

cime Number of victims of crime assisted

Number of initiatives

developed/expanded to prevent

radicalisation

Number of initiatives

developed/expanded to

protect/support witnesses and

whistlebowers

Number of critical

infrastructure/public spaces with

new/adapted facilities protecting

against security -related risks

Number of participants who consider the training useful for their

work

Number of participants who report three months after leaving the

training that they are using the skills and competences acquired

during the training

Absolute number of equipment Absolute number

Absolute number of

infrastructure/security relevant

facilities/tools/mechanisms

Absolute number of projects Absolute number of projects Absolute number Absolute number Absolute number Absolute number Absolute number Absolute number

37 n/a n/a 2 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

75 n/a n/a 3 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 023 941

To support the strengthening of Member States’ capabilities in

relation to preventing and combating crime, terrorism and

radicalisation as well as managing security-related incidents, risks

and crises, equipment will be purchased for the Estonian Rescue

Board (bomb suits and bomb robots), for the early warning system

in case of radiation danger; equipment will be purchased for

enhancing the CBRN capacity and the forensics capacity; also,

drones for fighting crime will be purchased; ICT equipment for the

Police and Border Guard Board will be purchased.

n/a n/a

To support the strengthening of Member States’ capabilities in

relation to preventing and combating crime, terrorism and

radicalisation as well as managing security-related incidents, risks

and crises, 3 projects will be implemented to prevent crime: 1

project on fighting against cyber crime; 1 project in the area of

preventing trafficking in human beings and fighting against

corruption; 1 project for preventing sexual abuse of children.

A project will be supported with the final

objective of assisting victims of human

trafficking via training of professionals.

n/a n/a n/a n/a

To support the strengthening of Member States’ capabilities in

relation to preventing and combating crime, terrorism and

radicalisation as well as managing security-related incidents, risks

and crises, training will be carried out and the number of officials

who consider the training useful for their work will be shown.

To support the strengthening of Member States’ capabilities in

relation to preventing and combating crime, terrorism and

radicalisation as well as managing security-related incidents, risks

and crises, trainings will be carried out and the number of officials

who use the skills and competences three months after the

trainings will be shown.

3 bomb robots will be procured for the Rescue Board (2 850 000

eur); 8 bomb suits will be procured (2 different size bomb suits

will be bought for each of the 4 units - 696 922 eur); 3 pieces of

measurement equipment will be purchased for detecting radiation

danger (400 000 eur); 5 pieces of forensics equipment will be

purchased (700 000 eur); 50 pieces of equipment will be

purchased to enhance CBRN (1 035 000 eur); 4 drone systems (1

900 000 eur) and 1 network scanner (2 500 000 eur) will be

procured for the Police and Border Guard Board; 1 piece of

equipment for enhancing cyber capacity will be purchased (673

500 eur). The cost estimations have been made on the basis of

previous procurements or price offers have been taken to

determine the cost.

n/a n/a

1 project on fighting against cyber crime (1 490 000 eur); 1 project

in the area of preventing trafficking in human beings and of

fighting against corruption (266 000 eur) ; 1 project for preventing

sexual abuse of children (750 000 eur).

1 Specific Actions project to support victims

of human trafficking (total 484 521 eur).

The budget of the project is shown under

the trainings.

n/a n/a n/a n/a

It is estimated on the basis of previous similar trainings of the

target groups that the following per cent and number of persons

trained will consider the training useful for their work - demining

trainings - 64% (52 persons) ; cyber unit training 50% (25 persons);

training of court officials and prosecutors 80% (196 persons);

trainings of the Centre of Excellence of the Estonian Academy of

Security Sciences 50% (500 persons); human trafficking training

50% (195 officials); training of professionals in fighting human

trafficking in the frame of the Specific Action project 50% (175

persons); CBRN trainings 80% (880 persons).

It is estimated on the basis of previous similar trainings of the

target groups that the following per cent and number of persons

trained will use the knowledge 3 months after the training -

demining training - 64% (52 persons), cyber unit training 30% (15

persons); training of court officials and prosecutors 70% (171

persons); trainings of the Centre of Excellence of the Estonian

Academy of Security Sciences 50% (500 persons); human

trafficking training 25% (98 officials); training of professionals in

fighting human trafficking in the frame of the Specific Action

project 35% (105 persons) . As it is expected that the people

trained in the CBRN area do not have to use their knowledge in 3

months after the training (i.e. there have not been any CBRN

incidents during this 3 months), they are not taken into account

under this indicator.

Difficulties with procurement - procurement failure, market

failure; difficulties with providing necessary supplies; the prices

will rise considerably. During project implementation it may turn

out, that it is possible to reach the objective with less number of

equipment.

n/a

The necessity to implement the project will pass; another more

important activities have to be funded; market or procurement

failure

Cancellation of trainings (due to a

pandemic or other unforeseen

circumstances); no suitable training experts

/ trainers/ experts to compile training

materials can be found or it will take longer

than expected, e.g. failure of

procurements.

n/a n/a n/a n/a

The content of the training or the trainer is not what the trainees

expect. The e-training may not be as useful as the contact training

(in case of pandemic).

The content of the training or the trainer is not what the trainees

expect. The e-training may not be as useful as the contact training

(in case of pandemic). If ther are not as many demining calls as

foreseen, the knowledge obtained during the training will not be

used as predicted. As for court officials and prosecutors, it may be

that there are not as many specific cases in the area where they

have been trained.

Equipment means a tangible asset to which an inventory number

is assigned. This indicator does not cover intangible assets. n/a n/a

Crime prevention means all measures that are intended to reduce

or otherwise contribute to reducing crime and citizens' feeling of

insecurity, both quantitatively and qualitatively, either through

directly deterring criminal activities or through policies and actions

designed to reduce the potential for crime and the causes of

crime.

It includes work of government, competent authorities, criminal

justice agencies, local authorities and the specialist associations

they have set up in Europe, the private and voluntary sectors,

researchers and the public, supported by the media.

Source: Art. 2(2) of the Council Decision 2009/902/JHA of 30

November 2009 setting up a European Crime Prevention Network

(EUCPN). Time

measurement: upon project completion

Victims of crime include victims of

terrorism. Crimes cover all types of crime

including crossborder crimes. A victim of

crime means: a) a natural person who has

suffered harm, including physical, mental

or emotional harm or economic loss which

was directly caused by a criminal offence;

b) family members of a person whose

death was directly caused by a criminal

offence and who have suffered harm as a

result of that person's death. A victim of

terrorism is a natural person who has

suffered harm, including physical, mental

or emotional harm or economic loss,

insofar as that was directly caused by a

terrorist offence, or a family member of a

person whose death was directly caused by

a terrorist offence and who has suffered

harm as a result of that person’s death.

Source: Art 1(a) and 2 of the Directive

2012/29/EU of 25 October 2012

establishing minimum standards on the

rights, support and protection of victims of

crime.

n/a n/a n/a n/a

Participant means a natural person benefiting directly from an

operation (project) without being responsible for initiating or both

initiating and implementing the operation (project) as set out in

Art. 2(36) CPR. For the purpose of this indicator a participant

means a law enforcement official or an employee of a public

authority (‘staff’).

In order to determine whether a participant considers the training

useful, each participant needs to be asked for her/his opinion.

Time measurement: immediately after the participant has

received the training.

Participant means a natural person benefiting directly from an

operation (project) without being responsible for initiating or both

initiating and implementing the operation (project) as set out in

Art. 2(36) CPR. For the purpose of this indicator a participant

means a law enforcement official or an employee of a public

authority (‘staff’). Time measurement: 3 months after the

participant received the training.

Project interim and final reports n/a Project final report Project final report n/a n/a n/a n/a Project interim and final reports Project interim and final reports

During periodic project reporting n/a Only successful projects will be reported (i.e projects that are

interrupted, will not be counted).

Only successful projects will be reported

(i.e. projects that are interrupted, will not

be counted).

n/a n/a n/a n/a In the end of the activity and in the end of the project 3 months after the participant received the training.

Each piece of equipment is counted once within one project

(identified by inventory numbers). n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Immediately after a participant has received the training, his/her

result is recorded and reported under this indicator. If a

participant attended several training activities within the same

project, the average result has to be calculated and is to be

reported in the end of the project. A result means the participants’

assessment of whether he/she considers training useful for work.

The target and reported data cannot be higher than the target and

reported data for the associated output indicator (number of

participants in training activities).

Between 3-6 months after a participant has received the training,

his/her result is recorded and reported under this indicator.

If a participant attended several training activities within the same

project, the overall result for each participant is calculated by

establishing the average of the individual results reported. This

step is carried out upon project closure.

The overall result is considered to be positive when the majority of

responses (> 50%) from the participant indicated that he/she is

using the skills and competences acquired during the training

activity. If the overall result is 50:50 (e.g. two positive and two

negative responses), the most recent result recorded is reported

as overall result for this participant. A result means the

participants’ assessment of whether he/she is using competences

and skills acquired during the training.

Each piece of equipment is counted once within one project

(identified by inventory numbers). n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a N/A N/A

Project report n/a n/a Project report Project final report n/a n/a n/a n/a Participant feedback survey Participant feedback survey

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms of Support.

The beneficiary on the project level, Responsible Authority on the

SFC level based on beneficiaries' reports.

n/a n/a

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms of Support.

The beneficiary on the project level, Responsible Authority on the

SFC level based on beneficiaries' reports.

The collection of the data is stipulated in

the Contract concluded with the

beneficiary. The beneficiary on the project

level, Responsible Authority on the SFC

level based on beneficiaries' reports.

n/a n/a n/a n/a

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms of Support.

The beneficiary on the project level, Responsible Authority on the

SFC level based on beneficiaries' reports.

The collection of the data is stipulated in the Terms of Support.

The beneficiary on the project level, Responsible Authority on the

SFC level based on beneficiaries' reports.

8 066 566,50 0 0 1 879 500 0 0 0 0 0 The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not

to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here.

The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not

to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here. .

0 The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not

to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here.

The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not

to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here.

75 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 75 75

90 90 90

2 688 855,50 0 0 626 500 0 0 0 0 0 The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not

to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here.

The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not

to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here.

0 The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not

to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here.

The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not

to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here.

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 755 422 0 0 2 506 000 0 0 0 0 0 The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not

to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here.

The cost is shown under the relevant output indicator. In order not

to count the cost twice, no cost is shown here.

n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Pikk 61 / 15065 Tallinn / Estonia / [email protected] / www.siseministeerium.ee

Registry code 70000562

European Commission

DG HOME F.4 Secretariat

25.05.2026 No 14-13.1/157-1

Submission of the amendment of the ISF

programme 2021-2027

Herewith the Ministry of the Interior is submitting the proposal for amendment of the

Internal Security Fund programme 2021-2027 (version 4.0).

Yours Sincerely,

/Signed digitally/

Tarmo Miilits

Secretary General

Annexes:

1. ISF Programme 2021-2027 (version 4.0)

2. Sisejulgeolekufondi rakenduskava 2021-2027 (ISF programme in Estonian)

3. ISF summary of the proposed amendments

4. ISF Performance Framework

CC: Mireia Raga-Gomez ([email protected])